Inhibitory effects of pirfenidone on dendritic cells and lung allograft rejection

Add-on therapy for pulmonary fibrosis, a forthcoming era with implications for practice: the BI 101550 and RELIEF trials

The therapeutic landscape for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PFILD) is increasingly complex, with add-on antifibrotic options now in clinical trials, or available for patients progressing on first-line therapy in both conditions. Here, we review two recent trials of potential add-on therapeutic options, the BI 101550 and RELIEF trials. BI 101550 was a phase 2 randomised control trial (RCT) of a novel phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor in patients with IPF, with a primary end-point of change in forced vital capacity (ΔFVC) (in mL) at 12 weeks. The RELIEF trial was a phase 2 RCT in patients with PFILD, with a primary end-point of ΔFVC (absolute % predicted) over 48 weeks. Whilst the BI 101550 and RELIEF trials showed positive results in their primary end-points, the strengths and weaknesses of both trials are discussed with importance for their interpretation and clinical impact. We review current clinical practice in IPF and PFILD and place the BI101550 and RELIEF trial results in context, highlighting advances and problems with antifibrotic therapies.

Commentary on

Richeldi L, et al. Trial of a preferential phosphodiesterase 4B inhibitor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 2178-2187.Behr J, et al. Pirfenidone in patients with progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (RELIEF): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial. Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9: 476-486.

Investigating the possible mechanisms of pirfenidone to be targeted as a promising anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, anti-oxidant, anti-apoptotic, anti-tumor, and/or anti-SARS-CoV-2

Pirfenidone (PFD) is a non-peptide synthetic chemical that inhibits the production of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), and collagen 1 (COL1A1), all of which have been linked to the prevention or removal of excessive scar tissue deposition in many organs. PFD has been demonstrated to decrease apoptosis, downregulate angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) receptor expression, reduce inflammation through many routes, and alleviate oxidative stress in pneumocytes and other cells while protecting them from COVID-19 invasion and cytokine storm. Based on the mechanism of action of PFD and the known pathophysiology of COVID-19, it was recommended to treat COVID-19 patients. The use of PFD as a treatment for a range of disorders is currently being studied, with an emphasis on outcomes related to reduced inflammation and fibrogenesis. As a result, rather than exploring the molecule's chemical characteristics, this review focuses on innovative PFD efficacy data. Briefly, herein we tried to investigate, discuss, and illustrate the possible mechanisms of actions for PFD to be targeted as a promising anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, anti-oxidant, anti-apoptotic, anti-tumor, and/or anti-SARS-CoV-2 candidate.

The role of immune response in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: far beyond the Th1/Th2 imbalance

INTRODUCTION

. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic disease of unknown origin characterized by progressive scarring of the lung leading to irreversible loss of function. Despite the availability of two drugs that are able to slow down disease progression, IPF remains a deadly disease. The pathogenesis of IPF is poorly understood, but a dysregulated wound healing response following recurrent alveolar epithelial injury is thought to be crucial. Areas covered. In the last few years, the role of the immune system in IPF pathobiology has been reconsidered; indeed, recent data suggest that a dysfunctional immune system may promote and unfavorable interplay with pro-fibrotic pathways thus acting as a cofactor in disease development and progression. In this article, we review and critically discuss the role of T cells in the pathogenesis and progression of IPF in the attempt to highlight ways in which further research in this area may enable the development of targeted immunomodulatory therapies for this dreadful disease.

EXPERT OPINION

A better understanding of T cells interactions has the potential to facilitate the development of immune modulators targeting multiple T cell-mediated pathways thus halting disease initiation and progression.

Lung Fibrosis and Fibrosis in the Lungs: Is It All about Myofibroblasts?

In the lungs, fibrosis is a growing clinical problem that results in shortness of breath and can end up in respiratory failure. Even though the main fibrotic disease affecting the lung is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which affects the interstitial space, there are many fibrotic events that have high and dangerous consequences for the lungs. Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), excessive allergies, clearance of infection or COVID-19, all are frequent diseases that show lung fibrosis. In this review, we describe the different kinds of fibrosis and analyse the main types of cells involved-myofibroblasts and other cells, like macrophages-and review the main fibrotic mechanisms. Finally, we analyse present treatments for fibrosis in the lungs and highlight potential targets for anti-fibrotic therapies.

The Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone Combined With Immunosuppressant Therapy in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A 24-Week Prospective Controlled Cohort Study

Objective

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD) that manifests as several subtypes with significant differences in prognosis. It is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone (PFD) combined with immunosuppressant (IS) in the treatment of CTD-ILD.

