1
|
Brignoli A, Ferrara E, Zannetti M, Loi G, Forti L, Socci C, Carriero A, Gennari A, Krengli M, Franco P. Capecitabine-Induced Ileitis during Neoadjuvant Pelvic Radio-Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Case Report with Literature Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9063-9077. [PMID: 37887555 PMCID: PMC10605187 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30100655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
We report on a clinical case of capecitabine-induced acute ileitis in a patient treated with pre-operative concurrent chemoradiation with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer and provide a comprehensive literature review. This a rare, but life-threatening, clinical situation, that clinicians should be aware of. Severe persistent diarrhea is the most frequent clinical feature and computed tomography is a valid tool for diagnosis. Conservative management includes capecitabine withdrawal, antidiarrheal therapy and endovenous hydration, together with dietary modifications and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Pelvic irradiation represents an adjunctive risk factor, which may increase the likelihood of occurrence of terminal ileitis. Early recognition and prompt intervention are crucial for successful clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Brignoli
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy; (A.B.); (E.F.); (M.Z.)
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of the Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy; (A.C.); (A.G.)
| | - Eleonora Ferrara
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy; (A.B.); (E.F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Micol Zannetti
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy; (A.B.); (E.F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Gianfranco Loi
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy;
| | - Laura Forti
- Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy;
| | - Carlo Socci
- Division of Surgery, Hospital ‘S.S. Trinita’, 28021 Borgomanero, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of the Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy; (A.C.); (A.G.)
- Division of Radiology, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of the Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy; (A.C.); (A.G.)
- Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy;
| | - Marco Krengli
- Radiation Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35100 Padua, Italy;
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35100 Padua, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy; (A.B.); (E.F.); (M.Z.)
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of the Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy; (A.C.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fiandra C, Rosati S, Arcadipane F, Dinapoli N, Fato M, Franco P, Gallio E, Scaffidi Gennarino D, Silvetti P, Zara S, Ricardi U, Balestra G. Active bone marrow segmentation based on computed tomography imaging in anal cancer patients: A machine-learning-based proof of concept. Phys Med 2023; 113:102657. [PMID: 37567068 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Different methods are available to identify haematopoietically active bone marrow (ActBM). However, their use can be challenging for radiotherapy routine treatments, since they require specific equipment and dedicated time. A machine learning (ML) approach, based on radiomic features as inputs to three different classifiers, was applied to computed tomography (CT) images to identify haematopoietically active bone marrow in anal cancer patients. METHODS A total of 40 patients was assigned to the construction set (training set + test set). Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18FDG-PET) images were used to detect the active part of the pelvic bone marrow (ActPBM) and stored as ground-truth for three subregions: iliac, lower pelvis and lumbosacral bone marrow (ActIBM, ActLPBM, ActLSBM). Three parameters were used for the correspondence analyses between 18FDG-PET and ML classifiers: DICE index, Precision and Recall. RESULTS For the 40-patient cohort, median values [min; max] of the Dice index were 0.69 [0.20; 0.84], 0.76 [0.25; 0.89], and 0.36 [0.15; 0.67] for ActIBM, ActLSBM, and ActLPBM, respectively. The Precision/Recall (P/R) ratio median value for the ActLPBM structure was 0.59 [0.20; 1.84] (over segmentation), while for the other two subregions the P/R ratio median has values of 1.249 [0.43; 4.15] for ActIBM and 1.093 [0.24; 1.91] for ActLSBM (under segmentation). CONCLUSION A satisfactory degree of overlap compared to 18FDG-PET was found for 2 out of the 3 subregions within pelvic bones. Further optimization and generalization of the process is required before clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Fiandra
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - S Rosati
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - F Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - N Dinapoli
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M Fato
- Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - P Franco
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - E Gallio
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - D Scaffidi Gennarino
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - P Silvetti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - S Zara
- Tecnologie Avanzate, Torino, Italy
| | - U Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - G Balestra
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Franco P, Porreca A, Mantello G, Valvo F, Gasparini L, Slim N, Manfrida S, De Felice F, Gerardi MA, Vagge S, Krengli M, Palazzari E, Osti MF, Gonnelli A, Catalano G, Pittoni P, Ivaldi GB, Lupattelli M, Rosetto ME, Niespolo RM, Guido A, Durante O, Macchia G, Munoz F, El Khouzai B, Lucido MR, Arcadipane F, Casadei Gardini A, Maria D'Angelillo R, Gambacorta MA, Genovesi D, Di Nicola M, Caravatta L. External validation of a composite bio-humoral index in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation. Radiother Oncol 2022; 177:9-15. [PMID: 36273737 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A prognostic scoring system based on laboratory inflammation parameters, [Hemo-Eosinophils-Inflammation (HEI) index], including baseline hemoglobin level, the systemic inflammatory index and eosinophil count was recently proposed in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ASCC). HEI was shown to discriminate disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival in ASCC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). We tested the accuracy of the model on a multicentric cohort for external validation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated with CRT were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier curves for DFS and OS based on HEI risk group were calculated and the log-rank test was used. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the prognostic factors for DFS and OS. The exponential of the regression coefficients provided an estimate of the hazard ratio (HR). For model discrimination, we determined Harrell's C-index, Gönen & Heller K Index and the explained variation on the log relative hazard scale. RESULTS A total of 877 patients was available. Proportional hazards were adjusted for age, gender, tumor-stage, and chemotherapy. Two-year DFS was 77 %(95 %CI:72.0-82.4) and 88.3 %(95 %CI:84.8-92.0 %) in the HEI high- and low- risk groups. Two-year OS was 87.8 %(95 %CI:83.7-92.0) and 94.2 %(95 %CI:91.5-97). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed a HR = 2.02(95 %CI:1.25-3.26; p = 0.004) for the HEI high-risk group with respect to OS and a HR = 1.53(95 %CI:1.04-2.24; p = 0.029) for DFS. Harrel C-indexes were 0.68 and 0.66 in the validation dataset, for OS and DFS. Gonen-Heller K indexes were 0.67 and 0.71, respectively. CONCLUSION The HEI index proved to be a prognosticator in ASCC patients treated with CRT. Model discrimination in the external validation cohort was acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, and University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
| | - Annamaria Porreca
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Giovanna Mantello
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Lucrezia Gasparini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Najla Slim
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Stefania Manfrida
- "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy.
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marianna A Gerardi
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Marco Krengli
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, and University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
| | - Elisa Palazzari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Oncological Referral Center, Aviano, Italy.
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy.
| | - Alessandra Gonnelli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Gianpiero Catalano
- Radiation Oncology Center, IRCCS Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy.
| | - Patrizia Pittoni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Asst Lariana, Ospedale di Como, Como, Italy.
| | | | - Marco Lupattelli
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, 06156, Perugia, Italy.
| | | | | | - Alessandra Guido
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Oreste Durante
- Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Fernando Munoz
- Department of Radiotherapy, Azienda U. S. L. della Valle d'Aosta, 11100, Aosta, Italy.
| | - Badr El Khouzai
- Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
| | | | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio San Giovanni Antica Sede, Torino, Italy.
| | - Andrea Casadei Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Università Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, 20019 Milan, Italy.
| | - Rolando Maria D'Angelillo
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy.
