Eliminating Xenoantigen Expression on Swine RBC

Initial investigation on the feasibility of porcine red blood cells from genetically modified pigs as an alternative to human red blood cells for transfusion

The decline in blood donation rates and the ongoing shortage of blood products pose significant challenges to medical societies. One potential solution is to use porcine red blood cells (pRBCs) from genetically modified pigs as an alternative to human red blood cells (hRBCs). However, adverse immunological reactions remain a significant obstacle to their use. This study aimed to evaluate the compatibility of diverse genetically modified pRBCs with human serum. We acquired human complement-competent serum, complement 7 (C7)-deficient serum, and hRBCs from all ABO blood types. Additionally, we used leftover clinical samples from health checkups for further evaluation. pRBCs were collected from wild-type (WT) and genetically modified pigs: triple knockout (TKO), quadruple KO (QKO), and TKO/hCD55.hCD39 knockin (hCD55.hCD39KI). The extent of C3 deposition on RBCs was measured using flow cytometry after incubation in C7-deficient serum diluted in Ca++-enriched or Ca++-depleted and Mg++-enriched buffers. The binding of immunoglobulin (Ig) M/IgG antibody to RBCs after incubation in ABO-type human serum was evaluated using flow cytometry. Naïve human serum- or sensitized monkey serum-mediated hemolysis was also evaluated. Phagocytosis was assessed by incubating labeled RBCs with the human monocytic cell line THP-1 and measurement by flow cytometry. All three genetic modifications significantly improved the compatibility of pRBCs with human serum relative to that of WT pRBCs. The extent of IgM/IgG binding to genetically modified pRBCs was lower than that of WT pRBCs and similar to that of O-type hRBCs. Total and alternative pathway complement activation in all three genetically modified pRBCs was significantly weaker than that in WT pRBCs and did not differ from that in O-type hRBCs. The extent of serum-mediated hemolysis and phagocytosis of these genetically modified pRBCs was low and similar to that of O-type hRBCs. Sensitized monkey serum-mediated hemolysis in QKO and TKO/hCD55.hCD39KI pRBCs was higher than in O-type hRBCs but lower than in TKO pRBCs. The elimination of porcine carbohydrate antigens in genetically modified pigs significantly enhanced pRBC compatibility with naïve human sera, which was comparable to that of O-type hRBCs. These findings provide valuable insights into the development of pRBCs as potential alternatives to hRBCs.

Future prospects for the clinical transfusion of pig red blood cells

Transfusion of allogeneic human red blood cell (hRBCs) is limited by supply and compatibility between individual donors and recipients. In situations where the blood supply is constrained or when no compatible RBCs are available, patients suffer. As a result, alternatives to hRBCs that complement existing RBC transfusion strategies are needed. Pig RBCs (pRBCs) could provide an alternative because of their abundant supply, and functional similarities to hRBCs. The ability to genetically modify pigs to limit pRBC immunogenicity and augment expression of human 'protective' proteins has provided major boosts to this research and opens up new therapeutic avenues. Although deletion of expression of xenoantigens has been achieved in genetically-engineered pigs, novel genetic methods are needed to introduce human 'protective' transgenes into pRBCs at the high levels required to prevent hemolysis and extend RBC survival in vivo. This review addresses recent progress and examines future prospects for clinical xenogeneic pRBC transfusion.

The respective relevance of sensitization to alloantigens and xenoantigens in pig organ xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection is a major cause of graft injury and contributes to failure of pig xenografts in nonhuman primates (NHPs). Most 'natural' or elicited antibodies found in humans and NHPs are directed against pig glycan antigens, but antibodies binding to swine leukocyte antigens (SLA) have also been detected. Of clinical importance is (i) whether the presence of high levels of antibodies directed towards human leukocyte antigens (HLA) (i.e., high panel-reactive antibodies) would be detrimental to the outcome of a pig organ xenograft; and (ii) whether, in the event of sensitization to pig antigens, a subsequent allotransplant would be at increased risk of graft failure due to elicited anti-pig antibodies that cross-react with human HLA or other antigens.

