Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein for the treatment of severe haemophilia A: Final results from the ASPIRE extension study

Real-world insights into the management of hemophilia A in Italy: treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization

PURPOSE

This real-world analysis described the Hemophilia A (HA) population in Italy, evaluating drug utilization and consumption of factor VIII (FVIII) products of patients under prophylaxis and on-demand therapy.

METHODS

From Jan-2017 to Jun-2022, male patients with HA were identified through prescriptions of FVIII products [extended half-life FVIII, standard half-life recombinant FVIII, and plasma-derived FVIII (EHL FVIII, SHL rFVIII, and pdFVIII, respectively)], or emicizumab or FVIII plus von Willebrand factor or HA-related hospitalization using administrative flows of Italian healthcare entities. Patients on treatment with FVIII products during 2021-2022 were stratified by treatment regimen (prophylaxis/on-demand). The mean annual consumption expressed in International Units (IU) of EHL FVIII and SHL FVIII in patients treated during 2021-2022 having at least 12-month follow-up were assessed.

RESULTS

Among included HA patients, 145 (39.5%) received EHL FVIII and 222 (60.5%) SHL FVIII. Of 165 patients on prophylaxis, 105 (64%) received an EHL FVIII and 60 (36%) an SHL FVIII. The mean annual consumption of FVIII was 336,700 IU (median 319,000 IU) for EHL FVIII and 440,267 IU (median 360,500 IU) for SHL FVIII. Specifically, for patients on EHL FVIII, the most common drugs were efmoroctocog alfa (N = 51) and damoctocog alfa pegol (N = 50), followed by turoctocog alfa pegol (N = 25) and rurioctocog alfa pegol (N = 19). Of 702 HA patients initially treated with FVIII products, 74 (10.5%) switched to emicizumab during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

These findings revealed an extensive use of EHL FVIII products, suggesting growing efforts from clinicians to optimize prophylactic strategies and achieve better bleeding protection.

Long-term efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis improves perceived pain, mental, and physical health in patients with hemophilia A: post hoc analysis of phase III trials using patient-reported outcomes

Background

Hemophilia-associated bleeding and resultant joint pain and mobility restrictions can predispose patients to poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Therefore, efficacy of a treatment needs to address more than just annualized bleed rates.

Objectives

Describe the evolution of HRQoL, pain, and activity in patients with hemophilia A, treated with efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis.

Design

A post hoc analysis from Kids A-LONG (NCT01458106), A-LONG (NCT01181128), and long-term extension study ASPIRE (NCT01454739) assessed change in pain and activity-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods

Physical health, pain, and HRQoL were assessed by PROs for a cumulative treatment duration of up to ~6 years. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in EuroQoL (EQ)-5D and Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire (Haem-A-QoL).

Results

118 adult/adolescents and 71 pediatric patients were included. The proportion of adults and adolescents reporting no problem in the EQ-5D analysis of 'pain/discomfort' significantly increased from A-LONG baseline (35.04%; 41/117) to ASPIRE month 30 (44.68%; 21/47; p = 0.024). Mean (standard deviation) Haem-A-QoL subdomain scores for 'feeling' and 'physical health' at A-LONG baseline improved by -3.24 (15.13; p = 0.018) and -3.85 (23.07; p = 0.047), respectively, at study end. Proportion of pediatric patients reporting no problem on the EQ-5D analysis of 'pain/discomfort', significantly increased from A-LONG baseline (75.0%; 42/56) to ASPIRE baseline (95.56%; 43/45; p = 0.046). Satisfaction levels for pediatric patients were high at A-LONG baseline and maintained until study end.

Conclusion

Long-term efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis reduces pain and improves HRQoL in adult and adolescent patients with hemophilia A. In pediatric patients, it reduces perceived pain and maintains satisfaction levels.

Trial registration

NCT01458106, NCT01181128, NCT01454739.

Real-world usage and effectiveness of recombinant factor VIII/factor IX Fc in hemophilia A/B: final data from the 24-month, prospective, noninterventional PREVENT study in Germany

Background

Real-world experience with efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor [F]VIII Fc fusion protein [rFVIIIFc]) and eftrenonacog alfa (a recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein [rFIXFc]) is needed to bridge evidence gaps.

Objectives

To describe rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc usage and effectiveness over a 24-month prospective period.

Methods

PREVENT (NCT03055611), a noninterventional study across 25 German hemophilia treatment centers, enrolled previously treated persons with hemophilia A and B (all ages/severities) on individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis before/at enrollment. Primary endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR), injection frequency (IF), and factor consumption (FC). Additionally, up to 12 months of retrospective FVIII/FIX data were collected. Physician and patient satisfaction, and safety outcomes were also assessed.

Results

Overall, 150 patients received ≥1 rFVIIIFc dose and 47 patients received ≥1 rFIXFc dose, with median prospective follow-up of 20.6 and 21.0 months, respectively. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc demonstrated low median ABR (0.5/1.7), annualized IF (121.8/52.2 injections/y), and FC (4611.7/2423.9 IU/kg) in line with product labels. Compared with previous FVIII/FIX, there was a 56.0% reduction in ABR for rFVIIIFc (rate ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64), with no change for rFIXFc (rate ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31); rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc reduced annualized IF (rFVIIIFc, mean difference, -31.7; 95% CI, -40.3 to -23.1; rFIXFc, mean difference, -37.3; 95% CI, -46.9 to -27.8), while FC remained stable (rFVIIIFc, +374.1; 95% CI, +46.8 to +701.3; rFIXFc, +503.9; 95% CI, +95.4 to +912.4). Most physicians and patients were satisfied or highly satisfied with rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc were well tolerated, with no inhibitor development or treatment-related serious adverse events.

Conclusion

Real-world PREVENT data complement phase 3 trials and show that individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis provided stable bleed protection with low IF and maintained FC. Compared with previous FVIII, ABR was considerably reduced with rFVIIIFc, with stable annualized FC. For rFIXFc, bleed protection was maintained vs previous FIX while reducing annualized IF.

Changes in Quality of Life, Adherence, and Kinesiophobia in Patients with Hemophilia Treated with Extended Half-Life Treatment: Final Results of the LongHest Project

(1) Background: Hemophilia is a bleeding disorder characterized by hemarthrosis. Prophylaxis is the gold standard for bleeding prevention. Extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII replacement products have shown to be associated with low bleeding rates. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of EHL prophylaxis in improving perceived quality of life, adherence to treatment, and kinesiophobia in patients with hemophilia. (2) Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. Forty-six patients from different regions, who had started EHL FVIII concentrate prophylactic treatment, were evaluated at baseline and at 12-month follow-up. The study variables were as follows: perceived quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey), adherence to treatment (Validated Hemophilia Regimen Treatment Adherence Scale-Prophylaxis), and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia). (3) Results: There were statistically significant differences in the domains Role-Physical (p < 0.001), Bodily Pain (p < 0.001), Role-Emotional (p < 0.001), Vitality (p = 0.04), and Social Functioning (p = 0.01) and the total scores, Physical Health (p < 0.001) and Mental Health (p < 0.001) on perceived quality of life. There were significant differences in the domains Skipping (p < 0.01), Communicating (p < 0.001), and the total score (p = 0.01) in terms of adherence. There were also significant differences in kinesiophobia (p = 0.02) after the study period. (4) Conclusions: EHL prophylaxis can improve the perceived quality of life of people with hemophilia. This prophylactic regimen, which requires fewer infusions, may improve adherence to treatment in adult patients with hemophilia over a 12-month period. The administration of extended half-life factor VIII concentrates can reduce kinesiophobia in adult patients with hemophilic arthropathy.

Cost-Effectiveness of Recombinant Factor IX Fc Prophylaxis and Recombinant Factor IX On-Demand Treatment in Patients with Haemophilia B Without Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant factor IX (rFIX) and recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) are standard half-life and extended half-life FIX replacement therapies, respectively, and represent established treatment options indicated for adults and children with haemophilia B. These FIX replacement therapies can be administered as prophylaxis (to prevent bleeding) or 'on-demand' (to stop bleeding). This analysis aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of once-weekly prophylaxis with rFIXFc versus on-demand treatment with rFIX in patients with haemophilia B without inhibitors in the Italian healthcare setting.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to assess a hypothetical cohort of adolescent or adult male patients (≥ 12 years) with haemophilia B (FIX level of ≤ 2 IU/dL) without inhibitors. Model inputs were derived from the pivotal phase 3 clinical studies for rFIXFc and rFIX, published literature and assumptions when published data were unavailable. The model employed a lifelong time horizon with 6-monthly transitions between health states, and it estimated total costs, total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), number of bleeds, number of surgeries and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

rFIXFc prophylaxis was associated with lower total costs per patient (€5,308,625 versus €6,564,510) and greater total QALYs per patient (15.936 versus 11.943) compared with rFIX on-demand; rFIXFc prophylaxis was therefore the dominant treatment strategy. The model also demonstrated that rFIXFc prophylaxis was associated with fewer incremental bleeds (- 682.29) and surgeries (- 0.39) compared with rFIX on-demand.

