Recurrent Preeclampsia: The Effect of Weight Change Between Pregnancies

Decreased postpartum exercise capacity after a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia: Implications for CVD risk prediction

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are associated with increased long-term risk for cardiometabolic risk factors (chronic hypertension [HTN], obesity, diabetes) and heart failure. Exercise capacity is a known predictor of heart failure in patients with normal resting cardiac filling pressures. In this prospective observational cohort study, we sought to identify predictors of reduced postpartum exercise capacity in participants with normotensive vs preeclamptic pregnancies.

METHODS

Preeclampsia (PreE) and normotensive subjects were enrolled to undergo bedside echocardiography within 48 hours of delivery, and rest/exercise echocardiography 12 weeks postpartum.

RESULTS

Recruited subjects (n = 68) were grouped according to their blood pressure as: a) normotensive pregnancy n = 15; b) PreE with normotensive postpartum (PreE-Resolved, n = 36); c) PreE with persistent postpartum HTN (PreE-HTN, n = 17). At enrollment, a significantly higher percentage of subjects in the PreE-HTN group were Black. Compared to normotensive and PreE-Resolved subjects, those with PreE-HTN demonstrated higher resting systolic blood pressure (SBP, 112 [normotensive] vs 112 [PreE-Resolved] vs 134 [PreE-HTN], P < .001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP, 70.0 vs 72.5 vs 85.0, P < .001), and significantly less postpartum weight loss (9.6% vs 13.6% vs 3.8%, P < .001). Following Bruce protocol stress testing, PreE-HTN subjects demonstrated achieved significantly lower exercise duration (10.4 vs 10.2 vs 7.9 minutes, P = .001). Subjects with PreE-HTN also demonstrated evidence of exercise-induced diastolic dysfunction as assessed by peak exercise lateral e' (18.0 vs 18.0 vs 13.5, P = .045) and peak exercise tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TR Vm, 2.4 vs 3.0 vs 3.1, P = 0.045). Exercise duration was negatively associated with gravidity (R = -0.27, P = .029) and postpartum LV mass index (R = -0.45, P < .001), resting average E/e' (R = -0.51, P < .001), BMI (R = -0.6, P < .001) and resting SBP (R = -0.51, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postpartum exercise stress testing capacity is related to readily available clinical markers including pregnancy factors, echocardiographic parameters and unresolved cardiometabolic risk factors.

Recurrence Risk of Pregnancy Complications in Twin and Singleton Deliveries

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to estimate and compare the recurrence risk of preterm birth (PTB), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertension (GH), and preeclampsia and eclampsia (PE and E) in subsequent pregnancy groups (index-subsequent) of singleton-singleton (n = 49,868), twin-singleton (n = 448), and singleton-twin (n = 723) pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

 Birthing individuals from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Consecutive Pregnancy Study (2002-2010) with ≥ 2 singleton or twin deliveries were examined. Adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for recurrent PTB, GDM, GH, and PE and E were estimated using Poisson regression models with robust variance estimators.

RESULTS

 The aRR of PTB and GDM ranged from 1.4 to 5.1 and 5.2 to 22.7, respectively, with the greatest recurrence relative risk for both conditions in singleton-singleton subsequent pregnancies (PTB: aRR = 5.1 [95% CI: 4.8-5.5], GDM: aRR = 22.7 [95% CI: 20.8-24.8]). The aRR of GH and PE and E ranged from 2.8 to 7.6 and 3.2 to 9.2, respectively, with the greatest recurrence relative risk for both conditions in twin-singleton subsequent pregnancies (GH: aRR = 7.6 [95% CI: 2.8-20.5], PE and E: aRR = 9.2 [95% CI: 2.9-28.6]).

CONCLUSION

 Recurrence relative risk was increased for PTB, GDM, GH, and PE and E in all subsequent pregnancy groups, which varied in magnitude based on the birth number of the index and subsequent pregnancy. This information provides insight into risk management for subsequent pregnancies including multiples.

KEY POINTS

· Recurrence risk for all conditions is persistent in all subsequent pregnancy groups.. · The magnitude of risk varies by the presence of multiples in the index or subsequent pregnancy.. · Singleton-singleton pregnancies are at the greatest risk of PTB.. · Singleton-singleton pregnancies are at the greatest risk of GDM.. · Twin-singleton pregnancies are at the greatest risk of hypertensive disorders..

Clinical features of recurrent preeclampsia: a retrospective study of 109 recurrent preeclampsia patients

Our study aimed to investigate the clinical features of recurrent preeclampsia (rPE) and evaluate the preventive effect of low-dose aspirin (LDA) in rPE. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 109 patients who experienced preeclampsia in two consecutive pregnancies and delivered at Peking University First Hospital from January 2016 to December 2022. We analyzed the pregnancy outcomes of patients with rPE and assessed whether the use of LDA during pregnancy could improve these outcomes. Our results revealed that patients with rPE had a higher body mass index (BMI) and a higher incidence of diabetes during pregnancy compared to their first onset of preeclampsia (29.01 ± 4.70 kg/m2 vs. 27.13 ± 4.25 kg/m2, P < 0.05; 11.01% vs. 1.83%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the incidence of severe preeclampsia was higher at recurrence in patients with rPE compared to their first onset (83.49% vs. 70.64%, P < 0.05), as well as the incidence of severe preeclampsia with chronic hypertension (34.86% vs. 8.26%, P < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of gestational diabetes and postpartum hemorrhage was higher in patients with rPE compared to their first preeclampsia onset (25.69% vs. 5.50%, P < 0.05; 20.18% vs. 5.83%, P < 0.05). Compared to the first onset of preeclampsia, patients with rPE had an earlier gestational age at delivery (35.42 ± 3.06 weeks vs. 36.60 ± 2.74 weeks, P < 0.05), lower birth weight of neonates (2478.39 ± 828.44 g vs. 2883.71 ± 712.94 g, P < 0.05), and a higher risk of premature birth (67.00% vs. 47.19%, P < 0.05). However, in patients with rPE, the use of LDA delayed the gestational age at delivery, increased the birth weight of the neonate, reduced the premature birth rate, and increased the perinatal survival rate. In conclusion, patients with rPE are at an increased risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. However, the use of LDA during pregnancy effectively improves these outcomes.

Evaluation and Management of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy complicate up to 10% of pregnancies and remain the major cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy can be classified into four groups depending on the onset of hypertension and the presence of target organ involvement: chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and superimposed preeclampsia on chronic hypertension. Hypertension during pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease and kidney failure. Early diagnosis and proper treatment for pregnant women with hypertension remain a priority since this leads to improved maternal and fetal outcomes. Labetalol, nifedipine, methyldopa, and hydralazine are the preferred medications to treat hypertension during pregnancy. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the diagnostic criteria, evaluation, and management of pregnant women with hypertension.

