Intratumoral Heterogeneity of HER2/neu in Breast Cancer?A Rare Event

Emerging Landscape of Targeted Therapy of Breast Cancers With Low Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Protein Expression

CONTEXT.—

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer is currently classified as negative or positive for selecting patients for anti-HER2 targeted therapy. The evolution of the HER2 status has included a new HER2-low category defined as an HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification. This new category opens the door to a targetable HER2-low breast cancer population for which new treatments may be effective.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the current literature on the emerging category of breast cancers with low HER2 protein expression, including the clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features, and outline the clinical trials and best practice recommendations for identifying HER2-low-expressing breast cancers by immunohistochemistry.

DATA SOURCES.—

We conducted a literature review based on peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, regulatory communications, ongoing and past clinical trials identified through ClinicalTrials.gov, and the authors' practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The availability of new targeted therapy potentially effective for patients with breast cancers with low HER2 protein expression requires multidisciplinary recognition. In particular, pathologists need to recognize and identify this category to allow the optimal selection of patients for targeted therapy.

VEGFA Status as a Predictive Marker of Therapy Outcome in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Following Ramucirumab-Based Treatment

Metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) often has a poor prognosis and may benefit from a few targeted therapies. Ramucirumab-based anti-angiogenic therapy targeting the VEGFR2 represents a milestone in the second-line treatment of mGC. Several studies on different cancers are focusing on the major VEGFR2 ligand status, meaning VEGFA gene copy number and protein overexpression, as a prognostic marker and predictor of response to anti-angiogenic therapy. Following this insight, our study aims to examine the role of VEGFA status as a predictive biomarker for the outcome of second-line therapy with Ramucirumab and paclitaxel in mGC patients. To this purpose, the copy number of the VEGFA gene, by fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments, and its expression in tumor tissue as well as the density of micro-vessels, by immunohistochemistry experiments, were assessed in samples derived from mGC patients. This analysis found that amplification of VEGFA concomitantly with VEGFA overexpression and overexpression of VEGFA with micro-vessels density are more represented in patients showing disease control during treatment with Ramucirumab. In addition, in the analyzed series, it was found that amplification was not always associated with overexpression of VEGFA, but overexpression of VEGFA correlates with high micro-vessel density. In conclusion, overexpression of VEGFA could emerge as a potential biomarker to predict the response to anti-angiogenic therapy.

Assessment of HER2 in Gastric-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma and its Prognostic Significance

As the most common type of human papillomavirus-independent endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs), gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinomas (GEAs) account for approximately 10% of all ECAs. Although anti-HER2 therapy has been proven effective in many cancers, it has not been used in ECAs, including GEAs, which is at least partly due to the lack of a well-defined guideline. Limited available data regarding HER2 in GEAs and ECAs have considerable variations likely caused by variations in the tumor type selection, testing methods, and scoring criteria. Here, we selected 58 GEA cases to examine the HER2 status using immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization and investigate the prognostic value and their association with other known or potential prognostic factors. When strong complete or lateral/basolateral membranous reactivity in ≥10% tumor cells was used to define HER2 positivity, relatively high prevalence of HER2 overexpression (10/58[17.2%]) and amplification (9/58 [15.5%]), as well as high immunohistochemistry-fluorescent in situ hybridization concordance rate (9/10 [90%]) was found in GEAs. A lateral/basolateral staining pattern ("U-shaped") was observed, at least focally, in most of HER2-positive (3+) and equivocal (2+) tumors. Notably, considerable heterogeneity of HER2 expression was observed in HER2 positive and equivocal cases (80.0% and 83.3%, respectively). HER2 overexpression and amplification were associated with worse progression-free survival (P = .047 and P = .032, respectively). Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was associated with worse progression-free survival (P = .032), whereas mutant-type p53 demonstrated no prognostic significance. Our work laid a solid foundation for the eventual development of a future standard HER2 testing guideline for GEAs.

HER2 Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer, an Evolving Concept

Amplification and/or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer is associated with an adverse prognosis. The introduction of anti-HER2 targeted therapy has dramatically improved the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Unfortunately, a significant number of patients eventually relapse and develop distant metastasis. HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) has been reported to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with anti-HER2 targeted therapies and was proposed to be a potential mechanism for anti-HER2 resistance. In this review, we described the current definition, common types of HER2 ITH in breast cancer, the challenge in interpretation of HER2 status in cases showing ITH and the clinical applications of anti-HER2 agents in breast cancer showing heterogeneous HER2 expression. Digital image analysis has emerged as an objective and reproducible scoring method and its role in the assessment of HER2 status with ITH remains to be demonstrated.

The role of HER2 as a therapeutic biomarker in gynaecological malignancy: potential for use beyond uterine serous carcinoma

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in carcinomas of the breast, stomach and colon. In 2018, clinical trial data confirmed the prognostic and predictive role of HER2 in uterine serous carcinoma, with a demonstrated survival benefit from combined chemotherapy and anti-HER2 targeted therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent disease. Approximately one-third of uterine serous carcinomas demonstrate HER2 protein overexpression and/or gene amplification and HER2 immunohistochemistry, supplemented by in situ hybridisation in equivocal cases, is fast becoming a reflex ancillary test at time of diagnosis. The potential role of HER2 in gynaecological tumours other than uterine serous carcinoma is yet to be firmly established. With the advent of personalised medicine, routine tumour sequencing and pursuit of targeted therapies, this is a field currently under active investigation. Emerging data suggest triaging endometrial carcinomas for HER2 analysis based on molecular classification may be superior to histotype-based testing, with copy-number high/p53 mutant tumours enriched for HER2 overexpression or amplification. Accordingly, many carcinosarcomas and a subset of clear cell and high-grade endometrioid carcinomas may be eligible for HER2 targeted therapy, although any clinical benefit in this context is currently undefined. For ovarian carcinomas, combined data support the role of HER2 as a prognostic biomarker, however its use as a therapeutic target is yet to be elucidated through clinical trials. In the cervix, reported rates of HER2 overexpression vary and are generally low, and currently there is insufficient evidence to justify routine HER2 testing in this context. Limited data suggest HER2 holds promise as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in vulvar Paget disease. Future clinical trials, with pathologist input to develop and refine site-specific scoring criteria, are required to establish what role HER2 might play more broadly in gynaecological cancer care.

FGFR2-amplified tumor clones are markedly heterogeneously distributed in carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract

Background

FGFR2 is a therapy-relevant target in tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and clinical trials are currently underway to test the efficacy of FGFR2 inhibitors. Tumor heterogeneity is one of the relevant causes of treatment failure. Almost nothing is known about the heterogeneous distribution of FGFR2-amplified clones in adenocarcinomas of the upper GIT.

Patients and methods

To assess FGFR2 gene copy number alteration and intratumoral heterogeneity of upper GIT adenocarcinomas, we analyzed 893 patient-derived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens, including primary operated and neoadjuvant-treated tumors (462 gastric carcinomas and 429 esophageal adenocarcinomas) as well as complementary lymph node and distant metastasis by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Results

Twenty-six gastric tumors (5.6%) and 21 esophageal adenocarcinomas (4.9%) showed FGFR2 amplification. Overall, 93% of gastric carcinomas and 83% of esophageal carcinomas showed heterogeneous amplification. FGFR2 amplification was found in different histological growth patterns, including intestinal and diffuse type according to the Lauren classification. In the primary gastric carcinoma group, FGFR2 amplification was associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Homogeneous FGFR2 amplification in tumors of the upper GIT is the exception. This has highly relevant implications in the nature of FGFR2 diagnostics (sufficient tumor cell number, determination of amplification at metastasis versus primary tumor, etc.) and on the response probability of appropriate inhibitors. It is relevant that the often poorly treatable and aggressive subtype of diffuse carcinomas (poorly cohesive carcinomas) also shows FGFR2 amplification and that an individualized therapy option with FGFR2 inhibitors could be an option in this group.

