PREDICTIVE VALUE OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHIC FEATURES IN THE BEVACIZUMAB AND RANIBIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA (BRDME) STUDY

A deep learning approach to hard exudates detection and disorganization of retinal inner layers identification on OCT images

The purpose of the study was to detect Hard Exudates (HE) and classify Disorganization of Retinal Inner Layers (DRIL) implementing a Deep Learning (DL) system on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). We collected a dataset composed of 442 OCT images on which we annotated 6847 HE and the presence of DRIL. A complex operational pipeline was defined to implement data cleaning and image transformations, and train two DL models. The state-of-the-art neural network architectures (Yolov7, ConvNeXt, RegNetX) and advanced techniques were exploited to aggregate the results (Ensemble learning, Edge detection) and obtain a final model. The DL approach reached good performance in detecting HE and classifying DRIL. Regarding HE detection the model got an AP@0.5 score equal to 34.4% with Precision of 48.7% and Recall of 43.1%; while for DRIL classification an Accuracy of 91.1% with Sensitivity and Specificity both of 91.1% and AUC and AUPR values equal to 91% were obtained. The P-value was lower than 0.05 and the Kappa coefficient was 0.82. The DL models proved to be able to identify HE and DRIL in eyes with DME with a very good accuracy and all the metrics calculated confirmed the system performance. Our DL approach demonstrated to be a good candidate as a supporting tool for ophthalmologists in OCT images analysis.

Optical coherence tomography in the management of diabetic macular oedema

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is the major cause of visual impairment in people with diabetes. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is now the most widely used modality to assess presence and severity of DMO. DMO is currently broadly classified based on the involvement to the central 1 mm of the macula into non-centre or centre involved DMO (CI-DMO) and DMO can occur with or without visual acuity (VA) loss. This classification forms the basis of management strategies of DMO. Despite years of research on quantitative and qualitative DMO related features assessed by OCT, these do not fully inform physicians of the prognosis and severity of DMO relative to visual function. Having said that, recent research on novel OCT biomarkers development and re-defined classification of DMO show better correlation with visual function and treatment response. This review summarises the current evidence of the association of OCT biomarkers in DMO management and its potential clinical importance in predicting VA and anatomical treatment response. The review also discusses some future directions in this field, such as the use of artificial intelligence to quantify and monitor OCT biomarkers and retinal fluid and identify phenotypes of DMO, and the need for standardisation and classification of OCT biomarkers to use in future clinical trials and clinical practice settings as prognostic markers and secondary treatment outcome measures in the management of DMO.

The additive effect of intravitreal dexamethasone combined with bevacizumab in refractory diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term structural and visual outcomes and side effects associated with intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) combined with bevacizumab (IVB) in treating patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and an inadequate response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents.

METHODS

In this prospective interventional case series, a total of 81 eyes of 81 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and refractory DME were included and assigned to one of two groups: I) those receiving three monthly intravitreal injections of combined bevacizumab and dexamethasone (IVB+IVD) and II) those receiving three monthly intravitreal injections of bevacizumab alone (IVB). The primary outcome was the inter-group difference in central macular thickness (CMT); secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers, and intraocular pressure (IOP) one month after the last injection.

RESULTS

Reduction in CMT and improvement in BCVA were significantly greater in the IVB+IVD group than the IVB group (109.88±156.25 vs. 43±113.67, respectively, P=0.03; and -0.13±0.23 vs. -0.01±0.17, respectively, P=0.008). Presence of neurosensory retinal detachment (NSD) (P<0.001) and complete inner segment/outer segment junction (IS-OS) disruption (P=0.049) on baseline OCT scans were associated with further CMT reductions in response to IVD. Conversely, identifiable epiretinal membrane (ERM) (P=0.002) and multiple hyperreflective foci (>20) (P=0.049) were associated with smaller reductions in CMT. Vitreomacular traction correlated with worse visual outcomes in the IVB+IVD group (P=0.003). The intergroup IOP difference was not clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

In patients with refractory DME, addition of IVD to the standard IVB regimen can improve visual and structural outcomes without increasing the risk of endophthalmitis, IOP rise, or intraocular inflammation. Patients with NSD are more likely to respond well to IVD. The presence of ERM may predict poor treatment response.

A real-world study for timely assessing the diabetic macular edema refractory to intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment

Background

Early Identifying and characterizing patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) is essential for individualized treatment and outcome optimization. This study aimed to timely investigate optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers of DME refractory to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.

