Cannabis Abuse and Perioperative Complications Following Inpatient Spine Surgery in the United States

Considerations for Anesthesia in Older Adults with Cannabis Use

Over the past decade, legislative changes occurred in the USA and the western world that were followed by a substantial increase in reported use of cannabis among the general population. Among patients undergoing anesthesia for surgery or interventional procedures, older patients-often defined as adults over 65 years-are one of the fastest-growing populations. Within this group, the prevalence of cannabis use almost tripled over the past decade. In addition to habitual cannabis use, recommendations for treatment of chronic pain with cannabinoids have become increasingly more common. The clinical relevance of cannabis use in older adults is supported by recent studies linking it to increased anesthetic requirements as well as respiratory, cardiovascular, and psychiatric complications following surgery. Still, evidence remains equivocal, as these associations may largely depend on the type, frequency, and route of cannabis administration, and current research is mostly limited to retrospective cohort studies. Multisystemic effects of cannabis can become especially relevant in patients of advanced age undergoing anesthesia, characterized by physiological and pharmacodynamic alterations as well as a higher risks of drug-to-drug interactions. Best-practice guidelines emphasize the need for detailed, systematic preoperative screening for habits of cannabis use, including the history, type, and frequency, to guide perioperative management in these patients. This review discusses considerations for anesthesia in older patients with habitual cannabis use while highlighting strategies and recommendations to ensure safe and effective anesthesia care.

Cannabis-Related Disorders Are Associated with Increased Early Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions and Delayed Emergency Department Visits Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release

BACKGROUND

The effect of cannabis on pain management following open carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery is unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes for patients with cannabis-related disorder (CRD) undergoing open CTR to a propensity-matched cohort of patients without CRD (no cannabis-related disorder [NCRD]).

METHODS

The TriNetX Research Network was queried to identify patients undergoing primary open CTR between January 2010 and December 2022. Patients with CRD were propensity matched to a NCRD cohort in a 1:1 ratio based on 7 characteristics. Rates of postoperative opioid prescriptions, emergency department (ED) services, and outpatient appointments were reported at 0-2, 2-6, and 6-12 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 925 CRD patients were propensity matched to 925 NCRD patients undergoing open CTR. Within 0-2 weeks postoperatively, CRD patients received significantly greater rates of opioid prescriptions compared to NCRD patients (30.9% and 25.6%, P = .011). No cannabis-related disorder (NCRD) patients presented for outpatient follow-up at significantly higher rates than CRD patients within 6 weeks postoperatively. CRD patients presented to the ED at significantly higher rates between 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively (11.0% vs. 8.0%, respectively, P = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis-related disorder (CRD) is associated with lower rates of outpatient follow-up but higher rates of postoperative opioid prescriptions and ED presentations following open CTR compared to a propensity-matched cohort of NCRD patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cohort Study; Level III.

Cannabis and Craniotomy for Glioblastoma: Impact on Complications and Health Care Utilization

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in treatment of glioblastomas (GBMs), the median survival remains 14-16 months. In the United States, 52.5 million people ≥12 years of age used cannabis in 2021. We aim to elucidate differences in complications after craniotomy for resection of GBM between users and nonusers of cannabis.

METHODS

Merative MarketScan Research Data (2008-2019) (includes >265 million patients) were used to extract adults (≥18 years of age) with GBM diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases-9 code 191.x and International Classification of Diseases-10 code C71.x) who had a craniotomy (Current Procedure Terminology code 61510) from inpatient admission data. The inverse probability treatment weighted analysis balanced the groups of cannabis abuse disorder (CAD) and no CAD in terms of age, gender, insurance coverage, comorbidities, and prior 12-month opioid dependence.

RESULTS

Individuals with CAD were younger (median, 37 vs. 51 years; P < 0.0001). There was a lower percentage of women (19% vs. 45%; P < 0.0001). In the CAD group, opioid abuse pattern for ≥12 months was higher (16% vs. 5%; P = 0.001) and the rate of complications was higher (32% vs. 15%; P = 0.001) during index hospital stay. At 6 months postdischarge, neurologic complications were higher among the CAD group (27% vs. 8%; P < 0.001). At 1 year postdischarge, patients with CAD sought fewer outpatient services (P = 0.012). More neurologic complications were seen in the CAD group (31% vs. 12%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective population-based study sounds a higher rate of neurologic complications among patients using cannabis who also had a newly diagnosed GBM. This suggests the lack of a protective effect from use of cannabis in patients with primary malignant brain tumors.

The impact of cannabis use disorder on urologic oncologic surgery morbidity, length of stay, and inpatient cost: analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2003 to 2014

PURPOSE

This study examined the impact of cannabis use disorder (CUD) on inpatient morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and inpatient cost (IC) of patients undergoing urologic oncologic surgery.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2014 was analyzed for patients undergoing prostatectomy, nephrectomy, or cystectomy (n = 1,612,743). CUD was identified using ICD-9 codes. Complex-survey procedures were used to compare patients with and without CUD. Inpatient major complications, high LOS (4th quartile), and high IC (4th quartile) were examined as endpoints. Univariable and multivariable analysis (MVA) were performed to compare groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of CUD increased from 51 per 100,000 admissions in 2003 to 383 per 100,000 in 2014 (p < 0.001). Overall, 3,503 admissions had CUD. Patients with CUD were more frequently younger (50 vs. 61), male (86% vs. 78.4%), Black (21.7% vs. 9.2%), and had 1st quartile income (36.1% vs. 20.6%); all p < 0.001. CUD had no impact on any complication rates (all p > 0.05). However, CUD patients had higher LOS (3 vs. 2 days; p < 0.001) and IC ($15,609 vs. $12,415; p < 0.001). On MVA, CUD was not an independent predictor of major complications (p = 0.6). Conversely, CUD was associated with high LOS (odds ratio (OR) 1.31; 95% CI 1.08-1.59) and high IC (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12-1.59), both p < 0.01.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CUD at the time of urologic oncologic surgery is increasing. Future research should look into the cause of our observed phenomena and how to decrease LOS and IC in CUD patients.

Potential perioperative cardiovascular outcomes in cannabis/cannabinoid users. A call for caution

Background

Cannabis is one of the most widely used psychoactive substances. Its components act through several pathways, producing a myriad of side effects, of which cardiovascular events are the most life-threatening. However, only a limited number of studies address cannabis's perioperative impact on patients during noncardiac surgery.

Methods

Studies were identified by searching the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases using relevant keyword combinations pertinent to the topic.

