Role of radiation therapy as immune activator in the era of modern immunotherapy for metastatic malignant melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015;38:119-125. [PMID: 23648438 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e3182940dc3]

COVID-19 vs. Cancer Immunosurveillance: A Game of Thrones within an Inflamed Microenviroment

The COVID-19 pandemic accounts for more than 500 million confirmed infections and over 6 million deaths worldwide in the last 2 years. SARS-CoV-2 causes a highly complex form of inflammation that affects the human organism both acutely and chronically. In the same line, cancer as an inflammation-induced and immune-editing disease appears to cross-react with immune system at different levels including early interactions during carcinogenesis and later cross-talks within the tumor microenvironment. With all that in mind, a reasonable question one might address is whether the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the derived "long lasting inflammatory status" that is frequently observed in patients, might affect the cancer immunosurveillance mechanisms and consequently their risk of developing cancer, as well as the tumor and immune cell behaviors within the inflamed microenvironment. On this context, this review intends to outline and discuss the existing knowledge on SARS-CoV-2-mediated immunomodulation under the prism of changes that might be able to interfere with cancer cell immunoescape and the overall tumor progression and response to conventional therapeutics. Our goal is to highlight a potential interplay between the COVID-19 immunopathology and cancer immune-microenvironment that may pave the way for thorough investigation in the future.

The abscopal effect: systematic review in patients with brain and spine metastases

Background

The abscopal effect is a rare phenomenon whereby local radiation induces a proposed immune-mediated anti-tumor effect at distant sites. Given the growing use of immunotherapies and systemic immune checkpoint inhibitors in neuro-oncologic practice, we aimed to review prior studies pertaining to this phenomenon in the context of tumor shrinkage both within the central nervous system as well as distant disease sites.

Methods

A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify all studies which assessed the abscopal effect in patients with treated metastatic cancer to the brain and/or spine. Articles were included if they reported the abscopal effect in patients (case studies) or if the abscopal effect was explicitly analyzed in case series with cohorts of patients with metastatic brain or spine tumors. Laboratory investigations and clinical trials investigating new therapies were excluded.

Results

Twenty reports met inclusion criteria [16 case reports, 4 case series (n = 160), total n = 174]. Case reports of the abscopal effect were in relation to the following cancers: melanoma (6 patients), breast cancer (3), lung adenocarcinoma (2), non-small-cell lung cancer (2), hepatocellular carcinoma (1), and renal cell carcinoma (1). Eleven patients had irradiation to the brain and 2 to the spine. Patients undergoing whole brain radiotherapy (6) had an average dose of 33.6 Gy over 8-15 fractions, and those undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (5) had an average dose of 21.5 Gy over 1-5 fractions. One patient had radiation to the body and an intracranial abscopal effect was observed. Most common sites of extracranial tumor reduction were lung and lymph nodes. Ten case studies (57%) showed complete resolution of extra-CNS tumor burden. Median progression-free survival was 13 months following radiation. Four papers investigated incidence of abscopal effects in patients with metastatic melanoma to the brain who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (n = 160); two papers found an abscopal effect in 35% and 52% of patients (n = 16, 21 respectively), and two papers found no evidence of abscopal effects (n = 61, 62).

Conclusions

Abscopal effects can occur following radiotherapy in patients with brain or spine metastases and is thought to be a result of increased anti-tumor immunity. The potential for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy to be used in combination with radiotherapy to induce an abscopal effect is an area of active investigation.

Isolation of circulating tumor cells to diagnose melanoma and evaluate the efficacy of surgical resection using melanoma-specific microsystem

Melanoma is one of the most aggressive skin cancers due to its potential to metastasize widely in the body. The risk of metastasis is increased with later detection and increased thickness of the primary lesion, thus early identification and surgical removal is critical for higher survival rates for patients. However, even with appropriate treatment, some patients will develop recurrence which may be difficult to identify until advanced or causing symptoms. Recent advances in liquid biopsy have proposed less-invasive alternatives for cancer diagnosis and monitoring using minimal/zero invasion at sample collection, and circulating tumor cells(CTCs) have been considered a promising blood-based surrogate marker of primary tumors. However, previous CTC technologies relying on epithelial-cell adhesion molecules have limited to epithelial cells, thus hampering use of CTCs for non-epithelial cancers such as melanoma. Here, we used the Melanoma-specific OncoBean platform(MelanoBean) conjugated with melanoma specific antibodies(MCAM and MCSP). The device was used in comprehensive studies for diagnosing melanoma and evaluating surgery efficacy based on change in the number and characteristics of CTCs and CTC-clusters pre- and post-surgical treatment. Our study demonstrated that melanoma patients(n=45) at all stages(I-IV) have a noticeable number of MCTCs as well as MCTC-clusters compared to healthy donors(n=9)(P=0.0011), and surgical treatment leads to a significant decrease in the number of CTCs(P<0.0001). The CTCs recovered from the device underwent molecular profiling for melanoma-associated genes expression using multiplexed qRT-PCR, demonstrating the ability to monitor molecular signature through treatment. The presented MelanoBean and the comprehensive approach will empower prognostic value of CTCs in melanoma in much larger cohort studies.

Intracranial Metastatic Disease: Present Challenges, Future Opportunities

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) is a prevalent complication of cancer that significantly limits patient survival and quality of life. Over the past half-century, our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of IMD has improved and enabled the development of surveillance and treatment algorithms based on prognostic factors and tumor biomolecular characteristics. In addition to advances in surgical resection and radiation therapy, the treatment of IMD has evolved to include monoclonal antibodies and small molecule antagonists of tumor-promoting proteins or endogenous immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging as well as the development of new serological assays to detect brain metastases promise to revolutionize IMD diagnosis. In this review, we will explore current treatment principles in patients with IMD, including the emerging role of targeted and immunotherapy in select primary cancers, and discuss potential areas for further investigation.

