Impact of Catheter Ablation on Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Symptoms in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is more common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is often highly symptomatic. The impact of catheter ablation (CA) may be under-reported when evaluated by long-term freedom from any atrial arrhythmia.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate whether CA of AF in patients with HCM would significantly reduce AF burden and improve symptoms.

METHODS

A multicenter registry was established to enroll HCM patients with pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing CA of AF between 2017 and 2021. The first AF recurrence and burden 12 months before and after CA were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 81 HCM patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices underwent CA of AF. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 1-year (35 [Q1-Q3: 23-50] months). AF was paroxysmal in 38 of 81 (46.9%) patients and burden pre-CA was 27.0% (Q1-Q3: 3.0% to 99.0%). A total of 35 (43.2%) patients had AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence within 12 months. AF burden reduced after CA to 0.5% (Q1-Q3 range: 0.0% to 11.1%) (P = 0.001); a 95% CI (13.8% to 100%) relative reduction. European Hearth Rhythm Association class improved by 1.8 ± 1.3 classes (P < 0.001). Of those with AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence, the reduction in AF burden was -33.7% (Q1-Q3: -88.9% to -13.8%) (P < 0.001) and 20 (57.1%) patients reported symptomatic improvement by ≥1 European Hearth Rhythm Association class. AF burden reduction was associated with symptomatic improvement. (r = -0.67; P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence is common after CA in HCM patients, but this may under-represent the impact of CA in this cohort. CA significantly reduced AF burden and improved symptoms. A comprehensive evaluation of AF burden, symptoms, and hard endpoints is needed to determine the utility of CA in this context.

From Atrial Fibrillation Management to Atrial Myopathy Assessment: The Evolving Concept of Left Atrium Disease in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent genetically inherited cardiovascular disorder in adults and a significant cause of heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Historically, atrial fibrillation (AF) has been considered as a critical aspect in HCM patients as it is considered to be a marker of disease progression, escalates the frequency of heart failure hospitalisations, increases the risk of thromboembolic events, and worsens quality of life and outcome. Increasing evidence suggests that AF is the result of a subtle long-standing process that starts early in the history of HCM. The process of left atrial dilation accompanied by morphologic and functional remodelling is the quintessential prerequisite for the onset of AF. This review aims to describe the current understanding of AF pathophysiology in HCM, emphasising the role of left atrial myopathy in its development. In addition, we discuss risk factors and management strategies specific to AF in the context of HCM, providing insights into the complexities and challenges of treating this specific patient population.

Evolving Contemporary Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with clinical and subclinical episodes occurring in nearly one-half of patients. AF in HCM historically has been characterized as a decisive disease complication associated with substantial risk for thromboembolic stroke and increased morbidity and mortality. However, there have been many advances in treatment strategy resulting in improved outcomes for this patient group. For example, stroke risk in HCM has been greatly reduced by using systemic oral anticoagulation initiated after the first clinical (symptomatic) AF episode, usually with preference given to direct anticoagulants over warfarin. In contrast, stroke risk scoring systems (such as CHA2DS2-VASc score) are not informative in HCM given the substantial potential for stroke events in patients with low scores, and therefore should not be used for anticoagulation decisions in this disease. A novel risk score specifically designed for HCM (HCM-AF score) can reliably identify most patients with HCM at risk for future AF. Although a strategy focused on controlling ventricular rate is effective in asymptomatic (or minimally symptomatic) patients with AF, restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm is required for most patients with marked AF symptom burden and impaired quality of life. Several antiarrhythmic drugs such as sotalol, disopyramide, and amiodarone, can be effective in suppressing AF episodes; albeit safe, long-term efficacy is supported by only limited data. Catheter AF ablation has emerged as an important treatment option for some patients, although freedom from AF after a single ablation is relatively low (35% at 3 years), multiple ablations and the concomitant use of antiarrhythmic drugs can control AF with more than two-thirds of patients maintaining sinus rhythm at 5 years. Surgical AF ablation with biatrial Cox-Maze IV performed as an adjunctive procedure during myectomy can reduce symptomatic AF episodes (70% of patients free from AF at 5 years). For the vast majority of patients who have HCM with AF, the implementation of contemporary therapies has allowed for improved quality of life and low HCM-related mortality.

