Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Postoperative Atelectasis

Weaning from mechanical ventilation in the operating room: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are associated with postoperative mortality and prolonged hospital stay. Although intraoperative mechanical ventilation (MV) is a risk factor for PPCs, strategies addressing weaning from MV are understudied. In this systematic review, we evaluated weaning strategies and their effects on postoperative pulmonary outcomes.

METHODS

Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022379145). Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials and observational studies of adults weaned from MV in the operating room. Primary outcomes included atelectasis and oxygenation; secondary outcomes included lung volume changes and PPCs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2) tool, and quality of evidence with the GRADE framework.

RESULTS

Screening identified 14 randomised controlled trials including 1719 patients; seven studies were limited to the weaning phase and seven included interventions not restricted to the weaning phase. Strategies combining pressure support ventilation (PSV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and low fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) improved atelectasis, oxygenation, and lung volumes. Low FiO2 improved atelectasis and oxygenation but might not improve lung volumes. A fixed-PEEP strategy led to no improvement in oxygenation or atelectasis; however, individualised PEEP with low FiO2 improved oxygenation and might be associated with reduced PPCs. Half of included studies are of moderate or high risk of bias; the overall quality of evidence is low.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited research evaluating weaning from intraoperative MV. Based on low-quality evidence, PSV, individualised PEEP, and low FiO2 may be associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary outcomes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO (CRD42022379145).

Effects of Different Extubation Strategies on Atelectasis in Older Adults after Major Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Older patients are particularly vulnerable to age-related respiratory changes. This prospective randomized controlled trial studied the effects of high and low fractions of inspired oxygen (FiO2) with the recruitment maneuver (RM) during extubation on lung atelectasis postoperatively in older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

We randomized a total of 126 patients aged >60 years who underwent both elective and emergency major abdominal surgeries and met the inclusion criteria into three groups (H, HR, and LR) using computer-generated block randomization. Group H received high FiO2 (1), Group HR received high FiO2 (1) with RM followed by a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, and Group LR received low FiO2 (0.4) with RM followed by a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O 10 minutes before extubation. Oxygenation and atelectasis were measured using the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/FiO2 ratios and lung ultrasound score. Postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded up to 24 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean PaO2/FiO2 at 30 minutes post-extubation was significantly higher in Groups LR and HR compared to that in Group H (390.71±29.55, 381.97±24.97, and 355.37±31.70; p<0.001). In the immediate postoperative period, the median lung ultrasound score was higher in Group H than that in Groups LR and HR (6 [5-7], 3 [3-5], and 3.5 [2.25-4.75]; p<0.001). The incidence of oxygen desaturation and oxygen requirements was higher in Group H during the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

The RM before extubation is beneficial in reducing atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications, irrespective of the FiO2 concentration used in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgeries. (Trail registration number: Reference No. CTRI/2022/04/042115; date of CTRI registration 25/02/2022; and date of enrolment of the first research participant 05/05/2022).

Comparison of ultrafast and fast track extubation after secundum atrial septal defect surgery in pediatric age group

BACGROUND

Patients who underwent ultrafast track on the operating table and fast track extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit for 2 to 6 h after secundum atrial septal defect surgery in the pediatric age group were compared.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and February 2017, 60 pediatric patients (24 boys, 36 girls; Mean age 7.5 ± 4.6 years) whose secundum atrial defect was closed were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were separated as those who were extubated on the operating table (Group1,n = 28) and those extubated in the pediatric intensive care unit within 2-6 h postoperatively (Group2,n = 32).

RESULTS

No difference was found in demographic data and preoperative catheter information between the groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 20(18-25)/27.5(20-30)minutes (p:0.001), the cross-clamp time was 10(10-15)/15(11-20)minutes(p:0.004), the postoperative drainage amount was 50(25-50)/60(32.5-100)ml(p:0.013), the length of stay in the intensive care unit was 1(1--1)/1(1-2)day(p:0.025), the length of stay after intensive care was 3(2-3)/3(3-4)days(p:0.001) and the total hospital stay was 4(3-4)/5(4-5.5) days (p < 0.001), which were respectively shorter for the group 1 compared to 2. Postoperative blood product replacement, positive inotrope support, pericardial effusion, mortality, and morbidity were not detected in either groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, it was observed that the UFT extubation was safe for the patients who were operated for secundum ASD, in the pediatric age group, and had a cross-clamp time not exceeding 15 min. It was found that the amount of drainage, length of stay in the intensive care unit, post-intensive care unit, and the total hospital stay of patients extubated on the operating table were shorter.