Methods

A total of 111 patients with CTD-ILD were enrolled, including those with systemic sclerosis (SSc), inflammatory myopathy (IIM), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and other CTDs (such as systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjogren's syndrome, and undifferentiated CTD). After evaluation of the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function (PF), and basic disease activity, patients either were or were not prescribed PFD and were followed up regularly for 24 weeks.

Results

After 24 weeks of treatment, predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) in the SSc-PFD group had improved by 6.60%, whereas this value was 0.55% in patients with SSc-no-PFD. The elevation in FVC% was also significant in IIM-PFD over the IIM-no-PFD controls (7.50 vs. 1.00%). The predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCo%) of RA-PFD was enhanced by 7.40%, whereas that of RA-no-PFD decreased by 5.50%. When performing a subtype analysis of HRCT images, the change in FVC% among patients with SSc with a tendency toward usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) was higher in those given PFD (SSc-PFD-UIP) than the no-PFD group (8.05 vs. −3.20%). However, in IIM patients with a non-UIP tendency, PFD displayed better therapeutic effects than the control (10.50 vs. 1.00%). DLCo% improved significantly in patients with the PFD-treated RA-non-UIP subtype compared with the patients with no-PFD (10.40 vs. −4.45%). Dichotomizing the patients around a baseline FVC% or DLCo% value of 70%, the PFD arm had a more improved FVC% than the no-PFD arm within the high-baseline-FVC% subgroups of patients with SSc and IIM (6.60 vs. 0.10%, 6.30 vs. 1.10%). In patients with RA-PFD, DLCo% showed a significant increase in the subgroup with low baseline DLCo% compared to that in patients with RA-no-PFD (7.40 vs. −6.60%).

Conclusion

The response of PF to PFD varied between CTD-ILD subsets. Patients with SSc and IIM showed obvious improvements in FVC%, especially patients with SSc-UIP and IIM-non-UIP. In RA, the subsets of patients with non-UIP and a lower baseline DLCo% most benefited from PFD.

Pirfenidone for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Beyond

Pirfenidone (PFD) slows the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) by inhibiting the exaggerated fibrotic response and possibly through additional mechanisms, such as anti-inflammatory effects. PFD has also been evaluated in other fibrosing lung diseases. Myocardial fibrosis is a common feature of several heart diseases and the progressive deposition of extracellular matrix due to a persistent injury to cardiomyocytes may trigger a vicious cycle that leads to persistent structural and functional alterations of the myocardium. No primarily antifibrotic medications are used to treat patients with heart failure. There is some evidence that PFD has antifibrotic actions in various animal models of cardiac disease and a phase II trial on patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction has yielded positive results. This review summarises the evidence about the possible mechanisms of IPF and modulation by PFD, the main results about IPF or non-IPF interstitial pneumonias and also data about PFD as a potential protective cardiac drug.

Role of antifibrotics in the management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy associated interstitial lung disease

The antifibrotic therapies nintedanib and pirfenidone were first approved by the United States for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 2014. In 2020, nintedanib received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of all progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD). Given that a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) is progressive interstitial lung disease and respiratory failure, antifibrotic therapies may be useful as adjuvant to traditional immunosuppression. However, randomized controlled trials of antifibrotic therapies in IIM are lacking. The purpose of this review is to (1) summarize the mechanism of action of nintedanib and pirfenidone in ILD with possible role in IIM-ILD, (2) review the clinical data supporting their use in interstitial lung disease in general, and more specifically in connective tissue disease associated ILD, and (3) discuss the evidence and remaining challenges for using antifibrotic therapies in IIM-ILD.

Antifibrotic drugs in lung transplantation and chronic lung allograft dysfunction: a review

This review aims to provide an overview of pre-transplant antifibrotic therapy on peri-transplant outcomes and to address the possible role of antifibrotics in lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction.Lung transplantation is an established treatment modality for patients with various end-stage lung diseases, of which idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases are growing indications. Theoretically, widespread use of antifibrotics prior to lung transplantation may increase the risk of bronchial anastomotic complications and impaired wound healing.Long-term graft and patient survival are still hampered by development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, on which antifibrotics may have a beneficial impact.Antifibrotics until the moment of lung transplantation proved to be safe, without increasing peri-transplant complications. Currently, best practice is to continue antifibrotics until time of transplantation. In a large multicentre randomised trial, pirfenidone did not appear to have a beneficial effect on lung function decline in established bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. The results of antifibrotic therapy in restrictive allograft syndrome are eagerly awaited, but nonrandomised data from small case reports/series are promising.

