Factors Predicting Risk for Antibody-mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Highly Human Leukocyte Antigen Sensitized Patients Transplanted After Desensitization

Bortezomib for antibody-mediated rejection of kidney transplant in youth: Associations with donor-specific antibody

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection is one of the most significant risk factors for allograft dysfunction and failure in children and adolescents with kidney transplants, yet optimal treatment remains unidentified. To date, there are mixed findings regarding the use of Bortezomib, a plasma cell apoptosis inducer, as an adjunct therapy in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection.

METHODS

In a retrospective single center study, we reviewed the efficacy and tolerability of bortezomib as adjunct therapy for treatment-refractory antibody-mediated rejection.

RESULTS

Six patients with a median age of 14.6 years (range 6.9-20.1 years) received bortezomib at a mean of 71 months (range 15-83 months) post-kidney transplant. Four patients experienced decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from 4% to 42%. One patient started bortezomib while on hemodialysis and did not recover graft function, and another patient progressed to hemodialysis 6 months after receiving bortezomib. Although DSA did not completely resolve, there was a statistically significant decline in DSA MFI pre and 12-months post-BZ (p = .012, paired t-test) for the subjects who were not on dialysis at the time of bortezomib. Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) score of ≥3 was seen in all six subjects at their biopsy prior to therapy. No adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Bortezomib was well tolerated and resulted in improvements in MFI of DSA among four pediatric subjects without allograft failure, although no effects were observed on eGFR trajectory. Further studies are needed to clarify whether earlier intervention with bortezomib could prevent renal failure progression.

Management of the sensitized pediatric renal transplant candidate

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with ESRD as it is associated with improved patient survival and better quality of life, especially in children. There are several barriers to a successful transplant including organ shortage, anatomic barriers, and immunologic barriers. One of the biggest immunologic barriers that precludes transplantation is sensitization, when patients have antibodies prior to transplantation, resulting in positive crossmatches with donor. 30%-40% of adult patients on the wait list are sensitized. There is a growing number of pediatric patients on the wait list who are sensitized. This poses a unique challenge to the pediatric transplant community. Therefore, attempts to perform desensitization to remove or suppress pathogenic HLA antibodies resulting in acceptable crossmatches, and ultimately a successful transplant, while reducing the risk of acute rejection, are much needed in these children. This review article aims to address the management of such patients both prior to transplantation, with strategies to overcome sensitization, and after transplantation with monitoring for allograft rejection and other complications.

TMA in Kidney Transplantation

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a rare and devastating complication of kidney transplantation, which often leads to graft failure. Posttransplant TMA (PT-TMA) may occur either de novo or as a recurrence of the disease. De novo TMA can be triggered by immunosuppressant drugs, antibody-mediated rejection, viral infections, and ischemia/reperfusion injury in patients with no evidence of the disease before transplantation. Recurrent TMA may occur in the kidney grafts of patients with a history of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in the native kidneys. Studies have shown that some patients with aHUS carry genetic abnormalities that affect genes that code for complement regulators (CFH, MCP, CFI) and components (C3 and CFB), whereas in 10% of patients (mostly children), anti-FH autoantibodies have been reported. The incidence of aHUS recurrence is determined by the underlying genetic or acquired complement abnormality. Although treatment of the causative agents is usually the first line of treatment for de novo PT-TMA, this approach might be insufficient. Plasma exchange typically resolves hematologic abnormalities but does not improve kidney function. Targeted complement inhibition is an effective treatment for recurrent TMA and may be effective in de novo PT-TMA as well, but it is necessary to establish which patients can benefit from different therapeutic options and when and how these can be applied.

Imlifidase for Kidney Transplantation of Highly Sensitized Patients With a Positive Crossmatch: The French Consensus Guidelines

Imlifidase recently received early access authorization for highly sensitized adult kidney transplant candidates with a positive crossmatch against an ABO-compatible deceased donor. These French consensus guidelines have been generated by an expert working group, in order to homogenize patient selection, associated treatments and follow-up. This initiative is part of an international effort to analyze properly the benefits and tolerance of this new costly treatment in real-life. Eligible patients must meet the following screening criteria: cPRA ≥ 98%, ≤ 65-year of age, ≥ 3 years on the waiting list, and a low risk of biopsy-related complications. The final decision to use Imlifidase will be based on the two following criteria. First, the results of a virtual crossmatch on recent serum, which shall show a MFI for the immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) > 6,000 but the value of which does not exceed 5,000 after 1:10 dilution. Second, the post-Imlifidase complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch must be negative. Patients treated with Imlifidase will receive an immunosuppressive regimen based on steroids, rATG, high dose IVIg, rituximab, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Frequent post-transplant testing for DSA and systematic surveillance kidney biopsies are highly recommended to monitor post-transplant DSA rebound and subclinical rejection.

Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility.

RESULTS

Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.

Successful Third Kidney Transplantation in a Nigerian Kidney Transplant Center: A Case Report

Patients with end-stage renal disease have limited options in the course of their management. Kidney transplantation (KT) remains the gold standard for the management of renal replacement therapy. There is increasing evidence supporting the viability of third and fourth KTs. Due to the complexities of carrying out a successful third KT and the scarcity of living organ donors, it is not a common procedure in Nigeria's few renal transplant centres. To date, there is no reported case of a successful third KT in Nigeria. Here, we present the first reported case of a third KT carried out in Nigeria on a 44-year-old hypertensive, hepatitis B-infected, non-diabetic male patient. He had the first living donor KT eight years ago, which he lost due to poor immunosuppressive medication adherence. He then had a second living donor, KT, four years ago. Both KTs were from altruistic donors and were performed in the same hospital outside Nigeria. He developed allograft nephropathy after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine 16 months ago and lost the second graft as a result. He was worked up and transplanted at our centre. Third kidney transplantation can be performed successfully despite the challenges of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization, antibiotic resistance, and surgical placement of the graft.

Serum Soluble B Cell-Activating Factor Is a Non-Invasive Biomarker of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Allograft With Satisfactory Risk Stratification Performance But Negligible Diagnostic Value

Objectives

B cell-activating factor (BAFF), which is critical in the activation and differentiation of B cells, is a candidate diagnostic and predictive biomarker for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). We aimed to investigate the value of serum soluble BAFF (sBAFF) for the diagnosis and risk stratification of ABMR after kidney transplantation.

