Blocking the phase-shifting effect of neuropeptide Y with light

Systematic review of drugs that modify the circadian system's phase-shifting responses to light exposure

We searched PubMed for primary research quantifying drug modification of light-induced circadian phase-shifting in rodents. This search, conducted for work published between 1960 and 2018, yielded a total of 146 papers reporting results from 901 studies. Relevant articles were those with any extractable data on phase resetting in wildtype (non-trait selected) rodents administered a drug, alongside a vehicle/control group, near or at the time of exposure. Most circadian pharmacology experiments were done using drugs thought to act directly on either the brain's central pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the SCN's primary relay, the retinohypothalamic tract, secondary pathways originating from the medial/dorsal raphe nuclei and intergeniculate leaflet, or the brain's sleep-arousal centers. While the neurotransmitter systems underlying these circuits were of particular interest, including those involving glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, serotonin, and acetylcholine, other signaling modalities have also been assessed, including agonists and antagonists of receptors linked to dopamine, histamine, endocannabinoids, adenosine, opioids, and second-messenger pathways downstream of glutamate receptor activation. In an effort to identify drugs that unduly influence circadian responses to light, we quantified the net effects of each drug class by ratioing the size of the phase-shift observed after administration to that observed with vehicle in a given experiment. This allowed us to organize data across the literature, compare the relative efficacy of one mechanism versus another, and clarify which drugs might best suppress or potentiate phase resetting. Aggregation of the available data in this manner suggested that several candidates might be clinically relevant as auxiliary treatments to suppress ectopic light responses during shiftwork or amplify the circadian effects of timed bright light therapy. Future empirical research will be necessary to validate these possibilities.

Functional Significance of the Excitatory Effects of GABA in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

Over 90% of neurons within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) express γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Although GABA is primarily an inhibitory neurotransmitter, in vitro studies suggest that the activation of GABA_A receptors (GABA_AR) elicits excitation in the adult SCN. The ratio of excitatory to inhibitory responses to GABA depends on the balance of chloride influx by Na⁺-K⁺-Cl^- cotransporter 1 (NKCC1) and chloride efflux by K⁺-Cl^- cotransporters (KCCs). Excitatory responses to GABA can be blocked by inhibition of the inward chloride cotransporter, NKCC1, with the loop diuretic bumetanide. Here we investigated the role of NKCC1 activity in phase shifting the circadian pacemaker in response to photic and nonphotic signals in male Syrian hamsters housed in constant darkness. In the early subjective night (CT 13.5), injection of bumetanide into the SCN reduced light-induced phase delays. However, during the late subjective night (CT 19), bumetanide administration did not alter light-induced phase advances. Injection of bumetanide during the subjective day (CT 6) did not alter the phase of free-running circadian rhythms but attenuated phase advances induced by injection of the GABA_AR agonist muscimol into the SCN. These data support the hypothesis that the excitatory effects of endogenously released GABA contribute to the ability of light to induce phase delays, thereby contributing to the most important function of the circadian system, its entrainment with the day-night cycle. Further, the finding that bumetanide inhibits the phase-advancing effects of muscimol during the subjective day supports the hypothesis that the excitatory responses to GABA also contribute to the ability of nonphotic stimuli to phase shift the circadian pacemaker.

Neuronal oscillations on an ultra-slow timescale: daily rhythms in electrical activity and gene expression in the mammalian master circadian clockwork

Neuronal oscillations of the brain, such as those observed in the cortices and hippocampi of behaving animals and humans, span across wide frequency bands, from slow delta waves (0.1 Hz) to ultra-fast ripples (600 Hz). Here, we focus on ultra-slow neuronal oscillators in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the master daily clock that operates on interlocking transcription-translation feedback loops to produce circadian rhythms in clock gene expression with a period of near 24 h (< 0.001 Hz). This intracellular molecular clock interacts with the cell's membrane through poorly understood mechanisms to drive the daily pattern in the electrical excitability of SCN neurons, exhibiting an up-state during the day and a down-state at night. In turn, the membrane activity feeds back to regulate the oscillatory activity of clock gene programs. In this review, we emphasise the circadian processes that drive daily electrical oscillations in SCN neurons, and highlight how mathematical modelling contributes to our increasing understanding of circadian rhythm generation, synchronisation and communication within this hypothalamic region and across other brain circuits.

Circadian regulation of mouse suprachiasmatic nuclei neuronal states shapes responses to orexin

Our knowledge of how circadian and homeostatic brain circuits interact to temporally organize physiology and behavior is limited. Progress has been made with the determination that lateral hypothalamic orexin (OXA) neurons control arousal and appetitive states, while suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) neurons function as the master circadian clock. During the day, SCN neurons exhibit heterogeneity in spontaneous resting membrane potential (RMP), with some neurons becoming severely depolarized (hyperexcited) and ceasing to fire action potentials (APs), while other neurons rest at moderate RMP and fire APs. Intriguingly, the day phase is when the SCN clock is most readily influenced by arousal, but it is unclear if and how heterogeneity in the excitability state of SCN neurons shapes their response to arousal signals, such as OXA. In whole‐cell recordings we show that during the day OXA recruits GABA‐GABA_A receptor signaling to suppress the RMP of hyperexcited silent as well as moderately hyperpolarized AP‐firing SCN neurons. In the AP‐firing neurons, OXA hyperpolarized and silenced these SCN cells, while in the hyperexcited silent neurons OXA suppressed the RMP of these cells and evoked either AP‐firing, depolarized low‐amplitude membrane oscillations, or continued silence at a reduced RMP. These results demonstrate how the resting state of SCN neurons determines their response to OXA, and illustrate that the inhibitory action of this neurochemical correlate of arousal can trigger paradoxical AP firing.

Temporal transcriptomics suggest that twin-peaking genes reset the clock

The mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) drives daily rhythmic behavior and physiology, yet a detailed understanding of its coordinated transcriptional programmes is lacking. To reveal the finer details of circadian variation in the mammalian SCN transcriptome we combined laser-capture microdissection (LCM) and RNA-seq over a 24 hr light / dark cycle. We show that 7-times more genes exhibited a classic sinusoidal expression signature than previously observed in the SCN. Another group of 766 genes unexpectedly peaked twice, near both the start and end of the dark phase; this twin-peaking group is significantly enriched for synaptic transmission genes that are crucial for light-induced phase shifting of the circadian clock. 341 intergenic non-coding RNAs, together with novel exons of annotated protein-coding genes, including Cry1, also show specific circadian expression variation. Overall, our data provide an important chronobiological resource (www.wgpembroke.com/shiny/SCNseq/) and allow us to propose that transcriptional timing in the SCN is gating clock resetting mechanisms.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10518.001

The daily cycles of life in mammals are driven by a small region of the brain called the suprachiasmatic nucleus (or SCN). The SCN receives signals from sunlight and other environmental factors to help coordinate most aspects of daily biological activity and behaviour. To work correctly, it is essential that the SCN switches certain genes on and off at exactly the right time. However, many questions remain over the identity of these genes and how their levels of activity change during a 24-hour period.

