Current United Kingdom sedation practice in pediatric intensive care

Exposure to Sedation and Analgesia Medications: Short-term Cognitive Outcomes in Pediatric Critical Care Survivors With Acquired Brain Injury

Background/Objective: Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) survivors risk significant cognitive morbidity, particularly those with acquired brain injury (ABI) diagnoses. Studies show sedative and analgesic medication may potentiate neurologic injury, but few studies evaluate impact on survivor outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate whether exposures to analgesic and sedative medications are associated with worse neurocognitive outcome. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 91 patients aged 8 to 18 years, undergoing clinical neurocognitive evaluation approximately 1 to 3 months after PICU discharge. Electronic health data was queried for sedative and analgesic medication exposures, including opioids, benzodiazepines, propofol, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine. Doses were converted to class equivalents, evaluated by any exposure and cumulative dose exposure per patient weight. Cognitive outcome was derived from 8 objective cognitive assessments with an emphasis on executive function skills using Principal Components Analysis. Then, linear regression was used to control for baseline cognitive function estimates to calculate a standardized residualized neurocognitive index (rNCI) z-score. Multivariable linear regression evaluated the association between rNCI and medication exposure controlling for covariates. Significance was defined as P < .05. Results: Most (n = 80; 88%) patients received 1 or more study medications. Any exposure and higher cumulative doses of benzodiazepine and ketamine were significantly associated with worse rNCI in bivariate analyses. When controlling for Medicaid, preadmission comorbid conditions, length of stay, delirium, and receipt of other medication classes, receipt of benzodiazepine was associated with significantly worse rNCI (β-coefficient = -0.48, 95% confidence interval = -0.88, -0.08). Conclusions: Exposure to benzodiazepines was independently associated with worse acute phase cognitive outcome using objective assessments focused on executive function skills when controlling for demographic and illness characteristics. Clinician decisions regarding medication regimens in the PICU may serve as a modifiable factor to improve outcomes. Additional inquiry into associations with long-term cognitive outcome and optimal medication regimens is needed.

Implementation of an algorithm for tapering analgosedation reduces iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in pediatric intensive care

BACKGROUND

Proper analgosedation is a cornerstone in the treatment of critically ill patients in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). Medications, such as fentanyl, morphine, and midazolam, are essential to safe and respectful care. The use of these medications over time may lead to side effects such as iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) in the tapering phase. The aim of the study was to test an algorithm for tapering analgosedation to reduce the prevalence of IWS in two Norwegian PICUs at Oslo University Hospital.

METHODS

A cohort of mechanically ventilated patients from newborn to 18 years with continuous infusions of opioids and benzodiazepines for 5 days or more were included consecutively from May 2016 to December 2021. A pre- and posttest design, with an intervention phase using an algorithm for tapering analgosedation after the pretest, was used. The ICU staffs were trained in using the algorithm after the pretest. The primary outcome was a reduction in IWS. The Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1) was used to identify IWS. A WAT-1 score ≥3 indicates IWS.

RESULTS

We included 80 children, 40 in the baseline group, and 40 in the intervention group. Age and diagnosis did not differ between the groups. The prevalence of IWS was 95% versus 52.5% in the baseline group versus the intervention group, and the peak WAT-1 median was 5.0 (IQR 4-6.8) versus 3.0 (IQR 2.0-6.0) (p = .012). Based on SUM WAT-1 ≥ 3, which describes the burden over time better, we demonstrated a reduction of IWS, from a median of 15.5 (IQR 8.25-39) to a median of 3 (IQR 0-20) (p = <.001).

CONCLUSION

We suggest using an algorithm for tapering analgosedation in PICUs since the prevalence of IWS was significantly lower in the intervention group in our study.

Retrospective observational study of chloral hydrate use in mechanically-ventilated pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients 2012-2017

Introduction: Chloral hydrate (CH) has long been utilized as a pediatric procedural sedation agent. However, very little is published describing CH use in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting. The aim of this retrospective observational cohort study was to investigate and describe the use of CH in mechanically-ventilated, critically ill children at a large pediatric tertiary referral hospital. Methods: Data were extracted from the hospital electronic medical record and a locally maintained registry of all children admitted to the PICU between 2012 and 2017. Patients admitted to the cardiovascular ICU were not included in this review. The clinical and pharmacy data for 3806 consecutive PICU admissions of mechanically-ventilated, critically ill children were examined. Results: 283 admissions received CH during their first ICU stay. CH-exposed children were younger (16 months vs. 35 months, p < 0.001), the median total dose of CH (indexed to duration of ventilation) was 11 mg/kg/day, the median time to first CH dose was 3 days and more CH doses were administered at night (1112 vs. 958, p < 0.001). We constructed a propensity score to adjust for the differences in patients with and without CH exposure using logistic regression including variables of age, sex, diagnosis, and PRISM3 score. After adjustment, the median length of mechanical ventilation was 5 days longer in the CH-exposed group (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 4-6) compared to unexposed CH patients. Similarly, the median length of ICU duration was 9.4 days longer (95% CI 7.1-11.6) and median length of hospital admission duration was 13.2 days longer (95% CI 7.8-18.6) in CH-exposed patients compared to CH-non-exposed. After adjustment, CH-exposed patients had a 9% higher median exposure to HFOV (95% CI 3.9-14.6), but did not have higher median exposures to new tracheostomy (95% CI -0.4-2.2) or ECMO (95% CI -0.2-5.0). Discussion: As part of an extended sedation regimen in mechanically-ventilated and critically ill children, CH is associated with somewhat higher complexity of illness and longer ICU durations.

An Assessment of the Practice of Neuromuscular Blockade and the Association Between Its Prophylactic Use and Outcomes Among Postoperative Pediatric Cardiac Patients

OBJECTIVES

The authors investigated the management of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) for pediatric patients after cardiac surgery, and compared the outcomes of patients who received prophylactic NMBA (pNMBA) infusions and patients without pNMBA infusions.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

At a tertiary teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients younger than 18, with congenital heart disease, who underwent cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Commencement of NMBA infusion in the first 2 hours after surgery MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was a composite of one or more of the following major adverse events (MAEs) that occurred within 7 days after surgery: death from any cause, a circulatory collapse that needed cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The secondary endpoints included the total duration of mechanical ventilation for the first 30 days after surgery. A total of 566 patients were included in this study. The MAEs occurred in 13 patients (2.3%). An NMBA was commenced within 2 hours after surgery in 207 patients (36.6%). There were significant differences in the incidence of postoperative MAEs between the pNMBA group and the non-pNMBA group (5.3% v 0.6%; p < 0.001). In multivariate regression models, pNMBA infusion was not significantly associated with the incidence of MAEs (odds ratio: 1.79, 95% CI: 0.23-13.93, p = 0.58), but was significantly associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation by 3.85 days (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative prophylactic neuromuscular blockade after cardiac surgery can be associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, but has no association with MAEs among pediatric patients with congenital heart disease.

Long-term neurocognitive outcomes after pediatric intensive care: exploring the role of drug exposure

BACKGROUND

Concerns exist regarding the impact of widely used clinical drugs on brain development. This study investigates long-term neurocognitive functioning in relation to frequently used drug exposure at the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

METHODS

This study compared children aged 6-12 years with previous PICU admission (age ≤1 year) for bronchiolitis requiring mechanical ventilation (patient group, n = 65) to a demographically comparable control group (n = 76) on a broad range of neurocognitive outcomes. The patient group was selected because bronchiolitis seldom manifests neurologically and is therefore not expected to affect neurocognitive functioning in itself. The relation between exposure to sedatives, analgesics and anesthetics and neurocognitive outcomes was assessed by regression analyses.

RESULTS

The patient group had lower intelligence than the control group (p < 0.001, d = -0.59) and poorer performance in neurocognitive functions; i.e., speed and attention (p = 0.03, d = -0.41) and verbal memory (p < 0.001, d = -0.60). Exposure to sedatives, analgesics and anesthetics was not related to neurocognitive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with PICU admission for bronchiolitis requiring mechanical ventilation are at risk of adverse neurocognitive outcomes. This study found no evidence for a role of exposure to sedatives, analgesics or anesthetics. Findings underline the importance of long-term follow-up after PICU admission, even in the absence of disease with neurological manifestation.

IMPACT

Animal studies have indicated that exposing the maturing brain to clinical drugs may cause neurodegeneration. Clinical studies show mixed evidence regarding the association between clinical drugs and neurocognitive outcomes. This study provides evidence for considerably lower neurocognitive functioning among children with a history of PICU admission for bronchiolitis compared to healthy peers. Bronchiolitis seldom manifests neurologically and is therefore not expected to affect neurocognitive functioning in itself. We found no evidence supporting a relation between drug exposure (i.e., sedatives, analgesics and anesthetics) and long-term neurocognitive outcomes. Findings underline the importance of structured follow-up after PICU admission.

