Coexistence of nasal reactivity to allergens with and without IgE sensitization in patients with allergic rhinitis

Local Allergic Rhinitis

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is defined by a clinical history suggestive of allergic rhinitis (AR), negativity of systemic IgE measurement and positive response to nasal allergen challenge (NAC). The term local respiratory allergy includes LAR, local allergic asthma (positive response in bronchial allergen challenge) and dual allergic rhinitis defined by the coexistence of AR and LAR. LAR worsens in severity and presence of comorbidities over time, and it is an independent entity from AR. Prevalence is higher in Mediterranean countries. LAR onset occurs during childhood in 36% of cases. Physiopathological features of LAR are: increased nasal eosinophilic inflammation, tryptase and eosinophil cationic protein, and presence of nasal specific IgE in secretions of 20-40% of subjects. A recent study demonstrated increase in sequential class switch recombination to IgE markers in mucosa of LAR with accumulation of IgE+ CD38+ plasmablasts. Moreover, there is increased expression in B cells of mucosal homing receptors CXCR3+ and CXCR4 in peripheral blood, with accumulation of Th9 and Th2 cells. NAC is the gold standard in the diagnosis of LAR. The measurement of specific IgE in nasal secretions basophil activation test or are still not suitable for diagnosis. There is ample evidence of the usefulness of allergen immunotherapy in the treatment in LAR after 4 DBPCRT in 152 patients. In conclusion, knowledge about LAR is continuously increasing, with detailed definition of physiopathological mechanisms and new phenotypes. More awareness of the disease should be promoted among different specialists, and NAC must be considered an essential diagnostic tool in any age group, including children.

Outdoor airborne allergens: Characterization, behavior and monitoring in Europe

Aeroallergens or inhalant allergens, are proteins dispersed through the air and have the potential to induce allergic conditions such as rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and asthma. Outdoor aeroallergens are found predominantly in pollen grains and fungal spores, which are allergen carriers. Aeroallergens from pollen and fungi have seasonal emission patterns that correlate with plant pollination and fungal sporulation and are strongly associated with atmospheric weather conditions. They are released when allergen carriers come in contact with the respiratory system, e.g. the nasal mucosa. In addition, due to the rupture of allergen carriers, airborne allergen molecules may be released directly into the air in the form of micronic and submicronic particles (cytoplasmic debris, cell wall fragments, droplets etc.) or adhered onto other airborne particulate matter. Therefore, aeroallergen detection strategies must consider, in addition to the allergen carriers, the allergen molecules themselves. This review article aims to present the current knowledge on inhalant allergens in the outdoor environment, their structure, localization, and factors affecting their production, transformation, release or degradation. In addition, methods for collecting and quantifying aeroallergens are listed and thoroughly discussed. Finally, the knowledge gaps, challenges and implications associated with aeroallergen analysis are described.

Challenges in Local Allergic Rhinitis Diagnosis, Management, and Research: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is diagnosed based on the presence of clinical symptoms such as rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal itching using negative skin prick testing and serum IgE assessment. Several novel studies have shown that it is possible to use the assessment of nasal sIgE (specific immunoglobulin E) secretion as an additional diagnostic criterion for local allergic rhinitis. Additionally, allergen immunotherapy is a promising-albeit still not fully assessed and evaluated-future method of managing patients with LAR. In this review, the historical background, epidemiology, and main pathophysiological mechanisms of LAR shall be presented. Additionally, we address the current state of knowledge based on selected articles regarding the assessment of the local mucosal IgE presence in response to exposure to such allergens as mites, pollen, molds, and others. The impact of LAR on quality of life as well as the possible options of management (including allergen immunotherapy (AIT), which showed promising results) will then be presented.