When a gene is active (or “being expressed”), it is used as a template to build the molecules of RNA that are needed to make proteins and to help to control how cells work. Pembroke et al. have now sequenced the RNA molecules made in the SCN of mice (which plays the same role as the equivalent human brain region) over a 24-hour period. The mice spent half of each day in the light, and half in the dark. This revealed that the expression levels of over a quarter of all the genes that are found in the SCN fluctuate over a 24-hour period. One particular group of genes peak in activity twice a day; Pembroke et al. suggest that these genes are important for controlling how an animal can adjust its body clock to light.

Further research is now needed to find out which of the newly discovered fluctuating genes play the most important roles in daily activity rhythms, and which might play a part in disease.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10518.002

Synchronization of Biological Clock Neurons by Light and Peripheral Feedback Systems Promotes Circadian Rhythms and Health

In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) functions as a circadian clock that drives 24-h rhythms in both physiology and behavior. The SCN is a multicellular oscillator in which individual neurons function as cell-autonomous oscillators. The production of a coherent output rhythm is dependent upon mutual synchronization among single cells and requires both synaptic communication and gap junctions. Changes in phase-synchronization between individual cells have consequences on the amplitude of the SCN’s electrical activity rhythm, and these changes play a major role in the ability to adapt to seasonal changes. Both aging and sleep deprivation negatively affect the circadian amplitude of the SCN, whereas behavioral activity (i.e., exercise) has a positive effect on amplitude. Given that the amplitude of the SCN’s electrical activity rhythm is essential for achieving robust rhythmicity in physiology and behavior, the mechanisms that underlie neuronal synchronization warrant further study. A growing body of evidence suggests that the functional integrity of the SCN contributes to health, well-being, cognitive performance, and alertness; in contrast, deterioration of the 24-h rhythm is a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease, cancer, depression, and sleep disorders.

Assessing ethanol's actions in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock using in vivo and in vitro approaches

Research over the past decade has demonstrated substantial interactions between the circadian system and the processes through which alcohol affects behavior and physiology. Here we summarize the results of our collaborative efforts focused on this intersection. Using a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches, we have shown that ethanol affects many aspects of the mammalian circadian system, both acutely as well as after chronic administration. Conversely, we have shown circadian influences on ethanol consumption. Importantly, we are beginning to delve into the cellular mechanisms associated with these effects. We are also starting to form a picture of the neuroanatomical bases for many of these actions. Finally, we put our current findings into perspective by suggesting new avenues of inquiry for our future efforts.

Site-specific effects of gastrin-releasing peptide in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The effects of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) on the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) are dependent on the activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in the SCN. In this study, the interaction between GRP, glutamate and serotonin in the regulation of circadian phase in Syrian hamsters was evaluated. Microinjection of GRP into the third ventricle induced c-fos and p-ERK expression throughout the SCN. Coadministration of an NMDA antagonist or 8-hydroxy-2-di-n-propylamino-tetralin [a serotonin (5-HT)1A,7 agonist, DPAT] with GRP limited c-fos expression in the SCN to a region dorsal to GRP cell bodies. Similar to the effects of NMDA antagonists, DPAT attenuated GRP-induced phase shifts in the early night, suggesting that the actions of serotonin on the photic phase shifting mechanism occur downstream from retinorecipient cells. c-fos and p-ERK immunoreactivity in the supraoptic (SON) and paraventricular hypothalamic nuclei also increased following ventricular microinjection of GRP. Because of this finding, a second set of experiments was designed to test a potential role for the SON in the regulation of clock function. Syrian hamsters were given microinjections of GRP into the peri-SON during the early night. GRP-induced c-fos activity in the SCN was similar to that following ventricular administration of GRP. GRP or bicuculline (a γ-aminobutyric acidA antagonist) administered near the SON during the early night elicited phase delays of circadian activity rhythms. These data suggest that GRP-induced phase-resetting is dependent on levels of glutamatergic and serotonergic neurotransmission in the SCN and implicate activity in the SON as a potential regulator of photic signaling in the SCN.

Feedback actions of locomotor activity to the circadian clock

The phase of the mammalian circadian system can be entrained to a range of environmental stimuli, or zeitgebers, including food availability and light. Further, locomotor activity can act as an entraining signal and represents a mechanism for an endogenous behavior to feedback and influence subsequent circadian function. This process involves a number of nuclei distributed across the brain stem, thalamus, and hypothalamus and ultimately alters SCN electrical and molecular function to induce phase shifts in the master circadian pacemaker. Locomotor activity feedback to the circadian system is effective across both nocturnal and diurnal species, including humans, and has recently been shown to improve circadian function in a mouse model with a weakened circadian system. This raises the possibility that exercise may be useful as a noninvasive treatment in cases of human circadian dysfunction including aging, shift work, transmeridian travel, and the blind.

On the intrinsic regulation of neuropeptide Y release in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian clock

Timing of the circadian clock of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is regulated by photic and non-photic inputs. Of these, neuropeptide Y (NPY) signaling from the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) to the SCN plays a prominent role. Although NPY is critical to clock regulation, neither the mechanisms modulating IGL NPY neuronal activity nor the nature of regulatory NPY signaling in the SCN clock are understood, as NPY release in the SCN has never been measured. Here, microdialysis procedures for in vivo measurement of NPY were used in complementary experiments to address these questions. First, neuronal release of NPY in the hamster SCN was rhythmic under a 14L : 10D photocycle, with the acrophase soon after lights-on and the nadir at midday. No rhythmic fluctuation in NPY occurred under constant darkness. Second, a behavioral phase-resetting stimulus (wheel-running at midday that induces IGL serotonin release) acutely stimulated SCN NPY release. Third, bilateral IGL microinjection of the serotonin agonist, (+/-)-2-dipropyl-amino-8-hydroxyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronapthalene (8-OH-DPAT) (another non-photic phase-resetting stimulant), at midday enhanced SCN NPY release. Conversely, similar application of the serotonin antagonist, metergoline, abolished wheel-running-induced SCN NPY release. IGL microinjection of the GABA agonist, muscimol, suppressed SCN NPY release. These results support an intra-IGL mechanism whereby behavior-induced serotonergic activity suppresses inhibitory GABAergic transmission, promoting NPY activity and subsequent phase resetting. Collectively, these results confirm IGL-mediated NPY release in the SCN and verify that its daily rhythm of release is dependent upon the 14L : 10D photocycle, and that it is modulated by appropriately-timed phase-resetting behavior, probably mediated by serotonergic activation of NPY units in the IGL.

A molecular explanation of interactions between photic and non-photic circadian clock-resetting stimuli

Non-photic clock-resetting events (arousal and locomotor activity) in the subjective day reduced expression of Period genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of hamsters. This decrease was attenuated by a 30-min light pulse occurring during the last 0.5 h of 3.5 h of confinement to a novel running wheel. This provides an example at the molecular level of an interaction between different modalities of synchronizing agents.

Gastrin releasing peptide and neuropeptide Y exert opposing actions on circadian phase

Microinjection of gastrin releasing peptide (GRP) into the third ventricle or the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) induces circadian phase shifts similar to those produced by light. Administration of GRP during the day does not alter circadian phase. In contrast, neuropeptide Y (NPY) induces phase shifts of circadian rhythms during the day but has little effect when administered at night, similar to the effects of most non-photic stimuli. NPY inhibits the phase shifting effects of light, and GRP is thought to be part of the photic signaling system within the SCN. This experiment was designed to test whether GRP and NPY inhibit each other's effects on circadian phase. Adult male Syrian hamsters equipped with guide cannulas aimed at the SCN were housed in constant darkness until stable free-running rhythms of wheel running activity were apparent. Microinjection of GRP during the early subjective night induced phase delays that were blocked by simultaneous administration of NPY. During the middle of the subjective day, microinjection of NPY caused phase advances that were blocked by simultaneous administration of GRP. These data suggest that GRP and NPY oppose each other's effects on the circadian clock, and that the actions of NPY on the photic phase shifting mechanism in the SCN occur at least in part downstream from retinorecipient cells.

