Comparative effectiveness of azathioprine in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: prospective, long-term, follow-up study of 394 patients

Thiopurines Have Sustained Long-term Effectiveness in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Which is Independent of Disease Duration at Initiation: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thiopurines are viable option for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] in resource-limited countries. However, data on the effect of disease duration at thiopurines initiation on long-term effectiveness are limited.

METHOD

We performed a propensity matched analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD]. Patients initiated on thiopurines early in the disease course [≤2 years] were compared with those started late [>2 years]. Effectiveness was defined as no requirement for hospitalisation, anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents, or surgery, and minimum steroid requirement [≤1 steroid course in 2 years] during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 988 [UC: 720, CD: 268] patients were included (male: 665 [60.8%], median age: 40 [32-51] years, median follow-up: 40 [19-81] months). Overall effectiveness at 5 and 10 years was 79% and 72% in UC, and 69% and 63% in CD, respectively. After propensity score matching, there was no difference in 5- and 10-year effectiveness between early and late thiopurine initiation groups either for UC [81% and 80% vs 82% and 74%; p = 0.92] or CD [76% and 66% vs 72% and 51%, p = 0.32]. Male sex for UC (negative: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI): 0.45-0.97; p = 0.03), and ileal involvement [positive: HR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.32-6.71; p = 0.008], steroid-dependent disease [positive: HR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.26-5.68; p = 0.01] and adverse events [negative: HR: 0.47, 95% CI:0.27-0.80; p = 0.005] for CD were predictors of thiopurine effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Thiopurines have sustained long-term effectiveness in both UC and CD. However, early thiopurine initiation had no better effect on long-term disease outcome compared with late initiation.

Thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease in the pandemic era: Safe or unsafe?

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC) are the two major types affecting millions across the globe. Various immunomodulatory drugs consisting of small molecules (thiopurines, methotrexate and tofacitinib) and biologics are used to treat IBD. Thiopurines (TP) are widely used in the treatment of IBD and it plays an important role both alone and in combination with anti-TNF agents as IBD maintenance therapy. Although the advent of biologics therapy has significantly advanced the management of IBD, TP remains the mainstay of treatment in resource-limited and low economic settings. However, the recently commenced pandemic has raised uncertainty over the safety of the use of immunosuppressant drugs such as TP among healthcare care providers and patients, as there is a scarcity of data on whether IBD patients are at higher risk of COVID-19 infection or more prone to its severe outcomes.

AIM

This review aims to encapsulate evidence on the risk of COVID-19 infection and its severe prognosis in IBD patients on TP. Additionally, it also evaluates the role of TP in inhibiting the viral protease, a potential drug target, essential for the replication and pathogenesis of the virus.

CONCLUSION

Emerging evidence suggests that TP therapy is safe during the current pandemic and does not carry an elevated risk when used as monotherapy or in combination with other IBD drugs. In-vitro studies demonstrate that TP is a potential therapeutic for present and future betacoronavirus pandemics.

Classic drugs in the time of new drugs: real-world, long-term outcomes of thiopurine monotherapy in 1016 patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines remain recommended as maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite their widespread use, long-term effectiveness data are sparse and safety is an increasingly debated topic which thwarts proper delineation in the current IBD treatment algorithm.

AIMS

To document effectiveness and safety of thiopurine monotherapy in patients with IBD, using the population-based IBD South-Limburg (IBDSL) cohort METHODS: All patients starting thiopurine monotherapy as maintenance between 1991 and 2014 were included. Therapy was defined as effective if there was no escalation to biologicals, no course of corticosteroids, no surgery and no hospitalisation for active disease during treatment. Long-term effectiveness was assessed by adjusting for differences in follow-up using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Mid- to long-term safety regarding cancer incidence and clinically relevant liver disease was documented.

RESULTS

In total, 1016 patients (643 Crohn's disease [CD]; 373 ulcerative colitis [UC]) received thiopurine monotherapy at a median of 15.2 (Q1-Q3 4.2-48.5) months after diagnosis. During follow-up, effectiveness rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 64%, 45%, 32%, respectively, in CD and and 66%, 41%, 36%, respectively in UC. No statistically significant differences in effectiveness were observed after stratification for era of initiation (pre-biological vs biological, CD: p = 0.56; UC: p = 0.43). Sixteen non-melanoma skin cancers (incidence rate [IR] 3.33/1000 PY), five lymphomas (IR 1.04/1000 PY) and one urinary tract cancer (IR 0.21/1000 PY) were recorded. Two cases of portal hypertension were identified.

CONCLUSION

In real-world practice, thiopurine monotherapy remains effective, safe and durable for patients with CD or UC, including in the era of biologics.

The Communication Between Intestinal Microbiota and Ulcerative Colitis: An Exploration of Pathogenesis, Animal Models, and Potential Therapeutic Strategies

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. The prolonged course of UC and the lack of effective treatment management make it difficult to cure, affecting the health and life safety of patients. Although UC has received more attention, the etiology and pathogenesis of UC are still unclear. Therefore, it is urgent to establish an updated and comprehensive understanding of UC and explore effective treatment strategies. Notably, sufficient evidence shows that the intestinal microbiota plays an important role in the pathogenesis of UC, and the treating method aimed at improving the balance of the intestinal microbiota exhibits a therapeutic potential for UC. This article reviews the relationship between the genetic, immunological and microbial risk factors with UC. At the same time, the UC animal models related to intestinal microbiota dysbiosis induced by chemical drugs were evaluated. Finally, the potential value of the therapeutic strategies for restoring intestinal microbial homeostasis and treating UC were also investigated. Comprehensively, this study may help to carry out preclinical research, treatment theory and methods, and health management strategy of UC, and provide some theoretical basis for TCM in the treatment of UC.

Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), as a global disease, has attracted much research interest. Constant research has led to a better understanding of the disease condition and further promoted its management. We here reviewed the conventional and the novel drugs and therapies, as well as the potential ones, which have shown promise in preclinical studies and are likely to be effective future therapies. The conventional treatments aim at controlling symptoms through pharmacotherapy, including aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologics, with other general measures and/or surgical resection if necessary. However, a considerable fraction of patients do not respond to available treatments or lose response, which calls for new therapeutic strategies. Diverse therapeutic options are emerging, involving small molecules, apheresis therapy, improved intestinal microecology, cell therapy, and exosome therapy. In addition, patient education partly upgrades the efficacy of IBD treatment. Recent advances in the management of IBD have led to a paradigm shift in the treatment goals, from targeting symptom-free daily life to shooting for mucosal healing. In this review, the latest progress in IBD treatment is summarized to understand the advantages, pitfalls, and research prospects of different drugs and therapies and to provide a basis for the clinical decision and further research of IBD.