Methods

We retrospective reviewed 72 eyes from 44 treatment-naïve patients who were treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF for DME. OCT scans prior to anti-VEGF were evaluated for serous retinal detachment (SRD), size of outer nuclear layer cystoid changes, diffuse retinal thickening, integrity of the inner segment-outer segment (IS-OS) junction, quantity and location of hyperreflective foci, vitreomacular interface abnormalities, and epiretinal membrane (ERM). The Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness was recorded at baseline and 4 months after treatment with anti-VEGF. The main outcome measure was the correlation between spectral-domain OCT measurements and BCVA response at baseline and after anti-VEGF treatment (mean change from baseline; ≥ 10 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in BCVA).

Results

Partially continuous IS-OS layers (partially vs. completely continuous: β, -0.138; Wald chi-square, 16.392; P<0.001) was predictor of better response to anti-VEGF treatment. In contrast, ERM (present vs. absent ERM: β, 0.215; Wald chi-square, 5.921; P=0.015) and vitreomacular traction (vitreomacular traction vs. posterior vitreous detachment: β=0.259; Wald chi-square=5.938; P=0.015) were the predictors of poor response. The improvement of BCVA trended toward the OCT predictive value of central macular thickness reduction; however, this was not significant.

Conclusion

Partially continuous IS-OS layers is predictive of better response to anti-VEGF therapy in DME. Meanwhile, ERM is a significant predictor of poor response.

Predictive factors for treatment outcomes with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in diabetic macular edema in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (DME), a common complication of diabetes. This study aimed to identify factors influencing DME intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment outcomes in real-world practice.

METHODS

This was a multi-center retrospective observational study using medical chart review of participants receiving anti-VEGF injections for DME (N = 248). Demographic and clinical variables were assessed for association with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) outcomes using regression models.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in BCVA (p < 0.001) and CMT (p < 0.001) after 12 months of treatment, although 21% of participants had decreased BCVA, and 41% had a < 10% CMT reduction at 12 months. Higher baseline BCVA (p = 0.022, OR=-0.024, 95% CI=-0.046,-0.004) and longer duration of diabetic retinopathy (p = 0.048, OR=-0.064, 95% CI=-0.129,-0.001) were negative predictors for BCVA response, whereas Aflibercept treatment (p = 0.017, OR = 1.107, 95% CI = 0.220,2.051) compared with other drugs and a positive "early functional response" (p < 0.001, OR=-1.393, 95% CI=-1.946,-0.857) were positive predictors. A higher baseline CMT (p < 0.001, OR = 0.019, 95% CI = 0.012,0.0261) and an "early anatomical response", (p < 0.001, OR=-1.677, 95% CI=-2.456, -0.943) were predictors for greater reduction in CMT. Overall, the variables could predict only 23% of BCVA and 52% of CMT response.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows a significant proportion of DME patients do not respond to anti-VEGF therapy and identifies several clinical predictors for treatment outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved through the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Tasmania (approval number H0012902), and the Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number 86 - 067).

Prevalence and clinical implications of subretinal fluid in retinal diseases: a real-world cohort study

Background/aims

To characterise the baseline prevalence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and its effects on anatomical and visual acuity (VA) outcomes in diabetic macular oedema (DME) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of 122 DME and 54 RVO patients who were initiated on anti-VEGF therapy with real-world variable dosing. The DME and RVO cohorts were subclassified based on the presence of SRF at presentation. Snellen VA was measured and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR). Changes in VA and central subfield thickness (CST) were assessed up to 24 months.

Results

SRF was present in 22% and 41% in DME and RVO patients, respectively. In the DME subcohort, eyes with SRF showed an improvement of 0.166 logMAR (1.7 Snellen chart lines) at 12 months and 0.251 logMAR (2.6 Snellen chart lines) at 24 months, which were significantly greater compared with those of the non-SRF group. A significantly greater reduction in CST was noted in the SRF eyes compared with the non-SRF eyes at 3 months and 1 month in the DME and RVO subcohorts, respectively.

Conclusion

Baseline SRF is a good marker for a greater reduction in CST in both DME and RVO, but an improvement in VA associated with SRF may be only noted in DME.

The Role of Intravitreal Corticosteroids in the Treatment of DME: Predictive OCT Biomarkers

This work aims to summarize predictive biomarkers to guide treatment choice in DME. Intravitreal anti-VEGF is considered the gold standard treatment for centers involving DME, while intravitreal steroid treatment has been established as a second-line treatment in DME. However, more than 1/3 of the patients do not adequately respond to anti-VEGF treatment despite up to 4-weekly injections. Not surprisingly, insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy has been linked to low-normal VEGF levels in the serum and aqueous humor. These patients may well benefit from an early switch to intravitreal steroid treatment. In these patients, morphological biomarkers visible in OCT may predict treatment response and guide treatment decisions. Namely, the presence of a large amount of retinal and choroidal hyperreflective foci, disruption of the outer retinal layers and other signs of chronicity such as intraretinal cysts extending into the outer retina and a lower choroidal vascular index are all signs suggestive of a favorable treatment response of steroids compared to anti-VEGF. This paper summarizes predictive biomarkers in DME in order to assist individual treatment decisions in DME. These markers will help to identify DME patients who may benefit from primary dexamethasone treatment or an early switch.