ORL1 receptor-mediated down-regulation of mPER2 in the suprachiasmatic nucleus accelerates re-entrainment of the circadian clock following a shift in the environmental light/dark cycle

The circadian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) generates the near 24-h period of the circadian rhythm and is entrained to the 24-h daily cycle by periodic environmental signals, such as the light/dark cycle (photic signal), and can be modulated by various drugs (non-photic signals). The mechanisms by which non-photic signals modulate the circadian clock are not well understood in mice. In mice, many reportedly non-photic stimuli have little effect on the circadian rhythm in vivo. Herein, we investigated the molecular mechanism in W-212393-induced phase advance using mice. W-212393 caused a significant phase advance of locomotor activity rhythm in mice at subjective day. Injection of W-212393 during subjective day elicited down-regulation of mPER2 protein in the SCN shell region, but not mPer2 mRNA. Administration of W-212393 during subjective day failed to produce phase advance in mPer2-mutant mice as well as in ORL1 receptor deficient mice. Furthermore, we show that such inhibition of mPER2 accelerates re-entrainment of the circadian clock following an abrupt shift in the environmental light/dark cycle, such as occurs with transmeridian flight. The present results suggest that post-translational down-regulation of mPER2 protein in the shell region of mouse SCN may be involved in W-212393-induced non-photic phase advance.

GABAAreceptor activation suppressesPeriod 1mRNA andPeriod 2mRNA in the suprachiasmatic nucleus during the mid-subjective day

The mammalian circadian clock can be entrained by photic and nonphotic environmental time cues. gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a nonphotic stimulus that induces phase advances in the circadian clock during the middle of the subjective day. Several nonphotic stimuli suppress Period 1- and Period 2 mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN); however, the effect of GABA on Period mRNA is unknown. In the present study we demonstrate that microinjection of the GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol into the SCN region suppresses the expression of Period 1 mRNA in the hamster. A significant suppression of Period 2 mRNA following microinjection of muscimol was not observed in free-running conditions. However, Period 2 mRNA was significantly reduced following muscimol treatment when animals were maintained under a light cycle and transferred to constant darkness 42 h prior to treatment. An additional study investigated the maximum behavioural phase advance inducible by GABA(A) receptor activation.Together, these data indicate that, like other nonphotic stimuli, GABA suppresses Period 1- and Period 2 mRNA in the SCN.

The circadian visual system, 2005

The primary mammalian circadian clock resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a recipient of dense retinohypothalamic innervation. In its most basic form, the circadian rhythm system is part of the greater visual system. A secondary component of the circadian visual system is the retinorecipient intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) which has connections to many parts of the brain, including efferents converging on targets of the SCN. The IGL also provides a major input to the SCN, with a third major SCN afferent projection arriving from the median raphe nucleus. The last decade has seen a blossoming of research into the anatomy and function of the visual, geniculohypothalamic and midbrain serotonergic systems modulating circadian rhythmicity in a variety of species. There has also been a substantial and simultaneous elaboration of knowledge about the intrinsic structure of the SCN. Many of the developments have been driven by molecular biological investigation of the circadian clock and the molecular tools are enabling novel understanding of regional function within the SCN. The present discussion is an extension of the material covered by the 1994 review, "The Circadian Visual System."

Dexras1: Shaping the responsiveness of the circadian clock

Living organisms are endowed with an autonomous timekeeping program that not only maintains circadian rhythms of behaviour and physiology but is reset by cues from the external, cyclic environment. Intracellular signaling events that mediate entrainment of the mammalian circadian clock by photic (light) as well as non-photic inputs are only beginning to be elucidated. Dexras1 is a novel Ras-like G protein that modulates multiple signaling cascades. Genetic ablation of Dexras1 in mice (dexras1(-/-)) results in altered responsiveness of the master circadian clock to photic and non-photic cues. This review will attempt to provide mechanistic insights into the involvement of Dexras1 in biological timing processes based on its role as a modulator of signal transduction.

Juxtacellular recording/labeling analysis of physiological and anatomical characteristics of rat intergeniculate leaflet neurons

The thalamic intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) is involved in mediating effects of both photic and nonphotic stimuli on mammalian circadian rhythms. IGL neurons containing neuropeptide Y (NPY) have been implicated in mediating nonphotic effects, but little is known about those involved in photic entrainment. We used juxtacellular recording/labeling in rats to characterize both photic responses and neurochemical phenotypes of neurons in the lateral geniculate area, focusing on the IGL and ventral lateral geniculate (VLG). Single neurons were recorded to characterize photic responsiveness and were labeled with Neurobiotin (Nb); tissue was stained for Nb, NPY, and in some cases for orexin A. Three classes of neurons were identified in the IGL/VLG. Type I neurons lacked NPY and showed sustained activations during retinal illumination and moderate firing rates in darkness. Type II neurons contained large amounts of NPY throughout the soma and showed varied responses to illumination: suppression, complex responses, or no response. Type III neurons had patches of NPY both on the external soma surface and within the soma, apparently representing internalization of NPY. Type III neurons resembled type I cells in their sustained activation by illumination but were virtually silent during the intervening dark period. These neurons appear to receive NPY input, presumably from other IGL cells, which may suppress their activity during darkness. These results demonstrate the presence of several classes of neurons in the IGL defined by their functional and anatomical features and reinforce the role of the IGL/VLG complex in integrating photic and nonphotic inputs to the circadian system.

Short-term constant light potentiation of large-magnitude circadian phase shifts induced by 8-OH-DPAT: effects on serotonin receptors and gene expression in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus

Nonphotic phase-shifting of mammalian circadian rhythms is thought to be mediated in part by serotonin (5-HT) acting in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) circadian clock. Previously we showed that brief (1-3 days) exposure to constant light (LL) greatly potentiates nonphotic phase-shifting induced by the 5-HT agonist, (+/-)2-dipropyl-amino-8-hydroxyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronapthalene (8-OH-DPAT). Here we investigated potential mechanisms for this action of LL, including 5-HT receptor upregulation and SCN clock gene and neuropeptide gene expression. Autoradiographic analysis of ritanserin inhibition of [3H]8-OH-DPAT binding indicated that LL (approximately 2 days) did not affect 5-HT7 receptor binding in the SCN or dorsal raphe. Measurement of 5-HT1A autoreceptors in the median raphe and 5-HT1B receptors in the SCN also showed no effect of LL. In experiment 2, hamsters held under a 14-h light : 10-h dark photocycle (LD) or exposed to LL for approximately 2 days received an intraperitoneal injection of 8-OH-DPAT or vehicle at zeitgeber time (ZT) 6 or 0 and were killed after 2 h of dark exposure. 8-OH-DPAT suppressed SCN Per1 and Per2 mRNAs at both ZTs, as assessed by in situ hybridization. Per1 mRNA was also suppressed by LL alone. In addition, in situ hybridization of arginine vasopressin (AVP) mRNA and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide mRNA showed that LL significantly suppressed the former but not the latter. The LL-induced suppression of SCN Per1 mRNA and AVP mRNA may be involved in LL-induced potentiation of pacemaker resetting, especially as these data provide additional evidence that LL suppresses circadian pacemaker amplitude, thus rendering the clock more susceptible to phase-shifting stimuli.