Results

Current evidence shows that cannabis use may cause several cardiovascular events, including abnormalities in cardiac rhythm, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular events. Additionally, cannabis interacts with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, decreasing their efficacy. Finally, the interplay of cannabis with inhalational and intravenous anesthetic agents may lead to adverse perioperative cardiovascular outcomes.

Conclusions

The use of cannabis can trigger cardiovascular events that may depend on factors such as the duration of consumption, the route of administration of the drug, and the dose consumed, which places these patients at risk of drug-drug interactions with anesthetic agents. However, large prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to further elucidate gaps in the body of knowledge regarding which patient population has a greater risk of perioperative complications after cannabis consumption.

Association Between Preoperative Cannabis Use and Increased Rate of Revision Surgery Following Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The use of cannabis as a method of chronic pain relief has skyrocketed since its legalization in states across the United States. Clinicians currently have a limited scope regarding the effectiveness of marijuana on surgical procedures. This systematic review aims to determine the effect of current cannabis use on the rate of failure of spinal fusions and overall surgical outcomes. A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched, identifying studies assessing spinal fusion with reported preoperative cannabis use. Outcomes of interest included reoperation due to fusion failure or pseudoarthrosis with a follow-up time of at least six months. Subgroups of cervical fusions alone and lumbar fusions alone were also analyzed. Certainty in evidence and bias was assessed using the GRADE criteria and ROBINS-I tool (PROSPERO #CRD42023463548). Four studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 788 patients (188 in the cannabis user group and 600 in the non-user group). The rate of revision surgery among cannabis users was higher than that in non-users for all spinal fusions (RR: 3.58, 95% CI: 1.67 to 7.66, p = 0.001). For cervical fusions alone, there remained a higher rate of revision surgery for cannabis users compared to non-users (RR: 4.47, 95% CI: 1.93 to 10.36, p = 0.0005). For lumbar fusions alone, there was no difference in the rates of revision surgery between cannabis users and non-users (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.28 to 7.73, p = 0.79). Cannabis use was shown to be associated with a higher rate of pseudoarthrosis revisions in spinal fusions on meta-analysis. On subgroup stratification by spine region, cannabis use remained associated with pseudoarthrosis revisions on cervical fusions alone but not lumbar fusions alone. Further research with larger, randomized studies is required to fully elucidate the relationship between cannabis use and fusion, both in general and by spinal region.

Cannabis use disorder and perioperative outcomes following complex cancer surgery

INTRODUCTION

Cannabis usage is increasing in the United States, especially among patients with cancer. We sought to evaluate whether cannabis use disorder (CUD) was associated with higher morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing complex cancer surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent complex cancer surgery between January 2016 and December 2019 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database. CUD was defined according to ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching was performed to create a 1:1 matched cohort that was well balanced with respect to covariates, which included patient comorbidities, sociodemographic factors, and procedure type. The primary composite outcome was in-hospital mortality and seven major perioperative complications (myocardial ischemia, acute kidney injury, stroke, respiratory failure, venous thromboembolism, hospital-acquired infection, and surgical procedure-related complications).

RESULTS

Among 15 014 patients who underwent a high-risk surgical procedure, a cohort of 7507 patients with CUD (median age; 43 years [IQR: 30-56 years]; n = 3078 [41.0%] female) were matched with 7507 patients who were not cannabis users (median age; 44 years [IQR: 30-58 years); n = 2997 [39.9%] female). CUD was associated with slight increased risk relative to postoperative kidney injury (CUD, 7.8% vs. no CUD, 6.1%); however, in-hospital mortality was slightly lower (CUD, 0.9% vs. no CUD, 1.6%) (both p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, after controlling for other risk factors, CUD was not associated with higher morbidity and mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.15; p = 0.158).

CONCLUSION

CUD was not associated with a higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality following complex cancer surgery.

Cannabis smoking and abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Despite increasing use of cannabis, literature on perioperative effects is lagging. We compared active cannabis-smokers versus non-smokers and postoperative wound morbidity and reoperations following open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent open, clean, AWR with transversus abdominis release and retromuscular synthetic mesh placement at our institution between January 2014 and May 2022 were identified using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Active cannabis-smokers were 1:3 propensity matched to non-smokers based on demographics and comorbidities. Wound complications, 30 day morbidity, pain (PROMIS 3a-Pain Intensity), and hernia-specific quality of life (HerQles) were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-two cannabis-smokers were matched to 216 non-smokers. SSO (18% vs 17% p = 0.86), SSI (11.1% vs 9.3%, p = 0.65), SSOPI (12% vs 12%, p = 0.92), and all postoperative complications (46% vs 43%, p = 0.63) were similar between cannabis-smokers and non-smokers. Reoperations were more common in the cannabis-smoker group (8.3% vs 2.8%, p = 0.041), driven by major wound complications (6.9% vs 3.2%, p = 0.004). No mesh excisions occurred. HerQles scores were similar at baseline (22 [11, 41] vs 35 [14, 55], p = 0.06), and were worse for cannabis-smokers compared to non-smokers at 30 days (30 [12, 50] vs 38 [20, 67], p = 0.032), but not significantly different at 1 year postoperatively (72 [53, 90] vs 78 [57, 92], p = 0.39). Pain scores were worse for cannabis-smokers compared to non-smokers at 30 days postoperatively (52 [46, 58] vs 49 [44, 54], p = 0.01), but there were no differences at 6 months or 1 year postoperatively (p > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Cannabis smokers will likely experience similar complication rates after clean, open AWR, but should be counseled that despite similar wound complication rates, the severity of their wound complications may be greater than non-smokers.

Risks associated with chronic cannabis use on opioid use, length of stay, and revision rate for patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Opioids are commonly prescribed to treat spinal pain, especially those undergoing surgery. Cannabis has been suggested as an agent that can modulate opioid needs in these patients.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of cannabis use on perioperative opioid requirement and revision surgery rate in patients undergoing lumbar fusion.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 48,499 patients from PearlDiver national database who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Opioid-use rates, MME, length of stay, and revision rates.

METHODS

Using PearlDiver, we identified patients for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), cannabis use disorder, revision lumbar fusion, demographics, and comorbidities. Cannabis users and non-users were propensity matched for age, sex, and tobacco use. Pre and postoperative cumulative morphine milli equivalence (MME) were calculated. Opioid-use rates, MME, length of stay (LOS), and revision rates were compared using univariate analysis. Revision rates were compared using Kaplan-Meyer log-rank analysis, and logistic and cox regression.

