1
|
Cortes-Mejia NA, Lillemoe HA, Cata JP. Return to Intended Oncological Therapy: State of the Art and Perspectives. Curr Oncol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11912-024-01594-7. [PMID: 39320576 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01594-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW Despite advances in surgical procedures, cancer recurrence still affects a substantial proportion of patients for whom surgery is considered a curative therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RIOT, addressing its definition, influencing factors, and clinical implications. FINDINGS RIOT can be defined as a continuous variable as the time from surgery to initiation of adjuvant therapies or categorically as whether patients can successfully receive adjuvant therapies or not. Factors influencing RIOT are age, sex, socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, physical performance and comorbidities, and quality of anesthesia and surgical care. Adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy are often administered to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgery and improve survival. Return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) has emerged as a promising outcome metric reflecting patients' functional recovery after surgery and their ability to receive adjuvant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas A Cortes-Mejia
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather A Lillemoe
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA.
- Department of Pain Medicine, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maeda S, Ouchi A, Komori K, Kinoshita T, Sato Y, Muro K, Taniguchi H, Masuishi T, Ito S, Abe T, Shimizu Y. Risk factors affecting delay of initiating adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:1293-1301. [PMID: 38904888 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02567-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been reported to lead to poor prognosis, but few studies have looked at associated factors. This study aimed to identify risk factors for delay in initiating AC. METHODS Data from 200 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection and AC for stage III CRC between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS AC was initiated more than 8 weeks after surgery in 12.5% of patients (the delay group). Compared to those with no delay (the non-delay group), patients in the delay group had significantly higher rates of synchronous double cancers (2.3% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.001), preoperative bowel obstruction (10.3% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.003), laparotomy (56.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.02), concomitant resection (2.9% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001), and postoperative complications (32.0% vs. 56.0%, p = 0.02), and a significantly longer length of hospital stay (median 12 vs. 30 days, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, synchronous double cancers (odds ratio 10.2, p = 0.008), preoperative bowel obstruction (odds ratio 4.6, p = 0.01), concomitant resection (odds ratio 5.2, p = 0.03), and postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa (odds ratio 4.0, p = 0.03) were identified as independent risk factors for delay in initiating AC. CONCLUSION Careful preoperative treatment planning for CRC patients with synchronous double cancers, preoperative bowel obstruction, and concomitant resection, and management for postoperative complication are necessary to avoid delay in initiating AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shingo Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Akira Ouchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
| | - Koji Komori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takashi Kinoshita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kei Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroya Taniguchi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Toshiki Masuishi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Seiji Ito
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Abe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng H, Chen J, Jia G, Liang Y, Li Y, Chen Y, Lin J, Wang P, Chen Q, Tang L, Mai H, Liu L. Determining the optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. ESMO Open 2024; 9:103707. [PMID: 39255536 PMCID: PMC11415671 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies on several malignancies have suggested that the time to commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is associated with survival outcomes. There have, however, been no relevant reports of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This clinical study examined newly diagnosed patients between April 2017 and December 2020. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to control for confounding factors. Cox models with restricted cubic splines, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the relationship between AC timing and survival. RESULTS A total of 551 patients were identified [median age, 45 years (interquartile range 36-52 years); 383 (69.5%) male]. Restricted cubic splines demonstrated that the timing of AC initiation had a U-shaped association with PFS. The risk of disease progression decreased within 37 days and subsequently increased. From 37 to 90 days, each additional 7-day delay conferred worse PFS of 1.32 months {hazard ratio (HR): 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.28], P = 0.04}. The cut-off value of the receiver operating characteristic curve for initiation was 69.5 days. At a median follow-up of 48 months, the PFS was significantly better in patients initiated within 69.5 days [HR: 2.18 (95% CI 1.17-4.06), log-rank P = 0.009], with a higher 3-year rate [78.8% (95% CI 75.1% to 82.7%) versus 59.0% (95% CI 42.2% to 82.5%)] than beyond 69.5 days. Positive results were also observed in secondary endpoints. The initiation group was an independent prognostic factor [HR: 2.28 (95% CI 1.42-3.66), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS The optimal timing of AC initiation is ∼37 days after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A delay beyond 69.5 days is associated with compromised survival. Efforts should be made to address the reasons for delays and ensure the timely initiation of AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - J Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - G Jia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Y Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Y Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Y Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - J Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - P Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Q Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - L Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - H Mai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - L Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pointer DT, Felder SI, Powers BD, Dessureault S, Sanchez JA, Imanirad I, Sahin I, Xie H, Naffouje SA. Return to intended oncologic therapy after colectomy for stage III colon adenocarcinoma: Does surgical approach matter? Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:1760-1770. [PMID: 37553808 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
AIM Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) is an important paradigm for surgically resected cancers requiring multimodal treatment. Benefits of minimally invasive colectomy (MIC) may allow earlier initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and have associated survival benefits. We sought to determine if operative approach affects RIOT timing in resected stage III colon cancer. METHODS NCDB identified pathological stage III colon adenocarcinoma patients who underwent resection and received ACT. Propensity score matching and kernel density estimation compared operative approaches and conversion impact on intervals to RIOT. RESULTS A total of 15,132 open colectomies (OC) versus 14,107 MIC were included. MIC patients had two-days shorter median length of stay (LOS) (4 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001), one-week shorter median time to RIOT (6 vs. 7 weeks; p = 0.015) comparing 12,867 matched pairs. There was no difference in time interval to RIOT between the LC versus RC, converted MIC vs. OC groups. MIC was a favourable predictor of earlier RIOT (HR 1.14 [1.07-1.22]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION MIC in stage III colon cancer is associated with a shorter time to RIOT when compared to OC. Since timely initiation of ACT may influence cancer outcome, MIC may be oncologically preferable. Prospective studies are needed to assess RIOT and survival outcomes in stage III colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Pointer
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Seth I Felder
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Benjamin D Powers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sophie Dessureault
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Julian A Sanchez
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Iman Imanirad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ibrahim Sahin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Hao Xie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Samer A Naffouje
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang Y, Lu Y, Tan H, Bai M, Wang X, Ge S, Ning T, Zhang L, Duan J, Sun Y, Liu R, Li H, Ba Y, Deng T. The optimal time of starting adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:422. [PMID: 37161562 PMCID: PMC10170689 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10863-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is now well-accepted as standard for high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, however the optimal time to initiate AC remains elusive. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases. The Hazard ratio (HR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as an effect measure to evaluate primary endpoints. All analyses were conducted using Stata software version 12.0 with the Random-effects model. RESULTS A total of 30 studies were included in our study. Upon comparison on overall survival (OS), we identified that delaying the initiation of AC for > 8 weeks after operation was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.27-1.48; P < 0.01). The poor prognostic value of AC delay for > 8 weeks was not undermined by subgroup analysis based on region, tumor site, sample size and study quality. No obvious differences were observed in survival between AC within 5-8 weeks and ≤ 4 weeks (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96 -1.10; P = 0.46). Moreover, two studies both highlighted that the survival benefit of AC was still statistically significant when AC was applied 5-6 months after surgery compared with the non-chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS Delaying the initiation of AC for > 8 weeks after surgery was significantly associated with poor OS. AC started within 8 weeks after surgery brought more benefits to CRC patients. There were no obvious differences in survival benefits between AC within 5-8 weeks and ≤ 4 weeks. Compared to patients not receiving AC after surgery, a delay of approximately 5-6 months was still useful to improve prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchong Yang
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Yao Lu
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Hui Tan
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ming Bai
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Xia Wang
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Shaohua Ge
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Tao Ning
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Le Zhang
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Jingjing Duan
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Yansha Sun
