1
|
Ruparel N, Islas-Robles A, Hilberer A, Cantrell K, Madrid M, Ryan C, Gerberick GF, Persaud R. Deriving a point of departure for assessing the skin sensitization risk of wearable device constituents with in vitro methods. Food Chem Toxicol 2024; 189:114725. [PMID: 38744418 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2024.114725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Wearable devices are in contact with the skin for extended periods. As such, the device constituents should be evaluated for their skin sensitization potential, and a Point of Departure (PoD) should be derived to conduct a proper risk assessment. Without historical in vivo data, the PoD must be derived with New Approach Methods (NAMs). To accomplish this, regression models trained on LLNA data that use data inputs from OECD-validated in vitro tests were used to derive a predicted EC3 value, the LLNA value used to classify skin sensitization potency, for three adhesive monomers (Isobornyl acrylate (IBOA), N, N- Dimethylacrylamide (NNDMA), and Acryloylmorpholine (ACMO) and one dye (Solvent Orange 60 (SO60)). These chemicals can be used as constituents of wearable devices and have been associated with causing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Using kinetic DPRA and KeratinoSens™ data, the PoDs obtained with the regression model were 180, 215, 1535, and 8325 μg/cm2 for IBOA, SO60, ACMO, and NNDMA, respectively. The PoDs derived with the regression model using NAMs data will enable a proper skin sensitization risk assessment without using animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kayla Cantrell
- Institute for In vitro Sciences Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Megan Madrid
- Institute for In vitro Sciences Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
von Kobyletzki LB, Ulriksdotter J, Sukakul T, Aerts O, Agner T, Buhl T, Bruze M, Foti C, Gimenez-Arnau A, Gonçalo M, Hamnerius N, Johansen JD, Rustemeyer T, Stingeni L, Wilkinson M, Svedman C. Prevalence of dermatitis including allergic contact dermatitis from medical devices used by children and adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and questionnaire study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024; 38:1329-1346. [PMID: 38400603 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Use of medical devices (MDs), that is, glucose sensors and insulin pumps, in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) has proven an enormous advantage for disease control. Adverse skin reactions from these MDs may however hamper compliance. The objective of this study was to systematically review and analyse studies assessing the prevalence and incidence of dermatitis, including allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) related to MDs used in patients with T1D and to compare referral routes and the clinical investigation routines between clinics being part of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG). A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases of full-text studies reporting incidence and prevalence of dermatitis in persons with T1D using MDs was conducted until December 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. The inventory performed at EECRDG clinics focused on referral routes, patient numbers and the diagnostic process. Among the 3145 screened abstracts, 39 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies included data on children only, 14 studies were on adults and nine studies reported data on both children and adults. Participants were exposed to a broad range of devices. Skin reactions were rarely specified. It was found that both the diagnostic process and referral routes differ in different centres. Further data on the prevalence of skin reactions related to MDs in individuals with T1D is needed and particularly studies where the skin reactions are correctly diagnosed. A correct diagnosis is delayed or hampered by the fact that, at present, the actual substances within the MDs are not declared, are changed without notice and the commercially available test materials are not adequately updated. Within Europe, routines for referral should be made more standardized to improve the diagnostic procedure when investigating patients with possible ACD from MDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L B von Kobyletzki
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - J Ulriksdotter
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - T Sukakul
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - O Aerts
- Contact Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) and Research Group Immunology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - T Agner
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Buhl
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - M Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - C Foti
- Section of Dermatology, DIMEPREJ Department, University "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - A Gimenez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar and Research Institute de Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Gonçalo
- Clinic of Dermatology, Coimbra University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - N Hamnerius
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - J D Johansen
- Department of Dermatology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Rustemeyer
- Dermato-Allergology and Occupational Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Stingeni
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - M Wilkinson
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - C Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
John SM, Bonertz A, Zimmer J, Aerts O, Bauer A, Bova M, Brans R, Del Giacco S, Dickel H, Corazza M, Crépy MN, Gallo R, Garcia-Abujeta JL, Giménez-Arnau AM, Klimek L, Lepoittevin JP, Ljubojević Hadžavdić S, Matura M, Mortz CG, Özkaya E, Pesonen M, Raison-Peyron N, Rustemeyer T, Skudlik C, Spiewak R, Stingeni L, Suomela S, Symanzik C, Taylor J, Torres M, Uter W, White I, Wilkinson M, Mahler V, Johansen JD. Severely compromised supply of patch test allergens in Europe hampers adequate diagnosis of occupational and non-occupational contact allergy. A European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD), European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) task forces 'Contact Dermatitis' and 'Occupational Skin Disease' position paper. Contact Dermatitis 2024. [PMID: 38812248 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Patch testing is the only clinically applicable diagnostic method for Type IV allergy. The availability of Type IV patch test (PT) allergens in Europe, however, is currently scarce. This severely compromises adequate diagnostics of contact allergy, leading to serious consequences for the affected patients. Against this background, the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) has created a task force (TF) (i) to explore the current availability of PT substances in different member states, (ii) to highlight some of the unique characteristics of Type IV vs. other allergens and (iii) to suggest ways forward to promote and ensure availability of high-quality patch testing substances for the diagnosis of Type IV allergies throughout Europe. The suggestions of the TF on how to improve the availability of PT allergens are supported by the ESCD, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and intend to provide potential means to resolve the present medical crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swen Malte John
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) and Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Andreas Bonertz
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Allergology Division, Langen, Germany
| | - Julia Zimmer
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Allergology Division, Langen, Germany
| | - Olivier Aerts
- University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Allergy Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maria Bova
- Department of Internal Medicine, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Richard Brans
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) and Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Stefano Del Giacco
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health and Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital "Duilio Casula", University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Monica Corazza
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Marie-Noëlle Crépy
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Diseases, University Hospital of Centre of Paris, Hotel-Dieu Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Rosella Gallo
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Ana Maria Giménez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Suzana Ljubojević Hadžavdić
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Mihaly Matura
- Department of Dermatology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Charlotte Gotthard Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Esen Özkaya
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maria Pesonen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Occupational Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Nadia Raison-Peyron
- Department of Dermatology, Montpellier University Hospital and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology-Allergology and Occupational Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christoph Skudlik
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) and Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Radoslaw Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Luca Stingeni
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sari Suomela
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Occupational Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Cara Symanzik
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) and Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - James Taylor
- Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Maria Torres
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga, UMA, RETICS ARADyAL, BIONAND, Malaga, Spain
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ian White
- Department of Cutaneous Allergy, St. John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Vera Mahler
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Allergology Division, Langen, Germany
