Antipsychotic withdrawal symptoms: phenomenology and pathophysiology

Reducing the Risk of Withdrawal Symptoms and Relapse Following Clozapine Discontinuation-Is It Feasible to Develop Evidence-Based Guidelines?

Clozapine is the only antipsychotic that is effective in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, in certain clinical situations, such as the emergence of serious adverse effects, it is necessary to discontinue clozapine. Stopping clozapine treatment poses a particular challenge due to the risk of psychotic relapse, as well as the development of withdrawal symptoms. Despite these challenges for the clinician, there is currently no formal guidance on how to safely to discontinue clozapine. We assessed the feasibility of developing evidence-based recommendations for (1) minimizing the risk of withdrawal symptoms, (2) managing withdrawal phenomena, and (3) commencing alternatives treatment when clozapine is discontinued. We then evaluated the recommendations against the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II criteria. We produced 19 recommendations. The majority of these recommendation were evidence-based, although the strength of some recommendations was limited by a reliance of studies of medium to low quality. We discuss next steps in the refinement and validation of an evidence-based guideline for stopping clozapine and identify key outstanding questions.

Definitions of relapse in trials comparing antipsychotic maintenance with discontinuation or reduction for schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Avoidance of relapse is the main aim of long-term antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia, yet how 'relapse' is defined in trials is not well-known.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of definitions of relapse in trials of continuous antipsychotic treatment compared with discontinuation, intermittent treatment or dose reduction for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Trials were identified from previous Cochrane reviews and a new search. The quality of relapse definitions was rated in terms of reliability and clinical relevance and associations between quality of definitions and trial characteristics and outcome were explored.

RESULTS

We identified 82 reports of 81 trials which employed 54 different definitions of relapse. There were 33 definitions in the 35 trials published since 1990, with recent trials employing complex definitions often involving alternative criteria. Only ten primary definitions of relapse required the presence of psychotic symptoms in all cases, and only three specified this in combination with a measure of overall severity or functional decline. Only two definitions specified a duration longer than two days. Relapse definitions were rated as showing good reliability in 37 trials, but only seven showed good clinical relevance. Six trials with definitions that were both reliable and clinically relevant were slightly longer, but did not differ from remaining trials in other characteristics or overall or relative risk of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic trials define relapse in numerous different ways, and few definitions consistently reflect suggested indications of a clinically significant relapse.

Long-term studies of antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia

Studies on long-term efficacy and safety should be a main concern in the evaluation of novel antipsychotics. The present paper is a review of important issues related to the design and performance of such trials. The variability of the natural course of schizophrenia, the variability in treatment response, and the variability of actions of different neuroleptics need to be considered. Long-term studies need to address maintenance of efficacy, prevention of relapse and recurrence, health economics, quality of life and a large number of safety issues in order to get approval for new drug applications and reimbursement on expensive new medicines. Assessment instruments for efficacy, tolerability and safety, need to be supplemented with rating scales for various aspects of psychopathology (positive, negative, deficit symptoms), social and work functioning, drug induced mental side effects, quality of life and accounts of total treatment costs.

Attempting to discontinue antipsychotic medication: Withdrawal methods, relapse and success

Few studies explore subjective experiences of attempting to discontinue antipsychotic medication, the withdrawal methods people use, or how their efforts affect their outcomes. People who take antipsychotics for off-label purposes are poorly represented in the literature. This study investigates experiences of attempting to discontinue antipsychotics in a cross-sectional sample and explores potential associations between withdrawal methods, relapse, and success. An anonymous online survey was completed by 105 adults who had taken antipsychotics for any reason and had attempted discontinuation at least once. A mixed methods approach was used to interpret the responses. Just over half (55.2%) described successfully stopping for varying lengths of time. Half (50.5%) reported no current use. People across diagnostic groups reported unwanted withdrawal effects, but these were not universal. Withdrawing gradually across more than one month was positively associated, and relapse was negatively associated with both self-defined successful discontinuation and no current use. Gradual withdrawal was negatively associated with relapse during withdrawal. We conclude it is possible to successfully discontinue antipsychotic medication, relapse during withdrawal presents a major obstacle to successfully stopping AMs, and people who withdraw gradually across more than one month may be more likely to stop and to avoid relapse during withdrawal.

Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates of Aggression in Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Effect Size Analysis

Background: Aggression in psychoses is of high clinical importance, and volumetric MRI techniques have been used to explore its structural brain correlates. Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and PsycINFO through September 2017 using thesauri representing aggression, psychosis, and brain imaging. We calculated effect sizes for each study and mean Hedge's g for whole brain (WB) volume. Methodological quality was established using the PRISMA checklist (PROSPERO: CRD42014014461). Results: Our sample consisted of 12 studies with 470 patients and 155 healthy controls (HC). After subtracting subjects due to cohort overlaps, 314 patients and 96 HC remained. Qualitative analyses showed lower volumes of WB, prefrontal regions, temporal lobe, hippocampus, thalamus and cerebellum, and higher volumes of lateral ventricles, amygdala, and putamen in violent vs. non-violent people with schizophrenia. In quantitative analyses, violent persons with schizophrenia exhibited a significantly lower WB volume than HC (p = 0.004), and also lower than non-violent persons with schizophrenia (p = 0.007). Conclusions: We reviewed evidence for differences in brain volume correlates of aggression in persons with schizophrenia. Our results point toward a reduced whole brain volume in violent as opposed to non-violent persons with schizophrenia. However, considerable sample overlap in the literature, lack of reporting of potential confounding variables, and missing research on affective psychoses limit our explanatory power. To permit stronger conclusions, further studies evaluating structural correlates of aggression in psychotic disorders are needed.

Severe Quetiapine Withdrawal Syndrome with Nausea and Vomiting in a 65-year-old Patient with Psychotic Depression

A 65-year old patient suffering from severe psychotic depression obtained quetiapine for roughly one year. Several attempts to discontinue quetiapine by tapering the dose provoked severe withdrawal symptoms with nausea and vomitus. Pretreatment with domperidone largely prevented withdrawal so that he finally could successfully discontinue quetiapine administration.

Experiencing antipsychotic discontinuation: results from a survey of Australian consumers

Despite high reported rates of antipsychotic non-adherence, little is known about consumer experiences during discontinuation. This study was designed to increase understanding of antipsychotic discontinuation from consumer perspectives. In 2011-2012, 98 Australian consumers involved with participating organizations completed an anonymous survey detailing past antipsychotic discontinuation attempts. Of the 88 participants who reported at least one discontinuation attempt, over half (n = 47, 54.7%) reported stopping without clinician knowledge or support. This group was 35% (confidence interval 15.4-54.6%) more likely to stop abruptly than those (n = 41, 45.3%) stopping with clinician support (P = 0.002). Only 10 participants (23.3%) recalled being given information about discontinuation symptoms other than relapse; however, 68 participants (78.2%) reported experiencing a range of discontinuation symptoms including physical, cognitive, emotional, psychotic or sleep-related disturbances. Findings cannot be readily generalized because of sampling constraints. However, the significant number of participants who reported discontinuation symptoms, in addition to psychosis, is consistent with previous research. This study provides new insight into consumer motivations for discontinuation and possible problems in clinical communication that may contribute to frequent non-collaborative discontinuation attempts. Mental health nurses, who play a pivotal role in medication communication events, may benefit from increased awareness of consumer perspectives on this topic.

Challenges in pharmacologic management of the hospitalized patient with psychiatric comorbidity

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric comorbidity is common in the inpatient medical population. Hospitalists are frequently faced with decisions regarding the psychopharmacologic management of medically ill patients, yet receive limited psychiatric training. This review aims to assist the hospitalist in making an informed decision about the continuation of home psychotropic medications in the medically ill patient.

METHODS

A PubMed literature review was performed to obtain information on the effects of psychotropic medication discontinuation. In addition, the literature was reviewed regarding the potential challenges of psychotropic medication continuation.

RESULTS

A growing number of studies demonstrate high rates of relapse when medications are discontinued in patients suffering from mood disorders, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorders. Abrupt cessation of psychotropics is especially dangerous, leading to a greater chance of destabilization. Discontinuation syndromes, with prominent physical symptoms, may also result from sudden psychotropic cessation. Conversely, continuing home psychotropic medication may cause adverse effects due to drug-drug interactions or changing pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

This review examines the risks of psychotropic discontinuation as well as the challenges of psychotropic continuation in the medically ill patient. When making complex psychopharmacologic decisions, hospitalists should employ all available resources, including pharmacists and consult-liaison psychiatrists. Ultimately, physicians and patients must make collaborative decisions, weighing the risks and benefits of psychiatric medications.