Methods

In the diagnostic study, sBAFF level among ABMR (n = 25), T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) (n = 14), 4 other pathological lesions (n = 21), and stable allograft function group (n = 15) were compared. In the nested case-control study, kidney allograft recipients with de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) or ABMR (n = 16) vs. stable allograft function (n = 7) were enrolled, and sBAFF was measured preoperatively, at D7, M1, M3, M6, M9, M12, M18 posttransplant and at allograft biopsy.

Results

There was no significant difference in sBAFF level at biopsy between ABMR and non-ABMR groups. Longitudinal study showed that the sBAFF levels decreased dramatically at D7 in both groups. The sBAFF level in the DSA group started to increase within M1, while in the stable group, it maintained a low level until M3 and M6. The sBAFF levels of the DSA group were significantly higher than that of the stable group at M1 [1,013.23 (633.97, 1,277.38) pg/ml vs. 462.69 (438.77, 586.48) pg/ml, P = 0.005], M3 [1,472.07 (912.79, 1,922.08) pg/ml vs. 561.63 (489.77, 630.00) pg/ml, P = 0.002], and M6 [1,217.95 (965.25, 1,321.43) pg/ml vs. 726.93 (604.77, 924.60) pg/ml, P = 0.027]. sBAFF levels at M3 had the best predictive value for the DSA/ABMR with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve value of 0.908. The predictive performance of the maximum (max) change rate from D7 to the peak within M3 was also excellent (AUROC 0.949, P = 0.580).

Conclusion

We clarified by a diagnostic study that sBAFF is not a diagnostic biomarker for ABMR in kidney transplantation and revealed by a nested case-control study that sBAFF values at M3 posttransplant and dynamic changes in sBAFF within M3 posttransplant have a good predictive value for the DSA/ABMR. It provides a useful tool for early screening of low-risk patients with negative preoperative DSA for the risk of developing postoperative DSA in kidney allograft recipients.

Clazakizumab for desensitization in highly sensitized patients awaiting transplantation

Alloantibodies are a significant barrier to successful transplantation. While desensitization has emerged, efficacy is limited. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an important mediator of inflammation and immune cell activation. Persistent IL-6 production increases the risk for alloantibody production. Here we report our experience with clazakizumab (anti-IL-6) for desensitization of highly HLA-sensitized patients (HS). From March 2018 to September 2020, 20 HS patients were enrolled in an open label pilot study to assess safety and limited efficacy of clazakizumab desensitization. Patients received PLEX, IVIg, and clazakizumab 25 mg monthly X6. If transplanted, graft function, pathology, HLA antibodies and regulatory immune cells were monitored. Transplanted patients received standard immunosuppression and clazakizumab 25 mg monthly posttransplant. Clazakizumab was well tolerated and associated with significant reductions in class I and class II antibodies allowing 18 of 20 patients to receive transplants with no DSA rebound in most. Significant increases in T_reg and B_reg cells were seen posttransplant. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in three patients. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months was 58 ± 29 ml/min/1.73 m² . Clazakizumab was generally safe and associated with significant reductions in HLA alloantibodies and high transplant rates for highly-sensitized patients. However, confirmation of efficacy for desensitization requires assessment in randomized controlled trials.

Complement-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies: Biomarker for Immunologic Risk Stratification in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation Recipients

Antibody-mediated rejection is a common cause of early kidney allograft loss but the specifics of antibody measurement, therapies and endpoints have not been universally defined. In this retrospective study, we assessed the performance of risk stratification using systematic donor-specific antibody (DSA) monitoring. Included in the study were children who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1, 2010 and March 1, 2018 at Stanford, with at least 12-months follow-up. A total of 233 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 45 (range, 9–108) months. Median age at transplant was 12.3 years, 46.8% were female, and 76% had a deceased donor transplant. Fifty-two (22%) formed C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibodies (C1q-dnDSA). After a standardized augmented immunosuppressive protocol was implemented, C1q-dnDSA disappeared in 31 (58.5%). Graft failure occurred in 16 patients at a median of 54 (range, 5–83) months, of whom 14 formed dnDSA. The 14 patients who lost their graft due to rejection, all had persistent C1q-dnDSA. C1q-binding status improved the individual risk assessment, with persistent; C1q binding yielding the strongest independent association of graft failure (hazard ratio, 45.5; 95% confidence interval, 11.7–177.4). C1q-dnDSA is more useful than standard dnDSA as a noninvasive biomarker for identifying patients at the highest risk of graft failure.

Approach to Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates and a Positive Crossmatch

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible kidney transplantation offers survival benefit compared with ongoing dialysis. There have been considerable advances in the last decade to allow for increased access to transplant for the HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. These include increased priority in the kidney allocation system, kidney paired donation, and novel desensitization strategies. A better understanding of the role of B cells, plasma cells, and complement and inflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of HLA antibody-mediated allograft injury has led to the use of novel therapeutics for desensitization and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Here we discuss current approaches to kidney transplantation in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates.

The Problem of Subclinical Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Defined as histologic evidence of rejection on a protocol biopsy in the absence of kidney dysfunction, subclinical rejection has garnered attention since the 1990s. The major focus of much of this research, however, has been subclinical T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). Herein, we review the literature on subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which may occur with either preexisting donor-specific antibodies (DSA) or upon the development of de novo DSA (dnDSA). In both situations, subsequent kidney function and graft survival are compromised. Thus, we recommend protocol biopsy routinely within the first year with preexisting DSA and at the initial detection of dnDSA. In those with positive biopsies, baseline immunosuppression should be maximized, any associated TCMR treated, and adherence stressed, but it remains uncertain if antibody-reduction treatment should be initiated. Less invasive testing of blood for donor DNA or gene profiling may have a role in follow-up of those with negative initial biopsies. If a protocol biopsy is positive in the absence of detectable HLA-DSA, it also remains to be determined whether non-HLA-DSA should be screened for either in particular or on a genome-wide basis and how these patients should be treated. Randomized controlled trials are clearly needed.

HLA Antibody Incompatible Renal Transplantation: Long-term Outcomes Similar to Deceased Donor Transplantation

Background.

HLA incompatible renal transplantation still remains one of best therapeutic options for a subgroup of patients who are highly sensitized and difficult to match but not much is known about its long-term graft and patient survival.

Methods.

