1
|
Orr SL. Parental mental health and migraine in youth: An evolving story historically plagued with sparse and inadequate literature and mother-blaming. Headache 2024. [PMID: 38934206 DOI: 10.1111/head.14779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Serena L Orr
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Section of Neurology, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li DJ, Tsai SJ, Chen TJ, Liang CS, Chen MH. Risk of major mental disorders in the offspring of parents with migraine. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2024; 23:23. [PMID: 38909222 PMCID: PMC11193281 DOI: 10.1186/s12991-024-00508-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine has been associated with mental disorders, however whether parental migraine is associated with an increased risk of major mental disorders (MMDs) in offspring has not been investigated. We aimed to examine the risk of the development of MMDs in the offspring of parents with migraine compared with those of parents without migraine. METHODS This study used data derived from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Offspring of parents with migraine and a control group consisting of offspring of parents without migraine matched for demographic and parental mental disorders were included. Cox regression was used to estimate the risk of MMDs, including schizophrenia, depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Sub-analyses stratified by the fathers and mothers were further performed to separately clarify the risks of MMDs among the offspring. RESULTS We included 22,747 offspring of parents with migraine and 227,470 offspring of parents without migraine as the controls. Parental migraine was significantly associated with an increased risk of ADHD (reported as hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals: 1.37, 1.25-1.50), bipolar disorder (1.35, 1.06-1.71), and depressive disorder (1.33, 1.21-1.47) compared to the offspring of parents without migraine. Importantly, sub-analyses showed that only maternal migraine was significantly associated with these risks. CONCLUSIONS Due to the heavy burden of MMDs, healthcare workers should be aware of the risk of MMDs in the offspring of parents with migraine, particular in mothers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dian-Jeng Li
- Department of Addiction Science, Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Meiho University, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Jen Tsai
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shihpai Road, Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
| | - Tzeng-Ji Chen
- Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Family Medicine, Hsinchu Branch, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Sung Liang
- Department of Psychiatry, Beitou Branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical School, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Psychiatry, National Defense Medical School, No. 60, Xinmin Road, Beitou District, Taipei, 11243, Taiwan.
| | - Mu-Hong Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shihpai Road, Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cohen F, Brooks CV, Sun D, Buse DC, Reed ML, Fanning KM, Lipton RB. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: A systematic review. Headache 2024; 64:516-532. [PMID: 38700185 DOI: 10.1111/head.14709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study reviewed migraine prevalence and disability gathered through epidemiologic survey studies in the United States conducted over the past three decades. We summarized these studies and evaluated changing patterns of disease prevalence and disability. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of US studies addressing the prevalence, disability, and/or burden of migraine, including both episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was used in conjunction with the PubMed search engine. Eligible studies were published before February 2022, were conducted in the United States, included representative samples, and used a case definition of migraine based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD). The primary measure of disease burden was the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS). The MIDAS measures days lost due to migraine over 3 months in three domains and defines groups with moderate (Grade III) or severe disability (Grade IV) using cut-scores. RESULTS Of the 1609 identified records, 26 publications from 11 US population-based studies met eligibility criteria. The prevalence of migraine in the population has remained relatively consistent for the past 30 years: ranging from 11.7% to 14.7% overall, 17.1% to 19.2% in women, and 5.6% to 7.2% in men in the studies reviewed. CM prevalence is 0.91% (1.3% among women and 0.5% of men) in adults and 0.8% in adolescents. The proportion of people with migraine and moderate-to-severe MIDAS disability (Grades III-IV), has trended upward across studies from 22.0% in 2005 to 39.0% in 2012, to 43.2% in 2016, and 42.4% in 2018. A consistently higher proportion of women were assigned MIDAS Grades III/IV relative to men. CONCLUSION The prevalence of migraine in the United States has remained stable over the past three decades while migraine-related disability has increased. The disability trend could reflect changes in reporting, study methodology, social and societal changes, or changes in exacerbating or remediating factors that make migraine more disabling, among other hypotheses. These issues merit further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Cohen
