1
|
Cron DC, Kuk AE, Parast L, Husain SA, King KL, Yu M, Mohan S, Adler JT. Associations Among Circle-Based Kidney Allocation, Center Waiting Time, and Likelihood of Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 2024:S0272-6386(24)00987-9. [PMID: 39366540 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/06/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE The kidney allocation system (KAS250), using circle-based distribution, attempts to address geographic disparities through broader sharing of deceased-donor kidney allografts. This study sought to evaluate the association between KAS250 and likelihood of deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) among waitlisted candidates, and whether the policy has differentially affected centers with shorter vs. longer waiting time. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & Participants: 160,941 candidates waitlisted at 176 transplant centers between 3/2017-3/2024. EXPOSURE KAS250 allocation policy. OUTCOME Rate of DDKT. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Multivariable Cox regression, modeling KAS250 as a time-dependent variable. RESULTS KAS250 was not independently associated with likelihood of DDKT overall (HR=1.01 vs. pre-KAS250, 95% C.I. 0.97-1.04). KAS250's association with likelihood of DDKT varied across centers from HR=0.18 (DDKT less likely after KAS250) to HR=17.12 (DDKT more likely) and varied even among neighboring centers. KAS250 was associated with decreased DDKT at 25.6% and increased DDKT at 18.2% of centers. Centers with previously long median waiting times (57+ months) experienced increased likelihood of DDKT after KAS250 (HR=1.20, 95% C.I. 1.15-1.26), whereas centers with previously short median waiting times (6-24mo.; HR=0.88, 0.84-0.92) experienced decreased likelihood of DDKT. LIMITATIONS Retrospective study of allocation policy changes, confounded by multiple changes over the study timeframe. CONCLUSION Association between KAS250 and DDKT varied across centers. For one-in-four centers, DDKT was less likely after KAS250 relative to pre-KAS250 trends. Candidates at centers with previously long waiting times experienced increased likelihood of DDKT after KAS250. Thus, broader distribution of kidneys may be associated with improved equity in access to DDKT, but additional strategies may be needed to minimize disparities between centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Cron
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Arnold E Kuk
- Biomedical Data Sciences Hub, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Layla Parast
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - S Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Miko Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Joel T Adler
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manzia TM, Trapani S, Nardi A, Ricci A, Lenci I, Sensi B, Angelico R, De Feo TM, Agnes S, Andorno E, Baccarani U, Carraro A, Cescon M, Cillo U, Colledan M, Pinelli D, De Carlis L, De Simone P, Ghinolfi D, Benedetto FD, Ettorre GM, Gruttadauria S, Lupo LG, Tandoi F, Mazzaferro V, Romagnoli R, Rossi G, Caccamo L, Rossi M, Spada M, Vennarecci G, Vivarelli M, Zamboni F, Tisone G, Cardillo M, Angelico M. Fairness and pitfalls of the Italian waiting list for elective liver transplantation: The ECALITA registry study. Dig Liver Dis 2024:S1590-8658(24)00956-3. [PMID: 39237429 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Revised: 08/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The challenge of transplant waiting-lists is to provide organs for all candidates while maintaining efficiency and equity. AIMS We investigated the probability of being transplanted or of waiting-list dropout in Italy. METHODS Data from 12,749 adult patients waitlisted for primary liver-transplantation from January 2012 to December 2022 were collected from the National Transplant-Registry.The cohort was divided into Eras:1 (2012-2014);2 (2015-2018);and 3 (2019-2022). RESULTS The one-year probability of undergoing transplant increased (67.6 % in Era 1vs73.8 % in Era 3,p < 0001) with a complementary 46 % decrease in waiting-list failures. Patients with hepatocellular-carcinoma were transplanted more often than cirrhotics[at model for end-stage liver-disease (MELD)-15:HR = 1.28,95 %CI:1.21-1.35;at MELD-25:HR = 1.04,95 %CI:0.92-1.19) and those with other indications (at MELD-15:HR = 1.27,95 %CI:1.11-1.46) across all eras. Candidates with Hepatitis-B-virus (HBV)related disease had a greater probability of transplant than those with Hepatitis-C virus-related (HR = 1.13,95 %CI:1.07-1.20), alcohol-related (HR = 1.13,95 %CI:1.05-1.21), and metabolic-related (HR = 1.18,95 %CI:1.09-1.28)disease. Waiting-list failures increased by 27 % every 5 MELD-points and by 14 % for every 5-year increase in recipient-age and decreased by 10 % with each 10-cm increase in stature. Blood-group O patients showed the highest probability of waiting-list failure (HR = 1.28,95 %CI:1.15-1.43). CONCLUSIONS Liver-transplantation waiting-list success-rates have significantly improved in Italy, with patients with hepatocellular-carcinoma and/or HBV-related diseases being favored. High MELD-score, old-age, short-stature, and blood-group O were significant risk-factors for waiting-list failure. Efforts to improve organ-allocation and prioritization-policies are underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Maria Manzia
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00133
| | - Silvia Trapani
- Italian National Transplant Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy, 00161
| | - Alessandra Nardi
- Department of Mathematics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ricci
- Italian National Transplant Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy, 00161
| | - Ilaria Lenci
- Hepatology and Transplant Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital Foundation], 00133
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00133
| | - Roberta Angelico
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00133.
| | - Tullia Maria De Feo
- North Italy Transplant program (NITp). Transplant Coordination Unit, Fondazione IRCSS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico [Cà Granda General Research Hospital], Milan, Italy, 20122
| | - Salvatore Agnes
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation Service, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Foundation A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy, 00136
| | - Enzo Andorno
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit. A.O.U. S. Martino [S. Martino University Hospital], Genoa, Italy, 16132
| | - Umberto Baccarani
- Department of Medicine, Università Degli Studi Di Udine [University of Udine], Udine, Italy, 33100
| | - Amedeo Carraro
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University and Hospital Trust of Verona. Azienda Ospedaliera Verona, Verona, Italy, 37129
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, AOU Sant'Orsola IRCCS [Sant'Orsola University Research Hospital], Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy, 40138
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy, 35135
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII [Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital] Bergamo, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy, 24127
| | - Domenico Pinelli
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII [Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital] Bergamo, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy, 24127
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Division of General Surgery & Abdominal Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda [Niguarda Metropolitan Hospital], University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy, 20161
| | - Paolo De Simone
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AOU Pisana [Pisana University Hospital], Pisa, Italy, 56124
| | - Davide Ghinolfi
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AOU Pisana [Pisana University Hospital], Pisa, Italy, 56124
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico [General Hospital], University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy, 41125
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation. Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini [San Camillo Forlanini Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00152
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneoper i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione [Research Hospital - Highly-specialized Mediterranean Institute for Transplants and Therapies]), UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Palermo, Italy; Department of Surgery and Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy, 90127
| | - Luigi Giovanni Lupo
- General Surgery and Liver transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy, 70121
| | - Francesco Tandoi
- General Surgery and Liver transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy, 70121
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Milan and Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS [Research Hospital Foundation], Istituto Nazionale Tumori [National Cancer Institute], IRCCS, Milan, 20133, Italy
| | - Renato Romagnoli
- Liver Transplant Center, General Surgery 2 U, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy, 10126
| | - Giorgio Rossi
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, 20122
| | - Lucio Caccamo
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, 20122
| | - Massimo Rossi
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Rome, Italy, 00185
| | - Marco Spada
- Department of Specialized Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and of Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS [Research Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00165
| | - Giovanni Vennarecci
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Transplantation, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy, 80131
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti [Joint Hospitals], Ancona, Italy, 60126
| | - Fausto Zamboni
- Department of Surgery, General and Hepatic Transplantation Surgery Unit, A.O.B. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy, 09047
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00133
| | - Massimo Cardillo
- Italian National Transplant Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy, 00161
| | - Mario Angelico
- Hepatology and Transplant Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital Foundation], 00133
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alvarez A, Montgomery A, Galván NTN, Brewer ED, Rana A. Predicting wait time for pediatric kidney transplant: a novel index. Pediatr Nephrol 2024; 39:2483-2493. [PMID: 38216782 PMCID: PMC11199301 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-06232-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over one thousand pediatric kidney transplant candidates are added to the waitlist annually, yet the prospective time spent waiting is unknown for many. Our study fills this gap by identifying variables that impact waitlist time and by creating an index to predict the likelihood of a pediatric candidate receiving a transplant within 1 year of listing. This index could be used to guide patient management by giving clinicians a potential timeline for each candidate's listing based on a unique combination of risk factors. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 3757 pediatric kidney transplant candidates from the 2014 to 2020 OPTN/UNOS database was performed. The data was randomly divided into a training set, comprising two-thirds of the data, and a testing set, comprising one-third of the data. From the training set, univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify significant predictive factors affecting wait times. A predictive index was created using variables significant in the multivariable analysis. The index's ability to predict likelihood of transplantation within 1 year of listing was validated using ROC analysis on the training set. Validation of the index using ROC analysis was repeated on the testing set. RESULTS A total of 10 variables were found to be significant. The five most significant variables include the following: blood group, B (OR 0.65); dialysis status (OR 3.67); kidney disease etiology, SLE (OR 0.38); and OPTN region, 5 (OR 0.54) and 6 (OR 0.46). ROC analysis of the index on the training set yielded a c-statistic of 0.71. ROC analysis of the index on the testing set yielded a c-statistic of 0.68. CONCLUSIONS This index is a modest prognostic model to assess time to pediatric kidney transplantation. It is intended as a supplementary tool to guide patient management by providing clinicians with an individualized prospective timeline for each candidate. Early identification of candidates with potential for prolonged waiting times may help encourage more living donation including paired donation chains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Alvarez