Abscopal Effects in Metastatic Cancer: Is a Predictive Approach Possible to Improve Individual Outcomes?

Patients with metastatic cancers often require radiotherapy (RT) as a palliative therapy for cancer pain. RT can, however, also induce systemic antitumor effects outside of the irradiated field (abscopal effects) in various cancer entities. The occurrence of the abscopal effect is associated with a specific immunological activation in response to RT-induced cell death, which is mainly seen under concomitant immune checkpoint blockade. Even if the number of reported apscopal effects has increased since the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibition, its occurrence is still considered rare and unpredictable. The cases reported so far may nevertheless allow for identifying first biomarkers and clinical patterns. We here review biomarkers that may be helpful to predict the occurrence of abscopal effects and hence to optimize therapy for patients with metastatic cancers.

Abscopal Effect and Drug-Induced Xenogenization: A Strategic Alliance in Cancer Treatment?

The current state of cancer treatment is still far from being satisfactory considering the strong impairment of patients' quality of life and the high lethality of malignant diseases. Therefore, it is critical for innovative approaches to be tested in the near future. In view of the crucial role that is played by tumor immunity, the present review provides essential information on the immune-mediated effects potentially generated by the interplay between ionizing radiation and cytotoxic antitumor agents when interacting with target malignant cells. Therefore, the radiation-dependent abscopal effect (i.e., a biological effect of ionizing radiation that occurs outside the irradiated field), the influence of cancer chemotherapy on the antigenic pattern of target neoplastic cells, and the immunogenic cell death (ICD) caused by anticancer agents are the main topics of this presentation. It is widely accepted that tumor immunity plays a fundamental role in generating an abscopal effect and that anticancer drugs can profoundly influence not only the host immune responses, but also the immunogenic pattern of malignant cells. Remarkably, several anticancer drugs impact both the abscopal effect and ICD. In addition, certain classes of anticancer agents are able to amplify already expressed tumor-associated antigens (TAA). More importantly, other drugs, especially triazenes, induce the appearance of new tumor neoantigens (TNA), a phenomenon that we termed drug-induced xenogenization (DIX). The adoption of the abscopal effect is proposed as a potential therapeutic modality when properly applied concomitantly with drug-induced increase in tumor cell immunogenicity and ICD. Although little to no preclinical or clinical studies are presently available on this subject, we discuss this issue in terms of potential mechanisms and therapeutic benefits. Upcoming investigations are aimed at evaluating how chemical anticancer drugs, radiation, and immunotherapies are interacting and cooperate in evoking the abscopal effect, tumor xenogenization and ICD, paving the way for new and possibly successful approaches in cancer therapy.

Innovations in radiotherapy and advances in immunotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases

Radiotherapy for brain metastases has evolved tremendously over the past four decades, allowing for improved intracranial control of disease with reduced neurotoxicity. The main technological advance was provided by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a computer-controlled delivery method that has opened the door for single-isocenter multi-metastases stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT). Other notable advances have occurred in the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and radiosurgery. When these two modalities are combined in the proper sequence (within 30 days from each other), it provides promising results in the treatment of intracranial metastases from melanoma. There is emerging evidence of a synergistic interaction between ICI and SRS, providing better intracranial tumor control and lengthening the survival of patients afflicted by this common complication of cancer.

Brain Radiation Induced Extracranial Abscopal Effects in Metastatic Melanoma

Historically, the brain has been viewed as a specialized neurovascular inert organ with a distinctive immune privilege. Therefore, radiation-induced extracranial abscopal effects would be considered an unusual phenomenon due to the difficulty of the immunogenic signaling molecules to travel across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, it is now possible that localized central nervous system radiation has the ability to disrupt the structural integrity of the BBB and increase its endothelial permeability allowing the free passage of immunogenic responses between the intracranial and extracranial compartments. Thus, the nascent tumor-associated antigens produced by localized brain radiation can travel across the BBB into the rest of the body to modulate the immune system and induce extracranial abscopal effects. In clinical practice, localized brain radiation therapy-induced extracranial abscopal effects are a rarely seen phenomenon in metastatic melanoma and other advanced cancers. In this article, we provide a detailed overview of the current state of knowledge and clinical experience of central nervous system radiation-induced extracranial abscopal effects in patients with malignant melanoma. Emerging data from a small number of case reports and cohort studies of various malignancies has significantly altered our earlier understanding of this process by revealing that the brain is neither isolated nor passive in its interactions with the body's immune system. In addition, these studies provide clinical evidence that the brain is capable of interacting actively with the extracranial peripheral immune system. Thus, localized radiation treatment to 1 or more locations of brain metastases can induce extracranial abscopal responses. Collectively, these findings clearly demonstrate that localized brain radiation therapy-induced abscopal effects traverses the BBB and trigger tumor regression in the nonirradiated extracranial locations.

Targeting Phosphatidylserine Enhances the Anti-tumor Response to Tumor-Directed Radiation Therapy in a Preclinical Model of Melanoma

Phosphatidylserine (PS) is exposed on the surface of apoptotic cells and is known to promote immunosuppressive signals in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Antibodies that block PS interaction with its receptors have been shown to repolarize the TME into a proinflammatory state. Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective focal treatment of isolated solid tumors but is less effective at controlling metastatic cancers. We found that tumor-directed RT caused an increase in expression of PS on the surface of viable immune infiltrates in mouse B16 melanoma. We hypothesize that PS expression on immune cells may provide negative feedback to immune cells in the TME. Treatment with an antibody that targets PS (mch1N11) enhanced the anti-tumor efficacy of tumor-directed RT and improved overall survival. This combination led to an increase in proinflammatory tumor-associated macrophages. The addition of anti-PD-1 to RT and mch1N11 led to even greater anti-tumor efficacy and overall survival. We found increased PS expression on several immune subsets in the blood of patients with metastatic melanoma after receiving tumor-directed RT. These findings highlight the potential of combining PS targeting with RT and PD-1 pathway blockade to improve outcomes in patients with advanced-stage cancers.

