1
|
Barbanti P, Allais G, Cevoli S, Guerzoni S, Valeriani M, Vernieri F. The Role of the Combination Paracetamol/Caffeine in Treatment of Acute Migraine Pain: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther 2024; 13:319-346. [PMID: 38446344 PMCID: PMC11111640 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00581-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Thirty years ago, the first migraine-specific drugs (triptans) appeared. Today two new categories (gepants and ditans) are marketed for acute migraine treatment. That said, is there still a role for conventional therapy? The aim of the present narrative review is to provide an expert overview examining the possible role of the combination paracetamol/caffeine in treatment of acute migraine pain. METHODS To understand possible settings for more appropriate use of paracetamol/caffeine (1000 mg/130 mg) in treatment of acute migraine, a structured literature search was performed using the PubMed database by a panel of experts from major Italian headache centers; articles not referring to migraine pain were excluded from this review; review articles were prioritized. RESULTS Overall response, even to newer specific and selective trigeminal targeted drugs (TTTs), is not over 60%; thus, there is still room for conventional therapies in acute migraine treatment. The panel identified settings in which the use of paracetamol/caffeine combination to treat acute migraine attacks might offer benefit considering the consolidated use through years, despite the lack of studies directly addressing the efficacy of paracetamol/caffeine in the identified populations: subjects > 65 years of age; presence of cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities; TTTs non-responders; pregnancy and breastfeeding; subjects < 18 years of age; paracetamol/caffeine as add-on therapy. CONCLUSIONS Paracetamol is included in the World Health Organization (WHO) essential drug list and has a high level of popularity among patients. Caffeine enhances the analgesic effect of other drugs including paracetamol. In early treatment of acute migraine pain, prescribing physicians might consider using the paracetamol/caffeine combination among other options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit-IRCCS San Raffaele, via della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
- University San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.
| | - Gianni Allais
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Women's Headache Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- Sabina Cevoli IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Valeriani
- Developmental Neurology Unit, IRCSS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy
- Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Neurology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ishii R, Ishizuchi K, Watanabe N, Fukazawa R, Trivedi M, Nakahara J, Takizawa T. Efficacy and tolerability of 100 mg of lasmiditan for migraine: A multi-center, prospective observational real-world study in Japan. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241258695. [PMID: 38859749 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241258695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan, a new medication for acute migraine attacks, is necessary. METHODS We performed a prospective, observational, multi-center, real-world study. A total of 48 patients with migraine (44 females, 44.6 ± 12.9 years old) were included in this study. RESULTS Twenty-three patients (47.9%) reported they were headache-free two hours after taking lasmiditan and were categorized into the responder group. In total, 44 patients (91.7%) experienced at least one side effect within two hours of taking the medication. Dizziness, somnolence, malaise, nausea, and palpitations were reported by 56.3% (n = 27), 45.8% (n = 22), 37.5% (n = 18), 20.8% (n = 10), and 14.6% (n = 7) of patients respectively. Of 48 patients, 20 (41.7%) indicated that they preferred lasmiditan to their previous acute treatment. There were no predictive factors for efficacy. CONCLUSION This real-world study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan. More than 90% of patients experienced side effects from lasmiditan. Approximately 40% of patients preferred lasmiditan despite the occurrence of side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryotaro Ishii
- Department of Neurology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Neurology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kei Ishizuchi
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Narumi Watanabe
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Fukazawa
- Department of Neurology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Neurology, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital, Shiga, Japan
| | - Meesha Trivedi
- Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Jin Nakahara
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsubasa Takizawa
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fullerton T, Pixton G. Long-Term Use of Rimegepant 75 mg for the Acute Treatment of Migraine is Associated with a Reduction in the Utilization of Select Analgesics and Antiemetics. J Pain Res 2024; 17:1751-1760. [PMID: 38764606 PMCID: PMC11102748 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s456006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine use of concomitant analgesics and antiemetics during treatment with rimegepant in adults with migraine. Patients and Methods This was a post hoc analysis of a long-term, open-label, safety study in adults with a history of 2-14 moderate or severe migraine attacks per month. Participants self-administered rimegepant 75 mg (1) up to once daily as needed (PRN) for 52 weeks or (2) every other day plus PRN (EOD+PRN) for 12 weeks. The PRN cohort was further divided based on baseline attack frequency, with PRN (2-8) and PRN (9-14) cohorts having a history of 2-8 or 9-14 attacks per month, respectively. Use of select analgesics and antiemetics was analyzed during a 30-day pre-treatment observation period (OP) and during rimegepant treatment. Results Overall, 1800 rimegepant-treated participants (PRN n = 1514, EOD+PRN n = 286) were included in the analysis. Select analgesics or antiemetics were used by 80.1% of participants during the OP. Among 1441 participants using analgesics or antiemetics during the OP, the proportion who did not use any analgesics or antiemetics following initiation of rimegepant treatment increased during weeks 1-4 (36.9%), 5-8 (52.6%), and 9-12 (56.5%). The mean number of days per month using analgesics or antiemetics was also significantly reduced over time in all cohorts beginning at weeks 1-4 (P < 0.001 vs OP). This pattern of reduced analgesic or antiemetic use was consistent for all rimegepant cohorts, but was most pronounced in the EOD+PRN cohort in which 74.8% of participants reported ≥50% reduction in analgesic/antiemetic days at weeks 9-12. Reduction in use was maintained over time, with 61.3% of participants not using any analgesics or antiemetics during weeks 49-52 of PRN treatment. Conclusion Long-term treatment with oral rimegepant was associated with reduced analgesic and antiemetic use. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03266588.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terence Fullerton
- Internal Medicine and Infectious Disease, Pfizer Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frattale I, Ferilli MAN, Ursitti F, Sforza G, Monte G, Proietti Checchi M, Tarantino S, Mazzone L, Valeriani M, Papetti L. Unsatisfactory response to acute medications does not affect the medication overuse headache development in pediatric chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:61. [PMID: 38649822 PMCID: PMC11036745 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01766-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine (CM) negatively impacts the quality of life of 2 to 4% of pediatric patients. In adults, CM is frequently linked to medication overuse headache (MOH), but there is a much lower prevalence of MOH in children. A suboptimal response to acute therapies may lead to their reduced use, thus preventing MOH development in children and adolescents. The frequency of patients with CM who do not respond to acute therapies was examined in the present study. We investigated whether the prevalence of MOH was different between responders and non-responders. We also examined whether patients receiving prophylactic therapy had an improved response to acute therapy. Finally, we investigated if there was a difference in the frequency of psychiatric comorbidities between responders and non-responders. METHODS We retrospectively analysed clinical data of all chronic pediatric migraineurs under the age of 18 referred to the Headache Centre at Bambino Gesù Children Hospital in June 2021 and February 2023. ICHD3 criteria were used to diagnose CM and MOH. We collected demographic data, including the age at onset of migraine and the age of the CM course. At baseline and after 3 months of preventive treatment, we evaluated the response to acute medications. Neuropsychiatric comorbidities were referred by the children's parents during the first attendance evaluation. RESULTS Seventy patients with CM were assessed during the chosen period. Paracetamol was tried by 41 patients (58.5%), NSAIDs by 56 patients (80.0%), and triptans by 1 patient (1.4%). Fifty-one participants (73%) were non-responder to the abortive treatment. The presence of MOH was detected in 27.1% of the whole populations. Regarding our primary aim, MOH was diagnosed in 29% of non-responder patients and 22% of responders (p > 0.05). All patients received preventative treatment. After 3 months of preventive pharmacological therapy, 65.4% of patients who did not respond to acute medications achieved a response, while 34.6% of patients who were non-responder remain non-responder (p < 0.05). Prophylactic therapy was also effective in 69% of patients who responded to acute medication (p < 0.05). Psychiatric comorbidities were detected in 68.6% of patients, with no difference between responders and non-responders (72.2% vs. 67.3%; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Despite the high prevalence of unresponsiveness to acute therapies in pediatric CM, it does not act as a protective factor for MOH. Moreover, responsiveness to acute drugs is improved by pharmacological preventive treatment and it is not affected by concomitant psychiatric comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Frattale
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Department of Wellbeing of Mental and Neurological, Dental and Sensory Organ Health, Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Ada Noris Ferilli
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabiana Ursitti
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Sforza
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Monte
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Proietti Checchi
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Samuela Tarantino
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Mazzone
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Department of Wellbeing of Mental and Neurological, Dental and Sensory Organ Health, Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Valeriani
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
- System Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
- Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Laura Papetti
- Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children' s Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza di Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Belvís R, Irimia P, González N, García-Ull J, Pozo-Rosich P, López-Bravo A, Morollón N, Quintas S, Plana A, Baz PG, Tentor A, Gallego Artiles N, León FJ, Pérez Martín M, Rivera I, Ramírez R, Colomina I, Lainez JM, Pascual J. Migraine treatment consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurology (SEN), Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (SEMFYC), Society of Primary Care Medicine (SEMERGEN) and Spanish Association of Migraine and Headache (AEMICE) on migraine treatment. Med Clin (Barc) 2024:S0025-7753(24)00137-4. [PMID: 38643025 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is a disease with a high prevalence and incidence, in addition to being highly disabling, causing a great impact on the patient's quality of life at a personal, family and work level, but also social, given its high expense due to its direct (care) and indirect (presenteeism and work absenteeism) costs. The multiple and recent developments in its pathophysiological knowledge and in its therapy require updating and, therefore, in this article the Spanish scientific societies most involved in its study and treatment (SEN, SEMFYC and SEMERGEN), together with the Association Spanish Association for Patients with Migraine and other Headaches (AEMICE), we have developed these updated care recommendations. We reviewed the treatment of migraine attacks, which consisted mainly of the use of NSAIDs and triptans, to which ditans and gepants have been added. We also discuss preventive treatment consisting of oral preventive drugs, botulinum toxin, and treatments that block the action of calcitonin-related peptide (CGRP). Finally, we emphasize that pharmacological treatments must be complementary to carrying out general measures consisting of identifying and managing/deletion the precipitating factors of the attacks and the chronicizing factors, controlling the comorbidities of migraine and eliminating analgesic overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Belvís
- Unidad de Cefaleas y Neuralgias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España.
