Rilmenidine sympatholytic activity preserves mental stress, orthostatic sympathetic responses and adrenaline secretion

Neurogenic Hypertension, the Blood-Brain Barrier, and the Potential Role of Targeted Nanotherapeutics

Hypertension is a major health concern globally. Elevated blood pressure, initiated and maintained by the brain, is defined as neurogenic hypertension (NH), which accounts for nearly half of all hypertension cases. A significant increase in angiotensin II-mediated sympathetic nervous system activity within the brain is known to be the key driving force behind NH. Blood pressure control in NH has been demonstrated through intracerebrovascular injection of agents that reduce the sympathetic influence on cardiac functions. However, traditional antihypertensive agents lack effective brain permeation, making NH management extremely challenging. Therefore, developing strategies that allow brain-targeted delivery of antihypertensives at the therapeutic level is crucial. Targeting nanotherapeutics have become popular in delivering therapeutics to hard-to-reach regions of the body, including the brain. Despite the frequent use of nanotherapeutics in other pathological conditions such as cancer, their use in hypertension has received very little attention. This review discusses the underlying pathophysiology and current management strategies for NH, as well as the potential role of targeted therapeutics in improving current treatment strategies.

Sympathetic Neural Mechanisms Underlying Attended and Unattended Blood Pressure Measurement

[Figure: see text].

The adrenal medulla in cardiovascular medicine: an untold story

Unlike noradrenaline, the sympathetic neurotransmitter which overflows to the circulation, adrenaline (ADR) is a secreted hormone, with a low plasma concentration, and plasma concentration for biological action a log order lower than that of noradrenaline. The venous drainage of the left adrenal medulla into the left renal vein does expose this vein to uniquely high plasma ADR concentrations and possible risk of thrombosis at high rates of ADR secretion. There is typically a different timeframe for adrenal medullary and sympathetic nervous system responses: ADR release is short term in contrast with sympathetic activation persisting for years in heart failure and hypertension. The historic view of Walter Cannon, subject to recent review, that the sympathoadrenal system is a unified biological system, was deconstructed further with demonstration of frequent mismatching of adrenal medullary and sympathetic nervous responses. Under gravity stimulation with standing, there is prompt sympathetic activation without ADR release. In many diseases, notably obesity, hypertension, heart failure and depressive illness, an activated sympathetic nervous system and silent adrenal medulla coexist. The therapeutic corollary of this is that ADR blockade is much less commonly needed clinically than pharmacological antagonism of the sympathetic nervous system.

Potential Therapeutic Use of Neurosteroids for Hypertension

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) contribution to long-term setting of blood pressure (BP) and hence hypertension has been a continuing controversy over many decades. However, the contribution of increased sympathetic vasomotor tone to the heart, kidney, and blood vessels has been suggested as a major influence on the development of high BP which affects 30-40% of the population. This is relevant to hypertension associated with chronic stress, being overweight or obese as well to chronic kidney disease. Treatments that have attempted to block the peripheral aspects of the SNS contribution have included surgery to cut the sympathetic nerves as well as agents to block α- and β-adrenoceptors. Other treatments, such as centrally acting drugs like clonidine, rilmenidine, or moxonidine, activate receptors within the ventrolateral medulla to reduce the vasomotor tone overall but have side effects that limit their use. None of these treatments target the cause of the enhanced sympathetic tone. Recently we have identified an antihypertensive action of the neurosteroid allopregnanolone in a mouse model of neurogenic hypertension. Allopregnanolone is known to facilitate high-affinity extra-synaptic γ-aminobutyric acid A receptors (GABA_AR) through allosteric modulation and transcriptional upregulation. The antihypertensive effect was specific for increased expression of δ subunits in the amygdala and hypothalamus. This focused review examines the possibility that neurosteroids may be a novel therapeutic approach to address the neurogenic contribution to hypertension. We discuss the causes and prevalence of neurogenic hypertension, current therapeutic approaches, and the applicability of using neurosteroids as antihypertensive therapy.

Sympathetic overactivity in dialysis patients-Underappreciated and clinically consequential

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remain frustratingly common in dialysis patients. A dearth of established evidence-based treatment calls for alternative therapeutic avenues to be embraced. Sympathetic hyperactivity, predominantly due to afferent nerve signaling from the diseased native kidneys, has been established to be prognostic in the dialysis population for over 15 years. Despite this, tangible therapeutic interventions have, to date, been unsuccessful and the outlook for patients remains poor. This narrative review summarizes established experimental and clinical data, highlighting recent developments, and proposes why interventions to ameliorate sympathetic hyperactivity may well be beneficial for this high-risk population.

