Cellular immune responses in hemophilia: why do inhibitors develop in some, but not all hemophiliacs?

Abnormal frequency of the memory B cell subsets and plasmablasts in patients with congenital severe hemophilia A: correlation with "Inhibitor" formation

BACKGROUND

Development of antibodies against infused Factor VIII (FVIII) or "inhibitors" represents a major challenge following FVIII replacement therapy in patients with hemophilia A (HA). Recent studies have shown that certain cellular compartments of the immune system contribute to the production of such antibodies. Herein, we determined the frequency of class-switched CD19+IgD-CD27+/non-class-switched CD19+IgD+CD27+ memory B cell subsets and CD19+CD27hiCD38hi plasmablasts in patients with severe HA and their association with the development of inhibitors in these patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional case-control study enrolled 32 patients with severe HA, including 8 with and 24 without inhibitors, and 24 healthy individuals. The frequencies of the memory B cell subsets and plasmablasts were determined using flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The frequency of CD19+IgD+CD27+ non-class-switched memory B cells was significantly lower in patients with HA (including both patients with and without inhibitors) than in healthy controls. The percentages of both CD19+IgD-CD27+ class-switched and CD19+IgD+CD27+ non-class-switched memory B cells did not differ significantly between patients with and without inhibitors. HA patients with inhibitors had significantly higher proportions of CD19+CD27hiCD38hi plasmablasts than the control group as well as the inhibitor (-) ones. No significant correlation was observed between the inhibitor levels with the percentages of memory B cell subsets and plasmablasts.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to demonstrate a dysregulated proportion of CD19+IgD+CD27+ non-class-switched memory B cells and CD19+CD27hiCD38hi plasmablasts in patients with severe HA. Therefore, strategies targeting memory B-cell/plasmablast differentiation may have promising outcomes in the management of inhibitor formation in patients with severe HA.

Altered frequency of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells is associated with development of inhibitors in patients with severe hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The development of anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies or "inhibitors" is a major complication following FVIII replacement therapy in patients with severe hemophilia A (HA), rendering the treatment inefficient. Data on the role of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in inhibitor formation in these patients are rare. Herein, we aimed to investigate whether a difference in the FOXP3+ Tregs is linked to the formation of the inhibitors in severe HA patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 32 patients with severe HA (8 patients with inhibitors and 24 without inhibitors) and 24 healthy controls were enrolled. The frequency of FOXP3+ Tregs was determined using multicolor flow cytometry method.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the median level of CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ Tregs did not significantly differ between HA patients and healthy controls and between HA patients with and without inhibitors (P > 0.05). However, patients with inhibitors had significantly lower amounts of CD4+ CD25- FOXP3+ Tregs compared to those without inhibitors as well as healthy controls (*P = 0.012 and *P = 0.004, respectively). The frequency of CD4+ CD25+ T cells was significantly higher in HA patients who developed inhibitors compared to the inhibitor-negative ones whereas they were lower in inhibitor-negative patients compared to the healthy controls (*P = 0.013 and *P = *0.029, respectively). The percentages of CD4+ CD25+ T cells were positively correlated with the levels of inhibitors in HA patients (r = 0.45, *P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrated for the first time that the CD4+ CD25- FOXP3+ Tregs might be implicated in the prevention of inhibitor formation in severe HA patients.

Can T-cell and B-cell excision circles predict development of inhibitors in pediatric hemophilia A?

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A (HA) therapy requires intravenous replacement infusions of factor (F) VIII concentrate. Inhibitors are high-affinity immunoglobulin G that are directed against FVIII and thereby render replacement therapy ineffective. This complication has significant prognostic implications. We aimed to examine the immune system involvement in inhibitor formation specifically T-cell excision circles (TRECs) and B-cell excision circles (KRECs), markers of new T and B cells, respectively, and examine them as surrogate markers for inhibitor formation.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 35 children with severe HA. Children were divided into two groups: with FVIII inhibitors and without FVIII inhibitors. TRECs and KRECs were measured in peripheral blood.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients with inhibitors and 24 without were evaluated. Children with inhibitors had higher levels of TRECs however not statistically significant (p = 0.085). CjKREC levels were higher in the inhibitor patients (p = 0.003). Moreover, the sj/cjKREC ratio was lower in the inhibitor patients (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may add to the notion that inhibitor formation is attributed to humoral immunity due to peripheral B-cell expansion and loss of peripheral tolerance. Improved knowledge regarding the involvement of the immune system in the formation of FVIII inhibitors will enable better therapy tailoring in the era of non-replacement therapies.

IMPACT

The etiology of FVIII inhibitor formation is multifactorial, in which the immune system plays a pivotal role. Our findings may add to the notion that inhibitor formation is attributed to humoral immunity due to peripheral B-cell expansion and production of antibodies against FVIII. Improved knowledge regarding the involvement of the immune system in the development of FVIII inhibitors will enable the identification of patients prone to inhibitor development and better therapy tailoring in the new era of non-replacement therapies.

Engineering a Therapeutic Protein to Enhance the Study of Anti-Drug Immunity

The development of anti-drug antibodies represents a significant barrier to the utilization of protein-based therapies for a wide variety of diseases. While the rate of antibody formation can vary depending on the therapeutic employed and the target patient population receiving the drug, the antigen-specific immune response underlying the development of anti-drug antibodies often remains difficult to define. This is especially true for patients with hemophilia A who, following exposure, develop antibodies against the coagulation factor, factor VIII (FVIII). Models capable of studying this response in an antigen-specific manner have been lacking. To overcome this challenge, we engineered FVIII to contain a peptide (323-339) from the model antigen ovalbumin (OVA), a very common tool used to study antigen-specific immunity. FVIII with an OVA peptide (FVIII-OVA) retained clotting activity and possessed the ability to activate CD4 T cells specific to OVA323-339 in vitro. When compared to FVIII alone, FVIII-OVA also exhibited a similar level of immunogenicity, suggesting that the presence of OVA323-339 does not substantially alter the anti-FVIII immune response. Intriguingly, while little CD4 T cell response could be observed following exposure to FVIII-OVA alone, inclusion of anti-FVIII antibodies, recently shown to favorably modulate anti-FVIII immune responses, significantly enhanced CD4 T cell activation following FVIII-OVA exposure. These results demonstrate that model antigens can be incorporated into a therapeutic protein to study antigen-specific responses and more specifically that the CD4 T cell response to FVIII-OVA can be augmented by pre-existing anti-FVIII antibodies.

BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of inhibitors in children with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia A (HA) is an x-linked recessive disease due to deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against infused FVIII is a major concern. B cell activating factor (BAFF) has been implicated in several autoimmune diseases.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the possible association of BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of FVIII inhibitor in children with severe HA.

METHODS

This cohort study was carried out on 100 newly diagnosed boys with severe HA who were never treated before with FVIII concentrate. Assessment of serum levels of BAFF and BAFF rs9514828 genotyping at first diagnosis was performed and the patients were followed up for the completion of a total of 50 exposure days or the development of inhibitors whichever occurred first. The patients were divided as positive or negative according to the presence or absence of inhibitors.

RESULTS

The risk allele for BAFF rs9514828 (T) was significantly more frequent in the inhibitor positive patients than the inhibitor negative patients (P = .003). In addition, CT+TT genotypes were associated with increased risk of FVIII inhibitor development. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that BAFF levels could predict the development of FVIII inhibitors at a cut-off value of ≥ .92 with a sensitivity of 85.9% and a specificity of 80.2%.

CONCLUSION

BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism could be independent risk factor and elevated BAFF levels might be useful prognostic marker for the development of FVIII inhibitor in newly diagnosed children with severe HA.

Ectopic Expression of FVIII in HPCs and MSCs Derived from hiPSCs with Site-Specific Integration of ITGA2B Promoter-Driven BDDF8 Gene in Hemophilia A

Hemophilia A (HA) is caused by mutations in the coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) gene (F8). Gene therapy is a hopeful cure for HA; however, FVIII inhibitors formation hinders its clinical application. Given that platelets promote coagulation via locally releasing α-granule, FVIII ectopically expressed in platelets has been attempted, with promising results for HA treatment. The B-domain-deleted F8 (BDDF8), driven by a truncated ITGA2B promoter, was targeted at the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus of HA patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (HA-iPSCs). The F8-modified, human induced pluripotent stem cells (2bF8-iPSCs) were differentiated into induced hematopoietic progenitor cells (iHPCs), induced megakaryocytes (iMKs), and mesenchymal stem cells (iMSCs), and the FVIII expression was detected. The ITGA2B promoter-driven BDDF8 was site-specifically integrated into the rDNA locus of HA-iPSCs. The 2bF8-iPSCs were efficiently differentiated into 2bF8-iHPCs, 2bF8-iMKs, and 2bF8-iMSCs. FVIII was 10.31 ng/10⁶ cells in lysates of 2bF8-iHPCs, compared to 1.56 ng/10⁶ cells in HA-iHPCs, and FVIII was 3.64 ng/10⁶ cells in 2bF8-iMSCs lysates, while 1.31 ng/10⁶ cells in iMSCs with CMV-driven BDDF8. Our results demonstrated a high expression of FVIII in iHPCs and iMSCs derived from hiPSCs with site-specific integration of ITGA2B promoter-driven BDDF8, indicating potential clinical prospects of this platelet-targeted strategy for HA gene therapy.

Hemophilia A Gene Therapy: Current and Next-Generation Approaches

INTRODUCTION

: Hemophilia comprises a group of X-linked hemorrhagic disorders that result from a deficiency of coagulation factors. The disorder affects mainly males and leads to chronic pain, joint deformity, reduced mobility, and increased mortality. Current therapies require frequent administration of replacement clotting factors, but the emergence of alloantibodies (inhibitors) diminishes their efficacy. New therapies are being developed to produce the deficient clotting factors and prevent the emergence of inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

: This article provides an update on the characteristics and disease pathophysiology of hemophilia A, as well as current treatments, with a special focus on ongoing clinical trials related to gene replacement therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

: Gene replacement therapies provide safe, durable, and stable transgene expression while avoiding the challenges of clotting factor replacement therapies in patients with hemophilia. Improving the specificity of the viral construct and decreasing the therapeutic dose are critical toward minimizing cellular stress, induction of the unfolded protein response, and the resulting loss of protein production in liver cells. Next-generation gene therapies incorporating chimeric DNA sequences in the transgene can increase clotting factor synthesis and secretion, and advance the efficacy, safety, and durability of gene replacement therapy for hemophilia A as well as other blood clotting disorders.

Haemophilia, state of the art and new therapeutic opportunities, a regulatory perspective

Haemophilia A and B are rare bleeding disorders. Over the past decades, they have been transformed from debilitating diseases to manageable conditions in the Western world. However, optimizing haemophilia care remains challenging in developing countries. Several challenges and unmet needs remain in the treatment of the haemophilia limiting the QoL of patients. These challenges are now being addressed by extended half‐life recombinant factors, rebalancing and substitution therapies. Gene therapy and genome editing show promise for a definite clinical cure. Here, we provide an overview of new therapeutic opportunities for haemophilia and their advances and limitations from a regulatory perspective. The database on human medicines from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was used and data from rare disease (orphan) designations and EPARs were retrieved for the analysis. Clinical trial databases were used to query all active studies on haemophilia. Gene therapy medicinal products based on AAV and lentiviral vectors are in development and clinical trials have reported substantial success in ameliorating bleeding tendency in haemophilia patients. The prospect of gene editing for correction of the underlying mutation is on the horizon and has considerable potential. With regard to the benefit of the gene therapy medicinal products, more long‐term efficacy and safety data are awaited. We are entering an era of innovation and abundance in treatment options for those affected by bleeding disorders, but issues remain about the affordability and accessibility to patients.

