1
|
Sanabria-Mazo JP, D'Amico F, Cardeñosa E, Ferrer M, Edo S, Borràs X, McCracken LM, Feliu-Soler A, Sanz A, Luciano JV. Economic Evaluation of Videoconference Group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression Versus Usual Care Among Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain Plus Comorbid Depressive Symptoms. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:104472. [PMID: 38242333 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.01.337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
Chronic pain and depression are frequently comorbid conditions associated with significant health care and social costs. This study examined the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of videoconference-based group forms of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (BATD), as a complement to treatment-as-usual (TAU), for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) plus depressive symptoms, compared to TAU alone. A trial-based economic evaluation (n = 234) was conducted from a governmental and health care perspective with a time horizon of 12 months. Primary outcomes were the Brief Pain Inventory-Interference Scale (BPI-IS) and Quality Adjusted Life Year. Compared to TAU, ACT achieved a significant reduction in total costs (d = .47), and BATD achieved significant reductions in indirect (d = .61) and total costs (d = .63). Significant improvements in BPI-IS (d = .73 and d = .66, respectively) and Quality Adjusted Life Year scores (d = .46 and d = .28, respectively) were found in ACT and BATD compared to TAU. No significant differences in costs and outcomes were found between ACT and BATD. In the intention-to-treat analyses, from the governmental and health care perspective, no significant differences in cost reduction and incremental effects were identified in the comparison between ACT, BATD, and TAU. However, in the complete case analysis, significant incremental effects of ACT (∆BPI-IS = -1.57 and -1.39, respectively) and BATD (∆BPI-IS = -1.08 and -1.04, respectively) compared with TAU were observed. In the per-protocol analysis, only the significant incremental effects of ACT (∆BPI-IS = -1.68 and -1.43, respectively) compared to TAU were detected. In conclusion, ACT and BATD might be efficient options in the management of CLBP plus comorbid depression symptoms as compared to usual care. However, no clear difference was found in the comparison between the 2 active therapies regarding cost-effectiveness or cost-utility. PERSPECTIVE: The economic evaluation of psychological therapies for the management of complex conditions can be used in decision-making and resource allocation. This study provides evidence that ACT and BATD are more effective and involve a greater reduction in costs than usual care in the management of CLBP plus comorbid depressive symptoms. TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04140838.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Sanabria-Mazo
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Francesco D'Amico
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eugenia Cardeñosa
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Basic Health Area (ABS) Maria Bernades, Direcció d'Atenció Primària Metropolitana Sud, Institut Català de la Salut, Viladecans, Spain
| | - Montse Ferrer
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Institut de Recerca Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sílvia Edo
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Xavier Borràs
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | | | - Albert Feliu-Soler
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Antoni Sanz
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Juan V Luciano
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaczorowski S, Donath L, Owen PJ, Saueressig T, Mundell NL, Topp M, Samanna CL, Döding R, Belavy DL. Telemedicine for Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain Lacks High-Quality Evidence on Delivery Modes and Effectiveness: An Umbrella Review. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:1221-1238. [PMID: 38117672 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Telemedicine is of growing importance, yet impacts on treatment efficacy remain unclear. Objective: This umbrella review (CRD42022298047) examined the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions on pain intensity, disability, psychological function, quality of life, self-efficacy, and adverse events in MSK pain. Methods: PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched from inception to August 9, 2022, for systematic reviews with meta-analysis, including telemedicine-delivered exercise, education, and psychological interventions, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). AMSTAR-2 was implemented. Standardized mean differences (SMDs; negative favors telemedicine) were extracted as effect estimates. Results: Of 1,135 records, 20 reviews (RCTs: n = 97, participants: n = 15,872) were included. Pain intensity SMDs were -0.66 to 0.10 for mixed pain (estimates: n = 16), -0.64 to -0.01 for low-back pain (n = 9), -0.31 to -0.15 for osteoarthritis (n = 7), -0.29 for knee pain (n = 1), -0.66 to -0.58 for fibromyalgia (n = 2), -0.16 for back pain (n = 1), and -0.09 for rheumatic disorders (n = 1). Disability SMDs were -0.50 to 0.10 for mixed pain (n = 14), -0.39 to 0.00 for low-back pain (n = 8), -0.41 to -0.04 for osteoarthritis (n = 7), -0.22 for knee pain (n = 1), and -0.56 for fibromyalgia (n = 1). Methodological quality was "critically low" for 17 reviews. Effectiveness tended to favor telemedicine for all secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Primary RCTs are required that compare telemedicine interventions with in-person delivery of the intervention (noninferiority trials), consider safety, assess videoconferencing, and combine different treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Kaczorowski
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit [University of Applied Sciences], Bochum, Germany
- Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lars Donath
- Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Patrick J Owen
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Burwood Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Niamh L Mundell
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Burwood Victoria, Australia
| | - Moritz Topp
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit [University of Applied Sciences], Bochum, Germany
| | - Claire L Samanna
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Burwood Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebekka Döding
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit [University of Applied Sciences], Bochum, Germany
| | - Daniel L Belavy
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit [University of Applied Sciences], Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fritz JM, Skolasky RL. In-person physiotherapy versus video conferencing for chronic knee pain. Lancet 2024; 403:1209-1211. [PMID: 38461838 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02896-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
| | - Richard L Skolasky
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore E, Paré C, Carde E, Pagé MG. Virtual group psychotherapy for chronic pain: exploring the impact of the virtual medium on participants' experiences. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2024; 25:131-138. [PMID: 37738606 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Virtual psychotherapy for chronic pain (CP) has been shown to be feasible, efficacious, and acceptable; however, little is known about how virtual delivery of group psychotherapy affects participants' experiences. This study aimed to explore the impact of a virtual medium during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on social interactions and therapeutic processes in the context of group psychotherapy for CP management. METHODS This qualitative, interview-based study collected data on 18 individuals who participated in virtual group psychotherapy in a tertiary care pain management unit. RESULTS Results of the thematic analysis showed 4 themes. First, the ability to participate and connect was modified by not meeting in person. Connections also occurred differently as the usual patterns of interactions changed. Participants described important shifts in how emotions are communicated and subsequent experience of empathy. Finally, the commonality of chronic pain experience was identified as a central driver of connection between participants. CONCLUSIONS Mixed impacts of the virtual medium on group psychotherapy dynamics and processes were found. Future research could explore ways to mitigate the negative impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Moore
- Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Catherine Paré
- Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Estelle Carde
- CREMIS (Centre de Recherche de Montréal sur les Inégalités Sociales, les Discriminations et les Pratiques Alternatives de Citoyenneté), Montreal, QC H2X 1K6, Canada
- Department of Sociology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1N8, Canada
| | - M Gabrielle Pagé
- Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
- Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
- D epartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2V 2S9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Does MB, Adams SR, Kline-Simon AH, Marino C, Charvat-Aguilar N, Weisner CM, Rubinstein AL, Ghadiali M, Cowan P, Young-Wolff KC, Campbell CI. A patient activation intervention in primary care for patients with chronic pain on long term opioid therapy: results from a randomized control trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:112. [PMID: 38254073 PMCID: PMC10802020 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10558-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given significant risks associated with long-term prescription opioid use, there is a need for non-pharmacological interventions for treating chronic pain. Activating patients to manage chronic pain has the potential to improve health outcomes. The ACTIVATE study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a 4-session patient activation intervention in primary care for patients on long-term opioid therapy. METHODS The two-arm, pragmatic, randomized trial was conducted in two primary care clinics in an integrated health system from June 2015-August 2018. Consenting participants were randomized to the intervention (n = 189) or usual care (n = 187). Participants completed online and interviewer-administered surveys at baseline, 6- and 12- months follow-up. Prescription opioid use was extracted from the EHR. The primary outcome was patient activation assessed by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Secondary outcomes included mood, function, overall health, non-pharmacologic pain management strategies, and patient portal use. We conducted a repeated measure analysis and reported between-group differences at 12 months. RESULTS At 12 months, the intervention and usual care arms had similar PAM scores. However, compared to usual care at 12 months, the intervention arm demonstrated: less moderate/severe depression (odds ratio [OR] = 0.40, 95%CI 0.18-0.87); higher overall health (OR = 3.14, 95%CI 1.64-6.01); greater use of the patient portal's health/wellness resources (OR = 2.50, 95%CI 1.42-4.40) and lab/immunization history (OR = 2.70, 95%CI 1.29-5.65); and greater use of meditation (OR = 2.72; 95%CI 1.61-4.58) and exercise/physical therapy (OR = 2.24, 95%CI 1.29-3.88). At 12 months, the intervention arm had a higher physical health measure (mean difference 1.63; 95%CI: 0.27-2.98). CONCLUSION This trial evaluated the effectiveness of a primary care intervention in improving patient activation and patient-reported outcomes among adults with chronic pain on long-term opioid therapy. Despite a lack of improvement in patient activation, a brief intervention in primary care can improve outcomes such as depression, overall health, non-pharmacologic pain management, and engagement with the health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered on 10/27/14 on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02290223).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique B Does
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA.
| | - Sara R Adams
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
| | - Andrea H Kline-Simon
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
| | - Catherine Marino
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Charvat-Aguilar
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
| | - Constance M Weisner
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrea L Rubinstein
- Department of Pain Medicine, The Permanente Medical Group, Santa Rosa, CA, USA
| | - Murtuza Ghadiali
- Addiction Medicine and Recovery Services, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Penney Cowan
- American Chronic Pain Association, Rocklin, CA, USA
| | - Kelly C Young-Wolff
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cynthia I Campbell
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fritz JM, Gibson B, Wetter DW, Del Fiol G, Solis V, Ford I, Lundberg K, Thackeray A. Use of implementation mapping in the planning of a hybrid type 1 pragmatic clinical trial: the BeatPain Utah study. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:3. [PMID: 38183154 PMCID: PMC10768478 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00542-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considerable disparities in chronic pain management have been identified. Persons in rural, lower income, and minoritized communities are less likely to receive evidence-based, nonpharmacologic care. Telehealth delivery of nonpharmacologic, evidence-based interventions for persons with chronic pain is a promising strategy to lessen disparities, but implementation comes with many challenges. The BeatPain Utah study is a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pragmatic clinical trial investigating telehealth strategies to provide nonpharmacologic care from physical therapists to persons with chronic back pain receiving care in ommunity health centers (CHCs). CHCs provide primary care to all persons regardless of ability to pay. This paper outlines the use of implementation mapping to develop a multifaceted implementation plan for the BeatPain study. METHODS During a planning year for the BeatPain trial, we developed a comprehensive logic model including the five-step implementation mapping process informed by additional frameworks and theories. The five iterative implementation mapping steps were addressed in the planning year: (1) conduct needs assessments for involved groups; (2) identify implementation outcomes, performance objectives, and determinants; (3) select implementation strategies; (4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and (5) evaluate implementation outcomes. RESULTS CHC leadership/providers, patients, and physical therapists were identified as involved groups. Barriers and assets were identified across groups which informed identification of performance objectives necessary to implement two key processes: (1) electronic referral of patients with back pain in CHC clinics to the BeatPain team and (2) connecting patients with physical therapists providing telehealth. Determinants of the performance objectives for each group informed our choice of implementation strategies which focused on training, education, clinician support, and tailoring physical therapy interventions for telehealth delivery and cultural competency. We selected implementation outcomes for the BeatPain trial to evaluate the success of our implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS Implementation mapping provided a comprehensive and systematic approach to develop an implementation plan during the planning phase for our ongoing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. We will be able to evaluate the implementation strategies used in the BeatPain Utah study to inform future efforts to implement telehealth delivery of evidence-based pain care in CHCs and other settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04923334 . Registered June 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| | - Bryan Gibson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David W Wetter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Victor Solis
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Isaac Ford
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Kelly Lundberg
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anne Thackeray