Optical coherence tomography patterns of diabetic macular edema and treatment response to bevacizumab: a short-term study

Background:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term response of intravitreal bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME) and assess the variation in treatment outcomes in different morphology patterns using spectral domain–optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

Objective:

To study different morphological patterns of DME based on OCT and compare their treatment response to bevacizumab.

Methods:

Hundred and twelve eyes of 112 patients with DME were included and treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml monthly for 3 months). The morphological patterns of DME were classified on the basis of OCT into three groups – diffuse retinal thickening (DRT), cystoid macular edema (CME), and serous retinal detachment (SRD) – and changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after treatment were compared.

Results:

A total of 112 eyes with DME were included and consisted of 40 DRT, 37 CME, and 35 SRD. Treatment with bevacizumab resulted in decrease in central macular thickness and improvement in BCVA in all three groups. The baseline visual acuity and CMT of DRT group was better than that of the other two groups. The treatment outcome was measured in terms of CMT and BCVA. Change in CMT was statistically significant among three groups and was found to be better in DRT group (p < 0.05, 95% confidence interval). However, there was statistically no significant variation between the three groups regarding the change in BCVA (p = 0.169, 95% confidence interval).

Conclusion:

Anatomic and visual improvement can be achieved by bevacizumab in all patterns of DME. However, individual pattern may respond differently. DRT, which appears to be the earliest form of DME, responds better than other types. Thus, the pattern of macular edema shown by OCT may provide an objective guideline in predicting the response of bevacizumab injection in DME.

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Biomarkers Predict Anatomical Response to Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To identify biomarkers that may predict an early anatomical response to the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) by means of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective study of treatment-naïve patients with DME who underwent 6 × 6 mm OCTA imaging of the macula at baseline and after three monthly IVB injections. Thirty-six eyes of 23 patients were included. Eyes that demonstrated evidence of an early anatomical response, consisting of a >10% decrease in central macular thickness (CMT) (n = 18), were compared with those eyes that failed to show such an improvement (n = 18).

RESULTS

At baseline, early-response eyes had worse starting best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, LogMAR 0.84 ± 0.41 versus LogMAR 0.51 ± 0.15, p = 0.004) and a larger CMT (490 ± 135 µm versus 356 ± 33 µm, p = 0.001), but smaller foveal avascular zones (FAZ) (0.309 ± 0.098mm versus 0.413 ± 0.095 mm, p = 0.003) compared with eyes that proved refractory to three monthly injections of IVB. The vascular density (VD) in both the foveal superficial and deep capillary plexuses was significantly greater in eyes that showed an early-treatment response compared with eyes that were non-responders (24.86 ± 6.90% versus 19.98 ± 7.13%, p = 0.045 and 32.30 ± 4.88% versus 26.95 ± 7.25%, p = 0.028, respectively). Early-treatment response to IVB was predicted by starting CMT (r ²= 0.266, p = 0.001), FAZ size (r ²= 0.234, p = 0.003), and VD in the superficial parafovea (r ²= 0.217, p = 0.004) and deep fovea (r ²= 0.157, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Projection-resolved OCTA may be useful in predicting an early anatomical response of DME to treatment with IVB.

Temporal variation of optical coherence tomography biomarkers as predictors of anti-VEGF treatment outcomes in diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To report a longitudinal analysis of specific optical coherence tomography (OCT) features in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with anti-VEGF.

METHODS

A total of 133 eyes of 103 consecutive patients with center-involving DME were included in the study. The eyes were treated between August 2008 and April 2019 with three monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, either with or without prompt or deferred laser, followed by pro re nata (PRN) re-treatment. The following OCT biomarkers were evaluated: subfoveal neuroretinal detachment (SND) (defined as present (SND+) or absent (SND-)), hyperreflective retinal foci (HRF) number (defined as: absent/few(HRF-) or moderate/many (HRF+)), external limiting membrane (ELM) integrity, central macular thickness (CMT), and central retinal thickness (CRT). Changes in SND status and in the number of HRF were evaluated at each DME recurrence throughout the follow-up(FU) period. Mutual correlation among OCT biomarkers and their relationship with visual and anatomic outcomes were assessed both at baseline and over the FU period.

