Health Disparities in Uterine Cancer: Report From the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference

The effect of food deserts on gynecologic cancer survival

Objective

Living in a food desert is a known negative health risk, with recent literature finding an associated higher mortality in patients with cancers. Gynecologic cancers have not specifically been studied. We aimed to describe patients with gynecologic cancers who live in a food desert and determine if there is an association between living in a food desert and gynecologic cancer mortality.

Methods

The 2013-2019 California Cancer Registry (CCR) was used to identify patients with endometrial, ovarian, or cervical cancers. Patient residential census tract was linked to food desert census tracts identified by the 2015 United States Department of Agriculture Food Access Research Atlas. Comorbidity data were obtained from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database (OSHPD). Treatment, diagnosis, and survival outcomes were obtained from the CCR's variables and compared by food desert status. Five-year disease-specific survival was analyzed by applying Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results

40,340 gynecologic cancer cases were identified. 60.1 % had endometrial cancer, 23.2 % had ovarian cancer, and 15.9 % had cervical cancer. The average age of the cohort was 59.4 years, 48.0 % was non-Hispanic White, 50.3 % was privately insured, and 6.8 % of lived in a food desert. Living in a food desert was associated with higher disease-specific mortality for patients with gynecologic cancers (endometrial cancer HR 1.43p < 0.001 95 % CI 1.22-1.68; ovarian cancer HR 1.47p < 0.001 95 % CI 1.27-1.69; cervical cancer HR 1.24p = 0.045 95 % CI 1.01-1.54).

Conclusion

Patients living in food deserts had worse disease-specific survival, making access to food a modifiable risk factor that may result in mitigating gynecologic cancer disparities.

Racial disparities in the treatment of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia in postmenopausal women

Disparities in endometrial cancer has increased during the past decade with Black women more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage and have higher mortality. The majority of research has been focused on cultural barriers, socioeconomic status, lack of access to care, comorbidities, and tumor histology to explain these disparities. Limited studies have been conducted on the disparity in the treatment of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia(EIN). We sought to analyze the differences in treatment used in the management of postmenopausal women with EIN to evaluate whether race/ethnicity is a contributing factor. An IRB approved retrospective study was conducted amongst women at a single institution diagnosed with EIN. Ethnicity/race was defined as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Asian. Demographic and clinical data was extracted. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between ethnicity/race and treatment, adjusted for age, BMI, and underlying medical conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes. In total, 254 patients were analyzed. A significant association between ethnicity/race and treatment with non-Hispanic Black women less likely to be treated with surgical management compared to non-Hispanic White women (OR = 0.326, 95 %CI 0.129-0.827, p = 0.026). Importantly, after adjusting for clinical risk factors(age, BMI, CVD, diabetes), non-Hispanic Black women remained at an increased risk of not undergoing surgical intervention (OR = 0.333, 95 % CI 0.125-0.882, p = 0.027). Future research is imperative to evaluate the root cause of this disparity in the healthcare system.

Sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of endometrial cancer cases in Puerto Rico during the period 2009 to 2015: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, the rising incidence rates of endometrial cancer have made it a significant public health concern for women worldwide. Treatment strategies for endometrial cancer vary based on several factors such as stage, histology, the patient's overall health, and preferences. However, limited amount of research on treatment patterns and potential correlations with sociodemographic characteristics among Hispanics is available. This study analyzes the treatment patterns for patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer in Puerto Rico.

METHODS

A secondary database analysis was performed on endometrial cancer cases reported to the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database from 2009 to 2015 (n = 2,488). The study population's sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were described, along with an overview of the therapy options provided to patients receiving care on the island. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of sociodemographic/clinical characteristics with treatment patterns stratified by risk of recurrence.

RESULTS

In our cohort, most patients were insured through Medicaid and had a median age of 60 years. Almost 90% of patients received surgery as the first course of treatment. Surgery alone was the most common treatment for low-risk patients (80.2%). High-risk patients were more likely to receive surgery with radiotherapy and chemotherapy (24.4%). Patients with Medicare insurance were five times (HR: 4.84; 95% CI: 2.45-9.58; p < 0.001) more likely to receive surgery when compared with patients insured with Medicaid. In contrast, those with private insurance were twice as likely to receive surgery (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.40-4.04; p = 0.001) when compared to those with Medicaid.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide insight into the treatment patterns for endometrial cancer in Puerto Rico and highlight the importance of considering factors such as disease risk when making treatment decisions. Addressing these gaps in treatment patterns can contribute to effective management of endometrial cancer.

