Accelerated Schedule for Hepatitis B Immunization

Chronic Viral Hepatitis in Elite Athletes: Approaches to Risk Assessment, Prevention and Management

Elite athletes who participate in contact sports are at risk of bleeding injuries, leading to transmission of blood-borne viruses including hepatitis type B, C and D (HBV, HCV and HDV) capable of causing chronic liver disease, liver failure and liver cancer. In view of the significant advances in the viral hepatitis field over the past decade, more structured approaches should be in place to screen for and manage viral hepatitis in elite athletes. HBV status should be assessed in all elite athletes, and those infected should receive nucleos(t)ide analogues for viral suppression, while uninfected individuals should receive HBV vaccination. The all-oral direct acting antivirals for HCV are highly effective and safe, thus the remaining challenge with hepatitis C is case identification and linkage to care. HDV is only found in HBV-infected individuals, which is characterized by rapid disease progression and higher rates of cirrhosis and liver cancer in infected subjects. Pegylated interferon was the mainstay of treatment for HDV infection until bulevirtide, a viral entry inhibitor, was recently approved by the European Union (EMA) and FDA in America, while multiple novel therapies are already in clinical trials as part of the HBV cure program. Overall, awareness of chronic viral hepatitis in athletes should be improved. Prevention remains the cornerstone of the management of viral hepatitis in sport coupled with rigorous disease assessment in infected individuals, and antiviral therapy where indicated.

Antibody response to an accelerated course of Hepatitis B vaccination

BACKGROUND

There are several courses with different dosing intervals for Hepatitis B vaccination. This independent study is looking at the antibody response after three doses of the accelerated course.

AIMS

The primary aim of the study was to examine data available at an Occupational Health Service for the antibody response to one or if nonresponsive, two accelerated Hepatitis B courses. A secondary aim is to determine if there is a difference in response for different sex and age groups.

METHODS

This is a retrospective anonymous and blinded study looking at the antibody response in 1032 healthcare personnel given the accelerated course of the Hepatitis B vaccine over a period of over 6 years. An anti-Hbs response 4 months after the start of the vaccination of >10 IU/ml was taken as indicative of a response.

RESULTS

After one course, 93% of the healthcare personnel developed antibody levels thought to confer immunity. After two courses, nearly 99% of the healthcare personnel had developed an adequate immune response. The response was better in females and <40 years old, a difference that was statistically significant for those aged <40.

CONCLUSIONS

The accelerated course confers high levels of immunity after 4 months and this supports the current practice of offering the accelerated dose to UK healthcare personnel who can be at immediate and higher risk of infection. Though some groups are less responsive, all groups mount a good response so all those at risk should be encouraged to have this vaccination.

An Analysis of Adherence to Vaccination Recommendations in a Thoracic Organ Transplant Cohort

(1) Background: Vaccination of solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients is vital to decrease infection-related morbidity and mortality. Here we describe our heart and lung transplant programs’ rates of completion of hepatitis B and pneumococcal vaccinations and identify potential opportunities for improvement. (2) Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study that included all heart and lung transplant recipients between 1 July 2013 and 31 July 2018. We assessed demographics, causes of organ failure, pretransplant hepatitis B immune status, and completion rates for hepatitis B vaccine series, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13), and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). (3) Results: A total of 41 patients were included in the heart transplant cohort. Twelve (29.3%) had baseline hepatitis B immunity. Only 8/29 (27.6%) completed the entire 3-dose hepatitis B vaccination series pretransplant. Pretransplant PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccination rates were 58.5% (24/41) and 48.8% (20/41), respectively; no additional patients received PCV13 or PPSV23 post-transplant. In the heart transplant cohort, a majority (82.9%) of patients were evaluated by the Transplant Infectious Diseases consultative service (TxID) pretransplant, and this had a statistically significant association with increased pneumococcal vaccination rates (p = 0.0017, PCV13 and p = 0.0103, PPSV23). In total, 55 patients were included in the lung transplant cohort. Five (9.1%) had baseline hepatitis B immunity; 33/50 (66.0%) completed the hepatitis B vaccine series in the pretransplant setting. Pretransplant PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccination rate was 40.0% (22/55) and 69.1% (38/55), respectively. There was only a 47.3% and 72.3% completion rate overall in the post-transplant setting. (4) Conclusions: There continues to be a need for a comprehensive and coordinated effort to increase vaccine adherence for all SOT candidates in the pretransplant setting.