Efficacy of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective therapy for AF. We conducted a meta-analysis to update the current clinical evidence on the efficacy of CA for AF in patients with HCM. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Clinicaltrials.gov for interventional and observational studies assessing single and multiple procedure success rate of CA in HCM patients. Our meta-analysis included 25 studies involving 1817 patients. Success rate following single procedure was 40.4% (95% CI 33.1 to 48.0%) at latest follow-up. The pooled success rate following multiple procedures was 51.4% (95% CI 42.9% to 60.0%) at latest follow-up. In the subgroup analysis for AF subtype, TCA was more successful for paroxysmal AF compared to non-paroxysmal AF. For the subset of studies reporting drug-free success rate, single and multiple procedures had a success rate of 33.4% (95% CI 19.3 to 49.1%) and 51.8% (95% CI 41.3 to 62.2%) at latest follow-up, respectively. CA is a suitable option for AF in patients with HCM. Success rate is greater in paroxysmal AF, after multiple procedures and with antiarrhythmic drugs.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation: A Review

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an inherited cardiological condition that exhibits various clinical symptoms. The leading cause of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with HCM is advanced diastolic dysfunction and left atrial dilatation and remodeling. In addition to the gradual symptomatic and functional decline caused by AF, there is an increased risk of thromboembolic disease and mortality, especially if there is a rapid ventricular rate or obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract. The mainstay of management of AF in HCM is a combination of non-pharmacological lifestyle and risk factor modification, long-term anticoagulation, and rhythm control with anti-arrhythmic medications, septal ablation, and radiofrequency catheter ablation. This article has examined the development of AF in HCM, its clinical symptomatology, and its impact, highlighting its management and the mortality associated with AF in HCM.

Identifying Atrial Fibrillation Mechanisms for Personalized Medicine

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of heart failure and stroke. The early maintenance of sinus rhythm has been shown to reduce major cardiovascular endpoints, yet is difficult to achieve. For instance, it is unclear how discoveries at the genetic and cellular level can be used to tailor pharmacotherapy. For non-pharmacologic therapy, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone of rhythm control, yet has suboptimal success. Improving these therapies will likely require a multifaceted approach that personalizes therapy based on mechanisms measured in individuals across biological scales. We review AF mechanisms from cell-to-organ-to-patient from this perspective of personalized medicine, linking them to potential clinical indices and biomarkers, and discuss how these data could influence therapy. We conclude by describing approaches to improve ablation, including the emergence of several mapping systems that are in use today.

Patient-Reported Atrial Fibrillation Following Septal Myectomy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes are important metrics of medical and surgical care. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and risk factors of patient-reported postdischarge atrial fibrillation (AF) following septal myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing transaortic septal myectomy from August 2001 to January 2017 were contacted regarding postdischarge AF through questionnaire-based surveys sent at 3, 5, and 10 years post procedure. For each patient, the most recent survey response was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 949 patients, 248 (26.1%) last responded at 3 years post procedure, 353 (37.2%) at 5 years, and 348 (36.7%) at 10 years. The overall incidence of patient-reported postdischarge AF was 34.4% (n=326), and at 3, 5, and 10 years, the incidences were 22.2%, 34.8%, and 42.5% (P<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, history of preoperative AF (OR 5.566, P<0.001), early postoperative AF within the first 30 days (OR 2.211, P<0.001), preoperative left atrial volume index (OR 1.014, P=0.005), postoperative right ventricular systolic pressure (OR 1.021, P=0.013), postoperative moderate or greater mitral valve regurgitation (OR 1.893, P=0.022), and preoperative septal thickness (OR 1.043, P=0.036) were independently associated with patient-reported postdischarge AF.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of patient-reported postdischarge AF increases with increasing length of follow-up after septal myectomy. We identified several risk factors for late postdischarge AF that were associated with chronicity of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and earlier intervention may mitigate late atrial arrhythmias.

Transcatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Long-term results and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency transcatheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been proven feasible. However, the long-term results of RFCA and its impact on clinical course of HCM are unknown. The aim of this study was to analyse clinical outcomes and long-term efficacy of RFCA in a multicentre cohort of patients with HCM and concomitant AF.

METHODS

Patients with HCM and AF consecutively undergoing RFCA were included. Ablation failure was defined as recurrence of AF, atrial tachycardia, or flutter lasting more than 3 min and occurring after the blanking period.

