1
|
Ljungberg Silic L, Persson C, Pesonen M, Suuronen K, Svedman C, Bergendorff O. 2-Cyanoethyl dimethyldithiocarbamate, a new contact allergen found in accelerator-free nitrile gloves. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 91:45-53. [PMID: 38602297 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from rubber glove usage is usually caused by rubber additives such as the accelerators. However, in analyses of the suspected gloves, ordinary rubber allergens are not always found. Accelerator-free rubber gloves are available, but some patients with accelerator allergy do not tolerate them and might also be patch test positive to them. OBJECTIVES To identify and chemically characterize a new allergen, 2-cyanoethyl dimethyldithiocarbamate (CEDMC), in rubber gloves. We describe two patient cases: patient 1 that led us to the identification of CEDMC and patient 2 with occupational ACD caused by CEDMC. METHODS The patients were examined with patch testing including baseline and rubber series, and their own rubber gloves. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used for chemical analysis of rubber gloves. The allergen was synthesized and identified by nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectrometry and infrared spectrometry, and tested on patient 2. RESULTS CEDMC was identified by HPLC in a nitrile glove associated with hand eczema in patient 1. Patient 2 whose nitrile gloves contained CEDMC was patch test positive to CEDMC. CONCLUSIONS CEDMC is a new contact allergen in nitrile gloves and probably forms during vulcanization from residual monomer acrylonitrile and rubber additives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Ljungberg Silic
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Christina Persson
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Maria Pesonen
- Occupational Health Unit, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Katri Suuronen
- Occupational Health Unit, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ola Bergendorff
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kursawe Larsen C, Jensen MB, Schwensen JFB. Contact allergy to N-isopropyl-N'-phenyl paraphenylenediamine in consecutively patch tested Danish eczema patients: An observational study with historical data from 2013 to 2023. Contact Dermatitis 2024. [PMID: 38922961 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Christoffer Kursawe Larsen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Bak Jensen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Jakob F B Schwensen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li ZM, Kannan K. Occurrence of 1,3-Diphenylguanidine, 1,3-Di- o-tolylguanidine, and 1,2,3-Triphenylguanidine in Indoor Dust from 11 Countries: Implications for Human Exposure. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2023; 57:6129-6138. [PMID: 37010350 PMCID: PMC10116588 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
1,3-Diphenylguanidine (DPG), 1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine (DTG), and 1,2,3-triphenylguanidine (TPG) are synthetic chemicals widely used in rubber and other polymers. Nevertheless, limited information is available on their occurrence in indoor dust. We measured these chemicals in 332 dust samples collected from 11 countries. DPG, DTG, and TPG were found in 100%, 62%, and 76% of the house dust samples, at median concentrations of 140, 2.3, and 0.9 ng/g, respectively. The sum concentrations of DPG and its analogues varied among the countries in the following decreasing order: Japan (median: 1300 ng/g) > Greece (940) > South Korea (560) > Saudi Arabia (440) > the United States (250) > Kuwait (160) > Romania (140) > Vietnam (120) > Colombia (100) > Pakistan (33) > India (26). DPG accounted for ≥87% of the sum concentrations of the three compounds in all countries. DPG, DTG, and TPG exhibited significant correlations (r: 0.35-0.73; p < 0.001). Elevated concentrations of DPG were found in dust from certain microenvironments (e.g., offices and cars). Human exposure to DPG through dust ingestion were in the ranges 0.07-4.40, 0.09-5.20, 0.03-1.70, 0.02-1.04, and 0.01-0.87 ng/kg body weight (BW)/day for infants, toddlers, children, teenagers, and adults, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-Min Li
- Department
of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman
School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United States
- Department
of Environmental Medicine, New York University
Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United States
| | - Kurunthachalam Kannan
- Department
of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman
School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United States
- Department
of Environmental Medicine, New York University
Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bauer A, Pesonen M, Brans R, Caroppo F, Dickel H, Dugonik A, Larese Filon F, Geier J, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Napolitano M, Patruno C, Rustemeyer T, Simon D, Schuttelaar MLA, Spiewak R, Stingeni L, Vok M, Weisshaar E, Wilkinson M, Valiukeviciene S, Uter W. Occupational contact allergy: The European perspective-Analysis of patch test data from ESSCA between 2011 and 2020. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 88:263-274. [PMID: 36694979 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Occupational skin diseases have led the occupational disease statistics in Europe for many years. Especially occupational allergic contact dermatitis is associated with a poor prognosis and low healing rates leading to an enormous burden for the affected individual and for society. OBJECTIVES To present the sensitization frequencies to the most relevant allergens of the European baseline series in patients with occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) and to compare sensitization profiles of different occupations. METHODS The data of 16 022 patients considered having OCD after patch testing within the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network between January 2011 and December 2020 were evaluated. Patients (n = 46 652) in whom an occupational causation was refuted served as comparison group. RESULTS The highest percentages of OCD were found among patients working in agriculture, fishery and related workers, metal industry, chemical industry, followed by building and construction industry, health care, food and service industry. Sensitizations to rubber chemicals (thiurams, carbamates, benzothiazoles) and epoxy resins were associated with at least a doubled risk of OCD. After a decline from 2014 onwards, the risks to acquire an occupation-related sensitization to methyl(chloro)isothiazolinone (MCI/MI) and especially to methylisothiazolinone (MI) seem to increase again. Sensitization rates to formaldehyde were stable, and to methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) slightly decreasing over time. CONCLUSIONS Among allergens in the European Baseline Series, occupational relevance is most frequently attributed to rubber accelerators, epoxy resins and preservatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maria Pesonen
