Tumor-selective blood flow decrease induced by an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, temocapril hydrochloride

Advances in nanomaterial-based targeted drug delivery systems

Nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems (NBDDS) are widely used to improve the safety and therapeutic efficacy of encapsulated drugs due to their unique physicochemical and biological properties. By combining therapeutic drugs with nanoparticles using rational targeting pathways, nano-targeted delivery systems were created to overcome the main drawbacks of conventional drug treatment, including insufficient stability and solubility, lack of transmembrane transport, short circulation time, and undesirable toxic effects. Herein, we reviewed the recent developments in different targeting design strategies and therapeutic approaches employing various nanomaterial-based systems. We also discussed the challenges and perspectives of smart systems in precisely targeting different intravascular and extravascular diseases.

Exploration of Site-Specific Drug Targeting—A Review on EPR-, Stimuli-, Chemical-, and Receptor-Based Approaches as Potential Drug Targeting Methods in Cancer Treatment

Cancer has been one of the most dominant causes of mortality globally over the last few decades. In cancer treatment, the selective targeting of tumor cells is indispensable, making it a better replacement for conventional chemotherapies by diminishing their adverse side effects. While designing a drug to be delivered selectively in the target organ, the drug development scientists should focus on various factors such as the type of cancer they are dealing with according to which drug, targeting moieties, and pharmaceutical carriers should be targeted. All published articles have been collected regarding cancer and drug-targeting approaches from well reputed databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, Wiley, and Springer. The articles published between January 2010 and December 2020 were considered. Due to the existence of various mechanisms, it is challenging to choose which one is appropriate for a specific case. Moreover, a combination of more than one approach is often utilized to achieve optimal drug effects. In this review, we have summarized and highlighted central mechanisms of how the targeted drug delivery system works in the specific diseased microenvironment, along with the strategies to make an approach more effective. We have also included some pictorial illustrations to have a precise idea about different types of drug targeting. The core contribution of this work includes providing a cancer drug development scientist with a broad preliminary idea to choose the appropriate approach among the various targeted drug delivery mechanisms. Also, the study will contribute to improving anticancer treatment approaches by providing a pathway for lesser side effects observed in conventional chemotherapeutic techniques.

Strategies to enhance drug delivery to solid tumors by harnessing the EPR effects and alternative targeting mechanisms

The Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect has been recognized as the central paradigm in tumor-targeted delivery in the last decades. In the wake of this concept, nanotechnologies have reached phenomenal levels in research. However, clinical tumors display a poor manifestation of EPR effect. Factors including tumor heterogeneity, complicating tumor microenvironment, and discrepancies between laboratory models and human tumors largely contribute to poor efficiency in tumor-targeted delivery and therapeutic failure in clinical translation. In this article, approaches for evaluation of EPR effect in human tumor were overviewed as guidance to employ EPR effect for cancer treatment. Strategies to augment EPR-mediated tumoral delivery are discussed in different dimensions including enhancement of vascular permeability, depletion of tumor extracellular matrix and optimization of nanoparticle design. Besides, the recent development in alternative tumor-targeted delivery mechanisms are highlighted including transendothelial pathway, endogenous cell carriers and non-immunogenic bacteria-mediated delivery. In addition, the emerging preclinical models better reflect human tumors are introduced. Finally, more rational applications of EPR effect in other disease and field are proposed. This article elaborates on fundamental reasons for the gaps between theoretical expectation and clinical outcomes, attempting to provide some perspective directions for future development of cancer nanomedicines in this still evolving landscape.