Immunometabolic adaptation and immune plasticity in pregnancy and the bi-directional effects of obesity

Mandatory maternal metabolic and immunological changes are essential to pregnancy success. Parallel changes in metabolism and immune function make immunometabolism an attractive mechanism to enable dynamic immune adaptation during pregnancy. Immunometabolism is a burgeoning field with the underlying principle being that cellular metabolism underpins immune cell function. With whole body changes to the metabolism of carbohydrates, protein and lipids well recognised to occur in pregnancy and our growing understanding of immunometabolism as a determinant of immunoinflammatory effector responses, it would seem reasonable to expect immune plasticity during pregnancy to be linked to changes in the availability and handling of multiple nutrient energy sources by immune cells. While studies of immunometabolism in pregnancy are only just beginning, the recognised bi-directional interaction between metabolism and immune function in the metabolic disorder obesity might provide some of the earliest insights into the role of immunometabolism in immune plasticity in pregnancy. Characterised by chronic low-grade inflammation including in pregnant women, obesity is associated with numerous adverse outcomes during pregnancy and beyond for both mother and child. Concurrent changes in metabolism and immunoinflammation are consistently described but any causative link is not well established. Here we provide an overview of the metabolic and immunological changes that occur in pregnancy and how these might contribute to healthy versus adverse pregnancy outcomes with special consideration of possible interactions with obesity.

Risk of preeclampsia by gestational weight gain in women with varied prepregnancy BMI: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Despite the important clinical significance, limited data on the joint contribution of prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) to preeclampsia, the second leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. This study aimed to estimate the risk of preeclampsia by GWG among women with varied prepregnancy BMI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data of 117 738 singleton pregnant women aged 18-49 years from 150 maternity hospitals in China between 2015 and 2018. GWG was calculated as the measured weight at the time of preeclampsia assessment minus prepregnancy weight; GWG velocity was calculated as the GWG divided by the gestational age at weighing. The non-linear associations of GWG with preeclampsia were examined by restricted cubic spline regression analysis according to prepregnancy BMI. The association of the GWG categories with preeclampsia was further examined by performing robust Poisson regression stratified by the prepregnancy BMI categories.

RESULTS

Among participants, 2426 (2.06%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia. Compared to women with normal BMI, those who were overweight and obese had 1.92- fold (95%CI, 1.73-2.14) and 5.06- fold (95%CI, 4.43-5.78) increased risks for preeclampsia, respectively. The association of GWG velocity with preeclampsia was presented as a J-shaped curve with the varied inflexion point (where the rate of preeclampsia was 2%), which was 0.54, 0.38, and 0.25 kg/week in women with normal BMI, overweight, and obesity, respectively; a steep risk rise was observed along with GWG velocity beyond the inflexion points. The overall adjusted relative risk for preeclampsia was calculated among women with the different GWG categories of GWG.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight that high prepregnancy BMI and exceed GWG contributed to increased risk of preeclampsia with a superimposed effect and underscore the need to optimize the recommendations for GWG for women with different prepregnancy BMI.

Does prepregnancy weight change have an effect on subsequent pregnancy health outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

International guidelines recommend women with an overweight or obese body mass index (BMI) aim to reduce their body weight prior to conception to minimize the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Recent systematic reviews have demonstrated that interpregnancy weight gain increases women's risk of developing adverse pregnancy outcomes in their subsequent pregnancy. Interpregnancy weight change studies exclude nulliparous women. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following MOOSE guidelines and summarizes the evidence of the impact of preconception and interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes for women regardless of parity. Sixty one studies met the inclusion criteria for this review and reported 34 different outcomes. We identified a significantly increased risk of gestational diabetes (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.66, 2.14, I²  = 87.8%), hypertensive disorders (OR 1.46 95% CI 1.12, 1.91, I²  = 94.9%), preeclampsia (OR 1.92 95% CI 1.55, 2.37, I²  = 93.6%), and large-for-gestational-age (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25, 1.49, I²  = 92.2%) with preconception and interpregnancy weight gain. Interpregnancy weight loss only was significantly associated with increased risk for small-for-gestational-age (OR 1.29 95% CI 1.11, 1.50, I²  = 89.9%) and preterm birth (OR 1.06 95% CI 1.00, 1.13, I²  = 22.4%). Our findings illustrate the need for effective preconception and interpregnancy weight management support to improve pregnancy outcomes in subsequent pregnancies.

Preconceptional maternal weight loss and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), including pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), Preeclampsia (PE), Hemolysis Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets (HELLP) and chronic hypertension, are leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although the pathophysiology of HDP is complex, preconceptional weight reduction in obese women might reduce these complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of preconceptional weight loss by lifestyle intervention or bariatric surgery in overweight and obese women and the reduction of the risk of HDP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Databases are searched until September 2019 resulting in 2547 articles: 110 full-text analysis and 29 detailed analysis. Reduced risks were shown for HDP in seven articles (n = 4381) of weight loss after lifestyle intervention or bariatric surgery (OR range 0.10-0.64), for PIH in four articles (n = 46,976) (OR range 0.14-0.79), and for PE in seven articles (n = 169,734) (OR range 0.14-0.84). The stratified analysis of weight loss after lifestyle intervention and bariatric surgery shows comparable results. The meta-analysis of 20 studies of the effectiveness of lifestyle intervention and bariatric surgery revealed reduced risks of HDP (OR 0.45 (95% CI 0.32-0.63)), PIH (OR 0.61 (95%CI 0.44-0.85)) and PE (OR 0.67 (95%CI 0.51-0.88)).

CONCLUSIONS

Preconceptional weight loss after lifestyle intervention or bariatric surgery is effective in reducing risks of HDP, PIH and PE, and emphasizes the need to optimize weight in overweight and obese women with a child wish. More research is recommended to investigate short-term and long-term beneficial and harmful side-effects of these interventions on maternal and offspring health.

Pregnancy Outcomes after Preeclampsia: The Effects of Interpregnancy Weight Change

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the effects of interpregnancy weight change on pregnancy outcomes, including recurrent preeclampsia, preterm birth, small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), and cesarean delivery, among women with a history of preeclampsia. We also evaluated whether these associations were modified by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) category in the first pregnancy (BMI < 25 vs. ≥25 kg/m²) and if associations were present among women who maintained a healthy BMI category in both pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study including 15,108 women who delivered their first two nonanomalous singleton live births in Missouri (1989-2005) and experienced preeclampsia in the first pregnancy. We performed Poisson regression with robust error variance to estimate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for outcomes of interest after controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Interpregnancy weight gain was associated with increased risk of recurrent preeclampsia, LGA, and cesarean delivery. These risks increased in a "dose-response" manner with increasing magnitude of interpregnancy weight gain and were generally more pronounced among women who were underweight or normal weight in the first pregnancy. Interpregnancy weight loss exceeding 1 BMI unit was associated with increased risk of SGA among underweight and normal weight women, while interpregnancy weight loss exceeding 2 BMI units was associated with reduced risk of recurrent preeclampsia among overweight and obese women.