One hundred thirty-four HLA incompatible renal transplantation patients from 2003 to 2018 with a median follow of 6.93 y were analyzed retrospectively to estimate patient and graft survivals. Outcomes were compared with groups defined by baseline crossmatch status and the type and timings of rejection episodes.

Results.

The overall patient survival was 95%, 90%, and 81%; and graft survival was 95%, 85%, and 70% at 1, 5, and 10 y, respectively. This was similar to the first-time deceased donor transplant cohort. The graft survival for pretreatment cytotoxic-dependent crossmatch (CDC) positive crossmatch group was significantly low at 83%, 64%, and 40% at 1, 5, and 10 y, respectively, compared with other groups (Bead/CDC, P = 0.007; CDC/Flow, P = 0.001; and microbead assay/flow cytometry crossmatch, P = 0.837), although those with a low CDC titer (<1 in 2) have comparable outcomes to the CDC negative group. Female patients in general fared worse in both patient and graft survival outcomes in each of the 3 groups based on pretreatment crossmatch, although this did not reach statistical significance. Antibody-mediated rejection was the most frequent type of rejection with significant decline in graft survival by 10 y when compared with no rejection (P < 0.001). Rejection that occurred or continued to occur after the first 2 wk of transplantation caused a significant reduction in graft survivals (P < 0.001), whereas good outcomes were seen in those with a single early rejection episode.

Conclusions.

One-, 5-, and 10-y HLA incompatible graft and patient survival is comparable to deceased donor transplantation and can be further improved by excluding high-CDC titer cases. Antibody-positive female patients show worse long-term survival. Resolution of early rejection is associated with good long-term graft survival.

B cells in transplant tolerance and rejection: friends or foes?

Our understanding of the role of B cells in organ transplantation remains incomplete and continues to grow. The majority of research has focused on the detrimental role of antibodies that drive the development of pathogenesis of the transplanted organ. However, it has been shown that not all donor-specific antibodies are harmful and in some circumstances can even promote tolerance through the mechanism of accommodation. Furthermore, B cells can have effects on transplanted organs through their interaction with T cells, namely antigen presentation, cytokine production, and costimulation. More recently, the role and importance of Bregs was introduced to the field of transplantation. Due to this functional and ontogenetic heterogeneity, targeting B cells in transplantation may bring undesired immunologic side effects including increased rejection. Therefore, the selective control of B cells that contribute to the humoral response against donor antigens will continue to be an important and challenging area of research and potentially lead to improved long-term transplant outcomes.

Acute Rejection and Infectious Complications in ABO- and HLA-Incompatible Kidney Transplantations

Background

Patients receiving ABO-incompatible (ABOi) or human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible (HLAi) kidney transplantation (KT) require potent immunosuppression and are thus at a higher risk of infectious complications. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of KT stratified by ABO and HLA incompatibilities and identified the factors associated with the clinical outcomes.

Material/Methods

Recipients who underwent living-related KT between 2012 and 2017 were included and classified into 4 groups: ABO-compatible and HLA-compatible (ABOc/HLAc), HLA-incompatible (ABOc/HLAi), ABO-incompatible (ABOi/HLAc), and ABO-incompatible and HLA-incompatible (ABOi/HLAi). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were carried out to evaluate the risk factors of acute rejection. Out of the 1732 patients who underwent KT, 1190, 131, 358, and 53 were in the ABOc/HLAc, ABOi/HLAc, ABOc/HLAi, and ABOi/HLAi groups, respectively.

Results

The ABO/HLAi group showed the lowest 5-year graft survival rate (91.7%). Death-censored graft survival was not significantly different among the groups. The mortality rate from infections was significantly higher in the ABOi/HLAi group (7.5%) than the other groups. Antibody-mediated rejection-free graft survival was the lowest in the ABOi/HLAi group, with significant differences compared with the ABOi/HLAc group (P=0.02) and the ABOc/HLAi group (P=0.03). ABOi/HLAi (hazard ratio [HR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–6.65; P<0.01) and combined infection (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.45–2.51; P<0.01) were significant risk factors for acute rejection.

Conclusions

Patients with both ABO and HLA incompatibilities showed inferior rates of overall patient and graft survival due to infectious complications. Infection was a prominent risk factor of acute rejection following KT after adjusting for possible confounders including ABO and HLA incompatibility.

What have we learned about how to prevent and treat antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation?

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in kidney transplantation is a major cause of late graft loss, and despite all efforts to date the "standard of care" remains plasmapheresis, IVIg, and steroids, which itself is based on low quality evidence. This review focuses on the risk factors leading to memory and de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA)-associated ABMR, the optimal prevention strategies for ABMR, and advances in  adjunctive and emerging therapies for ABMR. Because new agents require regulatory approval via a Phase 3 randomized control trial (RCT), an overview of progress in innovative trial design for ABMR is provided. Finally, based on the insights gained in the biology of ABMR, current knowledge gaps are identified for future research that could significantly affect our understanding of how to optimally treat ABMR.

The role of soluble B cell-activating factor in further stratifying the risk of antibody-mediated rejection post-renal transplant: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive value of serum soluble B cell-activating factor (sBAFF) for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which remains controversial.

METHODS

Systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and three Chinese databases. Studies of any relevant design were included. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019109198).

RESULTS

Nine observational studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 1302 cases (median NOS quality score = 8, range 6-8). The incidence of ABMR was significantly higher in the high sBAFF group than in the low sBAFF level group (Risk ratio [RR] 2.04 [95% CI 1.52-2.74], I² = 26%, P < 0.01, N = 1014). The subgroup analysis showed that regardless of pre-transplant donor-specific antibody (DSA) status, the high sBAFF level group still had a significantly higher incidence of ABMR. sBAFF was not associated with the risk of TCMR. The sBAFF level was significantly higher in the anti-HLA-antibody (+) group than in anti-HLA-antibody (-) patients before or after kidney transplantation (Standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.43 [0.29-0.56], P < 0.01, I² = 34%, N = 1001).

CONCLUSION

sBAFF is a promising biomarker to further stratify the risk of ABMR post-renal transplant.

