1
|
Sánchez‐Iglesias JL, Morales‐Coma C, Minig L, Lago V, Domingo S, Mancebo G, Siegrist J, Fidalgo García MS, Llueca A, Serra A, Cobas Lozano P, Lekuona Artola A, Gómez‐Hidalgo NR, Acosta Ú, Ferrer‐Costa R, Bradbury M, Pérez‐Benavente A, Gil‐Moreno A. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early markers of anastomotic leakage in intestinal resections for advanced ovarian cancer (EDMOCS). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:1302-1310. [PMID: 38532280 PMCID: PMC11168259 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Serum levels of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein (CRP) have been used to predict anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery, but information is scarce in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) surgery with bowel resection. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of procalcitonin and CRP in detecting anastomotic leakage after AOC surgery with bowel resection. The study also aimed to determine the optimal postoperative reference values and the best day for evaluating these markers. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective, observational and multicentric trial included 92 patients with AOC undergoing debulking surgery with bowel resection between 2017 and 2020 in 10 reference hospitals in Spain. Procalcitonin and CRP levels were measured at baseline and on postoperative days 1-6. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of procalcitonin and CRP at each postoperative day. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS Anastomotic leakage was detected in six patients (6.5%). Procalcitonin and CRP values were consistently higher in patients with anastomotic leakage at all postoperative days. The maximum area under the curve (AUC) for procalcitonin was observed at postoperative day 1 (AUC = 0.823) with a cutoff value of 3.8 ng/mL (83.3% sensitivity, 81.3% specificity). For CRP, the maximum AUC was found at postoperative day 3 (AUC = 0.833) with a cutoff level of 30.5 mg/dL (100% sensitivity, 80.4% specificity). CONCLUSIONS Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein are potential biomarkers for early detection of anastomotic leakage after ovarian cancer surgery with bowel resection. Further prospective studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Luis Sánchez‐Iglesias
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR)Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Lucas Minig
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyIMED HospitalValenciaSpain
- Department of GynecologyCEU Cardenal Herrera UniversityValenciaSpain
| | - Víctor Lago
- Department of GynecologyCEU Cardenal Herrera UniversityValenciaSpain
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyLa Fe University HospitalValenciaSpain
| | - Santiago Domingo
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyLa Fe University HospitalValenciaSpain
| | - Gemma Mancebo
- Gynecological Cancer Multidisciplinary UnitHospital del MarBarcelonaSpain
- Department of GynecologyUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
| | - Jaime Siegrist
- Oncologic Gynecology Unit, Department of GynecologyLa Paz University HospitalMadridSpain
| | | | - Antoni Llueca
- Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology SurgeryHospital General Universitario de CastellonCastellónSpain
- Department of MedicineUniversidad Jaume ICastellónSpain
| | - Anna Serra
- Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominal Pelvic Oncology SurgeryHospital General Universitario de CastellonCastellónSpain
- Department of MedicineUniversidad Jaume ICastellónSpain
| | - Paloma Cobas Lozano
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyHospital Universitario Donostia, OSI DonostialdeDonostiaSpain
| | - Arantza Lekuona Artola
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyHospital Universitario Donostia, OSI DonostialdeDonostiaSpain
| | | | - Úrsula Acosta
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
| | - Roser Ferrer‐Costa
- Department of BiochemistryVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
| | - Melissa Bradbury
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
| | - Assumpció Pérez‐Benavente
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR)Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Antonio Gil‐Moreno
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR)Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ledermann JA, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Concin N, Davidson B, Fotopoulou C, González-Martin A, Gourley C, Leary A, Lorusso D, Banerjee S, Chiva L, Cibula D, Colombo N, Croce S, Eriksson AG, Falandry C, Fischerova D, Harter P, Joly F, Lazaro C, Lok C, Mahner S, Marmé F, Marth C, McCluggage WG, McNeish IA, Morice P, Nicum S, Oaknin A, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Pignata S, Ramirez PT, Ray-Coquard I, Romero I, Scambia G, Sehouli J, Shapira-Frommer R, Sundar S, Tan DSP, Taskiran C, van Driel WJ, Vergote I, Planchamp F, Sessa C, Fagotti A. ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:248-266. [PMID: 38307807 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- CIBERONC, Madrid; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLLEIDA, University of Lleida, Lleida; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - F Amant
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - B Davidson
- Department of Pathology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A González-Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Program in Solid Tumours-Cima, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Gourley
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Leary
- Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - D Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - S Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Chiva
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - D Cibula
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - N Colombo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - S Croce
- Department of Biopathology, Bergonié Institut, Bordeaux, France
| | - A G Eriksson
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Falandry
- Institute of Aging, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon; CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U1060/Université Lyon 1/INRAE U1397/Hospices Civils Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Harter
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany
| | - F Joly
- GINECO Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François-Baclesse, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France
| | - C Lazaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL-CIBERONC), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Lok
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Mahner
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - F Marmé
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - W G McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - I A McNeish
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Nicum
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona
| | - J A Pérez-Fidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario - INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - I Romero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - G Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - J Sehouli
- North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO), Berlin; Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - S Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University of Singapore (NUS) Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C Taskiran
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - W J van Driel
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - C Sessa
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - A Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rousseau F, Ranchon F, Bardin C, Bakrin N, Lavoué V, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Falandry C. Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231192397. [PMID: 37724138 PMCID: PMC10505350 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231192397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, major advances have been made toward the individualization of epithelial ovarian cancer care, leading to an overall improvement of patient outcomes. However, real-life data indicate that the oldest populations do not benefit from this, due to aspects related to cancer (more aggressive histopathological features), treatment (i.e. frequently suboptimal), and the host (increased toxicities in patients with lower physiological reserve). A specific risk-benefit perspective should therefore be taken when considering surgery, chemotherapy, and maintenance treatments: the decision for cytoreductive surgery should include geriatric vulnerability and surgical complexity, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy being an option when primary surgery appears at high risk; carboplatin paclitaxel association remains the standard even in vulnerable older patients; and bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors maintenance are interesting options provided they are prescribed according to their indications with a close monitoring of their toxicities. Future studies should aim to individualize care without limiting access of older patients to innovation. A specific focus is needed on age-specific translational analyses (focusing on tumor mutational burden and impaired biological pathways), a better patient stratification according to geriatric parameters, an adaptation of both oncological treatment and geriatric interventions, and treatment adaptations not a priori but according to formal pharmacokinetic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédérique Rousseau
- Institut Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
- Société Francophone d'OncoGériatrie (SOFOG)
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| | - Florence Ranchon
- Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Unité de Pharmacie Clinique Oncologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
- CICLY Centre pour l’Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon, Oullins, France
- Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO)
| | - Christophe Bardin
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Cochin AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO)
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Hôpital Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite Cedex, France
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Service de Gynécologie, CHU de Rennes, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
- UMR S1085, IRSET-INSERM, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France
- Groupe Français de chirurgie Oncologique et Gynécologique (FRANCOGYN)
| | - Leila Bengrine-Lefevre
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Société Francophone d'OncoGériatrie (SOFOG)
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| | - Claire Falandry
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Unité de Gériatrie, Centre Hospitalier de la Croix Rousse, 103, Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon 69004, France
- Université de Lyon, CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U.1060/Université Lyon 1/INRA U1397/INSA Lyon/Hospices Civils Lyon Bâtiment CENS-ELI 2D; Hôpital Lyon Sud Secteur 2; Pierre-Bénite 69310, France
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite 69310, France Société Francophone d'OncoGériatrie (SOFOG)
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang W, Bao Y, Luo X, Yao L, Yuan L. Do ethnic chinese older adults with epithelial ovarian cancer survive a poorer prognosis? J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:110. [PMID: 37277766 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01177-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of suffering epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) for women increases with age evidently, while the prognosis of older EOC patients remain unclear. Against the backdrop of the accelerate aging process in China, this paper investigates whether the older EOC patients have a lower overall survival probability than the younger patients based on the sample of ethnic Chinese population. METHODS A total of 323 ethnic Chinese patients diagnosed as epithelial ovarian cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We compared the overall survival probability between the younger group (< 70 years) and the older patients group (≥ 70 years). Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, comparisons among different subgroups were evaluated using log-rank tests, and independent prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS 43 patients were (13.3%) in the older patients group and 280 (86.7%) in the younger group. The distribution patterns between two groups were significantly different with regard to marital status, histologic type and FIGO stage. The median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the younger group than the older patients group (not reached vs. median 39 months, p < 0.05). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the age (The older vs. the younger, HR: 1.967, P = 0.007), primary tumor laterality (HR: 1.849, P = 0.009), and FIGO stage (III vs. I, HR: 3.588, P = 0.001; and IV vs. I, HR: 4.382, P = 0.001; respectively) remained as important risk factors while Histology (HGSOC vs. CCOC, HR: 0.479, P = 0.025; and LGSOC/MOC/EC vs. CCOC, HR: 0.390, P = 0.034; respectively) and the number of lymph node dissected more than 10 was a protective factor (HR: 0.397, P = 0.008). In an analysis of 104 pairs of patients matched on the basis of the propensity score, the older patients group had significantly lower overall mortality (HR = 2.561, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Ethnic Chinese Older EOC patients have a worse prognosis than the younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Huang
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiting Bao
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xukai Luo
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Liangqing Yao
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Yuan
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Warring SK, Narasimhulu DM, Kumar A, Langstraat CL, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Cliby WA. Next Steps Toward Reducing Surgical Morbidity After Complex Cytoreductive Surgery in Fit Surgical Patients. J Gynecol Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.1089/gyn.2022.0114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simrit K. Warring
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Amanika Kumar
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, and Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Amy L. Weaver
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michaela E. McGree
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Impact of surgery and chemotherapy timing on outcomes in older versus younger epithelial ovarian cancer patients: A nationwide Danish cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101359. [PMID: 35989185 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To explore differences in surgical complexity, chemotherapy administration, and treatment delays between younger and older Danish patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We included a nationwide cohort diagnosed with EOC from 2013 to 2018. We described surgical complexity and outcomes, the extent of chemotherapy and treatment delays stratified by age (<70 and ≥ 70 years), and surgical modality (primary, interval, or no debulking surgery). RESULTS In total, we included 2946 patients. For patients with advanced-stage disease, 52% of the older patients versus 25% of the younger patients did not undergo primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking surgery (IDS). For patients undergoing PDS or IDS, older patients underwent less extensive surgery and more often had residual disease after surgery >0 cm compared to younger patients. Furthermore, older patients were less often treated with chemotherapy. Older patients had PDS later than younger. We did not find any differences between age groups concerning treatment delays. Two-year cancer-specific survival differed significantly between age groups regardless of curatively intended treatment. DISCUSSION This study demonstrates that older patients are treated less actively concerning surgical and oncological treatment than younger patients, leading to worse cancer-specific survival. Older patients do not experience more treatment delays than younger ones.