- Office of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Ashley Montgomery
- Office of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Nhu Thao Nguyen Galván
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eileen D Brewer
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abbas Rana
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stewart D, John P. Fully Understanding Sex/Gender Disparities in Kidney Care Requires End-to-End, National Data Collection. Kidney Int Rep 2024; 9:1951-1953. [PMID: 39081749 PMCID: PMC11284399 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Stewart
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Manook M, Olaso D, Anwar I, DeLaura I, Yoon J, Bae Y, Barbas A, Shaw B, Moris D, Song M, Farris AB, Stiede K, Youd M, Knechtle S, Kwun J. Prolonged xenokidney graft survival in sensitized NHP recipients by expression of multiple human transgenes in a triple knockout pig. Sci Transl Med 2024; 16:eadk6152. [PMID: 38865482 PMCID: PMC11328991 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk6152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
Genetic modification of porcine donors, combined with optimized immunosuppression, has been shown to improve outcomes of experimental xenotransplant. However, little is known about outcomes in sensitized recipients, a population that could potentially benefit the most from the clinical implementation of xenotransplantation. Here, five highly allosensitized rhesus macaques received a porcine kidney from GGTA1 (α1,3-galactosyltransferase) knockout pigs expressing the human CD55 transgene (1KO.1TG) and were maintained on an anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based immunosuppressive regimen. These recipients developed de novo xenoreactive antibodies and experienced xenograft rejection with evidence of thrombotic microangiopathy and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). In comparison, three highly allosensitized rhesus macaques receiving a kidney from GGTA1, CMAH (cytidine monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase), and b4GNT2/b4GALNT2 (β-1,4-N-acetyl-galactosaminyltransferase 2) knockout pigs expressing seven human transgenes including human CD46, CD55, CD47, THBD (thrombomodulin), PROCR (protein C receptor), TNFAIP3 (tumor necrosis factor-α-induced protein 3), and HMOX1 (heme oxygenase 1) (3KO.7TG) experienced significantly prolonged graft survival and reduced AMR, associated with dampened post-transplant humoral responses, early monocyte and neutrophil activation, and T cell repopulation. After withdrawal of all immunosuppression, recipients who received kidneys from 3KO.7TG pigs rejected the xenografts via AMR. These data suggest that allosensitized recipients may be suitable candidates for xenografts from genetically modified porcine donors and could benefit from an optimized immunosuppression regimen designed to target the post-transplant humoral response, thereby avoiding AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Manook
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Danae Olaso
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Imran Anwar
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Isabel DeLaura
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Yeeun Bae
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Andrew Barbas
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Brian Shaw
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Dimitrios Moris
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Mingqing Song
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | | | | - Stuart Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cutrone AM, Rega SA, Feurer ID, Karp SJ. Effects of the March 2021 Allocation Policy Change on Key Deceased-donor Kidney Transplant Metrics. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00779. [PMID: 38831485 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A major change to deceased-donor kidney allocation in the United States, Kidney Allocation System 250 (KAS250), was implemented on March 15, 2021. Evaluating the consequences of this policy on critical system performance metrics is critical to determining its success. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of critical performance measures of the kidney transplant system by reviewing all organs procured during a 4-y period in the United States. To mitigate against possible effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients records were stratified into 2 pre- and 2 post-KAS250 eras: (1) 2019; (2) January 1, 2020-March14, 2021; (3) March 15, 2021-December 31, 2021; and (4) 2022. Between-era differences in rates of key metrics were analyzed using chi-square tests with pairwise z-tests. Multivariable logistic regression and analysis of variations methods were used to evaluate the effects of the policy on rural and urban centers. RESULTS Over the period examined, among kidneys recovered for transplant, nonuse increased from 19.7% to 26.4% (all between-era P < 0.05) and among all Kidney Donor Profile Index strata. Cold ischemia times increased (P < 0.001); however, the distance between donor and recipient hospitals decreased (P < 0.05). Kidneys from small-metropolitan or nonmetropolitan hospitals were more likely to not be used over all times (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of KAS250 was associated with increased nonuse rates across all Kidney Donor Profile Index strata, increased cold ischemic times, and shorter distance traveled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa M Cutrone
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Scott A Rega
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Irene D Feurer
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Seth J Karp
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee JH, Koo TY, Lee JE, Oh KH, Kim BS, Yang J. Impact of sensitization and ABO blood types on the opportunity of deceased-donor kidney transplantation with prolonged waiting time. Sci Rep 2024; 14:2635. [PMID: 38302674 PMCID: PMC10834527 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53157-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The waiting time to deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) is long in Asian countries. We investigated the impact of sensitization and ABO blood type (ABO) on DDKT opportunity using two Korean cohorts: a hospital cohort from two centers and a national database. The impact of panel reactive antibody (PRA) based on the maximal PRA% and ABO on DDKT accessibility was analyzed using a competing risks regression model. In the hospital cohort (n = 4722), 88.2%, 8.7%, and 3.1% of patients belonged to < 80%, 80-99%, and ≥ 99% PRA groups, respectively, and 61.1%, 11.6%, and 27.3% belonged to A or B, AB, and O blood types, respectively. When PRA and ABO were combined, PRA < 80%/A or B and 80 ≤ PRA < 99%/AB had fewer DDKT opportunities (median, 12 years; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.71) compared with PRA < 80%/AB (median, 11 years). Also, PRA < 80%/O, 80 ≤ PRA < 99%/A or B, and PRA ≥ 99%/AB had a much lower DDKT opportunity (median, 13 years; sHR, 0.49). Furthermore, 80 ≤ PRA < 99%/O and PRA ≥ 99%/non-AB had the lowest DDKT opportunity (sHR, 0.28). We found similar results in the national cohort (n = 18,974). In conclusion, an integrated priority system for PRA and ABO is needed to reduce the inequity in DDKT opportunities, particularly in areas with prolonged waiting times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Hyeog Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Tai Yeon Koo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Eun Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Kook Hwan Oh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Seok Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeseok Yang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reed RD, Locke JE. Mitigating Health Disparities in Transplantation Requires Equity, Not Equality. Transplantation 2024; 108:100-114. [PMID: 38098158 PMCID: PMC10796154 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Despite decades of research and evidence-based mitigation strategies, disparities in access to transplantation persist for all organ types and in all stages of the transplant process. Although some strategies have shown promise for alleviating disparities, others have fallen short of the equity goal by providing the same tools and resources to all rather than tailoring the tools and resources to one's circumstances. Innovative solutions that engage all stakeholders are needed to achieve equity regardless of race, sex, age, socioeconomic status, or geography. Mitigation of disparities is paramount to ensure fair and equitable access for those with end-stage disease and to preserve the trust of the public, upon whom we rely for their willingness to donate organs. In this overview, we present a summary of recent literature demonstrating persistent disparities by stage in the transplant process, along with policies and interventions that have been implemented to combat these disparities and hypotheses for why some strategies have been more effective than others. We conclude with future directions that have been proposed by experts in the field and how these suggested strategies may help us finally arrive at equity in transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon D. Reed
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Jayme E. Locke
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Klassen DK. To B or Not to B Remains a Question. KIDNEY360 2024; 5:6-7. [PMID: 38271196 PMCID: PMC10917115 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000000000000294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
|
10
|
Cron DC, Husain SA, King KL, Mohan S, Adler JT. Increased volume of organ offers and decreased efficiency of kidney placement under circle-based kidney allocation. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1209-1220. [PMID: 37196709 PMCID: PMC10527286 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