CONCLUSION

Even small changes in interpregnancy weight may significantly affect pregnancy outcomes among formerly preeclamptic women. Appropriate weight management between pregnancies has the potential to attenuate such risks.

KEY POINTS

· Interpregnancy weight change among formerly preeclamptic women significantly affects pregnancy outcomes.. · Interpregnancy weight gain is associated with increased risk of recurrent preeclampsia, large-for-gestational-age and cesarean delivery.. · Interpregnancy weight loss is associated with increased risk of small-for-gestational age and recurrent preeclampsia..

Preeclampsia Across Pregnancies and Associated Risk Factors: Findings From a High-Risk US Birth Cohort

Background

Preeclampsia increases women's risks for maternal morbidity and future cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to identify opportunities for prevention by examining the association between cardiometabolic risk factors and preeclampsia across 2 pregnancies among women in a high‐risk US birth cohort.

Methods and Results

Our sample included 618 women in the Boston Birth Cohort with index and subsequent pregnancy data collected using standard protocols. We conducted log‐binomial univariate regression models to examine the association between preeclampsia in the subsequent pregnancy (defined as incident or recurrent preeclampsia) and cardiometabolic risk factors (ie, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, preterm birth, low birth weight, and gestational diabetes mellitus) diagnosed before and during the index pregnancy, and between index and subsequent pregnancies. At the subsequent pregnancy, 7% (36/540) had incident preeclampsia and 42% (33/78) had recurrent preeclampsia. Compared with women without obesity, women with obesity had greater risk of incident preeclampsia (unadjusted risk ratio [RR], 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1–4.5]) and recurrent preeclampsia (unadjusted RR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.5–6.7]). Preindex pregnancy chronic hypertension and diabetes mellitus were associated with incident, but not recurrent, preeclampsia (hypertension unadjusted RR, 7.9 [95% CI, 4.1–15.3]; diabetes mellitus unadjusted RR, 5.2 [95% CI, 2.5–11.1]. Women with new interpregnancy hypertension versus those without had a higher risk of incident and recurrent preeclampsia (incident preeclampsia unadjusted RR, 6.1 [95% CI, 2.9–13]); recurrent preeclampsia unadjusted RR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.5–3.9]).

Conclusions

In this diverse sample of high‐risk US women, we identified modifiable and treatable risk factors, including obesity and hypertension for the prevention of preeclampsia.

Clustering Longitudinal Blood Pressure Trajectories to Examine Heterogeneity in Outcomes Among Preeclampsia Cases and Controls

[Figure: see text].

Exercise alters cardiovascular and renal pregnancy adaptations in female rats born small on a high-fat diet

Intrauterine growth restriction programs adult cardiorenal disease, which may be exacerbated by pregnancy and obesity. Importantly, exercise has positive cardiovascular effects. This study determined if high-fat feeding exacerbates the known adverse cardiorenal adaptations to pregnancy in rats born small and whether endurance exercise can prevent these complications. Uteroplacental insufficiency was induced by bilateral uterine vessel ligation (Restricted) or sham (Control) surgery on embryonic day 18 (E18) in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Female offspring consumed a Chow or high-fat diet (HFD) from weaning and were randomly allocated to either a sedentary (Sedentary) or an exercise protocol at 16 wk; exercised before and during pregnancy (Exercise), or exercised during pregnancy only (PregEx). Systolic blood pressure was measured prepregnancy and rats were mated at 20 wk. During pregnancy, systolic blood pressure (E18) and renal function (E19) were assessed. Sedentary HFD Control females had increased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared with Chow. Compared with Control, Sedentary-Restricted females had increased eGFR, which was not influenced by HFD. Renal function was not affected by exercise and prepregnancy blood pressure was not altered. Restricted Chow-fed dams and dams fed a high-fat diet had a greater reduction in systolic blood pressure during late gestation, which was only prevented by Exercise. In summary, high-fat fed females born small are at a greater risk of altered cardiorenal adaptations to pregnancy. Although cardiovascular dysfunction was prevented by Exercise, renal dysfunction was not affected by exercise interventions. This study highlights that modifiable risk factors can have beneficial effects in the mother during pregnancy, which may impact fetal growth and development.

Preeclampsia for the Nephrologist: Current Understanding in Diagnosis, Management, and Long-term Outcomes

Preeclampsia is a multisystem progressive disorder of pregnancy that can be potentially catastrophic for the mother and the fetus. It involves complex perturbations of the kidney and systemic physiology, along with long-term effects on vascular and kidney health. Thus, the nephrologist plays a key role in the peripartum and long-term management of preeclampsia. Recent translational research has improved our understanding of its pathophysiology, and there is hope for novel therapies. In this review, we discuss the evolution of diagnostic criteria and dilemmas in the diagnosis of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. We summarize the advances in the pathogenesis and prediction of preeclampsia. We describe the management and prevention of preeclampsia focusing specially on the forthcoming strategies from the nephrologist's perspective. We address the evidence regarding long-term outcomes for the mother and the child. We end with exploring areas warranting future research.

Lifestyle information and access to a commercial weight management group to promote maternal postnatal weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour: the SWAN feasibility RCT

Background

Increasing numbers of UK women have overweight or obese body mass index scores when they become pregnant, or gain excessive weight in pregnancy, increasing their risk of adverse outcomes. Failure to manage postnatal weight is linked to smoking, non-healthy dietary choices, lack of regular exercise and poorer longer-term health. Women living in areas of higher social deprivation are more likely to experience weight management problems postnatally.

Objectives

The objectives were to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle information and access to a commercial weight management group focusing on self-monitoring, goal-setting and motivation to achieve dietary change commencing 8–16 weeks postnatally to achieve and maintain weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour.

Design

The design was a randomised two-arm feasibility trial with a nested mixed-methods process evaluation.

Setting

The setting was a single centre in an inner city setting in the south of England.

Participants

Participants were women with body mass index scores of > 25 kg/m2 at antenatal ‘booking’ and women with normal body mass index scores (18.0–24.9 kg/m2) at antenatal booking who developed excessive gestational weight gain as assessed at 36 weeks’ gestation.