| | - Pablo Irimia
- Servicio de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Pamplona, España
| | - Nuria González
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario San Carlos. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Madrid, España
| | - Jésica García-Ull
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Valencia, España
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Unidad de Cefalea y Grupo de Investigación en Cefalea, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Vall d'Hebron y Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España
| | - Alba López-Bravo
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Sección de Neurología, Hospital Reina Sofía. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS-A). Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Tudela, Navarra, España
| | - Noemí Morollón
- Unidad de Cefaleas y Neuralgias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Barcelona, España
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital de La Princesa. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Madrid, España
| | - Antoni Plana
- ABS Balàfia-Pardinyes-Secà de Sant Pere de Lleida, Àmbit Lleida. Institut Català de la Salut (ICS). Grupo de Trabajo de Neurología SEMFYC, Lleida, España
| | | | | | | | - Francisco Javier León
- Centro de Salut Dúrcal, Distrito Sanitario Granada Metropolitano. Grupo de Trabajo de Neurología SEMFYC, Granada, España
| | | | - Inés Rivera
- C.S. Barranco Grande, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
| | - Raquel Ramírez
- Servicio de Medicina de Familia, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, España
| | | | - José Miguel Lainez
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Valencia, España
| | - Julio Pascual
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria e IDIVAL. Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la SEN, Santander, España
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rattanawong W, Rapoport A, Srikiatkhachorn A. Medication "underuse" headache. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241245658. [PMID: 38613233 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241245658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many risk factors have been associated with migraine progression, including insufficient and ineffective utilization of migraine medications; however, they have been inadequately explored. This has resulted in suboptimal usage of medications without effective altering of prescribing recommendations for patients, posing a risk for migraine chronification. METHODS Our aim is to conduct a comprehensive review of the available evidence regarding the underuse of migraine medications, both acute and preventive. The term "underuse" includes, but is not limited to: (1) ineffective use of appropriate and inappropriate medication; (2) underutilization; (3) inappropriate timing of usage; and (4) patient dissatisfaction with medication. RESULTS The underuse of both acute and preventive medications has been shown to contribute to the progression of migraine. In terms of acute medication, chronification occurs as a result of insufficient drug use, including failure of the prescriber to select the appropriate type based on pain intensity and disability, patients taking medication too late (more than 60 minutes after the onset or after central sensitization has occurred as evidenced by allodynia), and discontinuation because of lack of effect or intolerable side effects. The underlying cause of inadequate effectiveness of acute medication lies in its inability to halt the propagation of peripheral activation to central sensitization in a timely manner. For oral and injectable preventive migraine medications, insufficient efficacy and intolerable side effects have led to poor adherence and discontinuation with subsequent progression of migraine. The underlying pathophysiology here is rooted in the repetitive stimulation of afferent sensory pain fibers, followed by ascending brainstem pain pathways plus dysfunction of the endogenous descending brainstem pain inhibitory pathway. Although anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) medications partially address pain caused by the above factors, including decreased efficacy and tolerability from conventional therapy, some patients do not respond well to this treatment. Research suggests that initiating preventive anti-CGRP treatment at an early stage (during low frequency episodic migraine attacks) is more beneficial than commencing it during high frequency episodic attacks or when chronic migraine has begun. CONCLUSIONS The term "medication underuse" is underrecognized, but it holds significant importance. Optimal usage of acute care and preventive migraine medications could potentially prevent migraine chronification and improve the treatment of migraine attacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanakorn Rattanawong
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Alan Rapoport
- Department of Neurology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anan Srikiatkhachorn
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lipton RB, Albrecht D, Bermudez M, Hu J, Hussey E, Levy J. A randomized, open-label, 5-period crossover study evaluating the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single dose of intranasal dihydroergotamine (DHE) powder (STS101), intramuscular DHE mesylate, and liquid nasal spray DHE in healthy adults. Headache 2024; 64:266-275. [PMID: 38413540 DOI: 10.1111/head.14685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of dihydroergotamine (DHE) after administration of intranasal DHE powder (STS101), liquid nasal spray (LNS) DHE mesylate, and intramuscular (IM) DHE mesylate injection in healthy participants. BACKGROUND DHE is an effective acute migraine treatment; however, self-administration difficulties have prevented its broader role in the management of migraine. METHODS This randomized, active-controlled, five-period crossover study was conducted over 5 weeks separated by 1-week washout periods. Three STS101 dosage strengths (5.2, 7.0, 8.6 mg), and one dose each of LNS DHE 2.0 mg, and IM DHE 1.0 mg, were administered to 36 healthy participants. Liquid chromatography, tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine DHE (including its 8'OH-DHE metabolite) plasma levels and to calculate PK parameters (Cmax , Tmax , AUC0-2h , AUC0-last , AUC0-inf , and t1/2 ). Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events (AEs), vital signs, electrocardiograms, nasal examinations, and laboratory parameters. RESULTS Thirty-six participants (mean age 36 years; 19% Hispanic Black and 81% Hispanic White) were enrolled. DHE plasma concentrations rose rapidly after STS101 5.2, 7.0, and 8.6 mg and IM DHE injection, with mean concentrations greater than 2000 pg/mL for all STS101 dose strengths at 20 min. All STS101 dose strengths showed approximately 3-fold higher Cmax , AUC0-2h , and AUC0-inf , than the LNS DHE. The mean AUC0-inf of STS101 7.0 and 8.6 mg were comparable to IM DHE (12,600 and 13,200 vs. 13,400 h × pg/mL). All STS101 dose strengths showed substantially lower variability (CV%) compared to LNS DHE for Cmax (35%-41% vs. 87%), and AUC0-inf (37%-46% vs. 65%). STS101 was well tolerated, and all treatment-emergent AEs were mild and transient. CONCLUSION STS101 showed rapid absorption and was well tolerated with mild and transient treatment-emergent AEs. Achieving effective DHE plasma concentrations within 10 min, STS101 displayed a favorable PK profile relative to the LNS with higher Cmax , AUC0-2h , and AUC0inf , and with greater response consistency. The AUC0-inf was comparable to IM DHE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology Montefiore Headache Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Jerry Hu
- Allucent, Gary, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Jeff Levy
- Quotient Sciences, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ormseth BH, Kavanagh KJ, Saffari TM, Palettas M, Janis JE. Assessing the Relationship between Obesity and Trigger Point-specific Outcomes after Headache Surgery. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5629. [PMID: 38486715 PMCID: PMC10939604 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Background Trigger point deactivation surgery is a safe and effective treatment for properly selected patients experiencing migraine, with 68.3%-100% experiencing symptom improvement postoperatively. However, it is still unknown why certain patients do not respond. Obesity has been shown to be associated with worsened migraine symptoms and a decreased response to select pharmacotherapies. This study aimed to determine whether obesity may also be associated with an attenuated response to surgery. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who had undergone trigger point deactivation surgery for migraine. Patients were split into obese and nonobese cohorts. Obesity was classified as a body mass index of 30 or higher per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. Outcomes and follow-up periods were determined with respect to individual operations. Outcomes included migraine attack frequency, intensity, duration, and the migraine headache index. Differences in demographics, operative characteristics, and operative outcomes were compared. Results A total of 62 patients were included in the study. The obese cohort comprised 31 patients who underwent 45 total operations, and the nonobese cohort comprised 31 patients who underwent 34 operations. Results from multivariable analysis showed no impact of obesity on the odds of achieving a more than 90% reduction in any individual outcome. The overall rates of improvement (≥50% reduction in any outcome) and elimination (100% reduction in all symptoms) across both cohorts were 89.9% and 65.8%, respectively. Conclusion Obese patients have outcomes comparable to a nonobese cohort after trigger point deactivation surgery for migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin H. Ormseth
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Kaitlin J. Kavanagh
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Tiam M. Saffari
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, N.J
| | - Marilly Palettas
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jeffrey E. Janis
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gong Z, Yang C, Dai W, Miao S, Liu Y, Jiao Z, Li B, Xie W, Zhao W, Han X, Yu S, Dong Z. Annexin A1 exerts analgesic effect in a mouse model of medication overuse headache. iScience 2023; 26:108153. [PMID: 37867938 PMCID: PMC10587614 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a serious global condition. The interaction between headache attacks and medication overuse complicates the understanding of its pathophysiology. In this study, we developed a preclinical MOH model that incorporates these two key factors by overusing rizatriptan benzoate (RIZ, 4 mg/kg, i.g.) in a glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, 10 mg/kg, i.p.) induced chronic migraine mouse model. We observed that RIZ overuse aggravated GTN-induced cutaneous allodynia and caused a prolonged state of latent sensitization. We also detected a significant upregulation of Annexin-A1 (ANXA1), a protein mainly expressed in the microglia of the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (SPVC), in GTN+RIZ mice. Intracerebroventricular injection of ANXA1-derived peptide Ac2-26 trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (5 μg/mouse) inhibited bright light stress (BLS) induced acute allodynia via the formyl peptide receptor (FPR) in GTN+RIZ mice. These results suggest that ANXA1 may have an analgesic effect in triptan-associated MOH and could potentially serve as a therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihua Gong
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bethune International peace Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050082, China
| | - Chunxiao Yang
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Wei Dai
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Shuai Miao
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Yingyuan Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Zhiyang Jiao
- Department of Outpatient, Shijiazhuang Fourth Retired Cadre Sanatorium of Hebei province Military Region, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050082, China
| | - Bozhi Li
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Wei Xie
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Wei Zhao
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Xun Han
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Shengyuan Yu
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Zhao Dong
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang Y, Huang W, Pan S, Shan Z, Zhou Y, Gan Q, Xiao Z. New management strategies for primary headache disorders: Insights from P4 medicine. Heliyon 2023; 9:e22285. [PMID: 38053857 PMCID: PMC10694333 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary headache disorder is the main cause of headache attacks, leading to significant disability and impaired quality of life. This disorder is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous condition with a complex network of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. However, the timely diagnosis and effective treatment of these headaches remain challenging. Precision medicine is a potential strategy based on P4 (predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory) medicine that may bring new insights for headache care. Recent machine learning advances and widely available molecular biology and imaging data have increased the usefulness of this medical strategy. Precision medicine emphasizes classifying headaches according to their risk factors, clinical presentation, and therapy responsiveness to provide individualized headache management. Furthermore, early preventive strategies, mainly utilizing predictive tools, are critical in reducing headache attacks and improving the quality of life of individuals with headaches. The current review comprehensively discusses the potential application value of P4 medicine in headache management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Songqing Pan
- Department of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Zhengming Shan
- Department of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Yanjie Zhou
- Department of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Quan Gan
- Department of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Zheman Xiao
- Department of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Morais A, Qin T, Ayata C, Harriott AM. Inhibition of persistent sodium current reduces spreading depression-evoked allodynia in a mouse model of migraine with aura. Pain 2023; 164:2564-2571. [PMID: 37318029 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT We investigated the efficacy of inhibiting persistent Na + currents (I NaP ) in acute rodent models of migraine with aura. Cortical spreading depression (SD) is a slow wave of neuronal and glial depolarization that underlies the migraine aura. Minimally invasive optogenetic SD (opto-SD) causes periorbital mechanical allodynia in mice, suggesting SD activates trigeminal nociceptors. Persistent Na + currents contribute to neuronal intrinsic excitability and have been implicated in peripheral and cortical excitation. We examined a preferential inhibitor of I NaP, GS-458967, on SD-induced periorbital allodynia, SD susceptibility, and formalin-induced peripheral pain. Periorbital mechanical allodynia was tested in male and female Thy1-ChR2-YFP mice after a single opto-SD event using manual von Frey monofilaments. GS-458967 (1 mg/kg, s.c.) or vehicle was dosed immediately after opto-SD induction, and allodynia was tested 1 hour later. The electrical SD threshold and KCl-induced SD frequency were examined in the cortex in male Sprague-Dawley rats after 1 hour pretreatment with GS-458967 (3 mg/kg, s.c.) or vehicle. Effects of GS-458967 (0.5-5 mg/kg, p.o.) on spontaneous formalin hind paw behavior and locomotion were also examined in male CD-1 mice. GS-458967 suppressed opto-SD-induced periorbital allodynia and decreased susceptibility to SD. GS-458967 also diminished early and late phase formalin-induced paw-licking behavior with early phase paw licking responding to lower doses. GS-458967 up to 3 mg/kg had no impact on locomotor activity. These data provide evidence that I NaP inhibition can reduce opto-SD-induced trigeminal pain behavior and support I NaP inhibition as an antinociceptive strategy for both abortive and preventive treatment of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreia Morais
- Neurovascular Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Tao Qin
- Neurovascular Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Cenk Ayata
- Neurovascular Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrea M Harriott
- Neurovascular Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Blumenfeld AM, Lipton RB, Silberstein S, Tepper SJ, Charleston L, Landy S, Kuruvilla DE, Manack Adams A. Multimodal Migraine Management and the Pursuit of Migraine Freedom: A Narrative Review. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1533-1551. [PMID: 37542624 PMCID: PMC10444724 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00529-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a neurologic disease with a complex pathophysiology that can be controlled with current treatment options but not cured. Therefore, treatment expectations are highly variable. The concept of migraine freedom was recently introduced and can mean different things, with some, for example, expecting complete freedom from headache and associated symptoms and others accepting the occasional migraine attack if it does not impact functioning. Therefore, migraine management should be optimized so that patients can have the best opportunity to achieve their optimal treatment goals. With migraine freedom as a goal and, given the complex pathophysiology of migraine and the high incidence of comorbidities among individuals with migraine, treatment with a single modality may be insufficient, as it may not achieve migraine freedom in those with more frequent or disabling attacks. In this clinical perspective article, we have identified four key, partially overlapping principles of multimodal migraine treatment: (1) manage common comorbidities; (2) control modifiable risk factors for progression by addressing medication and caffeine overuse; (3) diagnose and treat secondary causes of headache, if present; and (4) individualize acute and preventive treatments to minimize pain, functional disability, and allodynia. There are many barriers to pursuing migraine freedom, and strategies to overcome them should be optimized. Migraine freedom should be an aspirational goal both at the individual attack level and for the disease overall. We believe that a comprehensive and multimodal approach that addresses all barriers people with migraine face could move patients closer to migraine freedom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stewart J Tepper
