1
|
Wall NR, Fuller RN, Morcos A, De Leon M. Pancreatic Cancer Health Disparity: Pharmacologic Anthropology. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5070. [PMID: 37894437 PMCID: PMC10605341 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PCa) remains a formidable global health challenge, with high mortality rates and limited treatment options. While advancements in pharmacology have led to improved outcomes for various cancers, PCa continues to exhibit significant health disparities, disproportionately affecting certain populations. This paper explores the intersection of pharmacology and anthropology in understanding the health disparities associated with PCa. By considering the socio-cultural, economic, and behavioral factors that influence the development, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of PCa, pharmacologic anthropology provides a comprehensive framework to address these disparities and improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan R. Wall
- Division of Biochemistry, Department of Basic Science, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA; (R.N.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Ryan N. Fuller
- Division of Biochemistry, Department of Basic Science, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA; (R.N.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Ann Morcos
- Division of Biochemistry, Department of Basic Science, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA; (R.N.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Marino De Leon
- Division of Physiology, Department of Basic Science, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oh KM, An K, Lee M, Shin C, Steves SL. Colorectal cancer screening disparities in Asian Americans: the influences of patient-provider communication and social media use. Cancer Causes Control 2023:10.1007/s10552-023-01720-z. [PMID: 37266764 PMCID: PMC10237058 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01720-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We examined the role of patient-provider communication (PPC) during in-person visits and via electronic communication and social media use on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Asian Americans (AAs) and Non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) aged 50 and older. METHODS Health Information National Trends Survey 2017-2020 data were analyzed. RESULTS AAs tended to evaluate the quality of PPC during their in-person visits to a health care provider lower than NHWs. AAs' CRC screening rate was lower than the rate of NHWs (78.8% vs. 84.4%). After adjusting for sociodemographics, healthcare access, and health status, the quality of PPC was the only significant predictor associated with a lower probability of CRC screening among AAs (Adjusted OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56, 0.96); while the Internet to communicate with a health care provider was the only significant predictor of CRC screening among NHWs (Adjusted OR 1.76; CI 1.11, 2.79). AAs were more likely to use YouTube to watch a health-related video than NHWs (43.5% vs, 24%). However, social media use was not associated with CRC screening in both AAs and NHWs. CONCLUSION Use of electronic communication technology may contribute to improve health information literacy and reduce the disparity. On-line communication may empower the culturally and linguistically diverse AAs by improving their confidence in communication with health care providers. Thus, communication technologies need to be strategically utilized and tailored to better meet the communication needs of racial/ethnic minorities. Online communication technologies may reduce the disparities in PPC related to cancer screening and cancer burden experienced by AAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyeung Mi Oh
- School of Nursing, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
| | - Kyungeh An
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences & School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Moonju Lee
- School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Chanam Shin
- College of Nursing, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Steiling K, Kathuria H, Echieh CP, Ost DE, Rivera MP, Begnaud A, Celedón JC, Charlot M, Dietrick F, Duma N, Fong KM, Ford JG, Gould MK, Holguin F, Pérez-Stable EJ, Tanner NT, Thomson CC, Wiener RS, Wisnivesky J. Research Priorities for Interventions to Address Health Disparities in Lung Nodule Management: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 207:e31-e46. [PMID: 36920066 PMCID: PMC10037482 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202212-2216st] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Lung nodules are common incidental findings, and timely evaluation is critical to ensure diagnosis of localized-stage and potentially curable lung cancers. Rates of guideline-concordant lung nodule evaluation are low, and the risk of delayed evaluation is higher for minoritized groups. Objectives: To summarize the existing evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and prioritize research questions related to interventions to reduce disparities in lung nodule evaluation. Methods: A multidisciplinary committee was convened to review the evidence and identify key knowledge gaps in four domains: 1) research methodology, 2) patient-level interventions, 3) clinician-level interventions, and 4) health system-level interventions. A modified Delphi approach was used to identify research priorities. Results: Key knowledge gaps included 1) a lack of standardized approaches to identify factors associated with lung nodule management disparities, 2) limited data evaluating the role of social determinants of health on disparities in lung nodule management, 3) a lack of certainty regarding the optimal strategy to improve patient-clinician communication and information transmission and/or retention, and 4) a paucity of information on the impact of patient navigators and culturally trained multidisciplinary teams. Conclusions: This statement outlines a research agenda intended to stimulate high-impact studies of interventions to mitigate disparities in lung nodule evaluation. Research questions were prioritized around the following domains: 1) need for methodologic guidelines for conducting research related to disparities in nodule management, 2) evaluating how social determinants of health influence lung nodule evaluation, 3) studying approaches to improve patient-clinician communication, and 4) evaluating the utility of patient navigators and culturally enriched multidisciplinary teams to reduce disparities.