RESULTS

Of 48,499 patients undergoing PLIF, 3.4% were identified as chronic cannabis users. They were younger, and more likely to be male and use tobacco. They had a higher rate and amount of opioid use within 90-days preoperatively, and 90- and 365-days postoperatively, after controlling for age, sex, and tobacco use. Cannabis users had longer LOS (4.4 vs 4.0 days), and a higher rate of revision surgery (6.9% vs 3.2%). Log-rank analysis, as well as logistic and cox regression confirmed an increased revision rate. Concurrent tobacco and cannabis use also had an additive effect on revision rate to 8.1%, compared with those who used only cannabis (5.4%) or tobacco (4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic cannabis use is associated with an increased preoperative and long-term postoperative opioid use, a longer length of stay, and an increased revision rate.

Prevalence of cannabis use disorder and perioperative outcomes in adult colectomy patients: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The decriminalization of cannabis across the United States has led to an increased number of patients reporting cannabis use prior to surgery. However, it is unknown whether preoperative cannabis use disorder (CUD) increases the risk of postoperative complications among adult colectomy patients.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing an elective colectomy were retrospectively analyzed from the National Inpatient Sample database (2004-2018). To control for potential confounders, patients with CUD, defined using ICD-9/10 codes, were propensity score matched to patients without CUD in a 1:1 ratio. The association between preoperative CUD and composite morbidity, the primary outcome of interest, was assessed. Subgroup analyses were performed after stratification by age (≥50 years).

RESULTS

Among 432,018 adult colectomy patients, 816 (0.19%) reported preoperative CUD. The prevalence of CUD increased nearly three-fold during the study period from 0.8/1000 patients in 2004 to 2.0/1000 patients in 2018 (P-trend<0.001). After propensity score matching, patients with CUD exhibited similar rates of composite morbidity (140 of 816; 17.2%) as those without CUD (151 of 816; 18.5%) (p = 0.477). Patients with CUD also had similar anastomotic leak rates (CUD: 5.64% vs. No CUD: 6.25%; p = 0.601), hospital lengths of stay (CUD: 5 days, IQR 4-7 vs. No CUD: 5 days, IQR 4-7) (p = 0.415), and hospital charges as those without CUD. Similar findings were seen among patients aged ≥50 years in the subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Though the prevalence of CUD has increased drastically over the past 15 years, preoperative CUD was not associated with an increased risk of composite morbidity among adult patients undergoing an elective colectomy.

Association Between Marijuana Use and Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

INTRODUCTION

Though marijuana use has been linked to an increase in heart failure admissions, no prior study has explored the association between its use and outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study examines the relationship between marijuana use and postoperative outcomes in CABG patients.

METHODS

We utilized data from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2008 to 2018 for CABG patients ≥18 y old. Patients were divided into two groups based on marijuana use (abuse/dependency versus nonuse). Primary outcomes include in-hospital mortality, favorable discharge, and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes include acute kidney injury (AKI), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke. A multivariable model, adjusted for confounding variables, was utilized for each outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 343,796 patients met inclusion criteria for the study, 590 of which were marijuana users. In both marijuana user and nonuser groups, most patients were male and White with an average age of 56.0 and 66.3 y, respectively. There was a nonsignificant decreased odds of in-hospital mortality among marijuana users (odds ratio [OR] = 0.41, [0.141-1.124]). Marijuana users exhibited significantly decreased odds of home discharge (OR = 1.50, [1.24-1.81]), and increased odds of longer LOS (mean 10.4 d versus 9.8 d; OR = 1.14, [1.09-1.20]), AKI (OR = 1.40, [1.11-1.78]), AMI (OR = 1.56, [1.32-1.84]), and TIA/stroke (OR = 1.64, [1.21-2.22]).

CONCLUSIONS

Marijuana use and dependency are associated with increased nonhome discharge, AKI, AMI, TIA/stroke, and longer LOS. Further studies are needed to delineate the pathophysiologic derangements that contribute to these unfavorable post-CABG outcomes.

The Effect of Preoperative Marijuana Use on Surgical Outcomes, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Opioid Consumption Following Lumbar Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES

To (1) investigate the effect of marijuana use on surgical outcomes following lumbar fusion, (2) determine how marijuana use affects patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), and (3) determine if marijuana use impacts the quantity of opioids prescribed.

METHODS

Patients > 18 years of age who underwent primary one- or two-level lumbar fusion with preoperative marijuana use at our institution were identified. A 3:1 propensity match incorporating patient demographics and procedure type was conducted to compare preoperative marijuana users to non-marijuana users. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes (90-day all-cause and 90-day surgical readmissions, reoperations, and revision surgeries), pre- and postoperative narcotic usage, and PROMs were compared between groups. Multivariate regression models were created to determine the effect of marijuana on surgical reoperations patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) 1-year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 259 included patients, 65 used marijuana preoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that marijuana use (OR = 2.28, P = .041) significantly increased the likelihood of having a spine reoperation. No other surgical outcome was found to be significantly different between groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that marijuana use was not significantly associated with changes in 1-year postoperative PROMs (all, P > .05). The quantity of pre- and postoperative opioids prescriptions was not significantly different between groups (all, P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative marijuana use increased the likelihood of a spine reoperation for any indication following lumbar fusion, but it was not associated with 90-day all cause readmission, surgical readmission, the magnitude of improvement in PROMs, or differences in opioid consumption.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Short-Term Pain Outcomes and Pain Medication Utilization Among Urine Toxicology-Identified Opioid and Marijuana Users After Elective Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative pain outcomes may be influenced by preoperative substance use, which is often underreported due to associated stigma. This study examined the impact of urine toxicology-identified preoperative opioid and marijuana use on pain outcomes after elective spinal surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective spinal surgery between September 2020 and May 2022 were recruited for this prospective cohort study. Detailed chart review was completed to collect demographic, urine toxicology, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and pain medication data. Comparisons between self-reported and urine toxicology-identified substance use, preoperative/postoperative VAS ratings, and postoperative pain medication use were made using χ 2 tests, Student t -tests, and logistic regression, respectively. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and race.