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Marta Di Nicola
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Luciana Caravatta
- Radiation Oncology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Franco P, Segelov E, Johnsson A, Riechelmann R, Guren MG, Das P, Rao S, Arnold D, Spindler KLG, Deutsch E, Krengli M, Tombolini V, Sebag-Montefiore D, De Felice F. A Machine-Learning-Based Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature on Anal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071697. [PMID: 35406469 PMCID: PMC8996998 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus, being a rare cancer, requires national and international collaborations, networking, organizational proficiency and leadership to overcome barriers towards the implementation of clinical trials to establish improved standards of care treatment strategies and the conduction of translational research projects to shed light into its biology and molecular characterization. The purpose of the present study is to obtain a global frame of the scientific literature related to anal cancer, through a bibliometric analysis of the published articles during the last 20 years (2000–2020), exploring trends and common patterns in research, tracking collaboration and networks to foresee future directions in basic and clinical research. Abstract Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ASCC) is a rare disease. Barriers have been encountered to conduct clinical and translational research in this setting. Despite this, ASCC has been a prime example of collaboration amongst researchers. We performed a bibliometric analysis of ASCC-related literature of the last 20 years, exploring common patterns in research, tracking collaboration and identifying gaps. The electronic Scopus database was searched using the keywords “anal cancer”, to include manuscripts published in English, between 2000 and 2020. Data analysis was performed using R-Studio 0.98.1091 software. A machine-learning bibliometric method was applied. The bibliometrix R package was used. A total of 2322 scientific documents was found. The average annual growth rate in publication was around 40% during 2000–2020. The five most productive countries were United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (UK), France, Italy and Australia. The USA and UK had the greatest link strength of international collaboration (22.6% and 19.0%). Two main clusters of keywords for published research were identified: (a) prevention and screening and (b) overall management. Emerging topics included imaging, biomarkers and patient-reported outcomes. Further efforts are required to increase collaboration and funding to sustain future research in the setting of ASCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, “Maggiore della Carità” University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0321-3733424; Fax: +39-0321-3733698
| | - Eva Segelov
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia;
- Department of Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton 3168, Australia
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, 22002 Lund, Sweden;
| | - Rachel Riechelmann
- Department of Clinical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01000-000, Brazil;
| | - Marianne G. Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0316 Oslo, Norway;
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Sheela Rao
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK;
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, 22763 Hamburg, Germany;
| | | | - Eric Deutsch
- Institute Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| | - Marco Krengli
- Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, “Maggiore della Carità” University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Radiation Oncology, Policlinico “Umberto I” and Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.T.); (F.D.F.)
| | | | - Francesca De Felice
- Radiation Oncology, Policlinico “Umberto I” and Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.T.); (F.D.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mahmood A, Bhuva N, Fokas E, Glynne-Jones R. Compliance to chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 106:102381. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
6
|
Franco P, Chiloiro G, Montesi G, Montrone S, Arcelli A, Comito T, Arcadipane F, Caravatta L, Macchia G, Lupattelli M, Niespolo MR, Munoz F, Palazzari E, Krengli M, Valvo F, Gambacorta MA, Genovesi D, Mantello G. A Pattern of Care Report on the Management of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus—A Study by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Gastrointestinal Tumors Study Group. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 57:medicina57121342. [PMID: 34946287 PMCID: PMC8707820 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57121342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: The diagnosis and therapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus may vary significantly in daily clinical practice, even if international guidelines are available. Materials and Methods: We conducted a pattern of care survey to assess the management of patients with anal cancer in Italy (38 questions). We analyzed 58 questionnaires. Results: Most of the respondents work in public and/or university hospitals (75.8%) in northern Italy (65.5%). The majority (88.0%) treat less than 20 patients/year. Common examinations for diagnosis and staging are anorectal endoscopy (84.5%), computed tomography scan (86.2%) and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (96.5%). The most frequently prescribed dose to primary tumor is 50–54 Gy (46.5–58.6%) for early stage disease and 54–59.4 Gy (62.1–32.8%) for locally advanced cases. Elective volumes are prescribed around 45 Gy (94.8%). Most participants use volumetric intensity modulated radiotherapy (89.7%) and a simultaneous integrated boost (84.5%). Concurrent radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin is considered the standard of care (70.6%). Capecitabine is less frequently used (34.4%). Induction chemotherapy is an option for extensive localized disease (65.5%). Consolidation chemotherapy is rarely used (18.9%). A response evaluation is conducted at 26–30 weeks (63.9%) with a pelvic MRI (91.4%). Follow-up is generally run by the multidisciplinary tumor board (62.1%). Conclusions: Differences were observed for radiotherapy dose prescription, calling for a consensus to harmonize treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ‘Maggiore della Carita’ University Hospital, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-032137-33-424
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCCS, Via della Pineta Sacchetti, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Giampaolo Montesi
- Radiation Oncology Department, ‘S.M. Della Misericordia’ Hospital, AULSS 5 Veneto, Viale Tre Martiri 140, 45100 Rovigo, Italy;
| | - Sabrina Montrone
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Arcelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU ‘Citta’ della Salute e della Scienza’, Via Cavour 31, 10123 Turin, Italy;
| | - Luciana Caravatta
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ‘SS Annunziata Hospital’, ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (L.C.); (D.G.)
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital–Universita’ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Marco Lupattelli
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Piazzale Meneghini 1, 06156 Perugia, Italy;
| | - Marina Rita Niespolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Gerardo, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| | - Fernando Munoz
- Radiation Oncology Department, ‘Umberto Parini’ Regional Hospital, AUSL Valle d’Aosta, Aosta, Viale Ginevra 3, 11100 Aosta, Italy;
| | - Elisa Palazzari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Oncological Referral Center, Via Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano, Italy;
| | - Marco Krengli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ‘Maggiore della Carita’ University Hospital, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Scientific Direction Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Campeggi 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCCS, Via della Pineta Sacchetti, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ‘SS Annunziata Hospital’, ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (L.C.); (D.G.)