RESULTS

The mean FU was 71.2 months (SD 28.4; min. 12-max. 111). At baseline, the prevalence of SRD+ was 27.8% and a high number of HRF were detected in 41.4% of the eyes. A significant reduction in the number of HRF, CMT, CRT, and in the prevalence of SND was recorded in the post-loading phase (p-value <0.0001). In DME recurrences, the presence of SND+ and HRF+ was significantly more frequent in eyes with baseline SND+ and HRF+ compared to eyes presenting baseline SND- and HRF- (p-value <0.0001). No role of SND (p-value: 0.926) and HRF (p-value: 0.281) as baseline predictors of visual and anatomic outcomes was demonstrated, while a worse visual outcome was significantly correlated with a higher incidence of relapsing SND+ (p-value <0.0001) and HRF+ (p-value <0.0028) throughout the FU period.

CONCLUSION

In this study, SND and HRF were frequently present in DME recurrences with the same pattern exhibited at baseline, suggesting that these OCT biomarkers may characterize a specific pattern of DME that repeats over time. Moreover, the results suggested that the persistence and recurrence of SND and HRF may account for a decrease in visual function more than the baseline prevalence of these biomarkers. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Challenges in Diabetic Macular Edema Management: An Expert Consensus Report

Purpose

This paper aimed to present daily-practice recommendations for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) patients based on available scientific evidence and the clinical experience of the consensus panel.

Methods

A group of Spanish retina experts agreed to discuss different aspects related with the clinical management of DME patients.

Results

Panel was mainly focused on therapeutic objectives in DME management; definition terms; and role of biomarkers as prognostic and predictive factors to intravitreal treatment response. The panel recommends to start DME treatment as soon as possible in those eyes with a visual acuity less than 20/25 (always according to the retina unit capacity). Naïve patient was defined, in a strict manner, as a patient who, up to that moment, had never received any treatment. A refractory DME patient may be defined as the one who did not achieve a complete resolution of the disease, regardless of the treatment administered. Different optical coherence tomography biomarkers, such as disorganization of the retinal inner layers, hyperreflective dots, and cysts, have been identified as prognostic factors.

Conclusion

This document has sought to lay down a set of recommendations and to identify key issues that may be useful for the daily management of DME patients.

Predictive value of pupillography on intraoperative floppy iris syndrome in preoperative period

AIM

To present the frequency of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS) in cataract patients who taking alpha 1-a receptor antagonist (ARA) drugs, and evaluate the predictive value of pupil diameter (PD) changes in IFIS patients.

METHODS

Male cataract patients who are under treatment with alpha-1a-ARAs (alfuzosin, tamsulosin) intraoperatively were evaluated and were grouped as with/without IFIS. The preoperative PD values were compared with controls. Also, the intraoperative manipulations and early/late complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients (77 eyes) of 94 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients have been defined as IFIS (81.91%) and 40 patients (40 eyes) were taking tamsulosin and 37 patients (37 eyes) were taking alfuzosin. During the cataract surgery, the rate of posterior capsular rupture (P=0.754), vitreous loss (P=0.585), iris tears (P=0.004), and iris catching (P=0.000) were higher in IFIS group, but the difference was significant only in the iris catching. At the postoperative first-month visit, persistent IOP rise and iris stromal tears were more frequent in IFIS group, but the difference was not significant (P=0.311, P=0.146; respectively). In contrast, Descemet membrane detachment was insignificantly more frequent in controls (P=0.311). In IFIS and control patients, PDs were 9.54±1.78 and 9.72±1.57 mm (P=0.255) under scotopic illumination, 8.54±1.43 and 8.74±1.25 mm (P=0.289) under mesopic illumination, 6.99±1.35 and 7.27±1.39 mm (P=0.662) under photopic illumination, respectively. However PDs were lower in IFIS under all illumination degrees, no significant difference was detected between groups.

CONCLUSION

IFIS is a significant clinical syndrome with an increased intraoperative/postoperative complication ratio. The prediction of this syndrome is important because of prevention required precautions against possible complications. There is no association between IFIS and preoperative PD.

Age, Initial Central Retinal Thickness, and OCT Biomarkers Have an Influence on the Outcome of Diabetic Macular Edema Treated With Ranibizumab- Tri-center 12-Month Treat-and-Extend Study

Objective: We report the tri-center 1-year outcomes of a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen in four-week intervals with ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: In this retrospective study, all eyes received 3 monthly loading injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab, followed by a T&E regimen for DME. Regression models were used to evaluate the associating factors for visual and anatomical outcomes.

Results: Ninety one eyes from 64 patients were enrolled. Mean LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 0.58 at baseline to 0.36 at month 12 and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 411 μm at baseline to 290 μm at month 12. Younger age and eyes having thinner baseline CRT, with ellipsoid zone disruption (EZD), and without epiretinal membrane (ERM) were associated with better final CRT. Moreover, eyes with thicker baseline CRT tend to receive more injections. Among the parameters, only having ERM or EZD was associated with significant BCVA recovery.

