1
|
Ramia JM, Alcázar-López CF, Villodre-Tudela C, Rubio-García JJ, Hernández B, Aparicio-López D, Serradilla-Martín M. Benchmark Outcomes for Distal Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Prospective Snapshot Study from the Spanish Distal Pancreatectomy Project (SPANDISPAN). J Am Coll Surg 2024; 239:288-297. [PMID: 38533997 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000001086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving the quality of care is a priority for health systems to obtain better care and reduce costs. One of the tools for measuring quality is benchmarking (BM). We presented a 1-country prospective study of distal pancreatectomies (DPs) and determined BM. STUDY DESIGN Prospective, multicenter, observational snapshot study of DP carried out at Spanish hepatopancreatobiliary centers for a year (February 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023). Hepatopancreatobiliary centers were defined as high volume if they performed more than 10 DPs per year. Inclusion criteria include any scheduled DP for any diagnosis and age older than 18 years. The low-risk group was defined following the criteria given by Durin and colleagues and major complications as Clavien-Dindo ≥III. RESULTS A total of 313 patients from 42 centers and 46.6% from high-volume centers were included. Median DP by center was 7 (interquartile range 5 to 10), median age was 65 years (interquartile range 55 to 74), and 53.4% were female. The surgical approach was minimally invasive in 69.3%. Major complications were 21.1%. Postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C rate was 20.1%, and 90-day mortality was 1.6%. One hundred forty-three patients were in low-risk group (43.8%). Compared with previous BM data, an increasing MIS rate and fewer hospital stay were obtained. CONCLUSIONS We present the first determination of DP-BM in a prospective series, obtaining similar results to the previous ones, but our BM values include a shorter hospital stay and a higher percentage of minimally invasive surgery probably related to Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocols and prospective data collection. BM is a multiparameter valuable tool for reporting outcomes, comparing centers, and identifying the points to improve surgical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Ramia
- From the Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Alcázar-López, Villodre-Tudela, Rubio-García)
- ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Alcázar-López, Villodre-Tudela, Rubio-García)
- Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Villodre-Tudela)
| | - Cándido F Alcázar-López
- From the Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Alcázar-López, Villodre-Tudela, Rubio-García)
- ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Alcázar-López, Villodre-Tudela, Rubio-García)
| | - Celia Villodre-Tudela
- From the Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Alcázar-López, Villodre-Tudela, Rubio-García)
- ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Alcázar-López, Villodre-Tudela, Rubio-García)
- Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Villodre-Tudela)
| | - Juan J Rubio-García
- From the Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Alcázar-López, Villodre-Tudela, Rubio-García)
- ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain (Ramia, Alcázar-López, Villodre-Tudela, Rubio-García)
| | - Belén Hernández
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Elda, Alicante, Spain (Hernández)
| | - Daniel Aparicio-López
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain (Aparicio-López, Serradilla-Martín)
| | - Mario Serradilla-Martín
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain (Aparicio-López, Serradilla-Martín)
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain (Serradilla-Martín)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Martino M, Nicolazzi M, Baroffio P, Polidoro MA, Colombo Mainini C, Pocorobba A, Bottini E, Donadon M. A critical analysis of surgical outcomes indicators in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: From crude mortality to composite outcomes. World J Surg 2024. [PMID: 39129054 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indicators of surgical outcomes are designed to objectively evaluate surgical performance, enabling comparisons among surgeons and institutions. In recent years, there has been a surge in complex indicators of perioperative short-term and long-term outcomes. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview and a critical analysis of surgical outcomes indicators, with a special emphasis on hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. METHODS A narrative review of outcome measures was conducted using a combined text and MeSH search strategy to identify relevant articles focused on perioperative outcomes, specifically within HPB surgery. RESULTS The literature search yielded 624 records, and 94 studies were included in the analysis. Included papers were classified depending on whether they assessed intraoperative or postoperative specific or composite outcomes, and whether they assessed purely clinical or combined clinical and socio-economic indicators. Specific indicators included in composite outcomes were categorized into three main domains: intraoperative metrics, postoperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes. While postoperative mortality, complications, hospital stay and readmission were the indicators most frequently included in composite outcomes, oncological outcomes were rarely considered. CONCLUSIONS The evolution of surgical outcomes has shifted from the simplistic assessment of crude mortality rates to complex composite outcomes. Whether the recent explosion of publications on these topics has a clinical impact in real life is questionable. Outcomes from the patient perspective, integrating social and financial indicators, are not yet integrated into most of these composite analytical tools but should not be underestimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Di Martino
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Nicolazzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Paolo Baroffio
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Michela Anna Polidoro
- Hepatobiliary Immunopathology Laboratory, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Amanda Pocorobba
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bottini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stoop TF, Augustinus S, Björnsson B, Tingstedt B, Andersson B, Wolfgang CL, Werner J, Johansen K, Stommel MWJ, Katz MHG, Ghadimi M, House MG, Ghorbani P, Molenaar IQ, de Wilde RF, Mieog JSD, Keck T, Wellner UF, Uhl W, Besselink MG, Pitt HA, Del Chiaro M. Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG). Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15932-3. [PMID: 39120839 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15932-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma located in the pancreatic body might require a portomesenteric venous resection (PVR), but data regarding surgical risks after distal pancreatectomy (DP) with PVR are sparse. Insight into additional surgical risks of DP-PVR could support preoperative counseling and intraoperative decision making. This study aimed to provide insight into the surgical outcome of DP-PVR, including its potential risk elevation over standard DP. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study including all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent DP ± PVR (2018-2020), registered in four audits for pancreatic surgery from North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Patients who underwent concomitant arterial and/or multivisceral resection(s) were excluded. Predictors for in-hospital/30-day major morbidity and mortality were investigated by logistic regression, correcting for each audit. RESULTS Overall, 2924 patients after DP were included, of whom 241 patients (8.2%) underwent DP-PVR. Rates of major morbidity (24% vs. 18%; p = 0.024) and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage grade B/C (10% vs. 3%; p = 0.041) were higher after DP-PVR compared with standard DP. Mortality after DP-PVR and standard DP did not differ significantly (2% vs. 1%; p = 0.542). Predictors for major morbidity were PVR (odds ratio [OR] 1.500, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086-2.071) and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 1.420, 95% CI 1.032-1.970). Predictors for mortality were higher age (OR 1.087, 95% CI 1.045-1.132), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 4.167, 95% CI 1.852-9.374), and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 2.919, 95% CI 1.197-7.118), whereas concomitant PVR was not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS PVR during DP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body is associated with increased morbidity, but can be performed safely in terms of mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Simone Augustinus
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Karin Johansen
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Michael G House
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Poya Ghorbani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht/St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein, Utrecht & Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Keck
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ulrich F Wellner
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Waldemar Uhl
- Department of Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen H, Wang Y, Jiang K, Xu Z, Jiang Y, Wu Z, Lu X, Wang C, Weng Y, Wang W, Ding R, Zheng S, Li Y, Fu X, Shi G, Wang J, Chen H, Peng C, Deng X, Qiu Y, Luo Y, Sun B, Shen B. The Effect of Perioperative Dexamethasone on Postoperative Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2024; 280:222-228. [PMID: 38385254 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. BACKGROUND The glucocorticoid dexamethasone has been shown to improve postoperative outcomes in surgical patients, but its effects on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy are unclear. METHODS This multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in four Chinese high-volume pancreatic centers. Adults undergoing elective pancreaticoduodenectomy were randomized to receive either 0.2 mg/kg dexamethasone or a saline placebo as an intravenous bolus within 5 minutes after anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score within 30 days after the operation, analyzed using the modified intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS Among 428 patients for eligibility, 300 participants were randomized and 265 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analyses. One hundred thirty-four patients received dexamethasone and 131 patients received a placebo. The mean (SD) CCI score was 14.0 (17.5) in the dexamethasone group and 17.9 (20.3) in the placebo group (mean difference: -3.8; 95% CI: -8.4 to 0.7; P = 0.100). The incidence of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III; 12.7% vs 16.0%, risk ratio: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.43; P = 0.439) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (25.4% vs 31.3%, risk ratio: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.19; P = 0.286) were not significantly different between the two groups. In the stratum of participants with a main pancreatic duct ≤3 mm (n = 202), the CCI score was significantly lower in the dexamethasone group (mean difference: -6.4; 95% CI: -11.2 to -1.6; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative dexamethasone did not significantly reduce postoperative complications within 30 days after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoda Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kuirong Jiang
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhiwei Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhichong Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaojian Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuanchi Weng
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weishen Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rui Ding
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shifan Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yilong Li
- Department of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xu Fu
- Department of Pancreatic and Metabolic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Guodong Shi
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiancheng Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenghong Peng
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaxing Deng
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yudong Qiu
- Department of Pancreatic and Metabolic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Yan Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bei Sun
- Department of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Baiyong Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Henry AC, Salaheddine Y, Holster JJ, Daamen LA, Bruno MJ, Derksen WJM, van Driel LMJW, van Eijck CH, van Lienden KP, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Vleggaar FP, Groot Koerkamp B, Verdonk RC. Late cholangitis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A common complication with or without anatomical biliary obstruction. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00467-7. [PMID: 39054185 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative cholangitis is a common complication after pancreatoduodenectomy that can occur with or without anatomical biliary obstruction. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and risk factors of cholangitis after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in 2 Dutch tertiary pancreatic centers (2010-2019). Primary outcome was postoperative cholangitis, defined as systemic inflammation with abnormal liver tests without another focus of infection, at least 1 month after resection. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies were evaluated. Two types of postoperative cholangitis were distinguished; obstructive cholangitis (benign stenosis of the hepaticojejunostomy) and nonobstructive cholangitis. Potential risk factors were identified using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Postoperative cholangitis occurred in 93 of 900 patients (10.3%). Median time to first episode of cholangitis was 8 months (interquartile range 4-16) after pancreatoduodenectomy. Multiple episodes of cholangitis occurred in 44 patients (47.3%) and readmission was necessary in 83 patients (89.2%). No cholangitis-related mortality was observed. Obstructive cholangitis was seen in 37 patients (39.8%) and nonobstructive cholangitis in 56 patients (60.2%). Surgery was performed for cholangitis in 7 patients (7.5%) and consisted of revision of the hepaticojejunostomy or elongation of the biliary limb. Postoperative biliary leakage (odds ratio 2.56; 95% confidence interval 1.42-4.62; P = .0018) was independently associated with postoperative cholangitis. CONCLUSION Postoperative cholangitis unrelated to cancer recurrence was seen in 10% of patients after pancreatoduodenectomy. Nonobstructive cholangitis was more common than obstructive cholangitis. Postoperative biliary leakage was an independent risk factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Claire Henry
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Youcef Salaheddine
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica J Holster
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lydi M J W van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nicolazzi M, Di Martino M, Baroffio P, Donadon M. 6,126 hepatectomies in 2022: current trend of outcome in Italy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:211. [PMID: 38985363 PMCID: PMC11236879 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03398-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Whether hospital volume affects outcome of patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery, and whether the centralization of such procedures is justified remains to be investigated. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of liver surgery in Italy in relationship of hospital volume. METHODS This is a nationwide retrospective observational study conducted on data collected by the National Italian Registry "Piano Nazionale Esiti" (PNE) 2023 that included all liver procedures performed in 2022. Outcome measure were case volume and 30-day mortality. Hospitals were classified as very high-volume (H-Vol), intermediate-volume (I-Vol), low-volume (L-Vol) and very low-volume (VL-VoL). A review on centralization process and outcome measures was added. RESULTS 6,126 liver resections for liver tumors were performed in 327 hospitals in 2022. The 30-day mortality was 2.2%. There were 14 H-Vol, 19 I-Vol, 31 L-Vol and 263 VL-Vol hospitals with 30-day mortality of 1.7%, 2.2%, 2.6% and 3.6% respectively (P < 0.001); 220 centers (83%) performed less than 10 resections, and 78 (29%) centers only 1 resection in 2022. By considering the geographical macro-areas, the median count of liver resection performed in northern Italy exceeded those in central and southern Italy (57% vs. 23% vs. 20%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS High-volume has been confirmed to be associated to better outcome after hepatobiliary surgical procedures. Further studies are required to detail the factors associated with mortality. The centralization process should be redesigned and oversight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Nicolazzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, 28100, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, 28100, Italy
| | - Marcello Di Martino
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, 28100, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, 28100, Italy
| | - Paolo Baroffio
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, 28100, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, 28100, Italy.
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, 28100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iben-Khayat A, Felli E, Thebault B, Facques A, Najah H, Saint-Marc O. Short-term results of robot-assisted pancreatoduodeodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 146 patients operated in a high-volume center. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)02207-X. [PMID: 39084949 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a challenging operation because of complex anatomy and difficult and multiple reconstructions. Robot-assisted PD (RPD) is a novel minimally invasive technique, providing equivalent oncological outcomes to open surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of a single high-volume center series. METHODS Patients who underwent RPD from 2014 to 2021 in a high-volume center were included. Patient and disease-specific data, operative details, postoperative complications including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), length of stay (LOS) and long-term survival were recorded. Two groups were compared: Group 1: patients operated between 2014-2019 and Group 2 between 2020-2021. RESULTS One hundred and forty-six patients had RPD on the study period (99 in Group 1 and 47 in Group 2). Operative time was 320 min (285-360), major complications were observed in 28% and clinically significant POPF in 20% of the cases. Conversion rate was 2.1%. LOS was 14 days (9-22). Postoperative mortality was 4.1%. Clinically significant POPF decreased from 24% in Group 1 to 11% in Group 2 (p = 0.05). LOS decreased from 16(11-26) days in Group 1 to 11(8-14) in Group 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION RPD is safe and feasible. Technique standardization led to better post-operative outcomes, encouraging the dissemination and implementation of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdallah Iben-Khayat
- Departement of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Orléans, 14 Av. de l'Hôpital, 45100, Orléans, France
| | - Emanuelle Felli
- HPB Surgery Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Saint Vincent, 29, Rue du Faubourg National, 67000, Strasbourg, France; Institute for Translational Medicine and Liver Disease, Unité 1110 INSERM, Strasbourg, France
| | - Baudouin Thebault
- Departement of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Orléans, 14 Av. de l'Hôpital, 45100, Orléans, France
| | - Amaury Facques
- Departement of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Orléans, 14 Av. de l'Hôpital, 45100, Orléans, France
| | - Haythem Najah
- Departement of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Orléans, 14 Av. de l'Hôpital, 45100, Orléans, France
| | - Olivier Saint-Marc
- Departement of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Orléans, 14 Av. de l'Hôpital, 45100, Orléans, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bouça Machado T, Gigante Cristino H, Mieog JSD, Mortensen MB, Gonçalves G. Operation Volume in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: How Long Will We Keep Looking the Other Way? ACTA MEDICA PORT 2024; 37:565-566. [PMID: 38950613 DOI: 10.20344/amp.21621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Michael Bau Mortensen
- Department of Surgery. Odense Pancreas Centre, Upper GI and HPB Section. Odense University Hospital. Odense. Denmark
| | - Gil Gonçalves
- Botton-Champalimaud Pancreatic Cancer Centre. Lisbon. Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boggi U, Kauffmann E, Napoli N, Barreto SG, Besselink MG, Fusai GK, Hackert T, Abu Hilal M, Marchegiani G, Salvia R, Shrikhande SV, Truty M, Werner J, Wolfgang CL, Bannone E, Capretti G, Cattelani A, Coppola A, Cucchetti A, De Sio D, Di Dato A, Di Meo G, Fiorillo C, Gianfaldoni C, Ginesini M, Hidalgo Salinas C, Lai Q, Miccoli M, Montorsi R, Pagnanelli M, Poli A, Ricci C, Sucameli F, Tamburrino D, Viti V, Addeo PF, Alfieri S, Bachellier P, Baiocchi GL, Balzano G, Barbarello L, Brolese A, Busquets J, Butturini G, Caniglia F, Caputo D, Casadei R, Chunhua X, Colangelo E, Coratti A, Costa F, Crafa F, Dalla Valle R, De Carlis L, de Wilde RF, Del Chiaro M, Di Benedetto F, Di Sebastiano P, Dokmak S, Hogg M, Egorov VI, Ercolani G, Ettorre GM, Falconi M, Ferrari G, Ferrero A, Filauro M, Giardino A, Grazi GL, Gruttadauria S, Izbicki JR, Jovine E, Katz M, Keck T, Khatkov I, Kiguchi G, Kooby D, Lang H, Lombardo C, Malleo G, Massani M, Mazzaferro V, Memeo R, Miao Y, Mishima K, Molino C, Nagakawa Y, Nakamura M, Nardo B, Panaro F, Pasquali C, Perrone V, Rangelova E, Liu R, Romagnoli R, Romito R, Rosso E, Schulick R, Siriwardena A, Spampinato MG, Strobel O, Testini M, Troisi RI, Uzunoglo FG, Valente R, Veneroni L, Zerbi A, Vicente E, Vistoli F, Vivarelli M, Wakabayashi G, Zanus G, Zureikat A, Zyromski NJ, Coppola R, D’Andrea V, Davide J, Dervenis C, Frigerio I, Konlon KC, Michelassi F, Montorsi M, Nealon W, Portolani N, Sousa Silva D, Bozzi G, Ferrari V, Trivella MG, Cameron J, Clavien PA, Asbun HJ. REDISCOVER International Guidelines on the Perioperative Care of Surgical Patients With Borderline-resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg 2024; 280:56-65. [PMID: 38407228 PMCID: PMC11161250 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The REDISCOVER consensus conference aimed at developing and validating guidelines on the perioperative care of patients with borderline-resectable (BR-) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). BACKGROUND Coupled with improvements in chemotherapy and radiation, the contemporary approach to pancreatic surgery supports the resection of BR-PDAC and, to a lesser extent, LA-PDAC. Guidelines outlining the selection and perioperative care for these patients are lacking. METHODS The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used to develop the REDISCOVER guidelines and create recommendations. The Delphi approach was used to reach a consensus (agreement ≥80%) among experts. Recommendations were approved after a debate and vote among international experts in pancreatic surgery and pancreatic cancer management. A Validation Committee used the AGREE II-GRS tool to assess the methodological quality of the guidelines. Moreover, an independent multidisciplinary advisory group revised the statements to ensure adherence to nonsurgical guidelines. RESULTS Overall, 34 recommendations were created targeting centralization, training, staging, patient selection for surgery, possibility of surgery in uncommon scenarios, timing of surgery, avoidance of vascular reconstruction, details of vascular resection/reconstruction, arterial divestment, frozen section histology of perivascular tissue, extent of lymphadenectomy, anticoagulation prophylaxis, and role of minimally invasive surgery. The level of evidence was however low for 29 of 34 clinical questions. Participants agreed that the most conducive means to promptly advance our understanding in this field is to establish an international registry addressing this patient population ( https://rediscover.unipi.it/ ). CONCLUSIONS The REDISCOVER guidelines provide clinical recommendations pertaining to pancreatectomy with vascular resection for patients with BR-PDAC and LA-PDAC, and serve as the basis of a new international registry for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Kauffmann
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Niccolò Napoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - S. George Barreto
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Center, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, DiSCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Shailesh V. Shrikhande
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Gastrointestinal and HPB Service, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mark Truty
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, LMU, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher L. Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Elisa Bannone
