Is post-chemotherapy resection of seminomatous elements associated with higher acute morbidity?

Complex treatment of residual metastatic germ cell cancer: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Testicular cancer is the most common solid malignancy among men aged 15-35. Radical orchiectomy and platinum-based chemotherapy (BEP) are curative in the majority of patients, including advanced, metastatic cases. According to current urooncology guidelines all non-seminoma patients harbouring post-chemotherapy residual masses of ≥ 1 cm should undergo salvage retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). However, only 10% of residual tumors contain viable disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient outcomes and complications considering different treatment regimens and clinical characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective cross-sectional study patients (n=127) who underwent postchemotherapy RPLND between 2007 and 2023 at our referral center were evaluated. The patients received systemic treatment at various oncology centers. The number of BEP cycles received were occasionally different from standard. Only patients with normal postchemotherapy serum tumor markers and primary testicular or extragonadal germ cell neoplasms were included. Treatment groups were established according to the number of BEP cycles received, and the extent of RPLND (bilateral or modified template). Treatment outcomes and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Standard 3-4 courses of BEP were received by 100 (78,7%) patients, while 11 (8,7%) patients underwent less, and 16 (12,6%) more courses than standard. On histopathologic evaluation viable germ cell tumor, teratoma, and necrosis/fibrosis was present in 26 (20,5%), 67 (52,7%) and 34 (26,8%) of specimen, respectively. In the 5-6 BEP series subgroup high rate of viable disease (37,5%) was found and significantly more nephrectomies were performed, than other chemotherapy subgroups. Extratesticular GCT, viable disease in residual mass or progression after RPLND indicated lower survival. Mild (Clavien-Dindo I-II) or no postoperative complications were reported in 93,7% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests no significant benefit from exceeding 3-4 courses of BEP. Timely salvage RPLND should be performed in high volume centers for optimal treatment outcomes with acceptable complication rates. Adherence to the Heidenreich criteria is advisable where practical.

Evaluation of post-chemotherapy residual seminomatous masses by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT using tumor-to-liver ratio - conundrum or solution?

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of viable disease in post-chemotherapy seminomatous residual masses using visual interpretation, SUVmax, and T/L ratio.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study assessing the post-chemotherapy seminomatous residual masses of size >3 cm. The PET/CT scan findings were interpreted visually for presence of residual disease which were validated from histopathology reports or imaging follow-up for a maximum of 3 years. SUVmax and T/L ratios were also determined for all the residual lesions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value NPV were calculated and compared for all three parameters along with ROC analysis to obtain an optimal cutoff value for SUVmax and T/L ratio, respectively.

RESULTS

Sample size was 49. Out of these 49 patients, 8 had validation of PET results with histopathology. Rest was validated with imaging follow-up. FDG-PET was positive in 30 patients and negative in 19 patients by visual interpretation. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV by this method were 100%, 62.5%, 73%, and 100%, respectively. The SUVmax and T/L ratios were also calculated for these lesions. The cutoff for these two variables was 4.56 and 1.21, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV at these cutoffs were 76%, 87.5%, 86%, 77.7%, and 92%, 87.5%, 88%, 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET has a favorable diagnostic value in predicting viable disease in post-chemotherapy seminomatous residual masses and using T/L ratio cutoff of 1.21 will increase the specificity of the test.

Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for seminoma: Limitations of surgical intervention after first-line chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Patients with relapsed seminoma after first-line chemotherapy can be treated with salvage chemotherapy or postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND). Based on prior experience, surgical management can have worse efficacy and increased morbidity compared to nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Our aim was to characterize the surgical efficacy and difficulty in highly selected patients with residual disease after first-line chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Indiana University testis cancer database was queried to identify men who underwent PC-RPLND for seminoma between January 2011 and December 2021. Included patients underwent first-line chemotherapy and had evidence of retroperitoneal disease progression.

RESULTS

We identified 889 patients that underwent PC-RPLND, of which only 14 patients were operated on for seminoma. One patient was excluded for lack of follow-up. Out of 13 patients, only 3 patients were disease free with surgery only. Median follow up time was 29.9 months (interquartile ranges : 22.6-53.7). Two patients died of disease. The remaining 8 patients were treated successfully with salvage chemotherapy. During PC-RPLND, 4 patients required nephrectomy, 1 patient required an aortic graft, 2 patients required a partial ureterectomy, and 3 patients required partial or complete caval resection.

CONCLUSION

The decision between salvage chemotherapy and PC-RPLND as second-line therapy can be challenging. Salvage chemotherapy is effective but is associated with short and long-term morbidity. Surgical efficacy in this setting seems to be limited, but careful selection of patients may lead to surgical success without affecting the ability to receive any systemic salvage therapies if necessary or causing life-threating morbidity.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Testicular Cancer: 2023 Update

CONTEXT

Each year the European Association of Urology (EAU) produce a document based on the most recent evidence on the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of testicular cancer (TC).

OBJECTIVE

To represent a summarised version of the EAU guidelines on TC for 2023 with a focus on key changes in the 2023 update.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A multidisciplinary panel of TC experts, comprising urologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and pathologists, reviewed the results from a structured literature search to compile the guidelines document. Each recommendation in the guidelines was assigned a strength rating.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

For the 2023 EAU guidelines on TC, a review and restructure were undertaken. The key changes incorporated in the 2023 update include: new supporting text regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in males with metastatic germ cell tumours receiving chemotherapy; quality of life after treatment; an update of the histological classifications and inclusion of the World Health Organization 2022 pathological classification; inclusion of the revalidation of the 1997 International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group prognostic risk factors; and a new section covering oncology treatment protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2023 version of the EAU guidelines on TC include the highest available scientific evidence to standardise the management of TC. Better stratification and optimisation of treatment modalities will continue to improve the high survival rates for patients with TC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This article presents a summary of the European Association of Urology guidelines on testicular cancer published in 2023 and includes the latest recommendations for management of this disease. The guidelines are a valuable resource that may help patients in understanding treatment recommendations.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer is a demanding procedure: detailed real-life data of complications and additional surgical procedures in 295 cases