Subendotyping of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus-Induced Rhinitis and Its Impact on Respiratory Comorbidities

BACKGROUND

The impact of delayed hypersensitivity to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) on comorbidities of allergic rhinitis (AR) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The primary end point was to test the hypothesis that DP-induced AR could be divided into 2 subendotypes on the basis of presence or absence of a delayed-type mite sensitization detected by the positive result of atopy patch test for DP (DP-APT). The second end point was to evaluate differences in the long-term risk of respiratory comorbidities and nasal airway response to mite exposure.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study, we included 472 patients with DP-induced AR. A total of 343 patients had positive results of skin prick test/serum specific IgE and DP-APT and were assigned to a subendotype with both IgE- and T-cell-mediated mite sensitization (BMSS). The remaining 129 patients without delayed-type mite sensitization were included in the subendotype with only IgE-mediated mite sensitization. Nasal allergen provocation test with active anterior rhinomanometry, paranasal sinuses computed tomography scan, nasal endoscopy, and spirometry were performed.

RESULTS

At baseline, BMSS showed a larger increase in nasal airway resistance, total nasal score, and visual analogue scale score to mite exposure. During a 15-year follow-up, 56 patients developed chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, with higher incidence in BMSS than in the subendotype with only IgE-mediated mite sensitization (50 patients, 14.6% vs 6 patients, 12.4%; P < .001). BMSS also showed a higher incidence of conjunctivitis (25.7% vs 12.4%; P < .01). The rate of adult-onset asthma did not differ between groups, but patients with BMSS showed a more frequent link to chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (6 of 29 patients, 20.7% vs 0 of 10 patients, 0%). DP-APT independently predicted chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and conjunctivitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Two subendotypes with significantly different clinical outcome can be identified among patients with DP-induced AR according to the presence of delayed-type mite sensitization detected by positive DP-APT result.

Sequential class switch recombination to IgE and allergen-induced accumulation of IgE+ plasmablasts occur in the nasal mucosa of local allergic rhinitis patients

BACKGROUND

The involvement of allergen-specific (s)IgE in local allergic rhinitis (LAR) has been debated. Here, we investigate the effect of nasal allergen challenge with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (NAC-DP) in mucosal and peripheral B-cell subpopulations in LAR patients.

METHODS

Nine LAR, 5 allergic rhinitis (AR), and 5 non-atopic healthy control (HC) individuals were subjected to a 3-day NAC-DP protocol, and nasal biopsies and blood samples were collected before and after provocation. Nasal biopsies were used for immunohistochemistry and gene expression studies, whereas the frequency of lymphocyte subsets and basophil activation test (BAT) were analyzed in blood samples by flow cytometry. sIgG was measured in sera.

RESULTS

NAC-DP induced an increase in IgE⁺ CD38⁺ plasmablasts in the nasal mucosa of LAR patients, but not in AR or HC individuals. Markers of sequential recombination to IgE (εCSR) (from IgG) were observed in 33% of LAR, 20% of AR, and 0% of HC subjects. NAC-DP increased the proportion of peripheral CD19⁺ CD20⁺ CD38⁺ plasmablasts in AR and LAR patients, but not in HC. Expression of the mucosal homing receptor CXCR3 in peripheral CD19⁺ CD20⁺ CD38⁺ plasmablasts from LAR, AR, and HC individuals was 7%, 5%, and 0.5%, respectively. In vitro DP stimulation increased proliferating CD19⁺ CD20⁺ CD38⁺ plasmablasts in LAR and AR patients, but not in HC. Serum DP-sIgG was higher in LAR and AR patients as compared to HC. BAT was positive in 33%, 100%, and 0% of LAR, AR, and HC subjects, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that allergen exposure induces the sequential εCSR of IgG⁺ CD19⁺ CD20⁺ CD38⁺ plasmablasts in the nasal mucosa of LAR patients.

Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps in Endotypes of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus-Induced Rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Observation of the natural history of two emerging endotypes of allergic rhinitis, local-sensitization rhinitis (LAR) and dual-allergic rhinitis (DAR), compared with systemic-sensitization rhinitis (AR), could improve knowledge of the role of allergy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that endotypes of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP)-induced rhinitis were risk factors for CRSwNP and adult-onset asthma and to investigate whether delayed hypersensitivity to DP, assessed by atopy patch test, could be a contributing factor.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study over 15 years on a cohort of 999 patients: 468 with AR, 333 with LAR, and 198 with DAR. The latter endotype was characterized by the coexistence of seasonal disease caused by systemic sensitization to pollen in patients with DP-induced LAR. The study design included a physical visit; ear, nose, and throat examination with anterior rhinoscopy; skin prick test; serum-specific IgE; DP-atopy patch test; nasal allergen provocation test with DP; paranasal sinuses computed tomography scan; nasal endoscopy; and spirometry.

RESULTS

During 15 years of follow-up, 194 patients developed CRSwNP with a higher rate of LAR (28.2%) and DAR (22.2%) than AR (12%). For LAR and DAR, 7.5% and 10.6% of patients developed adult-onset asthma temporally linked to CRSwNP in 68% and 71.4% of cases, respectively. A total of 858 patients with rhinitis had delayed hypersensitivity to DP. Moreover, DP-ATP was an independent predictive factor for CRSwNP and had elevated positive and negative predictive values for localized allergic disease of the nasal mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

Endotypes of DP-induced allergic rhinitis represent risk factors for CRSwNP. Patients with local-sensitization rhinitis and DAR are more at risk than those with AR. In these emerging endotypes, progression toward CRSwNP is often associated with the development of adult-onset asthma. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps shows several possible indicators for type 2 endotype. Delayed hypersensitivity to DP is an independent predictive factor for CRSwNP.

The Utility of Nasal Challenges to Phenotype Asthma Patients

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease in terms of both phenotype and response to therapy. Therefore, there is a great need for clinically applicable tools allowing for improved patient classification, and selection for specific management approaches. Some interventions are highly helpful in selected patients (e.g., allergen immunotherapy or aspirin desensitization), but they are costly and/or difficult to implement. Currently available biomarkers measurable in peripheral blood or exhaled air display many limitations for asthma phenotyping and cannot identify properly the specific triggers of the disease (e.g., aeroallergens or NSAID). The united airway concept illustrates the relevant epidemiological and pathophysiological links between the upper and lower airways. This concept has been largely applied to patient management and treatment, but its diagnostic implications have been less often explored. Of note, a recent document by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology proposes the use of nasal allergen challenge to confirm the diagnosis of allergic asthma. Similarly, the nasal challenge with lysine acetylsalicylate (L-ASA) can be used to identify aspirin-sensitive asthma patients. In this review, we will summarize the main features of allergic asthma and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease and will discuss the methodology of nasal allergen and L-ASA challenges with a focus on their capacity to phenotype the inflammatory disease affecting both the upper and lower airways.

A Comparative Study of Montelukast and Azelastine add on Therapy in Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis Treatment: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory nasal condition with significant negative effects on the patients' quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of Montelukast and intranasal antihistamine in combination with intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) in moderate to severe allergic rhinitis on the patients' quality of life and AR control.

METHOD

This double-blind randomized clinical trial study was carried out on 66 moderate to severe AR patients referred to Namazi Hospital, Shiraz, Iran from 2020 to 2021, who were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group one received Montelukast add-on therapy and Budesonide nasal spray. The second group received intranasal antihistamine (Azelastine) add-on therapy and Budesonide nasal spray and the third group as the control group received intranasal Budesonide spray with a placebo tablet.To measure the impact of each medication on the patient's quality of life and AR control, we employed the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 questionnaire (SNOT 22). We evaluated the symptoms and compared them at baseline, one and three months after the start of treatments. Spirometry was performed to investigate the possibility of co-morbid asthma at baseline and end of the study.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 30.13 ± 12.7 years. Most patients experienced perennial AR (65.2%). Reduction of mean scores SNOT22 was statistically different between groups (P-value < 0.001). Three months after treatment, the mean decrease of SNOT-22 in the Azelastine group was statistically significant compared to both Montelukast (P-value < 0.001) and control groups (P-value < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the Montelukast and control groups (P-value = 0.142). 23 of 66 patients were diagnosed with asthma and asthma treatment was initiated. The amount of FEV1 change after AR treatment was not statistically significant between the groups in asthmatic patients (P-value = 0.351).

