Cra-mediated regulation of Escherichia coli adenylate cyclase

Regulation of Aerobic Succinate Transporter dctA of E. coli by cAMP-CRP, DcuS-DcuR, and EIIAGlc: Succinate as a Carbon Substrate and Signaling Molecule

INTRODUCTION

C4-dicarboxylates (C4-DC) have emerged as significant growth substrates and signaling molecules for various Enterobacteriaceae during their colonization of mammalian hosts. Particularly noteworthy is the essential role of fumarate respiration during colonization of pathogenic bacteria. To investigate the regulation of aerobic C4-DC metabolism, the study explored the transcriptional control of the main aerobic C4-DC transporter, dctA, under different carbohydrate conditions. In addition, mutants related to carbon catabolite repression (CCR) and C4-DC regulation (DcuS-DcuR) were examined to better understand the regulatory integration of aerobic C4-DC metabolism into CCR. For initial insight into posttranslational regulation, the interaction between the aerobic C4-DC transporter DctA and EIIAGlc from the glucose-specific phosphotransferase system was investigated.

METHODS

The expression of dctA was characterized in the presence of various carbohydrates and regulatory mutants affecting CCR. This was accomplished by fusing the dctA promoter (PdctA) to the lacZ reporter gene. Additionally, the interaction between DctA and EIIAGlc of the glucose-specific phosphotransferase system was examined in vivo using a bacterial two-hybrid system.

RESULTS

The dctA promoter region contains a class I cAMP-CRP-binding site at position -81.5 and a DcuR-binding site at position -105.5. DcuR, the response regulator of the C4-DC-activated DcuS-DcuR two-component system, and cAMP-CRP stimulate dctA expression. The expression of dctA is subject to the influence of various carbohydrates via cAMP-CRP, which differently modulate cAMP levels. Here we show that EIIAGlc of the glucose-specific phosphotransferase system strongly interacts with DctA, potentially resulting in the exclusion of C4-DCs when preferred carbon substrates, such as sugars, are present. In contrast to the classical inducer exclusion known for lactose permease LacY, inhibition of C4-DC uptake into the cytoplasm affects only its role as a substrate, but not as an inducer since DcuS detects C4-DCs in the periplasmic space ("substrate exclusion"). The work shows an interplay between cAMP-CRP and the DcuS-DcuR regulatory system for the regulation of dctA at both transcriptional and posttranslational levels.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights a hierarchical interplay between global (cAMP-CRP) and specific (DcuS-DcuR) regulation of dctA at the transcriptional and posttranslational levels. The integration of global and specific transcriptional regulation of dctA, along with the influence of EIIAGlc on DctA, fine-tunes C4-DC catabolism in response to the availability of other preferred carbon sources. It attributes DctA a central role in the control of aerobic C4-DC catabolism and suggests a new role to EIIAGlc on transporters (control of substrate uptake by substrate exclusion).

How Bacterial Pathogens Coordinate Appetite with Virulence

Cells adjust growth and metabolism to nutrient availability. Having access to a variety of carbon sources during infection of their animal hosts, facultative intracellular pathogens must efficiently prioritize carbon utilization. Here, we discuss how carbon source controls bacterial virulence, with an emphasis on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, which causes gastroenteritis in immunocompetent humans and a typhoid-like disease in mice, and propose that virulence factors can regulate carbon source prioritization by modifying cellular physiology. On the one hand, bacterial regulators of carbon metabolism control virulence programs, indicating that pathogenic traits appear in response to carbon source availability. On the other hand, signals controlling virulence regulators may impact carbon source utilization, suggesting that stimuli that bacterial pathogens experience within the host can directly impinge on carbon source prioritization. In addition, pathogen-triggered intestinal inflammation can disrupt the gut microbiota and thus the availability of carbon sources. By coordinating virulence factors with carbon utilization determinants, pathogens adopt metabolic pathways that may not be the most energy efficient because such pathways promote resistance to antimicrobial agents and also because host-imposed deprivation of specific nutrients may hinder the operation of certain pathways. We propose that metabolic prioritization by bacteria underlies the pathogenic outcome of an infection.