PURPOSE

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for germ cell tumours is a challenging procedure that may present relevant complications. The purpose was to analyse postoperative complications and identify risk factors for major complications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective unicentric analysis of a large cohort of 295 RPLNDs from 1992 to 2020. Early complications (30 days) and late complications (31-180 days) were classified according to the Clavien‒Dindo classification. The influence of surgical, patient-specific, and tumour-specific parameters on grade III-V complications was analysed in univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 232 were postchemotherapy RPLNDs, and 63 were primary RPLNDs. Early postoperative complications were found to be grades I-II in 58.6% (173/295), grades III-IV in 9.8% (29/295), and grade V in 0.3% (1/295). In 20% (58/295), additional surgical procedures were needed. Grade III-V complications were associated with ≥ 4 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy (OR 3.7 (1.5-8.9); p = 0.004), RPLND specimen (nonseminoma or immature teratoma) (OR 3.1 (1.4-6.6); p = 0.005), transfusions (OR 2.4 (1.1-5.4); p = 0.03), salvage RPLND (OR 4.1 (1.8-9.3); p < 0.001), and preoperatively elevated AFP (OR 5 (2.2-11.7); p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor for grade III-V complications was preoperative AFP elevation (OR 3.3 (1.2-9.2); p = 0.02). Limitations include the retrospective study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that RPLND is a demanding surgical procedure. Patients with a complex tumour history have a higher risk of complications. We recommend treatment of these complex cases in high-volume centres.

End-of-Treatment FDG PET-CT (EOT-PET) in Patients with Post-Chemotherapy Masses for Seminoma: Can We Avoid Further Intervention?

Anjana JoelContext  Patients with seminoma present with advanced disease. End-of-treatment (EOT) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is done to assess response and direct management of post-chemotherapy residual masses. Purpose  This article assesses the utility of EOT PET-CT in the management of post-chemotherapy residual lymph nodal masses seminoma. Materials and Methods  We analyzed all patients with seminoma who underwent an EOT PET-CT from January 2015 to January 2020 at our center and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of EOT PET-CT in the entire cohort of patients and among subgroups. Results  A total of 34 male patients underwent EOT PET-CT. Fourteen (41.2%) were stratified as good risk and 20 (58.8%) as intermediate risk. The median follow-up was 23 months (interquartile range: 9.75-53 months). In 23 patients there were residual masses of size more than 3 cm at the EOT PET scan. EOT PET was positive as per the SEMPET criteria in 18 (78%) out of 23 patients. None underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. All four who underwent image-guided biopsy, showed only necrosis on pathology. One patient with positive mediastinal node (standardized uptake value 13.6) had granulomatous inflammation. There was no relapse or progression during this period of follow-up. The NPV for EOT PET-CT for the entire cohort, > 3 cm, and > 6 weeks cutoff were 100%, respectively. The PPV for EOT PET-CT for the entire cohort, > 3 cm residual mass, and > 6 weeks cutoff were 8.7, 11.11, and 6.67%, respectively. Conclusion  EOT PET-CT has a low PPV and high NPV in predicting viable tumor in post-chemotherapy residual masses among patients with seminomatous germ cell tumors. If required, EOT PET positivity can be confirmed by a biopsy or reassessed with a repeat PET-CT imaging to document persistent disease prior to further intervention.

Serum Levels of MicroRNA-371a-3p (M371) Can Predict Absence or Presence of Vital Disease in Residual Masses After Chemotherapy of Metastatic Seminoma

Background

Radiological evaluation of postchemotherapy residual masses of metastatic seminoma is characterized by poor diagnostic accuracy. Serum levels of microRNA-371a-3p (M371) involve high specificity and sensitivity for the primary diagnosis of seminoma. We evaluated if M371 levels can indicate the presence of vital disease in postchemotherapy residual masses in patients with metastatic seminoma.

Methods

Twenty-three seminoma patients (median age 52 years) with residual masses had posttreatment measurements of serum M371 levels (group A), fourteen of whom had measurements also beforehand. The posttreatment results were compared with the clinical outcome during follow-up. Eleven patients with complete remission after treatment of metastatic seminoma (group B) and 33 men with non-malignant testicular diseases (group C) served as controls. M371 serum levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR using miR-30b-5p as endogenous control. An evaluation was performed with descriptive statistical methods.

Results

Twenty-two patients of Group A had uneventful follow-up so far, twenty-one of whom had M371 level &lt;5, and one other had a mildly elevated level below relative quantity (RQ) = 10. One patient with a level of RQ = 26.2 rapidly progressed. The median posttreatment M371 level of the non-progressing patients of group A is not significantly different from the median level of the control group with complete remission (B). Before treatment, the median M371 levels in groups A and B were 507.6 and 143.9, respectively. In both groups, significant drops in M371 levels resulted from treatment.

Conclusion

Normal M371 serum levels at the time of completion of treatment of metastatic seminoma indicate the absence of vital seminoma in residual masses, while elevated levels &gt;RQ = 10 predict the presence of disease. The optimal timing of M371 measurement after chemotherapy and the appropriate cutoff level still need to be determined. Based on the present results, measuring serum M371 levels involves the potential of a novel tool for assessing postchemotherapy residual masses of metastatic seminoma.

Spermatogenesis in pre-pubertal boys with Leydig cell neoplasms suggests paracrine stimulation by testosterone

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric Leydig cell tumors (LCTs) represent approximately 4% of pre-pubertal testicular tumors and are known to cause precocious puberty secondary to testosterone production. While gonadotropins and testosterone are known to initiate spermatogenesis beginning in puberty, it is yet to be determined if a similar phenomenon is triggered by isolated testosterone production in prepubescent boys.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if testicular pathology in pre-pubertal pediatric patients with LCTs exhibit spermatogenesis secondary to paracrine testosterone stimulation.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed patients who underwent orchiectomy for a testicular tumor from 2003-17. We included patients with LCTs and compared them to children with non-LCT pathology (teratomas and epidermoid cysts). We excluded other pathologies and tumors in pubertal patients. Data were collected on the presence of spermatogenesis on pathology, tumor markers and serum hormone results.

