Stimulating action of KW-5139 (Leu13-motilin) on gastrointestinal motility in the rabbit

Molecular characterization and distribution of motilin and motilin receptor in the Japanese medaka Oryzias latipes

Motilin (MLN) is a peptide hormone originally isolated from the mucosa of the porcine intestine. Its orthologs have been identified in various vertebrates. Although MLN regulates gastrointestinal motility in tetrapods from amphibians to mammals, recent studies indicate that MLN is not involved in the regulation of isolated intestinal motility in zebrafish, at least in vitro. To determine the unknown function of MLN in teleosts, we examined the expression of MLN and the MLN receptor (MLNR) at the cellular level in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Quantitative PCR revealed that mln mRNA was limitedly expressed in the gut, whereas mlnr mRNA was not detected in the gut but was expressed in the brain and kidney. By in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, mlnr mRNA was detected in the dopaminergic neurons of the area postrema in the brain and the noradrenaline-producing cells in the interrenal gland of the kidney. Furthermore, we observed efferent projections of mlnr-expressing dopaminergic neurons in the lobus vagi (XL) and nucleus motorius nervi vagi (NXm) of the medulla oblongata by establishing a transgenic medaka expressing the enhanced green fluorescence protein driven by the mlnr promoter. The expression of dopamine receptor mRNAs in the XL and cholinergic neurons in NXm was confirmed by in situ hybridization. These results indicate novel sites of MLN activity other than the gastrointestinal tract. MLN may exert central and peripheral actions through the regulation of catecholamine release in medaka.

Does ghrelin regulate intestinal motility in rabbits? An in vitro study using isolated duodenal strips

Rabbit duodenum has been used for examining the ability of motilin to cause muscle contraction in vitro. A motilin-related peptide, ghrelin, is known to be involved in the regulation of gastrointestinal (GI) motility in various animals, but its ability to cause rabbit GI contraction have not been well examined. The aim of this study is to clarify the action of rat ghrelin and its interaction with motilin in the rabbit duodenum. The mRNA expression of ghrelin and motilin receptors was also examined using RT-PCR. Rat ghrelin (10-9-10-6 M) did not change the contractile activity of the duodenum measured by the mean muscle tonus and area under the curve of contraction waves. In agreement with this result, the distribution of ghrelin receptor mRNA in the rabbit GI tract varied depending on the GI region from which the samples were taken; the expression level in the duodenum was negligible, but that in the esophagus or stomach was significant. On the other hand, motilin (10-10-10-6 M) caused a concentration-dependent contraction by means of increased mean muscle tonus, and consistently, motilin receptor mRNA was expressed heterogeneously depending on the GI region (esophagus = stomach = colon = rectum < duodenum = jejunum = ileum < cecum). Expression level of motilin receptor was comparable to that of ghrelin receptor in the esophagus and stomach. Pretreatment with ghrelin (10-6 M) prior to motilin did not affect the contractile activity of motilin in the duodenum. In conclusion, ghrelin does not affect muscle contractility or motilin-induced contraction in the rabbit duodenum, which is due to the lack of ghrelin receptors. The present in vitro results suggest that ghrelin might not be a regulator of intestinal motility in rabbits.

Motilin is a regulator of gastric contraction in Japanese fire belly newts (Cynops pyrrhogaster), in vitro studies using isolated gastrointestinal strips of newts, rabbits, and chickens

The effects of newt motilin on the contractility of the isolated gastrointestinal (GI) tract from Japanese fire belly newts (newt) were examined to clarify whether motilin regulates GI motility in urodele amphibians. In addition, contractile responsiveness to motilins from seven species of vertebrates (human, chicken, turtle, alligator, axolotol, newt and zebrafish) were compared in GI preparations from three different animals (rabbit duodenum, chicken ileum and newt stomach) to determine the species-specific action of motilin. Newt motilin (10^-10 M - 10^-6 M) caused a contraction of cognate gastric strips, while the upper, middle, and lower intestinal strips were insensitive. The rank order of motilins for contractile activity in newt gastric strips was newt > alligator > axolotol > chicken > turtle > human ≫ zebrafish. On the other hand, newt motilin caused a weak contraction in the rabbit duodenum (human > alligator = chicken > turtle > newt ≧ axolotol > zebrafish), and it was ineffective in the chicken ileum (chicken > turtle > alligator > human ≫ newt, axolotol and zebrafish). This study demonstrates that motilin induces contraction in the GI tract of a urodele amphibian, the newt, in a region (stomach)-specific manner and further indicates that a ligand-receptor interaction of the motilin system is a species-specific manner probably due to differences in the amino acid sequence of motilin.

Identification of motilin in Japanese fire bellied newt

Motilin, a peptide hormone consisting of 22 amino acid residues, was identified in the duodenum of pigs in the 1970s. It is known to induce gastrointestinal contractions during the interdigestive state in mammals. Although the motilin gene has been identified in various animal species, it has not been studied in amphibians. Here, we identified the motilin gene in the Japanese fire bellied newt (Cynops pyrrhogaster), and conducted an analysis of tissue distribution, morphological observations, and physiological experiments. The deduced mature newt motilin comprises 22 amino acid residues, like in mammals and birds. The C-terminus of the newt motilin showed high homology with motilin from other species compared to the N-terminus region, which is considered the bioactive site. Motilin mRNA expression in newts was abundant in the upper small intestine, with notably high motilin mRNA expression found in the pancreas. Motilin-producing cells were found in the mucosal layer of the upper small intestine and existed as two cell types: open-and closed-type cells. Motilin-producing cells in the pancreas were also found to produce insulin but not glucagon. Newt motilin stimulated gastric contractions but not in other parts of the intestines in vitro, and motilin-induced gastric contraction was significantly inhibited by treatment with atropine, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist. These results indicate that motilin is also present in amphibians, and that its gastrointestinal contractile effects are conserved in mammals, birds, and amphibians. Additionally, we demonstrated for the first time the existence of pancreatic motilin, suggesting that newt motilin has an additional unknown physiological role.

Pheasant motilin, its distribution and gastrointestinal contractility-stimulating action in the pheasant

Previously, pheasant motilin was identified as a 22-amino acid peptide with a sequence of FVPFFTQSDI QKMQEKERIK GQ. In the present study, the distribution of pheasant motilin mRNA was determined and compared with that of ghrelin, a motilin-related peptide. The effects of pheasant motilin on the cognate gastrointestinal (GI) muscle strips were also examined in an in vitro contraction study. The expression of pheasant motilin mRNA was highest in the small intestine (duodenum, jejunum and ileum), moderate in the colon and very low in the brain, lung, heart, pancreas, esophagus, proventriculus, gizzard and caecum, and this distribution was in contrast with that of ghrelin mRNA. Pheasant motilin caused contraction of the cognate GI tract in a region-dependent manner, similar to chicken motilin. The contraction in the small intestine was large and was not affected by atropine. In contrast, contraction in the proventriculus was small and was decreased by atropine. The crop and colon were insensitive to pheasant motilin. Neither GM109 nor MA2029, mammalian motilin receptor antagonists inhibited the contractions of pheasant motilin. Erythromycin was ineffective in the pheasant ileum, although it caused contraction of the rabbit duodenum. These results indicate that pheasant motilin caused contraction through an action on smooth muscles in the small intestine and an action on enteric cholinergic nerves in the proventriculus. This high responsiveness of the small intestine suggests that motilin is a regulator of small intestinal motility in avians, and the characteristic of the motilin receptor in the pheasant might be different from that in mammals, as is that in chickens.