- Mount Sinai Center for Headache and Facial Pain, Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Caroline V Brooks
- Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Daniel Sun
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leonardi M, Martelletti P, Burstein R, Fornari A, Grazzi L, Guekht A, Lipton RB, Mitsikostas DD, Olesen J, Owolabi MO, Ruiz De la Torre E, Sacco S, Steiner TJ, Surya N, Takeshima T, Tassorelli C, Wang SJ, Wijeratne T, Yu S, Raggi A. The World Health Organization Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders and the headache revolution: from headache burden to a global action plan for headache disorders. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:4. [PMID: 38178049 PMCID: PMC10768290 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01700-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders was developed by WHO to address the worldwide challenges and gaps in provision of care and services for people with epilepsy and other neurological disorders and to ensure a comprehensive, coordinated response across sectors to the burden of neurologic diseases and to promote brain health across life-course. Headache disorders constitute the second most burdensome of all neurological diseases after stroke, but the first if young and midlife adults are taken into account. Despite the availability of a range of treatments, disability associated with headache disorders, and with migraine, remains very high. In addition, there are inequalities between high-income and low and middle income countries in access to medical care. In line with several brain health initiatives following the WHOiGAP resolution, herein we tailor the main pillars of the action plan to headache disorders: (1) raising policy prioritization and strengthen governance; (2) providing effective, timely and responsive diagnosis, treatment and care; (3) implementing strategies for promotion and prevention; (4) fostering research and innovation and strengthen information systems. Specific targets for future policy actions are proposed. The Global Action Plan triggered a revolution in neurology, not only by increasing public awareness of brain disorders and brain health but also by boosting the number of neurologists in training, raising research funding and making neurology a public health priority for policy makers. Reducing the burden of headache disorders will not only improve the quality of life and wellbeing of people with headache but also reduce the burden of neurological disorders increasing global brain health and, thus, global population health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matilde Leonardi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Rami Burstein
- John Hedley-Whyte Professor of Anesthesia and Neuroscience at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arianna Fornari
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Neuroalgology Unit and Headache Center, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Alla Guekht
- Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Montefiore Headache Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, Bronx, USA
| | - Dimos Dimitrios Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jes Olesen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mayowa Ojo Owolabi
- Faculty of Clinical Sciences, Center for Genomic and Precision Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | | | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Timothy J Steiner
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Edvard Griegs gate, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
- Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Takao Takeshima
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- College of Medicine and Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, The Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tissa Wijeratne
- Department of Neurology, Sunshine Hospital, St Albans, VIC, Australia
- Australian Institute of Migraine, Pascoe Vale South, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shengyuan Yu
- Department of Neurology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Alberto Raggi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kubota GT. It is time anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies be considered first-line prophylaxis for migraine. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 80:218-226. [PMID: 35976302 PMCID: PMC9491437 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2022-s112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The result of more than thirty years of research, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are currently the state of the art for migraine preventive therapy. Their efficacy and safety, supported by an already large and growing body of evidence, are added by many other advantages: an early onset of action, favorable posology, negligible pharmacological interaction, and a broad-reaching efficacy in many challenging clinical contexts. When compared to standard prophylactics, these novel medications seem at least as efficacious, clearly more tolerable and, consequently, with a superior adherence profile. Furthermore, recently published analyses indicate that they are cost-effective, especially among those with chronic migraine. Yet, current guidelines endorse their use only after multiple other preventives have failed or have been deemed not tolerable. Although this recommendation may have been sensible at first, the now available data strongly point that time has come for anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies to be acknowledged as first-line treatments for migraine patients with severe disability. For these individuals, delaying treatment until several other alternatives have failed incurs in significant losses, both economically and to many relevant aspects of their lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Taricani Kubota