RESULTS

Orchiectomy for testicular tumors were completed in 66 patients, of which 20 were included in the non-LCT group and 9 in the LCT group. Two of the 9 LCT patients had bilateral pathology. Age at presentation was 6.3 ± 5.8 years for the non-LCT group vs. 8.4 ± 1.6 years for LCTs (p = 0.261). Spermatogenesis was detected in 7 (64%) LCT specimens vs 2 (10%) non-LCT specimens (p = 0.002). Age of the spermatogenesis patients in the non-LCT group (11.08 ± 2.5 years) was older than LCT ones (8.3 ± 2.0 years), suggesting that spermatogenesis in the non-LCT group may be due to early pubertal development. The summary figure demonstrates spermatogenesis identified in a pre-pubertal LCT patient.

DISCUSSION

In this study, pre-pubertal males with LCTs were identified to have pathology evidence of spermatogenesis compared to controls with non-LCT pathology. This represents the first study assessing paracrine testosterone effects on spermatogenesis in pre-pubertal patients with LCTs. In contrast, adult literature on LCTs primarily report on resulting concerns for fertility, gynecomastia and testicular atrophy.

CONCLUSION

LCTs can induce spermatogenesis in prepubertal patients. This reinforces the hypothesis that paracrine testosterone signaling plays a role in spermatogenesis. Our findings could help explore novel fertility preservation opportunities in children.

Management of urologic cancers during the pandemic and potential impact of treatment deferrals on outcomes

The COVID-19 pandemic-related constraints on healthcare access have raised concerns about adverse outcomes from delayed treatment, including the risk of cancer progression and other complications. Further, concerns were raised about a potentially significant backlog of patients in need of cancer care due to the pandemic-related delays in healthcare, further exacerbating any potential adverse outcomes. Delayed access to surgery is particularly relevant to urologic oncology since one-third of new cancers in men (20% overall) arise from the genitourinary (GU) tract and surgery is often the primary treatment. Herein, we summarize the prepandemic literature on deferred surgery for GU cancers and risk of disease progression. The aforementioned data on delayed surgery were gathered in the context of systemic delays present in certain healthcare systems, or occasionally, due to planned deferral in suboptimal surgical candidates. These data provide indirect, but sufficient insight to develop triage schemas for prioritization of uro-oncological cases. Herein, we outline the extent to which the pandemic-related triage guidelines had influenced urologic practice in various regions. To study the adverse outcomes in the pandemic-era, a survey of urologic oncologists was conducted regarding modifications in their initial management of urologic cancers and any delay-related adverse outcomes. While the adverse effects directly from COVID-19 related delays will become apparent in the coming years, the results showing short-term outcomes are quite instructive. Since cancer care was assigned a higher priority at most centers, this strategy may have avoided significant delays in care and limited the anticipated negative impact of pandemic-related constraints.

Management of residual disease after chemotherapy in germ cell tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although testicular cancer remains a highly curable malignancy, challenges and uncertainty still remain in certain aspects of management. Residual disease after chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) remains one of these challenges. We aim to highlight the recent literature on the management of residual disease after chemotherapy in GCT and the emerging innovations that may provide further guidance into this area.

RECENT FINDINGS

A subset of patients with GCT will have residual disease after chemotherapy, and management of these patients involves highly skilled multidisciplinary experts including medical oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists. Management options depend on histologic subtype, either seminoma or nonseminoma, and involve size criteria, possible further imaging modalities, and tumor markers. Even with these tools at highly specialized expert centers, uncertainty in management remains, and recent literature has explored the use of newer biomarkers to aid in these cases.

SUMMARY

Postchemotherapy residual masses in GCT can prove to be complicated cases to manage. Balancing survival with quality of life outcomes is important and requires a multidisciplinary team experienced in treating GCT.

Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy among patients with germ cell tumors using validated grading classifications

BACKGROUND

Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (PC-RPLND) is an essential, yet potentially morbid, therapy for the management of patients with advanced germ cell tumors. In the current study, the authors sought to define the complication profile of PC-RPLND using validated grading systems for intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) and early postoperative complications.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2018, all patients who underwent PC-RPLND were analyzed for iAEs and early postoperative complications using the Kaafarani and Clavien-Dindo classifications, respectively. Logistic regression models were conducted to assess patient and tumor factors associated with iAEs and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of the 453 patients identified, 115 patients (25%) and 252 patients (56%), respectively, experienced an iAE and postoperative complication. Major iAEs (grade ≥3) were observed in 15 patients (3%) and major postoperative complications (grade ≥3) were noted in 80 patients (18%). The most common iAE was vascular injury (112 of 132 events; 85%), which occurred in 92 patients (20%), and the most frequent postoperative complication was ileus, which occurred in 121 patients (27%). Original and postchemotherapy retroperitoneal mass size, nonretroperitoneal metastases, intermediate and/or poor International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification, previous RPLND, elevated tumor markers at the time of RPLND, and anticipated adjuvant surgical procedures increased the risk of both iAEs and postoperative complications. Patients who experienced an iAE were significantly more likely to experience a postoperative complication (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-3.97 [P < .001]).

CONCLUSIONS

In what to the authors' knowledge is the first analysis of PC-RPLND using validated classifications for both iAEs and postoperative complications, advanced disease and surgical complexity significantly increased the risks of major iAEs and postoperative complications. Standardized reporting of adverse perioperative events allows providers and patients to appreciate the consequences of PC-RPLND during counseling and decision making.

[Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular germ cell tumours: indications, complications and special cases]

Die retroperitoneale Lymphadenektomie ist integraler Bestandteil der stadienadaptierten Therapie von testikulären Keimzelltumoren. Verschiedene Ansätze der retroperitonealen Lymphadenektomie werden auf Basis unterschiedlicher Indikationen durchgeführt.

