Maintenance of asthma control by once-daily inhaled ciclesonide in adults with persistent asthma

The safety of long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the safety of long-term use of ICS in patients with asthma.

METHODS

A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of asthma with ICS, compared with non-ICS treatment (placebo or other active drugs), were reviewed.

RESULTS

Eighty-six RCTs (enrolling 51,538 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Oral or oropharyngeal candidiasis (RR 2.58, 95% CI 2.00 to 3.33), and dysphonia/hoarseness (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.85) were less frequent in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of upper respiratory tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection, influenza, decline in bone mineral density, and fractures between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the mild local adverse events, the long-term use of ICS was safe in patients with asthma.

Glucocorticoid production in the thymus and brain: Immunosteroids and neurosteroids

Glucocorticoids (GCs) regulate a myriad of physiological systems, such as the immune and nervous systems. Systemic GC levels in blood are often measured as an indicator of local GC levels in target organs. However, several extra-adrenal organs can produce and metabolize GCs locally. More sensitive and specific methods for GC analysis (i.e., mass spectrometry) allow measurement of local GC levels in small tissue samples with low GC concentrations. Consequently, is it now apparent that systemic GC levels often do not reflect local GC levels. Here, we review the use of systemic GC measurements in clinical and research settings, discuss instances where systemic GC levels do not reflect local GC levels, and present evidence that local GC levels provide useful insights, with a focus on local GC production in the thymus (immunosteroids) and brain (neurosteroids). Lastly, we suggest key areas for further research, such as the roles of immunosteroids and neurosteroids in neonatal programming and the potential clinical relevance of local GC modulators.

Improving the risk-to-benefit ratio of inhaled corticosteroids through delivery and dose: current progress and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are known to increase the risk of systemic and local adverse effects, especially with high doses and long-term use. Hence, considerable resources are invested to improve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of ICS, effective delivery systems and novel combination therapies to enhance the risk-to-benefit ratio of ICS.

AREAS COVERED

There is an unmet need for new solutions to achieve optimal clinical outcomes with minimal dose of ICS. This paper gives an overview of novel treatment strategies regarding the safety of ICS therapy on the basis of the three most recent molecules introduced to our everyday clinical practice - ciclesonide, mometasone furoate, and fluticasone furoate. Advances in aerosol devices and new areas of inhalation therapy are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Current progress in improving the risk-to-benefit ratio of ICS through dose and delivery probably established pathways for further developments. This applies both to the improvement of the PK/PD properties of ICS molecules but also includes technical aspects that lead to simplified applicability of the device with simultaneous optimal drug deposition in the lungs. Indubitably, the future of medicine lies not only in the development of new molecules but also in technology and digital revolution.

In vitro and ex vivo models in inhalation biopharmaceutical research - advances, challenges and future perspectives

Oral inhalation results in pulmonary drug targeting and thereby reduces systemic side effects, making it the preferred means of drug delivery for the treatment of respiratory disorders such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cystic fibrosis. In addition, the high alveolar surface area, relatively low enzymatic activity and rich blood supply of the distal airspaces offer a promising pathway to the systemic circulation. This is particularly advantageous when a rapid onset of pharmacological action is desired or when the drug is suffering from stability issues or poor biopharmaceutical performance following oral administration. Several cell and tissue-based in vitro and ex vivo models have been developed over the years, with the intention to realistically mimic pulmonary biological barriers. It is the aim of this review to critically discuss the available models regarding their advantages and limitations and to elaborate further which biopharmaceutical questions can and cannot be answered using the existing models.

Inhaled corticosteroids and risk of upper respiratory tract infection in patients with asthma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested a possible association between respiratory infection and the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). We aimed to ascertain the risk of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) with long-term inhaled corticosteroid use among patients with asthma.

METHODS

Through a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar from inception to May 2018, we included randomized controlled trials of any ICS vs. a control treatment for asthma, with reporting of URTI as an adverse event. We conducted meta-analyses by the Peto approaches to generate summary estimates comparing ICS with non-ICS treatment on the risk of URTI.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials (15,336 subjects) were included. Compared with non-ICS treatment, ICSs were associated with a significantly increased risk of URTI (Peto OR, 1.24; 95% CI 1.08-1.42; I² = 5%, p = 0.002). Subgroup analyses were performed for different dose, both high- and low-dose ICSs were associated with a significantly increased risk of URTI (high dose: Peto OR, 1.46; 95% CI 1.05-2.03; I² = 0%; p = 0.03) (low dose: Peto OR, 1.20; 95% CI 1.04-1.39; I² = 25%; p = 0.01). Moreover, fluticasone was observed with an increased risk of URTI (Peto OR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.02-1.38; p = 0.03; heterogeneity: I² = 21%) but not budesonide, low-dose fluticasone treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk of URTI but not high dose.

CONCLUSIONS

This study raises safety concerns about the risk of URTI associated with ICS use in patients with asthma, but it should be further investigated.

Comparison of intranasal ciclesonide, oral levocetirizine, and combination treatment for allergic rhinitis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily ciclesonide in comparison to both levocetirizine alone, and a ciclesonide/levocetirizine combination in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).

Methods

Subjects exhibiting moderate to severe allergic rhinitis for longer than 1 year were randomized in an open-label, 3-arm, parallel group, multicenter study. Subjects received 200 µg ciclesonide, 5 mg levocetirizine, or a combination of both. Changes from baseline until the end-of-study visit (2 weeks following) were evaluated by reflective total nasal symptom scores (rTNSSs), reflective total ocular symptom scores (rTOSSs), physician-assessed overall nasal signs and symptoms severity (PANS), and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaires (RQLQ).

Results

Significant improvements in rTNSS, PANS, and RQLQ in the ciclesonide monotherapy group were observed in comparison to the levocetirizine alone group. Three individual symptoms of rTNSS, including runny nose, nasal itching, and congestion, were improved in the ciclesonide-treated group. rTOSS scores for ciclesonide monotherapy improved from baseline, but no superiority over levocetirizine was shown. The absolute score and changes in rTNSS and PANS were positively correlated. Ciclesonide spray was more effective than levocetirizine in reducing nasal symptoms in both SAR and PAR patients. Ciclesonide and levocetrizine were well tolerated alone and in combination.

Conclusions

Our results provide support for an AR and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) recommendation stipulating that ciclesonide is superior to levocetirizine for the treatment of AR, with tolerable safety. Addition of levocetirizine to ciclesonide did not give further clinical benefit over monotherapy.

Effectiveness and safety of ciclesonide in the treatment of patients with persistent allergic or non-allergic asthma in medical practice (Data from a non-interventional study conducted in Austria)

BACKGROUND

Effectiveness and safety profile of ciclesonide in the treatment of persistent allergic or non-allergic asthma was evaluated in real-life setting in Austria.

METHODS

Prospective, single-arm, 3-month observational, non-interventional, open-label cohort study in patients with persistent asthma (with or without allergic component) of any severity grade was conducted. Patients were either treatment naïve or switched to treatment with ciclesonide and had an indication for treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.