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, ‘G.D’Annunzio’, University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Giovanna Mantello
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Via Conca 71, Torrette, 60002 Ancona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Das A, Arunsingh M, Bhattacharyya T, Prasath SS, Balakrishnan A, Mallick I. Intensity modulated radiotherapy in anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: Implementation and outcomes. J Cancer Res Ther 2021; 17:975-981. [PMID: 34528551 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_212_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Objective Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard curative treatment option for nonmetastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can reduce doses delivered to bowel and skin and reduce toxicities associated with conventional fields. Here, we present our institutional data on dosimetry, toxicity, and clinical outcomes with IMRT for anal cancer. Materials and Methods We analyzed 23 patients of anal SCC treated with curative-intent CCRT/radiation therapy alone, utilizing IMRT, between August 2011 and December 2016. The standard prescription dose was 54 Gy/27Fr/5.5 weeks, delivered in two phases, and concurrent chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C. Acute and late toxicities and dosimetric data were compiled and analyzed. Results The median age was 65 years. Fourteen (60.7%) patients had Stage IIIC disease. Eighteen patients received concurrent chemotherapy. No patient had any treatment breaks. Grade 3 acute perianal dermatitis was recorded in 11 (47.8%) patients. Proctitis, diarrhea, and cystitis were limited to Grade 1 in 73.9%, 47.8%, and 8.6% patients, respectively. The only late Grade 2+ toxicities were gastrointestinal toxicities in 4 (17.4%) patients. Twenty (87%) patients had complete response at 6 months. The 3-year local control, nodal control, and distant metastases-free survival were 85.9%, 86.6%, 84.7%, respectively, with 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival of 63.4% and 81%, respectively. Conclusion In this report on IMRT in anal cancer from India, treatment was well tolerated with lower acute toxicity than reported in other prospective studies. Long-term results are at par with other published studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avipsa Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Moses Arunsingh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Tapesh Bhattacharyya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - S Sriram Prasath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Arun Balakrishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Indranil Mallick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guren MG, Sebag-Montefiore D, Franco P, Johnsson A, Segelov E, Deutsch E, Rao S, Spindler KLG, Arnold D. Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus, Unresolved Areas and Future Perspectives for Research: Perspectives of Research Needs in Anal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:279-287. [PMID: 34645589 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Anal cancer is a relatively rare, mostly HPV-related cancer. The curative treatment consists of concurrent chemoradiation delivered with modern radiotherapy techniques. The prognosis for most patients with early localized disease is very favourable; however patients with locally advanced disease and/or HPV negative tumours are at higher risk of locoregional and distant treatment failure. Tailored approaches are presently being investigated to determine the most suitable regimen in terms of radiotherapy dose prescription, target volume selection, normal tissue avoidance, and combination therapy. Metastatic anal cancer is treated with chemotherapy aiming at prolonged survival. The role of immune therapy in the clinical setting is being investigated. There is little knowledge on the biology of anal cancer, and an urgent need for more clinical and translational research dedicated to this disease. In this article, the evidence-base for the current treatment is briefly reviewed, and perspectives on future research needs are high-lighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, AOU ''Maggiore della Carità,'' Novara, Italy
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Segelov
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia and Department of Oncology, Monash Health Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Sheela Rao
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Turchan WT, Liauw SL. Chemoradiation for Anal Cancer: Clinical Outcomes and Strategies to Optimize the Therapeutic Ratio According to HPV Status. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:349-360. [PMID: 34455990 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of anal cancer in the United States has increased in recent years, primarily related to the increasing incidence of HPV-associated anal squamous cell carcinoma, which is estimated to represent 80%-95% of anal cancers. Similar to head and neck cancer, HPV association has been demonstrated to be a strong positive prognostic factor in patients with anal cancer. Encouraging results from a number of studies investigating treatment de-escalation for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer support the notion that similar attempts may be feasible in HPV-associated anal cancer; however, the data to support this hypothesis are currently lacking. Studies are needed to determine how, if at all, HPV status should impact the management of patients with anal cancer. This review summarizes the relationship between HPV association and outcomes for patients with anal cancer, and how HPV status may impact the treatment of patients with anal cancer going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stanley L Liauw
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jang H, Park J, Artz M, Zhang Y, Ricci JC, Huh S, Johnson PB, Kim MH, Chun M, Oh YT, Noh OK, Park HJ. Effective Organs-at-Risk Dose Sparing in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using a Half-Beam Technique in Whole Pelvic Irradiation. Front Oncol 2021; 11:611469. [PMID: 34490075 PMCID: PMC8416480 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.611469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although there are some controversies regarding whole pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT) due to its gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities, it is considered for patients with gynecological, rectal, and prostate cancer. To effectively spare organs-at-risk (OAR) doses using multi-leaf collimator (MLC)'s optimal segments, potential dosimetric benefits in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using a half-beam technique (HF) were investigated for WPRT. METHODS While the size of a fully opened field (FF) was decided to entirely include a planning target volume in all beam's eye view across arc angles, the HF was designed to use half the FF from the isocenter for dose optimization. The left or the right half of the FF was alternatively opened in VMAT-HF using a pair of arcs rotating clockwise and counterclockwise. Dosimetric benefits of VMAT-HF, presented with dose conformity, homogeneity, and dose-volume parameters in terms of modulation complex score, were compared to VMAT optimized using the FF (VMAT-FF). Consequent normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) by reducing the irradiated volumes was evaluated as well as dose-volume parameters with statistical analysis for OAR. Moreover, beam-on time and MLC position precision were analyzed with log files to assess plan deliverability and clinical applicability of VMAT-HF as compared to VMAT-FF. RESULTS While VMAT-HF used 60%-70% less intensity modulation complexity than VMAT-FF, it showed superior dose conformity. The small intestine and colon in VMAT-HF showed a noticeable reduction in the irradiated volumes of up to 35% and 15%, respectively, at an intermediate dose of 20-45 Gy. The small intestine showed statistically significant dose sparing at the volumes that received a dose from 15 to 45 Gy. Such a dose reduction for the small intestine and colon in VMAT-HF presented a significant NTCP reduction from that in VMAT-FF. Without sacrificing the beam delivery efficiency, VMAT-HF achieved effective OAR dose reduction in dose-volume histograms. CONCLUSIONS VMAT-HF led to deliver conformal doses with effective gastrointestinal-OAR dose sparing despite using less modulation complexity. The dose of VMAT-HF was delivered with the same beam-on time with VMAT-FF but precise MLC leaf motions. The VMAT-HF potentially can play a valuable role in reducing OAR toxicities associated with WPRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunsoo Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, South Korea
| | - Jiyeon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Mark Artz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Yawei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Jacob C. Ricci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, United States
| | - Soon Huh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Perry B. Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Mi-Hwa Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Mison Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Young-Taek Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - O Kyu Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Hae-Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Concurrent Chemoradiation in Anal Cancer Patients Delivered with Bone Marrow-Sparing IMRT: Final Results of a Prospective Phase II Trial. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11050427. [PMID: 34069862 PMCID: PMC8157357 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the role of the selective avoidance of haematopoietically active pelvic bone marrow (BM), with a targeted intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) approach, to reduce acute hematologic toxicity (HT) in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation. We designed a one-armed two-stage Simon’s design study to test the hypothesis that BM-sparing IMRT would improve by 20% the rate of G0–G2 (vs. G3–G4) HT, from 42% of RTOG 0529 historical data to 62% (α = 0.05; β = 0.20). A minimum of 21/39 (54%) with G0–G2 toxicity represented the threshold for the fulfilment of the criteria to define this approach as ‘promising’. We employed 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within the pelvis. Acute HT was assessed via weekly blood counts and scored as per the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4.0. From December 2017 to October 2020, we enrolled 39 patients. Maximum observed acute HT comprised 20% rate of ≥G3 leukopenia and 11% rate of ≥G3 thrombocytopenia. Overall, 11 out of 39 treated patients (28%) experienced ≥G3 acute HT. Conversely, in 28 patients (72%) G0–G2 HT events were observed, above the threshold set. Hence, 18FDG-PET-guided BM-sparing IMRT was able to reduce acute HT in this clinical setting.
Collapse
|
12
|
Radiotherapy with Intensity-Modulated (IMRT) Techniques in the Treatment of Anal Carcinoma (RAINSTORM): A Multicenter Study on Behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Gastrointestinal Study Group. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081902. [PMID: 33920873 PMCID: PMC8071256 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the standard treatment in anal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was proved to reduce severe, acute and late toxicities. Moreover, IMRT techniques allow for the planning and delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), with a differential dose per fraction given to selected sub-regions during the same treatment session. This boost modality provides the chance to employ a dose-painted approach with a reduction in overall treatment time that could result in a potential clinical advantage. Since a large variability in dose prescription to the primary tumor and elective or involved lymph nodes can be found in available guidelines and clinical practice, a multicenter analysis was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and the impact of radiotherapy parameters on clinical outcomes for anal cancer patients treated with IMRT techniques within a national cohort. Abstract A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and clinical outcomes of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. In a cohort of 987 patients, the clinical complete response (CR) rate (beyond 6 months) was 90.6%. The 3-year local control (LC) rate was 85.8% (95% CI: 84.4–87.2), and the 3-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) rate was 77.9% (95% CI: 76.1–79.8). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 80.2% and 88.1% (95% CI: 78.8–89.4) (95% CI: 78.5–81.9), respectively. Histological grade 3 and nodal involvement were associated with lower CR (p = 0.030 and p = 0.004, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between advanced stage and nodal involvement, and LC, CFS, PFS, OS and event-free survival (EFS). Overall treatment time (OTT) ≥45 days showed a trend for a lower PFS (p = 0.050) and was significantly associated with lower EFS (p = 0.030) and histological grade 3 with a lower LC (p = 0.025). No statistically significant association was found between total dose, dose/fraction and/or boost modality and clinical outcomes. This analysis reports excellent clinical results and a mild toxicity profile, confirming IMRT techniques as standard of care for the curative treatment of anal cancer patients. Lymph node involvement and histological grade have been confirmed as the most important negative prognostic factors.