Main outcome measures

Recruitment, retention, acceptability of trial processes and identification of relevant economic data were the feasibility objectives. The proposed primary outcome was difference between groups in weight at 12 months postnatally, expressed as percentage weight change and weight loss from antenatal booking. Other proposed outcomes included assessment of diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, body image, maternal esteem, mental health, infant feeding and NHS costs.

Results

Most objectives were achieved. A total of 193 women were recruited, 98 allocated to the intervention arm and 95 to the control arm. High follow-up rates (> 80%) were achieved to 12 months. There was an 8.8% difference in weight loss at 12 months between women allocated to the intervention arm and women allocated to the control arm (13.0% vs. 4.2%, respectively; p = 0.062); 47% of women in the intervention arm attended at least one weight management session, with low risk of contamination between arms. The greatest benefit was among women who attended ≥ 10 sessions. Barriers to attending sessions included capability, opportunity and motivation issues. Data collection tools were appropriate to support economic evaluation in a definitive trial, and economic modelling is feasible to quantify resource impacts and outcomes not directly measurable within a trial.

Limitations

The trial recruited from only one site. It was not possible to recruit women with normal body mass index scores who developed excessive pregnancy weight gain.

Conclusions

It was feasible to recruit and retain women with overweight or obese body mass index scores at antenatal booking to a trial comparing postnatal weight management plus standard care with standard care only and collect relevant data to assess outcomes. Approaches to recruit women with normal body mass index scores who gain excessive gestational weight need to be considered. Commercial weight management groups could support women’s weight management as assessed at 12 months postnatally, with probable greater benefit from attending ≥ 10 sessions. Process evaluation findings highlighted the importance of providing more information about the intervention on trial allocation, extended duration of time to commence sessions following birth and extended number of sessions offered to enhance uptake and retention. Results support the conduct of a future randomised controlled trial.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN39186148.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 8, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Effect of interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although obesity is a well-known risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes, evidence is sparse about the effects of interpregnancy weight change on the risk of adverse perinatal complications in a subsequent pregnancy. The current study aims to assess the effect of interpregnancy weight change on the risk of developing gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, pregnancy induced hypertension, preterm birth, or delivering a large- or small-for-gestational age neonate.

Methods

Pubmed, Ovid Embase, ClinicalTrial.gov and the Cochrane library were systematically searched up until July 24th, 2019. Interpregnancy weight change was defined as the difference between pre-pregnancy weight of an index pregnancy and a consecutive pregnancy. Inclusion criteria included full text original articles reporting quantitative data about interpregnancy weight change in multiparous women with any time interval between consecutive births and the risk of any perinatal complication of interest. Studies reporting adjusted odds ratios and a reference group of − 1 to + 1 BMI unit change between pregnancies were harmonised by meta-analysis.

Results

Twenty-three cohort studies identified a total of 671,906 women with two or more consecutive pregnancies. Seven of these studies were included in the meta-analysis (280,672 women). Interpregnancy weight gain was consistently associated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, pregnancy induced hypertension and large-for-gestational age births. In contrast, interpregnancy weight loss was associated with a lower risk of delivering a large-for-gestational age neonate. The effect magnitude (relative risk) of interpregnancy weight gain on pregnancy induced hypertension or delivering a large-for-gestational age neonate was greater among women with a normal BMI in the index pregnancy compared to women with a starting BMI ≥25 kg/m².

Conclusion

These findings confirm that interpregnancy weight change impacts the risk of developing perinatal complications in a subsequent pregnancy. This provides evidence in support of guidelines encouraging women to achieve post-partum weight loss, as their risk of perinatal complications might be minimised if they return to their pre-pregnancy weight before conceiving again.

Prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017067326).

Are overweight and obesity associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery in Mexico? A cross-sectional study from the National Survey of Health and Nutrition

Background

In Mexico, obesity is a major public health problem; 71% of adults are overweight or obese. The proportion of deliveries by cesarean is also very high (45%). Women of reproductive age with overweight or obesity may be at higher risk of cesarean.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study to test the association between overweight and obesity (using body mass index, BMI) and cesarean delivery in Mexico using data from the 2012 National Survey of Health and Nutrition (ENSANUT). Our sample included women of reproductive age at the time of survey who reported a live birth between 2006 and 2012. We used bivariate statistics and a multivariate logistic regression model to test the association between measured BMI and self-reported cesarean delivery. We included individual, clinical, and household level confounders and used survey weights to produce population estimates.

Results

Our sample consisted of 4,570 women (population N = 7,447,541). Overall, 44% of the women reported a cesarean at last delivery. We found differences in the proportion of cesarean delivery by BMI group (normal = 39%; 95% CI [35–43]; overweight = 42%; 95% CI [38–45]; obesity = 52%; 95% CI [48–57]; p < 0.001). In multivariable models controlling for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, we found a strong and independent association between obesity and cesarean delivery among multiparous women, compared with multiparous women with normal BMI (obesity aOR: 1.60; 95% CI [1.21–2.12]).

Conclusions

We provide new evidence about the proportion of women with overweight and obesity who deliver in Mexico. Multiparous women with obesity are at higher risk of cesarean delivery in Mexico than multiparous women with normal body mass index. Given the high prevalence of both obesity and cesarean delivery in Mexico, this relationship is salient for women, health care providers, and the health system.

Efforts to reduce the cesarean deliveries rate need to take the obesity epidemic into account.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2393-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Interpregnancy weight change and perinatal outcomes: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence suggests that interpregnancy weight change (IPWC) is a risk factor for perinatal outcomes, since it may increase the probability of gestational complications including gestational diabetes or cesarean delivery. Additionally, IPWC may affect neonatal outcomes increasing the prevalence of newborns small for gestational age or preterm birth. However, the association between IPWC and perinatal outcomes has not systematically synthesized thus far. This study protocol aims to provide a clear, transparent and standardized procedure for systematically reviewing the association between IPWC and perinatal outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review and meta-analyses protocol is based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science will be systematically searched from their inception. No limits will be defined by study design, as such different tools to assess risk of bias will be used:Odd ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be reported to evaluate associations between IPWC and perinatal outcomes.

RESULTS

The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis will systematically synthesize the evidence regarding the association between IPWC and perinatal outcomes. Data will be extracted from published articles and findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Ethical approval and informed consent will not be required due to the nature of the study.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018100449.