RESULTS

In all, 307 patients (50.8% female; mean age, 45.7 years) were prescribed ciclesonide. After 3 months of observation, the percentage of patients with daily symptoms had declined from 33.2 to 3.9%, night-time symptoms from 21.8 to 5.2%, physical activity limitations from 73.9 to 24.4%, and rescue medication usage from 70.0 to 45.9%. The mean total Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score was 2.32 ± 1.14 at the first and 1.08 ± 0.88 at the final visit. The number of patients with well-controlled asthma (ACQ score < 1) increased considerably from 11.0% at baseline to 52.2% at study end. Clinically important mean improvements were observed in the total self-assessed Asthma Quality of Life score and all four domain scores. The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) increased by 0.3 L from 2.60 ± 0.87 L to 2.89 ± 0.86 L, and the mean FEV1% predicted increased from 75.1 ± 15.4% to 83.7 ± 14.9%. Incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was low (4 ADRs in 3 of 307 patients, or 1.0%).

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of ciclesonide under routine conditions in Austria. Improvements in symptom control, lung function, and quality of life were observed. Ciclesonide was well tolerated.

Depressive symptomatology, quality of life and disease control among individuals with well-characterized severe asthma

OBJECTIVES

A thorough examination of the relationship of asthma severity and control with symptoms of depression is needed to identify groups of asthmatics at high risk for poor disease control outcomes. This study examines the relationship of symptoms of depression with severity and control in a well-characterized cohort of asthmatics and healthy controls.

METHODS

Depressive symptoms and quality of life were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory. Disease control was measured by a composite index incorporating symptoms, activity limitation and rescue medication use.

RESULTS

Individuals with asthma (n = 91) reported more symptoms of depression than controls (n = 36; p < 0.001). Those with severe asthma (n = 49) reported more symptoms of depression (p = 0.002) and poorer asthma control (p < 0.0001) than those with not severe asthma. Worse asthma control was associated with more depressive symptoms in severe (r = 0.46, p = 0.002) but not in not severe (r = 0.13, p = 0.40) asthmatics. The relationship of symptoms of depression among severe asthmatics was attenuated by disease control. Exploratory analyses identified specific disease symptom characteristics, as opposed to exacerbations, as associated with symptoms of depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Among individuals with severe asthma, increased symptom burden is positively associated with risk for co-morbid depression. These findings point to a need for regular mood disorder screenings and treatment referrals among this group. Further research is warranted to examine whether treatment of comorbid depression improves treatment adherence and asthma-related quality of life.

Profile of ciclesonide for the maintenance treatment of asthma

Ciclesonide is a nonhalogenated synthetic inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of all severities of persistent asthma. It is available as a hydrofluroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler in two strengths, 80 mcg/activation and 160 mcg/activation, with the recommenced dosage being two inhalations twice-daily. It is a prodrug that is converted in the lung to its active form, which possesses 100-fold greater glucocorticoid-receptor-binding affinity than the parent compound. Its relative receptor affinity is similar to budesonide. In clinical studies, ciclesonide was effective in improving pulmonary function, reducing asthma symptoms, and reducing or eliminating the need for oral corticosteroids (OCSs). Patients with severe asthma dependent on OCSs and high doses of ICSs were able to achieve greater asthma control and reduce or even eliminate the use of OCSs when switched to ciclesonide. In comparison with fluticasone propionate and budesonide, ciclesonide was demonstrated to be at least as effective in maintaining pulmonary function and asthma control. In clinical trials, ciclesonide was well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events considered mild or moderate in intensity. It had low systemic bioavailability and no clinically significant hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis suppression at therapeutic doses. Its safety profile establishes ciclesonide as an important addition to the currently available ICSs.

Determination of lung deposition following inhalation of ciclesonide using different bioanalytical procedures

Ciclesonide (Alvesco(®)) is an inhaled corticosteroid administered as a solution via a metered-dose inhaler, using hydrofluoroalkane HFA-134a as a propellant. Ciclesonide is inhaled as a prodrug, which is activated by pulmonary esterases to the pharmacologically active metabolite desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC). Lung deposition is an important factor that contributes to the desired therapeutic effect of inhaled corticosteroid. More than 50% of the inhaled dose is deposited in the lung as demonstrated by scintigraphical methods after inhalation of ciclesonide. The swallowed drug does not contribute to the systemic circulation because of the low oral systemic bioavailability, which is below 1% for ciclesonide and des-CIC. Due to the negligible oral bioavailability the pharmacokinetic parameters following inhalation are a surrogate for lung deposition. The pulmonary bioavailability was more than 60% as assessed for des-CIC in pharmacokinetic studies using HPLC-MS/MS detection as bioanalytical method. Pharmacokinetics in asthmatic patients and healthy subjects are similar.

Efficacy and safety of ciclesonide in the treatment of 24,037 asthmatic patients in routine medical care

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety profile of ciclesonide (CIC) in the treatment of asthma was evaluated in a large patient population in a real-life setting in Germany.

METHODS

24,037 patients with persistent mild/moderate bronchial asthma were enrolled into three observational studies with identical design. Data were pooled and analyzed. Patients received ciclesonide (160 μg/day) and were observed for 3 months. FEV(1), PEF, NO, asthma episodes, use of rescue medication and adverse drug reactions (ADR) were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean (95% CI) FEV(1) significantly increased from 80.7 [80.5; 80.9]% of predicted at baseline to 90.1 [89.9; 90.2]% after 3 months (n = 20,297), mean PEF significantly increased from 338 [335; 340] l/min to 392 [390; 395] l/min (n = 8100). NO was significantly reduced from 53.6 [51.8; 55.4] ppb to 26.2 [25.2; 27.1] ppb (n = 971). The percentage of patients with daily symptoms declined from 24.3% to 1.9%, night-time symptoms from 13.3% to 1.3%, and β(2)-agonists use from 26.9% to 8.8%. ADRs were reported by 51 patients (0.2%). Most frequent ADRs were: dysphonia (n = 11), cough (n = 10), dyspnoea, throat irritation, and oral candidiasis (n = 5 each). 46 patients terminated the study prematurely, 41 due to ADR and 5 due to unknown/missing reason. One patient died due to cardiac failure (no causal relation).

CONCLUSION

These observational studies under real-life conditions support findings from controlled clinical studies regarding efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide in patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma. No unexpected ADRs were detected.

Efficacy and safety of ciclesonide in patients with severe asthma: a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study with long-term (1-year) follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide in patients with severe asthma over a 1-year period.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients aged 18 - 75 years with persistent asthma were enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, randomized study and treated with ciclesonide 320 or 640 μg twice daily (b.i.d.) with the option of continuing in a 40-week extension phase (EP).

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) from baseline to 12 weeks and safety over 1 year.

RESULTS

365 patients were randomized and 275 continued into the EP. During 12 weeks' treatment, morning peak expiratory flow significantly increased by 16 l/min (p < 0.001) and 14 l/min (p = 0.001) in the 320 and 640 μg b.i.d. groups, respectively. Both doses significantly reduced total asthma symptom scores by 0.29 (p < 0.0001). In both groups, the incidence of adverse effects (AEs) was low and mean cortisol levels in serum and urine were not suppressed during the EP.

CONCLUSIONS

Ciclesonide 320 μg b.i.d. sustained lung function and asthma symptoms in patients with severe asthma over 12 weeks' treatment, and maintained lung function during a 40-week EP; ciclesonide 640 μg b.i.d. did not provide additional benefits. Long-term use of ciclesonide was not associated with increased local AEs or negative effects on cortisol levels.