Motilin Comparative Study: Structure, Distribution, Receptors, and Gastrointestinal Motility

Motilin, produced in endocrine cells in the mucosa of the upper intestine, is an important regulator of gastrointestinal (GI) motility and mediates the phase III of interdigestive migrating motor complex (MMC) in the stomach of humans, dogs and house musk shrews through the specific motilin receptor (MLN-R). Motilin-induced MMC contributes to the maintenance of normal GI functions and transmits a hunger signal from the stomach to the brain. Motilin has been identified in various mammals, but the physiological roles of motilin in regulating GI motility in these mammals are well not understood due to inconsistencies between studies conducted on different species using a range of experimental conditions. Motilin orthologs have been identified in non-mammalian vertebrates, and the sequence of avian motilin is relatively close to that of mammals, but reptile, amphibian and fish motilins show distinctive different sequences. The MLN-R has also been identified in mammals and non-mammalian vertebrates, and can be divided into two main groups: mammal/bird/reptile/amphibian clade and fish clade. Almost 50 years have passed since discovery of motilin, here we reviewed the structure, distribution, receptor and the GI motility regulatory function of motilin in vertebrates from fish to mammals.

Motilin- and ghrelin-induced contractions in isolated gastrointestinal strips from three species of frogs

Ghrelin (GHRL) and motilin (MLN), gut peptides isolated from the mucosa of the stomach and duodenum, respectively, stimulate gastrointestinal (GI) motility in mammals and birds. However, the functions of MLN and GHRL in amphibian GI tracts have not been examined in detail. To clarify the regulation of GI motility by the two peptides, the effects of human MLN and rat GHRL on contractility of isolated GI strips from three species of frogs, the black-spotted pond frog (pond frog; Pelophylax nigromaculata), bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeiana) and Western clawed frog (Xenopus; Xenopus tropicalis), were examined in in vitro experiments. The GI tract of each frog was divided into the stomach, upper intestine, middle intestine and lower intestine. Human MLN caused contractions of the stomach in the pond frog and upper intestine in the bullfrog and Xenopus, but other GI regions were insensitive to human MLN. Erythromycin did not cause contraction of the upper intestine of the bullfrog and Xenopus. Rat GHRL did not cause contraction of the stomach and small intestines in the pond frog and bullfrog, but it caused a concentration-dependent contraction in the stomach and upper intestine of Xenopus, while des-acyl rat GHRL did not cause any contraction of them. In conclusion, human MLN caused the contraction of the stomach or upper intestine in the three species of frogs, but GHRL was effective only in the stomach and upper intestine of Xenopus. On the basis of these data, MLN but not GHRL causes the GI region-dependent contractions in the frogs.

Identification of pheasant ghrelin and motilin and their actions on contractility of the isolated gastrointestinal tract

Motilin and ghrelin were identified in the pheasant by molecular cloning, and the actions of both peptides on the contractility of gastrointestinal (GI) strips were examined in vitro. Molecular cloning indicated that the deduced amino acid sequences of the pheasant motilin and ghrelin were a 22-amino acid peptide, FVPFFTQSDIQKMQEKERIKGQ, and a 26-amino acid peptide, GSSFLSPAYKNIQQQKDTRKPTGRLH, respectively. In in vitro studies using pheasant GI strips, chicken motilin caused contraction of the proventriculus and small intestine, whereas the crop and colon were insensitive. Human motilin, but not erythromycin, caused contraction of small intestine. Chicken motilin-induced contractions in the proventriculus and ileum were not inhibited by a mammalian motilin receptor antagonist, GM109. Neither atropine (a cholinergic receptor antagonist) nor tetrodotoxin (a neuron blocker) inhibited the responses of chicken motilin in the ileum but both drugs decreased the responses to motilin in the proventriculus, suggesting that the contractile mechanisms of motilin in the proventriculus was neurogenic, different from that of the small intestine (myogenic). On the other hand, chicken and quail ghrelin did not cause contraction in any regions of pheasant GI tract. Since interaction of ghrelin and motilin has been reported in the house musk shrew, interaction of two peptides was examined. The chicken motilin-induced contractions were not modified by ghrelin, and ghrelin also did not cause any contraction under the presence of motilin, suggesting the absence of interaction in both peptides. In conclusion, both the motilin system and ghrelin system are present in the pheasant. Regulation of GI motility by motilin might be common in avian species. However, absence of ghrelin actions in any GI regions suggests the avian species-related difference in regulation of GI contractility by ghrelin.

A verification study of gastrointestinal motility-stimulating action of guinea-pig motilin using isolated gastrointestinal strips from rabbits and guinea-pigs

Motilin (MLN), a 22-amino-acid peptide hormone, is generally present in the mucosa of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, mainly the duodenum of mammals, and it regulates GI motility, especially that related to interdigestive migrating contraction. However, MLN and its receptor are absent in mice and rats, and MLN does not cause any mechanical responses in the rat and mouse GI tracts. The guinea-pig is also a rodent, but expression of the MLN gene in the guinea-pig has been reported. In the present study, two guinea-pig MLNs, FIPIFTYSELRRTQEREQNKGL found in the Ensemble Genome Database (gpMLN-1) and FVPIFTYSELRRTQEREQNKRL reported by Xu et al. (2001) (gpMLN-2), were synthesized, and their biological activities were evaluated in the rabbit duodenum and guinea-pig GI tract in vitro. Both gpMLNs showed contractile activity in longitudinal muscle strips of the rabbit duodenum. The EC₅₀ values of gpMLN-1 and gpMLN-2 were slightly higher than that of human MLN (hMLN), but the maximum contractions were as same as that of hMLN. Treatment with GM109 and hMLN-induced receptor desensitization decreased the contractile activity of both gpMLNs, indicating that the two gpMLN candidates are able to activate the MLN receptor (MLN-R) of the rabbit duodenum. In guinea-pig GI preparations, hMLN and gpMLNs did not show any mechanical responses in circular muscle strips from the gastric antrum or in longitudinal strips of the duodenum, ileum and colon although acetylcholine and 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium (DMPP) caused definite mechanical responses. The DMPP-induced neural responses in the gastric circular muscle and ileal longitudinal muscles were not modified by gpMLN-1. Even in the gastric and ileal strips with intact mucosa, no mechanical responses were seen with either of the gpMLNs. Furthermore, RT-PCR using various primer sets failed to amplify the gpMLN-2 mRNA. In conclusion, gpMLNs including one that was already reported and the other that was newly found in a database were effective to the rabbit MLN-R, whereas they did not cause any contractions or modification of neural responses in the guinea-pig GI tract, indicating that the MLN system is vestigial and not functional in regulation of GI motility in the guinea-pig as well as in other rodents such as rats and mice.

