Tumor deposit is a poor prognostic indicator for patients who have stage II and III colorectal cancer with fewer than 4 lymph node metastases but not for those with 4 or more

The prognostic impact of tumor deposits in colorectal cancer: More than just N1c

BACKGROUND

The identification of tumor deposits (TD) currently plays a limited role in staging for colorectal cancer (CRC) aside from N1c lymph node designation. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic impact, beyond American Joint Committee on Cancer N1c designation, of TDs among patients with primary CRC.

METHODS

Patients who had resected stage I-III primary CRC diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) stratified by TD status and lymph node (N) status was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 147,783 patients with primary CRC were identified. TDs were present in 15,444 patients (10.5%). The presence of TDs was significantly associated with adverse tumor characteristics, including advanced pathologic stage, nodal status, and metastasis status. The presence of TDs was associated with worse CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.02-3.22), as it was for each given N category (e.g., N2a and TD-negative [HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 2.37-2.64] vs. N2a and TD-positive [HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 3.49-4.03]). The presence of multiple TDs was also associated with decreased CSS for each given N category compared with a single TD (e.g. N2a with one TD [HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.65-3.61] vs. N2a with two or more TDs [HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 3.87-4.82]).

CONCLUSIONS

TDs were identified as an independent predictor of a worse outcome in patients with CRC. The presence of TDs confers distinctly different CSS and provides important prognostic information among patients with CRC and warrants further investigation as a unique variable in future iterations of CRC staging.

A combined nutritional risk index and carcinoembryonic antigen score predicts the outcome in radically resected colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Nutritional risk index (NRI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are useful prognostic markers in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the prognostic value of a combination of the NRI and CEA, namely, the NRI and CEA score (NCS), needs further investigation.

METHODS

Stage I-III CRC patients were collected and then divided into three subgroups by counting the NCS: NCS 1: high NRI with normal CEA; NCS 2: high NRI with elevated CEA or low NRI with normal CEA; and NCS 3: low NRI with elevated CEA. The differences in outcome, counted as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were tested among the subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 285 patients were enrolled, with 108 in NCS 1, 118 in NCS 2 and 59 in NCS 3. Patient features, including age, tumour deposit, T stage, N stage and TNM stage, were significantly different in the NCS subgroups. Both the DFS (log-rank = 26.06, P<0.001) and OS (log-rank = 39.10, P<0.001) were significant in different NCS subgroups, even in maximum tumour diameter ≤4 cm cases (DFS: log-rank = 21.42, P<0.001; OS: log-rank = 30.95, P<0.001), and NCS 1 patients displayed the best outcome compared with the rest of the subgroups. NCS was also found to be an independent risk factor for both DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

NCS was a useful prognostic indicator in stages I-III CRC patients.

Tumor Deposits as an Adverse Prognostic Indicator in Stage III Colon Cancer: A Multicenter Database Study

Objective

We explored the oncological impact of tumor deposits (TDs) on colon cancer and proposed optimal modifications to the current staging system.

Background

In the existing American Joint Committee on Cancer colon cancer staging system, TDs are incorporated into the N category as N1c. When lymph node metastases (LNMs) are present, their number is considered to determine nodal stages, such as N1a/b or N2a/b, regardless of TDs.

Methods

4212 patients with primary colon cancer who underwent surgical resection in the Seoul Colorectal Group (2010-2020) and 93,057 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results*Stat database (2000-2017) were included in this study. Patients were classified according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) (0/1-3/≥4) and the presence of TDs.

Results

TDs were significantly associated with left colon cancer, a higher T category, and vascular/perineural invasion. Patients with TDs had higher recurrence rates (23.1 vs 7.5%, P < 0.001). The TD-positive patients had notably worse overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival rates. The survival outcomes of TD-positive patients without LNM were inferior to those of TD-negative patients with LN1-3 (5-year OS: 78.9 vs 87.8%, P = 0.04). The survival outcomes of TD-positive patients with LN1-3 were similar to those of TD-negative patients with LN ≥4 (5-year OS: 87.0 vs 77.1%, P = 0.11). Survival outcomes obtained using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results *Stat database yielded consistent results.

Conclusions

TDs were associated with poor prognostic factors and had a significant impact on survival outcomes. The incorporation of tumor deposits into nodal classifications beyond the current N1c criteria may improve the staging system and more accurately reflect the recurrence and survival rates among patients with colon cancer. TD-positive in N1a or N1b could be categorized as N2.

Correlation Analysis Between Tumor Deposit and Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The mechanism underlying the formation of gastric tumor deposits (TDs) is unclear. We aimed to explore the risk factors for the formation and prognostic value of TDs.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 781 locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients from four medical institutions in China, from June 2014 to June 2018. The risk factors for TD formation and prognostic value were determined through univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that TD positivity was closely related to tumor diameter, Borrmann classification, differentiation degree, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, and nerve and vascular invasion (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (odds ratio [OR] 1.836, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.165-2.894, p = 0.009) and vascular invasion (OR 2.152, 95% CI 1.349-3.433, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for TD positivity. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that TD positivity (OR 1.533, 95% CI 1.101-2.134, p = 0.011), tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (OR 1.831, 95% CI 1.319-2.541, p < 0.001), pT4a stage (OR 1.652, 95% CI 1.144-2.386, p = 0.007), and vascular invasion (OR 1.458, 95% CI 1.059-2.008, p = 0.021) were independent risk factors for GC prognosis. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival of the TD-positive group showed significant effects among patients in the pT4a and pN3b stages (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TDs are closely related to tumor diameter and vascular invasion in LAGC patients, and TD positivity is an independent prognostic factor for LAGC patients, especially those at pT4a and pN3b stages.

Tumour deposits are associated with worse survival than extranodal extension; a network meta-analysis on tumour nodules in colorectal cancer

Lymph node metastases (LNM) play a central role in the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification for colorectal cancer (CRC), with extranodal extension (ENE) as an adverse feature. ENE has never been directly compared to tumour deposits (TD). The aim of this study was to perform an up-to-date systematic review, including a network meta-analysis to compare their prognostic value. A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases to identify all prognostic studies on ENE and TD. A total of 20 studies were included, with 7719 cases. The primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS); secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Frequentist paired and network meta-analyses were performed using the netmeta package in R. For univariable DFS analysis, LNM + TD+ cases had a significantly worse outcome compared with LNM + ENE+ cases [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-1.53], which was no longer significant for multivariable DFS analysis (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.87-1.46). All OS and multivariable DSS analyses showed a significantly worse outcome for LNM + TD+ cases compared with LNM + ENE cases. For all outcomes, both LNM + TD+ and LNM + ENE+ had a significantly increased hazard compared with LNM+ cases. This study shows that there is a trend towards worse outcome for LNM + TD+ than LNM + ENE+, not statistically significant in multivariable DFS analysis. Both groups perform significantly worse than cases with LNM only. To improve the accuracy of CRC staging, we recommend to put more emphasis on both ENE and TD in the TNM classification, with the most prominent role for TD.

Prognostic value of tumor deposits and positive lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In colorectal cancer (CRC), tumor deposits (TD) have been used to guide the N staging only in node-negative patients. It remains unknown about the prognostic value of TD in combination with positive lymph node ratio (LNR) in stage III CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors analyzed data from 31 139 eligible patients diagnosed with stage III CRC, including 30 230 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database as a training set and 909 from two Chinese hospitals as a validation set. The associations of TD and LNR with cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Both TD-positive and high LNR (value ≥0.4) were associated with worse CSS in the training [multivariable hazard ratio (HR), 1.50; 95% CI: 1.43-1.58 and HR, 1.74; 95% CI: 1.62-1.86, respectively] and validation sets (HR, 1.90; 95% CI: 1.41-2.54 and HR, 2.01; 95% CI: 1.29-3.15, respectively). Compared to patients with TD-negative and low LNR (value<0.4), those with TD-positive and high LNR had a 4.09-fold risk of CRC-specific death in the training set (HR, 4.09; 95% CI: 3.54-4.72) and 4.60-fold risk in the validation set (HR, 4.60; 95% CI: 2.88-7.35). Patients with TD-positive/H-LNR CRC on the right side had the worst prognosis ( P <0.001). The combined variable of TD and LNR contributed the most to CSS prediction in the training (24.26%) and validation (32.31%) sets. A nomogram including TD and LNR showed satisfactory discriminative ability, and calibration curves indicated favorable consistency in both the training and validation sets.