Sedation practices during high dose rate brachytherapy for children with urogenital and perianal rhabdomyosarcoma

BACKGROUND

A novel concept for an organ-preserving treatment of pediatric urogenital and perianal rhabdomyosarcoma includes high dose rate brachytherapy following surgical tumor resection. For the duration of the brachytherapy of 6 days plus 2-day recovery break the patients are not allowed to move and are kept under deep sedation, which can lead to difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation, withdrawal, delirium, and prolonged hospital stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate a protocol which includes a switch from fentanyl to ketamine 3 days prior to extubation to help ensure a rapid extubation and transfer from PICU.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical tumor resection of rhabdomyosarcoma and subsequent brachytherapy were treated according to a standardized protocol. We evaluated doses of fentanyl, midazolam and clonidine, time of extubation, length of PICU stay and occurrence of withdrawal symptoms and delirium. We compared fentanyl dose at time of extubation, duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation and time to discharge from PICU with patients after isolated severe traumatic brain injury.

RESULTS

Twentytwo patients (age 39.9 ± 29.8 months) were treated in our PICU to undergo brachytherapy. Extubation was performed 21.6 ± 13.5 h after the last brachytherapy session with an average fentanyl dose of 1.5 ± 0.5 µg/kg/h and patients were discharged from PICU 58.4 ± 30.3 h after extubation, which all is significantly lower compared to the control group (extubation after 88.0 ± 42.2 h, p < 0.001; fentanyl dose at the time of extubation 2.5 ± 0.6 µg/kg/h, p < 0.001; PICU discharge after 130.1 ± 148.4 h, p < 0.009). Withdrawal symptoms were observed in 9 patients and delirium in 13 patients.

CONCLUSION

A standardized analgesia and sedation protocol including an opioid break, scoring systems to detect withdrawal symptoms and delirium, and tapering plans contributes to successful early extubation and discharge from PICU after long-term deep sedation.

2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients With Consideration of the ICU Environment and Early Mobility

RATIONALE

A guideline that both evaluates current practice and provides recommendations to address sedation, pain, and delirium management with regard for neuromuscular blockade and withdrawal is not currently available.

OBJECTIVE

To develop comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for critically ill infants and children, with specific attention to seven domains of care including pain, sedation/agitation, iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment, and early mobility.

DESIGN

The Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility Guideline Taskforce was comprised of 29 national experts who collaborated from 2009 to 2021 via teleconference and/or e-mail at least monthly for planning, literature review, and guideline development, revision, and approval. The full taskforce gathered annually in-person during the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress for progress reports and further strategizing with the final face-to-face meeting occurring in February 2020. Throughout this process, the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures Manual for Guidelines development was adhered to.

METHODS

Taskforce content experts separated into subgroups addressing pain/analgesia, sedation, tolerance/iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment (family presence and sleep hygiene), and early mobility. Subgroups created descriptive and actionable Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. An experienced medical information specialist developed search strategies to identify relevant literature between January 1990 and January 2020. Subgroups reviewed literature, determined quality of evidence, and formulated recommendations classified as "strong" with "we recommend" or "conditional" with "we suggest." Good practice statements were used when indirect evidence supported benefit with no or minimal risk. Evidence gaps were noted. Initial recommendations were reviewed by each subgroup and revised as deemed necessary prior to being disseminated for voting by the full taskforce. Individuals who had an overt or potential conflict of interest abstained from relevant votes. Expert opinion alone was not used in substitution for a lack of evidence.

RESULTS

The Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility taskforce issued 44 recommendations (14 strong and 30 conditional) and five good practice statements.

CONCLUSIONS

The current guidelines represent a comprehensive list of practical clinical recommendations for the assessment, prevention, and management of key aspects for the comprehensive critical care of infants and children. Main areas of focus included 1) need for the routine monitoring of pain, agitation, withdrawal, and delirium using validated tools, 2) enhanced use of protocolized sedation and analgesia, and 3) recognition of the importance of nonpharmacologic interventions for enhancing patient comfort and comprehensive care provision.

Use of continuous infusion of clonidine for sedation in critically ill infants and children

BACKGROUND

Adequate sedation and analgesia are required for critically ill children in order to minimize discomfort, reduce anxiety, and facilitate care. This is commonly achieved through a combination of opioids and benzodiazepines. Prolonged use of these agents is associated with tolerance and withdrawal. Clonidine as an adjunctive sedative agent may reduce sedation-related adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

Our first aim was to describe the indication for clonidine administration and its secondary effects in a mixed cohort of critically ill children. Our secondary aim was to measure the consumption of sedatives during two study periods: before and after the use of clonidine in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

This was a single-center study conducted in a tertiary PICU and encompassed retrospective chart review of patients who received clonidine between November 2013 and April 2015. We collected data on clonidine dosage, duration of administration, indication for the prescription, and potential side effects. We analyzed the total consumption of sedatives over 18 months, before and after the introduction of clonidine in our sedation protocol.

RESULTS

A total of patients received clonidine, with a mean age of 2.2 ± 2.8 years. The primary reason for intensive care admission was respiratory failure (48%). The main indication for clonidine administration was increasing requirement for morphine and midazolam (60%). The mean duration of clonidine infusion was 9 ± 7.3 days. Bradycardia and hypotension occurred in five patients (11.6%) and nine patients (21%), respectively. These side effects did not result in any major intervention. Younger age was a risk factor for clonidine-associated bradycardia. We observed a significant decrease in morphine and midazolam consumption with clonidine as a comedication. Compared with the pre-study period, consumption decreased by 19.7% for morphine and by 59% for midazolam (calculated as milligram/admission).

CONCLUSION

Continuous infusion of clonidine in critically ill children is safe and effective. Clonidine is a sedative-sparing agent and this can help reduce complications associated with prolonged use of opioids and benzodiazepines.

The Withdrawal Assessment Tool to identify iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms in critically ill paediatric patients: A COSMIN systematic review of measurement properties

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1) is one of the most widely used clinician-reported outcome measures to evaluate iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms (IWS) in critically ill children. However, the WAT-1's measurement properties have not been aggregated. Aggregating psychometric research on the WAT-1 will enhance appropriate use, and outline gaps for future empirical research. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise, compare, and summarize the measurement properties and evidence quality, and describe the interpretability and feasibility of the WAT-1 for identifying IWS symptoms in critically ill children.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline, Embase and CINAHL was conducted from inception to 15 April 2020. Study inclusion/exclusion, data extraction, and measurement property evidence and the modified GRADE quality scoring were applied according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in the review. There was sufficient, high-quality evidence for reliability, structural validity, criterion validity, measurement error, construct validity, and feasibility. More information is required to support the WAT-1's content validity, responsiveness, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and interpretability according to COSMIN guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review indicate that the WAT-1 is a precise, easy to use measure of IWS in critically ill children despite some measurement property inconsistencies and gaps in the publication record. More information is required to support its content validity, responsiveness, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and interpretability.

Current State of Analgesia and Sedation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Critically ill pediatric patients often require complex medical procedures as well as invasive testing and monitoring which tend to be painful and anxiety-provoking, necessitating the provision of analgesia and sedation to reduce stress response. Achieving the optimal combination of adequate analgesia and appropriate sedation can be quite challenging in a patient population with a wide spectrum of ages, sizes, and developmental stages. The added complexities of critical illness in the pediatric population such as evolving pathophysiology, impaired organ function, as well as altered pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics must be considered. Undersedation leaves patients at risk of physical and psychological stress which may have significant long term consequences. Oversedation, on the other hand, leaves the patient at risk of needing prolonged respiratory, specifically mechanical ventilator, support, prolonged ICU stay and hospital admission, and higher risk of untoward effects of analgosedative agents. Both undersedation and oversedation put critically ill pediatric patients at high risk of developing PICU-acquired complications (PACs) like delirium, withdrawal syndrome, neuromuscular atrophy and weakness, post-traumatic stress disorder, and poor rehabilitation. Optimal analgesia and sedation is dependent on continuous patient assessment with appropriately validated tools that help guide the titration of analgosedative agents to effect. Bundled interventions that emphasize minimizing benzodiazepines, screening for delirium frequently, avoiding physical and chemical restraints thereby allowing for greater mobility, and promoting adequate and proper sleep will disrupt the PICU culture of immobility and reduce the incidence of PACs.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale to Brazilian Portuguese for the evaluation of sedation in pediatric intensive care

OBJECTIVE

To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) to Brazilian Portuguese for the evaluation of sedation in pediatric intensive care.