Budhu et al. show that tumor-directed irradiation of murine B16 melanoma causes an increase in PS on the surface of infiltrating immune cells. Blocking PS and RT improves the anti-tumor efficacy and overall survival, which can be further improved with the addition of anti-PD-1. Melanoma patients exhibit increased PS on their PBMCs after RT.

Radiation therapy enhanced therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD1 against gastric cancer

Radiation therapy is an important method in tumor treatment with distinct responses. This study aimed to investigate the immune effects of radiation therapy on the syngeneic gastric tumor model. Mouse forestomach carcinoma (MFC) cells were irradiated with different X-ray doses. Cell proliferation was determined by clonogenic assay. Gene and protein expression were determined by real-time quantitative PCR and western blot, respectively. The tumor model was established by subcutaneously injecting tumor cells in 615-(H-2 K) mice. Levels of immune-related factors in tumor tissues were determined by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. 5 Gy × 3 (three subfractions with 4 h interval) treatment significantly inhibited cell proliferation. Protein expression of stimulator of interferon genes (Sting) and gene expression of IFNB1, TNFα as well as CXCL-9 significantly increased in MFC cells after irradiation. In the MFC mouse model, no obvious tumor regression was observed after irradiation treatment. Further studies showed Sting protein expression, infiltration of dendritic cells and T cells, and significantly increased PD-1/PD-L1 expression in tumor tissues. Moreover, the irradiation treatment activated T cells and enhanced the therapeutic effects of anti-PD1 antibody against MFC tumor. Our data demonstrated that although the MFC tumor was not sensitive to radiation therapy, the tumor microenvironment could be primed after irradiation. Radiation therapy combined with immunotherapy can greatly improve anti-tumor activities in radiation therapy-insensitive tumor models.

Outcomes of Treatment for Melanoma Brain Metastases

Background

Historically, melanoma with brain metastases has a poor prognosis. In this retrospective medical record review, we report basic clinicopathological parameters and the outcomes of patients with melanoma and brain metastases treated with different treatment modalities before the era of immunotherapy and modern radiotherapy technique.

Methods

Patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and/or systemic therapy from 1998 to 2017. In our study, they were identified and stratified depending on treatment methods. Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of brain metastases to the death or last follow-up (2019 June 1^st). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method that was employed to calculate the hazard ratio.

Results

Six (12%) of 50 patients are still alive as of the last follow-up. The median overall survival from the onset of brain metastases was 11 months. The longest survival time was observed in patients treated by surgery followed by radiotherapy, surgery followed by radiotherapy and systemic therapy, and also radiotherapy followed by systemic therapy. The shortest survival was observed in the best supportive care group and patients treated by systemic therapy only.

Conclusions

Patients with brain metastases achieved better overall survival when treated by combined treatment modalities: surgery followed by radiotherapy (26.6 months overall survival), combining surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy (18.7 months overall survival), and also radiotherapy followed by systemic therapy (13.8 months overall survival).

COVID-19 in cancer patients: risk, clinical features, and management

A novel coronavirus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread across the world, prompting the World Health Organization to declare the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) a public health emergency of international concern. Cancer patients are regarded as a highly vulnerable population to SARS-CoV-2 infection and development of more severe COVID-19 symptoms, which is possibly due to the systemic immunosuppressive state caused directly by tumor growth and indirectly by effects of anticancer treatment. Currently, much effort has been directed toward studying the pathogenesis and treatment of COVID-19, but the risk profiles, prognoses, and treatment outcomes in cancer patients remain unclear. Based on the current literature, we summarize the risk profiles, clinical and biochemical characteristics, and therapy outcomes of COVID-19 infections in cancer patients. The challenges in the clinical care of cancer patients with COVID-19 are discussed. The goal of this review is to stimulate research to better understand the biological impact and prognoses of COVID-19 infections in cancer patients, thus facilitating improvement of the clinical management of these patients.

[Dendritic cell vaccines in neurological oncology]

Dendritic cell-based vaccines are an intensively studied active immunotherapy technology. Aim of this article is to review the results of the key clinical studies of such vaccines in the treatment of neuro-oncological diseases. Their effectiveness was studied most widely in the treatment of malignant glial tumors, the study went from experimental work to phase III clinical studies, preliminary results of which indicate some positive results of this immunotherapy method in adults. Currently, emphasis is also being placed on the identification of clinical and immunological correlates of the patient's response to therapy and on the search for new antigens for sensitization of dendritic cells Studies of dendritic cell vaccines also include a number of other neuro-oncological diseases. A separate part of this article is devoted to the treatment of intracerebral tumors in children, for example, medulloblastomas and gliomas of the pons. In addition, the potential use of dendritic cell vaccines for intracerebral metastases is considered.

Extracranial systemic antitumor response through the abscopal effect induced by brain radiation in a patient with metastatic melanoma

The abscopal effect is a term that has been used to describe the phenomenon in which localized radiation therapy treatment of a tumor lesion triggers a spontaneous regression of metastatic lesion(s) at a non-irradiated distant site(s). Radiation therapy induced abscopal effects are believed to be mediated by activation and stimulation of the immune system. However, due to the brain's distinctive immune microenvironment, extracranial abscopal responses following cranial radiation therapy have rarely been reported. In this report, we describe the case of 42-year-old female patient with metastatic melanoma who experienced an abscopal response following her cranial radiation therapy for her brain metastasis. The patient initially presented with a stage III melanoma of the right upper skin of her back. Approximately 5 years after her diagnosis, the patient developed a large metastatic lesion in her upper right pectoral region of her chest wall and axilla. Since the patient's tumor was positive for BRAF and MEK, targeted therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib was initiated. However, the patient experienced central nervous system (CNS) symptoms such as headache and disequilibrium and developed brain metastases prior to the start of targeted therapy. The patient received radiation therapy to a dose of 30 Gy delivered in 15 fractions to her brain lesions while the patient was on dabrafenib and trametinib therapy. The patient's CNS metastases improved significantly within weeks of her therapy. The patient's non-irradiated large extracranial chest mass and axilla mass also shrank substantially demonstrating the abscopal effect during her CNS radiation therapy. Following radiation therapy of her residual chest lesions, the patient was disease free clinically and her CNS lesions had regressed. However, when the radiation therapy ended and the patient continued her targeted therapy alone, recurrence outside of her previously treated fields was noted. The disease recurrence could be due to the possibility of developing BRAF resistance clones to the BRAF targeted therapy. The patient died eventually due to wide spread systemic disease recurrence despite targeted therapy.