Conclusions: A T&E regimen with ranibizumab by 4-week intervals is effective in improving BCVA and reducing CRT with efficacy notable starting from the third month. Clinical parameters including age, initial CRT, and presence of ERM or EZD significantly influenced therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, the presence of ERM should not preclude DME patients from receiving anti-VEGF therapy. Future studies with larger cohorts are warranted.

Factors associated with 1-year visual response following intravitreal bevacizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema: a retrospective single center study

Background

To explore the association of clinical characteristics and retinal microstructural features on optical coherence tomography in predicting 1-year visual response following intravitreal bevacizumab injections in eyes with visual impairment from center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME).

Methods

Medical records of patients with visual impairment from CI-DME, who initiated intravitreal bevacizumab injections between Jan 2012 and Dec 2016 and were followed for a minimum of 12 months were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

The study included 226 eyes with a mean (SD) baseline visual acuity (VA) of 51.8 (19.1) letters. At week 12, following the three initial treatments, a mean (SD) VA improved to 61.7 (17.8) letters. Visual gain ≥ 10 letters was observed in 109 eyes (48.2%), while a limited early visual gain < 5 letters was noted in 80 eyes (35.4%). At one year, 110 eyes (48.7%) achieved a good VA gain ≥ 10 letters. In addition, eyes with poor baseline VA had a higher proportion of eyes that obtained limited early VA gained at week 12 (< 5 letters) and maintained in this visual response category at moth 12 compared to eyes with better baseline VA (74.1% versus 59.1%). In the multivariable logistic regression, the following factors reduced the probability of 1-year visual gain ≥ 10 letters: elderly (p = 0.040), better baseline vision (p = 0.001), and limited early visual gain < 5 letters at week 12 (p < 0.001). In multivariable linear regression, male (p = 0.010) and eyes with the presence of hyperreflective foci on baseline OCT (p = 0.010) were likely to have higher VA improvement. However, eyes with better baseline VA (p = 0.002), limited early VA gain at week 12 (p < 0.001), and a presence of EZ disruption at week 12 (p = 0.002) were likely to have less VA improvement.

Conclusions

Although bevacizumab is considered as effective management for CI-DME, variability in treatment responses is expected. This study revealed that baseline characteristics and visual responses at week 12 might help predict the long-term treatment response. Eyes with characteristics at risk of limited long-term visual outcome may require attention in optimizing their individual treatment strategies.

Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice of Single Center: Three-Year Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to explore visual and anatomical outcomes in patients who underwent intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection for visual impairment from center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) in clinical practice.

METHODS

Medical records of consecutive CI-DME patients who initiated treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab injection between January 2012 and December 2016 and were followed for at least 12 months were retrospectively reviewed. Visual and anatomical changes after treatment over a 36-month period were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 286 patients (423 eyes) with a mean (standard deviation, SD) age of 56.8 (8.5) years included in this study. One hundred and forty-six (51%) patients were female, and 137 (47.9%) patients received bilateral eye treatment. Mean (SD) presenting visual acuity (VA) of overall eyes was 50.2 (19.6) letter scores. Stratified by baseline vision, eyes with initial VA worse than 20/40 achieved a statistically significant VA improvement, compared to baseline, by +8.4, +6.9, and +5.4 letters at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, with all p values <0.001. However, when initial VA was 20/40 and better, a non-statistically significant change in mean VA by +2.0, -3.5, and -3.6 letters were noted at the same time point (p value between 0.078 and 0.273). Unlike visual changes, a statistically significant decline in central subfield thickness compared to baseline was noted at the end of months 12, 24, and 36 in both initial VA subgroups (all p values <0.001). Nevertheless, even though the median number of given injections considerably decreased from 6 in the first 12 months to 2 in the second 12-month period and 1 in the final 12-month interval, required ophthalmic clinic visits decreased in frequency with median numbers of 10, 7, and 6 appointments in each consecutive 12-month duration.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the benefits of practical intravitreal anti-VEGF utilization to manage CI-DME in real-world settings. The improvement of vision in eyes presenting with poor baseline VA and maintenance of vision in eyes with better baseline VA were demonstrated through the 3-year review of each case. However, the burden of frequent monitoring warrants further evaluation of long-term compliance and efficacy.

Defining Cystoid Macular Degeneration in Diabetic Macular Edema: An OCT-Based Single-center Study

Objectives:

To describe cystoid macular degeneration (CMD), which has no clear definition in diabetic macular edema (DME), and examine its features in optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA).