Nanodrug Delivery Systems Modulate Tumor Vessels to Increase the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect

The use of nanomedicine for antitumor therapy has been extensively investigated for a long time. Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect-mediated drug delivery is currently regarded as an effective way to bring drugs to tumors, especially macromolecular drugs and drug-loaded pharmaceutical nanocarriers. However, a disordered vessel network, and occluded or embolized tumor blood vessels seriously limit the EPR effect. To augment the EPR effect and improve curative effects, in this review, we focused on the perspective of tumor blood vessels, and analyzed the relationship among abnormal angiogenesis, abnormal vascular structure, irregular blood flow, extensive permeability of tumor vessels, and the EPR effect. In this commentary, nanoparticles including liposomes, micelles, and polymers extravasate through the tumor vasculature, which are based on modulating tumor vessels, to increase the EPR effect, thereby increasing their therapeutic effect.

Exploiting the dynamics of the EPR effect and strategies to improve the therapeutic effects of nanomedicines by using EPR effect enhancers

The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect is a unique phenomenon of solid tumors that is related to their particular anatomical and pathophysiological characteristics, e.g. defective vascular architecture; large gaps between endothelial cells in blood vessels; abundant vascular mediators such as bradykinin, nitric oxide, carbon monoxide, and vascular endothelial growth factor; and impaired lymphatic recovery. These features lead to tumor tissues showing considerable extravasation of plasma components and nanomedicines. These data comprise the basic theory underlying the development of macromolecular agents or nanomedicines. The EPR effect is not necessarily valid for all solid tumors, because tumor blood flow and vascular permeability vary greatly. Tumor blood flow is frequently obstructed as tumor size increases, as often seen clinically; early stage, small tumors show a more uniform EPR effect, whereas advanced large tumor show heterogeneity in EPR effect. Accordingly, it would be very important to apply enhancers of EPR effect in clinical setting to make EPR effect more uniform. In this review, we discuss the EPR effect: its history, factors involved, and dynamics and heterogeneity. Strategies to overcome the EPR effect's heterogeneity may guarantee better therapeutic outcomes of drug delivery to advanced cancers.

The renin-angiotensin system blockers and survival in digestive system malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accumulating pre-clinical and clinical studies suggested that the renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) possess anti-carcinogenic properties, and their use is associated with favorable outcomes in many types of cancers.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of relevant databases through January 2019 was conducted to identify studies assessing the RASBs on prognostic outcomes in digestive system malignancies patients on the basis of predetermined selection criteria for pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis showed that the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) resulted in a significant improvement in overall survival (HR 0.79; 95%CI 0.70-0.89; P < .000), cancer-specific survival (HR 0.81; 95%CI 0.73-0.90; P < .000) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.68; 95%CI 0.54-0.85; P = .001), but not progression-free survival (HR 0.88; 95%CI 0.73-1.07; P = .183) and disease-free survival (HR 0.50; 95%CI 0.11-2.39; P = .103). Subgroup analysis indicated that the use of RASBs has a significant improvement of overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, and gastric cancer. Two studies evaluated the dose-response relationship between ACEIs/ARBs therapy and survival and showed higher doses and better survival [(1-364 defined daily doses: odds ratio (OR) 0.89, 95%CI 0.78-1.01, P = .076), (≥365 defined daily doses: OR 0.54, 95%CI: 0.24-1.24, P = .148].

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of studies supports a beneficial association between use of RASBs and survival of digestive system malignancies.

Nanoparticles' interactions with vasculature in diseases

The ever-growing use of inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) in biomedicine provides an exciting approach to develop novel imaging and drug delivery systems, owing to the ease with which these NPs can be functionalized to cater to various applications. In cancer therapeutics, nanomedicine generally relies on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect observed in tumour vasculature to deliver anti-cancer drugs across the endothelium. However, such a phenomenon is dependent on the tumour microenvironment and is not consistently observed in all tumour types, thereby limiting drug transport to the tumour site. On the other hand, there is a rise in utilizing inorganic NPs to intentionally induce endothelial leakiness, creating a window of opportunity to control drug delivery across the endothelium. While this active targeting approach creates a similar phenomenon compared to the EPR effect arising from tumour tissues, its drug delivery applications extend beyond cancer therapeutics and into other vascular-related diseases. In this review, we summarize the current findings of the EPR effect and assess its limitations in the context of anti-cancer drug delivery systems. While the EPR effect offers a possible route for drug passage, we further explore alternative uses of NPs to create controllable endothelial leakiness within short exposures, a phenomenon we coined as nanomaterial-induced endothelial leakiness (NanoEL). Furthermore, we discuss the main mechanistic features of the NanoEL effect that make it unique from conventionally established endothelial leakiness in homeostatic and pathologic conditions, as well as examine its potential applicability in vascular-related diseases, particularly cancer. Therefore, this new paradigm changes the way inorganic NPs are currently being used for biomedical applications.