Differential effects of constant light on circadian clock resetting by photic and nonphotic stimuli in Syrian hamsters

Circadian rhythms in Syrian hamsters can be phase shifted by behavioral arousal during the usual rest phase of the circadian rest-activity cycle. Phase shifts can be greatly potentiated by exposing the animals to constant light for 1 or 2 cycles. This could reflect a change in a specific nonphotic input pathway to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) circadian pacemaker, or it could be caused by a change in the amplitude of the pacemaker. If the latter, then phase shifts to any stimulus, including those activating the photic input pathway, should be potentiated. This hypothesis was tested by measuring phase shifts induced by microinjections of NMDA (500 nl, 10 mM) into the SCN area of hamsters exposed to constant light or dark for 2 days. NMDA induced significant phase delay shifts that mimicked those induced by light exposure early in the night. The magnitude of these shifts did not differ by prior lighting condition. Shifts induced by NMDA (200 nl, 10 mM) microinjections on day 3 and 13 of LL also did not differ. Phase shifts induced by a nonphotic stimulus (3 h of running stimulated by confinement to a novel wheel) were significantly potentiated by 2 days of exposure to constant light. These results indicate that exposure to constant light for 2 circadian cycles differentially affects phase resetting responses to photic and nonphotic inputs to the circadian pacemaker, suggesting that potentiation of shifts to nonphotic stimuli reflect changes in a nonphotic input pathway rather than in an amplitude dimension of the circadian pacemaker.

The opioid fentanyl affects light input, electrical activity andPergene expression in the hamster suprachiasmatic nuclei

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) contain a major circadian pacemaker, which is regulated by photic and nonphotic stimuli. Although enkephalins are present in the SCN, their role in phase regulation of the pacemaker is largely unknown. The opioid agonist fentanyl, a homologue of morphine, is an addictive drug that induces phase shifts of circadian rhythms in hamsters. We observed that these phase shifts are blocked by naloxone, which is a critical test for true opioid receptor involvement, and conclude that opioid receptors are the sole mediators of the actions of fentanyl on the circadian timing system. A strong interaction between opioids and light input was shown by the ability of fentanyl and light to completely block each other's phase shifts of behavioural activity rhythms. Neuronal ensemble recordings in vitro provide first evidence that SCN cells show direct responses to fentanyl and react with a suppression of firing rate. Moreover, we show that fentanyl induces a strong attenuation of light-induced Syrian hamster Period 1 (shPer1) gene expression during the night. During the subjective day, we found no evidence for a role of shPer1 in mediation of fentanyl-induced phase shifts. Based on the present results, however, we cannot exclude the involvement of shPer2. Our data indicate that opioids can strongly modify the photic responsiveness of the circadian pacemaker and may do so via direct effects on SCN electrical activity and regulation of Per genes. This suggests that the pathways regulating addictive behaviour and the circadian clock intersect.

Pharmacological modulation of circadian rhythms: a new drug target in psychotherapeutics

Daily variation in an organism's physiology and behaviour is regulated by the synchrony that is achieved between the internal timing mechanisms - the circadian rhythms of the biological clock - and the prevailing environmental cues. Proper synchrony constitutes an adaptive response; improper or lost synchrony may well yield maladaptation and, in the case of humans, a psychiatric disorder. On a basic level, the circadian system is comprised of three parts: a central oscillator, its various neuronal inputs and its outputs. For all three of these parts, the dissemination of new information is moving at an unprecedented pace, and the number of molecular targets for the opportunistic pharmacologist is growing in step. Monoamines, neuropeptides, kinases - sorting through all these, much less developing one into a drug discovery programme, may be the biggest challenge. However, the potential benefits in targeting a basic flaw in a fundamental biological system may be enormous.

Let there be “more” light: enhancement of light actions on the circadian system through non-photic pathways

Circadian rhythms are internally generated circa 24 h rhythms. The phase of the circadian pacemaker in mammals can be adjusted by external stimuli such as the daily cycle of light, as well as by internal stimuli such as information related to the physiological and behavioral status of the organism, collectively called "non-photic stimuli". We review a large number of studies regarding photic-non-photic interactions on the circadian system, with special focus on two widely described neurotransmitters associated with non-photic input pathways: neuropeptide Y (NPY) and serotonin 5-HT. Both neurotransmitters are capable of phase advancing the master pacemaker oscillation when applied during the subjective day, as do several behavioral manipulations. Also, both are capable of inhibiting light-induced phase shifts during the subjective night, suggesting a dynamic interaction between photic and non-photic stimuli in the fine-tuning of the pacemaker function. Suppression of the NPYergic and/or serotonergic non-photic input pathways can in turn potentiate the phase-shifting effects of light. These findings pose new questions about the possibility of a physiological role for the dynamic interaction between photic and non-photic inputs. This might be particularly important in the case of circadian system adjustments under certain conditions, such as depression, shift work or jet lag.

Dexras1 Potentiates Photic and Suppresses Nonphotic Responses of the Circadian Clock

Circadian rhythms of physiology and behavior are generated by biological clocks that are synchronized to the cyclic environment by photic or nonphotic cues. The interactions and integration of various entrainment pathways to the clock are poorly understood. Here, we show that the Ras-like G protein Dexras1 is a critical modulator of the responsiveness of the master clock to photic and nonphotic inputs. Genetic deletion of Dexras1 reduces photic entrainment by eliminating a pertussis-sensitive circadian response to NMDA. Mechanistically, Dexras1 couples NMDA and light input to Gi/o and ERK activation. In addition, the mutation greatly potentiates nonphotic responses to neuropeptide Y and unmasks a nonphotic response to arousal. Thus, Dexras1 modulates the responses of the master clock to photic and nonphotic stimuli in opposite directions. These results identify a signaling molecule that serves as a differential modulator of the gated photic and nonphotic input pathways to the circadian timekeeping system.

Circadian Phase Alteration by GABA and Light Differs in Diurnal and Nocturnal Rodents During the Day

These studies investigated the circadian effects of light and gamma aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) receptor activation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the diurnal unstriped Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus). Microinjection of the GABAA agonist muscimol into the SCN during the day produced phase shifts that were opposite in direction to those previously reported in nocturnal rodents. In addition, light had no significant effect on the magnitude of muscimol-induced phase delays during the daytime. Injection of muscimol during the night, however, significantly inhibited light-induced phase delays and advances in a manner similar to that previously reported in nocturnal rodents. Therefore, the circadian effects of GABAA receptor activation are similar in diurnal and nocturnal species during the night but differ significantly during the day.

