Impact of acute hepatitis B virus superinfection on chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Vaccination in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Neglected Topic

Patients with liver cirrhosis, due to their weakened innate and adaptive immunity, are more prone to frequent and severe vaccine-preventable infections. Moreover, impaired adaptive immunity results in a limited antibody response to vaccines. Despite this suboptimal antibody response, vaccines have proven to be very effective in reducing severe outcomes and deaths in these patients. In the Western world, regulatory authorities and scientific liver societies (e.g., AASLD and EASL) have recommended vaccinations for cirrhotic patients. However, despite these strong recommendations, vaccine coverage remains suboptimal. Improving vaccine effectiveness and safety information, providing comprehensive counseling to patients, fact-checking to combat fake news and disinformation and removing barriers to vaccination for disadvantaged individuals may help overcome the low coverage rate. In view of this, vaccines should be administered early in the course of chronic liver diseases, as their efficacy declines with the increasing severity of the disease.

Three double-dose reinforced hepatitis B revaccination scheme for patients with cirrhosis unresponsive to the standard regimen: an open-label randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the response rates between two different hepatitis B virus vaccination schedules for cirrhotic subjects who were non-responders to the first three 40 µg doses (month 0-1-2), and identify factors associated with the final response.

DESIGN

A total of 120 cirrhotic patients (72.5% decompensated) were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 40 µg booster vaccination at month 6 (classical arm) versus an additional round of three new 40 µg doses administered at monthly intervals (experimental arm). The main outcome was the rate of postvaccinal anti-hepatitis B surface antibodies levels ≥10 mIU/mL.

RESULTS

Efficacy by ITT analysis was higher in the experimental arm (46.7%) than in the classical one (25%); OR 2.63, p=0.013. The experimental arm increased response rates compared with the classical one from 31% to 68% (OR 4.72; p=0.007), from 24.4% to 50% (OR 3.09; p=0.012) and from 24.4% to 53.8% (OR 3.62; p=0.007), in Child A, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) <15 and MELD-Na<15 patients, respectively. Patients with more advanced liver disease did not benefit from the reinforced scheme. Both regimens showed similar safety profiles. Multivariable analysis showed that the experimental treatment was independently response associated when adjusted across three logistic regression models indicating equivalent cirrhosis severity.

CONCLUSION

For cirrhotic patients, the revaccination of non-responders to the first three dose cycle, with three additional 40 µg doses, achieved significantly better response rates to those obtained with an isolated 40 µg booster dose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01884415.

Vaccination in liver diseases and liver Transplantation: Recommendations, implications and opportunities in the post-covid era

The interest in vaccination efficacy and toxicity has surged following the Covid-19 pandemic. Immune responses to several vaccines have been shown to be suboptimal in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) or post-liver transplant (LT), as a consequence of cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction (CAID) or post-LT immunosuppression respectively. Accordingly, vaccine-preventable infections may be more common or severe than in the general population. The Covid-19 pandemic has greatly accelerated research and development into vaccination technology and platforms, which will have spillover benefits for liver patients. The aims of this review are: (i) to discuss the impact of vaccine-preventable infections on CLD and post-LT patients, (ii) to appraise current evidence supporting vaccination strategies, and (iii) to provide some insight into recent developments relevant for liver patients.

Impaired long-term anti-HBs responses in choronic hepatitis C patients: Results from a five-year follow-up study with healthy control

Although hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is recommended for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected individuals to avoid HBV superinfection, the persistence of their humoral and cell-mediated immunity responses to HBV vaccination is still under investigation. Patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and matched healthy controls, who completed three doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) in 2014, were followed up five years later. One booster dose of HepB was given to those with antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) lower than 10mIU/mL. Anti-HBs was tested at follow-up and on the 14th day after the booster dose, as well as HBsAg specific spot-forming cells of interferon γ and interleukin (IL) 2, 4, 5, and 6. At five years, only 56.58% of the CHC patients had sero-protective titers (≥10mIU/mL) of anti-HBs, compared to 70.83% in the controls (P < .05). Similarly, the geometric mean concentration (GMC) of anti-HBs in CHC patients was significantly lower than that in controls (16.95 vs 37.34 mIU/mL, P < .05). After the booster, both GMC and the rate of anamnestic response increased to a very high level in the two groups and the difference between them disappeared (P > .05). Multivariable analysis showed that HCV infection was an independent predictor factor to anti-HBs level at follow-up. HBsAg specific IL-6 was stronger in the CHC patients compared to the controls (P < .05). The data indicate that the durability of protective anti-HBs is poorer in CHC patients compared to healthy individuals, and impaired long-term anti-HBs responses might be associated with the increased HBsAg specific IL-6 responses.

Hepatitis C Virus Reactivation in Anti-HCV Antibody-Positive Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Following Anti-HBV Therapies

Background and Aims: Whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation occurs and how the viral load evolves in anti-HCV antibody-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who underwent nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapies remain unsolved. Methods: A cohort of 66 such patients was studied. Results: At the start of Nuc treatment (baseline), all patients had detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels (6.05 ± 1.88 log IU/mL), while HCV RNA levels (3.79 ± 1.43 log IU/mL) were detected (i.e., chronic hepatitis C (CHC)) in only 13 patients (19.7%). Following Nuc therapies, HBV DNA levels reached the nadirs at end of therapy (EOT) (6.05 ± 1.88 vs. 0.25 ± 0.99 log IU/mL, p < 0.0001) and relapsed at 6 months after EOT (6mEOT) at a level of 3.45 ± 2.64 log IU/mL compared with EOT (p < 0.0001). Among the 13 CHC patients, a non-significant decrease in HCV RNA was noted at EOT (3.52 ± 1.71 vs. 2.77 ± 2.63 log IU/mL, p = 0.166) but tended to decrease further at 6mEOT (2.77 ± 2.63 vs. 1.89 ± 2.06 log IU/mL, p = 0.063). Two of the thirteen CHC patients showed an increase in HCV-RNA ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL at EOT, and one of the fifty-three patients with undetectable HCV RNA at baseline (i.e., resolved past HCV infection) showed detectable HCV RNA at year 1 (3200 IU/mL) and year 2 (1240 IU/mL) following entecavir therapy. Conclusions: HCV reactivation did occur during HBV suppression, and the rate was 4.5% (3/66), 15.4% (2/13), and 1.9% (1/53), for all patients, CHC patients, and patients with resolved past HCV infection, respectively. The reverse HBV and HCV viral evolutions at 6mEOT indicate that HBV relapse may suppress HCV replication again.

Vaccination in Chronic Liver Disease: An Update

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) with or without cirrhosis remain at risk of developing hepatic decompensation when infected with viral or bacterial pathogens. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) currently recommends vaccination in CLD against hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza, pneumococcus, herpes zoster, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, and SARS-CoV-2. Inactivated vaccines are preferred over live attenuated ones, especially in transplant recipients where live vaccines are contraindicated. As the severity of the liver disease progresses, vaccine efficacy declines, and therefore, vaccines should be ideally administered early in the disease course for optimal immune response. Despite the strong recommendations, overall vaccination coverage in CLD remains poor; however, it is encouraging to note that in recent years coverage against influenza and pneumococcus has shown some improvement. Inadequate access to healthcare, lack of information on vaccine safety, poor financial reimbursement for healthcare providers, and vaccine misinformation are often responsible for low immunization rates. This review summarizes the impact of vaccine-preventable illness in those with CLD, updated vaccine guidelines, seroconversion rates in the vaccinated, and barriers faced by healthcare professionals in immunizing those with liver disease.

