Loss of SATB2 Expression in Colorectal Carcinoma Is Associated With DNA Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency and BRAF Mutation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:1409-1417. [PMID: 30001238 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001116]

Concomitant expression patterns of CDX2 and SATB2 as prognostic factors in stage III colorectal cancers

CDX2 and SATB2 are often used as biomarkers for identification of colorectal origin in primary or metastatic adenocarcinomas. Loss of CDX2 or SATB2 expression has been associated with poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, little is known regarding clinicopathological features, including prognosis, of CRCs with concomitant loss of CDX2 and SATB2. A total of 431 stage III CRCs were analyzed for their expression status in CDX2 and SATB2 using tissue microarray-based immunohistochemistry and expression status was correlated with clinicopathological variables, molecular alterations, and survival. CDX2-negative (CDX2-) CRCs and SATB2-negative (SATB2-) CRCs were found in 8.1 % and 17.2 % of CRCs, respectively, whereas both CDX2-negative and SATB2-negative (CDX2-/SATB2-) CRCs comprised 3.2 % of the CRCs. On survival analysis, neither CDX2-/SATB2+ nor CDX2+/SABT2- CRCs but CDX2-/SATB2- CRCs were associated with poor prognosis. CDX2-/SATB2- CRCs showed significant associations with tumor subsite of right colon, poor differentiation, decreased expression of CK20, aberrant expression of CK7, CIMP-high, MSI-high, and BRAF mutation. In summary, our results suggest that concomitant loss of CDX2 and SATB2 is a prognostic biomarker but isolated loss of CDX2 or SATB2 is not a prognostic biomarker for stage III CRCs.

Use of SATB2 and CDX2 Immunohistochemistry to Characterize and Diagnose Colorectal Cancer

SATB2 has been reported to be highly specific for lower gastrointestinal tract tumors. On the basis of its ileum-colon conversion effects, which involve the activation of colonic genes in cooperation with CDX2 and HNF4A, we hypothesized that SATB2 and CDX2 might define the characteristics of colorectal cancers (CRCs). In the present study, the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of 269 CRCs were analyzed according to SATB2 and CDX2 expression. CRCs with SATB2- and/or CDX2- phenotypes showed associations with poorly differentiated histotypes (P<0.00001), mucus production (P=0.0019), and mismatch repair-deficient phenotypes (P<0.00001). SATB2-/CDX2- CRCs were significantly associated with CK20-negativity, with or without CK7 expression (P<0.00001), as well as with MUC5AC-positivity (P<0.00001), and CD10-negativity (P=0.00047). Negativity for SATB2 or CDX2 was associated with the expression of PD-L1 in both all CRC (P<0.00001) and mismatch repair-proficient CRC (P=0.000091). Multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis identified negativity for SATB2 and/or CDX2 as potential independent risk factors for patients with CRC. Regarding the diagnostic utility of SATB2, all of the 44 CRC metastases could be diagnosed as colorectal in origin if the immunohistochemical phenotypes (including CK7, CK20, and p53) of the primary lesions and patient history were considered. Among the other 684 tumors, we were unable to distinguish a case of CK7-/CK20+/CDX2+/SATB2+ ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma from metastatic CRC without the patient history and clinical information.

Loss of SATB2 and CDX2 expression is associated with DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency and BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer

The relationship between the expression of the SATB2 and CDX2 proteins and common molecular changes and clinical prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) still needs further clarification. We collected 1180 cases of CRC and explored the association between the expression of SATB2 and CDX2 and clinicopathological characteristics, molecular alterations, and overall survival of CRC using whole-slide immunohistochemistry. Our results showed that negative expression of SATB2 and CDX2 was more common in MMR-protein-deficient CRC than in MMR-protein-proficient CRC (15.8% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.001; 14.5% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.000, respectively). Negative expression of SATB2 and CDX2 was more common in BRAF-mutant CRC than in BRAF wild-type CRC (17.2% vs. 6.1%, P = 0.003; 13.8% vs. 4. 2%; P = 0.004, respectively). There was no relationship between SATB2 and/or CDX2 negative expression and KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations. The lack of expression of SATB2 and CDX2 was associated with poor histopathological features of CRC. In multivariate analysis, negative expression of SATB2 (P = 0.030), negative expression of CDX2 (P = 0.043) and late clinical stage (P = 0.000) were associated with decreased overall survival of CRC. In conclusion, the lack of SATB2 and CDX2 expression in CRC was associated with MMR protein deficiency and BRAF mutation, but not with KRAS, NRAS and PIK3CA mutation. SATB2 and CDX2 are prognostic biomarkers in patients with CRC.

