A Topical Treatment Optimization Programme (TTOP) improves clinical outcome for calcipotriol/betamethasone gel in psoriasis: results of a 64-week multinational randomized phase IV study in 1790 patients (PSO-TOP)

A systematic review of 454 randomized controlled trials using the Dermatology Life Quality Index: experience in 69 diseases and 43 countries

BACKGROUND

Over 29 years of clinical application, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) has remained the most used patient-reported outcome (PRO) in dermatology due to its robustness, simplicity and ease of use.

OBJECTIVES

To generate further evidence of the DLQI's utility in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to cover all diseases and interventions.

METHODS

The methodology followed PRISMA guidelines and included seven bibliographical databases, searching articles published from 1 January 1994 until 16 November 2021. Articles were reviewed independently by two assessors, and an adjudicator resolved any opinion differences.

RESULTS

Of 3220 screened publications, 454 articles meeting the eligibility criteria for inclusion, describing research on 198 190 patients, were analysed. DLQI scores were primary endpoints in 24 (5.3%) of studies. Most studies were of psoriasis (54.1%), although 69 different diseases were studied. Most study drugs were systemic (85.1%), with biologics comprising 55.9% of all pharmacological interventions. Topical treatments comprised 17.0% of total pharmacological interventions. Nonpharmacological interventions, mainly laser therapy and ultraviolet radiation treatment, comprised 12.2% of the total number of interventions. The majority of studies (63.7%) were multicentric, with trials conducted in at least 42 different countries; 40.2% were conducted in multiple countries. The minimal clinically importance difference (MCID) was reported in the analysis of 15.0% of studies, but only 1.3% considered full score meaning banding of the DLQI. Forty-seven (10.4%) of the studies investigated statistical correlation of the DLQI with clinical severity assessment or other PRO/quality of life tools; and 61-86% of studies had within-group scores differences greater than the MCID in 'active treatment arms'. The Jadad risk-of-bias scale showed that bias was generally low, as 91.8% of the studies had Jadad scores of ≥ 3; only 0.4% of studies showed a high risk of bias from randomization. Thirteen per cent had a high risk of bias from blinding and 10.1% had a high risk of bias from unknown outcomes of all participants in the studies. In 18.5% of the studies the authors declared that they followed an intention-to-treat protocol; imputation for missing DLQI data was used in 34.4% of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides a wealth of evidence of the use of the DLQI in clinical trials to inform researchers' and -clinicians' decisions for its further use. Recommendations are also made for improving the reporting of data from future RCTs using the DLQI.

An effective patient-supporting intervention for topical treatment of psoriasis is also cost-effective

BACKGROUND

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of topical treatment combined with regular patient support provided by dermatological nurses in structured consultations of 20-min duration every fourth week improved psoriasis severity, quality of life and treatment adherence compared with topical treatment combined with standard patient support, which is seeing a dermatologist every third month.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the economic impact of the patient support from a healthcare-sector perspective in the RCT.

METHODS

Costs for primary care, secondary healthcare services and costs of prescription medication were compared for the intervention and nonintervention groups over 48 weeks. Health benefits were expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) measured by the EuroQoL five-dimension three-level questionnaire. Regression analyses were used to estimate incremental cost and QALYs.

RESULTS

The incremental cost was estimated at £462, with an average increase of 0.08 QALYs per patients for participants receiving the intervention compared with those receiving standard care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for patients was £5999/QALY. The intervention had an almost 100% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000 per QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing adherence issues is critical to improving outcomes for patients with psoriasis who use topical treatment. The personal support intervention was effective with an acceptable increase in costs.

Decision-making factors for the long-term topical treatment of mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis: TEPPSO, a case-vignette study on clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

Topical maintenance therapy strategy with regard to patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis (PP) continues to be heterogeneous and insufficiently investigated in real-life clinical practice. The objective of this study was to describe the initiation of long-term maintenance treatment and to identify clinical parameters influencing the therapeutic decision.

METHODS

TEPPSO was a French and Belgian multicentre cross-sectional study based on completion of questionnaires and assessment of credible clinical scenarios of mild-to-moderate PP by physicians using the validated case-vignette method.