HER-2 Amplification in Uterine Serous Carcinoma and Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Carcinoma

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) targeted therapy shows promising results in HER-2-positive uterine serous carcinoma (USC). HER-2 scoring criteria for USC and its associated noninvasive lesion, serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC), are not well-established. Here, we compare the breast and gastric (GI) HER-2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring criteria for HER-2 with HER-2/neu fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 68 tumors (17 USC with SEIC, 30 USC, 18 SEIC, 3 metastatic USC). The majority (97%) of lesions displayed intratumoral HER-2 IHC heterogeneity. Breast or GI IHC scoring criteria were performed equivalently. The breast and GI IHC criteria classified 51% and 47% USC as HER-2 negative (IHC 0/1+), 40% and 45% as equivocal (IHC 2+), and 9% each as HER-2 positive (IHC 3+). A quarter of USC classified as HER-2 negative or positive with the breast (25%, n=7/28) or GI IHC criteria (23%, n=6/26) was discordant by FISH. Specifically, 13% to 14% of IHC 0/1+ USC were FISH amplified; 50% of IHC 3+ USC were FISH negative. The majority (77% to 83%) of SEIC were HER-2 IHC 0/1+, and no SEIC was HER-2 IHC 3+. A minority (4% to 7%) of IHC 0/1+ SEIC were FISH positive. Discordant HER-2 status was observed between half (47%,bn=7/15) of synchronous SEIC and USC. In conclusion, USC displays HER-2 intratumoral heterogeneity, a high IHC/FISH discordance rate, and variation in HER-2 status between the SEIC and invasive components. Caution is required when evaluating HER-2 in small biopsies, which should be repeated on excisions. Both IHC and FISH should be performed on USC until clinical trials correlate HER-2 status with clinical response to HER-2-targeted therapy.

Detection of ERBB2 amplification in uterine serous carcinoma by next-generation sequencing: an approach highly concordant with standard assays

Uterine serous carcinoma is an aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer that accounts for fewer than 10% of endometrial carcinomas but is responsible for about half of deaths. A subset of cases has HER2 overexpression secondary to ERBB2 gene amplification, and these patients may benefit from anti-HER2 therapies, such as trastuzumab. HER2 protein overexpression is currently assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and ERBB2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly used to routinely identify predictive and prognostic molecular abnormalities in endometrial carcinoma. To investigate the ability of a targeted NGS panel to detect ERBB2 amplification, we identified cases of uterine serous carcinoma (n = 93) and compared HER2 expression by IHC and copy number assessed by FISH with copy number status assessed by NGS. ERBB2 copy number status using a combination of IHC and FISH was interpreted using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines for breast carcinoma. ERBB2 amplification by NGS was determined by the relative number of reads mapping to ERBB2 in tumor DNA compared to control nonneoplastic DNA. Cases with copy number ≥6 were considered amplified and copy number <6 were non-amplified. By IHC, 70 specimens were classified as negative (0 or 1+), 19 were classified as equivocal (2+), and 4 were classified as positive (3+). Using combined IHC/FISH, ERBB2 amplification was observed in 8 of 93 cases (9%). NGS identified the same 8 cases with copy number ≥6; all 85 others had copy number <6. In this series, NGS had 100% concordance with combined IHC/FISH in identifying ERBB2 amplification. NGS is highly accurate in detecting ERBB2 amplification in uterine serous carcinoma and provides an alternative to measurement by IHC and FISH.

Histopathological features of HER2 overexpression in uterine carcinosarcoma: proposal for requirements in HER2 testing for targeted therapy

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is an uncommon and highly aggressive tumor. There is no HER2 testing protocol for UCS despite the development of HER2 antibody conjugates. We aimed to elucidate histopathological HER2 expression details in UCS, to compare HER2 scores between ASCO/CAP criteria for gastric and breast cancer, and to propose requirements for HER2 testing for UCS. Eighty-nine specimens from 84 patients with metastatic/recurrent UCS were prospectively collected from May 2018 to July 2020. We performed HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for 89 specimens and FISH for 44 specimens. HER2 expression details and HER2 score were evaluated according to the latest ASCO/CAP criteria for gastric (2016) and breast cancer (2018). HER2 IHC scores according to the gastric cancer criteria were 0 in 31 cases (35%), 1+ in 26 (29%), 2+ in 22 (25%), and 3+ in 10 cases (11%) of the 89 specimens. A lateral/basolateral membranous staining pattern was observed in 28/32 (88%) specimens with HER2 scores of 2+/3+. HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity was identified in 28/32 (88%) of the specimens with HER2 scores of 2+/3+. The overall concordance rate of HER2 score was 70% between the gastric and breast criteria. FISH revealed HER2 gene amplification in 10/44 (23%) specimens containing only lateral/basolateral membranous staining pattern. Based on the histopathological features of HER2 expression in UCS, a scoring system that accepts lateral/basolateral staining patterns should be applied. Furthermore, we proposed specific requirements for UCS testing, including specimen selection, scoring system, and calculating the proportion of HER2-positive cells.

Concordance of Genomic Alterations between Circulating Tumor DNA and Matched Tumor Tissue in Chinese Patients with Breast Cancer

Purpose

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) served as a noninvasive method with less side effects using peripheral blood. Given the studies on concordance rate between liquid and solid biopsies in Chinese breast cancer (BC) patients were limited, we sought to examine the concordance rate of different kinds of genomic alterations between paired tissue biopsies and ctDNA samples in Chinese BC cohorts.

Materials and Methods

In this study, we analyzed the genomic alteration profiles of 81 solid BC samples and 41 liquid BC samples. The concordance across 136 genes was evaluated.

Results

The median mutation counts per sample in 41 ctDNA samples was higher than the median in 81 tissue samples (p=0.0254; Wilcoxon rank sum test). For mutation at the protein-coding level, 39.0% (16/41) samples had at least one concordant mutation in two biopsies. 20.0% tissue-derived mutations could be detected via ctDNA-based sequencing, whereas 11.7% ctDNA-derived mutations could be found in paired tissues. At gene amplification level, the overall concordant rate was 68.3% (28/41). The concordant rate at gene level for each patient ranged from 83.8% (114/136) to 99.3% (135/136). And, the mean level of variant allele frequency (VAF) for concordant mutations in ctDNA was statistically higher than that for the discordant ones (p < 0.001; Wilcoxon rank sum test). Across five representative genes, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 49.0% and 85.9%, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that ctDNA could provide complementary information on genetic characterizations in detecting single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions and deletions (InDels).

HER2 genomic heterogeneity is a frequent event in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and correlates with tumor morphology

AIM

To characterize a cohort of gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA) evaluated for HER2 gene amplification using bright field in situ hybridization (ISH) following the 2016 guidelines for GEA and correlating the results with clinico-pathological features. It was also aimed to evaluate the effect of applying the ISH criteria from the 2018 guidelines for breast cancer (BC) in the same GEA cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

159 GEA cases collected in a period of 59 months were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by ISH according to GEA and BC guidelines. All cases were reviewed for histological type, grading and presence of signet ring cells.

RESULTS

Most of the cases refereed to ISH were HER2 equivocal (57.9 %) by immunohistochemistry. According to the GEA guideline, 131 cases were HER2-negative (87.3 %) and 19 cases were HER2-positive (12.7 %). According to the BC guideline, 133 cases were HER2-negative (88.7 %) and 17 cases were HER2-positive (11.3 %), being statistically similar to the results obtained with the GEA guideline. HER2 genomic heterogeneity was detected in 31.6 % of the HER2-positive cases, almost exclusively in tubular adenocarcinoma. We observed a significant association between HER2 gene amplification and tubular adenocarcinomas, and absence of signet ring cells. The only case with HER2 gene amplification and presence of signet ring cells was a mixed carcinoma, where the signet ring cells represented the non-amplified component.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 positivity rate was similar when applying the GEA or the BC guidelines. We also establish a tight association between morphology and HER2 gene amplification.