Prolonged evolution of the memory B cell response induced by a replicating adenovirus-influenza H5 vaccine

Induction of an antibody response capable of recognizing highly diverse strains is a major obstacle to the development of vaccines for viruses such as HIV and influenza. Here, we report the dynamics of B cell expansion and evolution at the single-cell level after vaccination with a replication-competent adenovirus type 4 recombinant virus expressing influenza H5 hemagglutinin. Fluorescent H1 or H5 probes were used to quantitate and isolate peripheral blood B cells and their antigen receptors. We observed increases in H5-specific antibody somatic hypermutation and potency for several months beyond the period of active viral replication that was not detectable at the serum level. Individual broad and potent antibodies could be isolated, including one stem-specific antibody that is part of a new multidonor class. These results demonstrate prolonged evolution of the B cell response for months after vaccination and should be considered in efforts to evaluate or boost vaccine-induced immunity.

Safety and Immunogenicity of 3 Formulations of an Investigational Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Nonpregnant Women: Results From 2 Phase 2 Trials

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia in neonates and infants. RSV vaccination during pregnancy could boost preexisting neutralizing antibody titers, providing passive protection to newborns.

Methods

Two observer-blinded, controlled studies (RSV F-020 [clinical trials registration NCT02360475] and RSV F-024 [NCT02753413]) evaluated immunogenicity and safety of an investigational RSV vaccine in healthy, nonpregnant 18-45-year-old women. Both studies used a licensed adult formulation of combined tetanus toxoid-diphtheria toxoid-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine as a control. RSV F-020 evaluated immunogenicity and safety: participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive 1 dose of RSV-prefusion F protein (PreF) vaccine containing 30 µg or 60 µg of nonadjuvanted RSV-PreF, 60 µg of aluminum-adjuvanted RSV-PreF, or Tdap. RSV F-024 evaluated safety: participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 1 dose of 60 µg of nonadjuvanted RSV-PreF or Tdap.

Results

Both studies showed similar reactogenicity profiles for RSV-PreF and Tdap. No serious adverse events were considered vaccine related. In RSV F-020, geometric mean ratios of RSV-A neutralizing antibody levels at day 30 versus prevaccination were 3.1-3.9 in RSV-PreF recipients and 0.9 in controls. Palivizumab-competing antibody concentrations increased >14-fold in RSV-PreF recipients on day 30. RSV antibody titers waned after day 30 but remained well above baseline through day 90.

Conclusions

All formulations of RSV-PreF boosted preexisting immune responses in 18-45-year old women with comparable immunogenicity. The RSV-PreF safety profile was similar to that of Tdap vaccine.

Rapid immunization effects of a new type of 60 μg hepatitis B vaccine compared with traditional 20 μg hepatitis B vaccines in adults

BACKGROUND

The widely recommended standard schedule of hepatitis B vaccine for adults is months 0, 1 and 6, which takes 6 months to complete. Rapid completion of one vaccination schedule is important to adults because of its low compliance with follow-up doses. A new type of 60 μg Hepatitis B vaccine, made by Shenzhen Kangtai Biological Products Co., LTD., is originally recommended for low or non-responders. The objective of this clinical trial was to test whether this 60 μg hepatitis B vaccine could be used in primary immune population and what is its level of immunogenicity and safety compared with other hepatitis B vaccines.

