Monitoring of acromegaly: what should be performed when GH and IGF-1 levels are discrepant?

Pseudoacromegaly-A challenging entity in the endocrine clinic: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Pseudoacromegaly encompasses conditions with features of acromegaly/gigantism, but no growth hormone (GH) or insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) excess. We aimed to review published pseudoacromegaly cases evaluated due to clinical suspicion of acromegaly.

DESIGN/PATIENTS

PubMed/Medline search was conducted to identify reported pseudoacromegaly cases, which were systematically reviewed to ensure they met eligibility criteria: (1) presentation suggestive of acromegaly; (2) acromegaly excluded based on normal GH, IGF-1 and/or GH suppression on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT-GH); (3) diagnosis of the pseudoacromegaly condition was established. Data were retrieved from each case and analysed collectively.

RESULTS

Of 76 cases, 47 were males, mean ages at presentation and at first acromegaloid symptoms were 28 ± 16 and 17 ± 10 years, respectively. Most common conditions were pachydermoperiostosis (47%) and insulin-mediated pseudoacromegaly (IMP) (24%). Acromegaloid facies (75%) and acral enlargement (80%) were the most common features. Measurement of random GH was reported in 65%, IGF-1 in 79%, OGTT-GH in 51%. GH excess was more frequently excluded based on two tests (53%). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 30 patients, with pituitary adenoma or hyperplasia being reported in eight and three patients, respectively. Investigations differed between cases managed by endocrine and non-endocrine specialists, the former requesting more often IGF-1, OGTT-GH and pituitary MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudoacromegaly is a challenging entity that may be encountered by endocrinologists. Pachydermoperiostosis and IMP are the conditions most often mimicking acromegaly. Adequate assessment of GH/IGF-1 is crucial to exclude acromegaly, which may be better performed by endocrinologists. Pituitary incidentalomas are common and require careful judgement to prevent unnecessary pituitary surgery.

Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission

PURPOSE

The 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

Fifty-six acromegaly experts from 16 countries reviewed and discussed current evidence focused on biochemical assays; criteria for diagnosis and the role of imaging, pathology, and clinical assessments; consequences of diagnostic delay; criteria for remission and recommendations for follow up; and the value of assessment and monitoring in defining disease progression, selecting appropriate treatments, and maximizing patient outcomes.

RESULTS

In a patient with typical acromegaly features, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I > 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis. Random growth hormone (GH) measured after overnight fasting may be useful for informing prognosis, but is not required for diagnosis. For patients with equivocal results, IGF-I measurements using the same validated assay can be repeated, and oral glucose tolerance testing might also be useful. Although biochemical remission is the primary assessment of treatment outcome, biochemical findings should be interpreted within the clinical context of acromegaly. Follow up assessments should consider biochemical evaluation of treatment effectiveness, imaging studies evaluating residual/recurrent adenoma mass, and clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly, its complications, and comorbidities. Referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology, or imaging findings at diagnosis, and for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

Consensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease.

Position statement on the diagnosis and management of acromegaly: The French National Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol (NDTP)

Acromegaly is a rare disease with prevalence of approximately 60 cases per million, slight female predominance and peak onset in adults in the fourth decade. Clinical diagnosis is often delayed by several years due to the slowly progressive onset of symptoms. There are multiple clinical criteria that define acromegaly: dysmorphic syndrome of insidious onset, symptoms related to the pituitary tumor (headaches, visual disorders), general signs (sweating, carpal tunnel syndrome, joint pain, etc.), complications of the disease (musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, pneumological, dental, metabolic comorbidities, thyroid nodules, colonic polyps, etc.) or sometimes clinical signs of associated prolactin hypersecretion (erectile dysfunction in men or cycle disorder in women) or concomitant mass-induced hypopituitarism (fatigue and other symptoms related to pituitary hormone deficiencies). Biological confirmation is based initially on elevated IGF-I and lack of GH suppression on oral glucose tolerance test or an elevated mean GH on repeated measurements. In confirmed cases, imaging by pituitary MRI identifies the causal tumor, to best determine management. In a minority of cases, acromegaly can be linked to a genetic predisposition, especially when it occurs at a young age or in a familial context. The first-line treatment is most often surgical removal of the somatotroph pituitary tumor, either immediately or after transient medical treatment. Medical treatments are most often proposed in patients not controlled by surgical removal. Conformal or stereotactic radiotherapy may be discussed on a case-by-case basis, especially in case of drug inefficacy or poor tolerance. Acromegaly should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, preferably within an expert center such as a reference or skill center for rare pituitary diseases.

Impact of Variation between Assays and Reference Intervals in the Diagnosis of Endocrine Disorders

Method-related variations in the measurement of hormones and the reference intervals used in the clinical laboratory can have a significant, but often under-appreciated, impact on the diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders. This variation in laboratory practice has the potential to lead to an errant approach to patient care and thus could cause harm. It may also be the source of confusion or result in excessive or inadequate investigation. It is important that laboratory professionals and clinicians know about these impacts, their sources, and how to detect and mitigate them when they do arise. In this review article, we describe the historical and scientific context from which inconsistency in the clinical laboratory arises. Examples from the published literature of the impact of the method, reference interval, and clinical decision threshold-related discordances on the assessment and monitoring of various endocrine disorders are discussed to illustrate the sources, causes, and effects of this variability. Its potential impact on the evaluation of growth hormone deficiency and excess, thyroid and parathyroid disorders, hyperandrogenism, hypogonadism, glucocorticoid excess and deficiency, and diabetes mellitus is elaborated. Strategies for assessment and mitigation of the discordance are discussed. The clinical laboratory has a responsibility to recognise and address these issues, and although a lot has been accomplished in this area already, there remains more to be done.

Interpreting growth hormone and IGF-I results using modern assays and reference ranges for the monitoring of treatment effectiveness in acromegaly

Standard treatment for acromegaly focuses on the achievement of target absolute levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I). The appropriateness of these targets when measured using modern assay methods is not well defined. This paper reviews biochemical status assessed using methods available at the time and associated clinical outcomes. GH measurements were shown to provide an indication of changes in tumor size, and failure of GH suppression after glucose stimulation is associated with tumor recurrence. IGF-I levels were more closely associated with changes in symptoms and signs. Reduced GH and IGF-I concentrations were shown to be associated with increased longevity, although the degree of increase has only been analyzed for GH. Lowering of GH and IGF-I has consistently been associated with improved outcomes; however, absolute levels reported in previous studies were based on results from methods and reference ranges that are now obsolete. Applying previously described absolute thresholds as targets (e.g. "normal" IGF-I level) when using current methods is best applied to those with active acromegaly symptoms who could benefit from further lowering of biochemical markers. In asymptomatic individuals with mild IGF-I or GH elevations, targeting biochemical "normalization" would result in the need for combination pharmacotherapy in many patients without proven benefit. Measurement of both GH and IGF-I remains an essential component of diagnosis and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment in acromegaly; however, treatment goals based only on previously identified absolute thresholds are not appropriate without taking into account the assay and reference ranges being employed. Treatment goals should be individualized considering biochemical improvement from an untreated baseline, symptoms of disease, risks, burdens and costs of complex treatment regimens, comorbidities, and quality of life.

A retrospective study of the role of hypercapnia in patients with acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is a multisystemic disease characterized by an excessive release of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common consequence of acromegaly, and hypercapnia is frequently observed in patients with acromegaly, OSA, and obesity. However, the effects of hypercapnia on acromegaly remain unknown. This study was designed to investigate whether there are differences in clinical symptoms, sleep variables, and biochemical remission after surgery for acromegaly in patients with OSA with or without hypercapnia.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted involving patients with acromegaly and OSA. The pharmacotherapy history for acromegaly before surgery, anthropometric measures, blood gas, sleep monitoring data, and biochemical assays of hypercapnic and eucapnic individuals were collected 1-2 weeks before surgery. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for failed postoperative biochemical remission.