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Rui Liu
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Hongli Li
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Yi Ba
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
- Department of Cancer Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Ting Deng
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Farzaneh CA, Pigazzi A, Duong WQ, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ, Dekhordi-Vakil F, Dayyani F, Zell JA, Jafari MD. Analysis of delay in adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:35-42. [PMID: 36042105 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02676-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection has been the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding the optimal timing of AC for rectal cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of AC timing on overall survival for rectal cancer. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2016 was queried for primary clinical stage II or III rectal cancer patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery and AC. Patients were grouped based on AC initiation: early ≤ 4 weeks, intermediate 4-8 weeks, and delayed ≥ 8 weeks. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS We identified 8722 patients, of which 905 (10.4%) received early AC, 4621 (53.0%) intermediate AC, and 3196 (36.6%) delayed AC. Pathological lymph-node metastasis (ypN +) was positive in 73% of early AC, 74% intermediate AC, and 63% delayed AC (p < 0.05). The 5-year survival probability was 71.1% (95% CI 68-74%) for early AC, 73.2% (95% CI 72-75%) intermediate AC, and 65.8% (95% CI 64-68%) delayed AC (p < 0.001). Using Cox proportional hazard modeling, patients undergoing delayed AC had an associated decreased survival compared to patients receiving early AC (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.028-1.353, p = 0.018) or intermediate AC (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.179-1.395, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Delay in AC administration may be associated with decreased 5-year survival. Compared to early or intermediate AC, patients in the delayed AC group were observed to have increased risk of death, despite having lower proportions with ypN + disease. Patients with higher socioeconomic and education status were more likely to receive early chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Farzaneh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - A Pigazzi
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell College of Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, Box #172, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - W Q Duong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - J C Carmichael
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - M J Stamos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - F Dekhordi-Vakil
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - F Dayyani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - J A Zell
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - M D Jafari
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell College of Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, Box #172, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diverting ileostomy is a risk factor for renal impairment during CAPOX therapy. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:1616-1623. [PMID: 35867198 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02217-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Temporary ileostomy is sometimes created after colorectal surgery and may cause renal impairment. However, the impact of ileostomy on renal function during adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of ileostomy on renal function during adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS We examined 184 patients who received adjuvant CAPOX therapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) for CRC with or without ileostomy between January 2011 and December 2020 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. Clinicopathological factors, including renal function, were retrospectively reviewed in association with temporary ileostomy. Factors associated with reductions in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during CAPOX therapy were analyzed. RESULTS Eighteen patients (10%) underwent temporary ileostomy. The maximum decrease in eGFR during CAPOX therapy was significantly higher in patients with than in those without ileostomy (- 16.1 vs. - 5.6 mL/min/1.73m2, p = 0.003). A multivariate analysis identified ileostomy as one of factors independently associated with reductions in eGFR during CAPOX therapy (p = 0.003). The cumulative number of readmission due to dehydration was also higher in patients with ileostomy (33% vs. 1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Ileostomy significantly reduced eGFR during adjuvant CAPOX therapy. Therefore, renal function needs to be monitored during CAPOX therapy, particularly in patients with ileostomy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cao L, Xu C, Wang MD, Qi WX, Cai G, Cai R, Wang SB, Ou D, Li M, Shen KW, Chen JY. Influence of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Timing on Survival Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatments. Front Oncol 2022; 12:905223. [PMID: 35912233 PMCID: PMC9334789 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.905223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo determine the relationship between time to radiotherapy (TTR) and survival outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant treatments (NATs).MethodsContinuous non-metastatic BC patients receiving NAT and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) from 2009 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariable Cox model with restricted cubic splines (RCSs) was used to determine the panoramic relationship between TTR and survival outcomes. Multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding factors between the groups of TTR.ResultsA total of 315 patients were included. The RCS modeling demonstrated a non-linear relationship between TTR and survival outcomes. The lowest risk for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was observed at the TTR of 12 weeks, and the lowest risk of BC-specific survival (BCSS) at 10 weeks. TTR was accordingly transformed into categorical variables as ≤10, 11–20, and >20 weeks. Multivariable analysis revealed that the TTR of ≤10 weeks was an independent prognostic factor for worse DMFS (HR = 2.294, 95% CI 1.079–4.881) and RFS (HR = 2.126, 95% CI 1.038–4.356) compared with the TTR of 10–20 weeks, while the is no difference in DMFS, RFS, and BCSS between TTR >20 weeks and TTR of 10–20 weeks.ConclusionThere exists a non-linear relationship between TTR after surgery and survival outcomes in patients treated with NAT. Early initiation of RT following surgery does not seem to be associated with a better therapeutic outcome. A relatively flexible recommendation of TTR could be adopted in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Meng-Di Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Xiang Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu-Bei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Ou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun-Wei Shen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Yi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Jia-Yi Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jo Y, Lee JH, Cho ES, Lee HS, Shin SJ, Park EJ, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kang J. Clinical Significance of Early Carcinoembryonic Antigen Change in Patients With Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:739614. [PMID: 35615159 PMCID: PMC9124957 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.739614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative, postoperative, and trajectory changes in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgical resection for nonmetastatic CRC. The optimal cutoff values of preoperative CEA (CEA-pre), early postoperative CEA (CEA-post), and CEA level change (CEA-delta) were determined to maximize the differences in overall survival (OS) among groups. The patients were divided into three groups according to CEA-trend: normal, low CEA-pre; normalized, high CEA-pre/low CEA-post; elevated, high CEA-pre/high CEA-post. The integrated area under the curve (iAUC) was used to compare the discriminatory power of all variables. Results A total of 1019 patients diagnosed with stage I–III CRC were enrolled. The optimal cutoff values of CEA level were determined as 2.3 ng/mL for CEA-pre, 2.3 ng/mL for CEA-post, and -0.93 ng/mL for CEA-delta. Although subgroup dichotomization showed that CEA-pre, CEA-post, CEA-delta, and CEA-trend were all associated with OS in univariate analysis, CEA-trend was the only independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. The iAUC of CEA-trend was superior to that of CEA-pre, CEA-post, and CEA-delta. Compared with the normal group, the normalized group showed worse OS (p=.0007) in stage II patients but similar OS (p=.067) in stage III patients. Conclusion The optimal cutoff value of CEA level in the preoperative and postoperative periods was determined to be 2.3 ng/mL, and the combination of CEA-pre and CEA-post showed better prognostic stratification. However, its prognostic significance may differ depending on the CRC stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Younghoo Jo
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae-Hoon Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun-Suk Cho
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hye Sun Lee
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Su-Jin Shin
- Department of Pathology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun Jung Park
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung Hyuk Baik
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kang Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeonghyun Kang
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- *Correspondence: Jeonghyun Kang,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu W, Li Y, Tang Y, Song Q, Wang J, Li N, Chen S, Shi J, Wang S, Li Y, Jiao Y, Zeng Y, Jin J. Response prediction and risk stratification of patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy through an analysis of circulating tumour DNA. EBioMedicine 2022; 78:103945. [PMID: 35306340 PMCID: PMC8933829 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple approaches based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have been applied to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) and to predict prognosis or recurrence. However, a comparison of the approaches used in different cohorts and studies is difficult. We aimed to compare multiple approaches for MRD analysis after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods Sixty patients with LARC from a multicentre, phase II/III randomized trial were included, with tissue and blood samples collected. For each cfDNA sample, we profiled MRD using 3 approaches: personalized assay targeting tumour-informed mutations, universal panel of genes frequently mutated in colorectal cancer (CRC), and low depth sequencing for copy number alterations (CNAs). Findings Positive MRD based on post-NAT personalized assay was significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrence (HR = 27.38; log-rank P < 0.0001). MRD analysis based on universal panel (HR = 5.18; log-rank P = 0.00086) and CNAs analysis (HR = 9.24; log-rank P = 0.00017) showed a compromised performance in predicting recurrence. Both the personalized assay and universal panel showed complementary pattern to CNAs analysis in detecting cases with recurrence and the combination of the two types of biomarkers may lead to better performance. Interpretation The combination of mutation profiling and CNA profiling can improve the detection of MRD, which may help optimize the treatment strategies for patients with LARC.