Melanoma tumour vasculature heterogeneity: from mice models to human

Tumour angiogenesis is defined by an anarchic vasculature and irregularities in alignment of endothelial cells. These structural abnormalities could explain the variability in distribution of nanomedicines in various tumour models. Then, the main goal of this study was to compare and to characterize the tumour vascular structure in different mouse models of melanoma tumours (B16F10 and SK-Mel-28) and in human melanomas from different patients. Tumours were obtained by subcutaneous injection of 10⁶ B16F10 and 3.10⁶ SK-Mel-28 melanoma cells in C57BL/6 and nude mice, respectively. Tumour growth was evaluated weekly, while vasculature was analysed through fluorescent labelling via CD31 and desmin. Significant differences in tumour growth and mice survival were evidenced between the two melanoma models. A fast evolution of tumours was observed for B16F10 melanoma, reaching a tumour size of 100 mm³ in 7 days compared to SK-Mel-28 which needed 21 days to reach the same volumes. Important differences in vascularization were exposed between the melanoma models, characterized by a significant enhancement of vascular density and a significant lumen size for mice melanoma models compared to human. Immunostaining revealed irregularities in endothelium structure for both melanoma models, but structural differences of vasculature were observed, characterized by a stronger expression of desmin in SK-Mel-28 tumours. While human melanoma mainly develops capillaries, structural irregularities are also observed on the samples of this tumour model. Our study revealed an impact of cell type and tumour progression on the structural vasculature of melanoma, which could impact the distribution of drugs in the tumour environment.

Tumor targeting via EPR: Strategies to enhance patient responses

The tumor accumulation of nanomedicines relies on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. In the last 5-10 years, it has been increasingly recognized that there is a large inter- and intra-individual heterogeneity in EPR-mediated tumor targeting, explaining the heterogeneous outcomes of clinical trials in which nanomedicine formulations have been evaluated. To address this heterogeneity, as in other areas of oncology drug development, we have to move away from a one-size-fits-all tumor targeting approach, towards methods that can be employed to individualize and improve nanomedicine treatments. To this end, efforts have to be invested in better understanding the nature, the complexity and the heterogeneity of the EPR effect, and in establishing systems and strategies to enhance, combine, bypass and image EPR-based tumor targeting. In the present manuscript, we summarize key studies in which these strategies are explored, and we discuss how these approaches can be employed to enhance patient responses.

The effect of angiotensin system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) on cancer recurrence and survival: a meta-analysis

To assess the current evidence on the potential benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on cancer recurrence and survival, we comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to April 2013. Two authors screened out duplicates and independently reviewed the eligibility of each study. We included comparative studies comparing the use and nonuse of ACEIs or ARBs in cancer patients. Primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. We included 11 studies with 4964 participants in the final analysis. The meta-analysis showed that the use of ACEIs or ARBs resulted in a significant improvement in DFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.87; P=0.007)] and overall survival (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-0.99; P=0.04). Even when cancer stage was classified into low (I/II) or high (III/IV), DFS improvement was applied to both low stage (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.32-0.96; P=0.04) and high stage (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.37-0.94; P=0.03). Analysis according to cancer type showed benefits in urinary tract cancer (HR 0.22), colorectal cancer (HR 0.22), pancreatic cancer (HR 0.58), and prostate cancer (HR 0.14), but not in breast cancer and hepatocellular cancer. This meta-analysis provides evidence that the use of ACEIs or ARBs in cancer patients can lead to a 40 and 25% reduction in the risk of cancer recurrence and mortality.