Effect of Central Sympathoinhibition With Moxonidine on Sympathetic Nervous Activity in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome-A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity is increased in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Moxonidine is a centrally acting sympatholytic drug with known beneficial effects on hypertension, insulin sensitivity, dyslipidemia and inflammation. In this double-blind placebo controlled randomized clinical trial we examined the effect of moxonidine on modulating sympathetic activity and downstream metabolic abnormalities in 48 pre-menopausal women with PCOS (Rotterdam diagnostic criteria), recruited from the community (January 2013-August 2015). Participants received moxonidine (0.2 mg daily initially, up titrated to 0.4 mg daily in 2 weeks) (n = 23) or placebo (n = 25) for 12 weeks. Multiunit muscle sympathetic activity (by microneurography) and plasma noradrenaline levels were measured (primary outcomes). Fasting lipids, insulin resistance, serum androgens, and inflammatory markers were measured as secondary outcomes. Forty three women completed the trial (19 moxonidine, 24 placebo). Mean change in burst frequency (-3 ± 7 vs. -3 ± 8 per minute) and burst incidence (-3 ± 10 vs. -4 ± 12 per 100 heartbeat) did not differ significantly between moxonidine and placebo groups. Women on moxonidine had a significant reduction in hs-CRP compared to placebo group (-0.92 ± 2.3 vs. -0.04 ± 1.5) which did not persist post Bonferroni correction. There was a significant association between markers of insulin resistance at baseline and reduction in sympathetic activity with moxonidine. Moxonidine was not effective in modulating sympathetic activity in PCOS. Anti-inflammatory effects of moxonidine and a relationship between insulin resistance and sympathetic response to moxonidine are suggested which need to be further explored. Clinical Trial Registration Number: (NCT01504321).

Anti-Inflammatory Effects and Prediction of Blood Pressure Response by Baseline Inflammatory State in Catheter-Based Renal Denervation

This retrospective analysis aimed to examine off-target effects on inflammatory and renal function parameters in n=78 subsequent patients treated with renal denervation (RDN) for resistant hypertension. Ambulatory and office blood pressure (ABP/OBP), serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), cystatin C, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and white blood cell count (WBC) were assessed before, 6 and 12 months after RDN. ABP was significantly reduced by -8.2/-3.8 mm Hg (P=.002/.021) at 1 year after RDN, while an initial OBP reduction was not sustained during follow-up. IL-6 levels significantly decreased by -0.5 pg/mL (P=.042) and by -1.7 pg/mL (P<.001) at 6 and 12 months, baseline IL-6 levels possibly predicting ABP response to RDN (r=-0.295; P=.020). Concurrently, leukocyte count was reduced by -0.5 × 103 /μL (P=.017) and -0.8 × 103 /μL (P<.001), respectively. Serum creatinine and GFR remained unchanged, but we observed a significant increase in cystatin C by 0.04 mg/L (P=.026) and 0.14 mg/L (P<.001) at 6 and 12 months after the intervention.

Sympathomodulatory Effects of Antihypertensive Drug Treatment

BACKGROUND

An activation of sympathetic neural influences to the heart and peripheral circulation has been shown to represent a hallmark of the essential hypertensive state, adrenergic neural factors participating together with other variables at the development and progression of the high blood pressure state as well as of the hypertension-related target organ damage. This represents the rationale for employing in hypertension treatment drugs which combine the blood pressure-lowering properties with the modulatory effects on the sympathetic neural function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Several studies published during the past 40 years have investigated the impact of antihypertensive drugs on the sympathetic target as assessed by indirect and direct approaches. In the present paper, the effects of different monotherapies or combination drug treatment used in hypertension to lower elevated blood pressure values on various adrenergic markers will be examined. This will be followed by a discussion of the (i) hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic consequences of employing antihypertensive drugs with sympathomodulatory or sympathoexcitatory properties and (ii) mechanisms potentially responsible for the adrenergic responses to a given antihypertensive drug. The final part of this review will address the questions still open related to the impact of antihypertensive drug treatment on sympathetic function. Two questions in particular will be examined, i.e., whether antihypertensive drugs with sympathomodulatory properties may be capable to fully restore a "normal" adrenergic drive and how far sympathetic activity should be reduced in hypertensive patients.

