1
|
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:3708-3821. [PMID: 38689398 PMCID: PMC11095490 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including prevalence and incidence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care and the ramifications of AD for family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report discusses the larger health care system for older adults with cognitive issues, focusing on the role of caregivers and non-physician health care professionals. An estimated 6.9 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060, barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent or cure AD. Official AD death certificates recorded 119,399 deaths from AD in 2021. In 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death, Alzheimer's was the seventh-leading cause of death in the United States. Official counts for more recent years are still being compiled. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2021, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 140%. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.4 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2023. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $346.6 billion in 2023. Its costs, however, extend to unpaid caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes. Members of the paid health care and broader community-based workforce are involved in diagnosing, treating and caring for people with dementia. However, the United States faces growing shortages across different segments of the dementia care workforce due to a combination of factors, including the absolute increase in the number of people living with dementia. Therefore, targeted programs and care delivery models will be needed to attract, better train and effectively deploy health care and community-based workers to provide dementia care. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2024 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $360 billion. The Special Report investigates how caregivers of older adults with cognitive issues interact with the health care system and examines the role non-physician health care professionals play in facilitating clinical care and access to community-based services and supports. It includes surveys of caregivers and health care workers, focusing on their experiences, challenges, awareness and perceptions of dementia care navigation.
Collapse
|
2
|
Nandi A, Counts N, Bröker J, Malik S, Chen S, Han R, Klusty J, Seligman B, Tortorice D, Vigo D, Bloom DE. Cost of care for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in the United States: 2016 to 2060. NPJ AGING 2024; 10:13. [PMID: 38331952 PMCID: PMC10853249 DOI: 10.1038/s41514-024-00136-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Medical and long-term care for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) can impose a large economic burden on individuals and societies. We estimated the per capita cost of ADRDs care in the in the United States in 2016 and projected future aggregate care costs during 2020-2060. Based on a previously published methodology, we used U.S. Health and Retirement Survey (2010-2016) longitudinal data to estimate formal and informal care costs. In 2016, the estimated per patient cost of formal care was $28,078 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $25,893-$30,433), and informal care cost valued in terms of replacement cost and forgone wages was $36,667 ($34,025-$39,473) and $15,792 ($12,980-$18,713), respectively. Aggregate formal care cost and formal plus informal care cost using replacement cost and forgone wage methods were $196 billion (95% uncertainty range [UR]: $179-$213 billion), $450 billion ($424-$478 billion), and $305 billion ($278-$333 billion), respectively, in 2020. These were projected to increase to $1.4 trillion ($837 billion-$2.2 trillion), $3.3 trillion ($1.9-$5.1 trillion), and $2.2 trillion ($1.3-$3.5 trillion), respectively, in 2060.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arindam Nandi
- The Population Council, 1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
- One Health Trust, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Nathaniel Counts
- Office of the Commissioner of Health & Mental Hygiene for the City of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Simiao Chen
- University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rachael Han
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and The Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Benjamin Seligman
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles VA Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Daniel Vigo
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - David E Bloom
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aldridge MD, Hunt LJ, Harrison KL, McKendrick K, Li L, Morrison RS. Health Care Costs Associated With Hospice Use For People With Dementia In The US. Health Aff (Millwood) 2023; 42:1250-1259. [PMID: 37669483 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
Policy makers in the US are increasingly concerned that greater use of the Medicare hospice benefit by people with dementia is driving up costs. Yet this perspective fails to incorporate potential cost savings associated with hospice. We estimated the association between hospice use by people with dementia and health care costs, using Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data from the period 2002-19. For community-dwelling people with dementia, Medicare costs were lower for those who used hospice than for those who did not, whether hospice enrollment was in the last three days ($2,200) or last three months ($7,200) of life, primarily through lower inpatient care costs in the last days of life. In nursing homes, total and Medicare costs were lower for hospice users with dementia who enrolled within a month of death than for those who did not use hospice. Total costs for the entire last year of life for those who used any days of hospice in the last year compared with no hospice did not differ, although Medicare costs were higher and Medicaid costs lower for those in nursing homes. Medicare policies that reduce hospice access and incentivize hospice disenrollment may actually increase Medicare costs, given that hospice cost savings generally derive from a person's last days or weeks of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa D Aldridge
- Melissa D. Aldridge , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and James J. Peters Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Lauren J Hunt
- Lauren J. Hunt, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Lihua Li
- Lihua Li, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| | - R Sean Morrison
- R. Sean Morrison, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and James J. Peters Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johnston KJ, Loux T, Joynt Maddox KE. Risk Selection and Care Fragmentation at Medicare Accountable Care Organizations for Patients With Dementia. Med Care 2023; 61:570-578. [PMID: 37411003 PMCID: PMC10328553 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with dementia are a growing and vulnerable population within Medicare. Accountable care organizations (ACOs) are becoming Medicare's dominant care model, but ACO enrollment and care patterns for patients with dementia are unknown. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare differences in ACO enrollment for patients with versus without dementia, and in risk profiles and ambulatory care among patients with dementia by ACO enrollment status. RESEARCH DESIGN Cohort study assessing the relationships between patient dementia, following-year ACO enrollment, and ambulatory care patterns. SUBJECTS A total of 13,362 (weighted: 45, 499,049) person-years for patients [2761 (weighted: 6,312,304) for dementia patients] ages 65 years and above in the 2015-2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. MEASURES We assessed differences in ACO enrollment rates for patients with versus without dementia, and in dementia-relevant ambulatory care visit rates and validated care fragmentation indices among patients with dementia by ACO enrollment status. RESULTS Patients with versus without dementia were less likely to be enrolled in (38.3% vs. 44.6%, P<0.001), and more likely to exit (21.1% vs. 13.7%, P<0.01) ACOs. Among patients with dementia, those enrolled versus not enrolled in ACOs had a more favorable social and health risk profile on 6 of 16 measures (P<0.05). There were no differences in rates of dementia-relevant, primary, or specialty care visits. ACO enrollment was associated with 45.7% higher wellness visit rates (P<0.001), and 13.4% more fragmented primary care (P<0.01) spread across 8.7% more distinct physicians (P<0.05). CONCLUSION Medicare ACOs are less likely to enroll and retain patients with dementia than other patients and provide more fragmented primary care without providing additional dementia-relevant ambulatory care visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenton J Johnston
- General Medical Sciences Division, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Travis Loux
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University
| | - Karen E Joynt Maddox
- Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease, including prevalence and incidence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report examines the patient journey from awareness of cognitive changes to potential treatment with drugs that change the underlying biology of Alzheimer's. An estimated 6.7 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, and Alzheimer's disease was officially listed as the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States. In 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death, Alzheimer's was the seventh-leading cause of death. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. This trajectory of deaths from AD was likely exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2022. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $339.5 billion in 2022. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Members of the paid health care workforce are involved in diagnosing, treating and caring for people with dementia. In recent years, however, a shortage of such workers has developed in the United States. This shortage - brought about, in part, by COVID-19 - has occurred at a time when more members of the dementia care workforce are needed. Therefore, programs will be needed to attract workers and better train health care teams. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2023 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $345 billion. The Special Report examines whether there will be sufficient numbers of physician specialists to provide Alzheimer's care and treatment now that two drugs are available that change the underlying biology of Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
