Effect of liraglutide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Liraglutide does not increase heart rate of diabetic patients during acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists have been shown to reduce all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The probable increase in heart rate hinders its early usage in acute myocardial infarction patients. In our study, we aimed to find out whether the use of liraglutide in patients with acute myocardial infarction as early as at the time of hospitalization would increase the heart rate.

METHODS

This was an observational retrospective study. From December 2020 to August 2021, 200 patients with acute myocardial infarction were included in our study and divided into three groups: T2DM + liraglutide group (n = 46), T2DM + non-liraglutide group (n = 42), and non-T2DM group (n = 112). The primary outcomes were the differences in heart rate. Secondary outcomes were differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in heart rate among the three groups at admission, the day before the first shot of liraglutide, and before discharge. There was also no significant difference in heart rate between diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction and those on liraglutide during the hospital stay. And there were no differences of beta-blocker dosages among the three groups. Liraglutide did not affect the blood pressure during acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Liraglutide did not increase the heart rate in diabetic patients during acute myocardial infarction and did not lead to an increase in the dose of beta-blockers in the patients. It also had no effect on blood pressure and showed better efficacy in lowering glucose levels without additional hypoglycemic events.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists modestly reduced blood pressure among patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

AIM

The cardiovascular benefits provided by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) extend beyond weight reduction and glycaemic control. One possible mechanism may relate to blood pressure (BP) reduction. We aim to quantify the BP-lowering effects of GLP1-RAs.

METHODS

A comprehensive database search for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted until December 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, employing a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to determine outcomes with a mean difference (MD) in mmHg and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary endpoint was the mean difference in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were done to account for covariates.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, GLP-1RAs modestly reduced SBP [semaglutide: MD -3.40 (95% CI -4.22 to -2.59, p < .001); liraglutide: MD -2.61 (95% CI -3.48 to -1.74, p < .001); dulaglutide: MD -1.46 (95% CI -2.20 to -0.72, p < .001); and exenatide: MD -3.36 (95% CI -3.63 to -3.10, p < .001)]. This benefit consistently increased with longer treatment durations. Diastolic BP reduction was only significant in the exenatide group [MD -0.94 (95% CI -1.78 to -0.1), p = .03]. Among semaglutide cohorts, mean changes in glycated haemoglobin and mean changes in body mass index were directly associated with SBP reduction.

CONCLUSION

Patients on GLP-1RA experienced modest SBP lowering compared with placebo. This observed effect was associated with weight/body mass index reduction and better glycaemic control, which suggests that BP-lowering is an indirect effect of GLP-1RA and unlikely to be responsible for the benefits.

The impact of GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide on blood pressure profile, hydration, natriuresis in diabetic patients with severely impaired kidney function

Chronic treatment with GLP-1R agonists may moderately lower blood pressure due to increased natriuresis and RAAS inhibition. Short-term effect of these drugs on blood pressure may be opposite and its mechanism remains unclear. We investigated the effect of a single dose of liraglutide on diurnal blood pressure profile, natriuresis, hydration and serum concentration of renin, aldosterone and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). 17 patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 17 with > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 received in a random order a single subcutaneous dose 1.2 mg liraglutide and placebo with subsequent 24 h blood pressure and natriuresis monitoring. Before and after each medication thoracic fluid index and plasma renin, aldosterone and ANP were also assessed. The blood pressure load in the daytime and nighttime were significantly increased after liraglutide compared to placebo in patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2. In patients with eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 the changes of arterial pressure were comparable, while the morning surge was significantly reduced after liraglutide compared to placebo. After liraglutide 24 h urine sodium excretion increased in both groups vs. placebo (p < 0.001), the effect was greatest in subjects with eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Plasma ANP increased after liraglutide in both groups, most in patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 group. Plasma aldosterone (p = 0.013) and thoracic fluid index (p = 0.01) decreased after liraglutide compared to placebo (p = 0.013 and p + 0.01, respectively. Plasma renin concentration remained unchanged. In severe chronic kidney disease liraglutide induces a transient increase of blood pressure due to reduced natriuresis. The natriuretic effect of liraglutide in DKD may be related to increased ANP and decreased aldosterone secretion.