Regulatory Immune Cells in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Friends or Foes?

The immune system is receiving increasing attention for interstitial lung diseases, as knowledge on its role in fibrosis development and response to therapies is expanding. Uncontrolled immune responses and unbalanced injury-inflammation-repair processes drive the initiation and progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The regulatory immune system plays important roles in controlling pathogenic immune responses, regulating inflammation and modulating the transition of inflammation to fibrosis. This review aims to summarize and critically discuss the current knowledge on the potential role of regulatory immune cells, including mesenchymal stromal/stem cells, regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells, macrophages, dendritic cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Furthermore, we review the emerging role of regulatory immune cells in anti-fibrotic therapy and lung transplantation. A comprehensive understanding of immune regulation could pave the way towards new therapeutic or preventive approaches in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Inflammatory mediators in various molecular pathways involved in the development of pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a type of interstitial lung disease (ILD) that is marked by scarring of lung tissue, ultimately leading to respiratory failure. The survival rate of IPF is disappointing and to date demonstrates a clinical quandary. The exact etiology of the disease remains under discussion. According to the recent hypothesis, inflammatory mediators cause severe damage to the alveolar epithelium leading to the impairment of the alveolar structure. The role of inflammation in the development of the IPF has been controversial for years. There are two schools of thought regarding the role of inflammation. One group of researchers claims that cell death and fibroblast dysfunction are the primary causes and inflammation is just a secondary cause of IPF. The other group claims inflammation to be the primary cause. Studies using human subjects have also reported inflammation as a critical element in IPF. Inflammatory cytokinesserve amajor rolein commencing theinflammatoryresponse in the lungs. Several cytokines are reported to be involved in different molecular mechanisms underlying IPF, someof which alsocontribute additionally by acting as growth factors. The present review addressed to explore the contribution of various inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and various other inflammatory molecules activating the major molecular pathways involved during the development of IPF.

Kidney Allograft Fibrosis: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies

Interstitial fibrosis with tubule atrophy (IF/TA) is the response to virtually any sustained kidney injury and correlates inversely with kidney function and allograft survival. IF/TA is driven by various pathways that include hypoxia, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling, cellular rejection, inflammation and others. In this review we will focus on key pathways in the progress of renal fibrosis, diagnosis and therapy of allograft fibrosis. This review discusses the role and origin of myofibroblasts as matrix producing cells and therapeutic targets in renal fibrosis with a particular focus on renal allografts. We summarize current trends to use multi-omic approaches to identify new biomarkers for IF/TA detection and to predict allograft survival. Furthermore, we review current imaging strategies that might help to identify and follow-up IF/TA complementary or as alternative to invasive biopsies. We further discuss current clinical trials and therapeutic strategies to treat kidney fibrosis.Supplemental Visual Abstract; http://links.lww.com/TP/C141.

Antifibrotic drugs in connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD): from mechanistic insights to therapeutic applications

Fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs), which include systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome, idiopathic inflammatory myositis and systemic lupus erythematosus. The treatment of CTD-ILDs is challenging due to the paucity of proven effective treatments. Recently, two antifibrotic drugs conditionally approved for use in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, nintedanib and pirfenidone, have been trialled in CTD-ILDs based on overlapping pathological and clinical features between the two diseases. In this narrative review, we discuss the experimental evidence and clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic drugs in patients with CTD-ILDs and the potential mechanisms of action involved. Results from clinical trials suggest that nintedanib use retards lung function decline in progressive fibrotic CTD-ILDs. By contrast, the evidence for the efficacy of pirfenidone in these groups is not equally compelling. Further, well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of individual antifibrotic drugs in specific CTD-ILD subgroups.

Pirfenidone: Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Clinical Applications in Lung Disease

Pirfenidone (PFD) is a pharmacological compound with therapeutic efficacy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. It has been chiefly characterized as an antifibrotic agent, although it was initially developed as an antiinflammatory compound because of its ability to diminish the accumulation of inflammatory cells and cytokines. Despite recent studies that have elucidated key mechanisms, the precise molecular activities of PFD remain incompletely understood. PFD modulates fibrogenic growth factors, thereby attenuating fibroblast proliferation, myofibroblast differentiation, collagen and fibronectin synthesis, and deposition of extracellular matrix. This effect is mediated by suppression of TGF-β1 (transforming growth factor-β1) and other growth factors. Here, we appraise the impact of PFD on TGF-β1 production and its downstream pathways. Accumulating evidence indicates that PFD also downregulates inflammatory pathways and therefore has considerable potential as a viable and innovative antiinflammatory compound. We examine the effects of PFD on inflammatory cells and the production of pro- and antiinflammatory cytokines in the lung. In this context, recent evidence that PFD can target inflammasome pathways and ensuing lung inflammation is highlighted. Finally, the antioxidant properties of PFD, such as its ability to inhibit redox reactions and regulate oxidative stress-related genes and enzymes, are detailed. In summary, this narrative review examines molecular mechanisms underpinning PFD and its recognized benefits in lung fibrosis. We highlight preclinical data that demonstrate the potential of PFD as a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent and outline areas for future research.