Reward and Aversive Stimuli Produce Similar Nonphotic Phase Shifts

Circadian rhythms in rodents respond to arousing, nonphotic stimuli that contribute to daily patterns of entrainment. To examine whether the motivational significance of a stimulus is important for eliciting nonphotic circadian phase shirts in Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), the authors compared responses to a highly rewarding stimulus (lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation reward [BSR]) and a highly aversive stimulus (footshock). Animals were housed on a 14:10-hr light-dark cycle until test day, when they were given a 1-hr BSR session (trained animals) or a 1-mA electric footshock at 1 of 8 circadian times, and were maintained in constant dark thereafter. Both BSR pulses and footshock produced nonphotic phase response curves. These results support the hypothesis that arousal resulting from the motivational significance of a stimulus is a major factor in nonphotic phase shifts.

Neuropeptide y and n-methyl-d-aspartic acid interact within the suprachiasmatic nuclei to alter circadian phase

Circadian rhythms are reset by exposure to photic stimuli and nonphotic stimuli. Glutamate appears to be the primary neurotransmitter that communicates photic stimuli to the circadian clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. There is also substantial evidence that neuropeptide Y (NPY) mediates the effects of at least some nonphotic stimuli on the circadian clock. The purpose of this study was to investigate how NPY and glutamate receptor activation interact to reset the phase of the circadian clock. Microinjection of the glutamate agonist N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) during the subjective day significantly decreased NPY-induced phase advances. During the late subjective night, NMDA induced light-like phase advances, which were significantly reduced by microinjection of NPY. Microinjection of NPY inhibited NMDA-induced phase advances during the late subjective night, even when sodium-dependent action potentials were inhibited by tetrodotoxin. These data support the hypothesis that, during the subjective night, NPY and NMDA act on the same clock cells or on cells that communicate with clock cells by mechanisms not requiring action potentials. Although NPY and NMDA appear to be mutually inhibitory during both the day and the night, the mechanisms of this inhibition appear to be different during the day versus the night.

Behavioral arousal blocks light-induced phase advances in locomotor rhythmicity but not light-induced Per1 and Fos expression in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus

Both photic and nonphotic stimuli entrain circadian rhythms. Although the adaptive significance of nonphotic clock resetting is unknown, one possibility is that nonphotic cues modulate circadian responses to light. Results of studies on the interaction between photic and nonphotic stimuli support this idea. During the day, light blocks the effects of nonphotic stimuli on the phase of locomotor rhythms and on expression of clock genes in suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) neurons. At night, novelty-induced activity prior to and during exposure to light attenuates the phase-shifting response to that light, but the effects of this manipulation on clock gene expression are unknown. The present experiments explore the interaction between behavioral state and response to light at the molecular level. We show that confining hamsters to novel wheels immediately after a light pulse during the late subjective night attenuates light-induced phase advances of wheel-running rhythms and the transient effects on circadian period. In contrast to the striking effect of novelty-induced activity on behavioral responses to light, Fos protein and Per1 mRNA were robustly expressed in the SCN of all light-pulsed animals, regardless of behavioral treatment. Our results are inconsistent with the idea that light and nonphotic stimuli block each other's effects on phase shifts by inducing or attenuating transcription of Per1. Photic regulation of clock genes and spontaneous rhythmic expression of clock genes are probably mediated by different mechanisms.

Attenuation of circadian light induced phase advances and delays by neuropeptide Y and a neuropeptide Y Y1/Y5 receptor agonist

Circadian rhythms can be synchronised to photic and non-photic stimuli. The circadian clock, anatomically defined as the suprachiasmatic nucleus in mammals, can be phase shifted by light during the night. Non-photic stimuli reset the circadian rhythm during the day. Photic and non-photic stimuli have been shown to interact during the day and night. Precise mechanisms for these complex interactions are unknown. A possible pathway for non-photic resetting of the clock is thought to generate from the intergeniculate leaflet, which conveys information to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) through the geniculohypothalamic tract and utilises neuropeptide Y (NPY) as its primary neurotransmitter. Interactions between light and NPY were investigated during the early (2 h after activity onset) and late (6 h after activity onset) night in male Syrian hamsters. NPY microinjections into the region of the SCN significantly attenuated light-induced phase delay, during the early subjective night. Phase advances to light were completely inhibited by the administration of NPY during the late night. The precise mechanism by which NPY attenuates or blocks photic phase shifts is unclear, but the NPY Y5 receptor has been implicated in the mediation of this inhibitory effect. The NPY Y1/Y5 receptor agonist, [Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY, was administered via cannula microinjections following light exposure during the early and late night. [Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY significantly attenuated phase delays to light during the early night and blocked phase advances during the late night, in a manner similar to NPY. These results show the ability of NPY to attenuate phase shifts to light during the early night and block light-induced phase advances during the late night. Furthermore, this is the first in vivo study implicating the involvement of the NPY Y1/Y5 receptors in the complex interaction of photic and non-photic stimuli during the night. The alteration of photic phase shifts by NPY may influence photic entrainment within the circadian system.

Tetrodotoxin blocks the circadian effects of NMDA during the day but not at night

Light resets the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) during the night and inhibits the ability of non-photic stimuli, such as injection of muscimol, to reset the clock during the day. Since activation of NMDA receptors appears to mediate the effects of light in the SCN, we investigated whether there are day-night differences in the SCN responses to NMDA. During the night, microinjection of NMDA mimicked the ability of light to induce phase delays, and these effects were not inhibited by blocking Na+-dependent action potentials with tetrodotoxin (TTX). During the day, NMDA mimicked the ability of light to inhibit muscimol-induced phase advances; however, this was inhibited by TTX. These data suggest that Na+-dependent action potentials within the SCN are required for NMDA to mimic the effects of light during the day but not during the night.

Serotonin phase-shifts the mouse suprachiasmatic circadian clock in vitro

The mammalian circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) receives multiple afferent signals that could potentially modulate its phase. One input, the serotonin (5-HT) projection from the raphe nuclei, has been extensively investigated in rats and hamsters, yet its role(s) in modulating circadian clock phase remains controversial. To expand our investigation of 5-HT modulation of the SCN clock, we investigated the phase-shifting effects of 5-HT and its agonist, (+)8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (DPAT), when applied to mouse SCN brain slices. 5-HT induced 2-3 h phase advances when applied during subjective day, while non-significant phase shifts were seen after 5-HT application at other times. These phase shifts were completely blocked by the 5-HT antagonist, metergoline. DPAT also induced phase shifts when applied during mid-subjective day, and this effect appeared dose-dependent. Together, these results demonstrate that the mouse SCN, like that of the rat, is directly sensitive to in vitro phase-resetting by 5-HT.

Plasticity of hamster circadian entrainment patterns depends on light intensity

The multiple oscillatory basis of the mammalian circadian pacemaker is adduced by, among other phenomena, the occurrence of split locomotor activity rhythms in rodents after prolonged exposure to constant light. More recently, split rhythms entrained to a 24h light:dark:light:dark cycle have been documented following scheduled access of hamsters to a novel running wheel or by photoperiod manipulations alone. Because the incidence of constant light-induced splitting depends on light intensity, the role of this variable was assessed in this new splitting paradigm. Male Syrian hamsters, entrained to a 14h light:10h dark cycle, were transferred to individual running wheel cages 7h after light onset. Transfer coincided with the beginning of the scotophase of a new photocycle alternating between 5h of relative dark and 7h of light. For four weeks bright photophases (approximately 350 lux) were alternated with either dim (< 0.1 lux) or completely dark (0 lux) scotophases. An additional group received moderate intensity photophases (approximately 45 lux) paired with dim scotophase illumination. For an additional four weeks, all hamsters were exposed to the same bright:dim light:dark cycle. Dim light in the scotophase significantly increased the incidence of split activity rhythms relative to that observed with completely dark scotophases. Overall wheel-running rates and activity induced by a cage change were also increased in dim light-exposed animals. Group differences largely disappeared four weeks later when hamsters previously maintained in completely dark scotophases were exposed to dim scotophases. Photophase light intensity did not affect the overall incidence of splitting, but influenced the timing of activity in the afternoon scotophase. The effects of dim illumination may be mediated in part via enhanced locomotor responses to transfer to a new cage or by changes in coupling interactions between component oscillators.