CONCLUSIONS

TD and LNR represent independent prognostic predictors for stage III CRC. A combination of TD and LNR could be used to identify those at high-risk of CRC deaths.

Tumour deposits are independently associated with recurrence in colon cancer

AIM

Tumour deposits are focal aggregates of cancer cells in pericolic fat and mesentery, distinct from vessels, nerves and lymphatics. Their presence upstages lymph node negative patients but is ignored in lymph node positive patients. We investigated the clinicopathological factors associated with tumour deposits and their impact on recurrence in lymph node positive and negative patients.

METHOD

Clinicopathological variables were collected from the medical records of patients with Stage I-III colon cancer who underwent resection in 2017-2019. Pathology was reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist. Patients with rectal cancer, metastasis, and concurrent malignancy were excluded.

RESULTS

Tumour deposits were noted in 69 (9%) of 770 patients. They were associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis, advanced T category, poorly differentiated tumours, microsatellite stable subtype and lymphovascular and perineural invasion (p < 0.05). The presence of tumour deposits (hazard ratio 2.48, 95% CI 1.49-4.10) and of lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio 3.04, 95% CI 1.72-5.37) were independently associated with decreased time to recurrence. There was a weak correlation (0.27) between the number of tumour deposits and the number of positive lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

Tumour deposits are associated with more advanced disease and high-risk pathological features. The presence of tumour deposits and lymph node metastasis were found to be independent risk factors for decreased time to recurrence. A patient with both lymph node metastasis and tumour deposits is more than twice as likely to have recurrence compared with a patient with only lymph node metastasis. Tumour deposits independently predict recurrence and should not be ignored in lymph node positive patients.

Prognostic Value of Tumor Deposits in Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients with Different N Stages: A Population-Based, Retrospective, Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Tumor deposits (TDs) seem to be associated with the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The goal of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of TDs among patients with stage III CRC at different N stages.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on two independent cohorts of stage III CRC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (n = 8232) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (n = 423). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

Of 8232 patients in the SEER cohort, the presence of TDs revealed poorer 5-year OS rates and 5-year CSS rates in all N-stage subgroups. X-tile software identified 5 (5-year OS: P = 0.004; 5-year CSS: P < 0.001) as the optimal cutoff value for TD count in the TD-positive subgroup at the N2 stage. The OS (5-year OS: 62.0% vs. 42.0%, P < 0.001) and CSS (5-year CSS: 66.0% vs. 43.8%, P < 0.001) of patients with five or more TDs were significantly worse than those with one to four TDs in the N2 stage subgroups. Of 423 patients in the Wenzhou cohort, the 3-year OS rate for patients in the positive group was worse than that for patients in the negative group (88.7% vs. 94.3%, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

TD count should be considered when evaluating the prognosis of patients with the N2 stage. Those with higher TD counts (≥ 5) might have a worse prognosis.

Negative Prognostic Impact of Tumor Deposits in Rectal Cancer: A National Study Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether tumor deposits (TDs) in rectal cancer are associated with increased recurrence risk and decreased survival.

BACKGROUND

Tumor deposits (TDs) are considered a risk factor for recurrence after colon cancer resection, and the presence of TDs prompts adjuvant chemotherapy. The prognostic relevance of TDs in rectal cancer requires further exploration.

METHODS

All patients treated with abdominal resection surgery for rectal cancer in Sweden between 2011 and 2014 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint was local recurrence or distant metastasis. Secondary outcomes were overall and relative survival.

RESULTS

Five thousand four hundred fifty-five patients were identified of which 3769 patients were analyzed after exclusion. TDs were found in 404 (10.7%) patients, including 140 (3.7%) patients with N1c-status. In TD-positive patients, local recurrence and distant metastasis rates at 5 years were 6.3% [95% CI 3.8-8.8%] and 38.9% [95% CI, 33.6-43.5%] compared with 2.7% [95% CI, 2.1-3.3%] and 14.3% [95% CI, 13.1-15.5%] in TD-negative patients. In multivariable regression analysis, the risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis were increased; HR 1.86 [95% CI, 1.09-3.19; P =0.024] and 1.87 [95% CI, 1.52-2.31; P =<0.001], respectively. Overall survival at 5 years was 68.8% [95% CI, 64.4-73.4%] in TD-positive patients and 80.7% [95% CI, 79.4-82.1%] in TD-negative patients. pN1c-patients had similar outcomes regarding local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival as pN1a-b stage patients. TD-positive pN1a-b patients had significantly worse outcomes whereas TDs did not affect outcomes in pN2a-b patients.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that TDs have a negative impact on the prognosis in rectal cancer. Thus, efforts should be made to diagnose TD-positive rectal cancer patients preoperatively.

Tumor deposits are associated with a higher risk of peritoneal disease in non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tumor deposit (TD) is a poor prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This study aimed to determine whether TD carry the same risk of peritoneal recurrence as known high-risk (HR) features in CRC patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort-study of stage I-III CRC patients from 2010 to 2015 was conducted. TD group was defined by the presence of TD on histopathology whereas HR group was defined by the presence of obstruction, perforation, or T4-stage.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients with CRC were identified, of which 50 had TD and 101 had a HR feature. The overall risk of peritoneal recurrence was higher in the TD group versus HR group (36.0% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.03). The risk of peritoneum as the site of first recurrence was also higher in the TD group (22.0% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.03). Overall cancer recurrence at any site was also higher in the TD group (56.0% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.01). Median time to first recurrence was 1.2 (0.7-1.9) years in the TD group compared to 1.4 (0.8-2.1) years in the HR group (p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

In non-metastatic CRC patients, TD might have a higher risk of tumor recurrence versus their HR counterparts. Alternative strategies for surveillance and treatment should be considered.

Risk factors predict microscopic extranodal tumor deposits in advanced stage III colon cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is a frequent cause of cancer-related mortality in patients with lymph node or distant metastases. Pericolonic tumor deposits (TDs) are considered prognostically distinct from lymph node metastases.

AIM

To investigate risk factors for extranodal TDs in stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. We selected 155 individuals diagnosed with stage III colon cancer from the database of the Cancer Registry of the Tri-Service General Hospital. The patients were allocated into the groups with/without N1c. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier method were done. The primary outcomes investigate the association between the covariates and extranodal TDs, and prognostic significance of the covariates regarding the survival.

RESULTS

There were 136 individuals in the non-N1c group and 19 individuals in the N1c group. Patients with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) had a higher risk of TDs. Overall survival rates of patients with and without LVI were 6.64 years and 8.61 years, respectively (P = 0.027). The N1c patients without LVI had higher overall survival than those who with LVI (7.73 years vs 4.42 years, P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Patients having stage III colon cancer with LVI have a higher probability of having TDs than those with stage III colon cancer without LVI. Stage III colon cancer patients with TDs and LVI could have poor prognosis and outcome.

Role of one-step nucleic acid amplification in colorectal cancer lymph node metastases detection

Current histopathological staging procedures in colorectal cancer (CRC) depend on midline division of the lymph nodes (LNs) with one section of hematoxylin and eosin staining. Cancer cells outside this transection line may be missed, which could lead to understaging of Union for International Cancer Control Stage II high-risk patients. The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay has emerged as a rapid molecular diagnostic tool for LN metastases detection. It is a molecular technique that can analyze the entire LN tissue using a reverse-transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction to detect tumor-specific cytokeratin 19 mRNA. Our findings suggest that the OSNA assay has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting metastatic LNs in CRC and a high negative predictive value. OSNA is a standardized, observer-independent technique, which may lead to more accurate staging. It has been suggested that in stage II CRC, the upstaging can reach 25% and these patients can access postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, intraoperative OSNA sentinel node evaluation may allow early CRC to be treated with organ-preserving surgery, while in more advanced-stage disease, a tailored lymphadenectomy can be performed considering the presence of aberrant lymphatic drainage and skip metastases.

