Risk factors for BK virus infection in the era of therapeutic drug monitoring. Transplantation. 2013;95:1498-1505. [PMID: 23778568 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3182921995]

Challenges and opportunities in research on BK virus infection after renal transplantation

Renal transplantation is one of the primary approaches for curing end-stage kidney disease. With advancements in immunosuppressive agents, the short-term and long-term survival rates of transplanted kidneys have significantly improved. However, infections associated with potent immunosuppression have remained a persistent challenge. Among them, BK virus (BKV) reactivation following renal transplantation leading to BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is a major cause of graft dysfunction. However, we still face significant challenges in understanding the pathogenesis, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of BKVAN. These challenges include: 1. The mechanism of BKV reactivation under immunosuppressive conditions has not been well elucidated, leading to difficulties in breakthroughs in clinical research on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. 2. Lack of proper identification of high-risk individuals, and effective personalized clinical management strategies. 3.Lack of early and sensitive diagnostic markers. 4. Lack of direct and effective treatment options due to the absence of specific antiviral drugs. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current status and cutting-edge advancements in BKV-related research, providing new methods and perspectives to address future research challenges.

Interventions for BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), caused by infection with or reactivation of BK virus, remains a challenge in kidney transplantation. Screening is recommended for all kidney transplant recipients. For those with clinically significant infection, reduction of immunosuppression is the cornerstone of management. There is no specific antiviral or immunomodulatory therapy sufficiently effective for routine use.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to examine the benefits and harms of interventions for BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 September 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies investigating any intervention for the treatment or prevention of BKVAN for kidney transplant recipients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the study quality and extracted data. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve RCTs (2669 randomised participants) were included. Six studies were undertaken in single centres, and six were multicentre studies; two of these were international studies. The ages of those participating ranged from 44 to 57 years. The length of follow-up ranged from three months to five years. All studies included people with a kidney transplant, and three studies included people with signs of BK viraemia. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of the type of interventions and outcomes assessed. The overall risk of bias was low or unclear. Intensive screening for the early detection of BK viraemia or BK viruria prevents graft loss (1 study, 908 participants: RR 0.00, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.05) and decreases the presence of decoy cells and viraemia at 12 months (1 study, 908 participants: RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.11) compared to routine care (high certainty evidence). No other outcomes were reported. Compared to placebo, fluoroquinolones may slightly reduce the risk of graft loss (3 studies, 393 participants: RR 0.37, CI 0.09 to 1.57; I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence), probably makes little or no difference to donor-specific antibodies (DSA), may make little or no difference to BK viraemia and death, had uncertain effects on BKVAN and malignancy, but may increase the risk of tendonitis (2 studies, 193 participants: RR 5.66, CI 1.02 to 31.32; I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). Compared to tacrolimus (TAC), cyclosporin (CSA) probably makes little or no difference to graft loss and death, may make little or no difference to BKVAN and malignancy, but probably decreases BK viraemia (2 studies, 263 participants: RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.41; I2 = 38%) and probably reduces the risk of new-onset diabetes after transplantation (1 study, 200 participants: RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.35) (both moderate certainty evidence). Compared to azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) probably makes little or no difference to graft loss and BK viraemia but probably reduces the risk of death (1 study, 133 participants: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.16) and malignancy (1 study, 199 participants: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.16) (both moderate certainty evidence). Compared to mycophenolate sodium (MPS), CSA has uncertain effects on graft loss and death, may make little or no difference to BK viraemia, but may reduce BKVAN (1 study, 224 participants: RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.20; low certainty evidence). Compared to immunosuppression dose reduction, MMF or TAC conversion to everolimus or sirolimus may make little or no difference to graft loss, BK viraemia or BKVAN (low certainty evidence). TAC conversion to sirolimus probably results in more people having a reduced BK viral load (< 600 copies/mL) than immunosuppression reduction (1 study, 30 participants: RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.89; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to MPS, everolimus had uncertain effects on graft loss and BK viraemia, may reduce BKVAN (1 study, 135 participants: 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.11) and may increase the risk of death (1 study, 135 participants: RR 3.71, 95% CI 0.20 to 67.35) (both low certainty evidence). Compared to CSA, everolimus may make little or no difference to BK viraemia, has uncertain effects on graft loss and BKVAN, but may increase the risk of death (1 study, 185 participants: RR 3.71, 95% CI 0.42 to 32.55; low certainty evidence). Compared to immunosuppression reduction, the leflunomide derivative FK778 may make little or no difference to graft loss, probably results in a greater reduction in plasma BK viral load (1 study, 44 participants: -0.60 copies/µL, 95% CI -1.22 to 0.02; moderate certainty evidence), but had uncertain effects on BKVAN and malignancy. Aggravated hypertension may be increased with KF778 (1 study, 46 participants: RR 8.23, 95% CI 0.50 to 135.40; low certainty evidence). There were no deaths in either group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Intense monitoring early after transplantation for BK viruria and BK viraemia is effective in improving BK virus infection outcomes as it helps with early detection of the infection and allows for a timely reduction in immunosuppression reduction. There is insufficient evidence to support any other intervention for BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

BK polyomavirus DNAemia, allograft rejection, and de novo donor-specific antibodies after lowering target tacrolimus levels in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKV) DNAemia is a challenging infectious complication after kidney transplant (KT). Reduction of immunosuppression is the mainstay of management, and tacrolimus is often the first immunosuppressive medication adjusted upon the diagnosis of BKV DNAemia. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a new institutional protocol with lower target tacrolimus levels on BKV DNAemia, allograft rejection, and de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) among pediatric KT recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all KT episodes between January 2013 and December 2018. The new protocol with lower target tacrolimus levels was implemented in March 2015. One hundred twenty-seven patients were included in primary analysis. All patients received induction with basiliximab and methylprednisolone and were maintained on a steroid-based immunosuppressive regimen.

RESULTS

In the post-intervention cohort, cumulative incidence of BKV DNAemia at 100 days (13.4% vs. 17.8%, p = .605) and 18 months post-KT (34.1% vs. 26.7%, p = .504) was not significantly different from the pre-intervention cohort. Biopsy-proven rejection rate did not change. However, we observed a trend toward earlier development of dnDSA in the post-intervention cohort using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank p = .06). Younger recipient age at the time of transplant was found to slightly increase the risk of BKV DNAemia (OR: 1.09, 95% CI [1.01, 1.16], p = .024). There was an association between BKV DNAemia and biopsy-proven rejection of any type (adjustedOR: 2.77, 95% CI [1.26, 6.23], p = .012), especially acute T-cell-mediated rejection grade 1A and above (adjustedOR: 2.95, 95% CI [1.06, 8.30], p = .037), after adjusted for recipient age at the time of transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting lower tacrolimus levels did not decrease the incidence of BKV DNAemia within 100 days or 18 months post-KT, nor did it increase the risk of biopsy-proven rejection among pediatric KT recipients in our center. However, there was a trend toward earlier development of dnDSA, which may portend worse long-term graft outcome post-KT. Our findings highlight the need for individualized immunosuppressive regimens based on immunologic and infectious risk factors and the importance of implementing innovative biomarkers to guide therapy and improve outcomes.