Primordial Drivers of Diabetes Heart Disease: Comprehensive Insights into Insulin Resistance

Insulin resistance has been regarded as a hallmark of diabetes heart disease (DHD). Numerous studies have shown that insulin resistance can affect blood circulation and myocardium, which indirectly cause cardiac hypertrophy and ventricular remodeling, participating in the pathogenesis of DHD. Meanwhile, hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia associated with insulin resistance can directly impair the metabolism and function of the heart. Targeting insulin resistance is a potential therapeutic strategy for the prevention of DHD. Currently, the role of insulin resistance in the pathogenic development of DHD is still under active research, as the pathological roles involved are complex and not yet fully understood, and the related therapeutic approaches are not well developed. In this review, we describe insulin resistance and add recent advances in the major pathological and physiological changes and underlying mechanisms by which insulin resistance leads to myocardial remodeling and dysfunction in the diabetic heart, including exosomal dysfunction, ferroptosis, and epigenetic factors. In addition, we discuss potential therapeutic approaches to improve insulin resistance and accelerate the development of cardiovascular protection drugs.

Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: risk reduction and early intervention

People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) than those without. This increased risk begins with pre-diabetes, potentially 7-10 years before T2D is diagnosed. Selecting medication for patients with T2D should focus on reducing the risk of CVD and established CVD. Within the last decade, several antihyperglycemic agents with proven CV benefit have been approved for the treatment of hyperglycemia and for the prevention of primary and secondary CV events, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. T2D treatment guidelines recommend that an antihyperglycemic agent with proven CV benefit should be used after metformin in patients with high risk of or established CVD, regardless of glycated hemoglobin levels. Despite the availability of antihyperglycemic agents with proven CV benefit, and guidelines on when to use them, less than one in four patients with T2D and CVD receive this type of therapy. These findings suggest a potential gap between current recommendations and clinical practice. This article reviews the approved agents with CV indications, with a focus on injectable GLP-1RAs, and their place in the T2D treatment paradigm according to current guidelines. We aim to provide primary healthcare providers with in-depth information on subsets of patients who would benefit from this type of therapy and when it should be initiated, taking into consideration safety and tolerability and other disease factors. An individualized treatment approach is increasingly recommended in the management of T2D, employing a shared decision-making strategy between patients and healthcare professionals.

The Effect of Mind-Body Exercise on Blood Pressure in Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objectives. The effects and safety of mind-body exercise in improving blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertension were explored in this meta-analysis. Methods. A meta-analysis of studies from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane was performed to identify related experimental studies by screening out the randomized controlled trials from the time of respective database creation until January 22, 2021. In addition, first, we completed the research registration on the INPLASY platform on March 20, 2021 (registration number: INPLASY202130072) and, second, on the PROSPERO platform on December 28, 2021 (registration number: CRD42021289125). The data were analyzed using a random-effects model with the help of Stata 14.0 software. Results. A total of 2,277 patients from 30 studies were reflected in the present study. The results show that mind-body exercise can effectively improve systolic blood pressure [SMD = −0.994, 95% CI: −1.239∼−0.748, $P<0.01$ ] and diastolic blood pressure [SMD = −0.757, 95% CI: −1.009∼−0.505, $P<0.01$ ] in middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertension. Conclusion. The results of this meta-analysis show that mind-body exercise can effectively improve blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertension without adverse events.

The effect of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on serum uric acid concentration: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are a class of medications mainly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. They improve glucose tolerance, increase insulin secretion, and induce weight loss. There is controversy about the effect of GLP-1RAs on serum uric acid (SUA) concentration. Our systematic review aims to objectively answer whether GLP-1RAs affect SUA levels.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar datasets up to 27August,2021 with a language restriction of English only. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, uncontrolled trials, and conference abstracts were included. Studies with insufficient data, irrelevant types of study, and follow-up duration of less than a month were excluded from the review. After critical appraisal by the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists, articles underwent data extraction using a pre-specified Microsoft Excel sheet.