Evolving Role of Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Biologics and New Small Molecules

In recent years, with the increasing availability of biologic therapies and due to safety concerns, the role of thiopurines in the management of inflammatory bowel disease has been questioned. While acknowledging that the benefit/risk ratio of biologic therapies is very high, they are expensive and are not required by a majority of patients. Therefore, thiopurines do retain an important role as steroid-sparing and maintenance agents when used as monotherapy, and in combination therapy with biologics due to their clinical and pharmacokinetic optimization of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in particular. Safety concerns with thiopurines are real but also relatively rare, and with careful pre-treatment screening and ongoing monitoring thiopurine benefits outweigh risks in the majority of appropriately selected patients. Measurement of newer pharmacogenomic markers such as nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15), when combined with knowledge of existing known mutations (e.g., thiopurine S-methyltransferase-TPMT), will hopefully minimize the risk of potentially life-threatening leukopenia by allowing for pre-treatment dosing stratification. Further optimization of thiopurine dosing via measurement of thiopurine metabolites should be performed routinely and is superior to weight-based dosing. The association of thiopurines with malignancies including lymphoproliferative disorders needs to be recognized in all patients and individualized in each patient. The decrease in lymphoma risk after thiopurine cessation provides an incentive for thiopurine de-escalation in appropriate patients after a period of prolonged deep remission. This review will summarize the current role of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease management and provide recommendations for commencing and monitoring therapy, and when to consider de-escalation.

Review article: prevention, diagnosis and management of COVID-19 in the IBD patient

BACKGROUND

The current COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has emerged as a public health emergency. All nations are seriously challenged as the virus spreads rapidly across the globe with no regard for borders. The primary management of IBD involves treating uncontrolled inflammation with most patients requiring immune-based therapies. However, these therapies may weaken the immune system and potentially place IBD patients at increased risk of infections and infectious complications including those from COVID-19.

AIM

To summarise the scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, review unique concerns regarding IBD management and infection risk during the pandemic and assess COVID-19 management options and drug interactions in the IBD population.

METHODS

A literature review on IBD, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 was undertaken and relevant literature was summarised and critically examined.

RESULTS

IBD patients do not appear to be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and there is no evidence of an association between IBD therapies and increased risk of COVID-19. IBD medication adherence should be encouraged to prevent disease flare but where possible high-dose systemic corticosteroids should be avoided. Patients should exercise social distancing, optimise co-morbidities and be up to date with influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. If a patient develops COVID-19, immune suppressing medications should be withheld until infection resolution and if trial medications for COVID-19 are being considered, potential drug interactions should be checked.

CONCLUSIONS

IBD patient management presents a challenge in the current COVID-19 pandemic. The primary focus should remain on keeping bowel inflammation controlled and encouraging medication adherence.

Is there room for immunomodulators in ulcerative colitis?

Introduction: The management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) has evolved over the past few decades. While aminosalicylates remain the mainstay of induction and maintenance therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate UC, the advent of biologic agents and novel oral small molecules has substantively changed the treatment landscape for patients with moderate-to-severe disease and confounded the role of traditional immunomodulators (IMMs) such as thiopurines and methotrexate in the UC management algorithm.Areas covered: We summarize the mechanism of action of thiopurines and methotrexate, identify clinical parameters for their use, and appraise the evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of IMMs in UC as both monotherapy and in combination with other therapies, emphasizing on prospective, controlled data.Expert opinion: With the advent of several classes of highly effective treatments for UC, emergence of data demonstrating no benefit of IMMs over placebo, and concerns about the relative safety profile of long-term IMM exposure, we propose that the role of thiopurines or methotrexate be restricted to patients with milder disease failing to maintain corticosteroid-free remission on aminosalicylates alone or in combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor antagonists in patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Nonsynonymous Polymorphism in Guanine Monophosphate Synthetase Is a Risk Factor for Unfavorable Thiopurine Metabolite Ratios in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are refractory to thiopurine therapy preferentially produce 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) at the expense of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN), resulting in a high 6-MMP:6-TGN ratio (>20). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether genetic variability in guanine monophosphate synthetase (GMPS) contributes to preferential 6-MMP metabolizer phenotype.

METHODS

Exome sequencing was performed in a cohort of IBD patients with 6-MMP:6-TGN ratios of >100 to identify nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs). In vitro assays were performed to measure GMPS activity associated with these nsSNPs. Frequency of the nsSNPs was measured in a cohort of 530 Caucasian IBD patients.

RESULTS

Two nsSNPs in GMPS (rs747629729, rs61750370) were detected in 11 patients with very high 6-MMP:6-TGN ratios. The 2 nsSNPs were predicted to be damaging by in silico analysis. In vitro assays demonstrated that both nsSNPs resulted in a significant reduction in GMPS activity (P < 0.05). The SNP rs61750370 was significantly associated with 6-MMP:6-TGN ratios ≥100 (odds ratio, 5.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-25.12; P < 0.031) in a subset of 264 Caucasian IBD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The GMPS SNP rs61750370 may be a reliable risk factor for extreme 6MMP preferential metabolism.

Sustained Clinical Efficacy and Mucosal Healing of Thiopurine Maintenance Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-Life Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thiopurines are commonly used for treating ulcerative colitis (UC), despite the fact that controlled evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of thiopurines as maintenance therapy in a large cohort of UC patients.

METHODS

All UC patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy at three tertiary IBD centers from 1995 to 2015 were identified. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission. Secondary endpoints were mucosal healing (MH), defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0, long-term safety, and predictors of sustained clinical remission.

RESULTS

We identified 192 patients, contributing a total of 747 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up 36 months, range 1-210 months). Steroid dependency was the most common indication for thiopurine treatment (58%). Steroid-free remission occurred in 45.3% of patients; 36.3% stopped thiopurines because of treatment failure and 18.2% for adverse events or intolerance. The cumulative probability of maintaining steroid-free remission while on thiopurine treatment was 87%, 76%, 67.6%, and 53.4% at 12, 24, 36, and 60 months, respectively. MH occurred in 57.9% of patients after a median of 18 months (range 5-96). No independent predictors of sustained clinical remission could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurines represent an effective and safe long-term maintenance therapy for UC patients.

Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: New Findings and Perspectives

Thiopurines, available as azathioprine, mercaptopurine, and thioguanine, are immunomodulating agents primarily used to maintain corticosteroid-free remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. To provide a state-of-the-art overview of thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease, this clinical review critically summarises the available literature, as assessed by several experts in the field of thiopurine treatment and research in inflammatory bowel disease.

Effective long-term solution to therapeutic remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Role of Azathioprine

Azathioprine (AZA) is a well-known immunosuppressant used for many years for its ability to ensure long term disease remission in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) at an affordable cost to the public. However, the side effect profile has raised many concerns with numerous investigations into the risk, cause and prevention of these effects. Much of the side effect profile of AZA can be linked to a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) gene which ensures the breakdown and efficacy of AZA. Mutated TPMT alleles result in low or deficient TPMT levels which directly correlate to cytotoxity. This is a review of the role of AZA in the treatment of IBD. Knowing a patient's TPMT status allows the prescribing doctor to make an informed decision about dosage and be more alert to the signs of cytotoxicity. It is essential to include "early warning" SNP testing into common practice to ensure therapeutic efficacy.