Escherichia coli cryptic prophages sense nutrients to influence persister cell resuscitation

Cryptic prophages are not genomic junk but instead enable cells to combat myriad stresses as an active stress response. How these phage fossils affect persister cell resuscitation has, however, not been explored. Persister cells form as a result of stresses such as starvation, antibiotics and oxidative conditions, and resuscitation of these persister cells likely causes recurring infections such as those associated with tuberculosis, cystic fibrosis and Lyme disease. Deletion of each of the nine Escherichia coli cryptic prophages has no effect on persister cell formation. Strikingly, elimination of each cryptic prophage results in an increase in persister cell resuscitation with a dramatic increase in resuscitation upon deleting all nine prophages. This increased resuscitation includes eliminating the need for a carbon source and is due to activation of the phosphate import system resulting from inactivating the transcriptional regulator AlpA of the CP4-57 cryptic prophage. Deletion of alpA increases persister resuscitation, and AlpA represses phosphate regulator PhoR. Both phosphate regulators PhoP and PhoB stimulate resuscitation. This suggests a novel cellular stress mechanism controlled by cryptic prophages: regulation of phosphate uptake which controls the exit of the cell from dormancy and prevents premature resuscitation in the absence of nutrients.

Contributions of SpoT Hydrolase, SpoT Synthetase, and RelA Synthetase to Carbon Source Diauxic Growth Transitions in Escherichia coli

During the diauxic shift, Escherichia coli exhausts glucose and adjusts its expression pattern to grow on a secondary carbon source. Transcriptional profiling studies of glucose–lactose diauxic transitions reveal a key role for ppGpp. The amount of ppGpp depends on RelA synthetase and the balance between a strong SpoT hydrolase and its weak synthetase. In this study, mutants are used to search for synthetase or hydrolase specific regulation. Diauxic shifts experiments were performed with strains containing SpoT hydrolase and either RelA or SpoT synthetase as the sole source of ppGpp. Here, the length of the diauxic lag times is determined by the presence of ppGpp, showing contributions of both ppGpp synthetases (RelA and SpoT) as well as its hydrolase (SpoT). A balanced ppGpp response is key for a proper adaptation during diauxic shift. The effects of one or the other ppGpp synthetase on diauxic shifts are abolished by addition of amino acids or succinate, although by different mechanisms. While amino acids control the RelA response, succinate blocks the uptake of the excreted acetate via SatP. Acetate is converted to Acetyl-CoA through the ackA-pta pathway, producing Ac-P as intermediate. Evidence of control of the ackA-pta operon as well as a correlation between ppGpp and Ac-P is shown. Finally, acetylation of proteins is shown to occur during a diauxic glucose–lactose shift.

Modulating the direction of carbon flow in Escherichia coli to improve l-tryptophan production by inactivating the global regulator FruR

The fructose repressor (FruR) affects carbon flux through the central metabolic pathways of Escherichia coli. In this study, l-tryptophan production in Escherichia coli FB-04 was improved by knocking out the fruR gene, thereby inactivating FruR. This fruR knockout strain, E. coli FB-04(ΔfruR), not only exhibited higher growth efficiency, it also showed substantially improved l-tryptophan production. l-tryptophan production by E. coli FB-04(ΔfruR) and l-tryptophan yield per glucose were increased by 62.5% and 52.4%, respectively, compared with the parent E. coli FB-04. Metabolomics analysis showed that the fruR knockout significantly enhances metabolic flow through glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway and the TCA cycle, increasing levels of critical precursors and substrates for l-tryptophan biosynthesis. These results indicate that fruR deletion should enhance l-tryptophan production and improve the efficiency of carbon source utilization independent of genetic background.

Biofilm Growth of Escherichia coli Is Subject to cAMP-Dependent and cAMP-Independent Inhibition

We established that Escherichia coli strain 15 (ATCC 9723) produces both curli and cellulose, and forms robust biofilms. Since this strain is wild type with respect to the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS), it is an ideal strain in which to investigate the effects of the PTS on the biofilm growth of E. coli. We began by looking into the effects of PTS and non-PTS sugars on the biofilm growth of this strain. All the sugars tested tended to activate biofilm growth at low concentrations but to inhibit biofilm growth at high concentrations. Acidification of the medium was an inhibitory factor in the absence of buffer, but buffering to prevent a pH drop did not prevent the inhibitory effects of the sugars. The concentration at which inhibition set in varied from sugar to sugar. For most sugars, cyclic (c)AMP counteracted the inhibition at the lowest inhibitory concentrations but became ineffective at higher concentrations. Our results suggest that cAMP-dependent catabolite repression, which is mediated by the PTS in E. coli, plays a role in the regulation of biofilm growth in response to sugars. cAMP-independent processes, possibly including Cra, also appear to be involved, in addition to pH effects.