Ciclesonide and the treatment of asthma

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Asthma is a chronic disease characterized by airway inflammation and hyper-responsiveness. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) constitute the guideline-recommended first-line therapy for persistent asthma. However, concerns regarding ICS-related adverse events may contribute to their underutilization by physicians and patients.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The currently available published data on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, safety and efficacy of the ICS, ciclesonide, is described. Peer-reviewed publications (1996 - 2009) on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile, safety and efficacy of ciclesonide were reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Ciclesonide is delivered as an inactive prodrug, which is cleaved to the active molecule by intracellular esterases located in the lungs. This and other pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties may limit the amount of active molecule outside the lung and may reduce the incidence of side effects. Randomized placebo-controlled studies found that ciclesonide can initiate and maintain disease control in subjects with persistent asthma of all disease severities. Moreover, studies have found that ciclesonide is as effective as other ICSs in establishing and controlling disease symptoms. Controlled clinical trials also showed that ciclesonide is associated with minimal systemic and local treatment-related adverse events.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Published findings indicate that ciclesonide is effective at initiating and maintaining asthma control and is well tolerated, with a positive safety profile.

A 24-week comparison of low-dose ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in mild to moderate asthma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of ciclesonide (80 microg/day) with fluticasone propionate (200 microg/day) in mild to moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

Patients aged 12-75 years and previously treated with low doses of inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone propionate 250 microg/day or equivalent) entered a 2-4 week run-in period during which only rescue medication was permitted. For inclusion into the double-blind, 24-week treatment period, patients had to show a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) of 61-90% predicted and a decrease in FEV(1) during run-in of >or=10%. Patients (n = 480) were randomized to ciclesonide 80 microg (ex-actuator) once daily in the evening or fluticasone propionate 100 microg (ex-valve) twice daily. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in FEV(1). Secondary efficacy variables included asthma control and asthma-specific quality of life.

RESULTS

Both treatments significantly increased FEV(1) and other lung function variables from baseline (p < 0.0001, both groups, all variables). The least squares mean increases in FEV(1) were 0.46L (ciclesonide) and 0.52L (fluticasone propionate); non-inferiority of ciclesonide to fluticasone propionate was demonstrated (p = 0.0002, per-protocol analysis). Five patients in each group experienced asthma exacerbations. Improvements in the percent of days with asthma control (days with no asthma symptoms and no use of rescue medication) and asthma-specific quality of life were comparable between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed similar efficacy of ciclesonide 80 microg once daily and fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily in mild to moderate persistent asthma. The low dose of ciclesonide was efficacious during long-term treatment. EudraCT number: 2004-001072-39.

Comparison of effectiveness in ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on small airway function in mild asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of asthma treatment, but conventional ICS may have limited effectiveness in inflammation and patency of small airways. Ciclesonide is delivered and deposited in the peripheral region of the lung as a small particle corticosteroid. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of ciclesonide with fluticasone propionate on small airway function in asthma.

METHODS

Thirty mild persistent asthma patients treated with 200 microg of fluticasone propionate were randomized to receive either ciclesonide 200 microg once daily or fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily for 8 weeks. Small airway function was assessed by impulse oscillometry (IOS) and percentage of eosinophil induced sputum.

RESULTS

We observed that ciclesonide significantly improved IOS measured resistance of small airways (R5-R20; p<0.05), distal reactance (X5; p<0.01), reactance area (AX; p<0.01), and decreased late-phase sputum eosinophil level (p<0.01) compared with fluticasone propionate. There were no significant changes in spirometry indices in either group during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that ciclesonide improves small airway function and inflammation compared with fluticasone propionate in mild asthma. This study provides evidence that IOS and late-phase induced sputum allows detection of changes in the small airways that can not be detected by spirometry.

Lower-leg growth rates in children with asthma during treatment with ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate

Measurement of short-term lower-leg growth rate in children by knemometry has become established as an integral part of the available measures of systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in children. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the novel ICS ciclesonide (CIC) and the ICS fluticasone propionate (FP) on lower-leg growth rate and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis function in children with mild asthma. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study, 28 children, aged 6-12 yr, sequentially received daily doses of CIC 320 μg, FP 375 μg (330 μg ex-actuator) and placebo via a spacer in a randomized order. Each 2-wk treatment period was followed by a 2-wk washout period. Knemometry was performed at the beginning and end of each treatment period. Cortisol levels in 12-h overnight urine were measured at the end of each treatment period. No statistically significant differences were seen in lower-leg growth rates between CIC (0.30 mm/wk) and placebo (0.43 mm/wk) treatments. Lower-leg growth rate during FP treatment (0.08 mm/wk) was significantly reduced compared with both placebo [least squares (LS) mean: -0.35 (95% CI: -0.53, -0.18; p = 0.0002)] and CIC [LS mean: -0.23 (95% CI: -0.05, -0.40; p = 0.0137)]. Cortisol levels in 12-h overnight urine were significantly lower in the FP group when compared with CIC (p < 0.05); however, there were no statistically significant differences between each of the active treatments and placebo. CIC had no significant effect on lower-leg growth rate in children aged 6-12 yr with mild asthma. In contrast, a similar dose of FP significantly reduced lower-leg growth rate compared with placebo and CIC.

Ciclesonide therapy in asthma: a potential effect on small airway inflammation?

BACKGROUND

In asthma small airways inflammation often persists despite inhaled corticosteroids therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the effects of ciclesonide, a newer inhaled corticosteroid on small airways inflammation and the reliability of some biomarkers of small airways inflammation in asthma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Evaluation of a study assessing the short-term effects of ciclesonide on small airways inflammation in patients with mild to moderate asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Ciclesonide could have beneficial effects on small airways inflammation and some of the outcome measures used as efficacy endpoints could represent possible biomarkers of small airways involvement in obstructive chronic respiratory diseases.

Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of inhaled ciclesonide

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are recommended as first-line therapy for persistent asthma of all severities. Ciclesonide is a novel ICS, which is administered as an aerosol solution in a metered-dose inhaler, using hydrofluoroalkane-134a as a propellant. Because of the high respirable particle fraction, high pulmonary deposition is obtained in patients, which constitutes the basis of effective therapeutic action. The parent compound, ciclesonide, is pharmacologically inactive and is activated in the target organ, the lung, to form its only pharmacologically active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC). Low oral deposition combined with minimal formation of des-CIC in the oropharynx may minimize the typical oropharyngeal adverse events associated with ICSs. Low oral bioavailability, rapid clearance and high protein binding reduce pharmacologically relevant systemic exposure. The unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of ciclesonide offers a rationale that supports the favourable risk-benefit profile observed in clinical trials in patients with persistent asthma.

Ciclesonide: a safe and effective inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma

Ciclesonide is a novel inhaled corticosteroid used in the continuous treatment of mild-to-severe asthma. Its formulation and mechanism of action yield a low oral and systemic bioavailability, and high pulmonary deposition. In multiple clinical trials, ciclesonide is at least as effective as either fluticasone propionate or budesonide at symptom control, while in many cases having improved safety outcomes and tolerability. The improved safety and comparable efficacy profiles of ciclesonide demonstrated in current studies could potentially yield a treatment option that may lead to improved adherence and outcome.