HIV/HBV coinfection: temporal trends and patient characteristics, Spain, 2002 to 2018

Background

Recent and reliable estimates on the prevalence of coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) in Europe are lacking.

Aim

Leveraged on a study designed to assess HIV/HCV coinfection prevalence, we assessed the prevalence of HIV/HBV coinfection in Spain in 2018 and compared the results with five similar studies performed since 2002.

Methods

This cross-sectional prevalence study was carried out in 43 centres, and patients were selected using simple random sampling. The reference population comprised 40,322 patients and the sample size were 1,690 patients.

Results

The prevalence of HIV/HBV coinfection in Spain at the end of 2018 was 3.2%. The prevalence in 2002, 2009, 2015, 2016 and 2017 was 4.9%, 3.4%, 3%, 3.9% and 3%, respectively. Among the HIV/HBV-coinfected patients identified in 2018, 16.7% had cirrhosis according to transient elastography and 26.3% tested positive for antibodies against hepatitis D virus. All HIV/HBV-coinfected patients were receiving drugs with activity against HBV, and 97% of those tested for HBV DNA had an HBV DNA load < 80 IU/mL.

Conclusions

The prevalence of HIV/HBV coinfection in Spain remained stable at around 3% for a decade. Our data could facilitate the design of national programmes to control HBV infection and help identify areas of patient management that need improvement.

Quality of Care in Patients With Cirrhosis: Trends in Recommended Adult Vaccination Coverage

Objective

To assess the proportion of patients with cirrhosis up to date with vaccinations and associations of vaccination with age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, and type of provider follow-up.

Patients and Methods

Patients with cirrhosis diagnosed at Mayo Clinic in Rochester and Mayo Clinic Health System in Minnesota from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009, were followed up from diagnosis until May 31, 2015. Data were abstracted from Mayo Clinic and Minnesota State records. Factors determining vaccination coverage were assessed.

Results

At the end of the study period (8 years follow-up), 26.4% (95 of 360), 24.7% (82 of 332), 63.2% (180 of 285), and 25.5% (54 of 212) of patients with cirrhosis were up to date with hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus, pneumococcal pneumonia (PN), and herpes zoster vaccinations, respectively. Influenza (FLU) vaccine coverage increased from 36.1% (57 of 158) in 2007 to 2008 to 65.8% (106 of 161) in 2014 to 2015. Of those unvaccinated for HAV and hepatitis B virus before cirrhosis diagnosis, 18.6% (59 of 318) and 23.4% (71 of 304) completed vaccination. For HAV, more whites than nonwhites (28.3% [91 of 322] vs 10.5% [4 of 38]; odds ratio [OR], 3.35; 95% CI, 1.29 to 11.45; P=.02) and more non-Hispanics than Hispanics (27.4% [95 of 347] vs 0% [0 of 13]; OR, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.43; P=.03) were vaccinated. For PN, more younger than elderly people (66.8% [135 of 202] vs 54.2% [45 of 83]; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.87; P=.04) and married vs single people (56.8% [100 of 176] vs 73.4% [80 of 109]; OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.26 to 3.56; P=.005) were vaccinated. For FLU, in 2013 to 2014, more elderly (72.0% [54 of 75] vs 58.0% [69 of 119]; OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.99; P=.05); in 2008 to 2009, more Hispanics (100% [4 of 4] vs 41.6% [116 of 279]; OR, ∞; 95% CI, 2.25 to ∞; P=.02); and in 2011 to 2012, more married people (62.4% [101 of 162] vs 50.5% [56 of 111]; OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.1.0 to 2.66; P=.05) were vaccinated. For FLU in 2008 to 2009, coverage was higher in the primary care than the specialist setting (55.8% [48 of 86] vs 36.6% [72 of 197]; P=.003).

Conclusion

Except for PN and FLU, vaccination coverage in patients with cirrhosis falls short of Healthy People 2020 target. Specific interventions are needed to improve vaccination coverage in patients with cirrhosis.

Management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C coinfection: an expert review

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections share common routes of transmission. HBV/HCV coinfection can lead to interactions affecting mechanisms of infection and therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In the review, we present epidemiology of HBV/HCV coinfection and current therapeutic options for both viruses. The possibility of drug-drug interactions during the treatment of coinfected patients is discussed. However, the major part of the review is dedicated to interactions between viruses and risk of HBV reactivation during HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAA). Finally, we analyze available international and national guidelines for the management of HBV reactivations related to DAA administration.

EXPERT OPINION

The most important international societies' guidelines include comments on HBV/HCV coinfection, but due to their inconsistency we present a proposal of management for HBV/HCV coinfected patients focusing mostly on HBV reactivation in patients treated for HCV. We provide some advice that should be considered in future guidelines for the management of HBV/HCV coinfection.

Vaccination in adult liver transplantation candidates and recipients

In patients with chronic liver disease and liver transplant recipients, cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction syndrome and immunosuppressant drug regimens required to prevent graft rejection lead to a high risk of severe infections, associated with acute liver decompensation, graft loss and increased mortality. In addition to maintain their global health status, vaccination represents a major preventive measure against specific infectious risks of particular concern in this population, such as invasive pneumococcal diseases, influenza or viral hepatitis A and B. However, immunization in this setting raises several issues: i) recommended vaccination schedules rely on sparse immunogenicity data without clinical efficacy and effectiveness trials designed for this specific population; ii) dynamics of immunosuppression makes timing of immunization challenging; iii) live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated after transplantation; and iv) vaccines tolerance is poorly known in cirrhotic patients. This review outlines the rational for vaccination in adult liver transplant candidates and recipients and available data regarding immunization in this specific population.

Hepatitis B Vaccination in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis Evaluated for Liver Transplantation - A Simple Intervention Ensures High Adherence

BACKGROUND There is an unmet need to improve the HBV vaccination status in patients with chronic liver diseases. Primary care physicians and outpatient hepatologists often fail to vaccinate as recommended. Thus, new strategies to improve the HBV vaccination rate are required. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was performed in a cohort of patients with chronic liver diseases evaluated for liver transplantation. Vaccination status was taken from the patients' vaccination cards. HBsAg-, anti-HBc-, and anti-HBs-negative individuals were vaccinated against HBV at hospital discharge, and subsequent outpatient completion of the standard vaccination protocol was recommended in detail in the discharge letter. At months 2 and 8, titer controls were performed, and completion of vaccination was evaluated. RESULTS We prospectively recruited 37 patients. At baseline, the vaccination rate against HBV was 24% (N=9/37), and 3/9 HBV vaccinated patients presented with an anti-HBs-titer >10 IU/L. Thus, N=34 were vaccinated with Engerix® or Twinrix®. We evaluated 26/34 patients at month 2 and 10/26 again at month 8. The second vaccine dose was obtained by 21/26 (80%) of the patients seen at month 2, and 9/10 (90%) seen at month 8 obtained the third vaccine dose by primary care physicians or ambulant hepatologists. Only 2 patients presented with an anti-HBs-titer >10 IU/L at month 8. CONCLUSIONS Initiation of HBV vaccination during hospitalization and detailed recommendations on subsequent vaccinations in the discharge letter improve previously inadequate vaccination rates in the outpatient setting. Similar measures should be implemented at earlier time points of chronic liver diseases to achieve higher immune response rates.