Diagnostic gastrointestinal markers in primary lung cancer and pulmonary metastases

Histopathological diagnosis of pulmonary tumors is essential for treatment decisions. The distinction between primary lung adenocarcinoma and pulmonary metastasis from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract may be difficult. Therefore, we compared the diagnostic value of several immunohistochemical markers in pulmonary tumors. Tissue microarrays from 629 resected primary lung cancers and 422 resected pulmonary epithelial metastases from various sites (whereof 275 colorectal cancer) were investigated for the immunohistochemical expression of CDH17, GPA33, MUC2, MUC6, SATB2, and SMAD4, for comparison with CDX2, CK20, CK7, and TTF-1. The most sensitive markers for GI origin were GPA33 (positive in 98%, 60%, and 100% of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and other GI adenocarcinomas, respectively), CDX2 (99/40/100%), and CDH17 (99/0/100%). In comparison, SATB2 and CK20 showed higher specificity, with expression in 5% and 10% of mucinous primary lung adenocarcinomas and both in 0% of TTF-1-negative non-mucinous primary lung adenocarcinomas (25-50% and 5-16%, respectively, for GPA33/CDX2/CDH17). MUC2 was negative in all primary lung cancers, but positive only in less than half of pulmonary metastases from mucinous adenocarcinomas from other organs. Combining six GI markers did not perfectly separate primary lung cancers from pulmonary metastases including subgroups such as mucinous adenocarcinomas or CK7-positive GI tract metastases. This comprehensive comparison suggests that CDH17, GPA33, and SATB2 may be used as equivalent alternatives to CDX2 and CK20. However, no single or combination of markers can categorically distinguish primary lung cancers from metastatic GI tract cancer.

Diagnostic accuracy of SATB2 in identifying primary and metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a comparative immunohistochemical study

Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a new marker that could identify the colonic origin, but whether its expression is preserved in metastatic colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate SATB2 validity in the identification of CRC either alone or in combination with caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2) and/or cytokeratin 20 (CK20). Moreover, we examined the concordance of SATB2 expression in primary CRC and paired metastatic specimen. Immunohistochemical expression of SATB2, CDX2 and CK20 was evaluated in primary CRC, 50 paired metastatic CRC and 80 non-CRC specimens. This study demonstrated that the ideal SATB2 cut-off value for recognising colonic from non-colonic origin was 10%. SATB2 was more sensitive and specific than CK20. However, it was more specific but less sensitive than CDX2. Analysing the combined markers expression, SATB2 and CDX2 combination revealed better sensitivity, specificity and larger area under curve compared to SATB2 alone, CDX2 alone and combined CDX2 and CK20. Moreover, SATB2 was able to retain its expression at the metastatic sites. SATB2 was totally concordant between primary CRC and their paired metastatic sites (concordance rate = 100%) with perfect level of agreement. SATB2 could be considered as an accurate diagnostic marker of primary and metastatic CRC. SATB2 and CDX2 is the best combination serving the highest sensitivity and specificity in detection of CRC.

SATB2 Expression in Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcomas of Bone

OBJECTIVES

SATB2 is a transcriptional regulator that plays an important role in osteoblastic differentiation. We examined the prevalence and potential significance of SATB2 expression in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) of bone.

METHODS

We examined 38 cases of bone UPS without osteoid. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.4, with a median age of 48 years (range, 23-83 years). Tumors occurred primarily in the femur (n = 8) and ilium (n = 8), with a median tumor size of 9.5 cm (range, 1.8-27.0 cm). The median follow-up was 24.7 months (range, 2-82 months): 11 patients developed local recurrences, and 18 patients had metastases, mainly to lung and bone.

RESULTS

SATB2 expression (nuclear labeling ≥5%) was seen in 21 of 38 (55%) cases: 5 with focal (nuclear labeling 5%), 11 with patchy (nuclear labeling 5%-50%), and 5 with diffuse (nuclear labeling ≥50%) staining. Among this group, diffuse SATB2 expression demonstrated superior metastasis-free survival (P = .036) and event-free survival (P = .024). For comparison, 100 soft tissue UPS were stained; the majority were negative (75/100 [75%]).