METHODS

Cross-cultural adaptation process including the conceptual, item, semantic and operational equivalence stages according to current recommendations.

RESULTS

Pretests, divided into two stages, included 30 professionals from the pediatric intensive care unit of a university hospital, who administered the translated RASS to patients aged 29 days to 18 years. The pretests showed a content validity index above 0.90 for all items: 0.97 in the first stage of pretests and 0.99 in the second.

CONCLUSION

The cross-cultural adaptation of RASS to Brazilian Portuguese resulted in a version with excellent comprehensibility and acceptability in a pediatric intensive care setting. Reliability and validity studies should be performed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the RASS.

Safety of clonidine used for long-term sedation in paediatric intensive care: A systematic review

AIM

Although not approved, the α-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine is considered an option for long-term sedation protocols in paediatric intensive care. We reviewed adverse effects of clonidine occurring in this indication.

METHODS

Relevant literature was systematically identified from PubMed and Embase. We included interventional and observational studies on paediatric patients admitted to intensive care units and systemically long-term sedated with clonidine-containing regimes. In duplicates, we conducted standardised and independent full-text assessment and extraction of safety data.

RESULTS

Data from 11 studies with 909 patients were analysed. The studies were heterogeneous regarding patient characteristics (age groups, comorbidity, or comedication) and sedation regimes (dosage, route, duration, or concomitant sedatives). Just four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and one observational study had comparison groups, using placebo or midazolam. For safety outcomes, our validity evaluation showed low risk of bias only in three studies. All studies focused on haemodynamic problems, particularly bradycardia and hypotension. Observed incidences or subsequent interventions never caused concerns. However, only two RCTs allowed meaningful comparisons with control groups. Odds ratios showed no significant difference between the groups, but small sample sizes (50 and 125 patients) must be considered; pooled analyses were not reasonable.

CONCLUSION

All evaluated studies concluded that the use of clonidine in paediatric intensive care units is safe. However, a valid characterisation of the safety profile remains challenging due to limited, biased and heterogeneous data and missing investigation of long-term effects. This evaluation demonstrates the lack of data, which prevents reliable conclusions on the safety of clonidine for long-term sedation in critically ill children. For an evidence-based use, further studies are needed.

Sedation and Analgesia Practices in Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A Survey of 27 Centers from Turkey

The management and monitoring of sedoanalgesia are important measures in improving the efficacy of procedures and mechanical ventilation, as well as reducing adverse effects and preventing withdrawal syndrome, and delirium in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). As there is an ongoing need to clarify the best approach to sedoanalgesia in PICUs, we aimed to analyze the current approaches in sedation, analgesia, withdrawal, and delirium practices among PICUs in Turkey. Twenty-seven PICUs completed the survey. Only 9 (33.3%) and 13 (48.1%) centers had a written protocol for analgesia and sedation, respectively. Paracetamol and a combination of midazolam and fentanyl were preferred in 51.8 and 40% of the PICUs for postoperative periods, respectively, and 81.4% of the units preferred ketamine for short-term interventions. For prolonged sedation in mechanically ventilated children, a combination of benzodiazepines and opiates were the most preferred first-line agents with a very high percentage of 81.4%, whereas ketamine and dexmedetomidine accounted for 62.9 and 18.5%, respectively, as second-line options. Although sedative and analgesic agent preferences were comparable with the relevant literature, we should focus on developing a standardized, evidence-based algorithm for sedation and analgesic drugs.

Sedation, Analgesia, and Neuromuscular Blockade: An Assessment of Practices From 2009 to 2016 in a National Sample of 66,443 Pediatric Patients Cared for in the ICU

OBJECTIVES

To describe the pharmaceutical management of sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade medications administered to children in ICUs.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis using data extracted from the national database Health Facts.

SETTING

One hundred sixty-one ICUs in the United States with pediatric admissions.

PATIENTS

Children in ICUs receiving medications from 2009 to 2016.

EXPOSURE/INTERVENTION

Frequency and duration of administration of sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade medications.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 66,443 patients with a median age of 1.3 years (interquartile range, 0-14.5), 63.3% (n = 42,070) received nonopioid analgesic, opioid analgesic, sedative, and/or neuromuscular blockade medications consisting of 83 different agents. Opioid and nonopioid analgesics were dispensed to 58.4% (n = 38,776), of which nonopioid analgesics were prescribed to 67.4% (n = 26,149). Median duration of opioid analgesic administration was 32 hours (interquartile range, 7-92). Sedatives were dispensed to 39.8% (n = 26,441) for a median duration of 23 hours (interquartile range, 3-84), of which benzodiazepines were most common (73.4%; n = 19,426). Neuromuscular-blocking agents were dispensed to 17.3% (n = 11,517) for a median duration of 2 hours (interquartile range, 1-15). Younger age was associated with longer durations in all medication classes. A greater proportion of operative patients received these medication classes for a longer duration than nonoperative patients. A greater proportion of patients with musculoskeletal and hematologic/oncologic diseases received these medication classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesic, sedative, and neuromuscular-blocking medications were prescribed to 63.3% of children in ICUs. The durations of opioid analgesic and sedative medication administration found in this study can be associated with known complications, including tolerance and withdrawal. Several medications dispensed to pediatric patients in this analysis are in conflict with Food and Drug Administration warnings, suggesting that there is potential risk in current sedation and analgesia practice that could be reduced with practice changes to improve efficacy and minimize risks.

The Impact of a Clonidine Transition Protocol on Dexmedetomidine Withdrawal in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVES

This study describes our experience with a clonidine transition protocol to prevent dexmedetomidine (DEX) withdrawal in critically ill pediatric patients.

METHODS

Retrospective review of electronic medical records of patients in the pediatric intensive care unit of a single tertiary children's hospital. All patients up to 19 years of age, who received concomitant DEX infusion and enteral clonidine between June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018, were included.

RESULTS

Two of 24 encounters had DEX restarted for withdrawal (8.3%). Five of 14 encounters who were transitioned to clonidine 2 mcg/kg every 6 hours required an increased dose, and 1 of 10 encounters transitioned to clonidine 4 mcg/kg every 6 hours required an increased dose (36% vs 10%, p = 0.21). For encounters with clonidine dose increases, 5 of 6 had improvements in Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1) scores. Of these 5 encounters, 4 had decreasing or stable opioid and sedative requirements and 1 was transitioned to methadone. No encounters required discontinuation of clonidine owing to adverse events. Two of 24 encounters met our safety endpoint. One received a fluid bolus during the clonidine transition with no change in clonidine dosing, while the other had clonidine dose decreased for asymptomatic bradycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

The 24 encounters in our retrospective study add to the limited literature available to describe dosing, initiation time, and duration of clonidine to prevent withdrawal from DEX in critically ill pediatric patients. Further research is needed to clarify the optimal dosing and duration of clonidine to prevent DEX withdrawal in pediatric patients.

Evaluation of an updated sedation protocol to reduce benzodiazepines in a pediatric intensive care unit

Aim: Midazolam like other benzodiazepines is supposed to be neurotoxic in small children and to represent a risk factor for the development of delirium. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a modified analgesia and sedation protocol is feasible and effective to reduce the requirement of midazolam in neonates and young infants after cardiac surgery.Methods: Patients aged 6 months or younger who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease with cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled and divided into a pre-modification group (January-December 2016) and after adjusting our sedation protocol into a post-modification group (January-December 2018). We assessed the doses of midazolam, morphine and clonidine as well as sedation scores according to our nurse-driven sedation protocol every 8 h until 120 h after cardiac surgery. During weaning from analgesia and sedation, children were monitored regarding withdrawal symptoms and pediatric delirium.Results: Sixty-five patients were included (33 patients in the pre-modification group, 32 patients in the post-modification group). The number of patients receiving midazolam and the cumulative dose of midazolam could be successfully reduced. The sedation scores were still within the desired target range for adequate sedation without any negative side effects.Conclusions: It is feasible and safe to reduce the use of midazolam in infants after cardiac surgery maintaining sedation goals based on a modified nurse-driven analgesia and sedation protocol.

Gamma-hydroxybutyrate: is it a feasible alternative to midazolam in long-term mechanically ventilated children?

Aim: Benzodiazepines like midazolam are commonly used for long-term sedation of critically ill children requiring mechanical ventilation. Tolerance to midazolam may occur in these patients resulting in a ceiling effect with insufficient or missing sedative response to increases of midazolam infusion or bolus application. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a drug rotation protocol replacing continuous infusion of midazolam with gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) to counteract midazolam tolerance. Methods: This retrospective, observational study was conducted in a 14-bed pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center. Thirty-three mechanically ventilated children with tolerance to midazolam who received continuous infusion of GHB were included. Success of drug rotation from midazolam to GHB was defined as adequate sedation with GHB and subsequent reduction of required doses of midazolam. Results: In our cohort, drug rotation for at least 2 days could be successfully performed in 10 out of 34 children resulting in subsequent reduction of required doses of midazolam. Drug rotation to GHB failed in 24 patients due to insufficient sedation resulting in a premature termination of the protocol. In these children, dosing of midazolam could not be reduced following drug rotation. We could not identify factors which predict success or failure of drug rotation from midazolam to GHB. Conclusions: The data from our single-center study suggest that drug rotation from midazolam to GHB may be worth trying in children with midazolam tolerance during long-term sedation, but physicians should be aware of possible treatment failure.