Effects of small-dose S-ketamine on anesthesia-induced atelectasis in patients undergoing general anesthesia accessed by lung ultrasound: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atelectasis after anesthesia induction in most patients undergoing general anesthesia may lead to postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and affect postoperative outcomes. However, there is still no existing effective method used for the prevention of perioperative atelectasis. S-ketamine may prevent atelectasis due to airway smooth muscle relaxation and anti-inflammatory effects. Lung ultrasound is a portable and reliable bedside imaging technology for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis. The primary objective of this study is to assess whether a small dose of S-ketamine can reduce the incidence of atelectasis after intubation, and further investigate the effects of preventing the early formation of perioperative atelectasis and PPCs.

METHODS

This is a single-institution, prospective, randomized controlled, parallel grouping, and double-blind study. From October 2020 to March 2022, 100 patients (18-60 years old) scheduled for elective surgery will be recruited from Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, and randomly assigned to the S-ketamine group (group 1) and the normal saline group (group 2) at a ratio of 1:1. The label-masked agents will be administered 5 min before induction, and all patients will undergo a standardized general anesthesia protocol. Related data will be collected at three time points: after radial artery puncture (T1), 15 min after tracheal intubation (T2), and before extubation (T3). The primary outcome will be the total lung ultrasound scores (LUS) at T2. Secondary outcomes will include LUS in six chest regions at T2, total LUS at T3, arterial blood gas analysis results (PaCO2, PaO2) and PaO2/FiO2 at T2 and T3, and plateau pressure (Pplat) and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) at T2 and T3. The incidence of postoperative complications associated with S-ketamine and PPCs at 2 h and 24 h after surgery will be recorded.

DISCUSSION

This trial aims to explore whether a simple and feasible application of S-ketamine before the induction of general anesthesia can prevent atelectasis. The results of this study may provide new ideas and direct clinical evidence for the prevention and treatment of perioperative pulmonary complications during anesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04745286. Registered on February 9, 2021.

Effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional extubation strategy on postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia: a single-centre pilot randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a common cause of morbidity. Postoperative atelectasis is thought to be a significant risk factor in their development. Recent imaging studies suggest that patients' extubation may result in similar postoperative atelectasis regardless of the intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategy used. In this pilot trial, we hypothesized that a study investigating the effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional one on PPCs would be feasible.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot, single-centre, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Adult patients at moderate to high risk of PPCs and scheduled for elective surgery were eligible. Patients were randomized to an open lung extubation strategy (semirecumbent position, fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2] 50%, pressure support ventilation, unchanged positive end-expiratory pressure) or to a conventional extubation strategy (dorsal decubitus position, FIO2 100%, manual bag ventilation). The primary feasibility outcome was global protocol adherence while the primary exploratory efficacy outcome was PPCs.

RESULTS

We randomized 35 patients to the conventional extubation group and 34 to the open lung extubation group. We observed a global protocol adherence of 96% (95% confidence interval, 88 to 99), which was not different between groups. Eight PPCs occurred (two in the conventional extubation group vs six in the open lung extubation group). Less postoperative supplemental oxygen and better lung aeration were observed in the open lung extubation group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-centre pilot trial, we observed excellent feasibility. A multicentre pilot trial comparing the effect of an open lung extubation strategy with that of a conventional extubation strategy on the occurrence of PPCs is feasible.

STUDY REGISTRATION DATE

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04993001); registered 6 August 2021.

Releasing high positive end-expiratory pressure to a low level generates a pronounced increase in particle flow from the airways

OBJECTIVES

Detecting particle flow from the airways by a non-invasive analyzing technique might serve as an additional tool to monitor mechanical ventilation. In the present study, we used a customized particles in exhaled air (PExA) technique, which is an optical particle counter for the monitoring of particle flow in exhaled air. We studied particle flow while increasing and releasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different levels of PEEP on particle flow in exhaled air in an experimental setting. We hypothesized that gradually increasing PEEP will reduce the particle flow from the airways and releasing PEEP from a high level to a low level will result in increased particle flow.

METHODS

Five fully anesthetized domestic pigs received a gradual increase of PEEP from 5 cmH₂O to a maximum of 25 cmH₂O during volume-controlled ventilation. The particle count along with vital parameters and ventilator settings were collected continuously and measurements were taken after every increase in PEEP. The particle sizes measured were between 0.41 µm and 4.55 µm.

RESULTS

A significant increase in particle count was seen going from all levels of PEEP to release of PEEP. At a PEEP level of 15 cmH₂O, there was a median particle count of 282 (154-710) compared to release of PEEP to a level of 5 cmH₂O which led to a median particle count of 3754 (2437-10,606) (p < 0.009). A decrease in blood pressure was seen from baseline to all levels of PEEP and significantly so at a PEEP level of 20 cmH₂O.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, a significant increase in particle count was seen on releasing PEEP back to baseline compared to all levels of PEEP, while no changes were seen when gradually increasing PEEP. These findings further explore the significance of changes in particle flow and their part in pathophysiological processes within the lung.