Important decrease in invariant natural killer T, CD4+ regulatory T cells, CD8+ regulatory T cells, gamma-delta T cells, and CD4+ T lymphocytes in HIV-negative patients with hemophilia

Hereditary hemophilias are X-linked inherited bleeding disorders defined as deficiencies of the coagulation factors VIII or IX. They are characterized by easy to provoke or spontaneous bleeding. HIV infection in hemophilic patients is a risk factor for the reduction of CD4+ T cells. There is no information regarding the cellular immune function in HIV-negative patients with hemophilia. To evaluate the number of lymphocyte subsets in adult patients with hemophilia A or B as compared with healthy donors. 39 Adult hemophilics and 27 healthy donors were included. Lymphocyte subsets [CD4 and CD8 T cells, natural killer cells, natural killer T (NKT) cells, invariant NKT (iNKT) cells, gamma-delta T (γδT) cells, type 1 and 2 dendritic cells, CD14 monocytes, CD4 and CD8 regulatory T cells (Tregs), and B cells], were analyzed by flow cytometry. A significant decrease of CD4+ T lymphocytes, γδT cells, iNKT cells, CD4+ and CD8+ Tregs was observed in patients with hemophilia. Those patients having factor VIII inhibitor had the lowest CD4+ Treg and CD8+ Treg counts. CD14 monocytes were increased, as well as iNKT and type 2 dendritic cells in obese-overweight hemophilics. CD4+ lymphocytes, iNKT, γδT cells, and Tregs (CD4+ and CD8+), are significantly decreased in patients with hemophilia. Depletion of Tregs is more important in patients with factor VIII inhibitor. Physicians caring for hemophilia patients should realize that, even when they are not suffering infections frequently, may have early evidence of cellular immunodeficiency.

Fc Gamma Receptors and Complement Component 3 Facilitate Anti-fVIII Antibody Formation

Anti-factor VIII (fVIII) alloantibodies, which can develop in patients with hemophilia A, limit the therapeutic options and increase morbidity and mortality of these patients. However, the factors that influence anti-fVIII antibody development remain incompletely understood. Recent studies suggest that Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs) may facilitate recognition and uptake of fVIII by recently developed or pre-existing naturally occurring anti-fVIII antibodies, providing a mechanism whereby the immune system may recognize fVIII following infusion. However, the role of FcγRs in anti-fVIII antibody formation remains unknown. In order to define the influence of FcγRs on the development of anti-fVIII antibodies, fVIII was injected into WT or FcγR knockout recipients, followed by evaluation of anti-fVIII antibodies. Anti-fVIII antibodies were readily observed following fVIII injection into FcγR knockouts, with similar anti-fVIII antibody levels occurring in FcγR knockouts as detected in WT mice injected in parallel. As antibodies can also fix complement, providing a potential mechanism whereby anti-fVIII antibodies may influence anti-fVIII antibody formation independent of FcγRs, fVIII was also injected into complement component 3 (C3) knockout recipients in parallel. Similar to FcγR knockouts, C3 knockout recipients developed a robust response to fVIII, which was likewise similar to that observed in WT recipients. As FcγRs or C3 may compensate for each other in recipients only deficient in FcγRs or C3 alone, we generated mice deficient in both FcγRs and C3 to test for potential antibody effector redundancy in anti-fVIII antibody formation. Infusion of fVIII into FcγRs and C3 (FcγR × C3) double knockouts likewise induced anti-fVIII antibodies. However, unlike individual knockouts, anti-fVIII antibodies in FcγRs × C3 knockouts were initially lower than WT recipients, although anti-fVIII antibodies increased to WT levels following additional fVIII exposure. In contrast, infusion of RBCs expressing distinct alloantigens into FcγRs, C3 or FcγR × C3 knockout recipients either failed to change anti-RBC levels when compared to WT recipients or actually increased antibody responses, depending on the target antigen. Taken together, these results suggest FcγRs and C3 can differentially impact antibody formation following exposure to distinct alloantigens and that FcγRs and C3 work in concert to facilitate early anti-fVIII antibody formation.

Molecular Mechanisms of Inhibitor Development in Hemophilia

The development of neutralizing antibodies in hemophilia is a serious complication of factor replacement therapy. These antibodies, also known as "inhibitors", significantly increase morbidity within the hemophilia population and lower the quality of life for these patients. People with severe hemophilia A have an overall 25-40% lifetime risk of inhibitor development, compared to that of 5-15% lifetime risk in those with moderate/mild hemophilia A. The risk is lower in hemophilia B population (about 1-5%) and occurrence of inhibitors is almost only seen in patients with severe hemophilia B. The understanding of the pathophysiological mechanism leading to the development of inhibitors in patients with hemophilia has improved considerably over the last 2 decades. Identification of early biomarkers which predict inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with hemophilia will assist in risk identification and possible early intervention strategies. In this review, we aim to summarize the molecular mechanisms of inhibitor development in hemophilia and to identify potential areas in need of further investigation.

Safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa in the prevention and treatment of bleeds in previously untreated paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A: Results from the guardian 4 multinational clinical trial

Introduction

Turoctocog alfa is a recombinant, B domain‐truncated factor VIII (FVIII) approved for patients with haemophilia A.

Aim

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A.

Methods

Guardian 4 was a multicentre, multinational, non‐randomized, open‐label phase 3 trial comprising a main and extension phase. The former concluded once ≥ 50 patients had received treatment for ≥ 50 exposure days (EDs) or developed inhibitors. Patients received turoctocog alfa intravenously for prevention and treatment of bleeds. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of FVIII inhibitors (≥0.6 Bethesda Units) reported during the first 50 EDs.

Results

Of the 58 patients who completed the main phase, 25 (43.1%) patients developed inhibitors (detected within 6‐24 [mean: 14.2] EDs from treatment start). High‐risk mutations were identified in 60% of patients who developed inhibitors in the main phase and were a significant predictor of inhibitor development (P = .003). Of the 21 patients who started immune tolerance induction therapy, 85.7% completed treatment with a negative inhibitor test (note that data on the last 3 patients completing ITI are based on information collated from sites prior to the final database lock). Haemostatic response (including missing values as failure) was rated as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ for 86.1% of bleeds occurring during prophylaxis. The estimated mean annualized bleeding rate for patients on prophylaxis was 4.26 bleeds/patient/year (95% CI: 3.34 − 5.44).

Conclusions

Turoctocog alfa was effective at preventing and stopping bleeds and was well tolerated. Inhibitor development was within the expected range for this PUP population.

Individual combinations of danger signals synergistically increase FVIII product immunogenicity

INTRODUCTION

The most severe side effect in haemophilia A treatment is the development of antifactor VIII antibodies, also called inhibitors. Why inhibitors develop in a proportion of treated patients while others are unaffected still remains unanswered. The presence of immunological danger signals, associated with events such as infection or surgery, has been proposed to play a role. Previous studies demonstrated that the presence of the bacterial molecule lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can synergistically increase the activation of human DC and subsequent T cell activation by FVIII.