| | - Jeanne Duus Johansen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Skin and Allergy, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mowitz M, Hosseini S, Siemund I, Ulriksdotter J, Svedman C. New device, 'old' allergens. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by the Dexcom G7 glucose sensor. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 90:495-500. [PMID: 38316128 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) has been reported as an adverse effect from the use of several glucose sensors and insulin pumps from different manufacturers. Isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) has been identified as a major culprit sensitizer, but also other acrylates and (modified) colophonium have been reported as causes of ACD. OBJECTIVES To report the two first cases diagnosed with ACD caused by the Dexcom G7 (DG7) glucose sensor. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two children with suspected ACD from DG7 were patch tested with our medical device series with an addition of selected test preparations including two variants of modified colophonium - methyl hydrogenated rosinate (MHR) and glyceryl hydrogenated rosinate (GHR). Both patients were also tested with acetone extracts made from different parts of the DG7 sensor. The extracts were analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). RESULTS Both patients tested positive to IBOA, hydroabietyl alcohol and GHR. In addition, patient 1 had a positive reaction to MHR and patient 2 had a positive reaction to colophonium. The GC-MS analyses showed the presence of IBOA and colophonium-related substances in the DG7 extracts. CONCLUSIONS Both patients were diagnosed with contact allergy to well-known medical device-related sensitizers. The presence of IBOA and (modified) colophonium in a newly introduced (on the Swedish market in 2023) glucose sensor is remarkable and indicates an inadequate toxicological assessment of the materials used in the sensor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sarah Hosseini
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Siemund
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Josefin Ulriksdotter
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ulriksdotter J, Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Ofenloch R, Svedman C. Contact Allergy to Allergens in the Swedish Baseline Series Overrepresented in Diabetes Patients with Skin Reactions to Medical Devices - A Retrospective Study from Southern Sweden. Acta Derm Venereol 2024; 104:adv19676. [PMID: 38551376 PMCID: PMC11000652 DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v104.19676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Allergic contact dermatitis is reported among individuals using continuous glucose monitoring systems and insulin pumps. The aim of this study was to describe contact allergy patterns for allergens in the Swedish baseline series and medical device-related allergens among users. Contact allergy to baseline series allergens and isobornyl acrylate was compared between diabetes patients and dermatitis patients patch-tested at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology during 2017 to 2020. Fifty- four diabetes patients and 2,567 dermatitis patients were included. The prevalence of contact allergy to fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix was significantly higher in diabetes patients compared with dermatitis patients. Of the diabetes patients 13.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.5% tested positive to sesquiterpene lactone mix (p < 0.001). Of the diabetes patients 7.4% and of the dermatitis patients 2.3% tested positive to fragrance mix II (p = 0.041). Of the diabetes patients 70.4% tested positive to medical device-related allergens. Of the diabetes patients 63.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.2% were allergic to isobornyl acrylate (p < 0.001). In conclusion, not only medical device-related contact allergies, but also contact allergy to baseline series allergens (fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix), is overrepresented in diabetes patients who use medical devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefin Ulriksdotter
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Dermatology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden .
| | - Thanisorn Sukakul
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Robert Ofenloch
- Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Velasco-Amador JP, Prados-Carmona Á, Navarro-Triviño FJ. [Translated article] Medical Devices in Patients With Diabetes and Contact Dermatitis. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2024; 115:T280-T287. [PMID: 38242434 DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The development and commercialization of glucose sensors and insulin pumps has revolutionized the management of diabetes. These devices have been linked to multiple cases of contact dermatitis in recent years, however, giving rise to a growing interest in identifying the sensitizing allergens. Isobornyl acrylate was clearly identified as one of the main allergens responsible for contact dermatitis among users of the FreeStyle glucose sensor and was subsequently removed from the product ingredients. Remarkably, however, it is still used in most other sensors on the market. The common adhesive ingredients colophony and abietic acid derivatives have also been shown to be sensitizing agents. New components under study, such as dipropylene glycol diacrylate, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, and triethylene glycol methacrylate have recently been identified as allergens, though they are not commercially available for clinical testing. The benefits offered by glucose sensors and insulin pumps may be offset by sensitization to product ingredients, in some cases forcing discontinuation and diminishing quality of life. Dermatologists should play a role in this clinical and research scenario, offering case-by-case guidance to endocrinologists on skin care and possible alternatives for patients with glucose sensors and insulin pumps who develop contact dermatitis. They should also collaborate with the manufacturers developing these devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Velasco-Amador
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
| | - Á Prados-Carmona
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
| | - F J Navarro-Triviño
- Unidad de Eczema de Contacto e Inmunoalergia, Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cichoń M, Myśliwiec M, Trzeciak M. Role of acrylates in the development of contact dermatitis in diabetic patients-A Polish dermatology tertiary centre experience. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 90:126-133. [PMID: 37840370 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, an increasing number of contact dermatitis cases triggered by acrylates contained in diabetes medical devices have been reported. Acrylates seem to play a major role in the development of irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in diabetic patients. OBJECTIVES To study a group of patients with contact dermatitis caused by diabetes medical devices with a focus on acrylates as possible allergens responsible for contact dermatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifteen patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and contact dermatitis from diabetic devices were patch tested to 25 acrylate allergens. RESULTS Three patients (20%) reacted to the following allergens: three patients reacted to isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) and one of them additionally to 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (2-HEA); results were of clinical relevance. All three patients were using insulin pumps and glucose sensors (GS)-in one patient contact dermatitis was towards the insulin pump and the GS, in one patient only towards the insulin pump and in one patient only towards the GS. Twelve patients (80%) did not show any skin reaction towards the allergens tested. CONCLUSION A majority of diabetic patients showed no reactions towards any acrylate allergen tested; yet, the presence of untested allergens must be kept in mind. IBOA proved to be a cause of ACD in diabetes patients. 2-HEA might be another culprit allergen, but its presence in the devices must first be confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikołaj Cichoń
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Małgorzata Myśliwiec
- Department of Paediatrics, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Magdalena Trzeciak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Passanisi S, Berg AK, Chobot A, Dos Santos TJ, Piona CA, Messer L, Lombardo F. First International Survey on Diabetes Providers' Assessment of Skin Reactions in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Using Technological Devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231206155. [PMID: 37846755 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231206155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in diabetes technological devices led to optimization of diabetes care; however, long-lasting skin exposure to devices may be accompanied by an increasing occurrence of cutaneous reactions. METHODS We used an open-link web-based survey to evaluate diabetes-care providers' viewpoint on prevalence, management practices, and knowledge related to skin reactions with the use of diabetes technological devices. A post hoc analysis was applied to investigate differences in the level of awareness on this topic in relation to the experience in diabetes technology. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five responses from 39 different countries were collected. Most respondents (69%) routinely examine patients' skin at each visit. All the preventive measures are not clear and, mainly, homogenously put into clinical practice. Contact dermatitis was the most frequently reported cutaneous complication due to diabetes devices, and its most common provocative causes are not yet fully known by diabetes-care providers. Almost half of the respondents (42%) had discussed the presence of harmful allergens contained in adhesives with device manufacturers. There is general agreement on the need to strengthen knowledge on dermatological complications. CONCLUSIONS Although diabetes-care providers are quite aware of the chance to develop skin reactions in people with diabetes using technological devices, there are still some unmet needs. Large follow-up studies and further dissemination tools are awaited to address the gaps revealed by our survey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Passanisi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi," University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Anna Korsgaard Berg
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Agata Chobot
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
| | | | - Claudia Anita Piona
- Pediatric Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Unit, Regional Center for Pediatric Diabetes, University City Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laurel Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Fortunato Lombardo
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi," University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Holt E, Nguyen H, Bispham J, Liu J, Chapman K, Grady M. Perceptions of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in the T1D Exchange Diabetes Registry: Satisfaction, Concerns, and Areas for Future Improvement. Clin Diabetes 2023; 42:104-115. [PMID: 38230340 PMCID: PMC10788666 DOI: 10.2337/cd23-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Manufacturers continue to improve performance and usability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems. As CGM becomes a standard of care, especially for people on insulin therapy, it is important to routinely gauge how satisfied people with diabetes are with this technology. This article describes survey feedback from a large cohort of people with diabetes using older and current CGM systems and highlights areas of current satisfaction, concern, and future system improvement.