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Capretti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Associazione Oncologica Pisana P. Trivella, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alice Cattelani
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide De Sio
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, UNIVERSITA' CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE, Rome, Italy
| | - Armando Di Dato
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giovanna Di Meo
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, UNIVERSITA' CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE, Rome, Italy
| | - Cesare Gianfaldoni
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Michael Ginesini
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Quirino Lai
- Department of General and Specialty Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Miccoli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Montorsi
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michele Pagnanelli
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Associazione Oncologica Pisana P. Trivella, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Poli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Claudio Ricci
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (IRCCS AOUBO), Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Sucameli
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Domenico Tamburrino
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Virginia Viti
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pietro F. Addeo
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, UNIVERSITA' CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE, Rome, Italy
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia and UOC General Surgery, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Balzano
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Linda Barbarello
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Brolese
- Department of General Surgery & HPB Unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - Juli Busquets
- Division of Pancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Caniglia
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Damiano Caputo
- Research Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (IRCCS AOUBO), Bologna, Italy
| | - Xi Chunhua
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
- Pancreas Institute, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ettore Colangelo
- Department of General Surgery, “G. Mazzini” Hospital, Teramo, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, AUSL Toscana Sud Est, Misericordia Hospital of Grosseto, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Francesca Costa
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Crafa
- Division of General, Oncological and Robotic Surgery, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | | | - Luciano De Carlis
- Division of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Roeland F. de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Aurora, CO
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Di Sebastiano
- Surgical Oncology, Pierangeli Clinic, Department of Innovative Technology in Medicine & Dentistry, G. D’Annunzio University Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
- University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Melissa Hogg
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Vyacheslav I. Egorov
- Department for Surgical Oncology and HPB Surgery, Ilyinskaya Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation. San Camillo Forlanini Hospital-POIT, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, “Umberto I” Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Filauro
- Department of Surgery Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giardino
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Grazi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of HepatoBiliaryPancreatic Surgery, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy (UPMC Italy), Palermo, Italy
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- Department of General Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Eppendorf University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elio Jovine
- Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, IRCCS AOU of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matthew Katz
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Igor Khatkov
- Department of High Technology Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Gozo Kiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - David Kooby
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hauke Lang
- University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carlo Lombardo
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatc-Biliary Surgery, “F. Miulli” General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy. Department of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University, Casamassima, Bari, Italy
| | - Yi Miao
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
- Pancreas Institute, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
- Pancreas Center, The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Kohei Mishima
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - Carlo Molino
- Department of General and Speciality Surgery, General and Pancreatic Surgery Team 1, AORN A. Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Bruno Nardo
- Department of Surgery and Robotic, Division of General Surgery, Annunziata Hub Hospital, School of Medicine Surgery and TD, University of Calabria, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery & Transplantation, Montpellier University Hospital School of Medicine, Montpellier, France
| | - Claudio Pasquali
- Pancreatic & Digestive Endocrine Surgery Research Group—Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, DiSCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Vittorio Perrone
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elena Rangelova
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery at the Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery at the Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rong Liu
- Second Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Renato Romagnoli
- Division of General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Raffaele Romito
- Division of General Surgery II and HPB Unit, A.O.U. Maggiore della Carità di Novara, Novara, Italy
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Service de Chirurgie Générale, Mini-Invasive et Robotique, Centre Hôspitalier de
| | - Richard Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Aurora, CO
| | - Ajith Siriwardena
- Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Division of HBP, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Faik G. Uzunoglo
- Department of General Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Eppendorf University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Luigi Veneroni
- Chirurgia Generale e di Urgenza, Infermi Hospital Rimini, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Associazione Oncologica Pisana P. Trivella, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emilio Vicente
- General Surgery Service,Sanchinarro University Hospital, HM Hospitals Faculty of Health Sciences Camilo José Cela University Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, Division of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Division of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplantation Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ospedali Riuniti delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- Second Division of Surgery-Treviso-Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, DiSCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Roberto Coppola
- Research Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Vito D’Andrea
- Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - José Davide
- Department of Surgery, HEBIPA-Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Unit, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Isabella Frigerio
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio Michelassi
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital at Weill Cornell, New York, NY
| | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, Division of General and Digestive Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - William Nealon
- Department of Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Nazario Portolani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Donzília Sousa Silva
- Department of Surgery, HEBIPA-Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Unit, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - John Cameron
- Department of Surgery, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Horacio J. Asbun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu H, Bretthauer M, Fang F, Ye W, Yin L, Adami HO. Dramatic improvements in outcome following pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancers. Br J Cancer 2024:10.1038/s41416-024-02757-w. [PMID: 38937622 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02757-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy is the only cure for cancers of the pancreas and the periampullary region but has considerable operative complications and uncertain prognosis. Our goal was to analyse temporal improvements and provide contemporary population-based benchmarks for outcomes following pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS We empanelled a cohort comprising all patients in Sweden with pancreatic or periampullary cancer treated with pancreatoduodenectomy from 1964 to 2016 and achieved complete follow-up through 2016. We analysed postoperative deaths and disease-specific net survival. RESULTS We analysed 5923 patients with cancer of the pancreas (3876), duodenum (444), bile duct (504), or duodenal papilla (963) who underwent classic (3332) or modified (1652) Whipple's procedure or total pancreatectomy (803). Postoperative deaths declined from 17.2% in the 1960s to 1.6% in the contemporary time period (2010-2016). For all four cancer types, median, 1-year and 5-year survival improved substantially over time. Among patients operated between 2010 and 2016, 5-year survival was 29.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 25.5, 33.0) for pancreatic cancer, 71.2% (95% CI: 62.9, 80.5) for duodenal cancer, 30.8% (95% CI: 23.0, 41.3) for bile duct cancer, and 62.7% (95% CI: 55.5, 70.8) for duodenal papilla cancer. CONCLUSION There is a continuous and substantial improvement in the benefit-harm ratio after pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fang Fang
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Weimin Ye
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Li Yin
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Javaheri H, Ghamarnejad O, Bade R, Lukowicz P, Karolus J, Stavrou GA. Beyond the visible: preliminary evaluation of the first wearable augmented reality assistance system for pancreatic surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2024:10.1007/s11548-024-03131-0. [PMID: 38849631 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03131-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The retroperitoneal nature of the pancreas, marked by minimal intraoperative organ shifts and deformations, makes augmented reality (AR)-based systems highly promising for pancreatic surgery. This study presents preliminary data from a prospective study aiming to develop the first wearable AR assistance system, ARAS, for pancreatic surgery and evaluating its usability, accuracy, and effectiveness in enhancing the perioperative outcomes of patients. METHODS We developed ARAS as a two-phase system for a wearable AR device to aid surgeons in planning and operation. This system was used to visualize and register patient-specific 3D anatomical models during the surgery. The location and precision of the registered 3D anatomy were evaluated by assessing the arterial pulse and employing Doppler and duplex ultrasonography. The usability, accuracy, and effectiveness of ARAS were assessed using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire. RESULTS Perioperative outcomes of five patients underwent various pancreatic resections with ARAS are presented. Surgeons rated ARAS as excellent for preoperative planning. All structures were accurately identified without any noteworthy errors. Only tumor identification decreased after the preparation phase, especially in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy because of the extensive mobilization of peripancreatic structures. No perioperative complications related to ARAS were observed. CONCLUSIONS ARAS shows promise in enhancing surgical precision during pancreatic procedures. Its efficacy in preoperative planning and intraoperative vascular identification positions it as a valuable tool for pancreatic surgery and a potential educational resource for future surgical residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamraz Javaheri
- German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | | | - Paul Lukowicz
- German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Kaiserslautern, Germany
- University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Jakob Karolus
- German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Kaiserslautern, Germany.
- University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
| | - Gregor Alexander Stavrou
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boyev A, Azimuddin A, Prakash LR, Newhook TE, Maxwell JE, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Lee JE, Snyder RA, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Classification of Post-pancreatectomy Readmissions and Opportunities for Targeted Mitigation Strategies. Ann Surg 2024; 279:1046-1053. [PMID: 37791481 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Within a learning health system paradigm, this study sought to evaluate reasons for readmission to identify opportunities for improvement. BACKGROUND Post-pancreatectomy readmission rates have remained constant despite improved index hospitalization metrics. METHODS We performed a single-institution case-control study of consecutive patients with pancreatectomy (October 2016 to April 2022). Complications were prospectively graded in biweekly faculty and advanced practice provider meetings. We analyzed risk factors during index hospitalization and categorized indications for 90-day readmissions. RESULTS A total of 835 patients, median age 65 years and 51% (427/835) males, underwent 64% (534/835) pancreatoduodenectomies, 34% (280/835) distal pancreatectomies, and 3% (21/835) other resections. Twenty-four percent (204/835) of patients were readmitted. The primary indication for readmission was technical in 51% (105/204), infectious in 17% (35/204), and medical/metabolic in 31% (64/204) of patients. Procedures were required in 77% (81/105) and 60% (21/35) of technical and infectious readmissions, respectively, while 66% (42/64) of medical/metabolic readmissions were managed noninvasively. During the index hospitalization, benign pathology [odds ratio (OR): 1.8, P =0.049], biochemical pancreatic leak (OR: 2.3, P =0.001), bile/gastric/chyle leak (OR: 6.4, P =0.001), organ-space infection (OR: 3.4, P =0.007), undrained fluid on imaging (OR: 2.4, P =0.045), and increasing white blood cell count (OR: 1.7, P =0.045) were independently associated with odds of readmission. CONCLUSIONS Most readmissions following pancreatectomy were technical in origin. Patients with complications during the index hospitalization, increasing white blood cell count, or undrained fluid before discharge were at the highest risk for readmission. Predischarge risk stratification of readmission risk factors and augmentation of in-clinic resources may be strategies to reduce readmission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Bodegraven EA, van Ramshorst TME, Bratlie SO, Kokkola A, Sparrelid E, Björnsson B, Kleive D, Burgdorf SK, Dokmak S, Groot Koerkamp B, Cabús SS, Molenaar IQ, Boggi U, Busch OR, Petrič M, Roeyen G, Hackert T, Lips DJ, D’Hondt M, Coolsen MME, Ferrari G, Tingstedt B, Serrablo A, Gaujoux S, Ramera M, Khatkov I, Ausania F, Souche R, Festen S, Berrevoet F, Keck T, Sutcliffe RP, Pando E, de Wilde RF, Aussilhou B, Krohn PS, Edwin B, Sandström P, Gilg S, Seppänen H, Vilhav C, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. Minimally invasive robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a pan-European registry a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:3554-3561. [PMID: 38498397 PMCID: PMC11175778 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International guidelines recommend monitoring the use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS). However, data from prospective international audits on minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) are lacking. This study examined the use and outcome of robot-assisted (RDP) and laparoscopic (LDP) distal pancreatectomy in the E-MIPS registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS Post-hoc analysis in a prospective audit on MIPS, including consecutive patients undergoing MIDP in 83 centers from 19 European countries (01-01-2019/31-12-2021). Primary outcomes included intraoperative events (grade 1: excessive blood loss, grade 2: conversion/change in operation, grade 3: intraoperative death), major morbidity, and in-hospital/30-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified high-risk groups for intraoperative events. RDP and LDP were compared in the total cohort and high-risk groups. RESULTS Overall, 1672 patients undergoing MIDP were included; 606 (36.2%) RDP and 1066 (63.8%) LDP. The annual use of RDP increased from 30.5% to 42.6% ( P <0.001). RDP was associated with fewer grade 2 intraoperative events compared with LDP (9.6% vs. 16.8%, P <0.001), with longer operating time (238 vs. 201 min, P <0.001). No significant differences were observed between RDP and LDP regarding major morbidity (23.4% vs. 25.9%, P =0.264) and in-hospital/30-day mortality (0.3% vs. 0.8%, P =0.344). Three high-risk groups were identified; BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 , previous abdominal surgery, and vascular involvement. In each group, RDP was associated with fewer conversions and longer operative times. CONCLUSION This European registry-based study demonstrated favorable outcomes for MIDP, with mortality rates below 1%. LDP remains the predominant approach, whereas the use of RDP is increasing. RDP was associated with fewer conversions and longer operative time, including in high-risk subgroups. Future randomized trials should confirm these findings and assess cost differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard A. van Bodegraven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tess M. E. van Ramshorst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Svein O. Bratlie
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Arto Kokkola
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stefan K. Burgdorf
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Departement of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Olivier R. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miha Petrič
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Zaloška cesta, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Geert Roeyen
- Department of HPB, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium and University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daan J. Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherland
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mariëlle M E Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- HPB Surgical Division, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Sebastien Gaujoux
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Igor Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Fabio Ausania
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Regis Souche
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Éloi Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Frederik Berrevoet
- Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Robert P. Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Pando
- Department of Hepato, Pancreato, Biliary, and Transplant Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roeland F. de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Beatrice Aussilhou
- Departement of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Paul S. Krohn
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per Sandström
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Stefan Gilg
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Seppänen
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Caroline Vilhav
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ishii N, Harimoto N, Seki T, Muranushi R, Hagiwara K, Hoshino K, Tsukagoshi M, Watanabe A, Igarashi T, Shibuya K, Araki K, Shirabe K. The impact of lymphangiograpy on chyle leakage treatment duration after pancreatic surgery. Surg Today 2024; 54:651-657. [PMID: 38062229 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02777-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chyle leakage (CL) is a common complication in pancreatic surgery. Lymphangiography is a therapeutic option for CL in cases of conservative treatment failure. This study investigated the effect of lymphangiography on the healing time of CL. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 283 patients who underwent pancreatic resection between January 2016 and June 2022. The risk factors for CL and the treatment period were evaluated according to whether or not lymphangiography was performed. RESULTS Of the 29 patients (10.2%) that had CL, lymphangiography was performed in 6. Malignant disease, the number of harvested lymph nodes, and drain fluid volume on postoperative day 2 were identified as independent risk factors for CL. Lymphangiography was associated with the cumulative healing rate of CL, and patients who underwent lymphangiography had a significantly shorter treatment period. No lymphangiography-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION Lymphangiography is a feasible and safe treatment option for CL. The CL treatment period after pancreatic surgery was significantly shorter in patients who underwent lymphangiography than in those who did not. Our results suggest that lymphangiography may contribute to early improvement of persistent CL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norihiro Ishii
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Norifumi Harimoto
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
| | - Takamomi Seki
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Ryo Muranushi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Kei Hagiwara
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Kouki Hoshino
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Mariko Tsukagoshi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Akira Watanabe
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Takamichi Igarashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Gunma, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Araki
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Ken Shirabe
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showamachi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Khalid A, Amini N, Pasha SA, Demyan L, Newman E, King DA, DePeralta D, Gholami S, Deutsch GB, Melis M, Weiss MJ. Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on outcomes in pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. J Gastrointest Surg 2024:S1091-255X(24)00483-9. [PMID: 38821210 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a major surgical procedure associated with significant risks, particularly postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Studies have highlighted the importance of certain risk factors for POPF, which are crucial for surgical decision-making and the management of high-risk patients undergoing PD. This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing PD who met the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery - Class D (ISGPS-D) criteria. METHODS This study analyzed American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data (2014-2021) for patients undergoing ISGPS-D PD, classified as having a soft pancreatic texture and a pancreatic duct of ≤3 mm. This study focused on mortality rates and the correlation between several factors and POPF (ISGPS grade B/C). RESULTS From 5964 patients who underwent PD and met the ISGPS-D criteria, the 30-day mortality rate was 1.98%. Males had a higher incidence of POPF than females (57.42% vs 47.35%, respectively; P < .001). Patients with POPF experienced significantly higher rates of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa), including thrombosis, pneumonia, sepsis, delayed gastric emptying, wound disruption, infections, and acute renal failure. There was a marked increase in the 30-day readmission and mortality rates in patients with POPF (30.0% vs 17.6% and 3.2% vs 1.4%, respectively; all P < .001). Multivariate analysis highlighted female sex as a protective factor against mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; P < .001) and extended hospital stay (>10 days) as a predictor of increased mortality risk (OR, 2.37; P < .001). CONCLUSION This study underscored the significant association between POPF and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Future efforts should concentrate on refining surgical techniques and improving preoperative assessments to mitigate the risks associated with POPF in patients undergoing PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Khalid
- Northwell Health, North Shore/Long Island Jewish General Surgery, Manhasset, New York, United States.