- Occupational Health Unit, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Richard Brans
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Germany and Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Francesca Caroppo
- Unit of Clinic Dermatology, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Francesca Larese Filon
- Department of Public Health, Occupational Medicine, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Department of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Maddalena Napolitano
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences Vincenzo Tiberio, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Cataldo Patruno
- Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dagmar Simon
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marie L A Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Radoslaw Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Luca Stingeni
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marko Vok
- Dermatovenerološka ambulanta, Izola, Slovenia
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Skaidra Valiukeviciene
- Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Suzuki NM, Hafner MDFS, Lazzarini R, Duarte IAG, Veasey JV. Patch tests and hand eczema: retrospective study in 173 patients and literature review. An Bras Dermatol 2023; 98:339-346. [PMID: 36870887 PMCID: PMC10173083 DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand eczema (HE) is a highly prevalent, recurrent, and multifactorial disease. It encompasses a group of eczematous diseases that affect the hands, etiologically classified into irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and atopic dermatitis (AD). Few epidemiological studies in Latin America have investigated the characteristics of patients with this condition and the origin of the disease. OBJECTIVES To analyze the profile of patients diagnosed with HE submitted to patch tests aiming to determine its etiology. METHODS A retrospective descriptive study was carried out on epidemiological data and patch tests of patients with HE treated at a tertiary hospital in the city of São Paulo from January 2013 to December 2020. RESULTS A total of 173 patients were studied, whose final diagnosis was 61.8% of ICD, 23.1% of ACD and 5.2% of AD, with diagnostic overlap in 42.8% of the cases. The main positive and relevant patch tests were: Kathon CG (42%), nickel sulfate (33%), and thiuram mix (18%). STUDY LIMITATIONS The number of treated cases and socioeconomic profile was limited to a vulnerable population group. CONCLUSION HE is a diagnosis in which overlapping etiologies are frequent, with the main sensitizers identified in ACD being Kathon CG, nickel sulfate and thiuram mix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Mie Suzuki
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | | | - Rosana Lazzarini
- Dermatology Clinic, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scherrer MAR, Abreu EPD, Rocha VB. Sensitization to rubber allergens among 1,162 patients tested with the Brazilian standard battery. An Bras Dermatol 2023; 98:105-107. [PMID: 36379822 PMCID: PMC9837648 DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erica Possa de Abreu
- Service of Dermatology, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Vanessa Barreto Rocha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Uter W, Wilkinson SM, Aerts O, Bauer A, Borrego L, Brans R, Buhl T, Dickel H, Dugonik A, Filon FL, Garcìa PM, Giménez-Arnau A, Patruno C, Pesonen M, Pónyai G, Rustemeyer T, Schubert S, Schuttelaar MLA, Simon D, Stingeni L, Valiukevičienė S, Weisshaar E, Werfel T, Gonçalo M. Patch test results with the European baseline series, 2019/20-Joint European results of the ESSCA and the EBS working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC. Contact Dermatitis 2022; 87:343-355. [PMID: 35678309 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continual analyses of patch test results with the European baseline series (EBS) serve both contact allergy surveillance and auditing the value of included allergens. OBJECTIVES To present results of current EBS patch testing, obtained in 53 departments in 13 European countries during 2019 and 2020. METHODS Anonymised or pseudonymised individual data and partly aggregated data on demographic/clinical characteristics and patch test rest results with the EBS were prospectively collected and centrally pooled and analysed. RESULTS In 2019 and 2020, 22 581 patients were patch tested with the EBS. Sensitization to nickel remained most common (19.8 [19.2-20.4]% positivity [95% confidence interval]). Fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae yielded very similar results with 6.80 (6.43-7.19)% and 6.62 (6.25-7.00)% positivity, respectively. Formaldehyde at 2% aq. yielded almost one percentage point more positive reactions than 1% concentration (2.49 [2.16-2.85]% vs. 1.59 [1.33-1.88]); methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) and MI alone up to around 5% positives. Among the new additions, propolis was most commonly positive (3.48 [3.16-3.82]%), followed by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2.32 [2.0-2.68]%). CONCLUSION Ongoing surveillance on the prevalence of contact sensitization contributes to an up-to-date baseline series containing the most frequent and/or relevant contact sensitizers for routine patch testing in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Mark Wilkinson