Passive targeting of nanoparticles to cancer: A comprehensive review of the literature

Cancer remains the one of the most common causes of mortality in humans; thus, cancer treatment is currently a major focus of investigation. Researchers worldwide have been searching for the optimal treatment (the 'magic bullet') that will selectively target cancer, without afflicting significant morbidity. Recent advances in cancer nanotechnology have raised exciting opportunities for specific drug delivery by an emerging class of nanotherapeutics that may be targeted to neoplastic cells, thereby offering a major advantage over conventional chemotherapeutic agents. There are two ways by which targeting of nanoparticles may be achieved, namely passive and active targeting. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on passive targeting.

The EPR effect for macromolecular drug delivery to solid tumors: Improvement of tumor uptake, lowering of systemic toxicity, and distinct tumor imaging in vivo

The EPR effect results from the extravasation of macromolecules or nanoparticles through tumor blood vessels. We here provide a historical review of the EPR effect, including its features, vascular mediators found in both cancer and inflamed tissue. In addition, architectural and physiological differences of tumor blood vessels vs that of normal tissue are commented. Furthermore, methods of augmentation of the EPR effect are described, that result in better tumor delivery and improved therapeutic effect, where nitroglycerin, angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, or angiotensin II-induced hypertension are employed. Consequently, better therapeutic effect and reduced systemic toxicity are generally observed. Obviously, the EPR effect based delivery of nanoprobes are also useful for tumor-selective imaging agents with using fluorescent or radio nuclei in nanoprobes. We also commented a key difference between passive tumor targeting and the EPR effect in tumors, particularly as related to drug retention in tumors: passive targeting of low-molecular-weight X-ray contrast agents involves a retention period of less than a few minutes, whereas the EPR effect of nanoparticles involves a prolonged retention time-days to weeks.

Blood vessel hyperpermeability and pathophysiology in human tumour xenograft models of breast cancer: a comparison of ectopic and orthotopic tumours

BACKGROUND

Human tumour xenografts in immune compromised mice are widely used as cancer models because they are easy to reproduce and simple to use in a variety of pre-clinical assessments. Developments in nanomedicine have led to the use of tumour xenografts in testing nanoscale delivery devices, such as nanoparticles and polymer-drug conjugates, for targeting and efficacy via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. For these results to be meaningful, the hyperpermeable vasculature and reduced lymphatic drainage associated with tumour pathophysiology must be replicated in the model. In pre-clinical breast cancer xenograft models, cells are commonly introduced via injection either orthotopically (mammary fat pad, MFP) or ectopically (subcutaneous, SC), and the organ environment experienced by the tumour cells has been shown to influence their behaviour.

METHODS

To evaluate xenograft models of breast cancer in the context of EPR, both orthotopic MFP and ectopic SC injections of MDA-MB-231-H2N cells were given to NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice. Animals with matched tumours in two size categories were tested by injection of a high molecular weight dextran as a model nanocarrier. Tumours were collected and sectioned to assess dextran accumulation compared to liver tissue as a positive control. To understand the cellular basis of these observations, tumour sections were also immunostained for endothelial cells, basement membranes, pericytes, and lymphatic vessels.