Metabolic Regulation and Coordination of the Metabolism in Bacteria in Response to a Variety of Growth Conditions

Living organisms have sophisticated but well-organized regulation system. It is important to understand the metabolic regulation mechanisms in relation to growth environment for the efficient design of cell factories for biofuels and biochemicals production. Here, an overview is given for carbon catabolite regulation, nitrogen regulation, ion, sulfur, and phosphate regulations, stringent response under nutrient starvation as well as oxidative stress regulation, redox state regulation, acid-shock, heat- and cold-shock regulations, solvent stress regulation, osmoregulation, and biofilm formation, and quorum sensing focusing on Escherichia coli metabolism and others. The coordinated regulation mechanisms are of particular interest in getting insight into the principle which governs the cell metabolism. The metabolism is controlled by both enzyme-level regulation and transcriptional regulation via transcription factors such as cAMP-Crp, Cra, Csr, Fis, P(II)(GlnB), NtrBC, CysB, PhoR/B, SoxR/S, Fur, MarR, ArcA/B, Fnr, NarX/L, RpoS, and (p)ppGpp for stringent response, where the timescales for enzyme-level and gene-level regulations are different. Moreover, multiple regulations are coordinated by the intracellular metabolites, where fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (FBP), phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), and acetyl-CoA (AcCoA) play important roles for enzyme-level regulation as well as transcriptional control, while α-ketoacids such as α-ketoglutaric acid (αKG), pyruvate (PYR), and oxaloacetate (OAA) play important roles for the coordinated regulation between carbon source uptake rate and other nutrient uptake rate such as nitrogen or sulfur uptake rate by modulation of cAMP via Cya.

Large-scale 13C-flux analysis reveals distinct transcriptional control of respiratory and fermentative metabolism in Escherichia coli

The authors analyze the role transcription plays in regulating bacterial metabolic flux. Of 91 transcriptional regulators studied, 2/3 affect absolute fluxes, but only a small number of regulators control the partitioning of flux between different metabolic pathways.

In contrast to the canonical respiro-fermentative glucose metabolism, fully respiratory galactose metabolism depends exclusively on the PEP-glyoxylate cycle.

Of 91 transcription factors, 2/3 affect absolute fluxes, but only one controls the distribution of fluxes on galactose and nine on glucose.

Transcriptional control of hexose flux distributions is confined to the acetyl-CoA branch point.

The PEP-glyoxylate cycle is controlled by cAMP-Crp in a hexose uptake rate-dependent manner.

Focusing on central carbon metabolism of Escherichia coli, we aim here to systematically identify transcriptional regulators that control the distribution of metabolic fluxes during aerobic growth on hexoses. To assess the condition dependence of transcriptional control of flux, we selected glucose and galactose as two substrates that are highly similar, yet lead to distinct growth rates (Soupene et al, 2003), overall metabolic rates (De Anda et al, 2006; Samir El et al, 2009) and levels of catabolite repression (Hogema et al, 1998; Bettenbrock et al, 2007).

Experimentally determined fluxes (Fischer and Sauer, 2003a) during growth on glucose and galactose reveal two distinct metabolic states. On glucose, high metabolic rates lead to high overflow metabolism and respiratory fluxes through the TCA cycle. On galactose, in contrast, metabolism was much slower without overflow metabolism and respiratory fluxes exclusively through the PEP-glyoxylate cycle (Fischer and Sauer, 2003b).

To determine which transcriptional events controlled these two distinct metabolic states, we determined intracellular fluxes in 91 transcription factor mutants. These genetic perturbations primarily affected absolute fluxes but not the distribution of fluxes. The distribution of flux between glycolysis and pentose–phosphate pathway in upper metabolism, e.g., remained constant in all mutants under all conditions. Transcriptional control of the flux distribution was exclusively seen at the acetyl-CoA branch point. On glucose, nine transcription factors controlled the distribution of fluxes at this branch point, five of which (ArcA, IHFA, IHFB, PdhR, Fur) did so presumably directly through their known targets in TCA cycle and/or respiration. Without known targets in the relevant pathways, the remaining four transcription factors (GlpR, QseB, HdfR, GlcC) may act either indirectly or directly through unknown targets. On galactose, transcriptional control focused exclusively on the PEP-glyoxylate cycle. While deletion of six transcription factors (Cra, Crp, IHFA, IHFB, Mlc, NagC) abolished or reduced the PEP-glyoxylate cycle flux, we demonstrate by substrate-limited chemostat experiments, derepression of galactose uptake and show by metabolomics that five of these transcription factors act indirectly through increased cAMP concentrations that allosterically activate Crp, the only direct transcription factors that controls the PEP-glyoxylate cycle (Nanchen et al, 2008).