RESULTS

Of 1004 identified studies, 17 were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. Pre- to post-administration analysis of GLP-1RA effects on SUA demonstrated that GLP-1RAs could significantly reduce SUA concentration (difference in means=-0.341;SE=0.063;P-value<0.001). However, when compared to placebo, GLP-1 RAs did not perform any better in lowering SUA concentration (difference in means=-0.455;SE=0.259;P-value=0.079). Surprisingly, the active controls, that included insulin, metformin, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, did outperform GLP-1RAs in reducing SUA concentration (difference in means=0.250;SE=0.038;P-value<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of GLP-1RAs can result in a significant reduction in SUA concentration. However, this reduction is less than that seen with the use of insulin, metformin, and SGLT-2 inhibitors.

The effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure: a confirmatory meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Hypertension augments overall cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, control rates remain suboptimal. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have revolutionized the field of T2DM therapeutic management due to their multiple pleiotropic effects. Therefore, we sought to determine the effect of this class on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), pooling data from relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We searched major electronic databases, namely PubMed and Cochrane Library, along with gray literature sources, for RCTs assessing the effect of various GLP-1RAs on ambulatory BP in patients with T2DM.

RESULTS

We pooled data from seven RCTs in total. GLP-1RA treatment compared to placebo or active control resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in 24-h SBP (mean difference = -1.57 mm Hg; 95% CI,-4.12 to 0.98; I2 = 63%) and in 24-h DBP (mean difference = 1.28 mmHg; 95% CI,-0.31 to 2.87; I2 = 49%). No subgroup differences between the various GLP-1RAs were detected.

CONCLUSION

GLP-1RAs treatment does not influence either systolic or diastolic ambulatory BP in patients with T2DM.

The effect of mind-body exercise on blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertension: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Depending on the person, cervical spondylosis may have no clinical symptoms, but cervical spondylosis will definitely cause changes in people's blood pressure, which will further affect physical and mental health.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the effect and safety of mind-body exercise intervention on the blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertension through meta-analysis.

METHODS

This meta-analysis searched studies from 4 research databases: the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (from 1979), Web of Science (from 1950), PubMed (from 1965), and Cochrane (from 1991), Date of retrieval: January 22, 2021, Two authors will independently search literature records, scan titles, abstracts, and full texts, collect data, and assess materials for risk of bias. The data will be analyzed by Stata 14.0 software.

RESULTS

The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis program with no results. Data analysis will be completed after the program has been completed.

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis may provide clinical practice with more reliable evidence-based medical evidence that mind-body exercise can benefit the blood pressure of middle-aged and elderly hypertensive patients.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202130072.

Danuglipron (PF-06882961) in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending-dose phase 1 trial

Agonism of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) results in glycemic lowering and body weight loss and is a therapeutic strategy to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. We developed danuglipron (PF-06882961), an oral small-molecule GLP-1R agonist and found it had comparable efficacy to injectable peptidic GLP-1R agonists in a humanized mouse model. We then completed a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multiple ascending-dose phase 1 study ( NCT03538743 ), in which we enrolled 98 patients with T2D on background metformin and randomized them to receive multiple ascending doses of danuglipron or placebo for 28 d, across eight cohorts. The primary outcomes were assessment of adverse events (AEs), safety laboratory tests, vital signs and 12-lead electrocardiograms. Most AEs were mild, with nausea, dyspepsia and vomiting most commonly reported. There were no clinically meaningful AEs in laboratory values across groups. Heart rate generally increased with danuglipron treatment at day 28, but no heart-rate AEs were reported. Systolic blood pressure was slightly decreased and changes in diastolic blood pressure were similar with danuglipron treatment at day 28, compared with placebo. There were no clinically meaningful electrocardiogram findings. In this study in T2D, danuglipron was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the mechanism of action of GLP-1R agonism.