CONCLUSIONS

rFIXFc prophylaxis provides improved health outcomes and lower costs, and represents a cost-effective treatment option compared with rFIX on-demand for adolescent and adult male patients with haemophilia B. This comparative assessment of cost-effectiveness should help to inform both clinicians and healthcare policy makers when making treatment decisions for patients with haemophilia B.

Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in children: early steps in life's journey for people with severe hemophilia A

People with severe hemophilia A usually experience their first bleed early in life. In children with severe hemophilia A, primary prophylaxis is recommended to prevent recurrent and potentially life-threatening bleeds that significantly impact day-to-day life. Factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis is well-established in children and has been shown to reduce the development of hemophilic arthropathy. However, a major challenge of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (FVIII inhibitors). Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a human cell line-derived recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) whose immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety have been studied in 167 children with severe hemophilia A across two prospective clinical trials and their long-term extensions. In 105 previously untreated children, the inhibitor rate of 16.2% for high-titer inhibitors (26.7% for all inhibitors) was lower than published rates for hamster cell line-derived rFVIII products. There was no inhibitor development in previously untreated children with non-null F8 mutations and in previously treated children. In a case series of 10 inhibitor patients, 8 (80%) underwent successful immune tolerance induction with simoctocog alfa with a median time to undetectable inhibitor of 3.5 months. In an analysis of 96 children who enrolled in the extension studies and received long-term simoctocog alfa prophylaxis for up to 5 years, median spontaneous, joint, and total annualized bleeding rates were 0.3, 0.4, and 1.8, respectively. No thromboembolisms were reported in any of the 167 children, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Optimal care of children should consider several factors, including minimization of inhibitor development risk, maintaining tolerance to FVIII, highly effective bleed prevention and treatment, safety, and impact on long-term outcomes such as bone and joint health. In this context we review the pediatric clinical data and ongoing studies with simoctocog alfa.

A post hoc analysis of PROTECT VIII kids assessing long-term efficacy and safety of damoctocog alfa pegol in adolescents with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The safety and efficacy of the extended half-life factor VIII (FVIII) product damoctocog alfa pegol (BAY 94-9027, Jivi®) has been demonstrated in the PROTECT VIII Kids study (NCT01775618), where male previously-treated patients (PTPs) aged <12 years old with severe haemophilia A and ≥ 50 exposure days (EDs) were treated prophylactically. The PROTECT VIII Kids extension study assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of damoctocog alfa pegol in the same population.

AIM

To evaluate the long-term impact of damoctocog alfa pegol in a post hoc subgroup analysis of adolescent patients in the PROTECT VIII Kids study and its extension from 12th birthday onwards.

METHODS

The current analysis included PTPs aged ≥12 years old, who remained in the extension for ≥6 months following their 12th birthday. The observation period was defined as the time from 12th birthday to the end of the extension period; all data from this birthday were included whether in the main study or extension phase. The main efficacy variable was annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and the main safety variable was the frequency of inhibitor development.

RESULTS

This subgroup analysis comprised 25 patients. Median observation time after 12th birthday was 3.2 years. Median total/joint/spontaneous ABRs in the observation period were 1.7/0.7/0.3, respectively. Safety findings were consistent with those reported for the overall study population; no confirmed FVIII inhibitors or anti-drug antibodies were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Damoctocog alfa pegol is efficacious with a favourable safety profile in adolescents with haemophilia A, supporting its long-term use in children and adolescents.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol Prophylaxis in Patients with Haemophilia A Aged 12-&lt;18 Years at Enrolment into PROTECT VIII

INTRODUCTION

The phase 2/3 PROTECT VIII study demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety of damoctocog alfa pegol (BAY 94-9027; Jivi®), a B-domain-deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII), site-specifically PEGylated to improve its pharmacokinetic profile. We report a post hoc assessment of bleeding and safety outcomes in the subgroup of patients, aged 12-<18 years at enrolment.

METHOD

PROTECT VIII was a multicentre, open-label study of previously treated males aged 12-65 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII <1%). Twelve patients were included in this analysis. All received damoctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis for the total time in study (median [range] time in study 4.0 [1.3-6.2] years).

RESULTS

Overall median (Q1; Q3) total and joint annualised bleeding rates were 1.8 (0.4; 5.1) and 0.7 (0.2; 1.8), respectively, for the entire study. During the last 6 months of treatment, eight (66.7%) and ten (83.3%) out of 12 patients experienced zero total and joint bleeds, respectively. No patient developed FVIII inhibitors. No deaths or thrombotic events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy and safety of damoctocog alfa pegol were confirmed in adolescent patients with haemophilia A, with data for up to 6 years supporting its use as a long-term treatment option in this group as they transition into adulthood.

A post hoc analysis of previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A who developed inhibitors in the PUPs A-LONG trial

ABSTRACT

Inhibitor development is a major therapeutic complication for people with hemophilia. The phase 3 PUPs A-LONG study evaluated the safety and efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, herein referred to as rFVIIIFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A. Male PUPs <6 years old were enrolled and received rFVIIIFc; inhibitor development was the primary end point. Post hoc analyses, including patient treatment regimen patterns and timing of inhibitor development, descriptive and Kaplan-Meier analyses of time to first inhibitor-positive test by treatment regimen and by titer, and consumption, were performed to describe patients who developed inhibitors during PUPs A-LONG. We investigated patient characteristics (eg, demographics and genotype) and nongenetic risk factors (eg, intense factor exposure and central venous access device [CVAD] placement) that may predict inhibitor development and characteristics of inhibitor development (low-titer vs high-titer inhibitor). Baseline characteristics were similarly distributed for age, race, and ethnicity across both patients who were inhibitor-positive and those who were inhibitor-negative (all P > .05). High-risk F8 variants were associated with development of high-titer inhibitors (P = .028). High-titer inhibitor development was often preceded by the presence of a low-titer inhibitor. Patients whose low-titer inhibitor progressed to a high-titer inhibitor received a higher mean dose per infusion (98.4 IU/kg, n = 5) compared with those whose low-titer inhibitor resolved spontaneously (59.2 IU/kg, n = 7; P = .033) or persisted (45.0 IU/kg, n = 5; P = .047). There was no association between CVAD placement surgery and inhibitor development. Post hoc analyses suggest that F8 genotype and dose of factor are as important as inhibitor risk factors and require further investigation. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02234323.

Noninterventional study assessing joint health in persons with hemophilia A after switching to turoctocog alfa pegol: design of pathfinderReal

Background

Joint damage affects the quality of life of persons with hemophilia A. The long-term safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP) prophylaxis in persons with hemophilia A has been investigated in pivotal phase 3 trials in children, adolescents, and adults (pathfinder program). However, there is a lack of data on joint health in adult persons with hemophilia A treated with N8-GP.

Objectives

To describe the design of the ongoing pathfinderReal study investigating the joint health status in adult persons with hemophilia A after switching to N8-GP.

Methods

pathfinderReal is a multicountry, noninterventional, single-arm study (NCT05621746) of joint health in adult (≥18 years) male persons with hemophilia A who have switched to N8-GP. Patients enrolled in other interventional studies and those who have previously terminated N8-GP treatment will be excluded. Approximately 124 adults with hemophilia A will be enrolled and followed up for a maximum of 24 months. Data from routine clinical assessments of patients' joint health will be collected. The primary endpoint is change in Hemophilia Joint Health Score (defined as a change in total score of ≤2) from initiation of N8-GP treatment until the end of the study. Secondary endpoints include number of bleeding episodes, number and resolution of target joints, patient-reported outcomes of problem joint score, pain score, and change in physical function levels. An exploratory endpoint is included to measure the number of patients achieving improved Hemophilia Joint Health Score from the initiation of N8-GP until the end of the study.