Diabetes and the social, biologic, and behavioral determinants of endometrial cancer in the United States

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common types of cancer that affects women's reproductive system. The risk of endometrial cancer is associated with biologic, behavioral and social determinants of health (SDOH). The focus of the work is to investigate the cumulative effect of this cluster of covariates on the odds of endometrial cancer that heretofore have only been considered individually.

METHODS

We conducted a quantitative study using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) national data collected in 2020. Data analysis using weighted Chi-square test and weighted logistic regression were carried out on 84,118 female study participants from the United States.

RESULTS

Women with diabetes mellitus were approximately twice as likely to have endometrial cancer compared to women without diabetes (OR 1.54; 95%CI: 1.01-2.34). Biologic factors that included obesity (OR 3.10; 95% CI: 1.96-4.90) and older age (with ORs ranging from 2.75 to 7.21) had a significant increase in the odds of endometrial cancer compared to women of normal weight and younger age group of 18 to 44. Among the SDOH, attending college (OR 1.83; 95% CI: 1.12-3.00) was associated with increased odds of endometrial cancer, while renting a home (OR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.28-0.88), having other arrangements (OR 0.05; 95% CI: 0.02-0.16), being divorced (OR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.30-0.99), and having higher incomes ranging from $35,000 to $50,000 (OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.16-0.78), and above $50,000 (OR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14-0.62), were all associated with decreased odds of endometrial cancer. As for race, Black women (OR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.84) and women of other races (OR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15-0.88) were shown to have lower odds of endometrial cancer compared to White women.

CONCLUSION

Our results revealed the importance of adopting a comprehensive approach to the study of the associated factors of endometrial cancer by including social, biologic, and behavioral determinants of health. The observed social inequity in endometrial cancer among women needs to be addressed through effective policies and changes in social structures to advocate for a standardized healthcare system that ensures equitable access to preventive measures and quality of care.

Cancer incidence trends in New York State and associations with common population-level exposures 2010-2018: an ecological study

The impact of common environmental exposures in combinations with socioeconomic and lifestyle factors on cancer development, particularly for young adults, remains understudied. Here, we leveraged environmental and cancer incidence data collected in New York State at the county level to examine the association between 31 exposures and 10 common cancers (i.e., lung and bronchus, thyroid, colorectal, kidney and renal pelvis, melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and leukemia for both sexes; corpus uteri and female breast cancer; prostate cancer), for three age groups (25-49, 50-69, and 70-84 year-olds). For each cancer, we stratified by age group and sex, and applied regression models to examine the associations with multiple exposures simultaneously. The models included 642,013 incident cancer cases during 2010-2018 and found risk factors consistent with previous reports (e.g., smoking and physical inactivity). Models also found positive associations between ambient air pollutants (ozone and PM2.5) and prostate cancer, female breast cancer, and melanoma of the skin across multiple population strata. Additionally, the models were able to better explain the variation in cancer incidence data among 25-49 year-olds than the two older age groups. These findings support the impact of common environmental exposures on cancer development, particularly for younger age groups.

Worldwide association of the gender inequality with the incidence and mortality of cervical, ovarian, endometrial, and breast cancers

Background

There is a huge disparity in cancer incidence and mortality around the globe. A considerable share of this disparity can be explained by human development. Particularly in many less developed countries, women have been hindered in their human development. In this ecological study, we hypothesize that, notwithstanding acceptable overall development in countries, gender inequalities might affect the incidence and mortality of women's malignancies, and there is a distinct association between them.

Method

The data on the incidence and mortality of gynecologic and female breast cancers were retrieved from the GLOBOCAN database, and the data on the Human Development Index (HDI), Gender Development Index (GDI), and Gender Inequality Index (GII) were obtained from the United Nations Human Development Report. The Poisson regression modeling was then used to fit four models for each cancer.

Result

GII and GDI are both significantly associated with incidences of women's cancers, except for the insignificant association between GDI and the incidence of ovarian cancer. However, the association between GDI and the mortality of women's cancer is not strong. At the same time, there are significant direct relationships between GII and the mortality of breast, cervical, and endometrial cancer.

Conclusion

The incidence and mortality of women's cancers are ecologically associated with the country-level gender inequality captured with GDI and GII.

Racioethnic Disparities in Endometrial Cancer Outcomes

Black women are twice as likely to die from endometrial cancer (EC) compared with white women. This represents one of the worst racioethnic disparities amongst all cancers globally. Compared with white women, black women are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced EC, have more barriers to accessing care and experience increased delays in obtaining an EC diagnosis and commencing treatment. Histological and molecular differences place black women at higher risk of being diagnosed with more aggressive EC subtypes that carry less favourable outcomes. Furthermore, EC diagnostic pathways are less reliable in black women, and black women are less likely to receive evidence-based treatment for EC. This racioethnic disparity in EC outcomes exists both in the UK and US, despite differences in healthcare systems. This review methodically describes the key factors along the patient journey that contribute to the disparity in black women and proposes multifaceted approaches to lessen these gaps.