Collapse
|
13
|
Dee EC, Byrne JD, Wo JY. Evolution of the Role of Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1208. [PMID: 33801992 PMCID: PMC8001637 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior to the 1980s, the primary management of localized anal cancer was surgical resection. Dr. Norman Nigro and colleagues introduced neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prior to abdominoperineal resection. Chemoradiotherapy 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C afforded patients complete pathologic response and obviated the need for upfront surgery. More recent studies have attempted to alter or exclude chemotherapy used in the Nigro regimen to mitigate toxicity, often with worse outcomes. Reductions in acute adverse effects have been associated with marked advancements in radiotherapy delivery using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guidance radiation delivery, resulting in increased tolerance to greater radiation doses. Ongoing trials are attempting to improve IMRT-based treatment of locally advanced disease with efforts to increase personalized treatment. Studies are also examining the role of newer treatment modalities such as proton therapy in treating anal cancer. Here we review the evolution of radiotherapy for anal cancer and describe recent advances. We also elaborate on radiotherapy's role in locally persistent or recurrent anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James D. Byrne
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Jennifer Y. Wo
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA 02115, USA;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Blossom St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jethwa KR, Day CN, Sandhyavenu H, Gonuguntla K, Harmsen WS, Breen WG, Routman DM, Garda AE, Hubbard JM, Halfdanarson TR, Neben-Wittich MA, Merrell KW, Hallemeier CL, Haddock MG. Intensity modulated radiotherapy for anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: A 16-year single institution experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 28:17-23. [PMID: 33732911 PMCID: PMC7943964 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction To report long-term efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Materials and methods This was a retrospective review of patients with ASCC who received curative-intent IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy (98%) between 2003 and 2019. Overall survival (OS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported. Acute and late AEs were recorded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. Results 127 patients were included. The median patient age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55-69) and 79% of patients were female. 33% of patients had T3-4 disease and 68% had clinically involved pelvic or inguinal lymph nodes (LNs).The median patient follow-up was 47 months (IQR: 28-89 months). The estimated 4-year OS, CFS, and PFS were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%-89%), 77% (95% CI: 68%-86%), and 78% (95% CI: 70%-86%), respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidences of LR, LRR, and DM were 3% (95% CI: 1%-9%), 9% (95% CI: 5%-17%), and 10% (95% CI: 6%-18%), respectively. Overall treatment duration greater than 39 days was associated with an increased risk of LRR (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.4-19.5, p = 0.015). The most common grade 3+ acute AEs included hematologic (31%), gastrointestinal (GI) (17%), dermatologic (16%), and pain (15%). Grade 3+ late AEs included: GI (3%), genitourinary (GU) (2%), and pain (1%). Current smokers were more likely to experience grade 3+ acute dermatologic toxicity compared to former or never smokers (34% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions IMRT was associated with favorable toxicity rates and long-term efficacy. These data support the continued utilization of IMRT as the preferred treatment technique for patients with ASCC.
Collapse
Key Words
- 3DCRT, 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
- 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil
- ACT II, United Kingdom Anal Cancer Trial II
- AE, adverse events
- ASCC, anal canal squamous cell carcinoma
- Anal cancer
- BED, biologically effective dose
- CFS, colostomy-free survival
- CI, confidence interval
- CRT, chemoradiotherapy
- CTCAE v 4.0, common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0
- CTV, clinical target volume
- DM, distant metastasis
- DP-IMRT, dose-painted intensity modulated radiotherapy
- DVH, dose-volume histogram
- G, grade
- GI, gastrointestinal
- GU, genitourinary
- HIV, human immunodeficiency virus
- HR, hazard ratio
- IMRT
- IMRT, intensity modulated radiotherapy
- IQR, interquartile range
- LN, lymph node
- LR, local recurrence
- LRR, locoregional recurrence
- MMC, mitomycin-C
- OS, overall survival
- PFS, progression-free survival
- PTV, planning target volume
- RT, radiotherapy
- RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Radiation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Courtney N Day
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Karthik Gonuguntla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - David M Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Allison E Garda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Joleen M Hubbard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | | | - Kenneth W Merrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Michael G Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rimini M, Franco P, De Bari B, Zampino MG, Vagge S, Frassinetti GL, Arcadipane F, Bacigalupo A, Valgiusti M, Aloi D, Gervaso L, Corvò R, Bartolini G, Gerardi MA, Cascinu S, Casadei-Gardini A. The Prognostic Value of the New Combined Hemo-Eosinophil Inflammation Index (HEI Index): A Multicenter Analysis of Anal Cancer Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemo-Radiation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:671. [PMID: 33562397 PMCID: PMC7914854 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare tumor, and bio-humoral predictors of response to chemo-radiation (CT-RT) are lacking. We developed a prognostic score system based on laboratory inflammation parameters. We investigated the correlation between baseline clinical and laboratory variables and disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival in anal SCC patients treated with CT-RT in five institutions. The bio-humoral parameters of significance were included in a new scoring system, which was tested with other significant variables in a Cox's proportional hazard model. A total of 308 patients was included. We devised a prognostic model by combining baseline hemoglobin level, SII, and eosinophil count: the Hemo-Eosinophils Inflammation (HEI) Index. We stratified patients according to the HEI index into low- and high-risk groups. Median DFS for low-risk patients was not reached, and it was found to be 79.5 months for high-risk cases (Hazard Ratio 3.22; 95% CI: 2.04-5.10; p < 0.0001). Following adjustment for clinical covariates found significant at univariate analysis, multivariate analysis confirmed the HEI index as an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS. The HEI index was shown to be a prognostic parameter for DFS and OS in anal cancer patients treated with CT-RT. An external validation of the HEI index is mandatory for its use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Rimini
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital Modena, 41000 Modena, Italy;
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France; (B.D.B.); (D.A.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, 2300 La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Maria Giulia Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20019 Milan, Italy; (M.G.Z.); (L.G.)
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16121 Genova, Italy; (S.V.); (A.B.)
| | - Giovanni Luca Frassinetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori ‘Dino Amadori’–IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (G.L.F.); (M.V.); (G.B.)
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Almalina Bacigalupo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16121 Genova, Italy; (S.V.); (A.B.)
| | - Martina Valgiusti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori ‘Dino Amadori’–IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (G.L.F.); (M.V.); (G.B.)
| | - Deborah Aloi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France; (B.D.B.); (D.A.)
| | - Lorenzo Gervaso
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20019 Milan, Italy; (M.G.Z.); (L.G.)