METHODS

This is a 2-center randomized controlled study. A total of 1169 healthy adults aged between 25 and 55 who tested negative for HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc were eligible for the study and were enrolled from relatively fixed and stable sites, such as villages, schools and large enterprises et al in Xuanhua county in Hebei province and Huaibei county in Anhui province. They were randomized to group A (20 μg Engerix-B® with 0, 1, 6 month intervals), group B (20 μg Kangtai hepatitis B vaccine with 0, 1, 6 month intervals), group C (60 μg Kangtai hepatitis B vaccine with 0, 2 month intervals) and group D (20 μg Huabei hepatitis B vaccine made by recombinant DNA techniques in CHO cell with 0, 1, 6 month intervals). In group A, B and D, every study object's blood sample was collected in the second month after their final injection to test the anti-HBs levels; while in group C, the blood sample was collected in the second month after the first and the second injection to test the anti-HBs levels. Adverse events were collected after each dose to assess the vaccines' safety.

RESULTS

The seroprotection rates were 93.17%, 97.23%, 93.54% and 98.98% respectively and the geometric mean titers (GMTs) were 1033.38 mIU/ml, 600.75 mIU/ml, 265.69 mIU/ml and 1627.05 mIU/ml in group A,B,C and D respectively. The difference of seroprotection rate among the 4 groups was statistically significant (χ² = 17.26, P<0.05). The difference of titers of anti-HBs among the 4 groups was statistically significant (H = 162.42, P<0.05). BMI, age (older than 40) and smoking were the influence factors of anti-HBs levels on 60 μg hepatitis B vaccine.

CONCLUSION

60 μg hepatitis B vaccine has a satisfactory safety and seroprotection rate in adult, It could be used in rapid adult hepatitis B immunization.

Japanese encephalitis: a review of clinical guidelines and vaccine availability in Asia

Travelers to Asia are at risk for acquiring Japanese Encephalitis (JEV), an arbovirus with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in vaccination resulting in vaccines with low rates of side effects have strengthened the rationale to vaccinate more travelers to this region, as reflected in many updated national guidelines for prevention of disease in travelers. Vaccines however still require a complex pre-travel schedule and are costly, often leading to a requirement or desire for a vaccination option in the destination country. We explore current national guidelines for prevention of Japanese Encephalitis and seek to provide information on availability of JEV vaccines in various Asian countries.

Efficacy of an accelerated hepatitis B vaccination program during pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the feasibility and immunogenicity of an accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule of 0, 1, and 4 months in high-risk pregnant women.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective clinical trial of high-risk pregnant women who were hepatitis B surface antigen-negative at presentation for prenatal care. A detailed questionnaire was administered and eligible women received a hepatitis B vaccine intramuscularly on a 0-, 1-, and 4-month schedule. Adverse reactions and hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion rates were documented. Factors influencing seroconversion were determined.

RESULTS

Two hundred high-risk pregnant women were enrolled; 84% completed the three-dose vaccine series. Seroconversion (hepatitis B surface antigen 10 milli-international units/mL or greater) after one dose was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49-63%), 77% (95% CI, 71-83%) after two doses, and 90% (95% CI, 85-94%) after completing three doses. Body mass index was inversely associated with seroconversion rates (P<.001). There was no single body mass index above which seroconversion did not occur. There were no serious adverse events; injection site discomfort was the most prevalent complaint (10.5%).

CONCLUSION

An accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule at 0, 1, and 4 months in high-risk pregnant women is effective, practical, and well tolerated. This accelerated vaccine strategy can be completed during the course of pregnancy and provides another means of decreasing hepatitis B virus disease and transmission.