Collapse
|
4
|
Association between Patient-Provider Communication and Self-Perceived Mental Health in US Adults with Cancer: Real-World Evidence through Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Diseases 2022; 10:diseases10040088. [PMID: 36278587 PMCID: PMC9590007 DOI: 10.3390/diseases10040088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Using real-world data, this retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to analyze the association between patient–physician communication and self-reported mental health from cancer patients using publicly available 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) household component data. Four adjusted logistic regression models were conducted to analyze the association between patient–physician communication and self-perceived mental health among United States adult cancer patients, with each model assessing different aspects of patient–physician communication: being respected (respect), being listened to (listen), spending enough time (time), and being explained (explain). The main finding from this study was that only the time model showed a statistical significance, where patients who reported that their physician always spent enough time perceived their mental health as good. Other covariates that showed statistical significance with self-perceived mental health in cancer patients included age, income level, physical limitation, and limitation from pain. In conclusion, there were generally no statistically significant associations between patient–physician communication and mental health among cancer patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee MJ, Chung PL, Wu SI, Chen HM, Chen VH. Lung cancer and posttraumatic stress symptoms: Predictive factors and subgroup analysis. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/tpsy.tpsy_32_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
|
6
|
Chen JJ, Roldan CS, Nichipor AN, Balboni TA, Krishnan MS, Revette AC, Hertan LM, Chen AB. Patient-Provider Communication, Decision-Making, and Psychosocial Burdens in Palliative Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study on Patients' Perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:512-522. [PMID: 33556491 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.01.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Patient-provider communication impacts how patients with cancer make decisions about treatment. OBJECTIVES To examine patient perceptions of discussions, decision-making, and psychosocial burdens related to receiving palliative radiotherapy (RT), in order to inform best practices for communication about palliative RT. METHODS We conducted an exploratory qualitative study using oral questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Seventeen patients receiving their first course of palliative RT for lung or bone metastases at a comprehensive cancer center were interviewed. Patient interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using NVivo software. RESULTS Themes that impacted patients' decisions to initiate RT included a desire to minimize pain, optimism about what RT could provide for the future, perception of having "no other choice," disappointment about cancer progression, and unfamiliarity with RT. Most patients preferred shared decision-making regarding RT initiation and reported patient empowerment, effective communication, and team collaboration as contributing to shared decision-making. Most patients preferred their physicians to make decisions about RT treatment intensity and described trust in their physicians, institutional reputation, and RT expertise as motivators for this preference. Patients who possessed a proactive decisional mindset about initiating RT as opposed to having "no other choice" were less likely to report experiencing psychosocial burdens. CONCLUSION Most patients prefer shared decision-making regarding RT initiation but prefer their radiation oncologists to make decisions regarding treatment intensity. Communication that empowers patients in their desired level of engagement for RT decision-making may help patients make informed decisions, contribute toward a proactive decisional mindset, and reduce their perception of psychosocial burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Jane Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Claudia S Roldan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexandra N Nichipor
- Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tracy A Balboni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Monica S Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anna C Revette
- Survey and Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lauren M Hertan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aileen B Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Conley CC, Otto AK, McDonnell GA, Tercyak KP. Multiple approaches to enhancing cancer communication in the next decade: translating research into practice and policy. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:2018-2032. [PMID: 34347872 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Communicating risk and other health information in a clear, understandable, and actionable manner is critical for the prevention and control of cancer, as well as the care of affected individuals and their family members. However, the swift pace of development in communication technologies has dramatically changed the health communication landscape. This digital era presents new opportunities and challenges for cancer communication research and its impact on practice and policy. In this article, we examine the science of health communication focused on cancer and highlight important areas of research for the coming decade. Specifically, we discuss three domains in which cancer communication may occur: (a) among patients and their healthcare providers; (b) within and among families and social networks; and (c) across communities, populations, and the public more broadly. We underscore findings from the prior decade of cancer communication research, provide illustrative examples of future directions for cancer communication science, and conclude with considerations for diverse populations. Health informatics studies will be necessary to fully understand the growing and complex communication settings related to cancer: such works have the potential to change the face of information exchanges about cancer and elevate our collective discourse about this area as newer clinical and public health priorities emerge. Researchers from a wide array of specialties are interested in examining and improving cancer communication. These interdisciplinary perspectives can rapidly advance and help translate findings of cancer communication in the field of behavioral medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C Conley
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Amy K Otto
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Glynnis A McDonnell
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kenneth P Tercyak
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Associations between the severity of medical and surgical complications and perception of surgeon empathy in esophageal and gastric cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7551-7561. [PMID: 34110486 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06257-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of global physician empathy and its three subdimensions (establishing rapport, emotional and cognitive processes) on the severity of postoperative complications in a sample of cancer patients. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data on 256 patients with esogastric cancer from the French national FREGAT database. Empathy and its subdimensions were assessed using the patient-reported CARE scale and the severity of medical and surgical complications was reported with the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The usual covariates were included in multinomial logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Physician empathy predicted the odds of reporting major complications. When patients perceived high empathy, they were less likely to report major complications compared to no complications (OR = .95, 95% CI = [.91-.99], p = .029). Among the three dimensions, only "establishing rapport" (OR = .84, 95% CI = [.73-.98], p = .019) and the "emotional process" (OR = .85, 95% CI = [.74-.98], p = .022) predicted major complications. CONCLUSIONS Physician empathy is essential before surgery. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms associating empathy with health outcomes in cancer. Physicians should be trained to establish good rapport with patients, especially in the preoperative period.
Collapse
|
9
|
Asare M, Fakhoury C, Thompson N, Culakova E, Kleckner AS, Adunlin G, Reifenstein K, Benavidez GA, Kamen CS. The Patient-Provider Relationship: Predictors of black/African American Cancer Patients' Perceived Quality of Care and Health Outcomes. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 35:1289-1294. [PMID: 31167572 PMCID: PMC6893107 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1625006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
We examined whether the patient-provider relationship (PPR) is associated with Black survivors' health outcomes and whether this association was mediated by the quality of care. The outcome variables were survivors' quality of care and health outcome, and the predictor variable was PPR (communication, emotional support, time spent, and survivors' shared-decision making). A sample of 223 Black cancer survivors (age 63.0 ± 14.0 years) provided evaluable data. The most common cancer types reported by the participants were: gynecologic (32.7%), genitourinary (21.5%), and gastrointestinal cancers (11.2%). After controlling for covariates. A Structural Equation Model (SEM) showed that PPR was significantly associated with both health outcome (p = .015) and quality of care (p = .002). When PPR and quality of care were tested in the mediation model, the direct association between PPR and health outcome was attenuated, and it was no longer significant (b = -0.05, SE = 0.11, p = .65). However, indirectly, there was a strong association between PPR and health outcome through the quality of care (b = 0.22, SE = 0.08, p = .003), indicating full mediation. Providers' interpersonal relationships had a significant influence on the health of Black survivors, and this influence may be due to the increased positive perception of the quality of care. The implications of these findings for further research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Asare
- Baylor University, Department of Public Health, Waco, TX
| | | | | | - Eva Culakova
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Georges Adunlin