AIM AND METHODS

In the present study, we investigated whether a combination of two danger signals can further increase immune cell activation by FVIII. For this, human in vitro differentiated DC that were treated with combinations of danger signals were co-cultured with autologous primary T cells, and T cell proliferation was analysed.

RESULTS

Interestingly, by combining LPS with a second danger signal, lower LPS concentrations were sufficient to synergistically increase DC and subsequent T cell activation by FVIII. Of note, a combination of LPS and the double-stranded RNA, polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C)), was most potent in increasing FVIII immunogenicity, followed by LPS + R848 (resiquimod). However, a combination of LPS and the bacterial lipopeptide Pam3CysSK4 did not induce increased immune cell activation by FVIII.

CONCLUSION

Thus, individual combinations of danger signals can increase FVIII product immunogenicity. This should be considered in the treatment routine of haemophilia A patients.

Update on clinical gene therapy for hemophilia

In contrast to other diverse therapies for the X-linked bleeding disorder hemophilia that are currently in clinical development, gene therapy holds the promise of a lasting cure with a single drug administration. Near-to-complete correction of hemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency) and hemophilia B (factor IX deficiency) have now been achieved in patients by hepatic in vivo gene transfer. Adeno-associated viral vectors with different viral capsids that have been engineered to express high-level, and in some cases hyperactive, coagulation factors were employed. Patient data support that sustained endogenous production of clotting factor as a result of gene therapy eliminates the need for infusion of coagulation factors (or alternative drugs that promote coagulation), and may therefore ultimately also reduce treatment costs. However, mild liver toxicities have been observed in some patients receiving high vector doses. In some but not all instances, the toxicities correlated with a T-cell response directed against the viral capsid, prompting use of immune suppression. In addition, not all patients can be treated because of preexisting immunity to viral capsids. Nonetheless, studies in animal models of hemophilia suggest that the approach can also be used for immune tolerance induction to prevent or eliminate inhibitory antibodies against coagulation factors. These can form in traditional protein replacement therapy and represent a major complication of treatment. The current review provides a summary and update on advances in clinical gene therapies for hemophilia and its continued development.

Danger signal-dependent activation of human dendritic cells by plasma-derived factor VIII products

Treatment of haemophilia A by infusions of the clotting factor VIII (FVIII) results in the development of inhibitors/anti-drug antibodies in up to 25 % of patients. Mechanisms leading to immunogenicity of FVIII products are not yet fully understood. Amongst other factors, danger signals as elicited upon infection or surgery have been proposed to play a role. In the present study, we focused on effects of danger signals on maturation and activation of dendritic cells (DC) in the context of FVIII application. Human monocyte-derived DC were treated with FVIII alone, with a danger signal alone or a combination of both. By testing more than 60 different healthy donors, we show that FVIII and the bacterial danger signal lipopolysaccharide synergise in increasing DC activation, as characterised by increased expression of co-stimulatory molecules and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The degree and frequency of this synergistic activation correlate with CD86 expression levels on immature DC prior to stimulation. In our assay system, plasma-derived but not recombinant FVIII products activate human DC in a danger signal-dependent manner. Further tested danger signals, such as R848 also induced DC activation in combination with FVIII, albeit not in every tested donor. In our hands, human DC but not human B cells or macrophages could be activated by FVIII in a danger signal-dependent manner. Our results suggest that immunogenicity of FVIII is a result of multiple factors including the presence of danger, predisposition of the patient, and the choice of a FVIII product for treatment.

Marginal zone B cells are critical to factor VIII inhibitor formation in mice with hemophilia A

Although factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy can be lifesaving for patients with hemophilia A, neutralizing alloantibodies to FVIII, known as inhibitors, develop in a significant number of patients and actively block FVIII activity, making bleeding difficult to control and prevent. Although a variety of downstream immune factors likely regulate inhibitor formation, the identification and subsequent targeting of key initiators in inhibitor development may provide an attractive approach to prevent inhibitor formation before amplification of the FVIII immune response occurs. As the initial steps in FVIII inhibitor development remain incompletely understood, we sought to define early regulators of FVIII inhibitor formation. Our results demonstrate that FVIII localizes in the marginal sinus of the spleen of FVIII-deficient mice shortly after injection, with significant colocalization with marginal zone (MZ) B cells. FVIII not only colocalizes with MZ B cells, but specific removal of MZ B cells also completely prevented inhibitor development following FVIII infusion. Subsequent rechallenge with FVIII following MZ B-cell reconstitution resulted in a primary antibody response, demonstrating that MZ B-cell depletion did not result in FVIII tolerance. Although recipient exposure to the viral-like adjuvant polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid enhanced anti-FVIII antibody formation, MZ B-cell depletion continued to display similar effectiveness in preventing inhibitor formation following FVIII infusion in this inflammatory setting. These data strongly suggest that MZ B cells play a critical role in initiating FVIII inhibitor formation and suggest a potential strategy to prevent anti-FVIII alloantibody formation in patients with hemophilia A.

Antibody response to recombinant human coagulation factor VIII in a new rat model of severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Neutralizing antibodies toward FVIII replacement therapy (inhibitors) are the most serious treatment-related complication in hemophilia A (HA). A rat model of severe HA (F8(-/-) ) has recently been developed, but an immunological characterization is needed to determine the value of using the model for research into inhibitor development.

OBJECTIVES

Characterize the antibody response towards recombinant human coagulation factor VIII (rhFVIII) in the HA rat, following a human prophylactic dosing regimen.

METHODS

Two identical studies were performed, which included a total of 17 homozygous HA rats (F8(-/-) , 0% FVIII activity), 12 heterozygous rats (F8(+/-) ), and 12 wild-type (F8(+/+) ) rats. All rats received intravenous injections of rhFVIII at 50 IU kg(-1) twice weekly for 4 weeks. Predosing blood samples were analyzed for binding and neutralizing anti-rhFVIII antibodies at weeks 1-7.

RESULTS

In both studies, antibodies developed after 4-6 administrations of rhFVIII, and neutralizing antibodies reached levels similar to human patients (range 1-111 BU, median 6.0 BU) at the end of the study. There was no significant difference between the two studies or between genotypes in time to response or levels reached for binding and neutralizing antibodies. Interestingly, early spontaneous bleeds were associated with a faster antibody response.

CONCLUSIONS

Following intravenous administration of human FVIII, according to a clinical prophylaxis regimen, a robust and reproducible antibody response is seen in this HA rat model, suggesting that the model is useful for intervention studies with the aim of suppressing, delaying, or preventing the inhibitor response. Also, bleeds seem to have an adjuvant effect on the immune response.