Gender differences in hepatitis C seroprevalence and suboptimal vaccination and hepatology services uptake amongst substance misusers

Injecting drug users are the principal at risk group for blood borne viruses. The aim was to assess the feasibility of screening substance misusers for blood borne viruses, and to offer appropriate vaccinations/referral to hepatology services. This was a nurse led prospective 6-month study based at a large Substance Misuse Service in south east England. Of the 196 consecutive individuals assessed, 81 were eligible for HBV immunization of whom only 33.3% completed a vaccination course. Prevalence of positive serological markers were: anti-HBc 14.4%, HBsAg 1.5%, and HCV antibody 37.9%. Compared to men, women were more likely to accept blood borne virus testing (83.3% vs. 62.3%), have ever injected (89.6% vs. 76.3%), overdose (54.2% vs. 23.6%), be anti-HBc positive (27.5% vs. 8.8%), drink alcohol above national recommended guidelines (41.7% vs. 25.7%), and have a positive HCV serology (55% vs. 30.4%) (P ≤ 0.05 for all). Of the 73 individuals identified with a positive HBsAg and or HCV antibody, only 14 (19.1%) were known to hepatology services and 8 (20%) of those eligible subsequently accepted a specialist referral. In conclusion, serological markers for blood borne viruses remain high in substance misusers (anti-HBc 14.4%, HCV antibody 37.9%), with women more likely to be positive. Overall, only 33.3% and 20%, respectively, complete HBV vaccination and accept a hepatology referral. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount to address both the blood borne viruses and the substance misuse and realignment of hepatitis services to Substance Misuse Services may offer such a strategy.

Rapid immunization scheme for spouses of individuals estabilished as hepatitis B carriers during premarital tests

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to monitor the cases identified as hepatitis B carriers during premarital tests, to vaccinate their prospective spouses with a rapid vaccination scheme, and to compare the anti-HBs responses with the traditional vaccination scheme.

METHODS

Blood samples of 1250 couple spouses were tested for HBsAg and anti-HBs. HBsAg positive cases' fiancées which were found HBV negative were administered a rapid three-dose vaccination scheme on days 0, 7, and 21. Forty controls with similar age and gender were also were administered three doses of the same vaccine.

RESULTS

Out of 1250 cases (625 couples), 46 (3.6%) were HBsAg positive, and 40 of them aged between 18 and 39 were admitted to the rapid vaccination program.

CONCLUSION

Upon determination of HBsAg positivity in premarital tests, a rapid vaccination program provides early protection, but the 6th and 12th month vaccinations are also required. Anti-HBs response should be monitored.

Randomized trial of the immunogenicity and safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine given in an accelerated schedule coadministered with the human papillomavirus type 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted cervical cancer vaccine

The human papillomavirus type 16/18 (HPV-16/18) AS04-adjuvanted cervical cancer vaccine is licensed for females aged 10 years and above and is therefore likely to be coadministered with other licensed vaccines, such as hepatitis B. In this randomized, open-label study, we compared the immunogenicity of the hepatitis B vaccine administered alone (HepB group) or with the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (HepB+HPV group) in healthy women aged 20 to 25 years (clinical trial NCT00637195). The hepatitis B vaccine was given at 0, 1, 2, and 12 months (an accelerated schedule which may be required by women at high risk), and the HPV-16/18 vaccine was given at 0, 1, and 6 months. One month after the third dose of hepatitis B vaccine, in the according-to-protocol cohort (n = 72 HepB+HPV; n = 76 HepB), hepatitis B seroprotection rates (titer of ≥10 mIU/ml) were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.5 to 99.6) and 96.9% (CI, 89.2 to 99.6) in the HepB+HPV and HepB groups, respectively, in women initially seronegative for anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs) and anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc). Corresponding geometric mean titers of anti-HBs antibodies were 60.2 mIU/ml (CI, 40.0 to 90.5) and 71.3 mIU/ml (CI, 53.9 to 94.3). Anti-HBs antibody titers rose substantially after the fourth dose of hepatitis B vaccine. All women initially seronegative for anti-HPV-16 and anti-HPV-18 antibodies seroconverted after the second HPV-16/18 vaccine dose and remained seropositive up to 1 month after the third dose. Both vaccines were generally well tolerated, with no difference in reactogenicity between groups. In conclusion, coadministration of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine did not affect the immunogenicity or safety of the hepatitis B vaccine administered in an accelerated schedule in young women.