| | - Neda Amini
- Northwell Health, North Shore/Long Island Jewish General Surgery, Manhasset, New York, United States
| | - Shamsher A Pasha
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States
| | - Lyudmyla Demyan
- Northwell Health, North Shore/Long Island Jewish General Surgery, Manhasset, New York, United States
| | - Elliot Newman
- Northwell Health Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States
| | - Daniel A King
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
| | - Danielle DePeralta
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
| | - Sepideh Gholami
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
| | - Gary B Deutsch
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
| | | | - Matthew J Weiss
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Carp B, Weinberg L, Fletcher LR, Hinton JV, Cohen A, Slifirski H, Le P, Woodford S, Tosif S, Liu D, Muralidharan V, Perini MV, Nikfarjam M, Lee DK. The effect of an intraoperative patient-specific, surgery-specific haemodynamic algorithm in improving textbook outcomes for hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: a multicentre retrospective study. Front Surg 2024; 11:1353143. [PMID: 38859998 PMCID: PMC11163073 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1353143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The concept of a "textbook outcome" is emerging as a metric for ideal surgical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an advanced haemodynamic monitoring (AHDM) algorithm on achieving a textbook outcome in patients undergoing hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. Methods This retrospective, multicentre observational study was conducted across private and public teaching sectors in Victoria, Australia. We studied patients managed by a patient-specific, surgery-specific haemodynamic algorithm or via usual care. The primary outcome was the effect of using a patient-specific, surgery-specific AHDM algorithm for achieving a textbook outcome, with adjustment using propensity score matching. The textbook outcome criteria were defined according to the International Expert Delphi Consensus on Defining Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery and Nationwide Analysis of a Novel Quality Measure in Pancreatic Surgery. Results Of the 780 weighted cases, 477 (61.2%, 95% CI: 57.7%-64.6%) achieved the textbook outcome. Patients in the AHDM group had a higher rate of textbook outcomes [n = 259 (67.8%)] than those in the Usual care group [n = 218 (54.8%); p < 0.001, estimated odds ratio (95% CI) 1.74 (1.30-2.33)]. The AHDM group had a lower rate of surgery-specific complications, severe complications, and a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) [OR 2.34 (95% CI: 1.30-4.21), 1.79 (95% CI: 1.12-2.85), and 1.83 (95% CI: 1.35-2.46), respectively]. There was no significant difference between the groups for hospital readmission and mortality. Conclusions AHDM use was associated with improved outcomes, supporting its integration in hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. Prospective trials are warranted to further evaluate the impact of this AHDM algorithm on achieving a textbook impact on long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradly Carp
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Laurence Weinberg
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Luke R. Fletcher
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Data Analytical Research Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jake V. Hinton
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adam Cohen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hugh Slifirski
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Le
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen Woodford
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shervin Tosif
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Liu
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Marcos V. Perini
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mehrdad Nikfarjam
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dong-Kyu Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mise Y, Miyashita M, Yoshioka R, Kawano F, Takeda Y, Ichida H, Saiura A. Introduction of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy following phase 2a IDEAL guidelines. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302848. [PMID: 38709730 PMCID: PMC11073735 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is a newly introduced procedure, which is still evolving and lacks standardization. An objective assessment is essential to investigate the feasibility of RPD. The current study aimed to assess our initial ten cases of RPD based on IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term study) guidelines. METHODS This was a prospective phase 2a study following the IDEAL framework. Ten consecutive cases of RPD performed by two surgeons with expertise in open procedures at a single center were assigned to the study. With objective evaluation, each case was classified into four grades according to the achievements of the procedures. Errors observed in the previous case were used to inform the procedure in the next case. The surgical outcomes of the ten cases were reviewed. RESULTS The median total operation time was 634 min (interquartile range [IQR], 594-668) with a median resection time of 363 min (IQR, 323-428) and reconstruction time of 123 min (IQR, 107-131). The achievement of the whole procedure was graded as A, "successful", in two patients. In two patients, reconstruction was performed with a mini-laparotomy due to extensive pneumoperitoneum, probably caused by insertion of a liver retractor from the xyphoid. Major postoperative complications occurred in two patients. One patient, in whom the jejunal limb was elevated through the Treitz ligament, had a bowel obstruction and needed to undergo re-laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS RPD is feasible when performed by surgeons experienced in open procedures. Specific considerations are needed to safely introduce RPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mamiko Miyashita
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuji Yoshioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumihiro Kawano
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Takeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Ichida
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rompianesi G, Montalti R, Vrakas G, Zarrinpar A, Warren C, Loiaco G, Rubba F, Troisi RI. Benchmark Outcomes in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Multicenter Analysis of 80 996 Transplants From 126 Centers. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1618. [PMID: 38606349 PMCID: PMC11005896 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background We defined clinically relevant benchmark values in deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT), to assess the best achievable results in low-risk patient cohorts from experienced centers. Methods We identified the "ideal" cases from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files from centers performing ≥50 KT per year between 2010 and 2018. Cases have been selected based on the kidney donor profile index values (<35%), a cold ischemia time (CIT) ≤18 h, a HLA mismatch ≤4, and excluding blood group (ABO) incompatible, dual and combined transplants. The outcomes of the benchmark cohort have been compared with a group of patients excluded from the benchmark cohort because but not meeting 1 or more of the abovementioned criteria. Results The 171 424 KT patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files were screened and 8694 benchmark cases of a total of 80 996 KT (10.7%) from 126 centers meeting the selection criteria were identified. The benchmarks for 1-, 3-, and 5-y patient survival are ≥97%, ≥92.5%, and ≥86.7%, and ≥95.4%, ≥87.8%, and ≥79.6% for graft survival. Benchmark cutoff for hospital length of stay is ≤5 d, ≤23.6% for delayed graft function, and ≤7.5% and ≤9.1% for 6-mo and 1-y incidence of acute rejection. Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y actuarial graft survivals were 96.6%, 91.1%, and 84.2% versus 93.5%, 85.4%, and 75.5% in the benchmark and comparison groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y actuarial patient survivals were 98.1%, 94.8%, and 90.0% versus 96.6%, 91.1%, and 83.0% in the benchmark and comparison groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions For the first time, we quantified the best achievable postoperative results in an ideal scenario in deceased donor KT, aimed at improving the clinical practice guided by the comparison of center performances with the ideal outcomes defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Rompianesi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital of Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital of Naples, Italy
| | - Georgios Vrakas
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Ali Zarrinpar
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Curtis Warren
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Giuseppe Loiaco
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital of Naples, Italy
| | - Fabiana Rubba
- Public Health Department, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital of Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Srinivasa S. Disease-Specific Surgical Benchmarking: A Nuanced Approach to Operative Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2813-2814. [PMID: 38376709 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15055-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sanket Srinivasa
- Upper GI/ HPB Unit, Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Drexler R, Ricklefs FL, Ben-Haim S, Rada A, Wörmann F, Cloppenborg T, Bien CG, Simon M, Kalbhenn T, Colon A, Rijkers K, Schijns O, Borger V, Surges R, Vatter H, Rizzi M, de Curtis M, Didato G, Castelli N, Carpentier A, Mathon B, Yasuda CL, Cendes F, Chandra PS, Tripathi M, Clusmann H, Delev D, Guenot M, Haegelen C, Catenoix H, Lang J, Hamer H, Brandner S, Walther K, Hauptmann JS, Jeffree RL, Kegele J, Weinbrenner E, Naros G, Velz J, Krayenbühl N, Onken J, Schneider UC, Holtkamp M, Rössler K, Spyrantis A, Strzelczyk A, Rosenow F, Stodieck S, Alonso-Vanegas MA, Wellmer J, Wehner T, Dührsen L, Gempt J, Sauvigny T. Defining benchmark outcomes for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: A global multicenter analysis of 1119 cases. Epilepsia 2024; 65:1333-1345. [PMID: 38400789 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Benchmarking has been proposed to reflect surgical quality and represents the highest standard reference values for desirable results. We sought to determine benchmark outcomes in patients after surgery for drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). METHODS This retrospective multicenter study included patients who underwent MTLE surgery at 19 expert centers on five continents. Benchmarks were defined for 15 endpoints covering surgery and epilepsy outcome at discharge, 1 year after surgery, and the last available follow-up. Patients were risk-stratified by applying outcome-relevant comorbidities, and benchmarks were calculated for low-risk ("benchmark") cases. Respective measures were derived from the median value at each center, and the 75th percentile was considered the benchmark cutoff. RESULTS A total of 1119 patients with a mean age (range) of 36.7 (1-74) years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1 were included. Most patients (59.2%) underwent anterior temporal lobe resection with amygdalohippocampectomy. The overall rate of complications or neurological deficits was 14.4%, with no in-hospital death. After risk stratification, 377 (33.7%) benchmark cases of 1119 patients were identified, representing 13.6%-72.9% of cases per center and leaving 742 patients in the high-risk cohort. Benchmark cutoffs for any complication, clinically apparent stroke, and reoperation rate at discharge were ≤24.6%, ≤.5%, and ≤3.9%, respectively. A favorable seizure outcome (defined as International League Against Epilepsy class I and II) was reached in 83.6% at 1 year and 79.0% at the last follow-up in benchmark cases, leading to benchmark cutoffs of ≥75.2% (1-year follow-up) and ≥69.5% (mean follow-up of 39.0 months). SIGNIFICANCE This study presents internationally applicable benchmark outcomes for the efficacy and safety of MTLE surgery. It may allow for comparison between centers, patient registries, and novel surgical and interventional techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Drexler
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Franz L Ricklefs
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sharona Ben-Haim
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Anna Rada
- Department of Epileptology (Krankenhaus Mara), Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Friedrich Wörmann
- Department of Epileptology (Krankenhaus Mara), Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Thomas Cloppenborg
- Department of Epileptology (Krankenhaus Mara), Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Christian G Bien
- Department of Epileptology (Krankenhaus Mara), Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Matthias Simon
- Department of Epileptology (Krankenhaus Mara), Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery (Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel), Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Thilo Kalbhenn
- Department of Epileptology (Krankenhaus Mara), Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery (Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel), Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Albert Colon
- Department of Epileptology, Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, the Netherlands
- ACE Work Group Epilepsy Surgery Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Kim Rijkers
- ACE Work Group Epilepsy Surgery Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Center for Epileptology UMC/Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Olaf Schijns
- ACE Work Group Epilepsy Surgery Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Center for Epileptology UMC/Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Valeri Borger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rainer Surges
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michele Rizzi
- Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco de Curtis
- Epilepsy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Didato
- Epilepsy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicoló Castelli
- Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Bertrand Mathon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Fernando Cendes
- Department of Neurology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Poodipedi Sarat Chandra
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, AIIMS, and MEG Resource Facility, New Delhi, India
| | - Manjari Tripathi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, AIIMS, and MEG Resource Facility, New Delhi, India
| | - Hans Clusmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Daniel Delev
- Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc Guenot
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Hospital Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Claire Haegelen
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Hospital Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Hélène Catenoix
- Department of Neurology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Johannes Lang
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hajo Hamer
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Brandner
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katrin Walther
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jason S Hauptmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rosalind L Jeffree
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Josua Kegele
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute of Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eliane Weinbrenner
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute of Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Georgios Naros
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute of Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Julia Velz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Niklaus Krayenbühl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Julia Onken
- Institute for Diagnostics of Epilepsy, Epilepsy Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulf C Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Martin Holtkamp
- Institute for Diagnostics of Epilepsy, Epilepsy Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karl Rössler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Spyrantis
- Department of Neurosurgery and Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Adam Strzelczyk
- Department of Neurosurgery and Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix Rosenow
- Department of Neurosurgery and Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefan Stodieck
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hamburg Epilepsy Center, Protestant Hospital Alsterdorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mario A Alonso-Vanegas
- National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suarez", Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jörg Wellmer
- Ruhr-Epileptology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Tim Wehner
- Ruhr-Epileptology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Lasse Dührsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Sauvigny
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Staiger RD, Mehra T, Haile SR, Domenghino A, Kümmerli C, Abbassi F, Kozbur D, Dutkowski P, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. Experts vs. machine - comparison of machine learning to expert-informed prediction of outcome after major liver surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:674-681. [PMID: 38423890 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine learning (ML) has been successfully implemented for classification tasks (e.g., cancer diagnosis). ML performance for more challenging predictions is largely unexplored. This study's objective was to compare machine learning vs. expert-informed predictions for surgical outcome in patients undergoing major liver surgery. METHODS Single tertiary center data on preoperative parameters and postoperative complications for elective hepatic surgery patients were included (2008-2021). Expert-informed prediction models were established on 14 parameters identified by two expert liver surgeons to impact on postoperative outcome. ML models used all available preoperative patient variables (n = 62). Model performance was compared for predicting 3-month postoperative overall morbidity. Temporal validation and additional analysis in major liver resection patients were conducted. RESULTS 889 patients included. Expert-informed models showed low average bias (2-5 CCI points) with high over/underprediction. ML models performed similarly: average prediction 5-10 points higher than observed CCI values with high variability (95% CI -30 to 50). No performance improvement for major liver surgery patients. CONCLUSION No clinical relevance in the application of ML for predicting postoperative overall morbidity was found. Despite being a novel hype, ML has the potential for application in clinical practice. However, at this stage it does not replace established approaches of prediction modelling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxane D Staiger
- Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Tarun Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sarah R Haile
- Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anja Domenghino
- Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Fariba Abbassi
- Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Damian Kozbur
- Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Milo A Puhan
- Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Timmerhuis HC, Jensen CW, Ngongoni RF, Baiocchi M, DeLong JC, Ohkuma R, Dua MM, Norton JA, Poultsides GA, Worth PJ, Visser BC. Postoperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2095-2105. [PMID: 38438677 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10728-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has established advantages over the open approach. The costs associated with robotic DP (RDP) versus laparoscopic DP (LDP) make the robotic approach controversial. We sought to compare outcomes and cost of LDP and RDP using propensity matching analysis at our institution. METHODS Patients undergoing LDP or RDP between 2000 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patients were optimally matched using age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, body mass index, and tumor size. Between-group differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous data, and the McNemar's test for categorical data. Outcomes included operative duration, conversion to open surgery, postoperative length of stay, pancreatic fistula rate, pseudocyst requiring intervention, and costs. RESULTS 298 patients underwent MIDP, 180 (60%) were laparoscopic and 118 (40%) were robotic. All RDPs were matched 1:1 to a laparoscopic case with absolute standardized mean differences for all matching covariates below 0.10, except for tumor type (0.16). RDP had longer operative times (268 vs 178 min, p < 0.01), shorter length of stay (2 vs 4 days, p < 0.01), fewer biochemical pancreatic leaks (11.9% vs 34.7%, p < 0.01), and fewer interventional radiological drainage (0% vs 5.9%, p = 0.01). The number of pancreatic fistulas (11.9% vs 5.1%, p = 0.12), collections requiring antibiotics or intervention (11.9% vs 5.1%, p = 0.12), and conversion rates (3.4% vs 5.1%, p = 0.72) were comparable between the two groups. The total direct index admission costs for RDP were 1.01 times higher than for LDP for FY16-19 (p = 0.372), and 1.33 times higher for FY20-22 (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS Although RDP required longer operative times than LDP, postoperative stays were shorter. The procedure cost of RDP was modestly more expensive than LDP, though this was partially offset by reduced hospital stay and reintervention rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hester C Timmerhuis
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Christopher W Jensen
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rejoice F Ngongoni
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael Baiocchi
- Stanford Prevention Research Center and Departments of Statistics and Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan C DeLong
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rika Ohkuma
- Department of Quality, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Monica M Dua
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Norton
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - George A Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Patrick J Worth
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Brendan C Visser
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Stanford Health Care & Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nickel F, Wise PA, Müller PC, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, Salg GA, Steinle V, Niessen A, Mayer P, Mehrabi A, Loos M, Müller-Stich BP, Kulu Y, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Ann Surg 2024; 279:665-670. [PMID: 37389886 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of the current study was to investigate the perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in a high-volume center. BACKGROUND Despite RPDs prospective advantages over OPD, current evidence comparing the 2 has been limited and has prompted further investigation. The aim of this study was to compare both approaches while including the learning curve phase for RPD. METHODS A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis of a prospective database of RPD with OPD (2017-2022) at a high-volume center was performed. The main outcomes were overall- and pancreas-specific complications. RESULTS Of 375 patients who underwent PD (OPD n=276; RPD n=99), 180 were included in propensity score-matched analysis (90 per group). RPD was associated with less blood loss [500 (300-800) vs 750 (400-1000) mL; P =0.006] and more patients without a complication (50% vs 19%; P <0.001). Operative time was longer [453 (408-529) vs 306 (247-362) min; P <0.001]; in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma, fewer lymph nodes were harvested [24 (18-27) vs 33 (27-39); P <0.001] with RPD versus OPD. There were no significant differences for major complications (38% vs 47%; P =0.291), reoperation rate (14% vs 10%; P =0.495), postoperative pancreatic fistula (21% vs 23%; P =0.858), and patients with the textbook outcome (62% vs 55%; P =0.452). CONCLUSIONS Including the learning phase, RPD can be safely implemented in high-volume settings and shows potential for improved perioperative outcomes versus OPD. Pancreas-specific morbidity was unaffected by the robotic approach. Randomized trials with specifically trained pancreatic surgeons and expanded indications for the robotic approach are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philipp A Wise
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philip C Müller
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, University Hospital and St. Clare Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, University Hospital and St. Clare Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Amila Cizmic
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gabriel A Salg
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Verena Steinle
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Niessen
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Mayer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, University Hospital and St. Clare Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Yakup Kulu
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Radulova-Mauersberger O, Mibelli N, von Bechtolsheim F, Kroesen L, Hempel S, Weitz J, Distler M, Oehme F. Textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy with postoperative hyperamylasemia-a propensity score matching analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:451-457. [PMID: 38583895 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative serum hyperamylasemia (POH) is a part of the new, increasingly highlighted, definition for postpancreatectomy pancreatitis (PPAP). This study aimed to analyze whether the biochemical changes of PPAP are differently associated with postoperative complications after distal pancreatectomy (DP) compared with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The textbook outcome (TO) was used as a summary measure to capture real-world data. METHODS The data were retrospectively extracted from a prospective clinical database. Patients with POH, defined as levels above our institution's upper limit of normal on postoperative day 1, after DP and the corresponding propensity score-matched cohort after PD were evaluated on postoperative complications by using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS We analyzed 723 patients who underwent PD and DP over a period of 9 years. After propensity score matching, 384 patients (192 patients in each group) remained. POH was observed in 78 (41.1%) and 74 (39.4%) after PD and DP correspondingly. There was a significant increase of postoperative complications in the PD group: Clavien-Dindo classification system ≥3 (P < .01 vs P = .71), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (P < .001 vs P = .2), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (P < .001 vs P = .11), and length of hospital stay (P < .001 vs P = .69) if POH occurred compared with in the DP group. TO was significantly unlikely in cases with POH after PD compared with DP (P > .001 vs P = .41). Furthermore, POH was found to be an independent predictor for missing TO after PD (odds ratio [OR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.60; P < .001), whereas this was not observed in patients after DP (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.21-1.33; P = .18). CONCLUSION As a part of the definition for PPAP, POH is a predictive indicator associated with postoperative complications after PD but not after DP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Radulova-Mauersberger
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Nicolas Mibelli
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Felix von Bechtolsheim
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Louisa Kroesen
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hempel
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Florian Oehme
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Villodre C, Del Río-Martín J, Blanco-Fernández G, Cantalejo-Díaz M, Pardo F, Carbonell S, Muñoz-Forner E, Carabias A, Manuel-Vazquez A, Hernández-Rivera PJ, Jaén-Torrejimeno I, Kälviäinen-Mejia HK, Rotellar F, Garcés-Albir M, Latorre R, Longoria-Dubocq T, De Armas-Conde N, Serrablo A, Esteban Gordillo S, Sabater L, Serradilla-Martín M, Ramia JM. Textbook outcome in distal pancreatectomy: A multicenter study. Surgery 2024; 175:1134-1139. [PMID: 38071134 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome is an interesting quality metrics tool. Information on textbook outcomes in distal pancreatectomy is very scarce. In this study we determined textbook outcome in a distal pancreatectomy multicenter database and propose a specific definition of textbook outcome-distal pancreatectomy that includes pancreatic fistula. METHODS Retrospective multicenter observational study of distal pancreatectomy performed at 8 hepatopancreatobiliary surgery units from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018. The inclusion criteria were any scheduled distal pancreatectomy performed for any diagnosis and age > 18 years. Specific textbook outcome-distal pancreatectomy was defined as hospital stay P < 75, no Clavien-Dindo complications (≥ III), no hospital mortality, and no readmission recorded at 90 days, and the absence of pancreatic fistula (B/C). RESULTS Of the 450 patients included, 262 (58.2%) obtained textbook outcomes. Prolonged stay was the parameter most frequently associated with failure to achieve textbook outcomes. The textbook outcome group presented the following results. Preoperative: lower American Society of Anesthesiologists score < III, a lower percentage of smokers, and less frequent tumor invasion of neighboring organs or vascular invasion; operative: major laparoscopic approach, and less resection of neighboring organs and less operative transfusion; postoperative: lower percentage of delayed gastric emptying and pancreatic fistula B/C, and diagnosis other an adenocarcinoma. In the multivariate study, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score > II, resection of neighboring organs, B/C pancreatic fistula, and delayed gastric emptying were associated with failure to achieve textbook outcomes. CONCLUSION The textbook outcome rate in our 450 pancreaticoduodenectomies was 58.2%. In the multivariate analysis, the causes of failure to achieve textbook outcomes were American Society of Anesthesiologists score > II, resection of neighboring organs, pancreatic fistula B/C, and delayed gastric emptying. We believe that pancreatic fistula should be added to the specific definition of textbook outcome-distal pancreatectomy because it is the most frequent complication of this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Villodre
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain; ISABIAL: Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, Alicante, Spain; Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Fernando Pardo
- Department of Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Silvia Carbonell
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain; ISABIAL: Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Elena Muñoz-Forner
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Univertario, University of Valencia, Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Marina Garcés-Albir
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Univertario, University of Valencia, Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raquel Latorre
- Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain
| | | | | | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Luis Sabater
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Univertario, University of Valencia, Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mario Serradilla-Martín
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - José M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain; ISABIAL: Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, Alicante, Spain; Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nakajima T, Ikuta S, Fujikawa M, Ikuta L, Matsuki G, Ichise N, Kasai M, Okamoto R, Nakamoto Y, Aihara T, Yanagi H, Yamanaka N. High hand grip strength is a significant risk factor and a useful predictor of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:85. [PMID: 38438660 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03274-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most critical complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Studies on predictive factors for POPF that can be identified preoperatively are limited. Recent reports have highlighted the association between the preoperative nutritional status, including sarcopenia, and postoperative complications. We examined preoperative risk factors for POPF after PD, focusing on nutritional indicators. METHODS A total of 153 consecutive patients who underwent PD at our institution were enrolled in this study. Preoperative nutritional parameters, including hand grip strength (HGS) and skeletal muscle mass as components of sarcopenia, were incorporated into the analysis. POPFs were categorized according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). RESULTS Thirty-seven of the 153 patients (24.1%) fulfilled the ISGPF definition of CR-POPF postoperatively. In the univariate analysis, the incidence of CR-POPF was associated with male sex, non-pancreatic tumor diseases, a high body mass index, a high HGS and a high skeletal muscle mass index. In the multivariate analysis, non-pancreatic tumor diseases and an HGS ≥23.0 kg were selected as independent risk factors for CR-POPF (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS A high HGS, a screening tool for sarcopenia, was a risk factor for CR-POPF. It can accurately serve as a useful predictor of POPF risk in patients undergoing PD. These results highlight the potential of sarcopenia to reduce the incidence of POPF and highlight the need to clarify the mechanism of POPF occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayoshi Nakajima
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan.