- Department of Pharmaceutical, Social and Administrative Sciences, McWhorter School of Pharmacy Samford University Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Maiga AW, Deppen SA, Massion PP, Callaway-Lane C, Pinkerman R, Dittus RS, Lambright ES, Nesbitt JC, Grogan EL. Communication About the Probability of Cancer in Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules. JAMA Surg 2019; 153:353-357. [PMID: 29261826 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Importance Clinical guidelines recommend that clinicians estimate the probability of malignancy for patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) larger than 8 mm. Adherence to these guidelines is unknown. Objectives To determine whether clinicians document the probability of malignancy in high-risk IPNs and to compare these quantitative or qualitative predictions with the validated Mayo Clinic Model. Design, Setting, and Participants Single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients from a tertiary care Department of Veterans Affairs hospital from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2015. Cohort 1 included 291 veterans undergoing surgical resection of known or suspected lung cancer from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2015. Cohort 2 included a random sample of 239 veterans undergoing inpatient or outpatient pulmonary evaluation of IPNs at the hospital from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2012. Exposures Clinician documentation of the quantitative or qualitative probability of malignancy. Main Outcomes and Measures Documentation from pulmonary and/or thoracic surgery clinicians as well as information from multidisciplinary tumor board presentations was reviewed. Any documented quantitative or qualitative predictions of malignancy were extracted and summarized using descriptive statistics. Clinicians' predictions were compared with risk estimates from the Mayo Clinic Model. Results Of 291 patients in cohort 1, 282 (96.9%) were men; mean (SD) age was 64.6 (9.0) years. Of 239 patients in cohort 2, 233 (97.5%) were men; mean (SD) age was 65.5 (10.8) years. Cancer prevalence was 258 of 291 cases (88.7%) in cohort 1 and 110 of 225 patients with a definitive diagnosis (48.9%) in cohort 2. Only 13 patients (4.5%) in cohort 1 and 3 (1.3%) in cohort 2 had a documented quantitative prediction of malignancy prior to tissue diagnosis. Of the remaining patients, 217 of 278 (78.1%) in cohort 1 and 149 of 236 (63.1%) in cohort 2 had qualitative statements of cancer risk. In cohort 2, 23 of 79 patients (29.1%) without any documented malignancy risk statements had a final diagnosis of cancer. Qualitative risk statements were distributed among 32 broad categories. The most frequently used statements aligned well with Mayo Clinic Model predictions for cohort 1 compared with cohort 2. The median Mayo Clinic Model-predicted probability of cancer was 68.7% (range, 2.4%-100.0%). Qualitative risk statements roughly aligned with Mayo predictions. Conclusions and Relevance Clinicians rarely provide quantitative documentation of cancer probability for high-risk IPNs, even among patients drawn from a broad range of cancer probabilities. Qualitative statements of cancer risk in current practice are imprecise and highly variable. A standard scale that correlates with predicted cancer risk for IPNs should be used to communicate with patients and other clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia W Maiga
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Stephen A Deppen
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Pierre P Massion
- Department of Medicine, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville.,Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Rhonda Pinkerman
- Department of Surgery, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville
| | - Robert S Dittus
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville
| | - Eric S Lambright
- Department of Surgery, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jonathan C Nesbitt
- Department of Surgery, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Eric L Grogan
- Department of Surgery, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Watson KS, Hulbert A, Henderson V, Chukwudozie IB, Aponte-Soto L, Lerner L, Martinez E, Kim S, Winn RA. Lung Cancer Screening and Epigenetics in African Americans: The Role of the Socioecological Framework. Front Oncol 2019; 9:87. [PMID: 30915271 PMCID: PMC6423082 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in the U.S. and racial/ethnic minorities carry the greatest burden of lung cancer disparities with African Americans (AAs) impacted disproportionately. Inequities in lung cancer health disparities are often associated with multiple bio-behavioral and socio-cultural factors among racial/ethnic minorities. Epigenetic research has advanced the understanding of the intersectionality between biological and socio-cultural factors in lung cancer disparities among AAs. However, gaps exist in the engagement of diverse populations in epigenetic lung cancer research, which poses a challenge in ensuring the generalizability and implementation of epigenetic research in populations that carry an unequal cancer burden. Grounding epigenetic lung cancer research within a socio-ecological framework may prove promising in implementing a multi-level approach to community engagement, screening, navigation, and research participation among AAs. The University of Illinois Cancer Center (UI Cancer Center) is employing an evidence–based (EB) model of community/patient engagement utilizing the socio-ecological model (SEM) to develop a culturally sensitive epigenetic lung cancer research program that addresses multiple factors that impact lung cancer outcomes in AAs. By implementing epigenetic research within a group of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) guided by the SEM, the UI Cancer Center is proposing a new pathway in mitigating lung cancer disparities in underserved communities. At the individual level, the framework examines tobacco use among patients at FQHCs (the organizational level) and also tailors epigenetic research to explore innovative biomarkers in high risk populations. Interpersonal interventions use Patient Navigators to support navigation to EB tobacco cessation resources and lung cancer screening. Community level support within the SEM is developed by ongoing partnerships with local and national partners such as the American Lung Association (ALA) and the American Cancer Society (ACS). Lastly, at the policy level, the UI Cancer Center acknowledges the role of policy implications in lung cancer screening and advocates for policies and screening recommendations that examine the current guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPTF).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alicia Hulbert