Emerging drugs for asthma

BACKGROUND

Current therapies for asthma are aimed at controlling disease symptoms and for the majority of asthmatics inhaled corticosteroid anti-inflammatory therapy is effective. However, this approach requires life-time therapy while a subset of patients remains symptomatic despite optimal treatment creating a clear unmet medical need.

OBJECTIVES

It is recognised that airway inflammation is key to asthma pathogenesis. Biopharmaceutical approaches may identify new therapies that target key cells and mediators that drive the inflammatory responses in the asthmatic lung. Such an approach may provide disease-modifying treatments.

RESULTS

Significant areas of drug development include humanised monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for asthma therapy including those against IgE, IL-4 and IL-5. Asthma-relevant cytokines or chemokines have been targeted in a number of other ways. These include the use of humanised receptor blocking mAb or the removal of cytokines or chemokines via their binding to soluble receptor constructs. Small-molecule receptor antagonists also target receptors or the cellular signal transduction pathways that are activated following cytokine or chemokine receptor ligation. Another approach is to target asthma relevant mediators or the pathways controlling pro-inflammatory leukocyte accumulation within the asthmatic lung.

CONCLUSIONS

This review will discuss the current status, therapeutic potential and potential problems of these novel drug developments in asthma therapy. Current therapies for asthma are aimed at controlling disease symptoms, and for the majority of asthmatics inhaled corticosteroid anti-inflammatory therapy is effective. However, this approach requires lifetime therapy; and a subset of patients remains symptomatic despite optimal treatment, creating a clear unmet medical need. It is recognised that airway inflammation is key to asthma pathogenesis. Biopharmaceutical approaches may identify new therapies that target key cells and mediators that drive the inflammatory responses in the asthmatic lung. Such an approach may provide disease-modifying treatments. Significant areas of drug development include humanised mAb for asthma therapy, including those against IgE, IL-4 and IL-5. Asthma-relevant cytokines or chemokines have been targeted in a number of other ways. These include the use of humanised receptor blocking mAb or the removal of cytokines or chemokines via their binding to soluble receptor constructs. Small-molecule receptor antagonists also target receptors or the cellular signal transduction pathways that are activated following cytokine or chemokine receptor ligation. Another approach is to target asthma-relevant mediators, or the pathways controlling pro-inflammatory leukocyte accumulation within the asthmatic lung. This review will discuss the current status, therapeutic potential and potential problems of these novel drug developments in asthma therapy.

Ciclesonide: a review of its use in the management of asthma

Ciclesonide (Alvesco) is an inhaled corticosteroid used in the preventative treatment of persistent bronchial asthma in adults, adolescents and, in some countries, children. The drug is delivered by a non-chlorofluorocarbon hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI). In the lungs, ciclesonide is converted to an active metabolite, which is responsible for the beneficial effects of the drug in patients with asthma. Ciclesonide and its active metabolite have low systemic bioavailability and therefore have a low potential to produce systemic adverse events. Inhaled ciclesonide delivered by HFA-MDI is effective in the prophylactic treatment of persistent asthma in adults, adolescents and children, and is generally well tolerated. In general, ciclesonide improves lung function and reduces asthma symptoms and rescue medication use in adults and adolescents with asthma of varying severity. The drug is generally no less effective than other inhaled corticosteroids with regard to maintaining or improving lung function and may have a more favourable tolerability profile than some other agents in this class. Ciclesonide has also shown efficacy in paediatric patients with asthma. Data on its long-term effects on other clinical outcomes, such as asthma exacerbations, would be of interest. Further comparative and long-term studies would also be beneficial in order to definitively position ciclesonide with respect to other inhaled corticosteroids. In the meantime, ciclesonide offers an effective and well tolerated first-line preventative treatment option for persistent asthma.

A randomized, controlled trial to investigate the effect of ciclesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate on eye lens opacity

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended first-line therapy for the treatment of persistent asthma. However, reports from observational studies have suggested that the use of ICS may be associated with systemic adverse events, such as glaucoma and cataract (opacity of the lens) formation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare two ICS over 1 year regarding the formation/progression of lenticular opacities in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Adults (>or=18 years of age) with moderate-to-severe asthma were randomized to ciclesonide 640 micro g/day (n = 785) or beclomethasone dipropionate 640 micro g/day (n = 783) in a multinational, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group study. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a positive Class I grading shift (increase [worsening] in Lens Opacities Classification System [LOCS] III score of >or= 0.5 for nuclear opalescence, >or= 0.8 for cortical opacification, or >or= 0.5 for posterior subcapsular opacification, or cataract surgery) in either eye at any visit over the 12-month, double-blind treatment period.

RESULTS

Mean changes (+/- standard error) in nuclear opalescence and cortical and posterior subcapsular opacification were small and similar between groups (ciclesonide 640 micro g/day: 0.10 +/- 0.02, 0.07 +/- 0.02 and 0.04 +/- 0.01, respectively; beclomethasone dipropionate 640 micro g/day: 0.11 +/- 0.02, 0.09 +/- 0.02 and 0.03 +/- 0.01, respectively). Class I shifts were observed in 34.3% versus 36.8% of ciclesonide-treated and beclomethasone dipropionate-treated patients, respectively. Ciclesonide 640 micro g/day was non-inferior to beclomethasone dipropionate 640 micro g/day regarding Class I shifts (risk ratio of ciclesonide to beclomethasone dipropionate, 0.940 [95% confidence interval, 0.820-1.077]); the 95% confidence interval upper bound was lower than the pre-specified non-inferiority bound of 1.333 (p < 0.0001), thereby excluding the possibility of higher risk ratio values.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean changes in LOCS III scores were very small in both groups. Treatment with ciclesonide 640 micro g/day or beclomethasone dipropionate 640 micro g/day for 1 year has a minimal impact on lenticular opacities development and/or progression.

Metabolism of ciclesonide in the upper and lower airways: review of available data

Ciclesonide is a novel corticosteroid (CS) for the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis. After administration, the parent compound ciclesonide is converted by intracellular airway esterases to its pharmacologically active metabolite desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC). We investigated the in vitro activation of ciclesonide and further esterification of des-CIC to (mainly) des-CIC oleate in several human target organ test systems. Human precision-cut lung slices, alveolar type II epithelial cells (A549), normal bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE), and nasal epithelial cells (HNEC) were incubated with ciclesonide. Enzymes characterization and the determination of the reversibility of fatty acid esterification was investigated in HNEC and NHBE. Ciclesonide was taken up and converted to des-CIC in all cellular test systems. Intracellular concentrations of des-CIC were maintained for up to 24 h. Formation of des-CIC oleate increased over time in HNEC, A549 cells, and lung slices. The formed des-CIC fatty acid conjugates were reconverted to des-CIC. Increasing concentrations of carboxylesterase and cholinesterase inhibitors progressively reduced the formation of metabolites. The results derived from these studies demonstrate the activation of ciclesonide to des-CIC in the upper and lower airways. The reversible formation of des-CIC fatty acid conjugates may prolong the anti-inflammatory activity of des-CIC and may allow for once-daily dosing.