Die nervschonende retroperitoneale Lymphadenektomie als primäre Therapieoption bei nicht seminomatösen Keimzelltumoren im klinischen Stadium I sollte risikoadaptiert erfolgen. Geringfügige perioperative Komplikationen wie Wundinfekte, Lymphozelen und paralytischer Ileus treten bei in etwa 14 % der Patienten auf. Schwerwiegendere Komplikationen wie chylärer Aszites und Lungenarterienembolien treten bei ca. 5,4 % der Patienten auf. Die häufigste Langzeitkomplikation ist hierbei das Auftreten einer Retrograden Ejakulation. Der Erhalt der antegraden Ejakulation kann jedoch bei weit über 90 % der Patienten erreicht werden.

Die postchemotherapeutische retroperitoneale Lymphadenektomie ist integraler Bestandteil der multimodalen Therapie bei retroperitonealen Residualbefunden. Bei residuellen Befunden > 3 cm beim fortgeschrittenen Seminom dient das FDG PET als zuverlässige Entscheidungshilfe zur Durchführung einer retroperitonealen Lymphadenektomie.

Bei ca. 30 % der Patienten mit nicht seminomatösen Keimzelltumoren finden sich residuelle retroperitoneale Tumorbefunde. Diese sollten unabhängig von der Größe der Befunde bei negativen Serumtumormarkern oder Serumtumormarkern im Plateau komplett reseziert werden. Die postchemotherapeutische retroperitoneale Lymphadenektomie stellt einen herausfordernden Eingriff dar und sollte primär an ausgewiesenen Zentren durchgeführt werden. Bei bis zu 25 % der Patienten ist im Rahmen der postchemotherapeutischen retroperitonealen Lymphadenektomie die Resektion umgebender Strukturen indiziert. Eine Beteiligung der aorta abdominalis liegt in 6 – 10 % der Fälle vor, eine Beteiligung der vena cava in ca. 2 % der Fälle. Komplikationsraten liegen bei der postchemotherapeutischen retroperitonealen Lymphadenektomie höher als bei der primären nervschonenenden Lymphadenektomie mit signifikant höherem intraoperativen Blutverlust und signifikant höherer Transfusionsrate. Mit einer Wahrscheinlichkeit von 2 – 7 % tritt chylärer Aszites nach postchemotherapeutischer retroperitonealer Lymphadenektomie häufiger auf. Jedoch kann auch im Rahmen der postchemotherapeutischen Lymphadenektomie bei bis zu 85 % der Erhalt der antegraden Ejakulation erreicht werden. Entscheidend für den Erhalt der antegraden Ejakulation und einer Verbesserung der Morbidität insgesamt ist auch hier das nach Möglichkeit das Anstreben eines nervsparenden Vorgehens durch Anpassung der Felder.

[Management of residual masses of testis germ cell tumors]

A residual mass (RM) is an abnormal image with a transverse axis of more than 1cm trans that remains visible on the CT scan performed after chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumors. Their management depends on the histology of the initial tumor. In the case of a non-seminomatous germ cell tumor, all residual lesions must be resected if the tumor markers are negative. The surgery usually begins with a retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. This lymphadenectomy is a programed regional surgery and not the only resection of visible masses. All RM must be resected, regardless of their location, and may require successive actions. In order to limit its morbidity, modifications on the extent of the lymphadenectomy and the use of minimally invasive approaches are proposed by some center. When the initial tumor is a pure seminoma the attitude is different: the decay of the masses in post chemotherapy is often postponed. If lesions less than 3cm can be monitored, the others benefit from 18FDG PET at the end of chemotherapy: a positive attachment to PET is suspected of the presence of residual active tissue. The surgery of these RM is curative. If its extent is precise in the case of non-seminomatous tumor, it is more controversial in the case of seminoma. In the case of residual markers, surgery has a place in very specific situations.

ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.

Advanced Testis Cancer

Management of advanced testis cancer requires dedicated attention to the nuances of the disease to not only optimize cure but also ensure lifelong health. We are rapidly entering an era of precision medicine with novel biomarker discoveries that will undoubtedly change the treatment paradigm in both early- and late-stage disease.

Management of residual masses in testicular germ cell tumors

INTRODUCTION

About 50% of all patients with advanced testicular cancer demonstrate residual retroperitoneal or extraretroperitoneal masses. About two thirds of the masses harbour necrosis/fibrosis only whereas as about 10% and 40% harbour vital cancer or teratoma. Appropriate therapy will result in a high cure rate if performed properly. Areas covered: This review article covers the indication, the surgical technique and the oncological outcome of PC-RPLND and resection of extraretroperitoneal residual masses following chemotherapy in patients with advanced testis cancer. Expert commentary: Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) plays an integral part of the multimodality treatment in patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumours. Patients with nonseminomas, residual masses < 1cm and good prognosis can undergo active surveillance. In all other cases, PC-RPLND with or without resection of adjacent organs needs to be performed for curative intent. PC-RPLND requires a complex surgical approach and should be performed in experienced, tertiary referral centres only.

Therapeutic supine robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for post-chemotherapy residual masses in testicular cancer: technique and outcome analysis of initial experience

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is a therapeutic standard of care for post-chemotherapy residual masses in testicular cancer. While a robotic approach to this procedure has the potential of decreasing the morbidity associated with this major endeavour, it is often criticised for its inability to provide a bilateral complete template resection without redocking and repositioning the patient. Herein, we present the technique and initial outcomes of a supine approach to Robotic RPLND (R-RPLND) using the da Vinci Xi^® system, which obviates the need for repositioning or redocking for a bilateral full template resection. Three patients (age 21-36) with nonseminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis underwent R-RPLND for post-chemotherapy residual retroperitoneal masses with normalised tumor markers. Salient steps of the procedure were as follows: port placement in supine Trendelenburg position, docking of the da Vinci Xi^® system from one side, exposure of retroperitoneum, dissection of paracaval, retrocaval, interaortocaval, paraaortic and bilateral common iliac templates, and excision of gonadal vein. Mean console time and estimated blood loss were 257 (190-305) minutes and 333 (300-400) ml, respectively. Mean lymph node yield was 52 (29-94). One patient had a common iliac vein injury which was managed robotically without further consequence. No drains were placed in all three. There were no postoperative complications and all of them were advanced to a normal diet within 24 h and discharged on the second postoperative day. Histopathology reports were suggestive of necrosis and mature teratoma without any viable tumour. There have been no recurrences in these patients at a mean follow-up of 14 (1-22) months. R-RPLND in the supine position is practical, safe and feasible in the post-chemotherapy setting of testicular cancer. It eliminates the need for repositioning the patient or redocking the robot to achieve a complete resection with adequate lymph node yields, while preserving the benefits of a minimally invasive surgical approach.