RESULTS

Among 111 participants (mean age 58 years, 59% female, 95% with ≥1 comorbidity), urine toxicology overestimated drug use (47% vs 16%, P < .001) and underestimated alcohol use (16% vs 56%, P < .001) at preoperative baseline relative to patient reports. Two weeks postoperatively, participants with preoperative opioid metabolites reported no significant improvements in pain from baseline (6.67 preoperative vs 5.92 postoperative, P = .288) unlike nonusers (6.56 preoperative vs 4.61 postoperative, P < .001). They also had worse postoperative VAS (5.92 vs 4.61, P = .030) and heavier reliance on opioid medications (odds ratio = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.21-7.89, P = .019). Conversely, participants with preoperative marijuana reported similar improvements in pain from baseline (users: 6.88 preoperative vs 4.36 postoperative, P = .001; nonusers: 6.49 preoperative vs 5.07 postoperative, P = .001), similar postoperative pain (4.36 vs 5.07, P = .238), and similar postoperative reliance on opioid medications (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.38-2.44, P = .928). Trends were maintained among the 83 patients who returned for the 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although urine toxicology-identified preoperative opioid use was associated with poor postoperative pain relief and reliance on postoperative opioids for pain management after elective spinal surgery, preoperative marijuana use was not. Preoperative marijuana use, hence, should not delay or be a contraindication to elective spinal surgery.

Peri-Operative Impact of Cannabis Use in Conjunction With Elective Primary Breast Augmentation in a Private Practice

Background The consumption of recreational and medicinal cannabis in the United States continues to increase. Understanding the effects of cannabis in patients undergoing elective primary breast augmentation (EPBA) is of paramount importance with the expanding rates of reported cannabis consumption. Objectives This study aims to analyze the peri-operative impact of cannabis use in conjunction with EPBA in a single-surgeon practice in San Francisco, California. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of 134 adult female patients undergoing EPBA from August 2018 to January 2022 within a single-surgeon practice plastic surgery office. Cannabis use was self-reported as current use or former use. Cohorts were grouped as cannabis users and cannabis non-users. Results Of the 134 patient charts identified for analysis, 58 (43.3%) reported cannabis use. Cannabis users were significantly younger than cannabis non-users (26.8 years versus 31.5 years, P<0.001). No significant differences were found between groups among intra-operative blood loss, post-operative complication rates, post-operative narcotic use, or intra-operative anesthetic requirements. The incidence of adverse events, including wound breakdown, skin necrosis, and capsular contracture requiring reoperation, did not differ significantly between cannabis users and cannabis non-user groups. Ninety-six percent of patients had their implants placed subpectorally, and all procedures were done using a Keller funnel. Eighty-three percent of patients had Sientra implants, and 96% of all implants were silicone gel implants. All procedures were done under general anesthesia. Patients were followed for up to two years. Discussion This review found no significant differences in peri-operative and post-operative outcomes between cannabis users and cannabis non-users.

Cannabis Use Disorder Trends and Health Care Utilization After Cervical and Lumbar Spine Fusions

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify differences in complication rates after cervical and lumbar fusion over the first postoperative year between those with and without cannabis use disorder (CUD) and to assess how CUD affects opioid prescription patterns.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cannabis is legal for medical purposes in 36 states and for recreational use in 18 states. Cannabis has multisystem effects and may contribute to transient vasoconstrictive, prothrombotic, and inflammatory effects.

METHODS

The IBM MarketScan Database (2009-2019) was used to identify patients who underwent cervical or lumbar fusions, with or without CUD. Exact match hospitalization and postdischarge outcomes were analyzed at index, six, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Of 72,024 cervical fusion (2.0% with CUD) and 105,612 lumbar fusion patients (1.5% with CUD), individuals with CUD were more likely to be young males with higher Elixhauser index. The cervical CUD group had increased neurological complications (3% vs. 2%) and sepsis (1% vs. 0%) during the index hospitalization and neurological (7% vs. 5%) and wound complications (5% vs. 3%) at 12 months. The lumbar CUD group had increased wound (8% vs. 5%) and myocardial infarction (MI) (2% vs. 1%) complications at six months and at 12 months. For those with cervical myelopathy, increased risk of pulmonary complications was observed with CUD at index hospitalization and 12-month follow-up. For those with lumbar stenosis, cardiac complications and MI were associated with CUD at index hospitalization and 12 months. CUD was associated with opiate use disorder, decreasing postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in reoperation rates were observed for CUD groups undergoing cervical or lumbar fusion. CUD was associated with an increased risk of stroke for the cervical fusion cohort and cardiac (including MI) and pulmonary complications for lumbar fusion at index hospitalization and six and 12 months postoperatively. Opiate use disorder and decreased opiate dependence after surgery also correlated with CUD.

Perioperative Management for Complex Spine Fusion Surgery

Complex spine surgeries performed worldwide continue to increase in number, as do the age and comorbidity of patients undergoing these operations. Perioperative care protocols related to blood management, postoperative pain control, and intraoperative measures to mitigate morbidity may improve clinical workflows and patient outcomes.

The Effect of Marijuana on Postoperative Spine Patients' Emergency Department Visits, Readmission Rates, and Opioid Consumption

OBJECTIVE

To compare postoperative opioid consumption with patients who tested negative for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) preoperatively with those who were THC-positive and patients who were positive for THC and any other drug and to compare 90-day rates of postoperative emergency department (ED) visits and 90-day readmission rates, using morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), for those three patient populations.

METHODS

Three patient groups were confirmed with preoperative urine drug screens. Chart reviews were conducted to determine whether there was an ED visit or hospital readmission 90 days from the index procedure. MMEs were calculated for all patients.

RESULTS

There were a total of 252 patients in the THC-negative control group, 54 in the THC-positive group, and 47 in the THC-and-opioid-positive group. The 90-day ED visit and 90-day readmission rates were not statistically significant among the groups. Both the multidrug and THC-only-positive patients showed a higher 90-day MME compared with the control patients.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates that THC used may increase opioid consumption. The THC patients to be cautious toward are the multidrug user. Although not statistically significant, multidrug patients were noted for a trend toward increased ED visits and readmissions.

Cannabis Use Disorder Is Associated With Longer In-Hospital Lengths of Stay, Higher Rates of Medical Complications, and Costs of Care Following Primary 1- to 2-Level Lumbar Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to assess whether cannabis use disorder (CUD) patients undergoing primary 1- to 2-level lumbar fusion (1-2LF) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disorders have higher rates of: (1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS), (2) medical complications, and (3) healthcare expenditures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of the MSpine dataset of the PearlDiver claims from January 2007 to March 2018 was performed. Patients with CUD undergoing 1-2LF were queried and matched to a comparison group in a 1:5 ratio by age, sex, and various medical comorbidities yielding 22, 815 patients within the study (CUD = 3805; control = 19 010). Outcomes analyzed included LOS, 90-day medical complications, and costs. A P-value less than .004 was considered significant.