Overall, our absolute flux data demonstrate that control of flux splitting during growth on hexoses was confined to the acetyl-CoA branch point in E. coli. Of the 36 transcription factors known to target genes in pathways that diverge from the acetyl-CoA branch point, only one transcription factor on galactose and five plus potentially four others on glucose showed altered flux splitting. The primary focus of steady state transcriptional control on the acetyl-CoA branch point, and thus the metabolic decision between the energetically efficient respiration and the less efficient but more rapid fermentation, was recently also demonstrated with only relative flux data for Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Fendt et al, 2010).

In contrast to glucose-grown Bacillus subtilis (Fischer et al, 2005), for batch glucose-grown E. coli, none of the investigated transcription factor mutants exhibited improved biomass productivity. However, the mutants Cra, IHF A, IHF B and NagC with increased uptake rates grew much faster at almost unaltered biomass yields. As the removal of the glucose PTS-based repression with a Crr mutant also resulted in increased galactose uptake, we provide evidence that E. coli actively represses its galactose uptake at the expense of otherwise possible rapid growth.

Despite our increasing topological knowledge on regulation networks in model bacteria, it is largely unknown which of the many co-occurring regulatory events actually control metabolic function and the distribution of intracellular fluxes. Here, we unravel condition-dependent transcriptional control of Escherichia coli metabolism by large-scale ¹³C-flux analysis in 91 transcriptional regulator mutants on glucose and galactose. In contrast to the canonical respiro-fermentative glucose metabolism, fully respiratory galactose metabolism depends exclusively on the phosphoenol-pyruvate (PEP)-glyoxylate cycle. While 2/3 of the regulators directly or indirectly affected absolute flux rates, the partitioning between different pathways remained largely stable with transcriptional control focusing primarily on the acetyl-CoA branch point. Flux distribution control was achieved by nine transcription factors on glucose, including ArcA, Fur, PdhR, IHF A and IHF B, but was exclusively mediated by the cAMP-dependent Crp regulation of the PEP-glyoxylate cycle flux on galactose. Five further transcription factors affected this flux only indirectly through cAMP and Crp by increasing the galactose uptake rate. Thus, E. coli actively limits its galactose catabolism at the expense of otherwise possible faster growth.

Cra negatively regulates acid survival in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis

Survival in acidic environments is important for successful infection of gastrointestinal pathogens. Many bacteria have evolved elaborate mechanisms by inducing or repressing gene expression, which subsequently provide pH homeostasis and enable acid survival. In this study, we employed comparative proteomic analysis to identify the acid-responsive proteins of a food-borne enteric bacterium, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. The expression level of eight proteins involved in carbohydrate metabolism was up- or downregulated over twofold at pH 4.5 compared with pH 7.0. The role of a global transcriptional regulator catabolite repressor/activator Cra was further studied in this acid survival process. lacZ-fusion analysis showed that expression of cra was repressed under acidic pH. Deletion of the cra gene increased acid survival by 10-fold, whereas complementation restored the wild-type phenotype. These results lead us to propose that, in response to acidic pH, the expression of cra gene is downregulated to increase acid survival. This is the first study to demonstrate the regulatory role of Cra in acid survival in an enteric bacterium.

Engineering the Escherichia coli fermentative metabolism

Fermentative metabolism constitutes a fundamental cellular capacity for industrial biocatalysis. Escherichia coli is an important microorganism in the field of metabolic engineering for its well-known molecular characteristics and its rapid growth. It can adapt to different growth conditions and is able to grow in the presence or absence of oxygen. Through the use of metabolic pathway engineering and bioprocessing techniques, it is possible to explore the fundamental cellular properties and to exploit its capacity to be applied as industrial biocatalysts to produce a wide array of chemicals. The objective of this chapter is to review the metabolic engineering efforts carried out with E. coli by manipulating the central carbon metabolism and fermentative pathways to obtain strains that produce metabolites with high titers, such as ethanol, alanine, lactate and succinate.