Characterization of the gastric motility response to human motilin and erythromycin in human motilin receptor-expressing transgenic mice

Motilin is a gastrointestinal peptide hormone that stimulates gastrointestinal motility. Motilin is produced primarily in the duodenum and jejunum. Motilin receptors (MTLRs) are G protein-coupled receptors that may represent a clinically useful pharmacological target as they can be activated by erythromycin. The functions of motilin are highly species-dependent and remain poorly understood. As a functional motilin system is absent in rodents such as rats and mice, these species are not commonly used for basic studies. In this study, we examine the usefulness of human MTLR-overexpressing transgenic (hMTLR-Tg) mice by identifying the mechanisms of the gastric motor response to human motilin and erythromycin. The distribution of hMTLR was examined immunohistochemically in male wild-type (WT) and hMTLR-Tg mice. The contractile response of gastric strips was measured isometrically in an organ bath, while gastric emptying was determined using phenol red. hMTLR expression was abundant in the gastric smooth muscle layer. Interestingly, higher levels of hMTLR expression were observed in the myenteric plexus of hMTLR-Tg mice but not WT mice. hMTLR was not co-localized with vesicular acetylcholine transporter, a marker of cholinergic neurons in the myenteric plexus. Treatment with human motilin and erythromycin caused concentration-dependent contraction of gastric strips obtained from hMTLR-Tg mice but not from WT mice. The contractile response to human motilin and erythromycin in hMTLR-Tg mice was affected by neither atropine nor tetrodotoxin and was totally absent in Ca2+-free conditions. Furthermore, intraperitoneal injection of erythromycin significantly promoted gastric emptying in hMTLR-Tg mice but not in WT mice. Human motilin and erythromycin stimulate gastric smooth muscle contraction in hMTLR-Tg mice. This action is mediated by direct contraction of smooth muscle via the influx of extracellular Ca2+. Thus, hMTLR-Tg mice may be useful for the evaluation of MTLR agonists as gastric prokinetic agents.

Regulation of Gastrointestinal Motility by Motilin and Ghrelin in Vertebrates

The energy balance of vertebrates is regulated by the difference in energy input and energy expenditure. Generally, most vertebrates obtain their energy from nutrients of foods through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Therefore, food intake and following food digestion, including motility of the GI tract, secretion and absorption, are crucial physiological events for energy homeostasis. GI motility changes depending on feeding, and GI motility is divided into fasting (interdigestive) and postprandial (digestive) contraction patterns. GI motility is controlled by contractility of smooth muscles of the GI tract, extrinsic and intrinsic neurons (motor and sensory) and some hormones. In mammals, ghrelin (GHRL) and motilin (MLN) stimulate appetite and GI motility and contribute to the regulation of energy homeostasis. GHRL and MLN are produced in the mucosal layer of the stomach and upper small intestine, respectively. GHRL is a multifunctional peptide and is involved in glucose metabolism, endocrine/exocrine functions and cardiovascular and reproductive functions, in addition to feeding and GI motility in mammals. On the other hand, the action of MLN is restricted and species such as rodentia, including mice and rats, lack MLN peptide and its receptor. From a phylogenetic point of view, GHRL and its receptor GHS-R1a have been identified in various vertebrates, and their structural features and various physiological functions have been revealed. On the other hand, MLN or MLN-like peptide (MLN-LP) and its receptors have been found only in some fish, birds and mammals. Here, we review the actions of GHRL and MLN with a focus on contractility of the GI tract of species from fish to mammals.

Colonic Transit Time and Gut Peptides in Adult Patients with Slow and Normal Colonic Transit Constipation

PURPOSE

To investigate whether pathophysiological differences exist among healthy controls (HC) and patients with slow and normal transit constipation (STC and NTC), we evaluated (1) gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms using validated questionnaires; (2) circulating concentrations of neurotensin, motilin, corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF), and somatostatin; and (3) possible differences in frequency distribution of the neurotensin rs1800832 A/G and Neurotensin Receptor 1 rs6090453 C/G SNPs.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with severe functional constipation and 20 HC completed the study. Symptoms were evaluated by GSRS and Constipaq scoring system. Plasma concentrations of GI peptides were evaluated by ELISA on fasting and six sequential blood samples after a standard meal. Genotyping was performed by PCR and endonuclease digestion.

RESULTS

Symptom profiles largely overlapped between NTC and STC patients. As for peptide profiles, neurotensin showed lower concentrations at 60 and 90 min in STC versus HC, and motilin showed throughout the curve 85% and 82% lower levels in STC than HC and NTC, respectively. Finally, neurotensin polymorphism resulted in being associated with the peptide levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptom profile is not a reliable tool to discriminate STC, whilst the GI peptide profiles might help in identifying it.

Does motilin peptide regulate gastrointestinal motility of zebrafish? An in vitro study using isolated intestinal strips

Motilin (MOT), a 22-amino-acid peptide hormone produced in the duodenal mucosa, stimulates gastrointestinal motility in mammals and birds, and it is a mediator of interdigestive motor complexes. Recently, expression of MOT-like peptide (MOTLP) and its receptor mRNAs was identified in zebrafish. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the zebrafish MOTLP (zfMOTLP, HIAFFSPKEMRELREKE) affects zebrafish gastrointestinal motility, with comparison to the effect of human MOT, in which five amino acids are identical to zfMOTLP at positions 5, 9, 15, 16, and 17. zfMOTLP caused small contractions of the rabbit duodenum and chicken ileum but, the sensitivity was about 3000-times lower than that of human MOT. zfMOTLP-induced contraction in the rabbit duodenum was decreased by pretreatment of the MOT receptor antagonist GM109, indicating that zfMOTLP could bind to the MOT receptor. zfMOTLP (3-100nM) increased the intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration in zfMOT receptor-expressing HEK293 cells, but human MOT did not cause responses even at 100nM. In in vitro study using isolated zebrafish gastrointestinal strips, zfMOTLP caused only small contractions even at high doses (1-10μM). zfMOT receptor mRNA is detected in the gastrointestinal tract and brain to almost the same extent, and the expression level (40-70 copies/100ng total RNA) is much lower than that in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. These results suggest that the MOTLP/MOT receptor system is present in zebrafish, but its physiological role for regulation of gastrointestinal motility might be not significant due to the weak contractile activity and low expression level of the receptor.