Current controversies on the role of lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer for the journal: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations for the special seminars section on the role of lymphadenectomy for urologic cancers

The role of surgery in the locoregional management of many solid tumors has long been established. For testicular cancer, the incorporation of lymphadenectomy has played an important part in generating long-term survival outcomes in excess of 90% for germ cell tumor patients. In this review, we address several clinical scenarios in which lymphadenectomy at times is underutilized, and others ill advised.

Primary and Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for Testicular Cancer

Clinical stage I (CS I) testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) are highly curable. Following orchidectomy, a risk-adapted approach using active surveillance, nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) and primary chemotherapy is recommended by the current guidelines. CS I is defined as showing negative values for tumour markers (or values declining to their half-life following orchidectomy) and negative imaging studies of the chest, abdomen and retroperitoneum. Active surveillance can be performed in low- and high-risk NSGCT with an anticipated relapse rate of about 15% and 50%, respectively. The majority of patients will relapse with good and intermediate prognosis tumours, which have to be treated with 3 to 4 cycles of chemotherapy. About 25-30% of these patients will have to undergo postchemotherapy (PC) RPLND for residual masses. Primary chemotherapy with 1-2 cycles of cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin (PEB) is a therapeutic option for high-risk CS I NSGCT associated with a recurrence rate of only 2-3% and a minimal acute and long-term toxicity rate. Nerve-sparing RPLND, if performed properly, will cure about 85% of all high-risk patients with CS I NSGCT without the need for chemotherapy. PC-RPLND plays an integral part of the multimodality treatment in patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT). According to current guidelines and recommendations, PC-RPLND in advanced seminomas with residual tumours is only indicated if a positron emission tomography scan performed 6-8 weeks after chemotherapy is positive. In non-seminomatous TGCT, PC-RPLND is indicated for all residual radiographical lesions with negative or plateauing markers. Loss of antegrade ejaculation represents the most common long-term complication, which can be prevented by a nerve-sparing or modified template resection. The relapse rate after PC-RPLND is around 12%; however, it increases significantly to about 45% in cases with redo RPLND and late relapses. Patients with increasing markers should undergo salvage chemotherapy. Only select patients with elevated markers who are thought to be chemo-refractory might undergo desperation PC-RPLND if all radiographically visible lesions are completely resectable. PC-RPLND requires a complex surgical approach and should only be performed in experienced, tertiary referral centres.

[When is surgical resection of metastases in testicular germ cell tumors indicated and is there a scientific basis?]

Surgical resection of metastases represents an integral part of curative management in patients with testicular germ cell tumors (GCT). Primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) for low volume metastases in clinical stages I-IIB has to be differentiated from the more complex and more extensive postchemotherapeutic procedures. In Europe, primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) for clinical stage I nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT) plays a subordinate. In clinical stage IIA/B, nsRPLND is indicated for patients with marker-negative metastases in whom cure rates of about 65% can be achieved with surgery alone. For clinical stage IIA/B seminomas, nsRPLND represents an individual, still experimental procedure with high cure rates. Postchemotherapy residual tumor resection (pRTR) for advanced seminomas is only indicated in the context of a FDG-PET/CT-positive residual mass >3 cm in diameter. For NSGCT, pRTR is indicated in patients with residual masses >1 cm and negative or plateauing tumor markers to resect persisting teratoma or vital cancer. Complete resection of all masses including resection of adjacent vascular, visceral or skeletal metastases is mandatory to achieving the highest cure rate possible. Due to the complexity and the lower rate of significant morbidity and mortality, these procedures should be done at tertiary referral centers.

Characterizing the Morbidity of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer in a National Cohort of Privately Insured Patients

OBJECTIVE

To characterize morbidity of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for testis cancer, we analyze a contemporary national database. PC-RPLND is the standard for residual radiographic masses ≥1 cm (nonseminoma) and positron emission tomography-avid masses ≥3 cm (seminoma). Morbidity for PC-RPLND is greater than primary RPLND, which may be mitigated by performing surgery at a high-volume cancer center.

METHODS

Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition codes identified men with testis cancer undergoing PC- or primary RPLND in MarketScan (2007-2012). Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with receiving adjunctive procedures (ie, nephrectomy, vascular reconstruction), prolonged hospitalization, and 90-day readmission. Geographic variables assessed regionalization of PC-RPLND.

RESULTS

Of 559 men with claims for PC- or primary RPLND (206, 37% PC-RPLND), 19% of PC-RPLND underwent adjunctive procedures (vs 1% among RPLND, P  <  .01). For PC-RPLND, the nephrectomy rate was 10% and the vascular reconstruction rate was 8%. On multivariable analysis, PC-RPLND was associated with undergoing adjunctive procedures (odds ratio 41.9; 95% confidence interval 11.7, 150) and prolonged hospitalization (odds ratio 3.75; 95% confidence interval 1.68, 8.42) compared to primary RPLND. PC-RPLND was not associated with 90-day readmission. Up to 29% of PC-RPLNDs are performed in centers, billing just a single case through MarketScan in the 6 years studied.