Collapse
|
11
|
Simulating the Dynamic Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Responses. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071645. [PMID: 35406417 PMCID: PMC8996855 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A tumor is a complex tissue comprised of heterogeneous cell subpopulations which exhibit substantial diversity at morphological, genetic and epigenetic levels. Under the selective pressure of cancer therapies, a minor treatment-resistant subpopulation could survive and repopulate. Therefore, the intra-tumor heterogeneity is recognized as a major obstacle to effective treatment. In this paper, we propose a stochastic clonal expansion model to simulate the dynamic evolution of tumor subpopulations and the therapeutic effect at different times during tumor progression. The model is incorporated in the CES webserver, for the convenience of simulation according to initial user input. Based on this model, we investigate the influence of various factors on tumor progression and treatment consequences and present conclusions drawn from observations, highlighting the importance of treatment timing. The model provides an intuitive illustration to deepen the understanding of temporal intra-tumor heterogeneity dynamics and treatment responses, thus helping the improvement of personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
|
12
|
Vermeulin T, Lahbib H, Lucas M, Czernichow P, Jusot F, Di Fiore F, Merle V. Are patients living far from hospital at higher risk of late adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer? Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:3903-3910. [PMID: 35293007 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Late adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) administration after colectomy (> 56 days) is known to be associated with impaired prognosis. We aim to identify risk factors associated with late aCT, especially the travel time between patients' home and hospital. METHOD We performed a retrospective monocentre cohort study. Patients included had a colectomy for a stage III or "high risk" stage II colon cancer between 2009 and 2015 performed at a French university hospital. Risk factors for late aCT were identified using a fractional polynomial logistic regression. RESULTS Ninety-four patients were included. The risk of late aCT was associated with travel time length, emergent colectomy, the need for scheduled care before aCT, and length of time between colectomy and postoperative multidisciplinary meeting advising aCT. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that, in patients with colon cancer, factors unrelated to disease severity and complexity could be associated with a higher risk of late aCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Vermeulin
- Centre Henri Becquerel, Department of Medical Information, Rouen, France.,Rouen University Hospital, Research team "Dynamique et Evénements des Soins et des Parcours", Rouen, France.,Paris sciences et lettres, Paris-Dauphine University, Leda-Legos, Paris, France
| | - Hana Lahbib
- Rouen University Hospital, Research team "Dynamique et Evénements des Soins et des Parcours", Rouen, France
| | - Mélodie Lucas
- Rouen University Hospital, Research team "Dynamique et Evénements des Soins et des Parcours", Rouen, France.,Le Havre Hospital, Le Havre, France
| | - Pierre Czernichow
- Rouen University Hospital, Research team "Dynamique et Evénements des Soins et des Parcours", Rouen, France
| | - Florence Jusot
- Paris sciences et lettres, Paris-Dauphine University, Leda-Legos, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Di Fiore
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.,Centre Henri Becquerel, Department of Oncology, Rouen, France
| | - Véronique Merle
- Rouen University Hospital, Research team "Dynamique et Evénements des Soins et des Parcours", Rouen, France.,Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, Inserm U 1086, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vogel JD, Felder SI, Bhama AR, Hawkins AT, Langenfeld SJ, Shaffer VO, Thorsen AJ, Weiser MR, Chang GJ, Lightner AL, Feingold DL, Paquette IM. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Colon Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:148-177. [PMID: 34775402 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Amy J Thorsen
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kamarajah SK, Nathan H. Strengths and Limitations of Registries in Surgical Oncology Research. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:2989-2996. [PMID: 34506025 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05094-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, there has been a dramatic increase in studies based on large multi-institutional tumor registries. Applications of such databases span various research themes including epidemiology, oncology, surgical techniques, perioperative outcomes, and prognosis. Although these databases are acquired relatively easily, offer larger sample sizes and improved generalizability compared with institutional data, acknowledging limitations within analysis and cautious interpretation of data is important. Questionable conclusions can result when insufficient attention is paid to issues such as data quality and depth, potential sources of bias and missing data. This article reviews research themes and important limitations of these databases. The contemporary reporting of these issues in the literature and an increased awareness among surgical oncologists of potential applications and limitations will ensure that studies in the surgical oncology literature achieve high standards of methodological quality and clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Hari Nathan
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- University of Michigan, 2210A Taubman Health Care Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5343, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Watson J, Ninh MK, Ashford S, Cornett EM, Kaye AD, Urits I, Viswanath O. Anesthesia Medications and Interaction with Chemotherapeutic Agents. Oncol Ther 2021; 9:121-138. [PMID: 33861416 PMCID: PMC8140172 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-021-00149-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is now a leading health concern worldwide. In an effort to provide these patients with adequate care, coordination between anesthesiologists and surgeons is crucial. In cancer-related treatment, it is very clear that radio-chemotherapy and medical procedures are important. There are some obstacles to anesthesia when dealing with cancer treatment, such as physiological disturbances, tumor-related symptoms, and toxicity in traditional chemotherapy treatment. Therefore, it is important that a multisystemic, multidisciplinary and patient-centered approach is used to preserve perioperative homeostasis and immune function integrity. Adding adjuvants can help increase patient safety and satisfaction and improve clinical efficacy. Correctly paired anesthetic procedures and medications will reduce perioperative inflammatory and immune changes that could potentially contribute to improved results for future cancer patients. Further research into best practice strategies is required which will help to enhance the acute and long-term effects of cancer care in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Watson
- LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
| | - Michael K. Ninh
- LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
| | - Scott Ashford
- LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
| | - Elyse M. Cornett
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, P.O. Box 33932, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
| | - Alan David Kaye
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neurosciences, LSU Health Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
| | - Ivan Urits
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Shreveport, Shreveport, LA USA
- Valley Pain Consultants – Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Patel SH, Battaglia MA, Shanker BA, Cleary RK. A Single Institution Propensity Score Weighted Analysis of Time to Chemotherapy After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Colorectal Surgery. Am Surg 2021; 88:2877-2885. [PMID: 33856932 DOI: 10.1177/00031348211011137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncologic outcomes for colon cancer are optimal when chemotherapy is started within 6 to 8 weeks after surgery. The study objective was to investigate the impact of operative modality and urgency on the time interval from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS This is a retrospective institutional tumor registry cohort study of open and laparoscopic/robotic colorectal resections for stage II-IV cancer between April 2010 and January 2018. Primary outcome was time from surgery to chemotherapy. Predictor variables were adjusted for imbalances by propensity score weighting. RESULTS A total of 220 patients met inclusion criteria: 171 elective (108 laparoscopic/robotic and 63 open) and 49 urgent colectomies. After propensity score weighting, there was no significant difference in time to chemotherapy between elective minimally invasive and open surgical approaches (48 days vs. 58 days, P = .187). Only 68.9% of minimally invasive and 50.8% of open colectomy patients started chemotherapy within 8 weeks of surgery. There was a significant difference (P = .037) among surgical sites with rectal resections having the longest (55 days), and right colectomies having the shortest (46 days), time to chemotherapy. Patients who had urgent operations had significantly longer hospital length of stay (P < .001) and higher post-discharge emergency department visit rates (P < .001) than the elective operation group. However, there was no significant difference in time to chemotherapy. DISCUSSION Neither operative modality nor operative urgency resulted in a significant difference in postoperative time to initiating chemotherapy. Future efforts should be focused on identifying postoperative recovery criteria and optimum multidisciplinary communication methods that allow recovered patients to start chemotherapy sooner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samik H Patel