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Estave PM, Beeghly S, Anderson R, Margol C, Shakir M, George G, Berger A, O’Connell N, Burch R, Haas N, Powers SW, Seng E, Buse DC, Lipton RB, Wells RE. Learning the full impact of migraine through patient voices: A qualitative study. Headache 2021; 61:1004-1020. [PMID: 34081779 PMCID: PMC8428538 DOI: 10.1111/head.14151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To better characterize the ways that migraine affects multiple domains of life. BACKGROUND Further understanding of migraine burden is needed. METHODS Adults with migraine randomized to mindfulness-based stress reduction or headache education arms (n = 81) in two separate randomized clinical trials participated in semistructured in-person qualitative interviews conducted after the interventions. Interviews queried participants on migraine impact on life and were audio-recorded, transcribed, and summarized into a framework matrix. A master codebook was created until meaning saturation was reached and magnitude coding established code frequency. Themes and subthemes were identified using a constructivist grounded theory approach. RESULTS Despite most participants being treated with acute and/or prophylactic medications, 90% (73/81) reported migraine had a negative impact on overall life, with 68% (55/81) endorsing specific domains of life impacted and 52% (42/81) describing impact on emotional health. Six main themes of migraine impact emerged: (1) global negative impact on overall life; (2) impact on emotional health; (3) impact on cognitive function; (4) impact on specific domains of life (work/career, family, social); (5) fear and avoidance (pain catastrophizing and anticipatory anxiety); and (6) internalized and externalized stigma. Participants reported how migraine (a) controls life, (b) makes life difficult, and (c) causes disability during attacks, with participants (d) experiencing a lack of control and/or (e) attempting to push through despite migraine. Emotional health was affected through (a) isolation, (b) anxiety, (c) frustration/anger, (d) guilt, (e) mood changes/irritability, and (f) depression/hopelessness. Cognitive function was affected through concentration and communication difficulties. CONCLUSIONS Migraine has a global negative impact on overall life, cognitive and emotional health, work, family, and social life. Migraine contributes to isolation, frustration, guilt, fear, avoidance behavior, and stigma. A greater understanding of the deep burden of this chronic neurological disease is needed to effectively target and treat what is most important to those living with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paige M. Estave
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Summerlyn Beeghly
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Reid Anderson
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Caitlyn Margol
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Mariam Shakir
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Geena George
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Anissa Berger
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Nathaniel O’Connell
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Rebecca Burch
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Niina Haas
- BrightOutcome, Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA
| | - Scott W. Powers
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cinncinati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cinncinati, OH, USA
| | - Elizabeth Seng
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dawn C. Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard B. Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ailani J, Lipton RB, Hutchinson S, Knievel K, Lu K, Butler M, Yu SY, Finnegan M, Severt L, Trugman JM. Long-Term Safety Evaluation of Ubrogepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Phase 3, Randomized, 52-Week Extension Trial. Headache 2021; 60:141-152. [PMID: 31913519 PMCID: PMC7004213 DOI: 10.1111/head.13682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the long‐term safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine. Background Ubrogepant is an oral, calcitonin gene–related receptor antagonist in development for the acute treatment of migraine. The efficacy of ubrogepant was demonstrated in 2 phase 3 trials in which a significant improvement was observed in migraine headache pain, migraine‐associated symptoms, and ability to function. Methods This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, 52‐week extension trial. Adults with migraine with or without aura entered the trial after completing one of 2 phase 3 lead‐in trials and were re‐randomized 1:1:1 to usual care, ubrogepant 50 mg, or ubrogepant 100 mg. Randomization to ubrogepant dose was blinded. Those randomized to usual care continued to treat migraine attacks with their own medication. The usual care arm