Replacement treatment with biosynthetic human growth hormone in growth hormone-deficient hypopituitary adults

Dyslipidaemia and growth hormone deficiency - A comprehensive review

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a common complication of several pituitary and hypothalamic disorders and dependent on the onset of disease. It may have severe clinical implications ranging from growth retardation in childhood-onset, to impaired lipid metabolism and increased cardiovascular risk and mortality in adults. GH effectively modulates lipid metabolism at multiple levels and GHD has been associated with an atherogenic lipid profile, that can be reversed by GH replacement therapy. Despite increasing knowledge on the effects of GH on several key enzymes regulating lipid metabolism and recent breakthroughs in the development and wider availability of recombinant GH preparations, several questions remain regarding the replacement therapy in adults with GHD. This review aims to comprehensively summarize the current knowledge on (i) lipid profile abnormalities in individuals with GHD, (ii) proposed mechanisms of action of GH on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, and (iii) clinical implications of GH replacement therapy in individuals diagnosed with GHD.

State of the Art of Patient-reported Outcomes in Acromegaly or GH Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Insight into the current landscape of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROM) and differences between PROs and conventional biochemical outcomes is pivotal for future implementation of PROs in research and clinical practice. Therefore, in studies among patients with acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD), we evaluated (1) used PROMs, (2) their validity, (3) quality of PRO reporting, (4) agreement between PROs and biochemical outcomes, and (5) determinants of discrepancies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched 8 electronic databases for prospective studies describing both PROs and biochemical outcomes in acromegaly and GHD patients. Quality of PRO reporting was assessed using the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) criteria. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate determinants.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Ninety studies were included (acromegaly: n = 53; GHD: n = 37). Besides nonvalidated symptom lists (used in 37% of studies), 36 formal PROMs were used [predominantly Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire in acromegaly (43%) and Quality of Life-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults in GHD (43%)]. Reporting of PROs was poor, with a median of 37% to 47% of ISOQOL items being reported per study. Eighteen (34%) acromegaly studies and 12 (32%) GHD studies reported discrepancies between PROs and biochemical outcomes, most often improvement in biochemical outcomes without change in PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective studies among patients with acromegaly and GHD use a multitude of PROMs, often poorly reported. Since a substantial proportion of studies report discrepancies between PROs and biochemical outcomes, PROMs are pivotal in the evaluation of disease activity. Therefore, harmonization of PROs in clinical practice and research by development of core outcome sets is an important unmet need.

Growth hormone therapy in adults with growth hormone deficiency: a critical assessment of the literature

PURPOSE

Growth hormone (GH) therapy has been studied as treatment for clinical manifestations of adult-onset growth hormone deficiency (AO-GHD), including cardiovascular risk, bone health, and quality of life. Patients with AO-GHD typically also have significant history of pituitary pathology and hypopituitarism, which raises the question of what proportion of their clinical presentation can be attributed to GHD alone. Currently, much of the existing data for GH therapy in AO-GHD come from uncontrolled retrospective studies and observational protocols. These considerations require careful reassessment of the role of GH as a therapeutic agent in adult patients with hypopituitarism.

METHODS

We contrast results from placebo-controlled trials with those from uncontrolled and retrospective studies for GH replacement in patients with hypopituitarism. We also examine the evidence for the manifestations of AO-GHD being attributed to GHD alone, as well as the data on adults with congenital, life-long untreated isolated GHD.

RESULTS

The evidence for increased morbidity and mortality in hypopituitary patients with GHD, and for the benefits of GH therapy, are conflicting. There remains the possibility that the described clinical manifestations of AO-GHD may not be due to GHD alone, but may also be related to underlying pituitary pathology, treatment history and suboptimal hormone replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of inconsistent data on the benefits of GH therapy, treatment of AO-GHD remains an individualized decision. There is a need for more randomized, placebo-controlled studies to evaluate the long-term outcomes of GH therapy in adults with hypopituitarism.

Decreased quality of life (QoL) in hypopituitary patients: involvement of glucocorticoid replacement and radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Hypopituitary patients are assumed to have decreased QoL due to GHD. However, in placebo controlled trials, the effects of GH replacement are no different from placebo. Hydrocortisone dose > 20 mg/day and pituitary radiation are independently associated with poorer QoL. We assessed QoL in panhypopituitary GH- deficient patients never treated with GH.

METHODS

Study group was divided into: (a) surgery followed by radiation (n = 21) and (b) surgery alone (n = 32). Mean duration of GHD was 71.4 ± 7.8 months and mean daily hydrocortisone dose was 15 ± 0.7 mg. Control group had transnasal surgery for benign sinus conditions (n = 54).

RESULTS

AGHDA scores were significantly worse in the entire study group compared to controls (8.1 ± 1.0 vs. 5.1 ± 0.9, p = 0.03). In patients with history of radiation therapy AGHDA scores were significantly worse than in controls (9.1 ± 1.5, p = 0.02) and SNOT-22 (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test) scores were also significantly worse (15.8 ± 2.0 vs. 23.2 ± 3.5, p = 0.04). However, AGHDA scores in patients without history of radiation and on "physiological" dose of hydrocortisone were similar to those in controls (5.1 ± 0.9 vs. 7.3 ± 1.3, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Replacement with hydrocortisone doses not exceeding 20 mg/day and avoidance of radiation therapy was accompanied by normal QoL in patients not replaced with GH. Thus, we suggest that the decreased QoL in hypopituitary patients may not be due to GH deficiency per se, but rather to high hydrocortisone doses and to aftereffects of cranial radiation.

Vitamin D status in prepubertal children with isolated idiopathic growth hormone deficiency: effect of growth hormone therapy

Few studies, and with controversial results, analyzed vitamin D status in children before and after growth hormone (GH) treatment. Thus, we aimed to assess vitamin D status in prepubertal children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (GHD), and to evaluate the effect of GHD and GH treatment on vitamin D levels. Fifty prepubertal children with isolated GHD were compared with 50 controls. All were subjected to history, anthropometric assessment and measurement of 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), serum calcium, phosphorous, alkaline phosphatase and parathyroid hormone (PTH) at diagnosis and 1 year after GH therapy. Serum 25(OH)D levels <30 ng/mL and 20 ng/mL were defined as vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency, respectively. 25(OH)D was lower in cases than controls. Forty per cent of children with GHD were 25(OH)D insufficient and 44% deficient, while 16% were sufficient at baseline. There was a positive correlation between 25(OH)D and peak GH levels. Peak GH was a significant predictor of 25(OH)D levels. After 1 year of GH therapy, 25(OH)D increased (18.42±5.41 vs 34.5±10.1 ng/mL; P<0.001). Overall, 22% of cases remained insufficient and 24% deficient, with an increase in prevalence of children with normal levels (54%; P<0.001). 25(OH) correlated negatively with PTH (r=-0.71, P=0.01). In conclusion, hypovitaminosis D is prevalent in children with GHD and significantly improved 1 year after GH therapy. 25(OH)D should be assessed in children with GHD at diagnosis and during follow-up.