Hepatitis B and C coinfection in a real-life setting: viral interactions and treatment issues

BACKGROUND

Only limited data concerning hepatitis B (HBV) and C viruses (HCV) coinfection are available. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) may be more effective for HCV clearance than interferon (IFN)-based regimens with a risk of HBV reactivation.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 40 HBV/HCV-coinfected patients to evaluate their clinical profile and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Chronic dual infection was present in 25/40 (62.5%) patients, acute HCV superinfection in 5/40 (12.5%) patients and acute HBV superinfection in 10/40 (25%). Twenty-five patients (62.5%) were treated: 16/25 (64%) with IFN, 4/25 (16%) with nucleot(s)ide analogs (NUCs) and 5/25 (20%) with DAAs. Of the 16 patients treated with IFN-based therapy, 6 (37.5%) achieved both sustained virological response (SVR) and HBsAg clearance. Of the 4 patients treated with NUCs, one (25%) achieved both SVR and HBsAg clearance. All five patients treated with DAAs (100%) achieved SVR, while one case of HBV reactivation was recorded. Fifteen of the 40 patients (37.5%) did not receive any treatment. Eight of them (53.5%) presented with acute HBV superinfection: spontaneous HCV clearance was recorded in 5/8 (62.5%), while HBsAg clearance occurred in 6/8 (75%). Three of them (20%) presented with acute HCV superinfection; spontaneous HCV clearance was recorded in one of the three (33.5%). The other four patients (26.5%) presented with dual HBV/HCV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of patients presented with active HBV replication. Treatment with DAAs seems to be efficacious for HCV eradication. However, clinicians should be aware of HBV reactivation. HBV superinfection may lead to both HBsAg and HCV clearance.

Reactivation of hepatitis B after liver transplantation: Current knowledge, molecular mechanisms and implications in management

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major global health problem affecting an estimated 350 million people with more than 786000 individuals dying annually due to complications, such as cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver transplantation (LT) is considered gold standard for treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver failure and HCC. However, post-transplant viral reactivation can be detrimental to allograft function, leading to poor survival. Prophylaxis with high-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and anti-viral drugs have achieved remarkable progress in LT by suppressing viral replication and improving long-term survival. The combination of lamivudine (LAM) plus HBIG has been for many years the most widely used. However, life-long HBIG use is both cumbersome and costly, whereas long-term use of LAM results in resistant virus. Recently, in an effort to develop HBIG-free protocols, high potency nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as Entecavir or Tenofovir, have been tried either as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose HBIG with excellent results. Current focus is on novel antiviral targets, especially for covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), in an effort to eradicate HBV infection instead of viral suppression. However, there are several other molecular mechanisms through which HBV may reactivate and need equal attention. The purpose of this review is to address post-LT HBV reactivation, its risk factors, underlying molecular mechanisms, and recent advancements and future of anti-viral therapy.

Hepatitis B reactivation during or after direct acting antiviral therapy - implication for susceptible individuals

INTRODUCTION

The FDA issued a warning following 24 cases of HBV reactivation during DAA therapy for HCV, including individuals with inactive, occult and past HBV infection. Clinical presentations ranged from asymptomatic fluctuations in HBV DNA to fulminant hepatic failure, liver transplantation and death. The mechanism is unknown. Areas covered: HCV/HBV coinfection is common, particularly in regions endemic for HBV. HCV and HBV utilize host factors to support replication; both viruses evade/impair host immunity. Clinical presentations of HBV reactivation during DAAs are summarized. Other causes of HBV reactivation are revisited and recent data regarding HBV reactivation are presented. Expert opinion: HBV reactivation during DAAs for HCV occurs, with life-threatening consequences in some individuals. The risk of HBV reactivation is observed in all HBV stages. The rapid removal of HCV likely alters and liberates host-viral ± viral-viral interactions that lead to increased HBV replication. As immune reconstitution occurs with HCV removal, host recognition of HBV DNA likely ensues followed by vigorous host immune responses leading to liver injury (HBV flare). These cases highlight the importance of HBV testing prior to initiating DAA therapy, the need for close monitoring of HBV during therapy and timely administration of anti-HBV therapy to prevent serious sequelae.

Role of primary T-cell immunodeficiency and hepatitis B coinfection on spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C: The BC Hepatitis Testers Cohort

T-cell host immune response against hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been suggested to play an important role in determining HCV infection outcome. However, data from human studies are not available. This study examined the effect of primary T-cell deficiency along with other factors on the spontaneous clearance of HCV in a large population-based cohort in British Columbia, Canada. The BC Hepatitis Testers Cohort includes all individuals tested for HCV in BC in 1990-2013 linked with data on their medical visits, hospitalizations and prescription drugs. HCV-positive individuals with at least one valid HCV PCR test on/after HCV diagnosis (n=46 783) were included in this study. To examine factors associated with the spontaneous clearance of HCV, multivariable logistic regression was fitted on the full sample, and Cox proportional hazards model on the HCV seroconverters. Spontaneous clearance was observed in 25.1% (n=11 737) of those tested for HCV. After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds of spontaneous clearance of HCV was lower in people with primary T-cell immunodeficiency (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.94), and higher in females (aOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.54-1.68) and in those coinfected with HBV (aOR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.93-2.77). Similar results were observed in HCV seroconverters except HBV coinfection was not significant. In conclusion, primary T-cell immunodeficiency is associated with a lower spontaneous clearance of HCV while female sex and coinfection with HBV are associated with a higher spontaneous clearance.

Vaccination against hepatitis A and B in patients with chronic liver disease and type 2 diabetes: has anything changed?

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Given the severity of acute hepatitis in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD) and patients with type 2 diabetes (DM), most of these patients are recommended to be vaccinated. The aim is to assess the recent changes in HAV and HBV vaccination rates in patients with CLD and DM in the U.S. using the most recent population data.

METHODS

We used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) cycles 2009-2012 and 2013-2014, and compared those to previous cycles (1999-2004 and 2005-2008).