A pharmacist-led intervention to improve kidney transplant recipient outcomes and identify patients at risk of highly variable trough tacrolimus levels: a cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Given the positive impact of appropriate medication management on graft outcome and therefore of patient survival and graft function, the pharmacist's role in the kidney transplantation team has evolved over recent decades. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether pharmacist-led intervention after kidney transplantation is associated with a lower graft rejection rate and intra-patient variation in tacrolimus trough concentrations (Cmin). The study's secondary objective was to develop a questionnaire to identify patients at risk for highly variable Cmin.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed kidney transplant recipients at Rennes University Hospital (France) between January 2013 and December 2020. Patients who received pharmacist-led education (intervention group, n=139) were compared with patients who did not (control group, n=131), according to graft survival at 1 year post-transplant, coefficient of variation (%CV) for the tacrolimus Cmin, age, sex, length of hospital stay post-transplantation, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. In the intervention group, a questionnaire assessing patient knowledge was introduced to compare scores with the %CV.

RESULTS

In the intervention group, 1 year post-transplant graft survival was higher (95.7% vs 88.5%, p=0.0289) and patients had fewer variabilities in Cmin. The %CV was correlated with questionnaire scores (r=-0.9758, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacist-led interventions may have contributed to improved graft survival and patient management of immunosuppressants. Because %CV correlates with the patient questionnaire score, its introduction could be useful in identifying kidney transplant patients who would benefit most from a pharmacist-led patient education.

Polyomavirus Nephropathy in ABO Blood Group-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: Torque Teno Virus and Immunosuppressive Burden as an Approximation to the Problem

Introduction

Earlier reports suggest that patients after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi) are at enhanced risk of developing BK-virus (BKV, also known as BK polyomavirus [BKPyV]) nephropathy (BKPyVAN). It remains elusive whether this is a result of more intense immunosuppression or an ABOi-associated "intrinsic attribute." To address this question, we measured Torque Teno virus (TTV) loads as a quantitative proxy for immunosuppressive depth in ABOi recipients and compared them to human leukocyte antigen-incompatible (HLAi, i.e. pretransplant donor-specific antibody-positive) and standard-risk transplant recipients.

Methods

Our retrospective study screened 2256 consecutive kidney transplantations performed between 2007 and 2020 at the Medical University of Vienna. Out of 629 in-principle eligible transplantations, we were able to include 465 patients: 42 ABOi, 106 HLAi, and 317 control recipients. Longitudinal TTV- polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and BKV-PCR was carried out at predefined timepoints and ranged from pretransplant until month 24 posttransplantation. TTV loads and immunosuppression were evaluated in the context of BKV-associated complications.

Results

ABOi recipients had a higher TTV load compared to HLAi and controls both at month 3 (median 1.5 × 109 vs. 2.4 × 108 vs. 9.1 × 107; P = 0.010) and at month 6 (3.1 × 109 vs. 1.4 × 107 vs. 6.4 × 107; P = 0.014) posttransplantation. Tacrolimus exposure was significantly higher in ABOi patients compared to HLAi and control patients (ABOi vs. HLAi: P = 0.007; ABOi vs. controls: P < 0.0001). Biopsy-proven BKPyVAN was more frequent in ABOi recipients when compared to HLAi and control recipients (11.9% vs. 2.8% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.046).

Conclusion

Our data support the assumption that ABOi patients are indeed at higher risk to develop BKPyVAN. A higher TTV load and immunosuppressive burden suggest that intense immunosuppression, rather than an "intrinsic attribute" conferred by ABOi, may contribute to this finding.

BK polyomavirus infection: more than 50 years and still a threat to kidney transplant recipients

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a ubiquitous human polyomavirus and a major infection after kidney transplantation, primarily due to immunosuppression. BKPyV reactivation can manifest as viruria in 30%-40%, viremia in 10%-20%, and BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in 1%-10% of recipients. BKPyVAN is an important cause of kidney graft failure. Although the first case of BKPyV was identified in 1971, progress in its management has been limited. Specifically, there is no safe and effective antiviral agent or vaccine to treat or prevent the infection. Even in the current era, the mainstay approach to BKPyV is a reduction in immunosuppression, which is also limited by safety (risk of de novo donor specific antibody and rejection) and efficacy (graft failure). However, recently BKPyV has been getting more attention in the field, and some new treatment strategies including the utilization of viral-specific T-cell therapy are emerging. Given all these challenges, the primary focus of this article is complications associated with BKPyV, as well as strategies to mitigate negative outcomes.

Efficacy of mTOR Inhibitors and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Treatment of Polyoma BK Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Biopsy-Proven Study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the efficacy of a predetermined protocol that consisted of immunosuppressive drug reduction/withdrawal and intravenous immunoglobulin administration for the treatment of polyoma BK virus nephropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven polyoma BK virus nephropathy received a treatment regimen based on discontinuation of both calcineurin inhibitors and antiproliferative agents and switching to mTOR inhibitors accompanied by intravenous immunoglobulin administration.

RESULTS

Our study included 508 patients, with polyoma BK viremia detected in 80 patients. The mean age was 45.3 ± 9.5 years (range, 18-71 y), 64% were male, and mean follow-up was 37 ± 21 months (6-94 mo). All 16 patients who developed polyoma BK virus nephropathy and 9 patients who had highgrade polyoma BK viremia without nephropathy received intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. Compared with patients with viremia, patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy had significantly higher rates of graft loss due to rejection (18.8% vs 1.6%; P = .024) and all-cause graft loss (31.2% vs 6.3%; P = .014). Histopathologically, viral inclusion bodies disappeared and SV40 became negative after treatment in all 13 patients who underwent protocol biopsies. Unfortunately, histopathologically complete recovery without chronic tubular and interstitial tissue damage was achieved in only 4 patients after treatment. In addition, 3 patients lost their grafts due to acute antibody-mediated or mixed-type rejection (18.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy, clearance of viremia and SV40 should not be the sole outcomes to obtain. Aggressive reductions in maintenance immunosuppression and switching to double-drug therapy combined with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to high rates of graft loss/rejection and sequalae of chronic histological changes.

BKPyV DNAemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients Undergoing Regular Screening: A Single-Centre Cohort Study

Infection with BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a common opportunistic infection after kidney transplantation (KT) and may affect graft function. We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of BKPyV DNAemia in a prospective cohort of 601 KT recipients transplanted from 2012 to 2020. BKPyV PCR on plasma was performed at days 60, 90, 180, 270, and 360 post-KT. Any BKPyV DNAemia was defined as a single BKPyV DNA of ≥1000 copies/mL. Severe BKPyV DNAemia was defined as two consecutive BKPyV DNA of ≥10,000 copies/mL. Cumulative incidences were investigated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, and the risk factors were investigated in Cox proportional hazard models. The incidence of any BKPyV DNAemia and severe BKPyV DNAemia was 21% (18-25) and 13% (10-16) at one year post-KT, respectively. Recipient age > 50 years (aHR, 1.72; 95% CI 1.00-2.94; p = 0.049), male sex (aHR, 1.96; 95% CI 1.17-3.29; p = 0.011), living donors (aHR, 1.65; 95% CI 1.03-2.74; p = 0.045), and >3 HLA-ABDR mismatches (aHR, 1.72; 95% CI 1.01-2.94; p = 0.046) increased the risk of severe BKPyV DNAemia. Any BKPyV DNAemia was associated with an increased risk of graft function decline (aHR, 2.26; 95% CI 1.00-5.12; p = 0.049), and severe BKPyV DNAemia was associated with an increased risk of graft loss (aHR, 3.18; 95% CI 1.06-9.58; p = 0.039). These findings highlight the importance of BKPyV monitoring post-KT.