Biomarkers for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Beyond hormone receptors

The overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) results in a biologically and clinically aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtype. Since the introduction of anti-HER2 targeted agents, survival rates of patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC have dramatically improved. Currently, although the treatment decision process in metastatic BC is primarily based on HER2 and hormone-receptor (HR) status, a rapidly growing body of data suggests that several other sources of biological heterogeneity may characterize HER2-positive metastatic BC. Moreover, pivotal clinical trials of new anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates showed encouraging results in HER2-low metastatic BC, thus leading to the possibility, in the near future, to expand the pool of patients suitable for HER2-targeted treatments. The present review summarizes and puts in perspective available evidence on biomarkers that hold the greatest promise to become potentially useful tools for optimizing HER2-positive metastatic BC patients' prognostic stratification and treatment in the next future. These biomarkers include HER2 levels and heterogeneity, HER3, intrinsic molecular subtypes by PAM50 analysis, DNA mutations, and immune-related factors. Molecular discordance between primary and metastatic tumors is also discussed.

Evolving concepts in HER2 evaluation in breast cancer: Heterogeneity, HER2-low carcinomas and beyond

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a well-known negative prognostic factor in breast cancer and a target of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab as well as of other anti-HER2 compounds. Pioneering works on HER2-positive breast cancer in the 90s' launched a new era in clinical research and oncology practice that has reshaped the natural history of this disease. In diagnostic pathology the HER2 status is routinely assessed by using a combination of immunohistochemistry (IHC, to evaluate HER2 protein expression levels) and in situ hybridization (ISH, to assess HER2 gene status). For this purpose, international recommendations have been developed by a consensus of experts in the field, which have changed over the years according to new experimental and clinical data. In this review article we will document the changes that have contributed to a better evaluation of the HER2 status in clinical practice, furthermore we will discuss HER2 heterogeneity defined by IHC and ISH as well as by transcriptomic analysis and we will critically describe the complexity of HER2 equivocal results. Finally, we will introduce the clinical impact of HER2 mutations and we will define the upcoming category of HER2-low breast cancer with respect to emerging clinical data on the efficacy of specific anti-HER2 agents in subgroups of breast carcinomas lacking the classical oncogene addition dictated by HER2 amplification.

Selection of HER2/NEU negative tumor cells as a mechanism of resistance to trastuzumab in uterine serous carcinoma

•

Uterine serous carcinoma is an aggressive variant of endometrial cancer overexpressing HER2.

•

Heterogeneity in HER2/neu expression is detected in over 50% of USC.

•

Chemotherapy plus Trastuzumab is the preferred regimen for advanced HER2 USC.

•

Selection of HER2-negative tumors could be a mechanism-of-resistance to Trastuzumab.

Background

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive variant of endometrial cancer overexpressing HER2/neu in about 30% of cases. Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting Her2/Neu, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel, is considered the preferred regimen for the treatment of advanced or recurrent HER2/Neu+ USC per NCCN guidelines.

Case

We describe two USC patients with overexpression of HER2/neu at 2+/3+ level by immunohistochemistry and c-erbB2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay that, after an initial clinical response to trastuzumab, developed resistance/progression. Post-treatment biopsy (collected at the time of clinical progression on trastuzumab) demonstrated loss of HER2/neu overexpression in the recurrent/progressing tumor cells in both patients.

Conclusion

Selection of HER2/NEU negative tumor cells may represent a major mechanism of resistance to trastuzumab in USC patients.

HER2 double-equivocal breast cancer in Chinese patients: a high concordance of HER2 status between different blocks from the same tumor

Purpose

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is both an independent prognostic factor and a predictive factor for the efficacy of targeted therapy for breast cancer, so it is critical to accurately detect HER2 protein expression and/or gene amplification. According to the recommendations of the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines for HER2 breast cancer testing, an additional test should be pursued on a different block from the same tumor as one of the options for patients with immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ and a HER2/CEP17 ratio of < 2.0 with an average HER2 signals per tumor cell of ≥ 4.0 and < 6.0 by reflex test using dual-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (double-equivocal HER2). Our aim in this study is to explore the consistency of HER2 status between the two blocks.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 5685 primary invasive breast cancers between April 2015 and January 2019 from Peking Union Medical College Hospital. For cases with double-equivocal HER2 revealed in initial blocks, HER2 gene status was evaluated by FISH in a different block from the same tumor. The FISH score was interpreted according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing.

Results

In our cohort of 5685 specimens, the overall HER2 IHC3+, 2+, 1+ and 0 cases were 20.5%, 31.8%, 28.3%, and 19.5%, respectively. Then, 13.7%, 66.3%, and 20.0% of HER2 amplification, non-amplification, and equivocation rates were found, respectively, in IHC2+ patients (n = 1777) by reflex FISH assay. For specimens with double-equivocal HER2 (n = 333), HER2 status was assessed in another block from the same tumor by FISH and then the frequency of HER2 positive, negative, and equivocation was estimated at 5.7%, 22.5%, and 71.8%, respectively. Because double-equivocal HER2 cases are classified in the HER2 negative category by the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines, only 1.3% (19/1511) of HER2 positive patients were determined through additional HER2 testing in another block from the HER2 negative population.

Conclusions

HER2 status in different blocks from the same tumor in primary invasive breast cancer was highly concordant. Our data supported the recommendation of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer to remove the suggestion for additional HER2 testing using another block contained in the previous version.

Pathologic Features and Clinical Implications of Breast Cancer With HER2 Intratumoral Genetic Heterogeneity

OBJECTIVES

To review breast cancer with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) genetic heterogeneity (GH), with a focus on clinician interpretation of the results and subsequent management.

METHODS

We retrospectively searched all consecutive invasive breast cancers that underwent HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization testing and identified cases with HER2 GH.

RESULTS

Eleven (0.4%) cases of primary breast tumors with reported HER2 GH were identified over 76 months. HER2-positive tumor cells comprised a mean ± SD of 20% ± 15% of the overall tumor population (range, 5%-50%) and exhibited high levels of amplification (HER2/CEP17 = 5.4 ± 2.9). Three cases had morphologic heterogeneity. Of the four patients who completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, two had trastuzumab; all showed a partial pathologic response. We identified two cases in which there appeared to be clinical misinterpretation of the HER2 results.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 GH is an infrequent event, may contain morphologic heterogeneity, could infer incomplete response to neoadjuvant therapy, and requires adequate communication with treating clinicians.

What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases?

To evaluate the effect of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline in the identification of HER2-positive breast carcinomas (BC) in reflex in situ hybridization (ISH) test. A total of 592 primary invasive BC cases from before and after the publication of the updated ASCO/CAP guideline were evaluated for HER2 amplification by silver ISH according to the 2013 and 2018 guidelines. Cases were mostly (95%) HER2 equivocal by immunohistochemistry (IHC), not centrally reviewed. Other reasons for referring cases were IHC confirmation, IHC discordancy (either between needle-core-biopsy (NCB) and surgical excision specimen (SES) or between different laboratories) and IHC result unexpected for histopathologic features. Cases evaluated with the 2013 guideline (1st cohort) were 14.6% HER2-positive, decreasing significantly after the reclassification with the 2018 guideline due to the exclusion of group 2 cases without HER2 protein overexpression. Cases studied after the implementation of the 2018 guideline (2nd cohort) were 8.7% HER2-positive, a frequency that was not significantly different from the reclassification of the 1st cohort with the 2018 guideline. All cases referred for IHC confirmation had the expected ISH result. Cases with IHC discordancy between NCB and SES were ISH concordant. Only one out of 14 cases with an IHC score 3+ and classified as histological grade 1 or with a Ki67 below 10% was classified as ISH HER2-positive. The 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline resulted in a decrease of HER2-positive cases in reflex ISH test, selecting less patients for anti-HER2-targeted therapy.

Deletion of 3p13 is a late event linked to progression of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion prostate cancer

Introduction

Deletion of 3p13 is one of the most common alterations in prostate cancer preferentially occurring in tumors with TMPRSS2:ERG fusion. The cause for the striking association between 3p13 loss and ERG fusion is unknown.

Methods

Here, we made use of a preexisting heterogeneity prostate cancer tissue microarray including ten tissue spots from ten different tumor areas of 317 cancers to examine the spatial distribution of 3p13 deletions (determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization) in prostate cancer areas with and without ERG overexpression (determined by immunohistochemistry).