Attenuation of phase shifts to light by activity or neuropeptide Y: a time course study

Circadian rhythms in mammals can be synchronised to photic and non-photic stimuli. Interactions between photic and behavioural stimuli were investigated during the late subjective night, 6 h after activity onset in Syrian hamsters (CT18). Light pulses of 130 lx for 15 min at this time resulted in phase advance shifts. Novel wheel exposure, for a period of 3 h, following photic stimulation was able to attenuate the phase advancing effects of light. A time delay of up to 60 min between photic and behavioural stimuli also resulted in significant attenuation of light-induced phase shifts (P<0.05). A 90-min interval between stimuli resulted in no significant attenuation. Novel wheel exposure mediates its effects via the intergeniculate leaflet, which conveys information to the SCN and utilises neuropeptide Y (NPY) as its primary neurotransmitter. Phase shifts to light pulses given at CT18 were attenuated by NPY administration. Neuropeptide Y injections up to 60 min post-light exposure significantly attenuated phase shifts by 50% on average. However a 90-min interval between light and NPY microinjection did not significantly affect light-induced phase shifts. These results confirm previous work indicating that novel wheel exposure and NPY administration can modulate light-induced phase shifts during the late night. Further, they show for the first time that the time course for this interaction is similar between wheel running and NPY. Most significantly, our work indicates that the time course in vivo in the late night is similar to that shown previously in vitro during the early night.

Removal of polysialic acid from the SCN potentiates nonphotic circadian phase resetting

The adult suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) expresses a polysialylated form of neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM) that modulates cell interactions. Previous studies have shown that PSA is important for photic entrainment of the SCN circadian clock, suggesting that changes in cell-cell interactions may contribute to the phase-resetting capacity of this system. A possible role for PSA in nonphotic circadian phase resetting was evaluated using the enzyme endoneuraminidase (endo N) to selectively remove PSA from the SCN. Pretreatment of rat brain slices containing the SCN with endo N enhanced the daytime phase-advancing effects of the serotonin agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetralin [8-OH-DPAT] (41% greater than inactivated enzyme controls; P<.05). Similarly, removal of PSA from the Syrian hamster SCN in vivo potentiated the daytime phase-advancing effects of behavioral arousal (sleep deprivation) and of systemic application of 8-OH-DPAT (61% and 220% greater, respectively, than inactivated enzyme controls; both P<.05). While endo N perturbation of both photic and nonphotic phase resetting suggests that PSA plays a central role in clock regulation, it is striking that the effects on the two inputs are opposite in direction. This difference could reflect the antagonistic relationship between photic and nonphotic signaling pathways. It could also be explained by a permissive role of PSA common to both inputs, which in and of itself would not specify direction of response. Such a bidirectional control mechanism, based on PSA's attenuation of cell-cell interactions, is well documented in the developing nervous system, and may be retained in plastic regions of the adult brain.

Extended action of MKC-242, a selective 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, on light-induced Per gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus in mice

We reported previously that (S)-5-[3-[(1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethyl)amino]propoxy]-1,3-benzodioxole hydrochloride (MKC-242) (3 mg kg(-1), i.p.), a selective 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, accelerated the re-entrainment of hamster wheel-running rhythms to a new 8 hr delayed or advanced light-dark cycle, and also potentiated the phase advance of the wheel-running rhythm produced by light pulses. The molecular mechanism underlying MKC-242-induced potentiation of this phase shift, however, has not yet been elucidated. We examined the effects of MKC-242 on light-induced mPer1 and mPer2 mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of mice. MKC-242 (5 mg kg(-1), i.p.) potentiated light-induced mPer1 and mPer2 expression in the SCN of mice housed in constant darkness for 2 days, when mRNA levels were observed 3 hr after light-exposure. More potentiating action of MKC-242 on mPer2 expression in the SCN was observed in mice housed in constant darkness for 9-10 days. This facilitatory action of MKC-242 on mPer1 expression was antagonized by WAY100635, a selective 5-HT(1A) receptor blocker, indicating that MKC-242 activated 5-HT(1A) receptors. Other drugs such as 8-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.), paroxetine (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.), buspirone (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.), and diazepam (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.) did not display a potentiating action on light-induced mPer1 and mPer2 expression in the SCN. In the behavioral experiments, we found that MKC-242 (5 mg kg(-1), i.p.) potentiated light-induced phase delays of free-running rhythm in mice. The present results suggest that prolonged increase of mPer1 or mPer2 expression in the SCN by MKC-242 may be involved in the potentiation of photic entrainment by MKC-242 in mice.

Unilateral optic nerve transection alters light response of suprachiasmatic nucleus and intergeniculate leaflet

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the circadian pacemaker, receives photic input directly from the retina to synchronize the pacemaker to the environment. Additionally, the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL), which innervates the SCN, is known to modulate the retinal photic input to the SCN. To further understand the role of the IGL in mediating the photic input to the SCN, this study examined the effects of unilateral optic nerve transection (UONx) on the photic response of the SCN and IGL in adult and neonatal hamsters. UONx led to an overall reduction in light-induced c-Fos expression in the SCN and IGL. The c-Fos expression was greater in the SCN ipsilateral to the remaining eye, despite a symmetrically bilateral retinohypothalamic tract projection as revealed by intraocular injection of horseradish peroxidase. In contrast, UONx led to a greater c-Fos expression in the contralateral IGL. The contralateral IGL of UONx animals also revealed more neuropeptide Y-immunoreactive neurons, while the ipsilateral SCN of these animals exhibited a denser neuropeptide Y terminal field. The neonates with UONx showed a similar pattern with a slight compensation of the photic-induced c-Fos in the SCN. This study suggests that the IGL may have an ipsilateral inhibitory effect in mediating retinal photic input to the SCN.

Circadian phase-delaying effects of bright light alone and combined with exercise in humans

In a within-subjects (n = 18), counterbalanced design, the circadian phase-shifting effects of 3 h of 1) bright light (3,000 lx) alone 2) and bright light combined with vigorous exercise were compared. For each treatment, volunteers spent 3 nights and 2 days in the laboratory, typically receiving the treatment from approximately 2300 to 0200 on night 2. Bedtimes and waketimes were fixed to the volunteers' habits. Illumination was 50 lx during other wake hours and 0 lx during sleep. Bright Light Alone elicited a significant phase delay in rectal temperature minimum (70 min), but not in urinary 6-sulphatoxymelatonin (6-SMT) acrophase (20 min). Bright Light + Exercise elicited a significant phase delay in 6-SMT (68 min), but did not result in a significant difference in shift compared with Bright Light Alone. The study had adequate statistical power (80%) to detect phase-shift differences between treatments of approximately 2-2.5 h. Thus any antagonism of light shifts with exercise could not have been revealed. Within the limited exercise and light parameters of this study, the results suggest that exercise does not reliably modulate phase-shifting effects of late night bright light in humans.