RESULTS

Overall, 116 patients with symptomatic AF refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs were included. Over a median follow-up of 6.0 years (interquartile range: 3.0-8.9 years) recurrence rate after a single RFCA was 32.3 per 100 patient/years with 26% of patients free from AF relapses at 6-year follow-up. Among patients experiencing AF recurrence, 51 (66%) underwent at least one redo-procedure. The overall recurrence rate considering redo-procedures was 12.6 per 100 patients/years with 53% of patients free from AF relapses at 6 years. At last follow-up, with an average of 1.6 procedures, 67 (61%) patients were in sinus rhythm (SR). Patients remaining in SR showed better functional status compared with those experiencing arrhythmic recurrences (NYHA Class 1.6 ± 0.1 vs. 2.0 ± 0.1, p = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

RFCA of AF in HCM patients is an effective and safe strategy favoring long-term SR maintenance, reduction of atrial arrhythmic events, and improved functional status. However, most patients need repeat procedures and continuation of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Atrial fibrillation in patients with inherited cardiomyopathies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) often complicates the course of inherited cardiomyopathies and, in some cases, may be the presenting feature. Each inherited cardiomyopathy has its own peculiar pathogenetic characteristics that can contribute to the development and maintenance of AF. Atrial fibrillation may occur as a consequence of disease-specific defects, non-specific cardiac chamber changes secondary to the primary illness, or a combination thereof. The presence of AF can denote a turning point in the progression of the disease, promoting clinical deterioration and increasing morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the management of AF can be particularly challenging in patients with inherited cardiomyopathies. In this article, we review the current information on the prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatment of AF in three different inherited cardiomyopathies: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy, familial dilated cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy.

Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Evidence-based Review About Mechanism, Complications and Management

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is 1 of the most frequent genetic cardiovascular diseases affecting 1 out of every 500 individuals in general population. Atrial Fibrillation incidences were 3.8% per 100 patients per year and overall prevalence among HCM patients are 27.09%. Higher risk of death noted in HCM patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke and other thrombo embolic risks are increased in such patients. Medical management using mainly betablockers or amiodarone produced variable results and high rate of recurrence. Catheter ablation reduced symptom burden and complications despite moderate recurrence. Patients with multiple repeated procedures found to have better success rate and outcomes. The complications are not high leading to increased feasibility of the procedure. More research using latest techniques in catheter ablation need to be studied.

Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis and Considerations for Management

Atrial fibrillation is common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with a prevalence of 22-32 %. The impact of atrial fibrillation on overall survival, left ventricular function, thromboembolic stroke and quality of life is crucial. This review enlightens incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical symptoms. Early recognition of atrial fibrillation is essential. Monitoring methods for early detection are described. Finally effective therapy options are discussed including oral anticoagulation and the role of interventional catheter-based ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation in HCM patients.

Clinical Profile and Consequences of Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background:

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), is capable of producing symptoms that impact quality of life and is associated with risk for embolic stroke. However, the influence of AF on clinical course and outcome in HCM remains incompletely resolved.

Methods:

Records of 1558 consecutive patients followed at the Tufts Medical Center Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Institute for 4.8±3.4 years (from 2004 to 2014) were accessed.

Results:

Of the 1558 patients with HCM, 304 (20%) had episodes of AF, of which 226 (74%) were confined to symptomatic paroxysmal AF (average, 5±5; range, 1 to >20), whereas 78 (26%) developed permanent AF, preceded by 7±6 paroxysmal AF episodes. At last evaluation, 277 patients (91%) are alive at 62±13 years of age, including 89% in New York Heart Association class I or II. No difference was found in outcome measures for patients with AF and age- and sex-matched patients with HCM without AF. Four percent of patients with AF died of HCM-related causes (n=11), with annual mortality 0.7%; mortality directly attributable to AF (thromboembolism without prophylactic anticoagulation) was 0.1% per year (n=2 patients). Patients were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (most commonly amiodarone [n=103] or sotalol [n=78]) and AF catheter ablation (n=49) or the Maze procedure at surgical myectomy (n=72). Freedom from AF recurrence at 1 year was 44% for ablation patients and 75% with the Maze procedure ( P <0.001). Embolic events were less common with anticoagulation prophylaxis (4/233, 2%) than without (9/66, 14%) ( P <0.001).

Conclusions:

Transient symptomatic episodes of AF, often responsible for impaired quality of life, are unpredictable in frequency and timing, but amenable to effective contemporary treatments, and infrequently progress to permanent AF. AF is not a major contributor to heart failure morbidity or a cause of arrhythmic sudden death; when treated, it is associated with low disease-related mortality, no different than for patients without AF. AF is an uncommon primary cause of death in HCM virtually limited to embolic stroke, supporting a low threshold for initiating anticoagulation therapy.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation is effective for atrial fibrillation patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by decreasing left atrial pressure

Background

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to medical therapy remains controversial in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM); the acute effects on the direct left atrial (LA) pressure are not completely understood.

Methods

We consecutively studied patients with HCM (n=15) and without HCM (NHCM, n=106) who underwent extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation for drug-refractory AF. We compared clinical parameters, echocardiographic parameters, electrophysiological parameters, LA pressures using hemodynamic catheterization and recurrence rate in both groups.

