Cost of phacovitrectomy versus vitrectomy and sequential phacoemulsification

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Phacovitrectomy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the refractive error in patients undergoing combined phacovitrectomy with and without gas tamponade.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review including patients undergoing phacoemulsification alone (Group 1), combined phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (Group 2), and combined phacovitrectomy with gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) (Group 3). Axial length and keratometry were measured using an optical biometric system (Argos, Alcon Laboratories. Inc.), and a three-piece intraocular lens (IOL; NX-70S) was implanted in all groups. In each group, the prediction error at 3 months was calculated using IOL power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hill-RBF, Kane, and Barrett Universal II) for each eye. Outcome measures included the mean prediction error (MPE), its standard deviation (SD), and the mean absolute error (MAE). The change in IOL position at 3 months was also assessed using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

A total of 104 eyes were included (Group 1: 30; Group 2: 34; Group 3: 40 eyes). The MPE was -0.08 ± 0.37 diopters (D), -0.26 ± 0.32 D, and -0.59 ± 0.34 D in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively, using the Barrett Universal II formula (P < 0.01, ANOVA). The movement forward in the IOL position was 0.95 ± 0.16 mm, 0.94 ± 0.12 mm, and 1.07 ± 0.20 mm in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively (P < 0.01). No significant difference was shown in MPE among the four formulas after combined phacovitrectomy with gas (P = 0.531).

CONCLUSIONS

Phacovitrectomy in RRD induced a significant myopic shift using any of the clinically available formulas. This suggests that myopic shift should be taken into consideration for better refractive outcomes in phacovitrectomy with gas tamponade in RRD.

Visual outcomes and complications of combined versus sequential pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification for epiretinal membrane

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic epiretinal membrane (ERM) often requires surgical intervention via pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), for which cataract development is a common complication. There is insufficient data on the visual outcomes and complications of combined phacovitrectomy (COMB) in comparison to sequential PPV with deferred cataract surgery (SEQ) for ERM.

METHODS

A retrospective dataset analysis of 8 National Health Service ophthalmology departments. The main outcome measures were postoperative visual acuity (VA), operative complications, postoperative cystoid macular oedema (CMO) and recurrent ERM.

RESULTS

We included 898 and 299 eyes in the COMB and SEQ groups, respectively. Both procedures resulted in significantly better VA across all follow-up intervals (24 weeks). The proportion of eyes with Snellen VA of at least 20/40 at 12-24 weeks was comparable in both groups (47.8% [COMB] vs. 54.7% [SEQ], p = 0.4456). More eyes in the COMB group experienced posterior capsular rupture (2.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.0009) and iatrogenic retinal trauma (2.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.0023). However, regression analysis revealed that combined surgery did not predict either complication. There were no significant differences in the rates of CMO (6.5% [COMB] vs. 9% [SEQ], p = 0.1522) and recurrent ERM (2.1% [COMB] vs. 3.3% [SEQ], p = 0.2758) between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both combined and sequential procedures are comparably effective and safe means for managing eyes with ERM.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on a world-wide private ophthalmic practice

Purpose

To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a worldwide private ophthalmic practice.

Design

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the 2020 monthly outpatient and surgical volume of refractive, cataract, and retinal disease in Aier Eye clinics/hospitals of different regions, including the United States, Germany, Spain, Italy, and six major cities in China (Wuhan, Beijing, Shanghai, Shenyang, Urumqi and Yili). All of these data were compared to those of the same period of 2019.

Results

Overall, during the early stage (2020 January to 2020 April) of COVID-19 outbreak, the outpatient and surgical volume of three main type ocular diseases (refractive, cataract and retinal surgery) showed an obvious reduction and reached the bottom in February in China. The data from the United States, Germany, Spain and Italy revealed the same trend, but the visit count nadir occurred until April, which is consistent with the spread trend of COVID-19 disease around the world. The average change rates of surgery volume (refractive, cataract and retinal surgery) in Chinese centers are 5.59%, -26.38%, 11.76%. The change rates of refractive (REF) and cataract volumes (CAT) in the United States are -8.62% and -10.58%, in Germany are -13.71% and -20.49%, in Spain are 15.35% and 27.97%, in Italy are 30.43% and -22.64%. In addition, the optometry outpatient volumes keep going up since May, with an average increasing rate of 21.18%, ranging from 7.43% to 49.51%.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in this global chain of eye care units, the visit volumes of cataract, retinal and refractive changed significantly with the spread of COVID-19 pandemic. Among them, cataract surgery was the most affected sub-specialty, and refractive surgery and optometry volumes showed a potential growth in the near future. Therefore, medical institutions should make corresponding adjustments to the disease diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Cost Drivers of Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis

PURPOSE

To determine cost drivers of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) through evaluation of surgical costs and procedure length based on type of EK, use of preloaded grafts, and performance of simultaneous cataract surgery.

DESIGN

This study was an economic analysis of EKs at a single academic institution using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology.

PARTICIPANTS

Endothelial keratoplasty surgical cases, including Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center from 2016 to 2018 were included in the analysis.

METHODS

Data and inputs were obtained via the electronic health record (EHR) and from prior literature. Simultaneous cataract surgeries were included and separately categorized for analysis. Endothelial keratoplasty expenses were determined with TDABC, a method for cost calculation that incorporates the time that key resources are used and each resource's associated cost rate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcome measures included surgery length (in minutes) and day-of-surgery costs.