Growth hormone (GH) enhances anaerobic capacity: impact on physical function and quality of life in adults with GH deficiency

CONTEXT

Anaerobic capacity is impaired in adults with GH deficiency (GHD), adversely affecting physical function and quality of life (QoL).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether GH replacement improves anaerobic capacity, physical function and QoL in adults with GHD.

DESIGN

One-month double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of GH (0·5 mg/day), followed by a 6-month open phase.

PATIENTS

A total of 18 adults with GHD.

MEASUREMENTS

Anaerobic power (watts) was assessed by the 30-s Wingate test, and aerobic capacity by the VO2 max (l/min) test. Physical functional was assessed by the stair climb test, chair stand test, 7-day pedometry and QoL by the AGHDA questionnaire. Lean body mass (LBM) was quantified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

GH replacement normalized IGF-1 levels during both study phases. During the 1-month placebo-controlled study, improvement in stair climb and chair stand performance was observed during GH and placebo treatment; however, there were no significant GH effects observed in any outcome measure compared to placebo. Six months of GH treatment significantly increased anaerobic power (P < 0·05), chair stand repetitions (P < 0·0001), daily step count (P < 0·05) and QoL scores (P < 0·001) compared to baseline measurements. GH treatment did not significantly improve VO2 max. Improvement in anaerobic power independently predicted an improvement in energy and vitality domain of QoL (P = 0·03).

CONCLUSIONS

GH replacement improves anaerobic capacity, physical function and QoL in a time-dependent manner in adults with GHD. Improvement in the anaerobic but not aerobic energy system is likely to underlie the improvement in QoL in patients with GHD during GH replacement.

Effects of low dose versus high dose human growth hormone on body composition and lipids in adults with GH deficiency: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials

PURPOSE

Doses of growth hormone in adults with growth hormone deficiency are now lower than previously. However, it is not clear they are as effective as higher doses. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess efficacy of low to moderate dose (LD) GH replacement on standard endpoints of GH compared to higher doses.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was carried out using PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases from 1960 to 9/23/12. Three reviewers identified randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of 6 months duration. Of 173 publications, 28 representing 22 trials (591 GH-treated patients and 562 placebo) were included. Data were independently extracted by three reviewers. Endpoints were analyzed if ≥4 studies per dose group reported baseline and 6 month data.

RESULTS

Mean lean body mass (LBM) increased by 2.61 kg in GH-treated subjects versus 0.04 in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). Fat mass (FM) was reduced by -2.19 kg versus 0.31 (GH vs. placebo) (P = 0.0002). Changes in LBM and FM were dose-related (P = 0.02 and 0.007, respectively), high dose (HD) being more effective than low dose (LBM P = 0.03 and FM P = 0.04). In contrast, treatment with GH reduced total cholesterol -0.38 mmol/L versus. 0.01 (placebo) (P < 0.0001), and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) -0.42 mmol/L versus -0.1 (P = 0.0009), but there were no differences between LD and HD GH.

CONCLUSIONS

LDs of hGH improve total- and LDL-C, and body composition. Higher doses are more effective on body composition, but not lipids.

Analysis of short- and long-term metabolic effects of growth hormone replacement therapy in adult patients with craniopharyngioma and non-functioning pituitary adenoma

PURPOSE

Adult patients operated for craniopharyngioma develop more frequently GH deficiency (GHD) than patients operated for non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA). The aim of the study was to compare both short- (1 year) and long-term (5 years) effects of rhGH in 38 GHD adult patients (19 operated for Craniopharyngioma (CP) and 19 for NFPA).

METHODS

IGF-I levels, body composition (BF%), BMI, lipid profile and glucose homeostasis were evaluated in all patients. Pituitary MRI was performed at baseline and during follow-up, as needed.

RESULTS

At baseline no difference between the two groups was observed, apart from a higher prevalence of diabetes insipidus in CP patients (79 vs 21%). After 12 months, IGF-I SDS normalized and BF% significantly decreased only in the NFPA group. During long-term treatment, decrease in BF% and improvement in lipid profile shown by reduction in total- and LDL-cholesterol were present in NFPA group only, while increase in insulin levels and HbA1c and decrease of QUICKI were observed in CP patients only. Accordingly, after long-term therapy, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) was significantly higher in CP than in NFPA group (37% in CP and in 5% in NFPA group; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present data suggest that CP patients are less sensitive to the positive rhGH effects on lipid profile and BF% and more prone to insulin sensitivity worsening than NFPA patients, resulting in increased prevalence of MS in CP only.

Action of GH on skeletal muscle function: molecular and metabolic mechanisms

Skeletal muscle is a target tissue of GH. Based on its anabolic properties, it is widely accepted that GH enhances muscle performance in sports and muscle function in the elderly. This paper critically reviews information on the effects of GH on muscle function covering structure, protein metabolism, the role of IGF1 mediation, bioenergetics and performance drawn from molecular, cellular and physiological studies on animals and humans. GH increases muscle strength by enhancing muscle mass without affecting contractile force or fibre composition type. GH stimulates whole-body protein accretion with protein synthesis occurring in muscular and extra-muscular sites. The energy required to power muscle function is derived from a continuum of anaerobic and aerobic sources. Molecular and functional studies provide evidence that GH stimulates the anaerobic and suppresses the aerobic energy system, in turn affecting power-based functional measures in a time-dependent manner. GH exerts complex multi-system effects on skeletal muscle function in part mediated by the IGF system.

Hormone replacement therapy and physical function in healthy older men. Time to talk hormones?