Collapse
|
10
|
Cichoń M, Trzeciak M, Sokołowska-Wojdyło M, Nowicki RJ. Contact Dermatitis to Diabetes Medical Devices. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10697. [PMID: 37445875 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Skin adverse reactions to diabetes medical devices have been reported frequently over recent years. Adhesives attaching glucose sensors and continuous insulin infusion sets to the skin are proven to cause both allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Several allergens contained in adhesives and/or parts of medical devices are documented to cause allergic contact dermatitis, with acrylate chemicals being the most common culprit-especially isobornyl acrylate (IBOA), but also 2,2'-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate or cyanoacrylates. Epoxy resin, colophonium and nickel were also identified as causative allergens. However, repetitive occlusion, maceration of the skin and resulting disruption of the skin barrier seem to have an impact on the development of skin lesions as well. The purpose of this study is to highlight the burden of contact dermatitis triggered by diabetes medical devices and to show possible mechanisms responsible for the development of contact dermatitis in a group of diabetic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikołaj Cichoń
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Magdalena Trzeciak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Roman J Nowicki
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Enberg J, Hamnerius N, Mowitz M. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a new insulin pump system containing isobornyl acrylate. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 88:326-328. [PMID: 36607276 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Enberg
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Helsingborg's Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Nils Hamnerius
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Elbarbary NS, Simmons K, Buckingham B, Humayun KN, Johannsen J, Holl RW, Betz S, Mahmud FH. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Other complications and associated conditions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2022; 23:1451-1467. [PMID: 36537532 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Kimber Simmons
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Bruce Buckingham
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Khadija N Humayun
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Jesper Johannsen
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Reinhard W Holl
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Shana Betz
- Parent/Advocate for people with diabetes, Markham, Canada
| | - Farid H Mahmud
- Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Raison-Peyron N, Mowitz M, Dereure O, Svedman C. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in a Patient After Five Years of Use of Omnipod Insulin Pump. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:1342-1343. [PMID: 36048581 PMCID: PMC9445354 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221110578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Raison-Peyron
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
- Nadia Raison-Peyron, MD, Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier University, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Olivier Dereure
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alves da Silva C, Bregnhøj A, Mowitz M, Bruze M, Andersen KE, Sommerlund M. Contact dermatitis in children caused by diabetes devices. Contact Dermatitis 2022; 87:406-413. [PMID: 35634681 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insulin pump and glucose monitoring devices improve diabetes mellitus (DM) control and enhance patients' quality of life. However, a growing number of adverse cutaneous reactions related to the use of these devices has been reported. OBJECTIVE To investigate the culprits of localized contact dermatitis in pediatric patients with diabetes caused by insulin pump and glucose monitoring devices. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 15 pediatric patients patch tested as part of a clinical investigation for skin reactions associated with insulin pump and glucose monitoring devices RESULTS: Seven patients had positive patch test reactions to isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) and five had positive reactions to benzoyl peroxide (BP). Positive patch test reactions to materials from the glucose sensor and/or insulin pump were seen in 10 of the 15 patients. Three had positive reactions to adhesive remover wipe from Smith and Nephew Remove and four had reactions to EMLA plaster. CONCLUSION A high share of patients showed positive reactions to IBOA and/or their medical devices (insulin pumps or glucose devices). A third of patients showed positive reactions to benzoyl peroxide. The presence of additional unidentified allergens cannot be excluded, highlighting the importance of access to a full description of the chemical composition of the devices. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Bregnhøj
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Klaus Ejner Andersen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mette Sommerlund
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Allergic Contact Dermatitis, an Important Skin Reaction in Diabetes Device Users: A Systematic Review. Dermatitis 2022; 33:110-115. [PMID: 35245221 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Diabetes management has undergone many advances over the years, including the introduction of devices that allow patients to monitor blood glucose and administer insulin. Although these devices have improved patients' quality of life, they are associated with adverse reactions.A systematic literature search was performed up to May 2020 in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases, with no temporal restrictions. Articles were screened by title, abstract, and full text as needed. A manual search among the references of the included articles was also performed.Two hundred sixty-five articles were identified, and 50 studies met inclusion criteria. Several cases of allergic contact dermatitis due to the use of insulin infusion systems and blood glucose monitoring have been reported. Acrylates, methacrylates, and colophonium, as well as, in particular, isobornyl acrylate, represent the main allergens responsible.Skin reactions, in particular allergic contact dermatitis, are a very common adverse event caused by insulin pumps and glucose sensors, which may lead to discontinue the usage of these devices with serious consequences for the patients. Collaboration between specialists, specifically between dermatologists and diabetologists, with patients and manufacturers is essential for the correct management of diabetes devices and potential related skin reactions.
Collapse
|
17
|
Passanisi S, Salzano G, Lombardo F. Skin Involvement in Paediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev 2022; 18:e030921196145. [PMID: 34477525 DOI: 10.2174/1573399817666210903153837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Skin involvement is an overlooked aspect in the management of paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. A comprehensive search of published literature using the PubMed database was carried out using the following key terms: "children," "pediatric/paediatric patients," "skin," "skin disorders," "type 1 diabetes." Dermatological side effects are frequently observed among diabetic children and adolescents. Insulin-induced lipodystrophies and allergic contact dermatitis caused by insulin pumps or glycaemic sensors are the most common skin reactions in these patients. Furthermore, several diabetes-associated skin diseases such as necrobiosis lipoidica, granuloma annulare, vitiligo, and bullosis diabeticorum may already be present in paediatric patients. Paediatric diabetes specialists should pay attention to their patients' skin to recognize these disorders, identify the potential causes, and choose the most suitable treatment. Finally, the evaluation of skin concentrations of advanced glycation end-products using non-invasive diagnostic techniques may be used to assess the risk of chronic complications of diabetes as early as adolescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Passanisi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Salzano
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Fortunato Lombardo
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kamann S, Wagner N, Oppel E. Moderne Sensortechnik zur kontinuierlichen Glukosemessung: Anwendungseinschränkungen durch Kontaktallergien. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2021; 19:1715-1722. [PMID: 34894186 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14621_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicola Wagner
- Hautklinik, Universitätsklinik Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - Eva Oppel
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kamann S, Wagner N, Oppel E. Modern diabetes devices for continuous blood sugar measuring: Limitations due to contact allergies. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2021; 19:1715-1721. [PMID: 34751512 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
During the past years, diabetes diseases have increased significantly worldwide. However, new technologies such as continuous glucose measurement using a subcutaneous sensor are developing just as rapidly. A continuous improvement in insulin pump therapy is also contributing to an improved quality of life. A common feature of these modern devices for diabetes therapy is that they remain fixed in place on the skin for several days. In recent years, skin reactions, in particular pronounced contact dermatitis due to the devices and their adhesives have been increasingly reported. In particular, isobornyl acrylate, which used to be included in a glucose measurement sensor set, was identified as a main allergen. Development of contact allergy can result both in a necessity to quit the measuring system and in allergic cross-reactions to other systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Kamann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Feldafing, Germany
| | - Nicola Wagner
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eva Oppel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lombardo F, Passanisi S, Tinti D, Messina MF, Salzano G, Rabbone I. High Frequency of Dermatological Complications in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Web-Based Survey. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021; 15:1377-1381. [PMID: 32757778 PMCID: PMC8655296 DOI: 10.1177/1932296820947072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite advances in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), there is an increasing incidence of skin reactions related to diabetes devices such as patch pumps and glucose sensors. Aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of dermatological complications in pediatric patients with T1D using technological devices. METHODS Online survey regarding skin reactions related to the use of patch pumps and/or glucose sensors was administered to families of children and adolescents (0-17 years) with T1D. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, duration of diabetes, and clinical features of dermatological complications if present. RESULTS Our study population consisted of 139 patients (female 51.8%) aged 11.1 ± 3.3 years. More than half (51.1%) experienced skin reactions due to patch pumps or glucose sensors. Dermatological complications were mainly caused by continuous glucose monitoring (56.3% of total). Timing of appearance of dermatological reactions varied from a few days to several months after the introduction of the device. The application of hypoallergenic barrier bandages was the most frequently adopted measure to solve the issue. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirmed high frequency of dermatological complications among pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Well-designed studies are awaited to provide clear recommendations to minimize the burden of skin issues related to technological devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fortunato Lombardo
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult
and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Passanisi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult
and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- Stefano Passanisi, Department of Human
Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Via Consolare
Valeria 1, Messina, 98124, Italy.