RESULTS

In this study, 94 patients with OSA and acromegaly were included. Among them, 25 (26.6%) had hypercapnia. The hypercapnic group had higher body mass index (92% vs. 62.3%; p = 0.005) and poorer nocturnal hypoxemia index. No serological differences were found between the two groups. According to the post-surgery GH level, 52 patients (55.3%) reached biochemical remission. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR], 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-6.55), instead of hypercapnia (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.24-1.58), was associated with lower remission rates. Patients who received pharmacotherapy for acromegaly before surgery (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.79) and had higher thyroid-stimulating hormone levels (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88) were more likely to have biochemical remission after surgery. Multivariate analysis further showed that only diabetes mellitus (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.15-9.46) and preoperative pharmacotherapy (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83) remained significant. Hypercapnia, hormone levels, and sleep indicators had no effect on biochemical remission after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-center evidence shows that hypercapnia alone may not be a risk factor for lower biochemical remission rates. Correcting hypercapnia does not appear to be required before surgery. More evidence is needed to further support this conclusion.

Gene expression profiling of subcutaneous adipose tissue reveals new biomarkers in acromegaly

CONTEXT

Active acromegaly is characterized by lipolysis-induced insulin resistance, which suggests adipose tissue (AT) as a primary driver of metabolic aberrations.

OBJECTIVE

To study the gene expression landscape in AT in patients with acromegaly before and after disease control in order to understand the changes and to identify disease-specific biomarkers.

METHODS

RNA sequencing was performed on paired subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) biopsies from six patients with acromegaly at time of diagnosis and after curative surgery. Clustering and pathway analyses were performed in order to identify disease activity-dependent genes. In a larger patient cohort (n = 23), the corresponding proteins were measured in serum by immunoassay. Correlations between growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), visceral AT (VAT), SAT, total AT, and serum proteins were analyzed.

RESULTS

743 genes were significantly differentially expressed (P-adjusted < .05) in SAT before and after disease control. The patients clustered according to disease activity. Pathways related to inflammation, cell adhesion and extracellular matrix, GH and insulin signaling, and fatty acid oxidation were differentially expressed.Serum levels of HTRA1, METRNL, S100A8/A9, and PDGFD significantly increased after disease control (P < .05). VAT correlated with HTRA1 (R = 0.73) and S100A8/A9 (R = 0.55) (P < .05 for both).

CONCLUSION

AT in active acromegaly is associated with a gene expression profile of fibrosis and inflammation, which may corroborate the hyper-metabolic state and provide a means for identifying novel biomarkers.

Development and evaluation of the Acromegaly Symptom Diary

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are important to consider when evaluating treatments, yet there are no PRO measures for patients with acromegaly that have been developed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration guidance. Acromegaly is a rare, chronic condition caused by hypersecretion of growth hormone. Disease activity is monitored by measurement in serum of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I. The objectives of this research were to develop the Acromegaly Symptom Diary (ASD), establish a scoring algorithm, and evaluate the psychometric measurement properties of the ASD.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews consisting of concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing components were conducted with 16 adult participants with acromegaly. The concept elicitation component identified symptoms important to individuals with acromegaly. The cognitive debriefing component gathered information about the participants' experience with each proposed item of the ASD, their thought process for answering each question, and their interpretation of the items. The psychometric properties of the draft ASD were then evaluated using data from the ACROBAT Evolve (NCT03792555; n = 13) and ACROBAT Edge (NCT03789656; n = 47) clinical trials.

RESULTS

The 16 participants from the interviews described ongoing symptoms, with the most frequently reported being joint pain (n = 13) and fatigue (n = 12), followed by swelling (n = 8), headache (n = 7), and mood swings (n = 6), and were able to interpret and understand the ASD items and had no issues with the 24-hour recall period. From data collected in the clinical studies, the psychometric properties of internal consistency (0.91 - 0.80), test-retest reliability with item-level and total ASD scores (> 0.70), baseline construct validity (r ≥ |0.38|) across scales, and responsiveness to change (r = 0.52-0.56) were supported for the ASD. The proposed preliminary threshold range to characterize a meaningful change from the patients' perspective for the ASD total is a 4- to 6-point change for improvement or worsening out of a total score of 70.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide qualitative and quantitative evidence to support the ASD as fit for the purpose of evaluating the symptom experience of patients with acromegaly in clinical trials.

Acromegaly-related cutis verticis gyrata

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a disorder caused by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH), resulting in excessive levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and almost always due to a pituitary tumor. It is classically associated with acral enlargement, prominent facial features and soft tissue overgrowth. Skin manifestations include hirsutism, acne, skin tags, oily skin and acanthosis nigricans. However, other uncommon dermatological features, such as cutis verticis gyrata (CVG), may also occur. Here, we review acromegaly-related CVG aiming to raise awareness for its possible occurrence in this setting, and we discuss its pathophysiology, presentation, management and differential diagnosis.

DESIGN

A comprehensive literature search regarding CVG, particularly CVG related to acromegaly, has been carried out. Case reports, original studies and review papers, were considered.

RESULTS

CVG is a rare benign skin lesion characterized by thickened and folded scalp, resembling the brain gyri and sulci. The diagnosis of CVG mainly relies on clinical examination, although tissue biopsy may be necessary in case of uncertain etiology. In acromegaly, CVG appears to be driven by the trophic effects of GH and IGF-1 on skin and soft tissues. While CVG is uncommon in acromegaly, it seems to occur more frequently in male patients. The management of acromegaly-related CVG essentially relies on controlling the serum levels of GH and IGF-1. Surgical skin procedures should be reserved for patients with severe aesthetic distress, after achieving the best possible control of acromegaly.

CONCLUSIONS

CVG is a rare manifestation of acromegaly that may allow an earlier diagnosis and a swifter treatment of these patients, which in turn may improve or entirely reverse such remarkable skin lesions.

Biochemical discrepancies in the evaluation of the somatotroph axis: Elevated GH or IGF-1 levels do not always diagnose acromegaly

The most frequent diagnosis underlying the finding of an elevated growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is acromegaly due to a GH-secreting pituitary tumour. However, GH and IGF-1 levels can be discordant in patients with acromegaly due to early or partially treated disease, or there might be another cause of high GH or high IGF-1 unrelated to acromegaly, such as pre-analytical and technical pitfalls, physiological circumstances and pathological conditions. High GH and normal or low serum IGF-1, or alternatively, normal GH with elevated serum IGF-1, should be carefully assessed to avoid misinterpreting the activity of acromegaly or misdiagnosing a patient with acromegaly. We summarise here these biochemical discrepancies in the evaluation of the somatotroph axis.

The biochemical diagnosis of acromegaly: revising the role of measurement of IGF-I and GH after glucose load in 5 questions

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a rare disorder characterized by the excessive secretion of growth hormone (GH), mostly caused by pituitary adenomas. While in full-blown cases the diagnosis is easy to establish, milder cases are more challenging. Additionally, establishing whether full cure after surgery is reached may be difficult.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we will review the challenges posed by the variability in measurements of GH and its main effector insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) due to both biological changes, co-morbidities, and assays variability.

EXPERT OPINION

Interpretation of GH and IGF-I assays is important in establishing an early diagnosis of acromegaly, in avoiding misdiagnosis, and in establishing if cure is achieved by surgery. Physicians should be familiar with the variables that affect measurements of these 2 hormones, and with the performance of the assays available in their practice.

[Discordant parameters of insulin-like growth factor 1 and growth hormone in the diagnosis and monitoring of acromegaly]

Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disorder associated with multiple complications and increased mortality. Timely diagnosis and adequate treatment can bring the life expectancy of patients with acromegaly closer to the general population level. The tests for the diagnosis of acromegaly are measurement of both serum GH, and GH after oral glucose administration; serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). However, in clinical practice, up to 39% of patients with discordant results are found. The patients with discordant GH and IGF-1levels, are the most difficult to manage. This review discusses the prevalence of discordant GH and IGF-1 outcomes in patients with acromegaly; factors causing this discrepancy; the impact of hormone levels on treatment outcomes. Although endocrinologists are used to dealing with this discrepancy in clinical practice for many years, discordant patients'outcome remains uncertain and undefined The optimal treatment should be individually tailored for each patient, taking into account all clinical parameters.

GH and IGF-I levels and tumor shrinkage in response to first generation somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly: a comparative study between two reference centers for pituitary diseases in Brazil

PURPOSE

To compare biochemical and tumor response rates between two reference centers for pituitary diseases in Brazil after primary and adjuvant therapy with somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) in acromegaly.