Significance of tumor deposits combined with lymph node metastasis in stage III colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective multi-center cohort study from China

PURPOSE

The study aimed to explore the value of tumor deposits in stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) and verify whether patients with more tumor deposit numbers have higher risk of recurrence.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort analysis was performed at two cancer centers of China. Stage III CRC patients who underwent radical resection at the center between April 2008 and February 2019 were identified. The Univariate/Multivariate Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and PSM were recurrence-free survival (RFS) used.

RESULTS

Total 1080 stage III CRC patients (634 [58.7%] men; median [IQR] age, 60 [50-68] years) who underwent radical surgical resection were identified for inclusion in this study. Patients with tumor deposits had a 12.8% lower 3-year RFS (n = 236 [69.9%]) than the patients without tumor deposits (n = 844 [82.7%]) (P ≤ 0.0001). The 3-year RFS of patients with stage N2 (n = 335 [61.2%]) was 18.6% lower (P ≤ 0.0001) than the original cohort of patients with stage N1 (n = 745 [79.8%]), but it was similar to the RFS of patients with 4 or more tumor deposits plus lymph node metastases (n = 58 [61.4%]) (P = 0.91). The RFS for patients with 4 or more tumor deposits plus number of lymph node metastases (n = 58 [61.4%]) was 15.8% lower than the cohort of patients with 1-3 tumor deposits + number of lymph node metastases (n = 687 [77.2%]) (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with 4 or more tumor deposits + the number of lymph node metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.24-2.87) were independently associated with a shorter RFS.

CONCLUSION

The number of tumor deposits is an indicator of poor postoperative prognosis. It is necessary to incorporate the number of tumor deposits combined with the number of lymph node metastases to stratify postoperative stratification of stage III CRC, which may provide a new theoretical basis for adjuvant therapy for patients with N1 stage CRC after surgery.

Predictive and Prognostic Assessment Models for Tumor Deposit in Colorectal Cancer Patients With No Distant Metastasis

Background

More and more evidence indicated that tumor deposit (TD) was significantly associated with local recurrence, distant metastasis (DM), and poor prognosis for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to explore the main clinical risk factors for the presence of TD in CRC patients with no DM (CRC-NDM) and the prognostic factors for TD-positive patients after surgery.

Methods

The data of patients with CRC-NDM between 2010 and 2017 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for TD presence. Fine and Gray’s competing-risk model was performed to analyze prognostic factors for TD-positive CRC-NDM patients. A predictive nomogram was constructed using the multivariate logistic regression model. The concordance index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), and the calibration were used to evaluate the predictive nomogram. Also, a prognostic nomogram was built based on multivariate competing-risk regression. C-index, the calibration, and decision-curve analysis (DCA) were performed to validate the prognostic model.

Results

The predictive nomogram to predict the presence of TD had a C-index of 0.785 and AUC of 0.787 and 0.782 in the training and validation sets, respectively. From the competing-risk analysis, chemotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 0.542, p < 0.001) can significantly reduce CRC-specific death (CCSD). The prognostic nomogram for the outcome prediction in postoperative CRC-NDM patients with TD had a C-index of 0.727. The 5-year survival of CCSD was 17.16%, 36.20%, and 63.19% in low-, medium-, and high-risk subgroups, respectively (Gray’s test, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We constructed an easily predictive nomogram in identifying the high-risk TD-positive CRC-NDM patients. Besides, a prognostic nomogram was built to help clinicians identify poor-outcome individuals in postoperative CRC-NDM patients with TD. For the high-risk or medium-risk subgroup, additional chemotherapy may be more advantageous for the TD-positive patients rather than radiotherapy.

ARHGAP25 expression in colorectal cancer as a biomarker associated with favorable prognosis

Although progress has been made in the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and in the systemic therapy of patients with CRC, the prognosis for advanced CRC remains poor. Our previous study demonstrated that ARHGAP25 overexpression significantly inhibits CRC cell growth, invasion and migration. However, it was not possible to evaluate and analyze the overall survival (OS) rate of patients with CRC. Thus, the discovery of relevant factors and their expression on the basis of existing research is necessary to predict the OS rate of patients with advanced CRC. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to define the value of Rho GTPase-activating protein 25 (ARHGAP25) expression in predicting the OS rate in patients with CRC. The clinical data of 153 patients with CRC who underwent colorectal resection were retrospectively analyzed. In order to explore the expression of ARHGAP25, immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor tissues of these patients, was performed. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the prognostic value of ARHGAP25 expression for OS. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the effect of ARHGAP25 expression in the presence of other variables. Confounding factors and interaction were assessed by a stratified analysis using ARHGAP25 expression and other variables associated with survival. The univariate analysis revealed that, ARHGAP25 expression was associated with an improved OS in patients with CRC (P<0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed that ARHGAP25 expression was still correlated with an improved OS after adjusting for sex, age, invasion degree, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, TNM stage, tumor location, histological type, histological grade, tumor deposits, and postoperative treatment (P<0.05). The stratified analysis demonstrated that the predictive value of ARHGAP25 for the OS of patients with CRC was stronger in males, elderly patients (>70 years old), patients with T3 stage tumor, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage III, right hemicolon location and patients with a poorly differentiated tumor (P<0.05). Overall, our results demonstrated that ARHGAP25 may have an important potential value for improving the prognosis of patients with CRC.

Prognostic value of tumor deposits for long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The presence of tumor deposits (TDs) in colorectal cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. In patients with the concomitant presence of both TDs and lymph nodes (LNs), there is no staging option except for the number of positive LNs alone. Therefore, to determine the prognostic value of TDs in patients with stage III colorectal cancer, meta-analyses of survival outcomes of patients with TDs were performed comparing different subgroups based on the lymph node status.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Data were pooled, and overall effect size was calculated using random-effect models. Outcome measures were 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

We included in the analysis 18 nonrandomized studies and 1 prospective study that examined 90,455 patients. N1c patients (TD + LN-) had worse 5-year DFS than TDs-negative stage III patients (TD-LN +) with a RR of 1.30 (95% CI 1.06-1.61, I² = 47%). In subgroup analysis, N1c patients had worse 5-year DFS (RR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.25-2.05, I² = 40%) compared with TDs-negative N1 patients (TD-N1) whereas N1c patients had better 5-year OS (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.62-0.83, I² = 0%) and 5-year DFS (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.57-0.99, I² = 0%) compared with TDs-negative N2 patients (TD-N2).

CONCLUSIONS

These results may suggest that current nodal staging for colorectal cancer needs modification. The presence of TDs may have more adverse oncologic outcomes than TDs-negative N1 patients. More studies are warranted to further verify these results.

Scatter patterns in lymph node metastases as a novel prognostic indicator in patients with stage III/N2 colorectal cancer

To classify patients with stage III/N2 colorectal cancer into high- and low-risk groups for recurrence, the present study compared clinicopathological features by immunohistochemical staining. The single-center analysis included 53/668 patients (7.9%) with stage III/N2 colorectal cancer who underwent radical resection between January 2006 and December 2014. The present study examined cancer cell distribution in metastatic lymph nodes and classified patients into a group with circumferential localization patterns like a cystic mass (CLP) and a group with scatter patterns like fireworks (SPF). Subsequently, 5-year relapse-free survival (5Y-RFS) and 5-year overall survival (5Y-OS) rates were compared and the histological type (differentiation degree) of the primary adenocarcinoma was included. The CLP group included 16 patients (30.2%) and the SPF group included 37 patients (69.8%). The 5Y-RFS rates in these groups were 75.0 vs. 37.8%, respectively (P=0.021), and the 5Y-OS rates were 81.3 vs. 48.6% (P=0.033). Patient clinicopathological characteristics exhibited no significant differences between groups. The adenocarcinoma was well differentiated in 14 patients (Well; 26.4%) and moderately (Mod; n=37) or poorly (Por; n=2) differentiated in 39 patients (Mod+Por; 73.6%). Patients were further classified into four groups: Well/CLP (n=6), Well/SPF (n=8), Mod+Por/CLP (n=10) and Mod+Por/SPF (n=29). For Well/CLP vs. Well/SPF, the 5Y-RFS rates were 66.7 vs. 25.0%, respectively (P=0.293), and for Mod+Por/CLP vs. Mod+Por/SPF (80.0 vs. 41.4%; P=0.052), the respective values for 5Y-OS were 66.7 vs. 50.0% (P=0.552) and 90.0 vs. 48.3% (P=0.059). Based on the aforementioned results, the CLP group was considered a low-risk group for recurrence with a relatively good prognosis; however, the SPF group was considered a high-risk group for recurrence with a poor prognosis, suggesting a need for more potent multi-combination chemotherapy in these patients from the early postoperative period.