| | - Shinichi Ikuta
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Masataka Fujikawa
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Lisa Ikuta
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Goshi Matsuki
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Noriko Ichise
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Meidai Kasai
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Ryo Okamoto
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Nakamoto
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Aihara
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Hidenori Yanagi
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Naoki Yamanaka
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Marchese U, Desbiens JF, Lenne X, Naveendran G, Tzedakis S, Gaillard M, Bruandet A, Theis D, Boyer L, Truant S, Fuks D, El Amrani M. Study of Risk Factors for Readmission After Pancreatectomy for Cancer: Analysis of Nationwide Cohort. Ann Surg 2024; 279:486-492. [PMID: 37254769 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the factors associated with readmission after pancreatectomy for cancer and to assess their impact on the 1-year mortality in a French multicentric population. BACKGROUND Pancreatectomy is a complex procedure with high morbidity that increases the length of hospital stay and jeopardizes survival. Hospital readmissions lead to increased health system costs, making this a topic of great interest. METHODS Data collected from patients who underwent pancreatectomy for cancer between 2011 and 2019 were extracted from a French national medico-administrative database. A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate the association of baseline variables, including age, sex, liver-related comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor localization, and use of neoadjuvant therapy, along with hospital type and volume, with readmission status. Centers were divided into low and high volumes according to the cutoff of 26 cases/year. Logistic regression models were developed to determine whether the identified bivariate associations persisted after adjusting for the patient characteristics. The mortality rates during readmission and at 1 year postoperatively were also determined. RESULTS Of 22,935 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, 9129 (39.3%) were readmitted within 6 months. Readmission rates by year did not vary over the study period, and mean readmissions occurred within 20 days after discharge. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 1.12], age >70 years (OR = 1.16), comorbidities (OR = 1.21), distal pancreatectomy (OR = 1.11), and major postoperative complications (OR = 1.37) were predictors of readmission. Interestingly, readmission and surgery in low-volume centers increased the risk of death at 1 year by a factor of 2.15 [(2.01-2.31), P < 0.001] and 1.31 [(1.17-1.47), P < 0.001], respectively. CONCLUSIONS Readmission after pancreatectomy for cancer is high with an increased rate of 1-year mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Marchese
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Jean-François Desbiens
- Department of digestive surgery and Transplantation, CHRU de Lille, Lille
- Lille university, Lille
| | - Xavier Lenne
- Lille university, Lille
- Department of Medical Information, CHRU de Lille, Lille
| | - Gaanan Naveendran
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Martin Gaillard
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Amelie Bruandet
- Lille university, Lille
- Department of Medical Information, CHRU de Lille, Lille
| | - Didier Theis
- Lille university, Lille
- Department of Medical Information, CHRU de Lille, Lille
| | - Laurent Boyer
- Department of Medical Information La Timone Hospital, Marseille
- Aix-Marseille University, Jardin du Pharo, Marseille
| | - Stephanie Truant
- Department of digestive surgery and Transplantation, CHRU de Lille, Lille
- Lille university, Lille
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Mehdi El Amrani
- Department of digestive surgery and Transplantation, CHRU de Lille, Lille
- Lille university, Lille
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Halle-Smith JM, Pathak S, Frampton A, Pandanaboyana S, Sutcliffe RP, Davidson BR, Smith AM, Roberts KJ. Current postoperative nutritional practice after pancreatoduodenectomy in the UK: national survey and snapshot audit. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae021. [PMID: 38513279 PMCID: PMC10957164 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James M Halle-Smith
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samir Pathak
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Adam Frampton
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgical Innovation, Organ Regeneration and Transplant, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew M Smith
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kimura N, Igarashi T, Murotani K, Itoh A, Watanabe T, Hirano K, Tanaka H, Shibuya K, Yoshioka I, Fujii T. Novel choledochojejunostomy technique "T-shaped anastomosis" for preventing the development of postoperative cholangitis in pancreatoduodenectomy: A propensity score matching analysis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:301-311. [PMID: 38455496 PMCID: PMC10914695 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background There have been few studies of countermeasures against postoperative cholangitis, a serious complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) that impairs quality of life. Objective To evaluate our recently developed, novel method of choledochojejunostomy with a larger anastomotic diameter, the "T-shaped anastomosis." Methods The study included 261 cases of PD. The T-shaped choledochojejunostomy technique was performed with an additional incision for a distance greater than half the diameter of the bile duct at the anterior wall of the bile duct and the anterior wall of the elevated jejunum. To compensate for potential confounding biases between the standard anastomosis group (n = 206) and the T-shaped anastomosis group (n = 55), we performed propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was the incidence of medium-term postoperative cholangitis adjusted for PSM. Results In the PSM analysis, 54 patients in each group were matched, and the median bile duct diameter measured by preoperative CT was 8.8 mm versus 9.3 mm, the rate of preoperative biliary drainage was 31% versus 37%, the incidence of cholangitis within 1 month before surgery was 9% versus 13%, and the incidence of postoperative bile leakage was 2% versus 2%, with no significant differences. The incidence of medium-term postoperative cholangitis was 15% versus 4%, and multivariate logistic regression revealed that T-shaped choledochojejunostomy was an independent predictor of a reduced incidence of cholangitis (odds ratio, 0.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.81; p = 0.024). Conclusions The T-shaped choledochojejunostomy technique was shown to be effective with a significant reduction in the incidence of medium-term postoperative cholangitis. Clinical trial identification: UMIN000050990.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nana Kimura
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| | - Takamichi Igarashi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| | - Kenta Murotani
- Biostatistics Center, Graduate School of MedicineKurume UniversityKurumeJapan
| | - Ayaka Itoh
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| | - Toru Watanabe
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| | - Katsuhisa Hirano
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| | - Haruyoshi Tanaka
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| | - Kazuto Shibuya
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| | - Isaku Yoshioka
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| | - Tsutomu Fujii
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Halle-Smith JM, Bartlett D, Chatzizacharias N, Dasari BV, Marudanayagam R, Sutcliffe RP, Brown RM, Roberts KJ. Investigating misdiagnosis of suspected cancer among patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: three decades of experience. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:344-351. [PMID: 38071186 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic error can result in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) being mistakenly performed for benign disease. The aims of this study were to observe the error rate in PD over three decades and identify characteristics of benign disease that can mimic malignancy. METHODS Patients with a benign histological diagnosis after having PD performed for suspected malignancy between 1988 and 2019 were selected for review. Preoperative clinical features, imaging and pathological samples were reviewed alongside resection specimens to identify features that may have led to misdiagnosis. RESULTS Over the study period, 1812 patients underwent PD for suspected malignancy and 97 (5.2 %) of these had a final benign diagnosis. The rate of benign cases reduced across the study period. Some 62 patients proceeded to surgery without a preoperative tissue diagnosis; the decision to operate was made upon clinical and radiologic features alone. There were six patients who had a preoperative pathological sample suspicious for malignancy, of which two had autoimmune pancreatitis in the postoperative histology specimen. DISCUSSION Benign conditions, notably autoimmune and chronic pancreatitis, can mimic malignancy even with the use of EUS-FNA. The results of all available diagnostic modalities should be interpreted by a multidisciplinary team and honest discussions with the patient should follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Halle-Smith
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | - David Bartlett
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby Vm Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel M Brown
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kakati RT, Naffouje S, Spanheimer PM, Dahdaleh FS. Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:85. [PMID: 38386224 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01825-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly lethal malignancy with a minority of patients eligible for curative-intent surgical intervention. Pancreatic resections are technically demanding operations associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPRs), which include laparoscopic and robotic approaches, may enhance postoperative outcomes by lessening physiological impact of open surgery. A limited number of randomized-controlled trials as well as numerous retrospective reports have focused on MIPR outcomes and role in management of a variety of tumors, including PDAC. Today, MIPRs are generally considered acceptable alternatives to open surgery as a trend towards improved short-term metrics is observed. However, several questions remain regarding the oncological adequacy of MIPR's as long-term experience is less extensive compared to open techniques. This review aims to summarize existing evidence on MIPRs with a focus on PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasha T Kakati
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samer Naffouje
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Philip M Spanheimer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Fadi S Dahdaleh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, 120 Spalding Drive, Ste 205, Naperville, IL, 60540, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Drexler R, Sauvigny T, Pantel TF, Ricklefs FL, Catapano JS, Wanebo JE, Lawton MT, Sanchin A, Hecht N, Vajkoczy P, Raygor K, Tonetti D, Abla A, El Naamani K, Tjoumakaris SI, Jabbour P, Jankowitz BT, Salem MM, Burkhardt JK, Wagner A, Wostrack M, Gempt J, Meyer B, Gaub M, Mascitelli JR, Dodier P, Bavinzski G, Roessler K, Stroh N, Gmeiner M, Gruber A, Figueiredo EG, da Silva Coelho ACS, Bervitskiy AV, Anisimov ED, Rzaev JA, Krenzlin H, Keric N, Ringel F, Park D, Kim MC, Marcati E, Cenzato M, Westphal M, Dührsen L. Global Outcomes for Microsurgical Clipping of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Benchmark Analysis of 2245 Cases. Neurosurgery 2024; 94:369-378. [PMID: 37732745 PMCID: PMC10766286 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Benchmarks represent the best possible outcome and help to improve outcomes for surgical procedures. However, global thresholds mirroring an optimal and reachable outcome for microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) are not available. This study aimed to define standardized outcome benchmarks in patients who underwent clipping of UIA. METHODS A total of 2245 microsurgically treated UIA from 15 centers were analyzed. Patients were categorized into low- ("benchmark") and high-risk ("nonbenchmark") patients based on known factors affecting outcome. The benchmark was defined as the 75th percentile of all centers' median scores for a given outcome. Benchmark outcomes included intraoperative (eg, duration of surgery, blood transfusion), postoperative (eg, reoperation, neurological status), and aneurysm-related factors (eg, aneurysm occlusion). Benchmark cutoffs for aneurysms of the anterior communicating/anterior cerebral artery, middle cerebral artery, and posterior communicating artery were determined separately. RESULTS Of the 2245 cases, 852 (37.9%) patients formed the benchmark cohort. Most operations were performed for middle cerebral artery aneurysms (53.6%), followed by anterior communicating and anterior cerebral artery aneurysms (25.2%). Based on the results of the benchmark cohort, the following benchmark cutoffs were established: favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤2) ≥95.9%, postoperative complication rate ≤20.7%, length of postoperative stay ≤7.7 days, asymptomatic stroke ≤3.6%, surgical site infection ≤2.7%, cerebral vasospasm ≤2.5%, new motor deficit ≤5.9%, aneurysm closure rate ≥97.1%, and at 1-year follow-up: aneurysm closure rate ≥98.0%. At 24 months, benchmark patients had a better score on the modified Rankin scale than nonbenchmark patients. CONCLUSION This study presents internationally applicable benchmarks for clinically relevant outcomes after microsurgical clipping of UIA. These benchmark cutoffs can serve as reference values for other centers, patient registries, and for comparing the benefit of other interventions or novel surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Drexler
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Sauvigny
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias F. Pantel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Franz L. Ricklefs
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joshua S. Catapano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - John E. Wanebo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Michael T. Lawton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Aminaa Sanchin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Hecht
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kunal Raygor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Daniel Tonetti
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Adib Abla
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kareem El Naamani
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stavropoula I. Tjoumakaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pascal Jabbour
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brian T. Jankowitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohamed M. Salem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jan-Karl Burkhardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Wostrack
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Gaub
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health and Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Justin R. Mascitelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health and Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Philippe Dodier
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerhard Bavinzski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karl Roessler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nico Stroh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Matthias Gmeiner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Andreas Gruber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Eberval G. Figueiredo
- Division of Neurological Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Harald Krenzlin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Naureen Keric
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Florian Ringel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Dougho Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pohang Stroke and Spine Hospital, Pohang, Korea
| | - Mun-Chul Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pohang Stroke and Spine Hospital, Pohang, Korea
| | - Eleonora Marcati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Cenzato
- Department of Neurosurgery, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Manfred Westphal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lasse Dührsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Heckman JT, Martinez AE, Keim RL, Mazzaferro SE, Mir KS, Gorman MA, Shah US. Implementation of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy at a community tertiary care hospital utilizing a comprehensive curriculum. Am J Surg 2024; 228:83-87. [PMID: 37620215 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the outcomes of a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) program implemented at a community tertiary care hospital. METHODS A retrospective review of 65 RPD cases compared surgical outcomes and performance to benchmark data. RESULTS Postoperative complications occurred in 31% (20) of patients vs. ≤73% (variance -42), with grade IV complications in 3% (2) vs. ≤5% (variance -2). Postoperative pancreatic fistula type B frequency was 12% (8) vs. ≤15% (variance -3). One 90-day mortality occurred (1.5% vs. 1.6%). Failure to rescue rate was 7% vs. ≤9% (variance -2), and R1 resection rate was 2% vs. ≤39% (variance -37). There was a downward trend of operative time (rho = -0.600, P < 0.001), with a learning curve of 27 cases. Median hospital length of stay was 6 days vs. ≤15 days (variance -9). CONCLUSION Our comprehensive RPD training program resulted in improved operative performance and outcomes commensurate with benchmark thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason T Heckman
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and General Surgery, St. Peter's Health Partners, 319 S Manning Blvd, Ste 304, Albany, NY, 12208, United States
| | - Ashley E Martinez
- Albany Medical College, 43 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY, 12208, United States.
