Association of the type of induction immunosuppression with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, graft survival, and patient survival after primary kidney transplantation

Genitourinary malignancies in kidney transplant recipients

Advances in immunosuppressive therapy and postoperative management have greatly improved the graft and patient survival rates after kidney transplantation; however, the incidence of post-transplant malignant tumors is increasing. Post-renal transplantation malignant tumors are associated with renal failure, immunosuppression, and viral infections. Moreover, the risk of developing cancer is higher in kidney transplant recipients than in the general population, and the tendency to develop cancer is affected by the background and environment of each patient. Recently, cancer after kidney transplantation has become the leading cause of death in Japan. Owing to the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of genitourinary malignancies, it is crucial to understand their epidemiology, risk factors, and best practices in kidney transplant recipients. This review has a special emphasis on the epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment protocols of genitourinary malignancies in kidney transplant recipients to enhance our understanding of the appropriate management strategies. Optimal immunosuppressive therapy and cancer management for these patients remain controversial, but adherence to the general guidelines is recommended.

Basiliximab induction alone vs a dual ATG-basiliximab approach in first live-donor non-sensitized kidney transplant recipients with low HLA matching

Background

Individualizing induction therapy based on immunological risk is crucial for optimizing outcomes in kidney transplantation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis included 157 first live-donor non-sensitized kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Within this cohort, 96 individuals exhibited low human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching (5-6 HLA mismatches). The low HLA match subgroup was categorized into 52 KTRs receiving basiliximab alone and 44 recipients treated with a combined single ATG dose of 1.5 mg/kg and basiliximab. The primary endpoint was early acute cellular rejection (ACR) within 6 months post-transplant while secondary outcomes encompassed infection rates, renal allograft function, length of stay (LOS) and readmissions post-transplant.

Results

The incidence of early ACR was decreased for low HLA match KTRs, who received ATG-basiliximab, when compared with low HLA-matched KTRs who received basiliximab alone (9.1% vs 23.9%, P = .067). Age was a predictor for rejection, and subgroup analysis showed consistent rejection reduction across age groups. No significant differences were observed in admission for transplant LOS or in peri-operative complications, nor in infections rate including BK and cytomegalovirus viremia, allograft function and number of readmissions post-transplant up to 6 months post-transplant.

Conclusion

In non-sensitized first live-donor KTRs with low HLA matching, a dual ATG-basiliximab induction approach significantly reduced early ACR without compromising safety.

Post-Kidney Transplant Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis From a Single Italian Center

We describe the epidemiology of cancer after kidney transplantation (KTx), investigating its risk factors and impact on therapeutic management and survival in KTx recipients (KTRs). The association between modification of immunosuppressive (IS) therapy after cancer and survival outcomes was analyzed. We collected data from 930 KTRs followed for 7 [1-19] years. The majority of KTRs received KTx from a deceased donor (84%). In total, 74% of patients received induction therapy with basiliximab and 26% with ATG. Maintenance therapy included steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and mycophenolate. Patients with at least one cancer (CA+) amounted to 19%. NMSC was the most common tumor (55%). CA+ were older and had a higher BMI. Vasculitis and ADPKD were more prevalent in CA+. ATG was independently associated with CA+ and was related to earlier cancer development in survival and competing risk analyses (p = 0.01 and <0.0001; basiliximab 89 ± 4 vs. ATG 40 ± 4 months). After cancer diagnosis, a significant prognostic impact was derived from the shift to mTOR inhibitors compared to a definitive IS drug suspension (p = 0.004). Our data confirm the relevance of cancer as a complication in KTRs with ATG as an independent risk factor. An individualized choice of IS to be proposed at the time of KTx is crucial in the prevention of neoplastic risk. Finally, switching to mTORi could represent an important strategy to improve patient survival.

The impact of induction therapy on the risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in adult kidney transplant recipients with donor-recipient serological Epstein-Barr virus mismatch

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) poses a significant concern in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative patients transplanted from EBV-positive donors (EBV R-/D+). Previous studies investigating the association between different induction agents and PTLD in these patients have yielded conflicting results. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database, we identified EBV R-/D+ patients >18 years of age who underwent kidney-alone transplants between 2016 and 2022 and compared the risk of PTLD with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG), basiliximab, and alemtuzumab inductions. Among the 6620 patients included, 64.0% received ATG, 23.4% received basiliximab, and 12.6% received alemtuzumab. The overall incidence of PTLD was 2.5% over a median follow-up period of 2.9 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the risk of PTLD was significantly higher with ATG and alemtuzumab compared with basiliximab (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-3.04, P = .002 for ATG and aSHR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.04-3.11, P = .04 for alemtuzumab). However, PTLD risk was comparable between ATG and alemtuzumab inductions (aSHR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.72-1.77, P = .61). Therefore, the risk of PTLD must be taken into consideration when selecting the most appropriate induction therapy for this patient population.

Efficacy and safety of single-dose anti-thymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (BAS) versus a single dose of anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study included all pediatric KTRs from May 2013 to April 2018 and followed up to 12 months. In the first period, all recipients received BAS, while from May 2016, a single 3 mg/kg dose of r-ATG was instituted. Maintenance therapy consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor plus prednisone plus azathioprine or mycophenolate.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients were included (BAS, n = 113; r-ATG, n = 114). The main combination of immunosuppressive drugs was tacrolimus, prednisone, and azathioprine in both groups (87% vs. 88%, p = .718). Patients receiving r-ATG showed superior survival-free of the composite endpoint (acute rejection, graft loss, or death; 76% vs. 61%, p = .003; HR 2.08, 1.29-3.34, p = .003) and lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (10% vs. 21%, p = .015). There was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV infection (33% vs. 37%, p = .457), PTLD (1% vs. 3%, p = .309), 30-day hospital readmissions (24% vs. 23%, p = .847), and kidney function at 12 months (86 ± 29 vs. 84 ± 30 mL/min/1.73m2, p = .614).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that induction therapy with a single 3 mg/kg dose of r-ATG is associated with higher efficacy for preventing acute rejection and similar safety profile compared to BAS.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of De Novo Malignancy following Kidney Transplantation

Introduction: Post-transplant malignancy is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following kidney transplantation often emerging after medium- to long-term follow-up. To understand the risk factors for the development of de novo post-transplant malignancy (DPTM), this study aimed to assess the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of DPTM at a single nephrology centre over two decades. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 963 kidney transplant recipients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2000 and December 2020 and followed up over a median follow-up of 7.1 years (IQR 3.9-11.4). Cox regression models were used to identify the significant risk factors of DPTM development, the association of DPTM with graft survival, and mortality with a functioning graft. Results: In total, 8.1% of transplant recipients developed DPTM, and the DPTM incidence rate was 14.7 per 100 patient-years. There was a higher mean age observed in the DPTM group (53 vs. 47 years, p < 0.001). The most affected organ systems were genitourinary (32.1%), gastrointestinal (24.4%), and lymphoproliferative (20.5%). Multivariate Cox analysis identified older age at transplant (aHR 9.51, 95%CI: 2.60-34.87, p < 0.001) and pre-existing glomerulonephritis (aHR 3.27, 95%CI: 1.10-9.77, p = 0.03) as significant risk factors for DPTM. Older age was significantly associated with poorer graft survival (aHR 8.71, 95%CI: 3.77-20.20, p < 0.001). When age was excluded from the multivariate Cox model, DPTM emerged as a significant risk factor for poor survival (aHR 1.76, 95%CI: 1.17-2.63, p = 0.006). Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for tailored screening, prevention, and management strategies to address DPTM in an aging and immunosuppressed kidney transplant population.