was included in this trial to capture background rates of hepatic laboratory parameters and contextualize hepatic safety assessments. Safety and tolerability were the primary outcome measures. The safety population for the ubrogepant arms included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of treatment. All cases of alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevations of ≥3 times the upper limit of normal were adjudicated by an independent panel of liver experts who were blinded to dose. Results The safety population included 1230 participants (404 in the ubrogepant 50‐mg group, 409 in the ubrogepant 100‐mg group, and 417 in the usual care group). Participants were on average 42 years of age, 90% (1106/1230) female and 85% (1043/1230) white, with an average BMI of 30 kg/m2. Throughout the trial, 21,454 migraine attacks were treated with 31,968 doses of ubrogepant. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 268/404 (66%) participants receiving ubrogepant 50 mg and 297/409 (73%) receiving ubrogepant 100 mg. The most commonly reported TEAE was upper respiratory tract infection (<12%); findings were similar across dose groups. Treatment‐related TEAEs were reported by 42/404 (10%) participants in the ubrogepant 50‐mg group and 43/409 (11%) in the ubrogepant 100‐mg group. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported by 9/404 (2%) participants in the ubrogepant 50‐mg group and 12/409 (3%) participants in the ubrogepant 100‐mg group. Twenty cases of ALT/AST levels of ≥3 times the upper limit of normal were reported and reviewed by an independent clinical adjudication committee of liver experts. There were no cases of Hy’s Law. Conclusions Long‐term intermittent use of ubrogepant 50 and 100 mg given as 1 or 2 doses per attack for the acute treatment of migraine was safe and well tolerated, as indicated by a low incidence of treatment‐related TEAEs and SAEs and discontinuations due to adverse events in this 1‐year trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ailani
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Headache Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ashina M, Katsarava Z, Do TP, Buse DC, Pozo-Rosich P, Özge A, Krymchantowski AV, Lebedeva ER, Ravishankar K, Yu S, Sacco S, Ashina S, Younis S, Steiner TJ, Lipton RB. Migraine: epidemiology and systems of care. Lancet 2021; 397:1485-1495. [PMID: 33773613 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32160-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 282] [Impact Index Per Article: 94.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is a neurovascular disorder that affects over 1 billion people worldwide. Its widespread prevalence, and associated disability, have a range of negative and substantial effects not only on those immediately affected but also on their families, colleagues, employers, and society. To reduce this global burden, concerted efforts are needed to implement and improve migraine care that is supported by informed health-care policies. In this Series paper, we summarise the data on migraine epidemiology, including estimates of its very considerable burden on the global economy. First, we present the challenges that continue to obstruct provision of adequate care worldwide. Second, we outline the advantages of integrated and coordinated systems of care, in which primary and specialist care complement and support each other; the use of comprehensive referral and linkage protocols should enable continuity of care between these systems levels. Finally, we describe challenges in low and middle-income countries, including countries with poor public health education, inadequate access to medication, and insufficient formal education and training of health-care professionals resulting in misdiagnosis, mismanagement, and wastage of resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Knowledge Center on Headache Disorders, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan; Department of Neurology, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
| | - Zaza Katsarava
- Department of Neurology, Evangelical Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; EVEX Medical Corporation, Tbilisi, Georgia; Department of Neurology, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Thien Phu Do
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aynur Özge
- Department of Neurology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
| | | | - Elena R Lebedeva
- Department of Neurology, International Headache Centre Europe-Asia, the Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
| | - Krishnamurthy Ravishankar
- The Headache and Migraine Clinic, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shengyuan Yu
- Department of Neurology, People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Sait Ashina
- Comprehensive Headache Center, Department of Neurology and Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samaira Younis
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Timothy J Steiner