RESULTS

Maintenance therapy was recommended by dermatologists (Ds) and by general practitioners (GPs) in 79.1% and 76.8% of cases, respectively. GPs recommended the use of a fixed-dose combination of corticosteroid and vitamin D analogues in only 14.8% of cases, whereas this therapy was recommended by French and Belgian Ds in 54.8% and 39.8% of cases, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, significant determinants of the therapeutic decision were skin lesions impacting quality of life (OR 1.9 [95% CI: 1.1; 3.2] P=0.01) for Ds, and patient corticophobia (OR 1.7 [95% CI: 1.1; 2.7] P=0.03) or the presence of skin pruritus (OR 1.8 [95% CI: 1.2; 1.8] P=0.004) for GPs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance treatment with topical agents in patients with mild-to-moderate PP was considered in more than two thirds of cases. Heterogeneity in the choice of topical agents was evidenced particularly between Ds and GPs. Our study is the first to identify significant clinical determinants affecting the therapeutic decision. Updated and validated clinical practice guidelines are needed to ensure uniform therapeutic choices.

Regular support provided by dermatological nurses improves outcomes in patients with psoriasis treated with topical drugs: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patient adherence to topical antipsoriatic drugs is often poor, leading to poor efficacy. Use of long-term support delivered by dermatological nurses to patients treated with topical drugs may improve outcome.

AIM

To evaluate whether regular support from dermatological nurses improves outcome and treatment adherence in patients with psoriasis receiving topical medications.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT04220554), in which patients received once-daily topical medications (containing corticosteroids and/or calcipotriol) for as long as their psoriasis was visible. The patients were randomly allocated to standard care by the dermatologist either with (n = 51) or without (n = 52) support from dermatological nurses. The nurse support intervention consisted of a structured dermatological consultation at baseline and Week 1, followed by contact with a nurse each month (in the outpatient clinic or by telephone). The primary outcome was severity of psoriasis, which was measured by the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) and assessed by intention-to-treat analyses using linear mixed regression models for longitudinal data. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index; DLQI) and good adherence (defined as use of ≥ 80% of recommended doses).

RESULTS

In total, 92 patients (89%) completed the 48-week trial period. The intervention group improved more than the nonintervention group from baseline to Week 24 in LS-PGA (2.21 vs. 1.28, P = 0.001) and in DLQI at Week 12 (6.50 vs. 1.55, P < 0.001). Differences between the two groups in favour of the intervention were observed throughout the study period. More participants in the intervention group had good adherence compared with the nonintervention group (36% vs. 14%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Regular, continued patient support from dermatological nurses increased the efficacy of psoriasis treatment, improved quality of life and enhanced long-term adherence to topical antipsoriatic drugs. However, there is still room for more improvement.

Internet-based survey intervention improves adherence to methotrexate among psoriasis patients

BACKGROUND

While it is known that psoriasis patients have poor adherence to both topical and systemic medications, adherence to methotrexate is not well-characterized, and ways to improve methotrexate adherence have not been addressed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a digital intervention improved adherence to oral methotrexate as measured by electronic monitoring.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were randomized to receive either weekly digital interventions assessing treatment adherence or no intervention for 24 weeks. Patients received medication bottles with electronic monitoring, and returned at weeks 4, 12, and 24 to evaluate disease severity.

RESULTS

The intervention group took methotrexate correctly 77.1% of the weeks observed compared to the control group which averaged 64.5%. More intervention patients took methotrexate as directed compared to the control group (78.3% vs 64.2%, p < 0.0001). Patients were most adherent around follow-up visits, with 100% of digital intervention patients and 80% of control patients taking methotrexate correctly during the week of a follow-up visit (p = 0.02). The digital intervention did not significantly improve disease severity in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low cost, scalable digital interventions may have the potential to increase psoriasis patient adherence to methotrexate, although the mechanism for the improvement is not yet well defined.

Qualitative analysis of topical corticosteroid concerns, topical steroid addiction and withdrawal in dermatological patients

OBJECTIVE

To explore the phenomenon of topical corticosteroid (TCS) phobia and comprehensively understand the factors driving TCS concerns, in particular pertaining to steroid addiction and withdrawal.

DESIGN

Prospective qualitative study using 1:1 in-depth semistructured interviews and analysed using grounded theory.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a prior experience of TCS use for a dermatological condition recruited from a tertiary academic dermatology clinic, or through word of mouth and online social media platforms.

RESULTS

26 participants encompassing those with positive, neutral and negative opinions towards TCS were interviewed. 13 reported having topical steroid addiction or withdrawal. The drivers of TCS concerns could be categorised into seven themes: attitudes towards TCS (comprising beliefs and knowledge about TCS), availability of alternatives, treatment inconvenience, personality, patient's ongoing evaluation of clinical response to TCS, doctor-patient relationship and healthcare-seeking behaviour. Of mention, patients placed high value and trust on their own experiences with TCS, such as their perceived experienced side effects. The doctor who failed to acknowledge the patient's opinions and instead emphasised the safety of TCS was often viewed as dismissive, resulting in a deteriorating patient-doctor relationship.