The effects of abrupt antipsychotic discontinuation in cognitively impaired older persons: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic use for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) is controversial. Guidelines advise to reduce antipsychotics given the adverse effects and limited efficacy, to limit dose and treatment duration as well as to undertake discontinuation.

METHODS

A pilot study with 40 hospitalised geriatric cognitively impaired patients, in which the effects of abrupt antipsychotic discontinuation were investigated, using neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) scores before and one month after discontinuation. Withdrawal symptoms were monitored thrice a day with a checklist during five consecutive days.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 40) had a mean age of 84 years (range 67-95) and 53% were male. The total mean baseline NPI score was 21 (SD 12) with predominantly behavioural rather than psychological disturbances. After abrupt discontinuation, mild withdrawal symptoms were observed in 72% of the patients, with frequencies of symptoms peaking on day 2 (53%) and day 3 (48%). After one month, 31 patients (85%) were still off antipsychotics and improved on the majority of NPI domains, with a total mean NPI score decreasing from 18 (SD 13) to 12 (SD 8, p = 0.003). In the relapse group, there was no deterioration associated with the abrupt discontinuation and subsequent resumption of therapy with a total mean NPI score decreasing from 31 (SD 12) at baseline to 27 (SD 8) at one-month follow-up (p = 0.345).

CONCLUSION

Abrupt antipsychotic discontinuation appears to be feasible in older individuals with BPSD. Systematically performed discontinuation efforts in clinical practice are needed to differentiate between patients where antipsychotics have no added value and patients where the benefits outweigh the risks.

Addressing non-adherence to antipsychotic medication: a harm-reduction approach

This paper discusses the evidence base for interventions addressing non-adherence to prescribed antipsychotics. A case study approach is used, and the extent to which adherence improvement interventions might be used in collaboration with a specific patient is considered. The principles and application of harm-reduction philosophy in mental health are presented in a planned non-adherence harm-reduction intervention. This intervention aims to acknowledge the patient's ability to choose and learn from experience and to reduce the potential harm of antipsychotic withdrawal. The intervention evaluation method is outlined.

Switching antipsychotics: an updated review with a focus on quetiapine

Atypical antipsychotics offer broader efficacy and improved tolerability compared with conventional agents. Many patients currently treated with conventional antipsychotics continue to experience persistent symptoms or troublesome side effects and may benefit from a change to one of the newer atypical agents. There are also significant differences in the side-effect profiles of the atypicals, such that a switch from one atypical agent to another could offer advantages to many patients. Unfortunately, many clinicians remain uncertain about the switching process and are reluctant to initiate change. The aim of this review is to identify the indications for a switch in antipsychotic therapy with a focus on recent switching data for the atypical antipsychotic, quetiapine. The clinical aspects of quetiapine's receptor binding characteristics are reviewed including the implications of the low D(2) antagonist properties that make quetiapine the treatment of choice when EPS persists with other atypical antipsychotics. Practical guidelines are given for managing the process of changeover, for avoiding pitfalls and for maximizing the chances of a successful switch. For example, when managing the antipsychotic crossover, it is important to consider the psychological effects of switching arising from symptom and side-effect changes. Finally, advice is provided on the assessments necessary when evaluating the success of a change in therapy, together with guidance on the optimal duration of treatment trials.