Vaccination against hepatitis B among prisoners in Iran: accelerated vs. classic vaccination

BACKGROUND

Prisoners and injecting drug users are at constant risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the classic 6-months HBV vaccination might not provide immunization rapidly enough. In this randomized clinical trial we investigated the efficacy of an accelerated vaccination protocol vs. classic schedule among prisoners in Iran.

METHODS

180 prisoners were randomized into 2 vaccination groups; group A underwent accelerated vaccination at 0, 1, 4 and 8 weeks and group C were vaccinated at 0, 1 and 6 months. Antibody against Hepatitis-B surface-antigen (anti-HBs) was assessed at baseline, one, two, six and eight months after the first vaccine dose using immunoenzymatic assays. Seroprotection was defined as anti-HBs titer of 10 IU/L or more. Anti-HBc and HBsAg were measured at baseline and 8th month to evaluate new HBV infection and failure of vaccination.

RESULTS

Overall compliance was 100% and 90.4% in groups A and C respectively. While seroprotection rate at one month was significantly higher in group A (22.4%) compared to group C (4.7%), in the 8th month 78.8% and 93.4% seroprotection was achieved in groups A and C respectively (P < 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Compared to classic HBV vaccination regimen, an accelerated 0, 1, 4 and 8 weeks vaccination schedule can achieve early seroprotection more rapidly, provides clinically sufficient seroprotection with higher compliance in prisoners and can be suggested in situations that rapid immunization against HBV infection is warranted.

A randomized controlled study of accelerated versus standard hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-positive patients

BACKGROUND

In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccines is impaired. The primary and secondary aims of our study were to investigate the effectiveness and compliance of 2 different vaccination regimen in an HIV-infected population.

METHODS

A noninferiority trial with a 10% response margin was designed. Included were patients ≥ 18 years old, with negative HBsAg/anti-HBc serology, and not previously vaccinated against hepatitis B. Patients were stratified according to CD4(+) cell count: <200, 200-500, >500. Participants received 10 μg HBvaxPRO intramuscularly according to a 0-1-3 week schedule or the standard 0-4-24 week schedule. Anti-HBs levels were measured at week 28, considered protective ≥ 10 IU/L.

RESULTS

Modified intention to treat analysis in 761 patients was performed. Overall response difference was 50%(standard arm) versus 38.7% (accelerated arm) =11.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], [4.3, 18.3]), close to the 10% response margin. In CD4(+) cell count group 200-500 cells/mm(3,) the response difference was 20.8% (95% CI [10.9, 30.7]). However, the response difference in CD4(+)cell count group >500 cells/mm(3) was -1.8% (95% CI [-13.4,+9.7]). Compliance was significantly superior with the accelerated schedule, 91.8% versus 82.7% (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSION

In HIV-infected patients, compliance with an accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule is significantly better. The efficacy of an accelerated schedule proved to be non-inferior in CD4(+) cell count group >500 cells/mm(3).

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

CT00230061.

Use of an accelerated immunization schedule for combined hepatitis A and B protection in the corporate traveler

Increased international business travel to moderate or high endemic areas of hepatitis A and B may leave many business travelers at risk for infection if not vaccinated. Many international business travelers depart for hepatitis A and B endemic areas within 2 months of the decision to travel. Many of these travelers do not seek pretravel medical advice and are unaware of the risks and modes of acquiring hepatitis A and B. Monovalent vaccines and a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine are available and can be administered on an accelerated schedule. Because many areas endemic for hepatitis A are also endemic for hepatitis B, accelerated administration of the combined vaccine can offer protection for many international business travelers destined for areas endemic for both diseases and should be part of corporate travel immunization programs.

Chronic viral hepatitis as a public health issue in the world

This article will focus on the impact caused by chronic viral hepatitis B and C globally and will discuss public health measures that have to be implemented in order to prevent and control these diseases. Chronic viral hepatitis is a major global public health problem, an important cause of morbidity and mortality from sequelae which include chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and primary liver cancer. Being a 'silent' disease, the contribution of chronic hepatitis to global morbidity and mortality is generally underestimated. Hepatitis B and C prevention and control should seek to reduce both the incidence of new infections and the risk of chronic liver disease. A comprehensive public health prevention programme should include the prevention and detection of HBV and HCV infections, the diagnosis and control of viral hepatitis related chronic liver disease, conducting surveillance and monitoring the effectiveness of prevention activities, and setting up a research agenda.