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fritz JM, Gibson B, Wetter DW, Fiol GD, Solis VH, Ford I, Lundberg K, Thackeray A. Use of implementation mapping in the planning of a hybrid type 1 pragmatic clinical trial: the BeatPain Utah study. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3267087. [PMID: 37790359 PMCID: PMC10543377 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3267087/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Considerable disparities in chronic pain management have been identified. Persons in rural, lower income and minoritized communities are less likely to receive evidence-based, nonpharmacologic care. Telehealth delivery of nonpharmacologic, evidence-based interventions for persons with chronic pain is a promising strategy to lessen disparities, but implementation comes with many challenges. The BeatPain Utah study is a hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation pragmatic clinical trial investigating telehealth strategies to provide nonpharmacologic care from physical therapists to persons with chronic back pain receiving care in Community Health Centers (CHCs). CHCs provide primary care to all persons regardless of ability to pay. This paper outlines the use of implementation mapping to develop a multifaceted implementation plan for the BeatPain study. Methods During a planning year for the BeatPain trial we developed a comprehensive logic model including the 5-step implementation mapping process informed by additional frameworks and theories. The five iterative implementation mapping steps were addressed in the planning year; 1) conduct needs assessments for involved groups; 2) identify implementation outcomes, performance objectives and determinants; 3) select implementation strategies; 4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and 5) evaluate implementation outcomes. Results CHC leadership/providers, patients and physical therapists were identified as involved groups. Barriers and assets were identified across groups which informed identification of performance objectives necessary to implement two key processes; 1) electronic referral of patients with back pain in CHC clinics to the BeatPain team; and 2) connecting patients with physical therapists providing telehealth. Determinants of the performance objectives for each group informed our choice of implementation strategies which focused on training, education, clinician support and tailoring physical therapy interventions for telehealth delivery and cultural competency. We selected implementation outcomes for the BeatPain trial to evaluate the success of our implementation strategies. Conclusions Implementation mapping provided a comprehensive and systematic approach to develop an implementation plan during the planning phase for our ongoing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. We will be able to evaluate the implementation strategies used in the BeatPain Utah study to inform future efforts to implement telehealth delivery of evidence-based pain care in CHCs and other settings. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04923334. Registered June 11, 2021 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04923334.
Collapse
|
8
|
Midboe AM, Javier SJ, Salsbury SA, Katsovich L, Burgess DJ, King HA, Taylor SL, Martino S, Mayer JM, Wallace RB, Der-Martirosian C, Kerns RD. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on nonpharmacological pain management trials in military and veteran healthcare settings: an evaluation informed by implementation science. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:601-611. [PMID: 37030012 PMCID: PMC10415731 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare and clinical research, including a suite of 11 pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs), across clinics within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department of Defense (DOD). These PCTs were designed to evaluate an array of nonpharmacological treatments and models of care for treatment of patients with pain and co-occurring conditions. The aims of the study are to (a) describe modifications to PCTs and interventions to address the evolving pandemic and (b) describe the application of implementation science methods for evaluation of those PCT modifications. The project used a two-phase, sequential, mixed-methods design. In Phase I, we captured PCT disruptions and modifications via a Research Electronic Data Capture questionnaire, using Periodic Reflections methods as a guide. In Phase II, we utilized the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) taxonomy to develop a focus group interview guide and checklist that would provide more in-depth data than Phase I. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis. Phase I revealed that all PCTs made between two and six trial modifications. Phase II, FRAME-guided analyses showed that the key goals for modifying interventions were increasing treatment feasibility and decreasing patient exposure to COVID-19, while preserving intervention core elements. Context (format) modifications led eight PCTs to modify parts of the interventions for virtual delivery. Content modifications added elements to enhance patient safety; tailored interventions for virtual delivery (counseling, exercise, mindfulness); and modified interventions involving manual therapies. Implementation science methods identified near-real-time disruptions and modifications to PCTs focused on pain management in veteran and military healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda M Midboe
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Sarah J Javier
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Stacie A Salsbury
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA 52803, USA
| | - Lily Katsovich
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Departments of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Departments of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Diana J Burgess
- VA HSR&D Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Heather A King
- VA HSR&D Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27701, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Stephanie L Taylor
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Steve Martino
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
| | - John M Mayer
- The Vert Mooney Research (DBA US Spine & Sport Foundation), San Diego, CA 92111, USA
| | - Robert B Wallace
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Claudia Der-Martirosian
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA
| | - Robert D Kerns
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Departments of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Departments of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sanabria-Mazo JP, Colomer-Carbonell A, Borràs X, Castaño-Asins JR, McCracken LM, Montero-Marin J, Pérez-Aranda A, Edo S, Sanz A, Feliu-Soler A, Luciano JV. Efficacy of Videoconference Group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (BATD) for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Plus Comorbid Depressive Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMPACT Study). THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:1522-1540. [PMID: 37105508 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
This study examined the efficacy of adding a remote, synchronous, group, videoconference-based form of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) or behavioral activation therapy for depression (BATD) to treatment-as-usual (TAU) in 234 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) plus comorbid depressive symptoms. Participants were randomly assigned to ACT, BATD, or TAU. Compared to TAU, ACT produced a significant reduction in pain interference at posttreatment (d = .64) and at follow-up (d = .73). BATD was only superior to TAU at follow-up (d = .66). A significant reduction in pain catastrophizing was reported by patients assigned to ACT and BATD at posttreatment (d = .45 and d = .59, respectively) and at follow-up (d = .59, in both) compared to TAU. Stress was significantly reduced at posttreatment by ACT in comparison to TAU (d = .69). No significant between-group differences were found in depressive or anxiety symptoms. Clinically relevant number needed to treat (NNT) values for reduction in pain interference were obtained at posttreatment (ACT vs TAU = 4) and at follow-up (ACT vs TAU = 3; BATD vs TAU = 5). In both active therapies, improvements in pain interference at follow-up were significantly related to improvements at posttreatment in psychological flexibility. These findings suggest that new forms of cognitive-behavioral therapy are clinically useful in improving pain interference and pain catastrophizing. Further research on evidence-based change processes is required to understand the therapeutic needs of patients with chronic pain and comorbid conditions. TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04140838. PERSPECTIVE: Group videoconference-based ACT and BATD showed greater efficacy than TAU for reducing pain interference and pain catastrophizing in patients with CLBP plus clinically relevant depression. Psychological flexibility appeared to be the main contributor to treatment effects for both ACT and BATD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Sanabria-Mazo