RESULTS

There were 559 EKs included: 355 DMEKs and 204 DSAEKs. Fewer DSAEKs had simultaneous cataract extraction (47; 23%) than DMEK (169; 48%). Of the DMEKs, 196 (55%) used preloaded corneal grafts. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty cost $392.31 less (95% confidence interval, $251.05-$533.57; P < 0.0001) than DSAEK and required 16.94 fewer minutes (14.16-19.73; P < 0.0001). Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty cases that used preloaded corneal grafts cost $460.19 less ($316.23-$604.14; P < 0.0001) and were 14.16 minutes shorter (11.39-16.93; P < 0.0001). In multivariate regression, preloaded graft use saved $457.19, DMEK (compared with DSAEK) saved $349.97, and simultaneous cataract surgery added $855.17 in day-of-surgery costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost analysis of TDABC identified a day-of-surgery cost and surgical time reduction associated with the use of preloaded grafts for DMEK, DMEK compared with DSAEK, and isolated EK compared with EK combined with cataract surgery. This study provides an improved understanding of surgical cost drivers and margin incentivization, which may explain trends and indirectly influence patient care decisions in cornea surgery practices.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Pars Plana Vitrectomy Alone or Combined with Phacoemulsification to Treat Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review of the Recent Literature

Pars plana vitrectomy is today a common first-line procedure for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Removal or preservation of the natural lens at the time of vitrectomy is associated with both advantages and disadvantages. The combination of cataract extraction (i.e., phacoemulsification) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPVc) enhances visualization of the peripheral retina and the surgical management of the vitreous base. However, PPVc prolongs the surgical time and is associated with iatrogenic loss of the accommodation function in younger patients, possible postoperative anisometropia, and unexpected refractive results. Performance of pars plana vitrectomy alone (PPVa) requires good technical skills to minimize the risk of lens damage, and quickens cataract development. We retrieved all recent papers that directly compared PPVc and PPVa using parameters that we consider essential when choosing between the two procedures (the success rate of anatomical RRD repair, postoperative refractive error, intra- and postoperative complications, and costs). PPVa and PPVc were generally comparable in terms of RRD anatomical repair. PPVc was associated with fewer intraoperative, but more postoperative, complications. Macula-off RRD PPVc treatment was often associated with undesirable myopic refractive error. PPVa followed by phacoemulsification was the most expensive procedure.

Combined versus Sequential Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Phacoemulsification for Macular Hole and Epiretinal Membrane - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TOPIC

To compare the efficacy and safety between combined and sequential pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification for macular hole (MH) and epiretinal membrane (ERM).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The standard of care for MH and ERM is vitrectomy, which increases risk of developing cataract. Combined phacovitrectomy eliminates the need for a second surgery.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched in May 2022 for all articles comparing combined versus sequential phacovitrectomy for MH and/or ERM. The primary outcome was mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12-months follow-up. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. (PROSPERO, registration number, CRD42021257452) RESULTS: Of the 6470 studies found, 2 RCTs and 8 non-randomized retrospective comparative studies were identified. Total eyes for combined and sequential groups were 435 and 420, respectively. Meta-analysis suggested no significant difference between combined and sequential surgery for 12-month BCVA (combined = 0.38 logMAR, sequential = 0.36 logMAR; mean difference (MD) = +0.02 logMAR; 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.08; p = 0.51, I² = 0%, n = 4 studies, 398 participants), as well as absolute refractive error (p = 0.76, I² = 97%, n = 4 studies, 289 participants), risk of myopia (p = 0.15, I² = 66%, n = 2 studies, 148 participants), MH non-closure (p = 0.57, I² = 48%, n = 4 studies, 321 participants), cystoid macular edema (p = 0.15, I² = 0%, n = 6 studies, 526 participants), high intraocular pressure (p = 0.09, I² = 0%, n = 2 studies, 161 participants), posterior capsule opacification (p = 0.46, I² = 0%, n = 2 studies, 161 participants), posterior capsule rupture (p = 0.41, I² = 0%, n = 5 studies, 455 participants) and retinal detachment (p = 0.67, I² = 0%, n = 6 studies, 545 participants).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was detected between combined and sequential surgeries for visual outcomes, refractive outcomes, or complications. Given that most studies were retrospective and contained a high risk-of-bias, future high-quality RCTs are warranted.

Assessment of Risk Factors Affecting Refractive Outcomes after Phacovitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane

PURPOSE

To investigate factors associated with refractive outcomes after phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM).

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients undergoing phacovitrectomy for ERM was done. The main outcome measure was predictive refraction error (PE), defined as observed refraction error - target refraction error, calculated by the SRK/T, Haigis, and SRK II formulae. PE was measured at postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months. Simple and multiple linear regression analysis were used to evaluate factors associated with PE.

RESULTS

A total of 53 eyes of 53 patients were included. The mean PEs at postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months were all negative, implying myopic shift in all patients regardless of the intraocular lens formula used. Haigis formula showed the least myopic shift among the three formulae (p = 0.001, Friedman test). There was no significant difference in PE depending on preoperative central macular thickness (CMT) in subgroup analysis. On stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, ERM etiology (β = 0.759, p = 0.004, SRK/T formula; β = 0.733, p = 0.008, Haigis formula; β = 0.933, p < 0.001, SRK II formula), preoperative anterior chamber depth (β = -0.662, p = 0.013, Haigis formula; β = -0.747, p = 0.003, SRK II formula), and decrease of CMT (β = -0.003, p = 0.025, SRK/T formula) were significantly associated with PE at postoperative 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Myopic shift in PE was observed after combined phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane. ERM etiology, preoperative anterior chamber depth, and decrease of CMT were significantly associated with PE at postoperative 6 months. There was no difference in PE after surgery between the two groups defined by CMT (≥500 and <500 μm).