CONCLUSION

Future investigations aimed at answering these questions will be needed in order to improve cardiovascular protection in treated hypertensive patients.

Clinical experimental stress studies: methods and assessment

Stress is a state of threatened homeostasis during which a variety of adaptive processes are activated to produce physiological and behavioral changes. Stress induction methods are pivotal for understanding these physiological or pathophysiological changes in the body in response to stress. Furthermore, these methods are also important for the development of novel pharmacological agents for stress management. The well-described methods to induce stress in humans include the cold pressor test, Trier Social Stress Test, Montreal Imaging Stress Task, Maastricht Acute Stress Test, CO2 challenge test, Stroop test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task, noise stress, and Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test. Stress assessment in humans is done by measuring biochemical markers such as cortisol, cortisol awakening response, dexamethasone suppression test, salivary α-amylase, plasma/urinary norepinephrine, norepinephrine spillover rate, and interleukins. Physiological and behavioral changes such as galvanic skin response, heart rate variability, pupil size, and muscle and/or skin sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography) and cardiovascular parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, and self-reported anxiety are also monitored to assess stress response. This present review describes these commonly employed methods to induce stress in humans along with stress assessment methods.

The sympathetic nervous system as a target for the treatment of hypertension and cardiometabolic diseases

The regulation of blood pressure by the sympathetic nervous system is reviewed with an emphasis on the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the development and maintenance of hypertension. Evidence from patients and animal models is summarized. Because it is clear that there is a neural contribution to many types of human hypertension and other cardiometabolic diseases, the case is presented for a renewed emphasis on the development of sympatholytic approaches for the treatment of hypertension and other conditions associated with hyperactivity of the sympathetic nervous system.

Effects of aerobic conditioning on cardiovascular sympathetic response to and recovery from challenge

Exercise has widely documented cardioprotective effects, but the mechanisms behind these effects are still poorly understood. Here, we test the hypothesis that aerobic training lowers cardiovascular sympathetic responses to and speeds recovery from challenge. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial contrasting aerobic versus strength training on indices of cardiac (pre-ejection period, PEP) and vascular (low-frequency blood pressure variability, LF-BPV) sympathetic responses to and recovery from psychological and orthostatic challenge in 149 young, healthy, sedentary adults. Aerobic and strength training did not alter PEP or LF-BPV reactivity to or recovery from challenge. These findings, from a large randomized, controlled trial using an intent-to-treat design, show that moderate aerobic exercise training has no effect on PEP and LF-BPV reactivity to or recovery from psychological or orthostatic challenge. In healthy young adults, the cardioprotective effects of exercise training are unlikely to be mediated by changes in sympathetic activity.

Autonomic cardiac innervation: development and adult plasticity

Autonomic cardiac neurons have a common origin in the neural crest but undergo distinct developmental differentiation as they mature toward their adult phenotype. Progenitor cells respond to repulsive cues during migration, followed by differentiation cues from paracrine sources that promote neurochemistry and differentiation. When autonomic axons start to innervate cardiac tissue, neurotrophic factors from vascular tissue are essential for maintenance of neurons before they reach their targets, upon which target-derived trophic factors take over final maturation, synaptic strength and postnatal survival. Although target-derived neurotrophins have a central role to play in development, alternative sources of neurotrophins may also modulate innervation. Both developing and adult sympathetic neurons express proNGF, and adult parasympathetic cardiac ganglion neurons also synthesize and release NGF. The physiological function of these “non-classical” cardiac sources of neurotrophins remains to be determined, especially in relation to autocrine/paracrine sustenance during development.

 

Cardiac autonomic nerves are closely spatially associated in cardiac plexuses, ganglia and pacemaker regions and so are sensitive to release of neurotransmitter, neuropeptides and trophic factors from adjacent nerves. As such, in many cardiac pathologies, it is an imbalance within the two arms of the autonomic system that is critical for disease progression. Although this crosstalk between sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves has been well established for adult nerves, it is unclear whether a degree of paracrine regulation occurs across the autonomic limbs during development. Aberrant nerve remodeling is a common occurrence in many adult cardiovascular pathologies, and the mechanisms regulating outgrowth or denervation are disparate. However, autonomic neurons display considerable plasticity in this regard with neurotrophins and inflammatory cytokines having a central regulatory function, including in possible neurotransmitter changes. Certainly, neurotrophins and cytokines regulate transcriptional factors in adult autonomic neurons that have vital differentiation roles in development. Particularly for parasympathetic cardiac ganglion neurons, additional examinations of developmental regulatory mechanisms will potentially aid in understanding attenuated parasympathetic function in a number of conditions, including heart failure.