Conclusion

The pathfinderReal study will provide insights regarding the impact of N8-GP on joint health in persons with hemophilia A in a real-world setting.

Pharmacokinetic-guided versus standard prophylaxis in hemophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling more readily available and PK-guided prophylaxis endorsed by current hemophilia guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to summarize current evidence in the literature.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of PK-guided compared with non-PK-guided prophylaxis.

METHODS

We did not restrict inclusion to specific study design labels and included all studies consisting of at least one distinct cohort arm receiving PK-guided prophylaxis. We searched the following databases from inception to date of search: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the EU Clinical Trial Register. Following title, abstract, and full-text screening conducted independently by 2 review authors, we summarized studies qualitatively and synthesized included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) quantitatively by fitting random-effects models.

RESULTS

Search of databases on February 3, 2023, yielded 25 studies fitting our inclusion criteria. Of those, only 2 RCTs and 17 nonrandomized studies included a standard prophylaxis comparator group. Furthermore, risk of bias in the latter was substantial, primarily due to before-after study designs and retrospective comparator groups. Thus, nonrandomized studies were only presented qualitatively. A random-effects meta-analysis of the 2 identified RCT remained inconclusive with regards to bleeding outcomes (ratio of means, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.85-1.56) and factor consumption (ratio of means, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58-1.18).

CONCLUSION

Evidence in the literature suggesting a clinical benefit of PK-guided over standard fixed-dose prophylaxis was weak and mainly found in nonrandomized studies limited by lack of concurrent controls, heterogeneity in outcome reporting, small sample sizes, and high risk of bias.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

The road to implementation of pharmacokinetic-guided dosing of factor replacement therapy in hemophilia and allied bleeding disorders. Identifying knowledge gaps by mapping barriers and facilitators

Clinical guidelines and expert groups recommend the use of pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing of factor replacement therapy for the treatment of bleeding disorders, especially for patients with hemophilia. Although PK-guided dosing is increasingly applied, it is generally not considered standard clinical practice. The aim of this scoping review is to map barriers and facilitators for the implementation of PK-guided dosing in clinical practice and to identify knowledge gaps. A literature search was performed and 110 articles were included that describe PK-guided dosing in patients with bleeding disorders, mostly hemophilia A. We defined two overarching themes, efficacy and feasibility, and discuss five topics within each theme. For each topic, barriers, facilitators and knowledge gaps were described. Although consensus was found with regard to some topics, contradicting reports were found for others, especially with respect to the efficacy of PK-guided dosing. These contradictions highlight the need for future research to elucidate current ambiguities.

Prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII Fc in hemophilia A: long-term follow-up on joint health, efficacy, and safety from phase 3 studies in children and adults

Background

Recurrent joint bleeds are a major cause of morbidity in severe hemophilia. Prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, [rFVIIIFc]) has demonstrated benefits beyond bleed control, including joint health maintenance.

Objectives

To assess long-term efficacy and safety of rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A in phase 3 pivotal (A-LONG/Kids A-LONG) and extension (ASPIRE) studies.

Methods

Longitudinal analysis included pooled data from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG and ASPIRE. Subgroup analyses investigated outcomes in modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Joint Health Score and target joints in subjects with 4 to 5 years follow-up on individualized prophylaxis (IP), and those with the highest annualized bleeding rate (ABR) quartile during Year 1 of IP.

Results

Overall, rFVIIIFc consumption remained stable and low ABRs were maintained, with a median treatment duration of 4.2/3.4 years in subjects from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG, respectively. Median overall ABR also remained low (1.0-2.0) in subjects on IP for 4 to 5 years. Sustained improvements in modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Joint Health Score were demonstrated over a median follow-up of 3.7 years. In subjects from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG, 99.6% (n = 234)/100% (n = 9) of evaluable baseline target joints were resolved, with no recurrence in 95%/100% of target joints. In IP subjects within the highest ABR quartile in Year 1, continued improvements were observed over a median follow-up of 4.3 years in ABR and joint health, without increased factor consumption. No inhibitors or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

Previously treated subjects of all ages receiving long-term prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc had sustained clinical benefits, including improved joint health and low ABR.

Long-term outcomes of prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII Fc or recombinant factor IX Fc in patients with hemophilia previously treated on demand

Background

Prophylactic factor replacement therapy is recommended over on-demand treatment for preserving long-term joint health in hemophilia. Extended half-life products, including efmoroctocog alfa/eftrenonacog alfa (recombinant factor VIII [FVIII]/FIX Fc fusion proteins; herein rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc), have the potential to reduce treatment burden with less frequent administration and improve bleed prevention.

Objectives

We report post hoc data from patients with hemophilia A or B (HA/HB) who switched from prestudy on-demand FVIII/FIX to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis at the start of A-LONG/B-LONG or start of/during ASPIRE/B-YOND phase 3 studies.

Methods

Patients with ≥6 months rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis were enrolled. Treatment exposure, dosing, annualized bleeding rates, joint health, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes were assessed. Results were also stratified by age.

Results

Sixty-seven patients with HA and 50 with HB were analyzed; ≥60% were from regions outside Europe/North America, predominately those aged 12 to ‍25 years. No subjects returned to on-demand treatment postswitch.After switch to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis, median annualized bleeding rates were reduced and sustained at low levels with stable factor usage across age groups (median treatment duration: 4.8/3.6 years). HRQoL outcomes improved for all ages; most pronounced changes were in the sports and leisure and physical health domains. After switch to rFVIIIFc prophylaxis, total modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score and joints with pain decreased in 64.6% and 29.2% of patients with HA. Insufficient data from patients with HB limited joint health evaluation of rFIXFc.

Conclusions

Findings add to existing evidence and demonstrate the clinical and HRQoL benefits of switching patients from on-demand treatment to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis.

Clinical outcome and incidence of inhibitor development in severe hemophilia patients receiving low-dose prophylaxis: a 3-year follow-up study in Senegal, West Africa

INTRODUCTION

In Africa, where access to diagnosis and treatment of hemophilia is the lowest in the world, prophylaxis is rarely used in preference to on-demand treatment. There are limited data of prophylaxis treatment from sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and inhibitor development in people with hemophilia receiving low-dose prophylaxis (LDP) in a sub-Saharan African setting.

METHODS

We conducted a three-year prospective study. A once or twice weekly prophylaxis regimen of 25 IU/kg of rFVIIIFc or 30 IU/kg of rFIXFc was given to Hemophilia A and B, respectively. We evaluated clinical outcomes and inhibitors occurrence, determined by screening and titration using the Nijmegen technique.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients were included in the LDP regimen. The mean age was 6.3 years (1.5 - 10). A significant reduction was noted in the annualized bleeding rate, from 7.53 to 1.33 (p = 0.0001); the annualized joint bleeding rate passed from 3.6 to 1.4 (p = 0.001) and the proportion of severe bleeding, from 86.1% to 16.7% (p = 0.0001). The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) moved from 9.6 to 3.4 (p = 0.0001) and the Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH) improved from 25.8 to 30.9 (p = 0.0001). School absenteeism decreased from 7.33% to 2.59%. Adherence to prophylaxis was 89.5% versus 60%. Consumption was 580 IU/kg/year versus 1254.6 IU/kg/year before and after prophylaxis, respectively. Incidence of inhibitors was 23% (3 /13 HA).

CONCLUSION

The LDP in Hemophilia improves the clinical outcome without a surplus risk of inhibitor development. Using extended half-life clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) is better for prophylaxis in resource-limited countries, as they allow better compliance in treatment.

Real-world evidence on efmoroctocog alfa in patients with haemophilia A: A systematic literature review of treatment experience in Europe

INTRODUCTION

The real-world effectiveness of the efmoroctocog alfa (recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein, a rFVIIIFc) has been investigated in numerous studies, however, currently, there exists no comprehensive collection of the existing real-world evidence (RWE) on the performance of prophylactic use of rFVIIIFc.

AIM

The aims of this systematic literature study were to identify, review, evaluate and collate the RWE of prophylactic rFVIIIFc for patients with haemophilia A reported in Europe.

METHODS

We searched Medline and Embase from 2014 to February 2022 to identify publications reporting the effectiveness of rFVIIIFc in patients with haemophilia A. The outcomes of interest were annualised bleeding rates (ABR, AjBR, AsBR), injection frequency, factor consumption, adherence, development of inhibitors and quality-of-life measures.