Improving physical function and mobility in a continuously expanding elderly population emerges as a high priority of medicine today. Muscle mass, strength/power, and maximal exercise capacity are major determinants of physical function, and all decline with aging. This contributes to the incidence of frailty and disability observed in older men. Furthermore, it facilitates the accumulation of body fat and development of insulin resistance. Muscle adaptation to exercise is strongly influenced by anabolic endocrine hormones and local load-sensitive autocrine/paracrine growth factors. GH, IGF-I, and testosterone (T) are directly involved in muscle adaptation to exercise because they promote muscle protein synthesis, whereas T and locally expressed IGF-I have been reported to activate muscle stem cells. Although exercise programs improve physical function, in the long-term most older men fail to comply. The GH/IGF-I axis and T levels decline markedly with aging, whereas accumulating evidence supports their indispensable role in maintaining physical function integrity. Several studies have reported that the administration of T improves lean body mass and maximal voluntary strength in healthy older men. On the other hand, most studies have shown that administration of GH alone failed to improve muscle strength despite amelioration of the detrimental somatic changes of aging. Both GH and T are anabolic agents that promote muscle protein synthesis and hypertrophy but work through separate mechanisms, and the combined administration of GH and T, albeit in only a few studies, has resulted in greater efficacy than either hormone alone. Although it is clear that this combined approach is effective, this review concludes that further studies are needed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of combined hormone replacement therapy in older men before the medical rationale of prescribing hormone replacement therapy for combating the sarcopenia of aging can be established.

The effect of growth hormone (GH) replacement on muscle strength in patients with GH-deficiency: a meta-analysis

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVES

GH replacement increases muscle mass and reduces body fat in growth hormone deficiency (GHD) adults. A recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that this improvement in body composition is associated with improved exercise performance. The current meta-analysis was carried out to determine whether high-quality evidence exists to support a beneficial effect of GH replacement on strength.

DESIGN/METHODS

An extensive Medline search/literature review identified eight studies with utilizable, robust data, involving 231 patients in nine cohorts. Previously unpublished data were sought from authors and obtained in two cases. All studies included were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, of parallel or cross-over design and of an average 6.7 months duration. Information was retrieved in uniform format, with data pertaining to patient numbers, study-design, GH-dose, mean age, IGF-I levels and muscle strength measurements (isometric or isokinetic quadriceps strength) recorded. Data were analysed using a fixed-effects model, utilizing continuous data measured on different scales. A summary effect measure (d(s)) was derived for individual strength variables, whereas an overall summary effect was derived from the sum of all studies incorporating different variables; 95% CIs were calculated from the weighted variances of individual study effects.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed no significant improvement, neither when all studies were combined (d(s) = +0.01 +/- 0.26) nor when measured individually (isometric quadriceps strength, d(s) = +0.02 +/- 0.32 and isokinetic quadriceps strength, d(s) = 0.00 +/- 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from short-term controlled studies fails to support a benefit on muscle strength of GH replacement in GHD patients, which is likely to occur over a longer time-course, as seen in open-label studies.

Changes in insulin levels following 6-month treatment with recombinant human growth hormone in growth hormone-deficient adults

INTRODUCTION

Eighty-six adult patients with GH deficiency (GHD) of adult or childhood onset were treated for 6 months, with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) at a low (LD) or conventional dose (CD). The treatment effect on insulin levels was investigated.

METHODS

This manuscript refers to the Italian addendum to an International Study (B9R-EW-GDED) in which patients with GHD were randomized to receive r-hGH replacement therapy at a dose of either 3 microg/kg/day or 6 microg/kg/day for the 3 months. The dose was then doubled for the next 3 months.

RESULTS

After 6 months of r-hGH treatment, insulin levels increased with both GH dosages, with a greater increase achieved in the low-dose subgroup. Insulin levels also increased significantly in the childhood-onset, while even decreased in the adult-onset subgroup. On the whole, in more than 50% of patients, insulin values rose by >13%. Moreover, mean levels of IGF-I increased 2-3 fold (p<0.001 vs baseline) in both the LD and CD groups. Significant and similar increases in IGF binding protein-3 levels were seen in both the LD and CD groups over the treatment period, regardless the time of onset of GHD.

CONCLUSION

Insulin increased with both GH dosages and more than half of patients presented an important increase in insulin plasma levels. It would be of interest to assess if there is a correlation between the changes in insulin levels and other cardiovascular risk factors such as hemostatic parameters.

Impact of GH substitution on exercise capacity and muscle strength in GH-deficient adults: a meta-analysis of blinded, placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Several but not all trials suggest that GH replacement in GH-deficient adults improves aerobic exercise capacity, whereas its effect on muscle strength is more dubious. However, a denominator of these studies is a low sample size.

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed and analysed all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials on the effects of GH administration on aerobic exercise capacity and muscle strength in GH-deficient adults.

STUDY SELECTION

Fifteen trials were identified from four databases. We conducted an analysis of effects on aerobic exercise capacity, performed on either a treadmill or a bicycle ergometer, muscle strength assessed by a dynamometer, and muscle mass assessed by computerized tomography.

RESULTS

The total number of patients included was 306 and the duration of treatment ranged from 3 to 12 months. GH replacement significantly increased aerobic exercise capacity [8.9 ± 0.8%, (P < 0.001)] including VO(2) max [0.17 ± 0.02 l/min (P < 0.001)], as well as muscle volume [7.1 ± 1.6%, (P < 0.001)]. In contrast, muscle strength measured in 113 patients was not significantly increased [3.2 ± 2.2% (P = 0.15)].

CONCLUSION

GH replacement in GH-deficient adults is associated with a significant positive effect on aerobic exercise capacity and muscle mass.

Assessment of quality of life in adult patients with GH deficiency: KIMS contribution to clinical practice and pharmacoeconomic evaluations

Quality of life (QoL) has emerged as an important construct that has found numerous applications across healthcare-related fields, ranging from research and clinical evaluation of treatment effects to pharmacoeconomic evaluations and global healthcare policy. Impairment of QoL is one of the key clinical characteristics in adult GHD and has been extensively studied in the Pfizer International Metabolic Database (KIMS). We provide summarized evidence on GH treatment effects for both clinical and health economic applications based on the KIMS data. The primary focus is on those aspects of QoL research that cannot be investigated in the traditional clinical trial setting, such as specific patient subgroups, cross-country comparisons and long-term follow-up. First, the impact of age, gender, disease onset, primary aetiology, extent of hypopituitarism, previous radiotherapy and obesity on QoL before and during long-term GH replacement is discussed. Secondly, the studies on QoL in relation to country-specific normative values are reviewed. Finally, health economic data derived from KIMS including both burden of disease and utility assessment are evaluated. We conclude that the wide spectrum of analyses performed on the KIMS data allows for practical application of the results not only to research and clinical practice but also to health policy and global medical decision making.