Ciclesonide versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are an integral part of asthma management, and act as an anti-inflammatory agent in the airways of the lung. These agents confer significant benefit in terms of symptom management and improvement in lung function, but may also cause harm in terms of local and systemic side-effects. Ciclesonide is a novel steroid that has efficient distribution and release properties that mean it can be taken once daily, making it potentially useful in ongoing asthma management.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide in adults and children with chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group register of trials with pre-defined terms. Additional searches of CENTRAL and PubMed were undertaken. The literature searches for this review are current up to June 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel or crossover studies were eligible for the review. We included studies comparing ciclesonide with placebo, and we also included studies comparing ciclesonide at different doses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed studies for inclusion in the review, extracted data independently and checked each others' work. We contacted study investigators in order to obtain additional data. Extracted data were entered into RevMan 4.2 and analysed as fixed effect mean differences for continuous data, and fixed effect risk ratios for dichotomous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen trials (reporting 20 study comparisons) met the review entry criteria. We report findings from 18 group comparisons where data were available (6343 participants, of whom 1692 were children). Ciclesonide versus placebo: The short duration of the included studies means that there is a lack of data with respect to the impact of ciclesonide on asthma exacerbations. At doses of 100 mcg/d or less up to 400 mcg/d in mild to moderate asthma, ciclesonide improved lung function, asthma symptoms and rescue inhaler use, compared with placebo.Dose response outcomes: Comparisons of 100 versus 200 mcg/d, 100 versus 400 mcg/d and 400 versus 800 mcg/d did not yield significant differences in lung function outcomes. Adverse event data were not available in sufficient detail to permit assessment of the safety profile of this drug.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ciclesonide was more effective than placebo, in the short term, in improving lung function in patients with mild to moderate asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids. There remain questions as to dose response, and the lack of data on the longer term impact on exacerbations and safety profile should be addressed in future studies.

Ciclesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate coadministration: effect on cortisol in perennial allergic rhinitis

Coexisting asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are often treated with both intranasal and inhaled corticosteroids. This study investigated whether intranasal ciclesonide 200 microg once daily has an additional effect on cortisol suppression when coadministered with inhaled hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP). Adult patients (n = 150) with perennial AR received HFA-BDP 320 microg twice daily and placebo once daily during a run-in period. Patients were then randomized to ciclesonide or placebo and HFA-BDP (43 days). A single 2-mg dose of dexamethasone was administered on the last treatment day. Plasma cortisol decreased by 67.8 microg x h/dL (p < 0.001) during the run-in period. When ciclesonide was added, the change in mean plasma cortisol was similar for ciclesonide and placebo (8.5 microg x h/dL and 1.0 microg x h/dL, respectively). Dexamethasone decreased mean plasma cortisol (p < 0.001), demonstrating that further cortisol suppression was possible. This study suggests that intranasal ciclesonide can be used with an inhaled corticosteroid without increased cortisol suppression.

Intranasal ciclesonide coadministration with inhaled fluticasone propionate-salmeterol does not suppress cortisol in allergic rhinitis patients

Intranasal and inhaled corticosteroid administration concurrently in comorbid allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma may potentially enhance cortisol suppression. This study determined whether intranasal ciclesonide 200 micro g once daily has an additional effect on cortisol suppression when coadministered with inhaled fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (FP-SAL) 500 to 50 micro g twice daily. Adults (N = 150) with perennial AR received FP-SAL and placebo nasal spray during the run-in period. Patients were randomized to ciclesonide or placebo and FP-SAL (43 days). A single 2-mg dose of dexamethasone was administered on the last treatment day. Plasma cortisol decreased during run-in period (p < 0.001), indicating cortisol suppression by FP-SAL. After ciclesonide was added to FP-SAL, plasma cortisol was similar in both groups. Dexamethasone decreased mean plasma cortisol (p < 0.001), demonstrating that further suppression was possible. Ciclesonide coadministered with FP-SAL did not have an additive effect on cortisol suppression compared with FP-SAL.

Similar efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in patients with persistent asthma

This 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of once daily ciclesonide and twice daily fluticasone propionate in patients aged 12-75 years with persistent asthma. Patients were randomized to once-daily ciclesonide 80 micro g (n = 278) or 160 micro g (n = 271), or twice daily fluticasone propionate 88 micro g (n = 259) (all ex-actuator). Significant improvements from baseline were seen in all three treatment groups for forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use (all p < 0.0001). Asthma exacerbation rates were low (each ciclesonide group, n = 2; fluticasone group, n = 1). Adverse event reporting indicated good tolerability. Once daily ciclesonide 80 micro g or 160 micro g showed comparable efficacy and tolerability to twice daily fluticasone propionate 88 micro g in persistent asthma.

Randomized comparison of ciclesonide 160 and 640 microg/day in severe asthma

OBJECTIVE

Demonstrating clinical benefit of higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma is frequently problematic owing to their relatively flat dose-response curve in this condition. In this study we compared the efficacy and safety of a fourfold difference in the dose of ciclesonide-ciclesonide 320 microg twice daily (CIC640) versus ciclesonide 160 microg once daily (CIC160)-in patients with severe persistent asthma.

METHODS

Patients with bronchial asthma (6 months) were included in this randomized, double-blind study. After receiving fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily during run-in, patients were randomized to CIC160 (n=339) or CIC640 (n=341) for 12 weeks. Primary endpoints were time to first asthma exacerbation and forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)). Secondary endpoints included other lung function variables, asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use (RMU).

RESULTS

Asthma exacerbations occurred in 12.7% of patients receiving CIC160 and 6.7% receiving CIC640. CIC640 was superior for time to first exacerbation (p=0.0050, one-sided). FEV(1) increased significantly with CIC160 and CIC640 (least squares mean+/-SE of mean: 269+/-31 and 332+/-31 mL, respectively; p<0.0001), with no significant difference between groups. Change in % predicted FEV(1) and morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) were significantly higher with CIC640 (p<0.05). Asthma symptom score sums and RMU decreased in both groups; CIC640 was statistically superior (p=0.0108 and 0.0005, respectively). No unexpected adverse events were reported in either group and the majority of the events reported were mild or moderate in intensity. No significant changes in serum cortisol were observed from the baseline to the study end. Small decreases in creatinine-adjusted 24h urine cortisol levels from baseline were seen in both the treatment groups, which, due to the large patient numbers, were statistically significant (p<0.05); however, no dose-response effect was seen and the difference between groups was not significant (p=0.7892).

CONCLUSION

CIC640 was superior to CIC160 for time to first exacerbation, % predicted FEV1, morning PEF, asthma symptom score sum and RMU in patients with severe asthma; both doses had similar tolerability profiles and no significant changes in serum cortisol were seen in either treatment group.

Ciclesonide uptake and metabolism in human alveolar type II epithelial cells (A549)

Background

Ciclesonide is a novel inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of airway inflammation. In this study we investigated uptake and in vitro metabolism of ciclesonide in human alveolar type II epithelial cells (A549). Ciclesonide uptake was compared with fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid that is not metabolized in lung tissue. A549 cells were incubated with 2 × 10^-8 M ciclesonide or fluticasone propionate for 3 to 30 min to determine uptake; or with 2 × 10^-8 M ciclesonide for 1 h, followed by incubation with drug-free buffer for 3, 6, and 24 h to analyze in vitro metabolism. High performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure the concentrations of both corticosteroids and metabolites.

