Daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure is more effective at predicting mortality than clinic blood pressure

The overestimated prevalence of hypertension in a population survey: a cross-sectional study from Hebei province, China

OBJECTIVE

Currently, the prevalence of hypertension is mainly ascertained using a one-visit population survey, which may lead to overestimation. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of hypertension prevalence determined by a one-visit population survey.

METHODS

For this cross-sectional study, we continuously enrolled 1116 volunteers without a hypertension history in Hebei province from January 2018 to December 2019. The study population included 511 (45.80%) males and 605 (54.20%) females with a mean age of 48 years. The hypertension prevalence was assessed using two methods: one-visit screening and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. We directly compared the performances of daytime ambulatory BP monitoring and one-visit screening in the same group of subjects. In addition, we explored possible thresholds to improve the detection of hypertension.

RESULTS

During the one-visit survey, the mean BP value was about 8 mmHg higher than that determined by daytime ambulatory BP monitoring. The prevalence of hypertension was 29.84% and 14.07% during the one-visit and daytime multiple visit surveys, respectively. The risk factors for overestimated hypertension were female sex, body mass index < 24.00 kg/m², and diastolic BP of 100 mmHg. The positive predictive value of the one-visit population survey for diagnosing hypertension was 36.34%. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that in males, the best diagnostic threshold for hypertension diagnosis was 148/96 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

The hypertension prevalence was likely overestimated by 2-fold in the one-visit survey group compared to the daytime ambulatory BP monitoring group. Thus, the threshold for one-visit BP screening should be raised to 148/96 mmHg to improve the accuracy of hypertension diagnosis.

Social Ambivalence and Disease (SAD): A Theoretical Model Aimed at Understanding the Health Implications of Ambivalent Relationships

The protective influence of social relationships on health is widely documented; however, not all relationships are positive, and negative aspects of relationships may be detrimental. Much less is known about the relationships characterized by both positivity and negativity (i.e., ambivalence). This article provides a theoretical framework for considering the influence of ambivalent relationships on physical health, including reasons why ambivalence should be considered separately from relationships characterized as primarily positive (supportive) or primarily negative (aversive). We introduce the social ambivalence and disease (SAD) model as a guide to understanding the social psychological antecedents, processes, and consequences of ambivalent relationships. We conclude by highlighting gaps in the literature and features of the SAD model that may serve as a guide to future research on potential health-relevant pathways of ambivalent relationships.

Association between sex hormones and ambulatory blood pressure

INTRODUCTION

Higher levels of total testosterone and lower levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) have been associated with increased blood pressure (BP) in women with an inverse association between total testosterone and BP among men. Fewer studies have examined associations with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), blunted nocturnal BP decline or the role of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), a precursor to androgens.

METHODS

Baseline blood samples were assayed for 229 normotensive men (≥50 years) and women (≥55 years) participating in the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL. Standardized seated BP (SBP and DBP) and 24-h ABP were measured by trained technicians. Self-reported cardiovascular risk factors and sociodemographic variables were reported on baseline questionnaires. Sex stratified linear regression models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, BMI, smoking and alcohol estimated the association between each sex hormone and measures of BP and 24-h ABP. Logistic regression used to estimate associations with blunted nocturnal decline (>10% reduction in SBP or DBP during sleeping hours).

RESULTS

Total testosterone and SHBG demonstrated significant inverse correlations with SBP whereas DHEAS was not significantly associated with BP. Among men, in multivariable analyses, each 10% increase in DHEAS was associated with a 0.41 mmHg higher seated DBP (β = 4.29, 95% CI 0.84-7.73) and each 10% increase in total testosterone and SHBG was associated with a 0.54 mmHg (β = -5.65, 95% CI -10.45 to -0.84) and 0.60 mmHg (β = -6.30, 95% CI -11.38 to -1.21) decrease in seated DBP, respectively. No significant associations were observed among women.