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review surveys our current understanding of the impact of parental migraine on children. Understanding the impact of migraine on others in a family unit is critical to describing the full burden of migraine and to developing psychosocial supportive interventions for patients and their families. RECENT FINDINGS Having a parent with migraine is associated with several early developmental features including infant colic. Adolescent children of parents with migraine self-report their parent's migraine interferes with school and activities and events. Further, migraine is perceived to impact the relationship between the parent and child. Having a parent with migraine increases a child's risk of having migraine, and having more severe migraine disease. However, children with migraine whose parent also has migraine appear to receive more early and aggressive treatment. The impact of migraine extends beyond the parent with migraine and influences children across biological, psychological, and social domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Marzouk
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, 1165 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Elizabeth K Seng
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, 1165 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. .,Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Natalucci G, Faedda N, Baglioni V, Guidetti V. The Relationship Between Parental Care and Pain in Children With Headache: A Narrative Review. Headache 2020; 60:1217-1224. [PMID: 32474926 DOI: 10.1111/head.13822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In migraine or primary headache in children, parents play a fundamental role in pain management. For this narrative review, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Psych Info were searched using the terms "parent headache", "mother/father headache", "parental impact headache", "alexithymia parents headache", "catastrophizing parent headache", "family headache", "children parent headache", and "quality of life family headache". Articles were chosen for inclusion based on their relevance in to the topic. OVERVIEW Several parental and psychological characteristics can influence in children and adolescent headache, such as parental attitudes as oppressive or overprotective; punitive parenting styles; familial psychological symptoms, especially anxiety and depression; catastrophizing about their child's pain or excessive worry about their child's headache; inability to express emotions; and feelings that may lead to somatization problems. DISCUSSION Parents' attitudes and behaviors toward their child's headache have a strong relation with the severity of headache attacks. Mothers seem to have more influence than fathers on children's pain and emotional regulation. We suggest that the presence of caregiver-child transmission of maladaptive coping strategies, arising from difficulties expressing emotion, may lead to incorrect management of headache pain, further facilitating headache chronification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Natalucci
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Noemi Faedda
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Baglioni
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Guidetti
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gibbs SN, Shah S, Deshpande CG, Bensink ME, Broder MS, Dumas PK, Buse DC, Vo P, Schwedt TJ. United States Patients' Perspective of Living With Migraine: Country-Specific Results From the Global "My Migraine Voice" Survey. Headache 2020; 60:1351-1364. [PMID: 32369201 PMCID: PMC7496834 DOI: 10.1111/head.13829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Migraine is associated with debilitating symptoms that can affect daily functioning. “My Migraine Voice” was a large, cross‐sectional, multi‐country online survey aimed at understanding disease burden directly from people with migraine. Objective This study reports on the social and economic impacts of migraine, specifically the impact on activities of daily living and the costs of migraine, from the point of view of people with migraine in the United States. Methods The online survey was administered to adults with a self‐reported diagnosis of migraine who experienced 4 or more monthly migraine days each month for the previous 3 months. Prespecified screening quotas were used so that 90% of respondents reported current or past use of preventive migraine medication, 80% of whom switched treatment (ie, changed their prescribed preventive medication at least once). The remaining 10% were preventive treatment naïve (ie, never used any prescribed preventive medication). Burden of migraine on activities of daily living and caregivers (eg, functional limitations, fear of next migraine attack, sleep problems) and economic burden (eg, out‐of‐pocket costs, impact on work productivity using the validated work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire) reported by respondents from the United States are presented. Results are stratified by employment status, migraine frequency (chronic vs episodic migraine), and history of preventive treatment. Results Thousand hundred and one individuals with migraine from the United States responded to the survey. Respondents reported limitations completing daily activities during all migraine phases, including during the premonitory/aura and postdrome phases. Most (761/1101 (69%)) relied on family, friends, or others for help with daily tasks and reported being helped a median of 9 days (25th percentile 5 days, 75th percentile 15 days) within the last 3 months. Respondents with chronic migraine reported being helped for more days (median 10 days, 25th percentile 5 days, 75th percentile 23 days) in the last 3 months. Almost all (962/1101 (87%)) experienced sleep difficulties and 41% (448/1101) (48% (336/697) of those with 2 or more preventive treatment failures) were very