|
6
|
Inoriza JM, Carreras M, Coderch J, Turro-Garriga O, Sáez M, Garre-Olmo J. A 14-Year Longitudinal Analysis of Healthcare Expenditure on Dementia and Related Factors (DEMENCOST Study). J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 95:131-147. [PMID: 37482993 PMCID: PMC10578278 DOI: 10.3233/jad-221220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The large number of dementia cases produces a great pressure on health and social care services, which requires efficient planning to meet the needs of patients through infrastructure, equipment, and financial, technical, and personal resources adjusted to their demands. Dementia analysis requires studies with a very precise patient characterization of both the disease and comorbidities present, and long-term follow-up of patients in clinical aspects and patterns of resource utilization and costs generated. OBJECTIVE To describe and quantify direct healthcare expenditure and its evolution from three years before and up to ten years after the diagnosis of dementia, compared to a matched group without dementia. METHODS Retrospective cohort design with follow-up from 6 to 14 years. We studied 996 people with dementia (PwD) and 2,998 controls matched for age, sex, and comorbidity. This paper adopts the provider's perspective as the perspective of analysis and refers to the costs actually incurred in providing the services. Aggregate costs and components per patient per year were calculated and modelled. RESULTS Total health expenditure increases in PwD from the year of diagnosis and in each of the following 7 years, but not thereafter. Health status and mortality are factors explaining the evolution of direct costs. Dementia alone is not a statistically significant factor in explaining differences between groups. CONCLUSION The incremental direct cost of dementia may not be as high or as long as studies with relatively short follow-up suggest. Dementia would have an impact on increasing disease burden and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M. Inoriza
- Fundació Hospital de Palamós – Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà(SSIBE), Palamós, Spain
- Health services and health outcomes research group (GRESSIRES), Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà, Palamós, Spain
| | - Marc Carreras
- Health services and health outcomes research group (GRESSIRES), Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà, Palamós, Spain
- Department of Business Studies, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
- Serra-Húnter Programme, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Coderch
- Health services and health outcomes research group (GRESSIRES), Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà, Palamós, Spain
| | - Oriol Turro-Garriga
- Glòria Compte Research Institute, Fundació Salut Empordà, Figueres, Girona, Spain
| | - Marc Sáez
- Research Group on Statistics, Econometrics and Health (GRECS), University of Girona, Girona, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Josep Garre-Olmo
- Serra-Húnter Programme, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Nursing, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
- Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coe NB, White L, Oney M, Basu A, Larson EB. Public spending on acute and long-term care for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:150-157. [PMID: 35293675 PMCID: PMC9477973 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We estimate the spending attributable to Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) to the United States government for the first 5 years post-diagnosis. METHODS Using data from the Health and Retirement Study matched to Medicare and Medicaid claims, we identify a retrospective cohort of adults with a claims-based ADRD diagnosis along with matched controls. RESULTS The costs attributable to ADRD are $15,632 for traditional Medicare and $8833 for Medicaid per dementia case over the first 5 years after diagnosis. Seventy percent of Medicare costs occur in the first 2 years; Medicaid costs are concentrated among the longer-lived beneficiaries who are more likely to need long-term care and become Medicaid eligible. DISCUSSION Because the distribution of the incremental costs varies over time and between insurance programs, when interventions occur and the effect on the disease course will have implications for how much and which program reaps the benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma B Coe
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lindsay White
- Center for Health Care Quality and Outcomes, RTI International, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Melissa Oney
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Persson S, Saha S, Gerdtham U, Toresson H, Trépel D, Jarl J. Healthcare costs of dementia diseases before, during and after diagnosis: Longitudinal analysis of 17 years of Swedish register data. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 18:2560-2569. [PMID: 35189039 PMCID: PMC10078636 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study examines health-care costs attributed to dementia diseases in the 10 years prior to, during, and 6 years after diagnosis. METHODS Using administrative register data for people diagnosed with dementia (2010-2016) in southern Sweden (n = 21,184), and a comparison group without dementia, health-care costs over 17 years were examined using longitudinal regression analysis. RESULTS Average annual health-care costs per person were consistently higher before diagnosis in the dementia group (10 years before: Swedish krona (SEK) 2063, P < .005 and 1 year before: SEK8166, P < .005). At diagnosis, health-care costs were more than twice as high (SEK44,410, P < .005). Four to 6 years after diagnosis, there was no significant different in costs compared to comparators. DISCUSSION Excess health-care cost arise as early as 10 years before a formal diagnosis of dementia, and while there is a spike in cost after diagnosis, health-care costs are no different 4 years after. These findings question currently accepted assumptions on costs of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie Persson
- Health Economics UnitDepartment of Clinical Science (Malmö)Lund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Sanjib Saha
- Health Economics UnitDepartment of Clinical Science (Malmö)Lund UniversityLundSweden
- Global Brain Health Institute ,Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandUniversity California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ulf‐G. Gerdtham
- Health Economics UnitDepartment of Clinical Science (Malmö)Lund UniversityLundSweden
- Centre for Economic DemographyLund UniversityLundSweden
- Department of EconomicsLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Håkan Toresson
- Clinical Memory Research UnitDepartment of Clinical Science (Malmö)Lund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Dominic Trépel
- Global Brain Health Institute ,Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandUniversity California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Trinity CollegeTrinity Institute of Neurosciences (TCIN)DublinIreland
| | - Johan Jarl
- Health Economics UnitDepartment of Clinical Science (Malmö)Lund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reckrey JM, Ornstein KA, McKendrick K, Tsui EK, Morrison RS, Aldridge M. Receipt of Hospice Aide Visits Among Medicare Beneficiaries Receiving Home Hospice Care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:503-511. [PMID: 34954065 PMCID: PMC8930441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Hospice aides provide essential direct care to hospice patients, yet there is minimal research examining hospice aide visits. OBJECTIVES describe the prevalence and frequency of hospice aide visits, and 2) evaluate patient, community, and hospice characteristics associated with these visits. METHODS Longitudinal cohort study of Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) participants who died between 2010-2018 and received routine hospice care in the 6 months prior to death (n = 674). We characterized prevalence and frequency of hospice aide visits over time and used generalized linear modelling to identify factors associated with visits. RESULTS 64% of hospice enrollees received hospice aide visits and average visit frequency (1.3 per week) remained stable throughout enrollment. The only patient characteristic associated with receipt of hospice aide visits was primary hospice diagnosis (respiratory diagnosis vs. dementia: OR 0.372, P = 0.040). Those living in community-based residential housing and those cared for by hospices with aides employed as staff were more likely to receive any hospice aide visits (OR 2.331, P = 0.047 and OR 4.612, P = 0.002, respectively.) CONCLUSION: Hospice aide visits are a common component of hospice care, but visit frequency does not increase as death approaches. Receipt of hospice aide visits was primarily associated with community and hospice agency (rather than patient) characteristics. Future work is needed to ensure that hospice aides are integrated in the hospice interdisciplinary team and that access to hospice aide visits is meaningfully driven by patient and family needs, rather than the practice norms and business models of individual hospice agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Reckrey
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York.