A Validated LC-MS/MS Method for Performing Belatacept Drug Monitoring in Renal Transplantation

Belatacept, a CTLA4-Ig, was designed to prevent rejection and graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. This immunotherapy showed a long-term clinical benefit mainly on renal function and better glycemic control but was also associated with a higher number of severe infectious diseases, particularly CMV disease, and lymphoproliferative disease. Therapeutic drug monitoring usually guides the benefit-risk assessment of long-term immunosuppression. In this study, an analytical method by LC-MS/MS was developed in 20 microL of plasma for the belatacept quantification. Intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy were lower than 20% for the limit of quantification, and 15% for higher concentrations. The method was implemented in our lab and provided data about the inter-variability (N = 108) and intra-variability (N = 33) of belatacept concentrations in kidney transplant recipients with a stable renal function, after conversion from a CNI- to a belatacept-based regimen.

Single-Cell Transcriptome Identifies the Renal Cell Type Tropism of Human BK Polyomavirus

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection is the main factor affecting the prognosis of kidney transplant recipients, as no antiviral agent is yet available. A better understanding of the renal-cell-type tropism of BKPyV can serve to develop new treatment strategies. In this study, the single-cell transcriptomic analysis demonstrated that the ranking of BKPyV tropism for the kidney was proximal tubule cells (PT), collecting duct cells (CD), and glomerular endothelial cells (GEC) according to the signature of renal cell type and immune microenvironment. In normal kidneys, we found that BKPyV infection-related transcription factors P65 and CEBPB were PT-specific transcription factors, and PT showed higher glycolysis/gluconeogenesis activities than CD and GEC. Furthermore, in the BKPyV-infected kidneys, the percentage of late viral transcripts in PT was significantly higher than in CD and GEC. In addition, PT had the smallest cell-cell interactions with immune cells compared to CD and GEC in both normal and BKPyV-infected kidneys. Subsequently, we indirectly demonstrated the ranking of BKPyV tropism via the clinical observation of sequential biopsies. Together, our results provided in-depth insights into the renal cell-type tropism of BKPyV in vivo at single-cell resolution and proposed a novel antiviral target.

Is Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy More Common in Kidney Transplant Recipients Exposed to Valganciclovir? A Retrospective Single Center Analysis

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a frequent complication in the early phase after kidney transplantation. The most important risk factor for PVAN is the intensity of immunosuppression. A recent study suggests that exposure to valganciclovir (VGC) could also be a risk factor.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single-center study to investigate the effect of valganciclovir exposure on the risk for PVAN during the first 100 days post transplant. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative recipients of a CMV seropositive donor kidney received VGC prophylaxis, whereas CMV seropositive recipients were managed by a pre-emptive CMV strategy. Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for PVAN development with VGC treatment and strength of immunosuppressive therapy as time-dependent variables.

RESULTS

A total of 211 adults who received a kidney transplant between 2014 and 2019 were included. Eighteen (9%) developed PVAN. Multivariate regression analysis showed that women have a lower risk of developing PVAN (hazard ratio [HR] 0.08 (confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.58), P = .013), whereas age was associated with an increased risk for PVAN (HR 1.04 for every additional year [CI 1.00-1.08], P = .029). There was a trend toward a lower risk of PVAN for patients on reduced immunosuppressive therapy (HR 0.44 [CI 0.15-1.24], P = .12). VGC use was not associated with the risk for PVAN (HR 0.99 [CI 0.35-2.78], P = .98).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, VGC exposure was not associated with the risk for PVAN. Our study is the first to reassess in depth the hypothesis that VGC treatment increases the risk of PVAN. The unique strength of this study is the correction for the degree of immunosuppression and the statistical use of time-dependent covariates. This methodological approach can provide a foundation for further studies needed to confirm our findings.

Correlation between CYP3A5 gene polymorphism and BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) includes two active genotypes, namely CYP3A5*1/*1 or *1/*3 with the fast metabolic activity and CYP3A5*3/*3 with slow metabolic. We retrospectively analyzed the correlation between CYP3A5 gene polymorphism and the susceptibility to the BK virus (BKV) infection in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

According to the inclusion/ exclusion criteria, we selected 134 recipients who received kidney transplantation at the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2019 to December 2019. Based on the pre-operative CYP3A5 sequencing results, 134 recipients were divided into two groups: those expressing the fast metabolic CYP3A5*1/*1 or *1/*3 genotype; and, those expressing slow metabolic CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. These two recipient groups were then analyzed for the BKV infection rate with different metabolic types to establish the potential relationship between CYP3A5 gene polymorphism and BKV infection.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of BKV viruria was 37.3%, whereas BKV viremia was 4.5% among all 134 recipients. The fast metabolism group had 9.1% incidence of BKV viremia and 49.1% incidence of BKV viruria. In contrast, the slow metabolism group had only 1.3%incidence of BKV viremia (P = 0.031) with only 29.1% BKV viruria (P = 0.011). The incidence of low levels of urinary BKV in the fast metabolism group was higher than that in the slow metabolism group (P = 0.005), while no significant statistical difference in the incidence of high levels of urinary BKV and high and low levels of blood BKV.

CONCLUSION

After kidney transplantation, CYP3A5 gene polymorphism of recipients present a certain relationship with the occurrence of BKV infection, which may be of value for the prediction and prevention of BKV infection.

BK Virus Infection and BK-Virus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients

Poliomavirus BK virus (BKV) is highly infective, causing asymptomatic infections during childhood. After the initial infection, a stable state of latent infection is recognized in kidney tubular cells and the uroepithelium with negligible clinical consequences. BKV is an important risk factor for BKV-associated diseases, and, in particular, for BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVN) in renal transplanted recipients (RTRs). BKVN affects up to 10% of renal transplanted recipients, and results in graft loss in up to 50% of those affected. Unfortunately, treatments for BK virus infection are restricted, and there is no efficient prophylaxis. In addition, consequent immunosuppressive therapy reduction contributes to immune rejection. Increasing surveillance and early diagnosis based upon easy and rapid analyses are resulting in more beneficial outcomes. In this report, the current status and perspectives in the diagnosis and treatment of BKV in RTRs are reviewed.

Individualized Dosage of Tacrolimus for Renal Transplantation Patients Based on Pharmacometabonomics

The clinical pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in renal transplant patients has significant interindividual variability. T lymphocytes were selected to study the pharmacodynamic response of tacrolimus, which was significantly correlated with renal function and the outcome of renal transplant patients. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectroscopy (UPLC/Q-TOF-MS) was performed to obtain the metabolic profiles of 109 renal transplant patients. A partial least squares (PLS) model was constructed to screen potential biomarkers that could predict the efficacy of tacrolimus. Multinomial logistic regression analysis established a bridge that could quantify the relationship between the efficacy of tacrolimus and biomarkers. The results showed a good correlation between endogenous molecules and the efficacy of tacrolimus. Metabolites such as serum creatinine, mesobilirubinogen, L-isoleucine, 5-methoxyindoleacetate, eicosapentaenoic acid, N₂-succinoylarginine, tryptophyl-arginine, and butyric acid were indicated as candidate biomarkers. In addition, the key biomarkers could correctly predict the efficacy of tacrolimus with an accuracy of 82.5%. Finally, we explored the mechanism of individual variation by pathway analysis, which showed that amino acid metabolism was significantly related to the efficacy of tacrolimus. Moreover, orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) showed that there was no difference in key metabolites among different pharmacodynamic groups at 1 month and 3 months after dose adjustment, suggesting that pharmacometabonomics is a useful tool to predict individual differences in pharmacodynamics and thus to facilitate individualized drug therapy.