Results

3p13 deletions were found in 61 of 299 (20.4%) and ERG positivity in 174 of 317 (54.9%) interpretable cancers. The likelihood of 3p13 loss was twice as high in ERG-positive cancers (39/152, 25.7%) than in ERG-negative cancers (17/124, 13.7%, P=0.010). At least three tissue spots were interpretable for 3p13 deletion status in 279 cancers: only these were used for heterogeneity assessment. Among these tumors, 58 (20.8%) had a 3p13 deletion and 221 (79.2%) were undeleted. The majority of 3p13-deleted cancers showed marked intratumoral heterogeneity. Areas with and without 3p13 loss were found in 50 (18%) of 279 cancers with three or more interpretable tissue spots, while only eight (3%) tumors had a homogeneous 3p13 loss. Comparison with ERG data revealed that ERG fusion usually precede 3p13 deletions. In total, 26 (66.7%) of 39 cancers with ERG and 3p13 alteration had only focal 3p13 deletions in an otherwise ERG-positive background. In contrast, none of the cancers showed a pattern that would be consistent with 3p13 deletion preceding ERG fusion.

Conclusion

Our study identifies 3p13 deletion as a highly heterogeneous alteration in prostate cancer preferentially developing at rather late stages of progression in TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-positive tumors.

89Zr-trastuzumab PET supports clinical decision making in breast cancer patients, when HER2 status cannot be determined by standard work up

Background

Up-to-date information on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer (BC) is important, as expression can vary during the course of the disease, necessitating anti-HER2 therapy adjustments. Repeat biopsies, however, are not always possible. In this feasibility trial we assessed whether ⁸⁹Zr-trastuzumab PET could support diagnostic understanding and aid clinical decision making, when HER2 status could not be determined by standard work up. Additionally, HER2 status on circulating tumour cells (CTCs) was assessed.

Patients and methods

⁸⁹Zr-trastuzumab PET was performed in patients if disease HER2 status remained unclear after standard work up (bone scan, ¹⁸F-FDG PET, CT and if feasible a biopsy). PET result and central pathologic revision of available tumour biopsies were reported to the referring physician. CTC HER2 status prior to PET was evaluated afterwards and therefore not reported. Diagnostic understanding and treatment decision questionnaires were completed by the referring physicians before, directly after and ≥ 3 months after ⁸⁹Zr-trastuzumab PET.

Results

Twenty patients were enrolled: 8 with two primary cancers (HER2-positive and HER2-negative BC or BC and non-BC), 7 with metastases inaccessible for biopsy, 4 with prior HER2-positive and -negative metastases and 1 with primary BC with equivocal HER2 status. ⁸⁹Zr-trastuzumab PET was positive in 12 patients, negative in 7 and equivocal in 1 patient. In 15/20 patients, ⁸⁹Zr-trastuzumab PET supported treatment decision. The scan altered treatment of 8 patients, increased physicians’ confidence without affecting treatment in 10, and improved physicians’ disease understanding in 18 patients. In 10/20 patients CTCs were detected; 6/10 showed HER2 expression. CTC HER2 status was not correlated to ⁸⁹Zr-trastuzumab PET result or treatment decision.

Conclusion

⁸⁹Zr-trastuzumab PET supports clinical decision making when HER2 status cannot be determined by standard work up. The impact of CTC HER2 status needs to be further explored.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-018-4099-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Viral-Cellular DNA Junctions as Molecular Markers for Assessing Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity in Cervical Cancer and for the Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA

The development of cervical cancer is frequently accompanied by the integration of human papillomaviruses (HPV) DNA into the host genome. Viral-cellular junction sequences, which arise in consequence, are highly tumor specific. By using these fragments as markers for tumor cell origin, we examined cervical cancer clonality in the context of intra-tumor heterogeneity. Moreover, we assessed the potential of these fragments as molecular tumor markers and analyzed their suitability for the detection of circulating tumor DNA in sera of cervical cancer patients. For intra-tumor heterogeneity analyses tumors of 8 patients with up to 5 integration sites per tumor were included. Tumor islands were micro-dissected from cryosections of several tissue blocks representing different regions of the tumor. Each micro-dissected tumor area served as template for a single junction-specific PCR. For the detection of circulating tumor-DNA (ctDNA) junction-specific PCR-assays were applied to sera of 21 patients. Samples were collected preoperatively and during the course of disease. In 7 of 8 tumors the integration site(s) were shown to be homogenously distributed throughout different tumor regions. Only one tumor displayed intra-tumor heterogeneity. In 5 of 21 analyzed preoperative serum samples we specifically detected junction fragments. Junction-based detection of ctDNA was significantly associated with reduced recurrence-free survival. Our study provides evidence that HPV-DNA integration is as an early step in cervical carcinogenesis. Clonality with respect to HPV integration opens new perspectives for the application of viral-cellular junction sites as molecular biomarkers in a clinical setting such as disease monitoring.

Characterization of HER2 gene amplification heterogeneity in invasive and in situ breast cancer using bright-field in situ hybridization

The aims of this study were to evaluate and compare the HER2 gene amplification status in invasive and adjacent in situ breast carcinoma, using bright-field in situ hybridization, and to document the possible presence of HER2 genetic heterogeneity (HER2-GH) in both components. A cohort of 100 primary invasive carcinomas (IC) associated with carcinoma in situ (CIS) were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by SISH according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline. A second cohort of all the cases with HER2-GH since the introduction of the updated ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline was also characterized, and an evaluation of the HER2 gene amplification in the CIS component, if present, was also done. In the first cohort, the HER2 amplification in the IC was negative in 87% of the cases and positive in 13% of the cases, without the presence of HER2-GH. All the cases had an associated CIS with the same HER2 status as IC, with four cases of CIS presenting HER2-GH. In the CIS, we observed a significant relationship of HER2 gene amplification with high nuclear grade. In the four cases with HER2-GH in CIS, two cases presented HER2 gene amplification in the IC. The second cohort included 12 cases with HER2-GH in a total of 1243 IC cases (0.97%). Additionally, we identified two cases associated with non-amplified CIS. HER2-GH is a rare event in IC and can already be present in CIS, not being an important step in the acquisition of invasive features.

Do online prognostication tools represent a valid alternative to genomic profiling in the context of adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer? A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy has been based on clinical and pathological features. However, such decisions are seldom consistent. Web-based predictive models have been developed using data from cancer registries to help determine the need for adjuvant therapy. More recently, with the recognition of the heterogenous nature of breast cancer, genomic assays have been developed to aid in the therapeutic decision-making.

METHODS

We have carried out a comprehensive literature review regarding online prognostication tools and genomic assays to assess whether online tools could be used as valid alternatives to genomic profiling in decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer has been recently recognized as a heterogenous disease based on variations in molecular characteristics. Online tools are valuable in guiding adjuvant treatment, especially in resource constrained countries. However, in the era of personalized therapy, molecular profiling appears to be superior in predicting clinical outcome and guiding therapy.