Materials and Methods:

This study was conducted using OCT images of patients who were followed in Gazi University between November 2011 and March 2015. A total of 259 eyes (187 patients) found to have cystic changes on OCT were included. Macular ischemia, peripheral ischemia, and type of edema were identified on FFA. Vitreomacular interface abnormalities, foveal contour integrity, internal reflectivity of the cysts, and outer retinal layer defects were analyzed from OCT images. The horizontal and vertical diameters of the largest cyst within 1000 μm of the foveal center were measured for the definition of CMD. Cut-offs for these values were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Cystoid macular edema (CME) and CMD groups were created and their characteristics were analyzed.

Results:

The horizontal and vertical diameters of the largest cyst were moderately positively correlated with visual acuity (rs=0.349, r=0.419, respectively). Eyes with horizontal diameter of the largest cyst ≥450 μm were classified as CMD; in this group, sensitivity in the prediction of visual acuity ≤20/60 was 58%. Eyes with horizontal diameter of the largest cyst <450 μm were classified as CME; in this group, specificity in the prediction of visual acuity >20/60 was 73%. For the threshold of 300 μm determined for vertical diameter of the largest cyst, sensitivity was 62% and specificity was 69%. The CME and CMD groups were formed according to these cut-off values. Compared to the CME group, the CMD group had greater central subfield thickness and higher prevalence of outer retinal damage, severe disruption of foveal contour, macular ischemia, and diffuse/mixed type edema.

Conclusion:

In eyes with DME, CMD can be defined as the largest cyst within 1000 μm of the foveal center having a horizontal diameter of ≥450 μm and vertical diameter ≥300 μm, especially if associated with macular ischemia, outer retinal damage, loss of foveal contour, and diffuse/mixed type edema.

Prognostic role of optical coherence tomography after switch to dexamethasone in diabetic macular edema

AIMS

To analyze the visual outcome after early switch to dexamethasone (DEX) in eyes with diabetic macular edema previously treated with ranibizumab (RNB), based on structural spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features.

METHODS

Retrospective study of data from 28 eyes which underwent a loading dose of three monthly RNB injections and were then shifted to DEX implant injection. SD-OCT analysis was performed before switch to DEX (week 12, 12W) according to the presence of integrity of ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), and quantity of hyper-reflective spots (HRS). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes at different time points after DEX (month 1, 1M; 4 months, 4M; and 12 months, 12M) were compared among groups.

RESULTS

Significantly better BCVA was achieved at 1M in eyes with intact EZ (84.2 ± 12.3 letters; p  =  0.04), with intact ELM (83.2 ± 11.5 letters; p < 0.01), and with fewer HRS (84.6 ± 12.5 letters; p = 0.03). However, the greatest percentage visual increase was achieved in eyes with disrupted EZ (+ 11.4%; p < 0.01), with disrupted ELM (+ 17.2%; p < 0.01), without DRIL (+ 12.5%; p < 0.01), and with more HRS (+ 14.3%; p = 0.04). After 12 months, a significant BCVA gain was observed only in eyes with intact retinal inner layers (+ 14.2%; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater percentage BCVA improvement at 1M after switch to DEX was associated with EZ disruption, ELM disruption, intact retinal inner layers, and higher quantity of HRS. A switch to DEX therapy would be useful in patients with these SD-OCT features.

Characteristics of diabetic macular edema patients with serous retinal detachment

To determine characteristics of diabetic macular edema patients with serous retinal detachment (SRD).We classified naïve diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with or without SRD, and compared their baseline characteristics; intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) responsiveness; aqueous concentrations of IL (interleukin)-1β, -2, -8, -10, -17, placental growth factor (PlGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In addition, factors associated with the existence of SRD were identified.Of the 64 DME patients, 14 had SRD. The average levels of aqueous VEGF and PlGF were significantly higher in the SRD group than in the control group (P = .022 and P = .041, respectively). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups at baseline or after 3 consecutive monthly IVBs. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the level of aqueous VEGF was the only factor associated with the existence of SRD (odds ratio: 1.03; P = .038).Rather than aqueous inflammatory cytokines, levels of aqueous VEGFs were associated with the occurrence of SRD in DME patients. In terms of prognosis, the existence of SRD was not related with BCVA or CST changes.

Effect of ripasudil on diabetic macular edema

The current study aimed to address whether ripasudil, a Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor developed to treat glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OH), improves diabetic macular edema (DME) since it is known that ROCK upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor. We retrospectively investigated the foveal thickness (FT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, visual acuity (VA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) in 12 eyes with DME that received ripasudil treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma or OH and compared them with 14 eyes that received no treatment. One month after ripasudil therapy, the mean FT decreased significantly from 439 ± 72 µm to 395 ± 62 µm (P = 0.003); this change was significantly different from that in the controls, in which the mean FT increased by 1 ± 39 µm (P = 0.01). Ripasudil also caused a significant decrease in IOP from 17.3 ± 5.2 mmHg to 14.6 ± 4.0 mmHg (P = 0.02); this change was significantly greater than that in the controls, in which IOP changed by 0.0 ± 1.6 mmHg (P < 0.008). There was no significant difference in the VA changes between groups. Our results suggested that ripasudil may have positive effects on both IOP and DME.