The newest kidney allocation policy kidney allocation system 250 (KAS250) broadened geographic distribution while increasing allocation system complexity. We studied the volume of kidney offers received by transplant centers and the efficiency of kidney placement since KAS250. We identified deceased-donor kidney offers (N = 907,848; N = 36,226 donors) to 185 US transplant centers from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021 (policy implemented March 15, 2021). Each unique donor offered to a center was considered a single offer. We compared the monthly volume of offers received by centers and the number of centers offered before the first acceptance using an interrupted time series approach (pre-/post-KAS250). Post-KAS250, transplant centers received more kidney offers (level change: 32.5 offers/center/mo, P < .001; slope change: 3.9 offers/center/mo, P = .003). The median monthly offer volume post-/pre-KAS250 was 195 (interquartile range 137-253) vs. 115 (76-151). There was no significant increase in deceased-donor transplant volume at the center level after KAS250, and center-specific changes in offer volume did not correlate with changes in transplant volume (r = -0.001). Post-KAS250, the number of centers to whom a kidney was offered before acceptance increased significantly (level change: 1.7 centers/donor, P < .001; slope change: 0.1 centers/donor/mo, P = .014). These findings demonstrate the logistical burden of broader organ sharing, and future allocation policy changes will need to balance equity in transplant access with the operational efficiency of the allocation system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Cron
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Syed A Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kristen L King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joel T Adler
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Raza Abidi SS, Naqvi A, Worthen G, Vinson A, Abidi S, Kiberd B, Skinner T, West K, Tennankore KK. Multiview Clustering to Identify Novel Kidney Donor Phenotypes for Assessing Graft Survival in Older Transplant Recipients. KIDNEY360 2023; 4:951-961. [PMID: 37291713 PMCID: PMC10371275 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000000000000190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Key Points An unsupervised machine learning clustering algorithm identified distinct deceased kidney donor phenotypes among older recipients. Recipients of certain donor phenotypes were at a relatively higher risk of all-cause graft loss even after accounting for recipient factors. The use of unsupervised clustering to support kidney allocation systems may be an important area for future study. Background Older transplant recipients are at a relatively increased risk of graft failure after transplantation, and some of this risk may relate to donor characteristics. Unsupervised clustering using machine learning may be a novel approach to identify donor phenotypes that may then be used to evaluate outcomes for older recipients. Using a cohort of older recipients, the purpose of this study was to (1 ) use unsupervised clustering to identify donor phenotypes and (2 ) determine the risk of death/graft failure for recipients of each donor phenotype. Methods We analyzed a nationally representative cohort of kidney transplant recipients aged 65 years or older captured using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 2000 and 2017. Unsupervised clustering was used to generate phenotypes using donor characteristics inclusive of variables in the kidney donor risk index (KDRI). Cluster assignment was internally validated. Outcomes included all-cause graft failure (including mortality) and delayed graft function. Differences in the distribution of KDRI scores were also compared across the clusters. All-cause graft failure was compared for recipients of donor kidneys from each cluster using a multivariable Cox survival analysis. Results Overall, 23,558 donors were separated into five clusters. The area under the curve for internal validation of cluster assignment was 0.89. Recipients of donor kidneys from two clusters were found to be at high risk of all-cause graft failure relative to the lowest risk cluster (adjusted hazards ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.69 to 2.05 and 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.61 to 1.87). Only one of these high-risk clusters had high proportions of donors with established risk factors (i.e. , hypertension, diabetes). KDRI scores were similar for the highest and lowest risk clusters (1.40 [1.18–1.67] and 1.37 [1.15–1.65], respectively). Conclusions Unsupervised clustering can identify novel donor phenotypes comprising established donor characteristics that, in turn, may be associated with different risks of graft loss for older transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Sibte Raza Abidi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bonner SN, Thumma JR, Valbuena VSM, Stewart JW, Combs M, Lyu D, Chang A, Lin J, Wakeam E. The intersection of race and ethnicity, gender, and primary diagnosis on lung transplantation outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:985-992. [PMID: 36967318 PMCID: PMC11258797 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.1496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing racial disparities in lung transplant outcomes is a current priority of providers, policymakers, and lung transplant centers. It is unknown how the combined effect of race and ethnicity, gender, and diagnosis group is associated with differences in 1-year mortality and 5-year survival. METHODS This is a longitudinal cohort study using Standard Transplant Analysis Research files from the United Network for organ sharing. A total of 25,444 patients undergoing first time lung transplantation between 2006 and 2019 in the United States. The primary exposures were lung transplant recipient race and ethnicity, gender, and primary diagnosis group at listing. Multivariable regression models and cox-proportional hazards models were used to determine adjusted 1-year mortality and 5-year survival. RESULTS Overall, 25,444 lung transplant patients were included in the cohort including 15,160 (59.6%) men, 21,345 (83.9%) White, 2,318 (9.1%), Black and Hispanic/Latino (7.0%). Overall, men had a significant higher 1-year mortality than women (11.87%; 95% CI 11.07-12.67 vs 12.82%; 95% CI 12.20%-13.44%). Black women had the highest mortality of all race and gender combinations (14.51%; 95% CI 12.15%-16.87%). Black patients with pulmonary vascular disease had the highest 1-year mortality (19.77%; 95% CI 12.46%-27.08%) while Hispanic/Latino patients with obstructive lung disease had the lowest (7.42%; 95% CI 2.8%-12.05%). 5-year adjusted survival was highest among Hispanic/Latino patients (62.32%) compared to Black (57.59%) and White patients (57.82%). CONCLUSIONS There are significant differences in 1-year and 5-year mortality between and within racial and ethnic groups depending on gender and primary diagnosis. This demonstrates the impact of social and clinical factors on lung transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidra N Bonner
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Jyothi R Thumma
- Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Valeria S M Valbuena
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - James W Stewart
- Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael Combs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dennis Lyu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Andrew Chang
- Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jules Lin
- Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Elliot Wakeam
- Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alolod GP, Gardiner HM, Blunt R, Yucel RM, Siminoff LA. Organ Donation Willingness Among Asian Americans: Results from a National Study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:1478-1491. [PMID: 35595917 PMCID: PMC9675880 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01333-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Asian Americans are the fastest growing racial group in the USA, but their health disparities are often overlooked. Although their needs for transplantable organs are substantial, they have the lowest rates of organ donation per million compared to other Americans by race. To better understand Asian Americans' disposition toward organ donation, a self-administered survey was developed based on formative data collection and guidance from a Community Advisory Board composed of Asian American stakeholders. The instrument was deployed online, and quota sampling based on the 2017 American Community Survey was used to achieve a sample representative (N = 899) of the Asian American population. Bivariate tests using logistic regression and the chi-square test of independence were performed. Over half (58.1%) of respondents were willing to be organ donors. A majority (81.8%) expressed a willingness to donate a family member's organs, but enthusiasm depended on the family member's donor wishes. Only 9.5% of respondents indicated that the decision to donate their organs was theirs alone to make; the remainder would involve at least one other family member. Other key sociodemographic associations were found. This study demonstrates both the diversity of Asian Americans but also the centrality of the family's role in making decisions about organ donation. Practice and research considerations for the field are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard P Alolod
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Heather M Gardiner
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryan Blunt
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Recai M Yucel
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Laura A Siminoff
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Transplant access for children: there is more to be done. Pediatr Nephrol 2023; 38:941-944. [PMID: 36369300 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-022-05787-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
15
|
Maldonado AQ, Bradbrook K, Sjöholm K, Kjellman C, Lee J, Stewart D. The real unmet need: A multifactorial approach for identifying sensitized kidney candidates with low access to transplant. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14946. [PMID: 36841966 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At the start of 2020, the kidney waiting list consisted of 2526 candidates with a calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) of 99.9% or greater, a cohort demonstrated in published research to have meaningfully lower than average access to transplantation even under the revised kidney allocation system (KAS). METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of US kidney registrations using data from the OPTN [Reference (https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/about-data/)]. The period-prevalent study cohort consisted of US kidney-alone registrations who waited at least 1 day between April 1, 2016, when HLA DQ-Alpha and DP-Beta unacceptable antigen data became available in OPTN data collection, to December 31, 2019. Poisson rate regression was used to model deceased donor kidney transplant rates per active year waiting and using an offset term to account for differential at-risk periods. Median time to transplant was estimated for each IRR group using the Kaplan-Meier method. Sensitivity analyses were included to address geographic variation in supply-to-demand ratios and differences in dialysis time or waiting time. RESULTS In this study, we found 1597 additional sensitized (CPRA 50-<99.9%) candidates with meaningfully lower than average access to transplant when simultaneously taking into account CPRA and other factors. In combination with CPRA, candidate blood type, Estimated Post-Transplant Survival Score (EPTS), and presence of other antibody specificities beyond those in the current, 5-locus CPRA were found to influence the likelihood of transplant. CONCLUSION In total, this suggests approximately 4100 sensitized candidates are on the waiting list who represent a community of disadvantaged patients who may benefit from progressive therapies and interventions to facilitate incompatible transplantation. Though associated with higher risks, such interventions may nevertheless be more attractive than remaining on dialysis with the associated accumulation of mortality risk over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Darren Stewart