Molecular cloning of motilin and mechanism of motilin-induced gastrointestinal motility in Japanese quail

Motilin, a peptide hormone produced in the upper intestinal mucosa, plays an important role in the regulation of gastrointestinal (GI) motility. In the present study, we first determined the cDNA and amino acid sequences of motilin in the Japanese quail and studied the distribution of motilin-producing cells in the gastrointestinal tract. We also examined the motilin-induced contractile properties of quail GI tracts using an in vitro organ bath, and then elucidated the mechanisms of motilin-induced contraction in the proventriculus and duodenum of the quail. Mature quail motilin was composed of 22 amino acid residues, which showed high homology with chicken (95.4%), human (72.7%), and dog (72.7%) motilin. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that motilin-immunopositive cells were present in the mucosal layer of the duodenum (23.4±4.6cells/mm(2)), jejunum (15.2±0.8cells/mm(2)), and ileum (2.5±0.7cells/mm(2)), but were not observed in the crop, proventriculus, and colon. In the organ bath study, chicken motilin induced dose-dependent contraction in the proventriculus and small intestine. On the other hand, chicken ghrelin had no effect on contraction in the GI tract. Motilin-induced contraction in the duodenum was not inhibited by atropine, hexamethonium, ritanserin, ondansetron, or tetrodotoxin. However, motilin-induced contractions in the proventriculus were significantly inhibited by atropine and tetrodotoxin. These results suggest that motilin is the major stimulant of GI contraction in quail, as it is in mammals and the site of action of motilin is different between small intestine and proventriculus.

Effects of ghrelin and motilin on smooth muscle contractility of the isolated gastrointestinal tract from the bullfrog and Japanese fire belly newt

Ghrelin has been identified in some amphibians and is known to stimulate growth hormone release and food intake as seen in mammals. Ghrelin regulates gastrointestinal motility in mammals and birds. The aim of this study was to determine whether ghrelin affects gastrointestinal smooth muscle contractility in bullfrogs (anuran) and Japanese fire belly newts (urodelian) in vitro. Neither bullfrog ghrelin nor rat ghrelin affected longitudinal smooth muscle contractility of gastrointestinal strips from the bullfrog. Expression of growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHS-R1a) mRNA was confirmed in the bullfrog gastrointestinal tract, and the expression level in the gastric mucosa was lower than that in the intestinal mucosa. In contrast, some gastrointestinal peptides, including substance P, neurotensin and motilin, and the muscarinic receptor agonist carbachol showed marked contraction, indicating normality of the smooth muscle preparations. Similar results were obtained in another amphibian, the Japanese fire belly newt. Newt ghrelin and rat ghrelin did not cause any contraction in gastrointestinal longitudinal muscle, whereas substance P and carbachol were effective causing contraction. In conclusion, ghrelin does not affect contractility of the gastrointestinal smooth muscle in anuran and urodelian amphibians, similar to results for rainbow trout and goldfish (fish) but different from results for rats and chickens. The results suggest diversity of ghrelin actions on the gastrointestinal tract across animals. This study also showed for the first time that motilin induces gastrointestinal contraction in amphibians.

The proximal gastric corpus is the most responsive site of motilin-induced contractions in the stomach of the Asian house shrew

The migrating motor complex (MMC) is responsible for emptying the stomach during the interdigestive period, in preparation for the next meal. It is known that gastric phase III of MMC starts from the proximal stomach and propagates the contraction downwards. We hypothesized that a certain region of the stomach must be more responsive to motilin than others, and that motilin-induced strong gastric contractions propagate from that site. Stomachs of the Suncus or Asian house shrew, a small insectivorous mammal, were dissected and the fundus, proximal corpus, distal corpus, and antrum were examined to study the effect of motilin using an organ bath experiment. Motilin-induced contractions differed in different parts of the stomach. Only the proximal corpus induced gastric contraction even at motilin 10(-10) M, and strong contraction was induced by motilin 10(-9) M in all parts of the stomach. The GPR38 mRNA expression was also higher in the proximal corpus than in the other sections, and the lowest expression was observed in the antrum. GPR38 mRNA expression varied with low expression in the mucosal layer and high expression in the muscle layer. Additionally, motilin-induced contractions in each dissected part of the stomach were inhibited by tetrodotoxin and atropine pretreatment. These results suggest that motilin reactivity is not consistent throughout the stomach, and an area of the proximal corpus including the cardia is the most sensitive to motilin.

Mechanism of ghrelin-induced gastric contractions in Suncus murinus (house musk shrew): involvement of intrinsic primary afferent neurons

Here, we have reported that motilin can induce contractions in a dose-dependent manner in isolated Suncus murinus (house musk shrew) stomach. We have also shown that after pretreatment with a low dose of motilin (10(-10) M), ghrelin also induces gastric contractions at levels of 10(-10) M to 10(-7) M. However, the neural mechanism of ghrelin action in the stomach has not been fully revealed. In the present study, we studied the mechanism of ghrelin-induced contraction in vitro using a pharmacological method. The responses to ghrelin in the stomach were almost completely abolished by hexamethonium and were significantly suppressed by the administration of phentolamine, prazosin, ondansetron, and naloxone. Additionally, N-nitro-l-arginine methylester significantly potentiated the contractions. Importantly, the mucosa is essential for ghrelin-induced, but not motilin-induced, gastric contractions. To evaluate the involvement of intrinsic primary afferent neurons (IPANs), which are multiaxonal neurons that pass signals from the mucosa to the myenteric plexus, we examined the effect of the IPAN-related pathway on ghrelin-induced contractions and found that pretreatment with adenosine and tachykinergic receptor 3 antagonists (SR142801) significantly eliminated the contractions and GR113808 (5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4 antagonist) almost completely eliminated it. The results indicate that ghrelin stimulates and modulates suncus gastric contractions through cholinergic, adrenergic, serotonergic, opioidergic neurons and nitric oxide synthases in the myenteric plexus. The mucosa is also important for ghrelin-induced gastric contractions, and IPANs may be the important interneurons that pass the signal from the mucosa to the myenteric plexus.

Myenteric neural network activated by motilin in the stomach of Suncus murinus (house musk shrew)

BACKGROUND

It has been shown in human and canine studies that motilin, a gastroprokinetic hormone, induces gastric phase III contractions via the enteric nervous; however, the center of motilin action in the stomach has not been clearly revealed. In the present study, we investigated the neural pathway of motilin-induced gastric contraction by using Suncus murinus, a new animal model for motilin study.

METHODS

An isolated suncus stomach was used in vitro to determine the mechanism of motilin action through the myenteric plexus. Synthetic suncus motilin (10(-11) -10(-7) molL(-1) ) was added to an organ bath, and the spontaneous contraction response was expressed as a percent of ACh (10(-5) molL(-1) ) responses. Motilin-induced contractions were also studied by a pharmacological method using several receptor antagonists and enzyme inhibitor.