RESULTS

46 eligible publications (eight full-text articles) were included. rFVIIIFc showed a low ABR in patients with haemophilia A. Studies assessing treatment switching from a standard half-life (SHL) treatment to rFVIIIFc found that the ABR and consumption were reduced in most patients. Studies assessing rFVIIIFc effectiveness reported a median ABR between 0.0 and 2.0 with median injections per week ranging between 1.8 and 2.4 and median doses between 60 and 105 IU/kg/week. Of the studies assessing inhibitor development, only one study reported an incidence of a low titre inhibitor, and no patients developed clinically significant inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

rFVIIIFc prophylaxis treatment results in a low ABR across studies in patients with haemophilia A in a European real-world setting, which correlates with findings from clinical trials assessing the efficacy of rFVIIIFc in patients with haemophilia A.

Cost-effectiveness of recombinant factor VIII Fc versus emicizumab for prophylaxis in adults and adolescents with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the UK

INTRODUCTION

The economic and clinical burden of haemophilia A is high. Primary prophylaxis with factor VIII replacement therapy is the recognised standard of care, but the emergence of non-factor therapies, such as emicizumab, is extending treatment options for people with haemophilia A.

AIM

There are currently no direct comparisons of efficacy or cost between recombinant factor FVIII Fc-fusion protein efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor FVIII Fc-fusion protein referred to herein as rFVIIIFc) and emicizumab; therefore, a cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare prophylactic treatment with rFVIIIFc versus emicizumab in patients with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the UK.

METHODS

The cost-effectiveness model was based on a matching-adjusted indirect comparison and included male patients, aged ≥12 years, with haemophilia A without inhibitors. The model was designed as a Markov process with a flexible lifelong time horizon, and cost-effectiveness was presented as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Base-case analysis and sensitivity analyses (including scenario analyses, one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis [DSA] and probability sensitivity analysis [PSA]) were performed using the following treatment strategies: individualised prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc and prophylaxis with emicizumab administered once weekly (scenario analyses used regimens of once every 2 weeks or once every 4 weeks).

RESULTS

Base-case analysis, DSA and PSA indicated that, compared with emicizumab administered once weekly, rFVIIIFc individualised prophylaxis was the dominant treatment strategy, with lower costs, a greater number of quality-adjusted life years, and a lower number of bleeds.

CONCLUSIONS

rFVIIIFc has proven efficacy and is cost-effective compared with emicizumab, providing clinicians with a viable treatment option to improve the health outcomes for adults and adolescents with haemophilia A in the UK.

The More Recent History of Hemophilia Treatment

The availability first in the 1970s of plasma-derived and then in the 1990s of recombinant clotting factor concentrates represented a milestone in hemophilia care, enabling not only treatment of episodic bleeding events but also implementation of prophylactic regimens. The treatment of hemophilia has recently reached new landmarks. The traditional clotting factor replacement therapy for hemophilia has been substituted over the last 10 years by novel treatments such as bioengineered factor VIII and IX molecules with extended half-life and non-factor treatments including the bispecific antibody emicizumab. This narrative review is dedicated to these newer therapies, which are contributing significantly to improving the long-term management of prophylaxis in hemophilia patients. Another section is focused on the current state of gene therapy, which is a promising definitive cure for severe hemophilia A and B.

Immunogenicity of Current and New Therapies for Hemophilia A

Anti-drug antibody (ADA) development is a significant complication in the treatment of several conditions. For decades, the mainstay of hemophilia A treatment was the replacement of deficient coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to restore hemostasis, control, and prevent bleeding events. Recently, new products have emerged for hemophilia A replacement therapy, including bioengineered FVIII molecules with enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles: the extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII products. However, the main complication resulting from replacement treatment in hemophilia A is the development of anti-FVIII neutralizing alloantibodies, known as inhibitors, affecting approximately 25–30% of severe hemophilia A patients. Therefore, the immunogenicity of each FVIII product and the mechanisms that could help increase the tolerance to these products have become important research topics in hemophilia A. Furthermore, patients with inhibitors continue to require effective treatment for breakthrough bleedings and procedures, despite the availability of non-replacement therapy, such as emicizumab. Herein, we discuss the currently licensed treatments available for hemophilia A and the immunogenicity of new therapies, such as EHL-rFVIII products, compared to other products available.

Managing surgery in hemophilia with recombinant factor VIII Fc and factor IX Fc: Data on safety and effectiveness from phase 3 pivotal studies

Background

Surgical procedures impose hemostatic risk to people with hemophilia, which may be minimized by optimal factor (F) replacement therapy.

Methods

This analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of extended half-life factor replacement recombinant FVIII and FIX Fc fusion proteins (rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc) during surgery in phase 3 pivotal (A-LONG/Kids A-LONG and B-LONG/Kids B-LONG) and extension (ASPIRE and B-YOND) studies. Dosing regimens were determined by investigators. Injection frequency, dosing, blood loss, transfusions, and hemostatic response were assessed.

Results

Forty-five major (n = 31 subjects) and 90 minor (n = 70 subjects) procedures were performed in hemophilia A; 35 major (n = 22) and 62 minor (n = 37) procedures were performed in hemophilia B. Unilateral knee arthroplasty was the most common major orthopedic procedure (hemophilia A: n = 15/34; hemophilia B: n = 8/24). On the day of surgery, median total dose in adults/adolescents was 81 IU/kg for rFVIIIFc and 144 IU/kg for rFIXFc; most major procedures required ≤2 injections (including loading dose). Through days 1-14, most major procedures had ≤1 injection/day. Hemostasis was rated excellent (rFVIIIFc: n = 39/42; rFIXFc: n = 29/33) or good (n = 3/42; n = 4/33) in evaluable major surgeries, with blood loss comparable with subjects without hemophilia. Most minor procedures in adults/adolescents required one injection on the day of surgery, including median loading dose of 51 IU/kg (rFVIIIFc) and 80 IU/kg (rFIXFc). No major treatment-related safety concerns were identified. No subjects developed inhibitors or serious vascular thromboembolic events.

Conclusions

rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc were efficacious and well tolerated for the management of perioperative hemostasis across a wide spectrum of major and minor surgeries in hemophilia.

First study of extended half-life rFVIIIFc in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A: PUPs A-LONG final results

PUPs A-LONG evaluated the safety and efficacy of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with hemophilia A. This open-label, phase 3 study enrolled male PUPs (<6 years) with severe hemophilia A to receive rFVIIIFc. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of inhibitor development. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleed rate (ABR). Of 103 subjects receiving ≥1 dose of rFVIIIFc, 80 (78%) were aged <1 year at the study start, 20 (19%) had a family history of inhibitors, and 82 (80%) had high-risk F8 mutations. Twenty subjects began on prophylaxis, while 81 began an on-demand regimen (69 later switched to prophylaxis). Eighty-seven (81%) subjects completed the study. Inhibitor incidence was 31.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8% to 41.7%) in subjects with ≥10 exposure days (or inhibitor); high-titer inhibitor incidence was 15.6% (95% CI, 8.8% to 24.7%). The median (range) time to high-titer inhibitor development was 9 (4-14) exposure days. Twenty-eight (27%) subjects experienced 32 rFVIIIFc treatment-related adverse events; most were inhibitor development. There was 1 nontreatment-related death due to intracranial hemorrhage (onset before the first rFVIIIFc dose). The overall median (interquartile range [IQR]) ABR was 1.49 (0.00-4.40) for subjects on variable prophylaxis dosing regimens. In this study of rFVIIIFc in pediatric PUPs with severe hemophilia A, overall inhibitor development was within the expected range, although high-titer inhibitor development was on the low end of the range reported in the literature. rFVIIIFc was well-tolerated and effective for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02234323).

LongHest project: A prospective, observational study of extended half-life treatment in the musculoskeletal health of patients with severe haemophilia A

Background

Prophylactic treatment is the gold standard in the treatment of patients with haemophilia. Prophylaxis with extended half‐life (EHL) treatment has shown long‐term safety and efficacy in patients with haemophilia.

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy of prophylaxis with EHL treatment in the frequency of haemarthrosis and musculoskeletal health in adult patients with severe haemophilia A.

Methods

Prospective cohort study. Forty‐six patients with severe haemophilia A were recruited. The frequency of haemarthrosis (self‐reports), joint condition (Haemophilia Joint Health Score), pain intensity (visual analogue scale), range of motion (goniometry), and strength (dynamometry) and muscle activation (surface electromyography) were evaluated. Three assessments were carried out: at baseline (T0), at 6 months (T1) and at 12 months following treatment (T2).