or extremely fearful of a next migraine attack. Median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) monthly out‐of‐pocket costs of $90.00 ($30.00, $144.00) in doctor’s fees (n = 504), $124.00 ($60.00, $234.00) in health insurance (n = 450), $40.00 ($20.00, $100.00) for prescriptions (n = 630), and $50.00 ($0.00, $100.00) for complementary therapies (n = 255) were reported. Those with 2 or more preventive treatment failures reported higher monthly out‐of‐pocket doctor fees (median $99.00 ($30.00, $150.00), n = 388). Among employed respondents (n = 661), migraine resulted in 22% absenteeism, 60% presenteeism, 65% work productivity loss, and 64% activity impairment. Conclusions Migraine impacts individuals’ activities of daily living, work‐life, and financial status, especially individuals with high needs, namely those with 4 or more monthly migraine days and prior treatment failures. People with migraine are impaired during all migraine phases, experience fear of their next migraine attack and sleep difficulties, and pay substantial monthly out‐of‐pocket costs for migraine. Burden is even greater among those who have had 2 or more preventive treatment failures. Impacts of migraine extend beyond probands to caregivers who help people with migraine with daily tasks, employers who are affected by employee absenteeism, presenteeism, and reduced productivity, and society which is burdened by lost and reduced economic productivity and healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah N Gibbs
- Partnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael S Broder
- Partnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA
| | | | - Dawn C Buse
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela Vo
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hartman L, Jenkinson C, Morley D. Young People's Response to Parental Neurological Disorder: A Structured Review. Adolesc Health Med Ther 2020; 11:39-51. [PMID: 32273785 PMCID: PMC7105371 DOI: 10.2147/ahmt.s237807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction A significant paucity of literature exists relating to the impact on children of parental neurological disorder, with the exception of multiple sclerosis. The wider literature in this field (parental cancer, depression, alcoholism, HIV/AIDS) exhibits the many potential challenges young people might experience during serious parental illness. Given this, a literature review of parental neurological disorder is long overdue. Methods This review is structured around the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of neurological disorders. The WHO identifies 10 common neurological disorders; dementia, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, neuroinfections, neurological disorders associated with malnutrition, pain associated with neurological disorders, Parkinson's disease, stroke, and traumatic brain injury. A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE database was performed using key terms for each of the 10 conditions. Results for each condition were divided in to "negative", "positive and/or neutral" and "other" child responses. Results The search yielded a total of 6247 titles, of which 184 underwent a full-text assessment. Sixty-five met all eligibility criteria and were thus included in the review. A number of negative issues emerged across parental conditions including the prevalence of child mood disorders, parent-child role reversal, children's need for information on the parental condition, the importance of family cohesion, the negative effect of parental psychopathology and differences between male and female children. A limited number of positive outcomes were evident in a minority of parental conditions. Outcomes measured and methodologies employed were highly heterogeneous. Conclusion Children generally respond negatively to parental neurological disorder. Responses varied between neurological disorders, suggesting the need for parental disease-specific guidance and clinical management where required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian Hartman
- Lincoln College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3DR, UK
| | - Crispin Jenkinson
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - David Morley
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wells RE, Seng EK, Edwards RR, Victorson DE, Pierce CR, Rosenberg L, Napadow V, Schuman-Olivier Z. Mindfulness in migraine: A narrative review. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20:207-225. [PMID: 31933391 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1715212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Migraine is the second leading cause of disability worldwide, yet many patients are unable to tolerate, benefit from, or afford pharmacological treatment options. Non-pharmacological migraine therapies exist, especially to reduce opioid use, which represents a significant unmet need. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) have potential as a non-pharmacological treatment for migraine, primarily through the development of flexible attentional capacity across sensory, cognitive, and emotional experiences.Areas covered: The authors review efficacy and potential mechanisms of MBIs for migraine, including mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT).Expert opinion: While most mindfulness research studies for migraine to date have been pilot trials, which are small and/or lacked rigor, initial evidence suggests there may be improvements in overall headache-related disability and psychological well-being. Many research questions remain to help target the treatment to patients most likely to benefit, including the ideal dosage, duration, delivery method, responder characteristics, and potential mechanisms and biomarkers. A realistic understanding of these factors is important for patients, providers, and the media. Mindfulness will not 'cure' migraine; however, mindfulness may be an important tool as part of a comprehensive treatment approach to help patients 'mindfully' engage in valued life activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Erwin Wells