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Larry Charleston
- Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Posternack C, Kupchak P, Capriolo AI, Katz BJ. Targeting the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell to reduce headache pain and light sensitivity in migraine: A randomized double-blind trial. J Clin Neurosci 2023; 113:22-31. [PMID: 37150129 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 80% of patients with migraine report light sensitivity during attacks and almost half report that following headache, light sensitivity is the most bothersome symptom. Light wavelengths stimulating intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (IPRGCs) exacerbate headache-associated light sensitivity; green light is most comfortable. We developed optical tints that block wavelengths exacerbating migraine pain and transmit wavelengths that are most comfortable. We studied patients with migraine to determine if spectacles with these tints ameliorate headache pain and light sensitivity. Randomized participants wore control lenses or lenses blocking light wavelengths that stimulate IPRGCs. Participants applied the lenses at migraine onset and recorded baseline, two- and four-hour headache pain on an 11-point scale. Primary endpoint was pain reduction at two hours following the first severe or very severe headache. Statistical tests used included mixed-effects model analysis, Mann-Whitney test, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, Shapiro-Wilk test, Welch t-test. In 78 subjects, two- and four-hour pain reduction was not significantly different between groups. In post-hoc analyses of headaches with baseline pain scores ≥ 2, a mixed-effects model suggested that IPRGC lenses were associated with clinically and statistically significant reductions in two- and four-hour headache pain. In post-hoc analyses, fewer subjects wearing IPRGC lenses reported two-hour light sensitivity. Preliminary evidence suggests that optical tints engineered to reduce stimulation of IPRGCs may reduce migraine-associated pain and light sensitivity. Trial Registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04341298).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Kupchak
- Statistical Consultant, 79 Beechwood Avenue, Guelph, ON N1H 5Z7, Canada
| | - Amber I Capriolo
- Avania U.S., 100 Crowley Drive, Suite 216, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA
| | - Bradley J Katz
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, Department of Neurology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ruscheweyh R, Dresler T, Förderreuther S, Gaul C, Gossrau G, Jürgens TP, Ruschil V, Straube A, Scheidt J. What do patients' efficacy and tolerability ratings of acute migraine medication tell us? Cross-sectional data from the DMKG Headache Registry. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231174855. [PMID: 37177799 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231174855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most migraine patients need an effective acute medication. Real-world data can provide important information on the performance of acute migraine medication in clinical practice. METHODS We used data from the German Migraine and Headache Society Headache Registry, where patients rate efficacy and tolerability of and satisfaction with each of their acute headache medications. RESULTS A total of 1756 adult migraine patients (females: 85%, age: 39.5 ± 12.8 years, headache days per month: 13.5 ± 8.1) were included. Of these, 93% used acute medication, most frequently triptans (59.3%) and/or non-opioid analgesics (56.4%), and 58.5% rated efficacy as good or very good. This was more frequent for triptans (75.4%) than for non-opioid analgesics (43.6%, p < 0.001). Among non-opioid analgesics, naproxen was rated most effective (61.9% very good or good, p < 0.001 compared to ibuprofen, acetylsalicylic acid and paracetamol). Patient-rated efficacy significantly declined with higher headache frequencies (p < 0.001), and this effect remained significant after omitting patients overusing acute medication. CONCLUSION In the present population recruited at specialized headache centers, patients rated triptans as more effective than non-opioid analgesics, naproxen as more effective than ibuprofen, and acute medication efficacy decreased with increasing headache frequency.Trial registration: The German Migraine and Headache Society Headache Registry is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS 00021081).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology with Friedrich Baur Institute, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Migraine and Headache Society, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Dresler
- LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tuebingen Center for Mental Health, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Förderreuther
- Department of Neurology with Friedrich Baur Institute, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Charly Gaul
- Headache Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gudrun Gossrau
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Pain Center, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany
| | - Tim Patrick Jürgens
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center North-East, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Neurology, KMG Klinikum Güstrow, Güstrow, Germany
| | - Victoria Ruschil
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Straube
- Department of Neurology with Friedrich Baur Institute, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Scheidt
- Institute for Information Systems, University of Applied Sciences Hof, Hof, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhang L, Novick D, Zhong S, Li J, Walker C, Harrison L, Jackson J, Barlow S, Cotton S. Real-World Analysis of Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Insufficient Responders and Responders to Prescribed Acute Migraine Treatment in China. Pain Ther 2023; 12:751-769. [PMID: 36944864 PMCID: PMC10199977 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00494-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a common disabling primary headache disorder characterized by attacks of severe pain, sometimes accompanied by symptoms including nausea and photo-/phono-phobia. Real-world data of patients with migraine who sufficiently (responders) and insufficiently (insufficient responders) respond to acute treatment (AT) are limited in China. This analysis explored whether responders to AT differ from insufficient responders in terms of clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and patient-reported outcomes in China. METHODS Data were drawn from the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of internists/neurologists and their consulting patients with migraine, conducted in a real-world setting in China, January-June 2014. Responders and insufficient responders to prescribed AT were patients who typically achieved headache pain freedom within 2 h of AT in ≥ 4 and ≤ 3 of five migraine attacks, respectively. Responders were compared with insufficient responders; logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with insufficient response. RESULTS Of 777 patients currently receiving AT, 44.0% were insufficient responders. Significantly fewer responders than insufficient responders had migraine with aura (13.1 vs. 23.8%; p = 0.0001). Responders reported a significantly lower mean Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) total score (5.5 vs. 6.6; p = 0.0325). Responders reported a lower mean impairment while working (50.0 vs. 63.9%; p < 0.0001), overall work impairment (52.6 vs. 66.0%; p < 0.0001), and activity impairment (48.9 vs. 59.0%; p < 0.0001). Statistically significant factors associated with insufficient response to AT included diabetes, unilateral pain, vomiting, sensitivity to smell, visual aura/sight disturbance, and an increase in MIDAS total score. However, there were no statistically significant differences in ATs received by responders and insufficient responders at any regimen of therapy. CONCLUSIONS Many patients with migraine in China are insufficient responders to AT, experiencing worse symptoms that lead to overall poorer quality of life than responders. This unmet need suggests that new effective treatment options are required for migraine.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ezzati A, Fanning KM, Reed ML, Lipton RB. Predictors of treatment-response to caffeine combination products, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in acute treatment of episodic migraine. Headache 2023; 63:342-352. [PMID: 36748728 DOI: 10.1111/head.14459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify predictors of acute treatment optimization for migraine with "over-the-counter" (OTC) or prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as well as other widely used OTCs including acetaminophen, caffeine combination products (CCP), and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) among people with episodic migraine and to develop models that predict treatment response to each class of OTCs. BACKGROUND Efficacy of acute OTC medications for migraine varies greatly. Identifying predictors of treatment response to particular classes of medication is a step toward evidence-based personalized therapy. METHODS For this prediction model development study, we used data from 2224 participants from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study who were aged ≥18 years, met criteria for migraine, had <15 monthly headache days, and reported being on monotherapy for acute migraine attacks with one of the following classes medications: CCP (N = 711), acetaminophen (N = 643), ASA (N = 110), and prescription or OTC NSAIDs (N = 760). The primary outcome measures of treatment optimization were adequate 2-h pain freedom (2hPF) and adequate 24-h pain relief (24hPR), which were defined by responses of half the time or more to the relevant items on the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire-6. RESULTS The mean (SD) age of the participants was 46.2 (13.1) years, 79.4% (1765/2224) were female, 43.7% (972/2224) reported adequate 2hPF, and 46.1% (1025/2224) reported adequate 24hPR. Those taking CCP had better 2hPF and 24PR outcomes. For those taking NSAIDs, better outcomes were associated with lower average pain intensity (2hPF: odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.99; 24PR: OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96), cutaneous allodynia (2hPF: OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.96; 24PR: OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95), depressive symptoms (2hPF: OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98; 24PR: OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99), and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) grade (2hPF: OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.90; 24PR: OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95). Adequate 2hPF for those taking CCP was associated with male gender (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.21-2.77), lower average pain intensity (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91), lower cutaneous allodynia (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.97), and lower Migraine Symptom Severity Scale Score (MSSS; OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97). Adequate 24hPR for those taking CCP was associated with lower average pain intensity (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.96), lower cutaneous allodynia (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.96), and lower MIDAS grade (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96). Participants who were married (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.05-2.19), had lower average pain intensity (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89), lower MSSS (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.99), less depression (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99), and lower MIDAS grade (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.87) had adequate 2hPF after taking acetaminophen. Participants who were married (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02-2.21), had lower pain intensity (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.88), less depression (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.98) and lower MIDAS grade (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.42-0.67) had higher 24hPR following use of acetaminophen. A lower MSSS was the only factor associated with higher 2hPF and 24PR after using ASA (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.92 and OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.93). Predictive models had modest performance in identifying responders to each class of OTC. CONCLUSION A large subgroup of people with migraine had an inadequate response to their usual acute OTC migraine treatment 2- and 24-h after dosing. These findings suggest a need to improve OTC treatment for some and to offer prescription acute medications for others. Predictive models identified several factors associated with better treatment-response in each OTC class. Selecting OTC treatment based on factors predictive of treatment optimization might improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ezzati
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Raffaelli B, Fitzek M, Overeem LH, Storch E, Terhart M, Reuter U. Clinical evaluation of super-responders vs. non-responders to CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies: a real-world experience. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:16. [PMID: 36843007 PMCID: PMC9969617 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01552-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials and real-world studies revealed a spectrum of response to CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in migraine prophylaxis, ranging from no effect at all to total migraine freedom. In this study, we aimed to compare clinical characteristics between super-responders (SR) and non-responders (NR) to CGRP(-receptor) mAbs. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study at the Headache Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. The definition of super-response was a ≥ 75% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) in the third month after treatment initiation compared to the month prior to treatment begin (baseline). Non-response was defined as ≤ 25% reduction in MHD after three months of treatment with a CGRP-receptor mAb and subsequent three months of treatment with CGRP mAb, or vice versa. We collected demographic data, migraine disease characteristics, migraine symptoms during the attacks in both study groups (SR/NR) as well as the general medical history. SR and NR were compared using Chi-square test for categorical variables, and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS Between November 2018 and June 2022, n = 260 patients with migraine received preventive treatment with CGRP(-receptor) mAbs and provided complete headache documentation for the baseline phase and the third treatment month. Among those, we identified n = 29 SR (11%) and n = 26 NR (10%). SR reported more often especially vomiting (SR n = 12/25, 48% vs. NR n = 4/22, 18%; p = 0.031) and typical migraine characteristics such as unilateral localization, pulsating character, photophobia and nausea. A subjective good response to triptans was significantly higher in SR (n = 26/29, 90%) than in NR (n = 15/25, 60%, p = 0.010). NR suffered more frequently from chronic migraine (NR n = 24/26, 92% vs. SR n = 15/29, 52%; p = 0.001), medication overuse headache (NR n = 14/24, 58% versus SR n = 8/29, 28%; p = 0.024), and concomitant depression (NR n = 17/26, 65% vs. SR n = 8/29, 28%; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Several clinical parameters differ between SR and NR to prophylactic CGRP(-R) mAbs. A thorough clinical evaluation prior to treatment initiation might help to achieve a more personalized management in patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Raffaelli
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany ,grid.484013.a0000 0004 6879 971XClinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Mira Fitzek
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Lucas H. Overeem
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Elisabeth Storch
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Maria Terhart
