Differential response to amphetamine in schizophrenia

Adjunctive methylphenidate extended release in patients with schizophrenia: Protocol of a single-centre fixed dose cross-over open-label trial to improve functional and cognitive outcomes

Background

Cognitive symptoms, among the core symptoms of schizophrenia, are associated with poor functional outcome and burden of illness. To date, there is no effective pharmacological treatment for these symptom clusters. Augmentation with psychostimulants has been proposed as a potential treatment option.

Objectives

The present study aims to assess off-label use of adjunctive methylphenidate extended release (ER) in patients with schizophrenia who are stable on antipsychotic medications, and to assess its efficacy on functioning and cognitive outcome.

Methods

This is a single centre study at the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre. An open-label fixed dose controlled cross-over trial is planned. Eligible participants will be randomized into one of two arms of the study: 1) four weeks of add-on methylphenidate ER 36 mg, or 2) four weeks of treatment as usual. At 4 weeks, participants will switch arms. The duration of the study includes 8 weeks of treatment and a follow-up visit at 12 weeks. Primary outcome measures include tablet-based tests of functioning and cognition (VRFCAT and BAC) and will be administered at baseline and every 4 weeks. We are aiming to recruit a total of 24 participants.

Expected outcomes

The proposed project intends to assess a potential treatment option for cognitive deficits of schizophrenia, for which there are no recommendations by current treatment guidelines. The novelty and significance of the current study is that it investigates this intervention and assess applicability of it in a "real world setting" in a tertiary care hospital.

Translational cognitive systems: focus on attention

Cognitive dysfunction, particularly attentional impairment, is a core feature of many psychiatric disorders, yet is inadequately addressed by current treatments. Development of targeted therapeutics for the remediation of attentional deficits requires knowledge of underlying neurocircuit, cellular, and molecular mechanisms that cannot be directly assayed in the clinic. This level of detail can only be acquired by testing animals in cross-species translatable attentional paradigms, in combination with preclinical neuroscience techniques. The 5-choice continuous performance test (5C-CPT) and rodent continuous performance test (rCPT) represent the current state of the art of preclinical assessment of the most commonly studied subtype of attention: sustained attention, or vigilance. These tasks present animals with continuous streams of target stimuli to which they must respond (attention), in addition to non-target stimuli from which they must withhold responses (behavioral inhibition). The 5C-CPT and rCPT utilize the same measures as gold-standard clinical continuous performance tests and predict clinical efficacy of known pro-attentional drugs. They also engage common brain regions across species, although efforts to definitively establish neurophysiological construct validity are ongoing. The validity of these tasks as translational vigilance assessments enables their use in characterizing the neuropathology underlying attentional deficits of animal models of psychiatric disease, and in determining therapeutic potential of drugs ahead of clinical testing. Here, we briefly review the development and validation of such tests of attentional functioning, as well as the data they have generated pertaining to inattention, disinhibition, and impulsivity in psychiatric disorders.

Amphetamine improves rat 5-choice continuous performance test (5C-CPT) irrespective of concurrent low-dose haloperidol treatment

RATIONALE

Cognitive dysfunction mediates functional impairment in patients with schizophrenia, necessitating the timely development of pro-cognitive therapeutics. An important initial step in this process is to establish what, if any, pro-cognitive agents and associated mechanisms can be identified using cross-species translational paradigms. For example, attentional deficits-a core feature of schizophrenia-can be measured across species using the 5-choice continuous performance test (5C-CPT). The psychostimulant, amphetamine, improves human and rodent 5C-CPT performance.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we tested whether amphetamine would similarly improve 5C-CPT performance in the presence of dopamine D2 receptor blockade, since pro-cognitive treatments in schizophrenia would virtually always be used in conjunction with D2 receptor antagonists.

METHODS

We established the dose-response effects of amphetamine (0, 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0, 3.2, 10, or 32 μg/kg) on 5C-CPT performance in Long Evans rats, and then tested an amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg) × haloperidol (10 μg/kg) interaction; the low dose was chosen because higher doses exerted deleterious non-specific effects on performance.