Pharmacogenetics of thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease in East Asia: prospects for clinical application of NUDT15 genotyping

The thiopurine drugs 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and azathiopurine (AZA) are widely used to treat inflammatory bowel disease. However, the incidence of adverse reactions is high, particularly in Asia, and the mechanisms of toxicity in Asian populations remain unclear. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is a well-known enzyme that inactivates AZA or 6-MP through methylation and is one of the few pharmacogenetic predictors used in clinical settings in Western countries. Individuals carrying TPMT-deficient genetic variants require reduced drug doses, but this treatment modification is are not applicable to East Asian populations. Several genes code thiopurine-metabolizing enzymes, including TPMT, multidrug-resistance protein 4, and inosine triphosphatase. These genes have been studied as candidate pharmacogenetic markers; however, it remains unclear why Asian populations seem to be more intolerant than other ethnic groups to a full dose of thiopurines. A genome-wide association approach to identify Asian-specific pharmacogenetic markers in Korean patients with Crohn's disease revealed that a non-synonymous single nucelotide polymorphism in nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X-type motif 15 (NUDT15) which causes p.Arg139Cys was strongly associated with thiopurine-induced early leukopenia. Six common haplotypes of NUDT15 were reported, and five variants showed medium-to-low enzyme activities, compared with the wild haplotype. NUDT15 hydrolyzes the thiopurine active metabolites 6-thio-GTP and 6-thio-dGTP; variants of NUDT15 had lower enzyme activities, causing higher levels of thiopurine active metabolites, resulting in thiopurine-induced leukopenia. In clinical application, NUDT15 genotyping is a good candidate for predicting thiopurine toxicity in East Asian populations. However, the association of NUDT15 diplotypes with thiopurine toxicity remains unclear. Further analyses with large cohorts to confirm the clinical effects of each haplotype are planned.

Thiopurine Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: A Critical Review of the Evidence for Current Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Due to toxicity problems and controversial evidence, thiopurine use in ulcerative colitis (UC) has faced a lot of criticism. We present a critical review of the literature on efficacy of thiopurines in UC.

METHODS

Studies evaluating therapeutic efficacy of thiopurine remission induction and/or maintenance treatment in UC were identified using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Out of 5 randomized trials on thiopurine induction treatment, 3 demonstrated a significant effect of thiopurine treatment vs mesalamine or placebo in steroid-dependent UC patients: (1) lower endoscopic activity scores, (2) higher clinical remission rates, and (3) more patients who discontinued steroids. Two found no significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission of azathioprine compared with sulfasalazine or placebo in patients with active UC. Out of 7 randomized trials on thiopurine maintenance treatment, 4 demonstrated significant higher clinical and endoscopic remission rates in thiopurine-treated patients compared with placebo or mesalamine. Three found no significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission of thiopurine maintenance treatment compared with sulfasalazine or placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

All studies that investigated thiopurine treatment in UC had shortcomings, such as lack of sufficient power, no use of blinding, allowed concomitant treatment with steroids, and no endoscopy to confirm active disease at study entry or to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. Hence, current clinical practice of thiopurine treatment in UC is based on minimal and controversial evidence. This underscores the need for clinical studies with sufficient power and objective end points in order to determine efficacy of thiopurines in UC.

Rac Attack: Modulation of the Small GTPase Rac in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Thiopurine Therapy

The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are increasing. Although the etiology of IBD is unknown, it is thought that genetically susceptible individuals display an inappropriate inflammatory response to commensal microbes, resulting in intestinal tissue damage. Key proteins involved in regulating the immune response, and thus in inflammation, are the small triphosphate-binding protein Rac and its regulatory network. Recent data suggest these proteins to be involved in (dys)regulation of the characteristic inflammatory processes in IBD. Moreover, Rac-gene variants have been identified as susceptibility risk factors for IBD, and Rac1 GTPase signaling has been shown to be strongly suppressed in non-inflamed mucosa compared with inflamed colonic mucosa in IBD. In addition, first-line immunosuppressive treatment for IBD includes thiopurine therapy, and its immunosuppressive effect is primarily ascribed to Rac1 suppression. In this review, we focus on Rac modification and its potential role in the development of IBD, Rac as the molecular therapeutic target in current thiopurine therapy, and the modulation of the Rac signal transduction pathway as a promising novel therapeutic strategy.

Colonic microbiota can promote rapid local improvement of murine colitis by thioguanine independently of T lymphocytes and host metabolism

OBJECTIVE

Mercaptopurine (MP) and pro-drug azathioprine are 'first-line' oral therapies for maintaining remission in IBD. It is believed that their pharmacodynamic action is due to a slow cumulative decrease in activated lymphocytes homing to inflamed gut. We examined the role of host metabolism, lymphocytes and microbiome for the amelioration of colitis by the related thioguanine (TG).

DESIGN

C57Bl/6 mice with or without specific genes altered to elucidate mechanisms responsible for TG's actions were treated daily with oral or intrarectal TG, MP or water. Disease activity was scored daily. At sacrifice, colonic histology, cytokine message, caecal luminal and mucosal microbiomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Oral and intrarectal TG but not MP rapidly ameliorated spontaneous chronic colitis in Winnie mice (point mutation in Muc2 secretory mucin). TG ameliorated dextran sodium sulfate-induced chronic colitis in wild-type (WT) mice and in mice lacking T and B lymphocytes. Remarkably, colitis improved without immunosuppressive effects in the absence of host hypoxanthine (guanine) phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt)-mediated conversion of TG to active drug, the thioguanine nucleotides (TGN). Colonic bacteria converted TG and less so MP to TGN, consistent with intestinal bacterial conversion of TG to so reduce inflammation in the mice lacking host Hprt. TG rapidly induced autophagic flux in epithelial, macrophage and WT but not Hprt^-/- fibroblast cell lines and augmented epithelial intracellular bacterial killing.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment by TG is not necessarily dependent on the adaptive immune system. TG is a more efficacious treatment than MP in Winnie spontaneous colitis. Rapid local bacterial conversion of TG correlated with decreased intestinal inflammation and immune activation.

Second Korean guidelines for the management of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. The direct and indirect costs of the treatment of UC are high, and the quality of life of patients is reduced, especially during exacerbation of the disease. The incidence and prevalence of UC in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Various medical and surgical therapies, including biologics, are currently used for the management of UC. However, many challenging issues exist, which sometimes lead to differences in practice between clinicians. Therefore, the IBD study group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases established the first Korean guidelines for the management of UC in 2012. This is an update of the first guidelines. It was generally made by the adaptation of several foreign guidelines as was the first edition, and encompasses treatment of active colitis, maintenance of remission, and indication of surgery for UC. The specific recommendations are presented with the quality of evidence and classification of recommendations.