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany. .,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhao H, Xiao Z, Zhang L, Ford J, Zhong S, Ye W, Li J, Tockhorn-Heidenreich A, Cotton S, Chen C. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients with Episodic Migraine in China: Results from the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme™. J Pain Res 2023; 16:357-371. [PMID: 36762367 PMCID: PMC9904300 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s371887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study assessed treatment patterns, disease burden, outcomes, and unmet needs among patients with episodic migraine (EM) in China using Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme™ (DSP) real-world data. Background Migraine is a prevalent and debilitating neurological disorder which presents a major public health burden globally. Research on characteristics, disease burden, and treatment patterns in EM patients in China is limited. Methods Data were drawn from an existing data set Adelphi Migraine DSP, a point-in-time survey conducted in China (January-June 2014). Internists/neurologists completed patient record forms for the next 9 patients who consulted them in clinical practice; these same patients completed the 'patient self-completion questionnaires'. Descriptive analyses were used to assess key variables: patient demographics, treatment patterns (current acute and preventive medication [AM/PM]), effectiveness, issues with existing treatment, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scores. Results Total of 125 internists/neurologists provided data on 1113 patients with EM (headache days/month <15). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 43.8 (13.1) years; mean (SD) number of migraine days/month was 3.2 (1.7). AM was prescribed in 86.1% of patients (non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]: 62.7%; triptans: 7.7%), PM in 38.5%, and both in 24.9% of patients. Approximately 55% of patients experienced ≥1 issue with their current AM or PM. Migraine-related symptoms (including nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia) were fully controlled in <50% of patients receiving NSAIDs (21.7-38.4%) or triptans (32.4-43.5%). Insufficient response to current AM (migraine headache fully resolved within 2 hours in ≤3/5 attacks) was reported by 42.5% of patients. Mild-to-severe disability was reported by 36.8% of patients with a mean (SD) MIDAS score of 5.8 (7.3). Overall, 58.0% of work time was impaired (including time missed and impairment while working). Conclusion This analysis suggests, despite existing treatment options, disease burden and unmet medical needs remain substantial in Chinese patients with EM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongru Zhao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zheman Xiao
- Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Eli Lilly China, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Janet Ford
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Shiying Zhong
- Eli Lilly China, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenyu Ye
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jinnan Li
- Eli Lilly China, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | | | | | - Chunfu Chen
- Department of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Jinan, Jinan, People’s Republic of China,Department of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China,Correspondence: Chunfu Chen, Department of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, # 324 Jingwuweiqi, Road, Shandong, 250021, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13853153248, Email
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ali MD, Gayasuddin Qur F, Alam MS, M Alotaibi N, Mujtaba MA. Global Epidemiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Current Therapeutic Novelties in Migraine Therapy and their Prevention: A Narrative Review. Curr Pharm Des 2023; 29:3295-3311. [PMID: 38270151 DOI: 10.2174/0113816128266227231205114320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The current article reviews the latest information on epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, recent advancements in clinical management, current therapeutic novelties, and the prevention of migraines. In a narrative review, all studies as per developed MeSH terms published until February 2023, excluding those irrelevant, were identified through a PubMed literature search. METHODS Overall, migraine affects more than a billion people annually and is one of the most common neurological illnesses. A wide range of comorbidities is associated with migraines, including stress and sleep disturbances. To lower the worldwide burden of migraine, comprehensive efforts are required to develop and enhance migraine treatment, which is supported by informed healthcare policy. Numerous migraine therapies have been successful, but not all patients benefit from them. RESULTS CGRP pathway-targeted therapy demonstrates the importance of translating mechanistic understanding into effective treatment. In this review, we discuss clinical features, diagnosis, and recently approved drugs, as well as a number of potential therapeutic targets, including pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), adenosine, opioid receptors, potassium channels, transient receptor potential ion channels (TRP), and acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC). CONCLUSION In addition to providing more treatment options for improved clinical care, a better understanding of these mechanisms facilitates the discovery of novel therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Daud Ali
- Department of Pharmacy, Mohammed Al-Mana College for Medical Sciences, Abdulrazaq Bin Hammam Street, Al Safa, Dammam 34222, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fehmida Gayasuddin Qur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Princess Royal Maternity Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Md Sarfaraz Alam
- Department of Pharmaceutics, HIMT College of Pharmacy, Rajpura 8, Institutional Area, Knowledge Park I, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India
| | - Nawaf M Alotaibi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha Campus, Arar, Saudi Arabia
| | - Md Ali Mujtaba
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha Campus, Arar, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ezzati A, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML, Martin VT, Lipton RB. Predictors of treatment-response to Acute Prescription Medications in Migraine: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022; 223:107511. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
21
|
Cady R, Lipton RB, Buse DC, Josiassen MK, Lindsten A, Ettrup A. Optimization of acute medication use following eptinezumab initiation during a migraine attack: post hoc analysis of the RELIEF study. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:91. [PMID: 35902796 PMCID: PMC9336038 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01463-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of preventive treatment on the effectiveness of migraine management have rarely been examined. This post hoc analysis investigated the impact of eptinezumab on the optimization of acute medication effectiveness using the 4-item Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ-4) to measure acute medication optimization over 4 weeks post-infusion. METHODS RELIEF was a 12-week, phase 3, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in patients aged 18-75 years with a ≥ 1-year history of migraine and 4-15 migraine days per month in the 3 months prior to screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a 30-min infusion of eptinezumab 100 mg or placebo within 1-6 h of a qualifying migraine attack. The mTOQ-6 and 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) were administered at screening visit and week 4. From the mTOQ-6, we calculated the mTOQ-4 using the following items: "2-h pain free," "24-h relief," "able to plan," and "feeling in control" to measure acute medication optimization. RESULTS A total of 238 patients received eptinezumab 100 mg and 226 provided week 4 data; 242 received placebo and 232 provided week 4 data. In the eptinezumab arm, the proportion of patients with moderate/maximal optimization increased from 31.4% at baseline to 58.0% (26.6 percentage point increase) at week 4. The corresponding proportions in the placebo group were 40.5% to 50.4% (9.9 percentage point increase). Eptinezumab treatment was associated with numerically larger improvements in HIT-6 at week 4. Relative improvements with eptinezumab vs. placebo from baseline to week 4 in HIT-6 were greater in those with poor treatment optimization at baseline. CONCLUSIONS In comparison with placebo, treatment with eptinezumab was associated with improvements in acute medication optimization as measured by mTOQ and reductions in headache impact, as measured by HIT-6. These benefits were greater in those with poor acute treatment optimization prior to preventive treatment with eptinezumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04152083 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Cady
- RK Consults, Ozark, MO, United States.,Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, United States.,Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, United States
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.,Vector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Henriques S, Almeida A, Peres H, Costa-Ferreira A. Current Evidence in Migraine Surgery: A Systematic Review. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 89:113-120. [PMID: 34611094 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine headache is a widespread neurovascular disorder with an enormous social and economic impact. A subgroup of patients cannot be managed with pharmacological therapy. Although surgical decompression of extracranial sensory nerves has been proposed as a valid alternative treatment option, the medical community remains reluctant to accept it. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. An electronic search was performed in September 2020 on PubMed, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases for original articles reporting outcomes on migraine surgery. RESULTS The search strategy revealed a total of 922 studies, of which 52 were included in the review. Significant improvement was reported in 58.3% to 100% and complete elimination in 8.3% to 86.8% of patients across studies. No major complications were reported. DISCUSSION This systematic review demonstrates that migraine surgery is an effective and safe procedure, with a positive impact in patients' quality of life and a reduction in long-term costs. CONCLUSION There is considerable scientific evidence suggesting extracranial migraine surgery is an effective and safe procedure. This surgery should be considered in properly selected migraineurs refractory to medical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Henriques
- From the Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Porto University
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ezzati A, Fanning KM, Buse DC, Pavlovic JM, Armand CE, Reed ML, Martin VT, Lipton RB. Predictive models for determining treatment response to nonprescription acute medications in migraine: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study. Headache 2022; 62:755-765. [PMID: 35546653 DOI: 10.1111/head.14312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify predictors of acute treatment response for nonprescription (over-the-counter [OTC]) medications among people with migraine and develop improved models for predicting treatment response. BACKGROUND Pain freedom and sustained pain relief are important priorities in the acute treatment of migraine. OTC medications are widely used for migraine; however, it is not clear which treatment works best for each patient without going through the trial and error process. METHODS A prediction model development study was completed using the 2006 American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study survey, from participants who were aged ≥18, met criteria and headache day frequency for episodic migraine, did not take prescription medication for migraine, and used ≥1 of the following acute migraine medication classes: acetaminophen, aspirin, NSAIDs, or caffeine containing combination products (CCP). Two items from the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire were used to evaluate treatment response, adequate 2-h pain freedom (2hPF) and 24-h pain relief (24hPR), which were defined by a response to treatment ≥half the time at 2 h and 24 h post treatment, respectively. We identified predictors of adequate treatment response and developed models to predict probability of treatment response to each medication class. RESULTS The sample included 3852 participants (3038 [79.0%] females) with an average age of 45.0 years (SD = 12.8). Only 1602/3852 (41.6%) and 1718/3852 (44.6%) of the participants reported adequate 2hPF and 24hPR, respectively. Adequate treatment-response was significantly predicted by lower average headache pain intensity, less cutaneous allodynia, and lower depressive symptom scores. Lower migraine symptom severity was predictive of adequate 2hPF and fewer monthly headache days was predictive of adequate 24hPR. Among participants reporting OTC monotherapy (n = 2168, 56.3%) individuals taking CCP were more likely to have adequate 2hPF (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.95) and 24hPR (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.18-1.88) in comparison with those taking acetaminophen. Predictive models were modestly predictive of responders to OTC medications (c-statistics = 0.65; 95% CI 0.62-0.68). CONCLUSION These results show that response to acute migraine treatments is not optimized in the majority of people with migraine treating with OTC medications. Predictive models can improve our ability to choose the best therapeutic option for individuals with episodic migraine and increase the proportion of patients with optimized response to treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ezzati
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Jelena M Pavlovic
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Cynthia E Armand
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | - Vincent T Martin
- University of Cincinnati Headache and Facial Pain Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Patel D, Taljaard M, Yadav K, James D, Perry JJ. Current practice for primary headache disorders and perspectives on peripheral nerve blocks among emergency physicians in Canada: A national survey. Headache 2022; 62:512-521. [PMID: 35403242 DOI: 10.1111/head.14293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This national postal survey aimed to examine Canadian emergency physicians' practice patterns with respect to drug treatment and perspectives on peripheral nerve blocks. BACKGROUND The treatment of primary headache disorders in the emergency department is variable. METHODS We surveyed 500 emergency physicians listed in the Canadian Medical Directory according to a modified Dillman's method: an initial invitation was followed by up to four reminders to nonresponders. Physicians were asked questions regarding their frequency of medication administration and perspectives toward peripheral nerve blocks. RESULTS Of 500 mailed surveys, 468 were delivered and 179 physicians responded (response rate = 38.2%). The majority of physicians were men (92/144, 63.9%); 80.6% (116/144) had been in practice for greater than or equal to 10 years with 50.7% (75/148) in a community or district general teaching hospital. Commonly used pharmacotherapies for primary headaches were intravenous dopamine receptor antagonists (69%), co-administration of ketorolac and a dopamine receptor antagonist (54.2%), intravenous fluid boluses (54%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alone (53.5%), and acetaminophen (51.4%). Only 80 of 144 physicians (55.6%) reported previous experience with peripheral nerve blocks (95% confidence interval [CI] = 48%-65%). The majority (68/80, 85.0%) agreed peripheral nerve blocks are safe and 55.1% (43/78) agreed they are effective. The vast majority (118/140, 84.3%) would consider peripheral nerve blocks as a first-line treatment option given sufficient evidence from a future trial (95% CI = 78%-90%). CONCLUSION NSAIDs alone, as well as dopamine receptor antagonists with or without ketorolac are commonly used for primary headache in Canadian emergency departments. A large proportion of physicians have never used a peripheral nerve block in their practice; among those who have experience with peripheral nerve blocks, the majority find them safe and effective. The majority of respondents would consider peripheral nerve blocks as a first-line treatment option given sufficient evidence from a future trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilan Patel
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Krishan Yadav
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel James
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey J Perry
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mínguez-Olaondo A, Quintas S, Morollón Sánchez-Mateos N, López-Bravo A, Vila-Pueyo M, Grozeva V, Belvís R, Santos-Lasaosa S, Irimia P. Cutaneous Allodynia in Migraine: A Narrative Review. Front Neurol 2022; 12:831035. [PMID: 35153995 PMCID: PMC8830422 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.831035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective In the present work, we conduct a narrative review of the most relevant literature on cutaneous allodynia (CA) in migraine. Background CA is regarded as the perception of pain in response to non-noxious skin stimulation. The number of research studies relating to CA and migraine has increased strikingly over the last few decades. Therefore, the clinician treating migraine patients must recognize this common symptom and have up-to-date knowledge of its importance from the pathophysiological, diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic point of view. Methods We performed a comprehensive narrative review to analyze existing literature regarding CA in migraine, with a special focus on epidemiology, pathophysiology, assessment methods, risk for chronification, diagnosis and management. PubMed and the Cochrane databases were used for the literature search. Results The prevalence of CA in patients with migraine is approximately 60%. The mechanisms underlying CA in migraine are not completely clarified but include a sensitization phenomenon at different levels of the trigemino-talamo-cortical nociceptive pathway and dysfunction of brainstem and cortical areas that modulate thalamocortical inputs. The gold standard for the assessment of CA is quantitative sensory testing (QST), but the validated Allodynia 12-item questionnaire is preferred in clinical setting. The presence of CA is associated with an increased risk of migraine chronification and has therapeutic implications. Conclusions CA is a marker of central sensitization in patients with migraine that has been associated with an increased risk of chronification and may influence therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane Mínguez-Olaondo