- Department of Surgery, St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael A Battaglia
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Methods Consulting, BEMC, LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Beth-Ann Shanker
- Department of Surgery, St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Robert K Cleary
- Department of Surgery, St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alves CMM, de Oliveira Prado PC, Bastos RR. Net survival for colorectal cancer in Cuiabá and Várzea Grande (state of Mato Grosso), Brazil. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1196. [PMID: 33889205 PMCID: PMC8043687 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In studies of cancer survival, Population-Based Cancer Registries (PBCRs) can provide an overview of the disease for places that have this source of information available. In Brazil, PBCR is officially available in 22 state capitals and 8 cities in the interior of the country. PBCR data from Cuiabá and Várzea Grande, state of Mato Grosso, in Midwestern Brazil, were used to estimate the survival rate of colon (C18), rectosigmoid junction (C19) and rectum (C20) cancer cases diagnosed in 2000-2009 according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Five-year survival rate was estimated by the unbiased and consistent net survival estimator, which is used in the country estimates of the global surveillance of cancer survival programme CONCORD Group, for all cases, and also by sex, age group, diagnosis period and place of residence. The probability of death and the number of years of life lost to illness were also estimated. The estimated standardised 5-year survival rate for colorectal cancer was 45.46% (95% CI: 43.09%-47.96%) in the cities of Cuiabá and Várzea Grande. There was no difference between the curves when the survival rate was assessed by diagnostic period (2000-2004 and 2005-2009), sex, age group or city of residence. The gross 5-year probability of death from the disease was 51.2%, accounting for 6.4% of the gross probability of death from other causes, with 2.07 being the years of life lost to illness. The results obtained for Cuiabá and Várzea Grande are compatible with survival rates estimated for Brazil in the CONCORD study, but demonstrate the need to identify reasons why we continue to have low survival rates when compared to most countries involved in the global study mentioned. The results may reflect late diagnosis, difficult access and delays in starting treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Maria Meurer Alves
- Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Rua José Lourenço Kelmer, s/n – São Pedro, Juiz de Fora, 36036-900, Brazil
| | - Pedro Cainelli de Oliveira Prado
- Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Rua José Lourenço Kelmer, s/n – São Pedro, Juiz de Fora, 36036-900, Brazil
| | - Ronaldo Rocha Bastos
- Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Rua José Lourenço Kelmer, s/n – São Pedro, Juiz de Fora, 36036-900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Assessment of Cancer Center Variation in Textbook Oncologic Outcomes Following Colectomy for Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:775-785. [PMID: 32779080 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04767-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional metrics may inadequately represent rates of attaining optimal oncologic care. We evaluated a composite "textbook oncologic outcome" (TOO) to assess the incidence of achieving an "optimal" clinical result after colon adenocarcinoma (CA) resection. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients undergoing colectomy for non-metastatic CA between 2010 and 2015. TOO was defined as a margin negative resection with an AJCC compliant lymph node evaluation, no prolonged length of stay (LOS) or 30-day readmission/mortality, as well as receipt of stage appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Among 170,120 patients who underwent colectomy at 1315 hospitals, 93,204 (54.8%) achieved TOO with large variations observed among facilities. While certain factors were achieved nearly universally (R0 margin, 95.6%; no 30-day mortality, 97.2%), avoidance of prolonged LOS (77.3%) and appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy (83.0%) were achieved less consistently. On multivariable analysis, Black race/ethnicity (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.85), Medicaid insurance (OR 0.64, 0.61-0.68), and low-volume facility (< 50/year) (OR 0.83, 0.77-0.89) were associated with decreased likelihood of TOO. Achievement of TOO was associated with improved long-term survival (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.44-0.46). CONCLUSIONS Roughly one-half of patients undergoing resection of CA achieved an optimal clinical outcome. TOO may be a more useful quality metric to assess patient-centric composite outcomes following surgical procedures.
Collapse
|
19
|
Kulshrestha S, Bunn C, Patel PM, Sweigert PJ, Eguia E, Pawlik TM, Baker MS. Textbook oncologic outcome is associated with increased overall survival after esophagectomy. Surgery 2020; 168:953-961. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
20
|
Zhu L, Tong YX, Xu XS, Xiao AT, Zhang YJ, Zhang S. High level of unmet needs and anxiety are associated with delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:5299-5306. [PMID: 32112352 PMCID: PMC7547036 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05333-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of unmet supportive care needs and anxiety on the initiation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS This is a retrospective study from a single tertiary referral hospital. Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer who met the inclusion criteria were included. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and modified 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34) were applied to assess patient's anxiety level and unmet needs. The time intervals between initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and operation were recorded. Factors associated with delayed initiation of chemotherapy were investigated in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS A total of 135 patients with colorectal cancer were included. In total, 16.3% (22/135) and 5.2% (7/135) reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. In multivariate analysis, low to moderate income status, postoperative complications, anxiety, and high level of unmet needs are independent risk factors for late initiation of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed that psychological problems such as anxiety and high unmet supportive needs are correlated with delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Ave, No, Wuhan, 1095 China
| | - Yi Xin Tong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Ave, No, Wuhan, 1095 China
| | - Xiang Shang Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Ave, No, Wuhan, 1095 China
| | - Ai Tang Xiao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Ave, No, Wuhan, 1095 China
| | - Yu Jie Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Ave, No, Wuhan, 1095 China
| | - Sheng Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Ave, No, Wuhan, 1095 China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Obaid T, Salami AC, Nweze NJ, Deleon M, Force L, Gorgun E, Wexner S, Joshi ART. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction: a response. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1758. [PMID: 32473065 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- T Obaid
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - A C Salami
- Department of Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - N J Nweze
- Department of Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - M Deleon
- Department of Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - L Force
- Department of Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - E Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - S Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - A R T Joshi
- Department of Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tie J, Cohen JD, Lo SN, Wang Y, Li L, Christie M, Lee M, Wong R, Kosmider S, Skinner I, Wong HL, Lee B, Burge ME, Yip D, Karapetis CS, Price TJ, Tebbutt NC, Haydon AM, Ptak J, Schaeffer MJ, Silliman N, Dobbyn L, Popoli M, Tomasetti C, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Gibbs P. Prognostic significance of postsurgery circulating tumor DNA in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: Individual patient pooled analysis of three cohort studies. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:1014-1026. [PMID: 32984952 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 08/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Studies in multiple solid tumor types have demonstrated the prognostic significance of ctDNA analysis after curative intent surgery. A combined analysis of data across completed studies could further our understanding of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic marker and inform future trial design. We combined individual patient data from three independent cohort studies of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Plasma samples were collected 4 to 10 weeks after surgery. Mutations in ctDNA were assayed using a massively parallel sequencing technique called SafeSeqS. We analyzed 485 CRC patients (230 Stage II colon, 96 Stage III colon, and 159 locally advanced rectum). ctDNA was detected after surgery in 59 (12%) patients overall (11.0%, 12.5% and 13.8% for samples taken at 4-6, 6-8 and 8-10 weeks; P = .740). ctDNA detection was associated with poorer 5-year recurrence-free (38.6% vs 85.5%; P < .001) and overall survival (64.6% vs 89.4%; P < .001). The predictive accuracy of postsurgery ctDNA for recurrence was higher than that of individual clinicopathologic risk features. Recurrence risk increased exponentially with increasing ctDNA mutant allele frequency (MAF) (hazard ratio, 1.2, 2.5 and 5.8 for MAF of 0.1%, 0.5% and 1%). Postsurgery ctDNA was detected in 3 of 20 (15%) patients with locoregional and 27 of 60 (45%) with distant recurrence (P = .018). This analysis demonstrates a consistent long-term impact of ctDNA as a prognostic marker across nonmetastatic CRC, where ctDNA outperforms other clinicopathologic risk factors and MAF further stratifies recurrence risk. ctDNA is a better predictor of distant vs locoregional recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Tie