'Non-classical' HER2 FISH results in breast cancer: a multi-institutional study

The 2013 CAP/ASCO HER2 Testing Guidelines Update modified HER2 FISH categories such that some cases with 'monosomy', 'co-amplification/polysomy', low-level increased HER2 signals or clustered heterogeneity now are considered amplified or equivocal. This study examines the frequency and clinico-pathologic characteristics of breast cancers with equivocal or 'non-classical' HER2 FISH results. Breast cancers (2001-2014) with HER2 FISH results, HER2 immunohistochemistry, ER, grade, and age from three institutions (Stanford, UCSF, UWMC) were collected. HER2 FISH was interpreted using the updated recommendations. Amplified cases with non-classical results were grouped into the following categories: (1) 'monosomy' (ratio ≥2.0, mean HER2/cell<4.0); (2) 'co-amplified' (ratio<2.0, mean HER2/cell ≥6.0); (3) 'low amplified' (ratio ≥2.0, mean HER2/cell 4.0-5.9). Heterogeneous cases with clustered HER2-positive cells were also included. Of 8068 cases, 5.2% were equivocal and 4.6% had a 'non-classical' HER2 amplified result; 1.4% 'monosomy', 0.8% 'co-amplified', 2.1% 'low amplified', and 0.3% clustered heterogeneity. These cancers had a high frequency of ER positive (80.4%), Nottingham grade 3 (52.1%) results. The highest percentage of grade 3 cancers (66.7%) and positive HER2 immunohistochemistry (31.7%) was in the 'co-amplified' group. The 'monosomy' group had the highest percent grade 1 cancers (13.3%) and was most frequently HER2 immunohistochemistry negative (30.1%). Equivocal cases had very similar characteristics to the 'low-amplified' category. Cases with non-classical HER2 amplification or equivocal results are typically ER positive, higher grade cancers. 'Co-amplified' cases have the highest frequencies of aggressive characteristics and 'monosomy' cases the highest frequencies of lower risk features. With little clinical outcomes data currently available on these non-classical HER2 results, these results support the current classification scheme for HER2 FISH, with case-by-case correlation with additional clinical-pathologic factors when evaluating whether to offer HER2-targeted therapies in these non-classical cases.

Utility of cytopathological specimens and an automated image analysis for the evaluation of HER2 status and intratumor heterogeneity in breast carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Although updated HER2 testing guidelines have been improved by a collaboration between the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) in 2013, HER2 evaluation is still problematic because of issues involving CEP17 polysomy, heterogeneity, and HER2 score 2+ cases. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between HER2 gene heterogeneity, or so called CEP17 polysomy, using breast carcinoma cells sampled by scraping and the IHC score graded by automated image analysis using whole slide image.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We randomly selected 23 breast carcinoma cases with a HER2 score 0, 24 cases with a HER2 score 1+, 24 cases with HER2 score 2+, and 23 cases with HER2 score 3+ from the records of patients with breast cancer at Hiroshima University Hospital. We compared the results of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and cytological samples and compared the HER2 score calculated using an automated image analysis using wholly scanned slide images and visual counting.

RESULTS

We successfully performed the FISH assay in 78 of 94 cases (83%) using FFPE tissues and in all 94 (100%) cases using cytological samples. Frequency of both HER2 amplification and CEP17 polysomy was higher when cytological samples were used than when FFPE tissue was used. Frequency of HER2 heterogeneity using cytological samples was higher that than using FFPE tissue, except for the IHC score 3+ cases.

CONCLUSIONS

When assessment of HER2 status based on FISH using FFPE tissue cannot be accomplished, FISH using cytological samples should be considered. When intensity of HER2 is heterogeneous in the tumor tissue, particularly in cases regarded as score 2+, they should be evaluated by automated image analysis using the whole slide image.

Serum HER2 extra-cellular domain, S100ß and CA 15-3 levels are independent prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer patients

Background

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) prognosis is highly variable, depending on various factors such as the biological subtype, the performance status, disease extension…. A better evaluation of a patient’s prognostic factors could allow for a more accurate choice of treatments. The role of serum tumor markers remains, however, unclear in this population. Considering the recent interest in phenotypic changes and tumor heterogeneity during breast cancer progression, additional tumor markers could be interesting in this setting.

Methods

Two hundred fifty MBC patients treated at the Montpellier Cancer Institute (2008–2015) were retrospectively selected, based on the availability of frozen serum samples. The usual MBC clinical and pathological variables were collected, altogether with Cancer Antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), HER2 extra-cellular domain (ECD), Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE), S100ß protein and Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) serum levels in order to determine their prognostic value.

Results

With a median follow-up of 40.8 months, median overall survival was 16.2 months (95 % CI 12.4–20.6). In multivariate analysis, the performance status, brain or subcutaneous metastases, the number of previous metastatic chemotherapy lines and the tumor biological subtype were independent prognostic factors. Elevated CA 15-3 (HR = 1.95, IC 95 % 1.31–2.93, p = 0.001), HER2 ECD (regardless of tumor HER2 status, HR = 2.51, IC 95 % 1.53–4.12, p < 0.001) and S100ß (HR = 1.93, IC 95 % 1.05–3.54, p = 0.033) serum levels were independently associated with a poor outcome.

Conclusions

Serum CA 15-3, HER2 ECD and S100ß could represent useful independent prognostic factors in MBC. Of particular interest is the independent value of serum HER2 ECD levels, regardless of the tumor HER2 status, possibly linked to metastatic tumor heterogeneity.

Intratumoral heterogeneity as a source of discordance in breast cancer biomarker classification

BACKGROUND

Spatial heterogeneity in biomarker expression may impact breast cancer classification. The aims of this study were to estimate the frequency of spatial heterogeneity in biomarker expression within tumors, to identify technical and biological factors contributing to spatial heterogeneity, and to examine the impact of discordant biomarker status within tumors on clinical record agreement.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed using two to four cores (1.0 mm) for each of 1085 invasive breast cancers from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, which is part of the AMBER Consortium. Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was quantified using automated digital imaging analysis. The biomarker status for each core and for each case was assigned using clinical thresholds. Cases with core-to-core biomarker discordance were manually reviewed to distinguish intratumoral biomarker heterogeneity from misclassification of biomarker status by the automated algorithm. The impact of core-to-core biomarker discordance on case-level agreement between TMAs and the clinical record was evaluated.

RESULTS

On the basis of automated analysis, discordant biomarker status between TMA cores occurred in 9 %, 16 %, and 18 % of cases for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. Misclassification of benign epithelium and/or ductal carcinoma in situ as invasive carcinoma by the automated algorithm was implicated in discordance among cores. However, manual review of discordant cases confirmed spatial heterogeneity as a source of discordant biomarker status between cores in 2 %, 7 %, and 8 % of cases for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. Overall, agreement between TMA and clinical record was high for ER (94 %), PR (89 %), and HER2 (88 %), but it was reduced in cases with core-to-core discordance (agreement 70 % for ER, 61 % for PR, and 57 % for HER2).

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral biomarker heterogeneity may impact breast cancer classification accuracy, with implications for clinical management. Both manually confirmed biomarker heterogeneity and misclassification of biomarker status by automated image analysis contribute to discordant biomarker status between TMA cores. Given that manually confirmed heterogeneity is uncommon (<10 % of cases), large studies are needed to study the impact of heterogeneous biomarker expression on breast cancer classification and outcomes.

Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer

Context

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) amplification is used as a predictive marker for trastuzumab treatment in breast cancer. Both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing algorithms have been based on the 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines. In late 2013, the guidelines were updated with new scoring criteria.

Objective

—To assess the impact of the revised ASCO/CAP recommendations on both IHC and FISH results by using the dual-color HER2/neu and centromeric FISH probes.

Design

Retrospective analysis of 590 invasive carcinomas with concurrent IHC and dual-color HER2/neu and centromeric 17 (CEP17) FISH results, based on 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines, was conducted from July 2011 to June 2013. With the revised guidelines, patients were recategorized and concordance rates between the 2 assays were recalculated.

Results

—Overall concordance rates for FISH and IHC decreased from 94.9% to 93.8% with reclassification. Negative FISH cases decreased from 79.1% to 69.3%. However, equivocal FISH cases were significantly increased from 0.7% to 9.5%, leading to more retesting. Both positive IHC and FISH cases were also noted to be increased, leading to more patients being eligible for trastuzumab treatment, especially those patients with concurrent HER2/neu and CEP17 polysomy. Approximately 1% of patients with initial FISH negative results were reclassified as having positive results when both the ratios and average copy number of HER2/neu were considered under the revised guidelines.

Conclusions

The revised 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines can potentially lead to more patients being eligible for trastuzumab therapy but additional retesting is to be expected owing to an increased number of equivocal FISH cases.