Temporal Change in Anterior Chamber Depth after Combined Vitrectomy and Cataract Surgery Using Different Sizes of Intraocular Lens

This study aimed to investigate the temporal changes in the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and refractive prediction error (RPE) of 6 and 7 mm diameter intraocular lenses (IOLs) after cataract surgery or phacovitrectomy with or without sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas. We reviewed 120 eyes (120 patients) and divided them into six groups: three groups of cataract surgery alone and phacovitrectomy (with or without SF6), which were further divided according to IOL diameter (6 and 7 mm) used. We examined the ACD and IOL position using a swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomograph at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively; and the RPE at 1 month postoperatively. The ACD and IOL position at postoperative day 1 in the SF6 injection groups were significantly smaller than those in the other groups (p < 0.01). At 1 week, the ACD and IOL position of the 6 mm IOL SF6 injection group was smaller than those in the other groups (p < 0.01); thus, complications such as synechia or pupillary capture should be considered in the early postopera-tive period of phacovitrectomy with SF6, especially in the 6 mm IOL. The ACD, IOL position, and RPE at 1 month did not significantly differ among the groups, regardless of the IOL diameter or SF6. In the SF6 injection groups, the ACD and IOL position gradually deepened with less gas.

Refractive Outcomes of Combined Cataract Surgery and Vitrectomy Compared to Cataract Surgery Alone

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the refractive outcomes of combined cataract surgery and vitrectomy compared to cataract surgery alone.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review study included two groups: (1) combined surgery in 103 eyes (101 patients) who underwent cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) placement by a single cataract surgeon and vitrectomy by a single vitreoretinal surgeon at the same surgical setting; (2) cataract surgery alone by the same surgeon in 107 eyes (84 patients). Refractive outcomes and complications between the combined and cataract surgery alone group were compared. The predicted refractive error was compared to postoperative refractive outcomes in both groups, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), intraoperative or postoperative complications of either cataract surgery or vitrectomy, and cystoid macular edema.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between predicted and actual postoperative refractive outcomes between the combined and cataract surgery alone groups (within ±0.5 diopters [D], p = 0.099; within ±1.0 D, p = 0.721). There was no difference in SIA refractive outcomes between the two groups (p = 0.509). The use of intraoperative gas for retina tamponade did not significantly affect postoperative refractive outcomes. Both cataract surgery and vitrectomy were successfully performed without unexpected complications from either procedure affecting the other.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Combined cataract surgery and vitrectomy allows excellent refractive outcomes equal to cataract surgery alone, allowing each procedure to be performed independently by separate anterior and posterior segment surgeons. Combined procedures can be performed in eyes with a variety of retinal indications and can include fluid-gas exchange with minimal risk of PCIOL malposition or change in targeted refraction.

Influence of combined phacovitrectomy without tamponade on intraocular lens displacement and postoperative refraction

PURPOSE

To compare phacoemulsification versus phacovitrectomy regarding postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) shift and refraction.

METHODS

This prospective bilateral comparison study included 40 eyes of 20 patients. Inclusion criteria were combined phacovitrectomy without gas/air tamponade in one eye and cataract surgery in the contralateral eye with implantation of the same IOL. Postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) was compared between both groups 1-5 hr, 1 day and 8 weeks after surgery. Postoperative refraction was compared after 8 weeks using the Holladay I, HofferQ, SRK/T, Haigis and Barrett formulae.

RESULTS

There were no intergroup differences in ACD (8 weeks: 0.02 mm absolute difference, SD 0.22, range -0.36 to 0.65, p = 0.401), mean absolute refractive error (8 weeks: Holladay I p = 0.452; HofferQ p = 0.475; SRK/T p = 0.498; Haigis p = 0.869; and Barrett p = 0.352) or percentages within the 0.5 D and 1.0 D range at any time-point. All formulae were optimized for the phacovitrectomy and the cataract groups. There was no correlation of macular thickness change and refractive error (cataract group r²  = -0.13, p = 0.58; phacovitrectomy group r²  = -0.10, p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Combined phacovitrectomy without air/ gas tamponade caused neither ACD displacement nor refractive shifts compared to phacoemulsification alone. Surgically induced macular thickness change had no significant influence on postoperative refraction in this study. All five IOL formulae showed comparable postoperative refractive outcomes.

Intraocular lens power calculation formulas accuracy in combined phacovitrectomy: an 8-formulas comparison study

Background

Our study aimed to assess and compare the accuracy of 8 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (Barrett Universal II, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane and PEARL-DGS) in patients submitted to combined phacovitrectomy for vitreomacular (VM) interface disorders.

Methods

Retrospective chart review study including axial-length matched patients submitted to phacoemulsification alone (Group 1) and combined phacovitrectomy (Group 2). Using optimized constants in both groups, refraction prediction error of each formula was calculated for each eye. The optimised constants from Group 1 were also applied to patients of Group 2 – Group 3. Outcome measures included the mean prediction error (ME) and its standard deviation (SD), mean (MAE) and median (MedAE) absolute errors, in diopters (D), and the percentage of eyes within ± 0.25D, ± 0.50D and ± 1.00D.

Results

A total of 220 eyes were included (Group 1: 100; Group 2: 120). In Group 1, the difference in formulas absolute error was significative (p = 0.005). The Kane Formula had the lowest MAE (0.306) and MedAE (0.264). In Group 2, Kane had the overall best performance, followed by PEARL-DGS, EVO 2.0 and Barrett Universal II. The ME of all formulas in both Groups 1 and 2 were 0.000 (p = 0.934; p = 0.971, respectively). In Group 3, a statistically significant myopic shift was observed for each formula (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Surgeons must be careful regarding IOL power selection in phacovitrectomy considering the systematic myopic shift evidenced—constant optimization may help eliminating such error. Moreover, newly introduced formulas and calculation methods may help us achieving increasingly better refractive outcomes both in cataract surgery alone and phacovitrectomy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40942-021-00315-7.