- Division of Personalised Oncology, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua D Cohen
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yuxuan Wang
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lu Li
- Division of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael Christie
- Division of Personalised Oncology, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Pathology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret Lee
- Division of Personalised Oncology, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel Wong
- Division of Personalised Oncology, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suzanne Kosmider
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Iain Skinner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hui Li Wong
- Division of Personalised Oncology, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Lee
- Division of Personalised Oncology, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew E Burge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Desmond Yip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Christos S Karapetis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Timothy J Price
- Department of Medical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Niall C Tebbutt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew M Haydon
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Janine Ptak
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mary J Schaeffer
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Natalie Silliman
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa Dobbyn
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Maria Popoli
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Cristian Tomasetti
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Division of Personalised Oncology, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Glimelius B, Osterman E. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082289. [PMID: 32823998 PMCID: PMC7464071 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The value of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients has been the subject of many overviews, with opinions varying from “not effective”, since randomized trials have not been performed, to “as effective as in young individuals”, based upon many retrospective analyses of randomized trials that have included patients of all ages. In the absence of randomized trials performed specifically with elderly patients, retrospective analyses demonstrate that the influence on the time to tumour recurrence (TTR) may be the same as in young individuals, but that endpoints that include death for any reason, such as recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), are poorer in the elderly. This is particularly true if oxaliplatin has been part of the treatment. The need for adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients is basically the same as that in younger patients. The reduction in recurrence risks may be similar, provided the chosen treatment is tolerated but survival gains are less. Adding oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine is probably not beneficial in individuals above a biological age of approximately 70 years. If an oxaliplatin combination is administered to elderly patients, three months of therapy is in all probability the most realistic goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +46-18-611-24-32
| | - Erik Osterman
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden;
- Department of Surgery, Gävle Hospital, Region Gävleborg, SE-80187 Gävle, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sebastián-Tomás JC, Domingo-Del Pozo C, Gómez-Abril SÁ, Navarro-Martínez S, Ortiz-Tarín I, Torres-Sánchez T, Martínez-Blasco A, Martínez-Pérez A. Laparoscopic staged colon-first resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: Perioperative and midterm outcomes from a single-center experience. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1453-1461. [PMID: 32779218 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The present study aimed to evaluate the short- and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic colon-first staged resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). METHODS This study included patients with metastatic CRC who underwent laparoscopic surgical staged resection for the primary tumor and CRCLM between June 2013 and December 2018. Data collection included the baseline patient's and tumor features, the perioperative and histopathologic outcomes from both surgical procedures, and the oncologic follow-up. RESULTS Twenty-five patients were eligible for the study. Three major and 22 minor laparoscopic liver resections were performed following laparoscopic CRC surgery. Five patients required conversion to laparotomy during CRCLM resection, but no conversion was needed for the colorectal procedures. The rate of severe intraoperative complications (CLASSIC grade III-IV) was 8% and 16% during CRC and CRCLM resection, respectively. Three patients (12%) developed major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > III) after both interventions, including one death due to intraoperative bleeding. During a median follow-up of 30 months, 15 patients were diagnosed with disease recurrence. The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 33.3% and 73.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic staged resection for CRC and CRCLM is safe, feasible, and offers acceptable midterm oncological outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos Domingo-Del Pozo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Sergio Navarro-Martínez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Ortiz-Tarín
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Teresa Torres-Sánchez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Amparo Martínez-Blasco
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Aleix Martínez-Pérez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jawitz OK, Raman V, Barac YD, Anand J, Patel CB, Mentz RJ, DeVore AD, Milano C. Influence of donor brain death duration on outcomes following heart transplantation: A United Network for Organ Sharing Registry analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 159:1345-1353.e2. [PMID: 31147170 PMCID: PMC6821595 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We hypothesized that an increased duration of donor brain death may worsen survival following orthotopic heart transplantation. METHODS The United Network for Organ Sharing Registry was queried for first-time, adult recipients of heart transplant from 2006 to 2018. Cox proportional hazards with penalized smooth splines was used to stratify patients based on donor brain death interval: shorter (<22 hours), reference (22-42 hours), and longer (>42 hours). Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS A total of 22,960 patients met study criteria (9.2% shorter, 55.0% reference, and 35.8% longer). Longer brain death duration recipients were more likely to have a later year of transplant and have a mechanical bridge to transplant, whereas longer duration donors were more likely to be black and die of anoxia compared with shorter duration and reference donors. Compared with reference, neither shorter (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.12) nor longer donor brain death interval (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94-1.08) was associated with posttransplant survival in either unadjusted or multivariable analyses (both P values >0.6). CONCLUSIONS Longer duration of brain death was not associated with worse survival following heart transplantation. Donors with prolonged interval of brain death should not necessarily be excluded based on brain death period alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver K Jawitz
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
| | - Vignesh Raman
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Yaron D Barac
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Jatin Anand
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Chetan B Patel
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Robert J Mentz
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Adam D DeVore
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Carmelo Milano
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Template reporting increases key colon tumour descriptors. Template reporting was used for less than a third of the patients. High risk of underreporting.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of completeness of the radiological reports in primary local staging colon cancer when using a template. Methods The study used primary staging reports retrieved from the departments RIS/PACS. Five key tumour descriptors were evaluated within each report: tumour morphology (polypoid or annular), information on tumour breach of the colon wall (≥ T3), tumour out-growth in mm, nodal status and TNM in conclusion. The failure to provide a description of the presence or absence of a feature in a report counted as ‘not reported’. To allow comparisons between reporting styles, the template or free-text style of reporting was also recorded. Results During a two year period, a total of 666 patients CT reports were evaluated at the colorectal center multidisciplinary team (MDT) conference. In 200 of these reports a template was used. Information on tumour morphology (polypoid or annular) was present in 81% of the template reports vs 9% in free-text style. The figures in percentage for information on tumour breach of the colon wall (≥ T3) were 93% vs 48 %, tumour out-growth in mm: 51% vs 17%, nodal status: 99% vs 86% and TNM in conclusion: 98% vs 51%. P < 0.0001. Conclusion The present study provides additional support for the routine use of template reports to improve imaging reporting standards in colonic cancer.