RESULTS

In general U.S. population, the rates of quality measure (QM, serologic immunity or history of vaccination) for HBV increased from 31.9% in 1999-2004 to 49.5% in 2013-2014 (P < 0.0001), synchronously with an increase in self-reported HBV vaccination: from 24.4% to 41.3% (P < 0.0001). A similar increase was noted for HAV: 12.0% in 1999-2004 to 33.4% in 2013-2014 in vaccination, 44.0% to 52.4% in HAV QM (all P < 0.0001). Greater recent increases in HBV QM were noted in non-HBV CLD patients: 34.7% to 56.8% in HBV QM and 22.7% to 51.1% in HBV vaccination (all P < 0.0001), while the changes in patients with diabetes were similar to those in general U.S. population despite the recent CDC recommendation (for the age 19-59): 31.0% to 45.1% (P = 0.007) in HBV QM, and 22.3% to 39.0% (P = 0.0004) in HBV vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recommendations, HAV and HBV vaccination rates in patients with CLD and DM remain relatively low. Better vaccination strategies for these high risk patients should be undertaken.

Vaccinating Adult Patients with Cirrhosis: Trends over a Decade in the United States

Introduction. The progression of chronic liver disease to cirrhosis involves both innate and adaptive immune system dysfunction resulting in increased risk of infectious complications. Vaccinations against pneumococcus, hepatitis A virus (HAV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are well tolerated and effective in disease prevention and reduction in morbidity and mortality. Prior studies assessing vaccination rates in patients with cirrhosis have specific limitations and to date no study has provided a comprehensive evaluation of vaccination rates in patients with cirrhosis in the United States. Aim. This study assessed vaccination rates for pneumococcus, HAV, and HBV in patients with cirrhosis. Results. Overall 59.7% of patients with cirrhosis received at least 1 vaccination during the study period. Vaccination rates within the same or following year of cirrhosis diagnosis were 19.9%, 7.7%, and 11.0% against pneumococcus, HAV, and HBV, respectively. Trend analysis revealed significant increases in vaccination rates for pneumococcus in all patients with cirrhosis and within subgroups based on age, gender, and presence of concomitant diabetes. Conclusion. The study demonstrated that vaccination rates in patients with cirrhosis remain suboptimal. Ultimately, the use of electronic medical record (EMR) reminders improved communication between healthcare professionals and public health programs to increase awareness are fundamental to reducing morbidity, mortality, and health-care related costs of vaccine preventable diseases in patients with cirrhosis.

Distinct features in natural history and outcomes of acute hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Acute hepatitis C (AHCV) provides a diagnostic challenge with diverse clinical presentations.

GOALS

This study was aimed to examine the clinical and demographic features as well as outcomes in AHCV patients identified from inpatient and outpatient hospital settings.

STUDY

Patients with suspected AHCV were recruited from Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania and Brooklyn VA Medical Center between 2000 and 2010. AHCV was diagnosed by acute serum alanine aminotransferase elevation with anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) seroconversion, HCV-RNA fluctuations above 1 log, and/or recent high-risk exposure without prior HCV infection, excluding those with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clinical and therapeutic outcomes were monitored for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 40 AHCV patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 129 weeks. They were mostly men (68%) and whites (73%) with median age of 43 years, diverse risk factors (33% injection drugs, 20% health care-associated, 3% sexual, and 45% unknown), and wide variations in peak alanine aminotransferase (143 to 3435 U/L) and total bilirubin levels (0.4 to 19.3 mg/dL). Viremia resolved spontaneously in 23% and persisted without therapy in 27%, whereas 50% received interferon α-based therapy with 90% cure (18/20). Distinct clinical scenarios included: (1) wide viremic fluctuations >1 log (65%) and intermittent HCV-RNA negativity; (2) autoantibodies (25% antinuclear antibodies, 69% antismooth muscle antibodies) or autoimmune features; (3) delayed spontaneous viral clearance in 2 patients; (4) rapid cirrhosis progression in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

AHCV is a heterogenous disease that requires careful monitoring. The lack of apparent risk factor in high proportion of patients and its diverse presentations warrant diagnostic vigilance.

Need for immunization against hepatotropic viruses in children with chronic liver disease

OBJECTIVES

Infection with hepatotropic viruses is a common cause of acute deterioration and adverse outcome in children with chronic liver disease (CLD). Such superimposed infections may be preventable through vaccination. The present study aimed to evaluate the exposure rates of hepatitis A, B, and E viruses in children with CLD and suggest an optimal vaccination strategy.

METHODS

Children with CLD were prospectively evaluated with a demographic, clinical, and investigative proforma. Hepatitis B surface antigen positive cases were labeled as hepatitis B virus-CLD, and all other etiologies as non-HBV-related CLD. Patients were tested for exposure to hepatitis A (total anti-hepatitis A virus [HAV], immunoglobulin M anti-HAV), hepatitis B (hepatitis B surface antigen, total anti-hepatitis B core, anti-hepatitis B surface), and hepatitis E (IgG anti-hepatitis E virus).

RESULTS

A total of 142 children with CLD (age 9.1 ± 3.7 years, 83 [58.5%] boys) were enrolled. A total of 3.5% (5/142) and 38.7% (55/142) had received HAV and HBV vaccines, respectively. A total of 134 (94.4%) were total anti-HAV positive including 5 postimmunization patients, with higher positivity in those older than 5 years (19/25 vs 115/117; P = 0.001). Of the 115 patients with non-HBV-related CLD, 45 (39.1%) had exposure to HBV (40 total anti-hepatitis B core positive and 5 anti-HBs positive without immunization). Only 28 of 142 (19.7%) patients were IgG anti-HEV positive, with no difference across age.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 90.8%, 39.1%, and 19.7% of children with CLD from the developing world are exposed to hepatitis A, B, and E infections, respectively. Selective hepatitis A vaccination (patients younger than 5 years of age) and universal hepatitis B vaccination are required to protect children with CLD. Sanitation improvement and HEV vaccine trial are needed for prevention against HEV.

Co-incubation with core proteins of HBV and HCV leads to modulation of human dendritic cells

Hepatitis B and C (HBV and HCV) are hepatotropic viruses in humans with approximately 350 and 170 million chronic carriers respectively. Since both viruses have similar modes of transmission, many people are co-infected. Co-infection is common in intravenous drug users, HIV-positive individuals, and transplant recipients. Compared to mono-infected patients, co-infected patients exhibit exacerbated liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure. Some of the pathogenic effects may be attributed in part to the structural core proteins of both viruses-ones that have displayed immunomodulatory properties. Yet, the effects of their combined interaction on the human immune system remain a mystery. We aimed to elucidate the combined effects of HBV and HCV core proteins on human dendritic cells' (DCs) ability to present antigens and stimulate antigen-specific T-cells. We observed that when DCs, differentiated from human peripheral blood monocytes, were co-incubated with both core proteins, IL-10 production was dramatically enhanced, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-12 production was significantly reduced, and HLA-DR expression was downregulated. This instant functional and phenotypic modulation of DCs induced by a combination of HBV and HCV core proteins can allow them to behave like tolerizing DCs, inefficiently presenting antigens to CD4+ T-cells and even suppressing induction of the cellular immune response. These results reveal an important mechanism by which HBV and HCV synergistically induce immune tolerance early in infection that may be instrumental in establishing chronic, persistent infections.