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Ariadna Colomer-Carbonell
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Xavier Borràs
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | | | | | - Jesus Montero-Marin
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Adrián Pérez-Aranda
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Institute of Health Research of Aragon (IIS Aragon), Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Sílvia Edo
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Antoni Sanz
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Albert Feliu-Soler
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Juan V Luciano
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mayhew M, Balderson BH, Cook AJ, Dickerson JF, Elder CR, Firemark AJ, Haller IV, Justice M, Keefe FJ, McMullen CK, O'Keeffe-Rosetti MC, Owen-Smith AA, Rini C, Schneider JL, Von Korff M, Wandner LD, DeBar LL. Comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of remote (telehealth and online) cognitive behavioral therapy-based treatments for high-impact chronic pain relative to usual care: study protocol for the RESOLVE multisite randomized control trial. Trials 2023; 24:196. [PMID: 36927459 PMCID: PMC10018633 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07165-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (CBT-CP) is an effective but underused treatment for high-impact chronic pain. Increased access to CBT-CP services for pain is of critical public health importance, particularly for rural and medically underserved populations who have limited access due to these services being concentrated in urban and high income areas. Making CBT-CP widely available and more affordable could reduce barriers to CBT-CP use. METHODS As part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term® (NIH HEAL) initiative, we designed and implemented a comparative effectiveness, 3-arm randomized control trial comparing remotely delivered telephonic/video and online CBT-CP-based services to usual care for patients with high-impact chronic pain. The RESOLVE trial is being conducted in 4 large integrated healthcare systems located in Minnesota, Georgia, Oregon, and Washington state and includes demographically diverse populations residing in urban and rural areas. The trial compares (1) an 8-session, one-on-one, professionally delivered telephonic/video CBT-CP program; and (2) a previously developed and tested 8-session online CBT-CP-based program (painTRAINER) to (3) usual care augmented by a written guide for chronic pain management. Participants are followed for 1 year post-allocation and are assessed at baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-allocation. The primary outcome is minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥ 30% reduction) in pain severity (composite of pain intensity and pain-related interference) assessed by a modified 11-item version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include pain severity, pain intensity, and pain-related interference scores, quality of life measures, and patient global impression of change at 3, 6, and 12 months. Cost-effectiveness is assessed by incremental cost per additional patient with MCID in primary outcome and by cost per quality-adjusted life year achieved. Outcome assessment is blinded to group assignment. DISCUSSION This large-scale trial provides a unique opportunity to rigorously evaluate and compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of 2 relatively low-cost and scalable modalities for providing CBT-CP-based treatments to persons with high-impact chronic pain, including those residing in rural and other medically underserved areas with limited access to these services. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04523714. This trial was registered on 24 August 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Mayhew
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, USA.
| | | | - Andrea J Cook
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Morgan Justice
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | | | | | - Ashli A Owen-Smith
- Georgia State University and Center for Health Research and Evaluation Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | | | - Michael Von Korff
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | - Laura D Wandner
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA
| | - Lynn L DeBar
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matthias MS, Burgess DJ, Eliacin J. Healthcare Access and Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic for Black Veterans with Chronic Pain: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:1024-1029. [PMID: 36376625 PMCID: PMC9663172 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07884-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant disruptions in healthcare and rapid increases in virtual healthcare delivery. The full effects of these shifts remain unknown. Understanding effects of these disruptions is particularly relevant for patients with chronic pain, which typically requires consistent engagement in treatment to maximize benefit, and for Black patients, given documented racial disparities in pain treatment and telehealth delivery. OBJECTIVE To understand how Black patients with chronic pain experienced pandemic-related changes in healthcare delivery. DESIGN In-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews PARTICIPANTS: Black veterans with chronic pain. KEY RESULTS Participants described decreased ability to self-manage their chronic pain, obtain nonpharmacological services such as physical therapy, see their primary care providers, and schedule surgery. Most did not believe telehealth met their needs, describing feeling inadequately assessed for their pain and noting that beyond renewing prescriptions, telehealth visits were not that useful. Some believed their communication with their providers suffered from a lack of in-person contact. Others, however, were willing to accept this tradeoff to prevent possible exposure to COVID-19, and some appreciated the convenience of being able to access healthcare from home. CONCLUSIONS Black patients with chronic pain described mostly negative effects from the shift to telecare after the pandemic's onset. Given existing disparities and likely persistence of virtual care, research on the longer-term effects of virtual pain care for Black patients is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne S Matthias
- VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Diana J Burgess
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Johanne Eliacin
- VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fritz JM, Greene T, Brennan GP, Minick K, Lane E, Wegener ST, Skolasky RL. Characterizing modifications to a comparative effectiveness research study: the OPTIMIZE trial-using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Interventions (FRAME). Trials 2023; 24:137. [PMID: 36823645 PMCID: PMC9947905 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07150-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The OPTIMIZE trial is a multi-site, comparative effectiveness research (CER) study that uses a Sequential Multiple Assessment Randomized Trial (SMART) designed to examine the effectiveness of complex health interventions (cognitive behavioral therapy, physical therapy, and mindfulness) for adults with chronic low back pain. Modifications are anticipated when implementing complex interventions in CER. Disruptions due to COVID have created unanticipated challenges also requiring modifications. Recent methodologic standards for CER studies emphasize that fully characterizing modifications made is necessary to interpret and implement trial results. The purpose of this paper is to outline the modifications made to the OPTIMIZE trial using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-Based Interventions (FRAME) to characterize modifications to the OPTIMIZE trial in response to the COVID pandemic and other challenges encountered. METHODS The FRAME outlines a strategy to identify and report modifications to evidence-based interventions or implementation strategies, whether planned or unplanned. We use the FRAME to characterize the process used to modify the aspects of the OPTIMIZE trial. Modifications were made to improve lower-than-anticipated rates of treatment initiation and COVID-related restrictions. Contextual modifications were made to permit telehealth delivery of treatments originally designed for in-person delivery. Training modifications were made with study personnel to provide more detailed information to potential participants, use motivational interviewing communication techniques to clarify potential participants' motivation and possible barriers to initiating treatment, and provide greater assistance with scheduling of assigned treatments. RESULTS Modifications were developed with input from the trial's patient and stakeholder advisory panels. The goals of the modifications were to improve trial feasibility without compromising the interventions' core functions. Modifications were approved by the study funder and the trial steering committee. CONCLUSIONS Full and transparent reporting of modifications to clinical trials, whether planned or unplanned, is critical for interpreting the trial's eventual results and considering future implementation efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03859713. Registered on March 1, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M. Fritz
- grid.223827.e0000 0001 2193 0096Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Drive, Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
| | - Tom Greene
- grid.223827.e0000 0001 2193 0096Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Gerard P. Brennan
- grid.420884.20000 0004 0460 774XRehabilitation Services, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Kate Minick
- grid.420884.20000 0004 0460 774XRehabilitation Services, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Elizabeth Lane
- grid.223827.e0000 0001 2193 0096Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Drive, Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
| | - Stephen T. Wegener
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Richard L. Skolasky
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA ,grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ferguson MC, McNicol E, Kleykamp BA, Sandoval K, Haroutounian S, Holzer KJ, Kerns RD, Veasley C, Turk DC, Dworkin RH. Perspectives on Participation in Clinical Trials Among Individuals With Pain, Depression, and/or Anxiety: An ACTTION Scoping Review. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:24-37. [PMID: 36152760 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
For individuals experiencing pain, the decision to engage in clinical trials may be influenced by a number of factors including current and past care, illness severity, physical functioning, financial stress, and caregiver support. Co-occurring depression and anxiety may add to these challenges. The aim of this scoping review was to describe perspectives about clinical trial participation, including recruitment and retention among individuals with pain and pain comorbidities, including depression and/or anxiety. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Study features, sample demographics, perspectives, barriers and/or motivations were collected and described. A total of 35 assessments were included in this scoping review with 24 focused on individuals with pain (24/35, 68.6%), 9 on individuals with depression and/or anxiety (9/35, 25.7%), and 2 on individuals with pain and co-occurring depression/anxiety (2/35, 5.7%). Barriers among participants with pain and those with depression included: research team's communication of information, fear of interventional risks, distrust (only among respondents with pain), too many procedures, fear of inadequate treatment, disease-life stressors, and embarrassment with study procedures (more commonly reported in participants with depression). Facilitators in both groups included: altruism and supportive staff, better access to care, and the ability to have outcome feedback (more commonly among individuals with depression). Individuals with pain and depression experience challenges that affect trial recruitment and retention. Engaging individuals with pain within research planning may assist in addressing these barriers and the needs of individuals affected by pain and/or depression. PERSPECTIVE: This review highlights the need to address barriers and facilitators to participation in clinical trials, including the need for an assessment of perspectives from underserved or marginalized populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- McKenzie C Ferguson
- School of Pharmacy, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois.
| | - Ewan McNicol
- School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bethea A Kleykamp
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Karin Sandoval
- School of Pharmacy, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois
| | - Simon Haroutounian
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Katherine J Holzer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert D Kerns
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Christin Veasley
- Co-founder and Director, Chronic Pain Research Alliance, North Kingstown, Rhode Island
| | - Dennis C Turk
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Robert H Dworkin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kerns RD, Burgess DJ, Coleman BC, Cook CE, Farrokhi S, Fritz JM, Goertz C, Heapy A, Lisi AJ, Rhon DI, Vining R. Self-Management of Chronic Pain: Psychologically Guided Core Competencies for Providers. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2022; 23:1815-1819. [PMID: 35642906 PMCID: PMC9629397 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Kerns
- Department of Psychiatry
- Department of Neurology
- Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Diana J Burgess
- VA Health Services Research and Development Service (HSR&D) Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Brian C Coleman
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Center for Medical Informatics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Chad E Cook
- Departments of Orthopedics and Population Health Sciences, and the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shawn Farrokhi
- Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs (DOD-VA) Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence and Naval Medical Center, San Diego, California
| | - Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, College of Health, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Christine Goertz
- Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University School of Medicine, and Core Faculty Member, Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alicia Heapy
- Department of Psychiatry
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anthony J Lisi
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Center for Medical Informatics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robert Vining
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rhon DI, Fritz JM, Kerns RD, McGeary DD, Coleman BC, Farrokhi S, Burgess DJ, Goertz CM, Taylor SL, Hoffmann T. TIDieR-telehealth: precision in reporting of telehealth interventions used in clinical trials - unique considerations for the Template for the Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:161. [PMID: 35655144 PMCID: PMC9161193 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01640-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Recent international health events have led to an increased proliferation of remotely delivered health interventions. Even with the pandemic seemingly coming under control, the experiences of the past year have fueled a growth in ideas and technology for increasing the scope of remote care delivery. Unfortunately, clinicians and health systems will have difficulty with the adoption and implementation of these interventions if ongoing and future clinical trials fail to report necessary details about execution, platforms, and infrastructure related to these interventions. The purpose was to develop guidance for reporting of telehealth interventions.