Epidemiology of Cancer in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney transplantation is the ideal treatment modality for patients with end-stage kidney disease, with excellent outcomes post-transplant compared with dialysis. However, kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of infections and cancer because of the need for immunosuppression. Kidney transplant recipients have approximately two to three times greater risk of developing cancer than the general population, and cancer is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Most of the increased risk is driven by viral-mediated cancers such as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, anogenital cancers, and Kaposi sarcoma. Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in kidney transplant recipients, likely due to an interaction between ultraviolet radiation exposure and decreased immune surveillance. Occurrence of the more common types of solid organ cancers seen in the general population, such as breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers, is not, or is only mildly, increased post-transplant. Clinical care and future research should focus on prevention and on improving outcomes for important immunosuppression-related malignancies, and treatment options for other cancers occurring in the transplant setting.

Herpes Virus Infection in Lung Transplantation: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention Strategies

Lung transplantation is an ultimate treatment option for some end-stage lung diseases; due to the intense immunosuppression needed to reduce the risk of developing acute and chronic allograft failure, infectious complications are highly incident. Viral infections represent nearly 30% of all infectious complications, with herpes viruses playing an important role in the development of acute and chronic diseases. Among them, cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, being associated with an increased risk of chronic lung allograft failure. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with transformation of infected B cells with the development of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs). Similarly, herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella zoster virus and human herpesviruses 6 and 7 can also be responsible for acute manifestations in lung transplant patients. During these last years, new, highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tests have been developed, and preventive and prophylactic strategies have been studied aiming to reduce and prevent the incidence of these viral infections. In this narrative review, we explore epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment options for more frequent herpes virus infections in lung transplant patients.

Case Report: Non-negligible Epstein-Barr virus-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in a lung transplant recipient

Background

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are uncommon but serious complications in patients following solid organ transplantation. Primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a risk factor for the development of PTLD, especially early-onset PTLD, in EBV-negative recipients. To date, however, there are no specific guidelines on the threshold of EBV-DNA load for therapeutic intervention, the source for measurement (e.g., blood, bronchoalveolar fluid), or the use of antiviral agents as prophylaxis for early PTLD prevention in EBV-mismatched patients.

Methods

The present study describes a 56-year-old male lung transplant recipient diagnosed with EBV-associated PTLD.

Results

This patient had a history of invasive fungal disease and Mucor and Aspergillus fumigatus infections in the early post-transplant period, necessitating antifungal therapy throughout the course of the disease. The patient was EBV-positive 15 days after transplantation, with lung CT showing multiple bilateral nodules of varying sizes beginning 98 days after transplantation. A lung biopsy showed PTLD, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed EBV. This patient, however, did not receive any antiviral therapy for early PTLD prevention or any PTLD-related treatment. He died 204 days after lung transplantation.

Conclusion

The present study describes a lung transplant recipient who developed EBV-associated PTLD, a non-negligible disease, after solid organ transplantation. Monitoring EBV-DNA load is important, as a sudden increase may be a sensitive indicator of PTLD. An earlier diagnosis may increase the likelihood of successful treatment.

Second Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Dialysis Dependent Recipients by Induction Type in the United States

BACKGROUND

We examined the association between induction type for a second kidney transplant in dialysis-dependent recipients and the long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all second kidney transplant recipients who returned to dialysis before re-transplantation. Exclusion criteria included: missing, unusual, or no-induction regimens, maintenance regimens other than tacrolimus and mycophenolate, and positive crossmatch status. We grouped recipients by induction type into 3 groups: the anti-thymocyte group (N = 9899), the alemtuzumab group (N = 1982), and the interleukin 2 receptor antagonist group (N = 1904). We analyzed recipient and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) using the Kaplan-Meier survival function with follow-up censored at 10 years post-transplant. We used Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between induction and the outcomes of interest. To account for the center-specific effect, we included the center as a random effect. We adjusted the models for the pertinent recipient and organ variables.

RESULTS

In the Kaplan-Meier analyses, induction type did not alter recipient survival (log-rank P = .419) or DCGS (log-rank P = .146). Similarly, in the adjusted models, induction type was not a predictor of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys were associated with better recipient survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI [0.65, 0.83], P < .001) and graft survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI [0.64, 0.82], P < .001). Publicly insured recipients had worse recipient and allograft outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of average immunologic-risk dialysis-dependent second kidney transplant recipients, who were discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance, induction type did not influence the long-term outcomes of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys improved recipient and graft survival.

Association between Immunosuppressive Therapy Utilized in the Treatment of Autoimmune Disease or Transplant and Cancer Progression

Autoimmunity and cancer rates have both been on the rise in Western civilization prompting many to investigate the link between the two entities. This review will investigate the complex interactions between the activation and deactivation of the immune system and the development of malignancy. Additional focus will be placed on the main classes of immune inhibitor therapy utilized in transplant patients and in autoimmune disease including TNF-alpha, Calcineurin, mTOR, purine synthesis antagonists and IMPDH inhibitors.

Pediatric Onco-Nephrology: Time to Spread the Word-Part II: Long-Term Kidney Outcomes in Survivors of Childhood Malignancy and Malignancy after Kidney Transplant

Onco-nephrology is a recent and evolving medical subspecialty devoted to the care of patients with kidney disease and unique kidney-related complications in the context of cancer and its treatments, recognizing that management of kidney disease as well as the cancer itself will improve survival and quality of life. While this area has received much attention in the adult medicine sphere, similar emphasis in the pediatric realm has not yet been realized. As in adults, kidney involvement in children with cancer extends beyond the time of initial diagnosis and treatment. Many interventions, such as chemotherapy, stem cell transplant, radiation, and nephrectomy, have long-term kidney effects, including the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with subsequent need for dialysis and/or kidney transplant. Thus, with the improved survival of children with malignancy comes the need for ongoing monitoring of kidney function and early mitigation of kidney-related comorbidities. In addition, children with kidney transplant are at higher risk of developing malignancies than their age-matched peers. Pediatric nephrologists thus need to be aware of issues related to cancer and its treatments as they impact their own patients. These facts emphasize the necessity of pediatric nephrologists and oncologists working closely together in managing these children and highlight the importance of bringing the onco-nephrology field to our growing list of pediatric nephrology subspecialties.