CONCLUSION

Provision of knowledge and education is important but may be ineffective if the basis for TCS concern regarding safety is reasonable, or when the patient has a firmly established belief supporting his/her concern. In such instances, failure to acknowledge and respect the patient's decision to avoid TCS could worsen the doctor-patient relationship.

Proactive therapy: new perspectives for long-term topical treatment of psoriasis

Mild to moderate psoriasis is most often treated with topical therapy. The article reviews literature on topical treatments that have been assessed in clinical trials and real-life studies lasting at least 12 months. Calcipotriol/bethamethasone dipropionate foam in maintenance treatment following the induction phase can improve efficacy and safety of topical therapy in psoriatic patients. Introduction of new topical nonsteroidal drugs and the wider use of proactive therapy seem to be crucial to achieve satisfactory long-term outcomes in psoriasis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Long-term improvement of psoriasis patients' adherence to topical drugs: testing a patient-supporting intervention delivered by healthcare professionals

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis affects 2-4% of the Western adult population and is a socio-economic burden for patients and society. Topical drugs are recommended as first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate psoriasis, but low adherence is a barrier to treatment success. Psoriasis patients require support, in order to improve their long-term use of topical drugs. The project aims to test whether a patient-supporting intervention delivered by dermatology nurses can reduce the severity of psoriasis, improve the use of topical drugs, and is cost-effective compared to standard procedure.

METHODS

The intervention consists of improved support delivered to patients by three experienced dermatology nurses, who will support patients on a regular basis by consultations with a focus on providing reminder systems, accountability, reinforcement, and building trust in the treatment. Each patient will be supported by the same dermatology nurse throughout the entire study period. The effect will be compared with standard procedure. The intervention will be tested in a randomized controlled trial during a 48-week period. A group of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (psoriasis affecting ≥ 4% of the total body surface area) and 18-85 years of age who are prescribed topical treatment will be randomized to a non-intervention (n ≈ 57) or intervention group (n ≈ 57). Participants in both arms will be prescribed topical preparations containing corticosteroid and/or calcipotriol. The primary outcome will be a change in the severity of psoriasis, measured as reduction in the Lattice-System Physician's Global Assessment. Secondary outcomes will include changes in health-related quality of life (measured by disease specific and generic questionnaires), primary adherence (i.e., proportion of filled prescriptions), and secondary adherence by objective measure (rate of topical drug consumption (obtained by weighing medication packages) compared to estimated recommended consumption). A health economic evaluation is planned to run alongside the trial. Participants' total health costs will be estimated on the basis of health costs reported to the national health registries and costs spent on the intervention, after which a cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis will be carried out.

DISCUSSION

If the intervention can reduce the severity of psoriasis in a significant manner and is economically favorable compared to standard treatment, there is potential for implementing the intervention in dermatology clinics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04220554 . Registered on January 7, 2020. Study results, either positive, negative, or inconclusive, will be published on www.clinicaltrials.gov . Trial registration no. with the Danish Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics, registration no. 72613.

Long-term maintenance treatment of psoriasis: the role of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate aerosol foam in clinical practice

Most patients with psoriasis present with localized mild-to-moderate disease. In this case, the application of topical treatments in the first-line setting is recommended in most cases.Among different topical options, the fixed-dose combination of betamethasone dipropionate (BD) and vitamin D analogue (Cal) aerosol foam (Enstilar®, Leo Pharma) is approved as first-line topical therapy for the treatment of psoriasis in USA and the EU, due to its high efficacy and its favorable administration scheme.The PSO-LONG was the first trial to report on the long-term efficacy and safety of the Cal/DB foam treatment for the proactive management of psoriasis and now, the indications of Cal/BD foam included its use in the psoriasis maintenance treatment. However, the precise role of this treatment and the potential therapeutic schemes in the long-term management of psoriasis need further clarification.This Position Paper, authored by a group of Italian Expert Dermatologists, critically discusses the long-term management of psoriasis with Cal/BD foam in clinical practice. In particular, the biological rationale in the proactive treatment with Cal/BD foam and current evidence regarding this therapeutic approach are presented, along with its application also in patients with moderate-to-severe disease, difficult-to-treat lesions, or within combination regimens. In addition, strategies to improve adherence to long-term treatment of psoriasis are discussed.