KEY RESULTS

Suncus motilin induced a concentration-dependent gastric contraction at concentrations from 10(-9) to 10(-7) molL(-1) . The responses to suncus motilin in the stomach were completely abolished by atropine and tetrodotoxin treatment and significantly suppressed by administration of hexamethonium, verapamil, phentolamine, yohimbine, ondansetron, and naloxone, whereas ritanserin, prazosin, timolol, and FK888 did not affect the action of motilin. Additionally, N-nitro l-arginine methylester slightly potentiated the contractions induced by motilin.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The results indicate that motilin directly stimulates and modulates suncus gastric contraction through cholinergic, adrenergic, serotonergic, opioidergic, and NO neurons in the myenteric plexus.

Erythromycin inhibited glycinergic inputs to gastric vagal motoneurons in brainstem slices of newborn rats

BACKGROUND

Motilin has been known to stimulate the motility of digestive organs peripherally via activation of motilin receptors located at gastrointestinal (GI) cholinergic nerve endings and/or smooth muscle cells. Recent studies have indicated that motilin may also promote GI motility via actions in the central nervous system; however the sites of action and the mechanisms are not clear yet. The present study aimed to test the hypothesis that motilin receptor agonist erythromycin alters the synaptic inputs of preganglionic gastric vagal motoneurons (GVMs) located in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV).

METHODS

Gastric vagal motoneurons were retrogradely labeled by fluorescent tracer from the stomach wall of newborn rats. Fluorescently labeled GVMs in DMV were recorded using whole-cell patch-clamp in brainstem slices and the effects of motilin receptor agonist erythromycin on the synaptic inputs were examined.

KEY RESULTS

Erythromycin (100 nmol L(-1), 1 μmol L(-1), 10 μmol L(-1)) significantly inhibited the frequency of glycinergic spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) of GVMs and significantly inhibited the amplitude at the concentration of 10 μmol L(-1). These responses were prevented by GM-109, a selective motilin receptor antagonist. In the pre-existence of tetradotoxin (TTX, 1 μmol L(-1)), erythromycin (10 μmol L(-1)) caused significant decreases of the glycinergic miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs), in both the frequency and the amplitude. However, erythromycin (10 μmol L(-1)) didn't cause significant changes of the GABAergic sIPSCs.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Erythromycin selectively inhibits the glycinergic inputs of GVMs.

Ghrelin stimulates gastric motility of the guinea pig through activation of a capsaicin-sensitive neural pathway: in vivo and in vitro functional studies

BACKGROUND

Ghrelin stimulates gastric motility in rats, mice and humans. Although ghrelin and the ghrelin receptor are known to be expressed in the guinea-pig gastrointestinal tract, the effects of ghrelin on gastric motility have not been examined. Aim of the present study was to clarify the motor-stimulating action of ghrelin in the guinea-pig stomach.

METHODS

Gastric motility was measured as intraluminal pressure changes using a balloon inserted in the stomach of urethane-anaesthetized guinea pigs. The effects of ghrelin on gastric muscle contraction and [(3)H]-efflux from [(3)H]-choline-loaded strips were investigated in vitro.

KEY RESULTS

Ghrelin (0.3-30 microg kg(-1), i.v.) increased gastric motility in a dose-dependent manner but des-acyl ghrelin was ineffective. The action of ghrelin was completely inhibited by hexamethonium and D-Lys(3)-growth-hormone releasing peptide-6. Atropine partially decreased the stimulatory action of ghrelin. In capsaicin-pretreated guinea pigs, the ghrelin-induced response was markedly decreased. Ghrelin (1 micromol L(-1)) did not affect [(3)H]-efflux in non-stimulated preparations but significantly decreased electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced [(3)H]-efflux. L-Nitro arginine methylester (L-NAME) attenuated the inhibition of [(3)H]-efflux by ghrelin. Ghrelin did not cause any mechanical changes in gastric strips. Electrical field stimulation caused relaxation of gastric strips, which changed to atropine-sensitive contraction in the presence of L-NAME. Relaxation induced by EFS was slightly potentiated, but the EFS-induced contraction was not affected by ghrelin.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Ghrelin stimulates gastric motility of the guinea pig through activation of capsaicin-sensitive vago-vagal reflex pathway including efferent cholinergic neurons. Peripheral ghrelin receptors on enteric nitrergic nerves might affect the ghrelin-induced gastric action by releasing nitric oxide.

Differential effects of motilin on interdigestive motility of the human gastric antrum, pylorus, small intestine and gallbladder

Motilin was infused in this study with the aim of examining refractory characteristics for motilin stimulation of antral phase III and fasting gallbladder emptying. Moreover, interdigestive pyloric and small intestinal motility from duodenum to ileum were studied, as these may be target organs for motilin. Eight fasting, healthy male volunteers received, on separate subsequent days, repeated infusions of 13leucine-motilin (8 pmol (kg min)(-1) for 5 min) or saline at 30 min after phase IIIs in the duodenum. Interdigestive motility of the antrum, pylorus, duodenum, jejunum and ileum was measured for maximum 10 h by using a 21-lumen perfused catheter. Gallbladder motility was measured by ultrasonography. Motilin infusions induced antral phase IIIs, but only after a preceding phase III of duodenal origin. Under this condition, time-interval to phase III at the duodenal recording site was 30 +/- 13 (SEM) min after motilin, compared with 79 +/- 14 min after saline (P < 0.01), and compared with 121 +/- 13 min for motilin infusion following an antral phase III (P < 0.001). Motilin did not affect small intestinal motility or isolated pyloric pressure waves (IPPWs). However, the number of IPPWs was significantly affected by the origin of the preceding phase III, irrespective of whether motilin or saline was infused. Gallbladder volume decreased significantly within 10 min after each motilin infusion. We conclude that this study clearly demonstrates differential regional effects of motilin. Motilin initiates antral phase IIIs, but stimulation is subject to a refractory period which is clearly prolonged after a preceding antral phase III. Motilin induced gallbladder emptying, however, is not subject to a refractory state. Small intestinal phase IIIs as well as pyloric IPPWs are not affected by motilin.

Contractile effects and intracellular Ca2+ signalling induced by motilin and erythromycin in the circular smooth muscle of human colon