Research progress of BK virus and systemic lupus erythematosus

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease in which patients are often infected by viruses due to deficient immunity or immunosuppressant use. BK virus (BKV)mainly affects the kidney and can also cause multiple organ involvement throughout the body, which is similar to SLE. BKV is mostly a latent infection in vivo. The incidence of virus reactivation is higher in SLE patients. Reactivation of BKV can induce the production of autoantibodies, thereby promoting the occurrence and development of SLE.Purpose: Aim of this article is to review the prevalence and pathegenesis of BKV infection in SLE patients.Method: The literature search was conducted using four different databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science.Results: BK virus is higher infection and reactivation in SLE patients. The "hapten carrier" mechanism may lead to the production of autoantibodies. Some immunosuppressive drugs, like leflumide and hydroxychloroquine, may show a protective effect.Conclusions: BKV infection plays a role in the occurrence and development of SLE, and its significance deserves further exploration.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

Risk factors and outcomes of BK viremia among deceased donor kidney transplant recipients based on donor characteristics

INTRODUCTION

BK polyomavirus (BKV) is a common infection among kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Risk factors and outcomes based on donor characteristics remain largely unknown.

METHODS

In this study, we aimed to analyze the impact of donor factors through a paired kidney analysis. We included 289 pairs of adult deceased donor transplants (578 KTRs total); each pair had received kidneys from the same donor. Recipient pairs were divided into three groups: "no BK group" if neither KTR developed BK viremia (n = 336), "discordant" if the only one did (n = 176), and "concordant" if both did (n = 66). Acute rejection (AR), graft failure, and BK nephropathy (BKN) were outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Donors in the concordant group were younger, had lower kidney donor profile index (KDPI), and were less likely to be donor after circulatory death (DCD). In multivariate analyses, KTRs who had a donor with a higher body mass index (BMI) (hazard ratio (HR): 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-0.99; p = .009) were less likely to develop BKV. Concordance was not associated with AR (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.51-1.34; p = .45), graft failure (HR: 1.77; 95% CI: 0.42-7.50; p = .43), or BKN (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.51-2.03; p = .96).

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests lower donor BMI is associated with BKV infection, and concordance or discordance between paired kidney recipients is not associated with poor outcomes.

BK Virus and Cytomegalovirus Coinfections in Kidney Transplantation and Their Impact on Allograft Loss

We aimed to ascertain the interaction and effects of combined reactivations of BK virus and cytomegalovirus on kidney graft function. All consecutive kidney transplant recipients (KTR) between 2003 and 2016 were included. Of 1976 patients who received a kidney transplant, 23 (1.2%) presented BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Factors independently associated with BKVAN were diabetes mellitus (odds ratios (OR) 3.895%, confidence intervals (CI) (1.4-10.5)), acute allograft rejection (OR 2.8 95%, CI (1.1-7.6)) and nephrostomy requirement (OR 4.195%, CI (1.3-13)). Cytomegalovirus infection was diagnosed in 19% of KTR patients. Recipients with BKVAN presented more frequently with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection compared to patients without BKVAN (39% vs. 19%, p = 0.02). Acute allograft rejection (OR 2.95%, CI (1.4-2.4)) and nephrostomy requirement (OR 2.95%, CI (1.2-3)) were independently associated with CMV infection. Sixteen patients (69%) with BKVAN had graft dysfunction at one-year post-transplant and eight of them (35%) lost their graft. Patients presenting with BKVAN and graft loss presented more frequently a cytomegalovirus infection (OR 2.295%, CI (1.3-4.3)). In conclusion, we found a relation between CMV infection and graft loss in patients presenting BKVAN, suggesting that patients with CMV reactivation should be actively screened for BKV.

BK polyomavirus-pathogen, paradigm and puzzle

BK virus is a polyomavirus with seroprevalence rates of 80% in adults. Infection is usually acquired during childhood, and the virus is benign or pathologic depending on immune status. The virus reactivates in immunodeficiency states, mostly among transplant (either kidney or bone marrow) recipients. There are approximately 15 000 renal transplants every year in the USA, of which 5-10% develop BK polyomavirus nephropathy; 50-80% of patients who develop nephropathy go on to develop graft failure. BK virus is associated with BK polyomavirus nephropathy, ureteral stenosis, late-onset hemorrhagic cystitis, bladder cancer and other nonlytic large T-expressing carcinomas. The renal spectrum begins with viruria and can end with graft failure. The clinical spectrum and outcomes vary among transplant patients. New noninvasive diagnostic methods, such as urinary polyomavirus Haufen detected by electron microscopy, are currently under study. Treatment is primarily directed at decreasing immunosuppression but may be associated with graft rejection. Repeat transplantation is encouraged as long as viral clearance in plasma prior to transplant is accomplished. There remain no definitive data regarding the utility of transplant nephrectomy.

Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors as a risk factor for BK polyomavirus replication after kidney transplantation

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is responsible for a significant percentage of transplanted kidneys prematurely terminating their function. Its occurrence is closely related to the intensity of immunosuppressive therapy. In a group of 161 newly transplanted patients, we prospectively evaluated 457 protocol renal biopsies performed within the first year after transplantation. Using the calcineurin inhibitors (CI) nephrotoxicity score, the incidence of nephrotoxicity was monitored as a manifestation of excessive immunosuppression. Findings were correlated with clinical evidence of active BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication and PyVAN. Compared to the normal histology, nephrotoxicity was associated with more frequent BKPyV viremia and viruria (p = .01 and p < .01, respectively) and more common occurrence of PyVAN. The persistence of toxicity in the subsequent biopsy proved to be a negative risk factor of viremia and viruria (p = .03 and p < .01, respectively), independently of the initial BKPyV status. Toxicity could also be used as a predictor of viremia and viruria (p = .04 and p < .01, respectively) even in the absence of viral replication at the time of initial biopsy. The early histological manifestation of CI nephrotoxicity was associated with significant BKPyV reactivation in the risky first posttransplant year.

Deceased-Donor Acute Kidney Injury and BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection commonly complicates kidney transplantation, contributing to morbidity and allograft failure. The virus is often donor-derived and influenced by ischemia-reperfusion processes and disruption of structural allograft integrity. We hypothesized that deceased-donor AKI associates with BKV infection in recipients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We studied 1025 kidney recipients from 801 deceased donors transplanted between 2010 and 2013, at 13 academic centers. We fitted Cox proportional-hazards models for BKV DNAemia (detectable in recipient blood by clinical PCR testing) within 1 year post-transplantation, adjusting for donor AKI and other donor- and recipient-related factors. We validated findings from this prospective cohort with analyses for graft failure attributed to BKV within the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database.