Use of Machine Learning Consensus Clustering to Identify Distinct Subtypes of Black Kidney Transplant Recipients and Associated Outcomes

Importance

Among kidney transplant recipients, Black patients continue to have worse graft function and reduced patient and graft survival. Better understanding of different phenotypes and subgroups of Black kidney transplant recipients may help the transplant community to identify individualized strategies to improve outcomes among these vulnerable groups.

Objective

To cluster Black kidney transplant recipients in the US using an unsupervised machine learning approach.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study performed consensus cluster analysis based on recipient-, donor-, and transplant-related characteristics in Black kidney transplant recipients in the US from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. Each cluster's key characteristics were identified using the standardized mean difference, and subsequently the posttransplant outcomes were compared among the clusters. Data were analyzed from June 9 to July 17, 2021.

Exposure

Machine learning consensus clustering approach.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Death-censored graft failure, patient death within 3 years after kidney transplant, and allograft rejection within 1 year after kidney transplant.

Results

Consensus cluster analysis was performed for 22 687 Black kidney transplant recipients (mean [SD] age, 51.4 [12.6] years; 13 635 men [60%]), and 4 distinct clusters that best represented their clinical characteristics were identified. Cluster 1 was characterized by highly sensitized recipients of deceased donor kidney retransplants; cluster 2, by recipients of living donor kidney transplants with no or short prior dialysis; cluster 3, by young recipients with hypertension and without diabetes who received young deceased donor transplants with low kidney donor profile index scores; and cluster 4, by older recipients with diabetes who received kidneys from older donors with high kidney donor profile index scores and extended criteria donors. Cluster 2 had the most favorable outcomes in terms of death-censored graft failure, patient death, and allograft rejection. Compared with cluster 2, all other clusters had a higher risk of death-censored graft failure and death. Higher risk for rejection was found in clusters 1 and 3, but not cluster 4.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study using an unsupervised machine learning approach, the identification of clinically distinct clusters among Black kidney transplant recipients underscores the need for individualized care strategies to improve outcomes among vulnerable patient groups.

Transplant Onconephrology in Patients With Kidney Transplants

Cancer is a leading cause of death in patients with kidney transplantation. Patients with kidney transplants are 10- to 200-times more likely to develop cancers after transplant than the general population, depending on the cancer type. Recent advances in cancer therapies have dramatically improved survival outcomes; however, patients with kidney transplants face unique challenges of immunosuppression management, cancer screening, and recurrence of cancer after transplant. Patients with a history of cancer tend to be excluded from transplant candidacy or are required to have long cancer-free wait time before wait-listing. The strategy of pretransplant wait time management may need to be revisited as cancer therapies improve, which is most applicable to patients with a history of multiple myeloma. In this review, we discuss several important topics in transplant onconephrology: the current recommendations for pretransplant wait times for transplant candidates with cancer histories, cancer screening post-transplant, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, strategies for transplant patients with a history of multiple myeloma, and novel therapies for patients with post-transplant malignancies. With emerging novel cancer treatments, it is critical to have multidisciplinary discussions involving patients, caregivers, transplant nephrologists, and oncologists to achieve patient-oriented goals.

De Novo Malignancies after Kidney Transplantation

Cancer is an important outcome after kidney transplantation because it is the second leading cause of death in most Western countries. The excess risk of cancer after transplantation is approximately two to three times higher than the age- and sex-matched general population, driven largely by viral- and immune-related cancers. Once cancer develops, outcomes are generally poor, particularly for those with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. More importantly, effective screening and treatment strategies are limited in this high-risk population. In this review, we begin with a patient's journey that maps the experience of living with a kidney transplant and understand the patient's knowledge, education, and experience of cancer in the context of transplantation. The epidemiology and burden of cancer in recipients of kidney transplants, along with the up-to-date screening and treatment strategies, are discussed. We also focus on the current understanding of optimal care for recipients of kidney transplants who are living with cancer from the patients' perspectives.

Induction and maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplantation-Advances and controversies

Advances in immunosuppression have improved graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant recipients; however, treatment-related toxicities need to be balanced against the possibility of graft rejection. Several immunosuppressive agents are available for use in transplant recipients; however, the optimal combinations of agents remain unclear, resulting in variations in institutional protocols. Lymphocyte-depleting antibodies, specifically ATG, are the most common induction agent used for pediatric kidney transplantation in the US. Basiliximab may be used for induction in immunologically low-risk children; however, pediatric data are scarce. CNIs and antiproliferative agents (mostly Tac and mycophenolate in recent years) constitute the backbone of maintenance immunosuppression. Steroid-avoidance maintenance regimens remain controversial. Belatacept and mTOR inhibitors are used in children under specific circumstances such as non-adherence or CNI toxicity. This article reviews the indications, mechanism of action, efficacy, dosing, and side effect profiles of various immunosuppressive agents available for pediatric kidney transplantation.

Liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association consensus guidelines

Colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease worldwide, with more than 50% of patients developing metastases to the liver. Despite advances in improving resectability, most patients present with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases requiring palliative systemic therapy and locoregional disease control strategies. There is a growing interest in the use of liver transplantation to treat non-resectable colorectal liver metastases in well selected patients, leading to a surge in the number of studies and prospective trials worldwide, thereby fuelling the emerging field of transplant oncology. The interdisciplinary nature of this field requires domain-specific evidence and expertise to be drawn from multiple clinical specialities and the basic sciences. Importantly, the wider societal implication of liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases, such as the effect on the allocation of resources and national transplant waitlists, should be considered. To address the urgent need for a consensus approach, the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association commissioned the Liver Transplantation for Colorectal liver Metastases 2021 working group, consisting of international leaders in the areas of hepatobiliary surgery, colorectal oncology, liver transplantation, hepatology, and bioethics. The aim of this study was to standardise nomenclature and define management principles in five key domains: patient selection, evaluation of biological behaviour, graft selection, recipient considerations, and outcomes. An extensive literature review was done within the five domains identified. Between November, 2020, and January, 2021, a three-step modified Delphi consensus process was undertaken by the workgroup, who were further subgrouped into the Scientific Committee, Expert Panel, and Transplant Centre Representatives. A final consensus of 44 statements, standardised nomenclature, and a practical management algorithm is presented. Specific criteria for clinico-patho-radiological assessments with molecular profiling is crucial in this setting. After this, the careful evaluation of biological behaviour with bridging therapy to transplantation with an appropriate assessment of the response is required. The sequencing of treatment in synchronous metastatic disease requires special consideration and is highlighted here. Some ethical dilemmas within organ allocation for malignant indications are discussed and the role for extended criteria grafts, living donor transplantation, and machine perfusion technologies for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases are reviewed. Appropriate immunosuppressive regimens and strategies for the follow-up and treatment of recurrent disease are proposed. This consensus guideline provides a framework by which liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases might be safely instituted and is a meaningful step towards future evidenced-based practice for better patient selection and organ allocation to improve the survival for patients with this disease.