METHODS

Patients were classified as non-responders (NR), partial responders (PR), and full responders (FR) to 12-month SRL therapy according to: [criteria A] normal IGF-I and random GH (rGH) < 1 ng/mL (FR); ≥ 50% decrease of IGF-I and/or rGH (PR); < 50% decrease of IGF-I and rGH (NR); [criteria B] normal IGF-I (FR); ≥ 50% decrease of IGF-I (PR); < 50% decrease of IGF-I (NR). Tumor shrinkage <20% defined poor responders (tPR) and ≥ 20% good responders (tGR).

RESULTS

We studied 219 acromegaly patients (59% women, age 43.1 ± 13.9 years; 73 from Center I and 146 from Center II). After SRL therapy, the proportion of FR, PR, and NR by criteria A and B was 30.2 vs 49.1%, 52.8 vs 21.2% and 17 vs 29.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Considering criteria A or B separately, there was no difference in the proportion of FR, PR and NR between two centers. However, when comparing criteria A and B, the Center I showed a difference of 30.9% in classification of FR in relation to 13.2% observed in Center II (p = 0.006). tGR were 51.4% of patients, with no differences between the centers.

CONCLUSIONS

IGF-I alone significantly increased positive response rates to SRLs, whereas the inclusion of rGH levels into therapeutic decision might lead to a significant increment on the costs of acromegaly management.

Early postoperative prediction of both disease remission and long-term disease control in acromegaly using the oral glucose tolerance test

PURPOSE

Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is the cornerstone of acromegaly treatment. Two biochemical parameters, growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, sometimes diverge postoperatively; however, it is important to maintain disease control without further treatment, regardless of whether these parameters converge. This study investigated whether remission and long-term disease control could be predicted using early postoperative GH and IGF-1 levels.

METHODS

We reviewed 36 consecutive surgically treated patients with acromegaly. IGF-1 levels and minimum GH levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were evaluated at 2 weeks, as well as at 3 months postoperatively. After comparison between the remission and nonremission groups, we analyzed whether early postoperative parameters could predict remission and long-term disease control.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (69.4%, Group A) achieved remission within 1 year postoperatively. Of the remaining patients (median follow-up period, 53 months), seven (19.5%, Group B) maintained normal IGF-1 levels without treatment, whereas four (11.1%, Group C) required additional treatment. GH levels <1.5 ng/mL measured on the morning after surgery and nadir GH levels <0.7 ng/mL during the OGTT conducted at 2 weeks postoperatively were predictive of remission, with the latter demonstrating 95.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. All group C patients had nadir GH levels ≥0.7 ng/mL during the OGTT and IGF-1 levels ≥SD +3 at 2 weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative nadir GH levels during the OGTT and IGF-1 levels at 2 weeks postoperatively demonstrated excellent predictive value for both endocrinological remission and the necessity for additional treatment.

Revisiting the Role of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Measurement After Surgical Treatment of Acromegaly

CONTEXT

In the management of growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas, the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has been the gold standard not only for diagnoses but also for the determination of biochemical remission. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is an essential biomarker, although it should be adjusted for both age and sex.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated whether IGF-1 levels could serve as a reliable alternative to an OGTT for disease monitoring after the surgical treatment of acromegaly. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 320 patients who underwent surgical resection of their GH-secreting pituitary tumors at the Severance hospital. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to validate the accuracy of IGF-1 levels for the assessment of remission. In addition, regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with discrepancy between OGTT and IGF-1 levels.

RESULTS

Except for 1 week after surgery, ROC analyses showed an area under the curve of greater than 0.8 for IGF-1 at all time points. Of 320 patients, 270 achieved endocrine remission after surgery alone. Among these patients, IGF-1 levels were normalized in 250 patients. The mean duration from surgery to IGF-1 normalization was 4.7 months. Regression analyses demonstrated that risk of failed IGF-1 normalization was increased by 3.1-fold when the tumor invaded the cavernous sinus and increased by 9.0-fold in patients with incomplete tumor removal.

CONCLUSION

IGF-1 level is a reliable alternative to OGTT and plays a valuable role in monitoring acromegaly status.

Discordant GH and IGF-1 Results in Treated Acromegaly: Impact of GH Cutoffs and Mean Values Assessment

CONTEXT

Discordant growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) values are frequent in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of different GH cutoffs on discordance rate. To investigate whether the mean of consecutive GH measurements impacts discordance rate when matched to the last available IGF-1 value.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Referral center for pituitary diseases.

PATIENTS

Ninety acromegaly patients with at least 3 consecutive evaluations for GH and IGF-1 using the same assay in the same laboratory (median follow-up 13 years).

INTERVENTIONS

Multimodal treatment of acromegaly.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Single fasting GH (GHf) and IGF-1 (IGF-1f). Mean of 3 GH measurements (GHm), collected during consecutive routine patients' evaluations.

RESULTS

At last evaluation GHf values were 1.99 ± 2.79 µg/L and age-adjusted IGF-1f was 0.86 ± 0.44 × upper limit of normality (mean ± SD). The discordance rate using GHf was 52.2% (cutoff 1 µg/L) and 35.6% (cutoff 2.5 µg/L) (P = 0.025). "High GH" discordance was more common for GHf <1.0 µg/L, while "high IGF-1" was predominant for GHf <2.5 µg/L (P < 0.0001). Using GHm mitigated the impact of GH cutoffs on discordance (GHm <1.0 µg/L: 43.3%; GHm <2.5 µg/L: 38.9%; P = 0.265). At receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, both GHf and GHm were poor predictors of IGF-1f normalization (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.611 and AUC = 0.645, respectively). The prevalence of disease-related comorbidities did not significantly differ between controlled, discordant, and active disease patients.

DISCUSSION

GH/IGF-1 discordance strongly depends on GH cutoffs. The use of GHm lessen the impact of GH cutoffs. Measurement of fasting GH levels (both GHf and GHm) is a poor predictor of IGF-1f normalization in our cohort.

Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Biochemical Response to First-Line Treatment With Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly: A Real-Life Perspective

BACKGROUND

First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) represent the first-line medical treatment for acromegaly, recommended in patients with persistent disease after neurosurgery, or when surgical approach is not feasible. Despite the lack of strong recommendations from guidelines and consensus statements, data from national Registries report an increasing use of medical therapy as first-line treatment in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively evaluated the potential role of a large number of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the biochemical response to 6-month treatment with fg-SRLs, in a cohort of naïve acromegaly patients referred to a single tertiary center for pituitary diseases.

METHODS

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analyses were performed. Biochemical response was defined based on IGF-1 levels, represented as both categorical (tight control, control, >50% reduction) and continuous (linear % reduction) variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (33 females, median age 57 years) were included in the study. At univariable logistic regression analysis, we found that younger age (≤ 40 years; OR 0.04, p=0.045) and higher BMI (OR 0.866, p=0.034) were associated with a lower chance of achieving >50% IGF-1 reduction. On the contrary, higher IGF-1 xULN values at diagnosis (OR 2.304, p=0.007) and a T2-hypointense tumor (OR 18, p=0.017) were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of achieving >50% IGF-1 reduction after SRL therapy. Of note, dichotomized age, IGF1 xULN at diagnosis, and T2-hypointense signal of the tumor were retained as significant predictors by our multivariable logistic regression model. Furthermore, investigating the presence of predictors to the linear % IGF-1 reduction, we found a negative association with younger age (≤ 40 years; β -0.533, p<0.0001), while a positive association was observed with both IGF-1 xULN levels at diagnosis (β 0.330, p=0.018) and the presence of a T2-hypointense pituitary tumor (β 0.466, p=0.019). All these variables were still significant predictors at multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Dichotomized age, IGF-1 levels at diagnosis, and tumor T2-weighted signal are reliable predictors of both >50% IGF-1 reduction and linear % IGF-1 reduction after 6 month fg-SRL treatment in naïve acromegaly patients. These parameters should be considered in the light of an individualized treatment for acromegaly patients.

Maintenance of Acromegaly Control in Patients Switching From Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands to Oral Octreotide

PURPOSE

The phase 3 CHIASMA OPTIMAL trial (NCT03252353) evaluated efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules (OOCs) in patients with acromegaly who previously demonstrated biochemical control while receiving injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs).

METHODS

In this double-blind study, patients (N = 56) stratified by prior SRL dose were randomly assigned 1:1 to OOC or placebo for 36 weeks. The primary end point was maintenance of biochemical control at the end of treatment (mean insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1] ≤ 1.0 × upper limit of normal [ULN]; weeks 34 and 36). Time to loss of IGF-1 response and proportion requiring reversion to injectable SRLs were assessed as broader control measures.