RESULTS

This study found CUD patients undergoing primary 1-2LF experience longer in-hospital LOS (4- vs. 3-days, P < .0001). Additionally, CUD patients were found to have significantly higher frequency and odds-ratios (OR) (31.88 vs. 18.01% OR: 1.41, P < .0001) of adverse events within ninety days following their procedure. CUD patients also had significantly higher day of surgery ($18,946.79 vs. $15,691.02, P < .0001) and 90 days healthcare expenditures ($21,469.01 vs. $19,556.71, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with CUD can prepare for increased LOS, complications, and costs following primary 1-2LF. The study can be used to educate these patients of the potential outcomes following their procedure.

Cannabis use Disorder and Complications After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study, a retrospective database analysis, was to assess the impact of baseline cannabis use disorder (CUD) on perioperative complication outcomes in patients undergoing primary 1- to 2-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery.

METHODS

The PearlDiver Database was queried from January 2010 to December 2021 for patients who underwent primary 1- to 2-level ACDF surgery for degenerative spine disease. Patients with CUD diagnosis 6 months before the index ACDF surgery (i.e., CUD) were propensity matched with patients without CUD (i.e., control in a ratio of 1:1, employing age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index as matching covariates). Univariate and multivariable analysis models with adjustment of confounding variables were used to evaluate the risk of CUD on perioperative complications between the propensity-matched cohorts.

RESULTS

The 1:1 matched cohort included 838 patients in each group. Following multivariate analysis, CUD was demonstrated to be associated with an increased incidence of hospital readmission at 90 days (odds ratio [OR] = 2.64, 95% confidence interval: [1.19 to 6.78], [P = 0.027]) and revision surgery at 1 year postoperative (OR = 3.36, 95% confidence interval: [1.17 to 14.18], [P = 0.049]). CUD was additionally associated with reduced risk of overall medical complications at both 6 months and 1 year postoperative (OR = 0.55, [P = 0.021], and OR = 0.54, [P = 0.015], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that isolated baseline CUD is associated with an increased risk of hospital readmission at 90 days postoperative and cervical spine reoperation at 1 year after primary 1- to 2-level ACDF surgery with a decrease in overall medical complications, cardiac arrhythmias, and acute renal failure.

Venous thromboembolism and cannabis consumption, outcomes among hospitalized patients in the United States: A nationwide analysis

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) carries significant clinical implications, and with the rise in cannabis consumption, its potential influence on VTE outcomes warrants investigation. Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2016-2019), we analyzed 2,217,184 hospitalized VTE patients. Among these, 1.8 % (38,810) reported cannabis use. We compared demographics, comorbidities, in-hospital outcomes, and quality metrics between cannabis users and non-users with VTE. Cannabis users were chiefly younger males (average age 45 in cannabis users vs. 62 in non-cannabis users) from lower-income brackets. Notably, 5.4 % discharged against medical advice. Although in-hospital mortality was initially lower for cannabis users (2.8 % vs. 5.1 %, OR 0.6, 95 % CI 0.69-0.94, p = 0.008), this difference became non-significant post-propensity-score matching (aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.72-1.10, p = 0.3). Non-users faced higher in-hospital complications, a trend that persisted post-PSM. Among cannabis users, key mortality predictors were peripheral vascular disease, acute kidney injury, vasopressor use, cardiogenic shock, myocardial infarction, invasive ventilation, and surgical embolectomy. Cannabis users also had a shorter hospital stay (4.2 vs. 5.4 days) and slightly reduced costs ($27,472.95 vs. $31,660.75). The significantly younger age of VTE patients who use cannabis, coupled with the considerable proportion discharging against medical advice, underscores the urgency for tailored care interventions. Additional research is vital to comprehensively understand the interplay between cannabis consumption and VTE outcomes.

Cannabis and Cannabinoids in the Perioperative Period

Cannabis use is increasingly common, and with a growing number of jurisdictions implementing legalization frameworks, it is likely that providers will encounter more patients who use cannabis. Therefore, it is important for providers to understand the implications of cannabis use and practical considerations for the perioperative period. Cannabis affects multiple organ systems and may influence intraoperative anesthesia, as well as postoperative pain management. The effects of cannabis and key anesthetic considerations are reviewed here.

Analysis of Complications in Patients With a History of Cannabis Use and Tobacco Use Undergoing Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

There is limited information regarding the perioperative effects of marijuana in breast reconstructive surgeries.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to explore the association between a history of cannabis use and postoperative complications in the setting of implant-based breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Two databases, TriNetX and PearlDiver, were queried for patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on active ICD-10 diagnostic codes: (1) cannabis use only, (2) tobacco use only, (3) cannabis and tobacco use, and (4) neither cannabis nor tobacco use. Associations with postoperative complications were analyzed with a logistic regression test.

RESULTS

TriNetX search revealed that 327 patients had an active diagnosis of cannabis use only and 1118 had an active diagnosis of tobacco use only. Patients in the cannabis only cohort had a significantly increased risk of developing surgical site infection. Patients in the tobacco only cohort had significantly increased risk of developing wound dehiscence, need for debridement, and surgical site infection. The PearlDiver search included 472 patients who had an active diagnosis of both cannabis and tobacco use and 17,361 patients with a diagnosis of tobacco use only. Patients with a diagnosis of cannabis and tobacco use had a significantly increased risk of developing postoperative complications including surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, need for incision and drainage, and debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction with an active diagnosis of cannabis with or without tobacco use were at increased risk of developing postoperative complications, and the risk was even higher in patients using both tobacco and cannabis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

The effect of cannabis use on postoperative complications in patients undergoing spine surgery: A national database study

Background

With the increased use of cannabis in the US, there is a significant need to understand the medical complications associated with its use in relationship to a surgical population. Cannabis has mainly been studied with respect to its qualities of pain treatment, yet few studies have investigated post-surgical complications associated with its use. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the effect of cannabis use on complications in spine surgery, and compare these complications rates to opioid-related complications.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted using the PearlDiver Database. Using ICD codes 40,989 patients that underwent lumbar spine fusion between January 2010 and October 2020 were identified and divided into 3 study groups (i.e., control, patients with known opioid use disorder, and patients identified as cannabis users). Differences in the incidence of complications within 30 days of the index procedure and pseudarthrosis rates at 18 months postindex procedure were assessed among study groups using a multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Of 12.4% study population used cannabis and 38.8% had a known opioid use disorder. Results indicated increased odds of experiencing a VTE, hypoxia, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmia for both opioid and cannabis users compared to controls; however, when controlling for tobacco use there were no increased odds of complications within the cannabis group. The pseudarthrosis rate was greater in cannabis users (2.4%) than in controls (1.1%).