Neuropeptide Y rapidly reduces Period 1 and Period 2 mRNA levels in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus

The mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contains the main circadian clock. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) that is released from the intergeniculate leaflet of the lateral geniculate body to the SCN, acts in the SCN to advance circadian phase in the subjective day via the NPY Y2 receptor. We used semi-quantitative in situ hybridization to determine the effect of NPY on circadian clock genes, Period 1 (Per1) and Period 2 (Per2), expression in SCN slices. Addition of NPY to the brain slices in the subjective day resulted in reduction of Per1 and Per2 mRNA levels 0.5 and 2 h after treatment. NPY Y1/Y5 and Y2 agonists decreased Per1 within 0.5 h. These results suggest that NPY may induce phase shifts by mechanisms involving or resulting in reduction of Per1 and Per2 mRNA levels.

Glutamate blocks serotonergic phase advances of the mammalian circadian pacemaker through AMPA and NMDA receptors

The phase of the mammalian circadian pacemaker, located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), is modulated by a variety of stimuli, most notably the environmental light cycle. Light information is perceived by the circadian pacemaker through glutamate that is released from retinal ganglion cell terminals in the SCN. Other prominent modulatory inputs to the SCN include a serotonergic projection from the raphe nuclei and a neuropeptide Y (NPY) input from the intergeniculate leaflet. Light and glutamate phase-shift the SCN pacemaker at night, whereas serotonin (5-HT) and NPY primarily phase-shift the pacemaker during the day. In addition to directly phase-shifting the circadian pacemaker, SCN inputs have been shown to modulate the actions of one another. For example, 5-HT can inhibit the phase-shifting effects of light or glutamate applied to the SCN at night, and NPY and glutamate inhibit phase shifts of one another. In this study, we explored the possibility that glutamate can modulate serotonergic phase shifts during the day. For these experiments, we applied various combinations of 5-HT agonists, glutamate agonists, and electrical stimulation of the optic chiasm to SCN brain slices to determine the effect of these treatments on the rhythm of spontaneous neuronal activity generated by the SCN circadian pacemaker. We found that glutamate agonists and optic chiasm stimulation inhibit serotonergic phase advances and that this inhibition involves both AMPA and NMDA receptors. This inhibition by glutamate may be indirect, because it is blocked by both tetrodotoxin and the GABA(A) antagonist, bicuculline.

In vivo resetting of the hamster circadian clock by 5-HT7 receptors in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Serotonin (5-HT) has been strongly implicated in the regulation of the mammalian circadian clock located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN); however, its role in behavioral (nonphotic) circadian phase resetting remains elusive. Central to this issue are divergent lines of evidence that the SCN may, or may not, be a target for the phase-resetting effects of 5-HT. We have addressed this question using a novel reverse-microdialysis approach for timed perfusions of serotonergic and other agents to the Syrian hamster SCN with durations equivalent to the increases in in vivo 5-HT release during phase-resetting behavioral manipulations. We found that 3 hr perfusions of the SCN with either 5-HT or the 5-HT(1A,7) receptor agonist 2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-naphthalene (8-OH-DPAT) at midday advanced the phase of the free-running circadian rhythm of wheel-running assessed using an Aschoff type II procedure. Phase shifts induced by 8-OH-DPAT were enhanced more than threefold by pretreatment with the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor para-chlorophenylalanine. Phase advances induced by SCN 8-OH-DPAT perfusion were significantly inhibited by the 5-HT(2,7) receptor antagonist ritanserin and by the more selective 5-HT(7) receptor antagonist DR4004, implicating the 5-HT(7) receptor in mediating this phase resetting. Concurrent exposure to light during the 8-OH-DPAT perfusion abolished the phase advances. Furthermore, coperfusion of the SCN with TTX, which blocked in vivo 5-HT release, did not suppress intra-SCN 8-OH-DPAT-induced phase advances. These results indicate that 5-HT(7) receptor-mediated phase resetting in the SCN is markedly influenced by the degree of postsynaptic responsiveness to 5-HT and by photic stimulation. Finally, 5-HT may act directly on SCN clock cells to induce in vivo nonphotic phase resetting.

Opposing effects of behavioural activity and light on neurons of the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The mammalian circadian pacemaker is located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. It can be shifted in phase by photic cues and by the behavioural activity of the animal. When presented together, light and behavioural activity attenuate each others' phase-shifting effect. Still unclear is how behavioural activity affects the suprachiasmatic nuclei and how it interacts with photic information. Previously, we reported the occurrence of behaviourally induced suppressions of neuronal activity. The present study investigates the characteristics of these suppressions as a function of circadian time and, additionally, in the presence of photic cues. We performed long-term multiunit activity recordings of neurons in freely moving rats and found that these suppressions of neuronal firing in the suprachiasmatic nucleus occurred at every phase of the circadian cycle. The magnitude of the suppressions showed a circadian variation, with larger suppressions during subjective day. When a light pulse was applied during a suppression, light and activity appeared to oppose each others' effects within the recorded population of neurons. The resulting discharge level appeared to be the sum of both responses. The opposing effects of light and activity were also found in single unit recordings, indicating that photic and behavioural stimuli interact at the level of a single neuron.

Sleep deprivation stimulates serotonin release in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Recent literature suggests that sleep deprivation has a general stimulatory effect on the central serotonergic system. Herein we report that in hamsters, sleep deprivation induced by gentle handling for 3 h under dim red light at midday stimulates serotonin release in the suprachiasmatic nuclei by as much as 171%. Basal levels of 5-HT release are re-established within 1 h after cessation of treatment. Sleep deprivation also evokes phase advances of the circadian activity rhythm averaging 2 h. When sleep deprivation is undertaken in bright light, serotonin release is stimulated, but phase-shifting is greatly inhibited. It is therefore proposed that if the phase-resetting response to sleep deprivation is mediated by increased serotonin release, light inhibits the phase-resetting effect by blocking the postsynaptic or other downstream actions of serotonin.

Expression of Fos in the circadian system following nonphotic stimulation

Syrian hamsters, Mesocricetus auratus, were confined to novel running wheels for a 3-h period, starting at approximately circadian time (CT) 4.5 (i.e., approaching the middle of their subjective day). It can be reliably predicted from the amount of running in this situation whether or not there will be a subsequent phase-shift. Expression of the immediate early genes c-fos and fosB was examined by immunocytochemistry in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) of the thalamus, and the medial pretectal area of hamsters that ran vigorously in the novel wheel and would have phase-shifted. c-Fos was increased, compared to levels in a control group left in their home cages, in the IGL, and the pretectum (PT), but decreased in the SCN. No significant changes in FosB were detected in any region examined. An additional experiment argued against the possibility that the changes in c-Fos could be attributed to a rapid advance of the pacemaker to a different phase in the circadian cycle. Counts of c-Fos-positive cells in the IGL were similar in animals given pulses of running starting at CT 4.5 and starting at CT 12.5-16 (i.e., in the subjective night when they would have been active anyway). Altogether the results support the view that activation of the IGL is important in nonphotic clock resetting, and raise the possibility that the PT may also be involved in nonphotic resetting. However, the results also indicate that novelty-induced running does not alter c-Fos induction in a phase-specific manner in the IGL. The inhibition of c-Fos in the SCN by nonphotic phase-shifting events contrasts with the well-known inducing effects of light pulses. These different effects might underlie some of the interactions between nonphotic and photic zeitgebers when both act together on the circadian system.