| | - Davide Tinti
- Department of Pediatrics, University of
Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Maria Francesca Messina
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult
and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Salzano
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult
and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ivana Rabbone
- Department of Pediatrics, University of
Turin, Torino, Italy
- Department of Science of Health, Hub
Regional Center of Pediatric Diabetology, University of Oriental Piemonte, Novara,
Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Acrylates as a significant cause of allergic contact dermatitis: new sources of exposure. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2021; 38:555-560. [PMID: 34658693 PMCID: PMC8501444 DOI: 10.5114/ada.2020.95848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Acrylate monomers have a wide range of applications. Since the 1950s, many reports of occupational origin allergic contact dermatitis due to (meth)acrylate monomers have been published. During last decades, (meth)acrylate allergy has undergone an occupational shift from dentistry toward beauty industry and medical devices. The aim of the study was to conduct a literature review on acrylates as a cause of allergic contact dermatitis, current sources of exposure as well as identification of professional groups with an increased risk of this allergy and methods of effective prevention. Database review: Medline search (PubMed), Wiley Online Library and Web of Science base in years 1956–2019 using the following keywords: acrylates, manicurists, dentists, dental technicians, medical devices, occupational exposure, and allergic contact dermatitis. 204 346 articles containing the term ‘acrylates‘ have been found. They include 2 042 articles with the word ‘manicurists’, 169 919 – ‘dentists’, 218 236 – ‘dental technicians’, 2 427 418 – ‘medical devices’. Fifty-nine articles were chosen based on analysis of abstracts and full texts. In the past allergy to acrylates was mainly of occupational origin and dental technicians were the most often affected professional group. Since the long-lasting manicure has become popular, this problem concerns both manicurists and their customers. Moreover, the new significant trend is non-occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by medical devices especially dedicated to diabetes patients.
Collapse
|
22
|
Ulriksdotter J, Svedman C, Bruze M, Mowitz M. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by dipropylene glycol diacrylate in the Omnipod® insulin pump. Br J Dermatol 2021; 186:334-340. [PMID: 34510410 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) in the Omnipod® insulin pump have previously been reported. OBJECTIVES To present three cases of patients with ACD caused by a new allergen in the pump, and results from chemical analyses. METHODS Omnipod pumps from different batches were analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Aimed testing, with the department's medical device (MD) series and substances identified in the pump including dipropylene glycol diacrylate (DPGDA) at 0·01% and 0·1% in petrolatum (pet.), was performed. Patch testing also included extracts from the device, the adhesive patch as is, and allergens from baseline series. RESULTS All patients tested positive to 0·1% DPGDA in pet., and two patients additionally to a 0·01% concentration. DPGDA was found in extracts of the Omnipod pumps brought by the patients. An Omnipod pump from an earlier batch contained tripropylene glycol diacrylate, IBOA, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, di(ethylene glycol)ethyl ether acrylate (DEGEA) but no DPGDA. One of the patients reacted positively to all of these allergens except DEGEA, which was not tested. CONCLUSIONS When suspecting ACD to MDs, DPGDA at 0·1% in pet. should be tested. The contents of Omnipod have changed over time. Patch testing with updated test series and relevance assessment of positive reactions is a delicate task. Children, with lifelong use of MDs, risk contracting many allergies with potential cross-allergies. A question should be raised as to whether these low molecular weight acrylates should be used at all in devices constantly worn on the skin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ulriksdotter
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Dermatology, Helsingborg Hospital, Bergaliden 14, 251 87, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - C Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - M Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - M Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rigo RS, Levin LE, Belsito DV, Garzon MC, Gandica R, Williams KM. Cutaneous Reactions to Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021; 15:786-791. [PMID: 32389062 PMCID: PMC8258506 DOI: 10.1177/1932296820918894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) are the standard of care for type 1 diabetes in children. There is little reported on device-related skin complications and treatment options. This study documents cutaneous reactions to CGM and CSII devices in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes. METHODS One hundred and twenty-one subjects (3-25 years) with type 1 diabetes and CGM and/or CSII use were recruited over a three-month period from the Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. A five-question survey was completed for each subject detailing demographic data, diabetes management, and device-related skin complications. RESULTS Sixty percent of subjects reported skin complications related to CGM and/or CSII use. Terms most frequently used to describe cutaneous reactions were "red," "itchy," "painful," and "rash." Subjects who used both CGM and CSII were more likely to report skin problems than those who used only CSII (odds ratio 2.9, [95% confidence interval: 1.2-6.7]; P = .015). There were no associations between skin complications and sex or race/ethnicity. Twenty-two percent of subjects with adverse skin event(s) discontinued use of a device due to their skin problem. Seven percent were evaluated by a dermatologist. Eighty-one percent used a range of products to treat their symptoms, with variable perceived clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Skin complications related to CSII or CGM devices are commonly reported in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes and may lead to interruption or discontinuation of device use. Future studies are needed to elucidate the causes of these reactions and determine the best methods for prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel S. Rigo
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura E. Levin
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donald V. Belsito
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria C. Garzon
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachelle Gandica
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristen M. Williams