| | - Rebecca L Keim
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and General Surgery, St. Peter's Health Partners, 319 S Manning Blvd, Ste 304, Albany, NY, 12208, United States
| | - Sarah E Mazzaferro
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and General Surgery, St. Peter's Health Partners, 319 S Manning Blvd, Ste 304, Albany, NY, 12208, United States
| | - Kristin S Mir
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and General Surgery, St. Peter's Health Partners, 319 S Manning Blvd, Ste 304, Albany, NY, 12208, United States
| | - Michael A Gorman
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and General Surgery, St. Peter's Health Partners, 319 S Manning Blvd, Ste 304, Albany, NY, 12208, United States
| | - Ujas S Shah
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and General Surgery, St. Peter's Health Partners, 319 S Manning Blvd, Ste 304, Albany, NY, 12208, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mizumoto T, Takahara T, Nishimura A, Mii S, Uchida Y, Iwama H, Kojima M, Kato Y, Uyama I, Suda K. Challenge in optimizing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy including nerve plexus hanging maneuver: a Japanese single center experience of 76 cases. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1077-1087. [PMID: 38168732 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10653-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is technically demanding, and 20-50 cases are required to surpass the learning curve. This study aimed to show our experience of 76 cases from the introduction of RPD and report the changes in surgical results owing to the accumulation of cases and optimization of surgical techniques. METHODS A total of 76 patients who underwent RPD between November 2009 and May 2023 at the Fujita Health University Hospital were divided into three groups: competency (n = 23, Nov 2009-Mar 2020), proficiency (n = 31, Apr 2020-Jun 2022), and mastery (n = 22, Jul 2022-May 2023) phases. In the mastery phase, for the education of new surgeons and maintenance of surgical quality, optimization of the procedure, including hanging maneuver with or without stapling transection of the retropancreatic tissue was implemented. The surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS The mean operation time decreased over time despite of the participation of newly started operators in mastery phase [competency: 921.5 min (IQR 775-996 min) vs. proficiency: 802.8 min (IQR 715-887 min) vs. mastery: 609.2 min (IQR 514-699 min), p < 0.001]. Additionally, Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade IIIa complications decreased from 52.2% in competency phase to 35.5% and 9.1% in proficiency and mastery phases, respectively (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Operation time and major complications decreased along the learning curve from the introduction of RPD. In addition, optimization of the procedure, including hanging maneuver of the retropancreatic tissue seemed to be effective in reducing operation time and educating new RPD surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Mizumoto
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takahara
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
| | - Akihiro Nishimura
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Satoshi Mii
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Uchida
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hideaki Iwama
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kojima
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Koichi Suda
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fusai GK, Raptis DA, Hilal MA, Bassi C, Besselink M, Conlon K, Davidson B, Del Chiaro M, Dervenis C, Frigerio I, Falconi M, Hackert T, Harrison EM, Shrikhande SV, Siriwardena A, Smith M, Wolfgang C, Borakati A, Balci D, Elhadi M, Salinas CH, Machairas N, Marchegiani G, Oba A, Oberkofler C, Passas I, Ravikumar R, Velázquez PS, de Santibañes M, Schnitzbauer AA, Soggiu F, Tamburrino D, Tinguely P, Wei A, Zachiotis M, Bentabak K, Kacimi SE, Nikfarjam M, Shcherba A, Sergeant G, Coelho G, Torres O, Belev N, Tang E, Diaz C, Wei K, Hendi M, Gouvas N, Christophides T, Nikov A, Fathallah D, Saad M, Tammik O, Huhta H, Sulpice L, Lupinacci R, Demetrashvili Z, Stavrou GA, Felekouras GE, Papaziogas V, Misra S, Talib H, Al-Sader MAJ, Satoi S, Obeidat K, Fakhradiyev I, Khalife M, Elhadi M, Dulskas A, Ghani S, Padilla AE, Melchor-Ruan J, Erdene S, Benkabbou A, Nashidengo P, Koea J, Adeyeye NA, Amro S, Alnammourah WM, The C, Pędziwiatr M, Polkowski W, Barbu ST, Galun D, Goh BKP, Trotovšek B, Omoshoro-Jones J, Ielpo B, Abdelmageed A, Sandström P, Cristaudi A, Gloor B, Kuemmerli C, Tishreen AH, Chaaban MK, Wu CH, Jen PCYF, Baraket O, Taylor M, Jamieson N, Iype S, Giorgakis E, Qadan M, Ganai S, Al-Naggar H, Chihaka O, El Behi A, Kouicem AT, Chibane A, Bouzid C, Bentabak K, Bouali I, Samai N, Aya B, Drid B, Tidjane A, Tabeti B, Boudjenan-Serradj N, Larbi MH, Ouahab I, Touabti S, Ilhem O, Bouaoud S, Meriem A, Ouyahia A, Kouicem AT, Abdoun M, Mounira R, Rais M, Riffi O, Kacimi SE, McCormack L, Capitanich P, Goransky J, de Santibanes M, Mazza O, Salazar IP, Ramallo DR, Pablo F, Gondolesi GE, Schelotto PB, Rodriguez J, Apostolou C, Merrett N, Fox A, Hassen S, Joglekar S, Gananadha S, Wake R, Hagen K, Sritharan M, Hall K, Muralidharan V, Brown K, Nikfarjam M, Croagh D, Sritharan M, Berry R, Fayed A, Hodgson R, Kuany T, Loveday B, Banting S, Rowcroft A, Fox A, Knowles B, Taylor L, Chong L, Banting S, Perini M, Nikfarjam M, Lin YJ, Alsoudani A, Burnett D, Shah K, Fuge M, Bull N, Chen S, Navadgi S, Ng ZQ, Johansson M, Azaman NSBB, Pearson A, Apostolou C, Mischinger H, Schemmer P, Kornprat P, Hauer A, Hauer A, Kirbes K, Klug R, Schrittwieser R, Klaus A, Entschev A, Reichhold D, Ugrekhelidze K, Fink M, Stoyanova R, Sabateen M, Mahfoodh Z, Shenawi HA, Yaghan R, Chowdhury M, Shcherba A, Kirkovsky L, Korotkov S, Van den Bossche B, Boterbergh K, Poortmans M, Smet B, Strypstein S, Feryn T, Wahib EM, oubella S, Roeyen G, Hartman V, Bracke B, Hendrikx B, Gryspeerdt F, Berrevoet F, Poortmans N, Apers T, Appeltans B, Appeltans B, Wicherts D, Sergeant G, Garcia FOB, dos Santos IB, Garcia R, Pinto R, Leite TLS, Anghinoni M, Nobre CCG, Coelho G, Machado IFS, Carvalho N, Morais L, Barros AV, Gomes G, Buarque IL, Osvaldt AB, Militz M, Boff M, Marcelino L, Guerra E, Torelly L, Waechter FL, Rodrigues P, Teixeira UF, Osvaldt A, Marcelino L, Militz M, De Mello E, Goncalves R, Balzan S, Ramos EJB, Moraes-Junior JMA, Torres OJM, da Silva DV, Coimbra F, Coimbra FJF, Marques N, Marques N, Torres SM, Sampaio A, Canteras CA, Ferreira F, Machado MA, Kleinubing D, Lellis L, Brum SL, Gohar M, Atanasov B, Slavchev MT, Slavchev M, Belev N, Krastev P, Takorov I, Vladov N, Kostadinov R, Lukanova T, Mihaylov V, Chernopolsky PM, Madjov R, Bozhkov VM, Kostov VD, Kostov D, Nikolaev E, Muhezagiro F, Niyonkuru J, Irakoze P, Dixon E, Lo E, Ruo L, D'Souza D, Serrano PE, Skaro A, Tang E, Glinka J, Martin J, Zogopoulos G, Metrakos P, Chaudhury P, Torres-Quevedo R, Brañes A, Brañes A, Diaz C, Buckel E, Butte J, Devaud N, Paqui L, Wei K, Wang H, Cai L, Guo S, Chen Y, Hendi M, Cheung TT, Millan C, Argüello P, Pavlek G, Silovski H, Petrovic I, Romic I, Zedelj J, Amic F, Kolovrat M, Rakic M, Mikulic D, Štironja I, Bubalo T, Gouvas N, Papatheodorou P, Christophides T, Burda L, Straka M, Klos D, Tesarikova J, Loveček M, Gregorik M, Skalicky P, Stögerová C, Fichtl J, TomአS, Zaruba P, Nikov A, Tschuor C, Mohamed M, Sayed B, Shaheen A, Farid A, Attalla A, Ibrahim DF, Fathallah D, Elmzaien E, Magdy B, Salah S, Saleh A, Saker AAE, Swealem A, Sallam EI, Rozza H, Bassiony M, Elhassan M, Elmalah M, Belal M, El Gohary M, Hassanin MA, Elsayed N, Aboelfath S, El-Sayes I, Tayiawi M, Altatari A, Altatari AM, Saleh A, Qatora MS, Said M, Najjar A, Alahmed F, Zamri FMB, Ealreibi H, Alahmed H, Alyasin I, Abdelhalim K, Alfatah MA, Sharaan MA, El Moneam MA, Abdelalemm M, Mourad M, Sohaimee NB, Abosamak NE, Suhaimi NMFB, Shokralla S, Dean YE, Tanas Y, Waffa Z, Nafea A, Ramadan D, Abdelaal A, Mahmoud A, Nafea AM, Abuali ASAME, Korayem I, Fahmy M, Ibraheem M, Hamouda M, Helaly R, Khdour YF, Khdour Y, Farag M, Ibrahim A, Elareibi HE, Alboridy M, Mansour A, Ragab MG, Naguib M, Allam S, Elfarag HA, Elsakka A, Mannaa D, Elkeleny M, Suhaimi NAB, Uzir SSBM, Nasr S, El-Najjar A, Dohien M, Dohien M, Osman N, Gad N, Hassanin M, Fadel BA, Hamdan EHM, Monib F, Saad M, Abbas A, Abu-Elfatth AM, Elazeem HAA, Abdelhafez MHZ, Omar N, Hassan R, Mohamed A, Mahmoud SH, Abobakr AM, Mohamed EEE, Ahmed R, Hamza HM, Mohammed M, Marshod MA, Hussein AMM, Taha A, Ibrahim I, Nageh MA, Fouly MN, Hassan RA, Mohamed AKA, Elnabi MH, Salah M, Ali AYM, Sayed EGA, Sayad R, Saad MM, Abdelkarem M, Omar NG, Khalifa A, Faragalla H, Barakat A, Barakat ATM, Elshafey A, Eleisawy MF, Eleisawy M, Zahed MSM, Zahed M, Omer M, Allam M, Abuelnaga Y, Abdelzaher A, Alnimr A, Dabbous H, Sayed H, Elgarhy I, Elmeteini M, Bahaa M, Farag M, Eid M, Anas O, Ismail O, Nageeb O, Lasheen R, Tanyous S, Diab S, Badran Y, Fahim A, Alazab E, Elgarhy IM, Abdeljalil M, Hanna M, Gobran M, Gobran M, Abdelmawla MOMK, Nagy M, Nageeb OE, Ramadan S, Abdelmawgoud S, Zidan T, Abuelnaga Y, Tarkhan Y, Saad A, Awad AK, Elbadawy MA, Abdelmawla M, Mansy E, Moharam M, Elabd M, Eldabour A, Elwakil L, Hassanien MS, Elnashar A, Saleh HED, Michail M, Said A, El Garhy M, Ahmed MBE, Anas O, Ismail O, Abboud K, Nabil A, Elfiky M, Murad A, Azzam A, Azab MA, Awad S, Othman Z, Fahim AM, Abdelzaher AT, Zidan T, Abdelrhman R, Tolis EAN, Salem M, Ebrahim H, Abdelrazek HA, Abdelmoneim N, Salman D, Saa'd H, Ali D, Farouk A, Mandor AR, Monier A, Shehta A, Kassem A, Sanad A, Elsaadany R, Shaat MM, Elmorsi R, Awad S, Ghedan S, Menessy A, Elnabawy D, Abdou K, Abdelmaksoud M, Hassan M, Elweza O, Elboraei R, Abdallah A, Metwally IH, Elhamamsy M, Fareed AM, Zuhdy M, Elbalka SS, Alansary MN, Omar M, Elgharably AA, Hager E, El Gady A, Alsharif DS, Shaaban AM, Alsharif D, Samaan D, Samaan SSS, Oteem A, Shaaban AM, Alsharif DS, Samaan S, Zayed A, Allam A, El Gady A, Alsharif DS, Badr K, Elnoamany S, Samaan SS, Ellibady M, Ahmed EA, Elbassyiouny A, Boalot A, Badr H, Gamal M, Abuelazm M, Othman Z, Eldaly A, Eldaly AS, Essa M, Abdelrahman F, Sarhan A, Alsabbagh F, Allah MA, Bayomi A, Salama M, kivisild M, Tammik O, Podramagi T, Huhta H, Kauppila JH, Nortunen M, Jouffret L, Sommacale D, Brustia R, Cherif R, Lecolle K, El Amrani M, Beugniez C, Truant S, Piessen G, Degisors S, Dupré A, Perinel J, Adham M, Sgarbura O, Souche FR, Iannelli A, Gugenheim J, Savvala N, Scatton O, Lupinacci R, Ragot E, Manceau G, Karoui M, Goasguen N, Anyla M, Gaujoux S, Rhaiem R, Piardi T, Robin F, Sulpice L, Roussel E, Papet E, Schwarz L, Felli E, Giannone F, Pessaux P, Pipia I, Khutsishvili K, Demetrashvili Z, Krones C, Wüllenweber HP, Bartella I, Kamphues C, Loch F, Pozios I, Belyaev O, Mohan PV, Uhl W, Bulian D, Juengling N, Thomaidis P, Korn S, Welsch T, Bork U, Praetorius C, Weitz J, Distler M, Krautz C, Brunner M, Grützmann R, Mazzella E, Hecker A, Reichert M, Azizian A, Gaedcke J, Ghadimi M, Aghdassi A, Döbereiner J, Klose J, Kleeff J, Ronellenfitsch U, Oldhafer KJ, Wagner K, Reese T, Heumann A, Uzunoglu FG, Izbicki J, Goetz M, Scognamiglio P, Honselmann K, Keck T, Wellner U, Struecker B, Hackl C, Brennfleck FW, Brunner S, Kardassis D, Schütze F, Stavrou GA, Ghamarnejad O, Metzger R, Koenigsrainer A, Nadalin S, Anthoni C, Makridis G, Farkas SA, Löb S, Nikou E, Tsoukalas N, Bairamidis E, Vaia A, Prountzopoulou A, Fradelos E, Kechagias A, Kelgiorgi D, Avgerinos K, Ioannidis A, Konstantinidis KM, Konstantinidis MK, Papakonstantinou D, Papiri I, Michalopoulos N, Petropoulou Z, Christodoulou S, Margaris I, Chatzialis I, Selmani J, Papadoliopoulou M, Arkadopoulos N, Kokoropoulos P, Vassiliu P, Parasyris S, Sidiropoulos T, Stamopoulos P, Stergiou D, Sotiropoulou M, Vaslamatzis M, Roukounakis N, Kapiris SA, Kapiris SA, Vougas V, Roukounakis N, Dimitroulis D, Mantas D, Kotsifa E, Kotsifa E, Tomara N, Tomara NK, Machairas N, Dorovinis P, Kykalos S, Tsirlis T, Larentzakis A, Vrakopoulou GZ, Tzimas G, Pagkratis S, Triantafyllidis I, Papalampros A, Polydorou A, Syllaios A, Kontopoulou C, Politis D, Vouros D, Schizas D, Kyros E, Felekouras E, Karavokyros I, Griniatsos J, Bramis K, Toutouzas K, Karydakis L, Konstadoulakis M, Memos N, Kanavidis P, Massaras D, Fragulidis G, Frountzas M, Kordeni K, Vezakis A, Iliakopoulos K, Chardalias L, Kyriazanos I, Kyriazanos I, Marougkas M, Stamos N, Giannakopoulos T, Kalles V, Balalis D, Manatakis D, Korkolis D, Bourazani M, Delis S, Cyrochristos D, Baltagiannis E, Glantzounis G, Stylianidis S, Diamantis A, Valaroutsos A, Magouliotis D, Zacharoulis D, Christodoulidis G, Tepetes K, Perivoliotis K, Fergadi M, Tsiotos G, Mulita F, Maroulis I, Vailas M, Zygomalas A, Karavias D, Kontis E, Katsaros I, Kopanakis N, Tooulias A, Christou C, Raptis D, Katsanos G, Beradze N, Papaziogas V, Papadopoulos VN, Giakoustidis D, Katsourakis A, Efthymiou E, Chatzis I, Ntinas A, Hatzitheoklitos E, Tsalis K, Koustas P, Apostolos K, Petras P, Tsaramanidis S, Iakovidis C, Zacharakis E, Marjai T, Bursics A, Dede K, Tölgyes T, Vereczkei A, Kelemen D, Robert P, Vasavada B, Vaishnav D, Pawar P, Suryawanshi P, Shinde RM, Piplani C, Singh A, Sahu SK, Choudhary SR, Gupta R, Ramamurthy A, Babu E, Karuparthi S, Kumar S, Purushothaman G, Sathyanesan J, Venkatesh NR, John S, Singh AK, Gupta R, Singh SK, Sharma D, Yadav K, Leekha N, Pippari R, Pandey M, Francis NJ, Kumar T, Jain S, Poonia DR, Vishnoi JR, Sharma N, Pareek P, Byshetty R, Misra S, Varshney V, Ray R, Gulati S, Ghatak S, Das K, Khamrui S, Ray S, Sebastian GM, Chand JT, Appukuttan M, Chaturvedi A, Akhtar N, Prakash P, Gupta S, Rajan S, Kumar V, Sonkar AA, Ozair A, Suresh V, Virk S, Narasimhan M, Ardhanari R, Ramachandran S, Jain D, Velagala JR, Chattopadhyay S, Vodyala C, Velagala JR, Motwani K, Prajapati R, Tilak S, Bansal V, Kalayarasan R, Bhalerao S, S IP, Chisthi MM, A N, Latheef A, Yadev I, Sreekumar RC, Yadev I, KV V, Pandey D, Tripathi M, Fuadi AF, Prabowo E, Abbood AH, Hammoodi H, Al-juaifari MA, Al-Isawi A, Al-Tekreeti S, Al-Ogaili M, Hashim HT, Sadot E, Apel R, Sulimani O, Solomonov E, Itzhaki O, Lavy R, Shapira Z, Nicolini D, Vivarelli M, Rossi MDR, Mocchegiani F, Memeo R, Vincenti L, Fedele S, Andriola V, Gurrado A, Meo GD, Testini M, Neri V, Zironda A, Trizzino A, Pinelli D, Colledan M, Pizzini P, Cirelli R, Masetti M, Zanello M, Jovine E, Mastrangelo L, Lombardi R, Casadei R, Malpaga A, Frena A, Patauner S, Ciola M, Andreuccetti J, Manzoni A, Hilal MA, de Graaf N, Alfano MS, Molfino S, Baiocchi GL, Pisanu A, Mellano A, Papa MV, Carlo ID, Donati M, Zanatta M, Basile PF, Antonucci A, Papis D, Pighin M, Celotti A, Sasia D, Allisiardi F, Borghi F, Maione F, Giraudo G, Migliore M, Salomone S, Giaccardi S, Testa V, Giacometti M, Zonta S, Taddei A, Risaliti M, Muiesan P, Urciuoli I, Bencini L, Moraldi L, Anastasi A, Canonico G, Nelli T, Storto GL, D'Acapito F, Ercolani G, Solaini L, Cucchetti A, Gardini A, Pacilio CA, Barberis A, Filauro M, De Cian F, Valente R, Didomenico S, Papadia FS, Di Domenico S, De Rosa R, Massobrio A, Scabini S, Carganico G, Pessia B, Sista F, Schietroma M, Spampinato MG, Garritano S, D'Ugo S, Marchese T, Saladino E, Cuticone G, Gullá N, Recordare A, Palumbo R, Giani A, Ferrari G, Mazzola M, Dondossola D, Rossi G, Caccamo L, Zerbi A, Nappo G, Montorsi M, Coppa J, Busset MDD, Mazzaferro V, Troci A, Frontali A, Crespi M, Baldi C, Benuzzi L, Ferrara F, Stella M, Capurso G, Falconi M, Tamburrino D, Benedetto