CONCLUSION

Among men only, we observed statistically significant inverse cross-sectional associations between total testosterone and SHBG with seated DBP, and a significant positive association with DHEAS levels.

Clinical Implications of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The appropriate treatment targets for individuals with elevated blood pressure (BP) have received increased attention in light of recent clinical trial results. However, it is well known that the method used to measure BP can have a significant impact on the observed BP. In this review, we summarize the existing literature on the impact of BP measurement technique on observed BP readings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Manual BPs obtained in-clinic routinely differ from those obtained using automated devices. Further, clinic-based readings (either manual or automated) typically correlate poorly with readings from ambulatory BP monitoring or home-based devices. However, few studies utilize randomization or sound experimental design to explore differences in BP readings by method or technique. While numerous studies report differences in BP by method, most lack statistical rigor and therefore provide limited insight into the true effect of technique on BP measurements.

Blood pressure variability and cognitive decline in older people: a 5-year longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is common in later life. Identifying potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline may ameliorate the burden of disease. Cross-sectional studies show an association between blood pressure (BP) variability and impaired cognitive function in patients with hypertension and/or dementia. However, research examining the association between BP variability and cognitive function in the general older population is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we examined the association between BP variability and cognitive function over 5-year follow-up in an unselected community-dwelling cohort.

METHODS

Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed in 353 community-dwelling people aged at least 65 years. Cognitive assessment, using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG), was performed at baseline and at 5-year follow-up. BP variability was calculated using the coefficient of variation. Cognitive change over 5 years was defined as baseline score minus follow-up score.

RESULTS

Increased daytime systolic variability was associated with poorer performance on the CAMCOG total score and subscores. Daytime diastolic variability was associated with poorer performance on total CAMCOG, CAMCOG executive score, and MMSE. These findings were independent of demographic and cardiovascular risk factors. Daytime systolic variability was also independently associated with greater decline in total CAMCOG and MMSE scores over 5-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Increased BP variability is associated with poorer cognitive function in older people and may represent a novel modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability Increases Over a 10-Year Follow-Up in Community-Dwelling Older People

BACKGROUND

Greater ambulatory blood pressure variability (ABPV) is associated with end-organ damage and increased mortality. Age-related changes in the cardiovascular and autonomic nervous systems make age-associated increases in ABPV likely. Cross-sectional studies support this hypothesis, showing greater ABPV among older compared to younger adults. The only longitudinal study to examine changes in ABPV, however, found ABPV decreased over 5 years follow-up. This unexpected observation probably reflected the highly selected nature of the study participants.

METHODS

In this longitudinal study, we assessed changes in ABPV over 10 years in a community-cohort of older people. In addition, we examined the extent to which ABPV was predicted by demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and medication. Clinical examination and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were carried out at baseline and at 10 years follow-up in 83 people, median age 70 years. ABPV was calculated using SD and coefficient of variation (Cv). Three time periods were examined: daytime, nighttime, and 24 hours.

RESULTS

Daytime and 24-hour, systolic and diastolic, SD, and Cv were significantly greater at follow-up than at baseline (P < 0.001 in all cases). Mean BP did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Multilevel modeling showed follow-up interval had a significant, positive effect on SD and Cv (P < 0.004), independent of age, sex, and medication.ABPV increased over a 10-year follow-up despite stable mean BP. ABPV may therefore be an additional target for treatment in older people. Future studies should examine what degree of ABPV is harmful and if control of ABPV reduces adverse outcome.

Prevalence of resistant hypertension and associated factors for blood pressure control status with optimal medical therapy using Korean ambulatory blood pressure monitoring registry data

Background

Resistant hypertension (RH) may be one of the cause of the plateau in improving the control rate in hypertension (HT) management. The misdiagnosis of RH by clinic blood pressure (BP) is important clinical problem. Aim of the study were to investigate the prevalence of RH by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and the factor associated with control status of ambulatory BPs.