| | - Katherine A Ornstein
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York
| | - Karen McKendrick
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York
| | - Emma K Tsui
- CUNY Graduate School of Health and Health Policy (E.K..T.), New York, New York
| | - R Sean Morrison
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York; James J. Peters VA Medical Center (R.S.M., M.A.), Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Melissa Aldridge
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York; James J. Peters VA Medical Center (R.S.M., M.A.), Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report discusses consumers' and primary care physicians' perspectives on awareness, diagnosis and treatment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), including MCI due to Alzheimer's disease. An estimated 6.5 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, the latest year for which data are available. Alzheimer's disease was officially listed as the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States in 2019 and the seventh-leading cause of death in 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 16 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2021. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $271.6 billion in 2021. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Members of the dementia care workforce have also been affected by COVID-19. As essential care workers, some have opted to change jobs to protect their own health and the health of their families. However, this occurs at a time when more members of the dementia care workforce are needed. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2022 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $321 billion. A recent survey commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association revealed several barriers to consumers' understanding of MCI. The survey showed low awareness of MCI among Americans, a reluctance among Americans to see their doctor after noticing MCI symptoms, and persistent challenges for primary care physicians in diagnosing MCI. Survey results indicate the need to improve MCI awareness and diagnosis, especially in underserved communities, and to encourage greater participation in MCI-related clinical trials.
Collapse
|
11
|
Aldridge MD, Ornstein KA, McKendrick K, Reckrey J. Service Availability in Assisted Living and Other Community-Based Residential Settings at the End of Life. J Palliat Med 2021; 24:1682-1688. [PMID: 33826855 PMCID: PMC8823677 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Community-based residential settings (e.g., assisted living facilities and retirement communities), are increasing, where vulnerable older adults are living as they age and die. Despite prevalent serious illness, functional impairment, and dementia among residents, the mix and types of built-in services available are not known. Objective: To classify older adults in community-based residential settings by the types of services available and examine associations between service availability and hospice use and location of death. Design: Pooled cross-sectional analysis. Setting: Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data (2002-2018). Subjects: U.S. adults 65 years of age and older, who lived in a community-based residential setting and died between 2002 and 2018 (N = 1006). Measurements: Availability (yes/no) of nursing care, medication assistance, meals, laundry, cleaning, transportation, and recreation. Results: Our sample resided in assisted living facilities (32.0%), retirement communities (29.0%), senior citizen housing (13.7%), continuing care facilities (13.5%), and other (11.8%). Four classes of individuals with distinct combinations of available services were identified: 48.2% lived in a residence with all measured services available; 29.1% had availability of all services, except nursing care and medication assistance; 12.6% had availability of only recreation and transportation services; and 10.1% had minimal/no service availability. Of the 51.8% of older adults residing in settings without clinical services, more than half died at home and fewer than half died with hospice. Conclusions: The majority of older adults who die in community-based residential settings do not have access to built-in clinical services. Palliative care training for staff in these settings may be warranted, given variable rates of hospice use and high rates of home death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa D. Aldridge
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- James J. Peters Bronx VA Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Katherine A. Ornstein
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Karen McKendrick
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer Reckrey
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
An investigation of new medications initiation during ambulatory care visits in patients with dementia. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2021; 3:100058. [PMID: 35480611 PMCID: PMC9030674 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Objectives Methods Results Conclusion What was already known?Dementia remains responsible for a large economic burden; research has shown that patients with dementia have increased utilization of ambulatory care visits before and after diagnosis. Prior research in patients with dementia has focused on inappropriate prescribing, adverse drug interactions, and polypharmacy, but little work has been published investigating new medications prescribed at outpatient visits. Opportunities exist for pharmacists to manage medications in the outpatient setting for patients with complex medication regimens.
What the study adds?Though fewer visits for patients with dementia provided new medications compared to visits for patients without dementia, there was no statistically significant difference in odds of a new medication being provided after adjustment for important confounders. Some of the new medications more commonly provided to dementia patients include anticoagulants and antipsychotics that often require close monitoring and dosage adjustments. Pharmacist led services would likely improve the care of the dementia population in an outpatient setting, but further investigation of new medication usage and the utility of pharmacists is needed.