FD, Magistri P, Ballarin R, Zanus G, Brizzolari M, Uggeri F, Gianotti L, Cereda M, Ferraro D, Iacomino A, Ferraro D, Pisaniello D, Vennarecci G, Pisaniello D, Rompianesi G, Troisi RI, Patrone R, Belli A, Izzo F, Palaia R, Gianpaolo M, Maida P, Pasquale T, Bassi D, Cillo U, Moletta L, Sperti C, Serafini S, Milanetto AC, Pasquali C, Tolin F, Gruppo M, De Simoni O, Buscemi S, Marino MV, Giuffrida M, Dallavalle R, Calabretto F, Cobianchi L, Pugliese L, Giardino A, Butturini G, Regi P, Kauffmann EF, Di Franco G, Morelli L, Furbetta N, Napoli N, Boggi U, Pinotti E, Montuori M, Giuliani A, Izzo ML, Zanini N, Veneroni L, Giordano M, Palini GM, Garulli G, Vaccara VL, de Rose AM, Giuliante F, Ardito F, Mingoli A, Sapienza P, Lapolla P, Petrucciani N, Cossa A, Coppola A, Belloni E, Nigri G, Tisone G, Angelico R, Manzia TM, Caputo D, Saverio SD, Porcu A, Perra T, Feo C, Deiana G, Sartarelli L, Pisconti S, Tonini V, Patrono D, Moro F, Grasso L, Brolese A, Ciarleglio F, Marcucci S, Nistri C, Massani M, Tommaso S, Galasso E, Zanus G, Brizzolari M, Romano M, Rossi S, Novello S, Ferrero A, Langella S, Armentano S, Russolillo N, Dario L, Intini S, Giovanni T, Recordare AG, Pirozzolo G, Palumbo R, Calabrese F, Querini G, Zonta S, Caneparo A, Giacometti M, De Francesco M, Balduzzi A, Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Iacono C, Poletto E, Marchegiani G, Isa G, Malleo G, Alaimo L, Salvia R, Conci S, Crinò SF, Campagnaro T, Frigerio I, De Marchi F, Bonomo M, Napetti S, Frontali A, Chierici A, Cotsoglou C, Gjoni E, Paleino S, Granieri S, Hashimoto D, Satoi S, Yamamoto T, Uemura K, Matsumoto I, Kamei K, Maehira H, Tani M, Hirano S, Nakamura T, Asano T, Akahoshi K, Tanabe M, Ishii T, H Al Saffaf M, Hamoud MA, Khattab R, Alissawi S, Hassouneh A, Al-Maadani B, Alali MB, Hmdan QA, Obed A, Nijadat D, Al-Shami K, Al-shami M, Mohsen M, Al-Mallah R, Albaba S, Theab M, Massadeh N, Theab RAK, Wardeh S, Salahwardeh, Alissawi SZ, Mardini A, Arabiyat HAA, Arabiyat H, Al-Hyari A, Ababneh H, Naffa' MF, Buwaitel MM, Al-Mekhlafi A, Rababa H, Alzoubi M, Khamees A, Abuleil A, Almiani S, Obeidat K, Amarin Z, Al-Samawi A, Hammoud AAA, Hammad H, Alkhadem MA, Mahafdah MR, AlSaffaf M, Alsabah M, Hani MB, Hamoud MAAL, Alzghoul MW, Khattab RN, Shumrakh SK, Rababah A, Alghazo H, Rababah T, Khamees A, Awadi S, Sharie SA, Abdelnoor A, Shaout DM, Omarieh Q, Abu-Ghazal SY, Abu-Ghazal S, Shaout D, Abughazal SY, Fakhradiyev I, Tanabayeva S, Saliev T, Issabekov I, Spatayev Z, Han HS, Jo Y, Plaudis H, Martinsone KD, Atstupens K, Jawad M, Khalife M, Faraj WG, Alowjali F, Albaraesi MN, Aldressi W, Benamwor A, Ali SB, Saleh S, Alshatshat A, Younes E, Younes E, Ekhmaj R, Bahroun S, Bahroun SG, Ekhmaj R, Bahroun SG, Burgan D, Aalem HAA, El Hussain RK, Morgom M, Alshareea E, Ellafi AAD, Shoukrie S, Shamakhi TMO, Bareig E, Abusannuga M, Dkhakhni A, Gerwash AA, Gerwash A, Zawia A, Othman E, Binnawara M, Abdalsalam SJA, Aljamal S, Ahmeed S, Khalil WIA, Khalel W, Faraj T, Elhajdawe F, Emhemed M, Salem O, Abdulwahed E, Khalil W, Rhuma H, Alsori M, Mustafa T, Albarouni S, Albishti A, Elhadi M, Elkhuja T, Msherghi A, Hasan NSB, Hasan HB, Hasan NB, Gulbinas A, Barauskas G, Ignatavicius P, Riauka R, Vanagas T, Slepavicius A, Jurgaitis J, Dailidenas S, Eismontas V, Mikutaitis V, Šlepavičius A, Jurgaitis J, Mikutaitis V, Dulskas A, Kuliavas J, Aniukstyte L, Sileikis A, Gulla A, Šileikis A, Tumas J, Strupas K, Petrulionis M, Kvietkauskas M, Strupas K, Vito D, Rosso E, Tan JH, Zakaria AD, Mohamad IS, Meng LV, Huai TZ, Hayati F, Sellappan H, Maiyauen TK, Azman A, Chik I, Zuhdi Z, Yoong B, Soon KP, Kit KJ, Yoong BK, Koong JK, Koh PS, Ibrahim A, Abdullah NAN, Bong J, Ghani S, Zorrilla CF, Cruz MC, Valladares AM, Dominguez-Rosado I, Rosciano AEP, Sebastian GH, Melchor-Ruan J, Garcia-Herrera JS, Sandag E, Erdene S, Orgoi S, Korch M, Boutti AS, boumzebra Y, Boumzebra Y, Hourri F, Gouazar I, Belaid WA, Serji B, Tarik B, Tijani EH, Zentar A, Ghannam A, Bounaim A, Souadka A, Benkabbou A, El Ahmadi B, Amina H, Oumayma L, Amrani L, Majbar MA, Mohsine R, Elhassouni R, Echiguer S, Belkhadir Z, Nashidengo AP, Quayson F, Abebrese J, Nashidengo P, Adhikari KM, Lakhey PJ, Bhandari RS, Besselink MG, Bieze M, Augustinus S, Busch O, Pranger BK, Hoogwater FJH, Klaase JM, Meerdink M, Nijkamp MW, de Meijer VE, Koerkamp BG, van Eijck CHJ, Van Dam JL, Barbier L, Johnston P, Babor R, Chu MJJ, Oliver T, Wen D, Koea J, Koea J, Brown L, Srinivasa S, Bartlett A, Windsor J, Carr-Boyd P, Bindra V, Cross A, Connor S, Hore T, Gunawardene A, Welsh F, Mahadik M, Gordon A, Rossaak J, Adeyeye A, Enoch E, Kayode-Nissi V, Abiyere H, Alatise O, Okomayin A, Odion C, Tagar E, Sheshe AA, Muhammad AB, Garzali IU, Ajayi P, Kadri E, Jabri SA, Azri YA, Pal KMI, Siddiqui T, Waqar U, Waqar U, Chaudhry AA, Abbasy J, Khan MO, Shafqatullah S, Khokhar MI, Akbar A, Afzal A, Asghar M, Ullah S, Butt UI, Butt U, Bari H, Mohammad BN, Hameda M, Jayyab MA, Alzabadiah AHM, Adam I, Abuzaina K, Farid M, Emar MFM, Emar M, Zreqat Q, Titi R, Idkiedek SA, Amro S, Al-Qasrawi S, Almasri TA, Alnammourah WM, Kiswani G, Sinnokrot R, Harb ZA, Nafa'A H, Shtewi L, Salah AO, Joma ABA, Faraj S, Zitawi A, Dawood AJ, Saadeh I, Hmeedan A, Daraghmeh MAM, Janajreh ANA, Manassra F, Yassin LMA, Yassin R, Saleh AO, Faraj SM, Sulaiman AS, Khayyat Z, Joma ABA, Shawahni E, Salah A, khader A, Hammoudeh A, Abdulhaq A, Alawna R, Roman G, Targarona J, Grau RG, Molina R, Alegria CR, Coayla G, Enriquez JCM, Marcos JC, Hasiman AN, Teh C, Cerdeño R, David A, Sarmiento RI, Barroso RR, Alfonso C, Ang DD, Casupang A, Mamuric M, Jardinero JM, Motyka A, Flisińska M, Pierściński S, Mrowiec S, Rymarowicz J, Matyja M, Wikar T, Sierzega M, Pędziwiatr M, Richter P, Durczynski A, Kosztowny K, Ciesielski W, Wardeszkiewicz A, Szwedziak K, Wlazlak M, Grzasiak O, Szewczyk P, Hogendorf P, Wyroślak-Najs J, Rawicz-Pruszyński K, Sędłak K, Solecki M, Polkowski W, Słodkowski M, Wierzchowski M, Korcz W, Nazarewski L, Kornasiewicz O, Lopes M, Martins RM, Martins R, Vigia E, Silva DS, Davide J, Pereira A, Tenreiro N, Castro T, Eisa R, Diaconescu B, Ciubotaru C, Negoi I, Negoiţă V, Radulescu RB, Bacalbaşa N, Dima S, Dumitrascu T, Spanu A, Mardare M, Ginghina O, Catrina E, Brezean I, Misca M, Vilcu M, Aldoescu S, Petrea S, Bartos A, Liviu CC, Iancu I, Barbu ST, Bodea R, Mois E, Florin G, Hajjar NA, Matei S, Zaharie F, Scripcariu V, Musina AM, Roata CE, Dimofte GM, Velenciuc N, Lunca S, Ong WL, Ong WL, Duta C, Brebu D, Braicu V, Belyaev A, Popov A, Batova A, Katysheva A, Mizgirev D, Neledova L, Duberman B, Litvin A, Pobelenko A, Kuznetsov G, Khatkov I, Tyutyunnik P, Izrailov R, Bedzhanyan A, Petrenko K, Bredikhin M, Shatverian DG, Chardarov N, Bagmet N, Lyadov V, Mudryak D, Semenenko I, Tokarev M, Kriger A, Kaldarov A, Ivanov G, Kuchin D, Torgomyan G, Zagainov V, Davydkin V, Baranov AI, Drozdov E, Anatolievna LN, Abdullaev A, Gachabayov M, Ghunaim M, Alharthi M, Aljiffry M, Bogdanovic M, Zivanovic M, Bogdanovic A, Galun D, Dugalic V, Arbutina D, Milic L, Bezmarevic M, Antic A, Radenkovic D, Ignjatovic I, Zdujic P, Kmezic S, Karamarkovic A, Arbutina D, Juloski J, Radulovic R, Radulović R, Cuk V, Jeremic L, Radojkovic M, Stojanovic M, Golijanin D, Ignjatovic MK, Protic M, Chiow A, Seng LL, Thiruchelvam N, Poh BGK, Goh BKP, Quan DCW, Koh YX, TrotovŠek B, Petrič M, Djokić M, Tomazic A, Badovinac D, Loots E, Prodehl L, Khan MU, Marumo T, Devar JWS, Omoshoro-Jones J, Khan ZA, Jugmohan B, Valcarcel AQ, García BM, Mínguez J, Marcello M, Ramia J, Compañ A, Fernandes C, Morales M, Fernández JMV, Del Mar Rico-Morales M, Liñán MÁL, Figueras J, Soliva R, Butori E, Fondevila C, Ausania F, Martín B, Rodríguez M, Sánchez-Cabús S, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Arnau ABM, Domínguez RS, Ielpo B, Pinilla FB, Castro M, Valverde DP, Santos EPG, del Carmen Manzanares Campillo M, Ruiz P, Gutierrez EC, Falgueras L, Quer MTA, Shwely FA, Fragua RL, Gonzalez-Serna DB, Valmorisco MA, Beltran-Miranda P, Busquets J, Secanella L, Pelaez N, Plaza G, Duaigües MLG, álvarez PM, Escartín A, Loinaz C, Dziakova J, de la Serna S, Pérez-Aguirre E, Justo I, Saavedra J, Gomez JC, Boñar NL, Martín-Perez E, Di Martino M, de la Hoz Rogriguez Á, Marcacuzco A, Jiménez-Romero C, de la Rúa JFR, Hinojosa-Arco LC, Suárez-Muñoz MÁ, Martinez DF, Sanchez-Bueno F, Vazquez PG, de León AM, Saiz EC, García LS, Gonzalez-Pinto I, Rodríguez-Pino JC, Segura-Sampedro JJ, Morales R, Morales-Soriano R, Rotellar F, Zozaya G, Martí-Cruchaga P, López-Sánchez J, Muñoz-Bellvis L, Cuadrado A, ortega I, Fernández R, Gómez DD, Vera V, Padillo JP, Luque JB, Millan EI, Jorba R, García-Domingot MI, Redondo C, Cantos DM, Artigues E, Pozo CDD, Llorente CP, Martínez SN, Ibáñez CB, Ibáñez JM, Andujar RL, Dorcaratto D, Forner EM, Garces-Albir M, de Heredia JB, Montes-Manrique M, Rodriguez-Lopez M, Serrablo A, Milian D, Ruiz-Quijano P, Paterna-Lopez S, Dharmapala A, Dassanayake BK, Galketiya KB, Ibrahim AM, Hamid H, Alhaboob N, Abdelmageed A, Taha SSO, Vilhav C, Wennerblom JH, Bratlie SO, Bjornsson B, Lundgren L, Sandström P, Tingstedt B, Andersson R, Andersson B, Williamsson C, Sparrelid E, Holmberg M, Ghorbani P, Gkekas I, Kuemmerli C, Bolli M, Andreou A, Wenning AS, Gloor B, Peloso A, Toso C, Oldani G, Moeckli B, Wassmer CH, Cristaudi A, Pietro MH, Majno-Hurst PE, Roesel R, Abbassi F, Tarantino I, Steffen T, Ferrari C, Schmidt J, Meier O, Weber M, Gutknecht S, Jonas JP, Clavien PA, Al-Haj A, Aljaber A, Kayali AA, Kadoura L, Nashed E, Helaly H, Kayali H, Alhashemi M, Aloulou M, Alshaghel M, Mahli N, Al-Abed O, Azizeh O, Torab SS, Alkhaleel W, Aliwy MA, Alannaz O, Ghazal A, Masri R, Douba Z, Saad AS, Abdulmonem A, Shaban M, Alhouri AN, Alhouri A, Soliman A, Houri HNA, Houri HA, Omran S, Abbas A, Chaaban M, Kudmani MAA, Chaaban MK, Alhmaidi R, Yousef A, Youssef A, Nasri M, Alkhateb H, Almjersah A, Hassan N, Moussa A, Hamdan A, Hammed A, Alloush A, Hassan BH, Issa H, Dahhan HT, Souliman M, Hammed S, Tobba TM, Hamdan A, Ayoub S, Yu MC, Yang PC, Wu CH, Bouaziz H, Rahal K, Slim S, Karim A, Baraket O, Kchaou A, Houssem A, Said MA, Mabrouk MB, Hamida KB, Ghalleb M, Mahmoud AB, Maghrebi H, Kacem MJ, Tez M, Eminesariipek N, çetiindağ Ö, Tüzüner A, Karayalçin K, Emral AC, Dikmen K, Kerem M, Bayhan H, Türkoğlu MA, Iflazoğlu N, özet A, Aday U, öfkeli Ö, Gumusoglu A, Kabuli HA, Karabulut M, Peker K, Saglam S, Rahimi FSİ, Hanefa F, Isik A, Goksoy E, Dulundu E, Atici AE, Ozocak AB, Yegen C, Dural AC, Sahbaz NA, Ulgur HS, Aydin H, Ozkan OF, Duzgun O, çelik M, Pekmezci S, çoker A, Uguz A, Unalp OV, Sert I, Ertekin S, Ozbilgin M, Aydoğan S, Tekin E, Calik B, Yesilyurt D, Atici SD, Arıkan TB, Arıkan T, Gonullu E, Dikicier E, Capoglu R, Bayhan Z, Alfurais S, Colak E, Polat S, Çiftci AB, Milburn J, Jones C, Vass D, Taylor M, Dasari BVM, Kausar A, Sultana A, Subar D, Nunes Q, Skipworth J, Nwogwugwu O, van Laarhoven S, Kourdouli A, Awan AA, Bhatti I, Latif J, Hand F, Robertson F, Holroyd D, Holroyd D, Jamieson N, Lim W, Chang D, Frampton A, Lahiri R, Chakravartty S, Siddique H, Bashir M, Mcnally S, Young A, Smith A, Pine J, Garcea G, Haqq J, Malde D, Dunne D, Burridge I, Szatmary P, Hariharan D, Kocher H, Yip V, Khalil A, Nair AM, Liova I, O'Balogun A, Rothnie A, Chikkala B, Salinas CH, Frola C, Tsakiris C, Raptis D, Chasiotis D, Sharma D, Jessa F, Soggiu F, Fusai G, Kostakis I, Kathirvel M, Elnagar M, Dimitrokallis N, Iype S, Pericleous S, Mohamed A, Val ARD, Tinguely P, Likos-Corbett M, Afzal I, Bhogal R, Patel K, Siriwardena AK, de' Liguori Carino N, Sheen PA, Gareb F, Ammar K, Thakkar R, Pandanaboyana S, Leeds J, Gomez D, Gregory G, Ceresa C, Abbas H, Lazzereschi L, Reddy S, Gordon-Weeks A, Aroori S, Russell T, Roberts K, Chatzizacharias N, Sutcliffe R, Al-Sarireh B, Shingler G, Mortimer M, Skoryi D, Ilin I, Pisetska M, Cheverdiuk D, Kostyantyn K, Kopchak K, Kvasivka O, Valeriia S, Sumarokova V, Kryzhevskyi V, Sikachov S, Khomiak A, Malik A, Khomiak I, Bilyak A, Chooklin S, Chuklin S, Mikheiev I, Shylenko O, Klymenko A, Patel S, Cunningham S, Callery M, Kent T, Raut C, Wang J, Fairweather M, Sulciner M, Hirji S, Clancy T, Nebbia M, Qadan M, Musser A, Hogg M, Rodriquez J, Hamner J, Hennessy L, Dinerman A, Gupta A, Kimbrough C, Thompson R, Zeh HJ, Radi I, Polanco PM, Moris D, Lidsky ME, Lee D, Piper J, Gnerlich J, Tuvin D, Sticca R, Ganai S, Gusani N, Krinock D, Giorgakis E, Hardgrave H, Spencer-Cole RT, Klutts G, Hardgrave H, Nigh J, Nigh J, Andrade JCB, Mavros M, Osborn T, Ferrone C, O'Connor V, Boone B, Harris B, Schmidt C, Schrope B, Chabot J, Kluger M, Lasso ET, Nevler A, Yeo C, Ponzini F, Lavu H, Lamm R, Bowne W, Kyser N, Galanopoulos C, Abbasi A, Park J, Sham J, Dickerson L, Pillarisetty V, Sucandy I, Ross S, Winslow E, Hawksworth J, Radkani P, Fishbein T, Munoz AS, Lindberg J, Martins PN, Al-saban RAM, Al-Saban R, Al-Kubati W, Ghallab AAA, Alsanany GM, Almarashi H, Al-Samawi H, Al-Asadi MAMM, Alsayadi R, Hail S, Shream S, Bajjah HM, Al-Ameri S, Bajjah H, Al-Ameri SAAS, Al-Dowsh NA, AlDowsh NA, Al-Khawlani Q, Murshed YAA, Al-Shehari M, Jahaf AAD, Al-sharabi EAE, Aldumaini H, Alattas Z, Almassaudi A, Bajjah HMAH, Albakry R, Al-Naggar H, Shream SAA, Affary AA, Al-Markiz E, Al-Eryani F, Farhat H, Qadasi QA, Alwafy K, Abdualqader MYM, Ali RAAY, Albar A, Bleem HA, Galeb KSA, Ghushaim M, Sabbar M, Esmail M, Ali RAY, Salem RHM, Salem R, Saif W, Al-Faiq S, Alsharabi E, Hameed ATA, Almekhlafi T, Omairan A, Almarkiz E, Abduljawad H, Mansaleh O, Al-Melhani W, Abdualqader M, Al-Abdi R, Alwan HM, Mbanje C, Chihaka O. Pancreatic surgery outcomes: multicentre prospective snapshot study in 67 countries. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad330. [PMID: 38743040 PMCID: PMC10771125 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic surgery remains associated with high morbidity rates. Although postoperative mortality appears to have improved with specialization, the outcomes reported in the literature reflect the activity of highly specialized centres. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following pancreatic surgery worldwide. METHODS This was an international, prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional snapshot study of consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic operations worldwide in a 3-month interval in 2021. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality within 90 days of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore relationships with Human Development Index (HDI) and other parameters. RESULTS A total of 4223 patients from 67 countries were analysed. A complication of any severity was detected in 68.7 per cent of patients (2901 of 4223). Major complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade at least IIIa) were 24, 18, and 27 per cent, and mortality rates were 10, 5, and 5 per cent in low-to-middle-, high-, and very high-HDI countries respectively. The 90-day postoperative mortality rate was 5.4 per cent (229 of 4223) overall, but was significantly higher in the low-to-middle-HDI group (adjusted OR 2.88, 95 per cent c.i. 1.80 to 4.48). The overall failure-to-rescue rate was 21 per cent; however, it was 41 per cent in low-to-middle- compared with 19 per cent in very high-HDI countries. CONCLUSION Excess mortality in low-to-middle-HDI countries could be attributable to failure to rescue of patients from severe complications. The authors call for a collaborative response from international and regional associations of pancreatic surgeons to address management related to death from postoperative complications to tackle the global disparities in the outcomes of pancreatic surgery (NCT04652271; ISRCTN95140761).