Impact of low tacrolimus exposure and high tacrolimus intra-patient variability on the development of de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies in kidney transplant recipients

Introduction: De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) directed against HLA are a major contributing factor to the chronic deterioration of renal allograft function. Several factors, including the degree of HLA matching, younger recipient age, and past sensitization events have been shown to increase the risk for the development of dnDSA. The development of dnDSA is also strongly associated with modifications in the immunosuppressive regimen, non-adherence, and under-immunosuppression.Areas covered: Tacrolimus is widely used after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and in recent years, both a high intra-patient variability in tacrolimus exposure and low tacrolimus exposure have been found to be associated with a higher risk of dnDSA development in kidney transplant recipients. This article provides an overview of current findings published in the recent 5 years regarding the relationship between tacrolimus exposure and variation therein and the development of dnDSA.Expert opinion: In this review, we describe how combining data on tacrolimus intra-patient variability and mean pre-dose concentration may be an effective tool to identify kidney transplant recipients who are at higher risk of developing dnDSA.

The PI3Kδ selective inhibitor AS2541019 suppresses donor-specific antibody production in rat cardiac and non-human primate renal allotransplant models

Long-term graft survival after organ transplantation is difficult to achieve because of the development of chronic rejection. One cause of chronic rejection arises from antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which is dependent on the production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Current immunosuppression in organ transplantation is effective in preventing acute T cell-mediated rejection, but the risk of DSA production and graft loss due to AMR remains unchanged. Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase p110δ (PI3Kδ), a member of the family of PI3K lipid kinases, is a key mediator of B cell activation, proliferation and antibody production. AS2541019 is a novel PI3Kδ selective inhibitor that prevents antibody production by inhibiting B cell immunity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory effect of AS2541019 on DSA production in preclinical rodent and non-human primate allotransplant models. Concomitant administration of AS2541019 with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) inhibited de novo DSA production in an ACI-to-Lewis rat cardiac allotransplant model. To predict the efficacy of AS2541019 in clinical practice, we evaluated its effects in cynomolgus monkeys. AS2541019 inhibited B cell proliferation and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II expression on B cells in cynomolgus monkeys. Oral administration of AS2541019 inhibited MHC class II expression on peripheral B cells and anti-tetanus toxoid antibody production. In cynomolgus monkey renal allotransplant model, concomitant administration of AS2541019 with tacrolimus and MMF significantly inhibited de novo DSA production. Together, our findings indicate that the PI3Kδ selective inhibitor AS2541019 is a potential candidate for preventing AMR development by inhibiting DSA production.

Targeting STAT3 signaling in kidney disease

The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway is a multifaceted transduction system that regulates cellular responses to incoming signaling ligands. STAT3 is a central member of the JAK/STAT signaling cascade and has long been recognized for its increased transcriptional activity in cancers and autoimmune disorders but has only recently been in the spotlight for its role in the progression of kidney disease. Although genetic knockout and manipulation studies have demonstrated the salutary benefits of inhibiting STAT3 activity in several kidney disease models, pharmacological inhibition has yet to make it to the clinical forefront. In recent years, significant effort has been aimed at suppressing STAT3 activation for treatment of cancers, which has led to the development of a wide variety of STAT3 inhibitors, but only a handful have been tested in kidney disease models. Here, we review the detrimental role of dysregulated STAT3 activation in a variety of kidney diseases and the current progress in the treatment of kidney diseases with pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 activity.

Successful Third Kidney Transplant After Desensitization for Combined Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) and ABO Incompatibility: A Case Report and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND In the present era, kidney transplantation across immunological barriers (ABO incompatibility and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) incompatibility) is a successful strategy to provide transplantation to immunologically high-risk patients. The safety and outcome of crossing both ABO and HLA barriers simultaneously in a retransplantation scenario is rarely reported from the developing world. CASE REPORT A 30-year-old female underwent a third living donor kidney transplantation. Her previous 2 transplants being lost to chronic allograft nephropathy. The transplantation was done across a simultaneous blood group as well as HLA incompatibility. The donor was the mother who was blood group B, with the recipient being blood group O. The complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch of the pair was negative but the flow cross match for T as well as B lymphocytes was positive. The mean fluorescence intensity value for class I antigens was 6951 and that for class 2 antigens was 7534. The patient underwent a desensitization procedure including rituximab, plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin pre-transplantation. The pre-transplantation isohemaglutunin titer was <1: 8 and the donor specific antibody against class 1 antigens was <2200 and <770 against class 2 antigens. Induction was done with anti-thymocyte globulin in the dose of 3 mg/kg in 2 divided doses. The patient is maintained on triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus, prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil. After a follow-up period of 5 months, she maintains a good graft function with serum creatinine of 1.01 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS With the advances in the desensitizing procedures in the developing world, kidney transplantation across a combined HLA and ABO incompatible barrier can be offered to these highly sensitized patients, even in case of retransplantation.

Desensitisation strategies in high-risk children before kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Transplantation is the preferred modality for renal replacement therapy in children. With increasing rates of re-transplantation within the paediatric population, there are more sensitised children on waiting lists. One issue with developing strategies to treat these children is the number of different definitions of sensitisation. and we would therefore recommend an immunological risk stratification approach.

METHODS

We discuss methods of sensitisation prevention, assessment and management, including paired exchange programmes and desensitisation protocols.

RESULTS

There are limited published evidence-based data for desensitisation in adults and none in children; thus, we present information on the available therapies currently in use.

DISCUSSION

Further research is required to investigate strategies which prevent sensitisation in children, including the healthcare utility of incorporating epitope-based matching into organ allocation algorithms. Controlled studies are also needed to establish the most appropriate desensitisation regimen(s).

Failure to remove de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies is influenced by antibody properties and identifies kidney recipients with late antibody-mediated rejection destined to graft loss - a retrospective study

Current research is focusing on identifying bioclinical parameters for risk stratification of renal allograft loss, largely due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We retrospectively investigated graft outcome predictors in 24 unsensitized pediatric kidney recipients developing HLA de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), and treated for late AMR with plasmapheresis + low-dose IVIG + Rituximab or high-dose IVIG + Rituximab. Renal function and DSA properties were assessed before and longitudinally post treatment. The estimated GFR (eGFR) decline after treatment was dependent on a negative % eGFR variation in the year preceding treatment (P = 0.021) but not on eGFR at treatment (P = 0.74). At a median follow-up of 36 months from AMR diagnosis, 10 patients lost their graft. Altered eGFR (P < 0.001) and presence of C3d-binding DSAs (P = 0.005) at treatment, and failure to remove DSAs (P = 0.01) were negatively associated with graft survival in the univariable analysis. Given the relevance of DSA removal for therapeutic success, we analyzed antibody properties dictating resistance to anti-humoral treatment. In the multivariable analysis, C3d-binding ability (P < 0.05), but not C1q-binding, and high mean fluorescence intensity (P < 0.05) were independent factors characterizing DSAs scarcely susceptible to removal. The poor prognosis of late AMR is related to deterioration of graft function prior to treatment and failure to remove C3d binding and/or high-MFI DSAs.