Collapse
|
7
|
Panoskaltsis T, Papadimitriou C, Pallas N, Karamveri C, Kyziridis D, Hristakis C, Kiriakopoulos V, Kalakonas A, Vaikos D, Tzavara C, Tentes AA. Prognostic Value of En-Block Radical Bowel Resection in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery With HIPEC. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231165878. [PMID: 36958947 PMCID: PMC10041633 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231165878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify prognostic factors of survival and recurrence in advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing radical surgery and HIPEC. METHODS In a single Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, and over a 16-year period, from a total of 274 epithelial ovarian cancer patients, retrospectively, we identified 152 patients undergoing complete (CC-0) or near-complete (CC-1) cytoreduction, including at least one colonic resection, and HIPEC. RESULTS Mean age of patients was 58.8 years and CC-0 was possible in 72.4%. Rates of in-hospital mortality and major morbidity were 2.6% and 15.7%. Only 122 (80.3%) patients completed Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy (ASCH). Rates of metastatic Total Lymph Nodes (TLN), Para-Aortic and Pelvic Lymph Nodes (PAPLN) and Large Bowel Lymph Nodes (LBLN) were 58.7%, 58.5%, and 51.3%, respectively. Median, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 39 months, 43%, and 36.2%, respectively. The recurrence rate was 35.5%. On univariate analysis, CC-1, high Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), in-hospital morbidity, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were adverse factors for survival and recurrence. On multivariate analysis, negative survival indicators were the advanced age of patients, extensive peritoneal dissemination, low total number of TLN and no systemic PAPLN. Metastatic LBLN and segmental resection of the small bowel (SIR) were associated with a high risk for recurrence. CONCLUSION CC-O is feasible in most advanced ovarian cancer patients and HIPEC may confer a survival benefit. Radical bowel resection, with its entire mesocolon, may be necessary, as its lymph nodes often harbor metastases influencing disease recurrence and survival. The role of metastatic bowel lymph nodes has to be taken into account when assessing the impact of systemic lymphadenectomy in this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Panoskaltsis
- Gynaecological Oncology Unit, 2nd Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aretaieion Hospital, 68989The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, 376520Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - C Papadimitriou
- Oncology Unit, 2nd Department of Surgery Aretaieion Hospital, 68989The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - N Pallas
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, 376520Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - C Karamveri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, 376520Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - D Kyziridis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, Euromedica Kyanous Stavros, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C Hristakis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, Euromedica Kyanous Stavros, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - V Kiriakopoulos
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, 376520Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - A Kalakonas
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, Euromedica Kyanous Stavros, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - D Vaikos
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, Euromedica Kyanous Stavros, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C Tzavara
- Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Centre for Health Services Research, School of Medicine, 68989The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A A Tentes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, 376520Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, Euromedica Kyanous Stavros, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ade CJ, Dockery L, Walter AC, Benbrook DM, Vesely SK, Hammond ST, Moore KN, Holman LL. Association between Serum Biomarkers with Postoperative Complications and Delay of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Initiation in Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Primary Cytoreductive Surgery: A Pilot Study. Nutr Cancer 2022; 75:662-669. [PMID: 36495155 PMCID: PMC10127353 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2022.2152060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This study sought to describe and relate the factors associated with complications and delays in adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer treated with primary cytoreductive surgery. Serum from patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer scheduled for primary cytoreductive surgery were analyzed for prealbumin, 25-OH Vitamin D, intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 8 (IL-8), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein 2 (MCP-2), macrophage derived chemokine (MDC). Postoperative complications were identified using common terminology criteria for adverse events 4.0 and 30 day after surgery. Delays in adjuvant chemotherapy were defined as >1 week interval between surgery and initiation. Patients with postoperative complications (39.6%) were significantly older, had lower serum prealbumin levels, and higher serum IL-6 and IL-8 than those without. Univariate logistic regression found that age (OR: 1.12, 95%CI: 1.00-1.35) and IL-6 (OR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.99-1.05) were associated with postoperative complications, whereas age remained significant after multivariate analysis (OR:1.14, 95%CI: 1.00-1.29). Patients with delays in chemotherapy exhibited greater BMI and lower 25-OH Vitamin D than those without. Multivariate analysis found that increasing levels of 25-OH Vitamin D were associated with a lower risk of delayed chemotherapy initiation after controlling for age, body mass index, and tumor grade (OR: 0.93, 95%CI:0.87-0.99). This work suggests that in addition to age being predictive of postoperative complications, serum 25-OH Vitamin D may a provide insight into a patient's risk for postsurgical delays in chemotherapy initiation. These findings should, however, be confirmed in a larger study including robust survival analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl J Ade
- Department of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
- Department of Physician Assistant Studies, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
- Johnson Cancer Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
| | - Lauren Dockery
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma HSC, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Adam C Walter
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma HSC, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Doris M Benbrook
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma HSC, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Sara K Vesely
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Hudson College of Public Health, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Stephen T Hammond
- Department of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
- Johnson Cancer Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma HSC, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Laura L Holman
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma HSC, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hiu S, Bryant A, Gajjar K, Kunonga PT, Naik R. Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 8:CD007697. [PMID: 36041232 PMCID: PMC9427128 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007697.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and the leading cause of death in women with gynaecological malignancies. Opinions differ regarding the role of ultra-radical (extensive) cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer treatment. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity associated with ultra-radical/extensive surgery in the management of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 11), MEDLINE Ovid and Embase Ovid up to November 2021. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies (NRS), analysed using multivariate methods, that compared ultra-radical/extensive and standard surgery in women with advanced primary epithelial ovarian cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria, abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We identified three NRS and conducted meta-analyses where possible. MAIN RESULTS We identified three retrospective observational studies for inclusion in the review. Two studies included women exclusively undergoing upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) and the other study including both PDS and interval debulking surgical (IDS) procedures. All studies were at critical risk of bias due to retrospective and non-randomised study designs. Meta-analysis of two studies, assessing 397 participants, found that women who underwent radical procedures, as part of PDS, may have a lower risk of mortality compared to women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.82; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The results were robust to a sensitivity analysis including women with more-extensive disease (carcinomatosis) (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.85; I2 = 0%; n = 283, very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. One study reported a comparison of radical versus standard surgical procedures associated with both PDS and IDS procedures, but a multivariate analysis was only undertaken for disease-free survival (DFS) and therefore the certainty of the evidence was not assessable for overall survival (OS) and remains very low. The lack of reporting of OS meant the study was at high risk of bias for selective reporting of outcomes. One study, 203 participants, found that women who underwent radical procedures as part of PDS may have a lower risk of disease progression or death compared to women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.92; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The results were robust to a sensitivity analysis in one study including women with carcinomatosis (adjusted HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.82; n = 139; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. A combined analysis in one study found that women who underwent radical procedures (using both PDS and IDS) may have an increased chance of disease progression or death than those who received standard surgery (adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.31; I2 = 0%; n = 527; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. In absolute and unadjusted terms, the DFS was 19.3 months in the standard surgery group, 15.8 in the PDS group and 15.9 months in the IDS group. All studies were at critical risk of bias and we only identified very low-certainty evidence for all outcomes reported in the review. Perioperative mortality, adverse events and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were either not reported or inadequately reported in the included studies. Two studies reported perioperative mortality (death within 30 days of surgery), but they did not use any statistical adjustment. In total, there were only four deaths within 30 days of surgery in both studies. All were observed in the standard surgery group, but we did not report a risk ratio (RR) to avoid potentially misleading results with so few deaths and very low-certainty evidence. Similarly, one study reported postoperative morbidity, but the authors did not use any statistical adjustment. Postoperative morbidity occurred more commonly in women who received ultra-radical surgery compared to standard surgery, but the certainty of the evidence was very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found only very low-certainty evidence comparing ultra-radical surgery and standard surgery in women with advanced ovarian cancer. The evidence was limited to retrospective, NRSs and so is at critical risk of bias. The results may suggest that ultra-radical surgery could result in improved OS, but results are based on very few women who were chosen to undergo each intervention, rather than a randomised study and intention-to-treat analysis, and so the evidence is very uncertain. Results for progression/DFS were inconsistent and evidence was sparse. QoL and morbidity was incompletely or not reported in the three included studies. A separate prognostic review assessing residual disease as a prognostic factor in this area has been addressed elsewhere, which demonstrates the prognostic effect of macroscopic debulking to no macroscopic residual disease. In order to aid existing guidelines, the role of ultra-radical surgery in the management of advanced-stage ovarian cancer could be addressed through the conduct of a sufficiently powered, RCT comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery, or well-designed NRSs, if this is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Hiu
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ketankumar Gajjar
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, 1st Floor Maternity Unit, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK
| | - Patience T Kunonga
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Raj Naik
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dhanis J, Keidan N, Blake D, Rundle S, Strijker D, van Ham M, Pijnenborg JMA, Smits A. Prehabilitation to Improve Outcomes of Patients with Gynaecological Cancer: A New Window of Opportunity? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143448. [PMID: 35884512 PMCID: PMC9351657 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Surgery is an important mainstay in the treatment of gynaecological cancers but is associated with operative complications, especially for those with poor physical and mental health. Prehabilitation is a new and upcoming strategy to optimise patients’ functional capacity, nutritional status and psychosocial wellbeing in order to reduce complications and enhance recovery. In this review, we assessed the evidence on prehabilitation programmes for patients with gynaecological cancer. The limited evidence shows that prehabilitation may reduce length of hospital stay for ovarian cancer patients, and may result in significant weight loss in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. Comparative prospective studies are required to determine the effectiveness of prehabilitation on reducing operative complications and improving quality of life, and to further specify the content of such a programme for patients with gynaecological cancer. Abstract The literature evaluating the effect of prehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes and quality of life of patients with gynaecological cancer undergoing surgery was reviewed. Databases including Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE (Ovid) and PsycINFO were systematically searched to identify studies evaluating the effect of prehabilitation programmes on patients with gynaecological cancer. Both unimodal and multimodal prehabilitation programmes were included encompassing physical exercise and nutritional and psychological support. Primary outcomes were surgical complications and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were anthropometric changes and adherence to the prehabilitation programme. Seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising 580 patients. Included studies were nonrandomised prospective studies (n = 4), retrospective studies (n = 2) and one case report. Unimodal programmes and multimodal programmes were included. In patients with ovarian cancer, multimodal prehabilitation resulted in significantly reduced hospital stay and time to chemotherapy. In patients with endometrial and cervical cancer, prehabilitation was associated with significant weight loss, but had no significant effects on surgical complications or mortality. No adverse events of the programmes were reported. Evidence on the effect of prehabilitation for patients with gynaecological cancer is limited. Future studies are needed to determine the effects on postoperative complications and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joëlle Dhanis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (M.v.H.); (J.M.A.P.); (A.S.)