Results

At all time points the mean intracellular concentration was higher for ciclesonide when compared with fluticasone propionate. Activation of ciclesonide to desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC) was confirmed and conjugates of des-CIC with fatty acids were detected. The intracellular concentration of ciclesonide decreased over time, whereas the concentration of des-CIC remained relatively stable: 2.27 to 3.19 pmol/dish between 3 and 24 h. The concentration of des-CIC fatty acid conjugates increased over time, with des-CIC-oleate being the main metabolite.

Conclusion

Uptake of ciclesonide into A549 cells was more efficient than that of the less lipophilic fluticasone propionate. Intracellular concentrations of the pharmacologically active metabolite des-CIC were maintained for up to 24 h. The local anti-inflammatory activity of ciclesonide in the lung may be prolonged by the slow release of active drug from the depot of fatty acid esters.

In vitro metabolism of beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide, ciclesonide, and fluticasone propionate in human lung precision-cut tissue slices

Background

The therapeutic effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may be affected by the metabolism of the drug in the target organ. We investigated the in vitro metabolism of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), budesonide (BUD), ciclesonide (CIC), and fluticasone propionate (FP) in human lung precision-cut tissue slices. CIC, a new generation ICS, is hydrolyzed by esterases in the upper and lower airways to its pharmacologically active metabolite desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC).

Methods

Lung tissue slices were incubated with BDP, BUD, CIC, and FP (initial target concentration of 25 μM) for 2, 6, and 24 h. Cellular viability was assessed using adenosine 5'-triphosphate content and protein synthesis in lung slices. Metabolites and remaining parent compounds in the tissue samples were analyzed by HPLC with UV detection.

Results

BDP was hydrolyzed to the pharmacologically active metabolite beclomethasone-17-monopropionate (BMP) and, predominantly, to inactive beclomethasone (BOH). CIC was hydrolyzed initially to des-CIC with a slower rate compared to BDP. A distinctly smaller amount (approximately 10-fold less) of fatty acid esters were formed by BMP (and/or BOH) than by BUD or des-CIC. The highest relative amounts of fatty acid esters were detected for BUD. For FP, no metabolites were detected at any time point. The amount of drug-related material in lung tissue (based on initial concentrations) at 24 h was highest for CIC, followed by BUD and FP; the smallest amount was detected for BDP.

Conclusion

The in vitro metabolic pathways of the tested ICS in human lung tissue were differing. While FP was metabolically stable, the majority of BDP was converted to inactive polar metabolites. The formation of fatty acid conjugates was confirmed for BMP (and/or BOH), BUD, and des-CIC.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily inhaled ciclesonide in adults with mild to moderate asthma: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for the management of asthma, although side-effects may limit their use. Ciclesonide, a novel pro-drug inhaled corticosteroid, exerts potent and prolonged local anti-inflammatory effects in the lungs, and is considered to have an improved safety and tolerability profile. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide in adult patients with mild to moderate asthma.

METHODS

A placebo-controlled, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted. During the 4-week baseline period, patients were given 400 microg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate in a chlorofluorocarbon formulation. After the baseline period, 311 patients were given once-daily 100, 200 or 400 microg of ciclesonide or placebo for an 8-week treatment period without the use of a spacer. The primary efficacy variable was morning PEF.

RESULTS

Changes in the morning PEF (least squares mean) at the end of the study were 4.23 L/min (P < 0.001) in the 100 microg group, 3.75 L/min (P < 0.001) in the 200 microg group, -0.40 L/min (P < 0.001) in the 400 microg group, as compared with -24.95 L/min in the placebo group. In the ciclesonide groups, the PEF remained at the same level as the baseline period. No large differences were observed between the placebo group and the ciclesonide groups regarding safety.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily administration of ciclesonide at doses of 100, 200 or 400 microg was shown to be effective in adult patients with mild to moderate asthma. Ciclesonide is considered to have favourable safety profiles and be well tolerated.

Chronobiology and chronotherapy of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma

Study of the chronobiology of allergic rhinitis (AR) and bronchial asthma (BA) and the chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of the medications used in their treatment began five decades ago. AR is an inflammatory disease of the upper airway tissue with hypersensitivity to specific environmental antigens, resulting in further local inflammation, vasomotor changes, and mucus hypersecretion. Symptoms include sneezing, nasal congestion, and runny and itchy nose. Approximately 25% of children and 40% of adults in USA are affected by AR during one or more seasons of the year. The manifestation and severity of AR symptoms exhibit prominent 24-h variation; in most persons they are worse overnight or early in the morning and often comprise nighttime sleep, resulting in poor daytime quality of life, compromised school and work performance, and irritability and moodiness. BA is also an inflammatory medical condition of the lower airways characterized by hypersensitivity to specific environmental antigens, resulting in greater local inflammation as well as bronchoconstriction, vasomotor change, and mucus hypersecretion. In USA an estimated 6.5 million children and 15.7 million adults have BA. The onset and worsening of BA are signaled by chest wheeze and/or croupy cough and difficult and labored breathing. Like AR, BA is primarily a nighttime medical condition. AR is treated with H1-antagonist, decongestant, and anti-inflammatory (glucocorticoid and leukotriene receptor antagonist and modifier) medications. Only H1-antagonist AR medications have been studied for their chronopharmacology and potential chronotherapy. BA is treated with some of the same medications and also theophylline and beta2-agonists. The chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of many classes of BA medications have been explored. This article reviews the rather extensive knowledge of the chronobiology of AR and BA and the chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of the various medications used in their treatment.

The paradox of adult asthma control: "who's in control anyway?"

Surveys of Canadian patients with asthma and their physicians consistently report satisfaction with asthma management; however, when objective indicators are used, these same surveys also observe very poor levels of asthma control. The reasons for this apparent discrepancy, with an emphasis on the factors influencing adherence to therapy, are explored in the present review. Clues to the identification of patients at risk of dying from asthma and an approach to difficult asthma are discussed.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide 160 microg once daily vs. budesonide 400 microg once daily in children with asthma

Ciclesonide is an onsite-activated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for the treatment of asthma. This study compared the efficacy, safety and effect on quality of life (QOL) of ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator; nominal dose 200 microg) vs. budesonide 400 microg (nominal dose) in children with asthma. Six hundred and twenty-one children (aged 6-11 yr) with asthma were randomized to receive ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily (via hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler and AeroChamber Plus spacer) or budesonide 400 microg once daily (via Turbohaler) both given in the evening for 12 wk. The primary efficacy end-point was change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Additional measurements included change in daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), change in asthma symptom score sum, change in use of rescue medication, paediatric and caregiver asthma QOL questionnaire [PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ, respectively] scores, change in body height assessed by stadiometry, change in 24-h urinary cortisol adjusted for creatinine and adverse events. Both ciclesonide and budesonide increased FEV1, morning PEF and PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ scores, and improved asthma symptom score sums and the need for rescue medication after 12 wk vs. baseline. The non-inferiority of ciclesonide vs. budesonide was demonstrated for the change in FEV1 (95% confidence interval: -75, 10 ml, p = 0.0009, one-sided non-inferiority, per-protocol). In addition, ciclesonide and budesonide showed similar efficacy in improving asthma symptoms, morning PEF, use of rescue medication and QOL. Ciclesonide was superior to budesonide with regard to increases in body height (p = 0.003, two-sided). The effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis was significantly different in favor of ciclesonide treatment (p < 0.001, one-sided). Both ciclesonide and budesonide were well tolerated. Ciclesonide 160 microg once daily and budesonide 400 microg once daily were effective in children with asthma. In addition, in children treated with ciclesonide there was significantly less reduction in body height and suppression of 24-h urinary cortisol excretion compared with children treated with budesonide after 12 wk.