- Dermatology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Olivier Aerts
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) and Research group Immunology, Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Leopoldo Borrego
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Richard Brans
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Timo Buhl
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Aleksandra Dugonik
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Francesca Larese Filon
- Department of Public Health, Occupational Medicine, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Ana Giménez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar, Institut Mar d´Investigacions Mèdiques, Universitat Pompeu Fabra de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cataldo Patruno
- Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Maria Pesonen
- Division Occupational Medicine, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Györgyi Pónyai
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Dermato-oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steffen Schubert
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marie-L A Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dagmar Simon
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luca Stingeni
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Skaidra Valiukevičienė
- Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fonacier L, Frankel D, Mawhirt S. Contact allergens for the allergist. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2022; 128:629-644. [PMID: 35346877 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this article is to provide an overview and describe typically encountered skin contact allergens implicated in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). DATA SOURCES Published literature obtained through textbooks, online PubMed, and Google Scholar database searches, author photography, and adapted figures were used. STUDY SELECTIONS Studies on the evaluation of ACD and specific skin contact allergens were selected, with a focus on original research articles and clinical reviews. RESULTS Major classifications of common contact allergens include the following: (1) fragrances, (2) preservatives, (3) excipients, (4) rubber chemicals, (5) textile dyes, (6) topical medications, and (6) metals and other biomedical device components. The dermatitis distribution can aid in identifying the suspected contact allergen culprit. Certain contact allergens have features that are important to consider in the patch testing (PT) interpretation; these include possible irritant reactions, false-negative reactions or missed detection, and delayed reactions. Fragrances, preservatives, and excipients are culprits in personal products and facial or neck dermatitis. Patch testing with fragrances, preservatives, and patient-supplied products requires careful interpretation. Hand or foot dermatitis may be attributed to rubber chemicals or textile dyes. The management of topical corticosteroid contact allergy is guided on the basis of structural group classifications. Metal sensitization has been associated with dermatitis or biomedical device complications. CONCLUSION Each skin contact allergen has unique characteristics with regard to the dermatitis clinical presentation and potential PT nuances. These features are critical to recognize in the evaluation of ACD and PT interpretation and clinical relevance, leading to an accurate diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luz Fonacier
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, New York; New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York.
| | - David Frankel
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, New York
| | - Stephanie Mawhirt
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, New York; New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Allergic contact dermatitis to rubber accelerators in protective gloves: Problems, challenges, and solutions for occupational skin protection. Allergol Select 2021; 5:335-344. [PMID: 34734158 PMCID: PMC8561832 DOI: 10.5414/alx02265e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Protective gloves are an elementary component of personal protective equipment in many occupations and are intended to protect the hands from various hazards (e.g., wetness, chemicals, mechanical forces, or thermal stress). This is particularly important when other occupational safety measures (e.g., technical-organizational measures) cannot be implemented or are insufficient. However, it is not uncommon for protective gloves themselves to become a problem, as some of their ingredients (e.g., rubber accelerators) can cause allergic reactions. Accelerators in rubber gloves include thiurams, dithiocarbamates, thiazoles, guanidines, and thioureas. If no alternative means of protection are available, this may even result in abandoning the profession. This article is about rubber accelerators, which are often contained in protective gloves made of different rubber materials (e.g., natural rubber (latex) and nitrile rubber) and may cause delayed-type allergies, as well as related challenges, problems, and solutions for occupational skin protection.
Collapse
|
10
|
Contact Dermatitis Due to Boxing Gloves. Dermatitis 2021; 32:e107-e108. [PMID: 34405835 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Seine AJ, Baird EA, Chan L, Davis A, Greig D, Judd LE, Mahon C, Oakley A, Rademaker M, Reiche L, Stanway AD, Cheng HS. A baseline patch test series for New Zealand. Australas J Dermatol 2021; 62:489-495. [PMID: 34293187 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.13673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patch testing is the gold standard diagnostic test for allergic contact dermatitis and needs to be relevant to the region and the population being tested. The aim of this study was to develop a specific New Zealand baseline series (NZBS). METHOD We performed a retrospective case note review of patients attending four regional patch test centres between 2008 and 2020. Demographic and diagnostic information was collected for each patient along with results of patch testing. Using the results of this