Adherence to and dosing of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in the general population differs according to apolipoprotein E-genotypes

Association of DNA methylation and genetic variations of the APOE gene with the risk of diabetic dyslipidemia

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is a key regulator of lipoprotein metabolism, and consequently, affects the plasma and tissue lipid contents. The aim of the present study was to investigate the parallel effects of APOE genetic variants and promoter methylation levels of six CpGs on the risk of diabetic dyslipidemia. A total of 204 Palestinian type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients (mean age ± SD: 62.7±10.2) were enrolled in the present study (n=96 with dyslipidemia and n=108 without dyslipidemia). Next generation sequencing was performed to analyze five single nucleotide polymorphisms: Two variants rs7412 and rs429358 that determine APOE ε alleles, and three variants in the promoter region (rs769446, rs449647, and rs405509). For all subjects, the most common genotype was ε3/ε3 (79.4%). No statistical differences were observed in the APOE ε polymorphisms and the three promoter variants among T2D patients with and without dyslipidemia (P>0.05). A comparison of lipid parameters between ε3/ε3 subjects and ε4 carriers in both groups revealed no significant differences in the mean values of LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, and TC levels (P>0.05). Six CpG sites in the APOE promoter on chromosome 19:44905755-44906078 were identified, and differential DNA methylation in these CpGs were observed between the study groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association of DNA methylation level at the six CpGs with an increased risk of diabetic dyslipidemia (odds ratio, 1.038; 95% confidence interval, 1.012-1.064; P=0.004). In conclusion, the present study revealed that DNA methylation levels in six CpGs in the APOE promoter region was associated with the risk of diabetic dyslipidemia independently of the APOE ε4 variant which could be a potential therapeutic target to reverse the methylation of the APOE promoter.

The Association between Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism and Response to Statins in Group of Hyperlipidemic Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

APOE has an important role in lipids metabolism, and in the variability in low density lipoprotein (LDL) response to statins treatment between individuals. In this study, we aim to investigate the association between APOE polymorphism and response to statins in Jordanian hyperlipidemic patients at the diabetic clinic of Jordan University Hospital.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty two Jordanian Hyperlipidemic patients (52 males and 100 females) aged between 35-75 years were enrolled in this study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Jordan University Hospital. The genotypes of the patients were identified by polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism assay method (PCRRFLP).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The study showed that there is an association between APOE polymorphism and response to statin therapy. Patients who were APOE ε4 carriers had lower response to statins compared to ε3 and ε2 carriers (p=0.002). In addition, we found that there was no significant association between APOE polymorphism and LDL baseline (p=0.214). No significant differences were found in APOE genotypes distribution between males and females (p=0.06). No significant association was found between age and APOE genotypes (p=0.347). A genotype screening test for dyslipidemic Jordanian patients is recommended to choose the appropriate treatment decisions, dosage, and to recognize the potential side effects of statin therapy.

The potential applications of Apolipoprotein E in personalized medicine

Personalized medicine uses various individual characteristics to guide medical decisions. Apolipoprotein (ApoE), the most studied polymorphism in humans, has been associated with several diseases. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the potential role of ApoE polymorphisms in personalized medicine, with a specific focus on neurodegenerative diseases, by giving an overview of its influence on disease risk assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. This review is not a systematic inventory of the literature, but rather a summary and discussion of novel, influential and promising works in the field of ApoE research that could be valuable for personalized medicine. Empirical evidence suggests that ApoE genotype informs pre-symptomatic risk for a wide variety of diseases, is valuable for the diagnosis of type III dysbetalipoproteinemia, increases risk of dementia in neurodegenerative diseases, and is associated with a poor prognosis following acute brain damage. ApoE status appears to influence the efficacy of certain drugs, outcome of clinical trials, and might also give insight into disease prevention. Assessing ApoE genotype might therefore help to guide medical decisions in clinical practice.

Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on statin-induced decreases in plasma lipids and cardiovascular events

Hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and statins (inhibitors of a key enzyme of cholesterol synthesis, 3-hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase) are the drugs of choice for decreasing plasma cholesterol. It has been estimated that genetic factors can explain 40%-60% of final cholesterol concentrations and approximately 70% of the efficacy of statin treatment. The gene most often analyzed in the context of statin efficacy is the gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE). This review summarizes evidence of the association between variations in the APOE gene locus and the response of plasma lipids to statin therapy. Although the results are not consistent, carriers of the APOE4 allele seems to be less responsive to statins than carriers of APOE2 and APOE3 alleles. This effect is partially context-dependent (gene-gender interactions; gene-nutrition and gene-smoking interactions have not yet been studied) and the absolute differences vary between different population groups.