Potentiating action of MKC-242, a selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist, on the photic entrainment of the circadian activity rhythm in hamsters

Serotonergic projections from the midbrain raphe nuclei to the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) are known to regulate the photic entrainment of circadian clocks. However, it is not known which 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor subtypes are involved in the circadian regulation. In order to verify the role of 5-HT1A receptors, we examined the effects of 5-¿3-[((2S)-1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethyl)amino]-propoxy¿-1,3-b enzodioxole HCl (MKC-242), a selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist, on photic entrainment of wheel-running circadian rhythms of hamsters. MKC-242 (3 mg kg(-1), i.p.) significantly accelerated the re-entrainment of wheel-running rhythms to a new 8 h delayed or advanced light-dark cycle. MKC-242 (3 mg kg(-1), i.p.) also potentiated the phase advance of the wheel-running rhythm produced by low (5 lux) or high (60 lux) intensity light pulses. In contrast, 8-hydroxydipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT)(5 mg kg(-1), i.p.), a well known 5-HT1A/5-HT7 receptor agonist, only suppressed low intensity (5 lux) light-induced phase advances. The potentiating actions of MKC-242 on light pulse-induced phase advances were observed even when injected 20 or 60 min after the light exposure. The potentiating action of MKC-242 was antagonized by WAY100635, a selective 5-HT1A receptor blocker, but not by ritanserin, a 5-HT2/5-HT7 receptor blocker, indicating that MKC-242 is activating 5-HT1A receptors. Light pulse-induced c-fos expression in the SCN and the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) were unaffected by MKC-242 (3 mg kg(-1), i.p.). HPLC analysis demonstrated that MKC-242 (3 mg kg(-1), i.p.) decreased the 5-HIAA content in the SCN. The present results suggest that presynaptic 5-HT1A receptor activation may be involved in the potentiation of photic entrainment by MKC-242 in hamsters.

Neuropeptide Y blocks serotonergic phase shifts of the suprachiasmatic circadian clock in vitro

The mammalian circadian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) can be reset in vitro by various neurochemical stimuli. This study investigated the phase-shifting properties of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and serotonin (5-HT) agonists when applied alone, as well as their combined effects on clock resetting. These neurotransmitters have both been shown to advance the SCN clock in vitro when applied during the daytime. By monitoring the SCN neuronal activity rhythm in vitro, I first confirm that the 5HT1A/5HT7 agonist (+)DPAT maximally advances the SCN clock when applied at zeitgeber time 6 (ZT6). Conversely, NPY only phase advances the neuronal activity rhythm when applied at ZT 10. This effect occurs through stimulation of Y2 receptors. NPY, again acting through Y2 receptors, blocks (+)DPAT-induced phase shifts at ZT 6, while neither (+)DPAT nor 5-HT affect NPY-induced phase shifts at ZT 10. NPY appears to block (+)DPAT-induced phase shifts by preventing increases in cyclic AMP. These data are the first to demonstrate in vitro interactions between daytime resetting stimuli in the rat, and provide critical insights into mechanisms controlling circadian clock phase.

Roles of suprachiasmatic nuclei and intergeniculate leaflets in mediating the phase-shifting effects of a serotonergic agonist and their photic modulation during subjective day

Serotonin (5-HT) has been implicated in the phase adjustment of the circadian system during the subjective day in response to nonphotic stimuli. Two components of the circadian system, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) (site of the circadian clock) and the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL), receive serotonergic projections from the median raphe nucleus and the dorsal raphe nucleus, respectively. Experiment 1, performed in golden hamsters housed in constant darkness, compared the effects of bilateral microinjections of the 5-HT1A/7 receptor agonist, 8-hydroxydipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 0.5 microgram in 0.2 microliter saline per side), into the IGL or the SCN during the mid-subjective day. Bilateral 8-OH-DPAT injections into either the SCN or the IGL led to significant phase advances of the circadian rhythm of wheel-running activity (p < .001). The phase advances following 8-OH-DPAT injections in the IGL were dose department (p < .001). Because a light pulse administered during the middle of the subjective day can attenuate the phase-resetting effect of a systemic injection of 8-OH-DPAT, Experiment 2 was designed to determine whether light could modulate 5-HT agonist activity at the level of the SCN and/or the IGL. Serotonergic receptor activation within the SCN, followed by a pulse of light (300 lux of white light lasting 30 min), still induced phase advances. In contrast, the effect of serotonergic stimulation within the IGL was blocked by a light pulse. These results indicate that the respective 5-HT projections to the SCN and IGL subserve different functions in the circadian responses to photic and nonphotic stimuli.

Behavioral inhibition of light-induced circadian phase resetting is phase and serotonin dependent

Circadian rhythms in Syrian hamsters can be phase shifted by light exposure during the subjective night and by a bout of wheel running induced during the subjective day. Interactions between photic and behavioral stimuli were examined by comparing phase shifts to 15 min, 50 lux light pulses with and without a bout of running induced by confinement to a novel wheel 30 min prior to and extending through light exposure. Light pulses 6 h after dark onset on the first night of constant dark induced phase advance shifts averaging 80 min. Wheel running attenuated these shifts by 45% on average (p<0.01). Light pulses 1 h or 2.25 h after dark onset induced phase delay shifts averaging 50 min and 20 min, respectively, that were not affected by stimulated running. A significant running response to the novel wheel was evident at all 3 time points, but was greater to wheel confinement at both times early in the night. Stimulated running alone early or late in the night did not produce significant phase shifts. Behavioral attenuation of phase advances to light late in the night was prevented by pretreatment with the general 5HT1 antagonist metergoline (2 mg/kg i.p.). Metergoline did not significantly attenuate running in novel wheels. These results indicate that modulation of light-induced phase shifts by behavior is phase dependent and may involve direct or indirect actions of serotonin within the circadian system.

Scheduled activity reorganizes circadian phase of Syrian hamsters under full and skeleton photoperiods

Circadian rhythms can be shifted or entrained by light and by arousing nonphotic stimuli. Interactions between photic and nonphotic stimuli were examined by subjecting hamsters to a daily 3 h bout of induced running under full (FPP) or skeleton (two daily light pulses; SPP) photoperiods. Activity scheduled in mid-day of a FPP induced large phase delays (260 +/- 63 min) in hamsters that ran more than 4000 rev/3 h. Split rhythms were not evident in constant dark (DD) tests. Activity scheduled in mid-subjective day of a SPP induced 180 degrees inversions of circadian phase, apparently achieved by oscillator splitting in some cases. Activity scheduled late-day and early-night induced a mix of phase delays, advances and no responses. Activity scheduled at two phase ranges late in the night had no effect, but scheduled 1 h later (beginning the last hour of darkness) induced large phase delays (238 +/- 30 min). There was no evidence of oscillator splitting during DD tests, but free-running period was significantly longer in groups that showed large phase delays. Induced running schedules have powerful effects on the phase of photic entrainment and can alter intrinsic pacemaker properties, including internal oscillator coupling and period.