Renoprotective effects of pirfenidone on chronic renal allograft dysfunction by reducing renal interstitial fibrosis in a rat model

AIM

Pirfenidone (PFD) has been used as medication for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis due to its ability in reducing lung fibrosis. However, the underlying mode of action in renal fibrosis during chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD) requires further investigation. Therefore, the present study was conducted to explore the effects of PFD on renal injury induced by CRAD.

MAIN METHODS

Initially, the CRAD rat model was established, followed by the intragastric administration of PFD to the rats. Urine and blood samples were collected and tested against indicators of renal functions. The renal tissues were microscopically observed to determine the changes in pathological morphology. The anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic and anti-oxidant properties of PFD were explored in the setting of CRAD.

KEY FINDINGS

The success rate of model establishment was 92.31%, which was reflected by weight loss, appetite loss, faded fur, and retarded reaction, with the symptoms found to exacerbate with time. PFD treatment could improve renal function, ameliorate inflammation and renal fibrosis as well as promote the anti-oxidant ability of renal allograft, indicating its potential role as an effective therapeutic agent for CRAD.

SIGNIFICANCE

In conclusion, PFD was found to have renoprotective effects on renal injury induced by CRAD, which resulted in the alleviation of inflammation and renal fibrosis, providing novelty for CRAD clinical treatment.

Pirfenidone exerts beneficial effects in patients with IPF undergoing single lung transplantation

Pirfenidone demonstrated pleiotropic antiinflammatory effects in various experimental and clinical settings. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of previous treatment with pirfenidone on short-term outcomes after single lung transplantation (SLTx). Therefore, patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who were undergoing SLTx were screened retrospectively for previous use of pirfenidone and compared to respective controls. Baseline parameters and short-term outcomes were recorded and analyzed. In total, 17 patients with pirfenidone were compared with 26 patients without antifibrotic treatment. Baseline characteristics and severity of disease did not differ between groups. Use of pirfenidone did not increase blood loss, wound-healing, or anastomotic complications. Severity of primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours was less (0.3 ± 0.6 vs 1.4 ± 1.3, P = .002), and length of mechanical ventilation (37.5 ± 34.8 vs 118.5 ± 151.0 hours, P = .016) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (6.6 ± 7.1 vs 15.6 ± 20.3, P = .089) were shorter in patients with pirfenidone treatment. An independent beneficial effect of pirfenidone was confirmed by regression analysis while controlling for confounding variables (P = .016). Finally, incidence of acute cellular rejections within the first 30 days after SLTx was lower in patients with previous pirfenidone treatment (0.0% vs 19.2%; P = .040). Our data suggest a beneficial role of previous use of pirfenidone in patients with IPF who were undergoing SLTx.

Pirfenidone in restrictive allograft syndrome after lung transplantation: A case series

Pirfenidone may attenuate the decline of pulmonary function in restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) after lung transplantation. We retrospectively assessed all lung transplant recipients with RAS who were treated with pirfenidone for at least 3 months (n = 11) in our lung transplant center and report on their long-term outcomes following initiation of pirfenidone. Main outcome parameters included evolution of pulmonary function and overall survival. Pirfenidone appears to attenuate the decline in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Notably, 3 patients were bridged to redo-transplantation with pirfenidone for 11 (5-12) months and are currently alive, while 3 other patients demonstrate long-term stabilization of pulmonary function after 26.6 (range 18.4-46.6) months of treatment. Median overall 3-year survival after RAS diagnosis was 54.5%. Subjective intolerance, mainly anorexia and nausea, necessitating pirfenidone dose de-escalation in 55% of patients, as well as calcineurin dose increase requirements with about 20% are important complications during pirfenidone treatment after lung transplantation. Our findings provide further evidence that pirfenidone appears to be safe and may attenuate the rate of decline in lung function in patients with RAS, but the actual clinical benefit cannot be assessed in the context of this study design and requires further investigation in a larger randomized trial.