CONCLUSION

PC-RPLND is associated with adjunctive procedures and longer hospitalizations. Given the morbidity of PC-RPLND in this young patient population, efforts are needed to establish quality benchmarks for, reduce the morbidity of, and to accurately discriminate risk during patient discussions prior to this complex, specialized surgery.

Post-Chemotherapy Robotic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: Institutional Experience

PURPOSE

There is little literature on robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RRPLND) in the difficult post-chemotherapy (PC) setting. We report on the outcome of RRPLND in patients with PC-residual masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2015, we performed 12 PC-RRPLND. Mean patient age was 37.8 years. Mean body mass index was 30.78. Nine (75%) patients had nonseminomatus germ cell tumor (NSGCT) and three (25%) patients had seminoma tumors. Cancer stage was III in six (50%), II-C in three (25%), II-B in two (16.7%), and II-A in one (8.03%). International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification in the NSGCT was good in six, intermediate in two, and poor in one, and was good in the three seminoma patients.

RESULTS

The procedure was completed effectively in 11 (91.7%) patients. Mean operative time was 312 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 475 mL. Mean hospital stay was 3.2 days. Mean number of lymph node excised was 12. Six of the excised masses were ≥5 cm (N3), largest was 7.5 cm. Pathology showed teratoma in five (45.5%), benign/necrosis in five (45.5%), and viable germ cells in one (9%). Major complication (Clavien ≥3) occurred in one patient and minor (Clavien ≤2) in two. Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in eight patients and in one could not be assessed. At a median follow-up of 31 months, no infield or outfield relapses occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic PC-retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is technically feasible and with acceptable morbidity. It is associated with low blood loss and short hospital stay. More research is needed to assess the long-term outcome and to compare standard open RPLND.

Disparities in Interpretation of Primary Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Pathology

OBJECTIVES

Accurate pathologic interpretation of testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) can be problematic due to low incidence and variation in histologic patterns. By analyzing changes in the diagnosis of testicular specimens after secondary review, we hoped to determine how these can affect prognosis and treatment.

METHODS

From 1999 to 2013, a total of 235 patients underwent radical orchiectomy at a referring facility and had pathology specimens reanalyzed by our center's pathologists with expertise in genitourinary malignancies. We identified discrepancies in pathologic reporting.

RESULTS

Fifty (21.3%) patients had variations in interpretation of their orchiectomy specimens. A clinically significant alteration was identified in 16 (6.8%) patients, most commonly due to recognition (or misrecognition) of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) associated with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs). Changes in LVI status resulted in upstaging or downstaging from clinical stage 1A to stage 1B or vice versa in six patients with NSGCTs, with a subsequent change in therapeutic strategy. In addition, one patient with stage 1 pure seminoma had been misclassified with nonseminoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Inaccurate interpretation of orchiectomy specimens is not uncommon and may lead to incorrect tumor staging, imprecise assignment of progression risk, and inappropriate management recommendations. Secondary opinions of primary GCT orchiectomy specimens potentially facilitate appropriate counseling and therapeutic strategies.

Surgical removal of retroperitoneal tumors after chemotherapy treated testicular tumors

In the era of chemotherapy, patients with advanced testicular tumor often presents with residual mass after completion of chemotherapy. Post chemotherapy RPLND is an important part of the multimodality treatment in these patients. According to current guidelines and recommendations, post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) is recommended in NSGCT patients with all residual lesions and normalized tumor markers. In seminomas, surgery is considered in patients with residual tumor > 3 cm and a positive positron emission tomography (PET) scan. A conventional bilateral template should be performed for patients undergoing PC-RPLND. However, a modified template can be performed in select patients with low volume disease to reduce the long-term morbidities and peri-operative complications. Laparoscopic PC-RPLND is safe and feasible. The oncological outcome of PC-RPLND is excellent if all tumors are resected. PC-RPLND is a complex surgery and should be done in high volume tertiary centers.

Microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of a solitary, chemorefractory testicular cancer liver metastasis

We present a case of a patient with stage IIIC metastatic seminoma with a persistent chemorefractory liver lesion. The patient was deemed a poor surgical candidate due to the tumor's aggressive biology with numerous other liver lesions treated with chemotherapy and a relatively high probability for additional recurrences. Further chemotherapy with curative intent was not a feasible option due to the fact that the patient had already received second-line high-dose chemotherapy and four cycles of third-line treatment complicated by renal failure, refractory thrombocytopenia, and debilitating neuropathy. After initial failure of laser, microwave ablation of the chemorefractory liver metastasis resulted in prolonged local tumor control and rendered the patient disease-free for more than 35 months, allowing him to regain an improved quality of life.

Postchemotherapy surgery for germ cell tumors--what have we learned in 35 years?

Postchemotherapy surgery for advanced testicular cancer has evolved over the last couple of decades. Patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors and residual retroperitoneal mass ≥1 cm should undergo postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). For seminoma, RPLND is considered in those patients with masses ≥3 cm that are also positron emission tomography positive. Masses that occur outside of the retroperitoneum should be completely resected with the possible exception of bilateral lung masses when resection of the first mass shows necrosis. The role of surgery in patients with extragonadal germ cell tumors is most vital in those with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Importantly, patient selection, surgical planning, and consideration of referral to centers with this expertise are important to optimize success.

Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Primary Advanced Seminoma-a Retrospective Analysis: Treatment Results at the Northern Israel Oncology Center (1989-2010)

OBJECTIVE

Over the past 30 years, great strides have been made in the treatment of disseminated testicular tumors. Despite the low number of patients and the rarity of studies concerning primary advanced seminoma, the efficacy of chemotherapy is clear, mainly 3-4-cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Aiming to contribute to the understanding and implementation of proper chemotherapeutic management in advanced seminoma patients, we retrospectively summarized our experience with 26 patients who were referred for platinum-based chemotherapy, post-orchiectomy to the Northern Israel Oncology Center between 1989 and 2010. Response rate, side effects, and long-term outcome were investigated.

METHODS

Before chemotherapy, meticulous staging was done, including tumor markers (B-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)), and abdominal and pelvic computerized tomography (CT) scans were carried out.