RESULTS

The multicenter cohort mean kidney donor profile index was 49±27%, and 26% of donors had AKI. Mean recipient age was 54±13 years, and 25% developed BKV DNAemia. Donor AKI was associated with lower risk for BKV DNAemia (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.79). In the OPTN database, 22,537 (25%) patients received donor AKI kidneys, and 272 (0.3%) developed graft failure from BKV. The adjusted hazard ratio for the outcome with donor AKI was 0.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In a well-characterized, multicenter cohort, contrary to our hypothesis, deceased-donor AKI independently associated with lower risk for BKV DNAemia. Within the OPTN database, donor AKI was also associated with lower risk for graft failure attributed to BKV.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2021_03_10_CJN18101120_final.mp3.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay for BK polyomavirus immune response monitoring after kidney transplantation

BK virus (BKV) infection after kidney transplantation can cause BKV nephropathy (BKVAN) resulting in graft dysfunction and allograft loss. The treatment for BKVAN is reduction of the immunosuppressive load which increases the risk of kidney transplant rejection. There is no biomarker to monitor BKV activity besides BK viral load. The value of the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot (ELISPOT) assay as a tool to monitor the recipient's anti-BKV immune response after transplantation was investigated systematically. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies of ELISPOT evaluating the immune response against BKV. BKV status was categorized as "active BKV infection" and as "resolving BKV infection". Random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of the ELISPOT assay, after stratifying patients into groups based on positive and negative ELISPOT results. One-hundred twenty-seven articles were identified of which nine were included. Patients with negative ELISPOT had an increased risk of having active BKV replication (odds ratio of 71.9 (95%-CI 31.0-167.1). Pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95%-CI 0.89-0.98) and specificity was 0.88 (95%-CI 0.78-0.94). The standardized mean difference of the number of IFN-γ producing cells between patients with active BKV infection compared with patients who had resolving BKV infection was -2.09 (95%-CI -2.50, -1.68). The ELISPOT assay is a useful tool for BKV risk assessment and in combination with BKV load may support clinicians in guiding immunosuppressive therapy in patients with BKV replication.

Role of Virus-Specific T Cell Therapy for Cytomegalovirus and BK Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK virus (BKV) are common viral infections after kidney transplant. Their negative effects on patient and graft outcomes have been well described. However, despite improvement in screening and prophylaxis strategies, CMV and BKV continue to negatively affect both short- and long-term graft survival. Adequate cell-mediated immunity is essential for the control and prevention of opportunistic viral infections, such as CMV and BKV. Therefore, immune reconstitution, in particular T cell recovery, is a key factor in antiviral control after kidney transplantation. Cell-based immunotherapy offers an attractive alternative approach to traditional interventions. Adoptive T cell transfer, via infusions of allogeneic virus-specific T lymphocytes is capable of restoring virus-specific T cell immunity, and are safe and effective in the treatment of viral infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this article, we review the emerging role of virus-specific T cell therapy in the management of CMV and BKV after kidney transplantation. On the basis of the available data, virus-specific T cell therapy may be a promising addition to the antiviral treatment armamentarium after kidney transplantation. Future studies are needed to more clearly define the efficacy and risks of virus-specific T cell therapy in the kidney transplant population.

BK Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: Balancing Rejection and Infection

BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) and allograft rejection are two closely-associated diseases on opposite ends of the immune scale in kidney transplant recipients. The principle of balancing the immune system remains the mainstay of therapeutic strategy. While patient outcomes can be improved through screening, risk factors identification, and rapid reduction of immunosuppressants, a lack of standard curative therapy is the primary concern during clinical practice. Additionally, difficulty in pathological differential diagnosis and clinicopathology’s dissociation pose problems for a definite diagnosis. This article discusses the delicate evaluation needed to optimize immunosuppression and reviews recent advances in molecular diagnosis and immunological therapy for BKVN patients. New biomarkers for BKVN diagnosis are under development. For example, measurement of virus-specific T cell level may play a role in steering immunosuppressants. The development of cellular therapy may provide prevention, even a cure, for BKVN, a complex post-transplant complication.

Clinical evaluation of a laboratory-developed quantitative BK virus-PCR assay using the cobas® omni Utility Channel

BACKGROUND

In immunocompromised patients, BK Virus (BKV) reactivation may cause serious disease with high morbidity. Particularly for patient management after solid organ transplantation, monitoring of viral load in different clinical specimens is crucial to ensure early diagnosis and response to reactivation. In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of a custom designed primer /probe set for detection of BKV on the cobas® 6800, a high-throughput platform, employing the open channel of the system for integration of a lab-developed test (LDT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

A primer/probe set was optimized for the use on a high-throughput platform. Clinical performance was assessed in EDTA-plasma, serum and urine samples. Limit-of-detection (LOD) was determined by using a dilution series of BKV WHO standard. A CE-labeled PCR test (Altona Diagnostics) was used as a comparison to the assay.

RESULTS

The LOD for the LDT BKV assay was 6.7 IU/mL. Inter-and intra-run variability (at 5 x LOD) was low (<1.5 Ct in all specimens). All quality control panel specimens (Instand Germany n = 19) were correctly identified. Of 290 clinical samples tested, results were concordant for 280 samples. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay were 96 % and 98 % respectively. The quantitative analysis revealed a strong correlation (linear regression) between the CE-labelled comparator assay and the new BKV LDT assay with r² = 0.96 for n = 123 urine samples and r² = 0.98 for n = 167 plasma/serum samples.

CONCLUSION

Compared to a CE-IVD assay, the adapted LDT showed good analytical and clinical sensitivity and specificity for the detection and quantification of BKV in different clinical specimens. It represents a convenient solution to automate the LDT workflow with low hands-on time and thus facilitates high-throughput screening for BKV reactivation in immunocompromised patients.

Intravenous immunoglobulin as a preventive strategy against BK virus viremia and BKV-associated nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients-Results from a proof-of-concept study

BK virus (BKV) replication occurs frequently in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), potentially leading to BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and graft loss. Patients with high titers of BKV-neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are protected against BKV replication, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) infusion can increase NAb titers. We investigated whether early IVIg administration prevents BKV replication in patients with low NAb titers (<4 log₁₀ against the BKV-specific genotype). Based on NAb titers on the day of transplantation, KTR followed in the Strasbourg University Hospital (n = 174) were retrospectively divided into the following 3 risk categories for BKV replication: (1) patients with low NAb titers ("high-risk") who received IVIg for the first 3 posttransplant months (n = 44), (2) patients with low NAb titers ("high-risk") who did not undergo IVIg treatment (n = 41), and (3) patients with high NAb titers ("low-risk") who did not receive IVIg (n = 89). At 12 posttransplant months, the incidence of BKV viremia in the high-risk group treated with IVIg (6.8%) was similar to that observed in the low-risk group (10.1%) and markedly lower than that of the untreated high-risk group (36.6%; P < .001). Similar results were observed with regard to BKVAN. We conclude that IVIg may be a valuable strategy for preventing BKV replication.