CONCLUSIONS

UPS of bone demonstrated more frequent SATB2 expression compared with its soft tissue counterpart. In this series, diffuse SATB2 expression in UPS of bone was associated with better outcomes. Additional studies are still needed to determine its significance.

Comprehensive clinicopathologic, molecular, and immunologic characterization of colorectal carcinomas with loss of three intestinal markers, CDX2, SATB2, and KRT20

Caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2), special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2), and keratin 20 (KRT20) are frequently used as intestinal epithelium-specific markers in immunohistochemical studies. However, subsets of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) show loss of these markers. We analyzed The Cancer Genome Atlas data to explore molecular correlates of CDX2, SATB2, and KRT20 genes in 390 CRCs. The decreased mRNA expression of each of the three genes commonly correlated with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), CpG island methylator phenotype-high (CIMP-H), BRAF/RNF43 mutations, consensus molecular subtype 1, and high tumor mutational burden. The downregulation of CDX2 or SATB2 was dependent on both MSI-H and CIMP-H, whereas that of KRT20 was more dependent on MSI-H than on CIMP-H. Next, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of CDX2, SATB2, and KRT20 in 436 primary CRCs. In contrast to RNA-level expression, decreased expression of CDX2 and SATB2 was more dependent on CIMP-H than on MSI-H. However, consistent with RNA-level expression, decreased expression of KRT20 was more dependent on MSI-H than on CIMP-H. CIMP-H and lymphatic invasion were consistently associated with both CDX2 loss and SATB2 loss in CRCs, regardless of MSI status. In microsatellite stable CRCs, CDX2 loss correlated with BRAF mutation, whereas SATB2 loss was associated with KRAS mutations and decreased T-cell infiltration. Cases with concurrent loss of all three markers were found exclusively in MLH1-methylated MSI-H/CIMP-H CRCs. In conclusion, MSI-H and/or CIMP-H are major common correlates of decreased CDX2/SATB2/KRT20 expression in CRCs, but the specific features associated with the loss of each marker are different in CRCs.

Loss of SATB2 Occurs More Frequently Than CDX2 Loss in Colorectal Carcinoma and Identifies Particularly Aggressive Cancers in High-Risk Subgroups

Simple Summary

The immunohistochemical analysis of Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is increasingly being used to detect colorectal differentiation. Our study aimed to investigate SATB2 expression levels and the prognostic relevance of SATB2 loss in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), especially in comparison with CDX2, the standard marker of colorectal differentiation. We tested SATB2 expression in 1039 CRCs and identified SATB2 as a strong prognosticator in the overall cohort as well as in specific subcohorts, including high-risk subgroups. Compared to CDX2, SATB2 showed a higher prognostic power but was lost at a much higher frequency, generally rendering SATB2 as the less sensitive marker for colorectal differentiation compared to CDX2.

Abstract

Background: Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) has emerged as an alternative immunohistochemical marker to CDX2 for colorectal differentiation. However, the distribution and prognostic relevance of SATB2 expression in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) have to be further elucidated. Methods: SATB2 expression was analysed in 1039 CRCs and correlated with clinicopathological and morphological factors, CDX2 expression as well as survival parameters within the overall cohort and in clinicopathological subgroups. Results: SATB2 loss was a strong prognosticator in univariate analyses of the overall cohort (p < 0.001 for all survival comparisons) and in numerous subcohorts including high-risk scenarios (UICC stage III/high tumour budding). SATB2 retained its prognostic relevance in multivariate analyses of these high-risk scenarios (e.g., UICC stage III: DSS: p = 0.007, HR: 1.95), but not in the overall cohort (DSS: p = 0.1, HR: 1.25). SATB2 loss was more frequent than CDX2 loss (22.2% vs. 10.2%, p < 0.001) and of higher prognostic relevance with only moderate overlap between SATB2/CDX2 expression groups. Conclusions: SATB2 loss is able to identify especially aggressive CRCs in high-risk subgroups. While SATB2 is the prognostically superior immunohistochemical parameter compared to CDX2 in univariate analyses, it appears to be the less sensitive marker for colorectal differentiation as it is lost more frequently.

SATB2 in Neoplasms of Lung, Pancreatobiliary, and Gastrointestinal Origins

OBJECTIVES

Special AT-rich binding protein 2 (SATB2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) has high sensitivity and specificity for colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), but data on its expression in specific subsets of pulmonary, gastric, small bowel, and pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas (ADCAs) are relatively limited or discordant. We assessed SATB2 expression in a large cohort of ADCAs from these sites to determine its reliability in distinguishing CRC from them.