Conclusions

The pseudarthrosis rate was significantly greater in patients using cannabis and opioids compared to the control group. However, when controlling for tobacco use, results suggested a possible negative synergistic between cannabis use and concomitant tobacco use that may influence bone fusion.

Unlocking the Healing Potential: Cannabinoids in Spine Surgery for Pain Relief and Recovery

» Cannabinoids, such as D9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, interact with endocannabinoid receptors in the central nervous system and immune system, potentially offering pain relief. The entourage effect, resulting from the interaction of multiple cannabis components, may enhance therapeutic impact and efficacy, making them promising candidates for exploring pain relief in spine operations, known to be among the most painful operative procedures.» The use of cannabinoids in pain management requires careful consideration of safety, including their cognitive and psychomotor effects, potential cardiovascular risks, risk of dependence, mental health implications, and drug interactions.» Few studies have analyzed cannabinoid use in relation to spine surgery, with variable results reported, indicating possible effects on reoperation rates, mortality, complications, postoperative opioid use, and length of hospital stay.» Current knowledge gaps exist in the understanding of cannabinoid effects on spine surgery, including the exploration of different administration routes, timing, dosage, and specific outcomes. In addition, mechanistic explanations for the observed results are lacking.» Ethical considerations related to informed consent, medical expertise, societal impact, and legal compliance must also be thoroughly addressed when considering the utilization of cannabinoids in spinal pathologies and back pain treatment.

Analysis of postoperative complications related to cannabis and tobacco usage in patients undergoing mandible facial fracture surgeries

BACKGROUND

Cannabis is the third most used controlled substance in the world. Despite its widespread use, minimal research investigates cannabis usage in patients undergoing facial fracture surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate patterns of postoperative complications related to cannabis and tobacco usage after mandible fracture surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PearlDiver™, a commercially available healthcare database, was used to identify patients endorsing the use of cannabis, tobacco, or both who underwent mandible fracture surgeries for cross-sectional analysis. The study population was categorized into groups using the Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9), ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. A chi-square analysis was performed to assess the influence of cannabis and tobacco use on postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 8288 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 72 patients with cannabis-only usage, 914 patients with cannabis and tobacco usage, 3236 patients with tobacco-only usage, and 4066 in the control group. For patients using only cannabis, there was not an increased risk of developing postoperative complications compared with the control population. Patients with concurrent cannabis and tobacco usage and those with tobacco-only usage had an increased risk of surgical site infection, facial nonunion, facial abscess, debridement, and malocclusion after surgical repair of mandibular facial fracture.

CONCLUSION

Patients with tobacco-only as well as cannabis and tobacco usage had an increased risk of all postoperative complications, except malocclusion, compared with cannabis-only. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that healthcare providers consider a patient's history of tobacco use when planning and performing surgical treatment for traumatic mandible fractures.

Effect of Preoperative Marijuana on Patient Outcomes and Opioid Use after Lumbar Decompression

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES

Our study aims to analyze the effect of preoperative marijuana use on outcomes and postoperative opioid use in patients who have undergone lumbar decompression without fusion.

METHODS

All patients >18 years of age who underwent lumbar decompression from 2017-2022 with documented preoperative marijuana use at our academic institution were retrospectively identified. A 3:1 propensity match incorporating demographics, procedure type, and levels decompressed was performed to compare preoperative marijuana users and non-users. 1-year preoperative and postoperative opioid consumption in milligrams of morphine equivalents and postoperative outcomes including readmissions, reoperations, and complications, were obtained. A multivariate regression model was performed to measure the effect of marijuana use on the likelihood of a spine reoperation.

RESULTS

Of the 340 included patients, 85 were preoperative marijuana users. There were no significant differences in medical complications, 90-day readmissions, or opioid consumption preoperatively or postoperatively (P > .05). We identified a trend towards patients who used marijuana having more reoperations for any cause (20.0% vs 11.37%, P = .067). Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that preoperative marijuana use was a significant predictor of all-spine reoperations (OR = 2.06, P = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

In lumbar decompression patients, preoperative marijuana use does not impact opioid consumption, readmissions, or medical complications, but is a significant predictor of future postoperative reoperations. Additional research is necessary to further explore the role of marijuana use in spine surgery.

Cannabis Use Disorder and Perioperative Complications

Importance

Cannabis use is growing in the US and is increasingly perceived as harmless. However, the perioperative impact of cannabis use remains uncertain.

Objective

To assess whether cannabis use disorder is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after major elective, inpatient, noncardiac surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, population-based, matched cohort study used data from the National Inpatient Sample for adult patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent major elective inpatient surgery (including cholecystectomy, colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, femoral hernia repair, mastectomy, lumpectomy, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, hysterectomy, spinal fusion, and vertebral discectomy) from January 2016 to December 2019. Data were analyzed from February to August 2022.

Exposure

Cannabis use disorder, as defined by the presence of specific International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary composite outcome was in-hospital mortality and 7 major perioperative complications (myocardial ischemia, acute kidney injury, stroke, respiratory failure, venous thromboembolism, hospital-acquired infection, and surgical procedure-related complications) based on ICD-10 discharge diagnosis codes. Propensity score matching was performed to create a 1:1 matched cohort that was well balanced with respect to covariates, which included patient comorbidities, sociodemographic factors, and procedure type.

Results

Among 12 422 hospitalizations, a cohort of 6211 patients with cannabis use disorder (median age, 53 years [IQR, 44-59 years]; 3498 [56.32%] male) were matched with 6211 patients without cannabis use disorder for analysis. Cannabis use disorder was associated with an increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with hospitalizations without cannabis use disorder in adjusted analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37; P = .01). The outcome occurred more frequently in the group with cannabis use disorder (480 [7.73%]) compared with the unexposed group (408 [6.57%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, cannabis use disorder was associated with a modest increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality after major elective, inpatient, noncardiac surgery. In the context of increasing cannabis use rates, our findings support preoperative screening for cannabis use disorder as a component of perioperative risk stratification. However, further research is needed to quantify the perioperative impact of cannabis use by route and dosage and to inform recommendations for preoperative cannabis cessation.