Effect of Liraglutide on Cardiometabolic Risk Profile in People with Coronary Artery Disease with or without Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Whether liraglutide use improves cardiometabolic risk factors in different subsets of subjects with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we quantified the effects of liraglutide on cardiometabolic risk profile in subjects with CAD with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).

Methods: Online database searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar from incept up to 15th January 2021. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cardiometabolic risk profile. We used the random- or fixed-effect models to pool the weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Out of a total of 7,320 citations, six articles (seven RCTs) with 294 subjects with CAD (mean age, 61.21 years; 19% women) were included. Our findings presented as WMD and 95% CI showed a statistical significant decrease in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) [−0.36%; −0.47; −0.26, p < 0.001; I² = 0.0% (with 6 RCTs)], body mass index (BMI) [−0.61 kg/m²; −1.21; −0.01, p = 0.047; I² = 72.2% (with five RCTs)], and waist circumference [−2.41 cm; −3.47; −1.36, p < 0.001; I² = 0.0% (with three RCTs)]. Through a set of subgroup analyses, we found a significant reduction in BMI in CAD patients with T2D [WMD = −1.06; 95% CI, −1.42, −0.70, p < 0.001; I² = 0.0% (with three RCTs)] compared to CAD only patients [WMD = −0.08; 95% CI, −0.45, 0.29, p = 0.66; I² = 0.0% (with two RCTs)] in the liraglutide group compared with the placebo group. No significant changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and lipid profiles were observed.

Conclusions: Among people with established CAD, liraglutide significantly improved HbA1c, BMI, and waist circumference values. The effect of liraglutide on BMI was more robust in individuals with T2D compared to those without.

Making a case for the combined use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists for cardiorenal protection

Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) were initially approved to improve glycemic control in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Clinical trials have also demonstrated beneficial effects with regards to cardiovascular and renal parameters. Beyond improving glycemic control, these therapies promote weight loss and lower blood pressure when used individually, and in an additive manner when used together. Accordingly, taking advantage of complementary mechanisms of action with the combined use of these two classes of agents to further improve cardiorenal outcomes is conceptually appealing, but has yet to be explored in detail in clinical trials. In this review, we discuss proposed mechanisms for renal protection, clinical benefits, and adverse events associated with the individual and combined use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RA. The management of type 2 diabetes has significantly changed over the last few years, moving away from solely glycemic control towards the concurrent management of associated comorbidities in a patient population at significant risk of cardiovascular disease and progression of chronic kidney disease. It is from this perspective that we seek to outline the rationale for the sequential and/or combined use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RA in patients with type 2 diabetes.

A role for sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease?

With the lack of success and increasing urgency for therapies capable of impacting Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its progression, there are increasing efforts to expand testing of new mechanistic hypotheses to attack the disease from different angles. Three such hypotheses are the "Mitochondrial Cascade (MC)" hypothesis, the "Endo-Lysosomal Dysfunction (ELD)" hypothesis and the "Type 3 Diabetes (T3D)" hypothesis. These hypotheses provide a rationale for new pharmacological approaches to address the mitochondrial, endo-lysosomal and metabolic dysfunction associated with AD. It is increasingly evident that there is critical interplay between the metabolic dysfunction associated with obesity/metabolic syndrome/type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and patient susceptibility to AD development. A candidate for a common mechanism linking these metabolically-driven disease states is chronically-activated mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. Unrestrained chronic mTOR activation may be responsible for sustaining metabolic, lysosomal and mitochondrial dysfunction in AD, driving both the breakdown of the blood-brain barrier via endothelial cell dysfunction and hyperphosphorylation of tau and formation of amyloid plaques in the brain. It is hypothesized that sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition, mediated by sustained glucose loss, restores mTOR cycling through nutrient-driven, nightly periods of transient mTOR inhibition (and restoration of catabolic cellular housekeeping processes) interspersed by daily periods of transient mTOR activation (and anabolism) accompanying eating. In this way, a flexible mTOR dynamic is restored, thereby preventing or even reducing the progress of AD pathology. The first study to investigate the effect of SGLT2 inhibition in patients with AD is ongoing and focuses on the impact on energy metabolism in the brain following treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin.