RESULTS

SC tumours required longer development times to become size matched to MFP tumours, and also presented wide size variability and ulcerated skin lesions 6 weeks after cell injection. The 3 week MFP tumour model demonstrated greater dextran accumulation than the size matched 5 week SC tumour model (for P < 0.10). Immunostaining revealed greater vascular density and thinner basement membranes in the MFP tumour model 3 weeks after cell injection. Both the MFP and SC tumours showed evidence of insufficient lymphatic drainage, as many fluid-filled and collagen IV-lined spaces were observed, which likely contain excess interstitial fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

Dextran accumulation and immunostaining results suggest that small MFP tumours best replicate the vascular permeability required to observe the EPR effect in vivo. A more predictable growth profile and the absence of ulcerated skin lesions further point to the MFP model as a strong choice for long term treatment studies that initiate after a target tumour size has been reached.

Vascular permeability in cancer and infection as related to macromolecular drug delivery, with emphasis on the EPR effect for tumor-selective drug targeting

Tumor and inflammation have many common features. One hallmark of both is enhanced vascular permeability, which is mediated by various factors including bradykinin, nitric oxide (NO), peroxynitrite, prostaglandins etc. A unique characteristic of tumors, however, is defective vascular anatomy. The enhanced vascular permeability in tumors is also distinctive in that extravasated macromolecules are not readily cleared. We utilized the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect of tumors for tumor selective delivery of macromolecular drugs. Consequently, such drugs, nanoparticles or lipid particles, when injected intravenously, selectively accumulate in tumor tissues and remain there for long periods. The EPR effect of tumor tissue is frequently inhomogeneous and the heterogeneity of the EPR effect may reduce the tumor delivery of macromolecular drugs. Therefore, we developed methods to augment the EPR effect without inducing adverse effects for instance raising the systemic blood pressure by infusing angiotensin II during arterial injection of SMANCS/Lipiodol. This method was validated in clinical setting. Further, benefits of utilization of NO-releasing agent such as nitroglycerin or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were demonstrated. The EPR effect is thus now widely accepted as the most basic mechanism for tumor-selective targeting of macromolecular drugs, or so-called nanomedicine.

Comparison of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade for the prevention of premalignant changes in the liver

AIM

We investigate and compare the possible antitumor activity of clinically used angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; captopril, perindopril and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blocker, losartan against hepatocarcinogenesis initiated by diethylnitrosoamines (DENA) and promoted by carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4)).

MAIN METHODS

Diethylnitrosamine (DENA) (200mg/kgi.p.) initiated and carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4)) (2ml/kgi.p.) promoted hepatocarcinogenesis in male Wistar rats after 8weeks.

RESULTS

Hepatocarcinogenesis was manifested biochemically by elevation of serum hepatic tumor markers tested; α-feto protein (AFP) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). In addition, hepatic carcinogenesis was further confirmed by a significant increase in hepatic tissue growth factors; vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF). Moreover a marked increase in matrix metalloproteinase-2 and hydroxyproline content were also observed. Hepatocarcinogenesis was further confirmed by a significant decrease in hepatic endostatin and metallothonein level.

KEY FINDINGS

Long-term administration of the selected drugs for 2weeks before and throughout the experimental period produced a significant protection against hepatic carcinogenesis. The present results claimed that different doses of the selected drugs succeeded in normalization of serum tumor markers. Furthermore, the drugs reduced the elevated level in the hepatic growth factors, matrix metalloproteinase-2 and hydroxyproline induced by the hepatocarcinogen. Moreover, the amelioration was also accompanied by augmentation of hepatic content of metallothionein and endostatin. Histopathological examination of liver tissues of rats treated with DENA-CCl(4) correlated with the biochemical observations.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings suggest a similar protective effect of ACE inhibitors; captopril; perindopril and AT1R blocker, losartan against premalignant stages of liver cancer in the DENA initiated and CCl(4) promoted hepatocarcinogenesis model in rats. Therefore, RAS especially angiotensin II (Ang II) and AT1R interaction plays a pivotal role hepatocarcinogenesis development.