review, a group of 11 dermatologists with an interest in contact dermatitis agreed on a core group of allergens for inclusion in an NZBS, based on the frequency of positive reactions and allergens of interest. The remaining potential allergens were ranked by each dermatologist using an online questionnaire, with inclusion in the final NZBS by consensus. RESULTS Results from 2402 patients (67% female, mean age 44 years) from Auckland, Wellington, Palmerston North and Christchurch were collated. The 10 most frequent positive (relevant and non-relevant) allergens were nickel sulfate (22.0%), fragrance mix I (8.6%), cobalt chloride (7.3%), Myroxylon pereirae (5.6%), colophonium (5.1%), p-phenylenediamine (4.9%), methylisothiazolinone/methylchloroisothiazolinone (4.1%), fragrance mix II (3.9%), potassium dichromate (3.5%) and methylisothiazolinone (3.4%). Based on these results, a core series of 30 allergens was developed, with an additional 30 allergens added to form the extended series (total 60 allergens). CONCLUSION The baseline series of patch test allergens for routine use in New Zealand (NZBS) is based on national patch test data and expert consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian J Seine
- Department of Dermatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Lydia Chan
- Department of Dermatology, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | - Deborah Greig
- Department of Dermatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Dermatology, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Caroline Mahon
- Department of Dermatology, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.,University of Otago, Christchurch School of Medicine, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Amanda Oakley
- Department of Dermatology, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.,Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland's Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences Hamilton, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Marius Rademaker
- Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland's Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences Hamilton, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Harriet S Cheng
- Department of Dermatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Uter W, Zetzmann A, Ofenloch R, Schliemann S, Bruze M, Gonçalo M, Naldi L, Schuttelaar MLA, Svensson Å, Elsner P. Prevalence of contact allergies in the population compared to a tertiary referral patch test clinic in Jena/Germany. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 85:563-571. [PMID: 34184275 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The contact allergy prevalences in patch-tested patients are usually higher than those in the population, owing to morbidity-driven selection. OBJECTIVES To examine the differences between two samples, one from the population, one from the patch test clinic, in one area of Germany (Jena, Thuringia). METHODS Between August 2008 and October 2011, a total of 519 participants of the population-based european dermato-epidemiology network (EDEN) fragrance study were patch tested in Jena using a TRUE Test baseline series extended with some pet.-based (fragrance) allergen preparations. Between 2007 and 2012 (inclusive), 1906 routine patients were patch tested for suspected allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in the Jena University Hospital Department; of these 1694 (83.2%) with the German baseline series using pet./aq.-based, investigator-loaded allergens. RESULTS In the population (clinical) sample, 19.6% (41.1%) were sensitized to at least one of the allergens considered. The most common baseline series allergens in the population/clinical sample were nickel (10.5%/13.2%), fragrance mix (FM) II (2.9%/6.7%), FM I (2.3%/8.3%), and cobalt (1.6%/5%). The clinical sample was slightly older (71.5% vs 55.9% age 40+) and included less males (36% vs 49.3%). CONCLUSIONS Results are quite similar, although prevalences are usually higher in the clinical setting, with the exception of p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anica Zetzmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Robert Ofenloch
- Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Clinic of Dermatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Luigi Naldi
- Department of Dermatology, AULSS8 Ospedale San Bortolo di Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy.,Centro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Åke Svensson
- Department of Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Peter Elsner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Patch Test Results to European Baseline Series in Turkey: A Prospective and Multicenter Study. Dermatitis 2021; 32:397-405. [PMID: 33731647 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patch testing with the European Baseline Series (EBS) is an essential diagnostic tool for the assessment of allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE The aims of the study were to describe the most common contact allergens identified with patch testing in Turkey and to establish the distribution of contact allergens among different regions in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twelve centers consisting of tertiary health care institutions were included in the study. A total of 1169 patients were patch tested with the EBS from 2015 to 2017. RESULTS A total of 596 patients (51.0%) had 1 or more positive patch test reactions to the EBS. A total of 30.2% (n = 353) of those tested had clinical relevance. Contact sensitivity was more common in young patients. The most common 10 allergens were nickel sulfate (20.4%), followed by textile dye mix (8.6%), cobalt chloride (8.3%), potassium dichromate (8.0%), p-phenylenediamine base (4.5%), balsam of Peru (4.3%), methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (3.8%), thiuram mix (3.6%), fragrance mix I (3.0%), and methylisothiazolinone (2.9%). CONCLUSIONS This study provides a comprehensive profile of patch test results with the EBS in Turkey. An ongoing decrease in contact allergy to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone was observed. Textile dye mix and p-phenylenediamine are beginning to pose a new risk in Turkey.