Collapse
|
36
|
Li Z, Zhuo Q, Li B, Liu M, Chen C, Shi Y, Xu W, Liu W, Ji S, Yu X, Xu X. Feasibility of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:1. [PMID: 38169384 PMCID: PMC10759588 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03277-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no evidence supporting the feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS The clinical data of consecutive patients with borderline resectable PDAC who received NACT and underwent either LPD or OPD between January 2020 and December 2022 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS The analysis included 57 patients in the OPD group and 20 in the LPD group. Following NACT, the LPD group exhibited a higher median CA19-9 decrease rate compared to the OPD group (85.3% vs. 66.9%, P = 0.042). Furthermore, 3 anatomically borderline PDACs in the LPD group and 5 in the OPD group were downstaged into resectable status (30.0% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.069). According to RECIST criteria, 51 (66.2%) patients in the entire cohort were evaluated as having stable disease. The median operation time for the LPD group was longer than the OPD group (419 vs. 325 min, P < 0.001), while the venous resection rate was 35.0% vs. 43.9%, respectively (P = 0.489). There was no difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, with a median number of 18.5 in the LPD group and 22 in the OPD group, and the R1 margin rate (15.0% vs. 12.3%) was also comparable. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo complications (35.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.018) was lower in the LPD group compared to the OPD group. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that a tumor diameter > 3 cm before NACT (HR 2.185) and poor tumor differentiation (HR 1.805) were independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival, and a decrease rate of CA19-9 > 70% (OR 0.309) was a protective factor for early tumor recurrence and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS LPD for PDAC following NACT is feasible and oncologically equivalent to OPD. Effective control of CA19-9 levels is beneficial in reducing early tumor recurrence and improving overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qifeng Zhuo
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Borui Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Mengqi Liu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yihua Shi
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wenyan Xu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wensheng Liu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Shunrong Ji
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Xiaowu Xu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kolbeinsson HM, Chandana S, Wright GP, Chung M. Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Current Treatment and Novel Therapies. J INVEST SURG 2023; 36:2129884. [PMID: 36191926 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2129884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes for cancer-related deaths in the United States. Majority of patients present with unresectable or metastatic disease. For those that present with localized disease, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to maximize survival and optimize outcomes. The quality and safety of surgery for pancreatic cancer have improved in recent years with increasing adoption of minimally invasive techniques and surgical adjuncts. Systemic chemotherapy has also evolved to impact survival. It is now increasingly being utilized in the neoadjuvant setting, often with concomitant radiation. Increased utilization of genomic testing in metastatic pancreatic cancer has led to better understanding of their biology, thereby allowing clinicians to consider potential targeted therapies. Similarly, targeted agents such as PARP inhibitors and immune checkpoint- inhibitors have emerged with promising results. In summary, pancreatic cancer remains a disease with poor long-term survival. However, recent developments have led to improved outcomes and have changed practice in the past decade. This review summarizes current practices in pancreatic cancer treatment and the milestones that brought us to where we are today, along with emerging therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hordur Mar Kolbeinsson
- Spectrum Health General Surgery Residency, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Sreenivasa Chandana
- Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Cancer and Hematology Centers of Western Michigan, PC, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - G Paul Wright
- Spectrum Health General Surgery Residency, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Spectrum Health Medical Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Mathew Chung
- Spectrum Health General Surgery Residency, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Spectrum Health Medical Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Perri G, Marchegiani G, Partelli S, Andreasi V, Luchini C, Bariani E, Bannone E, Fermi F, Mattiolo P, Falconi M, Salvia R, Bassi C. Either High or Low Risk: The Acinar Score at the Resection Margin Dichotomizes the Risk Spectrum of Pancreas-specific Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1242-e1249. [PMID: 37325905 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic acinar content (Ac) has been associated with pancreas-specific complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. The aim of this study was to improve the prediction ability of intraoperative risk stratification by integrating the pancreatic acinar score. METHODS A training and validation cohort underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with a subsequent histologic assessment of pancreatic section margins for Ac, fibrosis (Fc), and fat. Intraoperative risk stratification (pancreatic texture, duct diameter) and pancreas-specific complications (postoperative hyperamylasemia [POH], postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis [PPAP], pancreatic fistula [POPF]) were classified according to ISGPS definitions. RESULTS In the validation cohort (n= 373), the association of pancreas-specific complications with higher Ac and lower Fc was replicated (all P <0.001). In the entire cohort (n= 761), the ISGPS classification allocated 275 (36%) patients into intermediate-risk classes B (POH 32%/PPAP 3%/POPF 17%) and C (POH 36%/PPAP 9%/POPF 33%). Using the acinar score (Ac ≥60% and/or Fc ≤10%), intermediate-risk patients could be dichotomized into a low-risk (POH 5%/PPAP 1%/POPF 6%) and a high-risk (POH 51%/PPAP 9%/POPF 38%) group (all P <0.001). The acinar score AUC for POPF prediction was 0.70 in the ISGPS intermediate-risk classes. Overall, 239 (31%) patients were relocated into the high-risk group from lower ISGPS risk classes using the acinar score. CONCLUSIONS The risk of pancreas-specific complications appears to be dichotomous-either high or low-according to the acinar score, a tool to better target the application of mitigation strategies in cases of intermediate macroscopic features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giampaolo Perri
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Andreasi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Division of Pathology, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Bariani
- Division of Pathology, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisa Bannone
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Fermi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Mattiolo
- Division of Pathology, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
McCarron FN, Yoshino O, Müller PC, Wang H, Wang Y, Ricker A, Mantha R, Driedger M, Beckman M, Clavien PA, Vrochides D, Martinie JB. Expanding the utility of robotics for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 10-year review and comparison to international benchmarks in pancreatic surgery. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9591-9600. [PMID: 37749202 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10426-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is an emerging alternative to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Although RPD offers various theoretical advantages, it is used in less than 10% of all pancreaticoduodenectomies. The aim of this study was to report our 10-year experience and compare RPD outcomes with international benchmarks for OPD. METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional database was performed of consecutive patients who underwent RPD between January 2011 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into low-risk and high-risk groups according to the selection criteria set by the benchmark study. Their outcomes were compared to the international benchmark cut off values. Outcomes were then evaluated over time to identify improvements in practice and establish a learning curve. RESULTS Of 201 RPDs, 36 were low-risk and 165 high-risk patients. Compared to the OPD benchmarks, outcomes of low-risk patients were within the cutoff values. High-risk patients were outside the cutoff for blood transfusions (26% vs. ≤ 23%), overall complications (78% vs. ≤ 73%), grade I-II complications (68% vs. ≤ 62%), and readmissions (22% vs ≤ 21%). Oncologic outcomes for high-risk patients were within benchmark cutoffs. Cases at the end of the learning curve included more pancreatic cancer (42% from 17%) and fewer low-risk patients (10% from 24%) than those at the beginning. After 41 RPD there was a decline in conversion rates and operative time. Between 95 and 143 cases operative time, transfusion rates, and LOS declined significantly. Complications did not differ over time. CONCLUSION RPD yields results comparable to the established benchmarks in OPD in both low- and high-risk patients. Along the learning curve, RPD evolved with the inclusion of more high-risk cases while outcomes remained within benchmarks. Addition of a robotic HPB surgery fellowship did not compromise outcomes. These results suggest that RPD may be an option for high-risk patients at specialized centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances N McCarron
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Dr., Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 2820, USA.
| | - Osamu Yoshino
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Philip C Müller
- Department of Surgery, Swiss HPB and Transplantation Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Huaping Wang
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Center for Surgical Outcomes, Wake Forest Center for Biomedical Informatics, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Yifan Wang
- Division of HPB and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ansley Ricker
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Rohit Mantha
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Michael Driedger
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Michael Beckman
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery, Swiss HPB and Transplantation Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - John B Martinie
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Alaimo L, Moazzam Z, Lima HA, Endo Y, Ruzzenente A, Guglielmi A, Ratti F, Aldrighetti L, Weiss M, Bauer TW, Alexandrescu S, Popescu I, Poultsides GA, Maithel SK, Marques HP, Martel G, Pulitano C, Shen F, Cauchy F, Koerkamp BG, Endo I, Kitago M, Aucejo F, Sasaki K, Fields RC, Hugh T, Lam V, Pawlik TM. An attempt to establish and apply global benchmarks for liver resection of malignant hepatic tumors. Surgery 2023; 174:1384-1392. [PMID: 37741777 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benchmarking is a process of continuous self-evaluation and comparison with best-in-class hospitals to guide quality improvement initiatives. We sought to define global benchmarks relative to liver resection for malignancy and to assess their achievement in hospitals in the United States. METHODS Patients who underwent curative-intent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, or colorectal or neuroendocrine liver metastases between 2000 and 2019 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics between open and minimally invasive approaches. Best-in-class hospitals were defined relative to the achievement rate of textbook oncologic outcomes and case volume. Benchmark values were established relative to best-in-class institutions. The achievement of benchmark values among hospitals in the National Cancer Database was then assessed. RESULTS Among 2,624 patients treated at 20 centers, a majority underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1,609, 61.3%), followed by colorectal liver metastases (n = 650, 24.8%), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 299, 11.4%), and neuroendocrine liver metastases (n = 66, 2.5%). Notably, 1,947 (74.2%) patients achieved a textbook oncologic outcome. After propensity score matching, 6 best-in-class hospitals with the highest textbook oncologic outcome rates (≥75.0%) were identified. Benchmark values were calculated for margin positivity (≤11.7%), 30-day readmission (≤4.1%), 30-day mortality (≤1.6%), minor postoperative complications (≤24.7%), severe complications (≤12.4%), and failure to achieve the textbook oncologic outcome (≤22.8%). Among the National Cancer Database hospitals, global benchmarks for margin positivity, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, severe complications, and textbook oncologic outcome failure were achieved in 62.9%, 27.1%, 12.1%, 7.1%, and 29.3% of centers, respectively. CONCLUSION These global benchmarks may help identify hospitals that may benefit from quality improvement initiatives, aiming to improve patient safety and surgical oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Zorays Moazzam
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Henrique A Lima
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Todd W Bauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Irinel Popescu
- Department of Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Hugo P Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Carlo Pulitano
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Federico Aucejo
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH
| | | | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Tom Hugh
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vincent Lam
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Karunakaran M, Roulin D, Ullah S, Shrikhande SV, De Boer HD, Demartines N, Barreto SG. Global Perceptions on ERAS ® in Pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg 2023; 47:2977-2989. [PMID: 37787776 PMCID: PMC10694106 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07198-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uptake of ERAS® pathways for pancreatic surgery have been slow and impacted by low compliance. OBJECTIVE To explore global awareness, perceptions and practice of ERAS® peri-pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS A structured, web-based survey (EPSILON) was administered through the ERAS® society and IHPBA membership. RESULTS The 140 respondents included predominantly males (86.4%), from Europe (45%), practicing surgery (95%) at academic/teaching hospitals (63.6%) over a period of 10-20 years (38.6%). Most respondents identified themselves as general surgeons (68.6%) with 40.7% reporting an annual PD volume of 20-50 cases, practicing post-PD clinical pathways (37.9%), with 31.4% of respondents auditing their outcomes annually. Reduced medical complications, cost and hospital length of stay, and improved patient satisfaction were perceived benefits of compliance to enhancing-recovery. Multidisciplinary co-ordination was considered the most important factor in the implementation and sustainability of peri-PD ERAS® pathways, while reluctance to change among health care practitioners, difficulties in data collection and audit, lack of administrative support, and recruitment of an ERAS® dedicated nurse were reported to be important barriers. CONCLUSIONS The EPSILON survey highlighted global clinician perceptions regarding the benefits of compliance to peri-PD ERAS®, the importance of individual components, perceived facilitators and barriers, to the implementation and sustainability of these pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monish Karunakaran
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, 500 032, India
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Didier Roulin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV and University of Lausanne UNIL, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Shahid Ullah
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, 400085, India
| | - Hans D De Boer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV and University of Lausanne UNIL, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Savio George Barreto
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, 500 032, India.
- Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Center, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Liu Q, Dai M, Guo J, Wu H, Wang W, Chen G, Hu Y, Han X, Xu Q, Zhang X, Yang S, Zhang Y, Kleeff J, Liao Q, Wu W, Liang Z, Zhang T, Zhao Y. Long-term Survival, Quality of Life, and Molecular Features of the Patients With Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Retrospective Study of 454 Cases. Ann Surg 2023; 278:1009-1017. [PMID: 37036095 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present comprehensive information on the clinicopathological, molecular, survival characteristics, and quality of life (QOL) after surgery for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas in a large cohort after long-term follow-up. BACKGROUND SPN is a rare tumor with an uncertain malignant potential, and solid information on long-term prognosis and QOL remains limited. METHODS All hospitalized patients with SPNs who underwent surgery between 2001 and 2021 at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were retrieved. A cross-sectional telephone questionnaire was administered to inquire about the QOL. Molecular analyses were performed using whole-exome sequencing. RESULTS Exactly 454 patients with SPN were enrolled, of whom 18.5% were males and 81.5% were females. The mean patient age was 31 ± 12 years. In total, 61.3% of the patients had no symptoms. The size of the tumors was 5.38 ± 3.70 cm; 83.4% were solid cystic tumors, and 40.1% had calcifications. The proportions of local resection, distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without pylorus preservation were 29.7%, 28.9% or 22.9%, and 11% or 6.8%, respectively. Over the years, there has been a significant shift from open to minimally invasive surgery. Among all surgical procedures, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) had the highest incidence of grade 2 to 4 complications (up to 32.3%), compared with 6.7% in distal pancreatectomy ( P < 0.001). Regarding histopathology, tissue invasion, perineural invasion, cancerous microvascular emboli, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were present in 16.5%, 2.2%, 0.7%, 2.0%, and 3.1% of patients, respectively. Sixty patients were lost to follow-up. Sixteen of the 390 patients who underwent resection (4.1%) experienced local recurrence or distant metastasis after surgery. In total, 361 patients responded to the telephone survey. Nearly 80% of patients claimed their QOL was not significantly affected after surgery; however, the remaining 20% complained of lower QOL during 3 to 6 years of follow-up after surgery. No clinicopathological factor could reliably predict clinical recurrence or metastasis after resection. A total of 28 driver genes were detected with mutations in at least 2 tumor samples and the top 3 frequently mutated genes were CTNNB1 , ATRNL1 , and MUC16 . CONCLUSIONS This study presented the largest cohort of patients with SPN after surgery from a single center and reported the QOL of these patients. SPN is associated with extremely favorable long-term survival, even in patients with metastasis, and most patients have a good QOL after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaofei Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Menghua Dai
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Junchao Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Huanwen Wu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Weibin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Ge Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Ya Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Xianlin Han
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Sen Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Yalu Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Jorg Kleeff
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Quan Liao
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Wenming Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyong Liang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Taiping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Yupei Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zwart MJ, van den Broek B, de Graaf N, Suurmeijer JA, Augustinus S, te Riele WW, van Santvoort HC, Hagendoorn J, Borel Rinkes IH, van Dam JL, Takagi K, Tran KT, Schreinemakers J, van der Schelling G, Wijsman JH, de Wilde RF, Festen S, Daams F, Luyer MD, de Hingh IH, Mieog JS, Bonsing BA, Lips DJ, Abu Hilal M, Busch OR, Saint-Marc O, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Hogg ME, Koerkamp BG, Molenaar IQ, Besselink MG. The Feasibility, Proficiency, and Mastery Learning Curves in 635 Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies Following a Multicenter Training Program: "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants". Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1232-e1241. [PMID: 37288547 PMCID: PMC10631507 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in "second-generation" RPD centers following a multicenter training program adhering to the IDEAL framework. BACKGROUND The long learning curves for RPD reported from "pioneering" expert centers may discourage centers interested in starting an RPD program. However, the feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves may be shorter in "second-generation" centers that participated in dedicated RPD training programs, although data are lacking. We report on the learning curves for RPD in "second-generation" centers trained in a dedicated nationwide program. METHODS Post hoc analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing RPD in 7 centers that participated in the LAELAPS-3 training program, each with a minimum annual volume of 50 pancreatoduodenectomies, using the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (March 2016-December 2021). Cumulative sum analysis determined cutoffs for the 3 learning curves: operative time for the feasibility (1) risk-adjusted major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) for the proficiency, (2) and textbook outcome for the mastery, (3) learning curve. Outcomes before and after the cutoffs were compared for the proficiency and mastery learning curves. A survey was used to assess changes in practice and the most valued "lessons learned." RESULTS Overall, 635 RPD were performed by 17 trained surgeons, with a conversion rate of 6.6% (n=42). The median annual volume of RPD per center was 22.5±6.8. From 2016 to 2021, the nationwide annual use of RPD increased from 0% to 23% whereas the use of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy decreased from 15% to 0%. The rate of major complications was 36.9% (n=234), surgical site infection 6.3% (n=40), postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) 26.9% (n=171), and 30-day/in-hospital mortality 3.5% (n=22). Cutoffs for the feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves were reached at 15, 62, and 84 RPD. Major morbidity and 30-day/in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly before and after the cutoffs for the proficiency and mastery learning curves. Previous experience in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy shortened the feasibility (-12 RPDs, -44%), proficiency (-32 RPDs, -34%), and mastery phase learning curve (-34 RPDs, -23%), but did not improve clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS The feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves for RPD at 15, 62, and 84 procedures in "second-generation" centers after a multicenter training program were considerably shorter than previously reported from "pioneering" expert centers. The learning curve cutoffs and prior laparoscopic experience did not impact major morbidity and mortality. These findings demonstrate the safety and value of a nationwide training program for RPD in centers with sufficient volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurice J.W. Zwart
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bram van den Broek
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nine de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Institute, Brescia, Italy
| | - José A. Suurmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simone Augustinus
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter W. te Riele
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacob L. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kosei Takagi
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Khé T.C. Tran
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jan H. Wijsman
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Center, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Roeland F. de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan S.D. Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A. Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J. Lips
- Department of Surgery, Twente Medical Spectrum, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Mohamed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Institute, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Olivier R. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Herbert J. Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Amer H. Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Melissa E. Hogg
- Department of Surgery, Northshore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL
| | - Bas G. Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Isaac Q. Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Morita Y, Sakaguchi T, Matsumoto A, Ida S, Muraki R, Kitajima R, Furuhashi S, Takeda M, Kikuchi H, Hiramatsu Y, Takeuchi H. The cholinesterase and C-reactive protein score is a potential predictor of pseudoaneurysm formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with soft pancreas. BMC Surg 2023; 23:344. [PMID: 37964345 PMCID: PMC10647161 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02211-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pseudoaneurysm (PA) rupture after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a life-threatening complication. Most PA cases originate from postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs). Although several risk factors for POPF have been identified, specific risk factors for PA formation remain unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed PD cases with soft pancreas and proposed a novel strategy for early detection of PA formation. METHODS Overall, 120 patients underwent PD between 2010 and 2020 at our institution; of these, 65 patients with soft pancreas were enrolled. We evaluated the clinicopathological factors influencing PA formation and developed a risk score to predict PA formation. RESULTS In total, 11 of the 65 patients developed PAs (PA formation group: PAG), and 8 of these 11 PAs ruptured. The median time to PA formation was 15 days, with a minimum of 5 days. The PAG was significantly older than the non-PA formation group, were predominantly men, and had comorbid diabetes mellitus. Pre- and intra-operative findings were similar between the two groups. Importantly, no significant differences were found in postoperative drain amylase levels and total drain amylase content. Cholinesterase and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on postoperative day (POD) 3 were significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that cholinesterase ≤ 112 U/L and CRP ≥ 16.0 mg/dl on POD 3 were independent predictors of PA formation. CONCLUSIONS Decreased cholinesterase and elevated CRP on POD 3 (Cho-C score) are useful predictors of PA formation in cases with soft pancreas. In such cases, periodic computed tomography evaluations and strict drain management are necessary to prevent life-threatening hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshifumi Morita
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan.
- Division of Surgical care, Morimachi, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
| | | | - Akio Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Shinya Ida
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Ryuta Muraki
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Ryo Kitajima
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Satoru Furuhashi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Makoto Takeda
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Kikuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Hiramatsu
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
- Department of Perioperative Functioning Care & Support, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroya Takeuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Marchegiani G, Perri G, Reich F, Procida G, Bannone E, Salvia R, Bassi C. Blood loss predicts pancreas-specific complications only in high-risk patients: results of a prospective and systematic blood loss estimation during pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1632-1636. [PMID: 37406083 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Perri
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Federico Reich
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppa Procida
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisa Bannone
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Augustinus S, Mackay TM, Andersson B, Beane JD, Busch OR, Gleeson EM, Koerkamp BG, Keck T, van Santvoort HC, Tingstedt B, Wellner UF, Williamsson C, Besselink MG, Pitt HA. Ideal Outcome After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Transatlantic Evaluation of a Harmonized Composite Outcome Measure. Ann Surg 2023; 278:740-747. [PMID: 37476990 PMCID: PMC10549886 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to define and assess Ideal Outcome in the national or multicenter registries of North America, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. BACKGROUND Assessing outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy among centers and countries requires a broad evaluation that cannot be captured by a single parameter. Previously, 2 composite outcome measures (textbook outcome and optimal pancreatic surgery) for pancreatoduodenectomy have been described from Europe and the United States. These composites were harmonized into ideal outcome (IO). METHODS This analysis is a transatlantic retrospective study (2018-2020) of patients after pancreatoduodenectomy within the registries from North America, Germany, The Netherlands, and Sweden. After 3 consensus meetings, IO for pancreatoduodenectomy was defined as the absence of all 6 parameters: (1) in-hospital mortality, (2) severe complications-Clavien-Dindo ≥3, (3) postoperative pancreatic fistula-International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) grade B/C, (4) reoperation, (5) hospital stay >75th percentile, and (6) readmission. Outcomes were evaluated using relative largest difference (RLD) and absolute largest difference (ALD), and multivariate regression models. RESULTS Overall, 21,036 patients after pancreatoduodenectomy were included, of whom 11,194 (54%) reached IO. The rate of IO varied between 55% in North America, 53% in Germany, 52% in The Netherlands, and 54% in Sweden (RLD: 1.1, ALD: 3%, P <0.001). Individual components varied with an ALD of 2% length of stay, 4% for in-hospital mortality, 12% severe complications, 10% postoperative pancreatic fistula, 11% reoperation, and 9% readmission. Age, sex, absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, body mass index, performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, biliary drainage, absence of vascular resection, and histologic diagnosis were associated with IO. In the subgroup of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, country, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy also was associated with improved IO. CONCLUSIONS The newly developed composite outcome measure "Ideal Outcome" can be used for auditing and comparing outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. The observed differences can be used to guide collaborative initiatives to further improve the outcomes of pancreatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Augustinus
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tara M. Mackay
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Joal D. Beane
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Olivier R. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bas G. Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Keck
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ulrich F. Wellner
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Caroline Williamsson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henry A. Pitt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sousa Da Silva RX, Breuer E, Shankar S, Kawakatsu S, Hołówko W, Santos Coelho J, Jeddou H, Sugiura T, Ghallab M, Da Silva D, Watanabe G, Botea F, Sakai N, Addeo P, Tzedakis S, Bartsch F, Balcer K, Lim C, Werey F, Lopez-Lopez V, Peralta Montero L, Sanchez Claria R, Leiting J, Vachharajani N, Hopping E, Torres OJM, Hirano S, Andel D, Hagendoorn J, Psica A, Ravaioli M, Ahn KS, Reese T, Montes LA, Gunasekaran G, Alcázar C, Lim JH, Haroon M, Lu Q, Castaldi A, Orimo T, Moeckli B, Abadía T, Ruffolo L, Dib Hasan J, Ratti F, Kauffmann EF, de Wilde RF, Polak WG, Boggi U, Aldrighetti L, McCormack L, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Serrablo A, Toso C, Taketomi A, Gugenheim J, Dong J, Hanif F, Park JS, Ramia JM, Schwartz M, Ramisch D, De Oliveira ML, Oldhafer KJ, Kang KJ, Cescon M, Lodge P, Rinkes IHMB, Noji T, Thomson JE, Goh SK, Chapman WC, Cleary SP, Pekolj J, Regimbeau JM, Scatton O, Truant S, Lang H, Fuks D, Bachellier P, Ohtsuka M, Popescu I, Hasegawa K, Lesurtel M, Adam R, Cherqui D, Uesaka K, Boudjema K, Pinto-Marques H, Grąt M, Petrowsky H, Ebata T, Prachalias A, Robles-Campos R, Clavien PA. Novel Benchmark Values for Open Major Anatomic Liver Resection in Non-cirrhotic Patients: A Multicentric Study of 44 International Expert Centers. Ann Surg 2023; 278:748-755. [PMID: 37465950 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities. BACKGROUND Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures. METHODS A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016-2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient. RESULTS Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI ® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months. CONCLUSION These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard X Sousa Da Silva
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eva Breuer
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sadhana Shankar
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Shoji Kawakatsu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Wacław Hołówko
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - João Santos Coelho
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Centre, Curry Cabral Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Heithem Jeddou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Teiichi Sugiura
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Mohammed Ghallab
- Paul Brousse Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Doris Da Silva
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Genki Watanabe
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Florin Botea
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nozomu Sakai
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Pietro Addeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Fabian Bartsch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kaja Balcer
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille, France
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Fabien Werey
- Department of Oncology and Digestive Surgery, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Victor Lopez-Lopez
- Clinic and University Virgen de la Arrixaca Hospital, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - Luciana Peralta Montero
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, General Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sanchez Claria
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, General Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jennifer Leiting
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Neeta Vachharajani
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Organ Transplant, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Eve Hopping
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide & Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Orlando J M Torres
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Presidente Dutra Hospital, São Luiz, Brazil
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Daan Andel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alicja Psica
- Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Matteo Ravaioli
- Hepato-biliary surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Keun Soon Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Tim Reese
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Leonardo A Montes
- General Surgery Department Liver, Pancreas and Intestinal Transplant Unit, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ganesh Gunasekaran
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Service, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Cándido Alcázar
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Transplant Unit, General Universitary Hospital Alicante and Health and Biomedical Research Institute of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Jin Hong Lim
- Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Muhammad Haroon
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant, Bahria International Hospital Orchard, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Qian Lu
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Antonio Castaldi
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Tatsuya Orimo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Beat Moeckli
- Division of Abdominal and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Teresa Abadía
- HPB Surgical Division, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Luis Ruffolo
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Josefina Dib Hasan
- Transplant Unit, Hospital Aleman de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucas McCormack
- Transplant Unit, Hospital Aleman de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Alejandro Serrablo
- HPB Surgical Division, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Christian Toso
- Division of Abdominal and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Jean Gugenheim
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Faisal Hanif
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant, Bahria International Hospital Orchard, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Joon Seong Park
- Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - José M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Transplant Unit, General Universitary Hospital Alicante and Health and Biomedical Research Institute of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Myron Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Service, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Diego Ramisch
- General Surgery Department Liver, Pancreas and Intestinal Transplant Unit, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michelle L De Oliveira
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karl J Oldhafer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Koo Jeong Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Hepato-biliary surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Peter Lodge
- Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Takehiro Noji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - John-Edwin Thomson
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide & Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Su Kah Goh
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide & Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | - William C Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Organ Transplant, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, General Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- Department of Oncology and Digestive Surgery, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille, France
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Irinel Popescu
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - René Adam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Paul Brousse Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Hugo Pinto-Marques
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Centre, Curry Cabral Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michał Grąt
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
McCarron FN, Vrochides D, Martinie JB. Current progress in robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery at a high-volume center. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:863-870. [PMID: 37927925 PMCID: PMC10623982 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been steady growth in the adoption of robotic HPB procedures world-wide over the past 20 years, but most of this increase has occurred only recently. Not surprisingly, the vast majority of robotics has been in the United States, with very few, select centers of adoption in Italy, South Korea, and Brazil, to name a few. We began our robotic HPB program in 2008, well before almost all other centers in the world, with the most notable exception of Giullianotti and colleagues. Our program began gradually, with smaller cases carefully selected to optimize the strengths of the original robotic platform and included complex biliary and pancreatic resections. We performed the first reported series of choledochojejunostomy for benign biliary strictures and first series of completion cholecystectomies. We began performing robotic distal pancreatectomies and longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomies, reporting our early experience for each of these procedures. Over time we progressed to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies. Initially, these were performed with planned conversions until we were able to optimize efficiency. Now we have performed over 200 robotic whipples, reaching a 100% robotic completion rate by 2020. Finally, we have added robotic major hepatectomies, including resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma to our repertoire. Since the program began, we have performed over 1600 robotic HPB cases. Outcomes from our program have shown superior lymph node harvest, lower DGE rates, shorter hospitalizations, and fewer rehab admissions with similar overall complications to open and laparoscopic procedures, signifying that over time a robotic HPB program is not only feasible but advantageous as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances N. McCarron
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas SurgeryCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas SurgeryCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - John B. Martinie
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas SurgeryCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chiche L, Yang HK, Abbassi F, Robles-Campos R, Stain SC, Ko CY, Neumayer LA, Pawlik TM, Barkun JS, Clavien PA. Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery. Ann Surg 2023; 278:647-654. [PMID: 37555327 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This forum summarizes the proceedings of the joint European Surgical Association (ESA)/American Surgical Association (ASA) symposium on Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery that took place in Bordeaux, France, as part of the celebrations of the 30th anniversary of the ESA. Three presentations focused on a) the main messages from the Outcome4Medicine Consensus Conference, which took place in Zurich, Switzerland, in June 2022, b) the patient perspective, and c) benchmarking were hold by ESA members and discussed by ASA members in a symposium attended by members of both associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Han-Kwang Yang
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | - Clifford Y Ko
- University of California at Los Angeles and the American College of Surgeons, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Leigh A Neumayer
- University of Florida, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Jeffrey S Barkun
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kawakatsu S, Mizuno T, Yamaguchi J, Watanabe N, Onoe S, Sunagawa M, Baba T, Igami T, Yokoyama Y, Imaizumi T, Ebata T. The Goal of Intraoperative Blood Loss in Major Hepatobiliary Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Saving Patients From a Heavy Complication Burden. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1035-e1040. [PMID: 37051914 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the goal of intraoperative blood loss in hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. BACKGROUND Although massive bleeding can negatively affect the postoperative course, the target value of intraoperative bleeding to reduce its adverse impact is unknown. METHODS Patients who underwent major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2010 and 2019 were included. Intraoperative blood loss was adjusted for body weight [adjusted blood loss (aBL)], and the overall postoperative complications were evaluated by the comprehensive complication index (CCI). The impact of aBL on CCI was assessed by the restricted cubic spline regression. RESULTS A total of 425 patients were included. The median aBL was 17.8 (interquartile range, 11.8-26.3) mL/kg, and the CCI was 40.6 (33.7-49.5). Sixty-three (14.8%) patients had an aBL<10 mL/kg, nearly half (45.4%) of the patients were in the range of 10 ≤aBL<20 mL/kg, and 37 (8.7%) patients had an aBL >40 mL/kg. The spline regression analysis showed a nonlinear incremental association between aBL and CCI; CCI remained flat with an aBL under 10 mL/kg; increased significantly with an aBL ranging from 10 to 20 mL/kg; grew gradually with an aBL over 20 mL/kg. These inflection points of ~10 and 20 mL/kg were almost consistent with the cutoff values identified by the recursive partitioning technique. After adjusting for other risk factors for the postoperative course, the spline regression identified a similar model. CONCLUSIONS aBL had a nonlinear aggravating effect on CCI after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The primary goal of aBL should be <10 mL/kg to minimize CCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoji Kawakatsu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Junpei Yamaguchi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Watanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Onoe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masaki Sunagawa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Taisuke Baba
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Igami
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yokoyama
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takahiro Imaizumi
- Department of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|