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
- Athenea Neuroclinics, Policlínica Guipúzcoa, Grupo Quirón Salud Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
- Neuroscience Area, Biodonostia Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
- Medicine Faculty, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Alba López-Bravo
- Hospital Reina Sofía, Tudela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Marta Vila-Pueyo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Robert Belvís
- Headache and Neuralgia Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Pablo Irimia
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- *Correspondence: Pablo Irimia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Efficacy of Lasmiditan Across Patient and Migraine Characteristics in Japanese Patients with Migraine: A Secondary Analysis of the MONONOFU Trial. Adv Ther 2022; 39:5274-5288. [PMID: 36138260 PMCID: PMC9525364 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02304-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This MONONOFU trial subgroup analysis evaluates the efficacy of lasmiditan across patient and migraine characteristics in Japanese patients with migraine. METHODS MONONOFU trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomly assigned in a 3:7:6:7 ratio to receive lasmiditan 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, or placebo for a single migraine attack within 4 h of pain onset. Efficacy of lasmiditan vs placebo was evaluated at 2 h post dose for proportion of patients with headache pain freedom. Efficacy was assessed across patient characteristics (age, sex, body weight, cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), and comorbidity of tension-type headache), migraine disease characteristics (history of migraine with aura, migraine prevention therapy, triptan response, and triptan use or nonuse), and migraine attack characteristics (headache severity, aggressive headache, attack during perimenstrual period, time to dosing, time of dosing, experienced treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of dizziness, and experienced TEAE of somnolence). Logistic regression was used; all subgroup analyses were not analyzed with multiplicity-adjusted statistical tests. RESULTS Treatment-by-subgroup interactions (by each arm) were not significant (p ≥ 0.05) for pain freedom at 2 h post dose across all patient subgroups and lasmiditan doses, except for CVRF (100 mg and 200 mg), migraine with aura (50 mg), triptan response (50 mg), and time to dosing (200 mg). Treatment-by-subgroup interactions (by overall) were not significant (p ≥ 0.05) for pain freedom at 2 h post dose across all patient subgroups, except for CVRFs. Higher proportions of patients were pain free at 2 h post dose when treated with lasmiditan (50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg) versus placebo, irrespective of most patient characteristics, migraine disease characteristics, and migraine attack characteristics. CONCLUSION Although few interactions were observed, lasmiditan could be a promising acute treatment option in a wide range of Japanese patients with migraine, as efficacy is not generally influenced by patient and migraine characteristics.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ornello R, Ahmed F, Negro A, Miscio AM, Santoro A, Alpuente A, Russo A, Silvestro M, Cevoli S, Brunelli N, Vernieri F, Grazzi L, Baraldi C, Guerzoni S, Andreou AP, Lambru G, Kamm K, Ruscheweyh R, Russo M, Torelli P, Filatova E, Latysheva N, Gryglas-Dworak A, Straburzyński M, Butera C, Colombo B, Filippi M, Pozo-Rosich P, Martelletti P, Sacco S. Is There a Gender Difference in the Response to onabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine? Insights from a Real-Life European Multicenter Study on 2879 Patients. Pain Ther 2021; 10:1605-1618. [PMID: 34564833 PMCID: PMC8586325 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00328-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is mostly a female disorder because of its lower prevalence in men. Less than 20% of patients included in the available studies on migraine treatments are men; hence, the evidence on migraine treatments might not apply to men. The aims of the present study were to provide reliable information on the effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) for chronic migraine in men and to compare clinical benefits between men and women. METHODS We performed a pooled patient-level gender-specific analysis of real-life data on BT-A for chronic migraine of patients followed-up to 9 months. We reported the 50% responder rates during each BT-A cycle, defined as percentage of reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs) compared to baseline, along with 75% and 30% responder rates. We also reported the mean decrease in MHDs and in days of acute medication use (DAMs) during each BT-A cycle as compared to baseline. We also evaluated the reasons for stopping the treatment within the third cycle. RESULTS We included an overall cohort of 2879 patients, 522 of whom (18.1%) were men. In men, 50% responder rates were 27.7% during the first BT-A cycle, 29.2% during the second, and 35.6% during the third cycle; in women, the corresponding rates were 26.6%, 33.5%, and 41.0%. In the overall cohort, responder rates did not differ between men and women during the first two cycles; during the third cycle, the distribution was different (P < 0.001) mostly because of higher rates of treatment stopping and non-responders in men. In the propensity score matched cohort, the trend was maintained but lost its statistical significance. Both men and women had a significant decrease in MHDs and in DAMs with BT-A treatment (P < 0.001). There were no gender differences in those changes with the only exception of MHD decrease which, during the third cycle, was lower in men than in women (7.4 vs 8.2 days, P = 0.016 in the overall cohort and 9.1 vs 12.5 days, P = 0.009 in the propensity score matched cohort). At the end of follow-up, 152 men and 485 women stopped BT-A treatment (29.1% vs 20.6%; P < 0.001). The relative proportion of patients stopping treatment because of inadequate response (less than 30% decrease in MHDs from baseline) was higher in men than in women (42.8% vs 39.6%), while the proportion of patients stopping because of adverse events was higher in women than in men (5.6% vs 0%; P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS Our pooled analysis suggests that the response to BT-A is significant in both men and women with a small gender difference in favor of women. Men tended to stop the treatment more frequently than women. We emphasize the need for more gender-specific data on migraine treatments from randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurosciences, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, UK
| | - Andrea Negro
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, RM Italy
| | - Anna Maria Miscio
- Unit of Neurology, Headache Center, Fondazione IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG Italy
| | - Antonio Santoro
- Unit of Neurology, Headache Center, Fondazione IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG Italy
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d’Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain ,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, Headache Center, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Silvestro
- Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, Headache Center, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Neuroology Department, Headache Center, IRCCS Foundation “Carlo Besta” Neurological Institute, via Celoria,11, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Anna P. Andreou
- Headache Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- Headache Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Katharina Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Russo
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Headache Center, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Elena Filatova
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Nina Latysheva
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Marcin Straburzyński
- Headache Clinic, Terapia Neurologiczna Samodzielni, Maurycego Mochnackiego 10, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Calogera Butera
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Bruno Colombo
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy ,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy ,Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d’Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain ,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, RM Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Togha M, Martami F, Jafari E, Ariyanfar S, Hashemi SM. The prevalence and characteristics of visceral autonomic symptoms among migraineurs: A population-based study. Cephalalgia 2021; 42:500-509. [PMID: 34786963 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211056849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence about visceral autonomic symptoms in the different phases of migraine attack. We evaluated the prevalence of these symptoms in migraineurs before, during, and after headache attacks. In addition, the association between migraine characteristics and visceral autonomic symptoms was investigated. METHODS A total of 605 participants who met the entry criteria were enrolled prospectively in this cross-sectional study. Participants were 18-60 years old and met the ICHD-3 criteria for migraine with or without aura. Information on the migraine symptoms was gathered from all participants in face-to-face interviews. A structured questionnaire was used to evaluate the related symptoms before, during, and after attacks. Migraine features of frequency, duration, and severity were also assessed. RESULTS Considering all phases, the most commonly present visceral symptom was nausea (52.9%). About half of participants reported at least one visceral symptom before the onset of attacks. While, during and after attacks, 71% and 36% of participants reported such characteristics, respectively. Notably, the migraine headache in participants with visceral symptoms was longer during attacks compared to participants without them (24.4 ± 29.6 vs. 16.8 ± 19.8; P = 0.008). Additionally, subjects with positive visceral symptoms experienced more severe migraine attacks than participants without symptoms for both the premonitory (8 ± 1.7 vs. 7.6 ± 1.8; P = 0.02) and during-attack (8.01 ± 1.7 vs. 7.09 ± 1.9; P = 0.001) phases. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that visceral symptoms were common in migraine sufferers not only during attacks but also in the premonitory and postdrome phases. Positive visceral symptoms were also associated with more burdensome headache attacks. Therefore, recognizing the phenotypic presentation of associated symptoms of migraine, especially during the pre-attack phase, could aid in early implementation of optimal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansoureh Togha
- Headache Department, 48439Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Martami
- School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, 48439Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elham Jafari
- Headache Department, 48439Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shadi Ariyanfar
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, 556492Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyedeh Melika Hashemi
- Headache Department, 48439Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nierenburg H, Stark-Inbar A. Nerivio ® remote electrical neuromodulation for acute treatment of chronic migraine. Pain Manag 2021; 12:267-281. [PMID: 34538078 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Nerivio® (by Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel) is a wireless, wearable, noninvasive, battery-operated, remote electrical neuromodulation device controlled by a smartphone application. It is US FDA authorized for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in people 12 years and older in the US, and European Conformity (CE) marked for the same indication in the EU. The American Headache Society Consensus Statement recommends Nerivio as a tier 2 treatment for migraines. This review summarizes a series of five independent clinical trials and two real-world evidence studies that established safety, tolerability and efficacy of Nerivio in treating migraine attacks. It further provides up-to-date practical information on device usability. Based on findings of this review, Nerivio offers a safe and effective nonpharmacological alternative for acute treatment in patients with chronic (and nonchronic) migraine.
Collapse
|
30
|
McGinley JS, Houts CR, Wirth RJ, Lipton RB. Measuring headache day severity using multiple features in daily diary designs. Cephalalgia 2021; 42:53-62. [PMID: 34407647 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211033829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Though migraine is thought of as a symptom complex, symptoms are typically assessed one at a time. For use in clinical research, we developed a composite measure of headache day severity by combining eight well-known symptoms captured in daily diaries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Data came from adults with a self-reported diagnosis of migraine (n = 4380) who provided daily diary information assessed using a novel digital platform. Nine observed features theoretically linked to headache day severity were analyzed using latent variable modeling to create a psychometrically robust headache day severity score. Logistic regression was used to assess the cross-sectional relationships of headache day severity scores against an array of clinically-relevant outcomes. RESULTS Participants were largely females (90%), approaching middle age (mean age of 37.3) and living in the United States (49%) or United Kingdom (23%). Findings supported a single latent headache day severity construct based on eight observed headache features. Headache day severity scores were associated with an increased odds of physician visits (Odds ratio[95% CI]: 1.71[1.32-2.21]), emergency department visits (4.12[2.23-7.60]), missed school/work (2.90[2.56-3.29]), missed household work (3.37[3.06-3.72]), and missed other activities (3.29[2.97-3.64]) (p < .0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS Modern measurement techniques support a single headache day severity construct that reflects migraine is a symptom complex. The headache day severity scores were associated with external validators and initial visualizations showed how headache day severity scores can be applied broadly in clinical practice and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James S McGinley
- Vector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carrie R Houts
- Vector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - R J Wirth
- Vector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Minen MT, Yang J, Ashina S, Rosen N, Duarte R. Survey of Pain Medicine Specialists' Familiarity with Migraine Management. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:3030-3040. [PMID: 34270743 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain specialists treat patients with headache and interface with those who use opioids more so than neurologists and headache specialists. We assessed headache medicine knowledge and needs of pain specialists. DESIGN/SETTING Cross-sectional online survey. SUBJECTS Members of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. METHODS Survey was based on a prior survey on primary care providers' knowledge and needs and was iteratively updated by four headache specialists, two with pain medicine affiliations. RESULTS Of the 105 respondents, 71.4% were physicians, 34.3% were women, and they averaged 20.0 ± 13.6 years in practice. The most common specialty was anesthesia (36.1%, n = 35/97) followed by neurology (14.4%, n = 14/97). About half of providers (55.7%, n = 34/61 and 53.3%, n = 32/60) were familiar with the American Academy of Neurology Guidelines for pharmacological migraine prevention and the Choosing Wisely Campaign recommendations for limiting neuroimaging and opioids. Less than half of all providers (39.7%, n = 23/58) were familiar with the American Headache Society guidelines for emergency management of migraine. Providers were aware of Level A evidence-based nonpharmacological therapies, with over three-fourths recognizing cognitive behavioral therapy (80.7%, n = 50/62) and biofeedback (75.8%, n = 47/62) as evidence-based interventions. About 80% of providers (n = 50/64) estimate making migraine diagnoses in ≤ 50% of their patients with headache. Providers consider starting preventive headache therapy at 7.1 ± 3.9 days/month and report referring 34.3%±34.2% of patients to behavioral interventions. CONCLUSIONS Dissemination and implementation of headache guidelines is needed for pain medicine specialists. Providers may need help diagnosing migraine based on currently accepted guidelines and referring for evidence-based behavioral therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia T Minen
- Departments of Neurology and Public Health; NYU Langone Health, 222 E 41st Street, Floor 10, New York, NY 10017
| | - Jackie Yang
- Departments of Neurology and Public Health; NYU Langone Health, 222 E 41st Street, Floor 10, New York, NY 10017
| | | | - Noah Rosen
- Department of Neurology and Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - Robert Duarte