PHACOVITRECTOMY VERSUS LENS-SPARING VITRECTOMY FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR ACCORDING TO THE SURGICAL EXPERIENCE

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety between lens-sparing vitrectomy and phacovitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treatment according to surgical experience.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 193 patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment who underwent either lens-sparing vitrectomy (n = 111) or phacovitrectomy (n = 82). Patients were operated by two experienced surgeons or eight vitreoretinal fellows and had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Anatomical success rate, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Primary anatomical success rate was 92.8% (103/111) for lens-sparing vitrectomy and 91.5% (75/82) for phacovitrectomy (P = 0.733). The fellows had lower success rate after phacovitrectomy compared with the experts, but not statistically significant (85% [34/40] vs. 97.6% [41/42], P = 0.054). During phacovitrectomy, one zonulysis case in the experts group and four posterior capsular rupture cases in the fellows group were noted. Cystoid macular edema was found only after phacovitrectomy (12.2% [10/82]), and epiretinal membrane occurred more after phacovitrectomy than after lens-sparing vitrectomy (28% [23/82] vs. 8.1% [9/111], P < 0.001). There was no difference in the occurrence of cystoid macular edema and epiretinal membrane after phacovitrectomy between two surgeon groups (P = 0.514, 0.701, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy has no additional benefit in improving the surgical outcome of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment management. Considering the intraoperative and postoperative complications and the relatively low success rate, phacovitrectomy may not be a desirable option in inexperienced surgeons.

Retinal detachment during COVID-19 era: a review of challenges and solutions

Background

Since the beginning of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there have been obstacles in the proper diagnosis and management of many diseases. We evaluated the changes in retinal detachment (RD) presentation and surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and propose solutions to minimize the detrimental effects of lockdown on RD diagnosis.

Materials and methods

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles with the keywords “Retinal detachment” AND “Coronavirus OR COVID-19 OR SARS OR MERS.”

Results

The COVID-19 lockdown was associated a 53–66% reduction in RD presentation. The decrease in the rate of macula-on RD, the increase in the mean duration of symptoms, and the rise in the number of patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy were all suggestive of a delayed presentation of RD. Moreover, a drop of 56–62% in RD repair surgeries was observed. However, the most frequently performed ophthalmic surgery changed from cataract surgery in April 2019 to RD repair in April 2020. Using phacovitrectomy instead of vitrectomy alone can reduce the number of operations in ophthalmology centers, decrease the use of personal protective equipment by 50%, and cut costs per patient by 17–20%. Also, developing a well-organized telemedicine system can decrease unnecessary visits and delayed presentations.

Conclusion

Delay in RD presentation and surgery is associated with a poorer prognosis. Optimizing the guidelines of RD management and developing a well-organized telemedicine system can minimize the impact of lockdown on RD management.

Comparative study of combined vitrectomy with phacoemulsification versus vitrectomy alone for primary full-thickness macular hole repair

Background

To assess the effectiveness and safety of 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification versus vitrectomy alone in patients over 50 years with primary full-thickness macular holes (FTMH).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records related to 406 consecutive vitrectomies performed for primary FTMH. Phacovitrectomy was performed in 294 phakic eyes whereas vitrectomy alone in 112 pseudophakic eyes. The cases were divided into three groups according to the stage of the FTMH: stage 2 (n = 93), stage 3 (n = 270), or stage 4 (n = 43). The primary outcome measure was the closure of the FTMH. The secondary outcome measures were the evolution of visual acuity as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Results

Neither the primary nor the secondary outcomes differed between phacovitrectomy and vitrectomy alone for all three stages. The FTMH were closed in 375 eyes (92.4 %) after a first operation. The closure rate was higher for stage 2 (96.8 %) than for stages 3 (91.1 %) or 4 (90.75 %), but not significantly (P = 0.189). The mean visual acuity increased significantly from preoperatively LogMAR 0.68 (± SD 0.2) to LogMAR 0.43 (± SD 0.24) at the end of the follow-up (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Combined 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with phacoemulsification for primary FTMH repair in patients over 50 years is as efficient and safe when compared with vitrectomy only.

Trial registration

The study was approved on 30^th April 2020 by the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission Ostschweiz, EKOS 20/074; BASEC Nr. 2020-01033).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-01918-2.

PHACOVITRECTOMY FOR PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR: A Retrospective Review

PURPOSE

To analyze the single surgery success rate and anterior segment complications related to phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in a series of patients undergoing phacovitrectomy for all types of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective interventional case series on 302 eyes undergoing phacovitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair between November 1, 2016, and February 2, 2019, in Edmonton, Canada. Primary outcomes included single surgery retinal reattachment rate and anterior segment complications. Secondary outcomes included the effects of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and macula and/or peripheral internal limiting membrane peeling on the rate of surgical success.

RESULTS

The single surgery success rate of phacovitrectomy for all types of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was 85.1%. The presence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy was associated with lower surgical success (odds ratio, 0.33; P = 0.01). Macular internal limiting membrane peeling was associated with higher surgical success (odds ratio, 2.4; P = 0.05). Anterior segment complications included posterior capsular opacification (28.8%), posterior synechiae (10.9%), and posterior capsular rupture (2.3%).

CONCLUSION

Phacovitrectomy is a safe and effective treatment option for the primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. This study provides evidence to support the safe incorporation of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation with retinal surgery.

Refractive outcomes of 8 biometric formulas in combined phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for epiretinal membrane

PURPOSE

To investigate the accuracy of 8 different biometric formulas in combined phacovitrectomy and the effect of constant optimization on refractive outcome.

SETTING

Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

In this single-center study, patients with cataract and epiretinal membrane who underwent combined phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling (Group B) and axial length-matched patients who underwent phacoemulsification (Group A) were included. In Group C, optimized constants from Group A were applied in patients of Group B. One eye of each patient was included. Main outcome measures after constant optimization for each biometric formula were refractive prediction error (PE), mean absolute error (MAE), and percentages of eyes with a PE within ±0.25 diopters (D), ±0.5 D, and ±1.0 D.