Effects of glucose-lowering on outcome incidence in diabetes mellitus and the modulating role of blood pressure and other clinical variables: overview, meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antidiabetic agents started in the 1960s. Updated meta-analyses of RCTs investigating glucose-lowering in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are lacking. Also, no previous attempt was made to evaluate the role of blood pressure (BP) reduction and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) change on outcome incidence following glucose-lowering.

OBJECTIVES

Three main clinical questions were investigated: the extent of different outcome reductions by glucose-lowering in patients with diabetes, the proportionality of outcome reductions to glycated hemoglobin (HBA1c) reductions and whether ongoing BP and LDL-C difference in RCTs can change glucose-lowering outcome effects.

METHODS

PubMed between 1960 and January 2019 (any language), Cochrane Collaboration Library and previous overviews were used as data sources to identify and select all RCTs comparing the glucose-lowering drugs with placebo or less intense treatment (intentional glucose-lowering RCTs); comparing glucose-lowering drugs with placebo without glucose-lowering intention, but HBA1c difference (nonintentional glucose-lowering RCTs); enrolling type 2 diabetes mellitus patients; and reporting ongoing SBP and DBP difference. We excluded RCTs of acute care, glucose intolerance, type 1 diabetes, multiple interventions applied and glucose-lowering by lifestyle or other interventions. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals, of seven fatal and nonfatal outcomes and of treatment-related discontinuations were calculated (random-effects model) before and after adjustment for the ongoing BP difference, while LDL-C difference was also considered. The relationships of different outcome reductions to HBA1c reductions were investigated by meta-regressions.

RESULTS

A total of 25 RCTs (174 235 individuals, follow-up 3.5 years) were eligible, and the resulted ongoing SBP/DBP difference was -1.4/-0.4 mmHg. Both before and after adjustment for BP difference, glucose-lowering reduced CHD (coronary heart disease) and both composites of major cardiovascular events were reduced by a mean of 8 and 5%, respectively, while before BP-adjustment the risk of treatment-related discontinuations was increased by 26% and the risk of stroke and all-cause death was reduced by 7 and 6%, respectively. Logarithmic risk ratios were related to HBA1c reductions for the composite of CHD and stroke and for treatment-related discontinuations. Glucose-lowering had no differential outcome effects, before and after estimate adjustment for the ongoing BP difference, at different HBA1c thresholds and targets, as well as when both baseline BP and achieved BP, overall cardiovascular risk and diabetes mellitus duration were considered as dichotomous effect modifiers. Although heart failure incidence was found increased by 15% in the early glucose-lowering RCTs, this effect faded away in contemporary RCTs. LDL-C change was overall trivial and did not change glucose-lowering outcome effects.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analyses of all glucose-lowering RCTs involving patients with diabetes provide precise estimates of benefits for CHD and major cardiovascular events after consideration of the resulting ongoing BP difference. No benefit or harm on mortality, heart failure and stroke were noticed, while discontinuations related to adverse events because of treatment were increased following glucose-lowering. The extent of glucose-lowering is proportionally related to changes of CHD and stroke composite, and treatment-related discontinuations.