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, we recommend Azelastine in conjunction with an intranasal corticosteroid for the treatment of moderate to severe allergic rhinitis. In moderate to severe AR or even asthma management, Montelukast has no greater impact than INCS.

The prevalence of non-allergic rhinitis phenotypes in the general population: A cross-sectional study

Background

Non‐allergic rhinitis (NAR) can be subdivided into several phenotypes: rhinorrhea of the elderly, rhinitis medicamentosa, smokers', occupational, hormonal, drug‐induced, gustatory, and idiopathic rhinitis. There are two pathophysiological endotypes of NAR: inflammatory and neurogenic. Phenotypes may serve as an indicator of an underlying endotype and, therefore, help to guide the treatment. The prevalence of each phenotype in the general population is currently unknown.

Methodology/Principal

Cross‐sectional questionnaire‐based study in the general population of the Netherlands.

Results

The prevalence of chronic rhinitis in the general population was 40% (N = 558, of those, 65% had NAR and 28% AR, in 7% allergy status is unknown). Individuals with NAR (N = 363) had significantly more complaints in October–February. Those with AR (N = 159) had significantly more complaints in April–August. The most common NAR phenotypes were idiopathic (39%) and rhinitis medicamentosa (14%), followed by occupational (8%), smokers' (6%), hormonal (4%), gustatory (4%), and rhinorrhea of the elderly (4%). The least prevalent phenotype was drug induced (1%). Nineteen percent of the NAR group could not be classified into any of the phenotypes.

Conclusions

This is the first study to describe the prevalences of NAR phenotypes in the general population. AR and NAR have a distinct seasonality pattern with NAR being more prevalent in autumn/winter and AR in spring/summer. Our data on the prevalence of phenotypes may help clinicians to anticipate the type of patients at their clinic and help guide a tailored treatment approach. The high prevalence of rhinitis medicamentosa is alarming, since this is a potentially preventable phenotype.

Advances and highlights in biomarkers of allergic diseases

During the past years, there has been a global outbreak of allergic diseases, presenting a considerable medical and socioeconomical burden. A large fraction of allergic diseases is characterized by a type 2 immune response involving Th2 cells, type 2 innate lymphoid cells, eosinophils, mast cells, and M2 macrophages. Biomarkers are valuable parameters for precision medicine as they provide information on the disease endotypes, clusters, precision diagnoses, identification of therapeutic targets, and monitoring of treatment efficacies. The availability of powerful omics technologies, together with integrated data analysis and network‐based approaches can help the identification of clinically useful biomarkers. These biomarkers need to be accurately quantified using robust and reproducible methods, such as reliable and point‐of‐care systems. Ideally, samples should be collected using quick, cost‐efficient and noninvasive methods. In recent years, a plethora of research has been directed toward finding novel biomarkers of allergic diseases. Promising biomarkers of type 2 allergic diseases include sputum eosinophils, serum periostin and exhaled nitric oxide. Several other biomarkers, such as pro‐inflammatory mediators, miRNAs, eicosanoid molecules, epithelial barrier integrity, and microbiota changes are useful for diagnosis and monitoring of allergic diseases and can be quantified in serum, body fluids and exhaled air. Herein, we review recent studies on biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma, chronic urticaria, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, food allergies, anaphylaxis, drug hypersensitivity and allergen immunotherapy. In addition, we discuss COVID‐19 and allergic diseases within the perspective of biomarkers and recommendations on the management of allergic and asthmatic patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Rhinology in review: from COVID-19 to biologicals