SUMMARY

A literature review of pig-to-primate studies indicates that relatively few highly-HLA-sensitized humans have antibodies that cross-react with pigs, predicting that most would not be at increased risk of rejecting an organ xenograft. Furthermore, the existing evidence indicates that sensitization to pig antigens will probably not elicit increased alloantibody titers; if so, 'bridging' with a pig organ could be carried out without increased risk of subsequent antibody-mediated allograft failure.

KEY MESSAGE

These issues have important implications for the design and conduct of clinical xenotransplantation trials.

Animal Transgenesis and Cloning: Combined Development and Future Perspectives

The revolution in animal transgenesis began in 1981 and continues to become more efficient, cheaper, and faster to perform. New genome editing technologies, especially CRISPR-Cas9, are leading to a new era of genetically modified or edited organisms. Some researchers advocate this new era as the time of synthetic biology or re-engineering. Nonetheless, we are witnessing advances in high-throughput sequencing, artificial DNA synthesis, and design of artificial genomes at a fast pace. These advances in symbiosis with animal cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) allow the development of improved livestock, animal models of human disease, and heterologous production of bioproducts for medical applications. In the context of genetic engineering, SCNT remains a useful technology to generate animals from genetically modified cells. This chapter addresses these fast-developing technologies driving this biotechnological revolution and their association with animal cloning technology.

An Efficacious Transgenic Strategy for Triple Knockout of Xeno-Reactive Antigen Genes GGTA1, CMAH, and B4GALNT2 from Jeju Native Pigs

Pigs are promising donors of biological materials for xenotransplantation; however, cell surface carbohydrate antigens, including galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (α-Gal), N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), and Sd blood group antigens, play a significant role in porcine xenograft rejection. Inactivating swine endogenous genes, including GGTA1, CMAH, and B4GALNT2, decreases the binding ratio of human IgG/IgM in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and erythrocytes and impedes the effectiveness of α-Gal, Neu5Gc, and Sd, thereby successfully preventing hyperacute rejection. Therefore, in this study, an effective transgenic system was developed to target GGTA1, CMAH, and B4GALNT2 using CRISPR-CAS9 and develop triple-knockout pigs. The findings revealed that all three antigens (α-Gal, Neu5Gc, and Sd) were not expressed in the heart, lungs, or liver of the triple-knockout Jeju Native Pigs (JNPs), and poor expression of α-Gal and Neu5G was confirmed in the kidneys. Compared with the kidney, heart, and lung tissues from wild-type JNPs, those from GGTA1/CMAH/ B4GALNT2 knockout-recipient JNPs exhibited reduced human IgM and IgG binding and expression of each immunological rejection component. Hence, reducing the expression of swine xenogeneic antigens identifiable by human immunoglobulins can lessen the immunological rejection against xenotransplantation. The findings support the possibility of employing knockout JNP organs for xenogeneic transplantation to minimize or completely eradicate rejection using multiple gene-editing methods.

Genetically modified immunomodulatory cell-based biomaterials in tissue regeneration and engineering

To date, the wide application of cell-based biomaterials in tissue engineering and regeneration is remarkably hampered by immune rejection. Reducing the immunogenicity of cell-based biomaterials has become the latest direction in biomaterial research. Recently, genetically modified cell-based biomaterials with immunomodulatory genes have become a feasible solution to the immunogenicity problem. In this review, recent advances and future challenges of genetically modified immunomodulatory cell-based biomaterials are elaborated, including fabrication approaches, mechanisms of common immunomodulatory genes, application and, more importantly, current preclinical and clinical advances. The fabrication approaches can be categorized into commonly used (e.g., virus transfection) and newly developed approaches. The immunomodulatory mechanisms of representative genes involve complicated cell signaling pathways and metabolic activities. Wide application in curing multiple end-term diseases and replacing lifelong immunosuppressive therapy in multiple cell and organ transplantation models is demonstrated. Most significantly, practices of genetically modified organ transplantation have been conducted on brain-dead human decedent and even on living patients after a series of experiments on nonhuman primates. Nevertheless, uncertain biosecurity, nonspecific effects and overlooked personalization of current genetically modified immunomodulatory cell-based biomaterials are shortcomings that remain to be overcome.