Clinical response to statins: mechanism(s) of variable activity and adverse effects

Statins represent a major advance in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, a significant risk factor for atherosclerosis. There is, however, notable interindividual variation in the cholesterolemic response to statins, and the origin of this variability is poorly understood; pharmacogenetics has attempted to determine the role of genetic factors. Myopathy, further, has been reported in a considerable percentage of patients, but the mechanisms underlying muscle injury have yet to be fully characterized. Most statins are the substrates of several cytochrome P450s (CYP). CYP polymorphisms may be responsible for variations in hypolipidemic activity; inhibitors of CYPs, e.g. of CYP3A4, can significantly raise plasma concentrations of several statins, but consequences in terms of clinical efficacy are not uniform. Pravastatin and rosuvastatin are not susceptible to CYP inhibition but are substrates of the organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, encoded by the SLCO1B1 gene. Essentially all statins are, in fact, substrates of membrane transporters: SLCO1B1 polymorphisms can decrease the liver uptake, as well as the therapeutic potential of these agents, and may be linked to their muscular side-effects. A better understanding of the mechanisms of statin handling will help to minimize adverse effects and interactions, as well as to improve their lipid-lowering efficiency.

Cardiovascular pharmacogenetics

Human genetic variation in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms as well as more complex structural variations such as insertions, deletions and copy number variants, is partially responsible for the clinical variation seen in response to pharmacotherapeutic drugs. This affects the likelihood of experiencing adverse drug reactions and also of achieving therapeutic success. In this paper, we review key studies in cardiovascular pharmacogenetics that reveal genetic variations underlying the outcomes of drug treatment in cardiovascular disease. Examples of genetic associations with drug efficacy and toxicity are described, including the roles of genetic variability in pharmacokinetics (e.g. drug metabolizing enzymes) and pharmacodynamics (e.g. drug targets). These findings have functional implications that could lead to the development of genetic tests aimed at minimizing drug toxicity and optimizing drug efficacy in cardiovascular medicine.

Genetic determinants of response to statins

In developed countries, cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death. Statins are abundantly prescribed to reduce the risk of coronary artery disease by lowering cholesterol. Genetic factors are thought to be partly responsible for the interindividual variation in the response to statins. This article reviews the most important studies conducted on pharmacogenetics of statins. Currently, there is no evidence to advocate pharmacogenetic testing before initiating therapy.

Pharmacogenetics of apolipoprotein E gene during lipid-lowering therapy: lipid levels and prevention of coronary heart disease

A non-optimal plasma concentration of lipids is among the major modifiable risk factors of atherosclerosis. Therefore, the prevention of cardiovascular disease by means of lipid-lowering therapy with statins and other agents is of great importance for patient groups where a lifestyle change, for example, diet modification, does not lead to adequately reduced lipid levels. The response of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to statin therapy is highly variable. This is partly attributed to hereditary variation in genes involved in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and lipid metabolism. The pharmacogenetics of lipid-lowering therapy have been investigated for more than 40 different genes. The gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE) has been the most frequently studied, particularly regarding the epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphism. Those with the epsilon4 allele seem to have the poorest and those with the epsilon2 allele the strongest response to statins with regards to LDL-C levels. In addition, the epsilon2 carriers may reach the LDL-C treatment goals more frequently than epsilon4 carriers. Few studies have investigated the interaction of the APOE epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphism and lipid-lowering therapy in relation to the course of coronary heart disease; the results are contradictory and so far inconclusive. This review summarizes the pharmacogenetic findings related to the influence of APOE gene variation on lipid responses and the prevention of coronary heart disease during lipid-lowering therapy.

Perspectives on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement

BACKGROUND

Elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). European and US guidelines now recommend lower LDL-C levels, particularly in high-risk patients. Although LDL-C treatment goals to reduce the risk of CHD are clear, many patients do not reach their LDL-C goals.

OBJECTIVES

Examine consensus guideline targets for LDL-C lowering in patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk; examine cholesterol goal achievement in clinical practice; evaluate the effectiveness of ezetimibe/statin and other adjunctive lipid-lowering treatments in achieving LDL-C goals; and consider ongoing controversies and the randomized controlled trials that may help to resolve or better illuminate them.

METHODS

An English-language PubMed search was conducted to identify prospective randomized controlled trials, open-label studies, and retrospective and observational studies from 2001 (same year that the executive summary of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III was published) to present for an analysis of the effects of adjunctive therapies on LDL-C lowering and goal attainment in patients at elevated cardiovascular risk.