RESULTS

Mean IGF-1 measurements were 0.80 and 0.97 × ULN for OOC and 0.84 and 1.69 × ULN for placebo, at baseline and end of treatment, respectively. Mean growth hormone (GH) changed from 0.66 to 0.60 ng/mL for OOCs and 0.90 to 2.57 ng/mL for placebo. Normalization of IGF-1 levels (≤ 1.0 × ULN) was maintained in 58.2% for OOCs vs 19.4% for placebo (P = .008); GH levels were maintained (< 2.5 ng/mL) in 77.7% for OOC vs 30.4% for placebo (P = .0007). Median time to loss of response (IGF-1 > 1.0 or ≥ 1.3 × ULN definitions) for patients receiving placebo was 16 weeks; for patients receiving OOCs, it was not reached for both definitions during the 36-week trial (P < .0001). Of the patients in the OOC group, 75% completed the trial on oral therapy. The OOC safety profile was consistent with previous SRL experience.

CONCLUSIONS

OOCs may be an effective therapy for patients with acromegaly who previously were treated with injectable SRLs.

ACROMEGALY AND A GIANT RETROPERITONEAL LIPOSARCOMA PRODUCING IGF-1

Objective

Liposarcoma is the most common histotype of retroperitoneal sarcomas, representing up to 45% of all cases. We report a rare combination of acromegaly and liposarcoma in the same individual.

Methods

Laboratory and imaging studies including an oral glucose tolerance test, measurements of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and a computed tomography scan were performed.

Results

The patient was a 60-year-old male with a history of acromegaly diagnosed on the basis of elevated IGF-1 at 1,373 ng/mL (age-appropriate reference range is 87 to 225 ng/mL) and macroadenoma treated with transsphenoidal surgery. He presented 8 years later with a history of abdominal distension and weight loss. Physical examination was notable for a right-sided abdominal mass that was tense and non-fluctuant. Two years earlier, he had a post oral glucose tolerance test GH level <0.25 ng/mL and IGF-1 level of 256 ng/mL (age-appropriate reference range is 55 to 206 ng/mL). Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging reported a 3.7 × 2.0-mm left-sided parasagittal lesion. Computed tomography scan showed a 25.0 × 22.0 × 32.3-cm heterogeneous giant mass in the right abdomen corresponding to a liposarcoma causing displacement of kidney, liver, and bowel loops. The patient was treated with a complete en bloc resection of the liposarcoma with the right kidney (45 × 33 × 17 cm) and tumor (9,400 g). Immunohistochemical examination revealed positive IGF-1 and GH staining. The patient suffered postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding that resulted in hemorrhagic shock and died on the 29th postoperative day after a cardiorespiratory arrest.

Conclusion

Acromegalic patients are at increased risk of developing various types of neoplasms. This is the first documented coexistence of liposarcoma and history of acromegaly.

Random Gh and Igf-I levels after transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: relation with long-term remission

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of IGF-I and random GH measurements 3 months after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) in predicting long-term remission in acromegaly patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 54 acromegaly patients who underwent TSS with the same neurosurgery team. Random GH and IGF-I values evaluated 3 months after TSS were related to long-term outcomes. The initiation of adjuvant therapy at any time defined surgical failure.

RESULTS

At 3 months, 14 (25.9%) patients had controlled disease (CD; normal IGF-I and GH < 1.0 µg/L), 25 (46.3%) had uncontrolled disease (UD; high IGF-I and GH), and 15 (27.8%) had biochemical discrepancies (BD): 12 BDI (normal IGF-I + GH ≥ 1.0 μg/L) and 3 BDII (high IGF-I + GH < 1.0 μg/L). All patients of the CD group, 2 of the UD, 11 of the BDI, and 2 of the BDII, progressed with long-term remission and had IGF-I ≤ 1.25-fold the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), in contrast with all cases of surgical failure where IGF-I was ≥1.3-fold ULN. Only one patient with normal IGF-I had recurrence, resulting in 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity of post-surgical IGF-I ≤ 1.25-fold ULN to predict long-term remission, observed in 54% of our cohort. Post-surgical random GH ≥ 1.7 µg/L was the best cutoff to identify surgical failure, but its accuracy to predict long-term outcomes was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

IGF-I levels ≤ 1.25-fold ULN 3 months after TSS was the best guide for long-term remission in acromegaly patients with both initial surgical failure and discrepant biochemical results.

Biochemical Control in Acromegaly With Multimodality Therapies: Outcomes From a Pituitary Center and Changes Over Time

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) normalization with long-term multimodality therapy in a pituitary center and to assess changes over time.

METHODS

Patients with acromegaly (N = 409), with ≥1 year of data after surgery and at least 2 subsequent clinic visits were included in long-term analysis (N = 266). Biochemical data, clinical characteristics, and therapeutic interventions were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, mean [standard deviation] age was 43.4 [14.3] years, body mass index was 28.5 (24.9-32.1) kg/m2 (median, interquartile range), serum IGF-1 index (IGF-1 level/upper limit of normal) was 2.3 [1.7-3.1], and 80.5% had macroadenomas. Patients with transsphenoidal surgery after 2006 were older [46.6 ± 14.3 vs 40.0 ± 13.4 years; P < 0.001]. Age and tumor size correlated inversely. Overall (N = 266), 93.2% achieved a normal IGF-1 level during 9.9 [5.0-15.0] years with multimodality therapy. The interval to first normal IGF-1 level following failed surgical remission was shorter after 2006: 14.0 (95% confidence interval, 10.0-20.0) versus 27.5 (22.0-36.0) months (P = 0.002). Radiation therapy and second surgery were rarer after 2006: 28 (22%) versus 62 (47.0%); P < 0.001 and 12 (9.4%) versus 28 (21.2%); P = 0.010, respectively. Age at diagnosis increased over time periods, possibly reflecting increased detection of acromegaly in older patients with milder disease. Male gender, older age, smaller tumor and lower IGF-1 index at diagnosis predicted long-term sustained IGF-1 control after surgery without adjuvant therapies.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of patients with acromegaly can be biochemically controlled with multimodality therapy in the current era. Radiotherapy and repeat pituitary surgery became less frequently utilized over time. Long-term postoperative IGF-1 control without use of adjuvant therapies has improved.

Fluctuation analysis of postoperative secretory status in patients operated for acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe endocrinological outcome in patients operated on for acromegaly.

METHODS

A retrospective study included 167 patients. Patients were assessed in the early postoperative period (EPP), at 3 months (M3), at 1 year (Y1), and then annually. They were classified as grade I (IGF-1 level normal-for-age and positive GH response on oral glucose tolerance test [nadir <0.4ng/L]); grade II (discordant); or grade III or IV (acromegaly, controlled or uncontrolled under medical therapy, respectively).

RESULTS

Taking all patients with all grades, 35% changed grades between EPP and M3, 26% between M3 and Y1 and 9% after Y1. In grade I, respectively 22%, 15% and 2% of patients changed grades between EPP and M3, between M3 and Y1, and after Y1, compared to 31%, 6% and 6% in grade IV. Respectively 57%, 67%, and 47% of grade II patients changed grades between EPP and M3, between M3 and Y1, and after Y1; between EPP or M3 and last follow-up (>1 year), respectively 74% and 75% of grade II patients changed grades. Knosp category, resection quality and abnormal GH response (vs. abnormal IGF-1) significantly impacted grade II patients' outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas outcome in grades I and III-IV seems to be determined by 1 year, grade II discordant patients' outcome remains uncertain even after 1 year.

Correlation analysis between short-term insulin-like growth factor-I and glucose intolerance status after transsphenoidal adenomectomy in acromegalic patients: a large retrospective study from a single center in China

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to investigate the associations of glucose tolerance status with insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and other clinical laboratory parameters of acromegalic patients before and after the patients underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA) by conducting a single-center, retrospective study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 218 patients with acromegaly who had undergone TSA as the first treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Serum IGF-I, growth hormone (GH) and glucose levels were measured before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The follow-up levels for random GH, GH nadir, and the percentage of the upper limit of normal IGF-I (%ULN IGF-I) were decreased significantly. The percentages of normal (39.0%), early carbohydrate metabolism disorders (33.0%) and diabetes mellitus (28.0%) changed to 70.2%, 16.5% and 13.3%, respectively, after TSA. %ULN IGF-I at baseline was higher in the diabetes mellitus (DM) group than in the normal glucose tolerance group and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) /impaired fasting glucose (IFG) groups before TSA, and the DM group exhibited a greater reduction in %ULN IGF-I value after surgery. The follow-up %ULN IGF-I value after surgery was significantly lower in the improved group, and Pearson's correlation analysis revealed that the reductions in %ULN IGF-I corresponded with the reductions in glucose level.