Initial experimental experience of triple-knockout pig red blood cells as potential sources for transfusion in alloimmunized patients with sickle cell disease

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusion remains important in the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, alloimmunization after blood transfusion is associated with patient morbidity and mortality. Triple-knockout (TKO) pigs (i.e., pigs in which the three known xenoantigens to which humans have anti-pig antibodies have been deleted) may be an alternative source of RBCs for these patients because many humans have no preformed antibodies to TKO pig RBCs (pRBCs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In an in vitro study, plasma from alloimmunized (n = 12) or non-alloimmunized (n = 12) SCD patients was used to determine IgM/IgG binding to, and CDC of, TKO pRBCs. In an in vivo study, after an estimated 25% of blood volume was withdrawn from two capuchin monkeys, CFSE-labeled TKO pRBCs were transfused. Loss of TKO pRBCs was monitored by flow cytometry, and 7 weeks later, 25% of blood was withdrawn, and CFSE-labeled monkey RBCs were transfused.

RESULTS

The in vitro study demonstrated that plasma from neither alloimmunized nor non-alloimmunized SCD patients bound IgM/IgG to, or induced CDC of, TKO pRBCs. In the in vivo study, survival of TKO pRBCs in the two capuchin monkeys was of 5 and 7 days, respectively, whereas after allotransfusion, survival was >28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, (1) in the present limited study, no antibodies were detected that cross-reacted with TKO pRBCs, and (2) TKO pigs may possibly be an alternate source of RBCs in an emergency if no human RBCs are available.

CRISPR/Cas Technology in Pig-to-Human Xenotransplantation Research

CRISPR/Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats linked to Cas nuclease) technology has revolutionized many aspects of genetic engineering research. Thanks to it, it became possible to study the functions and mechanisms of biology with greater precision, as well as to obtain genetically modified organisms, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic. The changes introduced by the CRISPR/Cas system are based on the repair paths of the single or double strand DNA breaks that cause insertions, deletions, or precise integrations of donor DNA. These changes are crucial for many fields of science, one of which is the use of animals (pigs) as a reservoir of tissues and organs for xenotransplantation into humans. Non-genetically modified animals cannot be used to save human life and health due to acute immunological reactions resulting from the phylogenetic distance of these two species. This review is intended to collect and summarize the advantages as well as achievements of the CRISPR/Cas system in pig-to-human xenotransplantation research. In addition, it demonstrates barriers and limitations that require careful evaluation before attempting to experiment with this technology.

Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) on primate complement-dependent cytotoxicity of genetically engineered pig cells: relevance to clinical xenotransplantation

Triple-knockout (TKO) pigs may be ideal sources of organs for clinical xenotransplantation because many humans have no preformed antibody to TKO pig cells. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is widely used for severe infection or the treatment/prevention of antibody-mediated rejection in allotransplantation. Anti-pig antibodies in IVIg could be harmful in clinical xenotransplantation. It is unknown whether anti-TKO pig antibodies are present in IVIg. The main aim of this study was to investigate in vitro whether IVIg contains anti-TKO pig antibodies with cytotoxic effect to pig cells. Undiluted pooled human serum (HS) and five different commercial preparations of IVIg were tested for IgM and IgG binding to red blood cells (RBCs) from wild-type (WT), α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO), and TKO pigs by flow cytometry. Complement-dependent lysis of IVIg against these pig pRBCs was measured by hemolytic assay. Pooled HS and 4 of 5 IVIg commercial preparations contained anti-pig IgG that bound to WT and GTKO pRBCs, but not to TKO pRBCs. One preparation of IVIg contained antibodies that bound to TKO pRBCs, but there was no cytotoxicity of IVIg to TKO pRBCs. The results suggest that IVIg administration to human recipients of TKO pig grafts would be safe. However, the specific preparation of IVIg would need to be screened before its administration.