Factors associated with spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus in Chinese population

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections spontaneously clear in approximately 15-45% of infected individuals. Factors which influence spontaneous HCV clearance remain to be identified. The purpose of the present study was to identify variables associated with spontaneous HCV clearance in a referred population of Chinese patients. The prevalence of host, viral, and environmental factors known to influence the outcome of HCV infections was compared in 92 HCV spontaneous clearance subjects and 318 HCV persistent infection subjects. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify those factors associated with spontaneous HCV clearance. In univariate analysis, female gender, a history of icteric hepatitis, serologic evidence of concurrent HBV infection, and rs12979860 CC genotype were positively associated with spontaneous HCV clearance, while alcohol consumption was negatively associated with clearance. In multivariate analysis, female gender, a history of icteric hepatitis, concurrent HBV infection, and rs12979860 CC genotype remained independent variables associated with spontaneous HCV clearance. Spontaneous HCV clearance is more likely to occur in females, subjects with a history of icteric hepatitis, HBV coinfections, and those with the rs12979860 CC genotype.

Advances in the treatment of hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection are at a high risk of developing liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, and consequently, warrant effective treatment.

AREAS COVERED

Effective treatment should eradicate HCV infection and inhibit HBV replication but without serious adverse reactions. Careful evaluation of disease progression, predominance of one virus over another, comorbidities and concomitant hepatitis delta virus and/or HIV infection are essential for better therapy choices. In the case of HCV predominance, Peg-interferon plus ribavirin with or without a first-generation directly acting antiviral (DAA) should be the first choice, but future treatments will be DAA-based and interferon-free. In the case of HBV predominance, tenofovir or entecavir should be part of treatment. Patients should be closely monitored for early identification and treatment of HCV or HBV reactivation.

EXPERT OPINION

High potency and high genetic barrier nucleos(t)ide analogues to inhibit HBV replication have been used for years, with no urgency for new drugs. Several DAAs for interferon-free therapy for HCV eradication will be available in the near future. We hope that the high cost of these drugs will not be a limitation to their use in developing countries. Further investigation of HBV/HCV interaction is needed before and during the administration of new therapies.

Role of interleukin 28-B in the spontaneous and treatment-related clearance of HCV infection in patients with chronic HBV/HCV dual infection

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the role of IL28-B polymorphism in the clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)/HCV coinfection during a long-term follow-up. Thirty-four consecutive patients with HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive/anti-HCV-positive chronic hepatitis were retrospectively enrolled at their first liver biopsy (LB). For all patients, a documented clinical, serological and virological follow-up of at least 3 years (range 3-16 years) after LB and a sample of whole blood for genetic evaluation were available. Of the 24 patients with detectable serum HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA at their first observation, three cleared both HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA, 12 HCV-RNA and five HBV-DNA. Of the seven HBV DNA-positive/HCV RNA-negative patients at enrolment, three cleared HBV-DNA and one remained HBV DNA-positive and became HCV RNA-positive. All three HBV DNA-negative/HCV RNA-positive patients remained unchanged. Compared with the 12 patients with HCV persistence, the 15 patients who cleared HCV were younger, had lower serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HCV load, and histological activity index (HAI) and fibrosis score, more frequently had IL28-B CC variant, had been receiving an interferon-based treatment and less frequently cleared serum HBV-DNA. To investigate the relationship between the IL28-B variants and clearance of HCV, excluding the confounding effect of interferon-based treatment, the Mantel-Haenszel test was used, which indicated an association between HCV clearance and IL28-B variants (p = 0.009). In chronic HBV/HCV coinfection, a long-term follow-up showed a frequent spontaneous or treatment-related clearance of active replication of one or both viruses and identified the IL28-B CC genotype as an independent predictor of HCV clearance.

Physicians infrequently adhere to hepatitis vaccination guidelines for chronic liver disease

Background and Goals

Hepatitis A (HAV) and hepatitis B (HBV) vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease is an accepted standard of care. We determined HAV and HBV vaccination rates in a tertiary care referral hepatology clinic and the impact of electronic health record (EHR)-based reminders on adherence to vaccination guidelines.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 705 patients with chronic liver disease referred to our liver clinic in 2008 with at least two follow-up visits during the subsequent year. Demographics, referral source, etiology, and hepatitis serology were recorded. We determined whether eligible patients were offered vaccination and whether patients received vaccination. Barriers to vaccination were determined by a follow-up telephone interview.

Results

HAV and HBV serologic testing prior to referral and at the liver clinic were performed in 14.5% and 17.7%; and 76.7% and 74% patients, respectively. Hepatologists recommended vaccination for HAV in 63% and for HBV in 59.7% of eligible patients. Patient demographics or disease etiology did not influence recommendation rates. Significant variability was observed in vaccination recommendation amongst individual providers (30–98.6%), which did not correlate with the number of patients seen by each physician. Vaccination recommendation rates were not different for Medicare patients with hepatitis C infection for whom a vaccination reminder was automatically generated by the EHR. Most patients who failed to get vaccination after recommendation offered no specific reason for noncompliance; insurance was a barrier in a minority.

Conclusions

Hepatitis vaccination rates were suboptimal even in an academic, sub-speciality setting, with wide-variability in provider adherence to vaccination guidelines.

Management of hepatitis C in HIV and/or HBV co-infected patients

Co-infection with either HIV or HBV in chronic hepatitis C patients is common, since all these viruses share transmission routes and geographical distribution. Interaction between these viruses generally amplifies liver damage, increasing the risk of developing end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. HIV-HCV co-infection is associated with poorer response to antiviral therapy. New antivirals against HCV are eagerly awaited for this population. HBV-HCV dual infections are less common. The principles guiding indication of therapy in monoinfected patients should be followed considering which virus replicates in persons with serological markers of dual HBV-HCV infection. Although there is growing evidence supporting the use of direct acting antivirals (DAA) in dually infected patients with active HCV replication, prospective trials should be conducted to demonstrate their benefit, assessing carefully the rate and clinical consequences of HBV rebounds.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in adults and children: updated Swedish consensus recommendations

Swedish recommendations for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were updated at a recent expert meeting. Therapy for acute HCV infection should be initiated if spontaneous resolution does not occur within 12 weeks. The recommended standard-of-care therapy for chronic HCV genotype 1 infection is an HCV protease inhibitor in combination with peginterferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin. Treatment is strongly recommended in patients with bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis, whereas in patients with less advanced fibrosis, deferring therapy may be preferential in light of likely therapeutic improvements in the near future. Patients with chronic genotype 2/3 infection should generally be treated with peg-IFN and ribavirin for 24 weeks. In patients with a very rapid viral response (i.e. HCV RNA below 1000 IU/ml on day 7), or favourable baseline characteristics and undetectable HCV RNA week 4, treatment can be shortened to 12-16 weeks, provided that no dose reductions are needed.

Acquirement and disappearance of HBsAg and anti-HCV in an aged population: a follow-up study in an endemic township

BACKGROUND

HBsAg and anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) are stable markers and widely used. The seroconversion and seroclearance of HBsAg and anti-HCV are important for disease control and prognosis of diseases.

AIMS

To investigate acquirement and disappearance of HBsAg and anti-HCV in an endemic area.