The impact of nativity on uterine cancer survival in the public hospital system of Queens, New York

OBJECTIVE

We studied cis-women with uterine cancer presenting to the two Public Hospitals in Queens, New York from 2006 to 2015 to examine the relationship between nativity (birthplace) and survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review of tumor registries identified women diagnosed with uterine cancer between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2015. Data from 259 women were available for this analysis.

RESULTS

Most women were born outside the United States (US) (76% versus 24%). The majority of US-born women were black (68%). Seventy-seven women (30%) were born in Latin America, 76 in the Caribbean Islands (29%) and 44 in Asia/South Asia (17%). Most women presented with stage I/II disease (70%) and endometrioid/mucinous histology (68%) with no significant differences observed among nativity groups. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival curves stratified by birthplace demonstrated significant differences in survival distributions among the groups using the log-rank test (P < 0.0001). The most favorable survival curves were observed among all foreign-born women, whereas the least favorable survival was demonstrated in US-born women. Time to death was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Adjusting for age of diagnosis, insurance status, stage, and treatment modality, Latin American and Asia/South Asia birthplace was significantly associated with increased survival time.

CONCLUSION

An immigrant health paradox was defined for foreign-born Latin American and Asian/South Asian women presenting to the two Public Hospitals of Queens, New York, as women born in these geographic regions were less likely to die at any given time compared to those born in the United States.

Black-White differences in uterine cancer symptomatology and stage at diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether uterine cancer symptoms differ between Black and White patients and how this may influence their stage at diagnosis.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database, we identified 2328 Black and 21,774 White patients with uterine cancer in 2008-2017. Their symptoms in the 18 months before diagnosis were categorized as postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) alone, PMB together with other symptoms (e.g., abdominal/pelvic pain, bloating), non-PMB symptoms alone, or no symptoms. Stage at diagnosis was dichotomized as advanced (i.e., regional/distant) versus localized. The association between race and stage was analyzed using regression models incrementally adjusting for symptoms and other patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A larger proportion of Black than White patients experienced PMB together with other symptoms (63.1% versus 58.0%) or experienced non-PMB symptoms alone (13.1% versus 9.4%) (p < 0.001). Black patients had a higher risk of advanced-stage diagnosis than White patients (45.0% versus 30.3%, unadjusted RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.44-1.59). Adjusting for Black-White differences in symptoms attenuated the RR to 1.46 (95% CI: 1.39-1.53). Compared to PMB symptoms alone, having additional non-PMB symptoms (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.15-1.26) and having non-PMB symptoms alone (RR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.88-2.10) were associated with increased risk of advanced-stage diagnosis. Further adjusting for histology and other patient characteristics reduced Black-White disparity in advanced-stage diagnosis to 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03-1.14) but symptoms remained significantly associated with stage at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Having non-PMB symptoms was associated with more advanced stage at diagnosis. Non-PMB symptoms were more common among Black than White patients, which might hinder symptom recognition/evaluation.

Exploring the perspectives of underrepresented voices: Perceptions and experiences of uterine cancer for black African, Caribbean, black British, and mixed-black women in the UK to develop strategies for early symptom presentation

OBJECTIVES

The uterine cancer (UC) mortality rate in the UK is significantly higher for women who belong to a Black ethnic group compared to those from other ethnic groups. This study aimed to understand the views and experiences of UC amongst Black ethnic minority women in the UK, with a focus on awareness and presentation of red-flag symptoms.

METHODS

Women of Black African, Caribbean, Black British and Mixed-Black ethnicity were purposefully recruited to participate in focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Twenty women from different regions in England participated in the study. Reflexive thematic analysis of the data led to the identification of three main themes: 1) Healthcare inequities; 2) Support and sense making with other Black women; and 3) Knowledge dissemination, mobilisation, and empowerment. Perceptions of inequitable healthcare provision and distrust influenced how participants, and their peer networks, approached seeking assistance from healthcare professionals. Concerns were also raised about culturally insensitive information resources, including issues of language, literacy, and representation, all of which served as potential barriers for women within Black ethnic minority groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The deficiency of targeted knowledge mobilisation and specific UC information aimed at Black ethnicity women living in the UK, reportedly contributes to the dissemination of misconceptions and an atmosphere of apprehension around a UC diagnosis. The insights from this study highlight the significance of designing culturally sensitive strategies to promote informed decision-making and empower the dissemination of accurate health knowledge amongst Black women.