The EPR effect: Unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect

The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect is a unique phenomenon of solid tumors related to their anatomical and pathophysiological differences from normal tissues. For example, angiogenesis leads to high vascular density in solid tumors, large gaps exist between endothelial cells in tumor blood vessels, and tumor tissues show selective extravasation and retention of macromolecular drugs. This EPR effect served as a basis for development of macromolecular anticancer therapy. We demonstrated methods to enhance this effect artificially in clinical settings. Of great importance was increasing systolic blood pressure via slow angiotensin II infusion. Another strategy involved utilization of NO-releasing agents such as topical nitroglycerin, which releases nitrite. Nitrite is converted to NO more selectively in the tumor tissues, which leads to a significantly increased EPR effect and enhanced antitumor drug effects as well. This review discusses molecular mechanisms of factors related to the EPR effect, the unique anatomy of tumor vessels, limitations and techniques to avoid such limitations, augmenting tumor drug delivery, and experimental and clinical findings.

Enhanced permeability and retention of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors: a royal gate for targeted anticancer nanomedicines

Over the past two decades cancer has ascended the causes of human death to be number one or two in many nations world wide. A major limitation inherent to most conventional anticancer chemotherapeutic agents is their lack of tumor selectivity. One way to achieve selective drug targeting to solid tumors is to exploit abnormalities of tumor vasculature, namely, hypervascularisation; aberrant vascular architecture; extensive production of vascular permeability factors stimulating extravasation within tumor tissues; and lack of lymphatic drainage. Maeda and his colleagues have extensively studied tumor vascular abnormalities in terms of active and selective delivery of anticancer drugs to tumor tissues, notably defining the enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR effect) of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors. Due to their large molecular size, nanosized macromolecular anticancer drugs administered intravenously (i.v.) escape renal clearance. Often they can not penetrate the tight endothelial junctions of normal blood vessels, but they can extravasate in tumour vasculature and become trapped in the tumor vicinity. With time the tumor concentration will build up reaching several folds higher than that of the plasma due to lack of efficient lymphatic drainage in solid tumor; an ideal application for EPR-based selective anticancer drug delivery. Establishing this principle hastened development of various polymer conjugates and polymeric micelles as well as multifunctional nanoparticles for targeted cancer chemotherapy. Indeed this selective high local concentration of nanosized anticancer drugs in tumor tissues has proven superior in therapeutic effect with minimal side effects in both preclinical and clinical settings. In this review the mechanisms and factors involved in the EPR effect, as well as the uniqueness of nanoscale drugs for tumor targeting through EPR effect, will be discussed in detail.

Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting

Of the tumor targeting strategies, the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect of macromolecules is a key mechanism for solid tumor targeting, and considered a gold standard for novel drug design. In this review, we discuss various endogenous factors that can positively impact the EPR effect in tumor tissues. Further, we discuss ways to augment the EPR effect by use of exogenous agents, as well as practical methods available in the clinical setting. Some innovative examples developed by researchers to combat cancer by the EPR mechanism are also discussed.

Factors and mechanism of "EPR" effect and the enhanced antitumor effects of macromolecular drugs including SMANCS

Both enhanced vascular permeability and angiogenesis of tumor sustain rapid growth of tumor involving many vascular mediators and high vascular density. On the contrary, however, they can be utilized for macromolecular drug delivery to tumor. Impaired reticuloendothelial/lymphatic clearance of macromolecules from the tumor, or lack of such clearance, is another unique characteristic of tumor tissue, which results intratumor retention of macromolecular drugs thus delivered (Figure 1). Consequently, enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect is the basis for the selective targeting of macromolecular drugs to tumor, and the EPR concept is now utilized for selective delivery of many macromolecular anticancer agents in aqueous formation for i.v. or i.a. as well as oily formation for i.a. dosing, which is not possible for low-molecular-weight drugs because of rapid washout by capillary vascular blood flow. This EPR concept has been validated in clinical settings with hepatoma and other solid tumors. In our laboratories, several promising macromolecular anticancer drugs after SMANCS, such as PEG-XO, PEG-DAO, PEG-ZnPP, were developed, warranting further investigation for clinical application. More efficient drug delivery to tumor, especially of macromolecular drugs, may be possible by enhancing the EPR effect with the use of various vascular permeability mediators or potentiators. Suppression of the EPR effect by the use of appropriate inhibitors or antidotes, such as the bradykinin antagonist HOE 140 and protease inhibitors or NOS inhibitors, may also be possible. Thus, one may be able to suppress or retard tumor growth and tumor metastasis. Also, by suppressing vascular permeability with antidotes such as the bradykinin antagonist HOE 140, pleural fluid in lung cancer and ascitic fluid in abdominal carcinomatosis may be controlled and the clinical course of cancer patients may be improved. In summary, tumor vasculature can be an excellent target for delivery of macromolecular anticancer drugs; the most beneficial class of drugs in view of tumor-selective targeting based on the EPR effect in solid tumor as well as compliance of patients and ultimate therapeutic efficacy.