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Radboud University, 6526 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-644404756
| | - Nathaniel Keidan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK; (N.K.); (D.B.); (S.R.)
| | - Dominic Blake
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK; (N.K.); (D.B.); (S.R.)
| | - Stuart Rundle
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK; (N.K.); (D.B.); (S.R.)
| | - Dieuwke Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Maaike van Ham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (M.v.H.); (J.M.A.P.); (A.S.)
| | - Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (M.v.H.); (J.M.A.P.); (A.S.)
| | - Anke Smits
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (M.v.H.); (J.M.A.P.); (A.S.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK; (N.K.); (D.B.); (S.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Angeles MA, Hernández A, Pérez-Benavente A, Cabarrou B, Spagnolo E, Rychlik A, Daboussi A, Migliorelli F, Bétrian S, Ferron G, Gil-Moreno A, Guyon F, Martinez A. The effect of major postoperative complications on recurrence and long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:8-17. [PMID: 35568582 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact on survival of major postoperative complications and to identify the factors associated with these complications in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after cytoreductive surgery. METHODS We designed a retrospective multicenter study collecting data from patients with IIIC-IV FIGO Stage ovarian cancer who had undergone either primary debulking surgery (PDS), early interval debulking surgery (IDS) after 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or delayed debulking surgery (DDS) after 6 cycles, with minimal or no residual disease, from January 2008 to December 2015. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with major surgical complications (≥Grade 3). We assessed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates according to the occurrence of major postoperative complications. RESULTS 549 women were included. The overall rate of major surgical complications was 22.4%. Patients who underwent PDS had a higher rate of major complications (28.6%) than patients who underwent either early IDS (23.2%) or DDS (14.0%). Multivariable analysis revealed that extensive peritonectomy and surgical timing were associated with the occurrence of major complications. Median DFS and OS were 16.9 months (95%CI = [13.7-18.4]) and 48.0 months (95%CI = [37.2-73.1]) for the group of patients with major complications, and 20.1 months (95%CI = [18.6-22.4]) and 56.7 months (95%CI = [51.2-70.4]) for the group without major complications. Multivariable analysis revealed that major surgical complications were significantly associated with DFS, but not with OS. CONCLUSIONS Patients who experienced major surgical complications had reduced DFS, compared with patients without major morbidity. Extensive peritonectomy and surgical timing were predictive factors of postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Aida Angeles
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse University Cancer Institute (IUCT) - Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
| | - Alicia Hernández
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, La Paz Investigation Institute (IdiPAZ), La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Asunción Pérez-Benavente
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bastien Cabarrou
- Biostatistics Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse University Cancer Institute (IUCT) - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Emanuela Spagnolo
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, La Paz Investigation Institute (IdiPAZ), La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Agnieszka Rychlik
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Amel Daboussi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse University Cancer Institute (IUCT) - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Federico Migliorelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paule de Viguier Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Sarah Bétrian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse University Cancer Institute (IUCT) - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Gwénaël Ferron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse University Cancer Institute (IUCT) - Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Oncogenesis of Sarcomas (ONCOSARC) team 19, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frédéric Guyon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Alejandra Martinez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse University Cancer Institute (IUCT) - Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy team 1, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barber EL, Garg R, Strohl A, Roque D, Tanner E. Feasibility and Prediction of Adverse Events in a Postoperative Monitoring Program of Patient-Reported Outcomes and a Wearable Device Among Gynecologic Oncology Patients. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2100167. [PMID: 35427184 PMCID: PMC9848580 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to test the feasibility of implementing a postoperative monitoring program for women with gynecologic cancers composed of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and a wearable activity monitor. METHODS We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery to this single-arm study. Enrolled patients completed PROs (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function, sleep disturbance, anxiety, fatigue, and pain intensity) at baseline and one-week intervals for 4 weeks. They also wore a wearable accelerometer device that measured steps, heart rate, and intensity of physical activity. The primary outcome was feasibility. The secondary outcome was prediction of unscheduled contacts with the health care system on a given postoperative day. RESULTS We enrolled 34 women. Three patients were unevaluable. The mean age was 58 years. The mean body mass index was 31 kg/m2; 17 patients were White (54.8%), 12 patients were Black (38.7%), and two patients (6.5%) were Asian. The overall wear time was 83.8%, and patients responded to 80.4% of the PRO instruments. Twenty-two patients (71%) had an unscheduled contact with the health care system postoperatively (median 1.5, 0.0-8.0). The day of an unscheduled health care utilization event was predicted with acceptable discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.81). PROs of fatigue and physical function were most predictive followed by wearable device outputs of lightly active minutes and average daily heart rate. CONCLUSION Implementation of a postoperative monitoring program of patient-reported outcomes and a wearable device was feasible. The specific day of an unscheduled contact with the health care system was predicted with acceptable discrimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L. Barber
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL,Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Institute for Public Health in Medicine, Chicago, IL,Emma L. Barber, MD, MS, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Northwestern University, 250 E Superior Suite 05-138, Chicago, IL 60611; e-mail:
| | - Ravi Garg
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Institute for Public Health in Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Anna Strohl
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH
| | - Dario Roque
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Edward Tanner
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Corey L, Cote ML, Ruterbusch JJ, Vezina A, Winer I. Disparities in adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:541.e1-541.e13. [PMID: 34736911 PMCID: PMC8983438 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black women experience worse survival effects with high-grade endometrial cancer. Differences in adjuvant treatment have been proposed to be major contributors to this disparity. However, little is known about the differences in type or timing of adjuvant treatment as it relates to race and ethnicity in the Medicare population. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine patterns of adjuvant therapy and survival for non-Hispanic Black women vs non-Hispanic White women and Hispanic women who have undergone surgery for high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population. STUDY DESIGN We used the Medicare-linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify women who underwent surgery as a primary treatment for uterine grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, clear-cell carcinoma, or serous carcinoma between the years 2000 and 2015. Women who did not identify as White or Black race or Hispanic ethnicity were excluded. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for receiving a treatment delay or not receiving adjuvant treatment (compared with those who received adjuvant treatment within 12 weeks) adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics. Overall survival was stratified by race and ethnicity, route of surgery, operative complications, and type and timing of adjuvant therapy, which were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio of death by race and ethnicity adjusted for known predictors and surgical outcomes and adjuvant therapy patterns. RESULTS A total of 12,201 women met the study inclusion criteria. Non-Hispanic Black patients had a significantly worse 5-year overall survival than Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients (30.9 months vs 51.0 months vs 53.6 months, respectively). Approximately 632 of 7282 patients (8.6%) who received adjuvant treatment experienced a treatment delay. Delay in treatment of ≥12 weeks was significantly different by race and ethnicity (P=.034), with 12% of Hispanic, 9% of non-Hispanic Black, and 8% of non-Hispanic White women experiencing a delay. After adjustment for the number of complications, age, histology (endometrioid vs nonendometroid), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, marital status, comorbidity count, surgical approach, lymph node dissection, and urban-rural code, Hispanic women had a 71% increased risk of treatment delay (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.38) for all stages of disease. In the same model, non-Hispanic Black race was independently predictive of decreased use of adjuvant treatment for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II and higher (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.68). Non-Hispanic Black race, number of perioperative complications, and nonendometrioid histology were predictive of worse survival in univariate models. Treatment delay was not independently predictive of worse 1- or 5-year survival at any stage. CONCLUSION Non-Hispanic Black race was predictive of worse 5-year survival across all stages and was associated with omission of adjuvant treatment in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II or higher high-grade endometrial cancer. In unadjusted analyses, patients who experience treatment omission or delay experienced poorer overall survival, but these factors were not independently associated in multivariate analyses. This study suggests that race and ethnicity are independently associated with the type and timing of adjuvant treatment in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer. Further efforts to identify specific causes of barriers to care and timely treatment are imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan Corey
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI.
| | - Michele L Cote
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI; Population Sciences and Disparities Research, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Julie J Ruterbusch
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | | | - Ira Winer
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Multi-Disciplinary Care Planning of Ovarian Cancer in Older Patients: General Statement-A Position Paper from SOFOG-GINECO-FRANCOGYN-SFPO. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051295. [PMID: 35267603 PMCID: PMC8909025 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This position paper aims to provide practitioners a proposal for multidisciplinary care planning for older patients with ovarian cancer from the time of suspected diagnosis. The first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer involves several interdependent sequences: cytoreductive surgery, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and maintenance targeted treatments. In older patients, care planning must be adapted to their geriatric parameters and consider the geriatric impact of each treatment sequence to allow treatment completion. Care planning should be centered on patient motivation and imply multidisciplinarity. Each step of treatment plan should be reconsidered in light of a geriatric assessment and follow-up. Studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the impact of geriatric vulnerability parameters at each step of the treatment agenda and the impact of geriatric interventions on patient outcomes. Abstract In this position paper the Société Francophone d’OncoGériatrie (SOFOG; French-speaking oncogeriatric society), the Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO, French society for oncology pharmacy), the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO, National Investigators’ Group for Studies in Ovarian and Breast Cancer) and the Groupe Français de chirurgie Oncologique et Gynécologique (FRANCOGYN) propose a multi-disciplinary care planning of ovarian cancer in older patients. The treatment pathway is based on four successive decisional nodes (diagnosis, resectability assessment, operability assessment, adjuvant, and maintenance treatment decision) implying multidisciplinarity and adaptation of the treatment plan according to the patient’s geriatric covariates and her motivation towards treatment. Specific attention must be paid to geriatric intervention, supportive care and pharmaceutical conciliation. Studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the impact of geriatric vulnerability parameters at each step of the treatment agenda and the impact of geriatric interventions on patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Benoit L, Koual M, Le Frère-Belda MA, Zerbib J, Fournier L, Nguyen-Xuan HT, Delanoy N, Bentivegna E, Bats AS, Azaïs H. Risks and benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery for advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:275-282. [PMID: 34753619 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymphadenectomy is debated in patients with ovarian cancer. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of lymphadenectomy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). METHODS A retrospective, unicentric study including all patients undergoing NACT and IDS was carried out from 2005 to 2018. Patients with and without lymphadenectomy were compared in terms of recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and complication rates. RESULTS We included 203 patients. Of these, 133 had a lymphadenectomy (65.5%) and 77 had involved nodes (57.9%). Patients without a lymphadenectomy were older, had a more extensive disease and less complete CRS. No differences were noted between the lymphadenectomy and no lymphadenectomy group concerning 2-year RFS (47.4% and 48.6%, p = 0.87, respectively) and 5-year OS (63.2% versus 58.6%, p = 0.41, respectively). Post-operative complications tended to be more frequent in the lymphadenectomy group (18.57% versus 31.58%, p = 0.09). In patients with a lymphadenectomy, survival was significantly altered if the nodes were involved (positive nodes: 2-year RFS 42.5% and 5-year OS 49.4%, negative nodes: 2-year RFS 60.7% and 5-year OS 82.2%, p = 0.03 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Lymphadenectomy during IDS does not improve survival and increases post-operative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Benoit
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Paris, France; Paris University, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1124, Université de Paris, Centre Universitaire des Saint-Père, Paris, France.