Methods

For 1230 subjects taking one or more antihypertensive medication (AHM) enrolled in the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (Kor-ABP) registry, the prevalence of RH was calculated which was defined as uncontrolled BP by three AHM classes including diuretic or BP in need of four or more AHM classes. The prevalence determined by clinic versus ambulatory BP was compared.

Results

The age was 59.3 ± 12.5 years, and 44.3 % were female (n = 1230). Among them 72 subjects were taking three AHM drugs including diuretics and 105 subjects were taking four or more AHM classes. With uncontrolled daytime ambulatory BP in 41 among 72 subjects, prevalence of RH was 11.9 % (146/1230). By using nighttime BP criteria, there was significant difference in the prevalence of RH for clinic versus nighttime BP (146/177 vs. 159/177, p = 0.0124). For control status of daytime BP, masked uncontrolled BP was 16.9 % and controlled BP with white-coat effect was 14.1 %. For nighttime BP control status, odd ratios for smoking (0.624), drinking (1.512), coronary artery disease (0.604), calcium antagonist (1.705), and loop diuretics (0.454) were all significant.

Conclusion

The prevalence itself was 11.9 % by daytime BP and it was significantly higher when using nighttime BP criteria. Control status of daytime BP was misclassified in 31.0 %. Smoking, drinking, coronary artery disease, calcium antagonist, and loop diuretics were associated with nighttime BP control status.

Discordance between ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure according to global cardiovascular risk group

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The detection of white coat hypertension (WCH), treated normalized hypertension, and masked hypertension (MH) is important to improve the effectiveness of hypertension management. However, whether global cardiovascular risk (GCR) profile has any effect on the discordance between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and clinic blood pressure (CBP) is unknown.

METHODS

Data from 1,916 subjects, taken from the Korean Multicenter Registry for ABP monitoring, were grouped according to diagnostic and therapeutic thresholds for CBP and ABP (140/90 and 135/85 mmHg, respectively). GCR was assessed using European Society of Hypertension 2007 guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean subject age was 54.1 ± 14.9 years, and 48.9% of patients were female. The discordancy rate between ABP and CBP in the untreated and treated patients was 32.5% and 26.5%, respectively (p = 0.02). The prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension and MH was 14.4% and 16.0%, respectively. Discordance between ABP and CBP was lower in the very high added-risk group compared to the moderate added-risk group (odds ratio [OR], 0.649; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.487 to 0.863; p = 0.003). The prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension was also lower in the very high added-risk group (OR, 0.451; 95% CI, 0.311 to 0.655).

CONCLUSIONS

Discordance between ABP and CBP was observed more frequently in untreated subjects than in treated subjects, and less frequently in the very high added-risk group, which was due mainly to the lower prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension.

Isolated increases in in-office pressure account for a significant proportion of nurse-derived blood pressure-target organ relations

AIMS

We determined the extent to which relationships between nurse-derived blood pressures (BPs) and cardiovascular damage may be attributed to isolated increases in in-office SBP independent of ambulatory BP.

METHODS

In 750 participants from a community sample, nurse-derived office BP, ambulatory BP, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV; applanation tonometry and SphygmoCor software; n=662), and left ventricular mass indexed to height (LVMI; echocardiography; n=463) were determined.

RESULTS

Nurse-derived office BP was associated with organ changes independent of 24-h BP (LVMI; partial r=0.15, P<0.005, PWV; partial r=0.21, P<0.0001) and day BP. However, in both unadjusted (P<0.0001 for both) and multivariate adjusted models (including adjustments for 24-h BP; LVMI; partial r=0.14, P<0.01, PWV; partial r=0.21, P<0.0001), nurse office-day SBP (an index of isolated increases in in-office BP) was associated with target organ changes independent of ambulatory BP and additional confounders, with the highest quartile (≥15 mmHg) showing the most marked increases in LVMI (P<0.0005) and PWV (P<0.0001) as compared to the lowest quartile (<-5 mmHg). These relationships were reproduced in those with normotensive day BP values and the quantitative effect of nurse office-day BP on target organ changes was at least equivalent to that of ambulatory BP.