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16121 Genova, Italy;
| | - Giulia Bartolini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori ‘Dino Amadori’–IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (G.L.F.); (M.V.); (G.B.)
| | | | - Stefano Cascinu
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019 Milan, Italy; (S.C.); (A.C.-G.)
| | - Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019 Milan, Italy; (S.C.); (A.C.-G.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim KS, Cheong KH, Kim K, Koo T, Koh HK, Chang JH, Chang AR, Park HJ. Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:2785. [PMID: 33531643 PMCID: PMC7854655 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82541-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the inter-physician variability in the target contouring of the radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Clinical target volume (CTV) of three patients diagnosed with ASCC was delineated by seven experienced radiation oncologists from multi-institution. These patients were staged as pT1N1a, cT2N0, and cT4N1a, respectively, according to 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE). The maximum distance from the boundaries of the STAPLE generated volume with confidence level of 80% to those of the contour of each CTV in 6 directions was compared. CTV of pelvis which includes primary tumor, perirectal tissue and internal/external iliac lymph node (LN) area (CTV-pelvis) and CTV of inguinal area (CTV-inguinal) were obtained from the seven radiation oncologists. One radiation oncologist did not contain inguinal LN area in the treatment target volume of patient 2 (cT2N0 stage). CTV-inguinal displayed moderate agreement for each patient (overall kappa 0.58, 0.54 and 0.6, respectively), whereas CTV-pelvis showed substantial agreement (overall kappa 0.66, 0.68 and 0.64, respectively). Largest variation among each contour was shown in the inferior margin of the CTV-inguinal. For CTV-pelvis, anterior and superior margin showed the biggest variation. Overall, moderate to substantial agreement was shown for CTV delineation. However, large variations in the anterior and cranial boarder of the CTV-pelvis and the caudal margin of the CTV-inguinal suggest that further studies are needed to establish a clearer target volume delineation guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan, Republic of Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Ho Cheong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea.
| | - Taeryool Koo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Kang Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ah Ram Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bone Marrow-Sparing IMRT in Anal Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemo-Radiation: Results of the First Phase of a Prospective Phase II Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113306. [PMID: 33182445 PMCID: PMC7696305 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hematological toxicity may be a consistent issue in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation, with a potentially detrimental effect on clinical outcomes and patient compliance to treatment. Chemotherapy is the most important trigger, since it induces myelosuppression, but radiation dose delivered to the hematopoietically active bone marrow (BM) also plays an important role. Active bone marrow can be identified using functional imaging with 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) and selectively spared during radiation delivery via intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). We investigated, within a prospective phase II trial, the potential effectiveness of targeted avoidance of active BM comprised within pelvic bones in reducing the acute hematologic toxicity profile of anal cancer patients undergoing concomitant chemo-radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. The results of the first step of the study fulfilled the criteria to define BM-sparing IMRT as “promising” and to continue with the second step of the phase II trial. Abstract Purpose: to investigate the role of selective avoidance of hematopoietically active BM within the pelvis, as defined with 18FDG-PET, employing a targeted IMRT approach, to reduce acute hematologic toxicity (HT) profile in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation. Methods: a one-armed two-stage Simon’s design was selected to test the hypothesis that BM-sparing approach would improve by 20% the rate of G0–G2 (vs. G3–G4) HT, from 42% of RTOG 0529 historical data to 62% (α = 0.05 and the β = 0.20). At the first stage, among 21 enrolled patients, at least 9 should report G0–G2 acute HT to further proceed with the trial. We employed 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within the pelvis. Acute HT was assessed via weekly blood counts and scored as per the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4.0. Results: from December 2017 to October 2019, 21 patients were enrolled. Maximum observed acute HT comprised 9% rate of ≥G3 leukopenia and 5% rate of ≥G3 neutropenia and anemia. Overall, only 4 out of 21 treated patients (19%) experienced ≥G3 acute HT. Conversely, 17 patients (81%) experienced G0–G2 events, way above the threshold set by the trial design. Conclusion: 18FDG-PET-guided BM-sparing IMRT was able to reduce acute HT in anal cancer patients treated with concomitant chemo-radiation. These results prompted us to conclude the second part of this prospective phase II trial.
Collapse
|
18
|
Murchison SC, DeVries KJ, Atrchian S. Patient Outcomes With Dose Escalation Using Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Retrospective Review of Anal Cancer Treated at a Large Academic Institution Between 2010 and 2016. Cureus 2020; 12:e10989. [PMID: 33209545 PMCID: PMC7668229 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The use of modern radiotherapy techniques (MRTs) has contributed to reduced treatment-related toxicities through better avoidance of normal structures and dose tapering, and has enabled the delivery of higher doses continuously. The purpose of this study was to review retrospectively (1) outcomes for anal cancer treated at BC Cancer (Canada) using MRT, and (2) the utilization and effect of dose escalation on cancer-related outcomes. Methods: Patients between 2010 and 2016 with biopsy-proven anal cancer, aged >18 years, and treated with primary curative-intent chemoradiation using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included. Primary end points included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and colostomy-free survival (CFS). Kaplan-Meier curves were created for prognostic factors, as well as dose escalation (>54 Gy vs. ≤54 Gy). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of the outcome. Results: A total of 273 patients were assessed. The median age was 61 years with 70% being female, 6% HIV positive, and 68% with locally advanced cancer (T3-4, or node positive). The median follow-up time was 41.3 months. Time from diagnosis to treatment was 60 days, and treatment duration 42 days. Dose escalation was prescribed for 22, of whom 15 were locally advanced cases. A total of 97% completed their radiation, including all who were dose-escalated; 11% required unplanned treatment breaks, with over half of breaks <5 days. More than 90% completed at least half of their chemotherapy; 41% had pre-treatment, and 34% post-treatment positron emission tomography (PET) scans. For primary tumor response, 88% were complete and 10% partial; 23% relapsed, with 15% locoregional, 5% distant, and 3% both, and 12% had salvage surgery. The colostomy rate was 15%, with 4% pre-treatment, 10% relapse related, and only 1% treatment-toxicity related. On univariate analysis, male sex was associated with a higher risk of death (p=0.02) and relapse (p=0.041). Non-squamous histology was consistently a strong predictor of all outcomes (OS, p=0.0089; RFS, p<0.0001; CFS, p<0.0001) as was advanced T stage (OS, p=0.0075; RFS, p=0.0019; CFS, p=0.0099), and node positivity (OS, p=0.0014; RFS, p=0.001; CFS, p=0.0071). Age, HIV status, grade, longer treatment times (>42-day median), and lack of a pre- or post-treatment PET scan were not associated with the outcome. Dose escalation beyond 54 Gy was not significant, even among locally advanced tumors. On multivariate analysis, non-squamous histology (OS, p=0.043; RFS, p<0.001; CFS, p=0.01), T4 (OS, p=0.049; RFS, p=0.026; CFS, p=0.042) and node positivity (OS, p=0.05; RFS, p=0.006) remained significant predictors of the outcome, although node positivity was no longer significant for CFS (p=0.10). Conclusion: BC Cancer outcomes for anal cancer treated with MRTs are comparable to what has been previously reported. Unplanned breaks were notably few, and short. Treatment-related colostomies were rare. Dose-escalated regimens were infrequently prescribed, appeared tolerable, but more often required a break. Prospective trials are needed to clarify efficacy of such regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kimberly J DeVries
- Population Oncology, Cancer Surveillance & Outcomes, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, CAN