We look back at the end of what soon will be seen as an historic year, from COVID-19 to real-world introduction of biologicals influencing the life of our patients. This review describes the important findings in Rhinology over the past year. A large body of evidence now demonstrates loss of sense of smell to be one of the most common symptoms of COVID-19 infection; a meta-analysis of 3563 patients found the mean prevalence of self-reported loss to be 47%. A number of studies have now shown long-term reduced loss of smell and parosmia. Given the high numbers of people affected by COVID-19, even with the best reported recovery rates, a significant number worldwide will be left with severe olfactory dysfunction. The most prevalent causes for olfactory dysfunction, besides COVID-19 and upper respiratory tract infections in general, are trauma and CRSwNP. For these CRSwNP patients a bright future seems to be starting with the development of treatment with biologics. This year the Nobel prize in Medicine 2021 was awarded jointly to David Julius and Ardem Patapoutian for their discoveries of receptors for temperature and touch which has greatly enhanced our understanding of nasal hyperreactivity and understanding of intranasal trigeminal function. Finally, a new definition of chronic rhinitis has been proposed in the last year and we have seen many papers emphasizing the importance of endotyping patients in chronic rhinitis and rhinosinusitis in order to optimise treatment effect.

Advances and highlights in allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a growing public health, medical and economic problem worldwide. The current review describes the major discoveries related to AR during the past 2 years, including risk factors for the prevalence of AR, the corresponding diagnostic strategy, precise underlying immunological mechanisms, and efficient therapies for AR during the ongoing global "coronavirus disease 2019" (COVID-19) pandemic. The review further attempts to highlight future research perspectives. Increasing evidence suggests that environmental exposures, climate changes, and lifestyle are important risk factors for AR. Consequently, detailed investigation of the exposome and the connection between environmental exposures and health in the future should provide better risk profiles instead of single predictors, and also help mitigate adverse health outcomes in allergic diseases. Although patients with dual AR, a newly defined AR phenotype, display perennial and seasonal allergens-related nasal symptoms, they are only allergic to seasonal allergens, indicating the importance of measuring inflammation at the local sites. Herein, we suggest that a combination of precise diagnosis in local sites and traditional diagnostic methods may enhance the precision medicine-based approach for management of AR; however, this awaits further investigations. Apart from traditional treatments, social distancing, washing hands, and disinfection are also required to better manage AR patients in the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic. Despite recent advances in understanding the immune mechanisms underlying the effects of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), further understanding changes of cell profiles after AIT and accurately evaluate the efficacy of AIT are required.

Diagnostic Tools in Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic mechanisms account for most cases of chronic rhinitis. This condition is associated with significant impairment of quality of life and high indirect costs. The identification of the allergic triggers of rhinitis has been historically based on the performance of atopy test [skin prick test (SPT) and serum allergen-specific (s)IgE]. Nevertheless, these tests only denote sensitization, and atopy and allergy represent two different phenomena. It is now clear that allergic phenotypes of rhinitis can exist in both atopic (allergic rhinitis, AR) and non-atopic (local allergic rhinitis, LAR) individuals. Moreover, both allergic phenotypes can coexist in the same rhinitis patient (dual allergic rhinitis, DAR). Therefore, a diagnostic approach merely based on atopy tests is associated with a significant rate of misdiagnosis. The confirmation of the allergic etiology of rhinitis requires the performance of in vivo test like the nasal allergen challenge (NAC). NAC is mandatory for the diagnosis of LAR and DAR, and helps decide the best management approach in difficult cases of AR. Nevertheless, NAC is a laborious technique requiring human and technical resources. The basophil activation test (BAT) is a patient-friendly technique that has shown promising results for LAR and DAR diagnosis. In this review, the diagnostic usefulness for chronic rhinitis of SPT, NAC, olfactory tests, serum sIgE, BAT and the quantification of inflammatory mediators in nasal samples will be discussed. The accurate performance of an etiologic diagnosis of rhinitis patients will favor the prescription of specific therapies with disease-modifying potential like allergen immunotherapy.