RESULTS

The study comprised 128 patients. For all formulas in Group A and Group B, refractive PE was 0.000 (P = .964 and P = .967, respectively). For formulas Barrett, Haigis, Hill, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Kane, and SRK-T, refractive PE was -0.147, -0.204, -0.180, -0.212, -0.180, -0.178, -0.153, and -0.159, respectively, in Group C (P = .569); MAE was 0.346, 0.375, 0.382, 0.379, 0.355, 0.377, 0.318, and 0.364, respectively, in Group A (P = .286); 0.402, 0.422, 0.417, 0.427, 0.417, 0.402, 0.370, and 0.401, respectively, in Group B (P = .364); and 0.401, 0.424, 0.419, 0.444, 0.424, 0.404, 0.391, and 0.422, respectively, in Group C (P = .767). Effect of constant optimization in phacovitrectomy was statistically significant for all formulas (P < .001 for each formula).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant difference was observed between the biometric formulas with regard to PE and MAE. However, in terms of phacovitrectomy, constant optimization should be considered for individual intraocular lens power calculations attributable to myopic shift.

Epiretinal membrane vitrectomy: outcomes with or without cataract surgery and a novel prognostic factor for cystoid macular edema

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes of vitrectomy with or without cataract surgery for the treatment of idiopathic ERM in phakic eyes and evaluate predictors of functional and anatomical outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of consecutive phakic ERM eyes distributed in three groups: a) combined (phacovitrectomy) group, b) PPV-only group, and c) consecutive group (PPV followed by cataract surgery). Main outcomes were final visual acuity (VA) and cystoid macular edema (CME) occurrence. Potential predictors of VA or CME included clinical variables and SD-OCT parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 108 eyes were included in this study. There were no differences in the final VA between consecutive and combined groups (0.22 vs 0.10 logMAR, p = 0.851). Twelve eyes from the combined group (23%) and one eye from the PPV-only group presented CME (p = 0.001). There were no differences between postoperative CME occurrence in combined versus consecutive group (12 vs 7, p = 0.38). The presence of cotton-ball sign predicted the development of CME [OR 2.86 (95%CI 1.01-8.18), p = 0.049] while separated ERM-ILM complex was found to be protective [OR 0.25 (95%CI 0.08-0.77), p = 0.015].

CONCLUSIONS

Functional and anatomical results of PPV with ERM and ILM peeling combined with cataract surgery was equivalent to the consecutive procedure, with both strategies being effective. Separated ERM-ILM complex has prognostic value in these patients, as its presence at baseline was found to be protective for postoperative CME.

Combined versus Sequential Phacoemulsification and Pars Plana Vitrectomy: A Meta-Analysis

TOPIC

It is unclear whether differences exist in efficacy and safety between combined versus sequentially performed phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy (phaco-PPV).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and incidence of complications between these surgical methods.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for articles reporting the efficacy and safety of combined versus sequential phaco-PPV for any indication. The primary outcomes were postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and mean absolute refractive error from target (RET). Secondary outcomes included efficacy outcomes and postoperative complications. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model in all cases. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for randomized trials and ROBINS-I tool for observational studies.

RESULTS

Of the 5410 articles identified, 1 randomized controlled trial and 14 comparative studies were included, with 1407 and 951 eyes in the combined and sequential surgery groups, respectively. Mean age was 62.71 ± 6.16 years and 44% (range, 32.1%-70%) of eyes were from men. The mean baseline BCVA was 0.88 ± 0.59 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units (Snellen equivalent, 20/152). The meta-analysis showed no significance between groups in postoperative mean BCVA (P = 0.76) and mean absolute RET (P = 0.46). The risks of synechiae formation (risk ratio [RR], 2.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83-4.11; P < 0.001), fibrin formation (RR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.84-4.30; P < 0.001), and intraoperative or postoperative retinal detachment (RR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.08-6.47; P = 0.03) were significantly higher after combined surgery. However, the risks of posterior capsular tear (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.73; P = 0.002) and macular hole nonclosure or reopening (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.03-0.93; P = 0.04) were significantly lower in the combined group.

DISCUSSION

No significant differences were found in visual and refractive outcomes between combined and sequential phaco-PPV, whereas differences existed in certain safety outcomes. These conclusions remain preliminary, as most evidence is derived from low- to moderate-quality retrospective studies. Given the variability in outcome reporting and associated heterogeneity, future randomized controlled trials are needed.

Biometric refractive error after cataract and retina surgery: a systematic review and a benchmark proposal

PURPOSE

To systematically review studies on refractive error after phacovitrectomy and phacoemulsification and to investigate factors associated with larger error.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed using PUBMED and EMBASE until May 2020. The articles were included in the study if they reported data about refractive error as the difference in spherical equivalent between actual vs. target refraction in patients who underwent phacovitrectomy and phacoemulsification according to the type of biometry (ultrasound or optical). An inverse variance meta-analysis technique was used to pool errors; standard deviations (SDs), which are an expression of random error, were reported descriptively as median and range of the 95% coefficient of reproducibility (95% CR: 1.96 SD).

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (197,353 eyes) were included. The mean error obtained using optical biometry was negligible for phacoemulsification (0.04 D, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.12; 8 studies, 587 eyes) and was consistent with larger datasets using mixed biometric methods (0.02, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.04; 5 studies, 194,522 eyes). A trend towards hyperopia was found with ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification (+0.21 D, 0.00-0.42 D; 7 studies, 394 eyes). Mean error after phacovitrectomy was clinically insignificant with optical biometry (-0.10 D, -0.22 to 0.02;, 8 studies, 453 eyes), and) and a mild myopic shift was possible with ultrasound biometry (-0.39 D, 95% CI: -0.68 to -0.09 D; 6 studies, 529 eyes). The 95% CR was greater and more variable with ultrasound biometry in patients who underwent phacovitrectomy (median 1.75 D, range 0.47-2.5) while it was consistent and lower with optical biometry in patients who underwent phacoemulsification (median 0.96 D, range 0.60-1.2]).