Collapse
|
14
|
Contact Allergy to Plastic Materials and Glues. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
15
|
The European Baseline Series. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
16
|
|
17
|
Aalto-Korte K. Contact Allergy to Protective Gloves. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_74] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
18
|
Brans R, Jakasa I, Goc S, John SM, Kezic S. Stratum corneum levels of inflammatory mediators and natural moisturizing factor in patch test reactions to thiurams and fragrances and their possible role in discrimination between irritant and allergic reactions to hapten mixtures. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 84:299-307. [PMID: 33222241 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patch test (PT) reactions to thiuram mix (TM) and fragrance mix (FM) I or II without concomitant reactions to their single constituents are potentially caused by the irritant properties of the mixes. OBJECTIVE Comparing inflammatory profiles of PT reactions to TM, FM I, FM II, and their constituents and assessing their potential in discrimination of irritant and allergic reactions. PATIENTS AND METHODS Levels of 14 cytokines and natural moisturizing factor (NMF) were determined in stratum corneum samples collected from PT reactions to TM, FM I or II, their constituents, and petrolatum (pet.) control sites in 36 individuals. RESULTS Levels of interleukin (IL)-16, chemokine (CXC motif) ligand (CXCL) 8, CXCL10, chemokine (CC motif) ligand (CCL) 17, and CCL22 were significantly increased in reactions (+, ++) to thiurams and fragrances compared to their petrolatum. controls, except for PT reactions to FM I/II with negative breakdown testing in which, however, decreased levels of NMF were observed. In doubtful reactions to FM I/II with negative breakdown testing, NMF was significantly lower than in petrolatum controls. CONCLUSIONS PT reactions to thiurams and fragrances indicate a Th2-skewed inflammation. The inflammatory profiles suggest that weak or doubtful FM I/II reactions without accompanying reaction to a constituent were irritant. IL-16 might be suitable to distinguish irritant from allergic reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Brans
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Ivone Jakasa
- Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Sanja Goc
- Department for Immunochemistry and Glycobiology, Institute for the Application of Nuclear Energy - INEP, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Swen M John
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Sanja Kezic
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Patch Testing of Mercaptobenzothiazole and Mercapto Mix: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience, 1994-2016. Dermatitis 2020; 32:232-244. [PMID: 33273233 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mercapto compounds are a category of rubber accelerators that may cause allergic contact dermatitis. This study characterizes patch test reactions to mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) and mercapto mix (MM) in a large North American population. METHODS The 1994-2016 North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series data were analyzed. Patients with allergic reactions to either MBT or MM (mercapto+) were included. The following characteristics were analyzed: strength of reaction, clinical and occupational relevance, coreactivity with other rubber accelerators, and sources of exposure. RESULTS A total of 49,795 patients were tested to mercapto compounds from 1994 to 2016; 633 (1.3%) had positive reactions to MBT and/or MM. The frequency to both MBT and MM significantly decreased over time (P < 0.0001). Mercapto+ patients were significantly more likely to be male, have occupationally related skin disease, and report involvement of the hands and/or feet (P < 0.0001). They were significantly less likely to have face, scalp/ears/neck, or trunk involvement (P ≤ 0.0001). There was significant coreactivity with carba mix (23.4%) and thiuram mix (32.5%). Mercaptobenzothiazole and MM reactions were frequently clinically (81.7% and 83.5%, respectively) and occupationally relevant (29.8% and 33.4%, respectively). Gloves were the most common source (31.3% and 30.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Patch test positivity to mercapto compounds significantly decreased from 1994 to 2016 but remains clinically and occupationally relevant.
Collapse
|
20
|
Positive Patch Test Reactions to Carba Mix and Thiuram Mix: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience (1994-2016). Dermatitis 2020; 32:173-184. [PMID: 33273217 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE This study characterizes concomitant reactions to carba mix (CM) and thiuram mix (TM) in a large North American population. Because thiurams and dithiocarbamates have structural similarity, concomitant reactions are expected. METHODS The 1994-2016 North American Contact Dermatitis Group data were analyzed. Patients with a final reaction interpreted as "allergic" to either CM or TM were included. RESULTS A total of 49,758 patients were tested to both CM and TM. A total of 3437 (6.9%) had positive reactions to CM and/or TM including the following groups: CM+ only (n = 1403, 40.8%), TM+ only (n = 1068, 31.0%), or both (n = 966, 28.1%). A total of 47.5% of TM+ patients were positive to CM and 40.8% of CM+ patients were positive to TM. Male sex, occupationally related dermatitis, and hand involvement were significantly more common in individuals positive to CM and/or TM as compared with those who were negative (P < 0.0001). More than 80% of CM+/TM+ reactions were currently relevant. Gloves were the most common source of CM and TM; clothing and footwear were also frequent. CONCLUSIONS Carba mix and TM remain important, clinically relevant allergens. Although significant concomitant reaction frequency was demonstrated, more than half of the patients reacting to either CM or TM would have been missed if both had not been tested, underscoring the importance of testing to both.