Emerging paradigm shift toward proactive topical treatment of psoriasis: A narrative review

Psoriasis (PsO) requires safe and effective long‐term management to reduce the risk of recurrence and decrease the frequency of relapse. Topical PsO therapies are a cornerstone in the management of PsO though safety concerns limit the chronic, continuous use of topical corticosteroids and/or vitamin D₃ analogs. Evidence‐based guidelines on optimal treatment targets and maintenance therapy regimens are currently lacking. This review explores the evidence supporting approaches to maintenance topical therapy for PsO including continuous long‐term therapy, chronic intermittent use, step‐down therapy, sequential or pulse therapy regimens, and proactive maintenance therapy. Several unaddressed questions are discussed including how and when to transition from acute to maintenance therapy, strategies for monitoring long‐term treatment, the role of topical maintenance therapy in the context of systemic and biologic therapies, risks of maintenance therapy, prescribing a topical preparation suitable for patients' preferences and skin type, and key concepts for patient education to maximize long‐term outcomes. Overall, emerging evidence supports a paradigm shift toward proactive treatment once skin is completely clear as a strategy to enhance disease control without compromising safety.

Patterns of dosage regimen instructions regarding topical medicines: how is the information perceived by patients?

BACKGROUND

The communication of dosage regimen instructions by physicians is of utmost importance on treatment adherence. Few studies until now have approached the topical treatment adherence subject.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims the characterization of dosage regimen instructions given by physicians and the assessment of chronic dermatological patients' perception regarding these instructions.

METHODS

Two instruments one for physicians (PHYSDOSAGE) and one for patients (PATIENTDOSAGE) were developed and applied in a cross-sectional, descriptive and exploratory study to two independent samples composed by 91 physicians and 43 patients.

RESULTS

Most of physicians reported to provide dosage regimen instructions. When cross checking information from both studied samples, physicians and patients, it was concluded that physicians reported to provide more frequently oral and written treatment instructions, e.g. electronic prescription, than patients reported having received it. Also, physicians claimed to often provide information about the duration of treatment and the frequency of topical medicines' application, which was not acknowledged by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Contradictory results were found between the physicians' information input and the patients' perception about dosage regimen instructions provided during the consultation. These findings could negatively influence the treatment adherence and the clinical outcomes. Thus, it is of paramount importance the implementation of strategies to improve optimal communication of dosage regimen instructions for topical medicines.

Systematic literature review of long-term efficacy data for topical psoriasis treatments

OBJECTIVE

To identify long-term efficacy evidence that supports use of topical therapies as regular maintenance therapy in the prevention of psoriasis relapse.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified clinical trials and observational studies that reported efficacy outcomes for topical psoriasis therapies with treatment durations of at least 12 weeks. For therapies with long-term data, the approved treatment schedules in product labels were reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies with at least 12-week efficacy outcomes were identified. Eight randomized controlled trials and six observational studies or single-arm open-label studies reported efficacy data for >12-week treatment periods. Most studies used treatment regimens that reflect current standard of care of repeated treatment of relapses. The PSO-LONG study is the only identified randomized controlled trial to have compared regular proactive maintenance use of a topical treatment (calcipotriol/betamethasone foam) with reactive management in response to psoriasis relapses.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited high-quality long-term efficacy data are available for topical psoriasis therapies. While some product labels mention clinical experience of up to 12 months, they do not provide specific recommendations on the optimal long-term regimen. Calcipotriol/betamethasone foam is the only treatment for which the approved label allows either reactive treatment of relapse or regular (twice weekly) maintenance use.

Systematic review and practical guidance on the use of topical calcipotriol and topical calcipotriol with betamethasone dipropionate as long-term therapy for mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis

While many patients with psoriasis are candidates for topical agents, long-term treatment effects are unclear. This systematic review evaluated global findings from clinical trials and real-world studies of topical calcipotriol and the two-compound formulation of calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate for mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis (including scalp psoriasis). PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE were searched for relevant English-language publications along with Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Latin American publication databases. Identified articles were screened by title and abstract against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis of key efficacy and safety findings from the full papers of selected publications was developed. Thirty-seven relevant papers were identified (25 English, 11 Chinese and one Japanese-language study) including 28 randomized controlled trials. While there was significant heterogeneity in study length, treatment intensity and clinical measures, following a critical review of the published data combined with expert opinion, the following clinical practice recommendations were agreed in order to assist healthcare providers: in adults, long-term treatment with calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate is well tolerated and efficacious for up to 1 year on an 'as needed' basis, and for up to 16 weeks on a fixed-treatment regimen. Calcipotriol is also well tolerated and efficacious when used long term (up to 52 weeks) 'as needed' and for up to 20 weeks on a fixed-treatment regimen. Used on an 'as needed' basis for up to 1 year, the safety and efficacy profile of fixed-dose combination calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate is more favorable than calcipotriol alone; regular consultation between patients and their dermatologist/primary care physician is required to review psoriasis symptoms and adjust treatment accordingly; a specific treatment goal should be agreed on initiation of topical agent(s) to determine when long-term treatment can begin or if a regimen change is warranted; and application frequency during the continued treatment phase should consider the patients' treatment expectations and goals.