The antifibrotic drug pirfenidone inhibits spondyloarthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes and osteoblasts in vitro

Background

The pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis (SpA) involves both inflammation and new bone formation in the spine. In line with this, the disease has been characterized as both inflammatory and fibrotic. The current treatment dampens inflammation while new bone formation can progress. Therefore, there is an unmet therapeutic need for the treatment of new bone formation in SpA. Fibrosis is mediated by myofibroblasts and new bone formation is the result of increased osteoblast mineralization and decreased osteoclast resorption. Here, we evaluate the potential effect of the newly approved anti-fibrotic agent pirfenidone (PFD) on fibrosis and new bone formation in cell culture models of SpA.

Methods

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) were isolated from SpA patients (n = 6) while the osteoblast cell line Saos-2 was purchased. The cells were cultured with PFD at 0.25 0.5, or 1.0 mg/ml. The proliferation of FLSs was analyzed with light microscopy and flow cytometry. The differentiation and activation of FLSs was assessed with flow cytometry, a membrane-based antibody array and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays. The mineralization capacity of osteoblasts was studied with an assay measuring deposition of hydroxyapatite.

Results

PFD reduced the Ki67 expression 7.1-fold in untreated FLSs (p = 0.001) and 11.0-fold in FLSs stimulated with transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and interferon gamma (IFNγ) (p = 0.022). There were no statistically significant changes in membrane expression of alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), or human leukocyte antigen DR (HLA-DR). In supernatants from FLSs stimulated with TGFβ, TNFα, and IFNγ, PFD decreased the secretion of 3 of 12 proteins more than 2-fold in the membrane-based antibody array. The changes in secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1, YKL-40) were validated with ELISA. PFD decreased the secretion of both Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1) (p = 0.006) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) (p = 0.02) by SpA FLSs stimulated with TGFβ, TNFα, and IFNγ. Finally, PFD inhibited the deposition of hydroxyapatite by osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner (p = 0.0001).

Conclusions

PFD inhibited SpA FLS proliferation and function and osteoblast mineralization in vitro. This encourages studies of the in vivo effect of PFD in SpA.

Pirfenidone alleviates lung ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat model

OBJECTIVE

Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury is among the complications seen after lung transplantation, resulting in morbidity and mortality. Pirfenidone, an antifibrotic agent for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, is reported to have cytoprotective properties in various disease models. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of pirfenidone on lung ischemia-reperfusion injury.

METHODS

Male Lewis rats (260-290 g) were divided into 3 groups: sham group (n = 5), warm ischemia (WI) group (n = 10), and WI plus pirfenidone (WI+PFD) group (n = 10). The sham group underwent 210 minutes of perfusion without ischemia. The WI and WI+PFD groups underwent 90 minutes of warm ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion. In the WI+PFD group, pirfenidone (300 mg/kg) was administered orally by gavage 30 minutes before ischemia. After reperfusion, arterial blood gas analysis, lung mechanics, lung wet-to-dry weight ratio, and histologic findings were obtained. The gene expressions of proinflammatory cytokines in lung tissue were measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Compared with the WI group, the WI+PFD group had significantly better dynamic pulmonary compliance (P < .01) and oxygenation levels (P < .05). The wet-to-dry ratio was lower in the WI+PFD group (P < .05). Histologic analysis showed that the WI+PFD group had reduced perivascular edema and neutrophil infiltration. The expression of tumor necrosis factor-α messenger RNA was decreased in the WI+PFD group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that in a rat hilar clamp model, pirfenidone alleviated lung ischemia-reperfusion through anti-inflammatory effects.

Modulation of subsets of cardiac B lymphocytes improves cardiac function after acute injury

Despite the long-standing recognition that the immune response to acute myocardial injury contributes to adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling, it has not been possible to effectively target this clinically. Using 2 different in vivo models of acute myocardial injury, we show that pirfenidone confers beneficial effects in the murine heart through an unexpected mechanism that depends on cardiac B lymphocytes. Naive hearts contained a large population of CD19+CD11b-CD23-CD21-IgD+IgMlo lymphocytes, and 2 smaller populations of CD19+CD11b+ B1a and B1b cells. In response to tissue injury, there was an increase in neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, as well as an increase in CD19+ CD11b- B lymphocytes. Treatment with pirfenidone had no effect on the number of neutrophils, monocytes, or macrophages, but decreased CD19+CD11b- lymphocytes. B cell depletion abrogated the beneficial effects of pirfenidone. In vitro studies demonstrated that stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and extracts from necrotic cells activated CD19+ lymphocytes through a TIRAP-dependent pathway. Treatment with pirfenidone attenuated this activation of B cells. These findings reveal a previously unappreciated complexity of myocardial B lymphocytes within the inflammatory infiltrate triggered by cardiac injury and suggest that pirfenidone exerts beneficial effects in the heart through a unique mechanism that involves modulation of cardiac B lymphocytes.