CONCLUSIONS

Phacovitrectomy causes a mild myopic shift compared to phacoemulsification, which is clinically relevant only with ultrasound biometry. Furthermore, our review provides estimates of fixed and random error for postoperative vs. target spherical equivalent as a continuous variable, that is easy to use as benchmark for quality assurance.

Cost-effectiveness of the triple procedure - phacovitrectomy with posterior capsulotomy compared to phacovitrectomy and sequential procedures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the triple procedure (phacovitrectomy + posterior capsulotomy, PhacoPPVc) compared to the double- (phacovitrectomy, PhacoPPV) or single sequential procedures.

METHODS

Prospective study on 31 eyes from 31 patients (mean age: 72.1 ± 9.1 years; 55% females) was performed with a preoperative decision to undergo only pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) (26%) or PhacoPPV (74%) and/or posterior capsulotomy based upon presence or absence of lens opacification or pseudophakia. Time during and between surgeries, surgical procedure codes, medical and transport costs, outcome and likelihood of complications after surgery were all included in the analysis. Societal perspectives and visual acuity were considered as measures of quality of adjusted life years (QALYs).

RESULTS

About 23 eyes underwent triple procedure and eight eyes underwent vitrectomy only (mean surgery times: 35.9 and 24.0 min, respectively). Posterior capsulotomy took on average 30 s, while preparation and cataract procedure took 13.0 min. The patients travelled on average 80km (average cost: $280.12) to the surgery unit. The average reimbursement fee for the day procedures ranged between $174.17 (YAG capsulotomy; Diagnosis Related Group (DRG): 0.034), $1045.48 (Phaco + intraocular lens (IOL); DRG: 0.204) and $1701.32 (PPV; DRG: 0.332). The combined procedures excluded lens and laser reimbursements, while the calculated reimbursements for the double/triple procedures were $2713.08/$2901.45, respectively, without significant loss of QALYs. PhacoPPVc was found to be unequivocally cost-effective, while PhacoPPV remained cost saving compared to sequential procedures.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the triple procedure has benefits to the patients, health institution and surgeon. For patients, it saves them travel and healing time; for health institution, it justifies the calculated higher costs and need for higher reimbursement for the double/triple procedures, which are cost saving.

Combined phaco-vitrectomy provides lower costs and greater area under the curve vision gains than sequential vitrectomy and phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

A majority of phakic patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane or macular hole require subsequent cataract surgery within 1-2 years. Combined phaco-vitrectomy eliminates the need for a second surgery and may enable patients to attain their best vision sooner. This study aims to compare the visual outcomes, complication rates, and costs of combined phaco-vitrectomy versus sequential vitrectomy followed by cataract surgery.

METHODS

Records were searched by CPT® codes to identify patients with both cataract and vitrectomy surgery at our institution over a 5-year period (2013-2018). Chart review included medical history, demographics, exam findings, operating room records, visual acuity (VA), and clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS v19 (IBM). Area under the curve for visual acuity was calculated as the trapezoidal mean of the change in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters.

RESULTS

After exclusion, 81 eyes of 78 patients underwent both cataract and vitrectomy surgeries at our institution. Thirty-four eyes underwent separate, sequential vitrectomy then phacoemulsification surgery, and 47 eyes had combined phaco-vitrectomy surgery. Total operating room times (120.81 ± 3.41 vs 161.03 ± 5.45 min; p < 0.0001) and associated costs were significantly lower in the combined surgery compared with those in the sequential surgery group. Baseline and final visual acuity were similar between the two groups. Baseline VA was 35.53 letters (~ 20/200) and 32.81 letters (~ 20/220) and increased to final VA of 63.74 (~ 20/53) and 60.91 letters (~ 20/61), in the sequential and combined groups respectively. Area under the curve for vision was greater in the combined surgery group, with subjects gaining an average of + 9.11 ± 3.32 letters from sequential surgery, and + 19.53 ± 3.53 letters in the combined surgery group (p = 0.04). Additionally, patients in the combined group attained their best visual acuity 449 days (15 months) sooner than those receiving sequential surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined phaco-vitrectomy surgery resulted in greater area under the curve visual acuity benefit and attainment of best visual acuity 15 months sooner compared with conventional sequential surgeries. There were no significant differences in complication rates or clinical outcomes between the groups, but operative times and costs were lower for combined surgery, supporting a favorable cost-benefit ratio. Graphical abstract.

Vitreoretinal Surgery in the Post-Lockdown Era: Making the Case for Combined Phacovitrectomy

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly limited the capacity of healthcare systems to provide elective services like cataract surgery. Cataract formation is a frequent complication after pars plana vitrectomy. In this paper, we review the pros and cons of combined phacovitrectomy as opposed to sequential surgery in the post-pandemic era. In particular, we discuss the patient-level visual benefits and societal economic advantages of this procedure.

Combining cataract surgery with 25-gauge high-speed pars plana vitrectomy: A prospective study

PURPOSE

To compare visual outcome and postoperative complications of combined 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification with vitrectomy alone surgery in patients with epiretinal membrane and macular hole.

METHODS

A total of 110 eyes (73 eyes with epiretinal membrane and 37 eyes with macular hole) were enrolled in this prospective study. The eyes were divided into two groups: Group A included 55 eyes which underwent phacovitrectomy at the same time and Group B included 55 eyes which underwent vitrectomy alone. Follow-up visits were at 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

The best-corrected visual acuity correlation by analysis of variance measurement showed statistically non-significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.32). The post hoc analysis from baseline, 1°, 2°, and 3° follow-ups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The most common postoperative complication was cystoid macular edema that has been detected in 11 patients (10%) (seven eyes in Group A and four eyes in Group B): 2 patients (1.8%) developed a chronic macular edema. Intraocular hypertension occurred in five eyes (4.5%) (three in Group A and two in Group B). Four eyes (3.6%) underwent another surgical procedure for a persistent macular hole (two in Group A and two in Group B). The intraocular lens repositioning was performed one day after surgery in three eyes (2.7%) (Group A). The mean preoperative visual acuity was not different between the two groups (p = 0.80).