METHODS

Seven years after a community screening, 1002 of 2909 residents of Tzukuan Township were recruited. HBsAg, anti-HCV and alanine transaminase (ALT) were checked in all who participated and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, anti-HBs, anti-HBc, HCV RNA, anti-HDV and upper abdominal ultrasonography were studied in different groups.

RESULTS

There were 461 male and 541 female residents with a mean age of 66.7 ± 8.6 years. No new HBsAg carrier was noted and the HBsAg clearance rate was 1.58% per year. One of the 17 cases with HBsAg clearance had positive HBV DNA, three had ALT elevation, two had cirrhosis and seven had anti-HBs seroconversion. Quantitative of HBsAg and HBV DNA were concordant and 78.1% subjects had low levels of titration. Anti-HBc alone contributed to 32.1% and was prominent in old age and the anti-HCV-positive group. The anti-HCV seroconversion rate was only 0.74% per year and household transmission was the only risk factor. Only 37.5% of cases with anti-HCV seroconversion had HCV viraemia and the anti-HCV seroreversion rate was 0.63% per year. The anti-HDV seroconversion rate was 0.72% per year and no subject showed anti-HDV clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Much higher rates of HBsAg seroclearance, anti-HCV seroreversion and anti-HBc alone were noted in this endemic area and no subject showed anti-HDV clearance.

Antiviral treatment of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus co-infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are among the most common causes of advanced chronic liver disease worldwide. HBV/HCV co-infection is not uncommon with an estimated 7-20 million individuals affected worldwide. Patients with HBV/HCV co-infection have an increased risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and even death. The pathophysiology of HBV/HCV co-infection is complex, as different patterns of virological dominance may occur, which can even fluctuate over time. Recently, combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin has been explored in HBV/HCV-coinfected patients who are positive for HCV-RNA. In this paper, we summarize the epidemiology, viral interaction and clinical features of HBV/HCV co-infection and the available treatment options. Detailed serological and virological evaluations are required for HBV/HCV-co-infected patients before initiation of antiviral therapy. At present, PEG-IFN-a plus ribavirin should be the treatment of choice in patients with dominant HCV replication. However, HBV rebound may occur after elimination of HCV, and thus close monitoring for both viruses is recommended even for patients with initially suppressed HBV DNA.

Low rates of hepatitis A and B vaccination in patients with chronic hepatitis C at an urban methadone maintenance program

Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) are at increased risk for complications of liver disease if they become infected with the hepatitis A (HAV) or hepatitis B (HBV) viruses. The authors examined the rates of testing for HAV, HBV, and HCV, as well as rates of vaccination against HAV and HBV in patients with chronic HCV in a random sample (N = 207) of medical records of patients enrolled in a methadone maintenance program. Almost all patients reviewed were tested for HAV, HBV, and HCV. Of the 111 patients with chronic HCV, 53 (48.6%) and 68 (63%) lacked immunity to HAV and HBV, respectively. Of those lacking immunity, 29 (54.7%) and 2 (2.9%) were vaccinated for HAV and HBV, respectively. Despite high rates of testing for HAV, HBV, and HCV at a methadone maintenance program, approximately half of those with chronic HCV eligible for the HAV vaccine received it, and few of those eligible for HBV vaccine received it.

Current Concepts of HBV/HCV Coinfection: Coexistence, but Not Necessarily in Harmony

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C are important causes of chronic liver disease globally. Although HBV/HCV coinfection is not uncommon, its epidemiology is poorly defined. Numerous studies provided evidence that coinfection accelerates liver disease progression and increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. By applying new cell culture models to examine the interaction of both viruses, investigators concluded that HBV and HCV replicate in the same hepatocyte without interference. The roles of innate and adaptive immunity in determining the viral replication and disease outcomes still need rigorous investigation. To date, no standard-of-care recommendation exists for HBV/HCV coinfection. Pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy demonstrated similar efficacy in suppressing HCV RNA in coinfection and HCV monoinfection. However, HBV reactivation during therapy can be a challenge. Future clinical trials evaluating the addition of a nucleoside/nucleotide analog for selective patients with HBV/HCV coinfection are essential for successful management of HBV/HCV coinfection.

Treatment of HBV/HCV coinfection

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) virus infections are among the most common causes of advanced chronic liver disease worldwide. HBV/HCV coinfection is not uncommon with an estimated 7 - 20 million individuals affected worldwide. Patients with HBV/HCV coinfection have an increased risk for cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and even death.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The pathophysiology of HBV/HCV coinfection is complex, as different patterns of virological dominance may occur, which can even fluctuate over time. Recently, combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin has been explored in HBV/HCV coinfected patients who are positive for HCV-RNA. HBV polymerase inhibitors may be indicated if HBV-DNA concentrations are above 2000 IU/ml. In this review, we summarize the epidemiology, viral interaction, its clinical features and the available treatment options.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Insights into viral interaction of HBV/HCV coinfection and treatment individualization strategies are provided in the review.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Detailed serological and virological evaluations are required for HBV/HCV coinfected patients before initiation of antiviral therapy. At present, PEG-IFN-alpha plus ribavirin should be the treatment of choice in patients with dominant HCV replication. However, HBV rebound may occur after elimination of HCV, and thus close monitoring for both viruses is recommended even for patients with initially suppressed HBV-DNA.

Pregnancy outcomes among liver transplant recipients in the United States: a nationwide case-control analysis

Liver transplant recipients and their infants may have an increased risk of obstetric complications. Our objective was to describe pregnancy outcomes in women with a prior transplant from a population-based perspective. We analyzed the 1993-2005 US Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to identify obstetric hospitalizations among transplant recipients (n = 206) and controls matched by age, hospital, and year (n = 4060). The effect of prior transplantation on maternal and fetal outcomes was evaluated with regression models with adjustments for patient and hospital factors, including admission to a transplant center. Between 1993 and 2005, 146 delivery admissions among liver transplant recipients were identified. Cesarean deliveries were more common among transplant recipients (38% versus 24%; P = 0.0001); however, this difference was not significant after multivariate adjustment [OR (odds ratio) = 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.60-1.27]. Maternal mortality was similar among cases and controls (0% versus 0.02%; P = 1.00), but transplant patients had higher rates of fetal mortality (6.3% versus 2.0%; P = 0.0006), antepartum admission (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.59-3.25), and maternal (OR = 2.63; 95% CI = 1.82-3.80) and fetal complications (OR = 2.49; 95% CI = 1.68-3.70). Gestational hypertension (30% versus 9%; P < 0.0001) and postpartum hemorrhage (8% versus 3%; P = 0.009) were more common among transplant recipients; their infants had higher rates of prematurity (27% versus 11%; P < 0.0001), distress (10% versus 5%; P = 0.005), and growth restriction (5% versus 2%; P = 0.05) but not congenital anomalies. Hospitalization in a transplant center ( approximately 50%) was associated with similar obstetric outcomes. In conclusion, although most pregnancy outcomes are favorable, liver transplant recipients and their infants have an increased risk of obstetric complications. Additional studies evaluating mechanisms aimed at reducing these complications are necessary.