CONCLUSION

This study examined the largest reported sample with complete preoperative and follow-up data. The results suggest that the age- and sex-adjusted IGF-I level, which reflects altered glucose metabolism, and the change of it are associated with improved glucose tolerance in acromegalic patients both before and after TSA.

SUBCLINICAL ACROMEGALY DUE TO A PITUITARY CYSTIC SOMATOTROPH ADENOMA

Objective

Excess growth hormone (GH) secretion from a cystic sellar lesion is rare. Indeed, there have been few cases of hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas with a cystic component.

Methods

We report a rare case of subclinical acromegaly that presented as a cystic sellar lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results

A 34-year-old Caucasian female presented with arthralgias, diaphoresis, paresthesias, cognitive slowing, headaches, presyncope, anxiety, and depression. She underwent evaluation by multiple providers without a diagnosis. Her physical examination was reportedly normal without evidence to suggest acromegaly. While she was undergoing workup for multiple sclerosis, a brain MRI scan revealed a cystic sellar lesion measuring approximately 1.6 × 0.9 cm approaching the optic chiasm. An insulin-like growth factor 1 level was incidentally screened months later and was elevated at 823 ng/mL (reference range is 69 to 227 ng/mL). A subsequent oral glucose tolerance test reported a growth hormone level of 7.5 ng/mL at its nadir (reference range is <1.0 ng/mL). Additional assessment of the pituitary axis reported normal levels of prolactin, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine, cosyntropin stimulation test, and a normal 24-hour urinary free cortisol collection. The patient underwent transsphenoidal surgery and her pathology reported a somatroph tumor that stained positive for GH and alpha subunit. No postsurgical complications were noted and postoperative MRIs did not demonstrate evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

Cystic pituitary adenomas can secret GH and may present with no classic clinical features of acromegaly. This case emphasizes the importance of a thorough hormonal evaluation in patients who present with a cystic pituitary incidentaloma.

Malaysian Consensus Statement for the Diagnosis and Management of Acromegaly

In Malaysia, acromegaly is under-recognised with only 10-15% of the expected number of cases from prevalence estimates, having been diagnosed and managed in established endocrine centres with access to multidisciplinary care. This is mainly due to lack of awareness and standardised approach in diagnosing this disease resulting in delay in diagnosis and management with suboptimal treatment outcomes. This first Malaysian consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of acromegaly addresses these issues and is based on current best practices and latest available evidence so as to reduce the disease burden on acromegaly patients managed in the Malaysian healthcare system.

Preoperative Fasting C-Peptide Acts as a Promising Predictor of Improved Glucose Tolerance in Patients With Acromegaly After Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 64 Cases From a Large Pituitary Center in China

Purpose: Abnormal glucose metabolism is one of the most frequent acromegaly complications. Improvement of glucose metabolism can be observed only in half of acromegaly patients after surgery. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for determining abnormal glucose metabolism before surgery in patients with acromegaly, and to explore the predictors of improved preoperative glucose intolerance after surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 64 patients who received transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. Growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and glucose metabolism were assessed before, immediately after, and 3 months after surgery. Glucose metabolic parameters included glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), plasma glucose (PG), C-peptide (CP), insulin (INS), and the indices of β-cell function, insulin sensitivity, and insulin resistance (IR). Results: Preoperatively, 18 patients (28.1%) had diabetes (DM), 34 (53.1%) had prediabetes (PreDM), and 12 (18.8%) had normal glucose tolerance (NGT). All the indices of pancreatic β-cell function were significantly lower in patients with DM than those with PreDM and NGT (all P < 0.005). IGF-1 was significantly positively correlated with insulin sensitivity and IR (P < 0.05), while GH was not. Postoperatively, glucose tolerance was improved in 71.2% of patients (37/52) with preoperative glucose intolerance. Insulin sensitivity was increased, while β-cell function and IR were decreased in most patients after surgery, regardless of whether their acromegaly achieved remission. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative fasting C-peptide (FCP, OR = 2.639, P = 0.022), disposition index (DI, OR = 1.397, P = 0.043) and Predictor-2 (OR = 0.578, P = 0.035) were determined to be the predictors for improved glucose tolerance status after surgery. Afterwards, through Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, FCP >2.445 ng/ml was the best independent predictor, with an 86.6% PPV (positive predictive value) and a 74.5% NPV (negative predictive value). Conclusions: Preoperative high FCP is a promising postsurgical predictor of improved glucose tolerance in patients with acromegaly. Oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) and HbA1c should be monitored regularly after surgery, and diabetes management should be adjusted based on the patient's latest glucose tolerance status.

Value of early postoperative random growth hormone levels and nadir growth hormone levels after oral glucose tolerance testing in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

There is no ideal marker to identify residual tumor tissue after surgery in patients with acromegaly. The purpose was to elucidate if early postoperative hormone testing gives reliable information regarding complete resection of a GH-producing pituitary adenoma.

DESIGN

Fourty-eight patients undergoing surgery for acromegaly from 04/2013-05/2014 were prospectively examined for random GH, IGF1, and GH levels after oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) in the early postoperative phase and on follow-up. Criterion for inclusion was a minimum follow-up of one year for each patient with respect to remission.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients showed GH suppression below 1 μg/l after OGTT in the early postoperative phase. Follow-up GH, IGF1 and OGTT tests confirmed the initial findings in 30 patients. The three remaining patients showed biochemical signs of persisting acromegaly. In the remaining 15 patients early postoperative GH suppression was above 1 μg/l. Of those, six patients went into remission during follow-up, nine patients without postoperative GH suppression <1 μg/l remained acromegalic.

CONCLUSIONS

GH suppression to <1 μg/l as well as random GH levels below 1 μg/l in the early postoperative phase seem to be of good positive predictive value for long-term remission. However, several patients without suppression of GH to <1 μg/l in the early postoperative OGTT went into delayed remission. These results have to be taken into account prior to initiation of further therapy.

Silent somatotroph pituitary adenomas: an update

Silent growth hormone adenomas (SGHA) are a rare entity of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Diagnosis is invariably made post-operatively of a tumor immunopositive for GH (and Pit-1 in selected cases) but without clinical acromegaly. Mainly young females are affected, and tumors are often uncovered by investigation for headaches or oligoamenorrhea. Integration of clinical, pathological and biochemical data is required for proper diagnosis. Beside normal IGF-1 levels, a third of SGHAs displays elevated GH levels and some will eventually progress to acromegaly. Almost two-thirds will be mixed GH-prolactin tumors and sparsely-granulated monohormonal GH tumors seems the more aggressive subtype. Recurrence and need for radiation is higher than other non-functioning tumors so close follow-up is warranted.

A multicenter, observational study of lanreotide depot/autogel (LAN) in patients with acromegaly in the United States: 2-year experience from the SODA registry

PURPOSE

This analysis evaluates the 2-year effectiveness and safety of lanreotide depot/autogel (LAN), as well as treatment convenience and acromegaly symptom relief, from the Somatuline^® Depot for Acromegaly (SODA) registry, a post-marketing, open-label, observational, multicenter, United States registry study.

METHODS

Patients with acromegaly treated with LAN were eligible for enrollment. Demographics, LAN dose, extended dosing interval (EDI) (interval of injections ≥42 days), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), growth hormone (GH), glycated hemoglobin, adverse events (AEs), injection convenience, and symptom data were collected.

RESULTS

As of September 29, 2014, 241 patients were enrolled in SODA. IGF-1 levels below age- and gender-adjusted upper normal limit (ULN) were achieved in 71.2% at month (M) 12 and 74.4% at M24; GH ≤2.5 µg/L in 83.3% at M12 and 80.0% at M24; GH <1.0 µg/L in 61.7% at M12 and 61.4% at M24. Both IGF-1 < ULN and GH ≤2.5 µg/L were achieved in 65.0% at M12 and 54.8% at M24; both IGF-1 < ULN and GH < 1.0 µg/L were achieved in 51.7 and 42.9% at M12 and M24, respectively. EDI regimen was 5.0% at baseline and 12.0% at M24. At M24, acromegaly symptoms appeared stable or improved. The most common AE was arthralgia (25.7%). Among 106 serious AEs reported by 42 patients, 10 were deemed related to therapy in 9 patients. At M24, 73.1% of patients rated LAN as convenient.