Spectrum of Disease Manifestations in Patients with Selective Immunoglobulin E Deficiency

BACKGROUND

Selective IgE deficiency (SIgED) has been previously evaluated in selected patients from allergy units. This study investigates the effects of SIgED on the entire population in a hospital setting and sought to delineate in detail the clinical aspects of SIgED.

METHODS

A retrospective study of the data obtained from electronic medical records of 52 adult patients (56% female) with a mean age of 43 years and IgE levels of <2.0 kU/L with normal immunoglobulin (Ig) IgG, IgA, and IgM levels, seen at our hospital, without selection bias, from 2010 to 2019.

RESULTS

Recurrent upper respiratory infections were recorded in 18 (34.6%) patients, pneumonia was recorded in 16 (30.7%) patients, bronchiectasis was recorded in 16 (30.7%) patients, and asthma was recorded in 10 (19.2%) patients. Eighteen patients (34.6%) suffered autoimmune clinical manifestations either isolated (19%) or combining two or more diseases (15%), Hashimoto's thyroiditis being the most frequent (19%), which was followed by arthritis (10%) and thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia (5.7%). Other less frequent associations were Graves' disease, primary sclerosing cholangitis, Sjögren's syndrome, and autoimmune hepatitis. Eczematous dermatitis (15.3%), chronic spontaneous urticaria (17.3%), and symptoms of enteropathy (21%) were also highly prevalent. Thirty percent of patients developed malignancies, with non-Hodgkin lymphomas (13.4%) being the most prevalent.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical manifestations of SIgED encompass a variety of infectious, non-infectious complications, and malignancy. Since it cannot be ruled out that some type of selection bias occurred in the routine assessment of IgE serum Ievels, prospective studies are required to better characterize SIgED and to determine whether it should be added to the list of antibody deficiencies.

Basophil activation test: Mechanisms and considerations for use in clinical trials and clinical practice

The basophil activation test (BAT) is a functional assay that measures the degree of degranulation following stimulation with allergen or controls by flow cytometry. It correlates directly with histamine release. From the dose-response curve resulting from BAT in allergic patients, basophil reactivity (%CD63⁺ basophils) and basophil sensitivity (EC₅₀ or similar) are the main outcomes of the test. BAT takes into account all characteristics of IgE and allergen and thus can be more specific than sensitization tests in the diagnosis of allergic disease. BAT reduces the need for in vivo procedures, such as intradermal tests and allergen challenges, which can cause allergic reactions of unpredictable severity. As it closely reflects the patients' phenotype in most cases, it may be used to support the diagnosis of food, venom and drug allergies and chronic urticaria, to monitor the natural resolution of food allergies and to predict and monitor clinical the response to immunomodulatory treatments, such as allergen-specific immunotherapy and biologicals. Clinical application of BAT requires analytical validation, clinical validation, standardization of procedures and quality assurance to ensure reproducibility and reliability of results. Currently, efforts are ongoing to establish a platform that could be used by laboratories in Europe and in the USA for quality assurance and certification.

Systematic evaluation of allergic phenotypes of rhinitis in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Three allergic phenotypes of rhinitis have been described in adults: allergic rhinitis (AR), local allergic rhinitis (LAR), and dual allergic rhinitis (DAR, coexistence of AR and LAR). Nevertheless, most centers follow a diagnostic approach only based on skin prick test and serum allergen-specific IgE (collectively called atopy tests, AT). This approach prevents the recognition of LAR and DAR, the diagnosis of which requires a nasal allergen challenge (NAC). Here, we investigate the existence of LAR and DAR phenotypes in children and adolescents, and the misdiagnosis rate associated with a work-up exclusively based on AT.