Positive end-expiratory pressure and risk of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients living at high altitudes and undergoing surgery at low altitudes: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in China

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether a high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP ≥5 cmH₂O) has a protective effect on the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in a cohort of patients living at high altitudes and undergoing general anaesthesia.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

A tertiary hospital in China.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult Tibetan patients living at high altitudes (≥3000 m) and who went to the low-altitude plain to undergo non-cardiothoracic surgery under general anaesthesia, from January 2018 to April 2020.

MEASUREMENTS

This study included 1905 patients who were divided according to the application of an intraoperative PEEP: low PEEP (<5 cmH₂O, including 0 cmH₂O) or high PEEP (≥5 cmH₂O). The primary outcome was a composite of PPCs within the first 7 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes included reintubation and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission within the first 7 postoperative days and total hospital stays (day).

RESULTS

The study included 1032 patients in the low PEEP group and 873 in the high PEEP group. There were no differences in the incidence of PPCs between the high and low PEEP groups (relative risk (RR) 0.913; 95% CI 0.716 to 1.165; p=0.465). After propensity score matching, 643 patients remained in each group, and the incidence of PPCs in the low PEEP group (18.0%) was higher than in the high PEEP group (13.7%; RR 0.720; 95% CI 0.533 to 0.974; p=0.033). There were no differences in the incidence of reintubation, unplanned ICU admission or hospital stays. The risk factors of PPCs derived from multiple regression showed that the application of >5 cmH₂O PEEP during intraoperative mechanical ventilation was associated with a significantly lower risk of PPCs in patients from a high altitude (OR=0.725, 95% CI 0.530 to 0.992; p=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of PEEP ≥5 cmH₂O during intraoperative mechanical ventilation in patients living at high altitudes and undergoing surgery at low altitudes may be associated with a lower risk of PPCs. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to further investigate perioperative lung protection ventilation strategies for patients from high altitudes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100044260).

Perioperative Pulmonary Atelectasis: Part II. Clinical Implications

The development of pulmonary atelectasis is common in the surgical patient. Pulmonary atelectasis can cause various degrees of gas exchange and respiratory mechanics impairment during and after surgery. In its most serious presentations, lung collapse could contribute to postoperative respiratory insufficiency, pneumonia, and worse overall clinical outcomes. A specific risk assessment is critical to allow clinicians to optimally choose the anesthetic technique, prepare appropriate monitoring, adapt the perioperative plan, and ensure the patient's safety. Bedside diagnosis and management have benefited from recent imaging advancements such as lung ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography, and monitoring such as esophageal manometry. Therapeutic management includes a broad range of interventions aimed at promoting lung recruitment. During general anesthesia, these strategies have consistently demonstrated their effectiveness in improving intraoperative oxygenation and respiratory compliance. Yet these same intraoperative strategies may fail to affect additional postoperative pulmonary outcomes. Specific attention to the postoperative period may be key for such outcome impact of lung expansion. Interventions such as noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support may be beneficial in specific patients at high risk for pulmonary atelectasis (e.g., obese) or those with clinical presentations consistent with lung collapse (e.g., postoperative hypoxemia after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgeries). Preoperative interventions may open new opportunities to minimize perioperative lung collapse and prevent pulmonary complications. Knowledge of pathophysiologic mechanisms of atelectasis and their consequences in the healthy and diseased lung should provide the basis for current practice and help to stratify and match the intensity of selected interventions to clinical conditions.

Pressure Support versus Spontaneous Ventilation during Anesthetic Emergence-Effect on Postoperative Atelectasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite previous reports suggesting that pressure support ventilation facilitates weaning from mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit, few studies have assessed its effects on recovery from anesthesia. The authors hypothesized that pressure support ventilation during emergence from anesthesia reduces postoperative atelectasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery using the Trendelenburg position.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled double-blinded trial, adult patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy or robot-assisted prostatectomy were assigned to either the pressure support (n = 50) or the control group (n = 50). During emergence (from the end of surgery to extubation), pressure support ventilation was used in the pressure support group versus intermittent manual assistance in the control group. The primary outcome was the incidence of atelectasis diagnosed by lung ultrasonography at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). The secondary outcomes were Pao2 at PACU and oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry less than 92% during 48 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were included in the analysis. The duration of emergence was 9 min and 8 min in the pressure support and control groups, respectively. The incidence of atelectasis at PACU was lower in the pressure support group compared to that in the control group (pressure support vs. control, 16 of 48 [33%] vs. 28 of 49 [57%]; risk ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.91; P = 0.024). In the PACU, Pao2 in the pressure support group was higher than that in the control group (92 ± 26 mmHg vs. 83 ± 13 mmHg; P = 0.034). The incidence of oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry less than 92% during 48 h postoperatively was not different between the groups (9 of 48 [19%] vs. 11 of 49 [22%]; P = 0.653). There were no adverse events related to the study protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of postoperative atelectasis was lower in patients undergoing either laparoscopic colectomy or robot-assisted prostatectomy who received pressure support ventilation during emergence from general anesthesia compared to those receiving intermittent manual assistance.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