Collapse
|
13
|
Chronic Care, Dementia Care Management, and Financial Considerations. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021; 22:1371-1376. [PMID: 34081893 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The needs of persons living with Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease-related dementia (AD/ADRD) are challenged by tremendous complexity impacting both care delivery and financing. Most persons living with dementia (PLWD) also suffer from other chronic medical or mental health conditions, which further burden quality of life and function. In addition to difficult treatment choices, optimal dementia care models likely involve people and services that are not typical pieces of the health care delivery system but are all critical partners-care partners, social workers, and community services, to name a few. More than 200 models of dementia care have demonstrated some efficacy. However, these successful interventions that might address much of the care needed by PLWD are uninsured in the United States, where insurance coverage has focused on acute care needs. This poses great difficulties for both care provision and care financing. In this article, we review these 3 key challenges: dementia care for those with chronic comorbid disease; care models that require people who are not typical providers in traditional care delivery systems; and the mandate to provide high-quality care that is currently not funded by usual health care insurance. We propose promising next steps that could substantially improve the lives of PLWD and the lives of their care partners, and highlight some of the many research questions that remain.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on caregivers and society. The Special Report discusses the challenges of providing equitable health care for people with dementia in the United States. An estimated 6.2 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, the latest year for which data are available, making Alzheimer's the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. This trajectory of deaths from AD was likely exacerbated in 2020 by the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 15.3 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2020. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $256.7 billion in 2020. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are more than three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 23 times as great. Total payments in 2021 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $355 billion. Despite years of efforts to make health care more equitable in the United States, racial and ethnic disparities remain - both in terms of health disparities, which involve differences in the burden of illness, and health care disparities, which involve differences in the ability to use health care services. Blacks, Hispanics, Asian Americans and Native Americans continue to have a higher burden of illness and lower access to health care compared with Whites. Such disparities, which have become more apparent during COVID-19, extend to dementia care. Surveys commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association recently shed new light on the role of discrimination in dementia care, the varying levels of trust between racial and ethnic groups in medical research, and the differences between groups in their levels of concern about and awareness of Alzheimer's disease. These findings emphasize the need to increase racial and ethnic diversity in both the dementia care workforce and in Alzheimer's clinical trials.
Collapse
|
15
|
Jain S, Rosenbaum PR, Reiter JG, Hoffman G, Small DS, Ha J, Hill AS, Wolk DA, Gaulton T, Neuman MD, Eckenhoff RG, Fleisher LA, Silber JH. Using Medicare claims in identifying Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Alzheimers Dement 2020; 17:10.1002/alz.12199. [PMID: 33090695 PMCID: PMC8296851 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study develops a measure of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) using Medicare claims. METHODS Validation resembles the approach of the American Psychological Association, including (1) content validity, (2) construct validity, and (3) predictive validity. RESULTS We found that four items-a Medicare claim recording ADRD 1 year ago, 2 years ago, 3 years ago, and a total stay of 6 months in a nursing home-exhibit a pattern of association consistent with a single underlying ADRD construct, and presence of any two of these four items predict a direct measure of cognitive function and also future claims for ADRD. DISCUSSION Our four items are internally consistent with the measurement of a single quantity. The presence of any two items do a better job than a single claim when predicting both a direct measure of cognitive function and future ADRD claims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth Jain
- Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Paul R. Rosenbaum
- The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joseph G. Reiter
- Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Geoffrey Hoffman
- Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan’s Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Dylan S. Small
- The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - JinKyung Ha
- Division of Geriatrics/Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alexander S. Hill
- Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David A. Wolk
- Department of Neurology, The Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania
| | - Timothy Gaulton
- The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark D. Neuman
- The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Roderic G. Eckenhoff
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lee A. Fleisher
- The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey H. Silber
- Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- The Departments of Pediatrics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhu CW, Ornstein KA, Cosentino S, Gu Y, Andrews H, Stern Y. Medicaid Contributes Substantial Costs to Dementia Care in an Ethnically Diverse Community. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2020; 75:1527-1537. [PMID: 31425587 PMCID: PMC7424274 DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbz108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this study was to estimate effects of dementia on Medicaid expenditures in an ethnically diverse community. METHODS The sample included 1,211 Medicare beneficiaries who did not have any Medicaid coverage and 568 who additionally had full Medicaid coverage enrolled in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP), a multiethnic, population-based, prospective study of cognitive aging in northern Manhattan (1999-2010). Individuals' dementia status was determined using a rigorous clinical protocol. Relationship between dementia and Medicaid coverage and expenditures were estimated using a two-part model. RESULTS In participants who had full Medicaid coverage, average annual Medicaid expenditures were substantially higher for those with dementia than those without dementia ($50,270 vs. $21,966, p < .001), but Medicare expenditures did not differ by dementia status ($8,458 vs. $9,324, p = .19). In participants who did not have any Medicaid coverage, average annual Medicare expenditures were substantially higher for those with dementia than those without dementia ($12,408 vs. $8,113, p = .02). In adjusted models, dementia was associated with a $6,278 increase in annual Medicaid spending per person after controlling for other characteristics. DISCUSSION Results highlight Medicaid's contribution to covering the cost of dementia care in addition to Medicare. Studies that do not include Medicaid are unlikely to accurately reflect the true cost of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn W Zhu
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Katherine A Ornstein
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Stephanie Cosentino
- Cognitive Neuroscience Division of the Department of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Yian Gu
- Cognitive Neuroscience Division of the Department of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Howard Andrews
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Yaakov Stern
- Cognitive Neuroscience Division of the Department of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aldridge MD, Ornstein KA, McKendrick K, Moreno J, Reckrey JM, Li L. Trends In Residential Setting And Hospice Use At The End Of Life For Medicare Decedents. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39:1060-1064. [PMID: 32479223 PMCID: PMC8045974 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
As more people live and die in the community despite complex health needs and functional impairment, the need for hospice increases. We found high and increasing penetration of hospice in community-based residential settings, compared with hospice use in private residences and nursing homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa D Aldridge
- Melissa D. Aldridge is a professor in the Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, in New York City, and the James J. Peters Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, in the Bronx, New York
| | - Katherine A Ornstein
- Katherine A. Ornstein is an associate professor in the Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine and the Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| | - Karen McKendrick
- Karen McKendrick is a senior data analyst in the Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| | - Jaison Moreno
- Jaison Moreno is a data analyst in the Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| | - Jennifer M Reckrey
- Jennifer M. Reckrey is an associate professor in the Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| | - Lihua Li
- Lihua Li is an assistant professor in the Department of Population Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on caregivers and society. The Special Report discusses the future challenges of meeting care demands for the growing number of people living with Alzheimer's dementia in the United States with a particular emphasis on primary care. By mid-century, the number of Americans age 65 and older with Alzheimer's dementia may grow to 13.8 million. This represents a steep increase from the estimated 5.8 million Americans age 65 and older who have Alzheimer's dementia today. Official death certificates recorded 122,019 deaths from AD in 2018, the latest year for which data are available, making Alzheimer's the sixth leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2018, deaths resulting from stroke, HIV and heart disease decreased, whereas reported deaths from Alzheimer's increased 146.2%. In 2019, more than 16 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.6 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias. This care is valued at nearly $244 billion, but its costs extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are more than three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 23 times as great. Total payments in 2020 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $305 billion. As the population of Americans living with Alzheimer's dementia increases, the burden of caring for that population also increases. These challenges are exacerbated by a shortage of dementia care specialists, which places an increasing burden on primary care physicians (PCPs) to provide care for people living with dementia. Many PCPs feel underprepared and inadequately trained to handle dementia care responsibilities effectively. This report includes recommendations for maximizing quality care in the face of the shortage of specialists and training challenges in primary care.