Schedules for hepatitis B vaccination of risk groups: balancing immunogenicity and compliance

INTRODUCTION

Vaccination is an important tool in hepatitis B prevention. However, several vaccine doses are required to induce long-term protection. Several at-risk groups have difficulties in adhering to the standard vaccination schedule.

OBJECTIVES

This paper aims to review the use of accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedules, in terms of immunogenicity and compliance.

RESULTS

Accelerated schedules (0.1.2.12 months) or super-accelerated schedules (0.7.21.360 days) have been shown to result in higher proportions of healthy vaccinees reaching anti-HBs antibody levels >or=10 IU/l more rapidly. A fourth completing dose is required to lift antibody levels to an equal height, as does a standard (0.1.6 months) schedule. Accelerated schedules do also increase the uptake of hepatitis B vaccine, that is the proportion of vaccinees who receive three doses. However, completing the schedule with a fourth dose is usually more difficult than completing a standard 0.1.6-month schedule. Several additional tools can help to increase the compliance (eg, reminder systems, outreach services and incentive schemes).

CONCLUSION

For rapid seroconversion and almost immediate protection in the short term, a (super)accelerated schedule could be used in at-risk groups. As long-term protection data with these (super) accelerated schedules have not been documented yet, a fourth dose at month 12 is still required. A shortened schedule (0.1.4 months) might be an alternative worth considering compared with the standard 0.1.6, as it convenes to internationally accepted minimum dose intervals and offers earlier protection. There is a clear need to study the long-term protection and effectiveness of the primary part of (super)accelerated schedules.

Liver disease in adolescents: A cohort study of high-risk individuals

Little is known about the health and behavior of adolescent offenders as they relate to abnormalities of liver biochemistry and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. A large study of male juvenile offenders was undertaken that allowed a re-evaluation of the normal limits of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), associations with elevated ALT, and HCV antibody positivity. Young offenders (age 12-19 years) serving community orders participated in a wide-ranging health survey and laboratory assessment between October 2003 and December 2005. Normal ranges for liver biochemistry were calculated from the 95th percentile of males at the lowest risk for liver disease. The final sample comprised 682 males, of whom 439 (64%) gave blood. The calculated upper limit of normal for ALT was 28 IU/L. Seventeen percent of adolescents had an elevated ALT. Strong associations with elevated ALT included HCV antibody positivity [odds ratio (OR) 14.6], overweight and obesity (OR 6.9), and elevated total cholesterol (OR 3.6). More than 90% of adolescents with elevated ALT levels had 1 or more features of the metabolic syndrome. HCV antibody was positive in approximately 3% of the cohort, with the most significant risk factor being injecting drug use (OR 7.8; P < 0.01). The new infection rate was 3.7% per year.

CONCLUSION

New upper limits for ALT provide greater sensitivity for the early diagnosis of liver disease in adolescents. High rates of HCV infection and obesity-related liver disease exist in this group, and targeted interventions are needed to reduce future health-related morbidity.

An accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule for young drug users

OBJECTIVE

To determine completion rates for an accelerated hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) program among a population of young drug users.

DESIGN

Between January 2001 and May 2002, a three-dose course of HBV vaccine (0, 7 and 21 days) was offered free to all drug users (aged 22 years or younger) accessing two outreach sites of a youth-focused support and drug treatment service in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Clients were offered vaccination in any safe environment of their choice. An audit was conducted on the health records of participating clients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of completed vaccinations; settings in which vaccinations were completed.

RESULTS

Ninety young people accepted vaccination, with 71% completing the full course. The majority preferred to receive vaccination at drug treatment outreach sites (53%).