| | - Meriem Koual
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Paris, France; Paris University, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1124, Université de Paris, Centre Universitaire des Saint-Père, Paris, France
| | | | - Jonathan Zerbib
- Radiology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Paris, France
| | - Laure Fournier
- Radiology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Paris, France
| | - Huyen-Thu Nguyen-Xuan
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Paris, France; Paris University, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Delanoy
- Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Paris, France
| | - Enrica Bentivegna
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Paris, France; Paris University, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Bats
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Paris, France; Paris University, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1147, Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France
| | - Henri Azaïs
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Paris, France; Paris University, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1147, Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lin H, Chen WH, Wu CH, Ou YC, Chen YJ, Chen YY, Lin YH, Fu HC. Impact of the Time Interval Between Primary Debulking Surgery and Start of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:5413-5422. [PMID: 34262349 PMCID: PMC8275047 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s313013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To investigate whether the time interval between primary debulking surgery (PDS) and initiating adjuvant chemotherapy affects survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed FIGO stage IIB to IV EOC patients who received PDS followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in our hospital between January 2008 and December 2016. The optimal cut-off time interval to chemotherapy related to survival was determined using the Contal and O’Quigley method and Cox hazard models. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the independent effect of time interval on survival. Results A total of 152 patients were identified and divided into three groups based on the time interval between PDS and initiating adjuvant chemotherapy: early (<23 days), intermediate (23–43 days) and late (>43 days). The intermediate group had a significantly better median progression-free survival (PFS, 35.5 months) compared to the early (20 months) and late (22.6 months) groups. After adjustments for confounding factors, time interval was still an independent variable affecting PFS. The intermediate group was associated with a better PFS compared with the early and late groups (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.10–0.83, p=0.002). There was no statistical significance in overall survival (OS) in univariate or multivariate analysis, although there was a trend towards better OS in the intermediate group. Conclusion Our results provide evidence that the time interval from PDS to chemotherapy influences PFS in patients with advanced EOC. The optimal time to initiate chemotherapy was between 23 and 43 days, within 3–6 weeks post-operatively. Initiating chemotherapy early (<23 days) did not appear to benefit PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Lin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsin Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Hsuan Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Lin-Kou, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Che Ou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Yi Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Han Lin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Chun Fu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Lin-Kou, Taiwan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wright JD, Huang Y, Melamed A, Albright BB, Hillyer GC, Previs R, Hershman MSDL. Use and outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:599-605. [PMID: 34158181 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative to primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) for stage IV uterine cancer. We examined utilization, perioperative outcomes and survival for NACT and PCS for stage IV uterine cancer. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results-Medicare database was used to identify women with stage IV uterine cancer treated from 2000 to 2015. Women were classified as NACT or PCS. Interval cytoreductive surgery (after NACT) or chemotherapy (after PCS) were recorded. The extent of surgery and perioperative outcomes were estimated for the groups. Multivariable proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to examine survival. RESULTS Among 3037 women, 1629 (53.6%) were treated with primary cytoreductive surgery, 554 (18.2%) with NACT, and 854 (28.1%) received no treatment. Use of NACT increased from 9.5% to 29.2%. After NACT, interval hysterectomy was performed in 159 (28.6%), while within the PCS group, 1052 (64.6%) received chemotherapy. Extended cytoreductive procedures were performed in 71.7% of women who received NACT vs. 79.1% after PCS (P = 0.03). The complication rate was 52.8% for NACT versus 56.2% for PCS (P = 0.42); medical complications were more frequently seen in the PCS group (39.4% versus 28.9%; P = 0.01). There was no difference in cancer specific (P = 0.48) or overall survival (P = 0.25) in women who received both chemotherapy and surgery regardless of whether the initial treatment was NACT or PCS. CONCLUSION Use of NACT is increasing for advanced stage uterine cancer. There was no difference in survival between NACT and primary cytoreductive surgery and NACT was associated with fewer perioperative medical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Wright
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, USA.
| | - Yongmei Huang
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, USA
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, USA
| | | | - Grace C Hillyer
- Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA
| | | | - M S Dawn L Hershman
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, USA; Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Blay JY, Boucher S, Le Vu B, Cropet C, Chabaud S, Perol D, Barranger E, Campone M, Conroy T, Coutant C, De Crevoisier R, Debreuve-Theresette A, Delord JP, Fumoleau P, Gentil J, Gomez F, Guerin O, Jaffré A, Lartigau E, Lemoine C, Mahe MA, Mahon FX, Mathieu-Daude H, Merrouche Y, Penault-Llorca F, Pivot X, Soria JC, Thomas G, Vera P, Vermeulin T, Viens P, Ychou M, Beaupere S. Delayed care for patients with newly diagnosed cancer due to COVID-19 and estimated impact on cancer mortality in France. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100134. [PMID: 33984676 PMCID: PMC8134718 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave on cancer patient management was measured within the nationwide network of the Unicancer comprehensive cancer centers in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS The number of patients diagnosed and treated within 17 of the 18 Unicancer centers was collected in 2020 and compared with that during the same periods between 2016 and 2019. Unicancer centers treat close to 20% of cancer patients in France yearly. The reduction in the number of patients attending the Unicancer centers was analyzed per regions and cancer types. The impact of delayed care on cancer-related deaths was calculated based on different hypotheses. RESULTS A 6.8% decrease in patients managed within Unicancer in the first 7 months of 2020 versus 2019 was observed. This reduction reached 21% during April and May, and was not compensated in June and July, nor later until November 2020. This reduction was observed only for newly diagnosed patients, while the clinical activity for previously diagnosed patients increased by 4% similar to previous years. The reduction was more pronounced in women, in breast and prostate cancers, and for patients without metastasis. Using an estimated hazard ratio of 1.06 per month of delay in diagnosis and treatment of new patients, we calculated that the delays observed in the 5-month period from March to July 2020 may result in an excess mortality due to cancer of 1000-6000 patients in coming years. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the delays in cancer patient management were observed only for newly diagnosed patients, more frequently in women, for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic cancers. These delays may result is an excess risk of cancer-related deaths in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Blay
- Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.
| | | | | | - C Cropet
- Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | | | - D Perol
- Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | | | - M Campone
- Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes et Angers, France
| | - T Conroy
- Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - C Coutant
- Centre George Francoise Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - J P Delord
- Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - J Gentil
- Centre George Francoise Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - F Gomez
- Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - O Guerin
- Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes et Angers, France
| | | | | | - C Lemoine
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - M A Mahe
- Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - H Mathieu-Daude
- Institut de Cancerologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - X Pivot
- Centre Paul Strauss/ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - G Thomas
- Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - P Vera
- Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | | | - P Viens
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - M Ychou
- Institut de Cancerologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Does Time-to-Chemotherapy after Primary Complete Macroscopic Cytoreductive Surgery Influence Prognosis for Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer? A Study of the FRANCOGYN Group. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10051058. [PMID: 33806443 PMCID: PMC7961531 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
To determine if the time-to-chemotherapy (TTC) after primary macroscopic complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) influences recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We conducted an observational multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of women with EOC treated from September 2006 to November 2016 in nine institutions in France (FRANCOGYN research group) with maintained EOC databases. We included women with EOC (all FIGO stages) who underwent primary complete macroscopic CRS prior to platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Two hundred thirty-three patients were included: 73 (31.3%) in the early-stage group (ESG) (FIGO I-II), and 160 (68.7%) in the advanced-stage group (ASG) (FIGO III-IV). Median TTC was 43 days (36–56). The median OS was 77.2 months (65.9–106.6). OS was lower in the ASG when TTC exceeded 8 weeks (70.5 vs. 59.3 months, p = 0.04). No impact on OS was found when TTC was below or above 6 weeks (78.5 and 66.8 months, respectively, p = 0.25). In the whole population, TTC had no impact on RFS or OS. None of the factors studied were associated with an increase in TTC. Chemotherapy should be initiated as soon as possible after CRS. A TTC greater than 8 weeks is associated with poorer OS in patients with advanced stage EOC.
Collapse
|
20
|
Barber EL, Garg R, Persenaire C, Simon M. Natural language processing with machine learning to predict outcomes after ovarian cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:182-186. [PMID: 33069375 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if natural language processing (NLP) with machine learning of unstructured full text documents (a preoperative CT scan) improves the ability to predict postoperative complication and hospital readmission among women with ovarian cancer undergoing surgery when compared with discrete data predictors alone. METHODS Medical records from two institutions were queried to identify women with ovarian cancer and available preoperative CT scan reports who underwent debulking surgery. Machine learning methods using both discrete data predictors (age, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory values) and natural language processing of full text reports (preoperative CT scans) were used to predict postoperative complication and hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery. Discrimination was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS We identified 291 women who underwent debulking surgery for ovarian cancer. Mean age was 59, mean preoperative CA125 value was 610 U/ml and albumin was 3.9 g/dl. There were 25 patients (8.6%) who were readmitted and 45 patients (15.5%) who developed postoperative complications within 30 days. Using discrete features alone, we were able to predict postoperative readmission with an AUC of 0.56 (0.54-0.58, 95% CI); this improved to 0.70 (0.68-0.73, 95% CI) (p < 0.001) with the addition of NLP of preoperative CT scans. CONCLUSIONS Natural language processing with machine learning improved the ability to predict postoperative complication and hospital readmission among women with ovarian cancer undergoing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Barber
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, IL, USA; Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Center for Health Equity Transformation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Institute of Public Health and Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
| | - Ravi Garg
- Institute of Public Health and Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Christianne Persenaire
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Melissa Simon
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, IL, USA; Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Center for Health Equity Transformation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Institute of Public Health and Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pergolotti M, Bailliard A, McCarthy L, Farley E, Covington KR, Doll KM. Women's Experiences After Ovarian Cancer Surgery: Distress, Uncertainty, and the Need for Occupational Therapy. Am J Occup Ther 2020; 74:7403205140p1-7403205140p9. [PMID: 32365320 PMCID: PMC7198238 DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2020.036897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Despite the growing literature on the association of functional, physical, and quality-of-life (QOL) deficits with poor postoperative outcomes, there is a gap in the literature identifying women's occupational performance needs after ovarian cancer surgery. OBJECTIVE To describe the experiences of women hospitalized after ovarian cancer surgery to identify potential areas for intervention. Goals were to (1) identify functional needs and limitations at time of discharge as measured by the typical acute care occupational therapy evaluation and semistructured interview and (2) understand the women's perspectives of their needs for occupational therapy and a safe return to home. DESIGN Single-arm, cross-sectional descriptive study. Mixed-methods data collection and analysis. SETTING Academic cancer center. PARTICIPANTS Women with ovarian cancer (N = 11) who had completed surgery. INTERVENTION Semistructured interviews and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) completed postsurgery. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES PROMs included the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer and Problem List, the PROMIS® Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) scales, and the Possibilities for Activity Scale-Women (PActS-W). RESULTS The mean NCCN Distress score was 6.0 (standard deviation [SD] = 3.1, with the top three concerns being pain (80%), worry (80%), and fatigue (78%). Mean GPH and GMH T scores were 38.0 (SD = 8.8) and 48.2 (SD = 8.4), respectively. Women scored a mean of 39.2 (SD = 11.2, range = 26-58) on the PActS-W. Thematic analyses found that the women were uncertain about potential functional limitations and significantly distressed. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Women with ovarian cancer experienced high levels of uncertainty and distress after surgery. Integrating in-home or community-based occupational therapy into routine care could decrease functional distress and uncertainty and help women manage concerns related to pain, worry, and fatigue. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS This study suggests that occupational therapy evaluation and intervention are needed to decrease distress and improve QOL of women upon discharge after ovarian cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzi Pergolotti