CONCLUSION

Nurse-elicited isolated increases in in-office BP account for a significant proportion of the relationship between nurse-derived BP and target organ changes independent of ambulatory BP. Therefore, high quality nurse-derived BP measurements do not approximate the impact of BP effects per se on cardiovascular damage.

Reproducibility of blood pressure dipping: relation to day-to-day variability in sleep quality

Previous studies of the reproducibility of blood pressure (BP) dipping have yielded inconsistent results. Few have examined factors that may influence day-to-day differences in dipping. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed on three occasions, approximately 1 week apart, in 115 untreated adult subjects with elevated clinic BPs. The mean ± standard deviation BP dip was 18 ± 7/15 ± 5 mm Hg (sleep/awake BP ratio = 0.87 ± 0.05/0.82 ± 0.06), with a median (interquartile range) day-to-day variation of 5.2 (3.1-8.1)/4.3 (2.8-5.6) mm Hg. There was no decrease in variability with successive measurements. The reproducibility coefficient (5.6 [95% confidence interval, 5.1-6.1] mm Hg) was greater and the intraclass correlation coefficient (0.53 [95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.63]) was smaller for the systolic dip than for 24-hour or awake systolic BPs, suggesting greater day-to-day variability in dipping. Variability in systolic dipping was greater in subjects with higher awake BP, but was not related to age, gender, race, or body mass index. Within individuals, day-to-day variations in dipping were related to variations in the fragmentation index (P < .001), a measure of sleep quality. Although mean 24-hour and awake BPs were relatively stable over repeated monitoring days, our study confirms substantial variability in BP dipping. Day-to-day differences in dipping are related to sleep quality.

[Measurement of blood pressure in consultation and automated mesurement (BPTru(®)) to evaluate the white coat effect]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

White coat effect (WCE) is one of the main bias that can affect office blood pressure (BP) measurement. Therefore, it is a factor must be considered in hypertensives to avoid mistakes in diagnosis and/or treatment. Employment of automated office BP (AOBP) devices could diminish that effect.

METHODS

Two studies were designed with the objective of evaluating differences between routinely office and AOBP measurements. WCE was also assessed. First, the TRUE-ESP study included normotensive and hypertensive patients attending specialized consultations at Cardiology, Nephrology, Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Family Practice. Second, the TRUE-HTA study included hypertensives attending a protocoled Hypertension Unit, with a trained staff.

RESULTS

TRUE-ESP study included 300 patients, 76% being hypertensives. A significant difference between office BP and AOBP measurement (SBP/DBP 9.8±11.6/3.4±7.9 mmHg, P<.001) was observed. Percentage of patients gathering WCE criteria was 27.7%. TRUE-HTA study included 101 hypertensive patients. A significant difference between office BP and AOBP measurement (SBP/DBP 5.7±9.3/2.1±5.3 mmHg, P<.001) and activity period-ABPM (SBP/DBP 8.5±6.7/3.5±2.5 mmHg, P<.001) was observed. Percentage of WCE patients was 32.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of AOBP devices can contribute to decrease WCE and to improve accuracy of office BP measurement.

Comparing the effects of white coat hypertension and sustained hypertension on mortality in a UK primary care setting

PURPOSE

We examined all-cause mortality within a primary care setting in patients with white coat hypertension or sustained hypertension in whom blood pressure (BP) monitoring was indicated.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study of ambulatory BP monitoring included 48 family practices in the county of Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Mortality was compared for patients having white coat hypertension (mean of 3 clinic BP readings >140/90 mm Hg and daytime ambulatory readings< or =135/85 mm Hg) and patients having sustained hypertension (mean of 3 clinic readings >140/90 mm Hg and daytime ambulatory readings >135/85 mm Hg).