Opportunities of Antidiabetic Drugs in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Meta-Analysis and Perspectives for Trial Design

To identify potential application of GLP1-RAs (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) and SGLT2-Is (sodium-dependent glucose cotrasnsporter-2 inhibitors) in cardiovascular medicine, we performed PubMed search until March 31, 2020 and selected placebo-controlled randomized trials (RCTs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Twenty-four hour ambulatory and office blood pressure (BP), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and changes in glycated hemoglobin and body weight were aggregated across RCTs using random-effect models. In 2238 patients (7 RCTs), SGLT2-Is lowered 24-hour systolic/diastolic BP by 4.4/1.9 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.4-5.5/1.2-2.6 mm Hg), whereas 2 GLP1-RAs RCTs produced contradictory BP results. Over 1.3 to 5.4 years of follow-up of 56 004 patients (7 RCTs), aggregate hazard ratios associated with GLP1-RA treatment were 0.88 (0.84-0.93) for MACE, 0.84 (0.74-0.89) for CKD, and ranged from 0.84 to 0.90 for individual MACE end points (P≤0.01). Across 5 SGLT2-Is RCTs, including 43 467 patients with 1.5 to 4.2 years follow-up, hazard ratios were 0.87 (0.82-0.93) for MACE, 0.68 (0.62-0.75) for HF, 0.82 (0.72-0.93) for cardiovascular death, 0.87 (0.79-0.96) for myocardial infarction, and 0.61 (0.56-0.67) for worsening CKD. The risk of HF and CKD, but not MACE, decreased with more BP lowering. Stricter glycemic control was associated with higher HF risk, but unrelated to MACE or CKD. The aggregate effect sizes on systolic BP, body weight, and glycated hemoglobin were -1.61 mm Hg, -2.40 kg, and -0.69% for GLP1-RAs, and -2.53 mm Hg, -1.15 kg and -0.24%, for SGLT2-Is (P<0.001). In conclusion, GLP1-RAs and SGLT2-Is reduced cardiovascular risk with differential benefit profiles.

Liraglutide reduces systolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

The antidiabetic effect of liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has been explored in several trials. We performed this meta-analysis determining the effects of liraglutide on blood pressure in these patients. Three electronic databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central) were searched for all published articles evaluating the effects of liraglutide on blood pressure in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Total 968 patients were included in 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with a follow-up of 16 ± 9 weeks. Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day reduced systolic blood pressure (weighted mean differences -5.39 (95% confidence interval, -7.26, -3.51) mm Hg, p < .001) and body weight (weighted mean differences -2.07 (95% confidence interval, -2.62, -1.51) kg, p < .001) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. There was no significant difference for changes of diastolic blood pressure between liraglutide 1.8 mg/day and placebo in these patients (weighted mean differences -0.53 (95% confidence interval, -1.96, 0.89) mm Hg, p > .05). The increases of heart rate were greater than placebo in patients treated with liraglutide 1.8 mg/day (weighted mean differences 6.03 (95% confidence interval, 4.78, 7.29) kg, p < .001). There was no significant correlation between reduction of systolic blood pressure and weight loss in patients treated with liraglutide 1.8 mg/day (p = .24). In conclusion, liraglutide reduces systolic blood pressure and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These data suggest the beneficial effects of liraglutide on cardiovascular protection and may improve prognosis in these patients.

Diabetes and calcification: The potential role of anti-diabetic drugs on vascular calcification regression

Vascular calcification (VC) has been well-established as an independent and strong predictor of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) as well as major cardiac adverse events (MACE). VC is associated with increased mortality in patients with CVD. Pathologically, VC is now believed to be a multi-directional active process ultimately resulting in ectopic calcium deposition in vascular beds. On the other hand, prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is gradually increasing thus making the current population more prone to future CVD. Although the mechanisms involved in development and progression of VC in DM patients are not fully understood, a series of evidences demonstrated positive association between DM and VC. It has been highlighted that different cellular pathways are involved in this process. These intermediates such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), various interleukins (ILs) and different cell-signaling pathways are over-expressed in DM patients leading to development of VC. Thus, considering the burden and significance of VC it is of great importance to find a therapeutic approach to prevent or minimize the development of VC in DM patients. Over the past few years various anti diabetic drugs (ADDs) have been introduced and many of them showed desired glucose control. But no study demonstrated the effects of these medications on regression of VC. In this review, we will briefly discuss the current understanding on DM and VC and how commonly used ADDs modulate the development or progression of VC.