The physiology of growth hormone and sport

The growth hormone (GH)/ insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis exerts short-and long-term metabolic effects that are potentially important during exercise. Exercise is a potent stimulus to GH release and there is some evidence that the acute increase in GH is important in regulating substrate metabolism post-exercise. Regular exercise also increases 24-hour GH secretion rates, which potentially contributes to the physiologic changes induced by training. The effects of GH replacement in GH-deficient adults provide a useful model with which to study the effects of the more long-term effects of the GH/ IGF-I axis. There is convincing evidence that GH replacement increases exercise capacity. Measures of exercise performance including maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and ventilatory threshold (VeT) are impaired in GH deficiency and improved by GH replacement, probably through some combination of increased oxygen delivery to exercising muscle, increased fatty acid availability with glycogen sparing, increased muscle strength, improved body composition and improved thermoregulation. Administration of supraphysiologic doses of GH to athletes increases fatty acid availability and reduces oxidative protein loss particularly during exercise, and increases lean body mass. It is not known whether these effects translate to improved athletic performance, although recombinant human GH is known to be widely abused in sport. The model of acromegaly provides evidence that long-term GH excess does not result in improved performance but it is possible that a "window" exists in which the protein anabolic effects of supraphysiologic GH might be advantageous.

Arterial pulse wave velocity, inflammatory markers, pathological GH and IGF states, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease

Blood pressure (BP) measurements provide information regarding risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease, but only in a specific artery. Arterial stiffness (AS) can be determined by measurement of arterial pulse wave velocity (APWV). Separate from any role as a surrogate marker, AS is an important determinant of pulse pressure, left ventricular function and coronary artery perfusion pressure. Proximal elastic arteries and peripheral muscular arteries respond differently to aging and to medication. Endogenous human growth hormone (hGH), secreted by the anterior pituitary, peaks during early adulthood, declining at 14% per decade. Levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) are at their peak during late adolescence and decline throughout adulthood, mirror imaging GH. Arterial endothelial dysfunction, an accepted cause of increased APWV in GH deficiency (GHD) is reversed by recombinant human (rh) GH therapy, favorably influencing the risk for atherogenesis. APWV is a noninvasive method for measuring atherosclerotic and hypertensive vascular changes increases with age and atherosclerosis leading to increased systolic blood pressure and increased left ventricular hypertrophy. Aerobic exercise training increases arterial compliance and reduces systolic blood pressure. Whole body arterial compliance is lowered in strength-trained individuals. Homocysteine and C-reactive protein are two inflammatory markers directly linked with arterial endothelial dysfunction. Reviews of GH in the somatopause have not been favorable and side effects of treatment have marred its use except in classical GHD. Is it possible that we should be assessing the combined effects of therapy with rhGH and rhIGF-I? Only multiple intervention studies will provide the answer.

Ten years of growth hormone (GH) replacement normalizes muscle strength in GH-deficient adults

CONTEXT

GH replacement for 1-5 yr improves, but does not fully normalize, muscle strength. OBJECTIVE, DESIGN, AND PATIENTS: In this single-center, open-labeled, prospective study, the effects of 10 yr of GH replacement on muscle strength and neuromuscular function were followed in 109 consecutive adults (61 men; mean age 50.0 yr; range 22-74 yr) with adult-onset GH deficiency.

RESULTS

The mean initial GH dose of 0.88 mg/d was gradually lowered to 0.47 mg/d. The mean IGF-I sd score increased from -1.54 at baseline to 1.12 at study end. GH replacement induced a sustained increase in lean mass and isometric knee flexor strength (60 degrees). In most other measures of upper leg and handgrip strength, there were transient increases during the first half of the study (0-5 yr), whereas during the second half (5-10 yr), the absolute values of muscle strength decreased and returned to or even below the baseline values. However, after correction for age and gender using observed/predicted value ratios, there were sustained and, until 7 yr, even progressive increases in the measures of muscle strength. At study end, knee flexor strength had increased to 104-110% of predicted, knee extensor strength to 93-108%, and handgrip strength to 88-93%. Measurements of neuromuscular function showed reduced voluntary motor unit activation after 10 yr.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten years of GH replacement therapy increased muscle strength during the first half of the study and thereafter partly protected against the normal age-related decline in muscle strength and neuromuscular function, resulting in approximately normalized muscle strength after 10 yr.

The effect of growth hormone replacement on exercise capacity in patients with GH deficiency: a metaanalysis

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVES

GH replacement in GH-deficient adults exerts clear effects on body composition, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence concerning its functional effects, which are more clinically important. This metaanalysis was carried out to determine the effects of GH replacement on exercise performance.

DESIGN/METHODS

A Medline search and examination of reference lists of included studies and relevant review articles identified 11 studies with utilizable, robust data, involving a total of 268 patients. All included studies were randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, and of either parallel or crossover design. Information was retrieved in uniform format, with data pertaining to patient numbers, study design, GH dose, age, IGF-I levels, and the exercise variables maximal oxygen uptake and maximal power output recorded. The data were analyzed using a fixed-effects model, using continuous data measured on different scales. A summary effect measure (ds) was derived for the individual exercise parameters, whereas an overall summary effect was derived from the sum of all studies across different variables; 95% confidence intervals were calculated from the weighted variances of individual study effects.

RESULTS

GH replacement was associated with significant improvement with all studies combined (ds=+0.32, 0.08-0.56), for maximal power output (ds=+0.4, 0.06-0.74), and maximal oxygen uptake (ds=+0.34, 0.07-0.62). There was no association between age or GH dose on the degree of improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence that GH replacement improves exercise performance in GH-deficient patients. This evidence should be considered when decisions are made regarding prescription of GH.

The growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-I axis in exercise and sport

The syndrome of adult GH deficiency and the effects of GH replacement therapy provide a useful model with which to study the effects of the GH/IGF-I axis on exercise physiology. Measures of exercise performance including maximal oxygen uptake and ventilatory threshold are impaired in adult GH deficiency and improved by GH replacement, probably through some combination of increased oxygen delivery to exercising muscle, increased fatty acid availability with glycogen sparing, increased muscle strength, improved body composition, and improved thermoregulation. In normal subjects, in addition to the long-term effects of GH/IGF-I status, there is evidence that the acute GH response to exercise is important in regulating substrate metabolism after exercise. Administration of supraphysiological doses of GH to athletes increases fatty acid availability and reduces oxidative protein loss, particularly during exercise, and increases lean body mass. Despite a lack of evidence that these metabolic effects translate to improved performance, GH abuse by athletes is widespread. Tests to detect GH abuse have been developed based on measurement in serum of 1) indirect markers of GH action, and 2) the relative proportions of the two major naturally occurring isoforms (20 and 22kDa) of GH. There is evidence that exercise performance and strength are improved by administration of GH and testosterone in combination to elderly subjects. The potential benefits of GH in these situations must be weighed against potential adverse effects.

Abuse of growth hormone among young athletes

The underground abuse of growth hormone (GH) among young athletes presents a challenge to medical professionals. Health care professionals providing knowledgeable guidance regarding healthy ways to improve performance and appearance, as well as accurate information regarding substances' perceived benefits, risks, and unknown qualities, is invaluable to the young athlete. Further research focused on the profile and motivation of young people who use GH is essential to understanding and intervening better with those who use these substances.

Steroid and prescription medicine abuse in the health and fitness community: A regional study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of abuse of certain prescription medicines (POM) amongst health club attendees. The non-therapeutic use of such medicines has previously been considered to be restricted to the professional athlete.

METHODS

In the summer of 2005, health club users in the South Wales area were given questionnaires and asked to return them in a stamped, addressed envelope. Anonymity of the respondents was assured.

RESULTS

From the distribution of 210 questionnaires, the response rate was 69.5% (146 questionnaires). The mean age of the sample was 33.6+/-6.7 years (range 15-72 years). Anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS) use is prominent amongst recreational gym users in this regional sample, with 70% (102 individuals) reporting AAS use, 65.8% (96 individuals) of whom were currently still using. Some 7% of respondents (10 individuals) were female and they also reported taking medication. This research demonstrated an enormous increase in the use of growth hormone (24%), insulin (14%), and tamoxifen (22%), with smaller increases in other drugs.

CONCLUSION

Drug users were from all levels of society and reported various physiological and psychological side effects from their use. The present study indicated that the most used medicine/drug from less than reputable sources was still AAS but that, as a consequence of the internet revolution, they were being caught up by the more expensive designer drugs, particularly growth hormone. Physicians and medical personnel must become aware that the use of AAS and other prescription medicines is on the increase and appears to be predominantly used for cosmetic reasons.

Effect of growth hormone on susceptibility to diet-induced obesity

Mice with a deficiency in GH function due to disruption of the GH receptor/binding protein gene (GHR(-/-)) are long lived, insulin sensitive, and obese, whereas mice with excess GH function due to expression of a bovine GH transgene (bGH) are short lived, glucose intolerant, and lean. When challenged with a high-fat (HF) diet, we hypothesized that these mice would be differentially susceptible to diet-induced obesity. To test this hypothesis, GHR(-/-), bGH, and littermate control (WT) mice were fed a HF diet (40% kcal) or a nutrient-matched low-fat diet (9% kcal) for 12 wk. On the HF diet, all mice, regardless of genotype, showed a similar percent weight gain and exhibited a significant increase in percent body fat and the mass of epididymal, retroperitoneal, and sc fat pads. For bGH mice, the increase in adipose tissue was relatively small, compared with the WT or GHR(-/-) mice, suggesting some resiliency, although not immunity, to diet-induced obesity. GHR(-/-) mice, which are relatively obese on a low-fat diet, responded to the dietary challenge in a manner similar to WT controls. With HF feeding, all genotypes experienced an increase in insulin levels and depot-dependent effect of adipose tissue. Together, these results further support a role for GH in energy balance regulation and nutrient partitioning. More importantly, because there were genotype-specific effects of diet, these data stress the importance of diet selection and sampling multiple adipose depots in studies with these mouse models.

The influence of growth hormone status on physical impairments, functional limitations, and health-related quality of life in adults

The availability of recombinant human GH and somatostatin analogs has resulted in widespread treatment for adults with GH deficiency (GHD) and those with GH excess (acromegaly). Despite being at opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of their GH/IGF-I axis, both of these populations experience overlapping somatic impairments. Adults with untreated GHD have low circulating levels of IGF-I that manifest as altered body composition with increased fat and reduced lean body and skeletal muscle mass. At the other end of the spectrum, adults with GH excess, who have elevated levels of IGF-I, also have altered body composition. Impairments that result from disorders of either GHD or GH excess are both associated with increased functional limitations, such as reduced ability to walk quickly for prolonged periods, and poorer health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Adults with untreated GHD and GH excess both commonly complain of excessive fatigue that seems to be associated more with impaired aerobic than muscular performance. Several studies have documented that administration of GH or somatostatin analogs to adults with GHD or GH excess, respectively, ameliorates abnormal biochemical profile and the associated somatic impairments. However, whether these improvements translate into improved physical function in adults with GHD or GH excess remains largely unknown, and their impact on HR-QoL controversial. Review of placebo-controlled trials to date suggests that GH and somatostatin analogs have greater effects on gas exchange and aerobic performance than as anabolic agents on skeletal muscle mass and function. Future investigations should include dose-response studies to establish the optimal combination of pharmacological agents plus exercise required to improve not only biochemical markers but also physical function and HR-QoL in adults with GHD or GH excess.

Low-dose GH improves exercise capacity in adults with GH deficiency: effects of a 22-month placebo-controlled, crossover trial

Fifty-five patients with adult-onset GH deficiency (mean age, 49 years) were enrolled in a placebo-controlled, crossover study to investigate the effects of GH therapy on exercise capacity, body composition, and quality of life (QOL). GH and placebo were administered for 9 months each, separated by a 4-month washout period. GH therapy was individually dosed to obtain an IGF-I concentration within the normal range for age and sex. The final mean daily dose of GH was 1.2 IU/day for men and 1.8 IU/day for women. Mean IGF-I concentration at baseline was higher in men than in women (95+/-33 vs 68+/-41 microg/l respectively; P < 0.04) and increased to a similar level on GH therapy. Body fat mass was reduced by 1.9+/-2.9 kg and lean body mass was increased by 1.8+/-2.8 kg (P = 0.0001 for each) with GH treatment. Total and low-density cholesterol levels decreased. Absolute maximal oxygen uptake increased by 6% (P = 0.01), relative to body weight by 9% (P = 0.004), and there was a trend toward increased endurance performance by 7% (P = 0.07). There were no significant effects on QOL. In conclusion, treatment with a low, physiologic dose of GH produced positive effects on body composition and lipids and improved exercise capacity, likely to be of clinical relevance. No changes in QOL were seen, possibly because of a good QOL at baseline.