Pirfenidone reduces profibrotic responses in human dermal myofibroblasts, in vitro

Pirfenidone (PFD) is a synthetic small molecule inhibitor with demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties in vitro and in vivo. The exact mechanism(s) of PFD action remain unclear, due in part to the broad effects of this drug on the complex processes involved in inflammation and fibrosis. While PFD is FDA-approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the efficacy of this compound for the treatment of dermal fibrosis has not yet been fully characterized. Dermal fibrosis is the pathological formation of excess fibrous connective tissue of the skin, usually the result of traumatic cutaneous injury. Fibroproliferative scarring, caused by delayed wound healing and prolonged inflammation, remains a major clinical concern with considerable morbidity. Despite efforts to identify a therapeutic that targets the fibrotic pathways involved in wound healing to mitigate scar formation, no satisfactory dermal antifibrotic has yet been identified. We aim to better elucidate the antifibrotic mechanism(s) of PFD activity using an in vitro model of dermal fibrosis. Briefly, cultured human dermal fibroblasts were stimulated with TGF-β1 to induce differentiation into profibrotic myofibroblast cells. A dose-dependent reduction in cellular proliferation and migration was observed in TGF-β1-stimulated cells when treated with PFD. We observed a clear inhibition in the development of essential myofibroblast mechanoregulatory machinery, including contractile F-actin stress fibers containing α-SMA and large super-mature focal adhesions. PFD treatment significantly reduced protein levels of major ECM components type I and type III collagen. PFD targeted the p38 MAPK signaling pathway and mitigated profibrotic gene expression profiles. This in vitro data promotes PFD as a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of dermal fibrosis.

Pirfenidone exerts a suppressive effect on CCL18 expression in U937-derived macrophages partly by inhibiting STAT6 phosphorylation

CONTEXT

CC chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) is suggested to play a role in the development of pulmonary fibrosis. Macrophages are thought to be the main source of CCL18, and the effect of pirfenidone, an anti-fibrotic agent for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, on the expression of CCL18 in macrophages warrants investigation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of pirfenidone on the expression of CCL18 in macrophages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

U937 cells were differentiated into macrophages by phorbol myristate acetate and then stimulated with recombinant IL-4 to induce the production of CCL18. The cells were treated with pirfenidone, and the mRNA and protein levels for CCL18 were measured by a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. The effects of pirfenidone on the IL-4 receptor (IL-4R) expression and STAT6 activation were investigated and on the JAK kinase activity were measured using the Z'-LYTE™ kinase assay.

RESULTS

Pirfenidone significantly suppressed the expression of CCL18 when the cells were treated with concentrations of 50-250 μg/mL. Pirfenidone did not affect the expression of the IL-4R components. The selective STAT6 inhibitor AS1517499 suppressed CCL18 expression. Both AS1517499 and pirfenidone suppressed STAT6 phosphorylation (p < .05), although the effect of pirfenidone was less marked than that of AS1517499. The Z'-LYTE™ kinase assay showed a reduction in the activities of JAK1, JAK3 and TYK2 by pirfenidone.

CONCLUSION

Pirfenidone suppresses CCL18 expression in macrophages and this effect is thought to be attributed partly to the inhibition of STAT6 phosphorylation.

Pirfenidone inhibits p38-mediated generation of procoagulant microparticles by human alveolar epithelial cells

Pirfenidone is a drug recently approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis but its mechanisms of action are partially unknown. We have previously demonstrated that the airways of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis contain procoagulant microparticles that activate coagulation factor X to its active form, Xa, a proteinase that signals fibroblast growth and differentiation, thus potentially contributing to the pathogenesis of the disease. We also reported that in vitro exposure of human alveolar cells to H2O2 causes microparticle generation. Since p38 activation is involved in microparticle generation in some cell models and p38 inhibition is one of the mechanisms of action of pirfenidone, we investigated the hypothesis that H2O2-induced generation of microparticles by alveolar cells is dependent on p38 phosphorylation and is inhibited by pirfenidone. H2O2 stimulation of alveolar cells caused p38 phosphorylation that was inhibited by pirfenidone. The drug also inhibited H2O2 induced microparticle generation as assessed by two independent methods (solid phase thrombin generation and flow cytometry). The shedding of microparticle-bound tissue factor activity was also inhibited by pirfenidone. Inhibition of p38-mediated generation of procoagulant microparticle is a previously unrecognized mechanism of action of the antifibrotic drug, pirfenidone.