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lin SY, Chuang CC, Tsan DL, Hung YS, Fu CJ, Shen YL, Chiang YY, Huang YC, Lu YJ, Yang CC. Maintenance of multi-domain neurocognitive functions in patients with newly-diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma after primary cranial radiotherapy combined with methotrexate-based chemotherapy: A preliminary case-series study. APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY. ADULT 2020; 29:432-441. [PMID: 32301346 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1749630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Conventional treatment for treating primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has consisted of either whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or methotrexate (MTX)-based combined modality therapy. However, delayed cognitive sequelae have emerged as a significant debilitating complication in PCNSL patients. A prospective observational case-series study with prospective assessments of neurocognitive functions (NCFs), neuroimaging, and activities of daily living in newly-diagnosed PCNSL patients was undertaken. A battery of neuropsychological measures, used to evaluate NCFs, is composed of ten standardized NCF tests, representing four domains sensitive to disease and treatment effects (executive function, attention, verbal memory, psychomotor speed), and activities of daily living. A total of 15 patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL were consecutively enrolled in this study. Comparing the NCF scores between the baseline (before WBRT) and post-treatment (after combined chemoradiation therapy) intervals (Mean = 122.33 days, SD = 34.49, range = 77-196), neurobehavioral outcomes consistently remained improving or stable in almost each domain of NCF. Specifically, the scores on Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-Revised (PASAT-R) were significantly improved between the baseline and post-chemoradiation assessment. Under the multidisciplinary treatment guidelines for treating patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL, multi-domain NCF become stabilized and even improved after the course of conformal WBRT combined with or without MTX-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinn-Yn Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Cheng Chuang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Din-Li Tsan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Shin Hung
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Ju Fu
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Liang Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Yin Chiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Cheng Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Cheng Yang
- Department of Psychology, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Holistic Mental Health Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dell'Acqua V, Surgo A, Arculeo S, Zerella MA, Bagnardi V, Frassoni S, Zampino MG, Ravenda PS, Rotundo MS, Kraja F, Kobiela J, Spychalski P, Fodor C, Gerardi MA, Cattani F, Bazani A, Petz W, Glynne-Jones R, Orecchia R, Leonardi MC, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of squamous cell anal canal cancer: acute and early-late toxicity, outcome, and efficacy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:685-694. [PMID: 32036405 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03517-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively review our experience on 84 patients with squamous cell anal canal cancer (SCAC) within 12 months after combined treatment with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), in terms of acute and early-late toxicity, overall treatment time and interruptions, colostomy-free survival (CFS), and tumor response. METHODS Acute gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and cutaneous (CU) toxicities were assessed according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Early-late toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late radiation morbidity scoring system. Tumor response was evaluated with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1. RESULTS Acute toxicity for 84 subjects (100%): severe (≥ G3) GI and skin toxicity was observed in 4 (5%) and 19 patients (23%), respectively. Early-late toxicity for 73 subjects (87%): severe (≥ G3) GI and vulvo-vaginal toxicity was observed in 2 (3%) and 2 (3%) patients, respectively. No acute or early-late severe GU toxicity was reported. A treatment interruption occurred in 65 patients (77%). CFS was 96% (95% CI 89-99) at 6 months and 92% (95% CI 83-96) at 12 months. At 6 months complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD) was observed in 70 (83%), 3 (4%), and 7 patients (8%), respectively. At 12 months, CR was observed in 60 patients (81%); eleven patients (15%) experienced PD. CONCLUSION Our study showed an excellent clinical result and very low acute toxicity rates, confirming the IMRT as standard of care for curative treatment of anal cancer patients. The current trial was registered with the number IEO N87/11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Dell'Acqua
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Radiation Oncology Department, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Simona Arculeo
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Simona Ravenda
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Saveria Rotundo
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fatjona Kraja
- Division of Oncology, University Hospital Centre "Mother Theresa", Rruga e Dibrës 372, 1000, Tirana, AL, Albania
| | - Jarek Kobiela
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Piotr Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Bazani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Wanda Petz
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shakir R, Adams R, Cooper R, Downing A, Geh I, Gilbert D, Jacobs C, Jones C, Lorimer C, Namelo WC, Sebag-Montefiore D, Shaw P, Muirhead R. Patterns and Predictors of Relapse Following Radical Chemoradiation Therapy Delivered Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:329-339. [PMID: 31629837 PMCID: PMC6961207 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to describe the patterns and predictors of treatment failure in patients receiving definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), delivered using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Our study was a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients treated with curative intent for ASCC using CRT delivered with a standardized IMRT technique in 5 UK cancer centers. Patients were included from the start of UK IMRT guidance from February 2013 to October 31, 2017. Collected data included baseline demographics, treatment details, tumor control, sites of relapse, and overall survival. Statistical analysis to calculate outcomes and predictive factors for outcome measures were performed using SPSS and R. RESULTS The medical records of 385 consecutive patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 24.0 months. Within 6 months of completing CRT, 86.7% of patients achieved a complete response. Three-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 75.6% and 85.6%, respectively. Of all relapses, 83.4% occurred at the site of primary disease. There were 2 isolated relapses in regional nodes not involved at outset. Predictive factors for cancer recurrence included male sex, high N-stage, and failure to complete radiation therapy as planned. CONCLUSIONS The treatment results compare favorably to published outcomes from similar cohorts using 3-dimensional conformal CRT. The observed patterns of failure support the current UK IMRT voluming guidelines and dose levels, highlighting our prophylactic nodal dose as sufficient to prevent isolated regional relapse in uninvolved nodes. Further investigation of strategies to optimize CR should remain a priority in ASCC because the site of primary disease remains the overwhelming site of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Shakir
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rachel Cooper
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute for Medical Research at St James, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Geh
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Duncan Gilbert
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Jacobs
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Jones
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Cressida Lorimer
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | | | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; Leeds Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Shaw
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom; School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Muirhead
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Meric de Bellefon M, Lemanski C, Castan F, Samalin E, Mazard T, Lenglet A, Demontoy S, Riou O, Llacer-Moscardo C, Fenoglietto P, Aillères N, Thezenas S, Debrigode C, Vieillot S, Gourgou S, Azria D. Long-term follow-up experience in anal canal cancer treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Clinical outcomes, patterns of relapse and predictors of failure. Radiother Oncol 2019; 144:141-147. [PMID: 31809980 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To assess the long-term outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS From 2007 to 2015, 193 patients were treated by IMRT for SCCAC. Radiotherapy delivered 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily-fractions to the primary tumor and elective nodal areas, immediately followed by a boost of 14.4-20 Gy to the primary tumor and involved nodes. Concurrent chemotherapy with 5-FU-mitomycin (MMC) or cisplatin was added for locally advanced tumors. Survivals were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Locoregional (LR) relapses were precisely assessed. Prognostic factors were evaluated by uni- and multivariate analyses. Late toxicity was scored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS Median follow-up was 70 months (range, 1-131). Forty-nine men (25%) and 144 women (75%) were analyzed. Median age was 62 years. Tumor stages were I, II, III and IV in 7%, 24%, 63% and 6% of cases, respectively. Chemotherapy was delivered in 167 patients (87%), mainly MMC (80%). Five-year OS, DFS, CFS and LR control rates were 74%, 68%, 66% and 85%, respectively. Forty-one patients (21%) had a relapse: 22 were LR, mostly in-field (68%). Predictors for LR failure were exclusive radiotherapy, chemotherapy lacking MMC and treatment breaks >3 days. Overall late toxicity ≥grade 2 occurred in 43% of patients, with 24% grade 3 and one case of grade 4 (hematuria). CONCLUSION CRT with IMRT assures excellent local control in locally advanced SCCAC with manageable long-term toxicity. Multicentric prospective trials are required to reinforce those results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maïlys de Meric de Bellefon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France.