Impact of growth hormone status on body composition and the skeleton

Severe growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) induces a well-defined clinical entity encompassing, amongst the most reported features, abnormalities of body composition, in particular increased fat mass, especially truncal, and reduced lean body mass. The results from virtually all treatment studies are in agreement that GH replacement improves the body composition profile of GHD patients by increasing lean body mass and reducing fat mass. More recently, the observations have been extended to adults with partial GHD, defined by a peak GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia of 3-7 microg/l. These patients exhibit abnormalities of body composition similar in nature to those described in adults with severe GHD; these include an increase in total fat mass of around 3.5 kg and a reduction of lean body mass of around 5.5 kg. The increase in fat mass is predominantly distributed within the trunk. The degree of abnormality of body composition is intermediate between that of healthy subjects and that of adults with GHD. The impact of GH replacement on body composition in adults with GH insufficiency, although predictable, has not been formally documented. The skeleton is another biological endpoint affected by GH status: in adults with severe GHD, low bone mass has been reported using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and other quantitative methodologies. The importance of low bone mass, in any clinical setting, is as a surrogate marker for the future risk of fracture. Several retrospective studies have documented an increased prevalence of fractures in untreated GHD adults. Hypopituitary adults with severe GHD have reduced markers of bone turnover which normalize with GH replacement, indicating that GH, directly or via induction of insulin-like growth factor-I, is intimately involved in skeletal modelling. Whilst the evidence that GH plays an important role in the acquisition of bone mass during adolescence and early adult life is impressive, the impact of GHD acquired later in adulthood is less clear. Recently we examined the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and age in 125 untreated adults with severe GHD using DEXA. A significant positive correlation was observed between BMD (z-scores) and age at all skeletal sites studied. Overall, few patients, except those aged less than 30 years, had significantly reduced bone mass (i.e. a BMD z-score of less than -2); correction of BMD to provide a pseudo-volumetric measure of BMD suggested that reduced stature of the younger patients may explain, at least in part, this higher frequency of subnormal BMD z-scores. Despite normal BMD, however, an increase in fracture prevalence may still be observed in elderly GHD adults as a consequence of increased falls related to muscle weakness and visual field defects.

The effects of five-year growth hormone replacement therapy on muscle strength in elderly hypopituitary patients

OBJECTIVE

Little is known of the long-term effects of GH replacement therapy on muscle strength in elderly adults with adult onset GH deficiency (GHD). In this study, the effects of 5 years of GH replacement therapy on muscle function were determined in adults over 60 years of age with adult onset GHD.

DESIGN

A prospective, open-label, single-centre study. Patients Twenty-six (12 male and 14 female) consecutive hypopituitary adults with adult onset GHD, mean age 65.0 (range 61-74) years.

MEASUREMENTS

Upper leg muscle strength was measured using a Kin-Com dynamometer. Right and left handgrip strength were measured using an electronic grip force instrument.

RESULTS

The mean insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) SD score increased from -1.10 at baseline to 1.21 at end of the study. Body weight was unchanged during the 5-year study. A sustained increase in lean body mass and a sustained reduction of body fat was observed as measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The GH replacement therapy induced a sustained increase in isometric (60 degrees ) knee flexor strength. After statistical correction for age and sex variables using observed/predicted value ratios, a sustained increase was also observed in concentric knee flexor strength at an angular velocity of 60 degrees /s, concentric knee extensor strength at 60 degrees /s and 180 degrees /s, and peak right handgrip strength. At baseline, knee flexor strength was 90-96% of predicted, knee extensor strength was 85-87% of predicted, and hand-grip strength was 74-80% of predicted values. At study end, knee flexor strength was 98-106% of predicted, knee extensor strength was 90-100% of predicted, and hand-grip strength was 80-87% of predicted values.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with adult onset GH deficiency had decreased baseline muscle strength also after correction for age and sex. The 5-year GH replacement therapy normalized knee flexor strength and improved, but did not fully normalize, knee extensor strength and handgrip strength.

Impact of growth hormone (GH) treatment on cardiovascular risk factors in GH-deficient adults: a Metaanalysis of Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

Patients with hypopituitarism have an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. GH treatment could modify the cardiovascular risk in adults with GH deficiency, but most published clinical trials involved few patients and the results are variable. We conducted a systematic review of blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of GH treatment in adult patients with GH deficiency published up to August 2003. Thirty-seven trials were identified. We combined the results for effects on lean and fat body mass; body mass index; triglyceride and cholesterol [high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and total] levels; blood pressure; glycemia; and insulinemia. Overall effect size was used to evaluate significance, and weighted differences between GH and placebo were used to appreciate the size of the effect. GH treatment significantly reduced LDL cholesterol [-0.5 (SD 0.3) mmol/liter], total cholesterol [-0.3 (0.3) mmol/liter], fat mass [-3.1 (3.3) kg], and diastolic blood pressure [-1.8 (3.8) mm Hg] and significantly increased lean body mass [+2.7 (2.6) kg], fasting plasma glucose [+0.2 (0.1) mmol/liter], and insulin [+8.7 (7.0) pmol/liter]. All effect sizes remained significant in trials with low doses and long-duration GH treatment. Thus, GH treatment has beneficial effects on lean and fat body mass, total and LDL cholesterol levels, and diastolic blood pressure but reduces insulin sensitivity. The global cardiovascular benefit remains to be determined in large trials with appropriate clinical endpoints.