A significant subgroup of resectable gallbladder cancer patients has an HER2 positive status

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) has a poor prognosis, and new targeted therapeutic options are needed. We investigated the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and its clinicopathological significance in a large cohort of GBC patients. We assessed HER2 expression in a consecutive series of 211 GBC cases by immunohistochemistry (IHC), paying particular attention to intratumoral heterogeneity. HER2 gene amplification was analyzed by dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). An HER2 positive status was called when the IHC score was 3+ or when the IHC score was 2+, and FISH was positive. Correlations were analyzed between HER2 status and clinicopathological parameters including survival. The HER2 IHC score was 0 in 144 (68.2%), 1+ in 28 (13.3%), 2+ in 14 (6.6%), and 3+ in 25 cases (11.8%). In 20/39 (51%) of the IHC 2+ and 3+ cases, the staining pattern was heterogeneous. In HER2 IHC score 2+ and 3+ cases, HER2 FISH was positive in 83% (10/12) and 96% (24/25), respectively. Altogether, 35/211 cases (16.6%) were HER2 positive. There was no significant association between HER2 status and clinicopathological variables or survival. We identified a significant subgroup of HER2-positive GBC cases, for whom a clinical trial with anti-HER2 therapy might be considered.

Microfluidic device for DNA amplification of single cancer cells isolated from whole blood by self-seeding microwells

Self-seeding microwell chips can sort single cells into 6400 wells based on cell size and their identity verified by immunofluorescence staining. Here, we developed a microfluidic device in which these single cells can be placed, lysed and their DNA amplified for further interrogation. Whole blood spiked with MCF7 tumor cells was passed through the microwell chips after leukocyte depletion and 37% of the MCF7 cells were identified by epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) staining in the microwells. Identified single cells were punched into the reaction chamber of the microfluidic device and reagents for cell lysis and DNA amplification introduced sequentially by peristaltic pumping of micro-valves. On-chip lysis and amplification was performed in 8 parallel chambers yielding a 10,000 fold amplification of DNA. Accessibility of the sample through the reaction chamber allowed for easy retrieval and interrogation of target-specific genes to characterize the tumor cells.

Clinicopathologic Significance of the Intratumoral Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Adjuvant Trastuzumab

OBJECTIVES

Although intratumoral heterogeneity of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification has been associated with a poor prognosis for primary HER2-positive breast cancer and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab, the clinicopathologic significance in a setting involving trastuzumab treatment as an adjuvant treatment has not been studied in patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 443 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and 1 year of trastuzumab. Three areas that showed different levels of HER2 protein expression were chosen, and silver in situ hybridization was performed.

RESULTS

HER2 regional and genetic heterogeneity was found in 6.2% and 6.8% of tumors, respectively. Both types of heterogeneity were significantly associated with hormone receptor positivity, HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 2+, a low level of HER2 gene amplification, and absence of an extensive intraductal component. Genetic heterogeneity also showed strong correlation with a lower histologic grade. In the hormone receptor-positive group, the regional heterogeneity affected disease-free survival of patients (hazard ratio, 4.869; 95% confidence interval, 1.424-16.646; P = .005), whereas genetic heterogeneity did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of intratumoral heterogeneity, especially in cases with hormone receptor positivity, may be valuable for assessing the prognosis of HER2-positive patients anticipating treatment with adjuvant systemic therapy and trastuzumab.

In situ single-cell analysis identifies heterogeneity for PIK3CA mutation and HER2 amplification in HER2-positive breast cancer

Detection of minor, genetically distinct subpopulations within tumors is a key challenge in cancer genomics. Here we report STAR-FISH (specific-to-allele PCR-FISH), a novel method for the combined detection of single-nucleotide and copy number alterations in single cells in intact archived tissues. Using this method, we assessed the clinical impact of changes in the frequency and topology of PIK3CA mutation and HER2 (ERBB2) amplification within HER2-positive breast cancer during neoadjuvant therapy. We found that these two genetic events are not always present in the same cells. Chemotherapy selects for PIK3CA-mutant cells, a minor subpopulation in nearly all treatment-naive samples, and modulates genetic diversity within tumors. Treatment-associated changes in the spatial distribution of cellular genetic diversity correlated with poor long-term outcome following adjuvant therapy with trastuzumab. Our findings support the use of in situ single cell-based methods in cancer genomics and imply that chemotherapy before HER2-targeted therapy may promote treatment resistance.

Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and alternative driver genetic alterations in breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification

Background

HER2 is overexpressed and amplified in approximately 15% of invasive breast cancers, and is the molecular target and predictive marker of response to anti-HER2 agents. In a subset of these cases, heterogeneous distribution of HER2 gene amplification can be found, which creates clinically challenging scenarios. Currently, breast cancers with HER2 amplification/overexpression in just over 10% of cancer cells are considered HER2-positive for clinical purposes; however, it is unclear as to whether the HER2-negative components of such tumors would be driven by distinct genetic alterations. Here we sought to characterize the pathologic and genetic features of the HER2-positive and HER2-negative components of breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification and to define the repertoire of potential driver genetic alterations in the HER2-negative components of these cases.

Results

We separately analyzed the HER2-negative and HER2-positive components of 12 HER2 heterogeneous breast cancers using gene copy number profiling and massively parallel sequencing, and identified potential driver genetic alterations restricted to the HER2-negative cells in each case. In vitro experiments provided functional evidence to suggest that BRF2 and DSN1 overexpression/amplification, and the HER2 I767M mutation may be alterations that compensate for the lack of HER2 amplification in the HER2-negative components of HER2 heterogeneous breast cancers.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that even driver genetic alterations, such as HER2 gene amplification, can be heterogeneously distributed within a cancer, and that the HER2-negative components are likely driven by genetic alterations not present in the HER2-positive components, including BRF2 and DSN1 amplification and HER2 somatic mutations.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0657-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

HER2 assessment by silver in situ hybridization: where are we now?

HER2 testing in breast and gastric cancer is critical not only as a prognostic tool but also as a predictive marker for response to the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. Currently, HER2 status is assessed on histological and cytological specimens by conventional validated methods such as immunohistochemistry and FISH, while bright-field in situ hybridization techniques, such as silver in situ hybridization and chromogenic in situ hybridization, may offer performance benefits over FISH. The major points are first, technical issues, advantages and disadvantages relevant to each methods, and their clinical implications and second, the well-known genetic heterogeneity of HER2, and the occurrence of polysomy of chromosome 17. This review aims to summarize the growing body of literature on the accuracy of bright-field in situ techniques, notably silver in situ hybridization, in assessing HER2 status, and to discuss the role of such methods in pathology practice.

Parallel single cancer cell whole genome amplification using button-valve assisted mixing in nanoliter chambers

The heterogeneity of tumor cells and their alteration during the course of the disease urges the need for real time characterization of individual tumor cells to improve the assessment of treatment options. New generations of therapies are frequently associated with specific genetic alterations driving the need to determine the genetic makeup of tumor cells. Here, we present a microfluidic device for parallel single cell whole genome amplification (pscWGA) to obtain enough copies of a single cell genome to probe for the presence of treatment targets and the frequency of its occurrence among the tumor cells. Individual cells were first captured and loaded into eight parallel amplification units. Next, cells were lysed on a chip and their DNA amplified through successive introduction of dedicated reagents while mixing actively with the help of integrated button-valves. The reaction chamber volume for scWGA 23.85 nl, and starting from 6–7 pg DNA contained in a single cell, around 8 ng of DNA was obtained after WGA, representing over 1000-fold amplification. The amplified products from individual breast cancer cells were collected from the device to either directly investigate the amplification of specific genes by qPCR or for re-amplification of the DNA to obtain sufficient material for whole genome sequencing. Our pscWGA device provides sufficient DNA from individual cells for their genetic characterization, and will undoubtedly allow for automated sample preparation for single cancer cell genomic characterization.

Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 protein and amplification of HER2 gene in salivary duct carcinoma

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an aggressive adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands, and accounts for 1-3% of all malignant salivary gland tumors, resembling morphologically invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. In contrast to IDC of the breast and gastric carcinoma (GC), the study of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in SDC has not progressed. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between HER2 protein expression and amplification of the HER2 gene, and compared them in terms of intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) in 13 cases of SDC using immunohistochemistry and dual color in situ hybridization. We found seven cases with protein overexpression (53.8%) and five cases with gene amplification (38.5%) in accordance with ASCO/CAP guidelines. ITH of HER2 protein expression was seen in seven cases (53.8%). Interestingly, the ratio of the HER2 gene showed homogenous distribution with or without the presence of ITH of HER2 protein expression. SDC tends to have more ITH of HER2 protein similarly to GC, in contrast to IDC of the breast. ITH of HER2 protein in SDC has no heterogeneity of the HER2 gene amplification. The mechanism of HER2 protein expression in SDC might proceed through a more complex pathway relative to that of IDC of the breast.