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Kristen M. Williams, MD, Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1150 Saint Nicholas Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gatica-Ortega ME, Mowitz M, Pastor-Nieto MA, Navarro-Triviño FJ, Fernández-Redondo V, Hernández-Cano N, Borrego L, Gómez-de-la-Fuente E, Torralba M, Svedman C, Giménez-Arnau A. Contact Dermatitis From Glucose Sensors In Spain: A Multicentric Approach. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 85:554-562. [PMID: 34185891 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic contact dermatitis from glucose sensors may interfere with their ongoing application. OBJECTIVE To evaluate a series of Spanish patients with contact dermatitis to glucose sensors regarding former sources of contact allergens, patch test results and outcomes from the ongoing use of the device. METHODS A series of patients with contact dermatitis from glucose sensors was investigated in eight dermatology departments across Spain epidemiologic features, brands, latency time to develop dermatitis, the ability to continue using the devices as well as the patch test results. RESULTS Thirty patients were evaluated mean age: 20 .93 years. 66 .7 % were children and 66 .7 % female. 90 .0 % used Freestyle Libre FSL. 8 /26 30 .8 % reacted to isobornyl acrylate IBOA and 2 /20 10 .0 % to N,N dimethylacrylamide DMAA. The mean latency time to develop dermatitis was 9 months. 16 /29 55 .2 % patients continued using the same sensor causing the reaction. 13 /29 44 .8 % were unable to continue using the sensor due to severe reactions. Of them, 5 were positive to IBOA, one to IBOA and DMAA; one to DMAA; one to colophony and 1 to isopropyl alcohol wipes. In one patient the outcome was unknown. CONCLUSION The frequency of sensitization to IBOA and DMAA, was lower than in other European series, but similar to a previously published Spanish article. Legislation requiring manufacturers to provide information regarding medical devices composition and cooperate with the investigation of contact dermatitis is urgently needed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Dept. of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - María A Pastor-Nieto
- Dermatology Dept. Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara Guadalajara, Spain.,Dept. of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Alcalá University Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Leopoldo Borrego
- Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Dermatology Dept. Hospital Universitario Insular Dermatology Dept. Hospital Universitario Insular
| | | | - Miguel Torralba
- Dept. of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Alcalá University Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.,Internal Medicine Dept., University Hospital of Guadalajara, Spain
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Dept. of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ana Giménez-Arnau
- Dermatology Dept. Hospital del Mar, IMIM, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Further Evidence of Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by 2,2'-Methylenebis(6-tert-Butyl-4-Methylphenol) Monoacrylate, a New Sensitizer in the Dexcom G6 Glucose Sensor. Dermatitis 2021; 33:287-292. [PMID: 34115662 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the spring of 2020, we have seen several patients experiencing severe allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from the Dexcom G6 glucose sensor after the composition of the sensor's adhesive patch had been changed. We have previously reported the finding of a new sensitizer, 2,2'-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate, in the Dexcom G6 adhesive patch. Three patients with ACD from Dexcom G6 tested positive to this sensitizer. They were also allergic to isobornyl acrylate, a sensitizer present both in Dexcom G6 and in other medical devices previously used by these patients. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to report the first 4 cases sensitized to 2,2'-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate without a simultaneous allergy to isobornyl acrylate. METHODS The cases were patch tested their own materials, a medical device series, and 2,2'-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate in several concentrations. RESULTS All 4 cases tested positive to 2,2'-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate at either 1.0% or 1.5% in petrolatum, whereas 20 controls tested negative to both concentrations. CONCLUSIONS The cases reported here provide further evidence of 2,2'-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate as a relevant culprit sensitizer in patients with ACD from Dexcom G6. However, the initially used patch test concentration (0.3%) did not suffice to elicit positive reactions in these cases, which is why patch testing at 1.5% is recommended.
Collapse
|
26
|
Shoelson AM, Mahony OM, Pavlick M. Complications associated with a flash glucose monitoring system in diabetic cats. J Feline Med Surg 2021; 23:557-562. [PMID: 33078691 PMCID: PMC10741285 DOI: 10.1177/1098612x20965012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Glucose monitoring is an integral part of diabetes management. Interstitial glucose monitoring systems are increasingly commonly being used for this purpose in dogs and cats, including the use of a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS). The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and nature of complications associated with the use of an FGMS in diabetic cats. METHODS The medical records of all cats that had placement of a 14-day FGMS during a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Data retrieved included the number of days the sensor remained attached and functional, location of sensor placement and complications associated with the sensor. Complications were defined as early sensor detachment, sensor failure prior to the end of the 14-day monitoring period and dermatologic changes at the sensor site. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. RESULTS Twenty cats had a total of 33 FGMSs placed. The majority (30/33 [91%]) of sensors were placed over the dorsolateral aspect of the thorax just caudal to the scapula. Twenty (61%) FGMSs remained attached and functional for the full 14 days. The overall incidence of complications associated with FGMS use was 10/33 (30%). The most frequent complication was early sensor detachment (n = 5/33 [15%]). Mild dermatologic changes (erythema, crusts) were noted with 4/33 (12%) FGMSs. More serious complications (skin erosions, abscess formation) were noted with 2/33 (6%) FGMSs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The use of the FGMS is relatively safe in cats, although there are potential complications that owners should be made aware of.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam M Shoelson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings
School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, MA, USA
| | - Orla M Mahony
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings
School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Facial Personal Protective Equipment: Materials, Resterilization Methods, and Management of Occupation-Related Dermatoses. Dermatitis 2021; 32:78-85. [PMID: 33273243 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus infectious disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in health care workers donning personal protective equipment (PPE) for extended periods. OBJECTIVES The aims of the study were to review facial PPE (surgical masks and N95 respirators) ingredients, to identify facial PPE resterilization techniques, and to recommend strategies for prevention and management of facial PPE-related dermatoses. METHODS Twenty-one facial PPE (11 N95 respirators, 10 surgical masks) were reviewed. Resterilization techniques were identified. Personal protective equipment-induced occupational dermatoses and management strategies were explored. RESULTS Polypropylene is the most common chemical identified in facial PPE. Most masks contain aluminum at the nosepiece. Two surgical masks released nickel. Facial PPE dermatoses include irritant contact dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, acne, and contact urticaria. Strategies for prevention and management of facial PPE occupational dermatoses are discussed. CONCLUSIONS There are increasing reports of occupational dermatoses associated with facial PPE. This review discusses the components of facial PPE, mask resterilization methods, and strategies for prevention and management of facial PPE dermatoses.