Collapse
|
21
|
The Effect of Atopy in the Prevalence of Contact Sensitization: The Experience of a Greek Referral Center. Dermatol Res Pract 2020; 2020:3946084. [PMID: 33133180 PMCID: PMC7568788 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3946084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Contact dermatitis is a well-known skin condition, which is related to stimuli and environmental exposure to chemicals, affecting all ages as well as both genders. In the present work, we attempt to investigate the patterns of contact sensitization, with respect to the personal history of atopy (AT), in Greece in a large number of allergens, using patch testing. The retrospective analysis included clinical routine data of 1978 patients collected from 2014 to 2016 in the Laboratory of Patch Testing, National Referral Centre of Occupational Dermatoses. Sensitization, in all cases, was tested with 28 allergens of the European baseline series as adjusted to our local circumstances and clinical experience. A total population of 1978 patients was evaluated, with a male-to-female ratio of 0.45 (1359 females/619 males). From our patient cohort, 693 (35%) patients were evaluated with a history of atopy, while 1285 (65%) were nonatopic. The five most prevalent allergens in the total population without AT were nickel sulphate 5% (15.47%), fragrance mix (I) 8% (9.10%), balsam of Peru (6.47%), cobalt chloride 1% (4.70%), and thiomersal 0.1% (4.10%). Respectively, in the total population with AT, the five most prevalent allergens were nickel sulphate 5% (10.36%), fragrance mix (I) 8% (5.11%), balsam of Peru (3.29%), thiomersal 0.1% (3.03%), and cobalt chloride 1% (2.78%). Contact dermatitis surveillance is of great importance towards the clinical and systematic understanding of the disease. Further studies should be directed towards that end, in order to facilitate more effective health policies.
Collapse
|
22
|
Horton E, Uter W, Geier J, Ballmer-Weber B, Bauer A, Bircher A, Dickel H, Giménez-Arnau A, Gonçalo M, John SM, Mahler V, Schuttelaar MLA, Simon D, Sanchez-Perez J, Rustemeyer T, Weisshaar E, Wilkinson M. Developing a cosmetic series: Results from the ESSCA network, 2009-2018. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 84:82-94. [PMID: 32845019 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is considerable variability across European patch test centres as to which allergens are included in local and national cosmetics series. OBJECTIVES To propose a standardized, evidence-based cosmetic series for Europe based on up-to-date analysis of relevant contact allergens. METHODS We collated data from the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) from 2009 to 2018 to determine which cosmetic allergens produce a high yield of contact allergy. Contact allergens with a prevalence of >0.3% that were considered relevant were included. Rare contact allergens were excluded if deemed no longer relevant or added to a supplemental cosmetic series for further analysis. RESULTS Sensitization prevalences of 39 cosmetic contact allergens were tabulated. Thirty of these allergens yielded >0.3% positive reactions and are therefore included in our proposed European cosmetic series. Six were considered no longer relevant and therefore excluded. Three were included in a supplementary European cosmetic series. An additional nine allergens were included in either the core or supplemental European cosmetic series following literature review. CONCLUSION We have derived a potential European cosmetic series based upon the above methods. This will require ongoing investigation based upon the changing exposure profiles of cosmetic allergens as well as new and evolving substances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Horton
- Department of Dermatology, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Barbara Ballmer-Weber
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Dermatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andreas Bircher
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy Unit, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ana Giménez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar, Institut Mar d'Investigacions Mediques, Universitat Autónoma, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Department of Dermatology, Clinic of Dermatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Swen Malte John
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), University of Osnabruck, Lower Saxony Institute for Occupational Dermatology (NIB), Osnabruck, Germany
| | - Vera Mahler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany
| | - Marie L A Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dagmar Simon
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark Wilkinson
- Department of Dermatology, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Patch Testing to Diphenylguanidine by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (2013–2016). Dermatitis 2020; 31:350-358. [DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
24
|
Uter W, Gefeller O, Mahler V, Geier J. Trends and current spectrum of contact allergy in Central Europe: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2007–2018*. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:857-865. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W. Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology University of Erlangen/Nürnberg Erlangen Germany
| | - O. Gefeller
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology University of Erlangen/Nürnberg Erlangen Germany
| | - V. Mahler
- Paul Ehrlich Institut Langen Germany
| | - J. Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology University Medical Center Göttingen Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Contact Allergy to Plastic Materials and Glues. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_79-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
26
|
The European Baseline Series. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_64-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
27
|
Allergic Reactions to Rubber Components. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_87-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
28
|
Aalto-Korte K. Contact Allergy to Protective Gloves. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_74-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
29
|
|
30
|
Sukakul T, Chaweekulrat P, Limphoka P, Boonchai W. Changing trends of contact allergens in Thailand: A 12‐year retrospective study. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 81:124-129. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thanisorn Sukakul
- Department of DermatologyFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Pichanee Chaweekulrat
- Department of DermatologyFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Pichaya Limphoka
- Department of DermatologyFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Waranya Boonchai