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stewart D, Mupfudze T, Klassen D. Does anybody really know what (the kidney median waiting) time is? Am J Transplant 2023; 23:223-231. [PMID: 36695688 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The median waiting time (MWT) to deceased donor kidney transplant is of interest to patients, clinicians, and the media but remains elusive due to both methodological and philosophical challenges. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from January 2003 to March 2022 to estimate MWTs using various methods and timescales, applied overall, by era, and by candidate demographics. After rising for a decade, the overall MWT fell to 5.19 years between 2015 and 2018 and declined again to 4.05 years (April 2021 to March 2022), based on the Kaplan-Meier method applied to period-prevalent cohorts. MWTs differed markedly by blood type, donor service area, and pediatric vs adult status, but to a lesser degree by race/ethnicity. Choice of methodology affected the magnitude of these differences. Instead of waiting years for an answer, reliable kidney MWT estimates can be obtained shortly after a policy is implemented using the period-prevalent Kaplan-Meier approach, a theoretical but useful construct for which we found no evidence of bias compared with using incident cohorts. We recommend this method be used complementary to the competing risks approach, under which MWT is often inestimable, to fill the present information void concerning the seemingly simple question of how long it takes to get a kidney transplant in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Klassen
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, United Network for Organ Sharing
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stratta RJ. Kidney utility and futility. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14847. [PMID: 36321653 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Changes in kidney allocation coupled with the COVID-19 pandemic have placed tremendous strain on current systems of organ distribution and logistics. Although the number of deceased donors continues to rise annually in the United States, the proportion of marginal deceased donors (MDDs) is disproportionately growing. Cold ischemia times and kidney discard rates are rising in part related to inadequate planning, resources, and shortages. Complexity in kidney allocation and distribution has contributed to this dilemma. Logistical issues and the ability to reperfuse the kidney within acceptable time constraints increasingly determine clinical decision-making for organ acceptance. We have a good understanding of the phenotype of "hard to place" MDD kidneys, yet continue to promote a "one size fits all" approach to organ allocation. Allocation and transportation systems need to be agile, mobile, and flexible in order to accommodate the expanding numbers of MDD organs. By identifying "hard to place" MDD kidneys early and implementing a "fast-track" or open offer policy to expedite placement, the utilization rate of MDDs would improve dramatically. Organ allocation and distribution based on location, motivation, and innovation must lead the way. In the absence of change, we are sacrificing utility for futility and discard rates will continue to escalate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Audry B, Savoye E, Pastural M, Bayer F, Legeai C, Macher MA, Kerbaul F, Jacquelinet C. The new French kidney allocation system for donations after brain death: Rationale, implementation, and evaluation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2855-2868. [PMID: 36000787 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In recent decades, the allocation policies of many countries have moved from center-based to patient-based approaches. The new French kidney allocation system (KAS) of donations after brain death for adult recipients, implemented in 2015, was principally designed to introduce a unified allocation score (UAS) to be applied locally for one kidney and nationally for the other and to replace regional borders by a new geographical model. The new KAS balances dialysis duration and waiting time to compensate for listing delays and provides more effective longevity matching between donors and recipients with better HLA and age matching. We report these changes, with their rationale and main results. Results show improved HLA matching for young recipients and more rapid access to transplant for older recipients. Young recipients also had better access to transplantation. Transplant access decreased for recipients aged 60-69 and required tuning of KAS parameters. In conclusion, our results strongly indicate that national or adequately broad geographic allocation areas, combined with multiplicative interactions between allocation criteria, permit multivariate optimization of organ allocation and thus improve national kidney sharing and balance HLA matching and age matching, at the price of longer cold ischemic times and more logistical constraints than with local allocation.
Collapse
|
19
|
Gragert L, Kadatz M, Alcorn J, Stewart D, Chang D, Gill J, Liwski R, Gebel HM, Gill J, Lan JH. ABO-adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:3093-3100. [PMID: 35975734 PMCID: PMC10087664 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed "ABO-adjusted cPRA," which simultaneously considers the impact of candidate HLA and ABO sensitization on the same scale. An ethnic-weighted ABO-adjusted cPRA value was computed for 190 467 candidates on the kidney waitlist by combining candidate's conventional HLA cPRA with the remaining fraction of HLA-compatible donors that are ABO-incompatible. Consideration of ABO sensitization resulted in higher ABO-adjusted cPRA relative to conventional cPRA by HLA alone, except for AB candidates since they are not ABO-sensitized. Within cPRA Point Group = 99%, 43% of the candidates moved up to ABO-adjusted cPRA Point Group = 100%, though this proportion varied substantially by candidate blood group. Nearly all O and most B candidates would have elevated ABO-adjusted cPRA values above this policy threshold for allocation priority, but relatively few A candidates displayed this shift. Overall, ABO-adjusted cPRA more accurately measures the proportion of immune-compatible donors compared with conventional HLA cPRA, especially for highly sensitized candidates. Implementation of this novel metric could enable the development of allocation policies permitting more ABO-compatible transplants without compromising equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loren Gragert
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Matthew Kadatz
- Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - James Alcorn
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Darren Stewart
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Doris Chang
- Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Robert Liwski
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - John Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - James H Lan
- Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wu W, Zhang H, Tan J, Fu Q, Li J, Wu C, Huang H, Xu B, Ling L, Liu L, Su X, Wang C. Eplet-Predicted Antigens: An Attempt to Introduce Eplets into Unacceptable Antigen Determination and Calculated Panel-Reactive Antibody Calculation Facilitating Kidney Allocation. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12122983. [PMID: 36552990 PMCID: PMC9776513 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12122983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) is a measure of sensitization based on unacceptable antigens (UAs). Determination of UAs based on single-antigen bead assays at allele or antigen levels may be inappropriate. We aimed to introduce eplets for better assessment of sensitization; (2) 900 recipients and 1427 donors were enrolled for candidate or donor pools, respectively. Eplets were from the HLA Epitope Registry. UAs were determined by anti-HLA antibodies identified using LIFECODES Single Antigen (LSA) kits. CPRA values were calculated using a simplified method of donor filtering; (3) HLA antigens containing all eplets of an HLA antigen in LSA kits (LSA antigen) were defined as eplet-predicted (EP) antigens, the reactivity of which could be predicted by that LSA antigen. High reactivity concordance was found between LSA and EP antigens. More HLA antigens were covered by EP antigens in the population than LSA antigens. CPRA values at the EP level were higher than at the allele level and lower than at the antigen level. The EP antigens facilitated UA determination for non-LSA antigens and avoided acute rejection; (4) UA determination using EP antigens can lead to more accurate assessment of sensitization, enabling a high probability of compatible organs and a low risk of adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenrui Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Huanxi Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Jinghong Tan
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Qian Fu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Jun Li
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Chenglin Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Huiting Huang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Bowen Xu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Liuting Ling
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Longshan Liu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China
- Correspondence: (L.L.); (X.S.)
| | - Xiaojun Su
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Correspondence: (L.L.); (X.S.)
| | - Changxi Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nishio-Lucar AG, Hunt HF, Booker SE, Cartwright LA, Larkin L, Gonzalez SA, Spiers JA, Srinivas T, Ahmad MU, Levan ML, Singh P, Wertin H, McAdams C, Lentine KL, Schaffer R. Utilizing Social Media to Identify Potential Living Donors: Learning from US Living Donor Programs. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022; 9:318-327. [PMID: 36466961 PMCID: PMC9684893 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00382-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Living donor transplantation provides the best possible recipient outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Yet, identifying potential living donors can be a laborious and resource intensive task that heavily relies on the recipient’s means and social network. Social media has evolved to become a key tool in helping to bring recipients and potential living donors together given its ease of utilization, widespread access, and improved recipient’s comfort with public solicitation. However, in the USA, formal guidelines to direct the use of social media in this context are lacking.
Recent Findings
To better inform the landscape and opportunities utilizing social media in living donation, the OPTN Living Donor Committee surveyed US transplant programs to explore programs’ experiences and challenges when helping patients use social media to identify potential living donors (September 2019). A large majority of survey participants (N = 125/174, 72%) indicated that their program provided education to use social media to identify potential living donors and most programs tracking referral source confirmed an increase utilization over time. The use of social media was compounded with program and recipient’s challenges including concerns about privacy, inadequate technology access, and knowledge gaps. In this review, we discuss the results of this national survey and recent literature, and provide suggestions to inform program practices and guidance provided to patients wishing to use social media to identify potential living donors.