Differences in Endogenous Esterification and Retention in the Rat Trachea between Budesonide and Ciclesonide Active Metabolite

The airway retention of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCs) depends largely on their lipophilicity. Inhaled budesonide (BUD) becomes highly lipophilic reversibly by the formation of esters acting as a reservoir of active BUD. Ciclesonide (CIC) was also reported to form esters after hydrolysis to active metabolite (CIC-AM). We have investigated lipophilicity and airway retention of BUD, CIC/CIC-AM, fluticasone propionate (FP), and mometasone furoate (MF), and compared esterification of BUD and CIC-AM and its contribution to GC airway retention. Rat tracheas were preincubated with the esterification inhibitor cyclandelate or vehicle. A (3)H-GC ( approximately 10(-7) M: BUD, CIC, CIC-AM, FP, MF) was added for 20 min. After incubation, one half of the trachea was used for analysis of GC uptake and the other to analyze GC release during 3 h in drug-free medium. GC species in trachea halves were analyzed by radiochromatography. At 20 min, the uptake of BUD was similar to that of CIC/CIC-AM; however, the BUD-ester pool was 9-fold greater (p < 0.01). BUD overall retention in trachea at 3 h was greater than that of other GCs (p < 0.01), and the BUD-ester pool was 3-fold greater than the CIC-AM-ester pool (p < 0.01). Cyclandelate decreased the initial BUD- and CIC-AM-ester pools (p < 0.01), and reduced the overall retention of BUD at 3 h (p < 0.01) but not of CIC-AM. Thus, BUD becomes esterified in the airways more promptly and to a greater extent than CIC-AM, and BUD esterification prolongs BUD airway retention. In contrast, airway retention of CIC-AM and CIC seems to be determined mainly by their lipophilicity, similar to FP and MF, which are not esterified.

Randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide and budesonide in adolescents with severe asthma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide compared with budesonide in adolescents with severe asthma.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, patients aged 12-17 years with severe asthma were treated with budesonide 400 microg once daily (QD) in a 2-week run-in period. At randomization, eligible patients were assigned 2:1 to ciclesonide 320 microg QD (ex-actuator) or budesonide 800 microg QD (metered dose), respectively, in the evening. Forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) was the primary variable. Patients recorded asthma symptom score and rescue medication use in diaries. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and 24-h urine cortisol.

RESULTS

Four hundred and three patients were randomized. Ciclesonide 320 microg QD and budesonide 800 microg QD significantly increased FEV(1) (least-squares mean: 505 and 536 mL, respectively; both p<0.0001 versus baseline) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (ITT: -138 mL; per-protocol: -122 mL) were above the non-inferiority limit (-150 mL). Median percentage of days without asthma symptoms and without rescue medication use was 84% with ciclesonide and 85% with budesonide. AEs were unremarkable, with no cases of confirmed candidiasis. Median creatinine-adjusted urine cortisol significantly decreased with budesonide treatment (15.9-13.7 nmol cortisol/mmol creatinine; p=0.0086 versus baseline), but not with ciclesonide (p=0.1125).

CONCLUSIONS

Ciclesonide 320 microg QD showed similar efficacy to budesonide 800 microg QD in adolescents with severe asthma. Ciclesonide was well tolerated and, unlike budesonide, had no effect on urine cortisol levels.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT No.: 2004-001233-41.

Comparison of twice-daily inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relative efficacy of ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate (FP) administered at comparable microgram doses in maintaining asthma control in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.

METHODS

This randomized, open-label, parallel-group study enrolled patients aged 12-75 years with a 6-month history of bronchial asthma. To enter a 2-week run-in period, patients had to have received FP 500-1000 microg/day or equivalent at a stable dose for 4 weeks and have a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV 1) 80% of predicted. To enter the treatment period, patients had to have the following during run-in: FEV 1 80% of predicted; reversibility of Delta FEV 1 12% after 200-400 microg salbutamol; and 1 day without asthma symptoms during the last 7 days. Patients were randomized to twice-daily ciclesonide 320 microg (ex-actuator) or twice-daily FP 330 microg (ex-actuator) for 6 months. Efficacy was assessed by lung function, asthma exacerbations, asthma symptoms and rescue medication use. Patients completed the standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ[S]). Adverse events (AEs), including local oropharyngeal AEs, were recorded.

RESULTS

528 patients were randomized (ciclesonide, n=255; FP, n=273). In both groups, FEV 1 was maintained from baseline to study end (mean increase: ciclesonide 11 mL, FP 24 mL; intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis). The least squares mean+/-standard error of the mean for the treatment difference was -13+/-29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -70, 44) in the ITT analysis and -27+/-34 (95% CI: -93, 40) in the per-protocol (PP) analysis, demonstrating non-inferiority of ciclesonide to FP. Morning, evening and site-measured PEF improved significantly with both treatments (ITT and PP analyses: p<0.05). Six patients receiving ciclesonide and seven receiving FP (ITT analysis) experienced an asthma exacerbation requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids. Both treatments significantly decreased asthma symptom score sum (ITT and PP analyses: p0.0001) and rescue medication use (ITT and PP analyses: p<0.05), with no significant difference between treatments. Both treatments significantly improved overall AQLQ(S) score (ITT and PP analyses: p<0.05). Significantly more patients experienced candidiasis and dysphonia with FP compared with ciclesonide (p=0.0023).

CONCLUSION

Ciclesonide 320 microg and FP 330 microg administered twice daily over 6 months provided similar efficacy in patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma previously well-controlled by high doses of ICS at baseline. Ciclesonide was associated with fewer local AEs than FP.

The role of esterases in the metabolism of ciclesonide to desisobutyryl-ciclesonide in human tissue

Ciclesonide (CIC) is an inhaled glucocorticosteroid. This study aimed to identify esterases involved in the metabolism of CIC to the active metabolite desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC), and to measure hydrolysis rates in human liver, lung and plasma and normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells in vitro. Ciclesonide (5 microM and 500 microM) was incubated with microsomal or cytosolic fractions from liver, lung and plasma (n=4 for each) and des-CIC formation was determined by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with U.V. detection. The roles of carboxylesterase, cholinesterase and A-esterase in CIC hydrolysis were determined using a range of inhibitors. Inhibitor concentrations for liver and NHBE cells were 100 microM and 5 microM, respectively. Liver tissue had a higher activity for 500 microM CIC hydrolysis (microsomes: 25.4; cytosol: 62.9 nmol/g tissue/min) than peripheral lung (microsomes: 0.089; cytosol: 0.915 nmol/g tissue/min) or plasma (0.001 nmol/mL plasma/min), corresponding with high levels of carboxylesterase and cholinesterase in the liver compared with the lung. CIC (5 microM) was rapidly hydrolyzed by NHBE cells (approximately 30% conversion at 4h), with almost complete conversion by 24h. In liver and NHBE cells, major involvement of cytosolic carboxylesterases, with some contribution by cholinesterases, was indicated. The highest level of conversion was found in the liver, the site of inactivation of des-CIC through rapid oxidation by cytochrome P450. Carboxylesterases in bronchial epithelial cells probably contribute significantly to the conversion to des-CIC in the target organ, whereas low systemic levels of des-CIC are a result of the high metabolic clearance by the liver following CIC inhalation.