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Vida Henderson
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Lisa Aponte-Soto
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Lane Lerner
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Erica Martinez
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Sage Kim
- Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Robert A Winn
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.,Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kushalnagar P, Engelman A, Sadler G. Deaf patient-provider communication and lung cancer screening: Health Information National Trends survey in American Sign Language (HINTS-ASL). PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:1232-1239. [PMID: 29548598 PMCID: PMC5985205 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2018] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether mode of communication and patient centered communication (PCC) with physicians were associated with the likelihood of deaf smokers inquiring about lung cancer screening. METHODS An accessible health survey including questions about PCC, modes of communication, smoking status and lung cancer screening was administered in American Sign Language (HINTS-ASL) to a nationwide sample of deaf adults from February to August 2017. Of 703 deaf adults who answered the lung screening question, 188 were 55-80 years old. RESULTS The odds ratio of asking about a lung cancer screening test was higher for people with lung disease or used ASL (directly or through an interpreter) to communicate with their physicians. PCC was not associated with asking about a lung cancer screening test. CONCLUSION Current or former smokers who are deaf and use ASL are at greater risk for poorer health outcomes if they do not have accessible communication with their physicians. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Optimal language access through interpreters or directly in ASL is critical when discussing smoking cessation or lung cancer screening tests. Counseling and shared decision-making will help improve high-risk deaf patients' understanding and decision-making about lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Kushalnagar
- Department of Psychology, Gallaudet University, Washington, D.C, United States.
| | - Alina Engelman
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, United States
| | - G Sadler
- Moore Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Phillips CR, Haase JE, Broome ME, Carpenter JS, Frankel RM. Connecting with healthcare providers at diagnosis: adolescent/young adult cancer survivors' perspectives. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2017; 12:1325699. [PMID: 28617094 PMCID: PMC5510205 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1325699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are a vulnerable and underserved population. AYAs' cancer survivorship is complicated by physical and psychosocial late effects which requires long-term follow-up. Connectedness with healthcare providers (HCPs) is a protective factor that may improve long-term follow-up behaviours of AYAs. However, little is known about AYAs' experiences connecting with HCPs. The purpose of this study was to describe AYA cancer survivors' experiences connecting with HCPs. This empirical phenomenological study interviewed nine AYA cancer survivors diagnosed during adolescence. Individual interviews were conducted and analysed using an adapted Colaizzi approach. The essential structure reveals that AYAs begin their experience of connectedness with a sense of disconnectedness prior to treatment. The diagnosis is a period of confusion and emotional turmoil that interfere with the AYAs' ability to connect. When AYAs come to accept their illness and gain familiarity with the environment, they then put forth an effort to connect with HCPs. Although it takes time for AYAs to reciprocate efforts to connect, HCPs should be aware that AYAs carefully assess and make judgments about whether or not HCPs can be trusted. Findings raise awareness of the actions and behaviours of HCPs that hinder connectedness, and targeted in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste R. Phillips
- Department of Science Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Joan E. Haase
- Department of Science Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Marion E. Broome
- Division of Healthcare of Women and Children, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Janet S. Carpenter