CONCLUSIONS

SODA indicates 2-year biochemical control with majority of patients achieving both IGF-1 < ULN and GH ≤2.5 µg/L. LAN was generally well tolerated with no new or unexpected safety signals reported during the observation period. clinicaltrials.gov Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT00686348.

Pitfalls in early biochemical evaluation after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with acromegaly

Although the current remission criteria for acromegaly are clear and concise, some pitfalls have been reported in early endocrinological evaluation after surgery. To evaluate the long-term (>4 year) outcome and to detect the pitfalls in early evaluation, we retrospectively reviewed 128 patients with acromegaly who underwent primary transsphenoidal surgery during 2011 and 2012. These included 66 men and 62 women, aged from 7 to 76 (mean 46) years old. 49 patients (38.3%) were preoperatively treated with somatostatin analog (SSA). Follow-up period ranged from 52 to 75 (63) months. Long-term remission using the current consensus criteria was achieved in 107 patients (83.6%), 105 of which patient had achieved remission in early evaluation. In 5 patients with preoperative SSA treatment, IGF-1 levels re-elevated more than one year after surgery. Five female patients without pretreatment with SSA showed delayed normalization of IGF-1 between 13 to 27 months postoperatively, two of which patients satisfied the remission criteria. In conclusion, the long-term results can be reliably predicted by the remission criteria early after surgery in most patients with acromegaly. For the accurate evaluation within a year after surgery, however, influence of preoperative treatment with SSA, delayed normalization of IGF-1, and poor GH suppression due to low insulin resistance must be considered, particularly in women.

The impact of adjustments to the diagnostic criteria for biochemical remission in surgically treated patients with acromegaly

BACKGROUND

The suggested criteria for biochemical remission in patients treated for acromegaly were recently modified. The aim of this project was to study to what extent this modification influences remission rates.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 55 consecutive patients [29 men; median age 47years (interquartile range 38-68)] diagnosed with acromegaly between 2003 and 2014. After treatment serum IGF-I and/or GH was measured according to a standardized protocol. The biochemical remission status was defined according to the clinical guidelines from 2010 and2014.

RESULTS

Out of 55 patients, 44 patients were primarily operated. Of these, 33 (75%) were evaluated 3-12months postoperatively by measuring serum IGF-I and GH during an oral glucose tolerance test. According to the 2010 guidelines, 11 patients (33%) were in biochemical remission, 15 patients (46%) were not and 7 patients (21%) had discordant results (normal IGF-I and high GH or vice versa). Applying the 2014 guidelines in the same group, 16 patients (49%) were in biochemical remission, 7 patients (21%) were not and 10 patients (30%) had discordant results. Thus, by using the most recent criteria for biochemical control, more patients were considered to be in remission, or with discordant results, and fewer patients not in remission (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

An apparently minor adjustment of the criteria for biochemical control has a significant impact on remission status in patients treated for acromegaly, eventually affecting follow-up and treatment strategies.

Prevalence of acromegaly in patients with symptoms of sleep apnea

Acromegaly is a rare disease with nonspecific symptoms with acral enlargement being almost universally present at diagnosis. The estimated prevalence is 40-125 cases/million but targeted universal screening studies have found a higher prevalence (about 10 fold). The aim of the ACROSAHS study was to investigate the prevalence of acromegaly and acromegaly comorbidities in patients with sleep apnea symptoms and acral enlargement. ACROSAHS was a Spanish prospective non-interventional epidemiological study in 13 Hospital sleep referral units. Facial and acral enlargement symptoms including: ring size and shoe size increase, tongue, lips and jaws enlargement, paresthesia or carpal tunnel syndrome and widening of tooth spaces, as well as other typical acromegaly comorbidities were recorded with a self-administered questionnaire of patients who attended a first visit for sleep apnea symptoms between 09/2013 and 07/2014. Serum insulin-like growth factor type 1 (IGF1) was measured in patients with ≥1 acral symptom to determine the prevalence of acromegaly. Of the 1557 patients enrolled, 1477 with complete data (72% male) were analyzed. 530 patients (36%) reported at least 1 acral enlargement symptom and were tested for IGF-1, 41 were above range, persisted in 7, and among those, 2 cases of acromegaly were diagnosed (prevalence of at least 1.35 cases/1000). Overall, 1019 patients (69%) had ≥2 acromegaly symptoms and should have been screened according to guidelines; moreover 373 patients (25%) had ≥1 symptom of acral enlargement plus ≥3 other acromegaly symptoms. In conclusion, in patients with sleep apnea symptoms and acral enlargement, we found an acromegaly prevalence of at least 1.35 cases per 1000 and a high prevalence of typical acromegaly symptoms. It is important that sleep specialists are aware of acromegaly symptoms to aid with acromegaly diagnosis.

Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) levels are increased in active acromegaly patients

PURPOSE

During follow-up of acromegaly patients, there is a discordance rate of 30% between the measurements of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels. Further tests are required to determine disease activity in patients with discordant results. This study was planned to investigate an association of serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and cathepsin B with disease activity in acromegaly patients.

METHODS

In this study, 64 acromegaly patients followed in our clinic were divided into two groups according to the 2010 consensus criteria for cure of acromegaly as patients with active disease (n = 24) and patients with controlled disease (n = 40). Serum matrix metalloproteinase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and cathepsin B levels were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.

RESULTS

The mean serum matrix metalloproteinase-2 level was significantly higher in the active acromegaly patients than in the controlled acromegaly patients (150.1 ± 54.5 ng/mL vs. 100.2 ± 44.6 ng/mL; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the active and controlled acromegaly patients regarding serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 and cathepsin B levels (p = 0.205 and p = 0.598, respectively). Serum matrix metalloproteinase-2 levels of 118.3 ng/mL and higher had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 77.5% in determining active disease. The risk of active acromegaly was 3.3 fold higher in the patients with a matrix metalloproteinase-2 level of >118.3 ng/mL than in the patients with a matrix metalloproteinase-2 level of <118.3 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, serum matrix metalloproteinase-2 level is increased in the active acromegaly patients and a threshold value in determining active disease was defined for serum matrix metalloproteinase-2 level. This study is the first to compare acromegaly patients having active or controlled disease in terms of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 levels. The results need to be confirmed by a study that will be conducted in a larger patient group also including a healthy control group to demonstrate the value of this novel marker in disease activity.

SOCS2 polymorphisms are not associated with clinical and biochemical phenotypes in acromegalic patients

PURPOSE

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2) is a STAT5b-regulated gene and one of its functions is to influence growth and development through negative regulatory effects on GH/IGF-1 pathway. So, we evaluate the potential influence of SOCS2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on clinical and laboratorial characteristics of a large cohort of Brazilian patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

Four SOCS2 SNPs (rs3782415, rs3816997, rs3825199 and rs11107116) were selected and genotyped by real-time PCR using specific Taqman probe assays. A total of 186 patients (116 women, age range 26-88 years) were evaluated.

RESULTS

No association of SOCS2 genotypes was observed with none of the following clinical and laboratorial characteristics: age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, basal GH, oral glucose tolerance test GH nadir, IGF-I, ULNR-IGF-I.

CONCLUSION

Despite of the key role of SOCS2 in the regulation of GH receptor signaling, we did not find any significant association between SOCS2 polymorphisms and acromegaly.

The ongoing challenge of discrepant growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I results in the evaluation of treated acromegalic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) are the principal biomarkers used to assess disease activity in acromegaly, and any discrepancy between them renders interpretation of results inconclusive. Purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of this discrepancy and identify parameters that might affect its occurrence.

DESIGN

A systematic review of MEDLINE and Scopus was performed (1987-2013) followed by a meta-analysis to address the frequency of discrepant results between GH and IGF-I levels. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed assessing the effects of the year of publication, the different types of GH testing and GH assays used, as well as the impact of treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) on the occurrence of this discrepancy.