Evaluation of Postnatal Sedation in Full-Term Infants

Prolonged sedation in infants leads to a high incidence of physical dependence. We inquired: (1) "How long does it take to develop physical dependence to sedation in previously naïve full-term infants without known history of neurologic impairment?" and (2) "What is the relationship between length of sedation to length of weaning and hospital stay?". The retrospective study included full-term patients over a period of one year that were <1 year of age and received opioids and benzodiazepines >72 hours. Quantification of fentanyl, morphine, and midazolam were compared among three time periods: <5 days, 5-30 days, and >30 days using t-test or one-way analysis of variance. Identified full-term infants were categorized into surgical (14/44) or medical (10/44) groups, while those with neurological involvement (20/44) were excluded. Physical dependence in full-term infants occurred following sedation ≥5 days. Infants with surgical disease received escalating doses of morphine and midazolam when administered >30 days. A positive association between length of sedation and weaning period was found for both respiratory (p < 0.01) and surgical disease (p = 0.012) groups, while length of sedation is related to hospital stay for the respiratory (p < 0.01) but not the surgical disease group (p = 0.1). Future pharmacological directions should lead to standardized sedation protocols and evaluate patient neurocognitive outcomes.

Analgesia, sedation, and delirium in pediatric surgical critical care

The alleviation of discomfort and distress is an essential component of the management of critically ill surgical patients. Pain and anxiety have multifocal etiologies that may be related to an underlying disease or surgical procedure, ongoing medical therapy, invasive monitors, an unfamiliar, complex and chaotic environment, as well as fear. Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies have complex risk benefit profiles. A fundamental understanding of analgesia, sedation, and delirium is essential for optimizing important outcomes in critically ill pediatric surgical patients. There has been a recent emphasis on goal directed, evidence based, and patient-centered management of the physical and psychological needs of these children. The purpose of this article is to review and summarize recent advances and describe current practice of these important subjects in the pediatric surgical intensive care environment.

Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl in Combination with Midazolam in Children on Mechanical Ventilation

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fentanyl for sedation therapy in mechanically ventilated children.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of mechanically ventilated patients between 2 months and 18 years of age. Patients were randomly divided into two groups; the control group with midazolam alone, and the combination group with both fentanyl and midazolam. The sedation level was evaluated using the Comfort Behavior Scale (CBS), and the infusion rates were adjusted according to the difference between the measured and the target CBS score.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were recruited and randomly allocated, with 22 patients in both groups. The time ratio of cumulative hours with a difference in CBS score (measured CBS-target CBS) of ≥ 4 points (i.e., under-sedation) was lower in the combination group (median, 0.06; interquartile range [IQR], 0-0.2) than in the control group (median, 0.15; IQR, 0.04-0.29) (P < 0.001). The time ratio of cumulative hours with a difference in CBS score of ≥ 8 points (serious under-sedation) was also lower in the combination group (P < 0.001). The cumulative amount of midazolam used in the control group (0.11 mg/kg/hr; 0.07-0.14 mg/kg/hr) was greater than in the combination group (0.07 mg/kg/hr; 0.06-0.11 mg/kg/hr) (P < 0.001). Two cases of hypotension in each group were detected but coma and ileus, the major known adverse reactions to fentanyl, did not occur.

CONCLUSION

Fentanyl combined with midazolam is safe and more effective than midazolam alone for sedation therapy in mechanically ventilated children.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02172014.

Multi-modal Educational Curriculum to Improve Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale Inter-rater Reliability in Pediatric Patients

Introduction:

The Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale (RASS) is a reliable and valid scale for assessing sedation in critically ill pediatric patients. This investigation evaluates the inter-rater reliability of the RASS in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients before and after an educational intervention.

Methods:

This prospective, interventional quality improvement study was completed in a 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit from July 2013 to July 2014. Children 0–18 years of age requiring mechanical ventilation and receiving sedative or analgesic medications were eligible. Staff completed simultaneous paired RASS assessments in 3 phases: baseline, after educational intervention, and maintenance.

Results:

Staff completed 347 paired assessments on 45 pediatric intensive care unit patients: 49 in the baseline phase, 228 in the postintervention phase, and 70 in the maintenance phase. There was a significant increase in the weighted κ after the intervention, from 0.56 (95% CI, 0.39–0.72) to 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77–0.95; P < 0.001). The improvement was maintained months later with weighted κ 0.78 (95% CI, 0.61–0.94). In subgroup analysis, there was an increase in weighted κ in patients less than 1 year of age (0.41–0.87) and those with developmental delay (0.49–0.84).

Conclusions:

The RASS is a reliable tool for sedation assessment in mechanically ventilated, sedated pediatric patients after implementation of an educational intervention. It is also reliable in patients less than 12 months of age and patients with developmental delay. The ability to easily educate providers to utilize a valid, reliable sedation tool is an important step toward using it to provide consistent care to optimize sedation.

Interprofessional Team's Perception of Care Delivery After Implementation of a Pediatric Pain and Sedation Protocol

BACKGROUND

Pain and agitation are common experiences of patients in pediatric cardiac intensive care units. Variability in assessments by health care providers, communication, and treatment of pain and agitation creates challenges in management of pain and sedation.

OBJECTIVES

To develop guidelines for assessment and treatment of pain, agitation, and delirium in the pediatric cardiac intensive unit in an academic children's hospital and to document the effects of implementation of the guidelines on the interprofessional team's perception of care delivery and team function.

METHODS

Before and after implementation of the guidelines, interprofessional team members were surveyed about the members' perception of analgesia, sedation, and delirium management RESULTS: Members of the interprofessional team felt more comfortable with pain and sedation management after implementation of the guidelines. Team members reported improvements in team communication on patients' comfort. Members thought that important information was less likely to be lost during transfer of care. They also noted that the team carried out comfort management plans and used pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies better after implementation of the guidelines than they did before implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines for pain and sedation management were associated with perceived improvements in team function and patient care by members of the interprofessional team.

Chloral hydrate enteral infusion for sedation in ventilated children: the CHOSEN pilot study

Background

We aimed to test a novel method of delivery of chloral hydrate (CH) sedation in ventilated critically ill young children.

Methods

Children < 12 years old, within 72 hours of admission, who were ventilated, receiving enteral tube-feeds, with intermittent CH ordered were enrolled after signed consent. Patients received a CH loading-dose of 10 mg/kg enterally, then a syringe-pump enteral infusion at 5 mg/kg/hour, increasing to a maximum of 9 mg/kg/hour. Cases were compared to historical controls matched for age group and Pediatric Risk of Mortality score (PRISM) category, using Fisher’s exact test and the t test. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as the use of an enteral CH continuous infusion without discontinuation attributable to a pre-specified potential harm.

Results

There were 21 patients enrolled, at age 11.4 (12.1) months, with bronchiolitis in 10 (48%), a mean Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) score of 6.2 (5.2), and having received enteral CH continuous infusion for 4.5 (2.2) days. Infusion of CH was feasible in 20/21 (95%; 95% CI 76–99%) patients, with one (5%) adverse event of duodenal ulcer perforation on day 3 in a patient with croup receiving regular ibuprofen and dexamethasone. The CH infusion dose (mg/kg/h) on day 2 (n = 20) was 8.9 (IQR 5.9, 9), and on day 4 (n = 11) was 8.8 (IQR 7, 9). Days to titration of adequate sedation (defined as ≤ 3 PRN doses/shift) was 1 (IQR 0.5, 2.5), and hours to awakening for extubation was 5 (IQR 2, 9). Cases (versus controls) had less positive fluid balance at 48 h (-2 (45) vs. 26 (46) ml/kg, p = 0.051), and a decrease in number of PRN sedation doses from 12 h pre to 12 hours post starting CH (4.7 (3.3) to 2.6 (2.8), p = 0.009 versus 2.9 (3.9) to 3.4 (5), p = 0.74). There were no statistically significant differences between cases and controls in inotrope scores, signs or treatment of withdrawal, or PICU days.