- Mackenzi Pergolotti, PhD, OTR/L, is Director of Research, ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Mechanicsburg, PA. At the time of the study, she was Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;
| | - Antoine Bailliard
- Antoine Bailliard, PhD, OTR/L, is Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Lauren McCarthy
- Lauren McCarthy, MS, OTR/L, is Occupational Therapist, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC. At the time of the study, she was Research Assistant, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Erica Farley
- Erica Farley, MS, OTR/L, is Occupational Therapist, Teton Therapy, Cheyenne, WY. At the time of the study, she was Research Assistant, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Human Services, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
| | - Kelley R Covington
- Kelley R. Covington, MS, is Research and Education Manager, ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Mechanicsburg, PA. At the time of the study, she was Research Assistant, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Human Services, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
| | - Kemi M Doll
- Kemi M. Doll, MD, MSCR, is Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle. At the time of the study, she was Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Joneborg U, Palsdottir K, Farm E, Johansson H, Salehi S. Time-interval to adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative management after upper abdominal surgical procedures in advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:353-359. [PMID: 32778486 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), longer time-interval from surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (TITC) is associated with decreased survival. Adding upper abdominal surgical procedures (UAP) increases rates of both complete gross resection and postoperative complications in EOC. Our objective was to investigate the association of UAP and TITC. Moreover, if specific postoperative monitoring after the most prevalent UAP increases early detection and management of complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS Women diagnosed with EOC 2014-2016 in the Stockholm/Gotland Region in Sweden were identified in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynaecologic Cancer. The association between UAP and TITC was investigated by multivariable linear regression and adjusted for predefined confounders. The follow-up and detection of postoperative complications after diaphragm resection, splenectomy and cholecystectomy was examined. RESULTS 240 women were selected for analysis. The TITC in women subjected to UAP was similar with a median of 30 days (p = 0.99). Moreover, despite a higher rate of postoperative and major complications (p < 0.001) and longer hospital stay (p < 0.001), in the adjusted analysis there was no association between UAP and prolonged TITC, with a mean difference of -2.27 days (95% Confidence Interval (CI), -5.99 to -1.45, p = 0.23). After the most prevalent UAP (diaphragm resection, splenectomy and cholecystectomy), eventual postoperative interventions were based on routine clinical management rather than procedure-specific postoperative surveillance. CONCLUSION UAP does not prolong TITC despite an increased rate of postoperative complications and longer length of hospital stay. Clinical non-specific surveillance is sufficient to detect postoperative complications after the most prevalent UAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrika Joneborg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Kolbrun Palsdottir
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Farm
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sahar Salehi
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hayden JM, Oras J, Block L, Thörn SE, Palmqvist C, Salehi S, Nordstrom JL, Gupta A. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine reduces time interval to initiation of chemotherapy after surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: randomised controlled double-blind pilot study. Br J Anaesth 2020; 124:562-570. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
24
|
Roy AG, Brensinger CM, Latif N, Giuntoli R, Kim S, Morgan M, Ko EM. Assessment of poor functional status and post-acute care needs following primary ovarian cancer debulking surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:227-232. [PMID: 31911537 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Poor baseline functional status is associated with adverse surgical outcomes. Additionally, decline in the postoperative setting may result in the delay of additional treatments, impacting overall survival. This study assesses the incidence and risk factors for functional decline following primary ovarian cancer debulking surgery in previously independent women using discharge location as a surrogate. METHODS All patients with a postoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer who underwent surgical debulking and had documentation of discharge location were identified using the 2011-2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were excluded if their baseline functional status was dependent or partially dependent, or if they died before discharge. Discharge destination was dichotomized as home versus non-home. Descriptive data included demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of clinical and surgical factors on discharge destination. RESULTS 1786 patients met the criteria for analysis; 120 (6.7%) patients were discharged to non-home. Differences between home and non-home discharges included age (53.2% vs 83.3% ≥60), body mass index (26.5 vs 27.8 median), comorbidities (45.2% vs 64.2% with ≥1), and complications (8.6% vs 30.0% with ≥1, all p<0.05). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, only increasing age and complications were independently associated with discharge to non-home. Those age ≥70 had 9.0 times the risk (95% CI 3.5 to 23.4; p<0.001) as age <50. The presence of one or more postoperative complications carried 4.5 times (95% CI 2.9 to 7.0; p<0.001) the risk of those without complications. 30 day mortality was also increased in patients discharged to non-home. DISCUSSION 6.7% of previously independent ovarian cancer patients were discharged to non-home following surgery. Major risk factors for non-home include older age, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Efforts to optimize baseline functional status and minimize surgical complications may improve discharge rates to non-home and postoperative functional status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Grace Roy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Colleen M Brensinger
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nawar Latif
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert Giuntoli
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarah Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark Morgan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily M Ko
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jeong SY, Choi CH, Kim TJ, Lee JW, Kim BG, Bae DS, Lee YY. Interval between secondary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with survivals in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res 2019; 13:1. [PMID: 31892329 PMCID: PMC6937657 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-019-0602-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) is possible in selected patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The goal of SCS is complete resection, although chemotherapy is always followed. Delayed intervals between primary debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy was reported to be associated with poorer survivals, however, the role of intervals in recurrent disease is still unknown.
Materials and methods
This retrospective cohort study reviewed data from electronic medical records of women with recurrent EOC treated at Samsung Medical Centre, Seoul, Korea, between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2015. Patients who underwent SCS with adjuvant chemotherapy for recurrent EOC were eligible. We defined intervals as the period between the day of SCS and the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Results
Seventy-nine patients were eligible for this study. Their median age was 48 (range, 18–69) years and median interval between the date of SCS and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy was 10 (range, 4–115) days. The rate of complete resection was 72.2% (57/79). Division of the patients by interval (Group 1, interval ≤ 10 days; Group 2, interval > 10 days) revealed no difference in clinical parameters. No gross residual disease after SCS (no vs. any gross residual, p = 0.002) and longer platinum-free survival (over 12 vs. 6–12 months, p = 0.023) were independent favorable prognostic factors in Cox model; however, the intervals did not affect survival.
Conclusions
Delayed intervals to adjuvant chemotherapy after secondary cytoreductive surgery is not associated with decreased survivals. It is important to identify recurrent EOC patients who might have no gross residual disease following SCS. Moreover, surgeons should strive for complete resection.
Collapse
|
26
|
Liberale G, Pop CF, Polastro L, Kerger J, Moreau M, Chintinne M, Larsimont D, Nogaret JM, Veys I. A radical approach to achieve complete cytoreductive surgery improve survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. J Visc Surg 2019; 157:79-86. [PMID: 31837942 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery of locally advanced ovarian cancer has evolved in the last few years from surgery to remove macroscopic residual disease (<1cm; R2b) to macroscopic complete cytoreductive surgery with no gross residual disease (R1). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the adoption of a maximalist surgical approach on postoperative complications, disease recurrence and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective study using prospectively collected data on patients who received either conservative approach (CA) or radical approach (RA) surgical treatment for primary ovarian cancer stage IIIc/IVa/IVb between June 2006 and June 2013. RESULTS Data for 114 patients were included, 33 patients in the CA group and 68 patients in the RA group were consequently analysed. In the RA group, operative time was longer, in relation to more complex surgical procedures; with more blood losses and a higher rate of compete macroscopic resection. Totally, 77% of the patients had postoperative complications, with more grade I/II complications in the RA group but the same rates of grade III/IV complications in the both groups (P=0.14). For all patient study population, the overall and disease-free survivals were improved in case of no macroscopic residual disease. Overall survival was improved in the RA group (P=0.05), with no difference in terms of disease-free survival (P=0.29) CONCLUSION: A radical approach in advanced ovarian cancer allows a higher rate of complete cytoreductive surgery impacting overall survival. However, a non-significant trend for increased mild complications (grade I/II) rate is observed in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Liberale
- Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules-Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, 121, boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - C-F Pop
- Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules-Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, 121, boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - L Polastro
- Medical Oncology, Institut Jules-Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - J Kerger
- Medical Oncology, Institut Jules-Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Moreau
- Statistics Department, Institut Jules-Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Chintinne
- Pathology Department, Institut Jules-Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - D Larsimont
- Pathology Department, Institut Jules-Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - J M Nogaret
- Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules-Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, 121, boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - I Veys
- Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules-Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, 121, boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Predictive Factors for Surgical Morbidities and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Delay for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated by Primary Debulking Surgery or Interval Debulking Surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 28:1520-1528. [PMID: 30036229 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative complications and adjuvant chemotherapy delay (ACD) are the most damaging outcomes after surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Establishing predictive factors should prevent their occurrence. METHODS We analyzed retrospectively all patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent cytoreduction at our institution between December 2010 and May 2016. We evaluated all 30-day complications and considered ACD all cases who did not start adjuvant chemotherapy until 42 days or did not perform it after cytoreductive surgery. These data were analyzed in the general group, and between primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) using χ test and Student t test. Relationship of variables was verified using Multiple Logistic Regression. RESULTS A total of 83 women were included. Of these, 43 (51.8%) were submitted to PDS and 40 (48.2%) to IDS. In the PDS group, 23 (53.5%) of the patients had complications. For the IDS group, 27 (67.5%) complicated (P = 0.192). Regarding the general group, independent predictors for 30-day complications were presence of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 5.466, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.151-25,972; P = 0.033) and estimated blood loss of greater than 300 mL (OR, 14.407; 95% CI, 2.736-75.863; P = 0.002). In multivariate analysis of the general group, independent predictors for ACD were the presence of hypertension as comorbidity (OR, 3.898; 95% CI, 1.119-13.578; P = 0.033), body mass index of greater than 30 kg/m (OR, 5.728; 95% CI, 1.169-28.069; P = 0.031), 30-day reoperation (OR, 21.275; 95% CI, 1.799-251.651; P = 0.015), and fever within 30 days (OR, 11.594; 95% CI, 1.714-78.412; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Comorbidities and intraoperative bleeding are the most relevant findings related to surgical complications. Surgical approach (PDS or IDS) was not related with complications. Surgical complications were significantly related to ACD.
Collapse
|
28
|
Economic Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using an Aggressive Surgical Paradigm. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 28:1077-1084. [PMID: 29683880 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) remains controversial in the United States. Generalizability of existing trial results has been criticized because of less aggressive debulking procedures than commonly used in the United States. As a result, economic evaluations using input data from these trials may not accurately reflect costs and outcomes associated with more aggressive primary surgery. Using data from an ongoing trial performing aggressive debulking, we investigated the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of NACT versus PDS for AEOC. METHODS A decision tree model was constructed to estimate differences in short-term outcomes and costs for a hypothetical cohort of 15,000 AEOC patients (US annual incidence of AEOC) treated with NACT versus PDS over a 1-year time horizon from a Medicare payer perspective. Outcomes included costs per cancer-related death averted, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Base-case probabilities, costs, and utilities were based on the Surgical Complications Related to Primary or Interval Debulking in Ovarian Neoplasms trial. Base-case analyses assumed equivalent survival; threshold analysis estimated the maximum survival difference that would result in NACT being cost-effective at $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay thresholds. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to characterize model uncertainty. RESULTS Compared with PDS, NACT was associated with $142 million in cost savings, 1098 fewer cancer-related deaths, and 1355 life-years and 1715 QALYs gained, making it the dominant treatment strategy for all outcomes. In sensitivity analysis, NACT remained dominant in 99.3% of simulations. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy remained cost-effective at $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay thresholds if survival differences were less than 2.7 and 1.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In the short term, NACT is cost-saving with improved outcomes. However, if PDS provides a longer-term survival advantage, it may be cost-effective. Research is needed on the role of patient preferences in tradeoffs between survival and quality of life.