RESULTS

Amphetamine improved 5C-CPT performance in poorly performing rats by increasing target detection, independent of haloperidol pretreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The pro-attentional effects of amphetamine were most likely mediated by dopamine release at D1-family receptors, since they persisted in the presence of acute D2 blockade. Alternative explanations for these findings are also discussed, as are their potential implications for future pro-cognitive therapeutics in schizophrenia.

Continuous performance test impairment in a 22q11.2 microdeletion mouse model: improvement by amphetamine

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) confers high risk of neurodevelopmental disorders such as schizophrenia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. These disorders are associated with attentional impairment, the remediation of which is important for successful therapeutic intervention. We assessed a 22q11.2DS mouse model (Df(h22q11)/+) on a touchscreen rodent continuous performance test (rCPT) of attention and executive function that is analogous to human CPT procedures. Relative to wild-type littermates, Df(h22q11)/+ male mice showed impaired attentional performance as shown by decreased correct response ratio (hit rate) and a reduced ability to discriminate target stimuli from non-target stimuli (discrimination sensitivity, or d'). The Df(h22q11)/+ model exhibited decreased prefrontal cortical-hippocampal oscillatory synchrony within multiple frequency ranges during quiet wakefulness, which may represent a biomarker of cognitive dysfunction. The stimulant amphetamine (0-1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently improved d' in Df(h22q11)/+ mice whereas the highest dose of modafinil (40 mg/kg, i.p.) exacerbated their d' impairment. This is the first report to directly implicate attentional impairment in a 22q11.2DS mouse model, mirroring a key endophenotype of the human disorder. The capacity of the rCPT to detect performance impairments in the 22q11.2DS mouse model, and improvement following psychostimulant-treatment, highlights the utility and translational potential of the Df(h22q11)/+ model and this automated behavioral procedure.

The effects in rats of lisdexamfetamine in combination with olanzapine on mesocorticolimbic dopamine efflux, striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy and stimulus generalization to a D-amphetamine cue

The etiology of schizophrenia is poorly understood and two principle hypotheses have dominated the field. Firstly, that subcortical dopamine function is enhanced while cortical dopamine function is reduced and secondly, that cortical glutamate systems are dysfunctional. It is also widely accepted that currently used antipsychotics have essentially no impact on cognitive deficits and persistent negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Reduced dopamine transmission via dopamine D1 receptors in the prefrontal cortex has been hypothesized to be involved in the aetiology of these symptom domains and enhancing cortical dopamine transmission within an optimal window has been suggested to be potentially beneficial. In these pre-clinical studies we have determined that combined administration of the d-amphetamine pro-drug, lisdexamfetamine and the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine increased dopamine efflux in the rat prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens to an extent greater than either drug given separately without affecting olanzapine's ability to block striatal dopamine D2 receptors which is important for its antipsychotic activity. Furthermore, in an established rodent model used to compare the subjective effects of novel compounds the ability of lisdexamfetamine to generalize to a d-amphetamine cue was dose-dependently attenuated when co-administered with olanzapine suggesting that lisdexamfetamine may produce less marked subjective effects when administered adjunctively with olanzapine.

Adjunctive lisdexamfetamine dimesylate therapy in adult outpatients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia: open-label and randomized-withdrawal phases

Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS), related to hypodopaminergic activity in the mesocortical pathway and prefrontal cortex, are predictive of poor outcomes and have no effective treatment. Use of dopamine-enhancing drugs (eg, psychostimulants) has been limited by potential adverse effects. This multicenter study examined lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), a d-amphetamine prodrug, as adjunctive therapy to antipsychotics in adults with clinically stable schizophrenia and predominant NSS. Outpatients with stable schizophrenia, predominant NSS, limited positive symptoms, and maintained on stable atypical antipsychotic therapy underwent a 3-week screening, 10-week open-label adjunctive LDX (20-70 mg/day), and 4-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled withdrawal. Efficacy measures included a modified Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale scores. Ninety-two participants received open-label LDX; 69 received double-blind therapy with placebo (n=35) or LDX (n=34). At week 10 (last observation carried forward; last open-label visit), mean (95% confidence interval) change in SANS-18 scores was -12.9 (-15.0, -10.8; P<0.0001). At week 10, 52.9% of participants demonstrated a minimum of 20% reduction from baseline in SANS-18 score. Open-label LDX was also associated with significant improvement in PANSS total and subscale scores. During the double-blind/randomized-withdrawal phase, no significant differences (change from randomization baseline) were found between placebo and LDX in SANS-18 or PANSS subscale scores. In adults with clinically stable schizophrenia, open-label LDX appeared to be associated with significant improvements in negative symptoms without positive symptom worsening. Abrupt LDX discontinuation was not associated with positive or negative symptom worsening. Confirmation with larger controlled trials is warranted.

A systematic review of psychostimulant treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia: challenges and therapeutic opportunities

BACKGROUND

Primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS) contribute heavily to functional disability and treatment of these symptoms continues to be a major unmet need even when the positive (psychotic) symptoms are controlled. The modified dopamine (DA) hypothesis posits that positive symptoms are associated with increased DA activity in the mesolimbic tract whereas NSS and cognitive symptoms are associated with decreased DA activity in the mesocortical (frontal) region. Several studies have reported improvement in NSS with DA agonist use, but with varying degrees of risk for triggering psychotic symptoms, especially in the absence of concurrent antipsychotic drug treatment. This article aims to examine older and newer evidence suggesting that psychostimulants may have a potential therapeutic role in the treatment of NSS together with a thorough review of the potential risks and benefits of psychostimulant administration in individuals with schizophrenia.

METHODS

A systematic search of relevant literature using electronic databases, reference lists, and data presented at recent meetings was conducted.

RESULTS

Improvement of NSS after psychostimulant administration is reviewed both in challenge and treatment paradigms with various agents such as methylphenidate, amphetamine, and modafinil or armodafinil. The literature points to evidence that, used adjunctively, DA agonists may improve NSS without worsening of positive symptoms in selected patients who are stable and treated with effective antipsychotic medications. Several areas of inadequate study and limitations are identified including small study samples, single-site trials, varying rigor of bias control, the dose and the duration of adjunctive psychostimulant administration, and the potential for development of tolerance.

CONCLUSION

Large, controlled clinical trials to further characterize effects of psychostimulants on NSS in carefully selected patients are warranted.

Pharmacogenetic treatments for drug addiction: cocaine, amphetamine and methamphetamine

BACKGROUND

Pharmacogenetics uses genetic variation to predict individual differences in response to medications and holds much promise to improve treatment of addictive disorders.

OBJECTIVES

To review how genetic variation affects responses to cocaine, amphetamine, and methamphetamine and how this information may guide pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

We performed a cross-referenced literature search on pharmacogenetics, cocaine, amphetamine, and methamphetamine.

RESULTS

We describe functional genetic variants for enzymes dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DbetaH), catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), and dopamine transporter (DAT1), dopamine D4 receptor, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; C-1021T) in the DbetaH gene is relevant to paranoia associated with disulfiram pharmacotherapy for cocaine addiction. Individuals with variable number tandem repeats (VNTR) of the SLC6A3 gene 3'-untranslated region polymorphism of DAT1 have altered responses to drugs. The 10/10 repeat respond poorly to methylphenidate pharmacotherapy and the 9/9 DAT1 variant show blunted euphoria and physiological response to amphetamine. COMT, D4 receptor, and BDNF polymorphisms are linked to methamphetamine abuse and psychosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Disulfiram and methylphenidate pharmacotherapies for cocaine addiction are optimized by considering polymorphisms affecting DbetaH and DAT1 respectively. Altered subjective effects for amphetamine in DAT1 VNTR variants suggest a 'protected' phenotype.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

Pharmacogenetic-based treatments for psychostimulant addiction are critical for successful treatment.