Effect of Self-care Before and During Pregnancy to Prevention and Control Preeclampsia in High-risk Women

Our aims to examine the factors influencing self-care for the prevention and control of preeclampsia in high-risk women. The current study is a review where the researcher browsed the available databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, Google Scholar, Medscape, and relevant research published between 1980 and 2016 were studied. To search for articles, relevant Medical Subject Heading keywords were first determined (Self-care, preeclampsia, prevention.) A total of 350 related articles were first selected, and the findings of 70 were used to compile the present article. The results of the study were classified under two general categories, including (1). Counseling and screening strategies and (2) self-care strategies for the prevention and control of preeclampsia in high-risk women. Screening women at risk for preeclampsia include measures such as measuring their blood pressure, checking for signs of depression, testing for thrombosis, taking a history of preeclampsia, providing preconception counseling about the appropriate age, time of pregnancy, and encouraging weight loss in obese women. This review showed a positive relationship between knowledge about self-care for preeclampsia and its control. The factors influencing preeclampsia self-care include making lifestyle changes, having a healthy diet, learning stress management, performing exercise and physical activities, taking antioxidants, dietary supplements, and calcium and adherence to aspirin and heparin regimens. There is a positive relationship between preconception counseling, screening women at risk for preeclampsia, self-care for the prevention, and control of preeclampsia.

(1) Tweetable abstract self-care in high-risk women is strongly associated with prevention and control of preeclampsia.

Association between periconceptional weight loss and maternal and neonatal outcomes in obese infertile women

Background

Obesity in women of reproductive age has deleterious effects on reproductive and offspring health. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between the magnitude of periconceptional body-mass index (BMI) change and maternal and neonatal outcomes in obese infertile women who participated in the LIFEstyle study. The LIFEstyle study was a randomized controlled trial, evaluating if a six-month lifestyle intervention program prior to infertility treatment in obese infertile women improved birth rates, compared to prompt infertility treatment.

Methods and findings

This is an exploratory post hoc analysis of the LIFEstyle study. We recorded periconceptional BMI change in women with an ongoing pregnancy, pooling data of all women, regardless of randomization arm. Periconceptional BMI change was calculated using weight at randomization and the periconceptional weight (measured in kilograms 12 weeks before or after conception and expressed as BMI change in units BMI (kg/m²)). Subsequently, women were categorized into quartiles according to the magnitude of their periconceptional change in BMI. The odds of maternal and neonatal outcomes were calculated using logistic regression analysis, comparing women in each of the first three weight change quartiles separately, and combined, to women in the fourth quartile. The fourth quartile was chosen as reference group, since these women had the least weight loss. We adjusted for periconceptional BMI, nulliparity and smoking status. In addition, we performed a subgroup analysis for singleton pregnancies. In the LIFEstyle study, 321 obese infertile women achieved an ongoing pregnancy which was conceived within 24 months after randomization. Periconceptional BMI change was available in 244 of these women (76%). Median BMI at randomization was 35.9 kg/m². Women in the first quartile (Q1) had a periconceptional BMI change of <-2.1 kg/m², women in the second quartile (Q2) -2.1 to -0.9 kg/m², women in the third quartile (Q3) -0.9 to 0.1 kg/m² and women in the fourth quartile (Q4) gained ≥0.1 kg/m². There were no significant differences between women in the quartiles regarding rates of excessive gestational weight gain (in term pregnancies), gestational diabetes, preterm birth, induction of labor, spontaneous vaginal birth and Caesarean section. Compared to women in Q4, the adjusted odds ratios, aOR, and 95% confidence interval for a hypertensive complication were; 0.55 (0.22–1.42) for women in Q1, 0.30 (0.12–0.78) for women in Q2, 0.39 (0.16–0.96) for women in Q3 and 0.39 (0.19–0.82) for women in Q1 to Q3 combined. In the subgroup analysis, investigating singleton pregnancies only, the statistically significant decreased rate of a hypertensive complication remained in women in Q2 (aOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10–0.72) and Q3 (aOR 0.39, 95%CI 0.16–0.98) and when comparing women in Q1 to Q3 together to women in Q4 (aOR 0.38, 95%CI 0.18–0.80). Furthermore, there was a significantly decreased aOR (95%CI) of preterm birth in women in Q2 (0.24, 0.06–0.98) and when combining women in Q1 to Q3 (0.37, 0.14–0.97) compared to women in Q4.

Conclusions

These results suggest that a periconceptional decrease in BMI in obese infertile women could lead to a decrease of the rates of hypertensive pregnancy complications and preterm birth. The results are limited by the exploratory nature of the analyses and further evidence is necessary to provide more definitive conclusions.

Interpregnancy weight change and adverse maternal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Examine associations between interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) change (difference in the pre-pregnancy BMIs of two consecutive pregnancies) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pre-eclampsia (PE), gestational hypertension (GHtn), primary cesarean delivery, and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC).

METHODS

Modified Poisson regression models estimated adjusted associations.

RESULTS

Every 1-unit increase in interpregnancy BMI increased risks of GDM (relative risk [RR]: 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.11), PE (RR: 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.09), GHtn (RR: 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10), and primary cesarean delivery (RR: 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05) and decreased the risk of a successful VBAC (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-0.997) in the second pregnancy. A BMI increase of ≥3 units increased risks of GDM (RR: 1.71, 95% CI, 1.52-1.93), PE (RR: 1.60, 95% CI, 1.33-1.94), GHtn (RR: 1.66, 95% CI, 1.42-1.94), and primary cesarean delivery (RR: 1.29, 95% CI, 1.12-1.49) and decreased the risk of a successful VBAC (RR: 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99) compared to women with interpregnancy BMI change within -1 and +1 unit. GDM was also increased among women increasing their BMI by ≥2 but <3 units (RR: 1.40; 95% CI, 1.21-1.61) and among those gaining ≥1 but <2 units (RR: 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.40).

CONCLUSION

An interpregnancy BMI increase of ≥3 units is associated with an increased risk of all outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of interpregnancy weight management.

Obesity and pregnancy: mechanisms of short term and long term adverse consequences for mother and child

Obesity is the most common medical condition in women of reproductive age. Obesity during pregnancy has short term and long term adverse consequences for both mother and child. Obesity causes problems with infertility, and in early gestation it causes spontaneous pregnancy loss and congenital anomalies. Metabolically, obese women have increased insulin resistance in early pregnancy, which becomes manifest clinically in late gestation as glucose intolerance and fetal overgrowth. At term, the risk of cesarean delivery and wound complications is increased. Postpartum, obese women have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism, depression, and difficulty with breast feeding. Because 50-60% of overweight or obese women gain more than recommended by Institute of Medicine gestational weight guidelines, postpartum weight retention increases future cardiometabolic risks and prepregnancy obesity in subsequent pregnancies. Neonates of obese women have increased body fat at birth, which increases the risk of childhood obesity. Although there is no unifying mechanism responsible for the adverse perinatal outcomes associated with maternal obesity, on the basis of the available data, increased prepregnancy maternal insulin resistance and accompanying hyperinsulinemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress seem to contribute to early placental and fetal dysfunction. We will review the pathophysiology underlying these data and try to shed light on the specific underlying mechanisms.

Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences

Obesity in women of reproductive age is increasing in prevelance worldwide. Obesity reduces fertility and increases time taken to conceive, and obesity-related comorbidities (such as type 2 diabetes and chronic hypertension) heighten the risk of adverse outcomes for mother and child if the woman becomes pregnant. Pregnant women who are obese are more likely to have early pregnancy loss, and have increased risk of congenital fetal malformations, delivery of large for gestational age infants, shoulder dystocia, spontaneous and medically indicated premature birth, and stillbirth. Late pregnancy complications include gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia, both of which are associated with long-term morbidities post partum. Women with obesity can also experience difficulties during labour and delivery, and are more at risk of post-partum haemorrhage. Long-term health risks are associated with weight retention after delivery, and inherent complications for the next pregnancy. The wellbeing of the next generation is also compromised. All these health issues could be avoided by prevention of obesity among women of reproductive age, which should be viewed as a global public health priority. For women who are already obese, renewed efforts should be made towards improved management during pregnancy, especially of blood glucose, and increased attention to post-partum weight management. Effective interventions, tailored to ethnicity and culture, are needed at each of these stages to improve the health of women and their children in the context of the global obesity epidemic.

Impact of inter-pregnancy BMI change on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the patterns and predictors of inter-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) change and its impact on perinatal outcomes in the second pregnancy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary teaching hospital in Adelaide, Australia.

POPULATION

Women with their first and second consecutive, singleton deliveries occurring between 2000 and 2012 (N=5371).

METHODS

Inter-pregnancy weight change calculated based on difference between BMI at respective antenatal booking visits. Association between inter-pregnancy weight change and perinatal outcomes investigated using multivariate generalised linear models, with stratification according to initial maternal BMI category in first pregnancy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Gestational diabetes (GDM); pregnancy induced hypertensive disorders; small-for-gestational age (SGA); preterm birth; large-for-gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia (>4500g).

RESULTS

On average, women with a normal BMI gained 1kg/m(2) between first and second pregnancies, while women who were overweight or obese gained 1.37kg/m(2). Among women with a normal BMI in their first pregnancy, a BMI increase of ≥4kg/m(2) was associated with increased risk of developing GDM (aRR 1.97; 95% CI 1.22-3.19), a macrosomic (aRR 4.06; 95% CI 2.25-7.34) or LGA infant (aRR 1.31 0.96-1.78) in the second pregnancy, while a reduction in BMI (≤-2kg/m(2)) was associated with an increased risk of SGA (aRR 1.94; 1.19-3.16). Among women who were overweight or obese in their first pregnancy, a BMI increase of ≥2-4 and ≥4kg/m(2) was associated with increased risks of developing GDM in the second pregnancy (aRR 1.39; 95% CI 1.01-1.91 and aRR 1.64 95% CI 1.16-2.31; ptrend<0.001), while no associations were observed for a BMI increase and risk of a macrosomic, SGA, or LGA infant. In contrast, reduction in BMI (≤-2kg/m(2)) was associated with a reduced risk of GDM (aRR 0.58 95% CI 0.37-0.90) and SGA (aRR 0.47; 95% CI 0.25-0.87).

CONCLUSION

Increases in BMI between pregnancies is associated with an increased risk for perinatal complications, even in normal-weight women, while a reduction in BMI is associated with improved perinatal outcomes among women who are overweight/obese. Inter-pregnancy weight control is an important target to reduce the risk of an adverse perinatal outcome in a subsequent pregnancy.

Inter-pregnancy interval and risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Women with a history of pre-eclampsia have a higher risk of developing pre-eclampsia in subsequent pregnancies. However, the role of the inter-pregnancy interval on this association is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of inter-pregnancy interval on the risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia or eclampia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS were searched (inception to July 2015).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Cohort studies assessing the risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia in the immediate subsequent pregnancy according to different birth intervals.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, methodological and quality assessment. Meta-analysis of adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) was used to measure the association between various interval lengths and recurrent pre-eclampsia or eclampsia.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 1769 articles and finally included four studies with a total of 77,561 women. The meta-analysis of two studies showed that compared to inter-pregnancy intervals of 2-4 years, the aOR for recurrent pre-eclampsia was 1.01 [95 % CI 0.95 to 1.07, I(2) 0 %] with intervals of less than 2 years and 1.10 [95 % CI 1.02 to 1.19, I(2) 0 %] with intervals longer than 4 years.

CONCLUSION

Compared to inter-pregnancy intervals of 2 to 4 years, shorter intervals are not associated with an increased risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia but longer intervals appear to increase the risk. The results of this review should be interpreted with caution as included studies are observational and thus subject to possible confounding factors.

Inter-Pregnancy Weight Change and the Risk of Recurrent Pregnancy Complications

Women with specific adverse pregnancy outcomes in their first pregnancy may be receptive to inter-pregnancy weight management guidance aimed at preventing these complications reoccurring in subsequent pregnancies. Thus the association between inter-pregnancy weight change and the risk of recurrent pregnancy complications at the second pregnancy was investigated in a retrospective cohort study of 24,520 women with their first-ever and second consecutive deliveries in Aberdeen using logistic regression. Compared with women who were weight stable, weight loss (>2BMI units) between pregnancies was associated with an increased risk of recurrent small for gestational age (SGA) birth and elective Cesarean-section, and was protective against recurrent pre-eclampsia, placental oversize and large for gestational age (LGA) birth. Conversely weight gain (>2BMI units) between pregnancies increased the risk of recurrent gestational hypertension, placental oversize and LGA birth and was protective against recurrent low placental weight and SGA birth. The relationships between weight gain, and placental and birth weight extremes were evident only in women with a healthy weight at first pregnancy (BMI<25units), while that between weight gain and the increased risk of recurrent gestational hypertension was largely independent of first pregnancy BMI. No relationship was detected between inter-pregnancy weight change and the risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm delivery, labour induction, instrumental delivery, emergency Cesarean-section or postpartum hemorrhage. Therefor inter-pregnancy weight change impacts the risk of recurrent hypertensive disorders, SGA and LGA birth and women with a prior history of these specific conditions may benefit from targeted nutritional advice to either lose or gain weight after their first pregnancy.