Viral interference between hepatitis B, C, and D viruses in dual and triple infections in HIV-positive patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the reciprocal inhibitory effects of hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)/hepatitis D virus (HDV) infections in naive and previously antiretroviral-experienced HIV-positive patients.

DESIGN

This retrospective study involved 72 consecutive patients of the Italian Cohort Naive Antiretroviral cohort: 21 coinfected with HBV/HCV (group 1BC), 18 infected with HBV (group 2B), and 33 infected with HCV (group 3C).

METHODS

Viral interference between HBV and HCV was assessed by means of the qualitative detection, quantification, and genotyping of each virus; HDV infection was assessed by means of genomic amplification.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that HBV DNA was less frequently detected in group 1BC than in group 2B (16 of 21 vs 18 of 18; P = 0.02), their HBV load was significantly lower (median 3.9 vs 5.4 log10 HBV DNA copies/mL; P = 0.002), and they more frequently carried HBV genotype D (12 of 13 vs 4 of 11; P = 0.0071). HCV RNA was less frequently detected in group 1BC than in group 3C (12 of 21 vs 33 of 33; P < 0.0001), and HDV RNA was more frequently detected in group 1BC than in group 2B (9 of 21 vs 2 of 18; P = 0.028). Multivariate analysis of the HBV-infected subjects showed that the risk of HCV coinfection was associated with older age [relative risk 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09 to 0.90; P = 0.033 for every 10 years older] and intravenous drug use (relative risk 73, 95% CI: 2.4 to >999.999; P = 0.013). The only predictor of HBV coinfection in HCV-infected individuals was a lower HCV load (relative risk 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.79 for every additional log10 HCV RNA; P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

HBV and HCV showed alternative dominant replication in the I.Co.N.A. cohort, with HBV having a more unfavorable effect on HCV replication.

Management of patients co-infected with HBV and HCV

HBV and HCV are both hepatotrophic pathogens that share common routes of transmission, namely through exposure to infected blood and body fluids. Available natural history studies suggest dual infection with HBV and HCV increases the risk of progressive liver disease, and the risk of cirrhosis and liver cancer. Owing to the dynamic nature of these chronic infections, with fluctuations in viral level and disease activity, close monitoring is needed to determine the appropriate time to intervene with treatment. The clinical profile most commonly encountered is for active HCV infection (HCV RNA-positive) with or without active HBV infection (HBsAg-positive with variable HBV DNA levels). For these patients, treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is the treatment of choice. For those with HBV-predominant disease (and HCV RNA-undetectable), the treatment is identical to that with HBV infection alone. For patients unresponsive to these initial treatments, there are no specific guidelines, and additional studies to define the treatment algorithms for nonresponders or relapsers are needed.

[Efficacy and safety of vaccination against hepatitis A and B in patients with chronic liver disease]

Vaccination to protect against hepatitis A and B should be part of the routine management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination in a group of patients with CLD and to assess the presence of factors predictive of response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective, single-center study in 194 patients (123 men, 71 women; mean age, 48.9+/-10.7 years) with CLD: 107 with chronic hepatitis (CH) and 87 with hepatic cirrhosis (HC), all Child-Pugh class A. The most frequent causes of CLD were HCV infection and alcohol. Patients negative for anti-HAV IgG received the HAV vaccination (1440 ELISA units in two doses) and those with negative HBV serology received the HBV vaccination ( three 20 microg doses). Patients with inadequate response to the latter vaccine received an additional double dose. Thirty patients received a combination vaccine (three doses).

RESULTS

Sixty patients (31%) received the HAV vaccine and 150 (77%) patients received the HBV vaccine. Seroconversion was achieved by 91.6% of patients for HAV and by 57% of the patients for HBV. After the additional dose, the response increased to 74%. Efficacy was similar between CH and HC. HBV vaccination was less effective in HC than in CH and the seroconversion rate was significantly lower in patients with HC and previous decompensation. The combination vaccine (30 patients) was highly immunogenic. No adverse effects were registered.

CONCLUSIONS

HAV vaccination has high efficacy in patients with CLD. Patients with HC respond weakly to HBV vaccination compared with those with CH and especially if there is prior decompensation. The combination vaccine seems particularly effective in patients with CLD. The three vaccines are safe.

Why actively promote vaccination in patients with cirrhosis?

Patients with cirrhosis are immunocompromised and have an increased risk of infection, with a worse outcome. Some of those infections may be prevented by vaccination. Immunization can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cirrhosis. Immunizations against hepatitis A and B viruses, influenza and pneumococcus are recommended by the French Haute Autorité de Santé since 2007. Vaccination against hepatitis A is recommended in non-immunized cirrhotic patients. Vaccination against hepatitis B is recommended in every cirrhotic patient with no serological markers, and post-vaccinal antibodies titer should be checked. Annual influenza immunization can be done in cirrhotic patients, and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine should be repeated after 3-5 years. Few data regarding vaccination coverage are available, but studies suggest that immunization rates are too low in this population.

Characteristics and outcome of patients with dual hepatitis B and C-associated hepatocellular carcinoma: are they different from patients with single virus infection?

BACKGROUND

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) caused by dual hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) infection may constitute a distinct disease group that is different from patients with single virus infection. This study compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with HBV, HCV and dual virus infection.

METHODS

A prospective database of 1215 HCC patients with chronic hepatitis B, C or dual virus infection was investigated.

RESULTS

Patients with HCV infection (n=388) were significantly older (mean age, 69 years) than patients with dual virus (n=75, 65 years) and HBV (n=752; 60 years) infection (P<0.0001). The male-to-female ratios for the HBV, dual virus and HCV groups were 5.2, 3.4 and 1.3 respectively (P<0.0001). Patients in the HBV group more often had higher total tumour volume (mean, 409 cm(3)) than those in the dual virus group (244 cm(3)) and HCV (168 cm(3)) group (P<0.0001). No significant differences of the severity of liver cirrhosis, performance status, cancer staging and tumour cell differentiation were noted among the three groups. Patients in the HCV group had a significantly poor survival in comparison with the HBV group only in the subset of patients with small tumour volume (<50 cm(3)) in the Cox proportional hazards model (relative risk, 1.44; P=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual HBV and HCV virus infection does not accelerate the speed of HCC formation in patients with chronic hepatitis B, and appears to have a modified course of carcinogenesis pathway that is diverted away from the biological behaviour of HBV and HCV infection.