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Castan
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuelle Samalin
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, INSERM U1194, IRCM, France
| | - Thibault Mazard
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, INSERM U1194, IRCM, France
| | - Alexis Lenglet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Sylvain Demontoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Riou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Carmen Llacer-Moscardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Norbert Aillères
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Thezenas
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Charles Debrigode
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, CHU Nîmes, France
| | - Sabine Vieillot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Oncology Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - David Azria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lee A, Albert A, Sheth N, Adedoyin P, Rowley J, Schreiber D. Patterns of care and outcomes of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for anal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:623-631. [PMID: 31392042 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.02.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Definitive chemoradiation is the standard of care for anal squamous cell carcinoma. Compared to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasingly becoming the preferred technique in order to reduce treatment related toxicity. The objective of this study is to evaluate practice patterns and total radiation treatment times of two radiation modalities. Methods A total of 6,966 patients with non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus who received definitive chemoradiation were queried from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004-2013. Logistic regression was performed to assess for predictors of IMRT receipt. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess overall survival (OS). Results In total, 3,868 (55.5%) received 3DCRT and 3,098 (44.5%) received IMRT. Total radiation treatment time was <7 weeks for 54.3% of patients treated with 3DCRT versus 63.8% of patients treated with IMRT. On multivariable logistic regression, positive clinical nodes (OR =1.20, P=0.001) and treatment at an academic facility (OR =1.23, P<0.001) were associated with increased likelihood of receiving IMRT. The 5-year OS was 73.0% for 3DCRT and 73.9% for IMRT (P=0.315). On multivariable analysis, total radiation treatment time ≥7 weeks (HR =1.33, P<0.001) was associated with worse survival while radiation modality (3DCRT vs. IMRT) did not impact survival (HR =0.98, P=0.763). Conclusions IMRT has dramatically increased in utilization from 2% to 65% during the study time period. IMRT was less likely than 3DCRT to have prolonged radiation treatment times, which was associated with worse survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Ashley Albert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Niki Sheth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Paul Adedoyin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jared Rowley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - David Schreiber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Summit Medical Group MD Anderson Cancer Center, Berkeley Heights, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Casadei-Gardini A, Montagnani F, Casadei C, Arcadipane F, Andrikou K, Aloi D, Prete AA, Zampino MG, Argentiero A, Pugliese G, Martini S, Iorio GC, Scartozzi M, Mistrangelo M, Fornaro L, Cassoni P, Marisi G, Dell'Acqua V, Ravenda PS, Lonardi S, Silvestris N, De Bari B, Ricardi U, Cascinu S, Franco P. Immune inflammation indicators in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation: training and validation cohort with online calculator (ARC: Anal Cancer Response Classifier). Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:3631-3642. [PMID: 31118786 PMCID: PMC6506779 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s197349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In anal cancer, there are no markers nor other laboratory indexes that can predict prognosis and guide clinical practice for patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the influence of immune inflammation indicators on treatment outcome of anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods: All patients had a histologically proven diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal/margin treated with chemoradiotherapy according to the Nigro’s regimen. Impact on prognosis of pre-treatment systemic index of inflammation (SII) (platelet x neutrophil/lymphocyte), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were analyzed. Results: A total of 161 consecutive patients were available for the analysis. Response to treatment was the single most important factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). At univariate analysis, higher SII level was significantly correlated to lower PFS (p<0.01) and OS (p=0.046). NLR level was significantly correlated to PFS (p=0.05), but not to OS (p=0.06). PLR level significantly affected both PFS (p<0.01) and OS (p=0.02). On multivariate analysis pre-treatment, SII level was significantly correlated to PFS (p=0.0079), but not to OS (p=0.15). We developed and externally validated on a cohort of 147 patients a logistic nomogram using SII, nodal status and pre-treatment Hb levels. Results showed a good predictive ability with C-index of 0.74. An online available calculator has also been developed. Conclusion: The low cost and easy profile in terms of determination and reproducibility make SII a promising tool for prognostic assessment in this oncological setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Casadei
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Kalliopi Andrikou
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Deborah Aloi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz", Besançon Cedex, France
| | - Alessandra Anna Prete
- Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy.,Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Pugliese
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefania Martini
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Mario Scartozzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Fornaro
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana University, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Department of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgia Marisi
- Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Veronica Dell'Acqua
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Simona Ravenda
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicola Silvestris
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz", Besançon Cedex, France
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Franco P, Ricardi U. Primary tumor size as a prognosticator in anal cancer patients. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:157. [PMID: 31157277 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.03.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer: Dose–Volume Relationship of Acute Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Disease Outcomes. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:634-641. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
27
|
Franco P, De Bari B, Arcadipane F, Lepinoy A, Ceccarelli M, Furfaro G, Mistrangelo M, Cassoni P, Valgiusti M, Passardi A, Casadei Gardini A, Trino E, Martini S, Iorio GC, Evangelista A, Ricardi U, Créhange G. Comparing simultaneous integrated boost vs sequential boost in anal cancer patients: results of a retrospective observational study. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:172. [PMID: 30201015 PMCID: PMC6131808 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1124-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate clinical outcomes of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) - intensity modulated radiotherapy (RT) in patients with non metastatic anal cancer compared to those of a set of patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal RT and sequential boost (SeqB). Methods A retrospective cohort of 190 anal cancer patients treated at 3 academic centers with concurrent chemo-RT employing either SIB or SeqB was analysed. The SIB-group consisted of 87 patients, treated with 2 cycles of Mitomycin (MMC) and 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) using SIB-IMRT delivering 42-45Gy/28–30 fractions to the elective pelvic lymph nodes and 50.4-54Gy/28-30fractions to the primary tumor and involved nodes, based on pre-treatment staging. The SeqB group comprised 103 patients, treated with MMC associated to either 5FU or Capecitabine concurrent to RT with 36 Gy/20 fractions to a single volume including gross tumor, clinical nodes and elective nodal volumes and a SeqB to primary tumor and involved nodes of 23.4 Gy/13 fractions. We compared colostomy-free survival (CFS), overall survival (OS) and the cumulative incidence of colostomy for each radiation modality. Cox proportional-hazards model addressed factors influencing OS and CFS. Results Median follow up was 34 (range 9–102) and 31 months (range 2–101) in the SIB and SeqB groups. The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidences of colostomy were 8.2% (95%CI:3.6–15.2) and 15.0% (95%CI:8.1–23.9) in the SIB group and 13.9% (95%CI: 7.8–21.8) and 18.1% (95%CI:10.8–27.0) in the SeqB group. Two-year CFS and OS were 78.1% (95%CI:67.0–85.8) and 87.5% (95%CI:77.3–93.3) in the SIB group and 73.5% (95%CI:62.6–81.7) and 85.4% (95%CI:75.5–91.6) in the SeqB, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards regression model highlighted an adjusted hazard ratio (AdjHR) of 1.18 (95%CI: 0.67–2.09;p = 0.560), although AdjHR for the first 24 months was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.49–1.84;p = 0.877) for the SIB approach. Conclusions SIB-based RT provides similar clinical outcomes compared to SeqB-based in the treatment of patients affected with non metastatic anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire 'Jean Minjoz', Besançon, France
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Alexis Lepinoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre 'Paul Strauss', Strasbourg, France
| | - Manuela Ceccarelli
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology and CPO Piedmont, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriella Furfaro
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Paola Cassoni
- Department of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Martina Valgiusti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Alessandro Passardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Andrea Casadei Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Trino
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefania Martini
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Evangelista
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology and CPO Piedmont, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre 'Georges-François-Leclerc', Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Franco P, Arcadipane F, Trino E, Gallio E, Martini S, Iorio GC, Piva C, Moretto F, Ruo Redda MG, Verna R, Tseroni V, Bona C, Pozzi G, Fiandra C, Ragona R, Bertetto O, Ricardi U. Variability of clinical target volume delineation for rectal cancer patients planned for neoadjuvant radiotherapy with the aid of the platform Anatom-e. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018; 11:33-39. [PMID: 29928706 PMCID: PMC6008279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Delineation of treatment volumes is a major source of uncertainties in radiotherapy (RT). This is also true for rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant RT, with a potential impact on treatment quality. We investigated the role of the digital platform Anatom-e (Anatom-e Information Sytems Ltd., Houston, Texas) in increasing the compliance to follow a specific treatment protocol in a multicentric setting. Materials and methods Two clinical cases of locally advanced rectal cancer were chosen. Participants were instructed to follow the 2009 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus atlas and asked to manually segment clinical target volumes (CTVs), for both patient 1 and 2, on day 1 with and without the use of Anatom-e. After one week (day 2), the same radiation oncologist contoured again, with and without Anatom-e, the same CT series. Intraobserver (Intra-OV) and interobserver (Inter-OV) variability were evaluated with the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the Hausdorff distance (HD) and mean distance to agreement (MDA). Results For clinical case 1, no significant difference was found for Intra-OV and Inter-OV. For clinical case 2, no significant difference was found for Intra-OV but a statistically significant difference was found for Inter-OV in DSC when using or not the platform. Mean DCS was 0.65 (SD: ±0.64; range: 0.58-0.79) for day 1 vs reference volume without Anatom-e and 0.72 (SD: ±0.39; range: 0.67-0.77) (p = 0.03) with it. Mean MDA was lower with Anatom-e (3.61; SD: ±1.33; range: 2.85-4.78) than without (4.14; SD: ±2.97; range: 2.18-5.21), with no statistical significance (p = 0.21) The use of Anatom-e decreased the SD from 2.97 to 1.33. Mean HD was lower with Anatom-e (26.06; SD: ±2.05; range: 24.08-32.62), with no statistical significance (p = 0.14) compared to that without (31.39; SD: ±1.31; range: 26.14-48.72). Conclusions The use of Anatom-e decreased the Inter-OV in the CTV delineation process for locally advanced rectal cancer with complex disease presentation planned for neoadjuvant RT. This system may be potentially helpful in increasing the compliance to follow shared guidelines and protocols.