Prevalence of IVS10nt-18G/A in Calabrian patients with moderate/mild hemophilia A and relation with Factor VIII inhibitor antibodies

Hemophilia A is an X-linked bleeding disorder caused by widespread mutations in the factor VIII gene. In the course of a screening to research some hemophilia A mutations, our team has identified and posted a previously unreported nucleotide change in intron 10 in 20 patients with hemophilia A. We tried to identify a possible blood relationship between the people with this mutation, performing a backwards study of every family tree. First, we interviewed the patients and, if possible, parents and grandparents. When direct memory was no longer available, we consulted Registries of Births, Marriages and Deaths, and if these data were not sufficient, going backwards in time, we consulted registries of parish churches where newborns were baptized. The studied mutation was present in 33 hemophilic patients living in Calabria, 28 of them related. Three patients, carriers of this mutation, developed an FVIII inhibitor. In all the cases, the inhibitor development followed intensive treatments, after many days of exposure. Our study displayed the presence of a responsible moderate hemophilia A mutation, limited apparently to our country, probably because of a single ancestral event, and connected with FVIII inhibitor development.

Violating the theory of single gene-single disorder: inhibitor development in hemophilia

Hemophilia is clinically and genetically heterogeneous blood disorder with several known gene defects accounting for the diversity of disease phenotype and inhibitor production. Although increasing number of causative mutations have been reported, not much is known regarding the root cause of inhibitor development against infused blood clotting factors, which represents a major challenge in the treatment of disease. The variations in the severity and frequency of bleeding in hemophiliacs with same molecular defect, indicates the role of modifier genes in the pathogenesis of disease. Herein, we aim to review and summarise the literature over the past decade, to gain insight into what is critical for the development of inhibitors in hemophilia. Aside from potential mutations in factor VIII and IX, polymorphisms in various genes such as human leukocyte antigen-I (HLA-I), HLA-II, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4, also tends to contribute to the development of inhibitors. Violating the theory of single gene-single disorder, new research indicates that inhibitor arise from a complex interplay of multiple genetic, immunological and environmental factors. With the revolutionary advances in whole genome sequencing, we propose a detailed genome wide study to identify the spectrum of genetic markers involved in the development of inhibitors for better diagnostics and therapeutics.

Managing haemophilia for life: 4th Haemophilia Global Summit

The 4th Haemophilia Global Summit was held in Potsdam, Germany, in September 2013 and brought together an international faculty of haemophilia experts and delegates from multidisciplinary backgrounds. The programme was designed by an independent Scientific Steering Committee of haemophilia experts and explored global perspectives in haemophilia care, discussing practical approaches to the optimal management of haemophilia now and in the future. The topics outlined in this supplement were selected by the Scientific Steering Committee for their relevance and potential to influence haemophilia care globally. In this supplement from the meeting, Jan Astermark reviews current understanding of risk factors for the development of inhibitory antibodies and discusses whether this risk can be modulated and minimized. Factors key to the improvement of joint health in people with haemophilia are explored, with Carlo Martinoli and Víctor Jiménez-Yuste discussing the utility of ultrasound for the early detection of haemophilic arthropathy. Other aspects of care necessary for the prevention and management of joint disease in people with haemophilia are outlined by Thomas Hilberg and Sébastian Lobet, who highlight the therapeutic benefits of physiotherapy and sports therapy. Riitta Lassila and Carlo-Federico Perno describe current knowledge surrounding the risk of transmission of infectious agents via clotting factor concentrates. Finally, different types of extended half-life technology are evaluated by Mike Laffan, with a focus on the practicalities and challenges associated with these products.

Factor VIII gene variants and inhibitor risk in African American hemophilia A patients

African American hemophilia A (HA) patients experience a higher incidence of neutralizing anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies ("inhibitors") vis-à-vis white patients. Nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (ns-SNPs) in the F8 gene encoding FVIII-H484, FVIII-E1241, and FVIII-V2238 are more prevalent in African Americans. This study tested the hypothesis that immune responses to these sites provoke inhibitors. Blood samples were obtained from 174 African American and 198 white HA subjects and their F8 gene sequences determined. Major histocompatibility complex class II binding and T-cell recognition of polymorphic sequences were evaluated using quantitative binding assays and HLA-DRB1 tetramers. Peptides corresponding to 4 common ns-SNPs showed limited binding to 11 HLA-DRB1 proteins. CD4 T cells from 22 subjects treated with FVIII products having sequences at residues FVIII-484, 1241, and 2238 differing from those of putative proteins encoded by their F8 genes did not show high-avidity tetramer binding, whereas positive-control staining of tetanus-specific CD4 T cells was routinely successful. African Americans with an intron-22 inversion mutation showed a 2-3 times-higher inhibitor incidence than whites with the same mutation (odds ratio = 2.3 [1.1-5.0, P = .04]), but this did not correlate with any of the ns-SNPs. We conclude that immune responses to "sequence-mismatched" FVIII products are unlikely to contribute appreciably to the inhibitor incidence in African Americans.

The intron-22-inverted F8 locus permits factor VIII synthesis: explanation for low inhibitor risk and a role for pharmacogenomics

Intron-22-inversion patients express the entire Factor VIII (FVIII)-amino-acid sequence intracellularly as 2 non-secreted polypeptides and have a positive "intracellular (I)-FVIII-CRM" status. Mutations conferring a positive I-FVIII-CRM status are associated with low inhibitor risk and are pharmacogenetically relevant because inhibitor risk may be affected by the nature of the therapeutic FVIII-protein (tFVIII), the affinity of any tFVIII-derived foreign peptide (tFVIII-fp) for any HLA class-II isomer (HLA-II) comprising individual major histocompatibility complex (MHC) repertoires, and the stability of any tFVIII-fp/HLA-II complex. We hypothesize that mutations conferring a completely or substantially negative I-FVIII-CRM status are pharmacogenetically irrelevant because inhibitor risk is high with any tFVIII and individual MHC repertoire.