Collapse
|
29
|
Cham S, Chen L, St. Clair CM, Hou JY, Tergas AI, Melamed A, Ananth CV, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Development and validation of a risk-calculator for adverse perioperative outcomes for women with ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220:571.e1-571.e8. [PMID: 30771346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 01/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary cytoreduction followed by platinum-based chemotherapy is the primary treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking is an alternative option, particularly in those who may be poor surgical candidates. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with short-term, significant perioperative morbidity and mortality for women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer and to create a nomogram to predict the risk of adverse perioperative outcomes. STUDY DESIGN We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who underwent surgery from 2011 to 2015. Demographic factors, clinical characteristics, comorbidity, functional status, and the extent of surgery were used to predict the risk of severe perioperative complications or death using multivariable models. Multiple imputation methods were employed for missing data. A nomogram was developed based on the final model. The discrimination ability of the model was assessed with a calibration plot and discrimination concordance index. RESULTS We identified a total of 7029 patients. Overall, 5.8% of patients experienced a Clavien-Dindo IV complication, 9.8% of patients were readmitted, 3.0% of patients required a reoperation, and 0.9% of patients died within 30 days. Among the baseline variables assessed, increasing age, emergent surgery, ascites, bleeding disorder, low albumin, higher American Society of Anesthesiology classification score, and a higher extended procedure score were associated with serious perioperative morbidity or mortality. Of these factors, performance of ≥3 cytoreductive procedures (adjusted odds ratio 4.53, 95% confidence interval 3.01-6.82), American Society of Anesthesiology classification score ≥ class 4 (adjusted odds ratio 2.89, 95% confidence interval 1.17-7.14), bleeding disorder (adjusted odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.82-4.10), and age ≥80 years (adjusted odds ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval 1.66-3.63) were most strongly associated with risk of an event. The final nomogram included the above variables and had an internal discrimination concordance index of 0.71, with accurate predictions in an internal validation set, indicating a 71% correct identification of patients across all possible pairs. CONCLUSION Women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer are at significant risk for the occurrence of adverse perioperative outcomes. Using readily identifiable characteristics, this nomogram can predict adverse outcomes.
Collapse
|
30
|
Wang XS, Shi Q, Williams LA, Cleeland CS, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Chen TY, Shahid DR, Ramirez PT, Iniesta MD, Siverand AM, Meyer LA. Validation and application of a module of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for measuring perioperative symptom burden in patients with gynecologic cancer (the MDASI-PeriOp-GYN). Gynecol Oncol 2019; 152:492-500. [PMID: 30876494 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in perioperative care is increasingly common. We report the development, validation, and application of an MD Anderson Symptom Inventory version for use in patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer or benign conditions (MDASI-PeriOp-GYN). METHODS Our process included: (1) generating PeriOp-GYN-specific candidate items from qualitative interviews with patients, followed by input from an expert panel; (2) dropping items that lacked independent clinical relevance; (3) validating psychometric properties (reliability, validity) of the resulting MDASI-PeriOp-GYN; and (4) conducting cognitive debriefing interviews with patients to confirm ease of comprehension, relevance, and acceptability. RESULTS Qualitative interviews with 40 patients generated 9 new PeriOp-GYN symptom items (bloating, abdominal cramping, constipation, hot flashes, dizziness, grogginess/confusion, urinary pain, difficulty urinating, and diarrhea) that, along with the core MDASI items, formed the new MDASI-PeriOp-GYN. A total of 150 patients (minimally invasive surgery (MIS) = 69, open surgery = 81) participated in the validation study; 121 patients also provided retest data. Cronbach alphas were 0.89 for symptoms and 0.86 for interference. Test-retest reliability was 0.88 for all symptom severity items. Known-group validity was supported by the detection of significant differences in symptom and interference levels by performance status (P < 0.01) and for all symptoms by surgery type (P < 0.01). Cognitive debriefing with 20 of the 150 patients demonstrated that the MDASI-PeriOp-GYN is an easy-to-use and understandable tool. CONCLUSIONS The MDASI-PeriOp-GYN is a valid, reliable, concise tool for measuring symptom severity and functional interference in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery and can be useful in assessing postoperative symptom burden via PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Shelley Wang
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - Qiuling Shi
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Loretta A Williams
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Charles S Cleeland
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Araceli Garcia-Gonzalez
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Ting-Yu Chen
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Denita R Shahid
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Maria D Iniesta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Ashley M Siverand
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wang M, Zhou J, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Zhang N, Wang L, Zhu W, He X, Zhu H, Xu W, Pan Q, Mao A, Li Q, Wang L. Surgical treatment of ovarian cancer liver metastasis. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019; 8:129-137. [PMID: 31098360 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.12.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In addition to hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic liver cancer (MLC) is another focus of hepatic surgeon. Good outcome of patients with liver metastasis (LM) from colorectal cancer or neuroendocrine tumor have been achieved. Ovarian cancer liver metastasis (OCLM) has its unique oncological characteristics and a variety of metastasis patterns, which brings a challenge to hepatic surgeon. Hepatic surgeons hold different views and techniques from gynecologists, which makes differences in the evaluation and treatment of the disease. We reviewed recent studies and, in combination with our own clinical experience, attempted to introduce the progress of surgical treatment of liver metastases from OC. In our experience, both preoperative imaging and surgical procedures are based on the assurance of R0 resection. R0 cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is the most favorable determinant for the prognosis of OC patients, and R0 liver resection (LR) is a component of R0 CRS. Gynecologists and hepatic surgeons should do their own preoperative and intraoperative evaluation for the extrahepatic and intrahepatic metastasis respectively. During the operation, regardless of the miliary nodules dissemination between the right hemidiaphragm and liver capsule, liver parenchymal infiltration (LPI) or liver parenchymal metastasis (LPM), 1-2 cm resection margin should be emphasized. For patients with liver portal lymph node metastasis (LPLNM), hepatic portal skeletonization should be performed, rather than portal lymph node dissection. The operation should be as radical as possible to ensure the patients to achieve good prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miao Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jiamin Zhou
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Lyu Zhang
- Research Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China
| | - Yiming Zhao
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Longrong Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Weiping Zhu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xigan He
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Hongxu Zhu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Weiqi Xu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Qi Pan
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Anrong Mao
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Qinchuan Li
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ferron G, Narducci F, Pouget N, Touboul C. [Surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer: Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 47:197-213. [PMID: 30792175 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Debulking surgery is the key step of advanced stage ovarian cancer treatment with chemotherapy. The quality of surgical resection is the main prognosis factor, thus a complete resection must be achieved (grade A) in an expert center (grade B). Surgery for stage IV is possible and has a benefit in case of complete peritoneal resection (LoE3). Pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomies are recommended in case of clinical or radiological suspicious lymph nodes (grade B). In absence of clinical or radiological suspicious lymph nodes and in case of complete peritoneal resection during initial debulking surgery, lymphadenectomy can be omitted because it won't change nor medical treatment nor overall survival (grade B). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be proposed in case of: impossibility to perform initial complete surgical resection (grade B) ; alteration of general state or co-morbidities or elderly patient (in order to decrease morbidity and increase quality of life) (grade B); stage IV with multiple intra-hepatic or pulmonary metastasis or important ascites with miliary (grade B). In case of stage III or IV ovarian cancer diagnosed on a biopsy during prior laparotomy, a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery should be preferred (gradeC). In case of palliative surgery or peroperative impossibility to perform a complete resection, no data regarding the type of surgery to perform influencing survival or quality of life is available. Peritoneal carcinosis description before resection and residual disease at the end of the surgery should be reported (size, location and reason of non-extirpability) (grade B). A score of peritoneal carcinosis such as Peritoneal Carcinosis Index (PCI) should be used in order to objectively evaluate the tumoral burden (gradeC). A standardized operative report is recommended (gradeC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ferron
- Inserm CRCT 19, département de chirurgie oncologique, institut Claudius Regaud, institut universitaire du cancer, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - F Narducci
- Inserm U1192, département de chirurgie oncologique, centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France
| | - N Pouget
- Département de chirurgie oncologique, chirurgie gynécologique et mammaire, institut Curie, site Saint-Cloud, 75005 Paris, France
| | - C Touboul
- IMRB, U955 Inserm, service de gynécologie obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, centre hospitalier intercommunal de Créteil, institut Mondor de recherche biomédicale, 94000 Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prognostic impact of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment intensity for ovarian cancer. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0206913. [PMID: 30418985 PMCID: PMC6231633 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of duration of first-line chemotherapy administration in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods Chemotherapy records were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Patients with on-time completion (105 days) were compared to patients finishing early (<105 days), delays of 1–4 weeks, or >4 weeks. For 222 women with stage IIIC/IV, stage-stratified estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. A delay sub-study was performed with outliers removed. Each week of delay was correlated with the change in PFS and OS to identify time points associated with change in outcome. Results Most women had on-time completion of chemotherapy (23.6%) or a treatment delay of ≤4 weeks (21.8%); 21.6% of women experienced a delay longer than 4 weeks. R0 resection at initial debulking (OR = 1.99, 95%CI: 1.18–3.36, p = 0.010) and RECIST complete response (OR = 4.88, 95%CI: 2.47–10.63, p<0.001) were strongly associated with on-time completion. Patients with on-time completion and < 1 month delay had similar median survivals of 43.1 months (lower 95% CI bound 33.7 months) and 44.5 months (lower bound 37.0, p = 0.93). Women with >1 month delay had decreased median survival of 18.1 months (14.7–24.9 months), while women with short intervals survived 35.0 months (95%CI: 21.8–49.8 months). Short-term delays lead to progressively decreasing OS. This was significantly different from the on-schedule survival estimate after 6 weeks of delay. Conclusions On-time completion of chemotherapy correlates with increased survival and higher complete response rates. Increasing delays in chemotherapy completion were associated with decreased survival.
Collapse
|
34
|
Liu XD, Liu Y, Gong TT, Guo JY, Wang YN, Wang L, Wu QJ, Jiao YS. Prognostic Influence of the Time Interval between Surgery and Chemotherapy in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. J Cancer 2018; 9:4172-4178. [PMID: 30519317 PMCID: PMC6277625 DOI: 10.7150/jca.27409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The influence of time to chemotherapy (TTC) on recurrence and survival among epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients still remains unknown. This single center retrospective cohort study was conducted on 489 EOC patients who underwent surgery followed by taxane- plus platinum-based chemotherapy in the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University between 2011 and 2015. The Multivariate cox proportional regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjustment for potential confounders. The median follow-up duration was 2.97 years (inter-quartile range from 2.11 to 4.13 years). The recurrence and mortality rate of the all patients was 50.9% (249/489) and 43.6% (213/489), respectively. Having comorbidity, residual disease, ascites, and advanced FIGO stage (III-IV) was associated worse PFS and OS of EOC patients. Compared to TTC less than 14 days, delayed TTC (more than 28 days) was associated with a worse PFS (HR=1.36; 95%CI: 0.96-1.92) and OS (HR=1.38; 95%CI: 0.95-2.00). Notably, in EOC patients with advanced stage, delayed TTC (more than 28 days) was associated with worse PFS (HR=1.51; 95%CI: 1.02-2.24) and OS (HR=1.53; 95%CI: 1.01-2.32) when comparing to TTC less than 14 days. In conclusion, delayed TTC was associated with higher rates of EOC recurrence and survival among these patients with advanced stage. The findings of the present study may provide evidence for gynecologist as well as these ovarian cancer patients to make further decision for the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Dong Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ting-Ting Gong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jing-Yi Guo
- School of postgraduate, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ya-Nan Wang
- School of postgraduate, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ling Wang
- School of postgraduate, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qi-Jun Wu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yi-Sheng Jiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cole AL, Austin AE, Hickson RP, Dixon MS, Barber EL. Review of methodological challenges in comparing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol 2018; 55:8-16. [PMID: 29758492 PMCID: PMC6054914 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2018] [Revised: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Randomized trials outside the U.S. have found non-inferior survival for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). However, these trials reported lower overall survival and lower rates of optimal debulking than U.S. studies, leading to questions about generalizability to U.S. practice, where aggressive debulking is more common. Consequently, comparative effectiveness in the U.S. remains controversial. We reviewed U.S. comparative effectiveness studies of NACT versus PDS for AOC. Here we describe methodological challenges, compare results to trials outside the U.S., and make suggestions for future research. We identified U.S. studies published in 2010 or later that evaluated the comparative effectiveness of NACT versus PDS on survival in AOC through a PubMed search. Two independent reviewers abstracted data from eligible articles. Nine of 230 articles were eligible for review. Methodological challenges included unmeasured confounders, heterogeneous treatment effects, treatment variations over time, and inconsistent measurement of treatment and survival. Whereas some limitations were unavoidable, several limitations noted across studies were avoidable, including conditioning on mediating factors and immortal time introduced by measuring survival beginning from diagnosis. Without trials in the U.S., non-randomized studies are an important source of evidence for the ideal treatment for AOC. However, several methodological challenges exist when assessing the comparative effectiveness of NACT versus PDS in a non-randomized setting. Future observational studies must ensure that treatment is consistent throughout the study period and that treatment groups are comparable. Rapidly-evolving oncology data networks may allow for identification of treatment intent and other important confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley L Cole
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA.