The sympathetic nervous system and blood pressure in humans: implications for hypertension

A neurogenic component to primary hypertension (hypertension) is now well established. Along with raised vasomotor tone and increased cardiac output, the chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system in hypertension has a diverse range of pathophysiological consequences independent of any increase in blood pressure. This review provides a perspective on the actions and interactions of angiotensin II, inflammation and vascular dysfunction/brain hypoperfusion in the pathogenesis and progression of neurogenic hypertension. The optimisation of current treatment strategies and the exciting recent developments in the therapeutic targeting of the sympathetic nervous system to control hypertension (for example, catheter-based renal denervation and carotid baroreceptor stimulation) will be outlined.

Therapeutic strategies for targeting excessive central sympathetic activation in human hypertension

The pathogenesis of hypertension and its mode of progression are complex, multifactoral and incompletely understood. However, there is accumulating evidence from humans and animal models of hypertension indicating that excessive central sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) plays a pathogenic role in triggering and sustaining the essential hypertensive state (the so-called 'neuroadrenergic hypothesis'). Importantly, augmented central sympathetic outflow has also been implicated in the initiation and progression of a plethora of pathophysiological processes independent of any increase in blood pressure, such as left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac arrhythmias. Thus, the sympathetic nervous system constitutes an important putative drug target in hypertension. However, traditional pharmacological approaches for the management of essential hypertension appear ineffective in reducing central sympathetic outflow. Recently, several new and promising therapeutic strategies targeting neurogenic hypertension have been developed. The present report will provide a brief update of this topic with a particular emphasis on human studies examining the efficacy of novel pharmacological approaches (central sympatholytics and statins), lifestyle modification (aerobic exercise training, weight loss and stress reduction) and surgical intervention (renal denervation, chronic carotid baroreflex stimulation and deep brain stimulation) in reducing excessive central sympathetic activation in hypertension.

Effects of chronic sympatho-inhibition on reflex control of renal blood flow and plasma renin activity in renovascular hypertension

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We determined if chronic sympatho-inhibition with rilmenidine has functional significance for the kidney by altering responses of renal blood flow (RBF) and plasma renin activity (PRA) to stress and acute hypotension in rabbits with renovascular hypertension.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

RBF to each kidney and renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) to the left kidney were measured in rabbits in which a renal artery clip induced hypertension (2K1C) and in sham-operated rabbits. After 2 weeks, a subcutaneous minipump was implanted to deliver rilmenidine (2.5 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)) to 2K1C rabbits for 3 weeks.

KEY RESULTS

After 5 weeks of renal artery stenosis, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 23% higher and PRA 3-fold greater than in sham-operated rabbits. Blood flow and renal vascular conductance in the stenosed kidney were lower (-75% and -80%) compared with sham, and higher in the non-clipped kidney (68% and 39%). Responses of RBF and PRA to hypotension were similar in 2K1C and sham rabbits. Airjet stress evoked a greater increase in MAP in 2K1C rabbits than sham controls. Chronic rilmenidine normalized MAP, reduced RSNA and PRA, and did not reduce RBF in the stenosed kidney. Responses of RBF (clipped and non-clipped kidney), RSNA and PRA to hypotension and airjet were little affected by rilmenidine.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our observations suggest that chronic sympatho-inhibition is an effective antihypertensive therapy in renovascular hypertension. It normalizes MAP and reduces basal PRA without compromising blood flow in the stenosed kidney or altering responses of MAP, haemodynamics and PRA to acute hypotension and stress.