Results

The LA volume index was significantly higher (51.9±13.6 mL/m² vs. 41.6±12.7 mL/m², p=0.02) in the HCM group than the NHCM group. The pre-ablation mean LA pressure was significantly higher in the HCM group than the NHCM group. Among the AF patients, the mean LA pressure decreased more significantly in the HCM group than the NHCM group (post-ablation minus pre-ablation pressures: 4.2±3.7 mmHg vs. 0.9±4.1 mmHg, p=0.03). The early recurrence rate (within 30 days after ablation) tended to be higher in the HCM group than the NHCM group (20% vs. 5.7%, p=0.08), but the rates of late recurrences (>30 days after ablation) were similar (13.3% vs. 7.6%, p=0.83). Discontinuation of antiarrhythmic drugs occurred at rates of 13% and 62% in the HCM and NHCM groups, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusions

The LA pressure in the HCM group decreased immediately after AF RFCA. Patients with HCM and drug-refractory AF may benefit from RFCA.

Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) represents a common inherited cardiac disorder with well-known complications Including stroke and sudden cardiac death. There is a recognised association between HCM and the development of AF. This review describes the epidemiology of AF within the HCM population and analyses the risk factors for the development of AF. It further discusses the outcomes associated with AF in this population, including the evidence in support of higher stroke risk in patients with HCM with AF compared with the general AF population. Finally, the evidence and recommendations for anticoagulation in this patient group are addressed.

Outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with and without atrial fibrillation: a survival meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent occurrence in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). It is associated with worsening symptoms, cardiovascular events, and mortality. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies reporting on mortality in patient with HCM and AF.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane for studies which reported cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with HCM and AF. Outcome was a composite of cardiac mortality and/or all-cause mortality. Mantel Haenszel odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis for the prespecified outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 6,858 patients; 1,314 (19%) had history of AF. During a mean follow up that ranged between 4 and 8 years, 405 (30.8%) patients with AF died as compared to 1,011 (18.2%) patients without AF (OR =2.49, 95% CI: 1.85-3.35, P<0.00001, I²=57%). Results persisted with inclusion of studies only reporting specifically on cardiac mortality (OR =2.80, 95% CI: 1.79-4.39, P<0.00001, I²=56%). Also, the mortality difference persisted after exclusion of deaths secondary to stroke in both groups (2 studies, 1,398 patients, OR =2.57, 95% CI: 1.57-4.20, P=0.0002, I²=31%). In three studies (5,857 patients); the presence of AF was associated with a pooled HR of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.29-2.13, P<0.0001, I²=41%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with HCM who develop AF have higher risk of mortality and cardiac deaths as compared to HCM patients without AF.

Who Needs Catheter Ablation And Which Approach?

Catheter ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has gained a significant role during maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to anti-arrhythmic medication. Catheter ablation techniques are also improved and progressed over years in parallel to better understanding of disease mechanisms and technological advancements. However, due to invasive nature of the therapy with its pertinent procedural risks, both appropriate patient selection and use of relevant approach should be considered by all electrophysiologists before decide to perform catheter ablation.

Impact of Cryoballoon Ablation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy-related Heart Failure due to Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. A Comparative Case Series

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a turning point in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) with Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (RFCA) is accepted to be successful in restoring sinus rhythm (SR) in HCM patients. The efficacy of cryoballoon (CB) therapy in HCM patients has not been studied so far.

METHODS

166 patients with AF underwent PVI with CB technology in our single center between 1/2012 and 12/2015. To evaluate the efficacy of the CB therapy in HCM patients, we compared their clinical outcome with those in "Non-HCM" AF patients in a 3 and 6 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Out of 166 AF patients (65.7% paroxysmal AF, PAF), 4 patients had HCM and PAF (young males < 50 years). During the blanking period, 26 patients (15.8%) suffered from AF recurrence (11.0% PAF), including all HCM patients. The 6 months follow up of "Non-HCM" AF patients showed acceptable results (80% stable SR), whereas the HCM patients remained AF.

IN CONCLUSION

Even if the CB provides advantages, the single device cannot be recommended in HCM patients because of early AF recurrences. Anyway, because of the specific hemodynamic changes in HCM patients with AF, ablation should be sought in an early state of its occurrence, then, however, preferably with RFCA.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Differentiation based off catheter ablation modalities was not considered due to the limited scope of the current field. Studies that employed alcohol septal ablation for the treatment of AF in HCM patients were excluded as were abstracts, case reports, conference presentations, editorials, reviews, and expert opinions

METHODS

Electronic searches were performed in six databases from their inception until January 2014. Relevant studies regarding catheter ablation for AF in HCM populations were identified. Data was extracted and analyzed according to pre-defined clinical endpoints

RESULTS

A review was undertaken of eight studies in which 241 HCM patients underwent catheter ablation for AF. Overall AF-free survival at last follow-up ranged from 47 to 77% (64-67%). Sinus rhythm was maintained at last follow-up in 47-82% (median 64-67%). AF recurrence ranged from 0 to 66% (median 35-40%).