Computational Image and Molecular Analysis Reveal Unique Prognostic Features of Immune Architecture in African Versus European American Women with Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) disproportionately affects African American (AA) women in terms of progression and death. In our study, we sought to employ computerized image and bioinformatic analysis to tease out morphologic and molecular differences in EC between AA and European-American (EA) populations. We identified the differences in immune cell spatial patterns between AA and EA populations with markers of tumor biology, including histologic and molecular subtypes. The models performed best when they were trained and validated using data from the same population. Unsupervised clustering revealed a distinct association between immune cell features and known molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer that varied between AA and EA populations. Our genomic analysis revealed two distinct and novel gene sets with mutations associated with improved prognosis in AA and EA patients. Our study findings suggest the need for population-specific risk prediction models for women with endometrial cancer.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery with Open Surgery for Type II Endometrial Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database

OBJECTIVE

Prior studies comparing minimally invasive surgery with open surgery among patients with endometrial cancer have reported similar survival outcomes and improved perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, patients with Type II endometrial cancer were underrepresented in these studies. We sought to compare the overall survival and surgical outcomes between open surgery and MIS in a large cohort of women with Type II endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Using data from the National Cancer Database, we identified a cohort of women who underwent hysterectomy for type II endometrial cancer (serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma) between January 2010 and December 2014. The primary outcome was a comparison of the overall survival for MIS with that for the open approach. The secondary outcomes included a comparison of the length of hospital stay, readmission within 30 days of discharge, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Outcomes were compared between the cohorts using the Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test. Multivariable logistic regression with inverse propensity weighting was used to determine clinical characteristics that were statistically significant predictors of outcomes. p values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

We identified 12,905 patients with Type II, Stage I-III endometrial cancer that underwent a hysterectomy. In total, 7123 of these women (55.2%) underwent MIS. The rate of MIS increased from 39% to 64% over four years. Women who underwent MIS were more often White, privately insured, older, and had a higher income. The laparotomy group had a higher rate of carcinosarcoma histology (30.9% vs. 23.6%, p < 0.001), stage III disease (38.4% vs. 27.4%, p < 0.001), and larger primary tumors (59 vs. 45 mm, p < 0.001). Lymph node dissection was more commonly performed in the MIS group (89.6% vs. 85.4%, p < 0.001). With regard to adjuvant therapy, subjection to postoperative radiation was more common in the MIS group (37% vs. 40.1%, p < 0.001), while chemotherapy was more common in the laparotomy group (37.6% vs. 33.9%, p < 0.001). The time interval between surgery and the initiation of chemotherapy was shorter in the MIS group (39 vs. 42 days, p < 0.001). According to the results of propensity-score-weighted analysis, MIS was associated with superior overall survival (101.7 vs. 86.7 months, p = 0.0003 determined using the long-rank test), which corresponded to a 10% decreased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.9; CI 0.857-0.954, p = 0.0002). The survival benefit was uniform across all three histology types and stages. MIS was associated with superior perioperative outcomes, including shorter length of stay (1 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001), lower 30-day readmission rates (2.5% vs. 5%), and lower 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality (0.5% vs. 1.3% and 1.5% vs. 3.6%, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). The increased adoption of MIS from 2010 to 2014 corresponds to a decrease in 90-day postoperative mortality (2.8% to 2.2%, r = -0.89; p = 0.04) and overall mortality (51% to 38%, r = -0.95; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients from the National Cancer Database, MIS was associated with improved overall survival and superior perioperative outcomes compared to open surgery among women with Type II endometrial cancer. A decrease in postoperative mortality and a shorter interval between surgery and the initiation of chemotherapy may contribute to the survival benefit of MIS. A racial and economic disparity in the surgical management of Type II endometrial cancer was identified, and further investigation is warranted to narrow this gap and improve patient outcomes.

Impact of abnormal uterine bleeding care in premenopausal patients prior to endometrial malignancy diagnosis

Background

Literature evaluating the management of abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal patients prior to endometrial malignancy diagnosis is lacking.

Objective

To evaluate predictors and consequences of inadequate evaluation and management of abnormal uterine bleeding and time to endometrial sampling in premenopausal patients prior to endometrial malignancy diagnosis.Study Design.This was a retrospective cohort study of premenopausal individuals with endometrioid endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia at a single institution from 2015 to 2020.. Complete noninvasive management encompassed pelvic exam, ultrasound, and progestin treatment before or in conjunction with the endometrial sampling of diagnosis. Multivariable logistic and ordinal odds models were used to evaluate predictors and outcomes.