Laboratory identification of factor inhibitors: an update

Coagulation factor inhibitors comprise antibodies that bind to and then neutralise specific pro-coagulant plasma proteins. Coagulation factor inhibitors can develop against any coagulation factor, although the most common are against factor VIII (FVIII). These can develop in individuals with inherited haemophilia A (HA) as an immune response to factor replacement therapy, or as auto-antibodies leading to the condition of acquired HA. Clinical suspicion for inhibitors may arise when individuals present with bleeding symptoms without any prior bleeding diathesis, or when a patient with known mild haemophilia presents with a bleeding diathesis more extreme to their usual presentation, or when there is failure of factor replacement therapy to arrest bleeding in a known haemophiliac. The laboratory identification of factor inhibitors requires a careful and systematic approach that excludes other possible causes of prolonged screening tests, most commonly the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and sometimes prothrombin time (PT). Coagulation factor inhibitor studies, including the Bethesda assay, are then undertaken to measure inhibitor titre, which guides treatment. This paper overviews the laboratory investigation of factor inhibitors, and also briefly reviews recent cross-laboratory inhibitor studies and the most recent evidence related to differential inhibitor formation according to type of therapy.

Profiling of differentially expressed genes in haemophilia A with inhibitor

Inhibitor development is the most significant complication in the therapy of haemophilia A (HA) patients. In spite of many studies, not much is known regarding the mechanism underlying inhibitor development. To understand the mechanism, we analysed profiles of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between inhibitor and non-inhibitor HA via a microarray technique. Twenty unrelated Korean HAs were studied: 11 were non-inhibitor and nine were HA with inhibitor (≥5 BU mL(-1)). Microarray analysis was conducted using a Human Ref-8 expression Beadchip system (Illumina) and the data were analysed using Beadstudio software. We identified 545 DEGs in inhibitor HA as compared with the non-inhibitor patients; 384 genes were up-regulated and 161 genes were down-regulated. Among them, 75 genes whose expressions were altered by at least two-fold (>+2 or <-2) were selected and classified via the PANTHER classification method. The expressions of signal transduction and immunity-related genes differed significantly in the two groups. For validation of the DEGs, semi-quantitative RT-PCR (semi-qRT-PCR) was conducted with the six selected DEGs. The results corresponded to the microarray data, with the exception of one gene. We also examined the expression of the genes associated with the antigen presentation process via real-time PCR. The average levels of IL10, CTLA4 and TNFα slightly reduced, whereas that of IFNγ increased in the inhibitor HA group. We are currently unable to explain whether this phenomenon is a function of the inhibitor-inducing factor or is an epiphenomenon of antibody production. Nevertheless, our results provide a possible explanation for inhibitor development.

A case-control study reveals immunoregulatory gene haplotypes that influence inhibitor risk in severe haemophilia A

Several genes that modify risk of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A patients have been identified. Aside from the underlying mutations that cause haemophilia A, inhibitor risk appears to be modified by polymorphisms in various cytokines and immunomodulators including IL10, TNFα and CTLA4. HLA haplotypes have not been strong determinants of inhibitor risk. We sought to confirm previous observations on FVIII inhibitor risk-modifying genes and to test new candidate genes encoding various otherTH1/TH2 cytokines. We also sought to determine whether normal FVIII gene polymorphisms affect inhibitor risk in caucasians. We studied 915 caucasian, severe haemophilia A patients (282 inhibitor cases and 633 non-inhibitor controls). Genes were analysed using 368 tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms starting 20 kb 5' and ending 10 kb 3' of each gene's coding sequence; four other polymorphisms (factor V Leiden & prothrombin 20210 polymorphisms and two in HFE) were also evaluated. Haplotypes that increased inhibitor risk were found in IL10 (OR = 1.33, P = 0.04), IL12 (OR = 1.31, P = 0.04) and IL1α (OR = 2.16, P = 0.034). Protective haplotypes were seen in IL2 (OR =  .69, P = 0.008) and IL1β (OR = 0.75, P = 0.02). One rare haplotype in the FVIII gene increased the risk of inhibitor development by nearly fourfold (OR = 3.8, P = 0.004). We replicate previous findings for IL10; identify new associations with IL1, IL2 and IL12; and identify a rare FVIII haplotype in caucasians that is associated with increased inhibitor risk.

T-cell responses in two unrelated hemophilia A inhibitor subjects include an epitope at the factor VIII R593C missense site

BACKGROUND

Development of neutralizing anti-factor (F)VIII antibodies ('inhibitors') is a serious clinical problem in hemophilia A. Increased inhibitor risk has been associated with certain FVIII missense substitutions, including R593C in the A2 domain.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to identify T-cell epitopes in FVIII and characterize T-cell responses in two unrelated hemophilia A subjects sharing F8-R593C and HLA-DRB1*1101 genotypes. We hypothesized that the hemophilic substitution site coincides with an important T-cell epitope.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The binding affinities of peptides for recombinant HLA-DR proteins were measured and compared with epitope prediction results. CD4+ T cells were stimulated using peptides and stained with fluorescent, peptide-loaded tetramers.

RESULTS

The inhibitor subjects, but not HLA-matched controls, had high-avidity HLA-DRB1*1101-restricted T-cell responses against FVIII(589-608), which contains the hemophilic missense site. Antigen-specific T cells secreted Th1 and Th2 cytokines and proliferated in response to FVIII and FVIII(592-603). FVIII(589-608) bound with physiologically relevant (micromolar) IC(50) values to recombinant DR0101, DR1101 and DR1501 proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemophilia A patients with R593C missense substitutions and these HLA haplotypes had an increased incidence of inhibitors in our cohorts, supporting a paradigm in which presentation of FVIII epitopes containing the wild-type R593 influences inhibitor risk in this hemophilia A sub-population.