Methotrexate in Crohn's disease: a new face for an old drug?

Methotrexate is commonly used in rheumatoid arthritis but randomised controlled trials demonstrated its efficacy also in Crohn's disease. Methotrexate, although marginally used in clinical practice, is considered an appropriate immunomodulator particularly in patients refractory or intolerant to thiopurines. Areas covered: A literature search using 'methotrexate', 'Crohn's disease' and 'Inflammatory Bowel Disease' as key words, identified randomised controlled trials, meta-analyses and observational studies. The aim of this review is to summarise and critically discuss the available evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of methotrexate in the treatment of Crohn's disease. Expert commentary: Methotrexate is effective in inducing and maintaining remission in steroid-dependent CD at a dose of 25 mg/week and 15 mg/week, respectively. Data from observational studies suggest that methotrexate may be as efficacious as thiopurines with a similar safety profile. In specific clinical settings, (patients with a history of malignancy or young Epstein-Barr Virus-seronegative patients), methotrexate compete favourably with thiopurines.

Progress in medical treatment of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a kind of chronic inflammatory disease and its etiology and pathogenesis are not clear. Accumulating evidence has indicated that the interactions among genotype, immune system and intestinal microbiota of patients play a significant role in the pathogenesis of UC. At present, it is difficult to cure UC. The main goals of UC treatment include inducing remission rapidly, maintaining the remission stage for a long time and preventing the occurrence of complications. As the incidence of UC keeps rising sharply in the recent 20 years, and a portion of patients have no response to the treatments or the effects are not satisfying, it is necessary to make further research for the treatment of UC. There are some main medical treatments for UC, such as 5-ASA, immune inhibitors, biological agents, Chinese herbal medicine, antibiotics and probiotics. In recent years, some new treatments such as stem cell transplantation, fecal bacteria transplantation and CO enema treatment are becoming the hot spot of research. This article will make a summary of the progress in medical treatment of UC in recent years.

A Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Therapeutic Outcomes of Infliximab- versus Tacrolimus-Based Strategies for Steroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

Background/Aims. Antitumor necrosis factor antibodies and calcineurin inhibitors have shown good therapeutic efficacy for steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Although some studies have compared the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) and cyclosporin A, there are no published studies comparing IFX and tacrolimus (Tac). This study aimed to compare therapeutic efficacies between IFX- and Tac-based strategies for steroid-refractory UC. Methods. Between July 2009 and August 2013, 95 patients with steroid-refractory UC received either IFX (n = 48) or Tac (n = 47) in our hospital. In the IFX group, the patients continued to receive maintenance treatment with IFX. In the Tac group, patients discontinued Tac treatment up to 3 months and subsequently received thiopurine. We retrospectively compared the therapeutic outcomes between the groups. Results. There was no significant difference in the colectomy-free rate, clinical remission rate, and clinical response rate at 2 months between the groups. However, relapse-free survival was significantly higher in the IFX group than in the Tac group (p < 0.001; log-rank test). The proportions of serious adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion. The findings of our study showed that IFX and Tac have similar short-term therapeutic efficacy for steroid-refractory UC. Maintenance treatment with IFX, however, yields better long-term outcomes than Tac-thiopurine bridging treatment.

Different Profile of Efficacy of Thiopurines in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines are effective drugs in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) even if studies that specifically investigate these drugs' profile of efficacy in UC compared with CD are scarce. Our aim was to compare the profile of efficacy of thiopurines in patients with UC and CD.

METHODS

We perfomed a longitudinal observational study evaluating steroid-free clinical remission (CR) and mucosal healing (MH) in all patients with UC and CD who would complete 2 years of maintenance treatment with thiopurines. In patients with UC, CR and MH were assessed before starting treatment and 2 years later using the Mayo score (CR = Mayo score <2; MH = Mayo subscore ≤1). In patients with CD, CR and MH were assessed at the same time points using the Crohn's disease activity index (CR = Crohn's disease activity index < 150) and the Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (MH = Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease < 2). The efficacy of thiopurines was assessed through intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

The study included 205 steroid-dependent patients (104 UC; 101 CD), 140 of whom (70 UC; 70 CD) completed the 2-year observation period. Steroid-free CR was recorded in 43 patients with UC and 37 with CD (intention-to-treat: 41% versus 36%; P = 0.6; per-protocol: 61% versus 53%; P = 0.4); MH was obtained in 38 patients with UC and 17 with CD (intention-to-treat: 36% versus 16%; P < 0.01; odds ratio, 2.9; per-protocol: 54% versus 25%; P < 0.01; odds ratio, 3.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurines are effective in maintaining steroid-free CR in both UC and CD although they show a better profile of efficacy in terms of MH in cases of UC.

Toxicity and response to thiopurines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

The use of thiopurines is well established in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. A wealth of data and experience, amassed over several decades, supporting their efficacy has recently been challenged by trials that failed to show a benefit in Crohn's disease when used early in the disease course, although other trials continue to support their role both as monotherapy and in combination with anti-TNF. Recent reports of previously unrecognized toxicity have also emerged. Fortunately, the absolute incidence of serious toxicity remains low, and an improved understanding of how best to minimize risk and the recognition of groups of patients at higher risk of toxicity from thiopurines means that they remain a relatively safe therapy in the majority of patients. In this paper, we review the literature evaluating the role of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease as well as their toxicity. We conclude that education regarding the spectrum of thiopurine side effects and optimal monitoring during therapy may help with optimizing safety and efficacy of these important medications.

Long-term efficacy and safety of azathioprine in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Azathioprine (AZA) is an established treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC).However, controversy exists regarding its efficacy in inducing and maintaining clinical remission, and long-term data are lacking. We studied the effectiveness of AZA in a large cohort of UC patients treated in a single center.

METHODS

All UC patients treated with AZA were identified from a prospective electronic database. We assessed response to therapy at 4 months and sustained clinical benefit at the last point of follow-up. We also examined predictors of response and sustained clinical benefit, as well as outcomes in those treated with AZA for >5 years.

RESULTS

The study included 255 patients. At 4 months, 207 (81.2%) of 255 patients were still on AZA and 163 (63.9%) had responded to therapy. At the last point of follow-up 164 (64.3%) patients were still receiving AZA, of whom 154 (60.4%) achieved sustained clinical benefit. This effect was durable among 71 patients who received AZA for >5 years, with 61 (85.9%) considered to have achieved sustained clinical benefit. Twenty-six patients required admission to hospital for an exacerbation during AZA treatment, 20 patients ultimately required biologic therapy, and 21 underwent colectomy. Only two (2.8%) of 71 patients receiving AZA for >5 years needed to escalate to a biologic therapy, and only one (1.4%) required a colectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

AZA is a safe and effective therapy in UC patients who fail 5-aminosalisylates in both the short and long term. Escalation to a biologic therapy or colectomy was unlikely among patients who were able to continue AZA therapy beyond 5 years.