HER2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity

Trastuzumab-containing therapy is a standard of care for patients with HER2+ breast cancer. HER2 status is routinely assigned using in situ hybridization to assess HER2 gene amplification, but interpretation of in situ hybridization results may be challenging in tumors with chromosome 17 polysomy or intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. Apparent chromosome 17 polysomy, defined by increased chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) signal number, is a common genetic aberration in breast cancer and represents an alternative mechanism for increasing HER2 copy number. Some studies have linked elevated CEP17 count ('polysomy') with adverse clinicopathologic features and HER2 overexpression, although there are numerous discrepancies in the literature. There is evidence that elevated CEP17 ('polysomy') count might account for trastuzumab response in tumors with normal HER2:CEP17 ratios. Nonetheless, recent studies establish that apparent 'polysomy' (CEP17 increase) is usually related to focal pericentromeric gains rather than true polysomy. Assigning HER2 status may also be complex where multiple cell subclones with distinct HER2 amplification characteristics coexist within the same tumor. Such genetic heterogeneity affects up to 40% of breast cancers when assessed according to a College of American Pathologists guideline, although other definitions have been proposed. Recent data have associated heterogeneity with unfavorable clinicopathologic variables and poor prognosis. Genetically heterogeneous tumors harboring HER2-amplified subclones have the potential to benefit from trastuzumab, but this has yet to be evaluated in clinical studies. In this review, we discuss the implications of apparent polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity for assigning HER2 status in clinical practice. Among our recommendations, we support the use of mean HER2 copy number rather than HER2:CEP17 ratio to define HER2 positivity in cases where coamplification of the centromere might mask HER2 amplification. We also highlight a need to harmonize in situ hybridization scoring methodology to support accurate HER2 status determination, particularly where there is evidence of heterogeneity.

Toward standard HER2 testing of endometrial serous carcinoma: 4-year experience at a large academic center and recommendations for clinical practice

HER2 overexpression and/or amplification have been reported in endometrial serous carcinoma, suggesting that HER2 may be a promising therapeutic target. However, there is considerable variation in the reported rates of HER2 overexpression and amplification, likely--at least in part--resulting from variability in the testing methods, interpretation, and scoring criteria used. Unlike in breast and gastric cancer, currently there are no established guidelines for HER2 testing in endometrial carcinoma. A total of 108 endometrial carcinoma cases--85 pure serous carcinomas and 23 mixed endometrial carcinomas with serous component--were identified over a 4-year period. All H&E and HER2 immunohistochemical slides were reviewed and HER2 FISH results (available on 52 cases) were retrieved from pathology reports. HER2 immunohistochemical scores were assigned according to the FDA criteria and the current breast ASCO/CAP scoring criteria. Clinical information was retrieved from the patients' medical records. Thirty-eight cases (35%) showed HER2 overexpression and/or gene amplification, 20 of which (53%) had significant heterogeneity of protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Lack of apical membrane staining resulting in a lateral/basolateral staining pattern was observed in the majority of HER2-positive tumors. Five of the HER2-positive cases (13%) demonstrated discrepant immunohistochemical scores when using the FDA versus ASCO/CAP scoring system. The overall concordance rate between HER2 immunohistochemistry and FISH was 75% (39/52) when using the FDA criteria, compared with 81% (42/52) by the ASCO/CAP scoring system. In conclusion, in this largest comprehensive study, 35% of endometrial serous carcinoma harbors HER2 protein overexpression and/or gene amplification, over half of which demonstrate significant heterogeneity of protein expression. The current breast ASCO/CAP scoring criteria provide the highest concordance between immunohistochemistry and FISH. Assessment of HER2 immunohistochemistry on multiple tumor sections or sections with large tumor areas is recommended, due to the significant heterogeneity of HER2 protein expression.

Comparison of HER2 and phospho-HER2 expression between biopsy and resected breast cancer specimens using a quantitative assessment method

Background

HER2/Neu (ErbB-2) overexpression, which occurs in 15–20% of breast cancer cases, is associated with better response to treatment with the drug trastuzumab. PhosphoHER2 (pHER2) has been evaluated for prediction of response to trastuzumab. Both markers are heterogeneously detected and are potentially subject to loss as a consequence of delayed time to fixation. Here, we quantitatively assess both markers in core needle biopsies (CNBs) and matched tumor resections to assess concordance between the core and the resection and between HER2 and pHER2.

Methods

A selected retrospective collection of archival breast cancer cases yielded 67 cases with both core and resection specimens. Both HER2 and pTyr¹²⁴⁸HER2 were analyzed by the AQUA® method of quantitative immunofluorescence on each specimen pair.

Results

Both HER2 immunoreactivity (P<0.0001) and pTyr¹²⁴⁸HER2 immunoreactivity (P<0.0001) were lower in resections relative to CNB specimens. However, clinical implications of this change may not be evident since no case changed from 3+ (CNB) to negative (resection). Assessment of pTyr¹²⁴⁸HER2 showed no direct correlation with HER2 in either CNB or resection specimens.

Conclusions

The data suggest that measurement of both HER2 and phospho- Tyr¹²⁴⁸HER2, in formalin-fixed tissue by immunological methods is significantly affected by pre-analytic variables. The current study warrants the adequate handling of resected specimens for the reproducible evaluation of HER2 and pHER2. The level of pTyr¹²⁴⁸HER2, was not correlated to total HER2 protein. Further studies are required to determine the significance of these observations with respect to response to HER2 directed therapies.

Canine mammary tumors: a review and consensus of standard guidelines on epithelial and myoepithelial phenotype markers, HER2, and hormone receptor assessment using immunohistochemistry

Although there have been several studies on the use of immunohistochemical biomarkers of canine mammary tumors (CMTs), the results are difficult to compare. This article provides guidelines on the most useful immunohistochemical markers to standardize their use and understand how outcomes are measured, thus ensuring reproducibility of results. We have reviewed the biomarkers of canine mammary epithelial and myoepithelial cells and identified those biomarkers that are most useful and those biomarkers for invasion and lymph node micrometastatic disease. A 10% threshold for positive reaction for most of these markers is recommended. Guidelines on immunolabeling for HER2, estrogen receptors (ERs), and progesterone receptors (PRs) are provided along with the specific recommendations for interpretation of the results for each of these biomarkers in CMTs. Only 3+ HER2-positive tumors should be considered positive, as found in human breast cancer. The lack of any known response to adjuvant endocrine therapy of ER- and PR-positive CMTs prevents the use of the biological positive/negative threshold used in human breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry results of ER and PR in CMTs should be reported as the sum of the percentage of positive cells and the intensity of immunolabeling (Allred score). Incorporation of these recommendations in future studies, either prospective or retrospective, will provide a mechanism for the direct comparison of studies and will help to determine whether these biomarkers have prognostic significance. Finally, these biomarkers may ascertain the most appropriate treatment(s) for canine malignant mammary neoplasms.

A novel, automated technology for multiplex biomarker imaging and application to breast cancer

AIMS

Multiplexed immunofluorescence is a powerful tool for validating multigene assays and understanding the complex interplay of proteins implicated in breast cancer within a morphological context. We describe a novel technology for imaging an extended panel of biomarkers on a single, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast sample and evaluating biomarker interaction at a single-cell level, and demonstrate proof-of-concept on a small set of breast tumours, including those which co-express hormone receptors with Her2/neu and Ki-67.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a microfluidic flow cell, reagent exchange was automated and consisted of serial rounds of staining with dye-conjugated antibodies, imaging and chemical deactivation. A two-step antigen retrieval process was developed to satisfy all epitopes simultaneously, and key parameters were optimized. The imaging sequence was applied to seven breast tumours, and compared with conventional immunohistochemistry. Single-cell correlation analysis was performed with automated image processing.