Summary
Transplant programs should become competent in the use of social media for potential living donor identification to empower patients interested in using this tool. Social media education should be provided to all patients regardless of voiced interest and, when appropriate, revisited at multiple time points. Programs should consider developing a “team of experts” that can provide focused education and support to patients embarking in social media living donor campaigns. Care should be taken to avoid exacerbating disparities in access to living donor transplantation. Effective and timely guidance to patients in the use of social media could enhance the identification of potential living donors.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kulkarni S, Glazier A, Lipkowitz G, Fynn-Tompson F, Woolley AE, Delmonico FL. A collaborative stewardship of OPOs and transplant centers to maintain equitable allocation when facilitating ex vivo organ preservation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2710-2711. [PMID: 35704287 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Kulkarni
- New England Donor Services, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - George Lipkowitz
- New England Donor Services, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.,Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Francis Fynn-Tompson
- New England Donor Services, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.,Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ann E Woolley
- New England Donor Services, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Francis L Delmonico
- New England Donor Services, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cron DC, Husain SA, Adler JT. The New Distance-Based Kidney Allocation System: Implications for Patients, Transplant Centers, and Organ Procurement Organizations. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022; 9:302-307. [PMID: 36254174 PMCID: PMC9558035 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00384-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review The goal of deceased donor kidney allocation policy is to provide objective prioritization for donated kidneys, and policy has undergone a series of revisions in the past decade in attempt to achieve equity and utility in access to kidney transplantation. Most recently, to address geographic disparities in access to kidney transplantation, the Kidney Allocation System changed to a distance-based allocation system—colloquially termed “KAS 250”—moving away from donor service areas as the geographic basis of allocation. We review the early impact of this policy change on access to transplant for patients, and on complexity of organ allocation and transplantation for transplant centers and organ procurement organizations. Recent Findings Broader sharing of kidneys has increased complexity of the allocation system, as transplant centers and OPOs now interact in larger networks. The increased competition resulting from this system, and the increased operational burden on centers and OPOs resulting from greater numbers of organ offers, may adversely affect organ utilization. Preliminary results suggest an increase in transplant rate overall but a trend toward higher kidney discard and increased cold ischemia time. Summary The KAS 250 allocation policy changed the geographic basis of deceased donor kidney distribution in a manner that is intended to reduce geographic disparities in access to kidney transplantation. Close monitoring of this policy’s impact on patients, transplant center behavior, and process measures is critical to the aim of maximizing access to transplant while achieving transplant equity.
Collapse
|
24
|
Stewart D, Tanriover B, Gupta G. Oversimplification and Misplaced Blame Will Not Solve the Complex Kidney Underutilization Problem. KIDNEY360 2022; 3:2143-2147. [PMID: 36591359 PMCID: PMC9802557 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0005402022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Stewart
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Bekir Tanriover
- Division of Nephrology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Gaurav Gupta
- Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia,Hume-Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tandukar S, Tandukar Z. Dual impact of donor service area removal from kidney allocation system and Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic on access to transplantation. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14797. [PMID: 35988050 PMCID: PMC9538084 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Donor service area was removed from kidney and pancreas allocation system in the United States on March 15, 2021 in favor of a distance based policy to provide geographic equity to access to transplantation. The policy change was introduced at a time when ongoing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic cases were declining following the first delta wave. METHODS In this Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients based study, deceased donor kidney transplant recipients between March 15 and December 2 of 2019, 2020 and 2021 were compared representing pre-policy change, pre-COVID cohort; pre-policy change, early COVID cohort; and post-policy change, late COVID cohort. RESULTS There were 11336, 11808, and 12914 kidney transplants in the 2019, 2020, and 2021 cohorts, respectively. Proportion of kidney transplants increased from 8798 (78%) to 9496 (80%) to 11152 (86%), and decreased from 2538 (22%) to 2312 (20%) to 1762 (14%) within and beyond 250 nautical miles in subsequent years. Median distance between donor and transplant hospital increased (73 vs. 63 vs. 119 nautical miles, P < .001) and mean cold ischemia time increased (18.1 vs. 17.8 vs. 19.9 h, P < .001). Access to transplantation did not change for various racial groups (P = .07), pediatric patients (P = .29), dialysis vintage of >5 years (P = .21), veterans (P = .07) and decreased for those with calculated PRA of 99% and 100% (P < .001). Rate of kidney discard (19.6% vs. 20.4% vs. 24%) remained high. Although there were numerical increases in transplants from donors with donation after circulatory death, donor acute kidney injury, kidney donor profile index >85% and donor age >60 years in successive years, rates of kidney discard also increased proportionally. CONCLUSION Improvement in the access to transplantation following the policy change was attenuated by the concurrent prevalence of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srijan Tandukar
- John C. McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis‐Knighton Medical CenterShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bockermann R, Järnum S, Runström A, Lorant T, Winstedt L, Palmqvist N, Kjellman C. Imlifidase-generated Single-cleaved IgG: Implications for Transplantation. Transplantation 2022; 106:1485-1496. [PMID: 34966107 PMCID: PMC9213077 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imlifidase is an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-specific protease conditionally approved in the EU for desensitization in highly sensitized crossmatch positive kidney transplant patients. Imlifidase efficiently cleaves both heavy chains of IgG in a 2-step process. However, low levels of the intermediate cleavage product, single-cleaved IgG (scIgG), may persist in the circulation. The study objective was to investigate Fc-mediated effector functions of scIgG and its potential impact on common clinical immunologic assays used to assess transplant eligibility. METHODS Imlifidase-generated scIgG, obtained by in vitro cleavage of HLA-sensitized patient serum or selected antibodies, was investigated in different complement- and FcγR-dependent assays and models, including clinical tests used to evaluate HLA-specific antibodies. RESULTS ScIgG had significantly reduced Fc-mediated effector function compared with intact IgG, although some degree of activity in complement- and FcγR-dependent models was still detectable. A preparation of concentrated scIgG generated from a highly HLA-sensitized individual gave rise to a positive signal in the anti-HLA IgG LABScreen, which uses anti-Fc detection, but was entirely negative in the C1qScreen. The same high-concentration HLA-binding scIgG preparation also generated positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity responses against 80%-100% of donor T and B cells, although follow-up titrations demonstrated a much lower intrinsic activity than for intact anti-HLA IgG. CONCLUSIONS ScIgG has a significantly reduced capacity to mediate Fc-dependent effector functions. However, remaining HLA-reactive scIgG in plasma after imlifidase treatment can cause positive assay results equivalent to intact IgG in clinical assays. Therefore, complete IgG cleavage after imlifidase treatment is essential to allow correct decision-making in relation to transplant eligibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tomas Lorant
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Transplantation Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ross-Driscoll K, Gunasti J, Lynch RJ, Massie A, Segev DL, Snyder J, Axelrod D, Patzer RE. Listing at non-local transplant centers is associated with increased access to deceased donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1813-1822. [PMID: 35338697 PMCID: PMC9580509 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The ability of kidney transplant candidates to travel outside of their usual place of care varies by sociodemographic factors, potentially exacerbating disparities in access. We used Transplant Referral Regions (TRRs) to overcome previous methodological barriers of using geographic distance to assess the characteristics and outcomes of patients listed for kidney transplant at centers in neighboring TRR or beyond neighboring TRRs. Among listed kidney transplant candidates, 20.9% traveled to a neighbor and 5.6% beyond a neighbor. A higher proportion of travelers were White, had some college education, and lived in ZIP codes with lower poverty. Travel to a neighbor was associated with a 7% increase in likelihood of deceased donor transplant (cHR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.09) and traveling beyond a neighbor with a 19% increase (cHR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.24). Travelers had similar rates of living donor transplant and waitlist mortality as patients who did not travel; those who traveled beyond a neighbor had slightly lower posttransplant mortality (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.99). In conclusion, the ability to travel outside of the recipient's assigned TRR increases access to transplantation and improves long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Ross-Driscoll
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia,Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia,Health Services Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jonathan Gunasti
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia,Health Services Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia,Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Raymond J. Lynch
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Allan Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jon Snyder
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota,Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David Axelrod
- Solid Organ Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Rachel E. Patzer
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia,Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia,Health Services Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia,Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Transplantation is a life-saving medical intervention that unfortunately is constrained by scarcity of available organs. An ideal system for allocating organs should seek to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people. It also must be fair and not disadvantage certain populations. However, policies aimed at reducing disparities also must be balanced with considerations of utility (graft outcomes), cost, efficiency, and any adverse effects on organ utilization. Here, we discuss the ethical challenges of creating a fair and equitable organ allocation system, focusing on the principles governing deceased donor kidney transplant waitlists around the world. The kidney organ allocation systems in the United States, Australia, and Hong Kong are used as illustrations.