Splitting a therapeutic dose of thioguanine may avoid liver toxicity and be an efficacious treatment for severe inflammatory bowel disease: a 2-center observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Thioguanine (TG) is a treatment for inflammatory bowel disease, but association with nodular regenerative hyperplasia has restricted its use. We conjectured that splitting a therapeutic daily dose of TG would be efficacious and should avoid liver toxicity.

METHODS

We report on 62 patients with severe inflammatory bowel disease not responding to prednisolone, conventional thiopurines, biologics, or calcineurin inhibitors. Patients were prescribed oral split-daily TG to avoid individual doses >0.3 mg/kg. Data on concomitant medication, clinical efficacy measured by Harvey-Bradshaw Index for Crohn's, or Simple Clinical Colitis Score for ulcerative/indeterminate colitis (UC), and some paired endoscopies were available. Safety was followed clinically and with bloods at 2 centers. All patients at the U.K. center had a liver biopsy or magnetic resonance imaging after 6 months. Twenty-one patients had serial ultrasounds at the Australian center.

RESULTS

At 6 months, 19/21 of patients with Crohn's disease and 27/38 with ulcerative colitis had improved clinical activity. At study end, 53% of patients maintained improved clinical activity of steroids. Median duration of TG was 8 (0.3-45) months, median dose was 0.6 (0.3-1) mg/kg per day. Previous thiopurine-related adverse reactions were not encountered. Twenty-nine patients withdrew because of loss to follow-up, medical adverse events, or surgery. Possible early nodular regenerative hyperplasia was found on liver biopsy in 1 patient who was heterozygote deficient for thiopurine methyltransferase; the TG dose was lowered. TG was discontinued in a patient with nodular regenerative hyperplasia and concomitant antiphospholipid syndrome. There was 1 successful term pregnancy; cord blood and breast milk TG were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Split-dose TG seemed well tolerated and efficacious in this retrospective study of patients with difficult inflammatory bowel disease.

Classical and recent advances in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are intestinal disorders that comprise the inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). These disorders have a significant effect on the quality of life of affected patients and the increasing number of IBD cases worldwide is a growing concern. Because of the overall burden of IBD and its multifactorial etiology, efforts have been made to improve the medical management of these inflammatory conditions. The classical therapeutic strategies aim to control the exacerbated host immune response with aminosalicylates, antibiotics, corticosteroids, thiopurines, methotrexate and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biological agents. Although successful in the treatment of several CD or UC conditions, these drugs have limited effectiveness, and variable responses may culminate in unpredictable outcomes. The ideal therapy should reduce inflammation without inducing immunosuppression, and remains a challenge to health care personnel. Recently, a number of additional approaches to IBD therapy, such as new target molecules for biological agents and cellular therapy, have shown promising results. A deeper understanding of IBD pathogenesis and the availability of novel therapies are needed to improve therapeutic success. This review describes the overall key features of therapies currently employed in clinical practice as well as novel and future alternative IBD treatment methods.

[Treatment strategy for refractory inflammatory bowel disease to improve endoscopic lesions and long-term prognosis]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease of unknown aetiology characterized by periods of remission and acute episodes of relapse with severe inflammation in the colonic mucosa. Conventional treatments for UC and CD include 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroid, elemental dietary treatment, corticosteroid, and thiopurine (azathioprine). Recently, new immunomodulators and anti-TNFa agents, such as tacrolimus, infliximab, and adalimumab have been developed and these treatments are available to be treated for patients with refractory UC and CD. Conventional step-up treatment has been replaced by top-down treatment using biologics. Infliximab and adalimumab induce not only clinical remission but also improve relapse rates and surgical rates. Endoscopic mucosal healing predicts short- and long-prognosis for both of these diseases, thus recent treatment strategy should be aimed for endoscopic remission. Although biologics is useful for patients with UC/CD, secondary loss of responses (LOR) for biologics has been partly observed in CD patients. Measuring anti-infliximab antibodies and concentration of infliximab trough level may help considering treatment strategy for patients with LOR.

A trial of mercaptopurine is a safe strategy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease intolerant to azathioprine: an observational study, systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines maintain remission and modify disease course in inflammatory bowel disease. Use is limited by intolerance and subsequent drug withdrawal in approximately 17% of patients treated with azathioprine. Previous case series have addressed the success rates of re-treatment with mercaptopurine in these individuals.

AIMS

To determine the rate of tolerance when trialling mercaptopurine in azathioprine-intolerant patients and the factors predictive of success, and to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of these data with other published data sets.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of 149 patients with IBD (82 with Crohn's disease and 67 with ulcerative colitis) previously intolerant of azathioprine subsequently treated with mercaptopurine was performed. A meta-analysis was undertaken of all published studies of mercaptopurine use in azathioprine-intolerant patients (455 patients in 11 included studies).

RESULTS

Mercaptopurine was tolerated by 58% of azathioprine-intolerant patients in the Edinburgh cohort. In the meta-analysis, 68% tolerated mercaptopurine. A higher proportion of those in the meta-analysis with GI toxicity (62%) or hepatotoxicity (81%) were able to tolerate mercaptopurine than those with flu-like illness (36%). Among those patients who ceased mercaptopurine for further adverse effects, 59% experienced the same adverse effect as they had with azathioprine.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows that switching to mercaptopurine is a safe therapeutic strategy for over two-thirds of azathioprine-intolerant patients and may help optimise immunomodulatory therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. A trial of mercaptopurine should be attempted in IBD patients (except those with acute pancreatitis or bone marrow aplasia) before considering thiopurine intolerance.

Recent progress in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comprises two main types, namely, Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The etiology of IBD is not clear, and there is no effective cure so far. Currently available agents for IBD mainly consist of traditional drugs (including aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants) and new biological preparations (mainly TNF-α monoclonal antibody). The treatment of IBD evolves with the progress of clinical research and pharmaceutical techniques, such as new dosage forms, different routes of administration, and the application of new biological preparations. This article reviews recent progress in the treatment of IBD.

[Guidelines for the management of ulcerative colitis]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. The quality of life can decreases significantly during exacerbations of the disease. The incidence and prevalence of UC in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Various medical and surgical therapies are currently used for the management of UC. However, many challenging issues exist and sometimes these lead to differences in practice between clinicians. Therefore, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) Study Group of Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) set out the Korean guidelines for the management of UC. These guidelines are made by the adaptation using several foreign guidelines and encompass treatment of active colitis, maintenance of remission and indication for surgery in UC. The specific recommendations are presented with the quality of evidence. These are the first Korean treatment guidelines for UC and will be revised with new evidences on treatment of UC.

Thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: response predictors, safety, and withdrawal in follow-up

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thiopurines represent the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases. Since it is likely that response to therapy and adverse events depends on the genetic background of patients our study aimed to evaluate retrospectively response to therapy and safety in a mixed IBD population in Southern Europe.