Sex-Associated Differences in Cytomegalovirus Prevention: Prophylactic Strategy is Potentially Associated With a Strong Kidney Function Impairment in Female Renal Transplant Patients

Post-transplantation cytomegalovirus (CMV) syndrome can be prevented using the antiviral drug (val)ganciclovir. (Val)ganciclovir is typically administered following a prophylactic or a pre-emptive strategy. The prophylactic strategy entails early universal administration, the pre-emptive strategy, early treatment in case of infection. However, it is not clear which strategy is superior with respect to transplantation outcome; sex-specific effects of these prevention strategies are not known. We have retrospectively analyzed 540 patients from the multi-centre Harmony study along eight pre-defined visits: 308 were treated according to a prophylactic, 232 according to a pre-emptive strategy. As expected, we observed an association of prophylactic strategy with lower incidence of CMV syndrome, delayed onset and lower viral loads compared to the pre-emptive strategy. However, in female patients, the prophylactic strategy was associated with a strong impairment of glomerular filtration rate one year post-transplant (difference: -11.8 ± 4.3 ml min-1·1.73 m-2, p = 0.006). Additionally, we observed a tendency of higher incidence of acute rejection and severe BK virus reactivation in the prophylactic strategy group. While the prophylactic strategy was more effective for preventing CMV syndrome, our results suggest for the first time that the prophylactic strategy might lead to inferior transplantation outcomes in female patients, providing evidence for a strong association with sex. Further randomized controlled studies are necessary to confirm this potential negative effect.

The Role of HLA and KIR Immunogenetics in BK Virus Infection after Kidney Transplantation

BK virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus with high seroprevalence in the general population with an unremarkable clinical presentation in healthy people, but a potential for causing serious complications in immunosuppressed transplanted patients. Reactivation or primary infection in kidney allograft recipients may lead to allograft dysfunction and subsequent loss. Currently, there is no widely accepted specific treatment for BKV infection and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy is the mainstay therapy. Given this and the sequential appearance of viruria-viremia-nephropathy, screening and early detection are of utmost importance. There are numerous risk factors associated with BKV infection including genetic factors, among them human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) alleles have been shown to be the strongest so far. Identification of patients at risk for BKV infection would be useful in prevention or early action to reduce morbidity and progression to frank nephropathy. Assessment of risk involving HLA ligands and KIR genotyping of recipients in the pre-transplant or early post-transplant period might be useful in clinical practice. This review summarizes current knowledge of the association between HLA, KIR and BKV infection and potential future directions of research, which might lead to optimal utilization of these genetic markers.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric patients: novel techniques and current opinion

Introduction: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an ester prodrug of the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid (MPA) and is recommended and widely used for maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ and stem-cell transplantation as well as in immunological kidney diseases. MPA is a potent, reversible, noncompetitive inhibitor of the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), a crucial enzyme in the de novo purine synthesis in T- and B-lymphocytes, thereby inhibiting cell-mediated immunity and antibody formation. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of MMF is still controversial as outcome data of clinical trials are equivocal. Areas covered: This review covers in great depth the existing literature on TDM of MMF in the field of pediatric (kidney) transplantation. In addition, the relevance of TDM in immunological kidney diseases, in particular childhood nephrotic syndrome is highlighted. Expert opinion: TDM of MMF has the potential to optimize therapy in pediatric transplantation as well as in nephrotic syndrome. Limited sampling strategies to estimate MPA exposure increase its feasibility. Future perspectives rather encompass approaches reflecting total immunosuppressive load than single drug TDM.

Association of graft survival with tacrolimus exposure and late intra-patient tacrolimus variability in pediatric and young adult renal transplant recipients-an international CTS registry analysis

Adolescent and young adult age is a high-risk window with an alarmingly increased likelihood of premature kidney graft loss due to immunological rejection. Using the large database of the Collaborative Transplant Study, we analyzed whether a more intense and less variable exposure to tacrolimus could counteract this young age-related enhanced immunoreactivity. Kidney graft recipients aged 12-23 years (n = 964) with a 1-year tacrolimus trough level between 4.0 and 10.9 ng/ml had a 5-year graft survival rate of 85.1%, significantly better than the poor 66.1% rate in patients with a trough level below 4.0 ng/ml who showed a 2.38-fold increased risk of graft loss in the multivariable analysis (P < 0.001). This association was not apparent in young children aged 0-11 years (n = 455) and less pronounced in adults aged 24-34 years (n = 1466). However, an intra-patient variability of tacrolimus (IPV) trough level ≥1.5 at post-transplant years 1 and 2 was associated with an increased graft loss risk in both 12- to 23-year-old and 0- to 11-year-old recipients (P < 0.001 and P = 0.045). Patients with high IPV made up as many as 30% of kidney graft recipients, indicating that a more intense and less variable exposure to tacrolimus could improve graft survival strongly in this high-risk group.

Glomerular Parietal Epithelial Cells Infection Is Associated With Poor Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients With BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV infection of glomerular parietal epithelial cells (GPECs) on graft outcome in kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN).

METHODS

A total of 152 kidney transplant recipients with BKPyVAN were divided into 31 with (GPEC-positive group) and 121 without (GPEC-negative group) BKPyV-infected GPECs. Clinicopathological characteristics and allograft survival were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The GPEC-positive group had more patients with advanced-stage BKPyVAN than the GPEC-negative group (P < .001). At the last follow-up, the GPEC-positive group had a significantly higher serum creatinine level than the GPEC-negative group. The graft loss rate in the GPEC-positive group was higher than that in the GPEC-negative group (32.3% vs 12.4%; P = .008). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the graft survival rate in the GPEC-positive group was lower than that in the GPEC-negative group (log-rank test, P = .004). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that BKPyV infection of GPECs was an independent risk factor for graft survival (hazard ratio, 3.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-8.76; P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

GPEC infection in patients with BKPyVAN indicates more-severe pathological damage and a rapid decline in renal function. BKPyV infection of GPECs is an independent risk factor for allograft loss.

Optimizing Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Time for Target Concentration Intervention

The immunosuppressive agent mycophenolate is used extensively in kidney transplantation, yet dosing strategy applied varies markedly from fixed dosing ("one-dose-fits-all"), to mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough concentration monitoring, to dose optimization to an MPA exposure target (as area under the concentration-time curve [MPA AUC0-12]). This relates in part to inconsistent results in prospective trials of concentration-controlled dosing (CCD). In this review, the totality of evidence supporting mycophenolate CCD is examined: pharmacological characteristics, observational data linking exposure to efficacy and toxicities, and randomized controlled trials of CCD, with attention to dose optimization method and exposure achieved. Fixed dosing of mycophenolate consistently leads to underexposure associated with rejection, as well as overexposure associated with toxicities. When CCD is driven by pharmacokinetic calculation to a target concentration (target concentration intervention), MPA exposure is successfully controlled and clinical benefits are seen. There remains a need for consensus on practical aspects of mycophenolate target concentration intervention in contemporary tacrolimus-containing regimens and future research to define maintenance phase exposure targets. However, given ongoing consequences of both overimmunosuppression and underimmunosuppression in kidney transplantation, impacting short- and long-term outcomes, these should be a priority. The imprecise "one-dose-fits-all" approach should be replaced by the clinically proven MPA target concentration strategy.