Collapse
|
29
|
Schold JD, Huml AM, Poggio ED, Reese PP, Mohan S. A tool for decision-making in kidney transplant candidates with poor prognosis to receive deceased donor transplantation in the United States. Kidney Int 2022; 102:640-651. [PMID: 35760150 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The primary outcomes for kidney transplant candidates are receipt of deceased or living donor transplant, death or removal from the waiting list. Here, we conducted a retrospective analysis of national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to evaluate outcomes for 208,717 adult kidney transplant candidates following the 2014 Kidney Allocation System in the United States. Competing risks models were utilized to evaluate Time to Equivalent Risk (TiTER) of deceased donor transplantation (DDTX) and death versus waitlist removal. We also evaluated TiTER based on kidney donor profile index (KDPI) and donor age. For all groups, the cumulative incidence of DDTX was initially higher from time of listing than death or waitlist removal. However, following accrued time on the waiting list, the cumulative incidence of death or waitlist removal exceeded DDTX for certain patient groups, particularly older, diabetic, blood type B and O and shorter pre-listing dialysis time. TiTER for all candidates aged 65-69 averaged 41 months and for 70 and older patients 28 months. Overall, 39.6% of candidates were in risk groups with TiTER under 72 months and 18.5% in groups with TiTER under 24 months. Particularly for older candidates, TiTER for kidneys was substantially shorter for younger donors or lower KDPI. Thus, our findings reveal that a large proportion of waitlisted patients in the United States have poor prognoses to ever undergo DDTX and our data may improve shared decision-making for candidates at time of waitlist placement. Hence, for specific patient groups, TiTER may be a useful tool to disseminate and quantify benefits of accepting relatively high risk donor organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse D Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Anne M Huml
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Emilio D Poggio
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Anwar IJ, DeLaura IF, Gao Q, Ladowski J, Jackson AM, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Harnessing the B Cell Response in Kidney Transplantation - Current State and Future Directions. Front Immunol 2022; 13:903068. [PMID: 35757745 PMCID: PMC9223638 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.903068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite dramatic improvement in kidney transplantation outcomes over the last decades due to advent of modern immunosuppressive agents, long-term outcomes remain poor. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), a B cell driven process, accounts for the majority of chronic graft failures. There are currently no FDA-approved regimens for ABMR; however, several clinical trials are currently on-going. In this review, we present current mechanisms of B cell response in kidney transplantation, the clinical impact of sensitization and ABMR, the B cell response under current immunosuppressive regimens, and ongoing clinical trials for ABMR and desensitization treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Past and Present Policy Efforts in Achieving Racial Equity in Kidney Transplantation. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022; 9:114-118. [PMID: 35646512 PMCID: PMC9127821 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00369-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Recent Findings Summary
Collapse
|
32
|
Phillpott M, Daga S, Higgins R, Lowe D, Krishnan N, Zehnder D, Briggs D, Khovanova N. Dynamic Behaviour of Donor Specific Antibodies in the Early Period Following HLA Incompatible Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10128. [PMID: 35516975 PMCID: PMC9062976 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation, monitoring donor-specific antibodies (DSA) plays a crucial role in providing appropriate treatment and increases kidney survival times. This work aimed to determine if early post-transplant DSA dynamics inform graft outcome over and above other predictive factors. Eighty-eight cases were classified by unsupervised machine learning into five distinct DSA response groups: no response, fast modulation, slow modulation, rise to sustained and sustained. Fast modulation dynamics gave an 80% rate for early acute rejection, whereas the sustained group was associated with the lowest rejection rates (19%). In complete contrast, the five-year graft failure was lowest in the modulation groups (4–7%) and highest in the sustained groups (25–31%). Multivariable analysis showed that a higher pre-treatment DSA level, male gender and absence of early acute rejection were strongly associated with a sustained DSA response. The modulation group had excellent five-year outcomes despite higher rates of early rejection episodes. This work further develops an understanding of post-transplant DSA dynamics and their influence on graft survival following HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mason Phillpott
- School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Sunil Daga
- St James's University Hospital, LTHT NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.,Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.,NIHR Leeds In-Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Higgins
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - David Lowe
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nithya Krishnan
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Zehnder
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.,North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Trust, Carlisle, Cumbria, United Kingdom
| | - David Briggs
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Natalia Khovanova
- School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
HLA Homozygosity and Likelihood of Sensitization in Kidney Transplant Candidates. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1312. [PMID: 35415215 PMCID: PMC8989785 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Homozygosity for HLAs has been associated with adverse outcomes after viral infection as well as pregnancy-induced HLA sensitization. We sought to assess the relationship between HLA locus homozygosity and the level of HLA antibody sensitization. Methods. We measured sensitization using the calculated panel reactive antibody value for a large cohort of 147 461 patients added to the US OPTN/United Network for Organ Sharing kidney transplant waitlist between December 2014 and December 2019. We used multinomial logistic modeling to compare 62 510 sensitized patients to 84 955 unsensitized controls. Results. We found that the number of homozygous HLA loci was strongly associated with the level of sensitization. Within mildly, highly, or extremely sensitized candidates, women displayed a higher relative abundance of HLA homozygosity at multiple HLA loci as compared with men, with attenuation of this effect in Black candidates. In a multivariable logistic model, the number of homozygous HLA loci interacted with female sex but not with other factors associated with sensitization, including recipient ethnicity and a history of prior kidney transplant. Conclusions. This study shows that HLA homozygosity is an innate genetic factor that affects the likelihood of HLA sensitization. Further research is needed to identify the immunologic mechanisms that underlie this observation.
Collapse
|
34
|
Rohan VS, Pilch N, McGillicuddy J, White J, Lin A, Dubay D, Taber DJ, Baliga PK. Early Assessment of National Kidney Allocation Policy Change. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:565-570. [PMID: 35290276 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The new kidney allocation changes with elimination of donor service areas (DSAs) and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network regions were initiated to improve equity in organ allocation. The aim of this evaluation was to determine the operational, financial, and recipient-related effect of the new allocation system on a large rural transplantation program. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of organ offers, allograft outcomes, and attributed costs in a comparative time cohort, before (December 16, 2020 to March 14, 2021) and after (March 15, 2021 to June 13, 2021) the allocation change was performed. Outcomes were limited to adult, solitary, deceased donor kidney transplantations. RESULTS We received 198,881 organ offers from 3,886 organ donors at our transplantation center from December 16, 2020 to June 31, 2021: 87,643 (1,792 organ donors) before the change and 111,238 (2094 organ donors) after the change, for a difference of +23,595 more offers (+302 organ donors). This resulted in 6.5 more organs transplanted vs a predicted loss of 4.9 per month. Local organ offers dropped from 70% to 23%. There was a statistically significantly increase in donor terminal serum creatinine (1.2 ± 0.86 mg/dL vs 2.2 ± 2.3 mg/dL, p < 0.001), kidney donor profile index (KDPI) (39 ± 20 vs 48 ± 22, p = 0.017), cold ischemia time (16 ± 7 hours vs 21 ± 6 hours, p < 0.001), and delayed graft function rates (23% vs 40%, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION The new kidney allocation policy has led to an increase in KDPI of donors with longer cold ischemia time, leading to higher delayed graft function rates. This has resulted in increasing logistical and financial burdens on the system. Implementing large-scale changes in allocation based predominantly on predictive modeling needs to be intensely reassessed during a longer follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinayak S Rohan
- From the Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, College of Medicine, Charleston, SC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Early Referral, Living Donation, and Preemptive Kidney Transplant. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:615-621. [PMID: 35246327 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.11.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preemptive kidney transplant (PKT) is recognized as the most beneficial and cost-effective form of renal replacement therapy among patients with end-stage renal disease. Despite optimal outcomes and improved quality of life associated with PKT, its use as a first renal replacement therapy remains low among patients with end-stage renal disease. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to compare, among adult kidney transplant recipients, characteristics across PKT status. METHODS We compared the characteristics of patients who did and did not have a PKT over 5 years, from 2010 to 2014, using the electronic health records of Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States. RESULTS A total of 233 patients received a kidney-alone transplant, and, of these, 44 patients (19%) were PKT and 189 patients (81%) were non-PKT. Of the patients in the PKT group, 43% received a kidney from a deceased donor. PKT recipients were more often White, had polycystic kidney disease or glomerulonephritis, received a living donor organ, and were transplanted at certain transplant centers. Estimated glomerular filtration rate on listing for those who received a deceased donor transplant was higher in PKT than non-PKT patients listed pre-dialysis. CONCLUSIONS PKT was associated with having a living kidney donor and with having a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at listing for deceased donor recipients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Rausch LA, Niederhaus SV, Forbes RC. Removal of DSA from KP/Pancreas Allocation. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00356-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
37
|