Collapse
|
27
|
Vo E, Massarweh NN, Chai CY, Tran Cao HS, Zamani N, Abraham S, Adigun K, Awad SS. Association of the Addition of Oral Antibiotics to Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Left Colon and Rectal Cancer Resections With Reduction of Surgical Site Infections. JAMA Surg 2019; 153:114-121. [PMID: 29049477 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Importance Surgical site infections (SSIs) after colorectal surgery remain a significant complication, particularly for patients with cancer, because they can delay the administration of adjuvant therapy. A combination of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is a potential, yet controversial, SSI prevention strategy. Objective To determine the association of the addition of oral antibiotics to MBP with preventing SSIs in left colon and rectal cancer resections and its association with the timely administration of adjuvant therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective review was performed of 89 patients undergoing left colon and rectal cancer resections from October 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016, at a single institution. A bowel regimen of oral antibiotics and MBP (neomycin sulfate, metronidazole hydrochloride, and magnesium citrate) was implemented August 1, 2015. Patients receiving MBP and oral antibiotics and those undergoing MBP without oral antibiotics were compared using univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for factors that may affect SSIs was used to evaluate the association between use of oral antibiotics and MBP and the occurrence of SSIs. Main Outcomes and Measures Surgical site infections within 30 days of the index procedure and time to adjuvant therapy. Results Of the 89 patients (5 women and 84 men; mean [SD] age, 65.3 [9.2] years) in the study, 49 underwent surgery with MBP but without oral antibiotics and 40 underwent surgery with MBP and oral antibiotics. The patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP were younger than those who received only MBP (mean [SD] age, 62.6 [9.1] vs 67.5 [8.8] years; P = .01), but these 2 cohorts of patients were otherwise similar in baseline demographic, clinical, and cancer characteristics. Surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open) and case type were similarly distributed; however, the median operative time of patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP was longer than that of patients who received MBP only (391 minutes [interquartile range, 302-550 minutes] vs 348 minutes [interquartile range, 248-425 minutes]; P = .03). The overall SSI rate was lower for patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP than for patients who received MBP only (3 [8%] vs 13 [27%]; P = .03), with no deep or organ space SSIs or anastomotic leaks in patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP compared with 9 organ space SSIs (18%; P = .004) and 5 anastomotic leaks (10%; P = .06) in patients who received MBP only. Despite this finding, there was no difference in median days to adjuvant therapy between the 2 cohorts (60 days [interquartile range, 46-73 days] for patients who received MBP only vs 72 days [interquartile range, 59-85 days] for patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP; P = .13). Oral antibiotics and MBP (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.86; P = .04) and minimally invasive surgery (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05-0.89; P = .03) were independently associated with reduced odds of SSIs. Conclusions and Relevance The combination of oral antibiotics and MBP is associated with a significant decrease in the rate of SSIs and should be considered for patients undergoing elective left colon and rectal cancer resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Vo
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Nader N Massarweh
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.,Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christy Y Chai
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nader Zamani
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Sherry Abraham
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kafayat Adigun
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samir S Awad
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jawitz OK, Raman V, Barac Y, Mulvihill MS, Moore C, Choi AY, Hartwig M, Klapper J. Impact of Donor Brain Death Duration on Outcomes After Lung Transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 108:1519-1526. [PMID: 31271742 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor brain death duration (BDD) may impact posttransplant graft function and survival in lung transplant. METHODS We queried the 2007 to 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing Registry for adult recipients undergoing first-time isolated lung transplant. Cox proportional hazard modeling with splines enabled identification of 3 donor brain death intervals for subsequent analysis: short (<24 hours), reference (24-60 hours), and long (>60 hours). The primary outcome was posttransplant survival. RESULTS In total, 19,721 donors and recipients met inclusion criteria. Median time from donor brain death until cross-clamp was 36.6 hours (interquartile range, 19.5). Unadjusted overall survival between cohorts was equivalent (log-rank P = .42); however, longer BDD was associated with improved bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS)-free survival (log-rank P < .001). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, BDD was not associated with recipient survival (P > .05). Similarly, logistic regression did not identify an independent association between BDD and primary graft dysfunction (P > .05). Increased BDD was, however, associated with a decreased risk of acute rejection (long vs reference; adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.94) and improved BOS-free survival (long vs reference; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.96). CONCLUSIONS Donor BDD is not associated with posttransplant survival or primary graft dysfunction. Long donor BDD, however, is associated with a decreased risk for acute rejection and improved BOS-free survival. Therefore, lung allografts from donors with a prolonged length of time from brain death until explant should not be viewed less favorably by donor selection centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver K Jawitz
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Vignesh Raman
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yaron Barac
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael S Mulvihill
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Carrie Moore
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ashley Y Choi
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthew Hartwig
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jacob Klapper
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Petrelli F, Zaniboni A, Ghidini A, Ghidini M, Turati L, Pizzo C, Ratti M, Libertini M, Tomasello G. Timing of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival in Colorectal, Gastric, and Pancreatic Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11040550. [PMID: 30999653 PMCID: PMC6520704 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 04/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in gastrointestinal malignancies is still a matter of debate. For colorectal cancer, it is recommended to start post-operative treatment within eight weeks. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical effects of starting adjuvant CT within or after 6–8 weeks post-surgery in colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. (2) Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched in December 2018. Publications comparing the outcomes of patients treated with adjuvant CT administered before (early) or after (delayed) 6–8 weeks post-surgery for colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). (3) Results: Out of 8752 publications identified, 34 comparative studies assessing a total of 141,853 patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant increased risk of death with delayed CT (>6–8 weeks post-surgery) in colorectal cancer (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–1.33; p <0.001). Similarly, for gastric cancer, delaying adjuvant CT was associated with inferior overall survival (HR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.04–1.38; p = 0.01). Conversely, the benefit of earlier CT was not evident in pancreatic cancer (HR = 1, 95% CI 1–1.01; p = 0.37). Conclusions: Starting adjuvant CT within 6–8 weeks post-surgery is associated with a significant survival benefit for colorectal and gastric cancer, but not for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Luca Turati
- Surgical Oncology Unit, ASST of Bergamo, 24100 Bergamo Ovest, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Peluso H, Jones WB, Parikh AA, Abougergi MS. Treatment outcomes, 30‐day readmission and healthcare resource utilization after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic malignancies. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2019; 26:187-194. [DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Peluso
- Department of Surgery University of South Carolina Greenville Health System, 701 Grove Road Greenville SC 29605 USA
| | - Wesley B. Jones
- Department of Surgery University of South Carolina Greenville Health System, 701 Grove Road Greenville SC 29605 USA
| | - Alexander A. Parikh
- Division of Surgical Oncology Brody School of Medicine East Carolina UniversityGreenville NC USA
| | - Marwan S. Abougergi
- Catalyst Medical Consulting Simpsonville SC USA
- Division of Gastroenterology Department of Internal Medicine University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbia SC USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van Rooijen S, Carli F, Dalton S, Thomas G, Bojesen R, Le Guen M, Barizien N, Awasthi R, Minnella E, Beijer S, Martínez-Palli G, van Lieshout R, Gögenur I, Feo C, Johansen C, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Roumen R, Schep G, Slooter G. Multimodal prehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity and reduce postoperative complications: the first international randomized controlled trial for multimodal prehabilitation. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:98. [PMID: 30670009 PMCID: PMC6341758 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5232-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 180] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in the world. Surgery is the only curative option. However, postoperative complications occur in up to 50% of patients and are associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates, lower health related quality of life (HRQoL) and increased expenditure in health care. The number and severity of complications are closely related to preoperative functional capacity, nutritional state, psychological state, and smoking behavior. Traditional approaches have targeted the postoperative period for rehabilitation and lifestyle changes. However, recent evidence shows that the preoperative period might be the optimal moment for intervention. This study will determine the impact of multimodal prehabilitation on patients' functional capacity and postoperative complications. METHODS/DESIGN This international multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial will include 714 patients undergoing colorectal surgery for cancer. Patients will be allocated to the intervention group, which will receive 4 weeks of prehabilitation (group 1, prehab), or the control group, which will receive no prehabilitation (group 2, no prehab). Both groups will receive perioperative care in accordance with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines. The primary outcomes for measurement will be functional capacity (as assessed using the six-minute walk test (6MWT)) and postoperative status determined with the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Secondary outcomes will include HRQoL, length of hospital stay (LOS) and a cost-effectiveness analysis. DISCUSSION Multimodal prehabilitation is expected to enhance patients' functional capacity and to reduce postoperative complications. It may therefore result in increased survival and improved HRQoL. This is the first international multicenter study investigating multimodal prehabilitation for patients undergoing colorectal surgery for cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial Registry: NTR5947 - date of registration: 1 August 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanus van Rooijen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Francesco Carli