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies and the risk of BK polyomavirus viremia and nephropathy

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is the cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy resulting in premature graft loss. There are limited data regarding the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and its prevention in developing BKV viremia and PVAN. In a prospective study, we analyzed 207 consecutive renal transplant recipients previously enrolled in 2 randomized trials evaluating different CMV prevention regimens with routine screening for BKV and CMV. Of these, 59 received valganciclovir and 100 valacyclovir prophylaxis; 48 patients were managed by preemptive therapy. At 3 years, the incidence of BKV viremia and PVAN was 28% and 5%, respectively. CMV DNAemia developed in 55% and CMV disease in 6%. Both BKV viremia (42% vs 23% vs 21%, P = .006) and PVAN (12% vs 2% vs 2%, P = .011) were increased in patients treated with valganciclovir prophylaxis compared to valacyclovir and preemptive therapy. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, valganciclovir prophylaxis was independent predictor of BKV viremia (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.38, P = .002) and PVAN (HR = 4.73, P = .026). In contrast, the risk of subsequent BKV viremia was lower in patients with antecedent CMV DNAemia (HR = 0.50, P = .018). These data suggest valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with increased risk of BKV viremia and PVAN. CMV DNAemia did not represent a risk for BKV.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Administration Significantly Increases BKPyV Genotype-Specific Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is one of the major causes of kidney graft dysfunction, and there are no BKPyV-specific antiviral therapies available. BKPyV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) play key roles in protecting against BKPyV replication and represent a potential therapeutic or preventive strategy. In this study, we evaluated NAb titers in intravenous immunoglobulin (i.v. Ig) preparations and in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) before and after i.v. Ig administration. NAb titers directed against major BKPyV genotypes were measured using a BKPyV pseudovirion system. Thirty-three KTR receiving high (1 g/kg of body weight/day; n = 17) or low (0.4 g/kg/day; n = 16) i.v. Ig doses were included. Median NAb titers in i.v. Ig preparations ranged from 5.9 log₁₀ 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) for genotype I to 4.1 log₁₀ IC₅₀ for genotype IV. A mean of 90% of patients (range, 88% to 100%) displaying low or negative BKPyV NAb titers against genotype I reached 4 log₁₀ IC₅₀ after the first i.v. Ig administration. This value was reached by a mean of 44% (range, 13% to 83%) and 19% (range, 0% to 38%) of patients against genotype II and genotype IV, respectively. The benefit of i.v. Ig administration persisted until the following course of treatment (day 22 ± 7 days) for genotypes I and II, and no cumulative effect was observed through the three doses. Our findings demonstrate that i.v. Ig administration results in a significant increase in BKPyV NAb titers in KTR. These in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic data provide the rationale for a proof-of-concept study investigating the efficacy of i.v. Ig for the prevention of BKPyV infection in KTR.

TNF-α Production by Monocytes Stimulated With Epstein-Barr Virus-Peptides as a Marker of Immunosuppression-Related Adverse Events in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Introduction

Infections and cancers now outnumber rejection as a cause of morbidity in transplant recipients, likely as a result of over-immunosuppression. Currently, there is no clinical tool to detect over-immunosuppression. We recently reported that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) production by CD14⁺CD16⁺ intermediate monocytes, following ex vivo stimulation by Epstein-Barr virus–peptides, could identify over-immunosuppressed patients.

Methods

We conducted a pilot study the assay using 142 peripheral blood mononuclear samples from a cohort of 71 kidney transplant recipients. Patients were classified as cases or controls according to the occurrence of opportunistic infection, recurring bacterial infections or de novo neoplasia in the 12 months following blood collection. We used both the classifier rule and a threshold of <73% of CD14⁺CD16⁺TNFα⁺ cells developed in a previous training set.

Results

Cases were detected with 83% sensitivity and 68% specificity. The negative predictive value of the assay was 89%. The hazard ratio for the occurrence of the endpoint was 6.8 (95% confidence interval 2.0–23.9; P = 0.003) in patients with a positive test. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that the association was independent of baseline clinical characteristics, renal function, and immunosuppressive regimen.

Conclusion

These data validate this cell-based assay as a promising tool for personalizing immunotherapy. Studies are under way for a 2-step assay with improved specificity.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen and calculated panel reactive antibody on BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) on BK virus activation as evidenced by BK viremia (BKV).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At our institution, 649 kidney transplant patients were screened for BKV from 2009 to 2017. Patients were considered to have BKV if they had >10 000 copies/mL of BK DNA in their blood. Donor and recipient HLA and cPRA, demographic, clinical and laboratory data, as well as immunosuppressive medications were collected.

RESULTS

We identified 122 BK positive and 527 BK negative patients. Only 25% of the patients had cPRA of 20% or more, and 64% had more than three HLA-A, -B, and -DR mismatches. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, male gender, age, and maintenance of steroid therapy significantly increased the risk of BKV (P = 0.005, 0.005 and <0.001, respectively). The degree of cPRA and the individual HLA allele and HLA allele matching did not significantly affect BKV.

CONCLUSION

Neither the degree of HLA mismatching nor cPRA appears to affect BKV. Moreover, no specific HLA allele, HLA allele matching, or cPRA were associated with BKV.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

The present AST-IDCOP guidelines update information on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection, replication, and disease, which impact kidney transplantation (KT), but rarely non-kidney solid organ transplantation (SOT). As pretransplant risk factors in KT donors and recipients presently do not translate into clinically validated measures regarding organ allocation, antiviral prophylaxis, or screening, all KT recipients should be screened for BKPyV-DNAemia monthly until month 9, and then every 3 months until 2 years posttransplant. Extended screening after 2 years may be considered in pediatric KT. Stepwise immunosuppression reduction is recommended for KT patients with plasma BKPyV-DNAemia of >1000 copies/mL sustained for 3 weeks or increasing to >10 000 copies/mL reflecting probable and presumptive BKPyV-associated nephropathy, respectively. Reducing immunosuppression is also the primary intervention for biopsy-proven BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Hence, allograft biopsy is not required for treating BKPyV-DNAemic patients with baseline renal function. Despite virological rationales, proper randomized clinical trials are lacking to generally recommend treatment by switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide or by the adjunct use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide, or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKPyV nephropathy can be successful if BKPyV-DNAemia is definitively cleared, independent of failed allograft nephrectomy.

BK virus: Current understanding of pathogenicity and clinical disease in transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKV) is an important cause of graft loss in renal transplant recipients that continues to pose a significant challenge to clinicians due to its frequently unpredictable onset, persistence, and the lack of effective antiviral agents or prevention strategies. This review covers our current understanding of epidemiology, viral transmission and disease progression, and treatment and prevention strategies that have been used to manage this disease.

Prevention of complications from use of conventional immunosuppressants: a critical review

Synthetic immunosuppressive drugs are largely used in immune-related renal diseases and in kidney transplantation. Most of these drugs have a low therapeutic index (the ratio that compares the blood concentration at which a drug becomes toxic and the concentration at which the drug is effective), which means that the drug should be dosed carefully and the patient monitored frequently. In this review, we consider the categories of synthetic immunosuppressive agents more frequently and conventionally used in clinical nephrology: glucocorticoids, Aalkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil), purine synthesis inhibitors (azathioprine, mycophenolate salts) and calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus). For each category the possible side effects will be reviewed, the general and specific measures to prevent or treat the adverse events will be suggested, and the more common mistakes that may increase the risk of toxicity will be described. However, the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive agents depend not only on the pharmacologic characteristics of single drugs but can be influenced also by the clinical condition and genetic characteristics of the patient, by the typology and severity of the underlying disease and by the interaction with other concomitantly used drugs.