METHODS

SATB2 IHC was performed on 335 neoplasms, including 40 lung ADCAs, 165 pancreatobiliary neoplasms (34 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms [IPMNs], 19 pancreatic ADCAs, 112 cholangiocarcinomas [CCs]), and 35 gastric, 13 small bowel, 36 ampullary (AMP), and 46 CRC ADCAs. The cases were evaluated for positivity (defined as ≥5% nuclear staining), and an H-score was calculated based on the percentage of SATB2+ cells and staining intensity. Analysis was performed to determine the optimal H-score threshold to separate CRC and non-CRC.

RESULTS

SATB2 was positive in 3% of lung, 2% of CC, 17% of gastric, 38% of small bowel, and 6% of AMP ADCAs. All pancreatic ADCA/IPMNs were negative, and 87% CRCs were positive.

CONCLUSIONS

SATB2 is not entirely specific for colorectal origin and can be expressed in a subset of gastrointestinal ADCAs. It is most useful in the differential of CRC vs lung and pancreatobiliary ADCAs.

Small Bowel Adenocarcinomas Featuring Special AT-Rich Sequence-Binding Protein 2 (SATB2) Expression and a Colorectal Cancer-Like Immunophenotype: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Simple Summary

Since small bowel adenocarcinoma may mimic a colorectal primary neoplasm histologically, it is pivotal to find biomarkers to discriminate these two biologically distinct neoplasms. The aim of our study was to evaluate the expression of special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2), expressed in the vast majority of colorectal carcinomas, and other gastrointestinal phenotypic markers, such as cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 20 and caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2), in 100 small bowel adenocarcinomas. We identified 20 SATB2-positive small bowel adenocarcinomas, including nine sporadic cancers, seven celiac disease-associated cancers and four Crohn’s disease-associated small bowel adenocarcinomas. Six small bowel adenocarcinomas, including two cases associated with celiac disease and four sporadic, displayed a full colorectal carcinoma-like immunoprofile. Unlike SATB2, cytokeratin patterns stratified small bowel adenocarcinoma patient prognosis. The small bowel should be considered as one of the possible sites of origin in cancers of unknown primary, even when the neoplasm shows a colorectal carcinoma-like immunoprofile.

Abstract

Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a transcription factor expressed by colonic cryptic epithelium and epithelial neoplasms of the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, as well as by small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBAs), though at a lower rate. Nevertheless, up to now, only small SBA series, often including a very limited number of Crohn’s disease-associated SBAs (CrD-SBAs) and celiac disease-associated SBAs (CD-SBA), have been investigated for SATB2 expression. We evaluated the expression of SATB2 and other GI phenotypic markers (cytokeratin (CK) 7 and CK20, caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR)), as well as mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, in 100 SBAs, encompassing 34 CrD-SBAs, 28 CD-SBAs and 38 sporadic cases (Spo-SBAs). Any mutual association and correlation with other clinico-pathologic features, including patient prognosis, were searched. Twenty (20%) SATB2-positive SBAs (4 CrD-SBAs, 7 CD-SBAs and 9 Spo-SBAs) were identified. The prevalence of SATB2 positivity was lower in CrD-SBA (12%) in comparison with both CD-SBAs (25%) and Spo-SBAs (24%). Interestingly, six SBAs (two CD-SBAs and four Spo-SBAs) displayed a full colorectal carcinoma (CRC)-like immunoprofile (CK7−/CK20+/CDX2+/AMACR+/SATB2+); none of them was a CrD-SBA. No association between SATB2 expression and MMR status was observed. Although SATB2-positive SBA patients showed a more favorable outcome in comparison with SATB2-negative ones, the difference did not reach statistical significance. When cancers were stratified according to CK7/CK20 expression patterns, we found that CK7−/CK20- SBAs were enriched with MMR-deficient cases (71%) and patients with CK7−/CK20− or CK7−/CK20+ SBAs had a significantly better survival rate compared to those with CK7+/CK20− or CK7+/CK20+ cancers (p = 0.002). To conclude, we identified a small (6%) subset of SBAs featuring a full CRC-like immunoprofile, representing a potential diagnostic pitfall in attempts to identify the site of origin of neoplasms of unknown primary site. In contrast with data on colorectal carcinoma, SATB2 expression is not associated with MMR status in SBAs. CK patterns influence patient survival, as CK7−/CK20− cancers show better prognosis, a behavior possibly due to the high rate of MMR-deficient SBAs within this subgroup.