Malignancy: An Adverse Effect of Immunosuppression

Benefits of solid organ transplantation in end stage organ diseases are indisputable. Malignancy is a feared complication of solid organ transplantation and is a leading cause of mortality in patients with organ transplantation. Iatrogenic immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection plays a crucial role in the cancer development in solid organ transplant recipients. Chronic exposure to immunosuppression increases the malignancy burden through deregulation of host immune defense mechanisms and unchecked proliferation of oncogenic viruses and malignancies associated with these viruses. Vigorous screening of candidates undergoing transplant evaluation for malignancies, careful assessment of donors, and vigilant monitoring of transplant recipients are necessary to prevent, detect, and manage this life-threatening complication.

Mycophenolic acid and cancer risk in solid organ transplant recipients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunosuppressive drug commonly used for prophylaxis of graft rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. The main concern with the prolonged use of immunosuppressive drugs is the risk of developing cancer. However, it remains unclear whether the immunosuppressive regimens containing MPA confer an increased degree of cancer risk. The present study aimed to determine the association between MPA exposure and the incidence of cancer in solid organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Relevant articles that had findings on the incidence (or event) of cancer in cohorts with and without MPA exposure were retrieved for data extraction. A meta-analysis was conducted by means of the random-effects model, and the relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used as a summary effect measure.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies were eligible for inclusion, with 32 studies that enabled meta-analysis. MPA exposure was significantly associated with a lower risk of cancer when compared to azathioprine exposure (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.53-0.81, P < .001) or no exposure to any additional treatments (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.73-0.99, P = .04). There was no significant difference in cancer risk for the comparison between MPA exposure and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor exposure (RR = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.96-2.46, P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

MPA exposure was not associated with an increased risk of cancer and may even be associated with a lower risk of cancer when compared to azathioprine or no treatment.

Managing immunosuppressive therapy in potentially cured post-kidney transplant cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer): overview of the available evidence and guidance for shared decision making

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have increased incidence of de novo cancers. After having undergone treatment for cancer with curative intent, reducing the overall immunosuppressive load and/or switching to an alternative drug regimen may potentially be of great benefit to avoid cancer recurrence, but should be balanced against the risks of rejection and/or severe adverse events. The TLJ (Transplant Learning Journey) project is an initiative from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). This article reports a systematic literature search undertaken by TLJ Workstream 3 to answer the questions: (1) Should we decrease the overall anti‐rejection therapy in potentially cured post‐kidney transplant cancer (excluding non‐melanoma skin cancer)? (2) Should we switch to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) in potentially cured post‐kidney transplant cancer (excluding non‐melanoma skin cancer)? The literature search revealed insufficient solid data on which to base recommendations, so this review additionally presents an extensive overview of the indirect evidence on the benefits versus risks of alterations in immunosuppressive medication. We hope this summary will help transplant physicians advise KTRs on how best to continue with anti‐rejection therapy after receiving cancer treatment with curative intent, and aid shared decision‐making, ensuring that patient preferences are taken into account.

Heterogeneous Manifestations of Posttransplant Lymphoma in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Case Series

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurs in 1% to 3% of adult renal transplant recipients (RTRs). PTLD has a heterogeneous presentation and is often associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and immunosuppression. We present a descriptive case series of 16 RTRs who demonstrate a variety of PTLD manifestations. Fifty-six percent received rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction, and 37.5% received basiliximab. Maintenance immunosuppression included glucocorticoids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Median time from transplantation to PTLD diagnosis was 96.5 months. PTLD involved a single site in 44% of RTRs and multiple sites in 56%. PTLD was localized to the gastrointestinal tract in 9 RTRs, in lymph nodes in 9, central nervous system in 4, bone marrow in 3, skin in 3, lungs in 2, perinephric space in 2, mediastinum in 1, and native kidney in 1. PTLD was EBV positive in 8 RTRs, monomorphic/monoclonal in 14, and of B-cell lineage in 13. Three RTRs had T-cell PTLD. Immunosuppressive agents, except glucocorticoids, were discontinued at diagnosis. Treatment was chemotherapy either alone (in 14 RTRs) or in combination with radiation. Complete remission was achieved in 62.5% of RTRs. Renal dysfunction developed in 62.5% of RTRs, and 4 received dialysis. The overall mortality rate was 62.5%, with median time of death 6.5 months after diagnosis. PTLD that was EBV negative and had T-cell involvement presented with aggressive disease and a higher mortality. Clinicians should be aware of the various PTLD manifestations. Early diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment is crucial for improved patient outcomes.

Rapamycin Inhibitors for Eye Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Renal Transplantation: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

The immunosuppressive efficiency obtained in the last decades in kidney transplantation significantly improved graft survival. However, there is still a high risk and incidence of cancer in transplant patients strongly and directly related to the type of immunosuppression. An increasing body of evidence suggests that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway may play a pivotal role in the development and progression of several neoplastic diseases.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a 47-year-old male patient who received a cadaveric primary renal transplant in November 2008 developing a poorly differentiated infiltrating and ulcerated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at the eye level. In this patient, the modification of an immunosuppressive regimen with introduction of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) led to the resolution of this severe condition.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of mTOR inhibitors and withdrawal of CNIs in kidney-transplanted patients with de novo eye SCC should be considered in this clinical setting.

Reuse of Molecules for Glioblastoma Therapy

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly malignant primary brain tumor. The current standard of care for GBM is the Stupp protocol which includes surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy concomitant with the DNA alkylator temozolomide; however, survival under this treatment regimen is an abysmal 12-18 months. New and emerging treatments include the application of a physical device, non-invasive 'tumor treating fields' (TTFs), including its concomitant use with standard of care; and varied vaccines and immunotherapeutics being trialed. Some of these approaches have extended life by a few months over standard of care, but in some cases are only available for a minority of GBM patients. Extensive activity is also underway to repurpose and reposition therapeutics for GBM, either alone or in combination with the standard of care. In this review, we present select molecules that target different pathways and are at various stages of clinical translation as case studies to illustrate the rationale for their repurposing-repositioning and potential clinical use.

Induction immunosuppression and the risk of incident malignancies among older and younger kidney transplant recipients: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Older (≥65) KT recipients differ from their younger counterparts in their immune response to immunosuppression (IS) and may have a different risk of malignancy after receiving induction.