Conclusions

Delivering CH by continuous enteral infusion is feasible, effective, and may be associated with less positive fluid balance. Whether there is a risk of duodenal perforation requires further study.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1879-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Differentiating Delirium From Sedative/Hypnotic-Related Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome: Lack of Specificity in Pediatric Critical Care Assessment Tools

OBJECTIVES

To identify available assessment tools for sedative/hypnotic iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium in PICU patients, the evidence supporting their use, and describe areas of overlap between the components of these tools and the symptoms of anticholinergic burden in children.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified using PubMed and EMBASE from the earliest available date until July 3, 2016, using a combination of MeSH terms "delirium," "substance withdrawal syndrome," and key words "opioids," "benzodiazepines," "critical illness," "ICU," and "intensive care." Review article references were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Human studies reporting assessment of delirium or iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in children 0-18 years undergoing critical care. Non-English language, exclusively adult, and neonatal intensive care studies were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

References cataloged by study type, population, and screening process.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium are both prevalent in the PICU population. Commonly used scales for delirium and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome assess signs and symptoms in the motor, behavior, and state domains, and exhibit considerable overlap. In addition, signs and symptoms of an anticholinergic toxidrome (a risk associated with some common PICU medications) overlap with components of these scales, specifically in motor, cardiovascular, and psychiatric domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Although important studies have demonstrated apparent high prevalence of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium in the PICU population, the overlap in these scoring systems presents potential difficulty in distinguishing syndromes, both clinically and for research purposes.

Ketamine Infusion as a Counter Measure for Opioid Tolerance in Mechanically Ventilated Children: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Drug rotation to prevent opioid tolerance is well recognized in chronic pain management. However, ketamine infusion as a counter measure for opioid tolerance is rarely described in mechanically ventilated children developing tolerance from prolonged opioid infusion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study in a 14-bed medical-surgical-cardiac pediatric intensive care unit. Thirty-two mechanically ventilated children who had developed tolerance from prolonged intravenous infusion of opioids received a continuous intravenous infusion of ketamine as an opioid substitute for more than 2 days, scheduled in a drug rotation protocol.

RESULTS

Thirty-two children (median age 2.5 years, range 0.1-16.0; weight 11.2 kg [3.8-62.0]) were included. Patients had received continuous intravenous infusion of opioids and benzodiazepines for 16.0 days (4.0-34.0) when drug rotation was started. The median dose of continuous intravenous infusion of ketamine was 4.0 mg·kg^-1·h^-1 (1.8-6.0) and the median duration was 3.0 days (2.0-6.0). After having restarted opioids, fentanyl doses were significantly lower compared with the time before the drug rotation began (after, 2.9 µg·kg^-1·h^-1 [0.8-4.9] vs before, 4.15 µg·kg^-1·h^-1 [1.2-10.0]; p < 0.001). Continuous intravenous infusion of midazolam and clonidine were unchanged during drug rotation. COMFORT-B scoring was significantly lower after having started drug rotation (after, 14.5 [8-19] vs before, 16 [11-22]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Drug rotation with ketamine in mechanically ventilated children with opioid tolerance is feasible and seems to reduce the rate of fentanyl infusion.

Effectiveness of α2agonists for sedation in paediatric critical care: study protocol for a retrospective cohort observational study

INTRODUCTION

Mechanically ventilated children in paediatric intensive care units are commonly administered analgesics and sedative agents to minimise pain and distress and facilitate cooperation with medical interventions. Opioids and benzodiazepines are the most common analgesic and sedative agents but have safety concerns. The α₂ agonists clonidine and dexmedetomidine are alternative sedatives in use despite neither having robust evidence to support their use. Studies evaluating effectiveness of α₂ agonists to date have not focused on sedation-based outcomes instead focusing on opioid-sparing properties and ventilation outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate if an opioid-based sedation regimen, with an α₂ agonist adjunct (clonidine or dexmedetomidine), produces a non-inferior proportion of time adequately sedated compared with a control group without an α₂ agonist adjunct, while conferring potential additional benefits such as reduced opioid administration and less exposure to potential additional agents such as benzodiazepines.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a retrospective cohort study in two Irish paediatric intensive care units using clinical information on patient characteristics, sedation scores and drug use. Eligible children admitted between January 2014 and June 2016 who were mechanically ventilated and received an opioid infusion will be included. Patients will be categorised into two exposure categories (received an α₂ agonist or did not receive an α₂ agonist) and the time adequately sedated (measured using the COMFORT Behaviour Score) will be calculated using interpolation of nursing sedation scores at each recorded time point. At least 150 per group is planned for inclusion to ensure adequate study power. Propensity score matching will be used in analysis to account for potential confounding by indication.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the ethics committees of both hospitals. Dissemination will occur via local, national and international presentations for academic and healthcare audiences as well as through peer reviewed publications.

Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 Monitoring in PICU: A Multicenter Study on Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Withdrawal syndrome is an adverse reaction of analgesic and sedative therapy, with a reported occurrence rate between 17% and 57% in critically ill children. Although some factors related to the development of withdrawal syndrome have been identified, there is weak evidence for the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic strategies. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of withdrawal syndrome in Italian PICUs, using a validated instrument. We also analyzed differences in patient characteristics, analgesic and sedative treatment, and patients' outcome between patients with and without withdrawal syndrome.

DESIGN

Observational multicenter prospective study.

SETTING

Eight Italian PICUs belonging to the national PICU network Italian PICU network.

PATIENTS

One hundred thirteen patients, less than 18 years old, mechanically ventilated and treated with analgesic and sedative therapy for five or more days. They were admitted in PICU from November 2012 to May 2014.

INTERVENTIONS

Symptoms of withdrawal syndrome were monitored with Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 scale.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The occurrence rate of withdrawal syndrome was 64.6%. The following variables were significantly different between the patients who developed withdrawal syndrome and those who did not: type, duration, and cumulative dose of analgesic therapy; duration and cumulative dose of sedative therapy; clinical team judgment about analgesia and sedation's difficulty; and duration of analgesic weaning, mechanical ventilation, and PICU stay. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that patients receiving morphine as their primary analgesic were 83% less likely to develop withdrawal syndrome than those receiving fentanyl or remifentanil.

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawal syndrome was frequent in PICU patients, and patients with withdrawal syndrome had prolonged hospital treatment. We suggest adopting the lowest effective dose of analgesic and sedative drugs and frequent reevaluation of the need for continued use. Further studies are necessary to define common preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Dexmedetomidine Use in Critically Ill Children With Acute Respiratory Failure

OBJECTIVE

Care of critically ill children includes sedation but current therapies are suboptimal. To describe dexmedetomidine use in children supported on mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure clinical trial.

SETTING

Thirty-one PICUs.

PATIENTS

Data from 2,449 children; 2 weeks to 17 years old.

INTERVENTIONS

Sedation practices were unrestrained in the usual care arm. Patients were categorized as receiving dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative, secondary sedative, periextubation agent, or never prescribed. Dexmedetomidine exposure and sedation and clinical profiles are described.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 1,224 usual care patients, 596 (49%) received dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative patients (n = 138; 11%) were less critically ill (Pediatric Risk of Mortality III-12 score median, 6 [interquartile range, 3-11]) and when compared with all other cohorts, experienced more episodic agitation. In the intervention group, time in sedation target improved from 28% to 50% within 1 day of initiating dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative. Dexmedetomidine as a secondary sedative usual care patients (n = 280; 23%) included more children with severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome or organ failure. Dexmedetomidine as a secondary sedative patients experienced more inadequate pain (22% vs 11%) and sedation (31% vs 16%) events. Dexmedetomidine as a periextubation agent patients (n = 178; 15%) were those known to not tolerate an awake, intubated state and experienced a shorter ventilator weaning process (2.1 vs 2.3 d).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the use of dexmedetomidine as a primary agent in low criticality patients offering the benefit of rapid achievement of targeted sedation levels. Dexmedetomidine as a secondary agent does not appear to add benefit. The use of dexmedetomidine to facilitate extubation in children intolerant of an awake, intubated state may abbreviate ventilator weaning. These data support a broader armamentarium of pediatric critical care sedation.

Short-term effects of neuromuscular blockade on global and regional lung mechanics, oxygenation and ventilation in pediatric acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Background

Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) has been shown to improve outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adults, challenging maintaining spontaneous breathing when there is severe lung injury. We tested in a prospective physiological study the hypothesis that continuous administration of NMB agents in mechanically ventilated children with severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) improves the oxygenation index without a redistribution of tidal volume V_T toward non-dependent lung zones.

Methods

Oxygenation index, PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, lung mechanics (plateau pressure, mean airway pressure, respiratory system compliance and resistance), hemodynamics (heart rate, central venous and arterial blood pressures), oxygenation [oxygenation index (OI), PaO₂/FiO₂ and SpO₂/FiO₂], ventilation (physiological dead space-to-V_T ratio) and electrical impedance tomography measured changes in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), and V_T distribution was measured before and 15 min after the start of continuous infusion of rocuronium 1 mg/kg. Patients were ventilated in a time-cycled, pressure-limited mode with pre-set V_T. All ventilator settings were not changed during the study.