Xenogeneic transplantation and tolerance in the era of CRISPR-Cas9

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of genetically modified donor pigs has been integral to recent major advances in xenograft survival in preclinical nonhuman primate models. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology has dramatically accelerated the development of multimodified pigs. This review examines the current and projected impact of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated donor modification on preventing rejection and potentially promoting tolerance of porcine xenografts.

RECENT FINDINGS

CRISPR-Cas9 has been used to engineer several genetic modifications relevant to xenotransplantation into pigs, including glycosyltransferase knockouts (GGTA1, CMAH, β4GALNT2, A3GALT2 and combinations thereof), other knockouts (SLA-I, ULBP1, PERV and GHR), and one knock-in (anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody transgene knocked into GGTA1). Although the use of these pigs as donors in preclinical nonhuman primate models has been limited to a single study to date, in-vitro analysis of their cells has provided invaluable information. For example, deletion of three of the glycosyltransferases progressively decreased the binding and cytotoxicity of preexisting immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M in human sera, suggesting that this 'triple-KO' pig could be a platform for clinical xenotransplantation.

SUMMARY

CRISPR-Cas9 enables the rapid generation of gene-edited pigs containing multiple tailored genetic modifications that are anticipated to have a positive impact on the efficacy and safety of pig-to-human xenotransplantation.

Vital, Porcine, Gal-Knockout Skin Transplants Provide Efficacious Temporary Closure of Full-Thickness Wounds: Good Laboratory Practice-Compliant Studies in Nonhuman Primates

Vital, genetically engineered porcine skin transplants have long been regarded as a promising treatment option for severe burn wounds. The objective of this two-part, preclinical study was to evaluate the ability of vital, split-thickness skin xenotransplants derived from designated pathogen-free, alpha 1,3 galactosyltransferase knockout miniature swine to provide temporary wound closure of full-thickness wound defects intended to model severe and extensive, deep partial- and full-thickness burn wounds. In part 1 of the study, four full-thickness wound defects were introduced in four cynomolgus macaques recipients and, then engrafted with two xenografts and two allografts to achieve temporary wound closure. On POD-15, autografts were used to achieve definitive wound closure and were observed until POD-22. In part 2 of the study, four additional subjects each received two full-thickness wound defects, followed by two xenografts to achieve temporary wound closure, and were observed postoperatively for 30 days without further intervention. All grafts were assessed for signs of adherence to the wound bed, vascularity, and signs of immune rejection via gross clinical and histological methods. Xenograft and allograft comparators were equivalent in part 1, and later autografts were otherwise indistinguishable. In part 2, all xenotransplants demonstrated adherence, vascularity, and survival until POD-30. These were unexpected results that exceed previously published findings in similar models. Furthermore, the ensuing GLP-study report directly supported regulatory clearance, permitting a phase I clinical trial. This solution holds great promise as an alternative to human cadaver allograft, the current standard of care for the treatment of severe burns.

Viable pigs after simultaneous inactivation of porcine MHC class I and three xenoreactive antigen genes GGTA1, CMAH and B4GALNT2

BACKGROUND

Cell surface carbohydrate antigens play a major role in the rejection of porcine xenografts. The most important for human recipients are α-1,3 Gal (Galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose) causing hyperacute rejection, also Neu5Gc (N-glycolylneuraminic acid) and Sd(a) blood group antigens both of which are likely to elicit acute vascular rejection given the known human immune status. Porcine cells with knockouts of the three genes responsible, GGTA1, CMAH and B4GALNT2, revealed minimal xenoreactive antibody binding after incubation with human serum. However, human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies cross-reacted with swine leucocyte antigen class I (SLA-I). We previously demonstrated efficient generation of pigs with multiple xeno-transgenes placed at a single genomic locus. Here we wished to assess whether key xenoreactive antigen genes can be simultaneously inactivated and if combination with the multi-transgenic background further reduces antibody deposition and complement activation.

METHODS

Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing and somatic cell nuclear transfer were used to generate pigs carrying functional knockouts of GGTA1, CMAH, B4GALNT2 and SLA class I. Fibroblasts derived from one- to four-fold knockout animals, and from multi-transgenic cells (human CD46, CD55, CD59, HO1 and A20) with the four-fold knockout were used to examine the effects on human IgG and IgM binding or complement activation in vitro.