Vascular permeability enhancement in solid tumor: various factors, mechanisms involved and its implications

Most solid tumors are known to exhibit highly enhanced vascular permeability, similar to or more than the inflammatory tissues. Common denominators affecting both cancer and inflammatory lesions are now well known: bradykinin (BK), nitric oxide (NO), peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)), prostaglandins (PGs), collagenases or matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and others. Incidentally, enzymes involved in these mediator syntheses are upregulated or activated. Initially described vascular permeability factor (VPF) (proteinaceous) was later identified to be the same as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes angiogenesis of cancer tissues as well. These mediators cross-talk or co-upregulate each other, such as BK-NO-PGs system. Therefore, vascular permeability observed in solid tumor may reflect the other side of the coin (angiogenesis). The vascular permeability and accumulation of plasma components in the interstitium described here is applicable for predominantly macromolecules (molecular weight, Mw>45 kDa), but not for low molecular compounds as most anticancer agents are. Macromolecular compounds (e.g., albumin, transferrin) or many biocompatible water-soluble polymers show this effect. Furthermore, they are not cleared rapidly from the sites of lesion (cancer/inflammatory tissue), thus, remain for prolonged time, usually for more than a few days. This phenomenon of "enhanced permeability and retention effect" observed in cancer tissue for macromolecules and lipids is coined "EPR effect", which is now widely accepted as a gold standard for anticancer drug designing to seek more cancer-selective targeting using macromolecular drugs. Consequently, drastic reduction of the systemic side effect is observed, while the macromolecular drugs will continuously exert antitumor activity. Other advantages of macromolecular drugs are also discussed.

Modulation of tumor-selective vascular blood flow and extravasation by the stable prostaglandin 12 analogue beraprost sodium

Improved delivery of macromolecular drugs to solid tumor is known as the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect of macromolecular drugs and lipids. We report here that a prostaglandin I2 (PGI2) analogue induces enhancement of tumor-selective drug delivery, while it decreases tumor blood flow, in a rat tumor model (AH136B). Beraprost sodium (BPS) is an analogue of PGI2 that is more stable than parental PGI2 in vivo (t1/2 for BPS is > 1 h vs. a few seconds for PGI2). Thus, BPS was administered to tumor-bearing rats to examine its effect on tumor vascular permeability as well as tumor blood flow. The amount of extravasation of the Evans blue-albumin complex in tumor tissue increased from two to three times, whereas tumor blood flow decreased almost 70%, in the group treated with BPS at 7 (microg/kg compared with controls. Tissue blood flow of normal organs such as the kidney and the liver did not change to a significant extent. These findings establish a new role for BPS, not only in enhancing macromolecular drug delivery, but also in reducing the blood supply to tumor tissues.