Comparison of model fit and discriminatory ability of the 8th edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification and the 9th edition of the Japanese classification to identify stage III colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The most widely accepted staging system for colorectal cancer (CRC) is the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. In Japan, the Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma (JCCRC) system is used. The two systems differ mainly in relation to tumor deposits (TD) and metastasis in the regional lymph nodes along the main feeding arteries and lateral pelvic lymph nodes (N3). Here, we investigated the prognostic ability of the two systems for stage III CRC.

METHODS

We reviewed 696 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection of stage III CRC at the National Cancer Center Hospital between May 2007 and April 2014. We examined the clinicopathological features of CRC and predicted overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) according to the 8th TNM and 9th JCCRC systems. The systems were compared using Akaike's information criterion (AIC), Harrell's concordance index (C-index), and time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

The 9th JCCRC system was more clinically effective according to AIC (OS, 1199 vs. 1206; RFS, 2047 vs. 2057), showed better discriminatory ability according to the C-index (OS, 0.65 vs. 0.62; RFS, 0.62 vs. 0.58), and its time-dependent ROC curve was superior compared with the 8th TNM system.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the 9th JCCRC system has superior discriminative ability to the 8th TNM system, because the 9th JCCRC accounts for the presence of TD and N3 disease, which were both significant predictors of poor prognosis. Reconsidering the clinical value of these two factors in the TNM system could improve its clinical significance.

Comparison of Short-term Results after Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Standard Colectomy for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Analysis of a Western Center Cohort

Purpose

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) right colectomy is a technically demanding procedure infrequently employed in Western centers. This retrospective cohort study aims to analyze the safety of laparoscopic CME colectomy compared to standard colectomy for right-sided colon cancer in a Western series.

Methods

Prospectively collected data from 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic CME right colectomy were compared to the ones of 55 patients who underwent laparoscopic standard right colectomy.

Results

No differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the CME and standard right colectomy groups. No differences were demonstrated in terms of blood loss (P = 0.060), intraoperative complications (P = 1), conversion rate (P = 0.102), and operative time (P = 0.473). No deaths were observed in either group, while complication rate was 40.0% in the CME and 49.1% in the standard group (P = 0.353). Severe complications occurred in 10.0% vs. 9.1% (P = 0.842), redo surgery in 5.0% vs. 7.3% (P = 0.708), and unplanned readmission in 5.0% vs. 5.5% (P = 1) after CME and standard colectomy, respectively. A significant difference in favor of CME was observed in the total length of specimen (P < 0.001), proximal (P = 0.018), and distal margins (P = 0.037). The number of lymph nodes harvested was significantly higher in the CME group (27 vs. 22, P = 0.037).

Conclusion

In Western series, where patients have less favorable clinical characteristics, laparoscopic CME allows to obtain better quality surgical specimens and comparable short-term outcomes compared to standard right colectomy.

The prognostic significance of tumor deposits in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Background

A tumor deposit (TD) is a phenomenon that has not been well studied in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but might have prognostic significance. The present study was conducted to explore the presence and the prognostic significance of TDs in patients with HNSCCs.

Methods

Six hundred forty-two pathologically confirmed HNSCC patients with neck dissection samples were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were followed up and evaluated every 3 months in the first 3 years after surgery, and every 6 months thereafter by physical examination and computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The five-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared in the TD and non-TD groups using multivariable analyses and propensity score matching (PSM) methodology (1:1).

Results

The 5-year OS, DSS, and RFS rate of all patients was 77.3%, 80.6%, and 71.9%, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, poorer rates of OS (HR =2.345, P<0.001), DSS (HR =2.818, P<0.001), and RFS (HR =2.536, P<0.001) were observed in the TD versus the non-TD group. In the PSM cohort, eighty-one patients who had TDs were paired with 70 patients without TDs. Significantly diminished rates of DSS (P=0.040) and RFS (P=0.004) were found in the TD versus the non-TD group.

Conclusions

In response to sparse reports regarding TDs in HNSCCs, the present study proposes the TD as an independent poor prognostic factor meriting further research because of its association with diminished OS, DSS, and RFS rates.

Utility of texture analysis on T2-weighted MR for differentiating tumor deposits from mesorectal nodes in rectal cancer patients, in a retrospective cohort

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the utility of MR texture analysis for differentiating tumor deposits from mesorectal nodes in rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pretreatment MRI of 40 patients performed between 2006 and 2018 with pathologically proven tumor deposits and/or malignant nodes in the setting of rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 25 tumor deposits (TDs) and 71 positive lymph nodes (LNs) were analyzed for morphological and first-order texture analysis features on T2-weighted axial images. MR morphological features (lesion shape, size, signal heterogeneity, contrast enhancement) were analyzed and agreed in consensus by two experienced radiologists followed by assessment with Fisher's exact test. Texture analysis of the lesions was performed using TexRAD, a proprietary software algorithm. First-order texture analysis features (mean, standard deviation, skewness, entropy, kurtosis, MPP) were obtained after applying spatial scaling filters (SSF; 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Univariate analysis was performed with non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. The results of univariate analysis were reassessed with generalized estimating equations followed by multivariate analysis. Using histopathology as a gold standard, diagnostic accuracy was assessed by obtaining area under the receiver operating curve.

RESULTS

MR morphological parameter, lesion shape was a strong discriminator between TDs and LNs with a p value of 0.02 (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI of 0.66 to 0.84, SE: 0.06) and sensitivity, specificity of 90% and 68%, respectively. Skewness extracted at fine filter (SSF-2) was the only significant texture analysis parameter for distinguishing TDs from LNs with p value of 0.03 (AUC: 0.70, 95% CI of 0.59 to 0.79, SE: 0.06) and sensitivity, specificity of 70% and 72%, respectively. When lesion shape and skewness-2 were combined into a single model, the diagnostic accuracy was improved with AUC of 0.82 (SE: 0.05, 95% CI of 0.72 to 0.88 with p value of < 0.01). This model also showed a high sensitivity of 91% with specificity of 68%.

CONCLUSION

Lesion shape on MR can be a useful predictor for distinguishing TDs from positive LNs in rectal cancer patients. When interpreted along with MR texture parameter of skewness, accuracy is further improved.

Association of KRAS mutation with tumor deposit status and overall survival of colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To examine associations of KRAS mutation with tumor deposit status and overall survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with incidental CRC diagnosed during 2010-2014 and recorded statuses of KRAS and tumor deposit in the National Cancer Database of the USA. Multivariable logistic regression and time-varying Cox regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

We included 45,761 CRC patients with KRAS status (24,027 [52.5%] men, 24,240 [53.0%] < 65 years old, 17,338 [37.9%] with KRAS mutation). Adjusted for microsatellite instability, age, pathologic stage and tumor grade, KRAS mutation (versus wild type) was associated with tumor deposit presence (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20). KRAS mutation was also linked to worse overall survival of CRC patients regardless of tumor deposit status (adjusted Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.33 for CRC with tumor deposits, and adjusted HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35 or CRC without) or tumor stage (adjusted HR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.14-1.54 for early-stage and adjusted HR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.10-1.27 for late-stage). Microsatellite instability was associated with better overall survival in CRC without tumor deposit (adjusted HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.99), but not in CRC with tumor deposit (adjusted HR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.97-1.30).