METHODS

We identified 66 700 adult KT recipients treated with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (n = 40 443) or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) (n = 26 327) induction (1/1/1999-12/31/2014) using USRDS/Medicare data. We estimated the risk of first-diagnosed post-KT malignancy associated with induction (ATG vs. IL-2RA) using Cox proportional hazard models. We then tested whether these risks differed between older and younger recipients (Wald test for interaction). Models incorporated inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

The 3-year cumulative incidences of any diagnosed malignancy were 11.5%. ATG was associated with a higher malignancy risk (HR = 1.12, 95%CI:1.06-1.18). This association differed (p_interaction  = 0.04) between younger (HR = 1.12, 95%CI:1.06-1.18) and older recipients (HR = 1.03, 95%CI:0.96-1.09). ATG was also associated with higher risk of skin (HR = 1.18, 95%CI:1.08-1.29), lung (HR = 1.24, 95%CI:1.05-1.47), and ovary malignancies (HR = 1.94, 95%CI:1.08-3.48). However, only the association of ATG with post-KT skin malignancy differed (p_interaction  = 0.01) between younger (HR = 1.18; 95%CI:1.08-1.29) and older (HR = 1.01; 95%CI:0.93-1.09) recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with IL-2RA induction, ATG was associated with elevated post-KT malignancy risk but only among younger recipients. Transplant centers may need to tailor induction IS for younger recipients to mitigate malignancy risk.

Induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients: Description of the practices according to the calendar period from the French multicentric DIVAT cohort

Background

There is extensive literature with comparisons between Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) and Basiliximab (BSX) as induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients. The purpose of our benchmarking study was to describe the consequences in terms of practices in 6 transplantation centers of a French prospective cohort.

Methods

We included adult patients who received a first or second kidney graft between 2013 and 2019 (n = 4157). We used logistic regressions to identify characteristics associated with the use of ATG or BSX.

Results

Use of ATG between the centers ranged from 41% to 75%. We observed different factors associated with the treatment decision. Compared to a first transplant, performing a second graft was the only factor significantly associated with the choice of ATG in all centers. The AUC ranged from 0.67 to 0.91, indicating that the centers seemed to define their own rules. As a result, for patients with the same low immunological risk, the probability of receiving ATG varied from 7% to 36%. We stratified the analyses according to two periods, from 2013 to 2015 and from 2016 to 2019. A similar heterogeneity was observed, and in some cases ATG indications between the centers were inverted.

Conclusions

The heterogeneity of induction therapy practices did not decrease in France, even if the reated literature is prolific. This illustrates the necessity to improve the literature by using meta-analyses of recent studies stratified by graft and patient profiles.

A Comparison of Immunosuppression Regimens in Hand, Face, and Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Authors have speculated that vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) recipients may require greater maintenance immunosuppression than solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients due to the higher antigenicity of skin. However, detailed comparisons of VCA and SOT immunosuppression regimens have been limited.

METHODS

Hand and face VCA recipient immunosuppression data were collected through a systematic literature review. Kidney recipient data were obtained through a retrospective chart review of the authors' institution. Prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) doses were compared between VCA and kidney recipients at predefined follow-up intervals (<1, 1-5, and >5 y). Tacrolimus target trough levels (TTTL) were compared at follow-up intervals of 1-5 and >5 y, and stratified into our institution's kidney transplant risk-based target ranges (4-6 ng/mL, 6-8 ng/mL) or higher (>8 ng/mL).

RESULTS

Immunosuppression data were available for 57 VCA and 98 kidney recipients. There were no significant differences in prednisone doses between groups at all follow-up intervals. VCA recipient mean MMF dose was significantly greater at <1-y (1.71 ± 0.58 versus 1.16 ± 0.55 gm/d; P = 0.01). For VCA recipients, there was a significant difference (P = 0.02) in TTTL distribution over the three predefined therapeutic ranges (4-6 ng/mL, 6-8 ng/mL, and >8 ng/mL) between 1 and 5 y (24.0%, 20.0%, 56.0%, respectively) and >5 y (28.6%, 42.9%, 28.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

At longer follow-up, VCA and kidney recipients receive comparable MMF/prednisone doses, and most VCA recipients are treated with TTTL similar to kidney recipients. Further research may improve our understanding of VCA's complex risk/benefit ratio, and enhance informed consent.

Practical recommendations for kidney transplantation in the COVID-19 pandemic

Kidney transplantation at the time of a global viral pandemic has become challenging in many aspects. Firstly, we must reassess deceased donor safety (for the recipient) especially in communities with a relatively high incidence of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). With respect to elective live donors, if one decides to do them at all, similar considerations must be made that may impose undue hardship on the donor. Recipient selection is also problematic since there is clear evidence of a much higher morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 for patients older than 60 and those with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity and lung disease. Unfortunately, many, if not most of dialysis patients fit that mold. We may and indeed must reassess our allocation policies, but this must be done based on data rather than conjecture. Follow-up routines must be re-engineered to minimize patient travel and exposure. Reliance on technology and telemedicine is paramount. Making this technology available to patients is extremely important. Modifying or changing immunosuppression protocols is controversial and not based on clinical studies. Nevertheless, we should reassess the need for induction therapy across the board for ordinary patients and the more liberal use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in transplant patients with proven infection.

Relationship between rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and development of PTLD and its aggressive form in renal transplant population

Introduction

The aim of our study is to explore the relationship of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (R-ATG) on development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) and its aggressive forms (monomorphic PTLD and Hodgkin lymphoma) in renal transplant recipients.

Methodology

All patients diagnosed with PTLD post-renal transplant in the United States’ Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network from 2003 till 2013 and followed up till 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Multi-variable logistic regression analysis assessed association of R-ATG to development of PTLD and its aggressive form.

Results

Risk of developing PTLD post renal transplant is 1.35%. In comparison to interleukin-2 blocker induction therapy, R-ATG is associated with increased risk of development of PTLD (Odds Ratio = 1.48, confidence interval ranges from 1.04 to 2.11, p = .02) and is associated with higher risk of development of aggressive PTLD (Odds Ratio = 1.83, confidence interval ranges from 1.001 to 3.34, p = .04).

Conclusion

We conclude that R-ATG induction is associated with a higher risk of PTLD and its aggressive form (monomorphic PTLD and Hodgkin lymphoma). Careful monitoring for development of PTLD in renal transplant recipients receiving R-ATG induction therapy is advised.

The FcγRIIIA-158 VV genotype increased the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in T-cell-depleted kidney transplant recipients - a retrospective study

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a severe complication in organ transplant recipients. The use of T lymphocyte-depleting antibodies (TLDAb), especially rabbit TLDAb, contributes to PTLD, and the V158F polymorphism of Fc gamma receptor IIIA (FcγRIIIA) also named CD16A could affect the concentration-effect relationship of TLDAb. We therefore investigated the association of this polymorphism with PTLD in kidney transplant recipients. We characterized the V158F polymorphism in two case-control cohorts (discovery, n = 196; validation, n = 222). Then, we evaluated the binding of rabbit IgG to human FcγRIIIA-158V and FcγRIIIA-158F. The V158F polymorphism was not linked to PTLD in the overall cohorts, but risk of PTLD was increased in VV homozygous recipients receiving TLDAb compared with F carriers in both cohorts, especially in recipients receiving TLDAb without muromonab (discovery: HR = 2.22 [1.03-4.76], P = 0.043, validation: HR = 1.75 [1.01-3.13], P = 0.049). In vitro, we found that the binding of rabbit IgG to human NK-cell FcγRIIIA was increased when cells expressed the 158-V versus the 158-F allotype. While the 158-V allotype of human FcγRIIIA binds rabbit immunoglobulin-G with higher affinity, the risk of PTLD was increased in homozygous VV kidney transplant recipients receiving polyclonal TLDAb.