Rilmenidine – its antihypertensive efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life in perimenopausal women with mild to moderate essential hypertension

OBJECTIVES

A prospective, open-labeled study to assess the antihypertensive effect of monotherapy with rilmenidine and its impact on quality of life (QoL), as well as on biochemical parameters in perimenopausal women with essential hypertension.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty-five perimenopausal women with mild to moderate essential hypertension (mean age 51.4+/-2.4 years) were enrolled. At baseline and after 12-week monotherapy with rilmenidine, we assessed: systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), fasting glucose, serum creatinine and total cholesterol levels. QoL was also assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks by two standardized questionnaires: the Short Form - 36 (SF-36) and the Subjective Symptoms Assessment Profile (SSAP). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test to compare changes in BP, QoL and biochemical parameters during therapy with rilmenidine.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks of therapy, there was a significant decrease in BP and HR. Normalization of BP was observed in 46 (84%) women. Rilmenidine did not influence serum creatinine, fasting glucose and lipid profile. Treatment was very well tolerated by the patients and no side-effects were noted. Both the SF-36 and the SSAP demonstrated improvement in general QoL. We observed a significant improvement in all SF-36 subscales. In the SSAP, a similar significant improvement was found, except dizziness subscale. Improvement in QoL was not related to reduction of BP.

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy with rilmenidine is safe and effective in BP treatment and significantly improves QoL in perimenopausal women with essential hypertension.

Effects of rilmenidine on 24-h rhythmicity of blood pressure and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity in essential hypertensive subjects

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of the centrally acting imidazoline-like compound rilmenidine on the circadian and short-term cardiovascular rhythms derived from continuous blood pressure (BP) recordings in patients with mild essential hypertension.

METHODS

This was a single-center, open study. Recordings were obtained from eight subjects, using a Portapres during two 24-h hospitalizations: the first after the inclusion visit and the second 4 weeks after starting rilmenidine treatment (1 or 2 mg/day). For circadian analysis of cardiovascular variables, 10 min were selected every hour to obtain 24 periods per subject for each session. Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was estimated using the sequence technique and the cross-spectral analysis between systolic BP and interbeat intervals.

RESULTS

Rilmenidine significantly reduced the overall systolic and diastolic BP and heart rate (P < 0.001). The effects of rilmenidine on BP and heart rhythm were marked during the daytime. Rilmenidine reduced the low-frequency (LF) component of systolic BP variability throughout the 24 h. The highest values of spontaneous BRS were observed at night. Rilmenidine increased the BRS obtained by the slope of the sequence method throughout the 24-h period (P < 0.001). The LF gain was significantly increased with rilmenidine during the day and the night.

CONCLUSIONS

Rilmenidine may differentially affect the baroreflex-dependent (phasic or reflex) and the baroreflex-independent (tonic) autonomic outflow. The 24-h approach reinforced this concept, since indexes of BRS were increased throughout the 24-h period while BP was reduced during the daytime.

Efficacy and tolerability of rilmenidine compared with isradipine in hypertensive patients with features of metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVES

A high prevalence of associated metabolic cardiovascular risk factors is often observed among hypertensive subjects. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of 1-2 mg/day of rilmenidine, a centrally acting antihypertensive agent with selectivity for I(1) imidazoline receptors, vs. 2.5-5 mg/twice daily of isradipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, in hypertensive patients with features of the metabolic syndrome.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this 6-month multicentre, comparative, double-blind, parallel group study, the primary objective was to assess the effects of the treatments on blood pressure (BP); the secondary endpoints were to assess glucose and lipid metabolism, in addition to clinical and biological tolerability. In non-responder patients, dose adjustment was possible from the first month and adding a diuretic from the third month.

RESULTS

Of an intention-to-treat population of 93 patients, 84 per protocol patients completed the study: 42 in the rilmenidine group and 42 in the isradipine group. BP decreased significantly (p < 0.001) and similarly in both groups (systolic blood pressure, SBP: -16.0 +/- 17.2 mmHg and -15.0 +/- 13.0 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure, DBP: -9.0 +/- 9.4 mmHg and -9.0 +/- 8.7 mmHg with rilmenidine and isradipine, respectively). Normalisation (DBP < 90 mmHg and SBP < 140 mmHg) and response (normalisation or decrease in SBP >or= 20 mmHg or decrease in DBP >or= 10 mmHg) rates were respectively 57% and 72% with rilmenidine and 64% and 79% with isradipine (NS between groups). The effects of the treatments on both glucose and lipid metabolism were comparable: no significant difference from baseline was observed on the main parameters including insulin sensitivity indexes. The two treatments appeared to be well tolerated throughout the study, with no serious adverse reaction reported in the rilmenidine group and one serious adverse event in the isradipine group (a perimalleolar oedema), leading to withdrawal from the study for the affected patient.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that in hypertensive patients with metabolic disorders, rilmenidine is an effective antihypertensive treatment, comparable to isradipine, with metabolic neutrality and a good tolerance profile.