- Comprehensive Headache Program, Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth K Seng
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Robert R Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David E Victorson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Charles R Pierce
- Department of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Lauren Rosenberg
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Vitaly Napadow
- Center for Integrative Pain NeuroImaging (CiPNI), Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Zev Schuman-Olivier
- Center for Mindfulness and Compassion, Addictions, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML, Murray S, Dumas PK, Adams AM, Lipton RB. Life With Migraine: Effects on Relationships, Career, and Finances From the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study. Headache 2019; 59:1286-1299. [PMID: 31407321 PMCID: PMC6771487 DOI: 10.1111/head.13613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the effects of migraine on important life domains and compare differences between respondents with episodic and chronic migraine and between sexes. Background Migraine is associated with a substantial personal and societal burden and can also affect the interpersonal dynamics, psychological health and well‐being, and financial stability of the entire family of the person with migraine. Methods The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study is a prospective, longitudinal, Web‐based survey study undertaken between September 2012 and November 2013 in a systematic U.S. sample of people meeting modified International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition migraine criteria: 19,891 respondents were invited to complete the Family Burden Module, which assessed the perceived impact of migraine on family relationships and life, career and finances, and overall health. Respondents were stratified by episodic migraine (<15 headache days/month) and chronic migraine (≥15 headache days/month) and sex for comparisons. Results A total of 13,064 respondents (episodic migraine: 11,944 [91.4%]; chronic migraine: 1120 [8.6%]) provided valid data. Approximately 16.8% of respondents not currently in a romantic relationship (n = 536 of 3189) and 17.8% of those in a relationship but not living together (n = 236 of 1323) indicated that headaches had contributed to relationship problems. Of those in a relationship and living together (n = 8154), 3.2% reported that they chose not to have children, delayed having children or had fewer children because of migraine (n = 260; episodic migraine: n = 193 of 7446 [2.6%]; chronic migraine: n = 67 of 708 [9.5%]; P < .001). Of individuals responding to career/finance items (n = 13,061/13,036), 32.7% indicated that headaches negatively affected ≥1 career area (n = 4271; episodic migraine: n = 3617 of 11,942 [30.3%]; chronic migraine: n = 654 of 1119 [58.4%]), and 32.1% endorsed worry about long‐term financial security due to migraine (n = 4180; episodic migraine: n = 3539 of 11,920 [29.7%]; chronic migraine: n = 641 of 1116 [57.4%]). Conclusions Migraine can negatively affect many important aspects of life including marital, parenting, romantic and family relationships, career/financial achievement and stability, and overall health. Reported burden was consistently greater among those with chronic migraine than among people with episodic migraine; however, few differences were seen between the sexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Sharron Murray
- American Migraine Foundation Partner, Wenatchee, WA, USA
| | - Paula K Dumas
- Executive Team, Migraine Again LLC, Alpharetta, GA, USA
| | | | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.,Montefiore Headache Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hall AL, Karvounides D, Gelfand AA, Mankin H, Kessel S, Corroo J, Malavolta CP, Pezzuto T, Chadehumbe M, Szperka CL. Improving the Patient Experience With Migraine Camp, a One-Day Group Intervention for Adolescents With Chronic Headache and Their Parents. Headache 2019; 59:1392-1400. [PMID: 31165479 DOI: 10.1111/head.13570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Though chronic migraine is actually common in adolescents, living with constant headache can be isolating for both patients and their families. As an outgrowth of clinical care, we developed the Miles for Migraine Youth Camp, a recurring 1-day event for adolescents with chronic headache and their parents. Migraine Camp was developed to provide expanded headache education, teach coping strategies for living with chronic pain, and encourage development of a supportive community for adolescents living with chronic headache disorders and their families. The creation and curriculum of the Camps at the University of California San Francisco and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia are described in this manuscript, along with patient and caregiver feedback. Overall, feedback was positive. Teens reported feeling less isolated and more prepared to cope with headaches using new strategies. Both patients and caregivers consistently described benefit from connecting with others who experience similar challenges. The Migraine Camp teams at both institutions found it feasible to conduct the Camps 1-2 times per year using existing resources, but noted that to scale it to a more regular event additional administrative and/or volunteer support would be needed. In summary, the experience has been positive for patients, caregivers, and staff, and we hope that this manuscript can serve as a "how to" model for similar events at other institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L Hall