METHODS

Clinical data were obtained during physician-conducted interviews, and AT and NAC were systematically performed in 5- to 18-year-old patients with chronic rhinitis. The misdiagnosis rate was defined as the proportion of cases where AT and NAC results were discordant.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients (mean age 15.1 years, 39.9% male) completed the study. AR (positive AT and NAC), LAR (negative AT and positive NAC), DAR (positive AT and NAC for some allergens and negative AT and positive NAC for other allergens), and non-allergic rhinitis (negative NAC) were diagnosed in 45.7%, 24.9%, 11.6%, and 17.9% of individuals, respectively. The clinical profile was comparable among allergic phenotypes, but allergic patients had a significantly earlier rhinitis onset, higher conjunctivitis prevalence, and more severe disease than NAR individuals. A diagnostic work-up exclusively based on AT misclassified 37.6% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LAR and DAR represent relevant differential diagnosis in pediatric rhinitis. NAC increases the diagnostic accuracy of clinical algorithms for rhinitis in children and adolescents.

Local Respiratory Allergy: From Rhinitis Phenotype to Disease Spectrum

Local respiratory allergy (LRA) is defined by the negativity of atopy tests, a clinical history suggestive of airway allergy and a positive response to the nasal and/or bronchial allergen challenge. The clinical spectrum of LRA is comprised of three conditions: local allergic rhinitis (LAR) and local allergic asthma in non-atopic patients, and dual allergic rhinitis (coexistence of allergic rhinitis and LAR) in atopic individuals. LRA is an independent disease phenotype not progressing to atopy over time, but naturally evolving to the clinical worsening and the onset of comorbidities. Published data suggests that LRA is mediated through the mucosal synthesis of allergen-specific (s)IgE, which binds to FcϵRI on resident mast cells, and in >50% of cases traffics to the blood stream to sensitize circulating basophils. To date, 4 clinical trials have demonstrated the capacity of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) to decrease nasal, conjunctival and bronchial symptoms, to improve quality of life, to increase the threshold dose of allergen eliciting respiratory symptoms, and to induce serum sIgG₄ in LRA individuals. Collectively, these data indicate that local allergy is a relevant disease mechanisms in both atopic and non-atopic patients with airway diseases.

Mechanisms of Allergen Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic inflammatory immunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated disease of the nasal mucosa that can be triggered by the inhalation of seasonal or perennial allergens. Typical symptoms include sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, nasal congestion and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis. AR affects a quarter of the population in the United States of America and Europe.

RECENT FINDINGS

AR has been shown to reduce work productivity in 36-59% of the patients with 20% reporting deteriorated job attendance. Moreover, 42% of children with AR report reduced at-school productivity and lower grades. Most importantly, AR impacts the patient's quality of life, due to sleep deprivation. However, a proportion of patients fails to respond to conventional medication and opts for the allergen immunotherapy (AIT), which currently is the only disease-modifying therapeutic option. AIT can be administered by either subcutaneous (SCIT) or sublingual (SLIT) route. Both routes of administration are safe, effective, and can lead to tolerance lasting years after treatment cessation. Both innate and adaptive immune responses that contribute to allergic inflammation are suppressed by AIT. Innate responses are ameliorated by reducing local mast cell, basophil, eosinophil, and circulating group 2 innate lymphoid cell frequencies which is accompanied by decreased basophil sensitivity. Induction of allergen-specific blocking antibodies, immunosuppressive cytokines, and regulatory T and B cell phenotypes are key pro-tolerogenic adaptive immune responses.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms is necessary for optimal selection of AIT-responsive patients and monitoring treatment efficacy. Moreover, it could inspire novel and more efficient AIT approaches.

Biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of therapy responses in allergic diseases and asthma

Modern health care requires a proactive and individualized response to diseases, combining precision diagnosis and personalized treatment. Accordingly, the approach to patients with allergic diseases encompasses novel developments in the area of personalized medicine, disease phenotyping and endotyping, and the development and application of reliable biomarkers. A detailed clinical history and physical examination followed by the detection of IgE immunoreactivity against specific allergens still represents the state of the art. However, nowadays, further emphasis focuses on the optimization of diagnostic and therapeutic standards and a large number of studies have been investigating the biomarkers of allergic diseases, including asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, food allergy, urticaria and anaphylaxis. Various biomarkers have been developed by omics technologies, some of which lead to a better classification of distinct phenotypes or endotypes. The introduction of biologicals to clinical practice increases the need for biomarkers for patient selection, prediction of outcomes and monitoring, to allow for an adequate choice of the duration of these costly and long‐lasting therapies. Escalating healthcare costs together with questions about the efficacy of the current management of allergic diseases require further development of a biomarker‐driven approach. Here, we review biomarkers in diagnosis and treatment of asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, viral infections, chronic rhinosinusitis, food allergy, drug hypersensitivity and allergen immunotherapy with a special emphasis on specific IgE, the microbiome and the epithelial barrier. In addition, EAACI guidelines on biologicals are discussed within the perspective of biomarkers.

Advances and novel developments in allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an upper airway disease with high prevalence in the world, and therefore needs to be thoroughly investigated and treated accordingly. Although the mechanisms underlying the pathology and treatment of AR have been widely studied, many aspects of AR are still unclear and warrant further investigations. The purpose of the present review was therefore to report recently published papers, which highlight the novel mechanisms and treatments of AR. These include role of environment, important proteins and cells, and some other factors in the pathogenesis of AR; as well as the role of immunotherapy and biologics in the treatment of AR.

Precision Medicine in House Dust Mite-Driven Allergic Asthma

House dust mites (HDMs) are the allergenic sources most frequently involved in airway allergy. Nevertheless, not every sensitized patient develops respiratory symptoms upon exposure to HDM, and there is a clinical need to differentiate allergic asthmatics (AAs) from atopic non-allergic asthmatics with HDM sensitization. This differentiation sometimes requires in vivo provocations like the bronchial allergen challenge (BAC). Interestingly, recent data demonstrate that non-atopic patients with asthma can also develop positive BAC results. This novel phenotype has been termed local allergic asthma (LAA). The interest in identifying the allergic triggers of asthma resides in the possibility of administering allergen immunotherapy (AIT). AIT is a disease-modifying intervention, the clinical benefit of which persists after therapy discontinuation. Recently, new modalities of sublingual tablets of HDM immunotherapy registered as pharmaceutical products (HDM-SLIT tablets) have become commercially available. HDM-SLIT tablets have demonstrated a robust effect over critical asthma parameters (dose of inhaled corticosteroids, exacerbations, and safety), thus being recommended by international guidelines for patients with HDM-driven AA. In this review, we will summarize the current knowledge on the phenotype and endotype of HDM-driven AA, and LAA, address the difficulties for BAC implementation in the clinic, and discuss the effects of AIT in AA and LAA.

Allergen Immunotherapy for Local Respiratory Allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIESW

Local respiratory allergy (LRA) is an eosinophilic phenotype of chronic airway disease. Three entities have been described within the LRA spectrum: local allergic rhinitis (LAR) and local allergic asthma (LAA) in non-atopic patients, and dual allergic rhinitis (DAR) in atopic patients (coexistence of LAR and allergic rhinitis). In this article, we aim to review the current evidence on the therapeutic options for LRA.

RECENT FINDINGS

No controlled study has assessed the effect of standard therapy (oral antihistamines, intranasal or inhaled corticosteroids, bronchodilators) in LRA subjects. Three randomized clinical trials and one observational study demonstrated that allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is able to control nasal and ocular symptoms, decrease the need for rescue medication, and improve quality of life in LAR individuals. Nasal or inhaled steroids can be expected to improve eosinophilic inflammation in LRA patients but cannot change the natural course of the disease. Moreover, the long-term and disease-modifying effects of AIT in LRA subjects need to be investigated.