METHODS

We evaluated demographic and clinical data of our patients treated with thiopurines. after 6 months in responders and non-responders to therapy. Moreover the likelihood to remain in thiopurine monotherapy was evaluated in responders, whereas adverse events were investigated in all patients.

RESULTS

Among disease- and patient-related parameters a shorter disease duration, female gender and ileal disease in Crohn's patients were associated with better response. By ROC analysis, the best predictors of response were decreasing values of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. In the long-term more than half of IBD patients who responded at 6 months remained on monotherapy at 42 months. Flu-like syndrome represented the most frequent adverse event followed by abnormalities of liver function tests and myelotoxicity. Adverse events did occur at any time and were frequently impredictable.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, thiopurines showed a good clinical efficacy, especially in patients with short duration of disease. Normalization of markers of systemic inflammation represents the most useful tool to assess response. Careful monitoring of patients is required during the whole duration of treatment although it may not prevent all severe complications.

Optimization of conventional therapy in patients with IBD

The majority of patients with IBD use conventional therapy (namely, aminosalicylates, antibiotics, corticosteroids and immunomodulatory agents) for prolonged periods of time, to both induce and maintain remission. Treatment paradigms in IBD have evolved towards a rapid escalation of therapy to achieve stringent goals, including mucosal healing and a reduction in the need for hospital admission and surgery. In this context, the failure to optimize conventional therapy can lead to a potentially effective treatment being abandoned too early, which is undesirable when only a limited number of drugs are effective in the management of IBD, and could also lead to patients being unnecessarily exposed to potentially toxic and/or expensive biologic drugs. This Review provides an overview of the many ways in which conventional therapy can be optimized, and describes strategies to improve adherence to drug regimens, such as simplifying the dosing regimen, optimizing drug delivery and dose, and tailoring medication on the basis of metabolite levels.

Common misconceptions about 5-aminosalicylates and thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease

Misconceptions are common in the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this paper, we state the most commonly found misconceptions in clinical practice and deal with the use of 5-aminosalicylates and thiopurines, to review the related scientific evidence, and make appropriate recommendations. Prevention of errors needs knowledge to avoid making such errors through ignorance. However, the amount of knowledge is increasing so quickly that one new danger is an overabundance of information. IBD is a model of a very complex disease and our goal with this review is to summarize the key evidence for the most common daily clinical problems. With regard to the use of 5-aminosalicylates, the best practice may to be consider abandoning the use of these drugs in patients with small bowel Crohn’ s disease. The combined approach with oral plus topical 5-aminosalicylates should be the first-line therapy in patients with active ulcerative colitis; once-daily treatment should be offered as a first choice regimen due to its better compliance and higher efficacy. With regard to thiopurines, they seem to be as effective in ulcerative colitis as in Crohn’ s disease. Underdosing of thiopurines is a form of undertreatment. Thiopurines should probably be continued indefinitely because their withdrawal is associated with a high risk of relapse. Mercaptopurine is a safe alternative in patients with digestive intolerance or hepatotoxicity due to azathioprine. Finally, thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) screening cannot substitute for regular monitoring because the majority of cases of myelotoxicity are not TPMT-related.

Conventional medical management of inflammatory bowel disease

Conventional therapies for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD) include aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, methotrexate, and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. A time-structured approach is required for appropriate management. Traditional step-up therapy has been partly replaced during the last decade by potent drugs and top-down therapies, with an accelerated step-up approach being the most appropriate in the majority of patients. When patients are diagnosed with CD or ulcerative colitis, physicians should consider the probable pattern of disease progression so that effective therapy is not delayed. This can be achieved by setting arbitrary time limits for administration of biological therapies, changing therapy from mesalamine in patients with active ulcerative colitis, or using rescue therapy for acute severe colitis. In this review, we provide algorithms with a time-structured approach for guidance of therapy. Common mistakes in conventional therapy include overprescription of mesalamine for CD; inappropriate use of steroids (for perianal CD, when there is sepsis, or for maintenance); delayed introduction or underdosing with azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate; and failure to consider timely surgery. The paradox of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy is that although it too is used inappropriately (when patients have sepsis or fibrostenotic strictures) or too frequently (for diseases that would respond to less-potent therapy), it is also often introduced too late in disease progression. Conventional drugs are the mainstay of current therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases, but drug type, timing, and context must be optimized to manage individual patients effectively.

Smoking status and response to thiopurines in steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The influence of smoking on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) susceptibility and on its clinical course is well known, but not its impact on drug efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response to thiopurines in patients with steroid-dependent IBD according to their smoking habits.

METHODS

The medical records of 163 IBD patients (103 Crohn's disease [CD], 60 ulcerative colitis [UC]) in whom thiopurines were started because of steroid-dependency were reviewed. Therapeutic response was defined by steroid-free clinical remission for at least 6 months after 12 months of starting thiopurines. Clinical data and smoking status at diagnosis, at the time thiopurines were started, and during the follow-up were registered.

RESULTS

A therapeutic response was obtained in 72% of CD and 61% of UC patients. Smoking habits did not influence the rate of response to thiopurines, the need for rescue therapies, or the development of penetrating/stricturing complications (CD) or proximal progression (UC). However, CD responders who continued smoking required new courses of steroids more often during follow-up. No influence of smoking was found when these outcomes were analyzed depending on gender or disease location. In the multivariate analysis, smoking status was the only predictive factor of drug tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Active smoking does not influence the response to thiopurines in steroid-dependent IBD, but may decrease the likelihood of drug tolerance.

Clinical practice in Crohn's disease in bordering regions of two countries: different medical options, distinct surgical events

Contemplating the multifactorial nature of Crohn's disease (CD), the purpose of this study was to compare two neighbouring CD populations from different nations and examine how clinical characteristics of patients can influence therapeutic strategies and consequently different surgical events in routine clinical practice. Cross-sectional study based on data of an on-line registry of patients with CD in northern Portugal and Galicia. Of the 1238 patients, all with five or more years of disease, 568 (46%) were male and 670 (54%) female. The Portuguese and Galician populations were similar regarding Montreal categories, age at diagnosis, and years of follow-up. Galician B2 patients were associated with immunosuppression (OR 3.6; CI 2.2-6.1) and biologic treatment (OR 1.8; CI 1.0-3.1). In both populations ileocolonic disease was associated with immunosuppression and biologic treatment and the penetrating group was linked to immunosuppression. In the north of Portugal 47% and 16% of patients, and in Galicia 63% and 33%, were treated with immunosuppressants and biologic treatment, respectively. In the north of Portugal 44% of patients classified as stricturing behavior were operated without immunomodulation, in contrast to 12% in Galicia. In the latter it was possible to maintain 16% of B2 patients and 40% of B3 patients without surgery with adequate immunosuppression and/or biologic treatment. The delta of surgeries in B2 patients was 8% and in B3 26%.

CONCLUSIONS

Stratifying patients according to the Montreal classification identified similar clinical patterns in disparate geographic populations, and revealed that differing medical therapeutic practices may influence the occurrence of surgical events.