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Montréal General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Susanne Dalton
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gwendolyn Thomas
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Rasmus Bojesen
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Morgan Le Guen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Foch Hôpital, Paris, France
| | | | - Rashami Awasthi
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Montréal General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Enrico Minnella
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Montréal General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Sandra Beijer
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Graciela Martínez-Palli
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ismayil Gögenur
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Carlo Feo
- Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Celena Scheede-Bergdahl
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
- Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Rudi Roumen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Goof Schep
- Department of Sports Medicine, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit Slooter
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, P.O. Box 7777, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lee KH, Kim HO, Kim JS, Kim JY. Prospective study on the safety and feasibility of early ileostomy closure 2 weeks after lower anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 2018; 96:41-46. [PMID: 30603633 PMCID: PMC6306500 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2019.96.1.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Transient loop ileostomies in rectal cancer surgery are generally closed after 2 or more months to allow adequate time for anastomotic healing. Maintaining the ileostomy may cause medical, surgical, or psychological complications; it also reduces the quality of life, and increase treatment costs. We performed this study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early ileostomy closure 2 weeks postoperatively. Methods If a patient who underwent total mesorectal excision had 2 or more risk factors for anastomotic leakage, a loop ileostomy was created. After confirmation of intact anastomosis via sigmoidoscopy and proctography 1 week postoperatively, the patient was enrolled and ileostomy was closed 2 weeks postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the frequency of complication after ileostomy repair. Results Thirty patients were enrolled in the study and 6 were excluded due to anastomotic leakage. Except for 1 case of wound infection (4.2%), no patient experienced any complication including newly developed leakage after the ileostomy closure. The mean duration to repair was 13.1 days (range, 8–16 days) and mean duration to the start of adjuvant treatment after radical surgery was 5.37 weeks (range, 3.0–8.1 weeks). Conclusion Transient loop ileostomy, which is confirmed to be intact endoscopically and radiologically, can be safely closed 2 weeks postoperatively without requiring a significant delay in adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Ha Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Hyung Ook Kim
- Department of Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of tumor deposits in stage III colon adenocarcinoma is poorly described. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of tumor deposits on oncologic outcomes in patients with stage III colon cancer. DESIGN This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS The 2010 to 2014 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with resected stage III colon adenocarcinoma on final pathology. PATIENTS Patients were divided into 3 groups: lymph nodes+tumor deposits-, lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, and lymph nodes-tumor deposits+. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome was 5-year overall survival. RESULTS Of 74,577 patients, there were 55,800 patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits-, 13,740 patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, and 5037 patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+. The groups had similar patient and facility characteristics, but patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had more advanced tumor characteristics. Patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ were less likely to receive adjuvant systemic therapy (52% vs 74% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- and 75% lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, p < 0.001) and had a longer delay to initiation of adjuvant treatment (>8 weeks; 43% vs 33% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- and 33% lymph nodes+tumor deposits+, p < 0.001). Patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had the lowest 5-year overall survival (46.0% vs 63.4% lymph nodes+tumor deposits- vs 61.9% lymph nodes-tumor deposits+, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ had similar 5-year overall survival compared with patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits- with ≤3 positive lymph nodes (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-1.01). Patients with lymph nodes+tumor deposits+ had worse prognosis regardless of the number of involved lymph nodes (≤3 +lymph nodes: HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.28-1.47 and ≥4 +lymph nodes: HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.22-1.38). Of those not receiving adjuvant treatment, patients with lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ were younger and had more adverse tumor features than lymph node+ disease. Lymph nodes-tumor deposits+ was independently associated with less delivery of adjuvant systemic therapy (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.82). LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its retrospective analysis of a prospective database. CONCLUSIONS The prognosis of patients with N1c disease is similar to nodal involvement without tumor deposits, yet these patients were less likely to receive adjuvant systemic therapy. Improvement in the delivery of appropriate care in these patients may increase survival and should be a target of future quality initiatives. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A666.
Collapse
|
34
|
Lee L, Wong-Chong N, Kelly JJ, Nassif GJ, Albert MR, Monson JRT. Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival. Surg Endosc 2018; 33:460-470. [PMID: 29967992 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6319-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) may improve surgical recovery and reduce time to adjuvant systemic therapy after colon cancer resection. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of MIS on the initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. METHODS The 2010-2014 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with resected stage III colon adenocarcinoma, and divided into MIS, which included laparoscopic and robotic approaches, and open surgery. Propensity-score matching was used to balanced open and MIS groups. The main outcome measures were delayed initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy (defined as > 8 weeks after surgery) and 5-year overall survival (OS). Multiple Cox regression was performed to identify independent predictors for 5-year OS, including an interaction between delayed systemic therapy and MIS, and adjusted for clustering at the hospital level. RESULTS There were 86,680 patients that were included in this study. Overall, 45% (38,713) underwent MIS colectomy, of which 93% underwent laparoscopic and 7% robotic surgery. After matching, 33,183 open patients were balanced to 33,183 MIS patients. Patient, tumor, and facility characteristics were similar in the matched cohort. More patients in the MIS group received adjuvant therapy within 8 weeks of surgery (49% vs. 42%, p < 0.001), and fewer MIS patients did not receive any systemic therapy (30% vs. 35%, p < 0.001). Delayed initiation of systemic therapy > 8 weeks was associated with worse 5-year OS (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.19-1.36). MIS was independently associated with improved survival (HR 0.92, 95%CI 0.86-0.97). This relationship remained even if 90-day mortality was excluded. CONCLUSIONS MIS approaches are associated with less delay to the initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival in patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma. Surgeons should favor MIS approaches for the treatment of stage III colon adenocarcinoma whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence Lee
- Center for Colon and Rectal Surgery, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA. .,Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Colon and Rectal Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, DS1-3310, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
| | - Nathalie Wong-Chong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Colon and Rectal Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, DS1-3310, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Justin J Kelly
- Center for Colon and Rectal Surgery, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - George J Nassif
- Center for Colon and Rectal Surgery, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Matthew R Albert
- Center for Colon and Rectal Surgery, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - John R T Monson
- Center for Colon and Rectal Surgery, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Turner MC, Farrow NE, Rhodin KE, Sun Z, Adam MA, Mantyh CR, Migaly J. Delay in Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Advantage in Stage III Colon Cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 226:670-678. [PMID: 29378259 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection is the standard of care for stage III colon cancer, yet many patients omit chemotherapy. We aimed to describe the impact of delayed chemotherapy on overall survival across multiple time points. STUDY DESIGN The 2006 to 2014 National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients with single primary stage III adenocarcinoma of the colon. Patients were grouped by receipt and timing of chemotherapy from resection date: chemotherapy omitted, <6 weeks, 6 to 8 weeks, 8 to 12 weeks, 12 to 24 weeks, and >24 weeks. Subgroup analyses were performed for those with comorbidities and those who had postoperative complications. Overall survival was compared using Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusting for patient, tumor, and facility characteristics. RESULTS In total, 72,057 patients were included; 20,807 omitted chemotherapy, 22,705 received it at <6 weeks, 15,412 between 6 and 8 weeks, 9,049 between 8 and 12 weeks, 3,595 between 12 and 24 weeks, and 489 at >24 weeks after resection. Compared with patients who omitted chemotherapy, patients who received chemotherapy at <6 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44), 6 to 8 weeks (HR 0.45), 8 to 12 weeks (HR 0.52), 12 to 24 weeks (HR 0.61), and >24 weeks (HR 0.68) had superior overall survival (p < 0.001). This survival benefit was preserved across subgroups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS After resection of stage III colon cancer, patients should receive adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 to 8 weeks for maximal benefit. However, chemotherapy should be offered to patients who are outside the optimal window, who have significant comorbidities, or who have had a complication more than 24 weeks from resection to improve the overall survival compared with omitting chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Zhifei Sun
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - John Migaly