Heterogeneity of memory B cells

Potential solid organ transplant recipients broadly sensitized to HLA have long wait times, low transplant rates and poor outcomes. The new kidney allocation system has improved access to the most highly sensitized recipients; however, their long-term outcomes are unknown. Emerging data suggest that memory B cell repertoire is broader than the plasma cell repertoire, therefore, despite refinements in anti-HLA antibody detection technology, donor-specific HLA- specific memory B cells may in fact be present in some, if not most, highly sensitized recipients with no detectable donor-specific antibodies. In addition, new findings have underscored the heterogeneity in memory B cell generation, and in the signals that determine memory versus plasma cell fate during primary antigen encounter, as well as memory B cell differentiation upon antigen reencounter into plasma cells or reentry into germinal centers to subsequently emerge as higher affinity and class-switched plasma cells. Thus, heterogeneity memory B cells generation may affect the efficacy of specific immunomodulation during the recall response. We propose that the ability to quantify donor-specific B cell in transplant recipients is urgently required to provide insights into the mechanisms of sensitization and recall, and for the early detection of acute and chronic AMR.

Risk factors for the development of antibody-mediated rejection in highly sensitized pediatric kidney transplant recipients

ABMR remains a significant concern for early graft loss, especially for those who are HS against HLA antigens. We sought to determine the risk factors leading to ABMR in HS pediatric kidney transplant recipients. From January 2009 to December 2015, 16 HS pediatric kidney transplant patients at our center (age range 2-21) were retrospectively reviewed for outcomes and risk factors for ABMR. All HS patients received desensitization with high-dose IVIG/rituximab prior to transplant. Two groups were examined: ABMR⁺ (n = 7) and ABMR^- (n = 9). Patient survival was 100%; however, one patient in the ABMR⁺ group suffered graft loss from ABMR 16 months post-transplant. ABMR⁺ patients had higher Class I PRA at the time of transplant (Class I: 73.1 ± 19.1 vs 49.1 ± 28.3, P = .075), although not statistically significant. ABMR⁺ patients were more likely to have a history of transplant nephrectomy (P = .013). The characteristic that most strongly correlated with ABMR was the DSA-RIS (P = .045), a scoring system used to quantify cumulative intensity of all DSA. In conclusion, DSA, as quantified by the RIS at the time of transplant, should be considered as part of the initial allocation strategy and patients with high RIS monitored closely for ABMR post-transplant.

Risk factors associated with the development of histocompatibility leukocyte antigen sensitization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite excellent short-term kidney allograft survival rates, long-term outcomes have not improved. For years, the focus on improving these outcomes revolved around minimization or elimination of calcineurin toxicity. Despite our best efforts, approximately 5000 allografts are lost each year in the United States and results in a significant emotional burden for patients and financial burden for the healthcare system.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advancements in detection of donor-specific histocompatibility leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) and improved assessment of allograft biopsy tissue have shown that the most common cause for graft failures is DSA-related antibody-mediated rejection. Sensitization is directly related to human tissue exposure prior to transplant. We now know that sensitization can occur in patients who are non compliant or poorly compliant with their calcineurin inhibitors. They develop de-novo DSAs, which are responsible for numerous allograft losses around the world.

SUMMARY

Given the current evidence, it is imperative that all transplant physicians recognize the importance of encouraging medication adherence to prevent the consequences of DSA-induced graft failure. However, little progress has been made in this area. Other potential therapeutic approaches based on B-cell depletion or modulation early posttransplant may help to reduce the risk for de-novo DSA development.

Rituximab and Monitoring Strategies for Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

Background

There is limited information on treatment strategies and monitoring strategies for late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after kidney transplantation.

Methods

In this observational and nonrandomized study, we compared 78 patients diagnosed with late ABMR (>3 months after transplant) who were treated with standard of care steroids/IVIG (n = 38) ± rituximab (n = 40) at our center between March 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016. All patients had follow-up biopsy and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) monitoring within 3 to 12 weeks.

Results

Patients had biopsy 7.3 ± 7 years after transplant and were followed for 15.9 ± 9.6 months after ABMR was diagnosed. Both treatment strategies were associated with a significant decline in DSA, microvascular inflammation (peritubular capillaritis + glomerulitis), and C4d Banff scores. In univariate regression analyses, rituximab, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), Banff i, t, v, chronicity (interstitial fibrosis + tubular atrophy + fibrous intimal thickening + allograft glomerulopathy) scores on the first biopsy, and eGFR and Banff v score on follow-up biopsy were associated with graft loss. Multivariate analyses retained only rituximab (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.84; P = 0.03) and eGFR at follow-up biopsy (0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.92; P < 0.001) as significant predictors of graft loss. Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that the benefit associated with rituximab was apparent after 1 year (15% vs 32% graft loss, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Treatment of late ABMR with steroids/IVIG ± rituximab was effective in reducing DSA and microcirculation inflammation. The addition of rituximab was associated with better graft survival. Follow-up biopsies could be considered in the management of acute rejection to monitor the effect of therapy. Randomized studies on the best therapeutic options for ABMR are needed.

Successful desensitization with proteasome inhibition and costimulation blockade in sensitized nonhuman primates

The detrimental effects of donor-directed antibodies in sensitized transplant patients remain a difficult immunologic barrier to successful organ transplantation. Antibody removal is often followed by rebound. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) deplete antibody-producing plasma cells (PCs) but have shown marginal benefit for desensitization. In an allosensitized nonhuman primate (NHP) model, we observed increased germinal center (GC) formation after PI monotherapy, suggesting a compensatory PC repopulation mediated via GC activation. Here we show that costimulation blockade (CoB) targets GC follicular helper T (Tfh) cells in allosensitized NHPs. Combined PI and CoB significantly reduces bone marrow PCs (CD19⁺CD20^-CD38⁺), Tfh cells (CD4⁺ICOS⁺PD-1^hi), and GC B cells (BCL-6⁺CD20⁺); controls the homeostatic GC response to PC depletion; and sustains alloantibody decline. Importantly, dual PC and CoB therapy prolongs rejection-free graft survival in major histocompatibility complex incompatible kidney transplantation without alloantibody rebound. Our study illustrates a translatable desensitization method and provides mechanistic insight into maintenance of alloantibody sensitization.