RESULTS

All 26 treated patients achieved complete remission, clinically and symptomatically, with normalization of their CT scans. At a median follow-up of 120 months (range, 24-268 months) all patients are alive, without evidence of recurrent disease. One patient whose disease recurred twice achieved a third complete remission following salvage treatment with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation. Another patient, who preferred surveillance, relapsed abdominally after 9 months but achieved long-standing complete remission with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Both these patients are alive with no evidence of disease. Three patients recovered uneventfully from bleomycin-induced pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced seminoma is a highly curable disease using platinum-based chemotherapy. Our study confirms the efficacy and safety of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced seminoma.

Laparoscopic lumbar-aortic lymphadenectomy in residual post-chemotherapy tumours in testicular cancer

INTRODUCTION

Open lumbar-aortic lymphadenectomy (OLAL) is the gold standard for treating post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal masses. Laparoscopic OLAL (L-OLAL) has emerged in recent years as an alternative for the handling of patients with these masses, with the additional potential benefits of minimal invasion.

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with the laparoscopic handling (L-OLAL) of residual post-chemotherapy masses in patients with advanced testicular cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1993 and 2009, 43 patients underwent post-chemotherapy L-OLAL. A transperitoneal technique was employed in all patients. We assessed demographic, perioperational and pathological variables, as well as complications and follow-up.

RESULTS

A unilateral dissection was performed in 17 patients, while 26 patients underwent a bilateral retroperitoneal dissection. In the first group, 4 patients relapsed. In the second group, there were no relapses. After an average follow-up of 21 months, the overall survival rate reached 95%. We recorded a rate of perioperative complications of only 9.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

In experienced hands, L-OLAL is a technically feasible surgical alternative for the treatment of patients who are carriers of advanced testicular cancer with residual post-chemotherapy masses. The dissection performed should be bilateral to avoid tumour relapses and increase the survival rate of these patients.

Current management of testicular cancer

Germ cell tumors (GCTs) of the testis are rare, but are the most common cancer in young men. GCTs may consist of one predominant histologic pattern or may represent a mixture of multiple histologic types. For treatment purposes, two broad categories are recognized: 1) pure seminoma and 2) others, which together are termed nonseminomatous GCTs (NSGCTs). In general, seminoma tends to be less aggressive, to be diagnosed at an earlier stage, and to spread predictably along lymphatic channels to the retroperitoneum before spreading hematogenously to the lung or other organs. Compared with NSGCTs, seminoma is exquisitely sensitive to radiation therapy and platinum-based chemotherapy. NSGCTs are usually mixed tumors and teratoma often exists at the sites of metastasis with other GCT elements; cure often requires chemotherapy to kill the chemosensitive-components and surgery to remove the teratomatous components. The main factors contributing to excellent cure rates of GCTs are careful staging at diagnosis; adequate early treatment using chemotherapeutic combinations, with or without radiotherapy and surgery; and very strict follow-up and salvage therapy. We review several clinical studies and summarize the current trends in the management of GCTs.

Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and resection for testicular cancer: an update on best practice

Clinical stage I testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs) are highly curable. Following orchidectomy a risk-adapted approach using active surveillance (AS), nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) and primary chemotherapy is recommended by the current guidelines. Clinical stage I is defined as negative or declining tumour markers to their half-life following orchidectomy and negative imaging studies of the chest, abdomen and retroperitoneum. Active surveillance can be performed in low-risk and in high-risk NSGCTs with an anticipated relapse rate of about 15% and 50%. The majority of patients will relapse with good and intermediate prognosis tumours which have to be treated with three to four cycles chemotherapy. About 25-30% of these patients will have to undergo postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for residual masses. Primary chemotherapy with one or two cycles of cisplatin (Platinol), etoposide and bleomycin (PEB) is a therapeutic option for high-risk clinical stage I NSGCT associated with a recurrence rate of only 2-3% and a minimal acute and long-term toxicity rate. nsRPLND, if performed properly, will cure about 85% of all high-risk patients with clinical stage I NSGCT without the need for chemotherapy. PC-RPLND forms an integral part of the multimodality treatment in patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs). According to current guidelines and recommendations, PC-RPLND in advanced seminomas with residual tumours is only indicated if a positron emission tomography (PET) scan performed 6-8 weeks after chemotherapy is positive. In nonseminomatous TGCT, PC-RPLND is indicated for all residual radiographic lesions with negative or plateauing markers. Loss of antegrade ejaculation represents the most common long-term complication which can be prevented by a nerve-sparing or modified template resection. The relapse rate after PC-RPLND is around 12%, however it increases significantly to about 45% in cases with redo RPLND and late relapses. Patients with increasing markers should undergo salvage chemotherapy. Only select patients with elevated markers who are thought to be chemorefractory might undergo desperation PC-RPLND if all radiographically visible lesions are completely resectable. PC-RPLND requires a complex surgical approach and should be performed in experienced, tertiary referral centres only.

Contemporary management of postchemotherapy testis cancer

CONTEXT

Some controversy still exists regarding the management of testis cancer following chemotherapy for disseminated disease.