CONCLUSION

A review of the current evidence suggests that catheter ablation of AF in HCM patients is effective with suitable efficacy and is justified in select patients. Future adequately powered randomized studies should be undertaken aimed at addressing long-term efficacy and complications associated with procedural outcomes.

QTc Interval Prolongation Predicts Arrhythmia Recurrence After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients complicated with atrial fibrillation (AF), catheter ablation has been recommended as a treatment option. Meanwhile, prolongation of QTc interval has been linked to an increased AF incidence in the general population and to poor outcomes in HCM patients. However, whether QTc prolongation predicts arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation in the HCM population remains unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-nine HCM patients undergoing primary AF ablation were enrolled. The ablation strategy included bilateral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal AF (n=27) and PVI plus left atrial roof, mitral isthmus and tricuspid isthmus linear ablations for persistent AF (n=12). Pre-procedural QTc was corrected by using the Bazett's formula. At a 14.8-month follow up, 23 patients experienced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Recurrent patients had longer QTc than non-recurrent patients (461.0±28.8 ms vs. 434.3±18.2 ms, P=0.002). QTc and left atrial diameter (LAD) were independent predictors of recurrence. The cut-off value of QTc 448 ms predicted arrhythmia recurrence with a sensitivity of 73.9% and a specificity of 81.2%. A combination of LAD and QTc (global chi-squared=13.209) was better than LAD alone (global chi-squared=6.888) or QTc alone (global chi-squared=8.977) in predicting arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation in HCM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

QTc prolongation is an independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence in HCM patients undergoing AF ablation, and might be useful for identifying those patients likely to have a better outcome following the procedure.

Impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction on outcome of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The relationship between outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and the severity of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two HCM patients (12 female, aged 65 ± 11 years) with paroxysmal (n=5; 23%) or persistent (n=17; 77%) AF were enrolled. LV diastolic function was evaluated according to the ratio of the mitral inflow early filling velocity to the velocity of the early medial mitral annular ascent (E/e') measured on pulsed wave and tissue Doppler assessments in all patients. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in all patients. A second procedure was performed in 3 patients. During a follow-up of 21 ± 12 months, sinus rhythm was maintained in 13 of 22 patients (59%). E/e' was significantly higher in the patients with AF recurrence than in those without (18 ± 7 vs. 11 ± 3; P<0.01). On Kaplan-Meier analysis the prevalence of AF recurrence was significantly higher in patients with E/e' ≥ 15 (n=6) than in those with E/e' <15 (n=16; P<0.01). On multivariate Cox regression analysis the only significant and independent predictor for AF recurrence was E/e' (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.37, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

LV diastolic dysfunction evaluated using E/e' was associated with difficulty of rhythm control after RFCA in patients with HCM and AF.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: present and future, with translation into contemporary cardiovascular medicine

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited heart disease with diverse phenotypic and genetic expression, clinical presentation, and natural history. HCM has been recognized for 55 years, but recently substantial advances in diagnosis and treatment options have evolved, as well as increased recognition of the disease in clinical practice. Nevertheless, most genetically and clinically affected individuals probably remain undiagnosed, largely free from disease-related complications, although HCM may progress along 1 or more of its major disease pathways (i.e., arrhythmic sudden death risk; progressive heart failure [HF] due to dynamic left ventricular [LV] outflow obstruction or due to systolic dysfunction in the absence of obstruction; or atrial fibrillation with risk of stroke). Effective treatments are available for each adverse HCM complication, including implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for sudden death prevention, heart transplantation for end-stage failure, surgical myectomy (or selectively, alcohol septal ablation) to alleviate HF symptoms by abolishing outflow obstruction, and catheter-based procedures to control atrial fibrillation. These and other strategies have now resulted in a low disease-related mortality rate of <1%/year. Therefore, HCM has emerged from an era of misunderstanding, stigma, and pessimism, experiencing vast changes in its clinical profile, and acquiring an effective and diverse management armamentarium. These advances have changed its natural history, with prevention of sudden death and reversal of HF, thereby restoring quality of life with extended (if not normal) longevity for most patients, and transforming HCM into a contemporary treatable cardiovascular disease.