Clinical Outcome of Patients With De Novo C1q-Binding Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies After Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

De novo donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (dnDSA) may cause graft loss in renal transplant recipients. The capability to bind the complement may help to stratify the risk for inferior outcomes associated with dnDSA. We developed a modified C1q-binding assay and hypothesized that C1q-binding dnDSA could differentiate between indolent and harmful dnDSA causing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 59 renal transplant recipients who developed dnDSA and had serum available and complete follow-up. All patients were analyzed for C1q-binding dnDSA at the time of dnDSA detection, and 1-year later or at time of AMR. AMR-positive patients were also tested 6 to 12 months before the event if IgG dnDSA was present.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 59 dnDSA patients developed AMR during 5.9 ± 3.1 years follow-up. AMR-positive patients had more dnDSA with a significant higher frequency of class I, a higher frequency and a higher mean fluorescence intensity value of C1q-dnDSA at all time-points. Death-censored AMR-free and allograft survivals were significantly lower in C1q-dnDSA patients. In multivariate analysis, C1q-dnDSA was an independent risk factor for AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

C1q-binding dnDSA is associated with inferior outcomes, yet not in all patients. Nevertheless, C1q-dnDSA was shown to be an independent risk factor of AMR and graft loss and may be a useful tool to stratify the immunological risk for AMR.

The UK National Registry of ABO and HLA Antibody Incompatible Renal Transplantation: Pretransplant Factors Associated With Outcome in 879 Transplants

BACKGROUND

ABO and HLA antibody incompatible (HLAi) renal transplants (AIT) now comprise around 10% of living donor kidney transplants. However, the relationship between pretransplant factors and medium-term outcomes are not fully understood, especially in relation to factors that may vary between centers.

METHODS

The comprehensive national registry of AIT in the United Kingdom was investigated to describe the donor, recipient and transplant characteristics of AIT. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare survival of AIT to all other compatible kidney transplants performed in the United Kingdom. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to determine which pretransplant factors were associated with transplant survival in HLAi and ABOi separately. The primary outcome was transplant survival, taking account of death and graft failure.

RESULTS

For 522 HLAi and 357 ABO incompatible (ABOi) transplants, 5-year transplant survival rates were 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66-75%) for HLAi and 83% (95% CI, 78-87%) for ABOi, compared with 88% (95% CI, 87-89%) for 7290 standard living donor transplants, and 78% (95% CI, 77-79%) for 15 322 standard deceased donor transplants (P < 0.0001). Increased chance of transplant loss in HLAi was associated with increasing number of donor specific HLA antibodies, center performing the transplant, antibody level at the time of transplant, and an interaction between donor age and dialysis status. In ABOi, transplant loss was associated with no use of IVIg, cytomegalovirus seronegative recipient, 000 HLA donor-recipient mismatch; and increasing recipient age.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of AIT were acceptable, certainly in the context of a choice between living donor AIT and an antibody compatible deceased donor transplant. Several factors were associated with increased chance of transplant loss, and these can lead to testable hypotheses for further improving therapy.

Tracing Donor-MHC Class II Reactive B cells in Mouse Cardiac Transplantation: Delayed CTLA4-Ig Treatment Prevents Memory Alloreactive B-Cell Generation

BACKGROUND

The dual role of B cells as drivers and suppressors of the immune responses have underscored the need to trace the fate of B cells recognizing donor major histocompatibility complex class I and class II after allograft transplantation.

METHODS

In this study, we used donor class II tetramers to trace the fate of I-E-specific B cells after immunization with BALB/c spleen cells or cardiac transplantation, in naive or sensitized C57BL/6 recipients. We combined this approach with genetic lineage tracing of memory B cells in activation-induced cytidine deaminase regulated Cre transgenic mice crossed to the ROSA26-enhanced yellow fluorescent protein reporter mice to track endogenous I-E-specific memory B cell generation.

RESULTS

Immunization with BALB/c splenocytes or heart transplantation induced an expansion and differentiation of I-E-specific B cells into germinal center B cells, whereas BALB/c heart transplantation into sensitized recipients induced the preferential differentiation into antibody-secreting cells. A 10.8-fold increase in the frequency of I-E-specific memory B cells was observed by day 42 postimmunization. Treatment with CTLA4-Ig starting on day 0 or day 7 postimmunization abrogated I-E-specific memory B cell generation and sensitized humoral responses, but not if treatment commenced on day 14.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of donor-specific memory B cells are generated between days 7 and 14 postimmunization, thus revealing a flexible timeframe whereby delayed CTLA4-Ig administration can inhibit sensitization and the generation of memory graft-reactive B cells.

Safety and Efficacy of Alemtuzumab Induction in Highly Sensitized Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Studies show that alemtuzumab, a potent lymphocyte-depleting agent, is well tolerated in pediatric renal transplantation. We report on the use of alemtuzumab induction in highly HLA sensitized (HS) pediatric kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

Fifty pediatric renal transplants were performed from 1/2009-12/2014. 15 HS patients received IVIG (2 g/kg ×2 doses)/rituximab (375 mg/m ×1) for desensitization with alemtuzumab induction (15-30 mg, 1 dose, subcutaneous), whereas 35 nonsensitized patients received anti-IL-2R. Graft survival and infections were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

All HS patients had received a prior transplant and were older with lower risk for viral infections due to serostatus. Patient survival was 100%, and graft outcomes were similar with mean 1-year creatinine of 1.03 ± 0.45 versus 0.99 ± 0.6 (P = 0.48). Although a higher incidence of acute cellular rejection was seen in HS patients receiving alemtuzumab (P = 0.001), there was a nonsignificant difference in antibody-mediated rejection. White blood cell and absolute lymphocyte count were significantly lower in alemtuzumab group at 30 days (P < 0.0001) and at 1 year (P = 0.026 and P = 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in bacterial, viral, or fungal infections after transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab induction with desensitization led to nearly equivalent graft survival and functional outcomes in HS pediatric patients as nonsensitized patients receiving anti-IL-2R induction. With this small sample size, we observed significant reduction of white blood cell and absolute lymphocyte count up to 1 year posttransplant. The risk of infection was comparable between the 2 groups; however, patients who received alemtuzumab were older and at lower risk of viral infection due to serostatus.