Topical Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris: The Swiss Treatment Pathway

Topical treatment is crucial for the successful management of plaque psoriasis. Topicals are used either as a stand-alone therapy for mild psoriasis or else in combination with UV or systemic treatment for moderate-to-severe disease. For the choice of a suitable topical treatment, the formulation matters and not just the active substances. This expert opinion paper was developed via a non-structured consensus process by Swiss dermatologists in hospitals and private practices to illustrate the current treatment options to general practitioners and dermatologists in Switzerland. Defining treatment goals together with the patient is crucial and increases treatment adherence. Patients' personal preferences and pre-existing experiences should be considered and their satisfaction with treatment and outcome regularly assessed. During the induction phase of "classical" mild-to-moderate psoriasis, the fixed combination of topical calcipotriol (Cal) 50 μg/g and betamethasone dipropionate (BD) 0.5 mg/g once daily is frequently used for 4-8 weeks. During the maintenance phase, a twice weekly (proactive) management has proved to reduce the risk of relapse. Of the fixed combinations, Cal/BD aerosol foam is the most effective formulation. However, the individual choice of formulation should be based on a patient's preference and the location of the psoriatic plaques. Tailored recommendations are given for the topical management of specific areas (scalp, facial, intertriginous/genital, or palmoplantar lesions), certain symptoms (hyperkeratotic or hyperinflammatory forms) as well as during pregnancy or a period of breastfeeding. As concomitant basic therapy, several emollients are recommended. If topical treatment alone does not appear to be sufficient, the regimen should be escalated according to the Swiss S1-guideline for the systemic treatment of psoriasis.

General practice recommendations for the topical treatment of psoriasis: a modified-Delphi approach

BACKGROUND

Although GPs are usually the first port of call for patients with psoriasis, there is a lack of consistent and up-to-date clinical recommendations for interventions for patients with mild-to-moderate disease.

AIM

To provide practical recommendations for GPs to optimise psoriasis treatment with topical therapies in four key areas: patient identification; treatment decision making with topical theory; topical treatment outcomes; and optimising patient adherence.

DESIGN & SETTING

A consensus-seeking programme (modified-Delphi approach) was undertaken to assess the literature and develop recommendations for GPs, based on evidence and expert opinion.

METHOD

Three dermatologists compiled 47 questions that were subsequently ranked and refined according to clinical relevance or importance using an online survey. Thereafter, 19 dermatologists from different European countries developed statements and clinical recommendations for the top seven ranked topical treatment and GP-relevant questions based on literature research and clinical experience. The final recommendations were based on 100% agreement among a final panel of seven experts.

RESULTS

The clinical effectiveness, fast onset of action, tolerability, cosmetic acceptability, and practicability of topical therapy, in addition to good physician-patient communication, are important for optimising patient adherence and maximising efficacy. Topical treatments combining corticosteroids and vitamin D analogues (administered as fixed combination) are well-established first-line treatments in mild-to-moderate psoriasis.

CONCLUSION

Simple but detailed practical guidance is provided, which is formed from evidence and expert clinical recommendations, to assist GPs with the optimal use of topical agents based on efficacy, tolerability, disease severity, site of psoriasis, patient lifestyle and preferences, and intended duration of treatment.

PSO-LONG: Design of a Novel, 12-Month Clinical Trial of Topical, Proactive Maintenance with Twice-Weekly Cal/BD Foam in Psoriasis

Background

Psoriasis vulgaris is commonly treated with topical corticosteroids and vitamin D analogues. Although potent and super-potent topical corticosteroids are very effective at clearing psoriasis, with short-term reactive treatment durations, symptoms usually recur after treatment discontinuation, necessitating long-term disease management strategies. A foam formulation of calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD foam), consisting of calcipotriol 50 μg/g and betamethasone dipropionate 0.5 mg/g, is approved for the daily treatment of psoriasis for up to 4 weeks. Here, we describe a clinical trial protocol for evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of twice-weekly Cal/BD foam as a proactive topical maintenance therapy for plaque psoriasis for up to 52 weeks.

Objective

The aim of this trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Cal/BD foam when applied twice weekly for up to 52 weeks as proactive maintenance therapy, with the goal of preventing or delaying disease relapse as long as possible while minimizing adverse effects.