CONCLUSIONS

An accelerated vaccination schedule appears acceptable to young drug users, suggesting that vaccination programs can be successful when barriers to immunisation are appropriately identified and addressed.

Hepatitis B vaccine uptake among injecting drug users in England 1998 to 2004: is the prison vaccination programme driving recent improvements?

In 1999, the Department of Health allocated additional funding to Health Authorities in England to expand hepatitis B immunization among injecting drug users (IDUs), with the aim of increasing coverage by 20%. In 2001, a vaccination programme for prison inmates in England was also instigated. Between 1998 and 2004 current IDUs participated in a series of annual unlinked anonymous surveys that recorded vaccine uptake (n = 11 383). The proportion self-reporting vaccine uptake rose significantly from 27% in 1998 to 59% in 2004 [adjusted odds ratio: 3.7 (95% CI 3.2-4.3); increase in uptake of 25% per annum (95% CI 22-27%)]. A second survey, which recruited 852 current IDUs from community settings in 2003/04, found that prisons were the most common source (38%) of vaccine doses, followed by drug services (28%) and general practitioners (17%), with only 14% receiving doses through needle exchanges. These data suggest that the 20% target of improving vaccination coverage has been met, with the prison vaccination programme likely to have made a substantive contribution in recent years. However, prevalence of antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen was stable (21%) and is currently similar among the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Consideration needs to be given to improving community vaccination provision for IDUs, targeting recent initiates, and determining when surveillance data should indicate reductions in infection so that the effectiveness of the targeted strategy can be assessed.

Rapid and sustained immune response against hepatitis A and B achieved with combined vaccine using an accelerated administration schedule

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatitis A and B vaccine administered on an accelerated schedule provides a rapid immune response against both hepatitis A and B viruses, which might be especially relevant for individuals who need protection quickly.

METHODS

A prospective, open-label, randomized study to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine Twinrix (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) (>or=720 EL.U/mL inactivated hepatitis A antigen and 20 microg/mL recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]) administered at 0, 7, 21 to 30 days, and 12 months compared with concurrent administration of Havrix [GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium (>or=1440 EL.U/mL inactivated hepatitis A antigen)] at 0 and 12 months, and Engerix-B [GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium (20 microg/mL recombinant HBsAg)] at 0, 1, 2, and 12 months in seronegative healthy adults.

RESULTS

At month 13, the anti-hepatitis B seroprotection rates (>10 mIU/mL) for the combined vaccine compared to the monovalent hepatitis B vaccine were 96.4% (95% CI: 92.7-98.5) and 93.4% (95% CI: 89.0-96.4), respectively. The anti-hepatitis A seroconversion rates were 100% in both groups (95% CI: 98.1-100). At day 37, the anti-hepatitis A seroconversion rates were similar in both groups (98.5% for combined vaccine, 98.6% for the monovalent vaccine group), but the combined vaccine resulted in a statistically significantly ( p < 0.001) better anti-hepatitis B seroprotection compared to monovalent hepatitis B vaccine, 63.2% versus 43.5%, respectively. The reactogenicity profile was similar in both study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined hepatitis A and B vaccine administered on an accelerated schedule was at least as immunogenic and as well tolerated as the corresponding monovalent vaccines.

Hepatitis A and B Booster Recommendations: Implications for Travelers

Hepatitis A and B are serious vaccine-preventable diseases with a predominantly overlapping epidemiological distribution. Travelers, a term encompassing a range of individuals, are at risk of contracting these diseases if they are unvaccinated. Although the benefits of the primary vaccination course of hepatitis A and B vaccines are clear, the administration of hepatitis A and B boosters varies worldwide. Recommendations on the need for booster vaccinations have recently been published, and the implications of these recommendations for travelers are discussed in this review. Until a greater understanding is reached on the immunogenicity of hepatitis A and B vaccines in certain special groups (e.g., immunocompromised persons), there will be a need to monitor antibody levels to assess whether booster vaccinations are required. However, for the majority of immunocompetent travelers, the full primary vaccination course will provide protection from both hepatitis A and B infection in the long term, without the need for boosters.