Motilin has excitatory effects on the colon of the rabbit and the dog, but little is known of its effect on the human colon. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects induced by motilin and erythromycin A (EMA) on muscle strips and on single cells from primary cultures from human colon. Isotonic contraction was recorded in circular muscle strips from macroscopically normal resection specimens of patients operated on for colonic neoplasm. Agonist-induced intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) signalling was studied in primary cultures of colonic smooth-muscle cells using the ratiometric Ca2+ indicator Indo 1, on a laser-scanning confocal epifluorescence microscope. In circular muscle strips, norleucine13-porcine motilin ([Nle13]-pm)and EMA induced tonic contractions with an EC50 of 92 +/- 21 nmol L(-1) and 31 +/- 16 micromol L(-1), respectively. The maximal contraction was 21 +/- 4% (motilin) and 33 +/- 12% (EMA) of the response to 10(-4) mol L(-1) acetylcholine (ACh). The motilin antagonist OHM-11526 (10(-5.5) mol L(-1)) abolished the effects of both [Nle13]-pm and EMA. Neither tetrodotoxin (10(-5.5) mol L(-1)), L-nitro-D-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (10(-3.5) mol L(-1)) nor guanethidine (10(-5) mol L(-1)) interfered with the effects of [Nle13]-pm or EMA. [Nle13]-pm (10(-11)-10(-6) mol L(-1)) induced rises of [Ca2+]i in cultured colonic myocytes. At 10(-6) mol L-1, 94% of the cells responded, and half of the cells responded at 1.4 nmol L(-1) [Nle13]-pm. 81% (35/43) and 95% (75/79) responded to EMA (10(-6) mol L(-1)) and acetylcholine (ACh, 10(-4) mol L(-1)), respectively. The motilin antagonist GM-109 inhibited motilin- and EMA-induced [Ca2+]i rises. In the absence of extracellular Ca2+, only 13% (7/52) of the cells responded to [Nle13]-pm (10(-6) mol L(-1)) vs. 90% (47/52) to ACh (10(-4) mol L(-1)). Motilin and EMA have direct excitatory effects on circular smooth muscle from the human colon and these effects are mediated via a smooth-muscle motilin receptor. These findings suggest that motilin may regulate colonic motility and that motilides may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of colonic hypomotility.

Design and synthesis of N-terminal cyclic motilin partial peptides: a novel pure motilin antagonist

Motilin antagonist was designed and synthesized on the basis of the structure-activity relationship analysis of porcine motilin that we reported recently. The drug design was performed on a specific concept to reduce a flexibility of peptide conformation of porcine motilin partial peptide by its cyclization. The cyclic peptide was synthesized using Boc (tert-butyloxycarbonyl) solid phase methodology, followed by cyclization using the azide procedure, and tested for the binding activity to motilin receptor and smooth muscle contractile activity. The cyclic peptides 3, 4, and 5 showed antagonistic property on contraction assay (pA2 [the negative logarithm of molar concentration of antagonist causing a 2-hold shift to the right of the concentration-response curve for motilin]: 4.5, 4.34, and 4.04, respectively, in rabbit duodenum) and no contractile activity even at high concentration.

Development of a sensitive liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry method for the measurement of KW-5139 in rat plasma

A sensitive method for the determination of a prokinetic peptide, KW-5139 (Leu(13)-motilin), in rat plasma has been developed utilizing liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS). KW-5139 was separated by reversed-phase HPLC, with a mixture of 75 mM ammonium formate (pH 3.0) and acetonitrile (4:1, v/v), and monitored by single ion recording (SIR)-ESI-MS at m/z 894 ([M+3H](3+)). Simple protein precipitation and the LC-ESI-MS analysis allowed the determination of KW-5139 in rat plasma with the mean precision and accuracy at the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ, 0.5 ng/mL) of 5.7 and 11.2%, respectively. The method was applied to the monitoring of the plasma time-concentration profile of KW-5139, intravenously administered to rats at a dose of 1 microg/kg.

Localization of motilin binding sites in subcellular fractions from rabbit antral and colonic smooth muscle tissue

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Motilin stimulates gastrointestinal motility, but in vitro studies reveal a direct smooth muscle effect, whereas in vivo studies reveal a neurally mediated effect. The aim of the present study was to determine if motilin binds to microsomes (smooth muscle) and/or synaptosomes (neurons).

METHODS

Subcellular fractions were prepared from tissue of rabbit gastric antrum and colon by differential centrifugation and density gradient centrifugation and characterized by determining motilin binding and the presence of membrane markers.

RESULTS

The purified microsomal fraction, enriched in the smooth muscle marker 5'-nucleotidase, was found to have the highest specific motilin binding in both antrum and colon. In the antrum, but not in the colon, the mitochondrial fraction also showed enrichment of [3H]-saxitoxin binding (marker for synaptosomes) and motilin binding, although the latter was much lower than in the microsomal fraction. Two receptor binding sites were characterized in both the antral mitochondrial/synaptosomal and colonic microsomal fraction (antrum: pKd,1 9.89+/-0.19, pKd,2 8.18+/-0.11, colon: pKd,1 9.72+/-0.31, pKd,2 8.39+/-0.58).

CONCLUSION

Motilin binding is predominantly associated with smooth muscle membranes in both antrum and colon of the rabbit. In both organs two motilin binding sites are present with comparable affinities, but the density in the colon is much higher for both sites. Whether they represent neural and smooth muscle receptors will require studies with isolated smooth muscle cells and neurons.

Effect of leucine 13-motilin (KW5139) on early gastric stasis after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVE

To test a hypothesis that exogenously administered motilin would improve early gastric stasis after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Prolonged gastric stasis is a frequent complication after PPPD. We demonstrated that this might at least in part be attributable to delayed recovery of phase III activity of the gastric migrating motor complex due to low concentrations of plasma motilin caused by resection of the duodenum.

METHODS

Ten patients with a mean age of 54 years (range, 33-70) who underwent PPPD were studied. An assembly of manometric tubes was placed in the gastric antrum and jejunum (neoduodenum) at surgery. A gastrostomy tube was added for drainage and volume measurements of the gastric juice. After baseline recording, saline as a placebo was given intravenously on day 14 and 0.5 microg/kg of KW5139 (leucine-13 motilin) was given on days 17 and 18 every 2 hours, 6 times a day. The daily volume of gastric juice output and a gastric motility index were measured.

RESULTS

The mean period until the first appearance of phase III activity in the stomach was 41 +/- 2 days. The injection of saline did not change the gastric motility index (7.3 +/- 1.1 to 7.1 +/- 1.3 mmHg; p = 0.72). In contrast, motilin resulted in a significant increase in the gastric motility index (7.5 +/- 1.0 to 17.7 +/- 2.0 mmHg; p < 0.001). The saline injection produced no change in the daily gastric juice output (1175 +/- 140 to 1393 +/- 193 mL; p = 0.09). Motilin significantly decreased the gastric juice output (1387 +/- 157 to 934 +/- 142 mL; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that KW5139 is a safe and effective prokinetic drug for the treatment of early gastric stasis after PPPD.