The Abscopal Effect of Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy: Fool's Gold or El Dorado?

An 'abscopal' effect if often used to refer to distant tumour regression after localised irradiation. Since the first report of the abscopal effect in the 1950s, well-documented cases with radiotherapy alone are very rare. It is widely accepted that the immune response plays an important role in the abscopal effect, although the mechanism is still unclear. With the recent success of cancer immunotherapy, there is growing interest in combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy to boost abscopal response rates. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) not only delivers ablative dose to the tumour, but may also induce robust immune responses. In this review we examine studies that combine SABR and immunotherapy. We review the preclinical rationale for SABR and immunotherapy combinations, the case for and against abscopal effects, and the current landscape of clinical trials.

Extracranial abscopal effect induced by combining immunotherapy with brain radiotherapy in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review

An extracranial abscopal effect induced by brain radiotherapy is particularly unusual because of the brain's distinctive immune microenvironment. We report a case of an extracranial abscopal effect in a 71‐year‐old male patient with lung adenocarcinoma treated with atezolizumab and later combined with brain radiation for brain metastasis. The subsequent abscopal effect first manifested as pseudoprogression of the primary lesion in the lung before remission was confirmed. This case suggests that immunotherapy increases the chance of an abscopal effect occurring after radiation therapy for brain metastases in patients with primary tumors with low immunogenicity.

Abscopal effect following radiation monotherapy in breast cancer: A case report

Radiotherapy has been found to be valuable for the control and eradication of local foci in various malignant tumors. The abscopal effect is determined as a systemic antitumor response at a distance from the irradiation site invoked by local irradiation. We herein present an extremely rare case of breast cancer in a 64-year-old woman, in whom the abscopal effect was observed after radiotherapy induced an antitumor response in all metastatic lesions, without any combination therapy. The patient was admitted to our hospital complaining of a breast mass and pain at the left hip, and was diagnosed with breast cancer with multiple bone, lung and lymph node metastases. She received treatment with local radiotherapy delivered to the breast tumor and some of the bone metastases but did not receive chemotherapy due to her poor performance status. However, 10 months after radiotherapy, spontaneous regression was observed, not only within the irradiated field, but also in the non-irradiated areas. All signs of cancer throughout the body disappeared, and the patient's performance status drastically improved. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of advanced breast cancer cases in which the abscopal effect was observed after radiation monotherapy; therefore, this case report is extremely rare and highly valuable.

Irradiation enhanced the effects of PD-1 blockade in brain metastatic osteosarcoma

Brain metastasis of osteosarcoma are rare but carry a dismal prognosis. Despite the advances in both systemic immunotherapy and localized radiation, it is still difficult to treat brain metastasis, with less than 12 months of survival from the time of diagnosis for most patients. Currently, there is interest in combining strategies to take advantage of the potential synergy. In this study, the mouse model of metastatic osteosarcoma to brain was used to explore the ability of local radiation and anti-PD-1 blockade to induce beneficial anti-tumor immune responses against distant, unirradiated brain metastatic tumors. Immune markers from the peripheral blood and tumor tissue were analyzed by flow cytometry, real-time PCR and western blot. The combination treatment produced a stronger systemic anti-tumor response than either treatment alone, shown by the reduced tumor burden and larger numbers of cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells in the unirradiated tumors, indicating an abscopal effect. These data suggested that combination treatment of irradiation with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy can induce abscopal anti-tumor responses and improve both local and distant control.

Abscopal, immunological effects of radiotherapy: Narrowing the gap between clinical and preclinical experiences

Radiotherapy-despite being a local therapy that meanwhile is characterized by an impressively high degree of spatial accuracy-can stimulate systemic phenomena which occasionally lead to regression and rejection of non-irradiated, distant tumor lesions. These abscopal effects of local irradiation have been observed in sporadic clinical case reports since the beginning of the 20th century, and extensive preclinical work has contributed to identify systemic anti-tumor immune responses as the underlying driving forces. Although abscopal tumor regression still remains a rare event in the radiotherapeutic routine, increasing numbers of cases are being reported, particularly since the clinical implementation of immune checkpoint inhibiting agents. Accordingly, interests to systematically exploit the therapeutic potential of radiotherapy-stimulated systemic responses are constantly growing. The present review briefly delineates the history of radiotherapy-induced abscopal effects and the activation of systemic anti-tumor immune responses by local irradiation. We discuss preclinical and clinical reports with specific focus on the corresponding controversies, and we propose issues that should be addressed in the future in order to narrow the gap between preclinical knowledge and clinical experiences.

Immunotherapy with radiotherapy in urological malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiotherapy has the potential to augment the host's immune response to cancer. Urological malignancies are highly immunogenic and the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy shows promise. In this review, we discuss the effects of radiotherapy on the cancer immune system and highlight the rationale for using the combined approach in prostate, urothelial and renal cancers. Current clinical studies are summarized emphasising the synergistic effects of the combination and the possibility of improved clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Local and abscopal effects have been observed in different urological cancers when using a combined approach. Large fraction size is associated with an increased immune response. Multiple radiotherapy/immunotherapy combinations are being studied in several clinical trials although no combination has yet been introduced in to standard practice.