Three-dimensional analysis of morphologic changes and visual outcomes in diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To investigate the association of retinal fluid volume with the visual and anatomic outcomes of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) after treatment with bevacizumab.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 65 eyes of 58 DME patients treated with bevacizumab. The volumes of the inner intraretinal fluid (IRF) in the inner nuclear layer (INL), outer IRF in the outer plexiform layer (OPL)/outer nuclear layer (ONL), and subretinal fluid (SRF) were calculated. The correlations between the baseline fluid volumes and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), area of disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), disrupted external limiting membrane (ELM), and disrupted ellipsoid zone (EZ) at 12 months after treatment were assessed.

RESULTS

The baseline volume of the inner IRF correlated with poor BCVA at the final visit (r = 0.52, P < .001) whereas the baseline volume of the outer IRF and SRF volume did not show a significant correlation with BCVA at the final visit (P = .07 and P = .61, respectively). The improvement in BCVA correlated with the reduction in the baseline volume of the inner IRF and outer IRF (r = 0.25, P = .04 and r = 0.36, P = .003), but not with the SRF volume (P = .59). The baseline volume of the inner IRF correlated positively with the area of DRIL and the disrupted ELM at the final visit (r = 0.56, P < .001 and r = 0.25, P = .04, respectively). Such relationship remained in each quadrant of the macula (P < .005 for all quadrants).

CONCLUSION

The baseline volume of the inner IRF correlated with a poor visual outcome, an increased DRIL area, and a more disrupted ELM area in patients with DME after treatment with bevacizumab.

Diabetic macular edema: Evidence-based management

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in patients with diabetic retinopathy with an increasing prevalence tied to the global epidemic in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its pathophysiology starts with decreased retinal oxygen tension that manifests as retinal capillary hyperpermeability and increased intravascular pressure mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) upregulation and retinal vascular autoregulation, respectively. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is the cornerstone of clinical assessment of DME. The foundation of treatment is metabolic control of hyperglycemia and blood pressure. Specific ophthalmic treatments include intravitreal anti-VEGF drug injections, intravitreal corticosteroid injections, focal laser photocoagulation, and vitrectomy, but a substantial fraction of eyes respond incompletely to all of these modalities resulting in visual loss and disordered retinal structure and vasculature visible on SD-OCT and OCT angiography. Efforts to close the gap between the results of interventions within randomized clinical trials and in real-world contexts, and to reduce the cost of care increasingly occupy innovation in the social organization of ophthalmic care of DME. Pharmacologic research is exploring other biochemical pathways involved in retinal vascular homeostasis that may provide new points of intervention effective in those cases unresponsive to current treatments.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema in a Real-World Clinical Setting

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcomes of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) in a real-world clinical setting and to assess the efficacy of subsequent alternative treatments in eyes with suboptimal response to anti-VEGF.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional case series.

METHODS

The medical records of consecutive eyes with center-involving DME, treated between August 2008 and June 2015 with 3 monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF injections-with or without prompt or deferred laser-followed by pro re nata re-treatment, were reviewed. A subgroup of eyes that were unresponsive to the treatment received subsequent alternative therapeutic options, including switching to another anti-VEGF drug, intravitreal injection of dexamethasone, and vitrectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 170 eyes of 129 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up (FU) was 45.6 months (SD 18; minimum 12-maximum 81). The change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1-year FU was +5 ETDRS letters (P < .0001). Improvement in BCVA was statistically significant up to 5 years. Improvement in central macular thickness (CMT) was statistically significant up to the last FU visit. In eyes with suboptimal response, no significant visual improvement was found by switching to another anti-VEGF (P =.4347). Twenty-four eyes treated with intravitreal dexamethasone and 14 with vitrectomy exhibited a significant reduction in CMT with variable functional responses. In these eyes, better BCVA gain was found in cases with an early change of the treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

The results support treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF for DME in real-world clinical settings and suggest that an early change of the therapeutic strategy should be considered for eyes unresponsive to the treatment.