Concentration-dependent stimulation of cholinergic motor nerves or smooth muscle by [Nle13]motilin in the isolated rabbit gastric antrum

In man, rabbit and cat, the effects of motilin and motilides are neurally mediated in vivo, whereas in vitro binding and contractility studies suggest the presence of a smooth muscular receptor. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro interactions of motilin with the enteric excitatory neurotransmission in the gastric antrum of the rabbit. Circular muscle strips from the pre-pyloric antrum were subjected to electrical field stimulation (1 ms, 1-32 Hz, 10 s train) and muscle twitch responses were recorded isometrically. Induced twitch responses were frequency dependent (1-32 Hz) and entirely neurogenic (tetrodotoxin sensitive). [Nle13]motilin dose-dependently (10[-9]-10[-8] M) enhanced the amplitude of, atropine sensitive, evoked contractions. At 4 Hz the response, expressed as a % of the response to 32 Hz, increased from 15.5 +/- 4.1% (control) to 28.1 +/- 5.8% (motilin 10[-9] M), and to 45.8 +/- 3.6% (motilin 10[-8.5] M) (P < 0.05). This effect was not inhibited by hexamethonium (10[-3.3] M) but was abolished by the motilin receptor antagonist GM-109 (10[-5] M). In unstimulated strips, motilin induced phasic-tonic contractions with a threshold concentration of 10[-8] M and an pEC50 of 7.48, which were also inhibited by GM-109 (10[-5] M) but not by tetrodotoxin (10[-5.5] M). The maximal tension, frequency and dose-dependency of carbachol-induced contractions were not influenced by motilin (pEC50, carbachol: 6.48 +/- 0.06 (control), 6.49 +/- 0.07 (motilin)). In conclusion, motilin enhances contractions induced by electrical field stimulation in the rabbit antrum by a post-ganglionic interaction with the cholinergic neurotransmission in vitro at low doses and interacts directly with antral smooth muscle at high doses. This model is an accurate reflection of the in vivo effects of motilin and provides a tool to study neurogenic and myogenic actions of motilin and motilides in vitro.

Functional characterization of neural and smooth muscle motilin receptors in the chicken proventriculus and ileum

To characterize the motilin receptors present in the chicken, the effects of chicken motilin (Phe-Val-Pro-Phe-Phe-Thr-Gln-Ser-Asp-Ile-Gln-Lys-Met-Gln-Glu-Lys-Glu-Arg -Asn-Lys-Gly-Gln), Leu13 porcine motilin, canine motilin and three erythromycin derivatives (EMA, EM523, GM611) on the contractility of the chicken gastrointestinal (GI) smooth muscles were investigated in vitro and compared with those in the rabbit duodenum. In the proventriculus longitudinal and circular muscle layers, chicken motilin (3 nM-1 microM) caused an atropine- and a tetrodotoxin-sensitive contraction (EC50 = 39-49 nM), and potentiated the EFS-induced contraction without affecting the responsiveness of acetylcholine. EM523 and GM611 (3-100 microM) contracted the proventriculus longitudinal muscle, and the maximum amplitudes of contraction were about 60% of that induced by chicken motilin. Chicken motilin (0.1 nM-100 nM) also caused contraction of the ileum (EC50 = 7 nM) through direct action on the smooth muscle cells. On the other hand, erythromycin derivatives showed only a weak contractile efficacy (about 20% of the maximum response of chicken motilin) even at high concentrations (10-100 microM). The rank order of potency in the ileum was chicken motilin > canine motilin > or = Leu13 porcine motilin > > GM611 > or = EM523 > or = EMA. GM109 slightly inhibited the ideal contractions induced by Leu13 porcine motilin at 100 microM (pA2 = 3.86). In the rabbit duodenum, chicken motilin was a full agonist with the same intrinsic activity as Leu13 porcine motilin, canine motilin and the erythromycin derivatives. However, the rank order of potency (Leu13 porcine motilin > or = canine motilin > chicken motilin > GM611 > or = EM523 > EMA) was different from that in the chicken ileum. In conclusion, chicken motilin causes an excitatory response in the chicken GI tract through activation of neural (proventriculus) and smooth muscle motilin receptors (ileum). The motilin receptor present in the ileum is different from that demonstrated in the rabbit intestine, because of a different rank order of motilin peptides in producing the contraction, low contracting activity of erythromycin derivatives and low antagonistic efficacy of GM109. Different pharmacological characteristics of the mechanical response induced by motilin peptides and erythromycin derivatives between the proventriculus and the ileum are discussed.

Does motilin stimulate the gastrointestinal motility of the pig? In vitro study using smooth muscle strips and dispersed muscle cells

To clarify the physiological role of motilin in the pig gastrointestinal (GI) tract, effect of Leu13-porcine motilin (LMT) on the contractility of GI smooth muscle was investigated in studies using isolated muscle strips and dispersed muscle cells. LMT produced no contraction in either longitudinal muscle (LM) or circular muscle (CM) of the stomach (fundus, corpus, antrum), duodenum, ileum and colon even at 1 microM. Pretreatment with LMT (1 nM-1 microM) did not potentiate the contractile response to acetylcholine (ACh) in each muscle strip. Dispersed cells from the duodenum responded to ACh in a concentration-dependent manner (EC50 = 10 pM), but not to LMT even at a high concentration (10 microM). Electrical field stimulation (EFS) caused a frequency-dependent (0.2-10 Hz) contraction of the duodenal LM that was almost completely inhibited by atropine or tetrodotoxin. EFS caused the relaxation of duodenal CM in a frequency-dependent manner (0.1-10 Hz). This relaxation was not inhibited by atropine, propranolol, phentolamine or guanethidine, indicating the involvement of noncholinergic, nonadrenergic (NCNA) nerves. NG-nitro L-arginine methylester (L-NAME, 100 microM) attenuated the EFS-induced relaxation and the inhibition at low frequency was larger than that at high frequency. L-Arginine prevented the inhibition by L-NAME but D-arginine did not. LMT (1 nM-1 microM) had no influence on EFS-induced cholinergic contraction of LM and EFS-induced NCNA relaxation of CM layer. The present in vitro studies indicate that motilin is ineffective in producing contraction and in modulating the autonomic neuroeffector transmission of the pig GI smooth muscle, and suggest that pig GI smooth muscle lacks functional motilin receptors.

Effects of various peptides on isolated rabbit lower esophageal sphincter

Strips of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) from rabbits were tested for their responses to several peptides, and to electrical field stimulation (EFS) under the presence of some peptides. Substance P (SP), motilin, and bombesin induced contraction, and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) induced relaxation. SP- and bombesin-induced contractions were antagonized by SP antagonist. VIP-induced relaxation was antagonized by phentolamine and VIP antagonist. Pretreatment with atropine, phentolamine, and diphenhydramine antagonized the motilin- and bombesin-induced contraction. Pretreatment with tetrodotoxin (TTX) attenuated the motilin- and bombesin-induced contraction, but not the SP-induced contraction and VIP-induced relaxation. EFS induced contraction, which was attenuated by TTX. Calcitonin gene-related peptide and neuropeptide Y had no effect on LES; however, they attenuated EFS-induced contraction. These findings suggest some characteristic peptidergic involvement in rabbit LES smooth muscle.

Effect of motilin on gastrointestinal myoelectric activity in conscious rabbits

Gastrointestinal myoelectric activity was investigated in conscious rabbits with chronically implanted electrodes. As rabbit stomach is never empty, food was removed 1 h before the beginning of recordings. Propagated activity fronts spontaneously started in the jejunum without associated changes in the antroduodenal area. Intravenous administration of either motilin (600-1500 ng/kg) or erythromycin (5-50 micrograms/kg) did not modify antral activity, but simultaneously increased duodenal and jejunal activity in a dose-dependent manner. Spontaneous and induced jejunal activity fronts showed some similarities. However, those induced did not propagate and were not followed by a quiescence period. The effects of motilin (900 ng/kg) and erythromycin (25 micrograms/kg) were resistant to atropine (0.5 mg/kg), hexamethonium (2 mg/kg), or ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg). These results suggest that motilin is not a physiological modulator of the migrating myoelectric complex (MMC) in rabbits. Moreover, neither cholinergic nor 5-HT3 receptors are involved in either motilin or erythromycin-induced actions.