CONCLUSION

KRAS mutation is independently associated with tumor deposit presence and a worse overall survival in CRC patients.

Tumor Deposits in Stage III Colon Cancer: Correlation With Other Histopathologic Variables, Prognostic Value, and Risk Stratification-Time to Consider "N2c"

Objectives:

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for stage III colon cancer define low-risk versus high-risk patients based on T (1 to 3 vs. 4) and N (1 vs. 2) status, with some variations in treatment. This study analyzes the impact of tumor deposits (TDs), T and N status, poor differentiation (PD), perineural invasion (PNI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) on survival.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective analysis (2010-2015) of the National Cancer Database of stage III colon cancer patients treated with both surgery and chemotherapy was conducted. Data was extracted on sex, race, age at diagnosis, Charlson-Deyo Score, histopathologic variables, and survival rates. Statistical analysis used the test of proportions, log-rank test for Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results:

For the 42,901 patients analyzed, 5-year survival rates were similar for LN⁺TD⁻ (59.8%) and LN⁻TD⁺ (58.2%), but significantly worse for LN⁺TD⁺ (41.5%) (P<0.001). The presence of LN⁺TD⁺ was more often associated with T4 (36.9%), N2 (55.1%), PD⁺ (37.4%), PNI⁺ (34.5%), and LVI⁺ (69.1%), than LN⁺TD⁻ or LN⁻TD⁺ (P<0.001). The hazard ratios for each variable were: TD: 1.34; T4: 1.71; N2: 1.44; PD⁺: 1.37; PNI: 1.11; LVI⁺: 1.18. LN⁻ patients with ≥3 TD⁺ (N1c) had worse overall survival than those with 1 to 2 TD⁺ (P<0.01), but similar to ≥4 LN⁺TD⁻ (N2) and 1 to 3 LN⁺TD⁺ (N1a-b). In our model, 5-year survival ranged from 23.4% for high-risk to 78.1% for low-risk patients (P<0.001).

Conclusion:

This National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis offers greater risk stratification and may prompt consideration of changes in American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification (N2c, in addition to N1c) to reflect the different prognosis and guide management, as well as survivorship strategies, for TD⁺ stage III colon cancer patients.

The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery

Background

The prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) count in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been rarely evaluated. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of TD count and finding out the optimal cutoff point of TD count to differentiate the prognoses of TD-positive CRC patients.

Method

Patients diagnosed with CRC from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, were analyzed. X-tile program was used to identify the optimal cutoff point of TD count in training cohort, and a validation cohort was used to test this cutoff point after propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk factors of survival.

Results

X-tile plots identified 3 (P < 0.001) as the optimal cutoff point of TD count to divide the patients of training cohort into high and low risk subsets in terms of disease-specific survival (DSS). This cutoff point was validated in validation cohort before and after PSM (P < 0.001, P = 0.002). More TD count, which was defined as more than 3, was validated as an independent risk prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

More TD count (TD count ≥ 4) was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival in CRC patients.

The unique prognostic characteristics of tumor deposits in colorectal cancer patients

Background

Both AJCC 7th and 8th TNM systems have included tumor deposits (TDs) in nodal staging when lymph nodes metastases (LNMs) are negative in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the prognostic role of TDs has not been determined in the presence of positive LNMs.

Methods

Two independent large-scale cohorts of CRC patients from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (n=69,178) [2010-2013] and Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) (n=3,137) [2010-2014] were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival curves and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

TDs were observed in 12.3% (n=8,480) and 14.8% (n=463) of patients in the SEER and FUSCC cohorts, respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested TDs were an independent adverse prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) (P<0.001). Remarkably, both cohorts showed the presence of TDs was significantly associated with OS, but not was the number of TDs (P=0.982 and P=0.252 for the SEER and FUSCC cohorts, respectively). In the presence of LNMs, positive TDs were associated with a shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR): 2.69, 95.0% confidence interval (CI): 2.597-2.778; P<0.001]. Further analysis combining TDs with LNMs demonstrated that the prognosis of patients with N1TD (N1 with positive TDs) was same as the N2 patients, and N2TD (N2 with positive TDs) patients had much worse prognosis than N2 (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Our results have shown the unique features of TDs in patients with CRC, different from LNMs. In the presence of LNMs, TDs should also be considered in TMN system.

The usefulness of the status of extranodal tumor extension as a factor that can predict the recurrence of stage III colorectal cancer

Background: Extranodal tumor extension (ENTE) is considered a poor prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for recurrence according to ENTE status in stage III CRC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 169 consecutive stage III CRC patients. All patients underwent a curative resection between 2005 and 2010. The presence or absence of ENTE was assessed in the resected lymph nodes. Results: ENTE was observed in 65 (38.5%). Recurrence occurred in 38 patients (22.5%) and was more frequent (p = .041) in the ENTE (+) group. Disease-free survival (p = .016) was significantly shorter in the ENTE (+) group than in the ENTE (-) group. In a univariable analysis, recurrence was associated with vascular invasion (p = .006), perforation (p = .024) in the ENTE (-) group and perforation (p = .048) in the ENTE (+) group. In a Cox's regression test, vascular invasion (p = .014) and the higher ratio of metastatic lymph nodes/total removed lymph nodes (MLN/TLN) (0.009) in the ENTE (-) group and perforation (p = .025) in the ENTE (+) group were independent risk factors of recurrence. Conclusions: Vascular invasion and the higher ratio of MLN/TLN in ENTE (-) patients and perforation in ENTE (+) patients were independent risk factors of recurrence.

Feasibility of relatively low neoadjuvant radiation doses for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is part of the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Although various options for modifying preoperative radiotherapy protocols have been researched and proposed, there is still no consensus as to the most appropriate dose regimen of neoadjuvant therapy for this disease.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of relatively low-dose radiation regimens on tumor regression and clinical outcomes in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by mesorectal excision.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in our hospital from June 2010 to December 2015. A total of 259 consecutive patients were enrolled, receiving 42 to 44 Gy (RLD, n = 31), 46 Gy (SD1, n = 69), or 50 Gy (SD2, n = 159) of CRT, combined with either capecitabine/oxaliplatin or capecitabine only or mFOLFOX6, followed by total mesorectal excision. A 1:4 propensity score matching was employed, and all patients in the RLD group were matched with 124 patients in the SD2 group. Rates of pCR, 3-year local/regional recurrence (LRR), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in the RLD group were all not significantly different (0.313 for pCR; 0.884 for LRR; and 0.762 for OS; 0.101 for DFS) from those in SD1 and SD2 groups. The RLD group showed a lower incidence of grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity than SD2 group (0.019). A propensity score analysis demonstrated no significant differences in the pCR rates and 3-year outcomes between the RLD and SD2 group.

CONCLUSION

Relatively low-dose regimen (≤44 Gy) of neoadjuvant CRT combined with standard concurrent chemotherapy appears to be both safe and effective in Chinese patients with LARC. Further testing by prospective randomized trials is needed.

Significance of SATB2 expression in colon cancer and its differential diagnosis in digestive tract adenocarcinoma and ovarian primary and metastatic carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To study the relationship between the expression of SATB2 in colonic adenocarcinoma and clinicopathological factors, and its role in the identification of ovarian digestive system metastatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the expression of SATB2 in 130 cases of colon adenocarcinoma, 46 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma, 47 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 22 cases of cholangiocarcinoma, 53 cases of ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma, and 38 cases of ovarian metastasis of colorectal carcinoma. Data was analyzed using SPSS 16.0 statistical software.

RESULTS

The positive expression rate of SATB2 in 130 cases of colon adenocarcinoma was 73.85% (96/130). The expression rate of SATB2 was significantly higher in well -moderately differentiated colon adenocarcinoma than in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (p<0.05); the expression rate was significantly higher in cases without tumor deposits than in cases with tumor deposits (p<0.05). The positive expression rate of SATB2 in ovarian metastases of colorectal adenocarcinoma was 81.58% (31/38). No positive expression of SATB2 was observed in other cancers.