- Pain and Headache Center, Northwell Department of Neurology, Zucker School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Peres MFP, Vasudeva R, Baygani SK, Dennehy EB, Vincent M, Friedman DI. Lasmiditan efficacy in migraine attacks with mild vs. moderate or severe pain. Curr Med Res Opin 2021; 37:1031-1038. [PMID: 33784930 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1903846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of lasmiditan (LTN) in treating migraine attacks of mild vs. moderate or severe pain intensity. METHODS Pooled data from two single-attack, placebo-controlled studies (SAMURAI [NCT02439320] and SPARTAN [NCT02605174]), and a prospective, randomized, open-label study (GLADIATOR [NCT02565186]) were assessed. Efficacy measures included the proportion of attacks with 2-h pain freedom (PF), 2-h most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom, and 24-h sustained pain freedom (SPF). Fisher's exact test was used to compare the proportion of PF, SPF, or MBS freedom outcomes among attacks treated at mild, moderate, or severe pain. RESULTS In SAMURAI and SPARTAN, most treated attacks were of moderate (N = 2768) or severe (N = 1147) intensity, compared to mild (N = 65). Numerically greater 2-h PF and 24-h SPF response rates were observed in attacks treated at mild compared to moderate or severe pain. Analysis of GLADIATOR data included 273 (1.5%), 11,644 (65.1%), and 5948 (33.3%) attacks treated when pain was mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. In general, a significantly greater proportion of attacks treated at mild pain achieved 2-h PF and MBS freedom, as well as 24-h SPF. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in LTN treatment groups were similar regardless of baseline head pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS Data from two placebo-controlled, single-attack trials, and an open-label study including treatment of multiple attacks, suggested a tendency to relatively better efficacy outcomes when LTN treatment was initiated at mild vs. moderate to severe pain. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship of lasmiditan outcomes to the time of administration in the course of a migraine attack.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario F P Peres
- Neurology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Simin K Baygani
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ellen B Dennehy
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Maurice Vincent
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Deborah I Friedman
- Neurology and Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lipton RB, Burstein R, Buse DC, Dodick DW, Koukakis R, Klatt J, Cheng S, Chou DE. Efficacy of erenumab in chronic migraine patients with and without ictal allodynia. Cephalalgia 2021; 41:1152-1160. [PMID: 33982623 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211010305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ictal cutaneous allodynia, common in chronic migraine, is associated with reduced responses to acute treatment with triptans. Allodynia's impact on the efficacy of newer preventive treatments such as erenumab is unknown. METHODS Post-hoc subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 12-week study of erenumab in chronic migraine, contrasting those with no allodynia with those with moderate-severe allodynia assessed with the Allodynia Symptom Checklist-12, was undertaken. RESULTS Of 648 randomized individuals with baseline Allodynia Symptom Checklist-12 scores, 386 (59.6%) had no allodynia and 153 (23.6%) had moderate-to-severe allodynia. Mean (standard deviation) baseline monthly migraine days were 17.6 (4.8) and 18.9 (4.3), respectively. Compared to placebo, the erenumab group had greater reductions in monthly migraine days and monthly acute migraine-specific medication days in both no allodynia and allodynia subgroups. Mean (95% confidence interval) treatment differences in change from baseline for monthly migraine days at week 12 were -2.5 (-3.7, -1.4) in the no allodynia subgroup and -3.3 (-5.3, -1.3) in the moderate-severe allodynia subgroup. Change in acute migraine-specific medication days were -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3) and -2.5 (-4.3, -0.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Erenumab's efficacy in reducing monthly migraine days and acute migraine-specific medication days in chronic migraine was not impacted by the presence of moderate-severe ictal allodynia.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02066415.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard B Lipton
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.,Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Dawn C Buse
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Buse DC, Armand CE, Charleston L, Reed ML, Fanning KM, Adams AM, Lipton RB. Barriers to care in episodic and chronic migraine: Results from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes Study. Headache 2021; 61:628-641. [PMID: 33797078 DOI: 10.1111/head.14103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess rates of and factors associated with traversing fundamental barriers to good medical outcomes and pharmacologic care in individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM), including socioeconomic status and race. BACKGROUND Barriers to good outcomes in migraine include the lack of appropriate medical consultation, failure to receive an accurate diagnosis, not being offered a regimen with acute and preventive pharmacologic treatments (if indicated), and not avoiding medication overuse. METHODS The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study was a longitudinal Internet-based survey. Respondents who met criteria for migraine consistent with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, had a Migraine Disability Assessment score ≥ 6, and provided health insurance coverage status were included in this analysis. Successfully traversing each barrier to care and the effects of sociodemographic characteristics were examined. RESULTS Among 16,789 respondents with migraine, 9184 (54.7%; EM: 7930; CM: 1254) were eligible. Current headache consultation was reported by 27.6% (2187/7930) of EM and 40.8% (512/1254) of CM respondents. Among consulters, 75.7% (1655/2187) with EM and 32.8% (168/512) with CM were accurately diagnosed. Among diagnosed consulters, 59.9% (992/1655) with EM and 54.2% (91/168) with CM reported minimally appropriate acute and preventive pharmacologic treatment. Among diagnosed and treated consulters, in the EM group 31.8% (315/992) and in the CM group 74.7% (68/91) met medication overuse criteria. Only 8.5% (677/7930) of EM and 1.8% (23/1254) of CM respondents traversed all four barriers. Higher income was positively associated with likelihood of traversing each barrier. Blacks and/or African Americans had higher rates of consultation than other racial groups. Blacks and/or African Americans and multiracial people had higher rates of acute medication overuse. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to improve care should focus on increasing consultation and diagnosis rates, improving the delivery of all appropriate guideline-based treatment, and avoidance of medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Cynthia E Armand
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Larry Charleston
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael L Reed
- Department of Outcomes Research, Vedanta Research, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hirata K, Ueda K, Komori M, Ye W, Kim Y, Cotton S, Jackson J, Treuer T. Unmet Needs in Japanese Patients Who Report Insufficient Efficacy with Triptans for Acute Treatment of Migraine: Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data. Pain Ther 2020; 10:415-432. [PMID: 33306190 PMCID: PMC8119538 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-020-00223-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine attacks notably impact people's daily lives, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and ability to work. Triptans are widely used as acute medication for a migraine attack but are ineffective, poorly tolerated, or contraindicated in some patients. HRQoL and work productivity are therefore likely to pose particular problems for patients whose migraine attacks do not respond sufficiently to triptan acute treatment. This real-world study aimed to determine whether migraine-related HRQoL, disability, and work productivity differed between triptan insufficient responders (TIRs) and sufficient responders (TSRs) receiving this acute treatment for migraine in Japan. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of 2017 Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme cross-sectional survey data collected from physicians and their consulting patients with migraine in Japan. Patients had to be receiving a triptan as their sole acute prescribed medication for migraine. TIRs were defined as patients who achieved headache pain freedom within 2 h of taking triptan acute treatment in no more than three of five migraine attacks. Differences in outcomes between TIRs and TSRs were examined in adjusted analyses using a multivariable general linear model. RESULTS Of 200 patients receiving a triptan as their sole prescribed acute treatment for migraine, 88 (44.0%) were classed as TIRs. Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were significantly lower-indicating poorer HRQoL-among TIRs than TSRs, as were mean EuroQol 5-dimension utility and visual analog scale scores (p < 0.05 for comparisons). TIRs also reported significantly (p ≤ 0.003) greater impairment than TSRs across all Work Productivity and Activity Impairment domains, with the exception of work time missed. Migraine disability was higher among TIRs than TSRs. CONCLUSION Migraine attacks had a negative impact on the HRQoL, disability, and work productivity of people with migraine in Japan reporting insufficient efficacy with acute triptan treatment, highlighting the need for more effective acute treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Hirata
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | | | | | - Wenyu Ye
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Yongin Kim
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Treatment of Migraine Surgery Safety and Efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146:187e-195e. [PMID: 32740592 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent clinical experience with migraine surgery has demonstrated both the safety and the efficacy of operative decompression of the peripheral nerves in the face, head, and neck for the alleviation of migraine symptoms. Because of the perceived novelty of these procedures, and the paranoia surrounding a theoretical loss of clinical territory, neurologists have condemned the field of migraine surgery. The Patient Safety Subcommittee of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons ventured to investigate the published safety track record of migraine surgery in the existing body of literature. METHODS A comprehensive review of the relevant published literature was performed. The relevant databases and literature libraries were reviewed from the date of their inception through early 2018. These articles were reviewed and their findings analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-nine published articles were found that demonstrated a substantial, extensively replicated body of data that demonstrate a significant reduction in migraine headache symptoms and frequency (even complete elimination of headache pain) following trigger-site surgery. CONCLUSIONS Migraine surgery is a valid method of treatment for migraine sufferers when performed by experienced plastic surgeons following a methodical protocol. These operations are associated with a high level of safety. The safety and efficacy of migraine surgery should be recognized by plastic surgeons, insurance companies, and the neurology societies.
Collapse
|
37
|
Tepper SJ, Vasudeva R, Krege JH, Rathmann SS, Doty E, Vargas BB, Magis D, Komori M. Evaluation of 2-Hour Post-Dose Efficacy of Lasmiditan for the Acute Treatment of Difficult-to-Treat Migraine Attacks. Headache 2020; 60:1601-1615. [PMID: 32634275 PMCID: PMC7496706 DOI: 10.1111/head.13897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors predicting response (2-hour headache pain freedom or most bothersome symptom freedom) to lasmiditan based on individual patient characteristics, migraine disease characteristics, and migraine attack characteristics. Further, efficacy specifically in difficult-to-treat patient/migraine disease characteristics or attack characteristics (ie, historically considered less responsive to certain acute therapies) subgroups was analyzed. BACKGROUND Knowledge of factors associated with a positive or negative response to acute treatment would be useful to practitioners prescribing acute treatments for migraine. Additionally, practitioners and patients would benefit from understanding the efficacy of lasmiditan specifically in subgroups of patients with migraine disease characteristics and migraine attack characteristics historically associated with decreased pain threshold, reduced efficacy of acute treatment, or increased burden of migraine. METHODS Pooled analyses were completed from 2 Phase 3 double-blind clinical trials, SPARTAN and SAMURAI. Data from baseline to 2 hours after taking lasmiditan (50, 100, or 200 mg) or placebo were analyzed to assess efficacy based on patient characteristics, migraine disease characteristics, and migraine attack characteristics. A total of 3981 patients comprising the intent-to-treat population were treated with placebo (N = 1130), lasmiditan 50 mg (N = 598), lasmiditan 100 mg (N = 1133), or lasmiditan 200 mg (N = 1120). Data were analyzed for the following efficacy measures at 2 hours: headache pain freedom and most bothersome symptom freedom. RESULTS None of the analyzed subgroups based on individual patient characteristics, migraine disease characteristics, or migraine attack characteristics predicted headache pain freedom or most bothersome symptom freedom response at 2 hours following lasmiditan treatment (interaction P ≥ .1). For the difficult-to-treat patient/migraine disease characteristics subgroups (defined as those with ≥24 headache days in the past 3 months, duration of migraine history ≥20 years, severe disability [Migraine Disability Assessment score ≥21], obesity [≥30 kg/m2 ], and history of psychiatric disorder), single doses of lasmiditan (100 or 200 mg) were significantly more effective than placebo (P ≤ .002) in achieving both endpoints. Headache pain freedom response rates for higher doses of lasmiditan were numerically greater than for lower doses of lasmiditan. For the difficult-to-treat migraine attack subgroups, patients with severe headache, co-existent nausea at the time of treatment, or who delayed treatment for ≥2 hours from the time of headache onset, both endpoint response rates after lasmiditan 100 or 200 mg were significantly greater than after placebo. Among those who delayed treatment for ≥4 hours from the time of headache onset, headache pain freedom response rates for the 200 mg dose of lasmiditan met statistical significance vs placebo (32.4% vs 15.9%; odds ratio = 2.7 [1.17, 6.07]; P = .018). While the predictors of response interaction test showed similar efficacy of lasmiditan vs placebo across subgroups defined by baseline functional disability (mild, moderate, or needs complete bed rest) at the time of treatment, analyses of lasmiditan efficacy within the subgroup "needs complete bed rest" appeared to show less efficacy (eg, in the 200 mg vs placebo group, 25.9% vs 18.5%; odds ratio = 1.56 [0.96, 2.53]; P = .070). CONCLUSIONS Efficacy of lasmiditan 200 and 100 mg for headache pain freedom and most bothersome symptom freedom at 2 hours post-treatment was generally not influenced by the individual patient characteristics, migraine disease history, or migraine attack characteristics that were analyzed. In the analyses of difficult-to-treat subgroups, patients receiving lasmiditan achieved greater responses (2-hour headache pain freedom and most bothersome symptom freedom) vs placebo recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart J. Tepper
- Department of NeurologyGeisel School of Medicine at DartmouthHanoverNHUSA
| | | | | | | | - Erin Doty
- Eli Lilly and Company, IndianapolisINUSA
| | - Bert B. Vargas
- Eli Lilly and Company, IndianapolisINUSA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTXUSA
| | - Delphine Magis
- Department of Neurology and Headache and Pain Multimodal Management ClinicCHR East Belgium HospitalVerviersBelgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pharmacotherapy failure and progression to botulinum toxin injection in vestibular migraine. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2020; 134:586-591. [DOI: 10.1017/s002221512000095x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveGiven the lack of evidence on patients with medically refractory vestibular migraine, this study aimed to identify factors associated with pharmacotherapy failure and progression to botulinum toxin injection in vestibular migraine.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on definite vestibular migraine patients from September 2015 to July 2019 who completed the Dizziness Handicap Inventory at least six weeks apart..ResultsThe study comprised 47 patients (mean age = 50.2 ± 15.8 years), with a mean follow-up time of 6.0 ± 6.0 months. The mean pre-treatment Dizziness Handicap Inventory score was 57.5 ± 23.5, with a mean reduction of 17.3 ± 25.2 (p < 0.001) at last follow up. Oscillopsia (r = 0.458, p = 0.007), failure of first medication (r = 0.518, p = 0.001) and pre-treatment Dizziness Handicap Inventory question 15 (an emotional domain question) score (r = 0.364, p = 0.019) were the only variables significantly correlated with progression to botulinum toxin injection.ConclusionMotion hypersensitivity, failure of first medication, and fear of social stigmatisation suggest a decreased treatment response. These symptoms may require more aggressive treatment at an earlier stage.