Macromolecular Therapeutics

Macromolecular drugs (also referred to as polymeric drugs) are a diverse group of drugs including polymer-conjugated drugs, polymeric micelles, liposomal drugs and solid phase depot formulations of various agents. In this review we will consider only water-soluble macromolecular drugs. In common, such drugs have high molecular weights, more than 40 kDa, which enables them to overcome renal excretion. Consequently, this group of drugs can attain prolonged plasma or local half-lives. The prolonged circulating time of these macromolecules enables them to utilise the vascular abnormalities of solid tumour tissues, a phenomenon called the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. The EPR effect facilitates extravasation of polymeric drugs more selectively at tumour tissues, and this selective targeting to solid tumour tissues may lead to superior therapeutic benefits with fewer systemic adverse effects. This contrasts with conventional low-molecular-weight drugs, where intratumour concentration diminishes rapidly in parallel with plasma concentration. The EPR effect is also operative in inflammatory tissues, which justifies the development and use of this class of drugs in infectious and inflammatory conditions. At the present time, several polymeric drugs have been approved by regulatory agencies. These include zinostatin stimalamer (copolymer styrene maleic acid-conjugated neocarzinostatin, or SMANCS) and polyethyleneglycol-conjugated interferon-alpha-2a. This article discusses these and other polymeric drugs in the setting of targeting to solid tumours.

Inhibition of renin-angiotensin system attenuates liver enzyme-altered preneoplastic lesions and fibrosis development in rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS

It is suggested that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in tumor development and fibrogenesis. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of RAS inhibition on the liver enzyme-altered preneoplastic lesions and fibrosis development.

METHODS

The effects of the clinically used angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), perindopril (PE), on two different rat model of liver carcinogenesis models induced separately by diethylnitrosamine (DEN) and a choline-deficient L-amino acid-defined (CDAA) diet were studied. This CDAA model was also used to elucidate the effect of PE on liver fibrosis development.

RESULTS

The immunohistochemical evaluation revealed that the glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT)-positive preneoplastic foci significantly decreased in the livers of the PE-treated groups. In CDAA-induced liver fibrosis model, PE revealed a marked inhibitory effect of liver fibrosis development. The hepatic hydroxyproline, serum fibrosis markers, alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) immunopositive cells in number, and alpha-(III) pro-collagen mRNA expression were significantly suppressed by PE treatment. These inhibitory effects of PE were achieved even at a clinically comparable dose (2 mg/kg per day).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that the RAS is involved in liver carcinogenesis and fibrosis development.

Perindopril: possible use in cancer therapy

Since angiogenesis is essential for the growth of any solid tumor, emerging efforts are being made to develop antiangiogenic therapy. To date, however, no antiangiogenic agent has become widely available for the clinical setting. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are commonly used as antihypertensive agents and it has recently been suggested that they decrease the risk of cancer. Studies have found that an ACE inhibitor, perindopril, is a potent inhibitor of experimental tumor development and angiogenesis at a clinically comparable dose. The potent angiogenic factor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is significantly suppressed by perindopril and also inhibits VEGF-induced tumor growth. In vitro studies showed that perindopril is not cytotoxic to either tumor cells or endothelial cells. Since perindopril is already in widespread clinical use without serious side effects, it may represent a potential new strategy for anticancer therapy.

Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review

Most solid tumors possess unique pathophysiological characteristics that are not observed in normal tissues or organs, such as extensive angiogenesis and hence hypervasculature, defective vascular architecture, impaired lymphatic drainage/recovery system, and greatly increased production of a number of permeability mediators. The phenomenon now known as the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for lipid and macromolecular agents has been observed to be universal in solid tumors. Primarily, enhanced vascular permeability will sustain an adequate supply of nutrients and oxygen for rapid tumor growth. The EPR effect also provides a great opportunity for more selective targeting of lipid- or polymer-conjugated anticancer drugs, such as SMANCS and PK-1, to the tumor. In the present review, the basic characteristics of the EPR effect, particularly the factors involved, are described, as well as its modulation for improving delivery of macromolecular drugs to the tumor. Tumor-specific vascular physiology is also described.