Hepatocellular carcinomas can be Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 positive: an important diagnostic pitfall

Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a sensitive and specific marker for tumors originating with the colon and appendix. It is now commonly used in surgical pathology, while working up carcinomas of unknown primary. We had anecdotally encountered occasional hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) that were SATB2 positive. Immunohistochemical expression of SATB2 in HCC has not yet been examined in detail. In this study, we evaluated SATB2 expression in 46 HCCs. Nineteen (41%) of 46 HCCs were positive for SATB2. SATB2 expression in HCCs was more commonly seen in poorly differentiated tumors (11 of 13 cases, 85%) than well and moderately differentiated tumors (8 of 33 cases, 24%), p value = 0.0001. No other statistically significant correlations were observed (p > 0.05). There were no other statistically significant correlations between SATB2 expression and age, gender, background liver disease, and cirrhosis (p > 0.05). Results of our study show that a significant subset (41%) of HCCs can be SATB2 positive. Awareness of this phenomenon is important as SATB2 expression in a liver tumor does not completely exclude a diagnosis of HCC.

Immunohistochemical staining as supportive diagnostic tool for pseudomyxoma peritonei arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: A report of two cases and literature review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) arising from an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) is a rare condition. The diagnosis of IPMN as the origin of PMP is mainly inferred from the clinical course and the exclusion of PMP from other organs. The pathological diagnosis has not yet been established. To evaluate the usefulness of immunohistochemical staining for the diagnosis of the primary lesion of PMP as IPMN.

METHODS

There are 2 cases of PMP arising from IPMN between March 2010 and December 2019 at National Center for Global Health and Medicine. A PubMed search that reported PMP arising from IPMN identified 16 additional cases. Diagnostic methods and clinicopathological features of 18 cases were compared.

RESULTS

Four cases including our two cases used immunohistochemical staining for the diagnosis of PMP arising from IPMN. The correspondence of the immunohistochemical staining between PMP and IPMN was shown in the three cases including previously reported two cases and one of our two cases to identify the primary lesion of PMP as IPMN. In addition, we revealed that the comparison of the immunostaining pattern of PMP with the representative immunostaining pattern of the candidate primary lesions is helpful for the diagnosis of the primary lesion of PMP.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemical staining is helpful to identify the primary lesion of PMP as IPMN.

Loss of SATB2 Expression Is a Biomarker of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-associated Colorectal Dysplasia and Adenocarcinoma

SATB2 is a sensitive immunohistochemistry marker of colorectal carcinoma and non-neoplastic colorectal epithelium that is complementary to CDX2. However, its expression is affected by molecular alterations. Inflammatory bowel disease-associated neoplasia demonstrates molecular alterations that are different from those in sporadic colorectal neoplasia. Given these differences, we examined SATB2 expression in 73 cases of inflammatory bowel disease-associated neoplasia including 37 dysplasia cases and 36 carcinomas and compared the expression patterns with 50 cases of nondysplastic colorectal mucosa in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease, 40 sporadic colonic polyps (20 conventional adenomas and 20 sessile serrated lesions/polyps), and 343 sporadic colorectal adenocarcinomas to assess SATB2 immunohistochemistry as a biomarker of inflammatory bowel disease-associated neoplasia. Loss of SATB2 expression was only identified in colorectal dysplasia arising in inflammatory bowel disease (15/37, 41%) and was not seen in nondysplastic colorectal mucosa with active inflammatory bowel disease or sporadic colonic polyps (P<0.001). Loss of SATB2 expression was identified in both endoscopically visible dysplasia (11/28, 39%) and invisible (4/9, 44%) dysplasia. Loss of SATB2 expression was identified in 67% (24/36) of inflammatory bowel disease-associated carcinomas and was significantly more frequent compared with sporadic colorectal carcinomas (47/343, 14%, P<0.001). There was no difference in positive CDX2 expression between inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal carcinoma and sporadic colorectal carcinoma (89% vs. 85%, P=1.0). In conclusion, loss of SATB2 expression is common in inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal dysplasia and adenocarcinoma and may be a helpful ancillary biomarker when evaluating for inflammatory bowel disease-associated dysplasia.