Adler JT, Husain SA, Xiang L, Rodrigue JR, Waikar SS. Initial Home Dialysis Is Increased for Rural Patients by Accessing Urban Facilities. KIDNEY360 2022; 3:488-496. [PMID: 35582180 PMCID: PMC9034801 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0006932021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background The 240,000 rural patients with end stage kidney disease in the United States have less access to nephrology care and higher mortality than those in urban settings. The Advancing American Kidney Health initiative aims to increase the use of home renal replacement therapy. Little is known about how rural patients access home dialysis and the availability and quality of rural dialysis facilities. Methods Incident dialysis patients in 2017 and their facilities were identified in the United States Renal Data System. Facility quality and service availability were analyzed with descriptive statistics. We assessed the availability of home dialysis methods, depending on rural versus urban counties, and then we used multivariate logistic regression to identify the likelihood of rural patients with home dialysis as their initial modality and the likelihood of rural patients changing to home dialysis within 90 days. Finally, we assessed mortality after dialysis initiation on the basis of patient home location. Results Of the 97,930 dialysis initiates, 15,310 (16%) were rural. Rural dialysis facilities were less likely to offer home dialysis (51% versus 54%, P<0.001). Although a greater proportion of rural patients (9% versus 8%, P<0.001) were on home dialysis, this was achieved by traveling to urban facilities to obtain home dialysis (OR=2.74, P<0.001). After adjusting for patient and facility factors, rural patients had a higher risk of mortality (HR=1.06, P=0.004). Conclusions Despite having fewer facilities that offer home dialysis, rural patients were more often on home dialysis methods because they traveled to urban facilities, representing an access gap. Even if rural patients accessed home dialysis at urban facilities, rural patients still suffered worse mortality. Future dialysis policy should address this access gap to improve care and overall mortality for rural patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Austin at Texas, Austin, Texas,Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - S. Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Lingwei Xiang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James R. Rodrigue
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sushrut S. Waikar
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kjellman C, Maldonado AQ, Sjöholm K, Lonze BE, Montgomery RA, Runström A, Lorant T, Desai NM, Legendre C, Lundgren T, von Zur Mühlen B, Vo AA, Olsson H, Jordan SC. Outcomes at 3 years posttransplant in imlifidase-desensitized kidney transplant patients. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3907-3918. [PMID: 34236770 PMCID: PMC9290474 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Imlifidase is a cysteine proteinase which specifically cleaves IgG, inhibiting Fc-mediated effector function within hours of administration. Imlifidase converts a positive crossmatch to a potential donor (T cell, B cell, or both), to negative, enabling transplantation to occur between previously HLA incompatible donor-recipient pairs. To date, 39 crossmatch positive patients received imlifidase prior to a kidney transplant in four single-arm, open-label, phase 2 studies. At 3 years, for patients who were AMR+ compared to AMR-, death-censored allograft survival was 93% vs 77%, patient survival was 85% vs 94%, and mean eGFR was 49 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs 61 ml/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. The incidence of AMR was 38% with most episodes occurring within the first month post-transplantation. Sub-analysis of patients deemed highly sensitized with cPRA ≥ 99.9%, and unlikely to be transplanted who received crossmatch-positive, deceased donor transplants had similar rates of patient survival, graft survival, and eGFR but a higher rate of AMR. These data demonstrate that outcomes and safety up to 3 years in recipients of imlifidase-enabled allografts is comparable to outcomes in other highly sensitized patients undergoing HLA-incompatible transplantation. Thus, imlifidase is a potent option to facilitate transplantation among patients who have a significant immunologic barrier to successful kidney transplantation. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02790437), EudraCT Number: 2016-002064-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tomas Lorant
- Department of Surgical SciencesUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
| | | | | | - Torbjörn Lundgren
- Department of Transplantation SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | | | - Ashley A. Vo
- Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterComprehensive Transplant CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterComprehensive Transplant CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Stewart D. Moving Toward Continuous Organ Distribution. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00352-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
40
|
Glorioso JM. Kidney Allocation Policy: Past, Present, and Future. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:511-516. [PMID: 35367019 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Despite an increase in the number of kidney transplants performed annually, there remain more than 90,000 individuals awaiting transplantation in the United States. As kidney transplantation has evolved, so has kidney allocation policies. The Kidney Allocation System, which was introduced in 2014, made significant strides to improve utility and equity, but regional and geographic disparities remain. Further modifications eliminating donor service areas have been introduced. Moving forward, systems involving continuous distribution and artificial intelligence may provide further advancement toward an ideal allocation system.
Collapse
|
41
|
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A Turgeon
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Dell Medical School, Austin, TX
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The Final Rule clearly states that geography should not be a determinant of a chance of a potential candidate being transplanted. There have been multiple concerns about geographic disparities in patients in need of solid organ transplantation. Allocation policy adjustments have been designed to address these concerns, but there is little evidence that the disparities have been solved. The purpose of this review is to describe the main drivers of geographic disparities in solid organ transplantation and how allocation policy changes and other potential actions could impact these inequalities. RECENT FINDINGS Geographical disparities have been reported in kidney, pancreas, liver, and lung transplantation. Organ Procurement and Transplant Network has modified organ allocation rules to underplay geography as a key determinant of a candidates' chance of receiving an organ. Thus, heart, lung, and more recently liver and Kidney Allocation Systems have incorporated broader organ sharing to reduce geographical disparities. Whether these policy adjustments will indeed eliminate geographical disparities are still unclear. SUMMARY Modern allocation policy focus in patients need, regardless of geography. Innovative actions to further reduce geographical disparities are needed.
Collapse
|
43
|
Cascino TM, Stehlik J, Cherikh WS, Cheng Y, Watt TMF, Brescia AA, Thompson MP, McCullough JS, Zhang M, Shore S, Golbus JR, Pagani FD, Likosky DS, Aaronson KD. A challenge to equity in transplantation: Increased center-level variation in short-term mechanical circulatory support use in the context of the updated U.S. heart transplant allocation policy. J Heart Lung Transplant 2021; 41:95-103. [PMID: 34666942 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The United States National Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) implemented changes to the adult heart allocation system to reduce waitlist mortality by improving access for those at greater risk of pre-transplant death, including patients on short-term mechanical circulatory support (sMCS). While sMCS increased, it is unknown whether the increase occurred equitably across centers. METHODS The OPTN database was used to assess changes in use of sMCS at time of transplant in the 12 months before (pre-change) and after (post-change) implementation of the allocation system in October 2018 among 5,477 heart transplant recipients. An interrupted time series analysis comparing use of bridging therapies pre- and post-change was performed. Variability in the proportion of sMCS use at the center level pre- and post-change was determined. RESULTS In the month pre-change, 9.7% of patients were transplanted with sMCS. There was an immediate increase in sMCS transplant the following month to 32.4% - an absolute and relative increase of 22.7% and 312% (p < 0.001). While sMCS use was stable pre-change (monthly change 0.0%, 95% CI [-0.1%,0.1%]), there was a continuous 1.2%/month increase post-change ([0.6%,1.8%], p < 0.001). Center-level variation in sMCS use increased substantially after implementation, from a median (interquartile range) of 3.85% (10%) pre-change to 35.7% (30.6%) post-change (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Use of sMCS at time of transplant increased immediately and continued to expand following heart allocation policy changes. Center-level variation in use of sMCS at the time of transplant increased compared to pre-change, which may have negatively impacted equitable access to heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Cascino
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Josef Stehlik
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Yulin Cheng
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Tessa M F Watt
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Alexander A Brescia
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Michael P Thompson
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jeffrey S McCullough
- Department of Health Management and Policy and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Min Zhang
- Department of Health Management and Policy and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Supriya Shore
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jessica R Golbus
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Francis D Pagani
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Donald S Likosky
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Keith D Aaronson
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Perosa M, Ferreira GF, Modelli LG, Medeiros MP, Neto SR, Moreira F, Zampieri FG, de Marco R, Bortoluzzo AB, Venezuela MK. Disparity in the access to kidney transplantation for sensitized patients in the state of Sao Paulo-Brazil. Transpl Immunol 2021; 68:101441. [PMID: 34358637 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Highly sensitized (HS) patients accumulate on deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) waitlists worldwide due to matching difficulty and inequity of allocation policies. Current situation of HS patients on KT waitlist in Brazil has not been published. All patients enrolled on the KT waitlist of the State of São Paulo from 2002 to 2017 were retrospectively assessed. Patients were divided into eight groups according to their degree of sensitization, PRA of 0%, >0-40%, >40-80%, >80-85%, >85-90%, >90-95%, >95-98% and > 98%. Cumulative incidence curves for transplantation or mortality/removal from waitlist were estimated by competing risk. Among 50,249 waitlisted candidates, 1247 prioritized, 2467 with age < 18 or > 75 years and 4152 submitted to living-donor KT were excluded from the analysis, remaining 42,383 patients. There were 29,664(70%) PRA 0%, 5611(13.2%) PRA > 0-40%, 3442(8.2%) PRA > 40-80%, 507(1.2%) PRA > 80-85%, 564(1.3%) PRA > 85-90%, 825(1.9%) PRA >90-95%, 859(2%) PRA > 95-98% and 911(2.2%) PRA > 98%. There was a progressive increase in the need of prioritization, waiting time for KT or on waitlist and time on dialysis as PRA increased (p < 0.001). Probability of DDKT clearly increased as PRA decreased so that PRA 0% candidates were much more likely to be transplanted compared to PRA > 98% patients(HR:13.02, p < 0.001). Waiting list mortality/removal was higher among PRA > 0-40%(HR1.05,p = 0.03), PRA > 90-95%(HR:1.10,p = 0.05), PRA > 95-98%(HR:1.26,p < 0.001) and PRA > 98%(HR:1.09,p = 0.05) patients compared to PRA zero candidates. HS patients in Sao Paulo-Brazil required greater prioritization due to lack of venous access, longer dialysis and waitlist times, lower probability of DDKT and higher rates of waitlist mortality/removal. We confirmed the disparity of access to KT among HS patients in Sao Paulo-Brazil, indicating the need of new strategies that optimize transplantation for this subcategory of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Perosa
- Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation Service of Leforte and Oswaldo Cruz Hospitals, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Gustavo F Ferreira
- Kidney Transplantation Service, Santa Casa Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Luis G Modelli