CONCLUSION

No significative differences between combined surgery and vitrectomy alone have been detected, in terms of postoperative complications and visual outcome.

A comparative study of lens management in the United Kingdom and India with regard to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery

INTRODUCTION

Lens management in phakic patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachments undergoing para plana vitrectomy surgery remains controversial among vitreoretinal surgeons. When combined phacovitrectomy is performed, the biometry decisions can be challenging both in the face of macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments and previous refractive surgery. This study analyses current trends in practise.

METHODS

A scenario-related survey was sent to all members of the British and Eire Association of Vitreoretinal Surgeons and to vitreoretinal surgeons in the northern Indian state of Punjab.

RESULTS

In post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis patients with a visually significant cataract and a macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, the majority of British and Eire Association of Vitreoretinal Surgeons members (67.3%) and surgeons in Punjab (91.4%) would perform a stand-alone para plana vitrectomy and defer cataract surgery. When a combined phacovitrectomy is performed in this scenario, the majority of British and Eire Association of Vitreoretinal Surgeons (68%) would implant an intraocular lens (using either Haigis-L or European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons/American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons calculators), whereas the majority of Punjab surgeons (79.3%) would leave the patient aphakic. In a patient with a cataract and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment undergoing combined phacovitrectomy surgery, without any previous refractive surgery, the majority of British and Eire Association of Vitreoretinal Surgeons members (47.3%) would use the opposite eye biometry, whereas most Punjab surgeons (62.7%) would leave the patient aphakic.

DISCUSSION

Vitreoretinal surgeons in both the United Kingdom and Punjab predominantly avoid combined surgery in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment cases, even when faced with a visually significant cataract. When combined phacovitrectomy is performed, most vitreoretinal surgeons preference using the opposite eye biometry for macula-off cases and Haigis-L (myope) or online calculators for post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis cases.

Macular Hole Surgery Using Gas Tamponade-An Outcome from the Oslo Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose: The study aims to determine the anatomical success and functional outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for macular holes (MH) performed at a single study center using a consistent procedure of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, SF6 tamponade and 3 days face-down positioning. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study involving eyes with MHs which underwent 23- or 25-gauge PPV with or without phacoemulsification and all undergoing a 20% SF6 gas tamponade, follow-up to 6 months postoperatively were included at the Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (12-month study period between 1 January and 31 December 2015) Pre- and post-operative Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) assessment, comprehensive eye examination and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. as well as Optical Coherence Tomography to determine the diameter of the MH and its closure were all carried out. Results: 198 consecutive eyes operated for MH (age: 69.4 ± 7.6 years; 1.6:1 female:male ratio) were included; 35.7%/48.6% had symptoms from 3-6/6-48 months; 5.1% had high-grade myopia, 21.5% focal VMT <1500 µm with or without epiretinal membrane (ERM), and 74.0%/26.0% had phakic/pseudophakic status. Primary closure of the MH occurred in 93.3% of the patients. Lens status and length of symptoms showed no significant correlation with closure of the MH. The pre-operative logMAR visual acuity: 0.8 ± 0.3 (median: 0.7; interquartile range (IQR): 0.5-0.8; range: 0.3-1.7), improved significantly post-operatively: 0.4 ± 0.3 (median: 0.3; interquartile range (IQR): 0.1-0.5; range: -0.02-1.2). BCVA improvement of <0.2, 0.2-0.4 and >0.4 was present in 28.3%, 27.3% and 44.4% of the treated patients. No significant median differences could be detected between the duration of the pre-operative symptoms and the pre-/post-operative visual acuity. Increased IOP was measured in 2.6% of the cases day after surgery. Conclusions: Our study found visual outcome not to be dependent upon the length of symptoms in MH patients treated by PPV all undergoing ILM peeling, SF₆ tamponade and face-down positioning. The large diameter MH was not a limiting factor to achieve improved post-operative BCVA.

Optical Biometry-Based Intraocular Lens Calculation and Refractive Outcomes after Phacovitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment and Epiretinal Membrane

We investigate the refractive error after phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD; 100 eyes) and epiretinal membrane (ERM; 102 eyes). Axial lengths were measured by optical biometry in most patients. The main outcome measures were the refractive and absolute prediction errors. The overall mean refractive prediction error (ME) and mean absolute prediction error (MAE) were −0.40 ± 0.72 D and 0.62 ± 0.55 D, respectively, at 3 months postoperatively. The ME and MAE were significantly higher in the RRD group than in the ERM group (−0.63 ± 0.74 D vs −0.16 ± 0.63 D, P < 0.001 and 0.75 ± 0.62 D vs 0.49 ± 0.43 D, P = 0.002, respectively), indicating greater myopic shift in the RRD group. In the RRD group, adding +0.5 D to the preoperative predicted refractive power decreased the postoperative ME and MAE to −0.13 ± 0.74 D and 0.58 ± 0.47 D, respectively. Based on our results, we conclude that postoperative myopic shift was significantly higher in the RRD group than in the ERM group, possibly because of forward displacement of the intraocular lens by gas tamponade. The myopic shift can be minimized by adding +0.5 D to the predicted refractive power in patients undergoing phacovitrectomy for RRD.