Results

152 subjects were included, 80.3 % with cancer and 19.7 % with atypical hyperplasia. The majority of patients had anovulatory bleeding, obesityand recent health care. Only 20.4 % had complete nonvinvasive management, and only 12.5 % had complete noninvasive management or endometrial sampling within 2 months of presentation with abnormal bleeding. Class III obesity reduced the likelihood of complete assessment and increased time to sampling, while age 45 and up and parity reduced time to sampling. Most patients had partial workup but no progestin treatment and long intervals before endometrial sampling after presentation to a provider with abnormal bleeding. Incomplete workup correlated to worse cancer grade and stage.

Conclusion

Despite high clinical risk and health care contact, most patients had insufficient gynecologic management preceding a diagnosis of endometrial malignancy. Inadequate care correlated to worse oncologic outcomes and demonstrates missed opportunities for early detection and prevention of endometrial cancer.

Approaches to developing de novo cancer population models to examine questions about cancer and race in bladder, gastric, and endometrial cancer and multiple myeloma: the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network incubator program

BACKGROUND

We are developing 10 de novo population-level mathematical models in 4 malignancies (multiple myeloma and bladder, gastric, and uterine cancers). Each of these sites has documented disparities in outcome that are believed to be downstream effects of systemic racism.

METHODS

Ten models are being independently developed as part of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network incubator program. These models simulate trends in cancer incidence, early diagnosis, treatment, and mortality for the general population and are stratified by racial subgroup. Model inputs are based on large population datasets, clinical trials, and observational studies. Some core parameters are shared, and other parameters are model specific. All models are microsimulation models that use self-reported race to stratify model inputs. They can simulate the distribution of relevant risk factors (eg, smoking, obesity) and insurance status (for multiple myeloma and uterine cancer) in US birth cohorts and population.

DISCUSSION

The models aim to refine approaches in prevention, detection, and management of 4 cancers given uncertainties and constraints. They will help explore whether the observed racial disparities are explainable by inequities, assess the effects of existing and potential cancer prevention and control policies on health equity and disparities, and identify policies that balance efficiency and fairness in decreasing cancer mortality.

Molecular Characterization of Endometrial Carcinomas in Black and White Patients Reveals Disparate Drivers with Therapeutic Implications

Although the incidence of endometrial carcinoma (EC) is similar in Black and White women, racial disparities are stark, with the highest mortality rates observed among Black patients. Here, analysis of 1,882 prospectively sequenced ECs using a clinical FDA-authorized tumor-normal panel revealed a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk histologic and molecular EC subtypes in self-identified Black (n = 259) compared with White (n = 1,623) patients. Clinically actionable alterations, including high tumor mutational burden/microsatellite instability, which confer benefit from immunotherapy, were less frequent in ECs from Black than from White patients. Ultramutated POLE molecular subtype ECs associated with favorable outcomes were rare in Black patients. Results were confirmed by genetic ancestry analysis. CCNE1 gene amplification, which is associated with aggressive clinical behavior, was more prevalent in carcinosarcomas occurring in Black than in White patients. ECs from Black and White patients display important differences in their histologic types, molecular subtypes, driver genetic alterations, and therapeutic targets.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our comprehensive analysis of prospectively clinically sequenced ECs revealed significant differences in their histologic and molecular composition and in the presence of therapeutic targets in Black versus White patients. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating diverse populations into molecular studies and clinical trials to address EC disparities. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2293.

A comparative analysis of endometrial cancer disparities in incidence, mortality, and survival between women living in Puerto Rico, Non-Hispanic Blacks, Non-Hispanic Whites, and US Hispanics between 2000-2018

Objective

 Endometrial cancer diagnosis in younger women is increasing in Puerto Rico and the United States. The study aims to evaluate the endometrial cancer trends in incidence, mortality, and survival by comparing US ethnic groups (NHW, NHB, and Hispanic) to women living in PR to assess whether disparities exist by age and stage at diagnosis on outcomes of interest.

Methods

 We performed a secondary data analysis and comparison of the age-specific and age-adjusted incidence rates, mortality rates, and the survival of endometrial cancer in PR with that of NHB, NHW, and Hispanic using data from the PR Central Cancer Registry, the SEER Program, and PR Demographic Registry from 2000 to 2018.

Results

 PR had the highest incidence rates (41.3 per 100,000 women) of endometrial cancer, followed by NHW, NHB, and Hispanic. Women in PR younger than 65 years old had higher incidence rates of endometrial cancer than compared groups. NHB have higher overall mortality rates (12.5 per 100,000 women). Between ages 20-34 and 35-49, women in PR have the highest mortality rates, and after age 50, mortality rates are higher for NHB.