Methods
A working group from the US Pain Management Collaboratory developed guidance for complete reporting of telehealth interventions. The process went through 5-step process from conception to final checklist development with input for many stakeholders, to include all 11 primary investigators with trials in the Collaboratory.
Results
An extension focused on unique considerations relevant to telehealth interventions was developed for the Template for the Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.
Conclusion
The Telehealth Intervention guideline encourages use of the Template for the Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist as a valuable tool (TIDieR-Telehealth) to improve the quality of research through a reporting guide of relevant interventions that will help maximize reproducibility and implementation.
Collapse
|
16
|
Killackey T, Baerg K, Dick B, Lamontagne C, Poolacherla R, Finley GA, Noel M, Birnie KA, Choinière M, Pagé MG, Dassieu L, Lacasse A, Lalloo C, Poulin P, Ali S, Battaglia M, Campbell F, Harris L, Mohabir V, Nishat F, Benayon M, Jordan I, Stinson J. Experiences of Pediatric Pain Professionals Providing Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study. CHILDREN 2022; 9:children9020230. [PMID: 35204950 PMCID: PMC8870259 DOI: 10.3390/children9020230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Chronic pain affects 1 in 5 youth, many of whom manage their pain using a biopsychosocial approach. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the way that healthcare is delivered. As part of a larger program of research, this study aimed to understand the impact of the pandemic on pediatric chronic pain care delivery including impact on patients’ outcomes, from the perspective of pediatric healthcare providers. A qualitative descriptive study design was used and 21 healthcare providers from various professional roles, clinical settings, and geographic locations across Canada were interviewed. Using a reflexive thematic analysis approach 3 themes were developed: (1) duality of pandemic impact on youth with chronic pain (i.e., how the pandemic influenced self-management while also exacerbating existing socioeconomic inequalities); (2) changes to the healthcare system and clinical practices (i.e., triaging and access to care); (3) shift to virtual care (i.e., role of institutions and hybrid models of care). These findings outline provider perspectives on the positive and negative impacts of the pandemic on youth with chronic pain and highlight the role of socioeconomic status and access to care in relation to chronic pain management during the pandemic in a high-income country with a publicly funded healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tieghan Killackey
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada; (T.K.); (C.L.); (L.H.); (V.M.); (F.N.)
| | - Krista Baerg
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada;
| | - Bruce Dick
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada;
| | - Christine Lamontagne
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
| | - Raju Poolacherla
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada;
| | - G. Allen Finley
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management & Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada;
| | - Melanie Noel
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; (M.N.); (K.A.B.)
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Kathryn A. Birnie
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; (M.N.); (K.A.B.)
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Manon Choinière
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada; (M.C.); (M.G.P.)
| | - M. Gabrielle Pagé
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada; (M.C.); (M.G.P.)
| | - Lise Dassieu
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada;
| | - Anaïs Lacasse
- Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 5E4, Canada;
| | - Chitra Lalloo
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada; (T.K.); (C.L.); (L.H.); (V.M.); (F.N.)
| | - Patricia Poulin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Otttawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
- Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - Samina Ali
- Departments of Pediatrics & Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada;
| | - Marco Battaglia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M6G 1H4, Canada;
- Division of Child and Youth Psychiatry, CAMH, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2, Canada;
| | - Lauren Harris
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada; (T.K.); (C.L.); (L.H.); (V.M.); (F.N.)
| | - Vina Mohabir
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada; (T.K.); (C.L.); (L.H.); (V.M.); (F.N.)
| | - Fareha Nishat
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada; (T.K.); (C.L.); (L.H.); (V.M.); (F.N.)
| | - Myles Benayon
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 3L8, Canada;
| | | | - Jennifer Stinson
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada; (T.K.); (C.L.); (L.H.); (V.M.); (F.N.)