- Kidney Transplantation Service, UNESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Renato de Marco
- Immunogenetic Institute and Research Incentive Funding Association, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Maria K Venezuela
- Insper Institute of Education and Research, Statistics and Data Science, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
Schold JD, Huml AM, Poggio ED, Sedor JR, Husain SA, King KL, Mohan S. Patients with High Priority for Kidney Transplant Who Are Not Given Expedited Placement on the Transplant Waiting List Represent Lost Opportunities. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 32:1733-1746. [PMID: 34140398 PMCID: PMC8425662 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020081146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation is associated with the best outcomes for most patients with ESKD. The national Kidney Allocation System prioritizes patients with Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) scores in the top 20% for expedited access to optimal deceased donor kidneys. METHODS We studied adults aged ≥18 years in the United States Renal Data System with top 20% EPTS scores who had been preemptively waitlisted or initiated dialysis in 2015-2017. We evaluated time to waitlist placement, transplantation, and mortality with unadjusted and multivariable survival models. RESULTS Of 42,445 patients with top 20% EPTS scores (mean age, 38.0 years; 57% male; 59% White patients, and 31% Black patients), 7922 were preemptively waitlisted. Among 34,523 patients initiating dialysis, the 3-year cumulative waitlist placement incidence was 37%. Numerous factors independently associated with waitlisting included race, income, and having noncommercial insurance. For example, waitlisting was less likely for Black versus White patients, and for patients in the lowest-income neighborhoods versus those in the highest-income neighborhoods. Among patients initiating dialysis, 61% lost their top 20% EPTS status within 30 months versus 18% of patients who were preemptively listed. The 3-year incidence of deceased and living donor transplantation was 5% and 6%, respectively, for patients who initiated dialysis and 26% and 44%, respectively, for patients who were preemptively listed. CONCLUSIONS Many patients with ESKDqualifying with top 20% EPTS status are not placed on the transplant waiting list in a timely manner, with significant variation on the basis of demographic and social factors. Patients who are preemptively listed are more likely to receive benefits of top 20% EPTS status. Efforts to expedite care for qualifying candidates are needed, and automated transplant referral for patients with the best prognoses should be considered. PODCAST This article contains a podcast athttps://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2021_07_30_JASN2020081146.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio,Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anne M. Huml
- Department of Nephrology and Hyptertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Emilio D. Poggio
- Department of Nephrology and Hyptertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John R. Sedor
- Department of Nephrology and Hyptertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio,Department Immunology and Inflammation, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Syed A. Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Kristin L. King
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
DuBay DA, Morinelli TA, Su Z, Mauldin P, Weeda E, Casey MJ, Baliga P, Taber DJ. Association of High Burden of End-stage Kidney Disease With Decreased Kidney Transplant Rates With the Updated US Kidney Allocation Policy. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:639-645. [PMID: 34037705 PMCID: PMC8156168 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) approved changes to the US kidney allocation system in 2019. The potential effects of this policy change using transplant rates normalized to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) incidence have not been investigated. Objective To estimate how the OPTN kidney allocation policy will affect areas of the US currently demonstrating low rates of kidney transplant, when accounting for the regional burden of ESKD. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional population-based economic evaluation analyzed access of patients with ESKD to kidney transplant in the US. Participants included patients with incident ESKD, those on the kidney transplant wait list, and those who received a kidney transplant. Data were collected from January 1 to December 31, 2017, and were analyzed in 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures The probability of a patient with ESKD being placed on the transplant wait list or receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant. States and donor service areas (DSAs) were compared for gains and losses in rates of transplanted kidneys under the new allocation system. Transplant rates were normalized for ESKD burden. Results A total of 122 659 patients had incident ESKD in the US in 2017 (58.2% men; mean [SD] age, 62.8 [15.1] years). The probability of a patient with ESKD receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant varied 3-fold across the US (from 6.36% in West Virginia to 18.68% in the District of Columbia). Modeling of the OPTN demonstrates that DSAs from New York (124%), Georgia (65%), and Illinois (56%) are estimated to experience the largest increases in deceased donor kidney allocation. Other than Georgia, these states have kidney transplant rates per incident ESKD cases above the mean (of 50 states plus the District of Columbia, New York is 16th and Illinois is 24th). In contrast, DSAs from Nevada (-74%), Ohio (-67%), and North Carolina (-61%)-each of which has a transplant rate per incident ESKD cases significantly below the mean-are estimated to experience the largest decreases in deceased donor allocation (of 50 states plus the District of Columbia, North Carolina is 34th, Ohio is 38th, and Nevada is 47th). Conclusions and Relevance The new OPTN-approved kidney allocation policy may result in worsening geographic disparities in access to transplants when measured against the burden of ESKD within a particular region of the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek A. DuBay
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Thomas Anthony Morinelli
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Zemin Su
- General Internal Medicine/Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Patrick Mauldin
- General Internal Medicine/Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Erin Weeda
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Michael J. Casey
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Prabhaker Baliga
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - David J. Taber
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
- Pharmacy Department, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Adler JT, Husain SA, King KL, Mohan S. Greater complexity and monitoring of the new Kidney Allocation System: Implications and unintended consequences of concentric circle kidney allocation on network complexity. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:2007-2013. [PMID: 33314637 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The deceased donor kidney allocation system in the United States has undergone several rounds of iterative changes, but these changes were not explicitly designed to address the geographic variation in access to transplantation. The new allocation system, expected to start in December 2020, changes the definition of "local allocation" from the Donation Service Area to 250 nautical mile circles originating from the donor hospital. While other solid organs have adopted a similar approach, the larger number of both kidney transplant centers and transplant candidates is likely to have different consequences. Here, we discuss the incredible increase in complexity in allocation, discuss some of the likely intended and unintended consequences, and propose metrics to monitor the new system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel T Adler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Syed A Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Westphal SG, Langewisch ED, Robinson AM, Wilk AR, Dong JJ, Plumb TJ, Mullane R, Merani S, Hoffman AL, Maskin A, Miles CD. The impact of multi-organ transplant allocation priority on waitlisted kidney transplant candidates. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:2161-2174. [PMID: 33140571 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Kidney-alone transplant (KAT) candidates may be disadvantaged by the allocation priority given to multi-organ transplant (MOT) candidates. This study identified potential KAT candidates not receiving a given kidney offer due to its allocation for MOT. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) database, we identified deceased donors from 2002 to 2017 who had one kidney allocated for MOT and the other kidney allocated for KAT or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) (n = 7,378). Potential transplant recipient data were used to identify the "next-sequential KAT candidate" who would have received a given kidney offer had it not been allocated to a higher prioritized MOT candidate. In this analysis, next-sequential KAT candidates were younger (p < .001), more likely to be racial/ethnic minorities (p < .001), and more highly sensitized than MOT recipients (p < .001). A total of 2,113 (28.6%) next-sequential KAT candidates subsequently either died or were removed from the waiting list without receiving a transplant. In a multivariable model, despite adjacent position on the kidney match-run, mortality risk was significantly higher for next-sequential KAT candidates compared to KAT/SPK recipients (hazard ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.44, 1.66). These results highlight implications of MOT allocation prioritization, and potential consequences to KAT candidates prioritized below MOT candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott G Westphal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Eric D Langewisch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Amanda M Robinson
- Research Department, United Network of Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Amber R Wilk
- Research Department, United Network of Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Jianghu J Dong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Troy J Plumb
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Ryan Mullane
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Shaheed Merani
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Arika L Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Alexander Maskin
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Clifford D Miles
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Schroder PM, Choi AY, Jackson AM, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. B cells in transplant tolerance and rejection: friends or foes? Transpl Int 2021; 33:30-40. [PMID: 31705678 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of the role of B cells in organ transplantation remains incomplete and continues to grow. The majority of research has focused on the detrimental role of antibodies that drive the development of pathogenesis of the transplanted organ. However, it has been shown that not all donor-specific antibodies are harmful and in some circumstances can even promote tolerance through the mechanism of accommodation. Furthermore, B cells can have effects on transplanted organs through their interaction with T cells, namely antigen presentation, cytokine production, and costimulation. More recently, the role and importance of Bregs was introduced to the field of transplantation. Due to this functional and ontogenetic heterogeneity, targeting B cells in transplantation may bring undesired immunologic side effects including increased rejection. Therefore, the selective control of B cells that contribute to the humoral response against donor antigens will continue to be an important and challenging area of research and potentially lead to improved long-term transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zachary W Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul M Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Y Choi
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Annette M Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|