Collapse
|
19
|
Kriit HK, Williams JS, Lindholm L, Forsberg B, Nilsson Sommar J. Health economic assessment of a scenario to promote bicycling as active transport in Stockholm, Sweden. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030466. [PMID: 31530609 PMCID: PMC6756337 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To conduct a health economic evaluation of a proposed investment in urban bicycle infrastructure in Stockholm County, Sweden. DESIGN A cost-effectiveness analysis is undertaken from a healthcare perspective. Investment costs over a 50-year life cycle are offset by averted healthcare costs and compared with estimated long-term impacts on morbidity, quantified in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The results are re-calculated under different assumptions to model the effects of uncertainty. SETTING The Municipality of Stockholm (population 2.27 million) committed funds for bicycle path infrastructure with the aim of achieving a 15% increase in the number of bicycle commuters by 2030. This work is based on a previously constructed scenario, in which individual registry data on home and work address and a transport model allocation to different modes of transport identified 111 487 individuals with the physical capacity to bicycle to work within 30 min but that currently drive a car to work. RESULTS Morbidity impacts and healthcare costs attributed to increased physical activity, change in air pollution exposure and accident risk are quantified under the scenario. The largest reduction in healthcare costs is attributed to increased physical activity and the second largest to reduced air pollution exposure among the population of Greater Stockholm. The expected net benefit from the investment is 8.7% of the 2017 Stockholm County healthcare budget, and 3.7% after discounting. The economic evaluation estimates that the intervention is cost-effective and each DALY averted gives a surplus of €9933. The results remained robust under varied assumptions pertaining to reduced numbers of additional bicycle commuters. CONCLUSION Investing in urban infrastructure to increase bicycling as active transport is cost-effective from a healthcare sector perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedi Katre Kriit
- Sustainable Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Lars Lindholm
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Bertil Forsberg
- Sustainable Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Johan Nilsson Sommar
- Sustainable Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Deardorff WJ, Liu PL, Sloane R, Van Houtven C, Pieper CF, Hastings SN, Cohen HJ, Whitson HE. Association of Sensory and Cognitive Impairment With Healthcare Utilization and Cost in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67:1617-1624. [PMID: 30924932 PMCID: PMC6684393 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the association between self-reported vision impairment (VI), hearing impairment (HI), and dual-sensory impairment (DSI), stratified by dementia status, on hospital admissions, hospice use, and healthcare costs. DESIGN Retrospective analysis. SETTING Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from 1999 to 2006. PARTICIPANTS Rotating panel of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries, aged 65 years and older (N = 24 009). MEASUREMENTS VI and HI were ascertained by self-report. Dementia status was determined by self-report or diagnosis codes in claims data. Primary outcomes included any inpatient admission over a 2-year period, hospice use over a 2-year period, annual Medicare fee-for-service costs, and total healthcare costs (which included information from Medicare claims data and other self-reported payments). RESULTS Self-reported DSI was present in 30.2% (n = 263/871) of participants with dementia and 17.8% (n = 4112/23 138) of participants without dementia. In multivariable logistic regression models, HI, VI, or DSI was generally associated with increased odds of hospitalization and hospice use regardless of dementia status. In a generalized linear model adjusted for demographics, annual total healthcare costs were greater for those with DSI and dementia compared to those with DSI without dementia ($28 875 vs $3340, respectively). Presence of any sensory impairment was generally associated with higher healthcare costs. In a model adjusted for demographics, Medicaid status, and chronic medical conditions, DSI compared with no sensory impairment was associated with a small, but statistically significant, difference in total healthcare spending in those without dementia ($1151 vs $1056; P < .001) but not in those with dementia ($11 303 vs $10 466; P = .395). CONCLUSION Older adults with sensory and cognitive impairments constitute a particularly prevalent and vulnerable population who are at increased risk of hospitalization and contribute to higher healthcare spending. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1617-1624, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Phillip L. Liu
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Richard Sloane
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Courtney Van Houtven
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Carl F. Pieper
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Susan Nicole Hastings
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC
| | - Harvey J. Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Heather E. Whitson
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC
- Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Confortin SC, Meneghini V, Ono LM, Garcia KC, Schneider IJC, d'Orsi E, Barbosa AR. Anthropometric indicators associated with dementia in the elderly from Florianópolis - SC, Brazil: EpiFloripa Ageing Study. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2019; 24:2317-2324. [PMID: 31269188 DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018246.20492017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between dementia and anthropometric indicators in the elderly from Florianópolis. METHOD This is a cross-sectional population-based survey performed with 1,197 elderly (≥ 60 years) in 2013/2014. Dementia was defined as the combined evidence of low MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) score and moderate/severe disability in the activities of daily living. The independent variables were body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), conicity index and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Logistic regression (crude and adjusted) was performed to identify associated factors. RESULTS Dementia prevalence was estimated at 15.1%. After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle and depressive symptoms, dementia was positively associated with the upper tertiles of the BMI (OR: 2.32; CI95%: 1.26-4.25), WC (OR: 2.22; CI95%: 1.20-4.11) and WHtR (OR: 2.30; CI95%: 1.19-4.43). CONCLUSION Results have shown that both obesity and abdominal fat were associated with the outcome, suggesting that BMI, WC and WHtR should be considered in the investigation of this relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Cararo Confortin
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Campus Universitário, Trindade. 88040-900 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| | - Vandrize Meneghini
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Campus Universitário, Trindade. 88040-900 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| | - Lariane Mortean Ono
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Campus Universitário, Trindade. 88040-900 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| | - Karyne Claudete Garcia
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Campus Universitário, Trindade. 88040-900 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| | - Ione Jayce Ceola Schneider
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Campus Universitário, Trindade. 88040-900 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| | - Eleonora d'Orsi
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Campus Universitário, Trindade. 88040-900 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| | - Aline Rodrigues Barbosa