Disease Recurrence and Acute Cellular Rejection Episodes During the First Year After Lung Transplantation Among Patients With Sarcoidosis

INTRODUCTION

Sarcoidosis is reported to recur after lung transplantation (LT). We sought to determine the frequency of recurrent disease after LT and predictors of recurrence. We also evaluated the incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes among these patients.

METHODS

The database of LT patients at Cleveland Clinic was interrogated for sarcoidosis patients who underwent LT between May 1993 and 2011. Charts were reviewed for demographics, type of transplant, posttransplant biopsy findings, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Data were available for 30 patients (mean age, 50 ± 9.3 years; range, 30-65 years; M-to-F ratio, 17:13; single-to-double-to-heart lung ratio, 5:24:1). Recurrence of sarcoidosis was noted among 7 patients (pathological recurrence in all and radiological findings suggesting recurrence in 1 patient) with no impact on overall outcomes. Presence of granulomas on explanted lungs was the only predictor of recurrence (85.7% vs 30.4%, odds ratio, 13.7; 1.4-136.2; P = 0.02).Overall burden of ACR episodes on all bronchoscopies was significantly lower in patients with disease recurrence (7.6 % vs 21.3% of biopsies, P = 0.038). Among patients with recurrent disease, ACR did not develop once disease recurrence had been seen on transbronchial biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of sarcoidosis patients have disease recurrence after LT and presence of active granulomas on explant is associated with subsequent recurrence. There may be an association of recurrence with lower frequency of ACR episodes. There does not appear to be any impact of sarcoidosis recurrence on 1-, 3-, or 5-year survivals.

Therapeutic lymphangiogenesis ameliorates established acute lung allograft rejection

Lung transplantation is the only viable option for patients suffering from otherwise incurable end-stage pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Despite aggressive immunosuppression, acute rejection of the lung allograft occurs in over half of transplant recipients, and the factors that promote lung acceptance are poorly understood. The contribution of lymphatic vessels to transplant pathophysiology remains controversial, and data that directly address the exact roles of lymphatic vessels in lung allograft function and survival are limited. Here, we have shown that there is a marked decline in the density of lymphatic vessels, accompanied by accumulation of low-MW hyaluronan (HA) in mouse orthotopic allografts undergoing rejection. We found that stimulation of lymphangiogenesis with VEGF-C156S, a mutant form of VEGF-C with selective VEGFR-3 binding, alleviates an established rejection response and improves clearance of HA from the lung allograft. Longitudinal analysis of transbronchial biopsies from human lung transplant recipients demonstrated an association between resolution of acute lung rejection and decreased HA in the graft tissue. Taken together, these results indicate that lymphatic vessel formation after lung transplantation mediates HA drainage and suggest that treatments to stimulate lymphangiogenesis have promise for improving graft outcomes.