Disparities in cannabis use and documentation in electronic health records among children and young adults

The legalizations of medical and recreational cannabis have generated a great deal of interest in studying the health impacts of cannabis products. Despite increases in cannabis use, its documentation during clinical visits is not yet mainstream. This lack of information hampers efforts to study cannabis's effects on health outcomes. A clear and in-depth understanding of current trends in cannabis use documentation is necessary to develop proper guidelines to screen and document cannabis use. Here we have developed and used a natural language processing pipeline to evaluate the trends and disparities in cannabis documentation. The pipeline includes a screening step to identify clinical notes with cannabis use documentation which is then fed into a BERT-based classifier to confirm positive use. This pipeline is applied to more than 23 million notes from a large cohort of 370,087 patients seen in a high-volume multi-site pediatric and young adult clinic over a period of 21 years. Our findings show a very low but growing rate of cannabis use documentation (<2%) in electronic health records with significant demographic and socioeconomic disparities in both documentation and positive use, which requires further attention.

Cannabis Use Does Not Increase Risk of Perioperative Complications Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cohort-Matched Comparison

Introduction: Cannabis use among arthroplasty patients has dramatically increased throughout the United States. Despite this trend, knowledge remains particularly limited regarding the effects of cannabis use on perioperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the goal of this research was to investigate how cannabis use affects risk of perioperative outcomes, cost and length of stay (LOS) after THA. Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify 331,825 patients who underwent primary THA between 2010 and 2014 using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) procedure code 81.51. Patients with an ICD-9 diagnosis code correlating to history of thromboembolic events, cardiac events, or active substance use other than cannabis were eliminated. The ICD-9 diagnosis codes for cannabis use (304.3-304.32, 305.2-305.22) were used to identify 538 patients with active use. Cannabis users were matched 1:1 to nonusers on age, sex, tobacco use, and comorbidities. The chi-square test was used to determine risk of major and minor complications, whereas the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare hospital charges and LOS. Results: A total of 534 (99.3%) patients with cannabis use were successfully matched with 534 patients without cannabis use. Risk of major complications among cannabis users (25, 4.68%) was similar to that of nonusers (20, 3.74%, p=0.446). Minor complications also occurred at similar rates between cannabis users (77, 14.4%) and nonusers (87, 16.3%, p=0.396). LOS for cannabis users (3.07±2.40) did not differ from nonusers (3.10±1.45, p=0.488). Mean hospital charges were higher for cannabis users ($17,847±10,024) compared with nonusers ($16,284±7025, p<0.001). Conclusion: Utilizing statistically matched cohorts within a nationally representative database demonstrated that cannabis use is not associated with increased risk of complications or prolonged LOS after primary THA. However, cannabis use is associated with higher hospital charges.

Perioperative Management of Comorbidities in Spine Surgery

The number of spinal operations performed in the United States has significantly increased in recent years. Along with these rising numbers, there has been a corresponding increase in the number of patient comorbidities. The focus of this article is to review comorbidities in Spine surgery patients and outline strategies to optimize patients and avoid complications.

Cannabis use is associated with decreased opioid prescription fulfillment following single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)

Background

Recently, there has been increasing legalization of marijuana within the United States, however data are mixed with respect to its efficacy in treating acute pain. Our goal was to identify a difference in opioid utilization in patients with known cannabis use before anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) compared with those that report no cannabis use.

Methods

This study was a retrospective case-control design using PearlDiver. Patients who underwent a single level ACDF between January 2010 and October 2020, were included. Patients were placed in the study group if they had a previous diagnosis of cannabis use, dependence, or abuse. Patients were excluded if they were under the age of 18 or if they had filled an opioid prescription within 3 months of their procedure. A control group was then created using a propensity score match on age, gender, and Charleston comorbidity index (CCI), and had no diagnosis of cannabis use. The primary outcome was the number of morphine milliequivalents (MME) dispensed per prescription following surgery.

Results

A total of 1,339 patients were included in each group. The number of patients filling prescriptions was lower in the cannabis group than in the control group at 3 days postoperatively (p<.001). The average total MME per day as prescribed was lower in the cannabis group than the control group at 60 days post-op (48.5 vs. 59.4, respectively; p=.018).

Conclusions

Patients who had a previous diagnosis of cannabis use, dependence or abuse filled fewer opioid prescriptions postoperatively (at 3 days postoperatively) and required lower doses (reduced average daily MME, at 60 days postoperatively) when compared with the control group.

Severe Cannabis use is Associated with Complications and Prolonged Length of Stay in Bariatric Surgery

PURPOSE

In the United States, recreational and medicinal cannabis use has continually increased in recent years, including in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the effects of cannabis use on morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery are uncertain, and the literature is limited by a paucity of studies. This study intends to evaluate the effects of cannabis use disorder on outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample 2016-2019 was queried for patients ≥ 18 years who underwent roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB), vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), or adjustable gastric band (AGB) surgery. Cannabis use disorder was identified using ICD-10 coding. Three outcomes were evaluated: medical complications, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Logistic regression was used to evaluate effects of cannabis use disorder on medical complications and in-hospital mortality, and linear regression for length of stay. All models controlled for race, age, sex, income, procedure type, and various medical comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 713,290 patients were included in this study, with 1,870 (0.26%) having cannabis use disorder. Cannabis use disorder was associated with medical complications (OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.31-3.82; P = 0.003) and longer lengths of stay (β: 1.3; SE: 0.297; P < 0.001), but not in-hospital mortality (OR: 3.29; CI: 0.94-11.5); P = 0.062).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe cannabis use was associated with higher risk for complications and extended length of stay. Future investigations are needed to better elucidate the relationship between cannabis use and bariatric surgery, including effects of dosage, chronicity, and method of ingestion.

Marijuana Use and its Effect on Clinical Outcomes and Revision Rates in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if (1) preoperative marijuana use increased complications, readmission, or reoperation rates following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), (2) identify if preoperative marijuana use resulted in worse patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and (3) investigate if preoperative marijuana use affects the quantity of opioid prescriptions in the perioperative period.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A growing number of states have legalized recreational and/or medical marijuana, thus increasing the number of patients who report preoperative marijuana use. The effects of marijuana on clinical outcomes and PROMs in the postoperative period are unknown.

METHODS

All patients 18 years of age and older who underwent primary one- to four-level ACDF with preoperative marijuana use at our academic institution were retrospectively identified. A 3:1 propensity match was conducted to compare patients who used marijuana versus those who did not. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, clinical outcomes, and PROMs were compared between groups. Multivariate regression models measured the effect of marijuana use on the likelihood of requiring a reoperation and whether marijuana use predicted inferior PROM improvements at the one-year postoperative period.