Metabolic regulation analysis of an ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain based on RT-PCR and enzymatic activities

BACKGROUND

A metabolic regulation study was performed, based upon measurements of enzymatic activities, fermentation performance, and RT-PCR analysis of pathways related to central carbon metabolism, in an ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain (CCE14) derived from lineage C. In comparison with previous engineered strains, this E coli derivative has a higher ethanol production rate in mineral medium, as a result of the elevated heterologous expression of the chromosomally integrated genes encoding PDCZm and ADHZm (pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase from Zymomonas mobilis). It is suggested that this behavior might be due to lineage differences between E. coli W and C.

RESULTS

This study demonstrated that the glycolytic flux is controlled, in this case, by reactions outside glycolysis, i.e., the fermentative pathways. Changes in ethanol production rate in this ethanologenic strain result in low organic acid production rates, and high glycolytic and ethanologenic fluxes, that correlate with enhanced transcription and enzymatic activity levels of PDCZm and ADHZm. Furthermore, a higher ethanol yield (90% of the theoretical) in glucose-mineral media was obtained with CCE14 in comparison with previous engineered E. coli strains, such as KO11, that produces a 70% yield under the same conditions.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that a higher ethanol formation rate, caused by ahigher PDCZm and ADHZm activities induces a metabolic state that cells compensate through enhanced glucose transport, ATP synthesis, and NAD-NADH+H turnover rates. These results show that glycolytic enzymatic activities, present in E. coli W and C under fermentative conditions, are sufficient to contend with increases in glucose consumption and product formation rates.

Correlation between growth rates, EIIACrr phosphorylation, and intracellular cyclic AMP levels in Escherichia coli K-12

In Escherichia coli K-12, components of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems (PTSs) represent a signal transduction system involved in the global control of carbon catabolism through inducer exclusion mediated by phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent protein kinase enzyme IIA(Crr) (EIIA(Crr)) (= EIIA(Glc)) and catabolite repression mediated by the global regulator cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP). We measured in a systematic way the relation between cellular growth rates and the key parameters of catabolite repression, i.e., the phosphorylated EIIA(Crr) (EIIA(Crr) approximately P) level and the cAMP level, using in vitro and in vivo assays. Different growth rates were obtained by using either various carbon sources or by growing the cells with limited concentrations of glucose, sucrose, and mannitol in continuous bioreactor experiments. The ratio of EIIA(Crr) to EIIA(Crr) approximately P and the intracellular cAMP concentrations, deduced from the activity of a cAMP-CRP-dependent promoter, correlated well with specific growth rates between 0.3 h(-1) and 0.7 h(-1), corresponding to generation times of about 138 and 60 min, respectively. Below and above this range, these parameters were increasingly uncoupled from the growth rate, which perhaps indicates an increasing role executed by other global control systems, in particular the stringent-relaxed response system.

Replacing the general energy-coupling proteins of the phospho-enol-pyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system ofSalmonella typhimuriumwith fructose-inducible counterparts results in the inability to utilize nonphosphotransferase system sugars

A Salmonella typhimurium mutant lacking Enzyme I and HPr, general proteins of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS), but producing homologues EIFructoseand FPr constitutively, did not grow in minimal medium supplemented with non-PTS sugars (melibiose, glycerol, and maltose) in the absence of any trace of Luria–Bertani broth; adding cyclic AMP allowed growth. On melibiose, rapid growth began only when melibiose permease activity had reached a threshold level. Wild-type cultures reached this level within about 2 h, but the mutant only after a 12–14 h lag period, and then only when cyclic AMP had been added to the medium. On a mixture of melibiose and a PTS sugar, permease was undetectable in either the wild type or mutant until the PTS sugar had been exhausted. Permease then appeared, increasing with time, but in the mutant it never reached the threshold allowing rapid growth on melibiose unless cyclic AMP had been added. On rich medium supplemented with melibiose or glycerol, the mutant produced lower (30%) levels of melibiose permease or glycerol kinase compared with the wild type. We propose that poor phosphorylation of the regulatory protein Enzyme IIAGlucose, leading to constitutive inducer exclusion and catabolite repression in this strain, accounts for these results.

Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli

The goal of systems biology is to understand the behavior of the whole in terms of knowledge of the parts. This is hard to achieve in many cases due to the difficulty of characterizing the many constituents involved in a biological system and their complex web of interactions. The lac promoter of Escherichia coli offers the possibility of confronting "system-level" properties of transcriptional regulation with the known biochemistry of the molecular constituents and their mutual interactions. Such confrontations can reveal previously unknown constituents and interactions, as well as offer insight into how the components work together as a whole. Here we study the combinatorial control of the lac promoter by the regulators Lac repressor (LacR) and cAMP-receptor protein (CRP). A previous in vivo study [Setty Y, Mayo AE, Surette MG, Alon U (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7702-7707] found gross disagreement between the observed promoter activities and the expected behavior based on the known molecular mechanisms. We repeated the study by identifying and removing several extraneous factors that significantly modulated the expression of the lac promoter. Through quantitative, systematic characterization of promoter activity for a number of key mutants and guided by the thermodynamic model of transcriptional regulation, we were able to account for the combinatorial control of the lac promoter quantitatively, in terms of a cooperative interaction between CRP and LacR-mediated DNA looping. Specifically, our analysis indicates that the sensitivity of the inducer response results from LacR-mediated DNA looping, which is significantly enhanced by CRP.

How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria

The phosphoenolpyruvate(PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) is found only in bacteria, where it catalyzes the transport and phosphorylation of numerous monosaccharides, disaccharides, amino sugars, polyols, and other sugar derivatives. To carry out its catalytic function in sugar transport and phosphorylation, the PTS uses PEP as an energy source and phosphoryl donor. The phosphoryl group of PEP is usually transferred via four distinct proteins (domains) to the transported sugar bound to the respective membrane component(s) (EIIC and EIID) of the PTS. The organization of the PTS as a four-step phosphoryl transfer system, in which all P derivatives exhibit similar energy (phosphorylation occurs at histidyl or cysteyl residues), is surprising, as a single protein (or domain) coupling energy transfer and sugar phosphorylation would be sufficient for PTS function. A possible explanation for the complexity of the PTS was provided by the discovery that the PTS also carries out numerous regulatory functions. Depending on their phosphorylation state, the four proteins (domains) forming the PTS phosphorylation cascade (EI, HPr, EIIA, and EIIB) can phosphorylate or interact with numerous non-PTS proteins and thereby regulate their activity. In addition, in certain bacteria, one of the PTS components (HPr) is phosphorylated by ATP at a seryl residue, which increases the complexity of PTS-mediated regulation. In this review, we try to summarize the known protein phosphorylation-related regulatory functions of the PTS. As we shall see, the PTS regulation network not only controls carbohydrate uptake and metabolism but also interferes with the utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus and the virulence of certain pathogens.

Positive regulation of Bacillus subtilis ackA by CodY and CcpA: establishing a potential hierarchy in carbon flow

Conversion of pyruvate to acetate via the phosphotransacetylase-acetate kinase pathway generates ATP and is a major overflow pathway under conditions of carbon and nitrogen excess. In Bacillus subtilis, this pathway is positively regulated by CcpA, a global regulator of carbon metabolism genes. Transcription of the acetate kinase gene (ackA) proved to be activated as well by a second global regulatory protein, CodY. Expression of an ackA-lacZ fusion was reduced in a codY mutant strain. CodY was found to bind in vitro to two sites in the ackA promoter region and to stimulate ackA transcription in a run-off transcription assay. This is the first known case of direct positive regulation by CodY. CodY and CcpA were found to bind to neighbouring sites and their effects were additive both in vivo and in vitro. Surprisingly, positive regulation by CodY, unlike repression, responded primarily to only one type of effector molecule. That is, branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) served as more potent co-activators of CodY-dependent ackA transcription than did GTP. Given the roles of CcpA and CodY in regulating genes whose products determine the metabolic fate of pyruvate, these two proteins may act together to mediate a hierarchical conversion of pyruvate to its many potential products.

Autoinducer 2 activity in Escherichia coli culture supernatants can be actively reduced despite maintenance of an active synthase, LuxS

Production of the signalling molecule (autoinducer-2) synthesized by LuxS has been proposed to be pivotal to a universal mechanism of inter-species bacterial cell-cell communication (quorum sensing); however recently the function of LuxS has been noted to be integral to central metabolism since it contributes to the activated methyl cycle. This paper shows that when Helicobacter pylori LuxS is overproduced in Escherichia coli, it forms cross-linkable multimers. These multimers persist at comparable levels after 24 h of growth if glucose is omitted from the growth medium; however, the levels of extracellular autoinducer-2 decline (Glucose Retention of AI-2 Levels: GRAIL). Glycerol, maltose, galactose, ribose and L-arabinose could substitute for glucose, but lactose, D-arabinose, acetate, citrate and pyruvate could not. Mutations in (i). metabolic pathways (glycolytic enzymes eno, pgk, pgm; galactose epimerase; the Pta-AckA pathway), (ii). sugar transport (pts components, rbs operon, mgl, trg), and (iii). regulators involved in conventional catabolic repression (crp, cya), cAMP-independent catabolite repression (creC, fruR, rpoS,) the stringent response (relA, spoT) and the global carbon storage regulator (csrA) did not prevent GRAIL. Although the basis of GRAIL remains uncertain, it is clear that the mechanism is distinct from conventional catabolite repression. Moreover, GRAIL is not due to inactivation of the enzymic activity of LuxS, since in E. coli, LuxS contained within stationary-phase cells grown in the absence of glucose maintains its activity in vitro.