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kim YW, Choi EH, Kim BR, Ko WA, Do YM, Kim IY. The impact of delayed commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy (eight or more weeks) on survival in stage II and III colon cancer: a national population-based cohort study. Oncotarget 2017; 8:80061-80072. [PMID: 29108388 PMCID: PMC5668121 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine the impact of chemotherapy delay on survival in patients with stage II or III colon cancer and the factors associated with the delay (≥8 weeks) of adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS Patients undergoing curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in a national population-based cohort were included. RESULTS Among 5355 patients, 154 (2.9%) received chemotherapy more than 8 weeks after surgery. Based on a multivariate analysis, the risk factors associated with chemotherapy delay ≥8 weeks were older age [65 to 74 years (hazard ratio [HR]=1.48) and ≥75 years (HR=1.69), p=0.0354], medical aid status in the health security system (HR=1.76, p=0.0345), and emergency surgery (HR=2.43, p=0.0002). Using an 8-week cutoff, the 3-year overall survival rate was 89.62% and 80.98% in the <8 weeks and ≥8 weeks groups, respectively (p=0.008). Independent prognostic factors for inferior overall survival included chemotherapy delay ≥8 weeks (HR=1.49, p=0.0365), older age [65 to 74 years (HR=1.94) and ≥75 years (HR=3.41), p<0.0001], TNM stage III (HR=2.46, p<0.0001), emergency surgery (HR=1.89, p<0.0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or higher (HR=1.50, p<0.0001), and higher transfusion amounts (HR=1.09, p=0.0392). CONCLUSIONS This study shows that delayed commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy, defined as ≥ 8 weeks, is associated with inferior overall survival in colon cancer patients with stage II or III disease. The delay to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is influenced by several multidimensional factors, including patient factors (older age), insurance status (medical aid), and treatment-related factors (emergency surgery).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Wan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Eun Hee Choi
- Institute of Lifestyle Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Bo Ra Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Woo-Ah Ko
- Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeong-Mee Do
- Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ik Yong Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Puccini A, Berger MD, Zhang W, Lenz HJ. What We Know About Stage II and III Colon Cancer: It's Still Not Enough. Target Oncol 2017; 12:265-275. [PMID: 28504299 PMCID: PMC7489295 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-017-0494-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer in 2004 has been the last practice changing progress in adjuvant treatment for patients with early colon cancer. Since then, many prognostic and predictive biomarkers have been studied, but only DNA mismatch repair status has been validated as having an important prognostic value. Accordingly, TNM and clinical-pathological patterns, such as pT4 lesions and lymph node sampling <12 nodes, are the main factors that guide physicians' choice regarding adjuvant treatment. More recently, many biomarkers showed promising results: POLE, ErbB2, CDX2, SMAD4, BRAF and KRAS. In addition to these, immune-contexture, molecular classification, and gene signatures could become new ways to better classify colon cancer patients with more discriminatory power than TNM. The aim of this review is to report the state-of-the-art of prognostic and predictive factors in the adjuvant setting and which of these could modify clinical practice and maybe replace TNM classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Puccini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 3456, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino - IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Martin D Berger
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 3456, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Wu Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 3456, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 3456, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Salazar MC, Rosen JE, Wang Z, Arnold BN, Thomas DC, Herbst RS, Kim AW, Detterbeck FC, Blasberg JD, Boffa DJ. Association of Delayed Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Survival After Lung Cancer Surgery. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:610-619. [PMID: 28056112 PMCID: PMC5824207 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Accepted: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Adjuvant chemotherapy offers a survival benefit to a number of staging scenarios in non-small-cell lung cancer. Variable recovery from lung cancer surgery may delay a patient's ability to tolerate adjuvant chemotherapy, yet the urgency of chemotherapy initiation is unclear. OBJECTIVE To assess differences in survival according to the time interval between non-small-cell lung cancer resection and the initiation of postoperative chemotherapy to determine the association between adjuvant treatment timing and efficacy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective observational study examined treatment-naive patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer who received postoperative multiagent chemotherapy between 18 and 127 days after resection between January 2004 and December 2012. The study population was limited to patients with lymph node metastases, tumors 4 cm or larger, or local extension. Patients were identified from the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based tumor registry that captures more than 70% of incident lung cancer cases in the United States. The association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival was evaluated using Cox models with restricted cubic splines. EXPOSURES Adjuvant chemotherapy administered at different time points after surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy according to time to initiation after surgery. RESULTS A total of 12 473 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 64 [57-70] years) were identified: 3073 patients (25%) with stage I disease; 5981 patients (48%), stage II; and 3419 patients (27%), stage III. A Cox model with restricted cubic splines identified the lowest mortality risk when chemotherapy was started 50 days postoperatively (95% CI, 39-56 days). Initiation of chemotherapy after this interval (57-127 days; ie, the later cohort) did not increase mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.037; 95% CI, 0.972-1.105; P = .27). Furthermore, in a Cox model of 3976 propensity-matched pairs, patients who received chemotherapy during the later interval had a lower mortality risk than those treated with surgery only (HR, 0.664; 95% CI, 0.623-0.707; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In the National Cancer Database, adjuvant chemotherapy remained efficacious when started 7 to 18 weeks after non-small-cell lung cancer resection. Patients who recover slowly from non-small-cell lung cancer surgery may still benefit from delayed adjuvant chemotherapy started up to 4 months after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C. Salazar
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joshua E. Rosen
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Zuoheng Wang
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Brian N. Arnold
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Daniel C. Thomas
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Roy S. Herbst
- Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anthony W. Kim
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Frank C. Detterbeck
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Justin D. Blasberg
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Daniel J. Boffa
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Liu Y, Zhai X, Li J, Li Z, Ma D, Wang Z. Is there an optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy to predict benefit of survival in non-small cell lung cancer? Chin J Cancer Res 2017; 29:263-271. [PMID: 28729777 PMCID: PMC5497213 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.03.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection is known to improve the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, few studies have reported the correlation between the time to initiation of AC (TTAC) and survival in NSCLC patients. Methods The clinical data of 925 NSCLC patients who received curative resection and post-operative AC at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. TTAC was measured from the date of surgery to the initiation of AC. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the duration from surgery to the time of tumor recurrence or last follow-up evaluation. The optimal cut-off value of TTAC was determined by maximally selected log-rank statistics. The DFS curve was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify risk factors independently associated with DFS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for survival analysis using the match data. Results The optimal discriminating cut-off value of TTAC was set at d 35 after curative resection based on which the patients were assigned into two groups: group A (≤35 d) and group B (>35 d). There was no significant difference in the DFS between the two groups (P=0.246), indicating that the TTAC is not an independent prognostic factor for DFS. A further comparison continued to show no significant difference in the DFS among 258 PSM pairs (P=0.283). Conclusions There was no significant correlation between the TTAC and DFS in NSCLC patients. Studies with larger samples are needed to further verify this conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutao Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhai
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Junling Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhiwen Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Di Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ziping Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kim RH, Kavanaugh MM, Caldito GC. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: Improved compliance with guidelines for chemotherapy and survival. Surgery 2016; 161:1633-1641. [PMID: 28027818 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Revised: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been demonstrated in clinical trials to have short-term benefits when compared to the open surgical approach. Guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend that patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. We hypothesized that laparoscopic colectomy is associated with increased compliance to recommendations for chemotherapy, a lesser time to start of chemotherapy, and increased overall survival. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried to identify patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer (T4, positive margins, <12 lymph nodes, or high tumor grade) diagnosed 2010-2012. Patients were divided into laparoscopic colectomy and open colectomy groups. Intent-to-treat analysis was used with converted cases included in the laparoscopic colectomy group. Rates of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, time from diagnosis and date of operation to start of chemotherapy, and overall survival were compared. RESULTS A total of 48,257 patients were included for analysis; 18,801 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy and 29,456 underwent open colectomy. Laparoscopic colectomy patients received adjuvant chemotherapy at a somewhat greater rate than open colectomy (66.2% vs 59.4%, P < .01). Among patients who received chemotherapy, mean time to start of chemotherapy after definitive resection was somewhat less for laparoscopic colectomy than open colectomy (48.7 vs 52.7 days, P < .01). Two-year overall survival was greater for laparoscopic colectomy than open colectomy (81.9% vs 73.2%, P < .01). CONCLUSION Compared to open colectomy, laparoscopic colectomy is associated with somewhat greater rates of compliance with guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer, as well as a slightly lesser time to start of chemotherapy and improved overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger H Kim
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, and the Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA.
| | - Mindie M Kavanaugh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, and the Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA
| | - Gloria C Caldito
- Department of Neurology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, and the Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA
| |
Collapse
|