RESULTS

The analysis retrieved 39 eligible studies totalling 7071 patients. The pooled discordance rate between GH and IGF-I was 25·7% (95% CI: 22·3-29·4), and the predominant format was that of elevated IGF-I with normal GH levels (15·3%, 95% CI: 12·5-18·7). No significant correlation between the discordance rate and the year of publication was shown; whereas, the use of ultrasensitive GH assays resulted in higher discordance rates (30·7%, 95% CI: 25·9-35·9 vs 19·8%, 95% CI: 14·1-27·2, P = 0·04) as did treatment with SSAs (32·5%, 95% CI: 27·8-37·4) vs (21·6%, 95% CI: 17·8-25·6, P = 0·001).

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancy between GH and IGF-I results is encountered in a quarter of treated patients with acromegaly, especially when using ultrasensitive GH assays or in patients receiving SSAs, a fact that the clinician should take into consideration when making clinical decisions.

DISCORDANCE BETWEEN GH AND IGF-1 LEVELS IN TURKISH ACROMEGALIC PATIENTS

OBJECTIVE

Discordance between insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) levels is an important problem in the follow-up of patients diagnosed with acromegaly. Our aims were to evaluate the discordance between IGF-1 and GH levels and compare the performance of different cut-off levels for the nadir in GH (GHn) in acromegalic patients.

METHODS

The study included 63 acromegalic patients in a follow-up at a tertiary care university hospital facility. Levels of IGF-1, IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and GH were investigated. The baseline GH and GHn levels were evaluated after an oral glucose tolerance test (cut-offs of 0.4 and 1 ng/mL, respectively). The discordance rates between GHn and IGF-1 levels, and IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratios were determined.

RESULTS

We first adopted a GHn cut-off value of 1 ng/mL and found that 27 patients (42.9%) exhibited biochemical remission (BR) (IGF-1 <95^th percentile, GH <1), and 25 patients (39.7%) had no BR (NBR) (IGF-1 ≥95^th percentile, GH >1). Discordance in the presence of normal IGF-1 and nonsuppressed GH (DC1) occurred in 2 of 63 (3.2%) patients; discordance in the presence of high IGF-1 and suppressed GH (DC2) occurred in 9 of 63 (14.3%) patients. If the GHn cut-off value adopted was 0.4 ng/mL, the distributions were 17 of 63 (27.0%) patients in BR, 29 of 63 (46.0%) patients in NBR, 12 of 63 (19.0%) in DC1, and 5 of 63 (7.9%) patients in DC2. If only the baseline GH values were considered, the distributions were very similar to those with a GHn cut-off value of 0.4 ng/mL. The IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio was lowest in the BR group.

CONCLUSION

Adopting a GHn cut-off value of 0.4 ng/mL did not increase the test performance compared with baseline GH only. In contrast, in the follow-up of acromegalic patients, the IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio might be a useful measurement when discordance between IGF-1 and GH levels occurs. We propose that these values be considered in clinical practice.

ABBREVIATIONS

BR = biochemical remission DC1 = discordance group 1 DC2 = discordance group 2 DM = diabetes mellitus GH = growth hormone GHn = nadir in GH IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1 IGFBP-3 = IGF binding protein-3 LAR = long-acting release NBR = not in biochemical remission OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test.

The influence of type 2 diabetes on serum GH and IGF-I levels in hospitalized Japanese patients

OBJECTIVE

Although serum insulin like growth factor type 1 (IGF-I) levels are negatively correlated with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with type 1 diabetes, this correlation is controversial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) because of the influence of multiple factors including insulin secretion and obesity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of T2DM on serum growth hormone (GH) and IGF-I levels in Japanese patients, who exhibited relatively low BMI compared with white patients in the previous studies.

DESIGN

We retrospectively analysed 315 consecutive Japanese hospitalized patients with T2DM. We analysed factors correlated with changes in serum IGF-I levels and those related to diabetes.

RESULTS

The median HbA1c was 8.7% (7.4-10.2) and the median body mass index (BMI) was 26.2kg/m(2) (23.1-29.7), which was relatively low compared with the previous studies. Overall, no correlations was found between serum GH or IGF-I levels and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or HbA1c; however, when stratified by FPG and HbA1c levels, serum IGF-I levels were significantly lower in patients with FPG≥200mg/dL than in those with FPG<200mg/dL (p=0.039). In addition, serum IGF-I levels were significantly lower in patients with HbA1c≥12% than in those with HbA1c<12% (p=0.046). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between fasting C-peptide levels and serum IGF-I levels (p=0.040), whereas no correlations was found for BMI, duration of T2DM, FPG levels, or HbA1c. Moreover, patients with improved HbA1c levels during the follow up period showed a significant increase in serum IGF-I levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum IGF-I levels were significantly decreased in Japanese patients with uncontrolled T2DM, and impaired insulin secretion may be a mechanism underlying this effect. When diagnosing acromegaly in patients with uncontrolled diabetes, these factors should be taken into account.

Clinical importance of achieving biochemical control with medical therapy in adult patients with acromegaly

In acromegaly, achieving biochemical control (growth hormone [GH] level <1.0 ng/mL and age- and sex-normalized levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1]) through timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment provides an opportunity to improve patient outcomes. Diagnosis of acromegaly is challenging because it is rooted in observing subtle clinical manifestations, and it is typical for acromegaly to evolve for up to 10 years before it is recognized. This results in chronic exposure to elevated levels of GH and IGF-1 and delay in patients receiving appropriate treatment, which consequently increases mortality risk. In this review, the clinical impact of elevated GH and IGF-1 levels, the effectiveness of current therapies, and the potential role of novel treatments for acromegaly will be discussed. Clinical burden of acromegaly and benefits associated with management of GH and IGF-1 levels will be reviewed. Major treatment paradigms in acromegaly include surgery, medical therapy, and radiotherapy. With medical therapies, such as somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and GH receptor antagonists, a substantial proportion of patients achieve reduced GH and normalized IGF-1 levels. In addition, signs and symptoms, quality of life, and comorbidities have also been reported to improve to varying degrees in patients who achieve biochemical control. Currently, there are several innovative therapies in development to improve patient outcomes, patient use, and access. Timely biochemical control of acromegaly ensures that the patient can ultimately improve morbidity and mortality from this disease and its extensive consequences.

Need for improved monitoring in patients with acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare and insidious disease characterized by the overproduction of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and is most commonly due to a pituitary adenoma. Patients with acromegaly who experience prolonged exposure to elevated levels of GH and IGF1 have an increased mortality risk and progressive worsening of disease-related comorbidities. Multimodal treatment with surgery, medical therapy, and radiotherapy provides biochemical control, defined by recent acromegaly clinical guidelines from the Endocrine Society as a reduction of GH levels to <1.0 ng/ml and normalization of IGF1 levels, to a substantial proportion of patients and is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Patients with acromegaly, even those without clinical symptoms of disease, require long-term monitoring of GH and IGF1 levels if the benefits associated with biochemical control are to be maintained and the risk of developing recurrent disease is to be abated. However, suboptimal monitoring is common in patients with acromegaly, and this can have negative health effects due to delays in detection of recurrent disease and implementation of appropriate treatment. Because of the significant health consequences associated with prolonged exposure to elevated levels of GH and IGF1, optimal monitoring in patients with acromegaly is needed. This review article will discuss the biochemical assessments used for therapeutic monitoring in acromegaly, the importance of monitoring after surgery and medical therapy or radiotherapy, the consequences of suboptimal monitoring, and the need for improved monitoring algorithms for patients with acromegaly.

LIMITATIONS OF CURRENT APPROACHES FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACROMEGALY

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a rare disease characterized by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH), typically from a benign pituitary somatotroph adenoma, that leads to subsequent hypersecretion of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Patients with acromegaly have an increased risk of mortality and progressive worsening of comorbidities. Surgery, medical therapy, and radiotherapy are currently available treatment approaches for patients with acromegaly, with overall therapeutic goals of lowering GH levels and achieving normal IGF-1 levels, reducing tumor size, improving comorbidities, and minimizing mortality risk. Although surgery can lead to biochemical remission in some patients with acromegaly, many patients will continue to have uncontrolled disease and require additional treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed recently published reports and present a summary of the safety and efficacy of current treatment modalities for patients with acromegaly.