Conclusions

Women in PR had higher endometrial cancer incidence rates in increasing trend from 2000 to 2018 compared to similar NHB, Hispanic, and NHW cohorts. Also, women in PR experienced higher incidence and mortality rates below 50 years old among all races and ethnicities. Future studies are needed to evaluate histology, obesity trends, and the impact on the quality of life for this cohort.

Trends in Uterine Cancer Mortality in the United States: A 50-Year Population-Based Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze mortality trends in uterine cancer in the United States over 50 years with an emphasis on age and race and ethnicity.

METHODS

Data on uterine cancer deaths from 1969 to 2018 were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics. Trends were examined by age and race and ethnicity after adjustment for the hysterectomy rate and pregnancy.

RESULTS

Uterine cancer mortality decreased between 1969 and 1997 (from 6.03 to 4.00/100,000) but increased between 1997 and 2018 (from 4.00 to 5.02/100,000). From 2001 to 2018, mortality rates increased by 1.25-fold across all age groups. In 2018, the mortality rate from uterine cancer for patients aged 70 years or older and 60-69 years was sixfold and threefold higher, respectively, than in younger patients (aged 50-59 years) (54.87/100,000 vs 27.80/100,000 vs 8.70/100,000). The mortality rate for non-Hispanic Black women was 2.2-fold higher than for non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander women (17.6/100,000 vs 7.82/100,000, 6.54/100,000, and 4.24/100,000, respectively). On an intersection analysis of age and race, non-Hispanic Black women aged older than 60 years had a threefold higher mortality rate than non-Hispanic White women (72/100,000 vs 24/100,000). A notable finding was that young non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women (30-39 years) had the highest annual increases in mortality at 3.3% and 3.8% per year compared with 2.2% in non-Hispanic White women.

CONCLUSION

Since 2001, the uterine cancer mortality rate has increased across all four racial and ethnic groups examined, with the highest increase seen among non-Hispanic Black women. The largest increase in mortality was observed among younger non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women.

Endometrial Cancer Knowledge and Guideline-Concordant Practice Patterns Among First-Line Providers

Background: Provider uncertainty about the appropriate guideline-concordant evaluation of endometrial cancer (EC) symptoms may be a factor in racial inequities in EC. To evaluate the relationship between EC knowledge and reported practice patterns in a nationally representative survey of first-line providers for initial EC symptoms. Materials and Methods: This was a mailed cross-sectional survey of physicians and nurse practitioners from professional organization roster of providers from Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN), Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Emergency Medicine. It queried demographics, practice characteristics, EC knowledge, and guideline-concordant practice patterns via three case vignettes. Regions of low response were retargeted to ensure strong representation among providers caring for Black women patients. EC knowledge was analyzed via a composite score (range: -3 to 10, with higher scores representing more EC knowledge), and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) used to test the association between knowledge and reported practice patterns. Results: Among 531 returned surveys (response rate = 38%), OBGYN had highest (53%) frequency of >6 (median) EC knowledge score, and Emergency Medicine had the lowest (15%) (p < 0.001). Nonguideline-concordant practice patterns were reported in 14%, 41%, and 35% of the three EC cases presented. Providers with knowledge >6, (n = 205) were significantly more likely to report guideline-concordant care on case vignettes (PR 1.28-1.36). Conclusions: In a national survey of multi-specialty backgrounds, there were basic knowledge gaps about EC and EC risk factors among providers, and a sizeable proportion reported nonguideline concordant practices. These findings indicate the importance of targeted education and training for first-line providers, as EC incidence rises.

Management of Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia: ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 5

SUMMARY

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) often is a precursor lesion to adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Hysterectomy is the definitive treatment for EIN-AEH. When a conservative (fertility-sparing) approach to the management of EIN-AEH is under consideration, it is important to attempt to exclude the presence of endometrial cancer to avoid potential undertreatment of an unknown malignancy in those who have been already diagnosed with EIN-AEH. Given the high risk of progression to cancer, those who do not have surgery require progestin therapy (oral, intrauterine, or combined) and close surveillance. Although data are conflicting and limited, studies have demonstrated that treatment with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device results in a higher regression rate when compared with treatment with oral progestins alone. Limited data suggest that cyclic progestational agents have lower regression rates when compared with continuous oral therapy. After initial conservative treatment for EIN-AEH, early detection of disease persistence, progression, or recurrence requires careful follow-up. Gynecologists and other clinicians should counsel patients that lifestyle modification resulting in weight loss and glycemic control can improve overall health and may decrease the risk of EIN-AEH and endometrial cancer.