Inhibition of the purinergic pathway prolongs mouse lung allograft survival

Lung transplantation has limited survival with current immunosuppression. ATP is released from activated T cells, which act as costimulatory molecules through binding to the purinergic receptor P2XR7. We investigated the role of blocking the ATP/purinergic pathway, primarily P2XR7, using its inhibitor oxidized ATP (oATP) in modulating rejection of mouse lung allografts. Mouse lung transplants were performed using mice with major histocompatibility complex mismatch, BALB/c to C57BL6. Recipients received suramin or oATP, and lung allografts were evaluated 15 to ≥ 60 days after transplantation. Recipients were also treated with oATP after the onset of moderate to severe rejection to determine its ability to rescue lung allografts. Outcomes measures included lung function, histology, thoracic imaging, and allo-immune responses. Blocking purinergic receptors with the nonselective inhibitor suramin or with the P2XR7-selective inhibitor oATP reduced acute rejection and prolonged lung allograft survival for ≥ 60 days with no progression in severity. There were fewer inflammatory cells within lung allografts, less rejection, and improved lung function, which was maintained over time. CD4 and CD8 T cells were reduced within lung allografts with impaired activation with prolonged impairment of CD8 responses. In vitro, oATP reduced CD8 activation of Th1 inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α and cytolytic machinery, granzyme B. Cotreatment with immunosuppressive agents, cyclosporine, rapamycin, or CTLA-4Ig resulted in no additive benefits, and oATP alone resulted in better outcomes than cyclosporine alone. This study illustrates a potential new pathway to target in hopes of prolonging survival of lung transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation can be a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage lung diseases. Unfortunately, long term graft and patient survival are limited by both acute and chronic allograft rejection, with a median survival of just over 6 years. Immunosuppressive regimens are employed to reduce the rate of rejection, and while protocols vary from center to center, conventional maintenance therapy consists of triple drug therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), antiproliferative agents [azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate, sirolimus (srl), everolimus (evl)], and corticosteroids (CS). Roughly 50% of lung transplant centers also utilize induction therapy, with polyclonal antibody preparations [equine or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)], interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) (daclizumab or basiliximab), or alemtuzumab. This review summarizes these agents and the data surrounding their use in lung transplantation, as well as additional common and novel therapies in lung transplantation. Despite the progression of the management of lung transplant recipients, they continue to be at high risk of treatment-related complications, and poor graft and patient survival. Randomized clinical trials are needed to allow for the development of better agents, regimens and techniques to address above mentioned issues and reduce morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date

The enduring success of lung transplantation is built on the use of immunosuppressive drugs to stop the immune system from rejecting the newly transplanted lung allograft. Most patients receive a triple-drug maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative and corticosteroids. Induction therapy with either an antilymphocyte monoclonal or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist are prescribed by many centres aiming to achieve rapid inhibition of recently activated and potentially alloreactive T lymphocytes. Despite this generic approach acute rejection episodes remain common, mandating further fine-tuning and augmentation of the immunosuppressive regimen. While there has been a trend away from cyclosporine and azathioprine towards a preference for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, this has not translated into significant protection from the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the main barrier to the long-term success of lung transplantation. This article reviews the problem of lung allograft rejection and the evidence for immunosuppressive regimens used both in the short- and long-term in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Effect of pirfenidone on proliferation, TGF-β-induced myofibroblast differentiation and fibrogenic activity of primary human lung fibroblasts

Pirfenidone is an orally active small molecule that has been shown to inhibit the progression of fibrosis in animal models and in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Although pirfenidone exhibits well documented antifibrotic and antiinflammatory activities, in vitro and in vivo, its molecular targets and mechanisms of action have not been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the effects of pirfenidone on proliferation, TGF-β-induced differentiation and fibrogenic activity of primary human lung fibroblasts (HLFs). Pirfenidone reduced fibroblast proliferation and attenuated TGF-β-induced α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and pro-collagen (Col)-I mRNA and protein levels. Importantly, pirfenidone inhibited TGF-β-induced phosphorylation of Smad3, p38, and Akt, key factors in the TGF-β pathway. Together, these results demonstrate that pirfenidone modulates HLF proliferation and TGF-β-mediated differentiation into myofibroblasts by attenuating key TGF-β-induced signaling pathways.

Pirfenidone: a potential new therapy for restrictive allograft syndrome?

This case report describes the evolution of pulmonary function findings (FVC, FEV1 and TLC) and CT features with pirfenidone treatment for restrictive allograft syndrome following lung transplantation. Furthermore, we herein report hypermetabolic activity on (18) F-FDG PET imaging in this setting, which could indicate active fibroproliferation and pleuroparenchymal remodeling. These findings may warrant further investigation.

Managing bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in children: what does the future hold?

The success of pediatric lung transplantation continues to be limited by long-term graft dysfunction. Historically this has been characterized as an obstructive spirometric defect in the form of the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). It is recognized, however, that this does not reflect many of the other acknowledged etiologies of chronic lung dysfunction-noting it is the sum of the parts that contribute to respiratory morbidity and mortality after transplant. The term chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has been coined to reflect these other entities and, in particular, a group of relatively recently described lung disorders called the restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). RAS is characterized by a restrictive spirometric defect. Although these entities have not yet been studied in a pediatric setting their association with poor compliance, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and post-infectious lung damage (particularly viral) warrants attention by pediatric lung transplant teams. Current therapy for the BOS subset of CLAD is otherwise limited to changing immunosuppressants and avoiding excessive infectious risk by avoiding over-immunosuppression. Long-term macrolide therapy in lung transplantation is not of proven efficacy. Reviewing previous BOS studies to explore restrictive spirometric cases and joint projects via groups like the International Pediatric Lung Transplant Collaborative will be the way forward to solve this pressing problem.