CONCLUSIONS

We have described a novel platform for evaluating biomarker co-localization. Expression in multiplexed images is consistent with conventional immunohistochemistry. Automation reduces inconsistencies in staining and positional shifts, while the fluorescent dye cycling approach dramatically expands the number of biomarkers which can be visualized and quantified on a single tissue section.

Marked heterogeneity of HER2/NEU gene amplification in endometrial serous carcinoma

Significant heterogeneity of HER2 protein expression has been recently observed in HER2 positive endometrial serous carcinomas. Tumor cells with HER2 overexpression and/or gene amplification in a heterogeneous tumor may represent a biologically more aggressive subclone that is clinically relevant to prognosis and potential targeted therapy. To correlate with HER2 protein heterogeneity, we investigated the heterogeneity of HER2/NEU gene amplification in endometrial serous carcinoma. A total of 17 endometrial serous carcinomas with heterogeneous HER2 protein expression were selected for the study, including nine cases with a 3+ and eight cases with a 2+ immunohistochemical score. Initial reflex HER2 FISH was available for seven of the eight 2+ cases, five of which showed HER2/NEU gene amplification. All 17 cases underwent repeat FISH targeting larger tumor tissue areas. Ten cases (72%) displayed striking heterogeneity of HER2/NEU gene copy number in the form of cluster amplification. Diffuse HER2 amplification was observed in four cases, no amplification was seen in three tumors. In cases with cluster amplification, HER2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry closely correlated at the cellular level with HER2/NEU gene amplification. In conclusion, the significant percentage of cases with heterogeneous HER2/NEU gene amplification indicates that the existing HER2 testing guidelines designed for breast cancer may not be applicable to endometrial serous carcinoma. Clinical testing on multiple different tumor samples or large tumor tissue sections is recommended for both immunohistochemistry and FISH assessment of HER2 status. Direct comparison with the HER2 immunostaining pattern may be helpful in detecting HER2 amplified areas in a heterogeneous tumor.

Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER2 in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (NCCTG N9831, BCIRG 006, and BCIRG 005)

A comprehensive, blinded, pathology evaluation of HER2 testing in HER2-positive/negative breast cancers was performed among three central laboratories. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were performed on 389 tumor blocks from three large adjuvant trials: N9831, BCIRG-006, and BCIRG-005. In 123 cases, multiple blocks were examined. HER2 status was defined according to FDA-approved guidelines and was independently re-assessed at each site. Discordant cases were adjudicated at an on-site, face-to-face meeting. Results across three independent pathologists were concordant by IHC in 351/381 (92 %) and FISH in 343/373 (92 %) blocks. Upon adjudication, consensus was reached on 16/30 and 18/30 of discordant IHC and FISH cases, respectively, resulting in overall concordance rates of 96 and 97 %. Among 155 HER2-negative blocks, HER2 status was confirmed in 153 (99 %). In the subset of 102 HER2-positive patients from N9831/BCIRG-006, primary blocks from discordant cases were selected, especially those with discordant test between local and central laboratories. HER2 status was confirmed in 73 (72 %) of these cases. Among 118 and 113 cases with IHC and FISH results and >1 block evaluable, block-to-block variability/heterogeneity in HER2 results was seen in 10 and 5 %, respectively. IHC−/FISH− was confirmed for 57/59 (97 %) primary blocks from N9831 (locally positive, but centrally negative); however, 5/22 (23 %) secondary blocks showed HER2 positivity. Among 53 N9831 patients with HER2-normal disease adjudicated as IHC−/FISH—(although locally positive), there was a non-statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival with concurrent trastuzumab compared to chemotherapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio 0.34; 95 % CI, 0.11–1.05; p = 0.06). There were similar agreements for IHC and FISH among pathologists (92 % each). Agreement was improved at adjudication (96 %). HER2 tumor heterogeneity appears to partially explain discordant results in cases initially tested as positive and subsequently called negative.

Does breast tumor heterogeneity necessitate further immunohistochemical staining on surgical specimens?

BACKGROUND

Prognostic and predictive tumor markers in breast cancer are most commonly performed on core needle biopsies (CNB) of the primary tumor. Because treatment recommendations are influenced by these markers, it is imperative to verify strong concordance between tumor markers on CNB specimens and the corresponding surgical specimens (SS).

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study was performed on 165 women (205 samples) with breast cancer diagnosed from January 2009 to July 2011. Tumor type, grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 expression by immunohistochemical (IHC) testing were retrospectively analyzed in the CNB and SS. Contingency tables and agreement modeling were performed.

RESULTS

There was substantial agreement between the CNB and SS for PR% and HER2; moderate agreement for tumor type, grade, and ER%; and fair agreement for Ki67%. In 8% of patients (n = 13), tumor heterogeneity was seen. In heterogeneous tumors the overall concordance between the CNB and SS was worse, especially for HER2. Six of these patients had areas of tumor that were positive for HER2, which were not detected in their CNBs. Nine patients had multiple distinct molecular subtypes within their tumor(s).

CONCLUSIONS

The heterogeneous distribution of antigens in breast cancer tumors raises concern that the CNB may not adequately represent the true biologic profile in all patients. There is strong concordance for tumor type, ER, and PR between CNB and SS (although a quantitative decline was noted from CNB to SS); however, HER2 activity does not appear to be adequately detected on CNB in patients with heterogeneous tumors. These data suggest that IHC testing on the CNB alone may not be adequate to tailor targeted therapy in all patients.

Heterogeneity of breast cancer: etiology and clinical relevance

Cancer progression is a dynamic process of clonal adaptation to changing microenvironments. From the single founder cell until the clinical detection of tumours, there are consecutive clonal expansions and a constant acquisition of genetic and epigenetic alterations, events that contribute to the generation of intra-tumor heterogeneity. In breast cancer intra-tumor heterogeneity can arise from the differentiation of stem-like cells along with the clonal selection during tumor progression, and represents a major challenge for the design of effective therapies. To infer breast cancer progression and its response to particular treatments it is important to understand the origins of the inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity and the forces that control tumor evolution. Insights about the evolution of breast cancer heterogeneity would contribute to the design of most effective therapeutic strategies to target the tumors at single clon level. This review is intended to give a general overview about the origins of breast cancer heterogeneity and its impact in the clinical management of the disease.

Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: its clinicopathological significance

Intratumoral heterogeneity of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification has been reported to occur with variable frequencies in breast cancers. However, there have been few studies of its clinicopathological significance. We used tissue microarrays to evaluate two aspects of intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 gene amplification: regional heterogeneity and genetic heterogeneity. We examined 96 invasive breast cancers in which HER2 amplification had been diagnosed in whole sections, and determined the clincopathological characteristics of those tumors. HER2 regional heterogeneity, defined as the existence of amplification/negative or amplification/equivocal patterns in different tissue microarray cores of a tumor, was present in 17 (18%) of the 96 cases. HER2 genetic heterogeneity, defined as the presence of tumor cells with a HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 ratio higher than 2.2 in 5-50% of the tumor cells, was found in 11 cases (11%), all of which showed HER2 regional heterogeneity. The cases with intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 gene amplification were characterized by low grade or equivocal HER2 amplification and equivocal (2+) HER2 expression in whole sections. The patients with intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 gene amplification had significantly shorter disease-free survival times than those with homogeneous HER2 gene amplification, and this effect was also evident in subgroup analysis by hormone receptor status. In multivariate analysis, intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity retained its status as an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival. In conclusion, intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 gene amplification is present in a subset of HER2-amplified breast cancers, especially in cases with low-grade HER2 amplification and equivocal HER2 expression, indicating a need for HER2 testing on more representative, larger tumor samples for accurate assessment of HER2 status in such cases. The patients with this heterogeneity have decreased disease-free survival, suggesting that genetic instability, and hence aberrant HER2 amplification in subclones of such tumors, may be associated with breast cancer progression.