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Campus Universitário, Trindade. 88040-900 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cantarero-Prieto D, Leon PL, Blazquez-Fernandez C, Juan PS, Cobo CS. The economic cost of dementia: A systematic review. DEMENTIA 2019; 19:2637-2657. [PMID: 30909718 DOI: 10.1177/1471301219837776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyse the available literature describing the economic burden of dementia and to compare costs between studies examining cost drivers. To shed light on this field, a systematic review is performed using PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science. An eight-year retrospective horizon was considered until 25 May 2018. Several papers were obtained from the database search (n = 23), being others (n = 3) identified through other sources (hand-searching) because we did not detect it through the three databases. The cost estimates were compared between three perspectives: state/publicly funded health services, third-party/private sector/not-for-profit organisations and patient and family and/or societal. The estimated total annual cost per person with dementia in Europe is on average €32,506.73 (n = 10), whereas for the United States, it gets €42,898.65 (n = 2). Furthermore, differences are appreciated by type of costs. Besides, differences by severity groups are also considered. Overall, the higher the severity the higher the associated costs. Dementia imposes a huge economic burden. The figures here presented provide a good framework to quantify these costs for both, economic experts and researchers, and policy decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cantarero-Prieto
- Health Economics Research Group, Department of Economics, The University of Cantabria and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Paloma Lanza Leon
- Health Economics Research Group, Department of Economics, The University of Cantabria and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Carla Blazquez-Fernandez
- Health Economics Research Group, Department of Economics, The University of Cantabria and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Pascual Sanchez Juan
- Neurology Unit, Valdecilla Hospital, IDIVAL, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Carmen Sarabia Cobo
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Cantabria. Nursing Research Group IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
White L, Fishman P, Basu A, Crane PK, Larson EB, Coe NB. Medicare expenditures attributable to dementia. Health Serv Res 2019; 54:773-781. [PMID: 30868557 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate dementia's incremental cost to the traditional Medicare program. DATA SOURCES Health and Retirement Study (HRS) survey-linked Medicare part A and B claims from 1991 to 2012. STUDY DESIGN We compared Medicare expenditures for 60 months following a claims-based dementia diagnosis to those for a randomly selected, matched comparison group. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We used a cost estimator that accounts for differential survival between individuals with and without dementia and decomposes incremental costs into survival and cost intensity components. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Dementia's five-year incremental cost to the traditional Medicare program is approximately $15 700 per patient, nearly half of which is incurred in the first year after diagnosis. Shorter survival with dementia mitigates the incremental cost by about $2650. Increased costs for individuals with dementia were driven by more intensive use of Medicare part A covered services. The incremental cost of dementia was about $7850 higher for females than for males because of sex-specific differential mortality associated with dementia. CONCLUSIONS Dementia's cost to the traditional Medicare program is significant. Interventions that target early identification of dementia and preventable inpatient and post-acute care services could produce substantial savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay White
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul Fishman
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Anirban Basu
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Paul K Crane
- Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Norma B Coe
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Handels R, Wimo A. Challenges and recommendations for the health-economic evaluation of primary prevention programmes for dementia. Aging Ment Health 2019; 23:53-59. [PMID: 29039976 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1390730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to review health-economic evaluations of (hypothetical) intervention programmes for the primary prevention of dementia, and highlight challenges and provide recommendations for future research to estimate its cost-effectiveness. METHODS We searched the databases PubMed, MODEM, CEA and NHS for publications on the cost-consequence, -effectiveness, -utility or -benefit analysis of (hypothetical) interventions to reduce the risk of developing dementia for persons without dementia, and described the study characteristics. RESULTS Three publications described the evaluation of a hypothetical risk reduction due to physical activity or a multidomain intervention programme. Two studies reported a reduction of care costs. One study yielded two scenarios of increased care costs and one scenario of reduced care costs. Only one study reported the impact in QALY terms, and found a QALY gain. CONCLUSION A few studies have evaluated a hypothetical multidomain prevention intervention, and reported that primary dementia prevention is potentially cost-saving or cost-effective. Various challenges remain to evaluate the health-economic impact of prevention interventions, including extrapolation of short-term trial effects, care costs in the dementia-free and life years gained, and accurate representation of usual care. We recommend extensive sensitivity analyses to examine the impact of assumptions regarding these aspects on the outcomes of cost-effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Handels
- a Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,b Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics , Karolinska Institute , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Anders Wimo
- b Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics , Karolinska Institute , Stockholm , Sweden.,c Centre for Research & Development, Uppsala University / County Council of Gävleborg , Gävle , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The opportunity costs of caring for people with dementia in Southern Spain. GACETA SANITARIA 2019; 33:17-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
27
|
Hudomiet P, Hurd MD, Rohwedder S. The Relationship Between Lifetime Out-of-pocket Medical Expenditures, Dementia, and Socioeconomic Status in the U.S. JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF AGEING 2018; 14:100181. [PMID: 31763164 PMCID: PMC6874215 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2018.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Dementia is one of the most expensive medical conditions. The costs are borne by families, by private insurance and by society via public programs such as Medicaid in the U.S.. There is extensive research on the relationship between dementia and annual medical spending. This paper, instead, estimates cumulative lifetime medical expenditures that can be attributed to the onset of dementia using a nationally representative longitudinal survey from the U.S., the Health and Retirement Study. The lifetime expenditures are estimated by summing any out-of-pocket medical spending reported in the panel from age 65 to death. Censored cases are imputed using a non-parametric matching algorithm called splicing. For example, survivors to the most recent wave are matched to similar individuals from older cohorts who are observed at the relevant ages all the way through death. We find that those who live with dementia for at least half a year pay, on average, $38,540 more out of pocket from age 65 to death when controlling for length of life, demographics, lifetime earnings and comorbidities. The costs of dementia are almost exclusively due to spending on nursing homes. Spending on drugs, doctor visits or hospitals, is not significantly related to dementia. The lifetime costs of dementia are significantly larger for white and rich individuals, perhaps because they use higher quality nursing homes and because they have more financial resources to spend down before becoming eligible for Medicaid support.