RESULTS

A substantial proportion of patients who receive medical therapy or radiotherapy will have persistently elevated GH and/or IGF-1. Because of the serious health consequences of continued elevation of GH and IGF-1, there is a need to improve therapeutic approaches to optimize biochemical control, particularly in high-need patient populations for whom current treatment options provide limited benefit.

CONCLUSION

This review discusses current treatment options for patients with acromegaly, limitations associated with each treatment approach, and areas within the current treatment algorithm, as well as patient populations for which improved therapeutic options are needed. Novel agents in development were also highlighted, which have the potential to improve management of patients with uncontrolled or persistent acromegaly.

Discordance between growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 after pituitary surgery for acromegaly: a stepwise approach and management

INTRODUCTION

Follow-up management of patients with acromegaly after pituitary surgery is performed by conducting biochemical assays of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1). Despite concordant results of these two tests in the majority of cases, there is increasing recognition of patients who show persistent or intermittent discordance between GH and IGF1 (normal GH and elevated IGF1 or vice versa).

METHOD

In this narrative review, the last three decades materials on the issue of discrepancy between GH and IGF1 were thoroughly assessed.

RESULTS

Various studies have obtained different discordance rates, ranging from 5.4 to 39.5%. At present, despite the use of current sensitive assays and more stringent criteria to define remission, the rate of discordance still remains high. A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain the postoperative discordance of GH and IGF1 including; altered dynamics of the GH secretion after surgery, early postoperative hormone assay, inaccurate or less sensitive tests and laboratory errors, too high cut-off point for GH suppression in the GH assays, GH nadir values not adjusted to age, sex, and body mass index, the influence of concomitant medication, co-existing physiologic and pathologic conditions, and many other proposed reasons. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms are still far from clear, and the solution continues to evade complete elucidation. Similarly, the impacts of such a discrepancy over mortality and morbidity and the risk of biochemical and/or clinical recurrence are unclear.

CONCLUSION

As a challenging clinical problem, a stepwise evaluation and management of these patients appears to be more rational.

Role of IGF1-(CA)19 promoter microsatellite in the clinical presentation of acromegaly

BACKGROUND

A highly polymorphic Cytosine-Adenosine (CA) repeat sequence microsatellite has been identified in the promoter region of IGF1 gene. Several studies investigated the relationship between IGF1-(CA)n polymorphism and IGF1 levels, with conflicting results. Aim of this study was to investigate the influence of this polymorphism on clinical and biochemical characteristics of acromegalic patients.

METHODS

Eighty-eight acromegalic patients and 104 normal subjects were included in the study. Blood DNA was extracted and analysed by microsatellite technique using capillary electrophoresis. Patients and controls were subdivided in 19/19 [homozygous for the (CA)19 allele], 19/X [heterozygous for the (CA)19 allele] and X/X (any other genotype).

RESULTS

The genotype frequency was significantly different between patients and controls, the proportion of 19/19 being lower (28·4% vs. 50·0%) and 19/X and X/X higher in acromegalic patients than in controls (P = 0·004). There were no significant differences in age, gender, basal and nadir GH, IGF1-SDS, tumour size, metabolic parameters, outcome and treatment among the three groups. The different frequency of genotypes in acromegalic patients vs. controls, as well as the lack of relationship between IGF1-(CA)n polymorphism and clinical and biochemical data in acromegalic patients, was confirmed using an additional alternative genotyping considering (CA)19 and (CA)20 homozygotes and heterozygotes vs. alleles with more than 19 of 20 repeats or less.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support the hypothesis that IGF-(CA)n alleles may have a significant role in determining clinical, biochemical and outcome of patients with acromegaly. The possible role of IGF1 polymorphism on susceptibility to acromegaly remains to be investigated.

Determination of nadir growth hormone concentration cutoff in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to define an appropriate nadir growth hormone (nGH) cutoff for patients with acromegaly in remission using the Access Ultrasensitive human growth hormone (hGH) assay (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 55 acromegalic subjects and 41 healthy adult volunteers. All subjects underwent oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) for growth hormones (GHs). An optimal cutoff for nGH for patients with active disease versus those in remission was determined using receiver-operating curve analysis.

RESULTS

The nGH of 0.53 ng/mL revealed a sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83-100%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 82-100%). All 22 patients with acromegaly in remission suppressed GH to <1 ng/mL, 20/22 (91%) suppressed to <0.4 ng/mL, and 19/22 (86%) of subjects suppressed to <0.3 ng/mL (the maximum nGH measured in our healthy volunteer group).

CONCLUSION

When using the Access Ultrasensitive hGH assay for OGTT, a cutoff of 0.53 ng/mL was found to most accurately differentiate patients with acromegaly in remission from those with active disease.

Long-term changes in serum IGF-1 levels after successful surgical treatment of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma

BACKGROUND

Successful treatment of acromegaly is known to normalize serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels within days after surgery. However, our clinical observations indicate that many cases of acromegaly show delayed normalization of serum IGF-1 levels after complete tumor resection.

OBJECTIVE

To study long-term changes of the serum IGF-1 levels in acromegalic patients for whom surgical treatment was thought to be successful.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed with 46 acromegalic patients with no residual tumor on sellar magnetic resonance imaging, and a nadir growth hormone of less than 0.4 μg/L on a postoperative oral glucose tolerance test.

RESULTS

In all patients, serum IGF-1 levels returned to the normal reference values for age and sex during the observational period (12-132 months). The mean duration from the time of surgery until IGF-1 normalization was 10 months (range, 3 days-57 months). Twenty-seven patients (59%) reached normal IGF-1 ranges within 3 months of surgery, whereas 19 patients (41%) experienced delayed (>3 months) IGF-1 normalization. Eleven patients (24%) recovered normal IGF-1 levels 12 to 57 months after surgery. The possibility of delayed IGF-1 cure was increased 8.8-fold with an immediate postoperative IGF-1 level increase of 100 μg/L.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory remission of acromegaly by IGF-1 criteria was delayed in a large proportion of acromegalic patients, especially those with high postoperative IGF-1 levels. Hence, additional treatment can be delayed in clinically stable acromegalic patients who show no evidence of residual tumors on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and a normal growth hormone suppressive response to a glucose load.

Growth hormone values after an oral glucose load do not add clinically useful information in patients with acromegaly on long-term somatostatin receptor ligand treatment

The optimal method of assessing GH status in acromegalic patients receiving medical therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSA) has been matter of debate. The aim of the study has been to investigate whether OGTT may add information in patients with discordant random GH (GHr) and IGF values. Moreover, we evaluated the association of GH nadir with the prevalence of co-morbidities observed in acromegalic patients on SSA therapy. We evaluated 130 patients with proven diagnosis of acromegaly on SSA. The patients were subdivided in three groups: patients with controlled disease (both safe random GH and normal IGF-I, group A, 20.0 %), patients with uncontrolled disease (both high random GH and IGF-I, group B, 34.6 %), and patients with discordant random GH and IGF-I values (group C, 35.4 %). A high concordance rate for GH nadir with random GH and IGF-I was observed in group B, while a significant reduced concordance rate has been observed in group A (100 % sensitivity, 64.5 % specificity). By contrast, in group C, we observed concordant results between GH nadir and IGF-I only in 14/59 patients. In group A, the prevalence of diabetes was lower than in group B or C. Safe random GH was the only single criteria associated with a lower prevalence of diabetes. Discrepant IGF-I and either GH nadir or random GH values are frequently observed in acromegalic patients treated with SSA. Concordant IGF-I and random GH may influence the prevalence of metabolic complications. GH nadir measurement may help to interpret discrepancies between random GH and IGF-I data only in few cases.

Multiple facets in the control of acromegaly

AIMS

The current article provides a brief overview of the criteria for defining disease control in acromegaly.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, narrative review of previously published evidence chosen at the author's discretion along with an illustrative case study from Latin America.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In the strictest sense, "cure" in acromegaly is defined as complete restoration of normal pulsatile growth hormone secretion, although this is rarely achieved. Rather than "cure", as such, it is more appropriate to refer to disease control and remission, which is defined mainly in terms of specific biochemical targets (for growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1) that predict or correlate with symptoms, comorbidities and mortality. However, optimal management of acromegaly goes beyond biochemical control to include control of tumour growth (which may be independent of biochemical control) and comprehensive management of the symptoms and comorbidities typically associated with the disease, as these may not be adequately managed with acromegaly-specific therapy alone.