Interleukin-27 is a potential marker for the onset of post-transplant malignancies

Background

Malignancies represent the third leading cause of post-transplant mortality worldwide. The main challenge for transplant physicians is a timely diagnosis of this condition. The aim of the study was to identify a soluble diagnostic marker for monitoring the development of post-transplant malignancies.

Methods

This is a multicentre, observational, perspective, case-control study. We enrolled 47 patients with post-transplant solid neoplasia. As a control group we employed 106 transplant recipients without a history of neoplasia and matched them with cases for the main demographic and clinical features. We investigated the transcriptomic profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from kidney graft recipients with and without post-transplant malignancies enrolled in two of the participating centres, randomly selected from the whole study population. Microarray results were confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the remaining patients from the same transplant centres and validated in a further independent group enrolled in two different transplant centres.

Results

We identified 535 differentially expressed genes comparing patients with and without post-transplant malignancies (fold change ≥2.5; false discovery rate <5%). The cancer pathway was closely related to gene expression data, and one of the most down-regulated genes in this pathway was interleukin-27 (IL-27), a cytokine regulating anti-tumour immunity. Quantitative PCR and ELISA confirmed the microarray data. Interestingly, IL-27 plasma levels were able to discriminate patients with post-transplant neoplasia with a specificity of 80% and a sensitivity of 81%. This observation was confirmed in an independent set of patients from two different transplant centres.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that IL-27 may represent a potential immunological marker for the timely identification of post-transplant neoplasia.

Immunologic Risk Assessment and Approach to Immunosuppression Regimen in Kidney Transplantation

The outcomes of kidney transplantation show a steady improvement with an increasing number of transplantations and decreasing incidence of acute rejection episodes. Successful transplantation begins with a comprehensive immunologic risk assessment and judicious choice of therapeutic agents. In this review, we discuss the trends in transplant immunosuppression practices and outcomes in the United States. We discuss practical testing algorithms for clinical decision making in induction therapy and fine-tuning maintenance immunosuppression. We introduce assessment tools for immune monitoring after transplantation and speculate on future directions in management.

Incidence and predictors of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease after kidney transplantation during adulthood and childhood: a registry study

Background

Differences in the epidemiology of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) between adult and paediatric kidney transplant recipients remain unclear.

Methods

Using the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (1963-2015), the cumulative incidences of PTLD in children (age <20 years) and adults were calculated using a competing risk of death model and compared with age-matched population-based data using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Risk factors for PTLD were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Among 23 477 patients (92% adult, 60% male), 505 developed PTLD, with 50 (10%) occurring in childhood recipients. The 25-year cumulative incidence of PTLD was 3.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.6] for adult recipients and 3.6% (95% CI 2.7-4.8) for childhood recipients. Childhood recipients had a 30-fold increased risk of lymphoma compared with the age-matched general population [SIR 29.5 (95% CI 21.9-38.8)], higher than adult recipients [SIR 8.4 (95% CI 7.7-9.2)]. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative recipient serology [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.33 (95% CI 2.21-5.01), P < 0.001], year of transplantation [aHR 0.93 for each year after the year 2000 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), P = 0.02], induction with an agent other than anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody [aHR 2.07 (95% CI 1.16-3.70), P = 0.01] and having diabetes [aHR 3.49 (95% CI 2.26-5.38), P < 0.001] were independently associated with PTLD.

Conclusions

Lymphoma occurs at similar rates in adult and paediatric recipients, but has been decreasing since the year 2000. EBV-negative patients and those with diabetes or induction agent other than anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody are at substantially increased risk of PTLD.

Anti-Tumor Potential of IMP Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: A Century-Long Story

The purine nucleotides ATP and GTP are essential precursors to DNA and RNA synthesis and fundamental for energy metabolism. Although de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis is increased in highly proliferating cells, such as malignant tumors, it is not clear if this is merely a secondary manifestation of increased cell proliferation. Suggestive of a direct causative effect includes evidence that, in some cancer types, the rate-limiting enzyme in de novo GTP biosynthesis, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), is upregulated and that the IMPDH inhibitor, mycophenolic acid (MPA), possesses anti-tumor activity. However, historically, enthusiasm for employing IMPDH inhibitors in cancer treatment has been mitigated by their adverse effects at high treatment doses and variable response. Recent advances in our understanding of the mechanistic role of IMPDH in tumorigenesis and cancer progression, as well as the development of IMPDH inhibitors with selective actions on GTP synthesis, have prompted a reappraisal of targeting this enzyme for anti-cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize the history of IMPDH inhibitors, the development of new inhibitors as anti-cancer drugs, and future directions and strategies to overcome existing challenges.

Cancer in kidney transplant recipients

Cancer is the second most common cause of mortality and morbidity in kidney transplant recipients after cardiovascular disease. Kidney transplant recipients have at least a twofold higher risk of developing or dying from cancer than the general population. The increased risk of de novo and recurrent cancer in transplant recipients is multifactorial and attributed to oncogenic viruses, immunosuppression and altered T cell immunity. Transplant candidates and potential donors should be screened for cancer as part of the assessment process. For potential recipients with a prior history of cancer, waiting periods of 2-5 years after remission - largely depending on the cancer type and stage of initial cancer diagnosis - are recommended. Post-transplantation cancer screening needs to be tailored to the individual patient, considering the cancer risk of the individual, comorbidities, overall prognosis and the screening preferences of the patient. In kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with cancer, treatment includes conventional approaches, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, together with consideration of altering immunosuppression. As the benefits of transplantation compared with dialysis in potential transplant candidates with a history of cancer have not been assessed, current clinical practice relies on evidence from observational studies and registry analyses.

Outcomes of renal transplantation in patients with previous hematologic malignancies

Recommendations regarding the appropriateness of renal transplantation in patients with prior hematologic malignancies are limited. Given the lack of available data, studies are needed to assess which of these patients will maximally benefit from renal transplantation. This study was undertaken to describe the incidence of new or recurrent malignancy as well as patient and allograft survival, acute rejection, and serious infections in patients with prior hematologic malignancies receiving renal transplantation. This was a single center retrospective review of all adult patients with a previous hematologic malignancy who received a living or deceased renal transplantation between January 2009 and January 2016. Eight renal transplantation recipients with prior hematologic malignancies were identified and followed for a minimum of 3 years. Six patients received prior chemotherapy and five had a prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Median time from remission to transplant was 2.6 years. Three-year patient and allograft survival were 87% and 75%, respectively. Three patients were diagnosed with new cancers within 3 years post-renal transplantation; one of which died from cancer-related complications with a functioning allograft. There was concern for recurrent hematologic malignancies in two patients based on serologic studies, but, both of these patients were alive with functioning allografts at 3-year follow-up. Our experience suggests that renal transplantation can be successfully performed in select patients with prior hematologic malignancy but with a significant risk for de novo malignancy post-transplant, which may be associated with an overall poor prognosis. Decisions regarding renal transplantation candidacy should be made based on risk stratification and multidisciplinary discussions with patients, hematologists, and transplant providers.