- Department of Science Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Richard M. Frankel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University, School of Medicine Indianapolis, INUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li CC, Matthews AK, Dossaji M, Fullam F. The Relationship of Patient-Provider Communication on Quality of Life among African-American and White Cancer Survivors. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 22:584-592. [PMID: 28581896 PMCID: PMC6077992 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1324540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Prior research has demonstrated poorer patient-provider communication ratings among African American compared to White patients. The quality of patient-provider communication has been shown to impact treatment outcomes among cancer patients. A secondary data analysis design was used to determine the relationship of six patient-provider communication variables on the physical health quality of life (PHQOL) and mental health quality of life (MHQOL) of African American and White cancer patients (N = 479). We also examined whether the relationship between communication patterns and QOL differed based on race/ethnicity. Mean physical and mental health QOL scores for the sample were 69.8 and 77.6, respectively. After controlling for significant sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital variables, results showed that patients who experienced fewer interpersonal communication barriers who were more satisfied with the information given by providers had higher PHQOL and MHQOL scores. Additionally, patients who felt more comfort in asking questions or had fewer unmet information needs had higher MHQOL. A stratified analysis showed that the relationship of overall satisfaction with information on MHQOL was stronger among African American patients than White patients. Future research should focus on the development of interventions to improve patient-provider communication as a means for enhancing QOL outcomes among cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien-Ching Li
- a Department of Health Systems Management , Rush University , Chicago , Illinois , USA
| | - Alicia K Matthews
- b Department of Health Systems Science , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois , USA
| | - Mazahir Dossaji
- a Department of Health Systems Management , Rush University , Chicago , Illinois , USA
| | - Francis Fullam
- a Department of Health Systems Management , Rush University , Chicago , Illinois , USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goel S, Paoli C, Iurlo A, Pereira A, Efficace F, Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, Cervantes F. Socioeconomic burden of participation in clinical trials in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Eur J Haematol 2017; 99:36-41. [PMID: 28370510 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the financial and psycho-social impact of participation in clinical trials of patients with BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). METHODS An international, observational cross-sectional study was performed in 143 consecutive MPN patients (51% myelofibrosis, 36% polycythemia vera, 13% essential thrombocythemia), 68% from Italy, 17% from USA, and 15% from Spain. RESULTS Thirty-five percent of patients reported having spent more money during the trial than in previous treatments and 21% having missed more workdays. Twelve percent replied that they would not have participated in the trial if the financial consequences would have been known beforehand. In 10% of the patients, the interpersonal relationships were more affected during the trial than in previous treatment but, overall, 91% subjects believed that participating in the clinical trial was worth the financial or emotional suffering. Concerning patients' suggestions, 54% of them indicated that the number of visits required for the trial should be clearly specified in the informed consent, 60% recommended travel cost reimbursement, and 23% hotel cost reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS Physicians and pharmaceutical companies involved in clinical trials with patients with hematological diseases should be aware of these problems and make efforts to attenuate the socioeconomic burden of participation in the trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Goel
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Chiara Paoli
- Center of Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandra Iurlo
- Oncohematology Division, IRCCS Ca' Granda-Maggiore Policlinico Hospital Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Pereira
- Hemostasis Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabio Efficace
- GIMEMA Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziano Barbui
- Research Foundation, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Ayalew Tefferi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alessandro M Vannucchi
- Center of Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lin J, McGlynn KA, Carter CA, Nations JA, Anderson WF, Shriver CD, Zhu K. The Impact of Preexisting Mental Health Disorders on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival among Lung Cancer Patients in the U.S. Military Health System. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 25:1564-1571. [PMID: 27566418 PMCID: PMC5777503 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Higher cancer-related mortality has been observed among people with mental health disorders than in the general population. Both delay in diagnosis and inadequate treatment due to health care access have been found to explain the higher mortality. The U.S. Military Health System (MHS), in which all beneficiaries have equal access to health care, provides an ideal system to study this disparity where there are no or minimal barriers to health care access. This study assessed preexisting mental health disorders and stage at diagnosis, receipt of cancer treatment, and overall survival among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the U.S. MHS. METHODS The study used data from the linked database from the Department of Defense's