Results

Twenty-two patients were studied (N = 18 met the criteria for pediatric ARDS). Median age (25–75 interquartile range) was 15 (7.8–77.5) weeks. Pulmonary pathology was present in 77.3%. The median lung injury score was 9 (8–10). The overall median CoV and regional lung filling characteristics were not affected by NMB, indicating no ventilation shift toward the non-dependent lung zones. Regional analysis showed a homogeneous time course of lung inflation during inspiration, indicating no tendency to atelectasis after the introduction of NMB. NMB decreased the mean airway pressure (p = 0.039) and OI (p = 0.039) in all patients. There were no significant changes in lung mechanics, hemodynamics and EELV. Subgroup analysis showed that OI decreased (p = 0.01) and PaO₂/FiO₂ increased (p = 0.02) in patients with moderate or severe PARDS.

Conclusions

NMB resulted in an improved oxygenation index in pediatric patients with AHRF. Distribution of V_T and regional lung filling characteristics were not affected.

Survey of Sedation and Analgesia Practice Among Canadian Pediatric Critical Care Physicians

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that almost all critically ill children experience some degree of pain or anxiety, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to inform preferred approaches to sedation, analgesia, and comfort measures in this environment. We conducted this survey to better understand current comfort and sedation practices among Canadian pediatric intensivists.

METHODS

The survey was conducted after a literature review and initial focus groups. The survey was then pretested and validated. The final survey was distributed by email to 134 intensivists from 17 PICUs across Canada using the Research Electronic Data Capture system.

RESULTS

The response rate was 73% (98/134). The most commonly used sedation scores are Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (42%) and COMFORT (41%). Withdrawal scores are commonly used (65%). In contrast, delirium scores are used by only 16% of the respondents. Only 36% of respondents have routinely used sedation protocols. The majority (66%) do not use noise reduction methods, whereas only 23% of respondents have a protocol to promote day/night cycles. Comfort measures including music, swaddling, soother, television, and sucrose solutions are frequently used. The drugs most commonly used to provide analgesia are morphine and acetaminophen. Midazolam and chloral hydrate were the most frequent sedatives.

CONCLUSION

Our survey demonstrates great variation in practice in the management of pain and anxiety in Canadian PICUs. Standardized strategies for sedation, delirium and withdrawal, and sleep promotion are lacking. There is a need for research in this field and the development of evidence-based, pediatric sedation and analgesia guidelines.

Pharmacological sedation management in the paediatric intensive care unit

Objective

This review addresses sedation management on paediatric intensive care units and possible gaps in the knowledge of optimal sedation strategies. We present an overview of the commonly used sedatives and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in children, as well as the ongoing studies in this field. Also, sedation guidelines and current sedation strategies and assessment methods are addressed.

Key findings

This review shows that evidence and pharmacokinetic data are scarce, but fortunately, there is an active research scene with promising new PK and PD data of sedatives in children using new study designs with application of advanced laboratory methods and modelling. The lack of evidence is increasingly being recognized by authorities and legislative offices such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Conclusion

The population in question is very heterogeneous and this overview can aid clinicians and researchers in moving from practice-based sedation management towards more evidence- or model-based practice. Still, paediatric sedation management can be improved in other ways than pharmacology only, so future research should aim on sedation assessment and implementation strategies of protocolized sedation as well.

A Pediatric Sedation Protocol for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Requires Sustenance Beyond Implementation

OBJECTIVES

To reevaluate the effect of a nursing-driven sedation protocol for mechanically ventilated patients on analgesic and sedative medication dosing durations. We hypothesized that lack of continued quality improvement efforts results in increased sedation exposure, as well as mechanical ventilation days, and ICU length of stay.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental, uncontrolled before-after study.

SETTING

Forty-five-bed tertiary care, medical-surgical-cardiac PICU in a metropolitan university-affiliated children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Children requiring mechanical ventilation longer than 48 hours not meeting exclusion criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

During both the intervention and postintervention periods, analgesia and sedation were managed by nurses following an algorithm-based sedation protocol with a targeted comfort score.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

The intervention cohort includes patients admitted during a 12-month period following initial protocol implementation in 2008-2009 (n = 166). The postintervention cohort includes patients meeting identical inclusion and exclusion criteria admitted during a 12-month period in 2012-2013 (n = 93). Median duration of total sedation days (IV plus enteral) was 5 days for the intervention period and 10 days for the postintervention period (p < 0.0001). The postintervention cohort received longer duration of mechanical ventilation (6 vs 5 d; p = 0.0026) and ICU length of stay (10 vs 8.5 d; p = 0.0543). After adjusting for illness severity and cardiac and surgical status, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that at any point in time, patients in the postintervention group were 58% more likely to be receiving sedation (hazard ratio, 1.58; p < 0.001) and 34% more likely to remain in the ICU (hazard ratio, 1.34; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Sedation quality improvement measures related to the use of opiate infusions, total days of sedation exposure, PICU length of stay, and mechanical ventilation days all deteriorated following initial successful implementation of a PICU sedation protocol. Implementation of a protocol alone may not lead to sustained quality improvement without routine monitoring and ongoing education to ensure effectiveness.

Clinical recommendations for pain, sedation, withdrawal and delirium assessment in critically ill infants and children: an ESPNIC position statement for healthcare professionals

Background

This position statement provides clinical recommendations for the assessment of pain, level of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium in critically ill infants and children. Admission to a neonatal or paediatric intensive care unit (NICU, PICU) exposes a child to a series of painful and stressful events. Accurate assessment of the presence of pain and non-pain-related distress (adequacy of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium) is essential to good clinical management and to monitoring the effectiveness of interventions to relieve or prevent pain and distress in the individual patient.

Methods

A multidisciplinary group of experts was recruited from the members of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). The group formulated clinical questions regarding assessment of pain and non-pain-related distress in critically ill and nonverbal children, and searched the PubMed/Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases for studies describing the psychometric properties of assessment instruments. Furthermore, level of evidence of selected studies was assigned and recommendations were formulated, and grade or recommendations were added on the basis of the level of evidence.

Results

An ESPNIC position statement was drafted which provides clinical recommendations on assessment of pain (n = 5), distress and/or level of sedation (n = 4), iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (n = 3) and delirium (n = 3). These recommendations were based on the available evidence and consensus amongst the experts and other members of ESPNIC.

Conclusions

This multidisciplinary ESPNIC position statement guides professionals in the assessment and reassessment of the effectiveness of treatment interventions for pain, distress, inadequate sedation, withdrawal syndrome and delirium.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4344-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clonidine as a First-Line Sedative Agent After Neonatal Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the cardiovascular tolerance of clonidine used as a first-line sedative after cardiac surgery in small infants.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A tertiary and quaternary referral cardiac PICU.

PATIENTS

All infants younger than 2 months who received a clonidine infusion for sedation after cardiac surgery from October 2011 to July 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Heart rate, blood pressure, central venous and left atrial pressure, vasoactive inotropic score, volume of fluid bolus, and lactate and central mixed venous saturation were assessed. Preinfusion values were compared with postinfusion values. Of 224 potentially eligible patients, only 23 infants met inclusion criteria, as most patients only received high doses of morphine and some received midazolam instead of clonidine. Clonidine administration was started at a median of 12 hours after surgery (Q1-Q3, 5-23), and infusion rate was 0.5-2 μg/kg/hr for a median duration of 30 hours (Q1-Q3, 12-54). Heart rate decreased (maximal mean decrease: 12% [149 beats/min (SD, 17) to 131 beats/min (SD, 17)]; p < 0.0001). Apart from a transient and limited drop in diastolic blood pressure of 13% (maximal mean decrease: from 42.8 mm Hg [SD, 5.9] to 37.1 mm Hg [SD, 4.0]; p = 0.018), all other cardiovascular variables were stable or improved. A contemporaneous cohort of patients who received midazolam, did so sooner after surgery, stayed longer in the PICU and showed less favorable hemodynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

IV clonidine as sedative added to morphine in selected patients seems hemodynamically safe. The observed decrease in heart rate and diastolic blood pressure seems of minimal clinical importance as all other hemodynamic variables remained stable or improved. The safety of clonidine given early after cardiac surgery as alternative to midazolam merits further study.

Prospective multicentre randomised, double-blind, equivalence study comparing clonidine and midazolam as intravenous sedative agents in critically ill children: the SLEEPS (Safety profiLe, Efficacy and Equivalence in Paediatric intensive care Sedation) study

BACKGROUND

Children in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) require analgesia and sedation but both undersedation and oversedation can be harmful.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of intravenous (i.v.) clonidine as an alternative to i.v. midazolam.