SUMMARY

Although our knowledge of immunomodulation by radiotherapy has improved significantly in recent times, there remain several unanswered questions regarding how to best use the combination in clinical practice. Ongoing trials will provide further insight into complex mechanisms governing radiotherapy-immunotherapy interactions, with potential to improve clinical outcomes.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: new strategies to checkmate cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) or programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptors have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in subsets of patients with malignant disease. This emerging treatment modality holds great promise for future cancer treatment and has engaged pharmaceutical research interests in tumour immunology. While ICIs can induce rapid and durable responses in some patients, identifying predictive factors for effective clinical responses has proved challenging. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action of ICIs and outlines important preclinical work that contributed to their development. We explore clinical data that has led to disease-specific drug licensing, and highlight key clinical trials that have revealed ICI efficacy across a range of malignancies. We describe how ICIs have been used as part of combination therapies, and explore their future prospects in this area. We conclude by discussing the incorporation of these new immunotherapeutics into precision approaches to cancer therapy.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors

Immunotherapy, particularly immune-checkpoint inhibition, is producing encouraging clinical responses and affecting the way numerous cancers are treated. Yet immune-checkpoint therapy is not effective for many patients, and even those who initially respond can experience relapse, fueling interest in finding new processes or tools to improve the effectiveness of these novel therapeutics. One such tool is radiation. Both preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that the systemic effects of immunotherapy can be amplified when it is used in combination with radiation and, conversely, that the immunogenic effects of local irradiation can be amplified and extended to distant sites when used with immunotherapy. We review how stereotactic ablative radiation therapy, a technique specifically indicated for tumors treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, can potentiate the effects of immune-checkpoint therapy. We further explore how these novel therapeutics may transform radiation, previously considered a local treatment option, into powerful systemic therapy.

Survival of melanoma patients treated with targeted therapy and immunotherapy after systematic upfront control of brain metastases by radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapies (ITs) have dramatically improved survival in metastatic melanoma (MM). However, their efficacy on brain metastasis (BM) remains limited and poorly documented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort of consecutive MM patients (pts) with BMs, all systematically upfront treated by Gamma-Knife (GK) at first BM and retreated in case of new BMs, from 2010 to 2015 at the time when ipilimumab BRAF ± MEK inhibitors and anti-PD1 were introduced in practice. Survival after 1st GK (OS_GK1) according to prognostic factors and treatment.

RESULTS

Among 179 consecutive pts treated by GK, 109 received IT and/or TT after the 1st GK. Median OS_GK1 was 10.95 months and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 49.5% and 27.4%, respectively, versus a median overall survival (OS) of 2.29 months (p < .001) in those who did not receive IT or TT. In pts who initially had a single BM, median OS and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 14.46 months, 66.7% and 43.4%, respectively; in pts with 2-3 BMs: 8.85 months, 46.4% and 31%, respectively; in pts with >3 BMs: 7.25 months, 37.2% and 11.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis for OS_GK1 confirmed that IT and TT were significantly and highly protective. Best OS_GK1 was observed in BRAF-wild-type pts receiving anti-PD1 or in BRAF-mutated pts receiving BRAF-inhibitors and anti-PD1 (12.26 and 14.82 months, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In real-life MM pts with BMs, a strategy aiming at controlling BM with GK together with TT and/or TT seems to achieve unprecedented survival rates.

T-lymphocyte homing: an underappreciated yet critical hurdle for successful cancer immunotherapy

Advances in cancer immunotherapy have offered new hope for patients with metastatic disease. This unfolding success story has been exemplified by a growing arsenal of novel immunotherapeutics, including blocking antibodies targeting immune checkpoint pathways, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy (ACT). Nonetheless, clinical benefit remains highly variable and patient-specific, in part, because all immunotherapeutic regimens vitally hinge on the capacity of endogenous and/or adoptively transferred T-effector (T_eff) cells, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, to home efficiently into tumor target tissue. Thus, defects intrinsic to the multi-step T-cell homing cascade have become an obvious, though significantly underappreciated contributor to immunotherapy resistance. Conspicuous have been low intralesional frequencies of tumor-infiltrating T-lymphocytes (TILs) below clinically beneficial threshold levels, and peripheral rather than deep lesional TIL infiltration. Therefore, a T_eff cell 'homing deficit' may arguably represent a dominant factor responsible for ineffective immunotherapeutic outcomes, as tumors resistant to immune-targeted killing thrive in such permissive, immune-vacuous microenvironments. Fortunately, emerging data is shedding light into the diverse mechanisms of immune escape by which tumors restrict T_eff cell trafficking and lesional penetrance. In this review, we scrutinize evolving knowledge on the molecular determinants of T_eff cell navigation into tumors. By integrating recently described, though sporadic information of pivotal adhesive and chemokine homing signatures within the tumor microenvironment with better established paradigms of T-cell trafficking under homeostatic or infectious disease scenarios, we seek to refine currently incomplete models of T_eff cell entry into tumor tissue. We further summarize how cancers thwart homing to escape immune-mediated destruction and raise awareness of the potential impact of immune checkpoint blockers on T_eff cell homing. Finally, we speculate on innovative therapeutic opportunities for augmenting T_eff cell homing capabilities to improve immunotherapy-based tumor eradication in cancer patients, with special focus on malignant melanoma.