Clinical utility of leflunomide for BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a significant clinical issue in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. No specific therapy is currently available, although treatment with leflunomide may be part of the therapeutic strategy. Here, we sought to examine the impact of leflunomide on the evolution of BKPyVAN.

METHODS

This was an observational retrospective study conducted in 3 French transplant centers. KT recipients who developed BKPyVAN and received leflunomide after failure of other treatment approaches were deemed eligible. Graft function, viral clearance, patient survival, rejection rates, treatment tolerability, and immunosuppression levels served as the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were included. Treatment with leflunomide was started after a mean of 1.4 ± 4.1months  after BKPyVAN diagnosis. Between the introduction of leflunomide and the end of follow-up, creatinine levels increased by 31 ± 118% (P = 0.04), whereas viremia decreased by 79 ± 37% (P < 0.001). Blood viral clearance was observed in 76% of the study patients. Rejection episodes occurred in 33% of the participants. Eleven patients lost their graft (9 of which because of BKPyVAN). Ten patients developed adverse effects and 3 discontinued leflunomide.

CONCLUSION

We cannot conclude about the exact place of leflunomide in the therapeutic strategy of BKPyVAN. It may be a part of the therapy to promote BK polyomavirus clearance in cases of BKPyVAN who fail to improve after immunosuppression lowering alone. Unfortunately, a significant decline in renal function and high rejection rates remain major clinical challenges.

Conversion From Mycophenolates to Mizoribine Is Associated With Lower BK Virus Load in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) is a graft-threatening complication after kidney transplantation. Current consensus regarding the prevention of BKVAN is to screen for BK viremia and to treat sustained BK viremia through reducing immunosuppression. This study assessed the effect of conversion from mycophenolates to mizoribine (MZR) on the prevention of BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

De novo kidney transplant recipients were screened for BK viruria. Sustained high levels of BK viruria (>10⁷ copies/mL) were treated by switching from mycophenolates to MZR. The reduction and clearance of BK viruria and viremia were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty kidney transplant recipients with high levels BK viruria were enrolled, including 11 recipients with BK viremia. After 6 months of MZR therapy, only 3 recipients still had high levels of BK viruria. The clearance rate of BK viremia was 100%. One episode of acute rejection occurred (2.0%) and was reversed by steroid administration. The serum uric acid level of the recipients was similar before and after switching to MZR, but the proportion of recipients receiving uric acid-reducing drugs increased significantly after 3 months of MZR therapy (19/50 vs 31/50; P = .02). No new cases of BK viremia were observed after conversion to MZR.

CONCLUSION

Conversion from mycophenolates to MZR in kidney transplant recipients with sustained high levels of BK viruria was associated with reduction of BK viruria and clearance of BK viremia. This may be an effective approach to prevent BK viremia and BKVAN.

Development and evaluation of a BK polyomavirus serotyping assay using Luminex technology

BACKGROUND

The BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is subdivided into four genotypes. The consequences of each genotype and of donor-recipient genotype (mis)match for BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and evaluate a genotype-specific IgG antibody-based BKPyV serotyping assay, in order to classify kidney transplant donors and recipients accordingly.

STUDY DESIGN

VP1 antigens of six BKPyV variants (Ib1, Ib2, Ic, II, III and IV) were expressed as recombinant glutathione-s-transferase-fusion proteins and coupled to fluorescent Luminex beads. Sera from 87 healthy blood donors and 39 KTRs were used to analyze seroreactivity and serospecificity against the different BKPyV genotypes. Six sera with marked BKPyV serotype profiles were analyzed further for genotype-specific BKPyV pseudovirus neutralizing capacity.

RESULTS

Seroreactivity was observed against all genotypes, with seropositivity rates above 77% comparable for KTRs and blood donors. Strong cross-reactivity (r > 0.8) was observed among genotype I subtypes, and among genotypes II, III and IV. Seroresponses against genotypes I and IV seemed genuine, while those against II and III could be out(cross)competed. GMT (Luminex) and IC₅₀ (neutralization assay) values showed good agreement in determining the genotype with the strongest seroresponse within an individual.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some degree of cross-reactivity, this serotyping assay seems a useful tool to identify the main infecting BKPyV genotype within a given individual. This information, which cannot be obtained otherwise from nonviremic/nonviruric individuals, could provide valuable information regarding the prevalent BKPyV genotype in kidney donors and recipients and warrants further study.

Is antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients a risk factor for developing cytomegalovirus or BK virus infection? Results from a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Data are scarce on cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK virus (BKV) infection after antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR).

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that the immunological response in patients with ABMR or the immune modulation associated with its treatment could predispose to CMV and BKV infection. Our objective was to investigate this hypothesis.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a single-center, matched case-control study (1:2 ratio) to analyze CMV and BKV replication during the first year after the ABMR diagnosis in kidney transplant recipients. Adult recipients with a histopathological diagnosis of ABMR between 2007-2015 were included as cases. Controls were kidney recipients who underwent transplantation immediately before and after the index case.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients diagnosed with ABMR (33 chronic active ABMR and 25 acute ABMR), with their matched controls (116) were included. Forty-four cases received treatment for ABMR, including plasmapheresis (41), immunoglobulins (40), and rituximab (31). Within 1 year after ABMR, cases showed CMV replication more often than controls (9/58, 15.5% vs 7/116, 6%, OR = 4.21, CI 1.10-16.16, p = 0.04). Over the study period, CMV PCR determinations were requested more frequently in cases than controls (46/58, 79.3% vs 63/116, 54.3%, OR = 4.58, CI 1.92-10.9, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis adjusted for CMV PCR determinations, retransplantation, antithymocyte globulin treatment and methylprednisolone treatment for acute rejection, CMV replication remained more common in cases than in controls (OR = 2.41, CI 0.49-11.73, p = 0.28). There were no differences in BKV replication in either urine or blood.

CONCLUSIONS

ABMR may be a risk factor for CMV but not for BKV replication in kidney transplant recipients.

BK Virus Infection in Thai Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and failure in kidney transplant recipients. Early detection and proper adjustment of immunosuppression is the best method for treatment of this condition and to improve long-term allograft outcome. Here, we reported the prevalence and risk factors of BK virus (BKV) infection in our population.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed kidney transplant recipients at Siriraj Hospital between January 2012 and December 2015 who had been investigated using real-time polymerase chain reaction BK viral load. BKV infection including BK viruria, BK viremia, and BKVAN had been reported.

RESULTS

In all, 173 patients were enrolled. Fifty-three patients (30.6%) were diagnosed with BKV infection. The median time to diagnosis of BKV infection was 10.9 months after transplantation. There were 11 cases of BKVAN. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) more than 1 g/d was the only significant risk factor for developing BKV infection (odds ratio = 2.35, 95% confidence interval 1.07-5.14). The high level of BK viral load in urine (>1.7 × 10⁷ copies/mL) could predict BK viremia.

CONCLUSION

Protocol screening of BKV following with adjusted immunosuppressive regimens should be established for preventing allograft loss in BKVAN especially in the first year after transplantation and in patients who receive more than 1 g of MPA per day. Urinary BK viral load is the early marker for prediction of BK viremia, which leads to BKVAN.