RESULTS

A routine primary care cohort consisting of 5,182 patients chosen to undergo ambulatory BP monitoring by their family physician was followed up for a median of 7.3 years (interquartile range, 5.8-8.9). There were 335 deaths (6.5%), corresponding to a mortality rate of 8.9 deaths (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-9.9) per 1,000 years of follow-up. Patients with white coat hypertension (n = 1,117) were more likely to be female and were on average younger than patients with sustained hypertension (n = 4,065). The unadjusted rate of all-cause mortality in patients with white coat hypertension was lower, at 4.4 deaths per 1,000 years of follow-up (95% CI, 3.1-6.0) than that in patients with sustained hypertension, at 10.2 deaths per 1,000 years of follow-up (95% CI, 9.1-11.4). This reduction in all-cause mortality was still clinically significant after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, use of antihypertensive medication, and practice-clustering effects (hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.97; P=.04).

CONCLUSIONS

White coat hypertension (elevation of clinic BP only) confers significantly less risk of death than sustained hypertension (elevation of both clinic and ambulatory BPs). Trials are now needed to evaluate the risk reduction achievable in patients who have white coat hypertension and are receiving BP-lowering therapy.

Initial and sustained cardiovascular risk reduction in a pharmacist-led diabetes cardiovascular risk clinic

Background

The atherogenic milieu of hypertension, hyperglycaemia and dyslipidaemia results in an excess of cardiovascular deaths in the diabetic population.

Objective

To determine the efficacy and long-term success of a pharmacist-delivered cardiovascular risk reduction clinic.

Methods

Patients with diabetes not achieving blood pressure (BP) and lipid targets at a standard diabetes clinic had a mean of four visits to the pharmacist-delivered clinic.

Results

BP was significantly reduced by attending the clinic (mean reduction in clinic BP 23/10 mmHg). Ambulatory BP monitoring demonstrated a mean reduction of 13/9 mmHg from clinic entry to discharge and this effect was sustained six months post-discharge .

Total cholesterol was reduced by 0.4 mmol/L (p=0.002) during clinic attendances and remained unchanged post discharge.

Conclusion

Patients previously thought to be `resistant' to treatment can have significant reductions in cardiovascular risk factors when enrolled in a short-lived, intense clinic set-up. This is maintained

Daytime and nighttime blood pressure as predictors of death and cause-specific cardiovascular events in hypertension

Our aim was to assess the prognostic significance of nighttime and daytime ambulatory blood pressure and their ratio for mortality and cause-specific cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients without major cardiovascular disease at baseline. We performed a meta-analysis on individual data of 3468 patients from 4 prospective studies performed in Europe. Age of the subjects averaged 61+/-13 years, 45% were men, 13.7% smoked, 8.4% had diabetes, and 61% were under antihypertensive treatment at the time of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Office, daytime, and nighttime blood pressure averaged 159+/-20/91+/-12, 143+/-17/87+/-12, and 130+/-18/75+/-12 mm Hg. Total follow-up amounted to 23 164 patient-years. We used multivariable Cox regression analysis to assess the hazard ratios associated with 1 standard deviation higher blood pressure. Daytime and nighttime systolic blood pressure predicted all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, coronary heart disease, and stroke, independently from office blood pressure and confounding variables. When these blood pressures were entered simultaneously into the models, nighttime blood pressure predicted all outcomes, whereas daytime blood pressure did not add prognostic precision to nighttime pressure. Appropriate interaction terms indicated that the results were similar in men and women, in younger and older patients, and in treated and untreated patients The systolic night-day blood pressure ratio predicted all outcomes, which only persisted for all-cause mortality after adjustment for 24-hour blood pressure. In conclusion, nighttime blood pressure is in general a better predictor of outcome than daytime pressure in hypertensive patients, and the night-day blood pressure ratio predicts mortality, even after adjustment for 24-hour blood pressure.