Decreased pituitary response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in young lean male patients with essential hypertension

Essential hypertension is associated with changes in central catecholaminergic pathways which might also be reflected in the pituitary response to stress stimuli. The aim of this study was to determine whether the response of pituitary hormones, cortisol, plasma renin activity, aldosterone and catecholamines to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia is changed in hypertension. We studied 22 young lean male patients with newly diagnosed untreated essential hypertension and 19 healthy normotensive, age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls. All subjects underwent an insulin tolerance test (0.1 IU insulin/kg body weight intravenously) with blood sampling before and 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after insulin administration. Increased baseline levels of norepinephrine (P<0.05), increased response of norepinephrine (P<0.001) and decreased response of growth hormone (P<0.001), prolactin (P<0.001), adrenocorticotropic hormone (P<0.05) and cortisol (P<0.001) were found in hypertensive patients when compared to normotensive controls. Increased norepinephrine levels and a decreased pituitary response to metabolic stress stimuli may represent another manifestation of chronically increased sympathetic tone in early hypertension.

Acute response to intracisternal bupivacaine in patients with refractory pain of the head and neck

Continuous intracisternal infusion of bupivacaine for the management of intractable pain of the head and neck is effective in controlling pain in this patient group. With the catheter tip being located at the height of the C1 vertebral body, autonomic regulatory information may also be influenced by the infusion of bupivacaine. By combining direct sampling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), via a percutaneously placed catheter in the cisterna magna, with a noradrenaline and adrenaline isotope dilution method for examining sympathetic and adrenal medullary activity, we were able to quantify the release of brain neurotransmitters and examine efferent sympathetic nervous outflow in patients following intracisternal administration of bupivacaine. Despite severe pain, sympathetic and adrenal medullary activities were well within normal range (4.2 +/- 0.6 and 0.7 +/- 0.2 nmol min(-1), respectively, mean +/-S.E.M.). Intracisternal bupivacaine administration caused an almost instantaneous elevation in mean arterial blood pressure, increasing by 17 +/- 7 mmHg after 10 min (P < 0.01). Heart rate increased in parallel (17 +/- 5 beats min(-1)), and these changes coincided with an increase in sympathetic nervous activity, peaking with an approximately 50% increase over resting level 10 min after injection (P < 0.01). CSF levels of GABA were reduced following bupivacaine (P < 0.05). CSF catecholamines and serotonin, and EEG, remained unaffected. These results show that acutely administered bupivacaine in the cisterna magna of chronic pain sufferers leads to an activation of the sympathetic nervous system. The results suggest that the haemodynamic consequences occur as a result of interference with the neuronal circuitry in the brainstem. Although these effects are transient, they warrant caution at the induction of intracisternal local anaesthesia.

Effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade on autonomic nervous system function in patients with essential hypertension

It has long been proposed that the renin-angiotensin system exerts a stimulatory influence on the sympathetic nervous system, including augmentation of central sympathetic outflow and presynaptic facilitation of norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerves. We tested this proposition in 19 patients with essential hypertension, evaluating whether the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) eprosartan and losartan had identifiable antiadrenergic properties. This was done in a prospective, randomized, three-way placebo-controlled study of crossover design. Patients were randomized to 600 mg of eprosartan daily, 50 mg of losartan daily, or placebo. The treatment period was 4 wk, with 2-wk washout periods. Multiunit firing rates in efferent sympathetic nerves distributed to skeletal muscle vasculature (muscle sympathetic nerve activity, MSNA) were measured with microneurography, testing whether ARBs inhibit central sympathetic outflow. In parallel, isotope dilution methodology was used to measure whole body norepinephrine spillover to plasma. Mean blood pressure on placebo was 151/98 mmHg, with both ARBs causing reductions of approximately 11 mmHg systolic and 6 mmHg diastolic pressure, placebo corrected. Both MSNA [35 +/- 12 bursts/min (mean +/- SD) on placebo] and whole body norepinephrine spillover [366 +/- 247 ng/min] were unchanged by ARB administration, indicating that the ARBs did not materially inhibit central sympathetic outflow or act presynaptically to reduce norepinephrine release at existing rates of nerve firing. These findings contrast with the easily demonstrable reduction in sympathetic nervous activity produced by antihypertensive drugs of the imidazoline-binding class, which are known to act within the brain to inhibit sympathetic nervous outflow. We conclude that sympathetic nervous inhibition is not a major component of the blood pressure-lowering action of ARBs in essential hypertension.