Collapse
|
39
|
Farris SG, Thomas JG, Kibbey MM, Pavlovic JM, Steffen KJ, Bond DS. Treatment effects on pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia symptoms in women with migraine and overweight/obesity. Health Psychol 2020; 39:927-933. [PMID: 32658497 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia represent two risk factors for greater headache-related disability. Yet, there is limited knowledge of the extent to which these risk factors are modifiable and whether nonpharmacological treatment-related changes are associated with migraine improvements. Using data from the Women's Health and Migraine (WHAM) study, a randomized controlled trial that compared effects of behavioral weight loss (BWL) and migraine education (ME) in women with migraine and overweight/obesity, we tested whether: (a) BWL versus ME produced greater changes in pain catastrophizing and allodynia from baseline across posttreatment and follow-up time points, and (b) whether these improvements were associated with improvements in headache disability. METHOD Women (N = 110) were randomly assigned to 16 weeks of either BWL or ME and assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and follow up (32 weeks). Multilevel mixed effects modeling tested: (a) for between-groups differences in pain catastrophizing and allodynia changes over time, and (b) associations of changes in pain catastrophizing and allodynia with changes in headache disability, adjusting for migraine severity and weight loss. RESULTS Both BWL and ME had significant reductions in pain catastrophizing and allodynia from baseline to posttreatment and follow up, and the improvements were comparable across conditions. Reductions in pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia were associated with significant reductions in headache disability, even when controlling for intervention-related improvements in migraine and weight loss. CONCLUSION Pain catastrophizing and allodynia are not only reduced after nonpharmacologic treatments for migraine, but greater improvements are associated with greater reductions in headache-related disability, independent of migraine severity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
40
|
Hirata K, Ueda K, Ye W, Kim Y, Komori M, Jackson J, Cotton S, Rajan N, Treuer T. Factors associated with insufficient response to acute treatment of migraine in Japan: analysis of real-world data from the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme. BMC Neurol 2020; 20:274. [PMID: 32641075 PMCID: PMC7341635 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01848-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Real-world data on sufficient/insufficient response, and predictors of insufficient response, to acute treatments for migraine are limited in Japan. This study aimed to identify factors associated with insufficient response to acute treatment of migraine by exploring significant differences between people with migraine who sufficiently/insufficiently respond to prescribed acute treatment in Japan. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 2014 Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme cross-sectional survey data collected from physicians and their consulting adult patients with migraine in Japan. Insufficient responders to prescribed acute treatment were patients who achieved headache pain freedom within 2 h of acute treatment in no more than three of their last five migraine attacks. Factors associated with insufficient response to prescribed acute migraine treatment were identified using backward logistic regression. Results Overall, 227/538 (42.2%) patients were classified as insufficient responders to prescribed acute migraine treatment. Significantly more insufficient responders than sufficient responders had consulted a neurologist or a migraine/headache specialist, and had chronic migraine or medication-overuse or tension-type headaches (p < 0.05). More insufficient responders than sufficient responders reported taking acute treatment when/after the pain started (77.0 vs. 68.9%) than at first sign of migraine (p < 0.05). Compared with sufficient responders, insufficient responders reported a significantly higher mean ± standard deviation (SD) Migraine Disability Assessment total score (12.7 ± 23.3 vs. 5.8 ± 10.4, p < 0.001) and lower quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions utility score 0.847 ± 0.19 vs. 0.883 ± 0.16, p = 0.024). Factors significantly associated with insufficient response to acute treatment included seeing a neurologist versus an internist (odds ratio [OR] 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–2.88; p = 0.002), taking acute medication when/after pain started versus at first sign of migraine (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.05–2.60; p = 0.030), a higher MIDAS total score (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02–1.06; p < 0.001), and presence of comorbid cardiovascular disease (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.28–0.98; p = 0.044). Conclusions Many people with migraine in Japan struggle to adequately treat migraine attacks with prescribed acute medication and exhibit high levels of unmet need for acute treatment. Optimized management strategies utilizing existing therapeutic options as well as additional effective therapeutic options for migraine are required to improve symptoms and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Hirata
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | | | - Wenyu Ye
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Yongin Kim
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Sarah Cotton
- Adelphi Real World, Adelphi Mill, Bollington, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ferroni P, Zanzotto FM, Scarpato N, Spila A, Fofi L, Egeo G, Rullo A, Palmirotta R, Barbanti P, Guadagni F. Machine learning approach to predict medication overuse in migraine patients. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2020; 18:1487-1496. [PMID: 32637046 PMCID: PMC7327028 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is largely used to develop automatic predictors in migraine classification but automatic predictors for medication overuse (MO) in migraine are still in their infancy. Thus, to understand the benefits of ML in MO prediction, we explored an automated predictor to estimate MO risk in migraine. To achieve this objective, a study was designed to analyze the performance of a customized ML-based decision support system that combines support vector machines and Random Optimization (RO-MO). We used RO-MO to extract prognostic information from demographic, clinical and biochemical data. Using a dataset of 777 consecutive migraine patients we derived a set of predictors with discriminatory power for MO higher than that observed for baseline SVM. The best four were incorporated into the final RO-MO decision support system and risk evaluation on a five-level stratification was performed. ROC analysis resulted in a c-statistic of 0.83 with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.69 and 0.87, respectively, and an accuracy of 0.87 when MO was predicted by at least three RO-MO models. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that the derived RO-MO system could effectively predict MO with ORs of 5.7 and 21.0 for patients classified as probably (3 predictors positive), or definitely at risk of MO (4 predictors positive), respectively. In conclusion, a combination of ML and RO - taking into consideration clinical/biochemical features, drug exposure and lifestyle - might represent a valuable approach to MO prediction in migraine and holds the potential for improving model precision through weighting the relative importance of attributes.
Collapse
Key Words
- AI, Artificial Intelligence
- AUC, Area Under the Curve
- Artificial intelligence
- BMI, body mass index
- CI, Confidence Interval
- DBH 19-bp I/D polymorphism, Dopamine-Beta-Hydroxylase 19 bp insertion/deletion polymorphism
- DSS, Decision Support System
- Decision support systems
- ICT, Information and Communications Technology
- KELP, Kernel-based Learning Platform
- LRs, likelihood ratios
- MKL, Multiple Kernel Learning
- ML, Machine Learning
- MO, Medication Overuse
- Machine learning
- Medication overuse
- Migraine
- NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- PVI, Predictive Value Imputation
- RO, Random Optimization
- ROC, Receiver operating characteristic
- SE, Standard Error
- SVM, Support Vector Machine
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Ferroni
- BioBIM (InterInstitutional Multidisciplinary Biobank), IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
- Dept. of Human Sciences & Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele Roma Open University, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio M. Zanzotto
- Department of Enterprise Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Noemi Scarpato
- Dept. of Human Sciences & Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele Roma Open University, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Spila
- BioBIM (InterInstitutional Multidisciplinary Biobank), IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Fofi
- Headache and Pain Unit, Dept. of Neurological, Motor and Sensorial Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, Dept. of Neurological, Motor and Sensorial Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Rullo
- Neatec S.p.A., Via Campi Flegrei, 34, 80078 Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Palmirotta
- Department of Biomedical Sciences & Human Oncology, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Dept. of Human Sciences & Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele Roma Open University, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
- Headache and Pain Unit, Dept. of Neurological, Motor and Sensorial Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
| | - Fiorella Guadagni
- BioBIM (InterInstitutional Multidisciplinary Biobank), IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
- Dept. of Human Sciences & Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele Roma Open University, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lombard L, Ye W, Nichols R, Jackson J, Cotton S, Joshi S. A Real-World Analysis of Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Level of Impairment in Patients With Migraine Who are Insufficient Responders vs Responders to Acute Treatment. Headache 2020; 60:1325-1339. [PMID: 32510611 PMCID: PMC7497096 DOI: 10.1111/head.13835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine if patients with migraine who responded sufficiently to acute treatment were significantly different from those who did not in terms of patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and patient level of impairment, and to identify characteristics associated with insufficient response. BACKGROUND Migraine is highly prevalent and impacts functional ability substantially. Current treatment approaches are not sufficiently meeting the needs of patients, and inadequate response to acute treatment is reported by at least 56% of patients with migraine in the United States. METHODS Data were obtained from the 2014 Adelphi Migraine Disease-Specific Program, a cross-sectional survey. Using logistic regression, we assessed the association between patient factors and insufficient response. Responders were defined as patients with migraine who achieved pain freedom within 2 hours of acute treatment in ≥4 of 5 attacks, while insufficient responders achieved it in ≤3 of 5 attacks. RESULTS Of 583 patients included, insufficient responders to acute treatment constituted 34.3% (200/583) of the study population. A statistically significantly larger proportion of insufficient responders vs responders had ≥4 migraine headache days/month (46.3% [88/190] vs 31% [114/368]), had ever been prescribed ≥3 unique preventive treatment regimens (11.7% [21/179] vs 6.3% [22/347]), and had chronic migraine, medication-overuse headaches, and comorbid depression (all P values ≤.05). Patient level of impairment was statistically significantly greater among insufficient responders vs responders. Factors associated with insufficient response after adjusting for covariates included Migraine Disability Assessment total score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, 95% CI [1.02, 1.05]), time of administration of acute treatment (OR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.15, 2.92]), depression (OR = 1.98, 95% CI [1.21, 3.23]), sensitivity to light not listed as current most troublesome symptom (OR = 2.30, 95% CI [1.21, 4.37]), and change in the average headache days per month before being prescribed an acute treatment vs now (OR = 1.75, 95% CI [1.05, 2.90]). CONCLUSIONS Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and health-related quality of life measures are statistically significantly different between insufficient responders and responders to acute treatment in patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wenyu Ye
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Sarah Cotton
- Adelphi Real World, Adelphi Mill, Bollington, UK
| | - Shivang Joshi
- DENT Neurologic Institute, Amherst, NY, USA.,University of Buffalo, School of Pharmacy, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
von Deneen KM, Zhao L, Liu J. Individual differences of maladaptive brain changes in migraine and their relationship with differential effectiveness of treatments. BRAIN SCIENCE ADVANCES 2020. [DOI: 10.26599/bsa.2019.9050021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a difficult disorder to identify with regard to its pathophysiological mechanisms, and its treatment has been primarily difficult owing to interindividual differences. Substantial rates of nonresponsiveness to medications are common, making migraine treatment complicated. In this review, we systematically analyzed recent studies concerning neuroimaging findings regarding the neurophysiology of migraine. We linked the current imaging research with anecdotal evidence from interindividual factors such as duration and pain intensity of migraine, age, gender, hormonal interplay, and genetics. These factors suggested the use of nonpharmacological therapies such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and placebo therapy for the treatment of migraine. Finally, we discussed how interindividual differences are related to such nondrug treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M. von Deneen
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an 710126, Shaanxi, China
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging, Ministry of Education, Xi’an 710126, Shaanxi, China
| | - Ling Zhao
- Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, Sichuan, China
| | - Jixin Liu
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an 710126, Shaanxi, China