Central Cancer Registry and the MHS Data Repository (MDR). The study subjects included 5,054 patients with histologically confirmed primary NSCLC diagnosed between 1998 and 2007. RESULTS Patients with a preexisting mental disorder did not present with more advanced disease at diagnosis than those without. There were no significant differences in receiving cancer treatments between the two groups. However, patients with a mental health disorder had a higher mortality than those without [adjusted HR, 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.20]. CONCLUSIONS Poor survival in NSCLC in patients with a preexisting mental health disorder is not necessarily associated with delay in diagnosis and/or inadequate cancer treatment. IMPACT This study contributes to the current understanding that health care access may not be sufficient to explain the poor survival among patients with NSCLC with preexisting mental health disorders. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(12); 1564-71. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Lin
- John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Katherine A McGlynn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Corey A Carter
- John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Joel A Nations
- John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - William F Anderson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Craig D Shriver
- John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kangmin Zhu
- John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Song Y, Lv X, Liu J, Huang D, Hong J, Wang W, Wang W. Experience of nursing support from the perspective of patients with cancer in mainland China. Nurs Health Sci 2016; 18:510-518. [PMID: 27510508 DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2015] [Revised: 06/11/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This study was conducted to understand patients' experiences of nursing support, to identify gaps between patients' expected needs and the nursing support they received, and to explore reasons for such disparity. A qualitative study with a phenomenological approach was used. A purposive sample of 22 patients with different types of cancer was recruited and interviewed using semistructured guidelines. The data were analyzed using phenomenological analytic methods. Several needs regarding nursing support were expressed, including informational, psychological, clinical, care coordination and communication needs, and there were some unmet or partially-met needs. Reasons for the disparities covered both patient- and nurse-related factors, including patients' lack of awareness regarding how to acquire professional assistance and reluctance to express their needs, and nurses' lack of active communication with patients, inability to provide specific support, and limited resources for coordination. The expectations of nursing support did not always correspond with the actual delivery of nursing care. A tailored intervention is warranted to meet patients' expectations, which might contribute to quality-of-care improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongxia Song
- School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China
| | - Xiaoqing Lv
- School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China
| | - Jingjing Liu
- School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China
| | - Dan Huang
- School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China
| | - Jingfang Hong
- School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.,Anhui Provincial Nursing International Research Center, Anhui, China
| | - Weili Wang
- School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.,Anhui Provincial Nursing International Research Center, Anhui, China
| | - Wenru Wang
- Alice Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Godlewski D, Adamczak M, Wojtyś P. Experiences of cancer patients in Poland throughout diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016; 26. [PMID: 26764219 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies have failed to explain why the mortality rate of cancer patients is higher in Poland than other countries in the European Union. We aimed to evaluate the health care system in Poland during the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. In this multicentre study, 125 cancer patients treated at 15 centres across Poland participated in focus group interviews in 2014. We identified and assessed crucial elements that affect a patients' experience from the early onset of symptoms, through to diagnosis and treatment. We found that the majority of patients were dissatisfied with the length of time taken to diagnose cancer. Throughout diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, patients reported a lack of communication from health care professionals. While dealings with oncologists and medical staff were viewed favourably, patients felt the cancer centres were not well organised. Patients recommended that having one doctor in charge of an individual's treatment and follow-up would improve patient care and well-being. A late cancer diagnosis may be contributing to the high mortality rate observed in Poland. In the future, new policies should be developed to reduce the time to cancer diagnosis, increase communication with health care professionals and improve the organisation of cancer care for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Godlewski
- Centre for Cancer Prevention and Epidemiology, Poznań, Poland
| | - M Adamczak
- Centre for Cancer Prevention and Epidemiology, Poznań, Poland
| | - P Wojtyś
- Centre for Cancer Prevention and Epidemiology, Poznań, Poland
| |
Collapse
|