Methods

Once-daily Cal/BD foam treatment responders from an initial 4-week open-label period were randomized to receive Cal/BD foam or foam vehicle applied to previously cleared plaques twice weekly for up to 52 weeks. In case of relapse, affected subjects in either group received rescue therapy with once-daily Cal/BD foam for 4 weeks on active areas. Thus, the trial (NCT02899962) compared the long-term use of Cal/BD foam in a proactive approach with a conventional, reactive approach.

Planned Outcomes

Efficacy endpoints included the time to first relapse, the number of relapse-free days, and the number of relapses during the maintenance phase. Safety assessments included adverse events, incidence of rebound, local safety and tolerability scores, and effects on calcium metabolism and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis function.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02899962.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01497-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Spotlight on Topical Long-Term Management of Plaque Psoriasis

During the 28th Congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) held in Madrid in October 2019, an industry hub was dedicated to the long-term management of psoriasis. Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease primarily involving the skin that affects up to 4% of the European population, the majority of whom present with chronic plaque psoriasis. Topical therapies are well established in the first-line treatment of psoriatic plaque flares. Nevertheless, as psoriasis is a chronic disease, long-term control should be considered. The aim of the session was to provide expert opinion on the benefit of long-term maintenance therapy in chronic plaque psoriasis and introduce the concept of pro-active management to decrease the number of relapses and improve patient quality of life. The current guidelines and recommendations were reviewed, as well as the available data on published clinical trials. There is still an important role for topical therapy in psoriasis and current recommendations suggest a maintenance regimen for psoriasis. Adherence optimization and proactive management of relapse can be key factors for obtaining clinical outcomes in topical long-term therapy. Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate foam is the only topical formulation with long-term data as a twice-weekly proactive treatment approach for up to 52 weeks for chronic plaque psoriasis.

Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate formulations for psoriasis: an overview of the options and efficacy data

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a very common chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting up to 3% of the general population with 75% of the psoriasis subjects being affected by a mild form of disease. Hence, topical therapy is the most frequent employed treatment in psoriasis also because it can be easily combined with systemic therapy. In this context, calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD) fixed-dose association represents the first-line treatment due to its efficacy and once-daily application. Different Cal/BD formulations, such as ointment, gel (topical suspension), and aerosol foam, are approved by US Food and Drug Administration.

AREAS COVERED

For this review, relevant English literature (trials, real-life studies, case series, and reviews) regarding Cal/BD different formulations efficacy in psoriasis was searched for through to 28 January 2020. The following database were consulted: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, EBSCO, and clinicaltrials.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

Cal/BD formulations are efficacious treatment for psoriasis. Cal/BD aerosol foam shows a higher efficacy compared to Cal/BD ointment or gel formulations, appearing as a game-changer in psoriasis therapy not only for mild disease but also for moderate psoriasis as well as in selected severe cases in combination with systemic treatments.

Optimizing Communication About Topical Corticosteroids: A Quality Improvement Study

Background

Patients are often non-adherent to topical corticosteroids (TCS). This may be in part due to poor communication between patients and dermatologists.

Objectives

This quality improvement (QI) study aims to describe dermatologist–patient communication about TCS treatments and to compare communication before and after the implementation of an educational intervention.

Methods

This QI study assesses the communication between dermatologists and new dermatology outpatients receiving a TCS prescription in a tertiary care center. The QI intervention is 2-pronged, consisting of an educational pamphlet for patients and a communication workshop for the dermatology team. Encounters were audiotaped, and communication was analyzed using a coding system (MEDICODE). Phase 1 recordings happened preintervention and reflect the usual dermatologist–patient communication in this practice setting and phase 2 recordings were postintervention.

Results

Phase 1 reveals that dermatologists frequently address informational medication themes, such as naming the medications and informing patients about their proper use. They less frequently discuss patient experience themes, such as goals of treatment, adverse effects of treatments, and exploring patients’ emotions about medications (such as anxiety, fears, etc.). After the intervention, there was more frequent discussion of patient experience themes without increasing consultation length. But, in both phases, physicians address most themes as a monolog with little verbal input from patients.

Conclusions

Our study raises awareness regarding dermatologists’ communication patterns about TCS, identifying specific areas for improvement, such as discussions of adverse effects, and explicitly addressing patients’ attitudes and emotions. This is an essential step to foster a sense-making of TCS for patients.

Visit Adherence of Mild to Moderate Psoriasis Patients: A Mobile-Based Randomized Study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to prospectively evaluate the visit adherence in mild to moderate psoriasis patients.