- Department of DermatologyFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hamnerius N, Pontén A, Björk J, Persson C, Bergendorff O. Skin exposure to the rubber accelerator diphenylguanidine in medical gloves-An experimental study. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 81:9-16. [PMID: 30724364 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Revised: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dermatitis caused by occupational contact allergy to rubber additives such as diphenylguanidine (DPG) in medical gloves is a hazard for healthcare workers. Both the duration of exposure to medical gloves and the number of gloves used per day vary. The use of alcoholic skin disinfectants before glove donning is mandatory. OBJECTIVES To assess whether skin exposure to the rubber accelerator DPG released from glove material is influenced by alcoholic hand disinfectants, time, and pH. METHODS With the use of ethanol washes, the amount of DPG left on the hands after wearing of gloves for 60 minutes was measured, and comparisons between hands exposed and not exposed to alcoholic disinfectant before glove donning were made. With the use of artificial sweat buffered at pH 4, 5, and 6, DPG release from the insides of gloves at different times was measured. RESULTS The use of alcoholic disinfectant prior to polyisoprene glove donning increased the amount of DPG recovered from the hands. Of the DPG released from polyisoprene gloves into artificial sweat, almost 84% was released within 10 minutes. pH did not influence the rate of release. CONCLUSIONS The use of alcoholic disinfectant increased skin exposure to the rubber accelerator DPG. Even a short duration of use of gloves results in substantial exposure to DPG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Hamnerius
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ann Pontén
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jonas Björk
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christina Persson
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ola Bergendorff
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gloves. Contact Dermatitis 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_74-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
33
|
Hamnerius N, Svedman C, Bergendorff O, Björk J, Bruze M, Engfeldt M, Pontén A. Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 79:149-156. [PMID: 29923205 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand eczema (HE) in healthcare workers (HCWs) is common. Besides wet work, healthcare work also implies exposure to contact allergens. OBJECTIVES To assess HE and contact allergy related to occupational exposures in HCWs. METHODS In a cross-sectional study, 311 HCWs with HE within the preceding 12 months and a control group of 114 HCWs without HE were investigated with the baseline series and a special patch test series based on substances found in the gloves, soaps, alcoholic hand disinfectants and hand creams provided at the hospitals. RESULTS Contact allergy to rubber additives was significantly more common in HCWs with HE (6%) than in HCWs without HE (1%, P = .02). The corresponding percentages for fragrances were 11% and 3%, respectively (P = .004). Occupational HE was found in 193 of 311 (62%) HCWs. Of these, 22 of 193 (11%) had occupational allergic contact dermatitis, including 17 with glove-related rubber contact allergy. Contact allergy to diphenylguanidine was as common as contact allergy to thiurams. Occupational contact allergy to rubber additives was significantly associated with sick-leave related to HE. CONCLUSION Contact allergy to rubber additives in medical gloves is the most common cause of occupational allergic contact dermatitis in HCWs. Aimed patch testing with relevant rubber additives is mandatory when HE in HCWs is investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Hamnerius
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ola Bergendorff
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jonas Björk
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Malin Engfeldt
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ann Pontén
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Uter W, Werfel T, White IR, Johansen JD. Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:ijerph15061108. [PMID: 29844295 PMCID: PMC6025382 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15061108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Revised: 05/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Contact allergy is common, affecting 27% of the general population in Europe. Original publications, including case reports, published since 2016 (inclusive) were identified with the aim of collating a full review of current problems in the field. To this end, a literature search employing methods of systematic reviewing was performed in the Medline® and Web of Science™ databases on 28 January 2018, using the search terms (“contact sensitization” or “contact allergy”). Of 446 non-duplicate publications identified by above search, 147 were excluded based on scrutiny of title, abstract and key words. Of the remaining 299 examined in full text, 291 were deemed appropriate for inclusion, and main findings were summarised in topic sections. In conclusion, diverse sources of exposures to chemicals of widely-differing types and structures, continue to induce sensitisation in man and may result in allergic contact dermatitis. Many of the chemicals are “evergreen” but others are “newcomers”. Vigilance and proper investigation (patch testing) are required to detect and inform of the presence of these haptens to which our populations remain exposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
| | - Ian R White
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - Jeanne D Johansen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, National Allergy Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wilkinson M, Gallo R, Goossens A, Johansen JD, Rustemeyer T, Sánchez-Pérez J, Schuttelaar ML, Uter W. A proposal to create an extension to the European baseline series. Contact Dermatitis 2017; 78:101-108. [PMID: 29194657 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2017] [Revised: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current European baseline series consists of 30 allergens, and was last updated in 2015. OBJECTIVES To use data from the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) to propose an extension to the European baseline series in response to changes in environmental exposures. METHODS Data from departmental and national extensions to the baseline series, together with some temporary additions from departments contributing to the ESSCA, were collated during 2013-2014. RESULTS In total, 31689 patients were patch tested in 46 European departments. Many departments and national groups already consider the current European baseline series to be a suboptimal screen, and use their own extensions to it. The haptens tested are heterogeneous, although there are some consistent themes. Potential haptens to include in an extension to the European baseline series comprise sodium metabisulfite, formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, additional markers of fragrance allergy, propolis, Compositae mix, and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. CONCLUSION In combination with other published work from the ESSCA, changes to the current European baseline series are proposed for discussion. As well as addition of the allergens listed above, it is suggested that primin and clioquinol should be deleted from the series, owing to reduced environmental exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Wilkinson