A randomized study comparing ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of once-daily ciclesonide and twice-daily fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

Patients aged 12-75 years with moderate bronchial asthma entered a 1-4 week run-in period. For inclusion into the 12-week, randomized, open-label treatment period, patients had to have a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) of either 60-80% of predicted or 80% of predicted and a defined use of rescue medication and asthma symptoms, depending on previous treatment. Patients received ciclesonide 320 microg once daily (ex-actuator) or fluticasone propionate 200 microg twice daily. Primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in FEV1.

RESULTS

In total, 474 patients were randomized. FEV1 increased significantly from baseline with ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses (all p < 0.0001). Treatment difference was -31 mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: -121, 59) in the PP analysis, demonstrating non-inferiority of ciclesonide. Similar findings were seen for other measures of lung function. In the ITT population, asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use decreased with both treatments (all p < 0.0001). Improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from baseline was significantly greater with ciclesonide than fluticasone (p = 0.005; one-sided). There were no cases of oral candidiasis in patients receiving ciclesonide and nine cases (3.8%) in those receiving fluticasone propionate (p = 0.002; one-sided).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with once-daily ciclesonide and twice-daily fluticasone propionate resulted in similar improvements in lung function in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Ciclesonide showed significant improvements in oral candidiasis and HRQoL over fluticasone.

Evidence-based selection of inhaled corticosteroid for treatment of chronic asthma

Published literature relevant to comparison of various inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) was reviewed. Marked heterogeneity was found in the reported results. The efficacy and side effects of ICSs depend on their formulation, dosing and device used, and the subjects' age, severity of asthma, and inhaler technique. All these factors have not been included uniformly in most study designs. Notwithstanding this limitation, it appears that fluticasone is generally very effective and safe in low-to-medium doses and may be used for most patients. Budesonide is the only Pregnancy Category B ICSs, all others being Category C, and it is available as nebulizer suspension suitable for use in children over 6 months of age. Budesonide, also available as dry powder inhaler, and beclomethasone, available as metered-dose inhaler, are equal in efficacy, and side effects and may be chosen according to the patient's ability to handle the device. Flunisolide causes fewer side effects but is also relatively less effective. Triamcinolone is generally less effective and causes more side effects than most of the other ICSs. Mometasone may be preferred if once-daily dosing is desired. Ciclesonide has been found highly effective in once-daily dose and without side effects even in high doses. Further studies comparing it with other ICSs over longer periods of use will determine its place in treatment of chronic asthma.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled ciclesonide

Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended first-line therapy for persistent asthma of all severities; however, oropharyngeal and systemic adverse events can be a concern. Inhaled corticosteroids exert their therapeutic and adverse effects by interacting with glucocorticoid receptors within and outside the lungs, respectively. Ciclesonide is a novel inhaled corticosteroid that possesses a unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Ciclesonide is inactive itself and converted to its pharmacologically active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, in the target organ, the lungs. Pulmonary activation combined with low oral deposition may minimize oropharyngeal adverse events, and low oral bioavailability, rapid clearance, and high protein binding may reduce systemic exposure. In addition, high pulmonary deposition due to the highly respirable particles, combined with the potential for prolonged lung retention via lipid conjugation, provides for effective therapeutic action.

In vitro metabolism of ciclesonide in human nasal epithelial cells

Ciclesonide, a corticosteroid in development for allergic rhinitis, is converted to the pharmacologically active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC), and des-CIC is subsequently esterified with fatty acids. Various experiments were performed to investigate ciclesonide metabolism in human nasal epithelial cells (HNEC). Human nasal epithelial cells were incubated with (a) 0.1 microM ciclesonide for 1 h and medium without ciclesonide for up to 24 h, (b) esterase inhibitors for 0.5 h followed by 5 microM ciclesonide for 6 h, or (c) 1 microM des-CIC for 6 h followed by medium without des-CIC for up to 24 h. Ciclesonide, des-CIC and des-CIC fatty acid conjugate concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The amount of ciclesonide in HNEC decreased approximately 93-fold from 0.5 to 24 h. In contrast, des-CIC was present at constant levels throughout the post-treatment period. Furthermore, fatty acid conjugates of des-CIC were retained in HNEC up to 24 h post-treatment. Carboxylesterase and cholinesterase inhibitors decreased ciclesonide metabolism > or =50%. The total amounts of des-CIC fatty acid conjugates decreased and the extracellular amounts of des-CIC increased with time. In conclusion, ciclesonide was rapidly converted to des-CIC by carboxylesterases and cholinesterases, and des-CIC underwent reversible fatty acid conjugation in HNEC.

Evaluation of tests of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function used to measure effects of inhaled corticosteroids

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence supporting the evaluation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function as a measure of systemic exposure and clinical adverse events, discuss factors that affect systemic exposure to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), and review the effects of various ICSs that are currently available or under development on HPA axis function from a therapeutic perspective.

DATA SOURCES

Randomized published clinical trials and review articles on the topic of HPA axis suppression were retrieved in MEDLINE. Searches dating back to 1988 were restricted to human studies published in English.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that evaluated HPA axis function and the methods used to measure its activities and the effects of ICSs (fluticasone propionate, budesonide, beclomethasone dipropionate, mometasone furoate, and ciclesonide) were selected.

RESULTS

Factors that influence adverse events caused by ICSs include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, delivery devices, and therapeutic dose and duration. Basal measurements of blood and urinary cortisol levels, reflecting basal HPA axis function, are the most sensitive markers for assessing systemic ICS bioavailability but, compared with dynamic stimulation tests, are poor clinical predictors of adrenal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Basal serologic and urinary cortisol tests provide the best measures of assessing and comparing systemic ICS exposure. Long-term clinical studies are needed to determine whether such tests are predictive of ICS toxicity.

Novel therapeutic interventions for allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis is a high-prevalence disease, affecting 10 - 20% of the general population. Allergic rhinitis is sustained by an IgE-mediated reaction and by a complex inflammatory network of cells, mediators and cytokines that becomes chronic when exposure to allergen persists. A T(H)2-biased immune response is the background of the allergic inflammation. The current therapeutic strategy is mainly based on drugs (antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, cromones and decongestants) and allergen immunotherapy. Drugs are (overall) effective in controlling symptoms but do not modify the immune background that leads to allergic inflammation and safety concerns may be present, especially for prolonged treatments. Immunotherapy can modify the allergic response but there is still room for improvement. Nowadays, several approaches are under investigation to optimise the management of allergic rhinitis. On one hand, new drugs and antimediators are being developed. On the other hand, attempts are being made to selectively block relevant signal pathways of allergic reaction. Finally, one of the major goals is to modify the T(H)2-biased immune response by improving the characteristics and modes of action of allergen immunotherapy.