Metastatic colorectal carcinomas with high SATB2 expression are associated with better prognosis and response to chemotherapy: a population-based Scandinavian study

Background: Survival and response to therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are very heterogeneous. There is an unmet need for better markers of prognosis and treatment benefit for mCRC patients. The homeobox 2 gene SATB2 has a highly specific expression in colorectal tissue and is associated with better prognosis in non-metastatic CRC.Material and methods: A population-based cohort of 798 mCRC patients was analysed. From primary tumour material, protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. BRAF and KRAS mutation status was also determined. Associations with clinicopathological data, overall and progression-free survival and response to first-line chemotherapy were analysed.Results: Tumour tissue and clinical data were available from 467 patients. SATB2 was strongly expressed in 58% of cases, significantly more in left-sided, low-grade and wild-type BRAF tumours. Patients with high SATB2 tumours had longer overall survival compared with low SATB2 tumours (median 13 vs 8 months respectively, p < .001). Chemotherapy was given to 282 patients (63%). Patients with high SATB2 tumours had longer OS (median 22 vs 15 months respectively, p = .001) and more often responded to chemotherapy than those with low SATB2 (objective response 43% vs 29%, p = .02; clinical response 83% vs 67%, p = .004). Progression-free survival on first-line irinotecan chemotherapy was longer in high SATB2 cases (median 8 vs 4 months respectively, p = .019). Patients with both low SATB2 expression and mutated BRAF (n = 69) had particularly poor survival compared to the rest (median 8 and 12 months respectively, p = .001). In multivariable analysis, the SATB2 findings were independent of known clinicopathological prognostic markers, including BRAF mutation status.Conclusion: Patients with mCRC expressing high level of SATB2 have better prognosis and response to chemotherapy than those with low SATB2 expression. Patients with both low SATB2 expression and mutated BRAF had particularly poor prognosis and could thus benefit from more aggressive therapies.

Satb2 regulates proliferation and nuclear integrity of pre-osteoblasts

Special AT-rich sequence binding protein 2 (Satb2) is a matrix attachment region (MAR) binding protein. Satb2 impacts skeletal development by regulating gene transcription required for osteogenic differentiation. Although its role as a high-order transcription factor is well supported, other roles for Satb2 in skeletal development remain unclear. In particular, the impact of dosage sensitivity (heterozygous mutations) and variance on phenotypic severity is still not well understood. To further investigate molecular and cellular mechanisms of Satb2-mediated skeletal defects, we used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to generate Satb2 mutations in MC3T3-E1 cells. Our data suggest that, in addition to its role in differentiation, Satb2 regulates progenitor proliferation. We also find that mutations in Satb2 cause chromatin defects including nuclear blebbing and donut-shaped nuclei. These defects may contribute to a slight increase in apoptosis in mutant cells, but apoptosis is insufficient to explain the proliferation defects. Satb2 expression exhibits population-level variation and is most highly expressed from late G1 to late G2. Based on these data, we hypothesize that Satb2 may regulate proliferation through two separate mechanisms. First, Satb2 may regulate the expression of genes necessary for cell cycle progression in pre-osteoblasts. Second, similar to other MAR-binding proteins, Satb2 may participate in DNA replication. We also hypothesize that variation in the severity or penetrance of Satb2-mediated proliferation defects is due to stochastic variation in Satb2 binding to DNA, which may be buffered in some genetic backgrounds. Further elucidation of the role of Satb2 in proliferation has potential impacts on our understanding of both skeletal defects and cancer.

SATB2 and CDX2 are prognostic biomarkers in DNA mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer

DNA mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer frequently displays reduced CDX2 expression, and recent literature has suggested that negative CDX2 expression is a poor prognostic biomarker in colon cancer. We have recently demonstrated that SATB2 is an immunohistochemical marker that is complementary to CDX2. Using a tissue microarray approach, we evaluated SATB2 and CDX2 immunohistochemical expression in 514 patients with colonic adenocarcinoma including 146 with mismatch repair protein deficient tumors and correlated expression with histopathologic variables, molecular alterations, and survival. Overall, SATB2-negative and/or CDX2-negative expression was identified in 33% of mismatch repair protein deficient tumors compared with only 15% of mismatch repair protein proficient tumors (p < 0.001) and in 36% of BRAF V600E mutated compared with only 13% of BRAF wild-type tumors (p < 0.001). Both SATB2-negative and CDX2-negative colonic adenocarcinomas more often displayed lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and perineural invasion (all with p < 0.05). SATB2-negative expression was also more frequently identified in tumors with mucinous or signet ring cell differentiation (p < 0.01 for both). In a multivariable analysis of survival in patients with mismatch repair protein deficient tumors (n = 131), only tumor stage (p = 0.01) and SATB2-negative and/or CDX2-negative expression (p = 0.009) independently predicted disease-specific survival. Of the 99 patients with stage II or III mismatch repair protein deficient tumors, death from disease only occurred in patients with either SATB2-negative or CDX2-negative tumors, and no patients with SATB2-positive/CDX2-positive tumors developed recurrence or died of disease. SATB2 and CDX2 expression had no effect on patient survival in mismatch repair protein proficient, BRAF-mutated, or KRAS-mutated tumors. In summary, our results suggest that SATB2 and CDX2 are prognostic biomarkers in patients with mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer and that inclusion of SATB2 and CDX2 immunohistochemistry may be helpful as part of a comprehensive pathologic risk assessment in mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer.

Colitis-associated colorectal adenocarcinomas are frequently associated with non-intestinal mucin profiles and loss of SATB2 expression

The special AT-rich sequence binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a sensitive and specific diagnostic marker for colorectal adenocarcinoma and reduced expression of SATB2 is associated with a poor prognosis. Colitis-associated colorectal adenocarcinoma often shows distinct morphologic and molecular phenotypes compared to sporadic cases. However, the SATB2 expression profile in colitis-associated carcinoma has not been defined. We performed immunohistochemistry for SATB2 as well as CDX2, MUC5AC, MUC6 and mismatch repair proteins on 60 consecutive colitis-associated carcinomas from 58 inflammatory bowel disease patients and compared the expression profile to a control group of 32 sporadic colorectal carcinomas. Only 26 (43%) colitis-associated carcinomas expressed SATB2, compared to 29 (91%) sporadic colorectal carcinomas (p < 0.0001). MUC5AC expression was more frequently observed in colitis-associated carcinomas than sporadic colorectal caracinomas (52% and 25% respectively; p = 0.013). Eight (13%) cases of colitis-associated carcinoma showed loss of CDX2 expression, which was retained in all of the sporadic controls (p = 0.047). In colitis-associated carcinoma, 50% of SATB2 negative cases had lymph node metastasis compared to only 15% of SATB2 positive cases (p = 0.007). Loss of SATB2 was particularly frequent in mucinous-type tumors, occurring in 83% of these cases. There was no significant association between SATB2 expression and mismatch repair protein status. These data show that the immunoprofile of colitis-associated carcinoma is different than that seen in sporadic cases. In particular, SATB2 is significantly less sensitive in colitis-associated carcinoma and it should be interpreted cautiously as a marker of colorectal origin in colitis patients. The association between loss of SATB2 and lymph node metastasis suggests that it may have similar prognostic value in the setting of inflammatory bowel disease as in sporadic cases.

Lysyl oxidase and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α: biomarkers of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the main causes of cancer mortality worldwide. Recent studies on tumor microenvironments have shown that tumor metabolism exerts a vital role in cancer progression.

AIM

To investigate whether lysyl oxidase (LOX) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) are prognostic and predictive biomarkers in GC.

METHODS

A total of 80 tissue and blood samples were collected from 140 patients admitted to our hospital between August 2008 and March 2012. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to measure the expression of LOX and HIF1α in tumor and adjacent tissues collected from patients with GC. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis was used to detect the mRNA expression levels of LOX and HIF1α in patients with GC. In addition, single-factor analysis was applied to analyze the relationship between LOX, HIF1α and prognosis of GC.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical staining suggested that the expression levels of LOX and HIF1α increased in tumor tissues from patients with GC. QRT-PCR analysis indicated that mRNA expression of LOX and HIF1α was also upregulated in tumor tissues, which was in accordance with the above results. We also detected expression of these two genes in blood samples. The expression level of LOX and HIF1α was higher in patients with GC than in healthy controls. Additional analysis showed that the expression level of LOX and HIF1α was related to the clinicopathological characteristics of GC. Expression of LOX and HIF1α increased with the number of lymph node metastases, deeper infiltration depth and later tumor–node–metastasis stages. Single-factor analysis showed that high expression of LOX and HIF1α led to poor prognosis of patients with GC.

CONCLUSION

LOX and HIF1α can be used as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for GC.