- Department of Dermatology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK
| | - Rosella Gallo
- Clinica Dermatologica, Department of Health Sciences (DiSSAL), Università di Genova, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - An Goossens
- Contact Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeanne D Johansen
- Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology, Free University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marie L Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Uter W, Amario-Hita J, Balato A, Ballmer-Weber B, Bauer A, Belloni Fortina A, Bircher A, Chowdhury M, Cooper S, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Dugonik A, Gallo R, Giménez-Arnau A, Johansen J, John S, Kieć-Świerczyńska M, Kmecl T, Kręcisz B, Larese Filon F, Mahler V, Pesonen M, Rustemeyer T, Sadowska-Przytocka A, Sánchez-Pérez J, Schliemann S, Schuttelaar M, Simon D, Spiewak R, Valiukevičienė S, Weisshaar E, White I, Wilkinson S. European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): results with the European baseline series, 2013/14. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- W. Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics; Biometry and Epidemiology; Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nürnberg; Erlangen Germany
| | - J.C. Amario-Hita
- Department of Dermatology; University Hospital of Puerto Real; Cádiz Spain
| | - A. Balato
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences; University of Naples Federico II; Napoli Italy
| | - B. Ballmer-Weber
- Department of Dermatology; University Hospital Zürich; Zürich Switzerland
- Centre for Dermatology and Allergology; Kantonsspital Luzern; Luzern Switzerland
| | - A. Bauer
- Department of Dermatology; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; Technical University of Dresden; Dresden Germany
| | - A. Belloni Fortina
- Pediatric Dermatology Unit; Department of Medicine DIMED; University of Padova; Padova Italy
| | - A. Bircher
- Allergology Unit; Department of Dermatology; University Hospital Basel; Basel Switzerland
| | - M.M.U. Chowdhury
- The Welsh Institute of Dermatology; University Hospital of Wales; Cardiff UK
| | | | | | - A. Dugonik
- Department of Dermatology; University Medical Center Maribor; Maribor Slovenia
| | - R. Gallo
- Clinica Dermatologica; IRCCS - AOU San Martino - IST and Department of Health Sciences; University of Genoa; Genoa Italy
| | - A. Giménez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology; Hospital del Mar; Universitat Autónoma; Barcelona Spain
| | - J.D. Johansen
- National Allergy Centre/Department of Dermatology; Gentofte Hospital; University of Copenhagen; Hellerup Denmark
| | - S.M. John
- Department of Dermatology; Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm); University of Osnabrück; Lower Saxony Institute for Occupational Dermatology (NIB); Osnabrück Germany
| | - M. Kieć-Świerczyńska
- Department of Dermatology; Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine; Łodz Poland
| | - T. Kmecl
- Department of Dermatology; General Hospital Celje; Celje Slovenia
| | - B. Kręcisz
- Department of Dermatology; Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine; Łodz Poland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Science; Institute of Medical Science; Jan Kochanowski University; Kielce Poland
| | - F. Larese Filon
- Department of Public Health, Occupational Medicine; University of Trieste; Trieste Italy
| | - V. Mahler
- Department of Dermatology; University Hospital Erlangen; Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg; Erlangen Germany
| | - M. Pesonen
- Occupational Medicine; Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH); Helsinki Finland
| | - T. Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology; Free University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | | - J. Sánchez-Pérez
- Department of Dermatology; Hospital Universitario la Princesa; Madrid Spain
| | - S. Schliemann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; University Hospital Jena; Jena Germany
| | - M.L. Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology; University Medical Centre Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - D. Simon
- Department of Dermatology; Inselspital; Bern University Hospital; University of Bern; Bern Switzerland
| | - R. Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology; Faculty of Pharmacy; Jagiellonian University Medical College; Krakow Poland
| | - S. Valiukevičienė
- Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases; Lithuanian University of Health Sciences; Kaunas Lithuania
| | - E. Weisshaar
- Department of Clinical Social Medicine; University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | - I.R. White
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology; Guy's Hospital; London UK
| | - S.M. Wilkinson
- Dermatology; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Leeds UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Warburton KL, Uter W, Geier J, Spiewak R, Mahler V, Crépy MN, Schuttelaar ML, Bauer A, Wilkinson M. Patch testing with rubber series in Europe: a critical review and recommendation. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 76:195-203. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2016] [Revised: 10/26/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology; University of Erlangen/Nürnberg; 91054 Erlangen Germany
| | - Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK); University Medical Centre; 37075 Goettingen Germany
| | - Radoslaw Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology; Jagiellonian University Medical College; 30-688 Krakow Poland
| | - Vera Mahler
- Department of Dermatology; University Hospital of Erlangen; 91054 Erlangen Germany
| | - Marie-Noëlle Crépy
- Department of Occupational Diseases, Centre Hôtel-Dieu, AP-HP; Paris University Hospital; 75004 Paris France
| | - Marie Louise Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology; University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen; 9713 GZ Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Allergy Centre, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; Technical University Dresden; 01307 Dresden Germany
| | - Mark Wilkinson
- Department of Dermatology; Chapel Allerton Hospital; Leeds LS7 4SA UK
| |
Collapse
|