RESULTS

Pigs were generated carrying four-fold knockouts of important xenoreactive genes. In vitro assays revealed that combination of all four gene knockouts reduced human IgG and IgM binding to porcine kidney cells more effectively than single or double knockouts. The multi-transgenic background combined with GGTA1 knockout alone reduced C3b/c and C4b/c complement activation to such an extent that further knockouts had no significant additional effect.

CONCLUSION

We showed that pigs carrying several xenoprotective transgenes and knockouts of xenoreactive antigens can be readily generated and these modifications will have significant effects on xenograft survival.

The desirable donor pig to eliminate all xenoreactive antigens

The humoral barrier has been the limiting factor in moving xenotransplantation towards the clinic. Improvements in somatic cell nuclear transfer and genome editing, particularly CRISPR-Cas9, have made it possible to create pigs with multiple glycan xenoantigen deletions for the purposes of reducing xenoreactive antibody binding to the xenografted organ. Recent studies have also considered the aetiology and existence of antibodies directed at the swine leucocyte antigen (SLA) complex, and potential genetic engineering strategies to avoid these antibodies. Evaluation of xenoreactive antibody binding is very important for the advancement of xenotransplantation, because if patients do not have any detectable xenoreactive antibody, then it is reasonable to expect that cellular rejection and not antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) will be the next hurdle to clinical application.

Carbohydrate antigen expression and anti-pig antibodies in New World capuchin monkeys: Relevance to studies of xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Old World non-human primates (OWNHPs) are used for preclinical pig-to-NHP studies. However, like pigs, OWNHPs express Neu5Gc, and therefore do not develop natural anti-Neu5Gc antibodies. New World NHPs (NWNHPs) have been reported not to express Neu5Gc. We investigated the potential of NWNHPs in xenotransplantation research.

METHODS

We investigated expression of Gal, Neu5Gc, and Sd^a antigens on RBCs and PBMCs from humans, selected OWNHPs, and capuchin monkeys (a NWNHP). Serum anti-Gal and anti-Neu5Gc IgM and IgG levels were measured by ELISA. Binding of primate serum IgM and IgG to pig RBCs was measured by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

(a) Neither humans, OWNHPs, or capuchin monkeys expressed Gal on their RBCs, but capuchins expressed Gal on PBMCs. Humans and capuchins did not express Neu5Gc on either RBCs or PBMCs, but OWNHPs expressed Neu5Gc on both cells. Sd^a was not expressed on any RBCs or PBMCs. (b) By ELISA, human and OWNHP, but not capuchin, sera showed IgM and IgG binding to Gal. Human and capuchin, but not OWNHP, sera demonstrated some binding to Neu5Gc. (c) Anti-Sd^a IgM/IgG antibodies were detected in OWNHP sera. Knockout of Sd^a on pig RBCs did not significantly reduce human and capuchin antibody binding.

CONCLUSION

Capuchin monkeys could be surrogates for humans in experiments using RBCs, islets, neuronal cells, etc, from triple-knockout pigs (but may be too small to be used as recipients of pig organ grafts).

Genetically-engineered pigs as sources for clinical red blood cell transfusion: What pathobiological barriers need to be overcome?

An alternative to human red blood cells (RBCs) for clinical transfusion would be advantageous, particularly in situations of massive acute blood loss (where availability and compatibility are limited) or chronic hematologic diseases requiring frequent transfusions (resulting in alloimmunization). Ideally, any alternative must be neither immunogenic nor pathogenic, but readily available, inexpensive, and physiologically effective. Pig RBCs (pRBCs) provide a promising alternative due to their several similarities with human RBCs, and our increasing ability to genetically-modify pigs to reduce cellular immunogenicity. We briefly summarize the history of xenotransfusion, the progress that has been made in recent years, and the remaining barriers. These barriers include prevention of (i) human natural antibody binding to pRBCs, (ii) their phagocytosis by macrophages, and (iii) the T cell adaptive immune response (in the absence of exogenous immunosuppressive therapy). Although techniques of genetic engineering have advanced in recent years, novel methods to introduce human transgenes into pRBCs (which do not have nuclei) will need to be developed before clinical trials can be initiated.