| | - Anna E Austin
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
| | - Ryan P Hickson
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
| | - Matthew S Dixon
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
| | - Emma L Barber
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611 USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Interval between debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 150:446-450. [PMID: 30001834 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) consists of debulking surgery and (neo)adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the time from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy (TTC) was associated with clinical outcome. METHODS We identified all Dutch patients who received optimal or complete debulking surgery for primary EOC (FIGO IIb-IV) between 2008 and 2015 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. TTC was divided into three groups based on the interquartile range (IQR). Early (<25%) and prolonged (>75%) TTC were compared to intermediate TTC (25-75%). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with a prolonged TTC and multivariable Cox regression to evaluate the independent effect of treatment interval on overall survival (OS). Patients receiving primary debulking surgery (PDS) and patients receiving interval debulking surgery (IDS) were analyzed separately. RESULTS 4097 patients were included, 1612 underwent PDS and 2485 IDS. Median TTC was 29 days (IQR 24-37). Age ≥ 65, complete debulking surgery, postoperative complications, and hospitalization ≥10 days were independently associated with a longer TTC for both PDS and IDS. TTC in the longest quartile was associated with poor OS after both PDS (Hazard Rate (HR) 1.43, 95% CI 1.09-1.88) and NACT-IDS (HR 1.22 (1.02-1.47)) when compared to the intermediate TTC, but only in patients with no macroscopic residual disease after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides evidence that delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival after complete (interval)debulking surgery. We advise to start adjuvant chemotherapy within five to six weeks after debulking surgery.
Collapse
|
37
|
Ahmed A, Deng W, Tew W, Bender D, Mannel RS, Littell RD, DeNittis AS, Edelson M, Morgan M, Carlson J, Darus CJ, Fleury AC, Modesitt S, Olawaiye A, Evans A, Fleming GF. Pre-operative assessment and post-operative outcomes of elderly women with gynecologic cancers, primary analysis of NRG CC-002: An NRG oncology group/gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 150:300-305. [PMID: 29807694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CC-002 is a prospective cooperative group study conducted by NRG Oncology to evaluate whether a pre-operative GA-GYN score derived from a predictive model utilizing components of an abbreviated geriatric assessment (GA) is associated with major post-operative complications in elderly women with suspected ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal or advanced stage papillary serous uterine (GYN) carcinoma undergoing primary open cytoreductive surgery. METHODS Patients 70 years or older with suspected advanced gynecologic cancers undergoing evaluation for surgery were eligible. A GA-GYN score was derived from a model utilizing the GA as a pre-operative tool. Patients were followed for six weeks post-operatively or until start of chemotherapy. Post-operative events were recorded either directly as binary occurrence (yes or no) using CTCAE version 4.0. RESULTS There were 189 eligible patients, 117 patients with primary surgical intervention and 37 patients undergoing interval cytoreduction surgery. The association between higher GA-GYN score and major postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary surgery was not significant (p = 0.1341). In a subgroup analysis of patients with advanced staged malignant disease who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, there was a trend towards an association with the GA-GYN score and post-operative complications. CONCLUSION The pre-operative GA-GYN score derived from a predictive model utilizing components of an abbreviated geriatric assessment was not predictive of major post-operative complications in elderly patients undergoing primary open cytoreductive surgery. However, there was an association between GA-GYN score and post-operative complications in a subgroup of patients with advanced staged malignant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amina Ahmed
- Department of OB/GYN, Division of Gyn Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
| | - Wei Deng
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 4263, United States.
| | - William Tew
- Department of Internal Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
| | - David Bender
- Gyn/Onc Division, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
| | - Robert S Mannel
- Department of OB/GYN, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, United States.
| | - Ramey D Littell
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California Gynecologic Cancer Program, San Francisco, CA 94115, United States.
| | - Albert S DeNittis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Main Line Hospital, Wynnewood, PA 19096, United States.
| | - Mitchell Edelson
- Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital, Jefferson Health, Abington, PA 19001, United States.
| | - Mark Morgan
- Department of OB/GYN, University of Pennsylvania Hospital System, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
| | - Jay Carlson
- Cancer Research for the Ozarks, Springfield, MO 65804, United States.
| | - Christopher J Darus
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Maine Medical Center, Scarborough, ME 04074, United States.
| | - Aimee C Fleury
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89169, United States.
| | - Susan Modesitt
- Department of OB/GYN, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
| | - Anthony Evans
- Marshfield Clinic, OB-GYN Dept, Marshfield, WI 54449, United States.
| | - Gini F Fleming
- Section of Medical Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Latif N, Kobie J, Mitra N, Burger R, Morgan M, Guintoli R, Ko E. A Prediction Model and Risk Calculator for Surgical Mortality and Serious Morbidity After Primary Cytoreductive Surgery. J Gynecol Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1089/gyn.2017.0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nawar Latif
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Julie Kobie
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert Burger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark Morgan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert Guintoli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily Ko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Davidson BA, Moss HA, Kamal AH. Top 10 Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know When Caring for Patients with Ovarian Cancer. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:250-254. [PMID: 29319389 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The vast majority of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer present with advanced-stage disease with a five-year survival rate less than 50%. Studies have shown that in the past, gynecologic oncologists were not routinely collaborating with palliative care physicians resulting in goals of care planning often not occurring until the last 30 days before death. In recent years, professional societies have been increasingly more vocal about the importance of incorporating palliative care early in a patient's disease course. As these calls increase, palliative care clinicians will be likely to comanage patients with ovarian cancer and may benefit from additional targeted education on this unique population. We brought together a team of gynecologic oncology and palliative care experts to collate practical pearls for the care of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. In this article, we use a "Top 10" format to highlight issues that may help palliative care physicians understand a patient's prognosis, address common misconceptions about ovarian cancer, and improve the quality of shared decision making and goals-of-care discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany A Davidson
- 1 Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina
| | - Haley A Moss
- 1 Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina
| | - Arif H Kamal
- 2 Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Fuqua School of Business, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jones NL, Chen L, Chatterjee S, Tergas AI, Burke WM, Hou JY, Ananth CV, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Wright JD. National Trends in Extended Procedures for Ovarian Cancer Debulking Surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 28:19-25. [PMID: 28953134 PMCID: PMC5734991 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Primary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer often requires extended radical procedures and is associated with significant morbidity. In 2010, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was shown to have similar survival to primary cytoreduction but with less need for radical surgery. We hypothesized that the increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy would decrease the use of radical cytoreductive procedures and thus examined trends in the performance of radical cytoreductive procedures. METHODS We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to determine the annual number of extended procedures (colon, small intestine, liver, diaphragm, spleen, and gastric resection, ileostomy, colostomy) performed in women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer from 1998 to 2013. Estimates were weighted to provide national averages. To account for changes in incidence over time, we used national incidence rates and report procedures performed per 1000 new cases of ovarian cancer. Trends were assessed using Cochrane-Armitage tests. RESULTS We identified 274,639 ovarian cancer patients who underwent surgery, ranging from 15,720 to 18,714 procedures performed each year. We identified a significant increase in the use of extended procedures over this period. These differences were significant for absolute numbers of procedures, rate per 1000 new ovarian cancer cases, and percent per hysterectomy/bilateral salpingoophorectomy for rectosigmoid resection, diaphragm resection, splenectomy, ileostomy, and liver resection. Specifically, the use of these procedures rose from 1998 to 2010, declined in 2011, and rose again in 2012 and 2013. CONCLUSIONS Although there was a transient decrease in the use of extended cytoreductive procedures from 2010 to 2011 after the publication of randomized neoadjuvant trial data, use of these procedures again rose in 2012 and 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel L Jones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- New York Presbyterian Hospital
| | - Ling Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
| | - Sudeshna Chatterjee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- New York Presbyterian Hospital
| | - Ana I. Tergas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- Department of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- New York Presbyterian Hospital
| | - William M. Burke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- New York Presbyterian Hospital
| | - June Y. Hou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- New York Presbyterian Hospital
| | - Cande V. Ananth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- Department of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
| | - Alfred I. Neugut
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- Department of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- New York Presbyterian Hospital
| | - Dawn L. Hershman
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- Department of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- New York Presbyterian Hospital
| | - Jason D. Wright
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
- New York Presbyterian Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Champer M, Huang Y, Hou JY, Tergas AI, Burke WM, Hillyer GC, Ananth CV, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Adherence to treatment recommendations and outcomes for women with ovarian cancer at first recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 148:19-27. [PMID: 29153542 PMCID: PMC5756507 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treatment selection for recurrent ovarian cancer is typically based on the duration of time between the completion of adjuvant, platinum-based therapy and the time of recurrence, the platinum free interval (PFI). We examined the use of, and outcomes associated with platinum-based chemotherapy based on the PFI in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify women aged >65years with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy and who developed a recurrence >3months after the completion of adjuvant therapy. Patients were stratified by PFI into 3 groups: PFI <6months, PFI 7-12months, and PFI >12months. Multivariable models were used to examine predictors of use of platinum-based therapy and survival for each group. RESULTS A total of 2369 patients were identified. In women with a PFI of ≤6months, treatment consisted of platinum-based combination therapy in 28.2%, single agent platinum in 5.2% and non-platinum therapy in 66.6%. Corresponding rates of these treatments among women with a PFI of 7-12months were 39.7%, 12.4% and 47.9%, respectively; the rates were 57.6%, 13.2% and 29.3% in those with a PFI of >12months, respectively. Median survival was 13, 18, and 27months for patients with a PFI of ≤6months, 7-12months, and >12months, respectively (P<0.0001). For all three groups, platinum combination therapy was associated with decreased risk of death compared to non‑platinum based therapy. CONCLUSION Platinum free interval is a strong predictor of survival in elderly women with recurrent ovarian cancer. There is widespread variation in treatment selection for women with recurrent ovarian cancer with many women receiving non-guideline based regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Champer
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States
| | - Yongmei Huang
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States
| | - June Y Hou
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States
| | - Ana I Tergas
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, United States
| | - William M Burke
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States
| | | | - Cande V Ananth
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, United States
| | - Alfred I Neugut
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, United States
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, United States
| | - Jason D Wright
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes of cardiophrenic lymph node resection in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 147:262-266. [PMID: 28888540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Revised: 09/01/2017] [Accepted: 09/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Surgical resection of enlarged cardiophrenic lymph nodes (CPLNs) in primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer has not been widely studied. We report on a cohort of patients undergoing CPLN resection during primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS), examining its feasibility, safety, and potential impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS We identified all patients undergoing primary CRS/CPLN resection for Stages IIIB-IV high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer at our institution from 1/2001-12/2013. Clinical and pathological data were collected. Statistical tests were performed. RESULTS 54 patients underwent CPLN resection. All had enlarged CPLNs on preoperative imaging. Median diameter of an enlarged CPLN: 1.3cm (range 0.6-2.9). Median patient age: 59y (range 41-74). 48 (88.9%) underwent transdiaphragmatic resection; 6 (11.1%) underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery. A median of 3 nodes (range 1-23) were resected. A median of 2 nodes (range 0-22) were positive for metastasis. 51/54 (94.4%) had positive nodes. 51 (94.4%) had chest tube placement; median time to removal: 4d (range 2-12). 44 (81.4%) had peritoneal carcinomatosis. 19 (35%) experienced major postoperative complications; 4 of these (7%) were surgery-related. Median time to adjuvant chemotherapy: 40d (range 19-205). All patients were optimally cytoreduced, 30 (55.6%) without visible residual disease. Median progression-free survival: 17.2mos (95% CI 12.6-21.8); median overall survival: 70.1mos (95% CI 51.2-89.0). CONCLUSIONS Enlarged CPLNs can be identified on preoperative imaging and may indicate metastases. Resection can identify extra-abdominal disease, confirm Stage IV disease, obtain optimal cytoreduction. In the proper setting it is feasible, safe, and does not delay chemotherapy. In select patients, it may improve survival.