Value of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibody Monitoring and Characterization for Risk Stratification of Kidney Allograft Loss

The diagnosis system for allograft loss lacks accurate individual risk stratification on the basis of donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (anti-HLA DSA) characterization. We investigated whether systematic monitoring of DSA with extensive characterization increases performance in predicting kidney allograft loss. This prospective study included 851 kidney recipients transplanted between 2008 and 2010 who were systematically screened for DSA at transplant, 1 and 2 years post-transplant, and the time of post-transplant clinical events. We assessed DSA characteristics and performed systematic allograft biopsies at the time of post-transplant serum evaluation. At transplant, 110 (12.9%) patients had DSAs; post-transplant screening identified 186 (21.9%) DSA-positive patients. Post-transplant DSA monitoring improved the prediction of allograft loss when added to a model that included traditional determinants of allograft loss (increase in c statistic from 0.67; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62 to 0.73 to 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.77). Addition of DSA IgG3 positivity or C1q binding capacity increased discrimination performance of the traditional model at transplant and post-transplant. Compared with DSA mean fluorescence intensity, DSA IgG3 positivity and C1q binding capacity adequately reclassified patients at lower or higher risk for allograft loss at transplant (category-free net reclassification index, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.67; P<0.001 and 0.93; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.36; P<0.001, respectively) and post-transplant (category-free net reclassification index, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.62; P<0.001 and 0.95; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.28; P<0.001, respectively). Thus, pre- and post-transplant DSA monitoring and characterization may improve individual risk stratification for kidney allograft loss.

Desensitization: Overcoming the Immunologic Barriers to Transplantation

HLA (Human Leucocyte Antigen) sensitization is a significant barrier to successful kidney transplantation. It often translates into difficult crossmatch before transplant and increased risk of acute and chronic antibody mediated rejection after transplant. Over the last decade, several immunomodulatory therapies have emerged allowing for increased access to kidney transplantation for the immunologically disadvantaged group of HLA sensitized end stage kidney disease patients. These include IgG inactivating agents, anti-cytokine antibodies, costimulatory molecule blockers, complement inhibitors, and agents targeting plasma cells. In this review, we discuss currently available agents for desensitization and provide a brief analysis of data on novel biologics, which will likely improve desensitization outcomes, and have potential implications in treatment of antibody mediated rejection.

Patterns of Early Rejection in Renal Retransplantation: A Single-Center Experience

It has been reported that kidney retransplant patients had high rates of early acute rejection due to previous sensitization. In addition to the acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) that has received widespread attention, the early acute T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) may be another important issue in renal retransplantation. In the current single-center retrospective study, we included 33 retransplant patients and 90 first transplant patients with similar protocols of induction and maintenance therapy. Analysis focused particularly on the incidence and patterns of early acute rejection episodes, as well as one-year graft and patient survival. Excellent short-term clinical outcomes were obtained in both groups, with one-year graft and patient survival rates of 93.9%/100% in the retransplant group and 92.2%/95.6% in the first transplant group. Impressively, with our strict immunological selection and desensitization criteria, the retransplant patients had a very low incidence of early acute ABMR (6.1%), which was similar to that in the first transplant patients (4.4%). However, a much higher rate of early acute TCMR was observed in the retransplant group than in the first transplant group (30.3% versus 5.6%, P < 0.001). Acute TCMR that develops early after retransplantation should be monitored in order to obtain better transplant outcomes.

Progress in Transplantation: Will It Be Achieved in Big Steps or by Marginal Gains?

A wish for progress in transplantation assumes that there are needs not met by the currently available therapy and that the barriers to resolving the problems can be surmounted. There are 5 major unmet needs: the potential to avoid transplantation either by prevention of disease or provision of an alternative to natural biological organ replacement; geographic heterogeneity of access to, and quality of, transplantation; availability of transplantation to those in need of it; survival of the patient and the transplant; and the avoidance of adverse effects of immunosuppression. During the past 50 years, there have been advances on at least 4 of these 5 fronts that illustrate the interplay of "big steps" and "marginal gains" in the following areas: surgical technique, testing the immunologic barriers, introduction of chemical and biological immunosuppression, and prophylaxis for microbial infections. The potential for further improvement comes in 5 major areas: blood biomarkers for monitoring of rejection, drug-free transplantation through the development of stable tolerance, eliminating the impact of ischemia-reperfusion injury, xenotransplantation of porcine kidneys, and finally, the possibility of autologous regeneration of functioning kidney tissue to treat advanced kidney disease.

Six-year outcomes in broadly HLA-sensitized living donor transplant recipients desensitized with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab

Desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab can improve transplantation rates in broadly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. However, long-term outcomes are lacking. Here we analyze long-term outcomes in living donor kidney transplant recipients desensitized with this regimen and compare them to low-risk recipients. Living donor kidney transplants that took place between July 2006 and December 2010 were considered retrospectively. The primary end point of the study was death-censored allograft survival at last follow-up. Secondary end points included patient survival, incidence of rejection, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and proteinuria. There were 66 sensitized and 111 low-risk patients included. Average follow-up was 68 months. There was no difference in long-term patient or graft survival. The rate of rejection was similar in the groups with more early rejection in the sensitized group and more late rejection in the low-risk group. There was more antibody-mediated rejection in the sensitized group. Estimated GFR was similar during the follow-up period. Risk factors for rejection included a positive cross-match (HR: 2.4 CI: 1.35-4.40) and age (HR: 0.97 CI: 0.95-0.99). Desensitization with IVIG and rituximab has good long-term results with graft outcomes similar to non-HLA-sensitized patients despite higher immunologic risk.

Unraveling the Role of Allo-Antibodies and Transplant Injury

Alloimmunity driving rejection in the context of solid organ transplantation can be grossly divided into mechanisms predominantly driven by either T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), though the co-existence of both types of rejections can be seen in a variable number of sampled grafts. Acute TCMR can generally be well controlled by the establishment of effective immunosuppression (1, 2). Acute ABMR is a low frequency finding in the current era of blood group and HLA donor/recipient matching and the avoidance of engraftment in the context of high-titer, preformed donor-specific antibodies. However, chronic ABMR remains a major complication resulting in the untimely loss of transplanted organs (3-10). The close relationship between donor-specific antibodies and ABMR has been revealed by the highly sensitive detection of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (7, 11-15). Injury to transplanted organs by activation of humoral immune reaction in the context of HLA identical transplants and the absence of donor specific antibodies (17-24), strongly suggest the participation of non-HLA (nHLA) antibodies in ABMR (25). In this review, we discuss the genesis of ABMR in the context of HLA and nHLA antibodies and summarize strategies for ABMR management.