Donor-derived infections and infectious risk in xenotransplantation and allotransplantation

Post-transplantation infections are common in allograft recipients and should be expected in all immunocompromised hosts. Based on the need for immunosuppression in xenotransplantation, procedures developed to enhance safety in allotransplantation can be applied in future xenotransplantation clinical trials. Standardized approaches can be developed to guide the evaluation of common infectious syndromes in xenograft recipients. The opportunity created by screening of swine intended as xenograft donors has equal applicability to allotransplantation-notably broader screening strategies for allograft donors such as use of advanced sequencing modalities including broad-range molecular probes, microarrays, and high-throughput pyrosequencing. Considerations in management of allotransplant- and xenotransplant-associated infections are largely the same. Experience in xenotransplantation will continue to inform thinking regarding donor-derived infections in allotransplantation. We expect that experience in managing complex allotransplant recipients will similarly inform clinical trials in xenotransplantation.

Does human leukocyte antigens sensitization matter for xenotransplantation?

The major histocompatibility complex class I and class II human leukocyte antigens (HLA) play a central role in adaptive immunity but are also the dominant polymorphic proteins targeted in allograft rejection. Sensitized patients with high levels of panel-reactive anti-HLA antibody (PRA) are at risk of early allograft injury, rejection, reduced allograft survival and often experience prolonged waiting times prior to transplantation. Xenotransplantation, using genetically modified porcine organs, offers a unique source of donor organs for these highly sensitized patients if the anti-HLA antibody, which places the allograft at risk, does not also enhance anti-pig antibody reactivity responsible for xenograft rejection. Recent improvements in xenotransplantation efficacy have occurred due to improved immune suppression, identification of additional xenogeneic glycans, and continued improvements in donor pig genetic modification. Genetically engineered pig cells, devoid of the known xenogeneic glycans, minimize human antibody reactivity in 90% of human serum samples. For waitlisted patients, early comparisons of patient PRA and anti-pig antibody reactivity found no correlation suggesting that patients with high PRA levels were not at increased risk of xenograft rejection. Subsequent studies have found that some, but not all, highly sensitized patients express anti-HLA class I antibody which cross-reacts with swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) class I proteins. Recent detailed antigen-specific analysis suggests that porcine-specific anti-SLA antibody from sensitized patients binds cross-reactive groups present in a limited subset of HLA antigens. This suggests that using modern genetic methods, a program to eliminate specific SLA alleles through donor genetic engineering or stringent donor selection is possible to minimize recipient antibody reactivity even for highly sensitized individuals.

β Cell Replacement Therapy: The Next 10 Years

β cell replacement with either pancreas or islet transplantation has progressed immensely over the last decades with current 1- and 5-year insulin independence rates of approximately 85% and 50%, respectively. Recent advances are largely attributed to improvements in immunosuppressive regimen, donor selection, and surgical technique. However, both strategies are compromised by a scarce donor source. Xenotransplantation offers a potential solution by providing a theoretically unlimited supply of islets, but clinical application has been limited by concerns for a potent immune response against xenogeneic tissue. β cell clusters derived from embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells represent another promising unlimited source of insulin producing cells, but clinical application is pending further advances in the function of the β cell like clusters. Exciting developments and rapid progress in all areas of β cell replacement prompted a lively debate by members of the young investigator committee of the International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association at the 15th International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association Congress in Melbourne and at the 26th international congress of The Transplant Society in Hong Kong. This international group of young investigators debated which modality of β cell replacement would predominate the landscape in 10 years, and their arguments are summarized here.