- Pediatric Headache Program, Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Yale New Haven Health/Connecticut Medical Group, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Dina Karvounides
- Pediatric Headache Program, Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy A Gelfand
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Child & Adolescent Headache Program, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Haley Mankin
- School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Janet Corroo
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Child & Adolescent Headache Program, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Miles for Migraine, Lafayette Hill, PA, USA
| | - Carrie P Malavolta
- Pediatric Headache Program, Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tara Pezzuto
- Nemours Neurology Headache Program, Alfred I. Dupont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Madeline Chadehumbe
- Pediatric Headache Program, Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christina L Szperka
- Pediatric Headache Program, Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Seng EK, Mauser ED, Marzouk M, Patel ZS, Rosen N, Buse DC. When Mom Has Migraine: An Observational Study of the Impact of Parental Migraine on Adolescent Children. Headache 2018; 59:224-234. [PMID: 30378682 DOI: 10.1111/head.13433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current study aimed to describe the impact of parental migraine on adolescent children (aged 11-17) living at home with a parent with migraine. BACKGROUND Emerging evidence suggests that migraine impacts the family members of people with migraine. However, there has been little research to evaluate the perspective of the child of a parent with migraine. METHODS This cross-sectional observational study included parents who met International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria for migraine and their 11-17-year-old children currently living with the parent with migraine recruited from neurologist offices and online. Parents completed measures of demographics, a diagnostic migraine criteria screener, parental illness impact (Parental Illness Impact Survey - Revised; subscales = Burden of Daily Help, Emotional Impact, Social Impact, Communication and Understanding, Impact on Personal Future, Friends Reactions, Parent/Child Relationship, and Global Well-Being), migraine-related disability (MIDAS), headache attack frequency, and headache attack pain intensity. Children completed measures of demographics, parental illness impact, and a migraine diagnostic screener if applicable. RESULTS Children (n = 40) reported the greatest impact of their parent's migraine on the Global Well-Being (M = 3.3, SD = 0.9) and Parent/Child Relationship (M = 3.5, SD = 0.6) subscales. There were no significant differences between the average child and parent rating of parental migraine impact on children. Correlations between parent and child ratings of parental migraine impact were strongest for the Social Impact subscale (ρ = 0.55, P < .001), and non-significant for the Parent/Child Relationship (ρ = 0.13, P = .416) and Friends Reactions (ρ = 0.18, P = .257) subscales. Higher attack frequency and endorsing severe disability on the MIDAS were associated with higher child-rated impact (eg, lower scores) on Global Well-Being (frequency ρ = -0.35, P = .028; MIDAS t(38) = 2.74, P = .009) and Impact on Personal Future (frequency ρ = -0.41, P = .009; MIDAS t(35.7) = 2.49, P = .017) subscales. Higher attack pain intensity was associated with higher child-rated impact (eg, lower scores) on Burden of Daily Help (r = -0.34, P = .031) and Emotional Impact (r = -0.40, P = .010). Over half of children (23/40, 57.5%) reported some kind of service or intervention to help them manage the impact of their parent's migraine on their lives would be helpful. CONCLUSIONS Parental migraine impacts children aged 11-17 living in the home, particularly in the domains of global well-being and the parent/child relationship. Parent and child reports are not strongly correlated across all domains of parental impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Seng
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA.,Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Emily D Mauser
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Maya Marzouk
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Zarine S Patel
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Noah Rosen
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA.,Neuroscience Intstitute, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA.,Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|