Ageing, growth hormone and physical performance

Human ageing is associated to a declining activity of the GH/IGF-I axis and to several changes in body composition, function and metabolism which show strict similarities with those of younger adults with pathological GH deficiency. The age-related changes of the GH/IGF-I axis activity are mainly dependent on age-related variations in the hypothalamic control of somatotroph function, which is also affected by changes in peripheral hormones and metabolic input. The term "somatopause" indicates the potential link between the age-related decline in GH and IGF-I levels and changes in body composition, structural functions and metabolism which characterise ageing. Physical exercise is an important environmental regulator of the GH/IGF-I axis activity. Increased physical fitness and regular training increase GH production in adults, while the GH response to aerobic or resistance exercise is reduced with age. In older subjects regular exercise has the potential to improve overall fitness and quality of life and is also associated to decreased morbidity and increased longevity. Similar effects are seen following GH therapy in adult deficiency. This assumption led to clinical trials focusing on rhGH and/or rhlGF-I as potential anabolic drug interventions in elderly subjects. To restore the activity of GH/IGF-I axis with anabolic, anti-ageing purposes, attention has been also paid to GH-releasing molecules such as GHRH, orally active synthetic GH-secretagogues (GHS) and, more recently, to the endogenous natural GHS, ghrelin, which exerts several important biological actions, including the regulation of metabolic balance and orexigenic effects. At present, however, there is no definite evidence that "frail" elderly subjects really benefit from restoring GH and IGF-I levels within the young adult range by treatment with rhGH, rhlGF-I, GHRH or GHS. In this article the alteration of the GH/IGF-I axis activity during ageing is revised taking into account the role of physical activity as a regulator of the axis function and considering the effects of the restoration of GH and IGF-I circulating levels on body composition and physical performance.

Effects of GH and insulin-like growth factor-I on body composition

In this review, different methods to estimate body composition are discussed shortly. The effects by GH on total and visceral fat mass, lean mass, muscle strength and body water are described. Gender differences in the sensitivity to GH administration are reviewed. Finally, a short description of the effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) administration on body composition has been included.

Effect of exogenous growth hormone and exercise on lean mass and muscle function in children with burns

We tested the hypothesis that the administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rHGH) and exercise would increase lean body mass (LBM) and muscle strength in burned children to a greater extent than rHGH or exercise separately. Children, ages 7-17 yr, with >40% body surface area burned, were randomized into groups. One group (GHEX, n = 10) participated in a 12-wk in-hospital physical rehabilitation program supplemented with an exercise program and received 0.05 mg. kg(-1). day(-1) of rHGH. A second exercising group (SALEX, n = 13) received saline. A third group (GH, n = 10) received a similar dose of rHGH as GHEX and participated in a 12-wk, home-based physical rehabilitation program without exercise. The fourth group (Saline, n = 11) received saline and participated in a 12-wk, home-based physical rehabilitation program without exercise. The mean (+/-SE) percent change in lean body mass after 12 wk was not significantly different between GHEX (9.0 +/- 2.1%), SALEX (5.4 +/- 1.6%), and GH (5.8 +/- 1.8%) groups (P = 0.33). However, the mean percent change in muscle strength was significantly greater in the GHEX (36.2 +/- 5.4%) and SALEX (42.6 +/- 10.0%) groups than in the GH (-7.4 +/- 4.7%) or Saline (6.7 +/- 4.4%) groups (P = 0.008). In summary, rHGH GHEX, SALEX, and GH alone produced similar improvements in LBM. However, muscle strength was only increased via exercise.

Long-term growth hormone replacement therapy in hypopituitary adults

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in the adult has now been fully recognised as a clinical entity characterised by abnormal body composition, osteopenia, impaired quality of life, cardiac dysfunction and an adverse lipid profile. While short-term studies of GH replacement have demonstrated irrefutably a favourable effect on all if not most features of GHD, data on long-term administration spanning more than 2 years are still scarce. Experience of GH replacement up to 5 to 10 years indicate that the beneficial effects on body composition, predominantly a decrease in body fat and an increase in lean mass, is maintained during treatment. Long-term GH therapy also increases muscle strength and exercise performance. All data, with one exception, are consistent with a significant increase in bone mass during prolonged GH therapy. The most distinct effect on bone was observed in the worst affected individuals and in males. Improvement in quality of life is documented shortly after initiation of GH replacement and is maintained during long-term studies. This may explain the reduction in days of sick leave seen during GH therapy. The beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk factors is sustained over a prolonged period of time, revealing a reduction in intima wall thickness, and an improvement in serum lipid levels and clotting parameters. The increase in lipoprotein(a) levels with GH therapy in some studies may be disturbing, but difficulties in measuring this parameter and inconsistencies between the different studies makes it difficult to estimate its real impact. No data are yet available to show that GH replacement will normalise or even improve mortality rate and fracture rate. Adverse events associated with GH replacement therapy are mainly secondary to fluid retention as a result of excess dose administration. This can be adequately prevented by monitoring GH replacement according to serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels. From what is currently known, GH replacement does not increase the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and does not induce new neoplasms or recurrence of the primary brain tumour; however, longer follow-up studies are needed to provide definitive answers. In conclusion, it appears not only that long-term GH replacement therapy in adults with GHD is a procedure that can be safely used, but that GH replacement should be considered as a possible life-long therapy in order to maintain its benefits.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Somatropin for Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency

The beneficial effects of somatropin (growth hormone [GH] replacement therapy) in adults are now established. Long-term somatropin administration in GH-deficient adults improves body composition, muscle strength, quality of life, bone mass and density, and lipoprotein pattern. The extent to which somatropin therapy can also reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in GH-deficient adults remains to be determined. By starting with a low dose of somatropin, which is gradually increased based on clinical response (body composition, well-being, and serum insulin-like growth factor-1 concentration), effective treatment can be achieved with a minimum of fluid-related adverse effects. Thorough long-term monitoring of glucose metabolism, cardiovascular measurements, and underlying pituitary disease, is, however, mandatory.

Growth hormone administration and exercise effects on muscle fiber type and diameter in moderately frail older people

OBJECTIVE

Reduced muscle mass and strength are characteristic findings of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and aging. We evaluated measures of muscle strength, muscle fiber type, and cross sectional area in response to treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) with or without a structured resistance exercise program in frail older subjects.

DESIGN

Placebo-controlled, randomized, double blind trial.

SETTING

Outpatient clinical research center at an urban university-affiliated teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-one consenting older subjects (mean age 71.3 +/- 4.5 years) recruited as a subset of a larger project evaluating rhGH and exercise in older people, who underwent 62 quadricep-muscle biopsies.