Antigenicity of tissues and organs from GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 triple gene knockout pigs

Clinical xenotransplantations have been hampered by human preformed antibody-mediated damage of the xenografts. To overcome biological incompatibility between pigs and humans, one strategy is to remove the major antigens [Gal, Neu5Gc, and Sd(a)] present on pig cells and tissues. Triple gene (GGTA1, CMAH, and β 4GalNT2) knockout (TKO) pigs were produced in our laboratory by CRISPR-Cas9 targeting. To investigate the antigenicity reduction in the TKO pigs, the expression levels of these three xenoantigens in the cornea, heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, and pancreas tissues were examined. The level of human IgG/IgM binding to those tissues was also investigated, with wildtype pig tissues as control. The results showed that αGal, Neu5Gc, and Sd(a) were markedly positive in all the examined tissues in wildtype pigs but barely detected in TKO pigs. Compared to wildtype pigs, the liver, spleen, and pancreas of TKO pigs showed comparable levels of human IgG and IgM binding, whereas corneas, heart, lung, and kidney of TKO pigs exhibited significantly reduced human IgG and IgM binding. These results indicate that the antigenicity of TKO pig is significantly reduced and the remaining xenoantigens on porcine tissues can be eliminated via a gene targeting approach.

B4GALNT2 and xenotransplantation: A newly appreciated xenogeneic antigen

Analysis of non‐Gal antibody induced after pig‐to‐baboon cardiac xenotransplantation identified the glycan produced by porcine beta‐1,4‐N‐acetyl‐galactosaminyltransferase 2 (B4GALNT2) as an immunogenic xenotransplantation antigen. The porcine B4GALNT2 enzyme is homologous to the human enzyme, which synthesizes the human SDa blood group antigen. Most humans produce low levels of anti‐SDa IgM which polyagglutinates red blood cells from rare individuals with high levels of SDa expression. The SDa glycan is also present on GM2 gangliosides. Clinical GM2 vaccination studies for melanoma patients suggest that a human antibody response to SDa can be induced. Expression of porcine B4GALNT2 in human HEK293 cells results in increased binding of anti‐SDa antibody and increased binding of Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA), a lectin commonly used to detect SDa. In pigs, B4GALNT2 is expressed by vascular endothelial cells and endothelial cells from a wide variety of pig backgrounds stain with DBA, suggesting that porcine vascular expression of B4GALNT2 is not polymorphic. Mutations in B4GALNT2 have been engineered in mice and pigs. In both species, the B4GALNT2‐KO animals are apparently normal and no longer show evidence of SDa antigen expression. Pig tissues with a mutation in B4GALNT2, added to a background of alpha‐1,3‐galactosyltransferase deficient (GGTA1‐KO) and cytidine monophosphate‐N‐acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase deficient (CMAH‐KO), show reduced antibody binding, confirming the presence of B4GALNT2‐dependent antibodies in both humans and non‐human primates. Preclinical xenotransplantation using B4GALNT2‐deficient donors has recently been reported. Elimination of this source of immunogenic pig antigen should minimize acute injury by preformed anti‐pig antibody and eliminate an induced clinical immune response to this newly appreciated xenotransplantation antigen.

N-glycolylneuraminic acid knockout reduces erythrocyte sequestration and thromboxane elaboration in an ex vivo pig-to-human xenoperfusion model

BACKGROUND

Wild-type pigs express several carbohydrate moieties on their cell surfaces that differ from those expressed by humans. This difference in profile leads to pig tissue cell recognition of human blood cells causing sequestration, in addition to antibody-mediated xenograft injury. One such carbohydrate is N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), a sialic acid molecule synthesized in pigs but not in humans. Here, we evaluate livers with and without Neu5Gc in an ex vivo liver xeno perfusion model.

METHODS

Livers from pigs with an α1,3-galactosyl transferase gene knockout (GalTKO) and transgenic for human membrane cofactor (hCD46) with (n = 5) or without (n = 7) an additional Neu5Gc gene knock out (Neu5GcKO) were perfused ex vivo with heparinized whole human blood. A drug regimen consisting of a histamine inhibitor, thromboxane synthase inhibitor, and a murine anti-human GPIb-blocking antibody fragment was given to half of the experiments in each group.