CONCLUSION

Loss of expression of SATB2 is associated with poor differentiation of primary colon cancer and the formation of tumor deposits. SATB2 provides an ideal diagnostic marker for clinical surgeons to choose the right treatment plan.

Stage I-III colon cancer patients with tumor deposits behave similarly to stage IV patients. Cross-section analysis of 392 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tumor deposits (TDs) are associated with adverse prognostic factors and decreased survival in colorectal cancer. However, controversy exists regarding their definition, evaluation, and staging categories. This study aimed to determine the survival and recurrence impact of the TD in colon adenocarcinomas; and to determine if TD patients behave similarly to stage IV patients.

METHODS

Cross-section study from 392 patients with colon adenocarcinoma from 2005 to 2012. We performed survival analysis and further stratified patients considering TD patients as a "stage IV-TD" to demonstrate if they behave similarly than stage IV patients.

RESULTS

From 392 patients, 204 (52%) were men, the mean age was 57.4 ± 13.9 years and 11.5% of cases had TD. In a multivariate analysis, TD failed to predict mortality and recurrence. Considering cases with TD as stage IV-TD, their mean survival was similar to stage IV patients (69.3 and 64.6 months, respectively) and different to those in stage III (110.5 months), II (135.7 months), and I (114.9 months) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TD failed to predict mortality and recurrence. Patients with TD in stage I-III shows similar mortality than stage IV patients; then, we suggest putting them into a substage IV category instead of the N1c category.

Poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Tumor deposit (TD) was associated with poor survival in colorectal cancer. However, its prognostic and staging value in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo‐CRT) is controversial. Four hundred and ninety‐five LARC patients following neo‐CRT and surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression in all lymph node (LN) ‐negative and LN‐positive patients. Next, we used three methods to classify the counts of LNs and TDs (oN, only LN counts; n1N, counts according to the N1c standards; n2N, total counts of LNs and TDs) to evaluate the impact of TD on N staging. TD‐positive patients were associated with more aggressive clinicopathological features. In multivariate analyses, TD was an independent poor prognostic factor of overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), and local recurrence‐free survival in all patients. In LN‐negative patients, TD was an independent poor prognostic factor of OS, DFS and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS). In LN‐positive patients, TD has poor prognostic value only in patients with one positive LN. Three multivariate analyses according to three N staging methods showed that oN was not an independent prognostic factor, whereas n1N and n2N were independently associated with poor survival in OS, DFS and DMFS. The n2N method seemed to be better than n1N method. TD is an independent poor prognostic factor in LARC patients following neo‐CRT, especially in patients with no more than one positive LN. TD probably should be considered as one positive LN when performing N staging.

A Review of Current Challenges in Colorectal Cancer Reporting

Context.—

Pathologic assessment of colorectal cancer resection specimens plays an important role in postsurgical management and prognostication in patients with colorectal cancer. Challenges exist in the evaluation and reporting of these specimens, either because of difficulties in applying existing guidelines or related to newer concepts.

Objective.—

To address challenging areas in colorectal cancer pathology and to provide an overview of the literature, current guidelines, and expert recommendations for the handling of colorectal cancer resection specimens in everyday practice.

Data Sources.—

PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) literature review; reporting protocols of the College of American Pathologists, the Royal College of Pathologists of the United Kingdom, and the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum; and classification manuals of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control.

Conclusions.—

This review has addressed issues and challenges affecting quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting. High-quality pathology reporting is essential for prognostication and management of patients with colorectal cancer.

Tumor deposit is an independent prognostic indicator in patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer

Background: Tumor deposits are one of the promising factors among the different edition of Tumor, Node, Metastasis classification. Despite improvement in the treatment of various types of metastatic disease the source and prognostic significance of tumor deposits in staging has not been deliberating the agreeable opinion. We investigated the possibility of tumor deposit as independent prognostic factor and evaluating its prognostic value in colorectal carcinoma patients. Methods: Author studied 313 colorectal cancer patients clinocopathological data and outcome who underwent radical resection. Data between 2011-2015 were retrospectively collected from Shanghai East Hospital, affiliated with Tongji University data information centre. The analysis was used to calculate 2 years disease free survival(DFS) and relation of tumor deposit with number of lymph node positive. Cox-regression analysis was performed to assess the prognostic factor. Results: Out of 313 colorectal patients included in the study, tumor deposits were detected in 17%. Tumor deposits (TDs) are relevantly associated with significant poor outcomes. The tumor deposit were significantly correlated with T-stage(P=<0.001), N-stage(P=<0.001), PLNC(P=<0.001), venous invasion(P=<0.001), TNM staging(P=<0.001), CEA(P=0.021) and CA19-9(P=0.042) of primary tumor. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that disease-free survival of CRC patients with positive tumor deposit were significantly poorer that those with negative tumor deposit cohort(P=<0.001) And with multivariate analysis in different model, we found that positive tumor deposit were significantly associated with shorter DSF which is totally independent with lymph node status (P=0.001 and P=0.023 respectively). Subgroup analysis found that of 179 CRC patients with negative lymph node status, the DFS of patients with positive tumor deposit were significantly shorter that those with negative tumor deposit(P=,0.001). Of 134patients with positive lymph node status, the DFS of patients shows similar result. (P=<0.001). Conclusion: We have shown that TDs are not equal to lymph node metastasis with respect to biology and outcome. Tumor deposits are an independent adverse prognostic factor in CRC patient who have undergone radical resection.

Prognostic value and characteristics of N1c colorectal cancer

AIM

The presence of tumour deposits (TDs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with poor prognosis. The seventh edition of TNM subclassified a new nodal stage, N1c, characterized by the presence of TDs without any concurrent positive lymph node (LN). It is not clear if the N1c category is or is not equal to LN metastasis. We aimed to examine the prevalence, characteristics and prognostic significance of this new subcategory.

METHOD

Consecutive patients who underwent surgery for CRC in two centres (2011-2014) were analysed. N1 cM0 patients were matched against non-N1 cM0 (N0, N1a and N1b) patients for 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

We identified 1122 patients with 648 (57.8%) colonic cancers. In 57 patients (5.1%), N1c status was associated with rectal cancers [rectum = 33/57 (57.9%) vs colon = 24/57 (42.1%); P = 0.029], a higher pathological tumour stage [pT3-T4 N1c = 55/843 (6.5% vspT3-T4 non-N1c = 2/279 (0.7%); P < 0.0001] and vascular emboli [n = 35 (61.4%) vs n = 552 (51.8%); P = 0.0305]. Synchronous metastasis was observed in 23 cases (40%). After a mean follow-up of 31 months, 3-year OS for M0 patients, was 89.4%, 89.1%, 86.6% and 81.8% for N0, N1a, N1b and N1c tumours, respectively. DFS was significantly worse for N1c than for N0 (P = 0.0169), with N1c status having a significant effect on DFS in colonic cancers (P = 0.014). The presence of more than one TD was associated with a significantly worse DFS (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that N1c CRC patients should be included among high-risk patients for whom it is widely accepted that adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered.

Impact of Tumor Deposits on Oncologic Outcomes in Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of tumor deposits in stage III colon adenocarcinoma is poorly described.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of tumor deposits on oncologic outcomes in patients with stage III colon cancer.

DESIGN

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The 2010 to 2014 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with resected stage III colon adenocarcinoma on final pathology.