DESIGN

Multicentre, double-blind, randomised equivalence trial.

SETTING

Ten UK PICUs.

PARTICIPANTS

Children (30 days to 15 years inclusive) weighing ≤ 50 kg, expected to require ventilation on PICU for > 12 hours.

INTERVENTIONS

Clonidine (3 µg/kg loading then 0-3 µg/kg/hour) versus midazolam (200 µg/kg loading then 0-200 µg/kg/hour). Maintenance infusion rates adjusted according to behavioural assessment (COMFORT score). Both groups also received morphine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary end point Adequate sedation defined by COMFORT score of 17-26 for ≥ 80% of the time with a ± 0.15 margin of equivalence. Secondary end points Percentage of time spent adequately sedated, increase in sedation/analgesia, recovery after sedation, side effects and safety data.

RESULTS

The study planned to recruit 1000 children. In total, 129 children were randomised, of whom 120 (93%) contributed data for the primary outcome. The proportion of children who were adequately sedated for ≥ 80% of the time was 21 of 61 (34.4%) - clonidine, and 18 of 59 (30.5%) - midazolam. The difference in proportions for clonidine-midazolam was 0.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 0.21], and, with the 95% CI including values outside the range of equivalence (-0.15 to 0.15), equivalence was not demonstrated; however, the study was underpowered. Non-inferiority of clonidine to midazolam was established, with the only values outside the equivalence range favouring clonidine. Times to reach maximum sedation and analgesia were comparable hazard ratios: 0.99 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.82) and 1.18 (95% CI 0.49 to 2.86), respectively. Percentage time spent adequately sedated was similar [medians clonidine 73.8% vs. midazolam 72.8%: difference in medians 0.66 (95% CI -5.25 to 7.24)]. Treatment failure was 12 of 64 (18.8%) on clonidine and 7 of 61 (11.5%) on midazolam [risk ratio (RR) 1.63, 95% CI 0.69 to 3.88]. Proportions with withdrawal symptoms [28/60 (46.7%) vs. 30/58 (52.6%)] were similar (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.28), but a greater proportion required clinical intervention in those receiving midazolam [11/60 (18.3%) vs. 16/58 (27.6%) (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.31)]. Post treatment, one child on clonidine experienced mild rebound hypertension, not requiring intervention. A higher incidence of inotropic support during the first 12 hours was required for those on clonidine [clonidine 5/45 (11.1%) vs. midazolam 3/52 (5.8%)] (RR 1.93 95% CI 0.49 to 7.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Clonidine is an alternative to midazolam. Our trial-based economic evaluation suggests that clonidine is likely to be a cost-effective sedative agent in the PICU in comparison with midazolam (probability of cost-effectiveness exceeds 50%). Rebound hypertension did not appear to be a significant problem with clonidine but, owing to its effects on heart rate, specific cardiovascular attention needs to be taken during the loading and early infusion phase. Neither drug in combination with morphine provided ideal sedation, suggesting that in unparalysed patients a third background agent is necessary. The disappointing recruitment rates reflect a reluctance of parents to provide consent when established on a sedation regimen, and reluctance of clinicians to allow sedation to be studied in unstable critically ill children. Future studies will require less exacting protocols allowing enhanced recruitment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN02639863.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 18, No. 71. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Efficacy of α2-Agonists for Sedation in Pediatric Critical Care: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Children in PICUs normally require analgesics and sedatives to maintain comfort, safety, and cooperation with interventions. α2-agonists (clonidine and dexmedetomidine) have been described as adjunctive (or alternative) sedative agents alongside opioids and benzodiazepines. This systematic review aimed to determine whether α2-agonists were effective in maintaining patients at a target sedation score over time compared with a comparator group. We also aimed to determine whether concurrent use of α2-agonists provided opioid-sparing effects.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and LILACS.

STUDY SELECTION

We included randomized controlled trials of children in PICU treated with clonidine or dexmedetomidine for the indication of sedation.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Six randomized controlled trials with sufficient data were identified and critically appraised. Three clonidine trials (two vs placebo and one vs midazolam) and three dexmedetomidine trials (two vs fentanyl, one vs midazolam) were included. Due to study heterogeneity it was not possible to pool studies. A narrative synthesis is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting of study results using the outcome "time maintained at target sedation score' for clonidine or dexmedetomidine was poor. Only one trial compared clonidine with midazolam using a sedation score outcome. This study was underpowered to demonstrate equivalence to midazolam as a sedative. The adjunctive use of clonidine demonstrated significant decreases in opioid use in neonates but not in older groups. Clonidine dose was inconsistent between studies. Dexmedetomidine demonstrated an opioid-sparing effect in two small trials. Further studies, including dose-finding studies and studies with sedation score-based outcomes, are needed.

Patterns of Sedation Weaning in Critically Ill Children Recovering From Acute Respiratory Failure

OBJECTIVE

To characterize sedation weaning patterns in typical practice settings among children recovering from critical illness.

DESIGN

A descriptive secondary analysis of data that were prospectively collected during the prerandomization phase (January to July 2009) of a clinical trial of sedation management.

SETTING

Twenty-two PICUs across the United States.

PATIENTS

The sample included 145 patients, aged 2 weeks to 17 years, mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure who received at least five consecutive days of opioid exposure.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Group comparisons were made between patients with an intermittent weaning pattern, defined as a 20% or greater increase in daily opioid dose after the start of weaning, and the remaining patients defined as having a steady weaning pattern. Demographic and clinical characteristics, tolerance to sedatives, and iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms were evaluated. Sixty-six patients (46%) were intermittently weaned; 79 patients were steadily weaned. Prior to weaning, intermittently weaned patients received higher peak and cumulative doses and longer exposures to opioids and benzodiazepines, demonstrated more sedative tolerance (58% vs 41%), and received more chloral hydrate and barbiturates compared with steadily weaned patients. During weaning, intermittently weaned patients assessed for withdrawal had a higher incidence of Withdrawal Assessment Tool-version 1 scores of greater than or equal to 3 (85% vs 46%) and received more sedative classes compared with steadily weaned patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study characterizes sedative administration practices for pediatric patients prior to and during weaning from sedation after critical illness. It provides a novel methodology for describing weaning in an at-risk pediatric population that may be helpful in future research on weaning strategies to prevent iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome.

Pediatric Withdrawal Identification and Management

Sedation administered by continuous intravenous infusion is commonly used in the pediatric intensive care unit to facilitate and maintain safe care of children during critical illness. Prolonged use of sedatives, including opioids, benzodiazepines, and potentially other adjunctive agents, is known to cause withdrawal symptoms when they are stopped abruptly or weaned quickly. In this review, the common signs and symptoms of opioid, benzodiazepine, and dexmedetomidine withdrawal will be discussed. Current tools used to measure withdrawal objectively, as well as withdrawal prevention and management strategies, will be discussed.

Nurse-driven pediatric analgesia and sedation protocol reduces withdrawal symptoms in critically ill medical pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

While several analgesia and sedation guidelines and protocols have been developed and implemented for adults, there is still little evidence of clinical use of analgesia and sedation protocols and the impact on withdrawal symptoms in critically ill children.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a nurse-driven goal-directed analgesia and sedation protocol for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients (pASP) on duration of mechanical ventilation, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) length of stay, total doses of opioids and benzodiazepines, and occurrence of withdrawal symptoms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a before and after protocol implementation study in a 14-bed medical-surgical-cardiac pediatric intensive care unit at a university children's hospital. A total of 337 medical pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation with PICU length of stay for at least 24 h were included. Prior to implementation of the protocol, analgesia and sedation was managed by the attending physician's order. Afterwards, postimplementation, nurses managed analgesia and sedation following a pASP, including COMFORT 'behavioral' Scale, Nurse Interpretation Sedation Scale, and Sophia Observation Withdrawal Symptoms Scale.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-five patients were included in the 15-month period before and 172 patients were included in the 15-month period after implementation of the pASP. Median duration of mechanical ventilation was 2.02 (0.96-25.0) days in the group preceding protocol implementation and 1.71 (0.96-66.0) days afterwards (P = 0.23). Median PICU length of stay was 5.8 (1-37.75) days in the preimplementation and 5.0 (1-120) days in the postimplementation group (P = 0.14). Total doses of opioids and benzodiazepines were 3.9 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) (0.1-70) vs 3.1 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) (0.05-56); P = 0.38 and 5.9 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) (0-82.0) vs 4.2 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) (0-66); P = 0.009 after implementation. Incidence of withdrawal was significantly lower over the postimplementation period (12.8% vs 23.6%; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a nurse-driven pASP reduced the total dose of benzodiazepines and the occurrence of withdrawal symptoms significantly.