Collapse
|
28
|
Foldes SS, Moriarty JP, Farseth PH, Mittelman MS, Long KH. Medicaid Savings From The New York University Caregiver Intervention for Families with Dementia. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2018; 58:e97-e106. [PMID: 29106531 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnx077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose of the study The economic burden of dementia is substantially borne by state Medicaid programs. We estimated savings, from the state payer perspective, from offering the New York University Caregiver Intervention (NYUCI), a well-studied caregiver support and counseling program, to eligible Minnesota Medicaid enrollees. Design and Methods A population-based microsimulation Markov model predicted and compared costs over 15 years with and without implementation of the NYUCI for family caregivers of community-based Medicaid eligibles with dementia. The model was informed by primary analysis of Minnesota Department of Human Services (MN DHS) data, and literature on the epidemiology, natural history, costs, and evidence-based management of the disease. Primary outcomes were predicted cumulative total direct costs, including medical, facility, and waiver-program payments for eligibles, and estimated costs of providing the NYUCI. Results Approximately 5-6% more eligibles with dementia would remain in the community annually from year 3 (2014) on, so that over 15 years 17% fewer would die in nursing homes (NH) if their caregivers received the NYUCI. After 15 years, MN DHS could realize savings of $40.4 million (2011 dollars, discounted at 3%) if all eligibles/caregivers enrolled. Savings were expected 5 years after implementation. Multiple sensitivity analyses, including best-and worst-case scenarios, estimated results ranging from 15-year cumulative savings of $178.9 million to a cumulative loss of $7.3 million, respectively, driven largely by assumed program effectiveness. Implications State payers can use enhanced caregiver support to moderate the growing tax burden of dementia, even without a breakthrough in the pharmacologic treatment of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven S Foldes
- Foldes Consulting LLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - James P Moriarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul H Farseth
- Reports and Forecasts Division, Minnesota Department of Human Services, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - Mary S Mittelman
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Deb A, Sambamoorthi U, Thornton JD, Schreurs B, Innes K. Direct medical expenditures associated with Alzheimer's and related dementias (ADRD) in a nationally representative sample of older adults - an excess cost approach. Aging Ment Health 2018; 22:619-624. [PMID: 28282733 PMCID: PMC5548651 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1286454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the excess direct annual healthcare expenditures associated with Alzheimer's and related dementias(ADRD) among community-dwelling older adults in the United States. METHODS This retrospective cross-sectional study compared the annual healthcare expenditures between elderly individuals aged 65 years and older with ADRD (n = 662) and without ADRD (n = 13,398) using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) for the years 2007, 2009, 2011 and 2013. Adjusted total annual medical expenditures was estimated using generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link in 2013 U.S. dollars. Adjusted inpatient, outpatient, emergency, home healthcare and prescription drug expenditures, were estimated using two-part logit-generalized linear regression models. RESULTS The adjusted mean total healthcare expenditures were higher for the ADRD group as compared to the no ADRD group($14,508 vs. $10,096). Among those with ADRD, 34.3% of the expenditures were for home healthcare as compared to 4.4% among those without ADRD. Among users, the ADRD group had significantly higher home healthcare ($3,240 vs. $566) and prescription drug expenditures($3,471 vs. $2,471). There were no statistically significant differences in inpatient, emergency room and outpatient expenditures between the ADRD and no ADRD group. CONCLUSION ADRD in U.S. community-dwelling elders is associated with significant financial burden, primarily driven by increased home healthcare use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arijita Deb
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Usha Sambamoorthi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - James Douglas Thornton
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Bernard Schreurs
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Kim Innes
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Zhu CW, Cosentino S, Ornstein KA, Gu Y, Andrews H, Stern Y. Interactive Effects of Dementia Severity and Comorbidities on Medicare Expenditures. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 57:305-315. [PMID: 28222520 DOI: 10.3233/jad-161077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have examined how dementia and comorbidities may interact to affect healthcare expenditures. OBJECTIVE To examine whether effects of dementia severity on Medicare expenditures differed for individuals with different levels of comorbidities. METHODS Data are drawn from the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP). Comprehensive clinical assessments of dementia severity were systematically carried out at ∼18 month intervals. Dementia severity was measured by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Comorbidities were measured by a modified Elixhauser comorbidities index. Generalized linear models examined effects of dementia severity, comorbidities, and their interactions on Medicare expenditures (1999-2010). RESULTS At baseline, 1,280 subjects were dementia free (CDR = 0, 66.4%), 490 had very mild dementia (CDR = 0.5, 25.4%), 108 had mild dementia (CDR = 1, 5.6%), and 49 had moderate/severe dementia (CDR = 2/3, 2.5%). Average annual Medicare expenditures for individuals with moderate/severe dementia were more than twice as high as those who were dementia free (CDR = 0: $9,108, CDR = 0.5/1: $11,664, CDR≥2: $19,604, p < 0.01). Expenditures were approximately 10 times higher among those with≥3 comorbidities than among those with no comorbidities ($2,612 for those with no comorbidities, to $6,109 for those with 1, $10,656 for those with 2, and $30,244 for those with≥3 comorbidities, p < 0.001). Dementia severity was associated with higher expenditures, but comorbidities were the most important predictor of expenditures. We did not find strong interaction effects between number of comorbidities and dementia severity. CONCLUSIONS Increasing dementia severity and higher comorbidities are associated with higher Medicare expenditures. Care of individuals with dementia should focus on management of comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn W Zhu
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Stephanie Cosentino
- Cognitive Neuroscience Division of the Department of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine A Ornstein
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yian Gu
- Cognitive Neuroscience Division of the Department of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Howard Andrews
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yaakov Stern
- Cognitive Neuroscience Division of the Department of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jutkowitz E, Kane RL, Gaugler JE, MacLehose RF, Dowd B, Kuntz KM. Societal and Family Lifetime Cost of Dementia: Implications for Policy. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017; 65:2169-2175. [PMID: 28815557 PMCID: PMC5657516 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the cost of dementia and the extra cost of caring for someone with dementia over the cost of caring for someone without dementia. DESIGN We developed an evidence-based mathematical model to simulate disease progression for newly diagnosed individuals with dementia. Data-driven trajectories of cognition, function, and behavioral and psychological symptoms were used to model disease progression and predict costs. Using modeling, we evaluated lifetime and annual costs of individuals with dementia, compared costs of those with and without clinical features of dementia, and evaluated the effect of reducing functional decline or behavioral and psychological symptoms by 10% for 12 months (implemented when Mini-Mental State Examination score ≤21). SETTING Mathematical model. PARTICIPANTS Representative simulated U.S. incident dementia cases. MEASUREMENTS Value of informal care, out-of-pocket expenditures, Medicaid expenditures, and Medicare expenditures. RESULTS From time of diagnosis (mean age 83), discounted total lifetime cost of care for a person with dementia was $321,780 (2015 dollars). Families incurred 70% of the total cost burden ($225,140), Medicaid accounted for 14% ($44,090), and Medicare accounted for 16% ($52,540). Costs for a person with dementia over a lifetime were $184,500 greater (86% incurred by families) than for someone without dementia. Total annual cost peaked at $89,000, and net cost peaked at $72,400. Reducing functional decline or behavioral and psychological symptoms by 10% resulted in $3,880 and $680 lower lifetime costs than natural disease progression. CONCLUSION Dementia substantially increases lifetime costs of care. Long-lasting, effective interventions are needed to support families because they incur the most dementia cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Jutkowitz