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
DeBar L, Mayhew M, Benes L, Bonifay A, Deyo RA, Elder CR, Keefe FJ, Leo MC, McMullen C, Owen-Smith A, Smith DH, Trinacty CM, Vollmer WM. A Primary Care-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Long-Term Opioid Users With Chronic Pain : A Randomized Pragmatic Trial. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175:46-55. [PMID: 34724405 PMCID: PMC9802183 DOI: 10.7326/m21-1436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is common, disabling, and costly. Few clinical trials have examined cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions embedded in primary care settings to improve chronic pain among those receiving long-term opioid therapy. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of a group-based CBT intervention for chronic pain. DESIGN Pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02113592). SETTING Kaiser Permanente health care systems in Georgia, Hawaii, and the Northwest. PARTICIPANTS Adults (aged ≥18 years) with mixed chronic pain conditions receiving long-term opioid therapy. INTERVENTION A CBT intervention teaching pain self-management skills in 12 weekly, 90-minute groups delivered by an interdisciplinary team (behaviorist, nurse, physical therapist, and pharmacist) versus usual care. MEASUREMENTS Self-reported pain impact (primary outcome, as measured by the PEGS scale [pain intensity and interference with enjoyment of life, general activity, and sleep]) was assessed quarterly over 12 months. Pain-related disability, satisfaction with care, and opioid and benzodiazepine use based on electronic health care data were secondary outcomes. RESULTS A total of 850 patients participated, representing 106 clusters of primary care providers (mean age, 60.3 years; 67.4% women); 816 (96.0%) completed follow-up assessments. Intervention patients sustained larger reductions on all self-reported outcomes from baseline to 12-month follow-up; the change in PEGS score was -0.434 point (95% CI, -0.690 to -0.178 point) for pain impact, and the change in pain-related disability was -0.060 point (CI, -0.084 to -0.035 point). At 6 months, intervention patients reported higher satisfaction with primary care (difference, 0.230 point [CI, 0.053 to 0.406 point]) and pain services (difference, 0.336 point [CI, 0.129 to 0.543 point]). Benzodiazepine use decreased more in the intervention group (absolute risk difference, -0.055 [CI, -0.099 to -0.011]), but opioid use did not differ significantly between groups. LIMITATION The inclusion of only patients with insurance in large integrated health care systems limited generalizability, and the clinical effect of change in scores is unclear. CONCLUSION Primary care-based CBT, using frontline clinicians, produced modest but sustained reductions in measures of pain and pain-related disability compared with usual care but did not reduce use of opioid medication. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn DeBar
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington (L.D.)
| | - Meghan Mayhew
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon (M.M., A.B., C.R.E., M.C.L., C.M., D.H.S., W.M.V.)
| | - Lindsay Benes
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, and Montana State University College of Nursing, Missoula, Montana (L.B.)
| | - Allison Bonifay
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon (M.M., A.B., C.R.E., M.C.L., C.M., D.H.S., W.M.V.)
| | - Richard A Deyo
- Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon (R.A.D.)
| | - Charles R Elder
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon (M.M., A.B., C.R.E., M.C.L., C.M., D.H.S., W.M.V.)
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (F.J.K.)
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon (M.M., A.B., C.R.E., M.C.L., C.M., D.H.S., W.M.V.)
| | - Carmit McMullen
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon (M.M., A.B., C.R.E., M.C.L., C.M., D.H.S., W.M.V.)
| | - Ashli Owen-Smith
- Georgia State University School of Public Health and Kaiser Permanente Center for Clinical and Outcomes Research, Atlanta, Georgia (A.O.)
| | - David H Smith
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon (M.M., A.B., C.R.E., M.C.L., C.M., D.H.S., W.M.V.)
| | | | - William M Vollmer
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon (M.M., A.B., C.R.E., M.C.L., C.M., D.H.S., W.M.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Roytman GR, Coleman BC, Corcoran KL, Goertz C, Long C, Lisi A. TEMPORARY REMOVAL: Changes in the Use of Telehealth and Face-To-Face Chiropractic Care in the Department of Veterans Affairs before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2021; 44:584-590. [PMID: 35249749 PMCID: PMC8742605 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
|
19
|
Coleman BC, Purcell N, Geda M, Luther SL, Peduzzi P, Kerns RD, Seal KH, Burgess DJ, Rosen MI, Sellinger J, Salsbury SA, Gelman H, Brandt CA, Edwards RR. Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pragmatic clinical trial participants. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 111:106619. [PMID: 34775101 PMCID: PMC8585559 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Characterizing the impacts of disruption attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical research is important, especially in pain research where psychological, social, and economic stressors attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic may greatly impact treatment effects. The National Institutes of Health - Department of Defense - Department of Veterans Affairs Pain Management Collaboratory (PMC) is a collective effort supporting 11 pragmatic clinical trials studying nonpharmacological approaches and innovative integrated care models for pain management in veteran and military health systems. The PMC rapidly developed a brief pandemic impacts measure for use across its pragmatic trials studying pain while remaining broadly applicable to other areas of clinical research. Through open discussion and consensus building by the PMC's Phenotypes and Outcomes Work Group, the PMC Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) Measure was iteratively developed. The measure assesses the following domains (one item/domain): access to healthcare, social support, finances, ability to meet basic needs, and mental or emotional health. Two additional items assess infection status (personal and household) and hospitalization. The measure uses structured responses with a three-point scale for COVID-19 infection status and four-point ordinal rank response for all other domains. We recommend individualized adaptation as appropriate by clinical research teams using this measure to survey the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on study participants. This can also help maintain utility of the measure beyond the COVID-19 pandemic to characterize impacts during future public health emergencies that may require mitigation strategies such as periods of quarantine and isolation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C Coleman
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States of America; Pain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
| | - Natalie Purcell
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Mary Geda
- Pain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Stephen L Luther
- Research and Development Service, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States of America; College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Peter Peduzzi
- Pain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Robert D Kerns
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States of America; Pain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Karen H Seal
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Diana J Burgess
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Marc I Rosen
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - John Sellinger
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Stacie A Salsbury
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, United States of America
| | - Hannah Gelman
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Cynthia A Brandt