METHODS

Plaque psoriasis patients aged 18 or above who were prescribed with a two-component formula ointment were eligible for the study. The patients were randomly assigned to group A or B, and received management with or without planned patient-doctor communication via a mobile platform. The outpatient visit was scheduled at week 2, 8, 16, 28, 48, and 52. Visit adherence was evaluated as the visit rate of the patients.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-one patients were included. Generally, the visit adherence dropped over time during follow-up. The visit rates in group A were 5.2-15.7% through the 52 weeks, and similar rates were found in group B (7.5-17.0%, vs group A, P > 0.05). A negative binomial regression model showed that older age and higher BSA were correlated with more frequent visits.

CONCLUSION

The visit adherence of mild to moderate psoriasis patients was very low in China. Proactive inquiries of the doctors via the mobile platform failed to improve the visit adherence of the patients.

A systematic review of factors influencing treatment adherence in chronic inflammatory skin disease - strategies for optimizing treatment outcome

Adherence describes how a patient follows a medical regime recommended by a healthcare provider. Poor treatment adherence represents a complex and challenging problem of international healthcare systems, as it has a substantial impact on clinical outcomes and patient safety and constitutes an important financial burden. Since it is one of the most common causes of treatment failure, it is extremely important for physicians to reliably distinguish between non-adherence and non-response. This systematic review aims to summarize the current literature on treatment adherence in dermatology, focusing on chronic inflammatory skin diseases such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and acne. A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed Database, including articles from 2008 to 2018. Low treatment adherence is a multidimensional phenomenon defined by the interplay of numerous factors and should under no circumstances be considered as the patient's fault alone. Factors influencing treatment adherence in dermatology include patient characteristics and beliefs, treatment efficacy and duration, administration routes, disease chronicity and the disease itself. Moreover, the quality of the physician-patient relationship including physician-time available for the patient plays an important role. Understanding patients' adherence patterns and the main drivers of non-adherence creates opportunities to improve adherence in the future. Strategies to increase treatment adherence range from reminder programs to simplifying prescriptions or educational interventions. Absolute adherence to treatment may not be realistically achievable, but efforts need to be made to raise awareness in order to maximize adherence as far as possible.

Dermatology nurses view on factors related to Danish psoriasis patients' adherence to topical drugs: a focus group study

BACKGROUND

Topical medications are first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate psoriasis, but adherence is low, which negatively affects patients' outcomes and quality of life. Nurses can play a central role in patient care, particularly in improving adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the experience of dermatology nurses with psoriasis patients' adherence to topical drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a semi-structured focus group study with 6 dermatology nurses and 2 dermatology nursing students. Participants were recruited from a dermatology hospital outpatient clinic. Data were analyzed by a systematic text condensation method with a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach.

RESULTS

Nurses experienced that factors such as social inequality, patient-centered nursing, and patients' quality of life can have an influence on adherence.

CONCLUSION

Optimal adherence to topical treatments is a complex exercise and is influenced by many different factors. Involving nurses when prescribing topical treatments may be beneficial since they are one of the most trustworthy professions and have a holistic view on psoriasis severity, patient preferences, health care resources available and socioeconomic factors.

[Adequate prescription and application of topicals : How to calculate the right volume for the prescription of ointment needed?]

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty regarding the suitable amount of prescribed ointment and its application by patients may cause insufficient or uneconomic health care provision. To address this issue, standardized methods and experts' knowledge on the suitable amount and coherent patient's elucidation for application of topicals are needed.

OBJECTIVES

Presented are current data in routine care and scientific evidence on the prescribed amount of topical agents as well as its application by patients in dermatological care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted via PubMed using the keywords as individual and pooled search terms: "local therapy", "topical treatment", "prescription", "amount of ointment needed", "involved area", "BSA", "finger-tip-unit", "Rule of Hand", "calculated dosage" and "rule of nines". We included original studies by manually screening title and abstract according to the relevance of the topic.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 19 clinical trials. The fingertip unit (FTU) is the most frequently used measurement for accurate application of external agents. Appropriate prescribed amount is calculated by required topical agent per involved surface area.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still a need for clarification to which extent the optimized amount of ointment is prescribed and advice for its application in routine care is given. The FTU combined with the "Rule of Hand" is an adequate measurement for patient's guidance on self-application.