RESULTS

Liver function tests (AST and ALT) were not significantly different between livers with and without the Neu5GcKO. GalTKO.hCD46.Neu5GcKO livers had less erythrocyte sequestration as evidenced by a higher mean hematocrit over time compared to GalTKO.hCD46 livers (P = .0003). The addition of Neu5GcKO did not ameliorate profound thrombocytopenia seen within the first 15 minutes of perfusion. TXB2 was significantly less with the added drug regimen (P = .006) or the presence of Neu5GcKO (P = .017).

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of Neu5Gc expression attenuated erythrocyte loss but did not prevent profound early onset thrombocytopenia or platelet activation, although TXB2 levels were decreased in the presence of Neu5GcKO.

Anti-Neu5Gc and anti-non-Neu5Gc antibodies in healthy humans

Our group previously investigated the levels of anti-Gal and anti-nonGal IgM and IgG in a cohort of 75 healthy humans of various backgrounds, and found some significant differences related to factors such as age, gender, ABO blood group, diet, vaccination history, and geographic location during childhood. We have now expanded our cohort (n = 84) to investigate the levels of anti-Neu5Gc and anti-nonGal/nonNeu5Gc antibodies in healthy humans. Anti-nonGal and anti-nonGal/nonNeu5Gc human IgM and IgG binding to pRBCs and pAECs from GTKO/CD46 and GTKO/CD46/Neu5GcKO pigs were measured by flow cytometry. Anti-Gal and anti-Neu5Gc IgM and IgG levels were measured by ELISA. In summary, (i) the great majority (almost 100%) of humans had anti-Neu5Gc IgM and IgG antibodies that bound to pAECs and approximately 50% had anti-Neu5Gc antibodies that bound to pRBCs, (ii) there was significantly less human antibody binding to pig cells that did not express either Gal or Neu5Gc compared with those that did not express Gal alone, (iii) the levels of both IgM and IgG binding to GTKO/CD46/Neu5GcKO pRBCs and pAECs were low, (iv) the level of anti-Neu5Gc IgG was higher in men than women, (v) the level did not change with age or diet, and there was some variability associated with (vi) previous vaccination history and (vii) the geographic region in which the individual spent his or her childhood. Our study confirms that human antibody binding to RBCs and AECs from GTKO/CD46/Neu5GcKO pigs is greatly reduced compared to binding to GTKO/CD46 cells. However, all humans appear to have a low level of antibody that binds to pAECs that is not directed to either Gal or Neu5Gc. Our findings require consideration in planning clinical trials of xenotransplantation.

The impact of serum incubation time on IgM/IgG binding to porcine aortic endothelial cells

The results of the assay for measuring anti-non-Gal antibodies (which affect pig xenograft survival) in recipients are important. Serum incubation time and concentration may be important factors in the extent of antibody binding to the graft. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the optimal incubation time and serum concentration for measuring anti-non-Gal antibody binding to porcine aortic endothelial cells (pAECs). Pooled human, naive, and sensitized baboon sera were incubated with wild-type, α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO), and GTKO/human CD55 pAECs. IgM/IgG binding to pAECs after varying serum incubation times (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 hour) and concentrations (5, 10, 20, and 40 μL) was determined by flow cytometry. An increase in incubation time from 30 minutes to 2 hour was associated with increases in anti-non-Gal IgM/IgG binding to GTKO and GTKO/hCD55 pAECs of pooled human, naive and sensitized baboon sera (P<.05). Pooled human serum showed a significant increase in anti-non-Gal IgM (1.5 times) and a minimal increase in anti-non-Gal IgG antibody binding. IgM/IgG binding of sensitized baboon serum to GTKO pAECs after 2-hour incubation was 1.5 times and 2 times greater than after 30-minutes incubation, respectively, whereas naïve baboon sera showed minimal (non-significant) increase in anti-non-Gal IgM/IgG antibody binding. With 2-hour incubation, increasing the serum concentration from 5 μL to 20 μL significantly increased antibody binding to non-Gal antigens in pooled human and sensitized baboon serum. With naïve baboon serum, only IgG was significantly increased. Increasing the serum incubation time contributed to improve the sensitivity of detecting anti-non-Gal antibodies, without affecting cell viability in vitro.