Collapse
|
28
|
Del Baldo F, Fracassi F, Pires J, Tardo AM, Malerba E, Manassero E, Gilor C. Accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system in cats and determination of the time lag between blood glucose and interstitial glucose concentrations. J Vet Intern Med 2021; 35:1279-1287. [PMID: 33991129 PMCID: PMC8163110 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The FreeStyle Libre (Abbott Laboratories) is a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) that measures interstitial glucose concentration (IG). The system is factory‐calibrated, easy to use, inexpensive, and could be useful for monitoring diabetic cats. Objectives To evaluate the analytical and clinical accuracy of the FGMS in cats and establish the lag‐time between IG and blood glucose concentration (BG). Animals Twenty client‐owned diabetic cats and 7 purpose‐bred healthy cats. Methods Prospective study. Blood glucose concentration was measured using a portable glucose meter validated for use in cats that served as a reference method for IG, as measured by FGMS. In diabetic cats, data were collected for sensor wearing time with different methods of application and accuracy across glycemic ranges. Accuracy was determined by fulfillment of ISO15197:2013 criteria. In healthy cats, lag‐time between IG and BG was established after IV administration of exogenous glucose. Results Good agreement between IG and BG was obtained (r = .93). Analytical accuracy was not achieved, whereas clinical accuracy was demonstrated with 100% of the results in zones A + B of the Parkes consensus error grid analysis. In the immediate 30 minutes after an IV bolus of glucose, when BG was increasing rapidly (approximately 2%/min), IG increased slowly, resulting in a difference of as much as 579 mg/dL, and no positive correlation between BG and IG was found. Conclusions and Clinical Importance The FGMS did not fulfill ISO requirements but is sufficiently accurate for glucose monitoring in cats, while considering the lag between IG and BG during periods of rapid changes in BG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Del Baldo
- Department of Veterinary Medical Science, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Fracassi
- Department of Veterinary Medical Science, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jully Pires
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Antonio Maria Tardo
- Department of Veterinary Medical Science, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eleonora Malerba
- Department of Veterinary Medical Science, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Chen Gilor
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.,Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Herman A, Uter W, Rustemeyer T, Matura M, Aalto-Korte K, Duus Johansen J, Gonçalo M, White IR, Balato A, Giménez Arnau AM, Brockow K, Mortz CG, Mahler V, Goossens A. Position statement: The need for EU legislation to require disclosure and labelling of the composition of medical devices. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 35:1444-1448. [PMID: 33955077 PMCID: PMC8251888 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, skin reactions secondary to the use of medical devices (MD), such as allergic contact dermatitis have increasingly been observed (e.g. to continuous blood sugar monitoring systems, insulin pumps, wound dressings, medical gloves, etc.): this is regarded as a developing epidemic. Lack of labelling of the composition of MD, as well as frequent lack of cooperation of manufacturers to disclose this relevant information, even when contacted by the clinician for the individual case of an established adverse reaction, significantly impede patient care. OBJECTIVES To advocate for full ingredient labelling in the implementation of EU regulation for MD. METHODS This position paper reviews the scientific literature, the current regulatory framework adopted for MD to date, and the likely impact, including some costs data in case of the absence of such labelling. RESULTS Efforts made by several scientific teams, who are trying to identify the culprit of such adverse effects, either via asking for cooperation from companies, or using costly chemical analyses of MD, can only partly, and with considerable delay, compensate for the absence of meaningful information on the composition of MD; hence, patient management is compromised. Indeed, without knowing the chemical substances present, physicians are unable to inform patients about which substances they should avoid, and which alternative MD may be suitable/tolerated. CONCLUSION There is an urgent need for full and accurate labelling of the chemical composition of MD in contact with the human body.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Herman
- Department of Dermatology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - W Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Univ. Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - T Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Matura
- Dermatology Unit, Skaraborgs Hospital Skövde, Skövde, Sweden
| | - K Aalto-Korte
- Occupational Health Unit, Finnish Institute of Occupational Heath, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J Duus Johansen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, National Allergy Research Centre, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Gonçalo
- Department of Dermatology, Coimbra University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - I R White
- Cutaneous Allergy Team, St. John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Balato
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - A M Giménez Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - K Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C G Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - V Mahler
- Med. Faculty, Univ. Erlangen/Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Goossens
- Contact Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Navarro-Triviño F. Skin Reactions to Glucose Sensors: Present and Future. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2020.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
31
|
Weng AT, Zachariae C, Christensen KB, Svensson J, Berg AK. Five-Month Follow-up Shows No Improvement in Dermatological Complications in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems and Insulin Pumps. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021; 15:317-323. [PMID: 31619071 PMCID: PMC8256062 DOI: 10.1177/1932296819882425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A Danish study showed that 90% of the pediatric patients who participated had some time experienced dermatological complications due to treatment with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). This follow-up study describes dermatological complications due to CSII and/or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) between the two study periods and includes health-related quality of life (HrQoL) measurements. METHODS A total of 138 patients (95%) out of 145 patients from the initial study answered an online questionnaire regarding dermatological complications related to CSII and/or CGM, five months later. A second questionnaire (DISABKIDS) regarding HrQoL was sent out to those 138 of which 111 patients completed it. The patients were aged from 2 to 20 years. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the data. RESULTS In total, 81% of the 138 patients continued to have dermatological complications at follow-up. Itching was the most frequently reported complication. Patients using Enlite reported more dermatological complications than those using Libre. In total, 79% of the patients who used barrier cream in the initial study still had dermatological complications five months later. Age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), or HbA1c levels showed no significant association with dermatological complications. Patients who perceived dermatological complications as a greater problem had lower HrQoL scores. CONCLUSION Once dermatological complications start to appear, they become chronic, indicating that the treatments currently available are inadequate. Patients perceiving dermatological complications as a greater problem were associated with lower HrQoL. These findings highlight the need for additional preventive studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna T. Weng
- Department of Pediatrics, Copenhagen
University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Science, University of
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Anna T. Weng, BSc, Department of Pediatrics,
Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, Herlev 2730,
Denmark.
| | - Claus Zachariae
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy,
Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospital, Denmark
| | - Karl B. Christensen
- Department of Public Health, Section of
Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jannet Svensson
- Department of Pediatrics, Copenhagen
University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Science, University of
Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna K. Berg
- Department of Pediatrics, Copenhagen
University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Science, University of
Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Svedman C, Bruze M, Antelmi A, Hamnerius N, Hauksson I, Ulriksdotter J, Mowitz M. Continuous glucose monitoring systems give contact dermatitis in children and adults despite efforts of providing less ‘allergy‐ prone’ devices: investigation and advice hampered by insufficient material for optimized patch test investigations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 35:730-737. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C. Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund UniversitySkåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| | - M. Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund UniversitySkåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| | - A. Antelmi
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund UniversitySkåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| | - N. Hamnerius
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund UniversitySkåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| | - I. Hauksson
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund UniversitySkåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| | - J. Ulriksdotter
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund UniversitySkåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
- Department of Dermatology Helsingborg Hospital Helsingborg Sweden
| | - M. Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund UniversitySkåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Novel diabetic devices are being developed to help manage diabetes and improve the quality of life of patients with diabetes. Both insulin pumps and glucose monitors are becoming increasingly convenient, long-lasting, and discrete for patients, but this often requires the use of strong external cutaneous adhesives and increased contact time with the skin. As a consequence, these devices have been associated with a variety of dermatologic reactions, namely, irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. Some of these reactions can be severe, precluding the use of these devices, which puts patients' long-term health at risk. Herein, we review the history of diabetic devices and reported cutaneous reactions to diabetic devices and commonly cited allergens.