Health Disparities in Ovarian Cancer: Report From the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference

Health disparity, defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as "preventable differences in the burden of disease, injury, violence, or opportunities to achieve optimal health that are experienced by socially disadvantaged populations," is seen across multiple diseases. We conducted an evidence review of health disparities and inequities and their mitigation strategies related to ovarian cancer as part of a CDC-sponsored project to develop educational materials for clinicians on the prevention and early diagnosis of gynecologic cancers. Our review found profound disparities in outcomes such as survival, treatment, and stage at diagnosis by factors such as race and ethnicity, insurance, socioeconomic status, and geographic location. We found little direct evidence on mitigation strategies. Studies support equivalent response to equivalent treatment between groups, suggesting that adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines can at least partially mitigate some of the differences.

Comprehensive analysis of germline drivers in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in unselected patients with endometrial cancer (EC), define biallelic gPVs within tumors, and describe their associations with clinicopathologic features.

METHODS

Germline assessment of at least 76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing clinical tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) sequencing from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021. In patients with gPVs, biallelic alterations in ECs were identified through analysis of loss of heterozygosity and somatic PVs. Clinicopathologic variables were compared using nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

Of 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs, and 15 patients had 2 gPVs. There were 231 gPVs in 35 genes (75 [32%] high penetrance; 39 [17%] moderate penetrance; and 117 [51%] low, recessive, or uncertain penetrance). Compared with those without gPVs, patients with gPVs were younger (P = .002), more often White (P = .009), and less obese (P = .025) and had differences in distribution of tumor histology (P = .017) and molecular subtype (P < .001). Among 231 gPVs, 74 (32%) exhibited biallelic inactivation within tumors. For high-penetrance gPVs, 63% (47 of 75) of ECs had biallelic alterations, primarily affecting mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination related genes, including BRCA1,BRCA2, RAD51D, and PALB2. Biallelic inactivation varied across molecular subtypes with highest rates in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or copy-number (CN)-high subtypes (3 of 12 [25%] POLE, 30 of 77 [39%] MSI-H, 27 of 60 [45%] CN-high, 9 of 57 [16%] CN-low; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Of unselected patients with EC, 13% had gPVs, with 63% of gPVs in high-penetrance genes (MMR and homologous recombination) exhibiting biallelic inactivation, potentially driving cancer development. This supports germline assessment in EC given implications for treatment and cancer prevention.

Racial Disparities in Brachytherapy Treatment among Women with Cervical and Endometrial Cancer in the United States

Brachytherapy improves clinical outcomes among women diagnosed with cervical and endometrial cancers. Recent evidence demonstrates that declining brachytherapy boosts for women with cervical cancer were associated with higher mortality. In this retrospective cohort study, women diagnosed with endometrial or cervical cancer in the United States between 2004 and 2017 were selected from the National Cancer Database for evaluation. Women ≥18 years of age were included for high intermediate risk (PORTEC-2 and GOG-99 definition) or FIGO Stage II-IVA endometrial cancers and FIGO Stage IA-IVA-non-surgically treated cervical cancers. The aims were to (1) evaluate brachytherapy treatment practice patterns for cervical and endometrial cancers in the United States; (2) calculate rates of brachytherapy treatment by race; and (3) determine factors associated with not receiving brachytherapy. Treatment practice patterns were evaluated over time and by race. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of brachytherapy. The data show increasing rates of brachytherapy for endometrial cancers. Compared to non-Hispanic White women; Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NHPI) women with endometrial cancer and Black women with cervical cancer were significantly less likely to receive brachytherapy. For both NHPI and Black women, treatment at community cancer centers was associated with a decreased likelihood of brachytherapy. The data suggest racial disparities among Black women with cervical cancer and NHPI women with endometrial cancer and emphasize an unmet need for brachytherapy access within community hospitals.

Lipidomic Profiling Reveals Biological Differences between Tumors of Self-Identified African Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites with Cancer

In the US, the incidence and mortality of many cancers are disproportionately higher in African Americans (AA). Yet, AA remain poorly represented in molecular studies investigating the roles that biological factors might play in the development, progression, and outcomes of many cancers. Given that sphingolipids, key components of mammalian cellular membranes, have well-established roles in the etiology of cancer progression, malignancy, and responses to therapy, we conducted a robust mass spectrometry analysis of sphingolipids in normal adjacent uninvolved tissues and tumors of self-identified AA and non-Hispanic White (NHW) males with cancers of the lung, colon, liver, and head and neck and of self-identified AA and NHW females with endometrial cancer. In these cancers, AA have worse outcomes than NHW. The goal of our study was to identify biological candidates to be evaluated in future preclinical studies targeting race-specific alterations in the cancers of AA. We have identified that various sphingolipids are altered in race-specific patterns, but more importantly, the ratios of 24- to 16-carbon fatty acyl chain-length ceramides and glucosylceramides are higher in the tumors of AA. As there is evidence that ceramides with 24-carbon fatty acid chain length promote cellular survival and proliferation, whereas 16-carbon chain length promote apoptosis, these results provide important support for future studies tailored to evaluate the potential roles these differences may play in the outcomes of AA with cancer.