PATIENTS

Patients were divided into 3 groups: lymph nodes+tumor deposits-, lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, and lymph nodes-tumor deposits+.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was 5-year overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 74,577 patients, there were 55,800 patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits-, 13,740 patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, and 5037 patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+. The groups had similar patient and facility characteristics, but patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had more advanced tumor characteristics. Patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ were less likely to receive adjuvant systemic therapy (52% vs 74% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- and 75% lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, p < 0.001) and had a longer delay to initiation of adjuvant treatment (>8 weeks; 43% vs 33% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- and 33% lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, p < 0.001). Patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had the lowest 5-year overall survival (46.0% vs 63.4% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- vs 61.9% lymph nodes-tumor deposits+, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ had similar 5-year overall survival compared with patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits- with ≤3 positive lymph nodes (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-1.01). Patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had worse prognosis regardless of the number of involved lymph nodes (≤3 +lymph nodes: HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.28-1.47 and ≥4 +lymph nodes: HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.22-1.38). Of those not receiving adjuvant treatment, patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ were younger and had more adverse tumor features than lymph node+ disease. Lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ was independently associated with less delivery of adjuvant systemic therapy (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.82).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective analysis of a prospective database.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with N1c disease is similar to nodal involvement without tumor deposits, yet these patients were less likely to receive adjuvant systemic therapy. Improvement in the delivery of appropriate care in these patients may increase survival and should be a target of future quality initiatives. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A666.

Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposits in Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer includes extranodal tumor deposits in the tumor-node-metastasis classification of colon cancer. However, it is unclear how tumor deposits compare with lymph node metastases in prognostic significance. This study evaluated the survival impact of tumor deposits relative to lymph node metastases in stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

The US National Cancer Database (2010-2012) was reviewed for resectable stage III adenocarcinoma of the colon, and stratified by presence of tumor deposits and lymph node metastases. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 6424, 10.1% had both tumor deposits and lymph node metastases [5-year survival (5YS) 40.2%], 2.5% had tumor deposits alone (5YS 68.1%), and 87.4% had lymph node metastases alone (5YS 55.4%). Patients with lymph node metastases alone tended to have a greater number of lymph nodes retrieved (20.9 versus 18.8, p = 0.0126) and were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy (66.9 vs 58.0%, p = 0.003) than those with only tumor deposits. Patients with both had significantly worse survival at all T stages (p < 0.05, all). There was no significant difference in survival between tumor deposits alone and lymph node metastases alone at any T stage (p > 0.8, all). After controlling for patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, patients with tumor deposits alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, p = 0.001] or only lymph node metastases (HR 0.64, p < 0.001) were associated with improved survival relative to patients with both.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant presence of tumor deposits and lymph node invasion carries poor prognostic significance. Tumor deposits alone appear to have prognostic implications similar to lymph node invasion alone.

Newly recognized extratumoral features of colorectal cancer challenge the current tumor-node-metastasis staging system

One of the most common malignant tumors in humans, colorectal cancer has been extensively studied during the past few decades. Staging colorectal cancer allows clinicians to obtain precise prognostic information and apply specific treatment procedures. Apart from remote metastases, the depth of tumor infiltration and lymph node involvement have traditionally been recognized as the most important factors predicting outcome. Variations in the molecular signature of colorectal cancer have also revealed differences in phenotypic aggressiveness and therapeutic response rates. This article presents a review of the extratumoral environment in colorectal surgery.

Beyond T, N and M: The impact of tumor deposits on the staging and treatment of colorectal and gastric carcinoma

This review aims to describe the results of the most recent studies on the prognostic value of TDs and highlight the impact of TDs on the staging and treatment of colorectal and gastric carcinoma. For colorectal carcinoma TDs have an adverse prognostic effect that is at least similar to that of positive regional lymph nodes. However, support is growing in favor of including of TDs in the M category, rather than the N or T categories of the TNM classification. Moreover, TDs seem to have an adverse effect on outcomes not only in patients without lymph node involvement but also in patients with nodal involvement. Although the prognostic impact of TDs in gastric cancer appears to be undeniable, the actual prognostic determinants of TDs, particularly in relation to the number, size and histological types, remain to be established. Although the 7th and 8th Edition of the TNM classification of colorectal and gastric carcinoma includes TDs in the N category, no current procedures or methods to assess preoperative or intraoperative N-status allow TD detection. After neoadjuvant treatment for advanced rectal carcinoma, the presence of TDs may indicate incomplete eradication of the main tumor and not discontinuous tumor foci. TDs have an undeniable prognostic impact but no algorithm of staging and strategy of treatment has been conformed to this prognostic factor to overcome the classical T,N, and M prognostic categories. Staging and treatment of colorectal and gastric cancers should be reconsidered in light of the emerging prognostic value of TDs.

Adjuvant treatment may benefit patients with high-risk upper rectal cancer: A nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis of 547 patients

Purpose

The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in treating patients with locally advanced upper rectal cancer (URC) after total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery remains unclear. We developed a clinical nomogram and a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA)-based risk stratification system for predicting 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) to determine whether these individuals require ACRT or ACT.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective analysis included 547 patients with primary URC. A nomogram was developed based on the Cox regression model. The performance of the model was assessed by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve in internal validation with bootstrapping. RPA stratified patients into risk groups based on their tumor characteristics.

Results

Five independent prognostic factors (age, preoperative increased carcinoembryonic antigen and carcinoma antigen 19-9, positive lymph node [PLN] number, tumor deposit [TD], pathological T classification) were identified and entered into the predictive nomogram. The bootstrap-corrected C-index was 0.757. RPA stratification of the three prognostic groups showed obviously different prognosis. Only the high-risk group (patients with PLN ≤ 6 and TD, or PLN > 6) benefited from ACRT plus ACT when compared with surgery followed by ACRT or ACT, and surgery alone (5-year CSS: 70.8% vs. 57.8% vs. 15.6%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our nomogram predicts 5-year CSS after TME surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer and RPA-based stratification indicates that ACRT plus ACT post-surgery may be an important treatment plan with potentially significant survival advantages in high-risk URC. This may help to select candidates of adjuvant treatment in prospective studies.

Radiotherapy for Patients With Resected Tumor Deposit-Positive Colorectal Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Based Population Study

CONTEXT

- According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer's Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition, TNM classification, tumor deposit (TD)-positive colorectal cancers (CRCs) are classified as N1c. The effects of radiotherapy and the effects of the updated American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition TNM N1c classification for patients with TD-positive CRC are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

- To investigate outcomes of radiotherapy in patients with resected TD-positive CRC.

DESIGN

- Resected TD-positive CRCs diagnosed from 2010 to 2014 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were investigated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

- We included 2712 qualified CRC patients, who either underwent adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 187; 6.9%) or received no radiotherapy (n = 2525; 93.1%). Univariate Cox proportional models showed improved CSS among all CRC patients who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy (CSS hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.95) and among rectal cancer patients when separated by location (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.83), although these associations were attenuated in multivariable-adjusted models. There was improved OS among rectal cancer patients (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-0.99). In subgroup analyses, radiotherapy was not associated with OS or CSS in either metastatic or nonmetastatic CRC patients. Instead, N1c category (versus N0) was associated with a worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.31-1.57) but was not associated with CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

- Radiotherapy did not independently improve OS among TD-positive CRC patients. In this study, classifying TD positivity as N1c was associated with worse OS than classifying TD positivity as N0. The findings seem to challenge the benefits of radiotherapy and the new N1c classification of TD for TD-positive CRC patients.

Time-dependent and nonlinear effects of prognostic factors in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer

The survival risk following curative surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) may be over- or underestimated due to a lack of attention to nonlinear effects and violation of the proportional hazards assumption. In this paper, we aimed to detect and interpret the shape of time-dependent and nonlinear effects to improve the predictive performance of models of prognoses in nonmetastatic CRC patients. Data for nonmetastatic CRC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 were obtained from the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results registry. Time-dependent and nonlinear effects were tested and plotted. A nonlinear model that used random survival forests was implemented. The estimated 5-year cancer-specific death rate was 17.95% (95% CI, 17.70-18.20%). Tumor invasion depth, lymph node status, age at diagnosis, tumor grade, histology and tumor site were significantly associated with cancer-specific death. Nonlinear and time-dependent effects on survival were detected. Positive lymph node number had a larger effect per unit of measurement at low values than at high values, whereas age at diagnosis showed the opposite pattern. Moreover, nonproportional hazards were detected for all covariates, indicating that the contributions of these risks to survival outcomes decreased over time. The nonlinear model predicted prognoses more accurately (C-index: 0.7934, 0.7933-0.7934) than did the Fine and Gray model (C-index: 0.7550, 0.7510-0.7583). The three-dimensional cumulative incidence curves derived from nonlinear model were used to identify the change points of the risk trends. It would be useful to implement these findings in treatment plans and follow-up surveillance in nonmetastatic CRC patients.

Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer: Improving the Value of Modern Staging-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is largely determined by tumor stage. Despite improvements made in the treatment of various types of metastatic disease, staging has not been refined. The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in staging remains debated. We have assessed the relation of TDs with metastatic pattern to evaluate whether TDs might add significant new information to staging. Methods We performed a systematic literature search that was focused on the role of TDs in CRC. Studies with neoadjuvant-treated patients were excluded. Data on stage, histologic factors, and outcome were extracted. Data from four large cohorts were analyzed for the relevance of the presence of TDs, lymph node metastases (LNMs), and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) on the pattern of metastases and outcomes. Results Of 10,106 included patients with CRC, 22% presented with TDs. TDs are invariably associated with poor outcome. Presence of TDs was associated with presence of LNMs and EMVI. In a pairwise comparison, effects of TD were stronger than those of both LNMs and EMVI. In the logistic regression model, TDs in combination with LNMs is the strongest predictor for liver (odds ratio [OR], 5.5), lung (OR, 4.3) and peritoneal metastases (OR, 7.0). Presence of EMVI adds information for liver and lung metastases, but not for peritoneal metastases. Conclusion We have shown that TDs are not equal to LNMs or EMVI with respect to biology and outcome. We lose valuable prognostic information by allocating TDs into nodal category N1c and only considering TDs in the absence of LNMs. Therefore, we propose that the number of TDs should be added to the number of LNMs to derive a final N stage.

The clinicopathologic relevance and prognostic value of tumor deposits and the applicability of N1c category in rectal cancer with preoperative radiotherapy

The clinicopathologic relevance and prognostic value of tumor deposits in colorectal cancer has been widely demonstrated. However, there are still debates in the prognostic value of tumor deposits and the applicability of N1c category in rectal cancer with preoperative radiotherapy. In this study, rectal cancer with preoperative radiotherapy followed by resection of primary tumors registered in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010-2012 were analyzed. There were 4,813 cases eligible for this study, and tumor deposits were found in 514 (10.7%) cases. The presence of tumor deposits was significantly associated with some aggressive characteristics, including poorer tumor differentiation, more advanced ypT category, ypN category and ypTNM stage, distant metastasis, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen, higher positive rates of circumferential resection margin and perineural invasion (all P < = 0.001). Tumor deposit was also an independent negative prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival in rectal cancer with preoperative radiotherapy (adjusted HR and 95% CI: 2.25 (1.51 - 3.35)). N1c category had significant worse survival compared with N0 category (adjusted HR and 95% CI: 2.41 (1.24 - 4.69)). In conclusion, tumor deposit was a significant and independent prognostic factor, and the N1c category by the 7th edition of AJCC/TNM staging system was applicable in rectal cancer with preoperative radiotherapy.

Tumor deposits in head and neck carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Tumor deposits, nodules in the peritumoral adipose tissue with no architectural residue of lymph node, have previously been described in colorectal adenocarcinomas. To date, however, there has been no examination of tumor deposits in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Neck dissection specimens of 140 patients with HNSCC were reevaluated for tumor deposits.

RESULTS

Tumor deposits were detected in 24 cases (17%). Cases with tumor deposits had more lymphatic invasion (p = .007), higher pathological N classification (p = .00), and more frequently showed distant metastasis (p = .003). Disease-free and overall survival were significantly shorter for tumor deposit positive cases (p = .016 and p = .005, respectively). Only tumor deposits were significant for overall survival. Tumor deposits increased the risk of recurrent disease 2294 times. Tumor deposits and pericapsular invasion were identified as independent prognostic markers; tumor deposits increased the risk of death from disease 3.4 times, whereas pericapsular invasion was associated with a 2.2-fold increase in the risk of death.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the existence of tumor deposits in neck dissection specimens of HNSCC and their association with poor prognosis. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E256-E260, 2016.

Management of nodal disease from colon cancer in the laparoscopic era

PURPOSE

In colon cancer (CC), nodal involvement is the main prognostic factor following potentially curative (R0) resection. The purpose of this study was to examine data from the literature to provide an up-to-date analysis of the management of nodal disease with special reference to laparoscopic treatment.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for potentially eligible studies published in English up to July 15, 2014.

RESULTS

In CC, nodal involvement is a frequent event and represents the main risk of cancer recurrence. Node negative patients recur in 10-30 % of cases most likely due to underdiagnosed or undertreated nodal disease. Extended colonic resections (complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation; D3 lymphadenectomy) provides a survival benefit and better local control. Sentinel lymph node mapping in addition to standard surgical resection represents an option for improving staging of clinical node negative patients. Both extended resection and sentinel lymph node mapping are feasible in a laparoscopic setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Both extended colonic resection and sentinel lymph node mapping should play a role in the laparoscopic treatment of CC with the purpose of improving control and staging of nodal disease.

The impact of tumor deposits on colonic adenocarcinoma AJCC TNM staging and outcome

The definition of tumor deposits (TDs) in colonic adenocarcinoma has been modified in different editions of the AJCC/TNM staging system. Studies have shown that the presence of TD is associated with advanced tumor growth and poor prognosis. Most of these data were obtained in patients with simultaneous lymph node (LN) metastases. Reports focusing on the impact of TD in patients without LN metastasis are limited. We retrospectively restaged all right-sided colonic adenocarcinomas over a 10-year period using criteria from the fifth, sixth, and seventh AJCC edition. We compared the number of tumor nodule interpreted as LN and TD in each edition and evaluated the stage migration caused by TD definition change. We then assessed clinical significance of TD in the AJCC seventh edition by comparing 5-year overall survival of N1c patients versus other N category (N0, N1, N2) patients with similar T and M status. We showed that the average number of tumor nodules interpreted as LNs per case and the number of cases with positive LNs were significantly decreased with the seventh edition compared with fifth/sixth; however, numbers of cases with TDs and <12 LNs were significantly increased with the seventh edition compared with fifth/sixth. These changes, however, resulted in minimal effects on the final stage grouping. Our survival analysis showed that N1c patients had significantly worse survival compared with N0 patients. Although not statistically significant, the hazard ratios indicated that the N1c group might have worse survival than the N1 group and better survival than the N2 group. Therefore, we conclude that TDs predict patient outcome at least similarly to positive LNs.

Tumor deposit is a poor prognostic indicator in patients who underwent simultaneous resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Tumor deposits are one of the important influencing factors among the different editions of Tumor, Node, Metastasis classification. Incidence and prognosis of tumor deposits in stage I, II, and III colorectal cancer patients has been explored. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of tumor deposits in stage IV colorectal cancer patients who underwent simultaneous resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM).

METHODS

Clinicopathological and outcome data of 146 consecutive SCRLM patients who underwent simultaneous R0 resection between July 2003 and July 2013 were collected from our prospectively established SCRLM database. The prognostic value of tumor deposits was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Tumor deposits were detected in 41.8% (61/146) of these SCRLM patients. Tumor deposits were significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis and nerve invasion of the primary tumors (P=0.002, P=0.041; respectively). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of SCRLM patients with tumor deposits were significantly poorer than those with no tumor deposits (P=0.039, P=0.001; respectively). And with multivariate analysis, we found that positive tumor deposits were significantly associated with shorter DFS independent of lymph node status (P=0.002). Subgroup analysis found that of the 57 SCRLM patients with negative lymph node status, the OS and DFS of patients with positive tumor deposits were significantly shorter than those with negative tumor deposits (P=0.002 and P=0.031, respectively). Of the 89 patients with positive lymph node status, the OS of patients with tumor deposits was not significantly different than those without tumor deposits (P=0.965); however, the DFS of patients with tumor deposits was significantly shorter than those with no tumor deposits (P=0.034).

CONCLUSION

Tumor deposits may be an independent adverse prognostic factor in SCRLM patients who underwent simultaneous R0 resection.