Immune Therapy for Sarcomas

Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery rapidly occurring at 14 days after start of chemotherapy for osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma is a good prognostic factor. Conversely, lymphopenia is associated with significantly decreased sarcoma survival. Clearly, the immune system can contribute towards better survival from sarcoma. This chapter will describe treatment and host factors that influence immune function and how effective local control and systemic interventions of sarcoma therapy can cause inflammation and/or immune suppression but are currently the standard of care. Preclinical and clinical efforts to enhance immune function against sarcoma will be reviewed. Interventions to enhance immune function against sarcoma have included regional therapy (surgery, cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, electroporation, and radiotherapy), cytokines, macrophage activators (mifamurtide), vaccines, natural killer (NK) cells, T cell receptor (TCR) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and efforts to decrease inflammation. The latter is particularly important because of new knowledge about factors influencing expression of checkpoint inhibitory molecules, PD1 and CTLA-4, in the tumor microenvironment. Since these molecules can now be blocked using anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, how to translate this knowledge into more effective immune therapies in the future as well as how to augment effectiveness of current interventions (e.g., radiotherapy) is a challenge. Barriers to implementing this knowledge include cost of agents that release immune checkpoint blockade and coordination of cost-effective outpatient sarcoma treatment. Information on how to research clinical trial eligibility criteria and how to access current immune therapy trials against sarcoma are shared, too.

Non-targeted transcriptomic effects upon thyroid irradiation: similarity between in-field and out-of-field responses varies with tissue type

Non-targeted effects can induce responses in tissues that have not been exposed to ionizing radiation. Despite their relevance for risk assessment, few studies have investigated these effects in vivo. In particular, these effects have not been studied in context with thyroid exposure, which can occur e.g. during irradiation of head and neck tumors. To determine the similarity between in-field and out-of-field responses in normal tissue, we used a partial body irradiation setup with female mice where the thyroid region, the thorax and abdomen, or all three regions were irradiated. After 24 h, transcriptional regulation in the kidney cortex, kidney medulla, liver, lungs, spleen, and thyroid was analyzed using microarray technology. Thyroid irradiation resulted in transcriptional regulation in the kidney medulla and liver that resembled regulation upon direct exposure of these tissues regarding both strength of response and associated biological function. The kidney cortex showed fewer similarities between the setups, while the lungs and spleen showed little similarity between in-field and out-of-field responses. Interestingly, effects were generally not found to be additive. Future studies are needed to identify the molecular mechanisms that mediate these systemic effects, so that they may be used as targets to minimize detrimental side effects in radiotherapy.

Understanding the Impact of ErbB Activating Events and Signal Transduction on Antigen Processing and Presentation: MHC Expression as a Model

Advances in molecular pathology have changed the landscape of oncology. The ability to interrogate tissue samples for oncogene amplification, driver mutations, and other molecular alterations provides clinicians with an enormous level of detail about their patient's cancer. In some cases, this information informs treatment decisions, especially those related to targeted anti-cancer therapies. However, in terms of immune-based therapies, it is less clear how to use such information. Likewise, despite studies demonstrating the pivotal role of neoantigens in predicting responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade, it is not known if the expression of neoantigens impacts the response to targeted therapies despite a growing recognition of their diverse effects on immunity. To realize the promise of 'personalized medicine', it will be important to develop a more integrated understanding of the relationships between oncogenic events and processes governing anti-tumor immunity. One area of investigation to explore such relationships centers on defining how ErbB/HER activation and signal transduction influences antigen processing and presentation.

New Strategies in Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Oligometastases

Patients with metastatic solid tumors are usually treated with palliative intent. Systemic therapy and palliative radiation are often used, with the goals of prolonging survival or maintaining quality of life, but not of cure. In contrast to this paradigm, the theory of oligometastasis suggests that some patients who have a small number of metastases may be amenable to cure if all lesions can be eradicated. Aggressive treatment of patients with oligometastases, using either surgery or radiotherapy, has become more common in the past decade, yet in most situations, no randomized evidence is available to support such an approach. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a novel treatment for oligometastases, delivering large doses of radiotherapy in only a few treatments, with excellent rates of local control, and appears to be an excellent noninvasive alternative to surgical resection of metastases. This article reviews recent biologic and clinical data that support the existence of the oligometastatic state and discusses gaps in this evidence base. The emerging role for SABR in the management of this challenging patient population is discussed with a focus on ongoing clinical trials in an attempt to improve overall survival, delay progression, or induce immunologic anticancer effects through the abscopal effect.

Immune modulation by hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy: Therapeutic implications

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become an attractive treatment modality and a safe, non-invasive alternative to surgery to control primary or secondary malignant tumors. While emphasis has been on the local tumor control as a treatment objective for SBRT, the rare but intriguing observations of abscopal (or out-of-field) effects have pointed to the exciting possibility of activating anti-tumor immunity by using high-dose radiation. This review summarizes the available evidence supporting immune modulation by SBRT alone, as well as its potential combination with immunotherapy. Promising preclinical research has revealed an array of immune changes following SBRT, which could affect the balance between anti-tumor immunity and tumor-promoting immunosuppression. However, shifting this balance in the clinical setting to obtain survival benefits has rarely been achieved so far, emphasizing the need for a better understanding of the interactions between high-dose radiotherapy and immunity or immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the combination of SBRT with immunotherapy, particularly with immune checkpoint blockers, has the clear potential to substantially increase the rate of abscopal effects. This warrants further research in this area, both in mechanistic preclinical studies and in clinical trials incorporating correlative studies.

Possible Interaction of Anti-PD-1 Therapy with the Effects of Radiosurgery on Brain Metastases

Delayed radiation-induced vasculitic leukoencephalopathy related to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases has been reported to manifest clinically 9 to 18 months after treatment. Immune-modulating therapies have been introduced to treatment regimens for malignancies with metastatic predilection to the brain. The interaction of these systemic therapies with other modalities of treatment for brain metastases, namely, SRS, has not been fully characterized. We report two patients with metastatic malignancies to the brain who received SRS followed by immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to programmed death 1 (PD-1). Both patients appeared to have early clinical and radiologic progression of their treated lesions, which was highly suspicious for tumor progression. Both patients underwent surgical resection of their lesions and the material was submitted for histopathologic examination. Pathologic examination in both cases showed predominantly radiation-induced changes characterized by reactive astrocytosis and vascular wall infiltration by T lymphocytes. The accelerated response to SRS in these two patients was temporally related to the initiation of immunotherapy. We propose a possible biologic interaction between SRS and the PD-1 mAbs. Additionally, awareness of this potential occurrence is critical for accurate interpretation and proper management of clinical and radiologic findings in these patients. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(6); 481-7. ©2016 AACR.

Endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated pathways to both apoptosis and autophagy: Significance for melanoma treatment

Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Disrupted intracellular signaling pathways are responsible for melanoma's extraordinary resistance to current chemotherapeutic modalities. The pathophysiologic basis for resistance to both chemo- and radiation therapy is rooted in altered genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that, in turn, result in the impairing of cell death machinery and/or excessive activation of cell growth and survival-dependent pathways. Although most current melanoma therapies target mitochondrial dysregulation, there is increasing evidence that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-associated pathways play a role in the potentiation, initiation and maintenance of cell death machinery and autophagy. This review focuses on the reliability of ER-associated pathways as therapeutic targets for melanoma treatment.

Steroid and anticonvulsant prophylaxis for stereotactic radiosurgery: Large variation in physician recommendations

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The risk of developing symptomatic edema or seizure following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is poorly defined, and many practitioners prescribe prophylactic corticosteroids and/or anticonvulsants. Because there are no clear guidelines regarding appropriate use, we sought to characterize prescribing practices and factors associated with these recommendations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a 1-time, internet-based survey among 500 randomly selected radiation oncologists self-described as specializing in central nervous system diseases who were registered in the American Society for Radiation Oncology directory. Physicians were contacted by e-mail and invited to complete the 22-question survey.

RESULTS

The response rate was 32% (n = 161). Sixty-six percent of respondents had been in practice for >10 years, and 45% of respondents practiced at an academic medical center. During/after SRS, 53% of respondents "always" or "usually" recommended corticosteroids, whereas 47% "never," "rarely," or "sometimes" recommended them. When prescribing corticosteroids, the recommended duration of use was <1 week, 1-2 weeks, or >2 weeks among 49%, 33%, and 18% of respondents, respectively. Respondents who worked in an academic medical center were less likely to prescribe corticosteroids, although this did not reach significance (P = .09). Seizure prophylaxis was less common overall, as 79% of respondents "rarely" or "never" prescribed anticonvulsants for SRS. Respondents who prescribed anticonvulsants more frequently had higher estimations of the risk of seizure within 2 weeks of SRS (P < .001), and their recommended duration of anticonvulsant use was <1 week, 1-2 weeks, and >2 weeks among 35%, 25%, and 41% of respondents, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is extreme variation in physician recommendations regarding prophylactic corticosteroid and anticonvulsant use for patients undergoing SRS. Further investigation of the risks and benefits of these medications for SRS is warranted, which may promote guideline development and more patient-centered, rational prescribing practices.

Matrix metalloproteinase-12 expression is increased in cutaneous melanoma and associated with tumor aggressiveness

Cutaneous melanoma is the most malignant form of skin cancer characterized by aggressive invasion. Matrix metalloproteinases play essential roles in tumor invasion due to their ECM degrading capacity. However, the clinical significance of matrix metalloproteinasis (MMP)-12 in human cutaneous melanoma has not been addressed yet. In the present study, we investigated MMP-12 expression level in 298 patients with cutaneous melanoma and 60 normal skin tissue specimens by immunohistochemistry assay. Appropriate statistical analysis was utilized to determine the association of MMP-12 with clinical features and prognosis of melanoma. Results showed that MMP-12 expression was increased in cutaneous melanoma compared with that in normal skin. It was also found that MMP-12 expression in melanoma was significantly associated with tumor invasion and metastasis. Univariate survival analysis indicated that patients with melanoma of high MMP-12 expression had unfavorable overall survival compared with those of low MMP-12 expression. Cox's proportional hazards analysis showed that MMP-12 expression was an independent prognostic marker of overall survival for patients with cutaneous melanoma. These results proved that MMP-12 expression was increased in cutaneous melanoma and associated with tumor progression. It also provided the first evidence that MMP-12 level could be an independent prognostic marker for patients with cutaneous melanoma.

A novel approach for the detection and genetic analysis of live melanoma circulating tumor cells

Background

Circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection and genetic analysis may complement currently available disease assessments in patients with melanoma to improve risk stratification and monitoring. We therefore sought to establish the feasibility of a telomerase-based assay for detecting and isolating live melanoma CTCs.

Methods

The telomerase-based CTC assay utilizes an adenoviral vector that, in the presence of elevated human telomerase activity, drives the amplification of green fluorescent protein. Tumor cells are then identified via an image processing system. The protocol was tested on melanoma cells in culture or spiked into control blood, and on samples from patients with metastatic melanoma. Genetic analysis of the isolated melanoma CTCs was then performed for BRAF mutation status.

Results

The adenoviral vector was effective for all melanoma cell lines tested with sensitivity of 88.7% (95%CI 85.6-90.4%) and specificity of 99.9% (95%CI 99.8-99.9%). In a pilot trial of patients with metastatic disease, CTCs were identified in 9 of 10 patients, with a mean of 6.0 CTCs/mL. At a cutoff of 1.1 CTCs/mL, the telomerase-based assay exhibits test performance of 90.0% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity. BRAF mutation analysis of melanoma cells isolated from culture or spiked control blood, or from pilot patient samples was found to match the known BRAF mutation status of the cell lines and primary tumors.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a telomerase-based assay effective for detecting and isolating live melanoma CTCs. These promising findings support further studies, including towards integrating into the management of patients with melanoma receiving multimodality therapy.