Animal models and treatments for addiction and depression co-morbidity

The high rates of co-morbidity of drug addiction with depression may be attributable to shared neurobiology. Here, we discuss shared neurobiological substrates in drug withdrawal and depression, with an emphasis on changes in brain reward circuitry that may underlie anhedonia, a core symptom of depression and drug withdrawal. We explored experimentally whether clinical antidepressant medications or other treatments would reverse the anhedonia observed in rats undergoing spontaneous nicotine or amphetamine withdrawal, defined operationally as elevated brain reward thresholds. The co-administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with a serotonin-1A receptor antagonist, or the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine, or the atypical antidepressant bupropion ameliorated nicotine or amphetamine withdrawal in rats. Thus, increases in monoaminergic neurotransmission, or neuroadaptations induced by increased monoaminergic neurotransmission, ameliorated depression-like aspects of drug withdrawal. Further, chronic pretreatment with the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, that has some efficacy in the treatment of the depression-like symptoms of schizophrenia, attenuated nicotine and amphetamine withdrawal. Finally, a metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor antagonist reversed threshold elevations associated with nicotine withdrawal. The effects of these pharmacological manipulations are consistent with the altered neurobiology observed in drug withdrawal and depression. Thus, these data support the hypothesis of common substrates mediating the depressive symptoms of drug withdrawal and those seen in psychiatric patients. Accordingly, the anhedonic state associated with drug withdrawal can be used to study the neurobiology of anhedonia, and thus contribute to the identification of novel targets for the treatment of depression-like symptoms seen in various psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Dopamine transporter gene associated with diminished subjective response to amphetamine

Individual variability in responses to stimulant drugs may influence risk of stimulant abuse and treatment response. However, the genetic determinants of this variability have yet to be elucidated. The dopamine transporter is an important site of amphetamine action. Therefore, the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) is a logical candidate gene to study. Using a drug challenge approach, we tested for association between DAT1 genotype and subjective responses to amphetamine in healthy adults. Volunteers participated in a double-blind, crossover design, randomly receiving placebo, 10 mg, and 20 mg oral D-amphetamine, and completed self-report measures on subjective effects including anxiety and euphoria. Subjects were genotyped for the DAT1 3'-untranslated region VNTR polymorphism and divided into groups based on genotype: homozygous for nine repeats (9/9, N=8), heterozygous (9/10, N=36) and homozygous for 10 repeats (10/10, N=52). The effects of amphetamine on ratings of Feel Drug, Anxiety, and Euphoria were examined with ANCOVA. In 9/10 and 10/10 subjects, amphetamine produced its expected effects of increased Euphoria, Anxiety, and Feel Drug (p<0.01). However, in 9/9 subjects, the effects of amphetamine were indistinguishable from placebo, suggesting that the 9/9 genotype has diminished subjective response to acute amphetamine. Interestingly, recent findings also implicate the 9/9 genotype in decreased therapeutic response to the stimulant methylphenidate in ADHD children. The current findings have important implications for understanding the genetic determinants of variability in stimulant response and risk of abuse.

Neurodevelopmental liabilities of substance abuse

The perinate is particularly risk-prone to chemical species which have the potential of inducing neuronal apoptosis or necrosis and thereby adversely altering development of the brain, to produce life-long functional and behavioral deficits. This paper is an overview for many substances of abuse, but the purview is much more broadened by the realization that even elevated levels of estrogens and corticosteroids in the pregnant mother can act as neuroteratogens, by passing via the placenta and altering neural development or inducing apoptosis in the perinate. Finally, therapeutic risks of anesthetics are highlighted, as these too induce neuronal apoptosis in the neonate by either blocking N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors or by acting as gamma-aminobutyric acid agonists. By understanding the mechanisms involved it may ultimately be possible to interrupt the mechanistic scheme and thereby prevent neuroteratological processes.