HBV superinfection in HCV chronic carriers: a disease that is frequently severe but associated with the eradication of HCV

The impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) superinfection in hepatitis C virus (HCV) chronic carriers was evaluated in a long-term follow-up study on 29 chronic anti-HCV carriers with acute hepatitis B (AVH-B) (Case group BC) and 29 anti-HCV negative patients with AVH-B (Control group B), pair-matched for age (+/-5 years), sex, and risk factors for the acquisition of HBV infection. Patients in Case group BC and those in Control group B showed similar initial HBV viral load and a similar trend of becoming negative for HBV-DNA. AVH-B showed a severe course more frequently in Case group BC than in Control group B (34.5% versus 6.9%, P < 0.05). Of the 28 patients in Case group BC alive at the end of the acute illness (one death from liver failure), 24 were followed up for 2-6 years, median 5 years: 22 patients became HBsAg-negative and two progressed to HBsAg-positive chronic hepatitis. HCV-RNA was undetectable in all patients during AVH-B; in the 24 patients with a long-term follow-up, HCV-RNA was detected in seven (29.2%) after 1 year, in 14 (58.3%) after 2 years, and in 18 (75%) after 3-6 years. The six patients who eradicated chronic HCV infection, compared with 18 showing reactivation of HCV replication, had higher values of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase and a higher prevalence of cases with severe AVH-B (83.3% versus 22.2%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although it can be life-threatening, HBV superinfection in HCV chronic carriers may lead to clearance of chronic HCV infection, especially in patients with severe AVH-B.

Acute hepatitis B in patients with or without underlying chronic HCV infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Acute hepatitis B course may be significantly modified by underlying chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and virological characteristics of acute hepatitis B in patients with or without chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with symptomatic acute hepatitis B were enrolled: 14 with underlying chronic HCV (Group A) and 13, matched by age and gender, with single hepatitis B (Group B). All patients were followed-up until HBsAg negativization.

RESULTS

Group A patients were HCV-RNA-negative on hospital admission and all but one remained negative during follow-up. HBeAg tested positive in 92.9% and 84.6% of Groups A and B patients, respectively. ALT, bilirubin, prothrombin time values and HBsAg titer were similar in both groups. Nevertheless, lower mean HBV-DNA levels (p=0.03), a shorter duration of HBsAg positivity (p<0.01) and of symptoms before ALT peak (p=0.014), and significantly lower peak ALT values (p=0.03) were observed in Group A compared to Group B patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute HBV infection suppressed HCV replication. Conversely, the underlying HCV infection exerted a modulatory effect on HBV replication which influenced the course, though not the outcome, of the acute disease. Although acute hepatitis B showed a mild clinical course in both groups of patients, HBV vaccination should be suggested to risk subjects.

Profile of patients triply infected with HIV and the hepatitis B and C viruses in the HAART era

HIV-HCV-HBV-coinfected patients were assessed to characterize the viral interactions in the setting of HIV coinfection and in the HAART era. All positive anti-HCV antibody and HBs antigen-positive HIV-infected patients were identified at five HIV clinics. Antihepatitis delta (HDV) antibody, serum HIV RNA, HCV RNA, and HBV DNA quantification and genotype determinations were performed. Out of 67 patients identified 47 (70%) were receiving anti-HBV therapy. HCV RNA and HBV DNA were detectable in 52.5% and 37% of patients, respectively. All possible patterns were found, regardless of anti-HBV therapy. HDV coinfection was associated with undetectable HCV RNA [RR 9.52 (95% CI 1.85-49.01); p = 0.007]. Independent factors predicting undetectable HBV DNA lacked HBeAg [RR 13.94 (95% CI 3.05-63.72); p = 0.001] and use of anti-HBV therapy [RR 11.42 (95% CI 2.43-53.54); p = 0.002]. Replication and genotypes of HCV or HBV had no impact on the replication of the other virus. In conclusion, in this cohort of triple infection (HBV/HCV/HIV) various viral patterns were identified. Spontaneous HCV clearance was frequent, and it was independently associated with HDV coinfection. In the absence of HBV therapy, HBV most often actively replicates. HBV/HCV replication or genotypes were not related to the replication of the other virus.

Hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection: epidemiology, clinical features, viral interactions and treatment

Because of the shared modes of transmission, hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is not uncommon in highly endemic areas and among subjects with a high risk of parenteral infections. The worldwide prevalence of HBV/HCV coinfection is unknown and might be underestimated with the phenomenon of silent (occult) HBV infection. HCV superinfection in patients with chronic HBV infection was the most common clinical features of coinfection in Asia-Pacific countries. Further, most, but not all, clinical observations suggested that interference between the two viruses was more frequently characterized by an inhibition of HBV replication exerted by HCV. However, longitudinal follow-up studies have demonstrated that the virological patterns in coinfection cases are widely divergent and have dynamic profiles over time. As compared with monoinfected patients, HBV/HCV coinfected persons tend to have more severe liver injury, a higher probability of liver cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation, and a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Detailed serological and virological evaluations are required for coinfected patients before initiation of antiviral therapy. Previous studies demonstrated that HBV/HCV coinfected patients responded poorly to interferon (IFN) monotherapy. Currently, for patients with dominant HCV infection and low level HBV viremia (<10(4) IU/mL), IFN or pegylated IFN plus ribavirin can achieve comparable sustained virus response as expected with HCV monoinfection. However, phenomenon of reciprocal viral interference can happen, and resultant "flare" of hepatitis activity may cause liver function deterioration. For coinfected patients with dually-active HBV/HCV, the optimal regimen for therapy remains unclear although adding oral nucleos(t)ide analogs to pegylated IFN and ribavirin seems a reasonable empiric option.

Acute hepatitis B 14 years after the implementation of universal vaccination in Italy: areas of improvement and emerging challenges

BACKGROUND

Italy had intermediate-level endemicity for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the 1970s and 1980s. In 1991, vaccination of infants and adolescents became mandatory. We report the impact of universal vaccination 14 years after its beginning.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study within a population-based surveillance for acute viral hepatitis. The incidence of acute hepatitis B (AHB) was estimated for the time since 1991, and the association between AHB and the considered risk factors was analyzed for the period 2001-2005.

RESULTS

The incidence of AHB progressively decreased from 1991 to 2005, mainly for persons in the age groups targeted by the universal vaccination campaign: there was a 24-fold and 50-fold decrease in the 15-24-year and 0-14-year age groups, respectively; for the > or =25-year age group, the incidence halved. Owing to the persons' ages, approximately 3% of total AHB cases should have been the target of vaccination campaign. In 2004-2005, foreigners accounted for 14% of total cases and for 57% of persons who should have been targets for vaccination. Missed opportunities for immunization were documented for approximately 50% of patients with AHB who reported cohabitation with HBV carriers and for 70% of those who reported injection drug use. The strongest associations with AHB were found for blood transfusion (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj)], 8.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-26), cohabitation with HBV carriers (OR(adj), 5.3; 95% CI, 3.6-7.7), injection drug use (OR(adj), 3.8; 95% CI, 2.5-5.8), and unsafe sexual practices (OR(adj), 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9-4.2).

CONCLUSION

Universal vaccination has contributed to a decreasing AHB incidence in Italy, especially by reducing the risk of infection among persons aged 15-24 years. Most infections occur in persons aged > or =25 years in association with injection drug use, unsafe sexual activity, percutaneous treatment, and iatrogenic exposure. Improvement of vaccine coverage in high-risk groups and adherence to infection control measures during surgery and percutaneous treatment are needed. The high risk still associated with blood transfusion needs to be further investigated, with consideration of occult HBV infection in blood donors. The potential spread of HBV infection from the immigrant population deserves adequate health policy prevention programs.