Induction Therapy in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients With Low Immunological Risk

BACKGROUND

In nonimmunized patients, similar rejection rates are observed for patients who have undergone thymoglobulin (antithymocyte globulins [ATG]) or basiliximab (BSX) therapy. While ATG may improve delayed graft function, it may also be associated with higher infection rates and malignancy risk. We compared survival and clinical outcomes in elderly recipients with low immunological risk according to their induction therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentric study on nonimmunized patients ≥65 years of age receiving a first kidney transplant between 2010 and 2017. The principal outcome was patient and graft survival. Secondary outcomes were cumulative probabilities of infection, first acute rejection episode, malignancy, de novo donor specific antibody, posttransplant diabetes (PTD), cardiac complications, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and occurrence of delayed graft function. Cox, logistic, or linear statistical models were used depending on the outcome studied, and models were weighted on the propensity scores.

RESULTS

Two hundred and four patients were included in the BSX group and 179 in the ATG group with the average age of 71.0 and 70.5 years, respectively. Patient and graft survival at 3 years posttransplantation were 74% (95% CI, 65%-84%) and 68% (95% CI, 60%-78%) in ATG and BSX group, respectively, without significant difference. Occurrence of PTD was significatively higher in BSX group (23% versus 15%, P = 0.04) due to higher trough levels of Tacrolimus on month 3 (9.48 versus 7.30 ng/mL, P = 0.023). There was no difference in other evaluated outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly recipients, ATG does not lead to poorer outcomes compared with BSX and could permit lower trough levels of Tacrolimus, thus reducing occurrence of PTD.

Posttransplant Malignancy

Posttransplant malignancy is a leading cause of death after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Recipients of SOT are at significantly higher risk of multiple cancers compared with the general population, most notably nonmelanoma skin cancer and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Risk factors for posttransplant malignancy include history of malignancy, immunosuppression, oncogenic viral infections, sun exposure, and disease-specific associations. Early detection and treatment of malignancies can improve survival.

Graft Pre-conditioning by Peri-Operative Perfusion of Kidney Allografts With Rabbit Anti-human T-lymphocyte Globulin Results in Improved Kidney Graft Function in the Early Post-transplantation Period-a Prospective, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Introduction: Although prone to a higher degree of ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI), the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) organs has become reality in transplantation. We therefore postulated that peri-operative perfusion of renal transplants with anti-human T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) ameliorates IRI and results in improved graft function.

Methods: We performed a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial involving 50 kidneys (KTx). Prior to implantation organs were perfused and incubated with ATLG (AP) (n = 24 kidney). Control organs (CP) were perfused with saline only (n = 26 kidney). Primary endpoint was defined as graft function reflected by serum creatinine at day 7 post transplantation (post-tx).

Results: AP-KTx recipients illustrated significantly better graft function at day 7 post-tx as reflected by lower creatinine levels, whereas no treatment effect was observed after 12 months surveillance. During the early hospitalization phase, 16 of the 26 CP-KTx patients required dialysis during the first 7 days post-tx, whereas only 10 of the 24 AP-KTx patients underwent dialysis. No treatment-specific differences were detected for various lymphocytes subsets in the peripheral blood of patients. Additionally, mRNA analysis of 0-h biopsies post incubation with ATLG revealed no changes of intragraft inflammatory expression patterns between AP and CP organs.

Conclusion: We here present the first clinical study on peri-operative organ perfusion with ATLG illustrating improved graft function in the early period post kidney transplantation.

Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03377283

Outcomes of Induction Therapy with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Induction immunosuppression is used in transplantation to prevent early acute rejection. The survival benefit of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction has not been established yet. We sought to determine the role of rATG in preventing rejection and improving overall survival.

Material/Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2005 to 2009 and data of consecutive 268 heart transplant recipients were reviewed.

Results

The data of 144 patients who received induction with rATG were compared to 124 patients who did not. Although overall survival was not different between the 2 groups (P=0.12), there was a significant difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 5 years (RMST=4.8 months; 95% CI: 1.0–8.6, P=0.01) and 10 years (RMST=10.4 months; 95% CI: 1.6–19.3, P=0.02) in favor of the non-induced patients. No difference was observed between induced and non-induced patients who developed de novo donor specific antibodies. There was a significant difference in median days to first rejection in favor of the induced group (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Induction with rATG adds no survival benefit in heart transplant recipients. Patients who did not receive induction therapy had higher life expectancy at 5 years and 10 years. Although there was significant delay in the first rejection episode in favor of the rATG induced group, no difference was observed in donor specific antibodies. This study indicates a need for separate analysis of peri-transplantation co-morbidities and mainly the incidence of acute kidney injury, which could affect long-term survival.

Risk factors associated with post-kidney transplant malignancies: an article from the Cancer-Kidney International Network

In kidney transplant recipients, cancer is one of the leading causes of death with a functioning graft beyond the first year of kidney transplantation, and malignancies account for 8-10% of all deaths in the USA (2.6 deaths/1000 patient-years) and exceed 30% of deaths in Australia (5/1000 patient-years) in kidney transplant recipients. Patient-, transplant- and medication-related factors contribute to the increased cancer risk following kidney transplantation. While it is well established that the overall immunosuppressive dose is associated with an increased risk for cancer following transplantation, the contributive effect of different immunosuppressive agents is not well established. In this review we will discuss the different risk factors for malignancies after kidney transplantation.

Impact of the posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder subtype on survival

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a life-threatening complication of solid organ transplantation. Histologic heterogeneity and a lack of treatment standards have made evaluating clinical outcomes in specific patient populations difficult. This systematic literature review investigated the impact of the PTLD histologic subtype on survival in a large data set.

METHODS

Case series were identified on PubMed with the search terms post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder/disease, PTLD, and solid organ transplantation, with additional publications identified through reference lists. The patient characteristics, immunosuppressive regimen, treatment, survival, and follow-up time for 306 cases were extracted from 94 articles, and these cases were combined with 11 cases from Emory University Hospital. Patients with a recorded subtype were included in a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (n = 234). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses identified predictors of overall survival (OS) for each subtype and B-cell subgroup.