Neuroadaptations to chronic exposure to drugs of abuse: relevance to depressive symptomatology seen across psychiatric diagnostic categories

Depressive symptomatology is expressed across a wide spectrum of psychiatric disorders including major depression and schizophrenia. Further, depressive symptomatology is also observed in individuals undergoing withdrawal from chronic exposure to various drugs of abuse including cocaine, amphetamine and nicotine. The negative affective state associated with drug withdrawal is phenomenonologically similar to that observed in depressed and schizophrenia patients suggesting that common underlying pathophysiological deficits may be involved in the depressive symptomatology seen across these different psychiatric disorders. The aim of the present review is to examine clinical and preclinical evidence in support of a common neurobiological substrate mediating the negative affect associated with different psychiatric illnesses. First, clinical and epidemiological data are presented demonstrating the high comorbidity between nicotine and psychostimulant dependence, and depression or schizophrenia. It is hypothesized that drug-use may represent an attempt to self-medicate an underlying negative affective state present in depressed and schizophrenia patients. Second, preclinical findings are presented that demonstrate common neurochemical deficits in drug withdrawal and depression. Taken together, these clinical and preclinical data support the hypothesis that common neurobiological substrates may mediate the depressive state observed across psychiatric diagnostic categories. Therefore, it is proposed that the study of drug-induced depressions in laboratory animals may have heuristic value in identifying the mechanisms underlying the depressive symptomatology associated not only with drug withdrawal but also major depression and schizophrenia.

Symptom provocation studies in psychiatric disorders: scientific value, risks, and future

Several lines of investigation have contributed to the increasing recognition of the biological basis of psychiatric disorders. Symptom provocation studies have made important contributions toward this. With the emergence of novel methodologies, the role of symptom provocation studies has come under increasing scrutiny and debate. The scientific contributions and risks of symptom provocation studies are discussed using the psychostimulant paradigm in schizophrenia research as the prototypical study. The application of studies in other areas of medicine that carry risks similar to those associated with symptom provocation studies, are also reviewed. The authors draw on the parallel of cardiac stress testing to highlight risks: benefits issues. Finally, the authors discuss the future of symptom provocation studies and emphasize that these studies will need to meet the highest scientific standards, ethical standards and safeguards.

Relationships between symptoms of schizophrenia and substance abuse

Previous work posits that severity of substance abuse and severity of schizophrenic symptoms should be linked by either or both of two mechanisms: self-regulation of symptoms and drug-induced exacerbation of symptoms. Research on these relationships has yielded mixed results. We examined the interrelationships of schizophrenic symptoms and substance abuse in 172 patients with co-occurring disorders. Relationships were weak or nonexistent, without any consistent pattern. Our findings do not support the view that substances are used to self-regulate symptoms. In addition, our results suggest that substance abuse may lead to higher rates of institutionalization through mechanisms other than by exacerbating symptoms.

Amphetamine and negative symptoms of schizophrenia

The purpose of this study was to assess further the effect of amphetamine on negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Thirty-seven schizophrenic males meeting DSM-III criteria were rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Abrams and Taylor Scale, and the Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale before and after double-blind administration of either amphetamine (n = 26) or placebo (n = 11). Our results indicated that amphetamine administration generally did not improve negative symptoms, even when accounting for changes in positive symptoms. However, greater baseline negative symptoms were associated with a modest diminution after amphetamine treatment. Therefore, amphetamine may modestly improve negative symptoms in those schizophrenics in whom this symptomatology is more severe.

Negative symptoms in schizophrenia: considerations for clinical trials. Working group on negative symptoms in schizophrenia

There is little agreement about the methodology of clinical trials of antipsychotic drugs in patients with negative symptoms. A literature review revealed wide variation in experimental design, rating scales and study duration. This reflects differing views as to the definition and response to treatment of negative symptoms. Some degree of standardization would improve comparability of studies and aid the development of new compounds. Patients included in such studies should have displayed negative symptoms for at least 6 months. Depressive symptoms, positive schizophrenic symptoms and extrapyramidal signs may all influence or be confused with negative symptoms and may respond to treatment; they should be at a low level at baseline and should be measured during the study period. Studies should last at least 8 weeks. Several scales are available for measuring negative symptoms and are reviewed; a global impression score should be used additionally.