Improving psoriasis patients' adherence to topical drugs: a systematic review

Background: Poor adherence to topical antipsoriatic drugs limits treatment effectiveness.Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate how health care providers may improve psoriasis patients' adherence to topical treatment.Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed for English-language articles in Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Cinahl, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library.Results: Ten studies of varying quality were identified. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the adherence-improving potential of interventions by health care providers to support patients showed improvement in adherence to topical treatment. In a prospective study with a pre/postdesign, an individualized, face-to-face consultation reported an improvement in patient-reported adherence to topical treatment over a 9-week period. Based on seven qualitative studies obtaining insights from either patients or health care providers, health care providers may need to address socio-economic factors, health care system factors, and treatment-, patient-, and disease-related factors in interventions that aim to improve the adherence of psoriasis patients to topical antipsoriatic drugs.Conclusion: There is a need to develop better adherence-improving interventions. A good patient-health care provider relationship is considered crucial to adherence and may be an important intervention target. Before interventions to improve adherence to topicals can be recommended for the clinic, the intervention should be tested in high-quality RCTs.

Shared Decision Making in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies

BACKGROUND

Patients with psoriasis face numerous treatment and self-management decisions. Shared decision making is a novel approach where patients' preferences and values are considered in cooperation with healthcare professionals before making treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to explore what is illuminated in psoriasis research regarding shared decision making, and to estimate the effects of shared decision-making interventions in this context.

METHODS

Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies were eligible for inclusion. We searched six electronic databases up to January 2018. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and quality criteria. The SPIDER framework was used to identify eligibility criteria for study inclusion. Narrative and thematic syntheses were utilized to identify prominent themes emerging from the data.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included in the review. Of these, we included 18 studies (19 papers) to describe what was illuminated with regard to shared decision making in psoriasis research. Four major themes emerged: interpersonal communication; exchange of competence and knowledge; different world view; and involvement and preference, organized under two analytical themes; "Co-creation of decisions" and "Organization of treatment and treatment needs". For shared decision-making effects, we included four controlled studies. These varied in scope and interventional length and showed limited use of shared decision making-specific outcome measures, reflecting the early stage of the literature. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-synthesis was not justified.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be a need to strengthen the relationship between medical doctors and patients with psoriasis. The evident lack of knowledge about each other's competence and the lack of self-efficacy for both patients and providers challenges the basic principles of shared decision making. The effects of shared decision making in psoriasis are inconclusive, and more research appears necessary to determine the possible benefits of shared decision-making interventions.

The Impact of Vitamin D on the Immunopathophysiology, Disease Activity, and Extra-Musculoskeletal Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Over the past two decades it has been increasingly recognized that vitamin D, aside from its crucial involvement in calcium and phosphate homeostasis and the dynamics of the musculoskeletal system, exerts its influential impact on the immune system. The mechanistic roles that vitamin D plays regarding immune activation for combating infection, as well as pathologically and mediating autoimmune conditions, have been progressively unraveled. In vitro and in vivo models have demonstrated that the action of vitamin D on various immunocytes is not unidirectional. Rather, how vitamin D affects immunocyte functions depends on the context of the immune response, in the way that its suppressive or stimulatory action offers physiologically appropriate and immunologically advantageous outcomes. In this review, the relationship between various aspects of vitamin D, starting from its adequacy in circulation to its immunological functions, as well as its autoimmune conditions, in particular systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a prototype autoimmune condition characterized by immune-complex mediated inflammation, will be discussed. Concurring with other groups of investigators, our group found that vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in patients with SLE. Furthermore, the circulating vitamin D levels appear to be correlated with a higher disease activity of SLE as well as extra-musculoskeletal complications of SLE such as fatigue, cardiovascular risk, and cognitive impairment.

Asian consensus on assessment and management of mild to moderate plaque psoriasis with topical therapy

A working group of dermatologists in Asian countries assessed the current status of psoriatic management in the region to prepare a consensus report on topical treatment in mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. Even though the association of psoriasis with systemic comorbidities is increasingly acknowledged, psoriasis is still lower in health‐care priority lists in the region. The psychosocial impact of psoriasis may be greater in Asian countries due to cultural norms and social discrimination. Non‐adherence to treatment is also common among Asians. The current care given to patients with mild to moderate psoriasis needs to be streamlined, enhanced and organized with a patient‐centered care approach to achieve better outcomes. A comprehensive assessment of the disease severity and its impact on a patient's life is required before initiating treatment. Education and active involvement of the patient in the treatment plan is an important part of psoriatic management. It is recommended to personalize topical treatment to meet the needs of the patient, depending on disease severity, psychosocial impact, the patient's expectations and, more importantly, the patient's willingness and ability to actively follow the treatment procedure. Fixed‐dose combination of corticosteroid and vitamin D analogs is the preferred topical medication for both initial and maintenance phases of treatment. The fast containment of the disease is the goal of the initial phase of 4–8 weeks and it demands a potent fast‐acting topical therapy. Satisfactory control of the disease and prevention of relapses should be achieved during the maintenance phase with twice a week or weekend applications.