RESULTS

OS differed significantly between monomorphic T-cell neoplasms (median, 9 months) and polymorphic, monomorphic B-cell, and Hodgkin-type neoplasms, for which the median OS was not reached (P = .0001). Significant differences in OS among B subgroups were not detected, but there was a trend toward decreased survival for patients with Burkitt-type PTLD. Kidney transplantation and a reduction of immunosuppression were associated with increased OS for patients with B-cell neoplasms in a multivariate analysis. Immunosuppression with azathioprine was associated with decreased OS for patients with T-cell neoplasms, whereas radiotherapy was associated with improved OS for patients with that subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

The histologic subtype represents an important prognostic factor in PTLD, with patients with T-cell neoplasms exhibiting very poor OS. Possibly lower survival for certain subsets of patients with B-cell PTLD should be explored further and suggests the need for subtype-specific therapies to improve outcomes. Cancer 2018;124:2327-36. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Anti-thymocyte globulins in kidney transplantation: focus on current indications and long-term immunological side effects

Antithymocyte globulins (ATGs) are part of the immunosuppression arsenal currently used by clinicians to prevent or treat acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. ATG is a mixture of non-specific anti-lymphocyte immunoglobulins targeting not only T cell subsets but also several other immune and non-immune cells, rendering its precise immunoglobulin composition difficult to appreciate or to compare from one preparation to another. Furthermore, several mechanisms of action have been described. Taken together, this probably explains the efficacy and the side effects associated with this drug. Recent data suggest a long-term negative impact on allograft and patient outcomes, pointing out the need to better characterize the potential toxicity and the benefit-risk balance associated to this immunosuppressive therapy within large clinical trials.

Safety and Efficacy of Induction Therapy With Thymoglobulin in AB0-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Data suggest an additional role of T cells in antibody-mediated rejections. In 2001 a protocol for AB0-incompatible kidney transplantation based on B-cell-depleting anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, antigen-specific blood group IgG immunoadsorption, intravenous immunoglobulins, and triple immunosuppression was introduced in Europe, which used induction therapy with the use of interleukin-2 receptor antibody (IL2-RA) basiliximab. We used thymoglobulin in AB0-incompatible patients as induction in the face of high immunologic risk.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 9 AB0i living donation (LD) recipients from 2011 to 2014. Desensitization included blood group-specific immunoadsorption. Eighteen AB0-compatible LD recipients receiving induction therapy with thymoglobulin served as control subjects. Another control group consisted of 18 AB0-compatible LD recipients receiving basiliximab. Follow-up was 24 months. We captured graft function by estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula), rejection episodes, and bacterial and viral infections.

RESULTS

All patients experienced immediate graft function. No significant or clinical differences were observed regarding graft function, rejection rates, or infections between the groups, although there seemed to be slightly higher cytomegalovirus infection rates due to preemptive therapy strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Thymoglobulin appears to be similar in safety and efficacy to IL-2-antagonists in AB0i kidney transplantation.

A retrospective analysis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder following liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate response rates and survival in adults developing post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) following liver transplantation.

METHODS

Patients were identified retrospectively and data collected through local liver and haematology electronic databases and pharmacy records.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were identified. The median age at first transplant and at development of PTLD was 48 and 54 years, respectively, with the median time from transplant to PTLD diagnosis of 56 months. The majority of cases (76%) were monomorphic B-cell lymphomas, and 36% of tumours were EBV positive. Treatment involved reduction in immune-suppression (RIS) in 30 (67%) with RIS the only treatment in 3. Ten (22%) patients were treated with rituximab alone, 13 (29%) with chemotherapy alone and 14 (31%) patients were treated with rituximab and chemotherapy. Twenty-six (58%) patients achieved a complete response (CR). At a median follow-up of 27 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 50 months. Response and OS were not associated with clinical factors or the use of rituximab.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes reported in this study are favourable and comparable to those reported previously. The addition of rituximab did not appear to have improved outcomes in this series, although a significant proportion of patients were able to avoid chemotherapy.

Epstein-Barr virus lymphoproliferative disease after solid organ transplantation

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was the first identified human oncovirus and is also one of the most ubiquitous viral infections known with established infections in more than 90% of individuals by early adulthood. EBV establishes latency by controlling expression of the viral genome making it silent to immune surveillance. In immunocompetent individuals, up to 1% of circulating T cells are directed at maintaining control over EBV replication. In addition to being involved in oncogenesis of lymphoid and epithelial tumors in immune-competent individuals, loss of immune surveillance over EBV predisposes individuals to EBV malignancies. Lymphoid proliferations from EBV-infected B cells arise in up to 20% of recipients of solid organ transplants (SOTs). One question not answered is why, when EBV requires such active immune surveillance, EBV malignancies are not even more prevalent in severely immune-compromised individuals. A better understanding of who develops complications related to EBV and what the immunologic risks are will ultimately make it feasible to perform prophylactic trials in those at highest risk. This review summarizes our current understanding of factors in SOT recipients that predispose them to the development of an EBV malignancy and that predict response to initial therapy. We then review the current landscape of those therapies, focusing on the goal of restoring long-term EBV-directed immunity to patients at risk.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after solid-organ transplant in children

The post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a diverse group of potentially life-threatening conditions affecting organ transplant recipients. PTLD arises in the setting of an attenuated host immunologic system that is manipulated to allow a foreign graft but then fails to provide adequate immune surveillance of transformed malignant or premalignant lymphocytes. The diversity of biological behavior and clinical presentation makes for a challenging clinical situation for those involved in the care of children with PTLD occurring after solid-organ transplantation. This review details a large transplant center's multidisciplinary approach to monitoring for PTLD and systematic approach to intervention, which has been essential for early recognition and successful treatment.

Chemotherapy and Transplantation: The Role of Immunosuppression in Malignancy and a Review of Antineoplastic Agents in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

It is estimated that solid organ transplant recipients have a two- to fourfold greater overall risk of malignancy than the general population. Some of the most common malignancies after transplant include skin cancers and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. In addition to known risk factors such as environmental exposures, genetics, and infection with oncogenic viruses, immunosuppression plays a large role in the development of cancer through the loss of the immunosurveillance process. The purpose of this article is to explain the role of immunosuppression in cancer and to review the classes of chemotherapeutics. The field of anticancer drugs is continually expanding and developing, with limited data on use in transplant recipients. This article aims to provide information on class review, adverse effects, dose adjustments, and drug interactions that are pertinent to the care of transplant recipients.

Daunting but Worthy Goal: Reducing the De Novo Cancer Incidence After Transplantation

Solid-organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing de novo malignancies compared with the general population, and malignancies become a major limitation in achieving optimal outcomes. The prevention and the management of posttransplant malignancies must be considered as a main goal in our transplant programs. For these patients, immunosuppression plays a major role in oncogenesis by both impairement of immunosurveillance, enhancement of chronic viral infection, and by direct prooncogenic effects. It is essential to manage the recipient with a long-term adapted screening program beginning before transplantation to use a prophylaxis to decrease infection-related cancer, to propose a viral monitoring, and to modulate the immunosuppression toward lower doses especially for calcineurin inhibitors. Indeed, strategies to induce tolerance or to allow a dramatic reduction of the immunosuppression burden are the more promising approaches for the reduction of the posttransplant malignancies.