Flavoprotein Fluorescence Correlation with Visual Acuity Response in Patients Receiving Anti-VEGF Injection for Diabetic Macular Edema

Anti-VEGF treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) complicating diabetic retinopathy (DR) has greatly improved structural and visual outcomes for patients with diabetes mellitus. However, up to 50% of patients are either nonresponsive or refractory to anti-VEGF treatment (no improvement in BCVA or central macular thickness (CMT)). It is believed that factors such as mitochondrial structural and functional damage, due to oxidative stress, are partially responsible for this lack of improvement. Flavoprotein fluorescence (FPF) has been shown to be a sensitive marker of mitochondrial function and has been found to correlate with the degree of diabetic retinopathy. FPF may also provide additional information regarding therapeutic response of patients receiving anti-VEGF treatment for DME. Eight patients with DR and DME with clinically significant DME (CSDME) who underwent anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) treatment were imaged before injection and at follow-up visit using FPF in addition to standard color fundus photography and OCT CMT. A strong correlation r = 0.98 (p = 0.000015) between the FPF decrease and the BCVA improvement was observed; BCVA improved as FPF values decreased. Notably, in the same patients, the correlation between OCT CMT decrease and BCVA improvement (r = 0.688) was not found to be significant (p = 0.13). These findings suggest that FPF can detect improvement in metabolic function preceding structural improvement and even with small changes in edema. Additionally, FPF may be supplementary to current diagnostic methods for earlier detection of therapeutic response to anti-VEGF treatment in patients with DME.

Biomarkers and predictors for functional and anatomic outcomes for small gauge pars plana vitrectomy and peeling of the internal limiting membrane in naïve diabetic macular edema: The VITAL Study

Purpose

We aimed to investigate biomarkers and predictive factors for visual and anatomical outcome in patients with naïve diabetic macular edema (DME) who underwent small gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling as a first line treatment.

Design

Multicenter, retrospective, interventional study.

Participants

120 eyes from 120 patients with naïve DME treated with PPV and ILM peeling with a follow up of 24 months.

Methods

Change in baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfoveal thickness (CST) 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Predictive value of baseline BCVA, CST, optical coherence tomography (OCT) features (presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and photoreceptor damage), and time between DME diagnosis and surgery. Additional treatment for DME needed. Intra- and post-operative complications (cataract rate formation, increased intraocular pressure).

Main outcome measures

The correlation between baseline characteristics and BCVA response (mean change from baseline; categorized improvement ≥5 or ≥10; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters) 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Results

Mean BCVA was 0.66 ± 0.14 logMAR, 0.52 ± 0.21 logMAR, and 0.53 ± 0.21 logMAR (p<0.001) at baseline, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Shorter time from DME diagnosis until PPV (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99, p<0.001) was a predictor for good functional treatment response (area under the curve 0.828). For every day PPV is postponed, the patient’s chances to gain ≥5 letters at 24 months decrease by 1.8%.

Presence of SRF was identified as an anatomical predictor of a better visual outcome, (OR: 6.29, 95% CI: 1.16–34.08, p = 0.033). Safety profile was acceptable.

Conclusions

Our results reveal a significant functional and anatomical improvement of DME 24 months after primary PPV, without the need for additional treatment. Early surgical intervention and presence of SRF predict good visual outcome. These biomarkers should be considered when treatment is chosen.

OCT Biomarkers as Functional Outcome Predictors in Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Dexamethasone Implant

PURPOSE

Identification and characterization of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) are important for individualizing treatment and optimizing outcome. We investigated OCT biomarkers for DME treated by intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant.

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 299 eyes from 284 patients treated with DEX implant for DME (naïve, n = 209; refractory, n = 90). Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was between 0.3 and 1.0 on a logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual chart.

METHODS

The OCT scans previous to DEX implants were evaluated for submacular fluid, size and location of cystoid changes, inner segment-outer segment (IS-OS) continuity, quantity and location of hyperreflective foci (HRF), vitreomacular interface abnormalities, and epiretinal membrane. The BCVA and central macular thickness were recorded at baseline and at 1, 2, and 4 months after treatment with DEX implants. Correlations between OCT measures and visual outcome were analyzed using the generalized estimating equations procedure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The correlation between spectral-domain (SD) OCT measures at baseline and BCVA response (mean change from baseline; categorized improvement [<5, 5-9, or ≥10; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters] in BCVA) after treatment with a DEX implant.

RESULTS

The presence of subretinal fluid (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-3.20; P = 0.01), absence of HRF (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.40-9.62; P = 0.01), and integrity of the IS-OS layer (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.30-3.37; P = 0.003) were all predictive of better visual outcome after treatment with DEX implants. Although eyes with naïve DME gained more vision than refractory eyes (P < 0.001), the predictive value of OCT findings did not differ according to this classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Spectral-domain OCT is useful in identifying various imaging findings in DME. Among eyes with DME, those with submacular fluid, no HRF, and a continuous IS-OS layer responded better to DEX implants than those without these features. These findings call for further study of combinations of OCT and metabolic biomarkers.