Effect of replacing the general energy-coupling proteins of the PEP:sugar phosphotransferase system of Salmonella typhimurium with their fructose-inducible counterparts on utilization of the PTS sugar glucitol

A strain of Salmonella typhimurium in which the genes encoding the general phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS) proteins HPr and Enzyme I have been deleted, the normally cryptic gene encoding the fructose-inducible Enzyme I (EI* or EI(fructose)) is expressed, and the fructose repressor protein is inactive (fruR or cra mutant) was studied. This strain lacks HPr and EI, but expresses FPr (DTP) and EI(fructose) constitutively. Since FPr and EI(fructose) can substitute for HPr and EI, the strain grew in minimal liquid medium supplemented with the PTS sugars glucose, fructose, N-acetylglucosamine, mannitol or mannose. However, it showed very poor to negligible growth on the PTS sugar glucitol. It also grew very poorly on the non-PTS sugars maltose, melibiose and especially glycerol. Adding cAMP to the medium allowed growth on glucitol, but did not affect growth on glycerol. We suggest that poor phosphorylation of the regulatory molecule Enzyme IIA(glucose) by FPr is responsible for these effects.

The regulation of Enzyme IIA(Glc) expression controls adenylate cyclase activity in Escherichia coli

During the last few years, several genes, such as pap, bgl and flhDC, have been shown to be coregulated by the histone-like nucleoid-structuring (H-NS) protein and the cyclic AMP-catabolite activator protein (cAMP/CAP) complex, suggesting an interaction between both systems in the control of some cellular functions. In this study, the possible effect of H-NS on the cAMP level was investigated. In a CAP-deficient strain, the presence of an hns mutation results in a strong reduction in the amount of cAMP, due to a decrease in adenylate cyclase activity. This is caused by the reduced expression of crr, which encodes the Enzyme IIA(Glc) of the phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS), from its specific P2 promoter. This leads to a twofold reduction in the global amount of Enzyme IIA(Glc), the adenylate cyclase activator, responsible for the decrease in adenylate cyclase activity observed in the hns crp strain.

CO sensing and regulation of gene expression by the transcriptional activator CooA

The transcriptional activator CooA from Rhodospirillum rubrum contains a six-coordinate protoheme that acts as a CO sensor in vivo. CO is a physiological effector of CooA and replaces one of the axial ligands of the ferrous heme to form the CO-bound CooA that is active as the transcriptional activator. Cys75 or His77 is coordinated to the ferric and ferrous hemes in CooA, respectively. The redox-controlled ligand exchange between Cys75 and His77 proceeds during the change in the redox state of the heme. The reduction and oxidation midpoint potentials of CooA have been determined to be -320 and -260 mV, respectively. The properties of a functional chimera derived from CRP and CooA suggest that CooA activates the transcription by a similar mechanism to that for CRP at Class II CRP-dependent promoters. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis has revealed that Arg24 and Arg53 of CooA, which will be concerned with the protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase, are critical amino acid residues for the transcriptional activator activity of CooA, and that Lys26 and Asp94 modulate the activity of CooA.

Regulation of expression of the adhE gene, encoding ethanol oxidoreductase in Escherichia coli: transcription from a downstream promoter and regulation by fnr and RpoS

The adhE gene of Escherichia coli, located at min 27 on the chromosome, encodes the bifunctional NAD-linked oxidoreductase responsible for the conversion of acetyl-coenzyme A to ethanol during fermentative growth. The expression of adhE is dependent on both transcriptional and posttranscriptional controls and is about 10-fold higher during anaerobic than during aerobic growth. Two putative transcriptional start sites have been reported: one at position -292 and the other at -188 from the translational start codon ATG. In this study we show, by using several different transcriptional and translational fusions to the lacZ gene, that both putative transcriptional start sites can be functional and each site can be redox regulated. Although both start sites are NarL repressible in the presence of nitrate, Fnr activates only the -188 start site and Fis is required for the transcription of only the -292 start site. In addition, it was discovered that RpoS activates adhE transcription at both start sites. Under all experimental conditions tested, however, only the upstream start site is active. Available evidence indicates that under those conditions, the upstream promoter region acts as a silencer of the downstream transcriptional start site. Translation of the mRNA starting at -292, but not the one starting at -188, requires RNase III. The results support the previously postulated ribosomal binding site (RBS) occlusion model, according to which RNase III cleavage is required to release the RBS from a stem-loop structure in the long transcript.