Ovarian, Uterine, and Vulvovaginal Cancers: Screening, Treatment Overview, and Prognosis

Ovarian, uterine, and vulvovaginal cancers affect approximately 96,000 women per year in the United States, resulting in approximately 29,000 deaths annually. Routine screening protocols do not detect these malignancies; thus, the recognition of risk factors and evaluation of worrisome symptoms are essential for early detection and improved prognoses. Treatment is managed by gynecologic oncologists, and often involves a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and possible radiation treatments. Survivor care is managed by the primary-care clinician: expert attention to the mental, physical, and sexual health of each patient will ensure the best outcomes and quality of life.

Alarming trends and disparities in high-risk endometrial cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the most recent publications highlighting the trends and disparities among patients diagnosed with high-risk endometrial cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endometrial cancer mortality continues to rise, driven by the increasing incidence of high-risk histologic subtypes that accounts for a disproportionate number of endometrial cancer deaths. The lack of progress made in endometrial cancer treatment, particularly of high-risk histologic subtypes, disproportionately affects black women who are more likely to be diagnosed with these aggressive tumor types. Even when accounting for high-risk histology, various factors across the spectrum of care may influence the survival disparities between black and white women, including timely access to guideline-concordant care, clinical trial enrollment, and systemic racism that impacts cancer outcomes.

SUMMARY

In this review, we highlight the disproportionate impact of worsening endometrial cancer mortality and healthcare inequalities contributing to the endometrial cancer survival disparity between black and white women.

Landmark Series on Disparities: Uterine Cancer and Strategies for Mitigation

Longstanding racial disparities exist in uterine cancer. There is a growing body of literature documenting differences in the prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and tumor characteristics of uterine cancer in Black women compared with White women that significantly contribute to the outcome disparity seen between the groups. This article seeks to provide an overview of racial disparities present in uterine cancer, with attention on Black women in the USA, as well as offer a review on the multifactorial etiology of the disparities described.

Risk of critical limb ischemia in long-term uterine cancer survivors: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

The risk of critical limb ischemia (CLI) which causes ischemic pain or ischemic loss in the arteries of the lower extremities in long-term uterine cancer (UC) survivors remains unclear, especially in Asian patients, who are younger at the diagnosis of UC than their Western counterparts.

AIM

To conduct a nationwide population-based study to assess the risk of CLI in UC long-term survivors.

METHODS

UC survivors, defined as those who survived for longer than 5 years after the diagnosis, were identified and matched at a 1:4 ratio with normal controls. Stratified Cox models were used to assess the risk of CLI.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2005, 1889 UC survivors who received surgery alone or surgery combined with radiotherapy (RT) were classified into younger (onset age < 50 years, n = 894) and older (onset age ≥ 50 years, n = 995) groups. While compared with normal controls, the younger patients with diabetes, hypertension, and receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT) were more likely to develop CLI. In contrast, the risk of CLI was associated with adjuvant RT, obesity, hypertension, and HRT in the older group. Among the UC survivors, those who were diagnosed at an advanced age (> 65 years, aHR = 2.48, P = 0.011), had hypertension (aHR = 2.18, P = 0.008) or received HRT (aHR = 3.52, P = 0.020) were at a higher risk of CLI.

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide study, we found that the risk factors associated with CLI were similar in both cohorts except for adjuvant RT that was negligible in the younger group, but positive in the older group. Among the survivors, hypertension, advanced age, and HRT were more hazardous than RT. Secondary prevention should include CLI as a late complication in UC survivorship programs.

Executive Summary of the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference

Evidence for uterine cancer prevention, diagnosis, and special issues from the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference is summarized.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognized the need for educational materials for clinicians on the prevention and early diagnosis of gynecologic cancers. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in evidence review from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and content experts from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review relevant literature, best practices, and existing practice guidelines as a first step toward developing evidence-based educational materials for women's health care clinicians about uterine cancer. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members and discussed at a virtual meeting of stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations in January 2021. This article is the evidence summary of the relevant literature and existing recommendations to guide clinicians in the prevention, early diagnosis, and special considerations of uterine cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps are noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research.