Results

There were significant changes in the within‐subject effect in the frequency of haemarthrosis in elbow (F(1.05;96.20) = 3.95; P < .001) and knee (F(1.73;157.99) = 9.96; P < .001). Significant within‐subject effect in elbow pain intensity (F(2;182) = 63.51; P < .001) was found. The mean values of the frequency haemarthrosis in elbow (from .66±1.01 to .04±.20) and knees (from .55±.68 to .33±.53) decrease after the period study. The intensity of elbow pain and (from 3.08±1.69 to 2.67±1.73), decrease after the 12‐month follow‐up period.

Conclusions

Prophylaxis with extended half‐life treatment reduces the frequency of haemarthrosis in elbow and knee in adult patients with haemophilia. EHL treatment reduces the intensity of elbow pain in patients with haemophilic arthropathy.

Clinical application of extended half-life factor VIII in children with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Only few studies have presented results from real-world clinical use of Extended Half-Life (EHL) products in children with haemophilia (CWH).

AIM

To retrospectively examine real-life experience with EHL factor VIII products use in CWH A, comparing with clinical experience from standard half-life products (SHL).

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records of CWH A who have been prescribed EHL factor concentrates was conducted. All before/after comparisons were performed with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test.

RESULTS

Twenty-three children with severe haemophilia A were enrolled in the study (3-6 years old: n = 4, 7-12 years old: n = 7 and 13-18 years old: n = 12). Median length of time that patients were treated with EHL products was 78 weeks. Median dosing interval was significantly lengthened from 2.3 to 3.5 days after switching from SHL to EHL concentrates. Mean trough FVIII levels were significantly increased from 2.3% to 4.1% after treatment with EHL products. Also, CWH A had a reduction of mean annual bleeding rate (ABR) and mean annual joint bleeding rate (AJBR) from 1 and .8 to .3 and .2, respectively, following treatment with EHL concentrates (ABR: p = .02, AJBR: p = .05). However, after switching to factor EHL, actual FVIII consumption, including bleeds, was significantly increased from 94 IU/kg/week to 118 IU/kg/week in CWH A. There was no inhibitor development.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the successful transition of 23 CWH A from SHL to EHL factor concentrates.

Impact of novel hemophilia therapies around the world

Hemophilia A and B are hereditary bleeding disorders, characterized by factor VIII or IX deficiencies, respectively. For many decades, prophylaxis with coagulation factor concentrates (replacement therapy) was the standard‐of‐care approach in hemophilia. Since the 1950s, when prophylaxis started, factor concentrates have been improved with virus inactivation and molecule modification to extend its half‐life. The past years have brought an intense revolution in hemophilia care, with the development of nonfactor therapy and gene therapy. Emicizumab is the first and only nonreplacement agent to be licensed for prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A, and real‐world data show similar efficacy and safety from the pivotal studies. Other nonreplacement agents and gene therapy have ongoing studies with promising results. Innovative approaches, like subcutaneous factor VIII and lipid nanoparticles, are in the preclinical phase. These novel agents, such as extended half‐life concentrates and emicizumab, have been available in resource‐constrained countries through the constant efforts of the World Federation of Haemophilia Humanitarian Aid Program. Despite the wide range of new approaches and therapies, the main challenge remains the same: to guarantee treatment for all. In this article, we discuss the evolution of hemophilia care, global access to hemophilia treatment, and the current and future strategies that are now under development. Finally, we summarize relevant new data on this topic presented at the ISTH 2021 virtual congress.

Improvement in pain-related quality of life in patients with hemophilia A treated with rFVIIIFc individualized prophylaxis: post hoc analysis from the A-LONG study

Background:

Pain, a common symptom of hemophilia, begins early in life primarily due to joint bleeding. Recurrent bleeding adversely affects patients’ pain-related physical functioning, which can negatively impact their quality of life (QoL).

Objective:

Post hoc analysis of data from the A-LONG study (NCT01181128), to assess change over time in pain-related QoL in patients with severe hemophilia A treated prophylactically with recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc).

Methods:

Patients who completed Haem-A-QoL (17–65 years) and EQ-5D-3L (⩾12–65 years) questionnaires at baseline (BL) and end of study (EoS). Individual-level changes were assessed using three pain-related items of the Haem-A-QoL ‘Physical Health’ domain and the pain/discomfort item of EQ-5D-3L. Distributions of responses (EoS versus BL) were compared using McNemar’s test.

Results:

A significantly greater proportion of patients reported they did not experience painful swellings ( n = 87; 66% versus 46%, p <  0.01) or pain in their joints ( n = 89; 42% versus 27%; p <  0.05) at EoS versus BL. The proportion of patients who did not find it painful to move numerically increased at EoS versus BL ( n = 86; 47% versus 38%; p = NS). A significantly greater proportion of patients reported no pain/discomfort at EoS versus BL ( n = 116; 45% versus 34%; p <  0.05).

Conclusion:

This study reports the effect of FVIII prophylaxis on patient-reported measures of pain over time in patients with severe hemophilia A. The results of this post hoc analysis showed improvements in pain from BL to EoS in patients receiving rFVIIIFc individualized prophylaxis indicating effective pain management, a key component of patient care.

Turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP) in severe hemophilia A: Long-term safety and efficacy in previously treated patients of all ages in the pathfinder8 study

Background

N8-GP (turoctocog alfa pegol; Esperoct) is a glycoPEGylated human recombinant factor VIII (FVIII).

Objectives

Pathfinder8 (NCT01480180) was a phase 3, multinational, open-label, nonrandomized trial to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of N8-GP in people of all ages with severe hemophilia A previously treated with N8-GP.

Patients/Method

Patients were recruited from the completed phase 3 pathfinder2 and pathfinder5 trials to receive intravenous N8-GP prophylaxis for up to 104 weeks, administered every 7 days, twice weekly, or three times weekly. Primary and secondary end points were the number of adverse events (AEs) reported and efficacy of treatment, respectively.

Results

Overall, 160 patients were exposed to N8-GP for a mean of 179 exposure days and 681 calendar days (≈1.9 years) per patient. In total, 119 patients experienced 510 AEs, corresponding to a rate of 1.71 AEs per patient-year of exposure; 97.5% of AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and no AEs led to withdrawal. No patients developed FVIII inhibitors during the trial. The Poisson estimate of mean annualized bleeding rate for all bleeds (excluding surgery) and across all regimens was 1.10 (median, 0.00), and for spontaneous bleeds was 0.61 (median, 0.00). Most (55.6%) patients experienced no bleeds that required FVIII treatment (excluding perioperative bleeds). The estimated hemostatic success rate for the treatment of 322 bleeding episodes (excluding surgery) was 95.8%, including missing values as failure.

Conclusions

Long-term prophylactic use of N8-GP appeared safe and efficacious across all age groups in people with severe hemophilia A previously treated with N8-GP.

Recombinant single-chain factor VIII in severe hemophilia: Long-term safety and efficacy in previously treated patients in the AFFINITY extension study

BACKGROUND

rVIII-SingleChain is a recombinant single-chain factor VIII used to treat people with hemophilia A.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this extension study was to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of rVIII-SingleChain prophylaxis in ≥200 previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A with ≥100 exposure days (EDs).

METHODS

In total, 222 patients were enrolled, of which 204 rolled over from prior rVIII-SingleChain studies. The median age was 21 years (range, 2-65 years), including 155 patients ≥12 years and 67 patients <12 years. Patients continued with their previously assigned dose and regimen, or switched at the investigator's discretion. Patients were treated for a mean duration of 31 months (range, 1-47 months), the mean ED was 342 (standard deviation, 135.5), and 212 (95.5%) patients achieved >100 EDs. When the study ended, most patients were on either a prophylaxis regimen of 34.9 (17-62) IU/kg, 3×/week (N = 88; 39.6%), or 37.2 (13-65) IU/kg, 2×/week regimen (N = 72; 32.4%).

RESULTS

Hemostatic efficacy was rated excellent or good in 87.1% of assessed bleeds. The median (range) annualized bleeding rate was 1.21 (0.0-42.6), and the annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR) was 0.32 (0.0-33.0) for prophylaxis regimens. Median AsBR was similar for patients treated 3×/week and 2×/week (0.31 and 0.30, respectively). Surgical hemostatic efficacy was rated excellent or good in 100% of surgeries. No inhibitors, anaphylactic reactions, or thromboembolic events were reported in PTPs.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm the safety and efficacy of rVIII-SingleChain as a long-term prophylaxis treatment modality for PTPs with severe hemophilia A.