RESULTS

Of the 240 patients included, 60 (25.0%) used marijuana preoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified marijuana use (odds ratio=5.62, P <0.001) as a predictor of a cervical spine reoperation after ACDF. Patients who used marijuana preoperatively had worse one-year postoperative Physical Component Scores of the Short-Form 12 (PCS-12) ( P =0.001), Neck Disability Index ( P =0.003), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Arm ( P =0.044) and VAS Neck ( P =0.012). Multivariate linear regression found preoperative marijuana use did not independently predict improvement in PCS-12 (β=-4.62, P =0.096), Neck Disability Index (β=9.51, P =0.062), Mental Component Scores of the Short-Form 12 (MCS-12) (β=-1.16, P =0.694), VAS Arm (β=0.06, P =0.944), or VAS Neck (β=-0.44, P =0.617).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative marijuana use increased the risk of a cervical spine reoperation after ACDF, but it did not significantly change the amount of postoperative opioids used or the magnitude of improvement in PROMs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Levwl III.

Preoperative Cannabis Use Associated With an Increased Rate of Reoperation and Postoperative Opioid Use Following Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

Objectives The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the associations among preoperative cannabis use, postoperative opioid use, and postoperative outcomes following elective anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). Methods Patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF were characterized preoperatively as active cannabis users, former users, or nonusers. Patients were also classified based on history of preoperative opioid use as chronic users, acute users, or nonusers. Groups were compared based on outcomes including the rate of emergency department visits six months postoperatively, rate of readmissions one year postoperatively, rate of reoperation two years postoperatively, and daily postoperative opioid use measured in milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) at 0-6 months and 6-12 months postoperatively.  Results Of the 198 patients included in this study, 13 (6.6%) were active cannabis users, 11 (5.6%) were former users, and 174 (87.8%) were nonusers. The rate of reoperation within two years was 23.1% for active cannabis users, 0% for former users, and 4.0% for nonusers (p=0.0075). The average daily opioid use in MMEs 6-12 months postoperatively was 49.4 for active cannabis users, 4.1 for former users, and 13.3 for nonusers (p=0.0014). For chronic opioid users, acute users, and nonusers, the average daily opioid use in MMEs 6-12 months postoperatively was 39.9, 18.4, and 5.7, respectively (p<.0001). Conclusions History of cannabis use is associated with increased postoperative opioid use and increased rate of reoperation following elective ACDF.

Knowledge Areas and New Trends in Lumbar Disc Herniation Research: Bibliometrics and Knowledge Mapping Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the coalitions and impact of authors, countries, institutions, and journals, evaluate the knowledge base, find the hotspot trends, and identify the emerging topics in lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHOD

The articles related to LDH were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection on August 21, 2021. Two scientometric software (CiteSpace 5.8.R.1 and VOSviewer 1.6.17) were used to perform bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis.

RESULTS

From the set parameters, 4642 articles were included in the literature. Although the total number of publications fluctuated between 2001 and 2020, a general trend toward increase was observed. Respectively, the most productive country and institution in the field were the United States and Wooridul Spine Hospital. The most active and cited authors were Lee and Weinstein. Spine was the most impactful and cited journal. Weinstein (JAMA 296:2441-2450, 2006) had the highest number of co-citations and Weinstein(N Engl J Med 358:794-810, 2008) had the highest number of citations. The keyword "low back pain" was ranked first for frequency and total link strength, whereas "risk factor" was ranked first for centrality. Topics including pathogenesis (disc herniation), examination methods (MRI), treatment methods (non-surgical treatment, surgical treatment), surgical options (laminectomy, discectomy), clinical observations (double-blind, efficacy, outcome, learning curve), and evaluation of efficacy (meta-analysis) of LDH have been the focus of leading-edge research in 2001-2020.

CONCLUSION

Using bibliometric methods, this study mapped the knowledge map of LDH research in the past 20 years. The study identifies existing trends to provide a framework for further research.

The Impact of Isolated Baseline Cannabis Use on Outcomes Following Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited literature evaluating the impact of isolated cannabis use on outcomes for patients following spinal surgery. This study sought to compare 90-day complication, 90-day readmission, as well as 2-year revision rates between baseline cannabis users and non-users following thoracolumbar spinal fusion (TLF) for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was queried between January 2009 and September 2013 to identify all patients who underwent TLF for ASD. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and either minimum 90-day (for complications and readmissions) or 2-year (for revisions) follow-up surveillance. Cohorts were created and propensity score-matched based on presence or absence of isolated baseline cannabis use. Baseline demographics, hospital-related parameters, 90-day complications and readmissions, and two-year revisions were retrieved. Multivariate binary stepwise logistic regression identified independent outcome predictors.

RESULTS

704 patients were identified (n=352 each), with comparable age, sex, race, primary insurance, Charlson/Deyo scores, surgical approach, and levels fused between cohorts (all, p>0.05). Cannabis users (versus non-users) incurred lower 90-day overall and medical complication rates (2.4% vs. 4.8%, p=0.013; 2.0% vs. 4.1%, p=0.018). Cohorts had otherwise comparable complication, revision, and readmission rates (p>0.05). Baseline cannabis use was associated with a lower risk of 90-day medical complications (OR=0.47, p=0.005). Isolated baseline cannabis use was not associated with 90-day surgical complications and readmissions, or two-year revisions.

CONCLUSION

Isolated baseline cannabis use, in the absence of any other diagnosed substance abuse disorders, was not associated with increased odds of 90-day surgical complications or readmissions or two-year revisions, though its use was associated with reduced odds of 90-day medical complications when compared to non-users undergoing TLF for ASD. Further investigations are warranted to identify the physiologic mechanisms underlying these findings. Level of Evidence: III.

Analyzing the Impact of Cannabinoids on the Treatment of Spinal Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cannabis is among the most used illicit substances globally, with medical applications, increased legalization, and shifting social attitudes leading to increased use in recent years. Cannabinoids are a group of psychoactive substances found within the cannabis plant, with the most common being Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. Due to the high prevalence of use, it is increasingly important to evaluate the effects of cannabis and cannabinoids on spine patients, in both operative and nonoperative settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cannabis and cannabinoids may be effective in treating patients with chronic conditions such as back pain and spinal cord injuries. Longitudinal effects and implications on surgical outcomes and complications are poorly understood. High-quality, outcomes-focused research can inform approaches for clinicians to approach cannabis and cannabinoid use. Studies to elucidate the standardization of cannabis regimens can help develop guidelines for potential therapeutic applications. Cannabis and cannabinoids may be useful alternatives or additions for many spine patients, but future research is needed for recommendations to be determined. Our manuscript reviews the available literature regarding cannabis use and various spinal conditions, organizing our findings into the following narrative themes: (1) the management of chronic lower back pain, (2) perioperative outcomes, (3) cannabis use in general orthopaedic procedures, and (4) spinal cord injuries.