Collapse
|
34
|
Skin Reactions to Glucose Sensors: Present and Future. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2020; 112:389-391. [PMID: 33220307 DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2020.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
35
|
Dendooven E, Foubert K, Goossens A, Gilles P, De Borggraeve W, Pieters L, Lambert J, Aerts O. Concomitant positive patch test reactions in FreeStyle-allergic patients sensitized to isobornyl acrylate. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 84:166-174. [PMID: 32965058 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concomitant positive patch test reactions in patients sensitized to isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) have rarely been documented. OBJECTIVES To report concomitant sensitizations in patients with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from the glucose sensor FreeStyle Libre and sensitized to IBOA. METHODS In 2019, 26 patients with suspected ACD from FreeStyle Libre were patch tested to a baseline series and to a (meth) acrylate series containing IBOA and 2-phenoxyethyl acrylate (PEA) 0.1% pet. Diabetes devices and patch test preparations were analyzed with gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for the presence of IBOA and PEA. RESULTS Of the 26 patients, 18 (69%) were sensitized to IBOA, and eight (44%) and 11 (61%) of these were co-sensitized to sesquiterpene lactones and fragrances, respectively. Ten patients (56%) were co-sensitized to PEA, which, contrary to IBOA, could not be detected in any device. The PEA test material was shown to be contaminated with IBOA. CONCLUSIONS Contact allergy to IBOA appears to be declining and IBOA-sensitized patients are most often co-sensitized to sesquiterpene lactones and fragrances. Vigilance is required when patch testing (acrylate) materials obtained from industry, as these might be contaminated and, hence, alter the results and their interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ella Dendooven
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Research Group Immunology, Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Research Group Natural Products and Food - Research and Analysis (NatuRA), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kenn Foubert
- Research Group Natural Products and Food - Research and Analysis (NatuRA), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - An Goossens
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philippe Gilles
- Molecular Design and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wim De Borggraeve
- Molecular Design and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luc Pieters
- Research Group Natural Products and Food - Research and Analysis (NatuRA), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Julien Lambert
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Research Group Immunology, Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Olivier Aerts
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Research Group Immunology, Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA. Dermatitis alérgica de contacto y otras dermatosis asociadas al uso de bombas de insulina y sensores de glucosa. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.piel.2019.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
37
|
Ahrensbøll-Friis U, Simonsen AB, Zachariae C, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD. Contact dermatitis caused by glucose sensors, insulin pumps, and tapes: Results from a 5-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 84:75-81. [PMID: 32677709 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of patients with contact dermatitis from glucose sensors and insulin infusion sets is increasing. Patch testing is challenging because of a lack of information concerning the constituent materials of medical devices. OBJECTIVES To report on products and causes of allergic reactions to glucose sensors or insulin infusion sets over a 5-year period and suggest a short screening series. METHODS Analysis of patch test data from consecutive patients suspected of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to glucose sensors and/or insulin infusion sets from 2015-2019. RESULTS Patient numbers increased from 4 to 15 per year; 30/38 (78.9%) were children. In 29 (76.3%), a diagnosis of allergic/probable ACD was established, mostly due to the tapes of the device or allergens in these tapes (n = 23) followed by allergens in the device housing (n = 10). Isobornyl acrylate, abitol, and colophonium were the most common allergens. Information from manufacturers was often difficult to obtain and, if accessible, inadequate. For this reason, the diagnosis was delayed for more than 1.5 years in 12 (31%) patients. CONCLUSIONS The increasing number of patients, mostly children, with ACD from devices used in treatment of type 1 diabetes demonstrates the importance of this problem. Allergies can easily be overlooked, due to the lack of mandatory labeling of the constituent materials of the devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrik Ahrensbøll-Friis
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Anne Birgitte Simonsen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Claus Zachariae
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Jacob P Thyssen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Jeanne D Johansen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Queirós CS, Alexandre MI, Garrido PM, Correia TE, Filipe PL. Allergic contact dermatitis to IBOA in FreeStyle Libre: Experience from a tertiary care Portuguese hospital. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:154-157. [PMID: 32352577 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina S Queirós
- Dermatology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria I Alexandre
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pedro M Garrido
- Dermatology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Teresa E Correia
- Dermatology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Paulo L Filipe
- Dermatology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hamnerius N, Mowitz M. Intense skin reaction to a new glucose monitoring and insulin pump system. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:524-527. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Hamnerius
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ulriksdotter J, Mowitz M, Svedman C, Bruze M. Patch testing and diagnosis when suspecting allergic contact dermatitis from medical devices. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:333-335. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Josefin Ulriksdotter
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
- Department of Dermatology Helsingborg Hospital Helsingborg Sweden
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ulriksdotter J, Svedman C, Bruze M, Glimsjö J, Källberg K, Sukakul T, Mowitz M. Contact dermatitis caused by glucose sensors-15 adult patients tested with a medical device patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:301-309. [PMID: 32608015 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to the glucose sensor FreeStyle Libre have been reported. Isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) and N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMAA) are known culprit allergens. OBJECTIVES To evaluate patients with suspected ACD to FreeStyle Libre in a standardized manner, present causative allergens, and assess patient-reported implications. METHODS A total of 15 patients with suspected ACD to FreeStyle Libre were patch tested with the Swedish baseline series and a new medical device series. IBOA and DMAA were tested at 0.1% and 0.3% in petrolatum (pet.). Readings were performed on day (D) 3 and D7. Background data, details on skin reactions, and associated implications were assessed using a questionnaire. RESULTS Thirteen patients were sensitized to IBOA and four to DMAA. Two positive reactions to IBOA and one to DMAA were seen only at 0.3% concentration on D7. Median duration of sensor use before dermatitis onset was 6 months. Half the number of the patients took precautions in everyday life due to sensor-related skin reactions. Six patients discontinued sensor usage. CONCLUSIONS Patients with suspected ACD to glucose sensors should be evaluated with a relevant patch test series containing IBOA and DMAA. Adding the 0.3% pet. concentration is recommended. The reading on D7 is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefin Ulriksdotter
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Dermatology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jenny Glimsjö
- Department of Medicine, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden
| | - Kajsa Källberg
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Thanisorn Sukakul
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Malinauskiene L, Šlekyte G, Mowitz M, Isaksson M, Zablockis R. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in two patients treated for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:170-171. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Malinauskiene
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Chest diseases, Immunology and AllergologyVilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
| | - Goda Šlekyte
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Chest diseases, Immunology and AllergologyVilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologySkåne University Hospital, Lund University Malmö Sweden
| | - Marléne Isaksson
- Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologySkåne University Hospital, Lund University Malmö Sweden
| | - Rolandas Zablockis
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Chest diseases, Immunology and AllergologyVilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Belloni Fortina A, Caroppo F, Tadiotto Cicogna G. Allergic contact dermatitis in children. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2020; 16:579-589. [DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2020.1777858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Belloni Fortina
- Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesca Caroppo
- Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Giulia Tadiotto Cicogna
- Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Herman A, Montjoye L, Baeck M. Adverse cutaneous reaction to diabetic glucose sensors and insulin pumps: Irritant contact dermatitis or allergic contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:25-30. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laurence Montjoye
- Department of DermatologyCliniques universitaires Saint‐Luc Brussels Belgium
| | - Marie Baeck
- Department of DermatologyCliniques universitaires Saint‐Luc Brussels Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kamann S, Heinemann L, Oppel E. Usage of Hydrocolloid-Based Plasters in Patients Who Have Developed Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Isobornyl Acrylate While Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14:582-585. [PMID: 31538817 PMCID: PMC7576941 DOI: 10.1177/1932296819876964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems replace more and more capillary self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients with diabetes. However, at least a subset of patients experience adverse skin reactions such as severe allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) after prolonged usage of CGM systems. A major allergen isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) has been identified recently. OBJECTIVES After developing an ACD, patients have difficulties in continuing the usage of their CGM system (and also of, eg, certain patch pumps). Most of such patients look for possibilities to continue the usage of, eg, a CGM system that requires intermittent scanning (iscCGM, Freestyle Libre). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eight patients with a known ACD were supplied with different hydrocolloid-based plasters (n = 5 with Hansaplast blister plaster, n = 2 with Cutimed Hydro B from BSN, and n = 1 with Stomahesive baseplate from Convatec). They attached these plasters to their skin underneath their iscCGM system. RESULTS All patients were able to continue the usage of this iscCGM system when using such plasters. CONCLUSION Patients with ACD benefit from the usage of such plasters; however, some limitations have to be acknowledged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Kamann
- Dermatology and Allergology, Feldafing, Germany
- Stefanie Kamann, MD, Dermatology and Allergology, Seewiesstraße 1, 82340 Feldafing, Germany.