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States of America; Pain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Robert R Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ali J, Antonelli M, Bastian L, Becker W, Brandt CA, Burgess DJ, Burns A, Cohen SP, Davis AF, Dearth CL, Dziura J, Edwards R, Erdos J, Farrokhi S, Fritz J, Geda M, George SZ, Goertz C, Goodie J, Hastings SN, Heapy A, Ilfeld BM, Katsovich L, Kerns RD, Kyriakides TC, Lee A, Long CR, Luther SL, Martino S, Matheny ME, McGeary D, Midboe A, Pasquina P, Peduzzi P, Raffanello M, Rhon D, Rosen M, Esposito ER, Scarton D, Hastings SN, Seal K, Silliker N, Taylor S, Taylor SL, Tsui M, Wright FS, Zeliadt S. Optimizing the Impact of Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Veteran and Military Populations: Lessons From the Pain Management Collaboratory. Mil Med 2021; 187:179-185. [PMID: 34791412 PMCID: PMC9389906 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are well-suited to address unmet healthcare needs, such as those arising from the dual public health crises of chronic pain and opioid misuse, recently exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. These overlapping epidemics have complex, multifactorial etiologies, and PCTs can be used to investigate the effectiveness of integrated therapies that are currently available but underused. Yet individual pragmatic studies can be limited in their reach because of existing structural and cultural barriers to dissemination and implementation. The National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, and Department of Veterans Affairs formed an interagency research partnership, the Pain Management Collaboratory. The partnership combines pragmatic trial design with collaborative tools and relationship building within a large network to advance the science and impact of nonpharmacological approaches and integrated models of care for the management of pain and common co-occurring conditions. The Pain Management Collaboratory team supports 11 large-scale, multisite PCTs in veteran and military health systems with a focus on team science with the shared aim that the "whole is greater than the sum of the parts." Herein, we describe this integrated approach and lessons learned, including incentivizing all parties; proactively offering frequent opportunities for problem-solving; engaging stakeholders during all stages of research; and navigating competing research priorities. We also articulate several specific strategies and their practical implications for advancing pain management in active clinical, "real-world," settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ali
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Margaret Antonelli
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Lori Bastian
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - William Becker
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Cynthia A Brandt
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Diana J Burgess
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA,University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Amy Burns
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Clarksville, MD 21029, USA0
| | - Alison F Davis
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Christopher L Dearth
- DoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA,Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Jim Dziura
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Rob Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
| | - Joe Erdos
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Shawn Farrokhi
- Naval Medical Center San Diego, Department of Physical Therapy, San Diego, CA 92134, USA
| | - Julie Fritz
- University of Utah, College of Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - Mary Geda
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Steven Z George
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27715, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey Goodie
- School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Susan N Hastings
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA,Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Alicia Heapy
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, LaJolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Lily Katsovich
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Robert D Kerns
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Tassos C Kyriakides
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Allison Lee
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Cynthia R Long
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA 52803, USA
| | - Stephen L Luther
- James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL 33612, USA,University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Steve Martino
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Michael E Matheny
- Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN 37212, USA,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
| | - Don McGeary
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Amanda Midboe
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Paul Pasquina
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA,Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Peter Peduzzi
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | | | - Daniel Rhon
- Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA
| | - Marc Rosen
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | | | - Dylan Scarton
- Henry Jackson Foundation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Susan N Hastings
- Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27701, USA,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Karen Seal
- University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA,San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA
| | - Norman Silliker
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Sakasha Taylor
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
| | - Stephanie L Taylor
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA,University of California Los Angeles Department of Medicine and Department of Health Policy and Management, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Megan Tsui
- Henry Jackson Foundation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Fred S Wright
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
| | - Steven Zeliadt
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA,University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fritz JM, Lane E, Minick KI, Bardsley T, Brennan G, Hunter SJ, McGee T, Rassu FS, Wegener ST, Skolasky RL. Perceptions of Telehealth Physical Therapy Among Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. TELEMEDICINE REPORTS 2021; 2:258-263. [PMID: 34927165 PMCID: PMC8670598 DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 prompted the rapid adoption of telehealth to provide physical therapy. Patients' perceptions about telehealth physical therapy are mostly unknown. This study describes perceptions of telehealth physical therapy among patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). Methods: This study surveyed participants in an ongoing multisite clinical trial of nonpharmacological LBP treatments. Participants were asked about their willingness to use telehealth for physical therapy and with other providers and completed the PROMIS-29. Results: Surveys were received from 102 participants (mean age = 48.5 [standard deviation; SD = 11.6]). Thirty-six (35.3%) expressed willingness to receive telehealth physical therapy, 22 were neutral (21.6%), and 44 were unwilling (43.1%). The percentage expressing willingness for telehealth physical therapy was lower than it was for family medicine (p < 0.001) or mental health (p < 0.001). Older (p = 0.049) and Black participants (p = 0.01) more likely expressed willingness to use telehealth for physical therapy. Conclusion: Education and familiarity may help patients view telehealth physical therapy more favorably. Clinical Trial Registration (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03859713).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M. Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Elizabeth Lane
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kate I. Minick
- Rehabilitation Services, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah, USA
| | - Tyler Bardsley
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Gerard Brennan
- Rehabilitation Services, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah, USA
| | - Stephen J. Hunter
- Rehabilitation Services, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah, USA
| | - Terrence McGee
- Rehabilitation Therapy Services, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, Maryland, USA
| | - Fenan S. Rassu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephen T. Wegener
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard L. Skolasky
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ali J, Davis AF, Burgess DJ, Rhon DI, Vining R, Young‐McCaughan S, Green S, Kerns RD. Justice and equity in pragmatic clinical trials: Considerations for pain research within integrated health systems. Learn Health Syst 2021; 6:e10291. [PMID: 35434355 PMCID: PMC9006531 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ali
- Department of International Health Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Alison F. Davis
- Pain Management Collaboratory, Department of Psychiatry Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
| | - Diana J. Burgess
- VA HSR&D Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Medical Center Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA
| | - Daniel I. Rhon
- Brooke Army Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Fort Sam Houston Texas USA
| | - Robert Vining
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic Davenport Iowa USA
| | - Stacey Young‐McCaughan
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston Texas USA
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System San Antonio Texas USA
| | - Sean Green
- Pain Management Collaboratory, Department of Psychiatry Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
| | - Robert D. Kerns
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, and Psychology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center West Haven Connecticut USA
| |
Collapse
|