Cost-minimization analysis of recombinant factor VIII Fc versus emicizumab for treating patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors in Europe

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A cost-minimization model was developed to compare recombinant factor VIII Fc (rFVIIIFc) and emicizumab as prophylaxis for hemophilia A without inhibitors.

METHODS

The model was based on 100 patients from the healthcare payer perspective in the UK, France, Italy, Spain, and Germany (5-year time horizon). Costs included: drug acquisition; emicizumab wastage by bodyweight (manufacturer's dosing recommendations); and additional FVIII for breakthrough bleeds. Scenario analyses (UK only): reduced emicizumab dosing frequency; and emicizumab maximum wastage.

RESULTS

Total incremental 5-year savings for rFVIIIFc rather than emicizumab use range from €89,320,131 to €149,990,408 in adolescents/adults (≥12 years) and €173,417,486 to €253,240,465 in children (<12 years). Emicizumab wastage accounts for 6% of its total cost in adolescents/adults and 26% in children. Reducing the emicizumab dosing frequency reduces the incremental cost savings with rFVIIIFc, but these remain substantial (adolescents/adults, >€92 million; children >€32 million). Maximum emicizumab wastage increases by 86% and 106%, respectively, increasing the incremental cost savings with rFVIIIFc to €125,352,125 and €105,872,727, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on cost-minimization modeling, rFVIIIFc use for hemophilia A prophylaxis in patients without inhibitors is associated with substantial cost savings in Europe, reflecting not only higher acquisition costs of emicizumab, but also other costs including wastage related to available vial sizes.

A survey of physicians' treatment switching practice in people on long-term prophylaxis for hemophilia in five European countries

OBJECTIVE

Recombinant factor VIII and factor IX Fc fusion proteins (rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc) were developed with an extended half-life (EHL) to improve the management of people with hemophilia A (PwHA) and B (PwHB), respectively.

METHODS

This survey gathered physician-reported treatment decisions and physician views on outcomes in PwHA or PwHB who switched to rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc in the 12 months prior to study completion.

RESULTS

Physicians (N = 37) considered bleeds, pharmacokinetic parameters, joint health and adherence the most important factors to assess both in routine care and when deciding to switch to an EHL therapy. In the 12 months prior to study completion, 37 physicians switched 113 PwHA to rFVIIIFc and 25 physicians switched 36 PwHB to rFIXFc. Most PwH (>90%) had moderate or severe hemophilia and many (>60%) switched within 6 months of the survey. The main reason for switching PwHA to rFVIIIFc was to allow fewer injections (49%), while the main reason for switching PwHB to rFIXFc was the product becoming available for use (36%). Overall, 96% of PwHA and 89% of PwHB who were switched remained on these EHL products at the time of survey. Mean total weekly dose, injection frequency and annualized bleeding rate were reported to have reduced following switching.

CONCLUSION

This survey provides valuable insight into reasons for, and challenges to, the use of EHL products in clinical practice. Physicians perceived that switching to treatment with rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc can improve quality of life, treatment burden, disease control and adherence.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of rFVIIIFc Versus Contemporary rFVIII Treatments for Patients with Severe Hemophilia A Without Inhibitors in the United States

BACKGROUND

A range of treatments for patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) have been developed over the last decade, allowing for reduced frequency of administration and improved outcomes (joint health and breakthrough bleeding rates). While clinically effective, the cost effectiveness of these treatments has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of contemporary rFVIII treatments for severe HA patients without inhibitors.

METHODS

A published semi-Markov model was used to compare three different prophylaxis regimens: (1) extended half-life (EHL) recombinant Factor VIII (rFVIII) Fc-fusion protein (rFVIIIFc, Eloctate^®, Sanofi), (2) EHL PEGylated rFVIII (PEG-rFVIII, Adynovate^®, Takeda), and (3) standard half-life (SHL) rFVIII (antihemophilic factor [recombinant], Advate^®, Takeda), used as a proxy for all SHL rFVIII treatments. Acquisition costs were included based on published dosing and weight data. Benefits were incorporated through published annualized bleeding rates, rates of target joint development/resolution, and improvements in the modified hemophilia joint health score. Results were presented as total, discounted costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

RESULTS

rFVIIIFc was shown to provide the most QALYs (27.922) compared with both PEG-rFVIII (27.454) and SHL rFVIII (27.071), at lower costs. Discounted lifetime costs were estimated at US$18.235m (rFVIIIFc), US$20.198m (PEG-rFVIII), and US$18.285m (SHL rFVIII), and were predominantly affected by model settings related to acquisition costs, patient weight, and dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

rFVIIIFc may offer a cost-effective option for severe HA patients. Uncertainties owing to the limited evidence base is the main limitation of the study.

Efmoroctocog Alfa: A Review in Haemophilia A

Efmoroctocog alfa (Elocta®, Eloctate®, Eloctate™), an extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII)-Fc fusion protein, is approved for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A. The efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa in the prevention and treatment of bleeding in previously treated patients (PTPs) and previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A has been demonstrated in phase III studies; this includes its use in the perioperative setting (in PTPs). Furthermore, the effectiveness of efmoroctocog alfa in clinical practice has been confirmed in numerous real-world studies; compared with conventional, standard half-life (SHL) FVIII products, prophylaxis with this EHL FVIII product achieved similar or reduced bleeding rates with fewer injections. Efmoroctocog alfa was generally well tolerated; inhibitors occurred in approximately one-third of PUPs in a phase III study. Efmoroctocog alfa is an established and effective EHL FVIII replacement therapy for the management of haemophilia A. Compared with SHL FVIII products, EHL FVIII products such as efmoroctocog alfa have the potential to optimise prophylactic outcomes by decreasing the burden of treatment or increasing the level of bleed protection.

Post-hoc analysis on the long-term response to fixed-dose prophylaxis with N8-GP in patients with haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Challenges with personalised prophylaxis in haemophilia remain, including designing unique dosing schedules that require continual adjustments and monitoring using complex sampling procedures.

AIM

To assess long-term efficacy and pharmacokinetic outcomes with fixed-dose N8-GP prophylaxis.

METHODS

Descriptive analyses were performed on data from the pathfinder 2 and pathfinder 5 trials of patients with severe haemophilia A. Bleed frequency and reoccurrence were assessed in relation to several clinical criteria of interest. Bleed risk relative to time since last dose was assessed using calculated annualised bleeding rate (ABR). Long-term ABR and mean factor VIII (FVIII) trough levels were assessed in patients who received consistent N8-GP prophylaxis every 4 days (Q4D).

RESULTS

During pathfinder 2, 117/136 patients with study-drug exposure of ≥600 days experienced bleeding episodes; 8.6% of bleeds were reoccurring bleeds; bleed reoccurrence decreased over time. For patients who received consistent Q4D prophylaxis across the trial (n = 61), mean ABR decreased from 3.5 bleeds/year (Year 1) to 1.6 bleeds/year (Year 6); mean FVIII trough levels stabilised at approximately 5% (Year 6). Across patients who received prophylaxis at some point during pathfinder 2 (n = 177), 125/126 (99%) reoccurring bleeds were joint bleeds. For patients receiving Q4D prophylaxis, bleeding risk generally increased as the time since the last prophylaxis dose increased. A similar reduction in ABR and stabilisation of trough level was observed in pathfinder 5.

CONCLUSION

Long-term exposure (> 5 years) to fixed-dose N8-GP prophylaxis resulted in a protective haemostatic effect, with reduction in bleed frequency and reoccurrence, and stabilisation of FVIII trough level over time.