RESULTS

Elevated LDL-C is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy; aggressive lowering is of great benefit to those at high risk. Statins are recommended first-line lipid-lowering agents, with a long, well-regarded history of efficacy and safety. Not all patients, however, can achieve recommended LDL-C goals simply using starting doses of statins. For such patients, more intensive therapy utilizing high-dose statins or combination therapy, including statins combined with other lipid-lowering agents, such as ezetimibe, bile acid resins (BARs), or niacin, is warranted. Potential limitations of the present review include possible publication bias and the focus on pharmacotherapy rather than lifestyle modification and the important objective of multiple risk-factor modification to reduce absolute global cardiovascular risk.

CONCLUSIONS

With a well-established link between elevated LDL-C and cardiovascular risk, aggressive LDL-C lowering becomes particularly important. Patients needing intensive LDL-C lowering to achieve goals will often require adjunctive treatments, including ezetimibe, BARs, or niacin along with statins. Given both their high mg: mg potency in lowering LDL-C and favorable tolerability and patient acceptance/adherence profile, ezetimibe/statin combination regimens arguably provide the greatest likelihood for patients to reach new, lower LDL-C targets; however, efficacy and safety data of any adjunctive treatment, along with drug costs and patient adherence to treatment (partly related to complexity of the regimen) all need to be considered when determining the optimal regimen to achieve LDL-C goals in individual patients according to their baseline absolute cardiovascular risk, LDL-C level, and consensus LDL-C targets.

Impact of genetic polymorphisms on the efficacy of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

Although pharmacologic treatment for cholesterol reduction represents an advance in cardiovascular and atherosclerosis treatment, the benefits of such therapy are still limited because of interindividual variability in the response to these drugs. Disease severity, treatment adherence, physiologic conditions, biologic conditions, and the patient's genetic profile could be cited as important factors in the evaluation of interindividual variability. In regard to the latter consideration, three large groups of genes could be investigated: (i) genes that code for proteins involved in metabolism and/or drug transport, thereby influencing the pharmacokinetics of these compounds; (ii) genes that code for proteins involved in the mechanism of action and/or in the metabolic pathway of drug action, and which therefore influence pharmacodynamics; and (iii) genes that code for proteins involved in direct development of the disease or in intermediate phenotypes. In this review we discuss pharmacogenetic studies of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and the implications of pharmacogenetic considerations for predicting treatment efficacy and reducing the adverse effects of these drugs. Once new studies have been performed and most of the genetic variability associated with drug action has been revealed, the great challenge will be to apply this knowledge in clinical medicine.

Apolipoprotein E genotypes are associated with lipid-lowering responses to statin treatment in diabetes: a Go-DARTS study

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes have been associated with variations in plasma-lipid levels and with response to statins, although the influence of APOE on the response to statins remains controversial, especially in patients with diabetes. We sought to evaluate the association of the APOE genotype with the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc)-lowering response to statins, in a large population-based cohort of patients with diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1383 patients, commencing statins between 1990 and 2006, were identified from the Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland database. Statin response was determined both by the minimum LDLc achieved, and by the failure of the patients to reach a clinical target LDLc (< or =2 mmol/l). APOE genotype and potential confounding covariates were entered into the linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

We found an association of APOE genotypes with both baseline and treatment responses. E2 homozygotes achieved lower LDLc levels (mean 0.6; confidence interval: 0.1-1.1 mmol/l) than E4 homozygotes (mean 1.7; confidence interval: 1.4-1.9 mmol/l; P=2.96 x 10). Minimum LDLc was associated by a linear trend with genotype. This relationship remained statistically significant after adjustment for baseline LDLc, adherence, duration, dose, smoking, and age. None of the E2 homozygotes failed to reach the target LDLc, compared with 32% of the E4 homozygotes (P=5.3 x 10).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the potential clinical value of the APOE genotype as a robust marker for LDLc responses to statin drugs, which might contribute to the identification of a particularly drug-resistant subgroup of patients. This marker provides information over and above baseline lipid levels.

Exploring design-related bias in clinical studies on receptor genetic polymorphism of hypertension

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although several candidate genes of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) have been investigated, the gene-drug relationship remains unclear. The objective was to appraise the elements of research methodology and explore potential biases, which may be contributing to discordant results in the gene-drug interaction assessment for RAAS.

METHODS

Systematic review of studies involving candidate polymorphisms, searching PubMed, and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were identified. Nine studies had a genomic evaluation as the primary question. Six studies investigated more than one gene. A gene-drug interaction was evaluated in two studies and only one of the studies had a placebo arm for accurately exploring the interaction. Almost, 90% of the studies had sample sizes of less than 500 patients. Four studies combined the allele frequencies of the heterozygotes group with one of the homozygotes groups. Almost one quarter of the studies combined different therapeutics in one group. Five studies included patients in one group from previous studies in which selection criteria were not quite similar.