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging, Ministry of Education, Xi’an 710126, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lombard L, Farrar M, Ye W, Kim Y, Cotton S, Buchanan AS, Jackson J, Joshi S. A global real-world assessment of the impact on health-related quality of life and work productivity of migraine in patients with insufficient versus good response to triptan medication. J Headache Pain 2020; 21:41. [PMID: 32349662 PMCID: PMC7189443 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01110-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine is a chronic, disabling neurological disease characterized by moderate-to-severe headache pain with other symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, and photophobia. Triptans, while generally effective, are insufficiently efficacious in 30–40% of patients and poorly tolerated by or contraindicated in others. We assessed the impact of insufficient response to triptans on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity in patients currently receiving any prescribed triptan formulation as their only acute migraine medication. Methods Data were from the 2017 Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians, neurologists, and headache specialists and their consulting patients with migraine in the USA, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK. Triptan insufficient responders (TIRs) achieved freedom from headache pain within 2 h of acute treatment in ≤3/5 migraine attacks; triptan responders (TRs) achieved pain freedom within 2 h in ≥4/5 attacks. Multivariable general linear model examined differences between TIRs and TRs in HRQoL and work productivity. Logistic regression identified factors associated with insufficient response to triptans. Results The study included 1413 triptan-treated patients (TIRs: n = 483, 34.2%; TRs: n = 930, 65.8%). TIRs were more likely to be female (76% vs. 70% for TIRs vs TRs, respectively; p = 0.011), older (mean age 42.6 vs. 40.5 years; p = 0.003), and had more headache days/month (7.0 vs. 4.4; p < 0.001). TIRs had significantly more disability, with higher Migraine Disability Scores (MIDAS; 13.2 vs. 7.7; p < 0.001), lower Migraine-specific Quality of Life scores, indicating greater impact (Role Function Restrictive: 62.4 vs. 74.5; Role Function Preventive: 70.0 vs. 82.2; Emotional Function: 67.7 vs. 82.1; all p < 0.001), and lower EQ5D utility scores (0.84 vs. 0.91; p = 0.001). Work productivity and activity were impaired (absenteeism, 8.6% vs. 5.1% for TIRs vs. TRs; presenteeism, 34.3% vs. 21.0%; work impairment, 37.1% vs. 23.3%; overall activity impairment, 39.8% vs. 25.3%; all p < 0.05). Conclusion HRQoL and work productivity were significantly impacted in TIRs versus TRs in this real-world analysis of patients with migraine acutely treated with triptans, highlighting the need for more effective treatments for patients with an insufficient triptan response. Further research is needed to establish causal relationships between insufficient response and these outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Lombard
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | | | - Wenyu Ye
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | - Yongin Kim
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | | | - Andrew S Buchanan
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
| | | | - Shivang Joshi
- DENT Neurologic Institute, Amherst, and University of Buffalo School of Pharmacy, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Torres-Ferrús M, Ursitti F, Alpuente A, Brunello F, Chiappino D, de Vries T, Di Marco S, Ferlisi S, Guerritore L, Gonzalez-Garcia N, Gonzalez-Martinez A, Khutorov D, Kritsilis M, Kyrou A, Makeeva T, Minguez-Olaondo A, Pilati L, Serrien A, Tsurkalenko O, Van den Abbeele D, van Hoogstraten WS, Lampl C. From transformation to chronification of migraine: pathophysiological and clinical aspects. J Headache Pain 2020; 21:42. [PMID: 32349653 PMCID: PMC7189559 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01111-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic migraine is a neurological disorder characterized by 15 or more headache days per month of which at least 8 days show typical migraine features. The process that describes the development from episodic migraine into chronic migraine is commonly referred to as migraine transformation or chronification. Ample studies have attempted to identify factors associated with migraine transformation from different perspectives. Understanding CM as a pathological brain state with trigeminovascular participation where biological changes occur, we have completed a comprehensive review on the clinical, epidemiological, genetic, molecular, structural, functional, physiological and preclinical evidence available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Torres-Ferrús
- Headache and Craniofacial Pain Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - F Ursitti
- Headache Center, Child Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesu' Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - A Alpuente
- Headache and Craniofacial Pain Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Brunello
- Juvenile Headache Centre, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - D Chiappino
- Department of Internal medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome, Sapienza, Italy
| | - T de Vries
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Di Marco
- Department of Biomedicine Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone Hospital, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - S Ferlisi
- Department of Biomedicine Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone Hospital, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - L Guerritore
- Department of Internal medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome, Sapienza, Italy
| | - N Gonzalez-Garcia
- Headache and Craniofacial Pain Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Gonzalez-Martinez
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa & Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - D Khutorov
- Department of Clinical Neurology and Sleep Medicine, The Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine of EMERCOM of Russia, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - A Kyrou
- University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Switzerland University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bern, Switzerland
| | - T Makeeva
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Medical center "New Medical Technologies", Voronezh, Russia
| | - A Minguez-Olaondo
- Department of Neurology, Universitary Hospital of Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain.,Department of Neurology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Department of Neurology, Hospital Quironsalud Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - L Pilati
- Department of Biomedicine Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone Hospital, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - A Serrien
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - O Tsurkalenko
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, State Institution "Dnipropetrovsk medical akademy MOH Ukraine", Dnipro, Ukraine
| | | | - W S van Hoogstraten
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Lampl
- Headache Medical Center Linz, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Marcus SC, Shewale AR, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Young WB, Viswanathan HN, Doshi JA. Comparison of healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with migraine with potentially adequate and insufficient triptan response. Cephalalgia 2020; 40:639-649. [PMID: 32223301 PMCID: PMC7273744 DOI: 10.1177/0333102420915167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Triptans are the most commonly prescribed acute treatments for migraine;
however, not all triptan users experience adequate response. Information on
real-world resource use and costs associated with triptan insufficient
response are limited. Methods A retrospective claims analysis using US commercial health plan data between
2012 and 2015 assessed healthcare resource use and costs in adults with a
migraine diagnosis newly initiating triptans. Patients who either did not
refill triptans but used other non-triptan medications or refilled triptans
but also filled non-triptan medications over a 24-month follow-up period
were designated as potential triptan insufficient responders. Patients who
continued filling only triptans (i.e. triptan-only continuers) were
designated as potential adequate responders. All-cause and migraine-related
resource use and total (medical and pharmacy) costs over months 1–12 and
months 13–24 were compared between triptan-only continuers and potential
triptan insufficient responders. Results Among 10,509 new triptan users, 4371 (41%) were triptan-only continuers, 3102
(30%) were potential triptan insufficient responders, and 3036 (29%) did not
refill their index triptan or fill non-triptan medications over 24 months’
follow-up. Opioids were the most commonly used non-triptan treatment (68%)
among potential triptan insufficient responders over 24 months of follow-up.
Adjusted mean all-cause and migraine-related total costs were $5449 and
$2905 higher, respectively, among potential triptan insufficient responders
versus triptan-only continuers over the first 12 months. Conclusions In a US commercial health plan, almost one-third of new triptan users were
potential triptan insufficient responders and the majority filled opioid
prescriptions. Potential triptan insufficient responder patients had
significantly higher all-cause and migraine-related healthcare utilization
and costs than triptan-only continuers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Montefiore Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - William B Young
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gazerani P, Cairns BE. Sex-Specific Pharmacotherapy for Migraine: A Narrative Review. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:222. [PMID: 32265634 PMCID: PMC7101090 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a common neurological disorder characterized by recurrent headache episodes that accompany sensory-motor disturbances, such as higher sensitivity to touch and light, extremity heaviness or weakness, and speech or language disabilities. Worldwide, migraine is one of the top 10 causes of disability and hence poses a huge economic burden to society. On average, migraine occurs in 12% of population but its occurrence is sexually dimorphic, as it is two to three times more prevalent in women than in men. This female to male ratio of migraine prevalence is age- and sex hormone-dependent. Advancements in understanding migraine pathogenesis have also revealed an association with both genetics and epigenetics. The severity of migraine, in terms of its attack duration, headache intensity, frequency, and occurrence of migraine-associated symptoms, has generally been reported to be greater in women. Sex differences in migraine disability and comorbidities, such as psychiatric disorders, have also been noted in some population-based studies. However, research on sex-related differences in response to migraine treatments is relatively scarce. Although a general observation is that women consume more medication than men for migraine treatment, strategies for the use of abortive and preventive medications for migraine are generally similar in both sexes. This narrative review summarizes available findings on sexually distinct responses to abortive and prophylactic pharmacotherapy of migraine. Basic experimental data and clinical findings will be presented, and potential mechanisms underlying sex-based responses will be discussed to highlight the importance and value of sex-based treatment in migraine research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parisa Gazerani
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Brian E Cairns
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rapoport AM, Lin T. Device profile of the Nerivio™ for acute migraine treatment: overview of its efficacy and safety. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:1017-1023. [DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1695599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tamar Lin
- Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd., Netanya, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Silberstein SD, Shrewsbury SB, Hoekman J. Dihydroergotamine (DHE) - Then and Now: A Narrative Review. Headache 2019; 60:40-57. [PMID: 31737909 PMCID: PMC7003832 DOI: 10.1111/head.13700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a narrative review of clinical development programs for non-oral, non-injectable formulations of dihydroergotamine (DHE) for the treatment of migraine. BACKGROUND Dihydroergotamine was one of the first "synthetic drugs" developed in the 20th century for treating migraine. It is effective and recommended for acute migraine treatment. Since oral DHE is extensively metabolized, it must be given by a non-oral route. Intravenous DHE requires healthcare personnel to administer, subcutaneous/intramuscular injection is challenging to self-administer, and the approved nasal spray formulation exhibits low bioavailability and high variability that limits its efficacy. Currently there are several attempts underway to develop non-oral, non-injected formulations of DHE. METHOD A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, then narrative review of identified reports, focusing on those published in the last 10 years. RESULTS Of 1881 references to DHE from a MEDLINE/PubMed search, 164 were from the last 10 years and were the focus of this review. Further cross reference was made to ClinicalTrials.gov for 19 clinical studies, of which some results have not yet been published, or are studies that are currently underway. Three nasal DHE products are in clinical development, reawakening interest in this route of delivery for migraine. Other routes of DHE administration have been, or are being, explored. CONCLUSION There is renewed appreciation for DHE and the need for non-oral, non-injected delivery is now being addressed.
Collapse
|
50
|
Dodick DW, Reed ML, Fanning KM, Munjal S, Alam A, Buse DC, Schwedt TJ, Lipton RB. Predictors of allodynia in persons with migraine: Results from the Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) study. Cephalalgia 2019; 39:873-882. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102418825346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Background Cutaneous allodynia is a common clinical feature of migraine that has been associated with reduced efficacy of acute migraine treatments and an increased risk of disease progression. Objective Identify factors associated with allodynia in a sample of adults with migraine. Methods An online survey panel was used to identify adults with migraine who averaged at least 1 monthly headache day over the previous 3 months. Data on sociodemographics, headache frequency, headache pain intensity, migraine symptom severity, medication use, depression and anxiety, and cutaneous allodynia (via the Allodynia Symptom Checklist) were obtained. Binary logistic modeling predicted the presence of allodynia. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results In total, 15,133 individuals with migraine met the eligibility criteria. Mean age was 43.1 years, 73.0% were female, and 81.0% were Caucasian. Allodynia was present in 39.9%. The fully adjusted model, controlling for sociodemographics and headache features, demonstrated that allodynia was significantly associated with a higher migraine symptom severity score (odds ratio 1.17, confidence interval 1.15, 1.19) and more severe pain intensity (odds ratio 1.11, confidence interval 1.08, 1.14); probable depression and/or anxiety (odds ratio 1.83, confidence interval 1.67, 2.00); and overuse of acute medication (odds ratio 1.23, confidence interval 1.09, 1.38). A higher number of monthly headache days increased the likelihood of allodynia, but the effect was attenuated in the fully adjusted model. Conclusion In a representative sample of US adults with migraine, there were significant associations between allodynia and headache frequency and intensity, anxiety and/or depression, symptom severity, and acute medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sagar Munjal
- Promius Pharma, a subsidiary of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Aftab Alam
- Promius Pharma, a subsidiary of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|