Nonpulmonary treatments for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: proceedings from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference

OBJECTIVE

To describe the recommendations from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference on nonpulmonary treatments in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DESIGN

Consensus conference of experts in pediatric acute lung injury.

METHODS

A panel of 27 experts met over the course of 2 years to develop a taxonomy to define pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and to make recommendations regarding treatment and research priorities. The nonpulmonary subgroup comprised three experts. When published data were lacking, a modified Delphi approach emphasizing strong professional agreement was utilized.

RESULTS

The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference experts developed and voted on a total of 151 recommendations addressing the topics related to pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, 30 of which related to nonpulmonary treatment. All 30 recommendations had strong agreement. Patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome should receive 1) minimal yet effective targeted sedation to facilitate mechanical ventilation; 2) neuromuscular blockade, if sedation alone is inadequate to achieve effective mechanical ventilation; 3) a nutrition plan to facilitate their recovery, maintain their growth, and meet their metabolic needs; 4) goal-directed fluid management to maintain adequate intravascular volume, end-organ perfusion, and optimal delivery of oxygen; and 5) goal-directed RBC transfusion to maintain adequate oxygen delivery. Future clinical trials in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome should report sedation, neuromuscular blockade, nutrition, fluid management, and transfusion exposures to allow comparison across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The Consensus Conference developed pediatric-specific definitions for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and recommendations regarding treatment and future research priorities. These recommendations for nonpulmonary treatment in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome are intended to promote optimization and consistency of care for patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and identify areas of uncertainty requiring further investigation.

[Sedation and analgesia practices among Spanish neonatal intensive care units]

INTRODUCTION

Pain management and sedation is a priority in neonatal intensive care units. A study was designed with the aim of determining current clinical practice as regards sedation and analgesia in neonatal intensive care units in Spain, as well as to identify factors associated with the use of sedative and analgesic drugs.

METHOD

A multicenter, observational, longitudinal and prospective study.

RESULTS

Thirty neonatal units participated and included 468 neonates. Of these, 198 (42,3%) received sedatives or analgesics. A total of 19 different drugs were used during the study period, and the most used was fentanyl. Only fentanyl, midazolam, morphine and paracetamol were used in at least 20% of the neonates who received sedatives and/or analgesics. In infusions, 14 different drug prescriptions were used, with the most frequent being fentanyl and the combination of fentanyl and midazolam. The variables associated with receiving sedation and/or analgesia were, to have required invasive ventilation (P<.001; OR=23.79), a CRIB score >3 (P=.023; OR=2.26), the existence of pain evaluation guides in the unit (P<.001; OR=3.82), and a pain leader (P=.034; OR=2.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half of the neonates admitted to intensive care units receive sedatives or analgesics. There is significant variation between Spanish neonatal units as regards sedation and analgesia prescribing. Our results provide evidence on the "state of the art", and could serve as the basis of preparing clinical practice guidelines at a national level.

Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia management of critically ill children: a pilot study evaluating guideline impact and feasibility in the PICU

AIMS

The aim of this study was to develop and implement guidelines for sedation and analgesia management in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and evaluate the impact, feasibility and acceptability of these as part of a programme of research in this area and as a prelude to future trial work.

METHOD

This pilot study used a pre-post design using a historical control.

SETTING

Two PICUs at different hospitals in an Australian metropolitan city.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients admitted to the PICU and ventilated for ≥24 h, aged more than 1 month and not admitted for seizure management or terminal care.

INTERVENTION

Guidelines for sedation and analgesia management for critically ill children including algorithm and assessment tools.

OUTCOME VARIABLES

In addition to key outcome variables (ventilation time, medication dose and duration, length of stay), feasibility outcomes data (recruitment, data collection, safety) were evaluated. Guideline adherence was assessed through chart audit and staff were surveyed about merit and the use of guidelines.

RESULTS

The guidelines were trialled for a total of 12 months on 63 patients and variables compared with the historical control group (n=75). Analysis revealed differences in median Morphine infusion duration between groups (pretest 3.63 days (87 h) vs post-test 2.83 days (68 h), p=0.05) and maximum doses (pretest 120 μg/kg/h vs post-test 97.5 μg/kg/h) with no apparent change to ventilation duration. Chart audit revealed varied use of tools, but staff were positive about the guidelines and their use in practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The sedation guidelines impacted on the duration and dosage of agents without any apparent impact on ventilation duration or length of stay. Furthermore, the guidelines appeared to be feasible and acceptable in clinical practice. The results of the study have laid the foundation for follow-up studies in withdrawal from sedation, point prevalence and longitudinal studies of sedation practices as well as drug trial work.

Risk factors associated with iatrogenic opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review and conceptual model

OBJECTIVES

Analgesia and sedation are common therapies in pediatric critical care, and rapid titration of these medications is associated with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all common and salient risk factors associated with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and build a conceptual model of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome risk in critically ill pediatric patients.

DATA SOURCES

Multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials, were searched using relevant terms from January 1, 1980, to August 1, 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were included if they were published in English and discussed iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome following either opioid or benzodiazepine therapy in children in acute or intensive care settings. Articles were excluded if subjects were neonates born to opioid- or benzodiazepine-dependent mothers, children diagnosed as substance abusers, or subjects with cancer-related pain; if data about opioid or benzodiazepine treatment were not specified; or if primary data were not reported.

DATA EXTRACTION

In total, 1,395 articles were evaluated, 33 of which met the inclusion criteria. To facilitate analysis, all opioid and/or benzodiazepine doses were converted to morphine or midazolam equivalents, respectively. A table of evidence was developed for qualitative analysis of common themes, providing a framework for the construction of a conceptual model. The strongest risk factors associated with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome include duration of therapy and cumulative dose. Additionally, evidence exists linking patient, process, and system factors in the development of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome.

FINDINGS

Most articles were prospective observational or interventional studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the state of existing evidence, well-designed prospective studies are required to better characterize iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in critically ill pediatric patients. This review provides data to support the construction of a conceptual model of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome risk that, if supported, could be useful in guiding future research.

Protocolized sedation vs usual care in pediatric patients mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure: a randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE

Protocolized sedation improves clinical outcomes in critically ill adults, but its effect in children is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether critically ill children managed with a nurse-implemented, goal-directed sedation protocol experience fewer days of mechanical ventilation than patients receiving usual care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Cluster randomized trial conducted in 31 US pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). A total of 2449 children (mean age, 4.7 years; range, 2 weeks to 17 years) mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure were enrolled in 2009-2013 and followed up until 72 hours after opioids were discontinued, 28 days, or hospital discharge.

INTERVENTION

Intervention PICUs (17 sites; n = 1225 patients) used a protocol that included targeted sedation, arousal assessments, extubation readiness testing, sedation adjustment every 8 hours, and sedation weaning. Control PICUs (14 sites; n = 1224 patients) managed sedation per usual care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included time to recovery from acute respiratory failure, duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation, neurological testing, PICU and hospital lengths of stay, in-hospital mortality, sedation-related adverse events, measures of sedative exposure (wakefulness, pain, and agitation), and occurrence of iatrogenic withdrawal.

RESULTS

Duration of mechanical ventilation was not different between the 2 groups (intervention: median, 6.5 [IQR, 4.1-11.2] days; control: median, 6.5 [IQR, 3.7-12.1] days). Sedation-related adverse events including inadequate pain and sedation management, clinically significant iatrogenic withdrawal, and unplanned endotracheal tube/invasive line removal were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Intervention patients experienced more postextubation stridor (7% vs 4%; P = .03) and fewer stage 2 or worse immobility-related pressure ulcers (<1% vs 2%; P = .001). In exploratory analyses, intervention patients had fewer days of opioid administration (median, 9 [IQR, 5-15] days vs 10 [IQR, 4-21] days; P = .01), were exposed to fewer sedative classes (median, 2 [IQR, 2-3] classes vs 3 [IQR, 2-4] classes; P < .001), and were more often awake and calm while intubated (median, 86% [IQR, 67%-100%] of days vs 75% [IQR, 50%-100%] of days; P = .004) than control patients, respectively; however, intervention patients had more days with any report of a pain score ≥ 4 (median, 50% [IQR, 27%-67%] of days vs 23% [IQR, 0%-46%] of days; P < .001) and any report of agitation (median, 60% [IQR, 33%-80%] vs 40% [IQR, 13%-67%]; P = .003), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among children undergoing mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure, the use of a sedation protocol compared with usual care did not reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation. Exploratory analyses of secondary outcomes suggest a complex relationship among wakefulness, pain, and agitation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00814099.