Collapse
|
43
|
Relationship between initiation time of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in ovarian cancer patients: a dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Sci Rep 2017; 7:9461. [PMID: 28842667 PMCID: PMC5572704 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10197-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Although several studies have previously investigated the association between the initiation time of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in ovarian cancer, inconsistencies remain about the issue. We searched PubMed and Web of Science through the May 24, 2017 to identify cohort studies that investigated the aforementioned topic. Fourteen studies with 59,569 ovarian cancer patients were included in this meta-analysis. We conducted meta-analyses comparing the longest and shortest initiation time of adjuvant chemotherapy and dose-response analyses to estimate summary hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effects model was used to estimate HRs with 95% CIs. When comparing the longest with the shortest category of initiation time of adjuvant chemotherapy, the summary HR was 1.18 (95% CI: 1.06–1.32; I2 = 17.6; n = 7) for overall survival. Additionally, significant dose-response association for overall survival was observed for each week delay (HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00–1.09; I2 = 9.05; n = 5). Notably, these findings were robust in prospective designed cohort studies as well as studies with advanced stage (FIGO III-IV) patients. No evidence of publication bias was observed. In conclusion, prolonged initiation time of adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a decreased overall survival rate of ovarian cancer, especially in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
44
|
Barber EL, Dusetzina SB, Stitzenberg KB, Rossi EC, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF, Garrett JM. Variation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization for epithelial ovarian cancer at high volume hospitals in the United States and associated survival. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 145:500-507. [PMID: 28366545 PMCID: PMC5503107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 03/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate variation in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy by high volume hospitals and to determine the association between hospital utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival. METHODS We identified incident cases of stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2012. Inclusion criteria were treatment at a high volume hospital (>20 cases/year) and treatment with both chemotherapy and surgery. A logistic regression model was used to predict receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on case-mix predictors (age, comorbidities, stage etc). Hospitals were categorized by the observed-to-expected ratio for neoadjuvant chemotherapy use as low, average, or high utilization hospitals. Survival analysis was performed. RESULTS We identified 11,574 patients treated at 55 high volume hospitals. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used for 21.6% (n=2494) of patients and use varied widely by hospital, from 5%-55%. High utilization hospitals (n=1910, 10 hospitals) had a median neoadjuvant chemotherapy rate of 39% (range 23-55%), while low utilization hospitals (n=2671, 14 hospitals) had a median rate of 10% (range 5-17%). For all ovarian cancer patients adjusting for clinical and socio-demographic factors, treatment at a hospital with average or high neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization was associated with a decreased rate of death compared to treatment at a low utilization hospital (HR 0.90 95% CI 0.83-0.97 and HR 0.85 95% CI 0.75-0.95). CONCLUSIONS Wide variation exists in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to treat stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer even among high volume hospitals. Patients treated at hospitals with low rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization experience decreased survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Barber
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
| | - Stacie B Dusetzina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Karyn B Stitzenberg
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Emma C Rossi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Paola A Gehrig
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - John F Boggess
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Joanne M Garrett
- Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kalogera E, Nitschmann C, Dowdy S, Cliby W, Langstraat C. A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 144:343-347. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
46
|
Alexander M, Blum R, Burbury K, Coutsouvelis J, Dooley M, Fazil O, Griffiths T, Ismail H, Joshi S, Love N, Opat S, Parente P, Porter N, Ross E, Siderov J, Thomas P, White S, Kirsa S, Rischin D. Timely initiation of chemotherapy: a systematic literature review of six priority cancers - results and recommendations for clinical practice. Intern Med J 2017; 47:16-34. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.13190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2015] [Revised: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Alexander
- Department of Pharmacy; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - R. Blum
- Department of Medical Oncology; Bendigo Health; Bendigo Victoria Australia
| | - K. Burbury
- Department of Haematology; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - J. Coutsouvelis
- Pharmacy Department; Alfred Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Centre for Medicine Use and Safety; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - M. Dooley
- Pharmacy Department; Alfred Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Centre for Medicine Use and Safety; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - O. Fazil
- Pharmacy Department; Monash Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - T. Griffiths
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - H. Ismail
- Departments of Pharmacy; Royal Women's Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology; Latrobe Regional Hospital; Traralgon Victoria Australia
| | - N. Love
- Department of Nursing; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Opat
- Department of Clinical Haematology; Monash Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - P. Parente
- Department of Medical Oncology; Eastern Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Eastern Clinical School; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - N. Porter
- Department of Clinical Haematology; Monash Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - E. Ross
- Division of Neurosciences, Cancer and Infection Medicine; The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - J. Siderov
- Pharmacy Department; Austin Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - P. Thomas
- Departments of Nursing; Royal Women's Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. White
- Department of Medical Oncology; Northern Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Kirsa
- Department of Pharmacy; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - D. Rischin
- Department of Medical Oncology; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Singh S, Guetzko M, Resnick K. Preoperative predictors of delay in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143:241-245. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
48
|
Desale MG, Tanner EJ, Sinno AK, Angarita AA, Fader AN, Stone RL, Levinson KL, Bristow RE, Roche KL. Perioperative fluid status and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 144:S0090-8258(16)31501-3. [PMID: 28029449 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2016] [Revised: 10/10/2016] [Accepted: 10/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of fluid status on perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS Patients undergoing CRS for stage III or IV EOC at a comprehensive cancer center from 12/2010 to 05/2015 were identified. Those who underwent upper abdominal procedures or colon resections were included. Demographic, perioperative, and 30-day complication data were collected. Perioperative weight change was utilized as a surrogate for fluid status. The time to diuresis (tD) was defined as the postoperative day the patient's weight began to downtrend. RESULTS One hundred ten patients were included. Median age was 62years and median BMI 25.8kg/m2. The majority (74.5%) were stage IIIC. At least 1 bowel resection was performed in 60 cases (54.5%). A median of 5381mL of crystalloid (range 1000-17,550mL) and 500mL of colloids (range 0-2783mL) was given intraoperatively. The median perioperative weight change was +7.3kg (range-0.9kg to +35.7kg). The median tD was 3days (range 1-17days). On univariate analysis, net positive fluid status was associated with unscheduled reoperation, anastomotic leak, surgical site infections (SSI), and length of stay >5days. On multivariate analysis, fluid status was independently associated with SSI (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative fluid excess is common in patients undergoing CRS for EOC and is independently associated with SSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Desale
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - E J Tanner
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - A K Sinno
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - A Africano Angarita
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - A N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - R L Stone
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - K L Levinson
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - R E Bristow
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of California-Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
| | - K Long Roche
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hacker NF, Rao A. Surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 41:71-87. [PMID: 27884789 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer has been practised since the pioneering work of Tom Griffiths in 1975. Further research has demonstrated the prognostic significance of the extent of metastatic disease pre-operatively, and of complete cytoreduction post-operatively. Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer should be referred to high volume cancer units, and managed by multidisciplinary teams. The role of thoracoscopy and resection of intrathoracic disease is presently investigational. In recent years, there has been increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with poor performance status, which is usually due to large volume ascites and/or large pleural effusions. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces the post-operative morbidity, but if the tumour responds well to the chemotherapy, the inflammatory response makes the surgery more difficult. Post-operative morbidity is generally tolerable, but increases in older patients, and in those having multiple, aggressive surgical procedures, such as bowel resection or diaphragmatic stripping. Primary cytoreductive surgery should be regarded as the gold standard for most patients until a test is developed which would allow the prediction of platinum resistance pre-operatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neville F Hacker
- Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick NSW 2031, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington NSW 2031, Australia.
| | - Archana Rao
- Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick NSW 2031, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Garcia-Soto AE, Java JJ, Nieves Neira W, Pearson JM, Cohn DE, Lele SB, Tewari KS, Walker JL, Alvarez Secord A, Armstrong DK, Copeland LJ. Does time interval between surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration in advanced ovarian cancer carry a prognostic impact? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study ancillary study. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143:484-489. [PMID: 27726923 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the relationship of the time from surgery to intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy (TSIC) initiation with survival of patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients using ancillary data from cooperative group clinical trials. METHODS Data from 420 patients with stage III EOC treated with IP chemotherapy under GOG-0114 and 172 were reviewed. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate independent prognostic factors and estimate their covariate-adjusted effects on PFS and OS. RESULTS The median TSIC was 62.5days (interquartile range 28-83). The median TSIC was longer for patients in GOG-0114 vs those in GOG-172 (83 vs 26days, p<0.001). TSIC was significantly associated (p=0.049) with PFS: each 10% increase in TSIC (days) decreases the risk of progression by 3%. TSIC was not significantly associated with OS in this model. In a linear regression model, gross residual disease was significantly associated with shorter TSIC (R2 -0.141, 95%CI -0.217, -0.064, p<0.001). When only data from GOG-172 were considered, no statistical significant association was found between TSIC and PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS In this ancillary data study, TSIC was not associated with improved OS in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. TSIC was significantly associated with PFS for the entire cohort, suggesting increase in PFS with longer TSIC. However, this was not found when only data from GOG 172 or GOG 114 were analyzed separately. Hence, the relationship between IP chemotherapy initiation and time from surgery needs to be studied further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene E Garcia-Soto
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of OB-GYN, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
| | - James J Java
- NRG Statistics and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
| | - Wilberto Nieves Neira
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of OB-GYN, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
| | - J Matthew Pearson
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of OB-GYN, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
| | - David E Cohn
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
| | - Shashikant B Lele
- Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
| | - Krishnansu S Tewari
- Obstetrics-Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, United States.
| | - Joan L Walker
- Gynecologic Oncology, Peggy and Charles Stephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
| | | | - Deborah K Armstrong
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|