The role of serotonin in schizophrenia: an overview of the nomenclature, distribution and alterations of serotonin receptors in the central nervous system

Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that is widely distributed throughout the central nervous system. The role of serotonin in schizophrenia is still unclear. Postmortem studies of serotonin receptor subtypes in schizophrenia have been inconclusive for the most part. The most promising findings involve a reduction in 5-HT2 receptors and 5-HT reuptake sites in the prefrontal cortex of schizophrenic patients. In this paper we review the function, distribution and pharmacological characteristics of serotonin receptors. Postmortem studies are also reviewed, focusing upon the role of these receptors in schizophrenia.

Mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs. Implications for novel therapeutic strategies for schizophrenia

The mechanisms which contribute to the actions of atypical antipsychotic drugs, such as clozapine and the putative atypical agents remoxipride and raclopride, are reviewed. Examination of available preclinical and clinical data leads to two hypotheses concerning the mode of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs. The first hypothesis is that antagonism of the dopamine D2 receptor is both necessary and sufficient for the atypical profile, but that interaction with subtypes of the D2 receptor differentiates typical from atypical antipsychotic drugs. The second hypothesis has been previously advanced, and suggests that a relatively high ratio of serotonin 5-HT2:dopamine D2 receptor antagonism may subserve the atypical profile. It seems likely that the atypical antipsychotic drug profile may be achieved in more than one way.

Drug abuse in schizophrenic patients: clinical correlates and reasons for use

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to 1) determine substance abuse prevalence and preference in a diverse sample of schizophrenic, schizoaffective, and schizophreniform inpatients, 2) compare drug-abusing and non-drug-abusing patients on demographic and clinical variables during the acute and stabilization phases of their hospital course, and 3) obtain data from patients on reasons for drug abuse and on acute state-related changes during periods of intoxication.

METHOD

Eighty-three psychotic inpatients consecutively admitted to a New York City teaching hospital were evaluated. Sixty-eight had schizophrenia, 12 had schizoaffective disorder, and three had schizophreniform disorder diagnosed according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Each patient received ratings on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Global Assessment Scale, and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms at admission and at discharge, an evaluation of premorbid adjustment, and an extensive interview on drug and alcohol use.

RESULTS

Forty (48%) of the patients received diagnoses of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence. The drug-abusing patients primarily used cannabis (N = 26), alcohol (N = 21), and cocaine (N = 14) and reported that they abused drugs to get "high," to relieve depression, and to relax. They had significantly fewer positive and negative symptoms at discharge, better sexual adjustment and worse school performance during adolescence, and more family histories of drug abuse than the non-drug-abusing patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Schizophrenic patients who abuse drugs may represent a subgroup of patients with better prognoses and less severe clinical characteristics of schizophrenia, but their drug abuse may adversely affect global outcome.

Predictors of response to high dose antipsychotics in chronic schizophrenics

Significant numbers of chronic schizophrenic patients do not experience sufficient symptom relief from usual doses of antipsychotic medication. Clinicians must decide if high doses of antipsychotics should be tried. In this study baseline symptoms, drug levels, and the symptomatic effects of an acute stimulant challenge were examined before 14 subjects received a 50% increase in their antipsychotic dosing. The group as a whole did not improve. Several individuals with lower drug levels, high baseline hallucinations, and stimulant-induced improvement in hallucinations improved mildly after 3 weeks on the higher antipsychotic dose.

Nonregressive schizophrenia--a long-term comparative follow-up investigation

A 14-17 year follow-up study of a first admission sample of nonregressive schizophrenic cases revealed a phenomenological and diagnostic consistency over time. Some improved and adapted well in society but a considerable proportion developed into chronic schizophrenic syndromes. Schizophrenic deterioration was also manifested among those who adhered to a nonregressive course without ever revealing frank psychotic decompensation. Treatment consumption and disability were high. Prognosis and outcome were, in the main, similar to a parallel series of regressive schizophrenic first-admission cases of similar sex and age composition. The sex difference noted in the intermediate-term outcome study in 1973, with a more favourable outcome among the women, was no longer present. The findings added further support to the validity of the concept of nonregressive schizophrenia and to the hypothesis of a joint nosology with classical schizophrenia.