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health
| | - Robert L. Kane
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota
| | | | - Richard F. MacLehose
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota
| | - Bryan Dowd
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota
| | - Karen M. Kuntz
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Deb A, Thornton JD, Sambamoorthi U, Innes K. Direct and indirect cost of managing alzheimer's disease and related dementias in the United States. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2017; 17:189-202. [PMID: 28351177 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1313118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Care of individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) poses special challenges. As the disease progresses, individuals with ADRD require increasing levels of medical care, caregiver support, and long-term care which can lead to substantial economic burden. Areas covered: In this expert review, we synthesized findings from studies of costs of ADRD in the United States that were published between January 2006 and February 2017, highlighted major sources of variation in costs, identified knowledge gaps and briefly outlined directions for future research and implications for policy and program planning. Expert commentary: A consistent finding of all studies comparing individuals with and without ADRD is that the average medical, non-medical, and indirect costs of individuals with ADRD are higher than those without ADRD, despite the differences in the methods of identifying ADRD, duration of the study, payer type and settings of study population. The economic burden of ADRD may be underestimated because many components such as direct non-medical costs for home safety modifications and adult day care services and indirect costs due to the adverse impact of ADRD on caregivers' health and productivity are not included in cost estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arijita Deb
- a School of Pharmacy , Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | - James Douglas Thornton
- a School of Pharmacy , Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | - Usha Sambamoorthi
- a School of Pharmacy , Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | - Kim Innes
- b School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology , West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Abstract
This report describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease, including incidence and prevalence, mortality rates, costs of care, and the overall impact on caregivers and society. It also examines in detail the financial impact of Alzheimer's on families, including annual costs to families and the difficult decisions families must often make to pay those costs. An estimated 5.4 million Americans have Alzheimer's disease. By mid-century, the number of people living with Alzheimer's disease in the United States is projected to grow to 13.8 million, fueled in large part by the aging baby boom generation. Today, someone in the country develops Alzheimer's disease every 66 seconds. By 2050, one new case of Alzheimer's is expected to develop every 33 seconds, resulting in nearly 1 million new cases per year. In 2013, official death certificates recorded 84,767 deaths from Alzheimer's disease, making it the sixth leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth leading cause of death in Americans age ≥ 65 years. Between 2000 and 2013, deaths resulting from stroke, heart disease, and prostate cancer decreased 23%, 14%, and 11%, respectively, whereas deaths from Alzheimer's disease increased 71%. The actual number of deaths to which Alzheimer's disease contributes is likely much larger than the number of deaths from Alzheimer's disease recorded on death certificates. In 2016, an estimated 700,000 Americans age ≥ 65 years will die with Alzheimer's disease, and many of them will die because of the complications caused by Alzheimer's disease. In 2015, more than 15 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.1 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's and other dementias, a contribution valued at more than $221 billion. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age ≥ 65 years with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias are more than two and a half times as great as payments for all beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are 19 times as great. Total payments in 2016 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age ≥ 65 years with dementia are estimated to be $236 billion. The costs of Alzheimer's care may place a substantial financial burden on families, who often have to take money out of their retirement savings, cut back on buying food, and reduce their own trips to the doctor. In addition, many family members incorrectly believe that Medicare pays for nursing home care and other types of long-term care. Such findings highlight the need for solutions to prevent dementia-related costs from jeopardizing the health and financial security of the families of people with Alzheimer's and other dementias.
Collapse
|
36
|
Manuel DG, Garner R, Finès P, Bancej C, Flanagan W, Tu K, Reimer K, Chambers LW, Bernier J. Alzheimer's and other dementias in Canada, 2011 to 2031: a microsimulation Population Health Modeling (POHEM) study of projected prevalence, health burden, health services, and caregiving use. Popul Health Metr 2016; 14:37. [PMID: 27822143 PMCID: PMC5095994 DOI: 10.1186/s12963-016-0107-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, there is concern that increases in the prevalence of dementia will result in large demands for caregivers and supportive services that will be challenging to address. Previous dementia projections have either been simple extrapolations of prevalence or macrosimulations based on dementia incidence. METHODS A population-based microsimulation model of Alzheimer's and related dementias (POHEM:Neurological) was created using Canadian demographic data, estimates of dementia incidence, health status (health-related quality of life and mortality risk), health care costs and informal caregiving use. Dementia prevalence and 12 other measures were projected to 2031. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2031, there was a projected two-fold increase in the number of people living with dementia in Canada (1.6-fold increase in prevalence rate). By 2031, the projected informal (unpaid) caregiving for dementia in Canada was two billion hours per year, or 100 h per year per Canadian of working age. CONCLUSIONS The projected increase in dementia prevalence was largely related to the expected increase in older Canadians, with projections sensitive to changes in the age of dementia onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas G Manuel
- Health Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ; Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ; Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ; School of Public and Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ottawa and Toronto, Ottawa, Ontario Canada
| | - Rochelle Garner
- Health Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario Canada
| | - Philippe Finès
- Health Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario Canada
| | | | - William Flanagan
- Health Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario Canada
| | - Karen Tu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ottawa and Toronto, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ; Department of Family Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Kim Reimer
- BC Ministry of Health, Victoria, British Columbia Canada
| | - Larry W Chambers
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ; Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ; School of Public and Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario Canada ; Alzheimer's Society of Canada, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario Canada
| | - Julie Bernier
- Health Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lin HR, Otsubo T, Sasaki N, Imanaka Y. The determinants of long-term care expenditure and their interactions. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/20479700.2016.1141469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
38
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and (select 8682 from (select(sleep(5)))aqxj)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
39
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 order by 1-- rkdf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
40
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 waitfor delay '0:0:5'-- bmov] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
41
|
|
42
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 order by 1-- bcpd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
43
|
|
44
|
|
45
|
|
46
|
|
47
|
|
48
|
|
49
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 waitfor delay '0:0:5'] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
50
|
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 and 2364=4691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|