HLA-DR-restricted T-cell responses to factor VIII epitopes in a mild haemophilia A family with missense substitution A2201P

An HLA-DRA-DRB1*0101-restricted T-cell epitope in the factor VIII (FVIII) C2 domain occurred in a mild haemophilia A patient with missense substitution FVIII-A2201P. His T cells responded to synthetic peptides FVIII(2186-2205) and FVIII(2194-2213) (J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 2399). T cells from family members with genotype FVIII-A2201P were analysed to determine if FVIII-specific T cells occur in individuals with a haemophilic mutation but no clinically significant inhibitor response. Fluorescent MHC class II tetramers corresponding to subjects'HLA-DRB1 types were loaded with 20-mer peptides and utilized to label antigen-specific CD4+ T cells. T-cell responses to peptides spanning the FVIII-C2 sequence were evaluated. T cells recognizing specific peptides were cloned, and antigen specificity was verified by proliferation assays. Plasma and/or purified IgG samples were tested for FVIII inhibitory activity. CD4+ T cells and T-cell clones from two brothers who shared the DRB1*0101 allele responded to FVIII(2194-2213). A haemophilic cousin's HLA-DRA-DRB1*1104-restricted response to FVIII(2202-2221) was detected only when CD4+CD25+ cells were depleted. A great uncle and two obligate carriers had no detectable FVIII-C2-specific T cells. Concentrated IgG from the brother without a clinical inhibitor response showed a low-titre FVIII inhibitor. FVIII-specific T cells and inhibitory IgG were found in a previously infused, haemophilic subject who had a sub-clinical FVIII inhibitor. CD4+CD25+ depleted T cells from a non-infused haemophilic cousin recognized an overlapping FVIII epitope, indicating a latent HLA-DRA-DRB1*1104-restricted T-cell response to FVIII. Specific T-cell responses to FVIII can occur without clinically significant inhibitors.

Immunoglobulin isotypes and functional anti-FVIII antibodies in response to FVIII treatment in Balb/c and C57BL/6 haemophilia A mice

Previous studies have demonstrated that genetic factors play an important role in determining the likelihood of formation of anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies in haemophilia A patients. We were interested in characterizing the spectrum of FVIII antibody formation and the primary and secondary immune responses after FVIII administration in two different exon 16-disrupted haemophilia A mouse strains, Balb/c and C57BL/6. Balb/c and C57BL/6 E16 haemophilia A mice were used in all experiments. Total FVIII antibodies and FVIII inhibitors were measured using ELISA and Bethesda assays respectively. T- and B-cell cytokines were quantified using ELISA and flow cytometry. FVIII antibodies, but not functional inhibitors were detectable 1 week after the first FVIII treatment in both strains. These antibodies mainly belonged to the IgM and IgA isotypes. After the fourth FVIII treatment, neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies were detected in both mouse strains: Balb/c (mean inhibitory titer 58 BU) and C57BL/6 (mean inhibitory titer 82 BU). IgG1 levels were similar in both strains but the IgG2A and IgG2B subclasses were higher in C57BL/6 mice. The results of intracellular cytokine staining of T cells indicated that the FVIII-treated C57BL/6 mice produced more IL10 and Th1 cytokines than the FVIII-treated Balb/c mice. These studies show that C57BL/6 mice develop a stronger immune response towards FVIII than Balb/c mice. We propose that the enhanced Th1 and IL10 cytokine micro-environment induced in C57BL/6 mice is responsible for this difference. Therefore, genetic strain-dependent differences must be considered when evaluating immunological outcomes in mouse models of haemophilia A.

Successful Peritoneal Dialysis in a Hemophilia a Patient with Factor VIII Inhibitor

Chronic kidney disease and need for renal replacement therapy in hemophiliacs are relatively rare occurrences. Successful hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis applications have been reported in the literature. We report a difficult-to-manage patient with hemophilia A plus factor VIII inhibitor who presented with gastrointestinal bleeding complicated by uremia. We admitted this hemophilia A patient with gastrointestinal bleeding who did not take regular factor infusions. He also had chronic kidney disease due to urinary stone disease. Since uremia might have contributed to bleeding, we chose hemodialysis along with factor VIII supplementation. His factor VIII and factor VIII inhibitor levels were 4% and 5 Bethesda units respectively. In order to bypass the inhibitor, we applied factor VIIA and prothrombin complex concentrate. After cessation of the hemorrhage, we placed a Tenckhoff catheter under prothrombin complex concentrate infusion. We did not observe any perioperative complication. To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful peritoneal dialysis in a hemophilia A patient who had factor VIII inhibitors.

How we treat a hemophilia A patient with a factor VIII inhibitor

The most significant complication of treatment in patients with hemophilia A is the development of alloantibodies that inhibit factor VIII activity. In the presence of inhibitory antibodies, replacement of the missing clotting factor by infusion of factor VIII becomes less effective. Once replacement therapy is ineffective, acute management of bleeding requires agents that bypass factor VIII activity. Long-term management consists of eradicating the inhibitor through immune tolerance. Despite success in the treatment of acute bleeding and inhibitor eradication, there remains an inability to predict or prevent inhibitor formation. Ideally, prediction and ultimately prevention will come with an improved understanding of how patient-specific and treatment-related factors work together to influence anti–factor VIII antibody production.

Passive transfer of polyethylene glycol to liposomal-recombinant human FVIII enhances its efficacy in a murine model for hemophilia A

The replacement therapy using recombinant human FVIII (rFVIII) is the first line of therapy for hemophilia A. Approximately 15-30% of the patients develop inhibitory antibodies. Recently, we reported that liposomes composed of phosphatidylserine (PS) could reduce the immunogenicity of rFVIII. However, PS containing liposomal-rFVIII is likely to reduce the systemic exposure and efficacy of FVIII due to rapid uptake of the PS containing liposomes by the reticuloendothelial system (RES). Here, we investigated whether phosphatidylserine (PS) liposomes containing Polyethylene glycol (PEG) (PEGylated), could reduce the immunogenicity of rFVIII and reverse the reduction in systemic exposure of rFVIII. Animals given PEGylated liposomal-rFVIII had lower total and inhibitory anti-rFVIII antibody titers, compared to animals treated with rFVIII alone. The mean stimulation index of CD4+ T-cells from animals given PEGylated liposomal-rFVIII also was lower than for animals that were given rFVIII alone. Pharmacokinetic studies following intravenous dosing indicated that the systemic exposure (area under the activity curve, AUAC(0-24h)) of PEGylated liposomal-rFVIII was approximately 59 IU/mL x h and significantly higher than that of non-PEGylated liposomal-rFVIII (AUAC(0-24h) approximately 36 IU/mL x h). Based on these studies, we speculate that PEGylated PS-containing liposomal rFVIII may improve efficacy of rFVIII.