Current status on the evaluation and management of the highly sensitized kidney transplant recipient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In light of the recent changes to the kidney allocation system (KAS) and the observed increase in the rate of transplantation of the highly sensitized kidney transplant candidate, the evaluation and care of this population is a timely topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

In its first year, the new KAS has already realized one goal of improving the chances of transplanting the most highly sensitized patients in the waiting list. This has brought to the forefront the need for recipient readiness in this special population, as well as the need for histocompatibility labs and kidney transplant programs to align themselves with each other, and also with the requirements of the United Network for Organ Sharing, and increase proficiency in testing and data interpretation. This manuscript is a review of the literature as well as practice patterns as they relate to the changes in KAS and the observed outcome since the activation of the new KAS, with the ultimate goal of aiding in the development of a more unified approach in the care of this specialized population which will allow for interdisciplinary and cross centre dialogue to optimize long term care and outcomes.

SUMMARY

Here we will review the changes to the KAS as they affect the highly sensitized kidney transplant recipient, and additional considerations in the evaluation and management of these patients.

Delayed Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-Associated Protein 4-Immunoglobulin Treatment Reverses Ongoing Alloantibody Responses and Rescues Allografts From Acute Rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection has emerged as the leading cause of late graft loss in kidney transplant recipients, and inhibition of donor-specific antibody production should lead to improved transplant outcomes. The fusion protein cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4-immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig) blocks T cell activation and consequently inhibits T-dependent B cell antibody production, and the current paradigm is that CTLA4-Ig is effective with naïve T cells and less so with activated or memory T cells. In this study, we used a mouse model of allosensitization to investigate the efficacy of continuous CTLA4-Ig treatment, initiated 7 or 14 days after sensitization, for inhibiting ongoing allospecific B cell responses. Delayed treatment with CTLA4-Ig collapsed the allospecific germinal center B cell response and inhibited alloantibody production. Using adoptively transferred T cell receptor transgenic T cells and a novel approach to track endogenous graft-specific T cells, we demonstrate that delayed CTLA4-Ig minimally inhibited graft-specific CD4(+) and T follicular helper responses. Remarkably, delaying CTLA4-Ig until day 6 after transplantation in a fully mismatched heart transplant model inhibited alloantibody production and prevented acute rejection, whereas transferred hyperimmune sera reversed the effects of delayed CTLA4-Ig. Collectively, our studies revealed the unexpected efficacy of CTLA4-Ig for inhibiting ongoing B cell responses even when the graft-specific T cell response was robustly established.

One-year Results of the Effects of Rituximab on Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplantation: RITUX ERAH, a Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is based on a combination of plasma exchange (PE), IVIg, corticosteroids (CS), and rituximab, but the place of rituximab is not clearly specified in the absence of randomized trials.

METHODS

In this phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with biopsy-proven AMR to receive rituximab (375 mg/m) or placebo at day 5. All patients received PE, IVIg, and CS. The primary endpoint was a composite of graft loss or no improvement in renal function at day 12.

RESULTS

Among the 38 patients included, at 1 year, no deaths occurred, but 1 graft loss occurred in each group. The primary endpoint frequency was 52.6% (10/19) and 57.9% (11/19) in the rituximab and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.744). Renal function improved in both groups, as soon as day 12 with no difference in serum creatinine level and proteinuria at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Supplementary administration of rituximab and total number of IVIg and PE treatments did not differ between the 2 groups. Both groups showed improved histological features of AMR and Banff scores at 1 and 6 months, with no significant difference between groups but with a trend in favor of the rituximab group. Both groups showed decreased mean fluorescence intensity of donor-specific antibodies as soon as day 12, with no significant difference between them but with a trend in favor of the rituximab group at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

After 1 year of follow-up, we observed no additional effect of rituximab in patients receiving PE, IVIg, and CS for AMR. Nevertheless, our study was underpowered and important differences between groups may have been missed. Complementary trials with long-term follow-up are needed.

Donor-specific antibodies require preactivated immune system to harm renal transplant

•

Pretransplant DSA have a deleterious impact on graft survival only in the presence of high pretransplant serum levels of sCD30.

•

The majority of patients with pretransplant DSA might be transplanted safely without special pretreatment measures.

Kidney transplantation in the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) is associated with a high failure rate due to antibody-mediated rejection. Many centers avoid transplantations if DSA are present. Others perform such transplantations after removal of DSA by apheresis under potent immunosuppression.

We provide strong evidence that DSA positive recipients reject their grafts at a high rate only if the immune activation marker sCD30 is also high, suggesting that T-cell help from an activated immune system is necessary for pretransplant DSA to exert a deleterious effect on the graft.

High-risk patients with DSA and sCD30 may benefit from special treatment measures. The presence of DSA alone may not be deleterious.

Background

It is an unresolved issue why some kidney transplant recipients with pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) show a high transplant failure rate, whereas in other patients DSA do not harm the graft. We investigated whether help from preactivated T-cells might be necessary for DSA to exert a deleterious effect.

Methods

The impact of pretransplant DSA and immune activation marker soluble CD30 (sCD30) on 3-year graft survival was analyzed in 385 presensitized kidney transplant recipients.

Findings

A deleterious influence of pretransplant DSA on graft survival was evident only in patients who were positive for the immune activation marker sCD30. In the absence of sCD30 positivity, 3-year graft survival was virtually identical in patients with or without DSA (83.1 ± 3.9% and 84.3 ± 2.8%, P = 0.81). A strikingly lower 3-year graft survival rate of 62.1 ± 6.4% was observed in patients who were both sCD30 and DSA positive (HR 2.92, P < 0.001). Even in the presence of strong DSA with ≥ 5000 MFI, the 3-year graft survival rate was high if the recipients were sCD30 negative.

Interpretation

Pretransplant DSA have a significantly deleterious impact on graft survival only in the presence of high pretransplant levels of the activation marker sCD30.