| | | | - Eva Oppel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Navarro‐Triviño FJ, Sierra Cerdán MJ, Ruiz‐Villaverde R. Tegaderm
TM
I.V. Advanced can prevent eczematous reaction caused by Dexcom glucose monitoring system. Int J Dermatol 2020; 59:e166-e168. [DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
47
|
Vidal‐Albareda C, Yelmo‐Valverde R, Solórzano‐Zepeda C, Rodríguez‐Muñoz N, de‐la‐Hoz‐Caballer B, González‐de‐Olano D. Prevalence of contact dermatitis to glucose sensors in pediatric population and the main allergens involved. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:47-49. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Belén de‐la‐Hoz‐Caballer
- Department of AllergologyRamón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS Madrid Spain
- Spanish Thematic Network and Co‐operative Research Centres, ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid Spain
| | - David González‐de‐Olano
- Department of AllergologyRamón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS Madrid Spain
- Spanish Thematic Network and Co‐operative Research Centres, ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Contact Allergy-Emerging Allergens and Public Health Impact. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17072404. [PMID: 32244763 PMCID: PMC7177224 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Contact allergy (sensitisation) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) resulting from it have a considerable public health impact. For the present review, all pertinent articles were systematically searched via Medline and Web of Science™; additionally, all available issues of the journals "Contact Dermatitis" and "Dermatitis" were manually searched, covering the years 2018-2019, thereby extending and re-focusing a previous similar review. New allergens, or previously described allergens found in a new exposure context or of other current importance, are described in sections according to substance classes, e.g., metals, preservatives, fragrances. As a common finding in many investigations, a lack of information on product composition has been noted, for instance, regarding a newly described allergen in canvas shoes (dimethylthiocarbamylbenzothiazole sulfide) and, most notably, absence of co-operation from manufacturers of glucose-monitoring devices and insulin pumps, respectively. These latter devices have been shown to cause severe ACD in a considerable number of diabetic patients caused by the liberation of isobornyl acrylate and N,N'-dimethylacrylamide, respectively, as demonstrated by an international collaboration between dermatologists and chemists. Improved and complete ingredient labelling for all types of products, and not just cosmetics, must be put on the legislative agenda.
Collapse
|
49
|
Pyl J, Dendooven E, Van Eekelen I, den Brinker M, Dotremont H, France A, Foubert K, Pieters L, Lambert J, De Block C, Aerts O. Prevalence and Prevention of Contact Dermatitis Caused by FreeStyle Libre: A Monocentric Experience. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:918-920. [PMID: 32054722 DOI: 10.2337/dc19-1354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cutaneous adverse events (CAE) from FreeStyle Libre include allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by the allergen isobornyl acrylate (IBOA). We aim to report CAE from this glucose sensor, ACD to IBOA in particular, and the outcome of using barrier films as a prevention. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A monocentric, retrospective review of medical files from adult and pediatric patients with diabetes using Freestyle Libre, in the period between December 2016 and April 2019, was performed with a focus on CAE. RESULTS Fifty-seven of 1,036 patients with diabetes (5.5%) were referred to our dermatology department because of CAE from FreeStyle Libre. Thirty-nine of 1,036 (3.8%) had ACD due to IBOA. Only two patients, of whom one sensitized to IBOA, had a benefit from using barrier films. CONCLUSIONS CAE occurred in 5.5% of FreeStyle Libre users, and 3.8% suffered from ACD due to IBOA. Barrier films had limited value in the prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen Pyl
- Department of Dermatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.,University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ella Dendooven
- Department of Dermatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.,University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ine Van Eekelen
- Department of Dermatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.,University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marieke den Brinker
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hilde Dotremont
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Annick France
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kenn Foubert
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Natural Products & Food Research and Analysis, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Luc Pieters
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Natural Products & Food Research and Analysis, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Julien Lambert
- Department of Dermatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.,University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Christophe De Block
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolic Diseases, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Olivier Aerts
- Department of Dermatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium .,University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Asarani NAM, Reynolds AN, Boucher SE, de Bock M, Wheeler BJ. Cutaneous Complications With Continuous or Flash Glucose Monitoring Use: Systematic Review of Trials and Observational Studies. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14:328-337. [PMID: 31452386 PMCID: PMC7196864 DOI: 10.1177/1932296819870849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)/flash glucose monitoring (FGM) use in diabetes management is increasing. Cutaneous complications associated with these devices were reported. We conducted a systematic review to provide an overview of cutaneous complications with CGM/FGM use. METHODS We identified observational studies and intervention trials that report on cutaneous complications with CGM/FGM use up to January 14, 2019. Studies were identified through Medline, Embase, and PubMed, or with hand searching of the previous publications. Screening was duplicated and data extracted to consider four main themes: incidence rate and severity, participant perspectives of cutaneous complications, potential solutions, and future directions in diabetic technology relevant to reducing cutaneous complications. RESULTS A total of 54 eligible studies were identified. The overall event rate of cutaneous complications reported from 19 trials was one event per eight weeks of sensor wear-time of which 1.5% were considered severe. The most common cutaneous complications were wear-related erythema, itching, and induration. Although skin irritations were the most common cause of CGM/FGM discontinuation, most users experienced less pain or discomfort with CGM/FGM than capillary blood glucose testing. Future technological advances may reduce, but not eliminate cutaneous complications. CONCLUSION The incidence rate of reported cutaneous complications with CGM/FGM use from the available literature is low, with one event per eight weeks of sensor wear-time. Reported complication severity was also low, leading to low rates of CGM/FGM discontinuation. However, there appear to be discrepancies between reporting in trial and observational data. Greater constancy in reporting is necessary to understand the frequency of this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nurul A. Mohd Asarani
- Department of Women’s and Children’s
Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Andrew N. Reynolds
- Department of Medicine, Dunedin School
of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Sara E. Boucher
- Department of Women’s and Children’s
Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Martin de Bock
- Department of Paediatrics, University of
Otago, Christchurch
| | - Benjamin J. Wheeler
- Department of Women’s and Children’s
Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand
- Benjamin J. Wheeler, MBChB, PhD, Department
of Women’s and Children’s Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of
Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, Otago 9022, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|