Collapse
Key Words
- AJCC/UICC, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer
- CHT, chemotherapy
- CT, computed tomography
- CTV, clinical target volume
- Contouring
- DSC, Dice similarity coefficient
- GTV, gross tumor volume
- HD, Hausdorff distance
- Inter-OV, inter-observer variability
- Interobserver variability
- Intra-OV, intra-observer variability
- MDA, mean distance to agreement
- MR, magnetic resonance imaging
- Neoadjuvant radiotherapy
- OARs, organs at risk
- RT, radiotherapy
- RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Rectal cancer
- Ros, radiation oncologists
- SD, standard deviation
- SWOG, Radiation Committee of the Southwest Oncology Group
- Target volume delineation
- VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, AOU Citta' della salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Trino
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, AOU Citta' della salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Gallio
- Department of Medical Physics, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefania Martini
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, AOU Citta' della salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, AOU Citta' della salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristina Piva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ivrea Community Hospital, Ivrea, Italy
| | - Francesco Moretto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Cardinal Massaia' Community Hospital, Asti, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Ruo Redda
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, AO Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberta Verna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Vassiliki Tseroni
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Presidio San Giovanni Antica Sede, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristina Bona
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASL Verbano Cusio Ossola, Verbania, Italy
| | - Gabriele Pozzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AO 'SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo', Alessandria, Italy
| | - Christian Fiandra
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, AOU Citta' della salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ragona
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, AOU Citta' della salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, AOU Citta' della salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Franco P, Montagnani F, Arcadipane F, Casadei C, Andrikou K, Martini S, Iorio GC, Scartozzi M, Mistrangelo M, Fornaro L, Cassoni P, Cascinu S, Ricardi U, Casadei Gardini A. The prognostic role of hemoglobin levels in patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation for anal cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:83. [PMID: 29720197 PMCID: PMC5930791 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1035-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent chemo-radiation (CT-RT) is a standard therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of anal canal. Different clinical and biological factors may potentially affect outcome. We investigated the prognostic role of baseline hemoglobin (Hb) in a cohort of anal cancer patients submitted to CT-RT with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. METHODS Up to 161 patients with clinical stage T1-T4/N0-N3/M0 were treated. Response was assessed at 6 weeks and thereafter at 3, 6 and 12 months. Two different approaches were used:a)simultaneous integrated boost following RTOG 05-29 indications;b)first sequence of 45Gy/25 fractions to the pelvis followed by 9-14.4 Gy/5-8 fractions to the macroscopic disease. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS On multivariate analysis, pre-treatment Hb level had a significant correlation to OS (HR:0.53;95% CI:0.33-0.87; p = 0.001), but not to PFS (HR:0.78;95% CI:0.53-1.15; p = 0.12) Patients with pre-treatment Hb ≥ 12 g/dl had 5-year PFS and OS of 82.2%, compared to 29.3% and 32.8% for those below the threshold. The likelihood to achieve a complete remission increased by 5.6% for every single-unit (g/dl) increase in baseline Hb level over 11 g/dl. On multivariate analysis, response to treatment had a significant correlation to PFS (incomplete vs complete response - HR:5.43;95% CI:2.75-10.7; p < 0.0001) and OS (HR: 6.96;95% CI:2.96-16.5; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS We showed that baseline Hb level is a strong indicator for poor response to RT-CT in anal cancer patients. A close clinical monitoring for incomplete response to treatment should be advised in patients with low pre-treatment Hb. The hypothesis that the preservation of adequate Hb level during treatment may lead to a better outcome needs prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin at AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | | | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Casadei
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Kalliopi Andrikou
- Modena Cancer Center, Department of Oncology/Hematology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefania Martini
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin at AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin at AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Scartozzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Fornaro
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Department of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Modena Cancer Center, Department of Oncology/Hematology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin at AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Casadei Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
De Bari B, Lestrade L, Franzetti-Pellanda A, Jumeau R, Biggiogero M, Kountouri M, Matzinger O, Miralbell R, Bourhis J, Ozsahin M, Zilli T. Modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy with image guidance allows low toxicity rates and good local control in chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018; 144:781-789. [PMID: 29441419 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-018-2608-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report outcomes of a population of anal cancer patients treated with modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy and daily image-guided radiotherapy techniques. METHODS We analyzed data of 155 patients consecutively treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy in three radiotherapy departments. One hundred twenty-two patients presented a stage II-IIIA disease. Chemotherapy was administered in 138 patients, mainly using mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil (n = 81). All patients received 36 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) on the pelvic and inguinal nodes, on the rectum, on the mesorectum and on the anal canal, and a sequential boost up to a total dose of 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) on the anal canal and on the nodal gross tumor volumes. RESULTS Median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range 12-51). Toxicity data were available for 143 patients: 22% of them presented a G3+ acute toxicity, mainly as moist desquamation (n = 25 patients) or diarrhea (n = 10). Three patients presented a late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (anal incontinence). No grade 4 acute or late toxicity was recorded. Patients treated with fixed-gantry IMRT delivered with a sliding window technique presented a significantly higher risk of acute grade 3 (or more) toxicity compared to those treated with VMAT or helical tomotherapy (38.5 vs 15.3%, p = 0.049). Actuarial 4-year local control rate was 82% (95% CI 76-91%). CONCLUSIONS Modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy with daily image-guided radiotherapy is effective and safe in treating anal cancer patients and should be considered the standard of care in this clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois-CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland. .,Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz", INSERM U1098 EFS/BFC, 3, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon Cedex, France.
| | - Laëtitia Lestrade
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz", INSERM U1098 EFS/BFC, 3, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon Cedex, France.,Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Raphael Jumeau
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois-CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maira Biggiogero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clinica Luganese, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Melpomeni Kountouri
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Oscar Matzinger
- Radiation Oncology Department, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Vevey, Switzerland
| | - Raymond Miralbell
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois-CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mahmut Ozsahin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois-CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|