General anesthetic techniques for enhanced recovery after surgery: Current controversies

General anesthesia technique can influence not only immediate postoperative outcomes, but also long-term outcomes beyond hospital stay (e.g., readmission after discharge from hospital). There is lack of evidence regarding superiority of total intravenous anesthesia over inhalation anesthesia with regards to postoperative outcomes even in high-risk population including cancer patients. Optimal balanced general anesthetic technique for enhance recovery after elective surgery in adults includes avoidance of routine use preoperative midazolam, avoidance of deep anesthesia, use of opioid-sparing approach, and minimization of neuromuscular blocking agents and appropriate reversal of residual paralysis. Given that the residual effects of drugs used during anesthesia can increase postoperative morbidity and delay recovery, it is prudent to use a minimal number of drug combinations, and the drugs used are shorter-acting and administered at the lowest possible dose. It is imperative that the discerning anesthesiologist consider whether each drug used is really necessary for accomplishing perioperative goals.

Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Background and objectives

With the intensive study of lung protective ventilation strategies, people begin to advocate the individualized application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This study investigated the optimal PEEP in patients during one-lung ventilation (OLV) and its effects on pulmonary mechanics and oxygenation.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients who underwent elective thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups received an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) after OLV. Patients in Group A received optimal PEEP followed by PEEP decremental titration, while Group B received standard 5 cmH₂O PEEP until the end of OLV. Relevant indexes of respiratory mechanics, pulmonary oxygenation and hemodynamics were recorded after entering the operating room (T₀), 10 minutes after intubation (T₁), pre-ARM (T₂), 20 minutes after the application of optimal PEEP (T₃), at the end of OLV (T₄) and at the end of surgery (T₅). Postoperative outcomes were also assessed.

Results

The optimal PEEP obtained in Group A was 8.8 ± 2.4 cmH₂O, which positively correlated with BMI and forced vital capacity (FVC). Group A had a higher C_PAT than Group B at T₃, T₄, T₅ (p < 0.05) and a smaller ΔP than Group B at T₃, T₄ (p < 0.01). At T₄, PaO₂ was significantly higher in Group A (p < 0.01). At T₃, stroke volume variation was higher in Group A (p < 0.01). Postoperative outcomes did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the individualized PEEP can increase lung compliance, reduce driving pressure, and improve pulmonary oxygenation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy, with little effect on hemodynamics.

Individualized PEEP ventilation between tumor resection and dural suture in craniotomy

OBJECTIVE

Atelectasis, which affects oxygenation, is always occurred after craniotomy under general anesthesia. The commonly used protective ventilation strategy, which includes recruitment maneuver and higher level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), can effectively reduce atelectasis after heart and abdominal surgery, but increase intracranial pressure and reduce cerebral perfusion in patients undergoing craniotomy. We hypothesized individualized PEEP ventilation between tumor resection and dural suture in craniotomy could effectively reduce postoperative atelectasis, improve PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, and without reducing the regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO₂).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

96 patients underwent tumor craniotomy in supine position were randomized into the control group (C group) and individualized PEEP group (P group). In the C group, the tidal volume (VT) was set at 8 mL/kg of predicted body weight, but PEEP were not used. In the P group, VT was set at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight combined with individualized PEEP between tumor resection and dural suture, while in other periods of general anesthesia, VT was set at 8 mL/kg of predicted body weight. PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, lung ultrasound score (LUS) and rScO₂ were measured before induction, 1 h and 24 h after extubation.

RESULTS

Individual PEEP in the P group was 7.0 (4.0-9.0). The PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio and rScO₂ in the P group were significantly higher than that of the C group (395 ± 62 vs. 344 ± 40, 67 ± 5 vs. 61 ± 4, respectively, p < 0.05) and the LUS of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the C group [7.5 (5.3-8.3) vs. 10.0 (9.0-12.0), p < 0.05] 1 h after extubation.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical ventilation with individualized PEEP between tumor resection and dural suture in craniotomy can reduce atelectasis, improve PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio and rScO₂ 1 h after extubation.