Prepregnancy body mass index in a first uncomplicated pregnancy and outcomes of a second pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effect of body mass index (BMI) before a first uncomplicated pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy, including preterm births, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, and neonatal deaths.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a population-based cohort study (n = 121,092) using the Missouri maternally linked birth registry (1989 through 2005). Multivariable binary logistic regression models were fit to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the parameters of interest after controlling for sociodemographic and pregnancy-related confounders in the second pregnancy.

RESULTS

Compared to women with a normal BMI in their first pregnancy, those who were underweight prepregnancy had increased odds for preterm birth by 20% and small for gestational age by 40% in their second pregnancy, while those with prepregnancy obesity had increased odds for large for gestational age, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and neonatal deaths in their second pregnancy by 54%, 156%, 85%, and 37%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Women starting a first pregnancy with suboptimal BMI may be at risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy, even if their first pregnancy was uncomplicated or if they reached a normal weight by their second pregnancy. The long-term consequences of suboptimal BMI carry considerable public health implications.

Risk factors differ between recurrent and incident preeclampsia: a hospital-based cohort study

PURPOSE

To examine whether risk factors, including prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), differ between recurrent and incident preeclampsia.

METHODS

Data included electronic medical records of nulliparas (n = 26,613) delivering 2 times or more in Utah (2002-2010). Modified Poisson regression models were used to examine (1) adjusted relative risks (RR) of preeclampsia and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with prepregnancy BMI; (2) maternal risk factor differences between incident and recurrent preeclampsia among primiparous women.

RESULTS

In the first pregnancy, compared with normal weight women (BMI: 18.5-24.9), preeclampsia risks for overweight (BMI: 25-29.9), obese class I (BMI: 30-34.9), and obese class II/III (BMI: ≥ 35) women were 1.82 (95% CI = 1.60-2.06), 2.10 (95% CI = 1.76-2.50), and 2.84 (95% CI = 2.32-3.47), respectively, whereas second pregnancy-incident preeclampsia risks were 1.66 (95% CI = 1.27-2.16), 2.31 (95% CI = 1.67-3.20), and 4.29 (95% CI = 3.16-5.82), respectively. Recurrent preeclampsia risks associated with BMI were highest among obese class I women (RR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.06-2.42) without increasing in a dose-response manner. Nonwhite women had higher recurrence risk than white women (RR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.16-2.50), whereas second pregnancy-incident preeclampsia risk did not differ by race.

CONCLUSION

Prepregnancy BMI appeared to have stronger associations with risk of incident preeclampsia either in the first or second pregnancy, than with recurrence risk. Nonwhite women had higher recurrence risk.

The preconceptional period as an opportunity for prediction and prevention of noncommunicable disease

Preconceptional care is a set of interventions, aimed to identify and modify medical, behavioral, and social risks to a woman's health and her pregnancy outcome, prior to conception. Diagnosing and treating some of the common noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) may have an impact on pregnancy outcome. Ample time should be allowed to properly intervene in some of the following situations: hypertension, diabetes, obesity, systemic lupus erythematosus, thyroid disease, anemia, epilepsy, asthma, and cardiac disease. Diabetes mellitus and obesity are common NCDs, with proven efficacy for preconceptional care, for both maternal and perinatal outcome. These primary components of the metabolic syndrome, if properly treated prior to pregnancy, will prevent long-term hazards for the mother, her children, and the next generations, by providing in utero primary prevention of NCDs.

Hypertension, preeclampsia and eclampsia among HIV-infected pregnant women from Latin America and Caribbean countries

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for hypertensive disorders in a cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women.

METHODS

Hypertensive disorders (HD) including preeclampsia/eclampsia (PE/E) and pregnancy induced hypertension, and risk factors were evaluated in a cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women from Latin America and the Caribbean enrolled between 2002 and 2009. Only pregnant women enrolled for the first time in the study and delivered at ≥20 weeks gestation were analyzed.

RESULTS

HD were diagnosed in 73 (4.8%, 95% CI: 3.8%-6.0%) of 1513 patients; 35 (47.9%) had PE/E. HD was significantly increased among women with a gestational age-adjusted body mass index (gBMI) ≥25 kg/m(2) (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.9-5.0), hemoglobin (Hg) ≥11 g/dL at delivery (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.6) and age ≥35 years (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-3.2). PE/E was increased among women with a gBMI ≥25 kg/m(2) (OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.5-6.0) and Hg ≥11 g/dL at delivery (OR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2-6.5). A previous history of PE/E increased the risk of PE/E 6.7 fold (95% CI: 1.8-25.5). HAART before conception was associated with PE/E (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.9).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-infected women, with a previous history of PE/E, a gBMI ≥25 kg/m(2), Hg at delivery ≥11 g/dL and in use of HAART before conception are at an increased risk of developing PE/E during pregnancy.

Periconception weight loss: common sense for mothers, but what about for babies?

Obesity in the childbearing population is increasingly common. Obesity is associated with increased risk for a number of maternal and neonatal pregnancy complications. Some of these complications, such as gestational diabetes, are risk factors for long-term disease in both mother and baby. While clinical practice guidelines advocate for healthy weight prior to pregnancy, there is not a clear directive for achieving healthy weight before conception. There are known benefits to even moderate weight loss prior to pregnancy, but there are potential adverse effects of restricted nutrition during the periconceptional period. Epidemiological and animal studies point to differences in offspring conceived during a time of maternal nutritional restriction. These include changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, body composition, glucose metabolism, and cardiovascular function. The periconceptional period is therefore believed to play an important role in programming offspring physiological function and is sensitive to nutritional insult. This review summarizes the evidence to date for offspring programming as a result of maternal periconception weight loss. Further research is needed in humans to clearly identify benefits and potential risks of losing weight in the months before conceiving. This may then inform us of clinical practice guidelines for optimal approaches to achieving a healthy weight before pregnancy.

Interpregnancy body mass index change and success of term vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effect of interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) change on success of term vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) among normal, overweight and obese women.

STUDY DESIGN

Using 1992-2009 Washington State birth certificate data linked with hospitalization records, we conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women (BMI ≥18.5 kg/m(2)) with a primary cesarean in their first birth and a term trial of labor in their second. Interpregnancy weight change (difference between first and second prepregnancy BMIs) was categorized as maintenance (<1 BMI unit change), loss (≥1 unit), moderate gain (≥1 and <2 units), high gain (≥2 units). We estimated relative risks of VBAC success using generalized linear models with a log-link function, adjusting for maternal age, race/ethnicity, nativity, marital status, education, smoking, primary cesarean indication, interpregnancy interval, birth year for second birth, and prenatal care adequacy.