CONCLUSION

Most studies contain several methodological limitations. Also biases driven from patient selection, combining different alleles, combining different therapeutics, and combining end points may have occurred in these studies. These limitations and biases may contribute to inconsistency of the results of these studies.

Pharmacogenetics of chronic cardiovascular drugs: applications and implications

Cardiovascular disease continues to be a tremendous worldwide problem, and drug therapy is a major modality to attenuate its burden. At present, conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and heart failure are pharmacologically managed with an empirical trial-and-error approach. However, it has been suggested that this approach fails to adequately address the therapeutic needs of many patients, and pharmacogenetics has been offered as a tool to enhance patient-specific drug therapy. This review outlines pharmacogenetic studies of common cardiovascular drugs, such as diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins and warfarin, ultimately highlighting considerations for future research and practice.

Pharmacogenomics of cholesterol-lowering therapy

The prevention of cardiovascular disease is critically dependent on lipid-lowering therapy, including 3-hydroxymethyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), cholesterol absorption inhibitors, bile acid resins, fibrates, and nicotinic acid. Although these drugs are generally well tolerated, severe adverse effects can occur in a minority of patients. Furthermore, a subset of patients does not respond to cholesterol-lowering therapy with a reduction in coronary heart disease progression. Significant progress has been made in the identification of common DNA sequence variations in genes influencing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of statins and in disease-modifying genes relevant for coronary heart disease (CHD). Among the most promising candidate genes for pharmacogenomic analysis of statin therapy are HMG-CoA reductase as a direct target gene and other genes modulating lipid and lipoprotein homeostasis. Based on data from pharmacogenetic trials, a combined analysis of multiple genetic variants in several genes is more likely to give significant results than single gene studies in small cohorts. In the future, pharmacogenomic testing may allow risk stratification of patients to avoid serious side effects and enable clinicians to select lipid-lowering drugs with the highest efficacy resulting in the best response to therapy.

Statin pharmacogenomics: what have we learned, and what remains unanswered?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Statins are widely prescribed and are established as first-line therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Response to treatment varies considerably from person to person; however, inherited traits (genetic variability) may play a central role in this inter-individual variation. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent progress in the research for exploring genetic determinants of clinical efficacy and safety of statin therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to 41 previous studies of 19 genes, the results of 17 pharmacogenomic studies investigating the relationship between common genetic variants and response to statin therapy in terms of lipid responses, clinical outcomes, and adverse events have been reported since January 2004 - 15 candidate genes related to pharmacodynamics and three to pharmacokinetics of statins. These reported data suggest that genetic variations influencing intestinal cholesterol absorption, cholesterol production, and lipoprotein catabolism may all play a role in modulating responsiveness, as well as genes involved in drug metabolism of statins. They also suggest that combined analysis of multiple variants in several genes, all of which have possible functional relations, is more likely to give significant results, especially when being performed with a larger number of participants.

SUMMARY

Pharmacogenomic studies of statin therapy will provide a better picture as to who is most likely and least likely to benefit from treatment, which results in more individualized management of coronary artery disease.

Pharmacogenetics of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: exploring the potential for genotype-based individualization of coronary heart disease management

Despite the benefit of statin therapy in the prevention of coronary heart disease, a considerable inter-individual variation exists in its response. It is well recognized that genetic variation can contribute to differences in drug disposition and, consequently, clinical efficacy at the population level. Pharmacogenetics, exploring genetic polymorphisms that influence response to drug therapy, may one day allow the clinician to customize treatment strategies for patients in order to improve the success rate of drug therapies. To date, 41 studies have investigated the relationships between common genetic variants and response to statin therapy in terms of lipid effects and clinical outcomes; 16 candidate genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism and 3 in pharmacokinetics. APOE is the most extensively studied locus, and absolute difference in LDL cholesterol reduction across genotypes remained 3-6%. Moreover, none of the associations was striking enough to justify genetic analysis in clinical practice. Reported data have suggested that larger studies (>1000 participants) or combination analyses with >2 different polymorphisms would enable us to find clinically or biologically meaningful difference, which could be assumed as >10% absolute difference, and that genes influencing cholesterol biosynthesis in the liver, such as ABCG5/G8, CYP7A1, HMGCR, would be good candidates for future studies.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pharmacogenomics: overview and implications for practice

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely prescribed and recommended as first-line therapy for most patients with hypercholesterolemia or established coronary heart disease. However, there is interpatient variability in lipid-lowering response to statins that is not explained by initial cholesterol levels and inadequate dosing alone. Genetic polymorphisms may contribute. This review discusses the potential contribution of polymorphisms in genes encoding proteins involved in drug metabolism and transport, cholesterol biosynthesis, lipid metabolism and others to lipid responses to statins.