Switching to amisulpride

The introduction of atypical antipsychotics represents an important advance in the treatment of schizophrenia. As their therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and safety profiles are clearly superior to classical neuroleptics, atypical antipsychotic agents are considered to be the treatment of choice in first episode patients. In addition, an increasing number of patients are being switched from classical to atypical antipsychotic agents. Switching is especially relevant in patients with a poor therapeutic response to classical neuroleptics and persistent symptoms (positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depressive syndromes, cognitive deficit); in patients with a psychotic relapse despite compliance; in patients with important side-effects (not only acute and tardive extrapyramidal symptoms [EPS] and general side-effects, but also dysphoria or neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome [NIDS]); and in patients who are non-compliant due to side-effects. Switching to atypical antipsychotics should be performed with extreme care in stabilised patients; or in patients who present a danger to themselves or others at relapse; or in patients who are on depot neuroleptics who were non-compliant to previous oral treatment. Switching requires careful planning to reduce the risk of withdrawal effects (neuroleptic withdrawal syndrome, cholinergic rebound, exacerbation of symptoms or relapse, rebound of parkinsonism, dystonia, akathisia, dyskinesia), which may mask the beneficial effects and lead to early discontinuation of the new treatment. Patients, family and carers should be actively involved at all stages, and educated about the possible benefits and problems associated with switching therapy. Cross-tapering old and new treatment is the preferred method for switching and this involves tapering off the previous antipsychotic agent and any adjunctive treatment (sedatives, anticholinergic medication), while gradually titrating the new atypical antipsychotic agent to the established therapeutic dose. Switching patients to amisulpride treatment offers effective antipsychotic therapy, with a positive effect on negative and depressive symptoms. Amisulpride treatment also results in improved quality of life and social functioning in addition to fewer relapses and days of hospitalisation during long-term follow-up.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome after neuroleptic discontinuation

1. Neuroleptic withdrawal can cause autonomic and behavioral symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, diaphoresis, myalgia, anxiety, restlessness) and movement disorders (withdrawal emergent parkinsonism, withdrawal dyskinesia, covert dyskinesia). 2. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but extremely severe adverse reaction to neuroleptic drugs characterized by extrapyramidal and autonomic symptoms, altered level of consciousness and abnormal laboratory findings. 3. Withdrawal neuroleptic malignant syndrome, though an even rarer condition (only 7 cases reported to date), should alert to consider the possibility that abrupt neuroleptic discontinuation can be complicated by NMS. 4. The pathophysiology of withdrawal medical symptoms may be related to a cholinergic rebound; withdrawal neuroleptic malignant syndrome may be attributed to an "imbalance" in the dopaminergic system. 5. The authors report two cases of NMS precipitated by the abrupt withdrawal of neuroleptic drugs.

Remoxipride in the treatment of psychoses

In Sweden the atypical neuroleptic drug remoxipride has now been used in routine treatment of psychoses for almost two years. Over 7,000 patients have been treated. During that time both advantages and problems, foreseen and unforeseen, have been encountered. This paper is based on clinical experiences and the discussion is illustrated by five short case-histories. The most important points of the discussion are: As expected, remoxipride seems to produce less extrapyramidal side-effects than traditional neuroleptics. Patients experience less, if any, impairment in cognitive functioning than with traditional neuroleptics. Patients experience less inhibition of feelings and emotions than with traditional neuroleptics, which most often is of great positive value but may also create problems when feelings and emotions get overwhelming and difficult to handle. It is very important that patients get adequate psychological support and attention from the psychiatric team when changing from a traditional neuroleptic drug to remoxipride.

Overcoming the neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome: clinical observations with remoxipride

Remoxipride is a selective dopamine D2 antagonist with virtually no activity on other transmitter receptors. It antagonizes dopamine agonists within a wide dose range in animals when it does not cause sedation or akinesia. Clinical studies with remoxipride have demonstrated antipsychotic efficacy apparently equal to classical neuroleptics in short- and long-term treatment of schizophrenia. Remoxipride has a low extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) profile, and it is generally well tolerated. In clinical practice remoxipride has been reported to differ from classical neuroleptics with regard to subjective side effects. On switching to remoxipride, patients report improvement in cognitive, conative, affective and emotional functions. In many cases the reports are supported by family members and/or caregivers. Although anecdotal, such reports are in line with the low EPS profile of remoxipride and its weak sedative properties. It may indicate that remoxipride does not elicit the neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome, commonly experienced with classical neuroleptics, or that remoxipride improves the deficit syndrome (or primary negative symptoms) of schizophrenia. These and other hypotheses need to be confirmed by formal clinical studies.

A neurochemical basis for alcohol and other drug addiction

There are major clinical observations in alcohol and other drug addicts and neurochemical studies in animals and humans that support the hypothesis for a common neurochemical basis for alcohol and other drug addiction. The common occurrence of concurrent alcohol and multiple drug dependence in clinical and general populations, family history and genetic studies, and basic and clinical research in the neurochemistry of addictive behavior provide evidence for a common genealogical vulnerability to combined alcohol and other drug addiction. Clinical neurochemical models for addictive behaviors can be derived from neurochemical pathways for the initiation and sustenance of addictive disorders. The role of tolerance and dependence is not specific to addiction but indicates a homeostatic response of the brain to the presence of a foreign substance. Animal and human studies are analyzed for clinical synthesis of a neurochemical basis for addictive disorders.