RESULTS

Among 8302 women who attempted a term trial of labor, 65% had a successful VBAC. Women with normal BMI before their first pregnancy experienced an 8% decrease in VBAC success with moderate gain (relative risk [RR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.98) and a 12% decrease in success with high gain (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93), compared with normal weight women who maintained weight. Weight loss increased VBAC success in women who were overweight (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.25) or obese before their first delivery (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49), compared with overweight and obese women, respectively, who maintained weight.

CONCLUSION

Women can improve their chance of successful VBAC through interpregnancy weight management.

Interpregnancy weight change and risk for adverse perinatal outcome

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between interpregnancy weight change and the risk for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

All live-born singleton births delivered at 21-42 weeks of gestation in women who had their first two consecutive births between 2009 and 2011 in Flanders (the northern part of Belgium) and who were included in the Study Center for Perinatal Epidemiology database (N=7,897) were included. Interpregnancy weight change was calculated as the difference between the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) of the first pregnancy and the prepregnancy BMI of the second pregnancy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-induced hypertension, cesarean delivery, macrosomia (4,000 g or greater), low birth weight (less than 2,500 g), and congenital malformations were performed.

RESULTS

The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for gestational diabetes mellitus was 2.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.78; P=.002) for interpregnancy weight retention of 2 or more BMI units, and the adjusted OR for pregnancy-induced hypertension was 3.76 (95% CI 2.16-6.57; P<.001) with an increase of 3 or more BMI units between pregnancies, but these associations were only present in underweight and normal-weight women. In overweight and obese women, the adjusted OR was 2.04 (95% CI 1.41-2.95; P<.001) for cesarean delivery for an interpregnancy weight retention of 2 or more BMI units. In underweight and normal-weight women, the risk for macrosomia was halved if women lost more than 1 BMI unit between pregnancies, but at the same time, the risk for low birth weight doubled.

CONCLUSION

We show that weight retention between the first and second pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for perinatal complications, even in underweight and normal-weight women. Stabilizing interpregnancy weight appears an important target for reducing adverse perinatal outcomes in a second pregnancy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Weight loss before conception: A systematic literature review

The prevalence of overweight and obesity in women has increased during the last decades. This is a serious concern since a high BMI before conception is an independent risk factor for many adverse outcomes of pregnancy. Therefore, dietary counseling, intended to stimulate weight loss in overweight and obese women prior to conception has recently been recommended. However, dieting with the purpose to lose weight may involve health risks for mother and offspring. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify papers investigating the effects of weight loss due to dietary interventions before conception. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of weight loss prior to conception in overweight or obese women on a number of health-related outcomes in mother and offspring using studies published between January 2000 and December 2011. Our first literature search produced 486 citations and, based on predefined eligibility criteria, 58 were selected and ordered in full text. Two group members read each paper. Fifteen studies were selected for quality assessment and two of them were considered appropriate for inclusion in evidence tables. A complementary search identified 168 citations with four papers being ordered in full text. The two selected studies provided data for overweight and obese women. One showed a positive effect of weight loss before pregnancy on the risk of gestational diabetes and one demonstrated a reduced risk for large-for-gestational-age infants in women with a BMI above 25 who lost weight before pregnancy. No study investigated the effect of weight loss due to a dietary intervention before conception. There is a lack of studies on overweight and obese women investigating the effect of dietary-induced weight loss prior to conception on health-related variables in mother and offspring. Such studies are probably lacking since they are difficult to conduct. Therefore, alternative strategies to control the body weight of girls and women of reproductive age are needed.

Heparin in pregnant women with previous placenta-mediated pregnancy complications: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial

To assess whether antithrombotic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin effectively prevents recurrence of late pregnancy complications, 135 women with previous history of preeclampsia, hemolytic anemia, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count syndrome, intrauterine fetal death, fetal growth restriction, or placental abruption who had been referred within the 12th gestational week were randomized to medical surveillance alone (n = 68) or combined to open-label nadroparin (3800 IU daily subcutaneous injections) treatment (n = 67) in the setting of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial, run in Italy from April 2007 to April 2010. Primary outcome was a composite end point of late-pregnancy complications. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study was stopped for futility at the time of the first planned interim analysis. Among the 128 women eventually available for final analyses, 13 of the 63 (21%) randomized to nadroparin compared with 12 of the 65 (18%) on medical surveillance alone progressed to the primary end point. The absolute event risk difference between treatment arms (2.2; -1.6 to 16.0) was not statistically significant (P = .76). Thus, nadroparin did not prevent late-pregnancy complications in women at risk of recurrence. This finding challenges the role of antithrombotic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in the prevention of recurrent late pregnancy complications The trial was registered at http://ricerca-clinica.agenziafarmaco.it as EudraCT 2006-004205-26.

Antepartum obstetrical complications associated with obesity

Obesity is a major risk factor for many obstetrical complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, indicated preterm birth, macrosomia, and stillbirth. Clinicians should be aware of the unique obstetrical management considerations related to obesity, including recommendations for alterations in prenatal care. In addition, obese gravidas commonly have underlying medical conditions that can impact pregnancy and must be appreciated to optimize care. Obese women should be educated about these risks, ideally before pregnancy. Awareness of the complications that can arise for these women and potential changes in management offer opportunities to improve both prenatal and lifelong health.

Hypertension in pregnancy

Hypertension is a common complication of pregnancy. Preeclampsia, in particular, is associated with substantial risk to both the mother and the fetus. Several risk factors have been recognized to predict risk for preeclampsia. However, at present no biomarkers have sufficient discriminatory ability to be useful in clinical practice, and no effective preventive strategies have yet been identified. Commonly used medications for the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy include methyldopa and labetalol. Blood pressure thresholds for initiating antihypertensive therapy are higher than outside of pregnancy. Women with prior preeclampsia are at increased risk of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and renal disease.

Postpartum evaluation and long term implications

Hypertension, proteinuria and biochemical changes caused by pre-eclampsia may persist for several weeks and even months postpartum. Hypertension and pre-eclampsia may even develop for the first time postpartum. Care in the six weeks postpartum should include management of hypertension and screening for secondary causes of hypertension including renal disease if abnormalities persist beyond six weeks. Optimal postpartum monitoring for patients with preeclampsia has not been determined, and care needs to be individualized. The postpartum period also provides a window of opportunity for planning for the next pregnancy in addition to discussing long term implications of pre-eclampsia. Increased risk for the development of premature cardiovascular disease is the most significant long term implication of pre-eclampsia. Pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease share a common disease pathophysiology. Women who develop pre-eclampsia have pre-existing metabolic abnormalities or may develop them later in life. Women with early onset pre-eclampsia are at the highest risk of ischemic heart disease. Women with a history of pre-eclampsia should adopt a heart healthy lifestyle and should be screened and treated for traditional cardiovascular risk factors according to locally accepted guidelines.