Heterogeneity of motilin receptors in the gastrointestinal tract of the rabbit

Motilin, a 22-amino acid peptide synthesized in endocrine cells of intestinal mucosa, stimulates GI smooth muscle contractility. To elucidate the mode of action of motilin, we attempted to determine whether motilin receptors are localized on nerve cells or on smooth muscle cells of the GI tract. Mucosa-free tissues from rabbit antrum and duodenum were homogenized separately with a Polytron prior to differential centrifugation to obtain synaptosome or plasma membrane-enriched fractions, as determined by the distribution of [3H]saxitoxin (SAX) binding (neural membranes) and 5' nucleotidase (5'N) activity (smooth muscle plasma membranes). Motilin binding was evaluated by the displacement of [125I]motilin by motilin (1-22) on the various membrane fractions. In the antrum, motilin binding was highly correlated with SAX binding (r = 0.81, p < 0.0005), and also significantly with 5'N activity (r = 0.54, p < 0.05). In the duodenum, motilin binding correlated significantly with 5'N activity (r = 0.67, p < 0.005), but not with SAX binding (r = -0.11, NS). Receptor affinity, for the motilin antagonist MOT(1-12)[CH2NH]10-11, for motilin(1-22), and for the motilin agonist erythromycin lactobionate was significantly (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.05, respectively) higher in SAX-enriched fractions from the antrum than in 5'N-enriched fractions from the duodenum. Therefore, in the rabbit: 1) motilin receptors appear to be predominantly located on nerve tissues in the antrum and restricted to smooth muscle cells in the duodenum, and 2) antral receptors and duodenal receptors displayed different pharmacological characteristics, probably corresponding to two specific and heterogeneous motilin receptor subtypes.

Recovery of gastrointestinal motility from post-operative ileus in dogs: effects of Leu13-motilin (KW-5139) and prostaglandin F2 alpha

Cyclical motor activity of the gastrointestinal tract, normally occurring during the interdigestive period in several mammals, is disrupted in the post-operative ileus. We determined the recovery from the disappearance of cyclical motor activity, from the stomach to the colon, in dogs after laparotomy with the force transducers. Moreover, we examined the effects of Leu13-motilin (KW-5139) and prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha), administered in the early post-operative period, on the gastrointestinal motility. Following laparotomy, the cyclical motor activity reappeared firstly in the ileum and the colon, then in the jejunum and the duodenum, and finally in the stomach. The reappearance time of the phase III contractions in the stomach was 105.8 +/- 10.6 h (n = 4). In the early post-operative period, KW-5139 (0.5 microgram kg-1, i.v.) induced phase-III-like contractions, whereas PGF2 alpha (50 micrograms kg-1, i.v.) induced simultaneously occurring contractions over the whole gastrointestine. The treatment with KW-5139 (0.5 microgram kg-1, i.v.) four times (twice daily on the first and the second post-operative day) significantly (P < 0.05) shortened the time required to recover the phase III contractions in the stomach (64.2 +/- 2.2 h, n = 4), whereas that with PGF2 alpha (50 micrograms kg-1, i.v.) four times did not (111.3 +/- 17.2 h, n = 4). The present results indicate that, after laparotomy, the cyclical motor activity recovers faster in the distal intestine than in the proximal intestine and the stomach, and that KW-5139, but not PGF2 alpha, shortens the reappearance time of the phase III activity in the stomach.

Immunocytochemical localization of motilin-containing cells in the rabbit gastrointestinal tract

Motilin-immunopositive cells (Mo cells) are known to be present in the upper small intestine of various species, including man. However, whether Mo cells are present in the rabbit gastrointestinal tract remained to be elucidated. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the distribution of Mo cells in the rabbit gastrointestinal tract by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method using a new anti-motilin serum (CPV2) raised in chickens. The results of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay suggested that this antiserum recognized the C-terminal region of the motilin molecule. Motilin-immunopositive cells were found in the epithelia of the crypts and villi throughout the rabbit gastrointestinal tract from the gastric antrum to the distal colon, but no immunostaining occurred in the gastric body. Morphometric analysis revealed that Mo cells were localized preferentially in the upper small intestine, as reported for other species, and the cell densities (cells/mm2, mean +/- SE) were: gastric antrum (0.41 +/- 0.16), duodenum (8.2 +/- 0.8), jejunum (1.9 +/- 0.5), ileum (0.62 +/- 0.14), cecum (0.19 +/- 0.05), proximal colon (0.13 +/- 0.03), and distal colon (0.39 +/- 0.18). Our results demonstrated conclusively that Mo cells exist in the rabbit gastrointestinal tract and showed for the first time their regional distribution. Furthermore, our new chicken antiserum would appear to be a useful tool for the determination of plasma motilin concentrations by radioimmunoassay and for the immunoneutralization of endogenous motilin in the rabbit.

Excitatory action of [Leu13]motilin on the gastrointestinal smooth muscle isolated from the chicken

The effects of a porcine motilin analogue, [Leu13]motilin (LMT) on the smooth muscle preparations isolated from the chicken gastrointestinal (GI) tract were investigated in vitro. In the proventriculus, LMT (100 nM to 30 microM) caused an atropine-sensitive contraction and enhanced the electrical field stimulation (EFS)- or 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenyl-piperazinium (DMPP)-induced contraction without affecting the response to acetylcholine (ACh). LMT also caused a concentration-dependent contraction of the intestinal tract (duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon). The responsiveness to LMT was strongest in the jejunum and weakest in the colon. The responses to LMT in the intestinal segments were not affected by tetrodotoxin, atropine, hexamethonium, pyrilamine, spantide, and 5-hydroxyltryptamine-induced desensitzation, but significantly decreased by verapamil or removal of external Ca2+. LMT did not enhance the EFS- or DMPP-induced contraction in the ileum. Canine motilin also contracted the intestinal segments in a similar concentration range to LMT with an equal potency, but erythromycin A (EMA) and N-ethyl-N-demethyl-8,9-anhydroerythromycin A, 6-9-hemiketal (EM523) showed only a weak contractile activity even at high concentration (up to 100 microM), indicating that motilin receptors in the chicken intestine were somewhat different from those of mammals. In conclusion, LMT produces an excitatory response in the chicken GI tract with a different sensitivity from region to region. The mechanisms of the action were different between the proventriculus and small intestine; that is, LMT contracts the small intestine through the direct action on the smooth muscle cells, but this peptide acts on the enteric cholinergic neurones and stimulates ACh release, and thus regulates autonomic neuroeffector transmission in the proventriculus.