The neurobiology of human obesity

Earlier ideas that sympathetic nervous system activity is low in human obesity, contributing to weight gain through absence of sympathetically mediated thermogenesis, can now be discounted. The application of sympathetic nerve recording techniques and isotope dilution methodology quantifying neurotransmitter release from sympathetic nerves has established that the sympathetic outflows to the kidneys and skeletal muscle vasculature are activated in obese humans. The cause remains unclear. The adipocyte hormone, leptin, stimulates the sympathetic nervous system in rodents, but whether this applies in humans is uncertain. Cross-sectional studies suggest a quantitative link exists between regional sympathetic nervous tone (most notably in the kidneys) and rates of leptin release, but definitive studies documenting that leptin administration activates the human sympathetic nervous system have not been done. What might be the clinical implications of these new findings? The demonstration that the suppressed sympathetic tone characterizing many experimental models of obesity does not exist in human obesity weakens the case for the use of beta3-adrenergic agonists as thermogenic agents to facilitate weight loss. Although the neurogenic character of obesity-related hypertension is now established, whether antiadrenergic antihypertensive drugs are the preferred agents for blood pressure reduction has not been adequately tested. Multiple site central venous sampling, disclosing release of leptin into the internal jugular veins, led to the demonstration that the leptin gene is also expressed in the brain, in addition to adipocytes. Brain resistance to leptin has been inferred in human obesity, given that overweight is accompanied by high plasma leptin levels. The fact that the genes for leptin and its receptors are normally expressed in the brain in human obesity, and that release of leptin from the brain is actually increased, argues against this. Brain leptin release has the potential to override the peripheral, adipocyte leptin system.

Comparison of rilmenidine and lisinopril on ambulatory blood pressure and plasma lipid and glucose levels in hypertensive women with metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

In previous studies, the I1 imidazoline specific agonist rilmenidine effectively lowered office blood pressure (BP) in patients with metabolic syndrome, improved glucose metabolism and did not demonstrate unfavourable effects on plasma lipids. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of 12weeks therapy with rilmenidine compared with the ACE inhibitor lisinopril on ambulatory BP, plasma lipid and fasting glucose levels in women with metabolic syndrome.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Prospective randomised open-label, blinded end-points study.

METHODS

Female patients (n = 51) with hypertension and other components of metabolic syndrome were treated with 1 mg rilmenidine (n = 24) or 10 mg lisinopril (n = 27), once- or twice-daily. Anthropometric measurements, office BP and heart rate (HR) measurements, ambulatory BP monitoring, lipid and fasting glucose assessment were performed before and after 12weeks of treatment

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in ambulatory BP and HR, including 24-h, daytime and night-time values, and in lipids and glucose levels. All changes were adjusted for baseline values using the analysis of covariance method.

RESULTS

Ambulatory 24-h systolic BP and diastolic BP were decreased significantly in the rilmenidine group (-11.9 +/- 1.9 and -7.7 +/- 0.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001) respectively and the lisinopril group (-11.0 +/- 1.8 and -6.7 +/- 0.7 mm Hg respectively, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups. Rilmenidine reduced 24-h ambulatory HR (-3.6 +/- 0.8 bpm versus 0.3 +/- 0.8 bpm with lisinopril; p = 0.002). The reductions of day-time and night-time BP were also significant for both treatment groups, but the rilmenidine group demonstrated a greater decrease in night-time diastolic BP (p = 0.046). Rilmenidine significantly increased HDL cholesterol and decreased fasting glucose levels (p = 0.009 and p = 0.012, respectively). HDL cholesterol tended to increase and fasting glucose tended to decrease in the lisinopril group. However, differences between groups were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Rilmenidine has similar effects on ambulatory BP patterns in hypertensive women with metabolic syndrome as lisinopril. Rilmenidine compared with lisinopril significantly reduces ambulatory HR. In this study, rilmenidine and lisinopril demonstrate similar effects on plasma lipid and fasting glucose levels.