Clotting factor concentrates for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in previously treated individuals with haemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

The hallmark of severe hemophilia (A or B) is recurrent bleeding into joints and soft tissues with progressive joint damage, despite on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis has long been used, but not universally adopted, because of medical, psychosocial, and cost controversies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of clotting factor concentrate prophylaxis in managing previously-treated individuals with hemophilia A or B.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. In addition, we searched MEDLINE and Embase and online trial registries. Most recent search of Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register: 24 February 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating people with hemophilia A or hemophilia B, who were previously treated with clotting factor concentrates to manage their hemophilia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed trials for eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The authors used the GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials (including 608 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Eight of the trials (477 participants) had arms comparing two or more prophylactic regimens to one another and four of the trials (n = 258) compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment (two trials had multiple arms and were included in both comparisons). Comparison of two or more prophylactic regimens For trials comparing one prophylaxis regimen to another, given the heterogeneity of the data, none of the data were pooled for this comparison. Considering the individual trials, three trials reported the primary outcome of joint bleeding, and none showed a dfference between dosing regimens (low-certainty evidence). For the secondary outcome of total bleeding events, prophylaxis with a twice-weekly regimen of FIX likely results in reduced total bleeds compared to a once-a-week regimen of the same dose, mean difference (MD) 11.2 (5.81 to 16.59) (one trial, 10 participants, low-certainty evidence). Transient low-titer anti-FVIII inhibitors were reported in one of the trials. Blood-transmitted infections were not identified. Other adverse events reported include hypersensitivity, oedema, and weight gain. These were, however, rare and unrelated to study drugs (very low-certainty evidence). Comparison of prophylactic and on-demand regimens Four of the trials (258 participants) had arms that compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis may result in a large decrease in the number of joint bleeds compared to on-demand treatment, MD -30.34 (95% CI -46.95 to -13.73) (two trials, 164 participants, low-certainty evidence). One of these trials (84 participants) also reported the long-term effects of prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy showing improved joint function, quality of life, and pain; but no differences between groups in joint structure when assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In one trial (84 participants) validated measures for joint health and pain assessment showed that prophylaxis likely improves joint health compared to an on-demand regimen with an estimated change difference of 0.94 points (95% CI 0.23 to 1.65) and improves total pain scores, MD -17.20 (95% CI -27.48 to -6.92 (moderate-certainty evidence). Two trials (131 participants) reported that prophylaxis likely results in a slight increase in adverse events, risk ratio 1.71 (1.24 to 2.37) (moderate-certainty evidence). No inhibitor development and blood-transmitted infections were identified. Overall, the certainty of the body of evidence was judged to be low because of different types of bias that could have altered the effect.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from RCTs that prophylaxis, as compared to on-demand treatment, may reduce bleeding frequency in previously-treated people with hemophilia. Prophylaxis may also improve joint function, pain and quality of life, even though this does not translate into a detectable improvement of articular damage when assessed by MRI.  When comparing two different prophylaxis regimens, no significant differences in terms of protection from bleeding were found. Dose optimization could, however, result in improved efficacy. Given the heterogeneity of the data, pooled estimates were not obtained for most comparisons.  Well-designed RCTs and prospective observational controlled studies with standardised definitions and measurements are needed to establish the optimal and most cost-effective treatment regimens.

Recombinant factor VIII Fc for the treatment of haemophilia A

Prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) is the current therapeutic approach for people with haemophilia A. However, standard half-life (SHL) FVIII products must be injected frequently, imposing a substantial burden on the individual and making it difficult to tailor therapy according to patient need and lifestyle, which could impact adherence. Recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc; Elocta® , Sobi; Eloctate® , Sanofi) is a recombinant fusion protein that undergoes slower clearance from the body than SHL FVIII products. This pharmacokinetic property of rFVIIIFc allows prophylactic administration every 3-5 days, or once weekly in selected patients, with doses adjusted to patient needs and clinical outcomes. Higher FVIII levels can be achieved maintaining dosing frequency similar to that usually applied with SHL FVIII. This review provides a summary of recent data from the A-LONG, Kids A-LONG, ASPIRE and PUPs A-LONG studies and recently published real-world experience relevant to rFVIIIFc use in individualised regimens. The review also introduces ongoing studies of rFVIIIFc, including its use for induction of immune tolerance, and discusses some aspects to consider when switching patients to rFVIIIFc and managing ongoing treatment. In summary, rFVIIIFc is suitable for individualised prophylaxis regimens that can be tailored according to patient clinical needs and lifestyle.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Recombinant Factor VIII Fc Fusion Protein in Subjects With Severe Hemophilia A: Expanded to Include Pediatric Subjects

Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) has been indicated for adults and children with hemophilia A. The objective of this article was to build a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model using adult and pediatric data sets and explore relevant dosing scenarios across all ages. The activity-time profiles of rFVIIIFc from 3 clinical studies (all trials registered at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01027377, NCT01181128, and NCT01458106) were characterized, and covariates that determine variability of rFVIIIFc PK in children and adults were identified and implemented. Data sets were pooled to estimate population PK parameters. Simulations were conducted to generate activity-time profiles at steady state (SS). The proportion of subjects maintaining SS trough >1 and >3 IU/dL and time >10 IU/dL were estimated. The rFVIIIFc model was a two-compartment model that identified weight and von Willebrand factor as significant covariates. Model-predicted SS peaks and troughs of rFVIIIFc activity-time profiles confirmed the necessity of modifying dosing in pediatric subjects. The model also predicted that the average subject in the adult and adolescent group dosed with 40 IU/kg every 2 days maintained factor VIII activity >10 IU/dL for the entire duration. Children aged <6 years and aged 6 to <12 years receiving this dose maintained factor VIII activity of >10 IU/dL for nearly two-thirds and three-quarters of their time, respectively. In conclusion, these population PK analyses characterize activity-time profiles for rFVIIIFc among pediatric and adult subjects. The model was used for simulation of clinically relevant dosing scenarios, which can provide better protection and better clinical outcomes.

Confirmed long-term safety and efficacy of prophylactic treatment with BAY 94-9027 in severe haemophilia A: final results of the PROTECT VIII extension study

Introduction

The phase 2/3 PROTECT VIII main study demonstrated efficacy and safety of BAY 94–9027 (damoctocog alfa pegol; Jivi^®), a B‐domain‐deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII), site‐specifically PEGylated to extend its half‐life.

Aim

To report the final efficacy and safety data for BAY 94–9027 from the PROTECT VIII extension.

Methods

Previously treated males aged 12–65 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII <1%) who completed the multicentre, open‐label PROTECT VIII main study were eligible for the extension. Patients received either on demand or prophylaxis treatments (30‒40 IU/kg twice weekly [2 × W], 45‒60 IU/kg every 5 days [E5D], or 60 IU/kg every 7 days [E7D]) and could switch to any prophylaxis regimen (variable frequency) as needed. Annualised bleeding rates (ABR), zero bleeds and safety outcomes were included in this final analysis.

Results

At extension completion, patients (n = 121) received BAY 94–9027 for a median (range) total time of 3.9 (0.8–7.0) years. Median (Q1; Q3) total ABR was 1.49 (0.36; 4.80) for prophylaxis patients (n = 107), compared with 34.09 (20.3; 36.6) for on‐demand patients (n = 14). Median total ABRs for 2 × W (n = 23), E5D (n = 33), E7D (n = 23) and variable frequency (n = 28) groups were 1.57, 1.17, 0.65 and 3.10, respectively. Of prophylaxis patients, 20.6% were bleed‐free during the entire extension (median time, 3.2 years) and 50.0% were bleed‐free during the last 6 months. No patient developed FVIII inhibitors. No deaths or thrombotic events were reported.

Conclusions

Efficacy and safety of BAY 94–9027 was confirmed, with extension data supporting its use as a long‐term treatment option for patients with haemophilia A.

PROTECT VIII kids extension study: Long-term safety and efficacy of BAY 94-9027 (damoctocog alfa pegol) in children with severe haemophilia A

Introduction

BAY 94‐9027 (damoctocog alfa pegol; an extended half‐life PEGylated recombinant factor VIII [FVIII]) demonstrated efficacy and safety in previously treated paediatric patients (PTPs) aged <12 years with severe haemophilia A in the PROTECT VIII Kids study (NCT01775618).

Aim

To evaluate the long‐term safety of BAY 94‐9027 in PTPs aged <12 years at enrolment.

Methods

In the PROTECT VIII Kids study, boys <12 years with severe haemophilia A were enrolled in two age cohorts (6–<12 years and <6 years) and treated prophylactically twice weekly, every 5 days or every 7 days, with BAY 94‐9027 for ≥50 exposure days (EDs). Patients who had completed ≥50 EDs and ≥6 months in the main study or 12‐week safety expansion study were eligible to participate in the extension. Primary safety variable was frequency of inhibitor development; main efficacy variable was annualised bleeding rate (ABR).

Results

Of 73 PTPs from the main/expansion studies, 59 (81%) entered the extension phase for a median (range) duration of 5.0 (0.4–5.9) years. Overall, 39 patients completed ≥5 years of treatment. No patients developed FVIII inhibitors/anti‐PEG antibodies, and two patients aged <6 years discontinued. Median ABR for total bleeds was 1.5 (<6 years) and 1.9 (6–<12 years). Total ABR improved in the extension vs. the main study. In the last 12 months of treatment, median spontaneous ABR was 0.0 in both age groups.