Carbamazepine Treatment of Psychosis

1. The antiseizure medication carbamazepine, when used to treat psychosis, does not produce the same side effects that appear as problematic in neuroleptic treatment, most notably tardive dyskinesia. 2. Carbamazepine has useful sedating, antianxiety, and antidepressant properties that make it an effective treatment for manic psychosis. 3. Nursing actions include assisting psychiatry in establishing and maintaining effective carbamazepine treatment, ensuring safe treatment, enhancing the patient's self-care agency, and facilitating research regarding the effects of carbamazepine treatment.

Dopaminergic supersensitivity and vomiting among schizophrenic patients

The prevalence of vomiting among schizophrenic inpatients was determined over a 6-week period; 8 of 19 patients (42%) experienced at least one episode of vomiting and 3 (16%) experienced 4 episodes. A hypothesis that this may be a dopaminergic supersensitivity phenomenon is proposed, but no association with tardive dyskinesia, another putative supersensitivity phenomena, could be demonstrated. The authors suggest that vomiting among schizophrenic patients is usually underestimated and may at times be a serious clinical problem.

Heterocyclic antidepressant, monoamine oxidase inhibitor and neuroleptic withdrawal phenomena

1. The authors review the literature describing acute symptomatology produced by the gradual or abrupt withdrawal of heterocyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) and neuroleptics. 2. Withdrawal of heterocyclic antidepressants and antipsychotic agents causes similar symptomatology. Symptoms produced by the discontinuation of these drugs include nausea, emesis, anorexia, diarrhea, rhinorrhea, diaphoresis, myalgias, paresthesias, anxiety, agitation, restlessness, and insomnia. 3. Psychotic relapse is often presaged by anxiety, agitation, restlessness, and insomnia. Prodromal symptoms are distinguished from the effects of neuroleptic withdrawal by a temporal relationship of the latter to reductions in the dosage or discontinuation of antipsychotic agents. 4. Withdrawal of MAOIs can result in severe anxiety, agitation, pressured speech, sleeplessness or drowsiness, hallucinations, delirium, and paranoid psychosis. 5. MAOI withdrawal phenomena resemble the symptoms produced by the discontinuation of chronically administered psychostimulants. 6. The capacity of MAOIs to exert amphetamine-like effects presynaptically and the propensity of somatic treatments for depression to subsensitize presynaptic receptors regulating the release of catecholamines provide a basis for the development of psychotic symptoms upon the withdrawal of MAOI. Evidence for this hypothesis is reviewed.

Panic anxiety after abrupt discontinuation of mianserin

We observed a case of withdrawal after abrupt discontinuation of mianserin. A 41-year-old woman was treated according to a diagnosis of depression, which was her 6th episode. Mianserin 30 mg/day, etizolam 1 mg/day and flunitrazepam 1 mg/day were administered. When the patient discontinued taking the drugs by herself because of subsiding of these symptoms, severe panic anxiety appeared. This panic anxiety was not relieved by taking etizolam and flunitrazepam again, but subsided rapidly by the re-administration of mianserin 30 mg/day, and because of that the depressive symptom also disappeared. From these experiences panic anxiety seemed to be a withdrawal symptom, and involvement of the noradrenergic system in panic anxiety as well as serotonergic system was suggested.

Monoamine oxidase inhibitor withdrawal phenomena: symptoms and pathophysiology

The author reviews the literature reporting the untoward effects of withdrawing monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). The withdrawal of these agents can result in severe anxiety, agitation, pressured speech, sleeplessness or drowsiness, hallucinations, delirium and paranoid psychosis. MAOI withdrawal phenomena resemble the symptoms produced by the discontinuation of chronically administered psychostimulants. The capacity of MAOI to exert amphetamine-like effects presynaptically, and the propensity of somatic treatments for depression to subsensitize presynaptic receptors regulating the release of catecholamines, can provide a basis for the development of psychotic syndromes upon the withdrawal of MAOIs. Evidence for this hypothesis is reviewed.