Single-dose recombinant activated factor VII therapy in hemophilia patients with inhibitors

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) is well established as an effective hemostatic agent for the management of hemorrhage in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. Its use in prophylaxis is currently being investigated. On-demand treatment schedules usually involve multiple bolus doses of 90 to 120 microg/kg administered every 2 to 3 hours, but recent evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that the use of higher single doses is equally safe and effective when used for the home treatment of hemarthroses. Consequently, the use of a single dose of 270 microg/kg rFVIIa for the treatment of bleeds in inhibitor patients has recently been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA). Such high-dose regimens may overcome the rapid clearance rate observed in pediatric patients, and may be more convenient for patients with poor venous access. It also has been suggested that individually tailored single-dose therapies might be beneficial in selected groups of patients, although proper monitoring of such patients is advised. Further research should contribute towards more effective dose optimization of rFVIIa in hemophilic inhibitor patients.

How to predict and prevent the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins

Therapeutic proteins in general induce an immune response, especially when administered as multiple doses over prolonged periods. Non-human therapeutic proteins such as asparaginase and streptokinase induce antibodies by the classical immune reaction and their primary immunogenic factor is the degree of non-self. Human therapeutic proteins such as the interferons and GM-CSF breakdown immune tolerance and protein aggregation is their main factor inducing antibodies. Many other factors influence the level of immunogenicity of proteins, such as storage conditions,contaminants or impurities in the preparation, downstream processing, dose and length of treatment, as well as route of administration, appropriate formulation and disease status and concomitant treatment of patients. Clinical manifestations of antibodies directed against the protein include loss of efficacy, cross neutralization of endogenous proteins and general immune system effects, such as anaphylaxis or serum sickness.

T-cell responses over time in a mild hemophilia A inhibitor subject: epitope identification and transient immunogenicity of the corresponding self-peptide

BACKGROUND

Antibodies that neutralize factor (F) VIII activity, clinically referred to as 'inhibitors', complicate the treatment of hemophilia A patients; current tolerance and bypass strategies are extremely costly and sometimes ineffective. The development of inhibitors requires T-cell help.

OBJECTIVES

We characterized T-cell responses of a subject with mild hemophilia A with missense genotype A2201P for one year following his initial inhibitor response, with the goals of defining the primary epitope(s) and its (their) MHC Class II restriction. We investigated the possible involvement of regulatory T cells in modulating immune responses.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The subject developed high-titer FVIII-neutralizing antibodies (250 BU mL(-1)) that declined over time to 8 BU ml(-1). His clotting activity was initially impaired (3%) but returned to baseline (8-10%) within four weeks. MHC Class II tetramers were used to analyze his CD4 T cells, which were stimulated with peptides spanning the C2 domain. Responses of total and CD25-depleted CD4 cells to sequences containing A2201 (native), P2201 (hemophilic), and other predicted T-cell epitopes were evaluated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

An HLA-DRA-DRB1*0101 restricted T-cell epitope containing the wild-type A2201 sequence was identified. Interestingly, peptides containing A2201 were recognized by CD4 T cells at all time points, whereas a P2201 peptide was recognized only near the initial peak response. The responsiveness of CD25-depleted CD4 cells to an A2201 peptide was enhanced 11 and 19 weeks following inhibitor detection, suggesting the possible involvement of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in modulating immune responses. Patient-derived T-cell clones proliferated in response to C2 protein and to peptides containing A2201 but not P2201.

Early factor VIII exposure and subsequent inhibitor development in children with severe haemophilia A

Recent reports have suggested that the incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia is the highest in those first exposed to factor VIII under 6 months of age. In this study, we investigated inhibitor development in children first exposed to FVIII as neonates and also examined the effect of other genetic and environmental variables. Three hundred and forty-eight children with severe haemophilia A were investigated. Inhibitors developed in 68 of 348 (20%), with 34 of 348 (10%) high titre inhibitors. The incidence in relation to initial FVIII exposure was: <1 month nine of 35 (26%), 1-6 months 13 of 51 (25%), 6-12 months 27 of 130 (21%), 12-18 months 13 of 66 (20%) and >18 months six of 66 (9%). While we observed a significant difference in inhibitor development and age at first exposure across all age groups (P = 0.018), no significant difference was observed in children treated at different time points during the first year of life (P = 0.44). Similar results were obtained for high titre inhibitors. There was also no difference in the incidence of inhibitors in relation to initial FVIII exposure in a subgroup of 144 children with the intron 22 mutation. Inhibitors developed more frequently in those initially treated with recombinant when compared with plasma-derived FVIII (P = 0.006) and in those with a major molecular defect (P = 0.009). In this study, exposure to FVIII during the neonatal period was not associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors than those treated later during the first year of life. Initial treatment with recombinant FVIII and the presence of a major molecular defect were the most important variables affecting inhibitor development.

Urgent inhibitor issues: targets for expanded research

Although up to 80% of high-responding inhibitors in patients with severe factor VIII deficiency can be eliminated using heterogeneous regimens for immune tolerance induction, the residual morbidity in this population of haemophilic patients is far from trivial. There is an exigent need for focussed basic, translational and clinical research to extend our understanding of the pathogenesis of haemophilic inhibitor development. In this article, we identify four key research needs, including (i) whether presently available clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) have differential antigenicity, giving rise to clinically relevant immunogenicity; (ii) the interplay of quantitative and qualitative (e.g. age at first exposure) influences of CFCs as well as host-environmental factors (e.g. vaccination effects) on inhibitor development; (iii) the therapeutic role (if any) that concurrent immune tolerance with suppressive or immune-competitive therapeutic strategies play in inhibitor eradication and (iv) pending any major therapeutic advances, alternative or enhanced strategies for treating acute haemorrhage and for preventing chronic haemorrhagic events in these patients.

Haemophilia therapies

In the last few decades dramatic improvements in the management of haemophilia patients have occurred. Haemophilia has moved from a fatal or disabling disease to a hereditary disorder with available treatment and much better clinical outcomes. The safety of antihaemophilic factor concentrates has been dramatically improved and, in a multidisciplinary environment including haematologists, orthopaedic surgeons, paediatrics, infectiologists, specialised nurses and physiotherapists, complications related to haemophilia are now limited, markedly improving the quality of life of haemophiliacs. One can even think that the cure of haemophilia through gene therapy might occur in the next decades. Keeping this ultimate aim in mind, efforts at present are mainly focused on bioengineered Factor VIII/Factor IX concentrates with increased efficacy or longer half-life or decreased immunogenicity. In addition, several preclinical and clinical studies are being carried out for optimising and individually tailoring the therapeutic regimens of antihaemophilic therapies using global haemostasis tests in combination with the routine coagulation assays.