A population-based study of health-care resource use among infliximab users

OBJECTIVES

We sought to describe the characteristics of health-care utilization (HCU) among patients with Crohn's disease using infliximab (IFX).

METHODS

Using the University of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Epidemiology Database (UMIBDED), we extracted all subjects with newly prescribed IFX, newly prescribed purine analogs (azathioprine, AZA) (without IFX), newly prescribed steroids (Ster) (without IFX or purine analogs) after 2001, and those not prescribed any of these drugs (ND). All of the subjects must have had HCU data available for 5 years before initial prescription and for 3 years afterward. We analyzed the number of physician visits, hospital visits, and surgeries.

RESULTS

IBD-associated physician visits were consistently higher for IFX, both pre- and post-initial dosing, although overall physician visits were similar between IFX, AZA, and Ster. There was a steep rise in hospitalizations in the 6 months before initial prescription of IFX, AZA, or Ster, and hospitalizations were higher in the IFX cohort until 18-24 months after the first prescription, at which point levels fell to those evident 2-5 years before initiating IFX and to levels in the other drug groups. Likelihood of surgery post-dosing was greater in IFX than in AZA or ND for up to 36 months but was not different than Ster.

CONCLUSIONS

In a "step-up" approach to IFX use, it takes 2 years for the physician visits to reduce to 2-year pre-dosing rates and 18-24 months to reach hospitalization rates at 2 years pre-dosing and hospitalization rates of the AZA and Ster groups. Surgical rates to 3 years post-dosing were still higher than in AZA or ND groups.

Patients with late-adult-onset ulcerative colitis have better outcomes than those with early onset disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The influence of age on the presentation, clinical course, and therapeutic response of patients with adult-onset ulcerative colitis (UC) is understudied. Given potential age-related differences in risk factors and immune function, we sought to determine if disease behavior or clinical outcomes differed between patients diagnosed with UC in later versus earlier stages of adulthood.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 295 patients with UC seen at a tertiary care center from 2001 to 2008. Adult subjects newly diagnosed with UC between the ages of 18 and 30 years were defined as early onset, those newly diagnosed at age 50 or older were defined as late onset. The 2 groups were analyzed for differences in medication use and clinical end points, including disease extent, severity at the time of diagnosis, and steroid-free clinical remission at 1 year after disease onset.

RESULTS

Disease extent and symptom severity were similar between groups at the time of diagnosis. One year after diagnosis, more patients in the late-onset group achieved steroid-free clinical remission (64% vs 49%; P = .01). Among those who required systemic steroid therapy, more late-onset patients achieved steroid-free remission by 1 year (50% vs 32%; P = .01). Former smoking status was a more common risk factor in the late-onset cohort (P < .001), whereas more early onset patients had a positive family history (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early and late-adult-onset UC have similar initial clinical presentations, but differ in disease risk factors. Late-onset patients have better responses to therapy 1 year after diagnosis.

Adverse clinical phenotype in inflammatory bowel disease: a cross sectional study identifying factors potentially amenable to change

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A significant proportion with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exhibit an adverse clinical phenotype reflected in endpoints like surgery and hospitalizations. We sought to identify clinico-demographic factors associated with these adverse consequences that may be amenable to change.

METHODS

Over 6 months IBD patients visiting a metropolitan center were prospectively identified and given a comprehensive survey addressing patient knowledge, mental health and satisfaction with medical care along with other clinical data. Logistic regression analyses assessed for associations between clinico-demographic variables and adverse clinical endpoints (previous surgery [ever] and/or recent inpatient admission over a 16 month observation period).

RESULTS

Of 256 IBD patients, 162 responded (response rate 63%); 95 (59%) had Crohn's disease (CD), 63 (40%) ulcerative colitis (UC), four indeterminate colitis; 53% were female. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of hospitalization included moderate/severe disease activity, psychological co-morbidity, numbers of medications and outpatient visits (odds ratio [OR] 7.09 [2.83-17.76], 4.13 [1.25-13.61], 1.26 [1.03-1.54], 1.17 [1.00-1.37] respectively; all P < 0.05). Post-surgical patients were more likely to have CD, more currently active disease and longer disease duration (OR 8.55 [2.43-29.4], 3.52 [1.26, 9.87], 1.14 [1.08, 1.21] respectively; all P < 0.02), yet were less likely to have previously seen a gastroenterologist, OR 0.25 [0.08-0.76] (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

'At risk' patients (those previously operated, with ongoing disease activity, dissatisfaction and/or psychological comorbidities) may benefit from early identification and more intensive management. Specialist gastroenterology care appears to be under-utilized in operated patients yet may reduce future IBD morbidity.

Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults: American College Of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee

Guidelines for clinical practice are aimed to indicate preferred approaches to medical problems as established by scientifically valid research. Double-blind placebo controlled studies are preferable, but compassionate-use reports and expert review articles are used in a thorough review of the literature conducted through Medline with the National Library of Medicine. When only data that will not withstand objective scrutiny are available, a recommendation is identified as a consensus of experts. Guidelines are applicable to all physicians who address the subject regardless of specialty training or interests and are aimed to indicate the preferable but not necessarily the only acceptable approach to a specific problem. Guidelines are intended to be flexible and must be distinguished from standards of care, which are inflexible and rarely violated. Given the wide range of specifics in any health-care problem, the physician must always choose the course best suited to the individual patient and the variables in existence at the moment of decision. Guidelines are developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee and approved by the board of trustees. Each has been intensely reviewed and revised by the Committee, other experts in the field, physicians who will use them, and specialists in the science of decision analysis. The recommendations of each guideline are therefore considered valid at the time of composition based on the data available. New developments in medical research and practice pertinent to each guideline will be reviewed at a time established and indicated at publication to assure continued validity. The recommendations made are based on the level of evidence found. Grade A recommendations imply that there is consistent level 1 evidence (randomized controlled trials), grade B indicates that the evidence would be level 2 or 3, which are cohort studies or case-control studies. Grade C recommendations are based on level 4 studies, meaning case series or poor-quality cohort studies, and grade D recommendations are based on level 5 evidence, meaning expert opinion.

Optimizing conventional therapies for inflammatory bowel disease

Conventional therapies remain the mainstay of treatment for most patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with only a minority of patients requiring biologic therapies. Recently, attention has focused on optimizing dosing strategies for biologic agents; however, of equal importance are recent advances in the optimization of conventional IBD therapies. Newer aminosalicylate formulations demonstrate similar efficacy with a reduced pill burden and less frequent dosing, while new corticosteroid preparations may retain efficacy with a significantly improved safety profile. The limited indications for antibiotics and probiotics have been further refined by recent data, although uncertainties remain. Advances in the understanding of thiopurine metabolism continue to improve dose optimization and the potential for deliberate therapeutic manipulation with adjunctive therapies. An improved knowledge of intracellular methotrexate metabolism may translate to similar opportunities in the future. This article discusses recent advances relevant to clinical practice today.