The New Era of Cancer Immunotherapy: Manipulating T-Cell Activity to Overcome Malignancy

Using the immune system to control cancer has been investigated for over a century. Yet it is only over the last several years that therapeutic agents acting directly on the immune system have demonstrated improved overall survival for cancer patients in phase III clinical trials. Furthermore, it appears that some patients treated with such agents have been cured of metastatic cancer. This has led to increased interest and acceleration in the rate of progress in cancer immunotherapy. Most of the current immunotherapeutic success in cancer treatment is based on the use of immune-modulating antibodies targeting critical checkpoints (CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1). Several other immune-modulating molecules targeting inhibitory or stimulatory pathways are being developed. The combined use of these medicines is the subject of intense investigation and holds important promise. Combination regimens include those that incorporate targeted therapies that act on growth signaling pathways, as well as standard chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In fact, these standard therapies have intrinsic immune-modulating properties that can support antitumor immunity. In the years ahead, adoptive T-cell therapy will also be an important part of treatment for some cancer patients. Other areas which are regaining interest are the use of oncolytic viruses that immunize patients against their own tumors and the use of vaccines against tumor antigens. Immunotherapy has demonstrated unprecedented durability in controlling multiple types of cancer and we expect its use to continue expanding rapidly.

[Non-targeted effects (bystander, abscopal) of external beam radiation therapy: an overview for the clinician]

Radiotherapy is advocated in the treatment of cancer of over 50 % of patients. It has long been considered as a focal treatment only. However, the observation of effects, such as fatigue and lymphopenia, suggests that systemic effects may also occur. The description of bystander and abscopal effects suggests that irradiated cells may exert an action on nearby or distant unirradiated cells, respectively. A third type of effect that involves feedback interactions between irradiated cells was more recently described (cohort effect). This new field of radiation therapy is yet poorly understood and the definitions suffer from a lack of reproducibility in part due to the variety of experimental models. The bystander effect might induce genomic instability in non-irradiated cells and is thus extensively studied for a potential risk of radiation-induced cancer. From a therapeutic perspective, reproducing an abscopal effect by using a synergy between ionizing radiation and immunomodulatory agents to elicit or boost anticancer immune responses is an interesting area of research. Many applications are being developed in particular in the field of hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation of metastatic disease.

Intracranial control and radiographic changes with adjuvant radiation therapy for resected brain metastases: whole brain radiotherapy versus stereotactic radiosurgery alone

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of postoperative whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone in patients with resected brain metastases (BM). We reviewed records of patients who underwent surgical resection of BM followed by WBRT or SRS alone between 2003 and 2013. Local control (LC) of the treated resected cavity, distant brain control (DBC), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), overall survival (OS), and radiographic leukoencephalopathy rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. One-hundred thirty-two patients underwent surgical resection for 141 intracranial metastases: 36 (27 %) patients received adjuvant WBRT and 96 (73 %) received SRS alone to the resection cavity. One-year OS (56 vs. 55 %, p = 0.64) and LC (83 vs. 74 %, p = 0.31) were similar between patients receiving WBRT and SRS. After controlling for number of BM, WBRT was associated with higher 1-year DBC compared with SRS (70 vs. 48 %, p = 0.03); single metastasis and WBRT were the only significant predictors for reduced distant brain recurrence in multi-variate analysis. Freedom from LMD was higher with WBRT at 18 months (87 vs. 69 %, p = 0.045), while incidence of radiographic leukoencephalopathy was higher with WBRT at 12 months (47 vs. 7 %, p = 0.001). One-year freedom from WBRT in the SRS alone group was 86 %. Compared with WBRT for patients with resected BM, SRS alone demonstrated similar LC, higher rates of LMD and inferior DBC, after controlling for the number of BM. However, OS was similar between groups. The results of ongoing clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Combinations of radiation therapy and immunotherapy for melanoma: a review of clinical outcomes

Radiation therapy has long played a role in the management of melanoma. Recent advances have also demonstrated the efficacy of immunotherapy in the treatment of melanoma. Preclinical data suggest a biologic interaction between radiation therapy and immunotherapy. Several clinical studies corroborate these findings. This review will summarize the outcomes of studies reporting on patients with melanoma treated with a combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy. Vaccine therapies often use irradiated melanoma cells, and may be enhanced by radiation therapy. The cytokines interferon-α and interleukin-2 have been combined with radiation therapy in several small studies, with some evidence suggesting increased toxicity and/or efficacy. Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody which blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, has been combined with radiation therapy in several notable case studies and series. Finally, pilot studies of adoptive cell transfer have suggested that radiation therapy may improve the efficacy of treatment. The review will demonstrate that the combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy has been reported in several notable case studies, series and clinical trials. These clinical results suggest interaction and the need for further study.

Current approaches to the treatment of metastatic brain tumours

Metastatic tumours involving the brain overshadow primary brain neoplasms in frequency and are an important complication in the overall management of many cancers. Importantly, advances are being made in understanding the molecular biology underlying the initial development and eventual proliferation of brain metastases. Surgery and radiation remain the cornerstones of the therapy for symptomatic lesions; however, image-based guidance is improving surgical technique to maximize the preservation of normal tissue, while more sophisticated approaches to radiation therapy are being used to minimize the long-standing concerns over the toxicity of whole-brain radiation protocols used in the past. Furthermore, the burgeoning knowledge of tumour biology has facilitated the entry of systemically administered therapies into the clinic. Responses to these targeted interventions have ranged from substantial toxicity with no control of disease to periods of useful tumour control with no decrement in performance status of the treated individual. This experience enables recognition of the limits of targeted therapy, but has also informed methods to optimize this approach. This Review focuses on the clinically relevant molecular biology of brain metastases, and summarizes the current applications of these data to imaging, surgery, radiation therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

Imaging changes following stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic intracranial tumors: differentiating pseudoprogression from tumor progression and its effect on clinical practice

Stereotactic radiosurgery has become standard adjuvant treatment for patients with metastatic intracranial lesions. There has been a growing appreciation for benign imaging changes following radiation that are difficult to distinguish from true tumor progression. These imaging changes, termed pseudoprogression, carry significant implications for patient management. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of pseudoprogression in metastatic brain lesions, research to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression, and clinical implications of pseudoprogression on treatment decisions.