Regulation of adhE (encoding ethanol oxidoreductase) by the Fis protein in Escherichia coli

The adhE gene of Escherichia coli encodes a multifunctional ethanol oxidoreductase whose expression is 10-fold higher under anaerobic than aerobic conditions. Transcription of the gene is under the negative control of the Cra (catabolite repressor-activator) protein, whereas translation of the adhE mRNA requires processing by RNase III. In this report, we show that the expression of adhE also depends on the Fis (factor for inversion stimulation) protein. A strain bearing a fis::kan null allele failed to grow anaerobically on glucose solely because of inadequate adhE transcription. However, fis expression itself is not under redox control. Sequence inspection of the adhE promoter revealed three potential Fis binding sites. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis, using purified Fis protein and adhE promoter DNA, showed three different complexes.

Recognition of target DNA and transcription activation by the CO-sensing transcriptional activator CooA

CooA from Rhodospirillum rubrum is a heme-based CO-sensing transcriptional activator, in which CO acts as a physiological effector. In this study, we examined the mechanism of site-specific recognition and transcriptional activation by CooA by elucidating the transcriptional activator activity of the mutant CooA proteins and the chimeric proteins derived from CRP and CooA and the promoter activity of the mutant promoters. Site-directed mutagenesis has revealed that Arg(177), Gln(178), and Ser(181) on the recognition helix of the helix-turn-helix motif in CooA are responsible for the site-specific recognition. The side chains of these amino acid residues at positions 177, 178, and 181 are believed to be hydrogen bonding to the G:A, T:A, and C:G pairs at positions 2/15, 3/14, and 4/13 in the CooA-dependent promoters to recognize the DNA site for CooA. The properties of the CRP/CooA chimeric proteins constructed in this work suggest that CooA activates transcription by a similar mechanism to that of CRP at Class II CRP-dependent promoters.

Expression of the phosphotransferase system both mediates and is mediated by Mlc regulation in Escherichia coli

The ptsHIcrr operon encodes the cytoplasmic components of the phosphotransferase system (PTS). It is expressed from two major promoters, of which the upstream promoter has previously been shown to be induced by glucose and to be dependent upon cAMP/CAP. This promoter is now shown to be repressed by Mlc. Mlc is a transcriptional regulator controlling, among others, the gene ptsG, encoding EIICBGlc, the glucose-specific transporter of the PTS. Transcription of ptsH p0 and ptsG are subject to the same regulatory pattern. In addition to induction by glucose and repression by Mlc, mutations in ptsHIcrr, which interrupt the PEP-dependent phosphate transfer through the soluble components of the PTS, lead to high expression of both ptsH and ptsG, while mutations inactivating EIIBCGlc are non-inducible. Mutations in mlc lead to high constitutive expression and are dominant, implying that Mlc is the ultimate regulator of ptsHI and ptsG expression. Growth on other PTS sugars, besides glucose, also induces ptsH and ptsG expression, suggesting that the target of Mlc regulation is the PTS. However, induction by these other sugars is only observed in the presence of ptsG+, thus confirming the importance of glucose and EIICBGlc in the regulation of the PTS. The ptsG22 mutation, although negative for glucose transport, shows a weak positive regulatory phenotype. The mutation has been sequenced and its effect on regulation investigated.

Expression systems and physiological control of promoter activity in bacteria

Promoter activity in vivo is not just dependent on the performance of the regulator/promoter pair which may predominantly control transcription initiation in response to a given signal, it also relies on overimposed mechanisms that connect the activity of individual promoters to the metabolic and energetic status of the bacterial cells. Such mechanisms - which frequently become limiting for biotechnological applications involving regulated promoters - include classic (i.e. cAMP/CRP-mediated) or alternative catabolite control checks, recruitment of protein intermediates of the phosphotransferase sugar transport system, coregulation through protein-induced DNA bending and the interplay of sigma factors during various growth stages.