Incidence and Characteristics of Cataract Surgery in Poland, during 2010-2015

Background: To assess the incidence and characteristic of cataract surgery in Poland from 2010 to 2015 and to interpret these findings. Patients and methods: Data from all patients who underwent cataract surgery alone or in combined procedures in Poland between January 2010 and December 2015 were evaluated. Patient data were from the national database of hospitalizations maintained by National Health Fund. Data on the population of Poland were obtained from Central Statistical Office of Poland. Results: In total, 1,218,777 cataract extractions (alone or combined with other procedures) were performed in 1,081,345 patients during 2010–2015. Overall, the incidence of cataract surgery increased from 5.22/1000 person-years in 2010 to 6.17/1000 person-years in 2015. Phacoemulsification was performed in 97.46% of cataract extractions, and 3.02% of cataract extractions were combined procedures. The rate of one-day procedures increased from 28.3% in 2010 to 43.1% in 2015. The probability of second-eye surgery 12 months after the first-eye surgery increased from 44% in 2010 to 73% in 2015 (log-rank test p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In Poland, from 2010 to 2015, the total incidence of cataract surgery, the number of people who underwent surgery, and the number of one-day cataract surgeries increased significantly.

Clinical outcomes of 25-gauge vitrectomy surgery for vitreoretinal diseases: comparison of vitrectomy alone and phaco-vitrectomy

AIM

To compare the clinical outcomes of combined 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and phacoemulsification/posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL) implantation with vitrectomy alone surgery in patients with various vitreoretinal diseases.

METHODS

A total of 306 eyes (145 with PPV alone and 161 with phaco-vitrectomy) were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. The surgical approach was 25-gauge PPV combined with phacoemulsification and PC-IOL implantation at the same time in eyes in phaco-vitrectomy group and only PPV in eyes in vitrectomy alone surgery group. The main outcome measures were postoperative clinical outcomes included anterior chamber inflammation, changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

RESULTS

The most common postoperative complication was anterior chamber reaction which has higher incidence in phaco-vitrectomy group (P<0.001). The mean postoperative 1(st) day IOP of vitrectomy alone group was significantly lower than that of phaco-vitrectomy group (16.3±5.8 mm Hg vs 17.8±8.1 mm Hg, respectively, P=0.02). Hypotony (IOP≤8 mm Hg) was not different between groups in the postoperative 1(st) day (P>0.05). The mean preoperative visual acuity was not different between groups (1.6±0.9 logMAR vs 1.8±0.9 logMAR, respectively, P>0.05). However, the mean visual acuity was decreased in vitrectomy alone group at the final visit compared to phaco-vitrectomy group (1.2±0.8 logMAR, 0.9±0.7 logMAR, respectively P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Twenty-five gauge PPV combined with phacoemulsification surgery is a safe and efficient procedure, which can be preferred in phacic patients with a variety of vitreoretinal diseases compared to vitrectomy alone. Despite improved outcomes, this approach is not free of limitations as anterior chamber complications especially with combined surgery.

Wait times and volume of cataract surgery in Ontario: 2000-2012

OBJECTIVE

To review cataract surgery trends and wait times in Ontario.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of health records.

METHODS

Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing service claims between 2000 and 2012 were analyzed for the yearly number of cataract surgeries, alone and in combination with other procedures. The number of Ontarians with cataracts was estimated by applying composite prevalence curves derived from published population data. This was then used to calculate the yearly number of procedures per 1000 Ontarians with cataracts.

RESULTS

Per 1000 people with cataract, the rate of cataract extraction increased 18.9% overall from 2000 to 2012, increasing by 38.3% from 2000 to 2006 and decreasing by 14.6% from 2006 to 2012. Mean wait times for cataract surgery decreased by 45.8% from 2006 to 2009 and increased 28.5% from 2009 to 2013. The proportion of surgeries that were same-day bilateral cataract extraction increased 2.21-fold from 2000 to 2012 but represented only 0.82% of total cataract surgeries in 2012. In 2000, 3% of cataract surgeries were combined with other procedures, and this decreased to 1.8% in 2012. Of these combinations, the rates of combined glaucoma filtration procedures decreased by 44.3%, anterior vitrectomy decreased by 32.5%, posterior vitrectomy increased by 58.3%, and corneal transplantation decreased by 10.7% during this time period.

CONCLUSIONS

The yearly rate of cataract surgery has decreased since 2006, and wait times have increased from 2009. Same-day bilateral cataract extraction represented less than 1% of the total cataract surgical volume. Rates of cataract combined with posterior vitrectomy have increased (58%), whereas anterior vitrectomy at the time of cataract surgery decreased (33%).

Clear Corneal Phacovitrectomy with Posterior Capsulorhexis and IOL Implantation in Management of Selective Vitreoretinal Cases

Purpose. To describe our technique, clear corneal phacovitrectomy with posterior capsulorhexis (CCPV), for the management of selected posterior segment intraocular foreign body (IOFB), posteriorly dislocated lens fragments (PDLF), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) cases. Methods. This was a single-center retrospective interventional case series. In 21 patients (21 eyes) we performed phacovitrectomy through three clear corneal tunnel incisions (CCTI) and posterior capsulorhexis to remove IOFB (n = 8), PDLF from the vitreous cavity after complicated phacoemulsification (n = 6), and vitreous hemorrhage and epiretinal membranes in PDR (n = 7). The procedure was completed with implantation of a hydrophobic acrylic IOL through the CCTI. Results. The mean visual acuity (logMAR) was 0.90 preoperative and improved to 0.26 over a mean follow-up of 8.7 months (range, 6–12 months). The intraocular lens was implanted into the capsular bag (n = 12) or onto the anterior capsule (n = 9). One PDR patient experienced an intraprocedural complication, hemorrhage from isolated fibrovascular adhesions. One IOFB patient developed apparent anterior proliferative vitreoretinopathy and required a repeat intervention. Conclusion. Selected vitreoretinal IOFB, PDLF, and PDR cases can be successfully managed by a combined surgical approach involving clear corneal phacovitrectomy with posterior capsulorhexis and implantation of an IOL, with good visual outcome and a low complication rate.