Conclusions

BAY 94‐9027 showed long‐term safety and efficacy for the prevention and treatment of bleeds in younger and older paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A.

Efficacy of rFVIIIFc versus Emicizumab for the Treatment of Patients with Hemophilia A without Inhibitors: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of A-LONG and HAVEN Trials

Purpose

Primary prophylaxis, using factor VIII replacement, is the recognized standard of care for severe hemophilia A. Recombinant factor VIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) and emicizumab, a humanized, bispecific antibody, are approved for routine prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in severe hemophilia A. These products have different mechanisms of action, methods of administration and treatment schedules. In the absence of head-to-head trials, indirect treatment comparisons can provide informative evidence on the relative efficacy of the two treatments. The aim of the study was to compare the approved dosing regimens for each product, rFVIIIFc individualized prophylaxis and emicizumab administered once every week (Q1W), every 2 weeks (Q2W) or every 4 weeks (Q4W), based on clinical trial evidence.

Patients and Methods

The comparison was conducted using matching-adjusted indirect comparison since clinical evidence did not form a connected network. Individual patient data for rFVIIIFc (A-LONG) were compared with data for emicizumab (HAVEN trial program) for mean annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and proportion of patients with zero bleeds. Safety data reported across the analyzed treatment arms were tabularized but not formally compared.

Results

After matching, no significant differences were observed between mean ABR for rFVIIIFc and emicizumab administered Q1W, Q2W or Q4W. The proportion of patients with zero bleeds was significantly higher with rFVIIIFc compared with emicizumab administered Q4W (51.2% versus 29.3%, respectively; odds ratio 2.53; 95% confidence interval 1.09–5.89); no significant differences noted when rFVIIIFc was compared with emicizumab administered Q1W or Q2W. The mean number of adverse events expressed per participant was 1.9 for individualized prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc and 3.7–4.0, 4.1 and 3.6 for emicizumab administered Q1W, Q2W or Q4W, respectively.

Conclusion

This indirect treatment comparison suggests that rFVIIIFc individualized prophylaxis is more efficacious than emicizumab Q4W, and at least as effective as more frequent emicizumab regimens, for the management of hemophilia A.

Recombinant FVIIIFc Versus BAY 94-9027 for Treatment of Patients with Haemophilia A: Comparative Efficacy Using a Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Introduction

Prophylaxis with recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) is the current standard of care for haemophilia A. Several approaches have been used to extend the half-life of rFVIII to improve prophylaxis outcomes. An indirect comparison of pivotal clinical trial data was performed to evaluate the relative efficacy of two extended half-life therapies approved for the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A: recombinant FVIII–IgG₁ Fc domain fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) and pegylated rFVIII (BAY 94-9027).

Methods

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to compare the rFVIIIFc individualised prophylaxis arm of the A-LONG phase III clinical trial (n = 117) and the BAY 94-9027 approved dosing regimens of the PROTECT VIII phase II/III study (n = 110). Following matching for baseline characteristics, mean annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and the proportion of patients with zero bleeds were compared for rFVIIIFc and BAY 94-9027. Additional supportive analyses comparing rFVIIIFc individualised prophylaxis and the individual prophylaxis regimens included in the PROTECT VIII group (twice weekly, and every 5 and 7 days [Q5D and Q7D]) were conducted.

Results

Mean ABR was lower in the rFVIIIFc individualised prophylaxis group versus the BAY 94-9027 pooled prophylaxis population (3.0 versus 4.9), providing a clinically relevant and statistically significant difference (mean difference [MD] − 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] − 3.5 to − 0.4). A statistically significant difference in ABR was also observed for rFVIIIFc compared with BAY 94-9027 Q7D (3.2 versus 6.4; MD − 3.3; 95% CI − 6.4 to − 0.2). The difference in the proportion of patients with zero bleeds between rFVIIIFc (46.5%) and BAY 94-9027 pooled prophylaxis population (38.2%) was not statistically significant (odds ratio 1.4; 95% CI 0.8 to 2.5).

Conclusions

This indirect treatment comparison indicates a statistically significant and clinically relevant difference in ABR favouring individualised prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc versus BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis. The proportion of patients with zero bleeds was numerically greater with rFVIIIFc treatment but did not achieve statistical significance.

2021 clinical trials update: Innovations in hemophilia therapy

Therapies engineered to prolong clotting factor protein circulation time, manipulate the balance of pro-coagulant and anti-coagulant proteins, or introduce new genetic material to enable endogenous factor protein production dominate the clinical trial landscape of hemophilia. The availability of clotting factor concentrates and the establishment of primary prophylaxis have dramatically improved health outcomes for hemophilia patients. But, the burden of hemostatic therapy remains significant, and many barriers to consistent longitudinal use of prophylaxis exist. Several types of emerging therapeutics including engineered factor concentrates, substitutive therapies, rebalancing therapies, and gene transfer/editing all aim to reduce the challenges of current hemophilia treatment. Emerging treatment options may reduce treatment frequency or need for intravenous administration. They may also introduce new challenges in laboratory assessment of hemostasis. These novel therapies must not introduce significant new health risks and continue to support similar or improved outcomes. The potential ramifications of rebalancing the coagulation cascade, particularly in a stress or inflammatory state, or introduction of new genetic material are not trivial. The focus of this review is to provide an overview of active and recently completed clinical trials as well as emerging preclinical data investigating new therapeutic possibilities for hemophilia patients and potentially other rare bleeding disorders.

Emerging benefits of Fc fusion technology in the context of recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy

Although the primary reason for recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) development was to reduce treatment burden associated with routine prophylaxis, new evidence suggests additional benefits of Fc fusion technology in the treatment of people with haemophilia A. Preclinical research has been utilized to characterize the potential immunomodulatory properties of rFVIIIFc, including an ability to reduce inflammation and induce tolerance to factor VIII. This has since been expanded into clinical research in immune tolerance induction (ITI) with rFVIIIFc, results of which suggest the potential for rapid tolerization in first‐time ITI patients and therapeutic benefit in patients undergoing rescue ITI. The potential for improved joint health through the anti‐inflammatory properties of rFVIIIFc has also been suggested. In addition, a new avenue of research into the role of rFVIIIFc in promoting bone health in patients with haemophilia A, potentially through reduced osteoclast formation, has yielded encouraging results that support further study. This review summarizes the existing preclinical and clinical studies of immunomodulation and tolerization with rFVIIIFc, as well as studies in joint and bone health, to elucidate the potential benefits of rFVIIIFc in haemophilia A beyond the extension of factor VIII half‐life.

Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein for the treatment of severe haemophilia A: Final results from the ASPIRE extension study

Introduction

The efficacy and safety of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) as an extended half‐life treatment for severe haemophilia A were demonstrated in the Phase 3 A‐LONG and Kids A‐LONG studies. Eligible subjects who completed A‐LONG and Kids A‐LONG could enrol in ASPIRE (NCT01454739), an open‐label extension study.

Aim

To report the long‐term safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc in subjects with severe haemophilia A who enrolled in ASPIRE.

Methods

Previously treated subjects received one or more of the following regimens: individualized prophylaxis (IP), weekly prophylaxis, modified prophylaxis or episodic treatment. Subjects could switch treatment regimen at any time. The primary endpoint was inhibitor development.

Results

A total of 150 subjects from A‐LONG and 61 subjects from Kids A‐LONG enrolled in ASPIRE. Most subjects received the IP regimen (A‐LONG: n = 110; Kids A‐LONG: n = 59). Median (range) treatment duration in ASPIRE for subjects from A‐LONG and Kids A‐LONG was 3.9 (0.1‐5.3) years and 3.2 (0.3‐3.9) years, respectively. No inhibitors were observed (0 per 1000 subject‐years; 95% confidence interval, 0‐5.2) and the overall rFVIIIFc safety profile was consistent with prior studies. For subjects on the IP regimen, annualized bleed rates (ABR) remained low (median overall ABR for adults and adolescents was <1.0) and extended‐dosing intervals were maintained (median of 3.5 days) for the majority of subjects in ASPIRE.

Conclusion

ASPIRE results, which include up to 5 years of follow‐up data, confirm earlier reports on the consistent and well‐characterized safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc treatment for severe haemophilia A.