Infliximab maintenance therapy is associated with decreases in direct resource use in patients with luminal or fistulizing Crohn's disease

GOALS

To estimate the impact of infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy on the use of hospital resources in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

STUDY

Medical records of patients treated with IFX maintenance therapy (5 mg/kg body weight; intravenous infusion) for luminal (L) or fistulizing (F) CD at 13 hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were assessed as their own controls. Use of CD-related healthcare resources was recorded comparing 1-year periods before and after first IFX infusion (pre-IFX and post-IFX).

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-three CD patients (n=84 L; 69 F) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean number of IFX infusions was 7/y with an average of 335 mg/infusion dose/patient. During the pre-IFX period, 55% of patients needed hospitalization versus 31% in the post-IFX period (P<0.001). Mean inpatient stay was 11.3 d/y [11.2 (L), 11.5 (F)] for the pre-IFX period, and 6.3 d/y [6.2 (L), 6.3 (F)] in the post-IFX period (P<0.001). Surgery was required in 24% patients in the pre-IFX period and in 11% post-IFX (P<0.001). There were no significant changes in the incidence of outpatient visits although emergency room visits fell significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance IFX in CD patients is associated with decreases in the use and length of hospitalizations and the need for surgery in clinical practice.

Azathioprine for ocular inflammatory diseases

PURPOSE

To evaluate treatment outcomes of azathioprine for noninfectious ocular inflammatory diseases.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Medical records of 145 patients starting azathioprine as a sole noncorticosteroid immunosuppressant at 4 tertiary uveitis services were reviewed. Main outcome measures included control of ocular inflammation, sustained control after tapering prednisone to </= 10 mg/day, and discontinuation of treatment because of side effects.

RESULTS

Among 145 patients (255 eyes) treated with azathioprine, 63% had uveitis, 23% had mucous membrane pemphigoid, 11% had scleritis, and 3% had other inflammatory diseases. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50% to 74%) of patients with active disease initially gained complete inactivity of inflammation sustained over at least 28 days within 1 year of therapy, and 47% (95% CI, 37% to 58%) tapered systemic corticosteroids to </= 10 mg daily while maintaining control of inflammation within 1 year of therapy. Treatment success was most common for intermediate uveitis (90% with sustained inactivity within 1 year; 95% CI, 64% to 99%). Over the median follow-up of 230 days (interquartile range, 62 to 679 days), azathioprine was discontinued at a rate of 0.45 per person-years (/PY): 0.16/PY because of side effects, 0.10/PY because of ineffectiveness, 0.09/PY because of disease remission, and 0.10/PY because of unspecified causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Azathioprine was moderately effective as a single corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent in terms of control of inflammation and corticosteroid-sparing benefits, but required several months to achieve treatment goals; it seems especially useful for patients with intermediate uveitis. Treatment-limiting side effects occurred in approximately one-fourth of patients within 1 year, but typically were reversible.

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of azathioprine and mercaptopurine in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Debate exists regarding to whether thiopurine therapy is as effective in ulcerative colitis (UC) as it is in Crohn's disease.

AIM

To review systematically the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) in UC, and to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of AZA/MP for the induction or maintenance of UC clinical remission.

SELECTION OF STUDIES

Evaluating AZA/MP for induction and/or maintenance of clinical remission of UC. Randomized-controlled-trials comparing AZA/MP with placebo/5-aminosalicylates were included in the meta-analysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic and manual. Study quality: Independently assessed by two reviewers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

By 'intention-to-treat'.

RESULTS

Thirty noncontrolled studies (1632 patients) were included in the systematic review. Mean efficacy of AZA/MP was 65% for induction and 76% for maintenance of the remission. Seven controlled studies were included in the meta-analysis. (i) Induction of remission: four studies (89 AZA/MP-treated patients) showed mean efficacy of 73% vs. 64% in controls (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 0.59-4.29). (ii) Maintenance of remission: six studies (124 AZA/MP-treated patients) showed mean efficacy of 60% vs. 37% in controls (OR = 2.56; 95% CI = 1.51-4.34). When only studies comparing AZA/MP vs. placebo were considered, OR was 2.59 (95% CI = 1.26-5.3), absolute risk reduction was 23% and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) to prevent one recurrence was 5.

CONCLUSION

Thiopurine drugs (AZA/MP) are more effective than placebo for the prevention of relapse in UC, with an NNT of 5 and an absolute risk reduction of 23%.

Prospective evaluation of the pharmacogenetics of azathioprine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

To investigate whether pharmacogenetic loci or metabolite concentrations explain clinical response or side effects to AZA.

METHODS

Patients with IBD were given 2 mg/kg of AZA without dose escalation or adjustment. Serial clinical response, thiopurine methyl transferase (TPMT) activity and thioguanine nucleotide (TGN) concentrations were measured over 6 months. All patients were genotyped for inosine triphosphatase (ITPase) and TPMT. Clinical response and side effects were compared to these variables.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seven patients were analysed. Thirty-nine per cent withdrew due to adverse effects. Heterozygous TPMT genotype strongly predicted adverse effects (79% heterozygous vs. 35% wild-type TPMT, P < 0.001). The ITPA 94C>A mutation was associated with withdrawal due to flu-like symptoms (P = 0.014). A baseline TPMT activity below 35 pmol/h/mg/Hb was associated with a greater chance of clinical response compared with a TPMT above 35 pmo/h/mg/Hb (81% vs. 43% respectively, P < 0.001). Patients achieving a mean TGN level above 100 were significantly more likely to respond (P = 0.0017).

CONCLUSIONS

TPMT testing predicts adverse effects and reduced chance of clinical response (TPMT >35 pmol/h/mg/Hb). ITPase deficiency is a predictor of adverse effects and TGN concentrations above 100 correlate with clinical response.

Are we giving azathioprine too much time?

Azathioprine is currently the key drug in the maintenance treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. However, there are still some practical issues to be resolved: one is how long we must maintain the drug. Given that inflammatory bowel diseases are to date chronic, non-curable conditions, treatment should be indefinite and only the loss of efficacy or the appearance of serious side effects may cause withdrawal. As regards to efficacy and their maintenance over time, evidence supports the continuous usefulness of the drug in the long term: in fact its withdrawal very substantially increases the risk of relapse. About side effects, azathioprine is a relatively well tolerated drug and even indefinite use seems safe. The main theoretical risks of prolonged use would be the myelotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and the development of cancer. In fact, serious bone marrow suppression or serious liver damage are uncommon, and can be minimized with proper use of the drug. Recent metanalysis suggests that the risk of lymphoma is real, but the individual risk is rather low, and decision analysis suggests a favorable benefit/risk ratio in the long term. Therefore, in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in whom azathioprine is effective and well tolerated, the drug should not be stopped. This recommendation concerns the use of azathioprine as a single maintenance drug, and is not necessarily applicable to patients receiving concomitant biological therapy.