INTERVENTION

Random assignment to a 6-month course of one of four protocols: rhGH administered subcutaneously daily at bedtime, rhGH and a structured resistance exercise program, structured resistance exercise with placebo injections, or placebo injections only.

MEASUREMENTS

Muscle biopsy specimens were obtained from the vastus lateralis muscle. Isokinetic dynamometry strength tests were used to monitor individual progress and to adjust the weights used in the exercise program. Serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) was measured and body composition was measured using a Hologic QDR 1000W dual X-ray densitometer.

RESULTS

The administration of rhGH resulted in significant increase in circulating IGF-I levels in the individuals receiving rhGH treatment. Muscle strength increased significantly in both the rhGH/exercise (+55.6%, P =.0004) as well as the exercise alone (+47.8%, P =.0005) groups. There was a significant increase in the proportion of type 2 fibers between baseline and six months in the combined rhGH treated subjects versus those not receiving rhGH (P =.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are encouraging in that they suggest an effect of growth hormone on a specific aging-correlated deficit. IGF-I was increased by administrating rhGH and muscle strength was increased by exercise. The administration of rhGH to frail older individuals in this study resulted in significant changes in the proportions of fiber types. Whether changes in fiber cross-sectional area or absolute number occur with long-term growth hormone administration requires further study.

Growth hormone and exercise: physiology, use and abuse

This review summarizes the interactions between growth hormone (GH) and exercise. Exercise has profound effects upon the GH-insulin-like growth factor I axis per se. In addition, there is increasing evidence that such physiological perturbations might be influential in the performance responses to repeated training. However, the ergogenic effects of systemic administration of recombinant human GH by athletes and bodybuilders remain unproven. What is certain is that the prevalence of GH abuse by sportspeople will increase, not least because it is currently undetectable. The frequent and potentially severe side-effects associated with such 'doping' will be of increasing relevance to endocrinologists.

Growth hormone replacement in adults with growth hormone deficiency: assessment of current knowledge

The recent availability of recombinant human growth hormone (GH) has led to intense investigation of the consequences of adult GH deficiency (GHD) and the effects of GH replacement. These studies have led to the identification of a characteristic syndrome of GHD consisting of decreased mood and well-being, with alterations in body composition and substrate metabolism. In both placebo-controlled and open studies, GH replacement therapy has consistently been shown to reverse or correct these features. Whether long-term GH replacement will result in a reduction of osteoporotic fractures, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is not yet known. To date, no permanent serious adverse effects have been associated with GH replacement in GHD, and although currently expensive, it is anticipated that GH replacement will become routine in the treatment of the severely hypopituitary adult.

Growth hormone therapy for hypopituitary adults: time for re-appraisal

The advent of the production of large quantities of recombinant growth hormone (GH) has made it possible to have sufficient material to assess its efficacy in adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Although some studies have shown that patients who are severely deficient benefit from GH therapy, the spectrum of GHD is broad, and the degree of deficiency at times is very difficult to define. In some cases, benefit is not easily quantified, and some studies have claimed benefits that, although statistically significant, are either not clinically important or are so marginal as to be questionable in terms of cost, difficulty of administration and potential risks. The purpose here is to identify the current problems in the diagnosis of GHD, to discuss the rationale for GH therapy and to assess the potential effects of GHD as well as the benefits of GH therapy in GHD adults. We will include a commentary as to which effects appear more robust than others and which are likely to result in the greatest patient benefit. Finally, some attention will be paid to long-term safety issues that should be monitored to ensure that this medication is safe even for the patients with the greatest need.

[Growth hormone deficiency. Treatment with growth hormone and body composition]

Increased fat mass, decreased lean mass, muscular mass and bone mineral density are characteristic of the body composition in GH deficiency, GH treatment reverses these abnormalities. Body composition was determined in 20 young adults with GHD diagnosed in childhood, whose GH treatment was stopped 1 year earlier. Reevaluation of GH secretion in these patients showed that 12 remained GH deficient (confirmed GHD) while eight recovered normal GH secretion (transient GHD). One year after stopping the GH treatment, patients with confirmed GHD showed an increased fat mass as compared with value at the end of the treatment; in addition a decreased bone mineral content was observed in the patients with low physical activity. There was no increased fat mass in transient GHD; however, these patients presented with low bone mineral content, as previously reported in adults with history of delayed growth and adolescence.

Effects of growth hormone on bone and muscle

The decade since the initial availability of recombinant growth hormone (GH) has seen an increase in our understanding of the effects of GH on muscle and bone. Adult GH deficiency (GHD) is associated with osteopenia, the severity of which is related to three factors: the timing, age of onset and severity of GHD. Epidemiological data suggest that this osteopenia is associated with an increased risk of fracture. The impact of GH replacement therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) appears to be related to a large number of interrelated factors, including the dose and duration of therapy, timing of onset of GHD, skeletal site, degree of osteopenia at baseline, and age and gender of the patient. Overall, the effect of GH replacement on BMD in the majority of patients is beneficial. As yet, however, no data are available that demonstrate a reduction in fracture rate following GH therapy. In comparison with normal individuals, GH-deficient individuals have reduced lean body mass and muscle strength, both of which increase within 12 months of GH therapy. Therefore, the effects of GH replacement on muscle and bone in GH-deficient individuals are significant and beneficial, although the longer-term effects of GH replacement in terms of reducing the number of fractures and prevention of frailty in old age are not yet established. The effects of GH on bone and muscle in GH-replete individuals have been studied less fully. While GH therapy modulates markers of bone resorption and formation, its effects in patients with idiopathic osteoporosis are disappointing, with oestrogen therapy or bisphosphonates proving to be more effective in post-menopausal women. To date, however, there have been no GH treatment trials of adequate duration (longer than 18 months), and it remains possible that longer-term trials may demonstrate more profound effects. The effects of GH therapy on muscle have been examined in normal elderly individuals. Generally, the doses used have been supraphysiological and associated with an unacceptable incidence of side-effects. GH therapy has resulted in an increase in lean body mass, but functional ability and strength have not improved in the majority of studies. Thus, clear-cut beneficial effects of GH on muscle and bone in GH-replete individuals have not been demonstrated. It seems unlikely that normal elderly individuals will benefit significantly from GH therapy, but frail individuals or those with musculoskeletal or neuromuscular pathology are potential candidates for study.