OBJECTIVE

To review the available literature concerning the management of postchemotherapy testis cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A Medline search was conducted to identify original and review articles, as well as guidelines addressing the management of testis cancer following first-line chemotherapy. Keywords included germ cell tumor, testis cancer, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and chemotherapy. The most relevant articles were critically reviewed with the consensus of all the collaborative authors, who have expertise in the management of germ cell tumors (GCTs).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Approximately one-third of patients who undergo chemotherapy for metastatic GCTs have residual retroperitoneal disease. All patients with residual masses ≥1cm after chemotherapy for nonseminomatous GCTs should undergo postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) because of the risk of mature teratoma in 40-45% of cases and of viable GCT in 10-15% of cases. Patients who obtain a complete serologic remission and radiographic residual <1 cm after chemotherapy have a 6-9% risk of relapse. Patients with a completely resected teratoma in only the PC-RPLND specimen have a >90% chance of cure, while patients with viable GCTs should be considered for additional therapy, depending on the percentage of viable tumor. In patients with disseminated seminoma, postchemotherapy masses <3cm may be safely observed, while patients with masses >3 cm should be evaluated with positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography 2 mo after completion of chemotherapy, with very selective administration of PC-RPLND. Late relapse occurring >2 yr after chemotherapy is rare, and surgery remains the mainstay of therapy in cases of resectable masses independent of tumor markers. There is still controversy on whether high-dose chemotherapy confers a survival benefit compared with conventional-dose chemotherapy in the salvage setting. Surgery should always be considered for resectable masses following salvage therapies or in chemoresistant disease to maximize chance of cure.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced GCTs can achieve long-term disease-free survival when chemotherapy is combined with expert and judicious resection of residual disease. PC-RPLND is recommended for residual masses >1cm identified on postchemotherapy imaging in nonseminomatous GCT and possibly for PET-positive residual disease ≥3cm in treated seminomas.

[Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer. Literature review by the Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology, External Genitalia Group]

INTRODUCTION

Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (PC RPLDN) leads to an overall survival rate for testicular cancer exceeding 75%. Several questions still persist concerning: preoperative assessment of residual masses, reducing templates of dissection, choosing surgical approaches or including RPLND in high-risk patients' management.

METHOD

The main series in the literature of the past 20 years were analyzed and selected to address these issues and reach a consensual diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

RESULTS

Forty-eight original articles (1992 to 2011) were selected. They confirm that no preoperative tool can predict the histological nature of residual masses. The unilateral modified template is a valid option for selected patients but the full bilateral dissection remains the standard but more morbid. The laparoscopic approach is being evaluated. The LDNRP PC is indicated in "high risk" situations especially after salvage chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The bilateral lymphadenectomy by laparotomy of any supracentimeter residual mass, 6 weeks after chemotherapy, for germ cell tumors of the testicle is a standard of care.

2-¹⁸fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for postchemotherapy seminoma residual lesions: a retrospective validation of the SEMPET trial

BACKGROUND

2-¹⁸fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been recommended in international guidelines in the evaluation of postchemotherapy seminoma residuals. Our trial was designed to validate these recommendations in a larger group of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

FDG-PET studies in patients with metastatic seminoma and residual masses after platinum-containing chemotherapy were correlated with either the histology of the resected lesion(s) or the clinical outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy seven FDG-PET results were contributed. Of 127 eligible PET studies, 69% were true negative, 11% true positive, 6% false negative, and 15% false positive. We compared PET scans carried out before and after a cut-off level of 6 weeks after the end of the last chemotherapy cycle. PET sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value were 50%, 77%, 91%, and 25%, respectively, before the cut-off and 82%, 90%, 95%, and 69% after the cut-off. PET accuracy significantly improved from 73% before to 88% after the cut-off (P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the high specificity, sensitivity, and NPV of FDG-PET for evaluating postchemotherapy seminoma residuals. When carried out at an adequate time point, FDG-PET remains a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in this clinical setting and spares patients unnecessary therapy.

Advanced seminoma and nonseminoma: SIU/ICUD Consensus Meeting on Germ Cell Tumors (GCT), Shanghai 2009

The use of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy has led to a dramatic improvement in the cure rate of patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs). With high complete response (CR) rates achieved in approximately 80% of patients with advanced testicular cancer after standard first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Thereafter, the goals of various trials were to reduce the chemotherapy toxicity by limiting the number of chemotherapy cycles, the duration of therapy, and reducing the doses of, or even omitting, individual cytotoxic drugs, while maintaining efficacy, or to investigate the potential role of carboplatin as single agent or combined with etoposide and bleomycin for advanced seminoma. From prospective randomized trials and available data from additional sources, a European standard has been defined in several consensus conferences,(1-3) with the most recent consensus conference published by the European Society for Medical Oncology Consensus Group.(4,5) These international guidelines were developed from the previous published guidelines and data from available current trials. The principles of evidence-based medicine were scored (score 1-4) using a modified version of the Oxford levels of evidence and are listed in the present report in brackets. Draft guidelines were presented at an International Consensus in Urological Disease (ICUD) meeting (Shanghai, November 2009). The writing committee compiled the results of the discussion. All participants agreed to this final update.

Management of the residual post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal mass in germ cell tumors

The management of the residual mass in the retroperitoneum following induction chemotherapy for metastatic testicular cancer has evolved over the past three decades. A multidisciplinary approach involving cisplatin-based chemotherapy and postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) has increased long-term survival rates above 80%. Advances into the appropriate patient selection and timing of surgery have lowered morbidity while improving oncologic outcomes. However, areas of controversy still exist within the field. Management of the small residual mass, predictors of the histology of the residual mass, the extent of PC-RPLND, the role of PC-RPLND in the setting of elevated serum tumor markers, and the role of positron-emission tomography are all topics of ongoing research and debate. We will discuss these issues and review the current guidelines for the management of the residual postchemotherapy retroperitoneal mass in this review.

[Assessment of residual tumours after systemic treatment of metastatic seminoma: ¹⁸F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography - meta-analysis of diagnostic value]

BACKGROUND

Meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy and sensitivity of FDG (2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) positron emission tomography (PET) to predict viable residual tumours in patients with metastatic seminoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Altogether 5 studies with 130 patients were identified. Both FDG PET and the size of the residual lesions on conventional computed tomography (CT; lesions either ≤ or > 3 cm) were correlated with the presence or absence of viable residual tumour.

RESULTS

The specificity (92 vs 59%), sensitivity (72 vs 63%), positive (70 vs 28%) and negative (93 vs 86%) predictive value of FDG PET were superior to data obtained by assessing residual tumour size (either ≤ or > 3 cm) applying CT scans alone.

CONCLUSION

In view of the data currently available, FDG PET seems to be a clinically useful predictor of viable tumour in post-chemotherapy residuals of pure seminoma.