The effect of probiotics supplementation on blood pressure: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Fermented milk has over the last decade been intensively studied because of the putative antihypertensive effect. The aim of our study is to investigate the role of probiotics support therapy in blood pressure and, as a kind of convenient and economic drugs for prevention and auxiliary treatment of hypertension.

Materials and methods

We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of probiotics consumption on blood pressure. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinical trials, CNKI and the Cochrane library were searched. Also, the grey literature and references were searched.

Results

Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2037 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included. Probiotic consumption significantly changed systolic blood pressure (SBP) by − 3.05 mmHg (95%CI: − 4.67, − 1.44; P < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by − 1.51 mmHg (95%CI: − 2.38, − 0.65; P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that the benefit effect of probiotics supplementation in SBP was only observed in hypertension [weight mean difference (WMD) = − 3.31 mmHg, 95%CI: − 5.71, − 0.92; P = 0.007] or type 2 diabetes (WMD = -4.85 mmHg, 95%CI: − 9.28, − 0.42; P = 0.032) patients, and the decreased DBP level by probiotics supplementation was only observed in hypertension patients (WMD = -2.02 mmHg, 95%CI: − 3.68, − 0.36; P = 0.017).This effect could only last for a short-term time of 8 or 10 weeks, but not for a long-term time.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis found a moderate and statistically significant reduction for either SBP or DBP with probiotics supplement compared with controls. Thus, probiotics is a potential for the dietary treatment of hypertension.

Effect of Hemoglobin A1c Reduction or Weight Reduction on Blood Pressure in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have shown their beneficial effects on cardiovascular outcomes and multiple cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension. However, the mechanism of blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of these agents has not been elucidated. This study aims to evaluate the effect of hemoglobin A1c reduction or body weight reduction with GLP-1RA treatment and SGLT2i treatment on BP changes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods and Results Studies were identified by a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register until June 2019. Meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between hemoglobin A1c reduction or body weight reduction and changes of BP. A total of 184 trials were included. Both GLP-1RA and SGLT2i led to significant reductions in systolic BP (weighted mean difference, -2.856 and -4.331 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.001 for both) and diastolic BP (weighted mean difference, -0.898 and -2.279 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.001 for both). For both drug classes, hemoglobin A1c reduction was not independently associated with systolic BP reduction or diastolic BP reduction. In GLP-1RA treatment, weight reduction was positively associated with systolic BP reduction and diastolic BP reduction (β=0.821 and β=0.287, respectively; P<0.001 for both). In SGLT2i treatment, weight loss was significantly associated with systolic BP reduction (β=0.820; P=0.001) but was not associated with diastolic BP reduction. Conclusions Treatment with GLP-1RA and SGLT2i led to significant reductions in BP in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Weight reduction was significantly and independently associated with BP reductions in GLP-1RA treatment and SGLT2i treatment.

Pharmacologic therapy of obesity: mechanisms of action and cardiometabolic effects

Obesity is a chronic, relapsing, multifactorial disease, which has become a serious threat to public health globally, as the worldwide prevalence of obesity increases exponentially over time. It has been well established that obesity is associated with multiple adverse cardiometabolic effects. Although lifestyle changes are the first line of therapy for obesity, these are often insufficient in attaining weight loss goals. Orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, lorcaserin, naltrexone/bupropion, and liraglutide are agents that have been approved for the treatment of obesity but their effects on cardiometabolic risk factors and outcomes have not been clearly elucidated. Given the detrimental repercussions of obesity on cardiometabolic health, there is a pressing clinical need to fully understand the effects of these agents beyond weight loss alone. Certain previous weight loss drugs have been withdrawn due to safety concerns and this underlines the need for more careful assessment of the effects of the various pharmacologic agents currently used for the treatment of obesity. This review aims to provide an overview of the mechanisms, efficacy, safety and cardiometabolic effects of the currently available pharmacologic agents for weight loss.