Travel-related hepatitis B: risk factors and prevention using an accelerated vaccination schedule

Rates of global travel and tourism are increasing dramatically, especially to regions with medium or high endemicity for hepatitis A and B, such as Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East. International travelers to these areas should be protected against both hepatitis A and B, regardless of their anticipated length of stay. However, many travelers depart within weeks of planning their trip (too late to complete the accelerated 0-, 1-, 2-month regimen for hepatitis B), and a majority of those traveling depart without being vaccinated. Although extended-stay travelers are at high risk for hepatitis B, short-stay travelers also are at risk. The most commonly encountered risk factors for travel-related hepatitis B are casual sexual activity with a new partner, medical and dental care abroad, and in the expatriate community, adoption of children who are hepatitis B carriers. Although efficacy studies of accelerated schedules for hepatitis B immunization have not been conducted, the results of immunogenicity studies in healthy volunteers who received an accelerated, 3-dose regimen on a 0-,7-, and 21-day schedule suggest that excellent, rapid, and long-term protection will be conferred. More data are needed to assess the efficacy of accelerated schedules in persons aged >40 years and to determine whether a fourth dose of hepatitis B vaccine is needed in all age groups.

The place of accelerated schedules for hepatitis A and B vaccinations

The availability of accelerated schedules of vaccination, as well as the development of combination vaccines, has enhanced the methods of protection against infectious disease, in particular that of hepatitis A and B viruses. The benefits of using accelerated schedules include: (i) enhanced adherence to and subsequent completion of vaccine courses; (ii) convenience for the recipient of the vaccine; (iii) reduced administration costs of providing the vaccine; and, most importantly, (iv) the ability to provide protection against these serious infections to those who will be imminently exposed to the risk and so require protection as quickly as possible. Active immunisation against both hepatitis A and B viruses has only been recognised within the last 20 years. During this time clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of administering the monovalent hepatitis B vaccine by way of accelerated schedules. There are now several accelerated schedules of administration of hepatitis B vaccine which can be tailored to the needs of the individual at risk of exposure to infection. One such schedule allows the primary course to be administered within a period of 1 month. This schedule of day 0, 7 and 21, with a booster at 12 months, is licensed for use with the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine Engerix B and results in a seroprotection rate of 65% at day 28 which increases to 99% at month 13. In more recent years, the development of a multivalent or combination vaccine against hepatitis A and B (Twinrix) has been a welcome advance in the protection against viral hepatitis, and has been of particular benefit to those who are at risk of infection with both viruses. The advantages of accelerated schedules have also been recognised with this combination vaccine. The primary course may be administered within a period of 1 month so providing protection for those at risk and, in particular, the last minute traveller.

Vaccination options for last-minute travellers in need of travel-related prophylaxis against hepatitis A and B and typhoid fever: a practical guide

Last-minute travellers represent a particular challenge to travel healthcare professionals, as standard vaccination schedules can take a few months to complete. This has led researchers to investigate the value of alternative accelerated schedules and existing schedules among this group, particularly with respect to time taken for an individual to seroconvert, duration of protection and multiple vaccination requirements. This paper reviews the available options for the three most common vaccine preventable diseases among travellers-hepatitis A, hepatitis B and typhoid fever. Studies suggest that even if the first dose of hepatitis A vaccine is given on the day of travel, this will provide adequate protection, and that immunity to typhoid fever can be provided in over 70% of travellers following vaccination 1 week prior to departure. For hepatitis B, an accelerated schedule of 0, 7 and 21-days has been shown to induce early protection, and is considered to be of benefit to the last-minute traveller. Practical guidelines on vaccination options from one week up to one month, as well as one month or more prior to travel are presented. This should provide guidance for travel healthcare professionals, and reassure last-minute travellers that they need not begin their journey unprotected against these three serious infectious diseases.

Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B): a review of its immunogenicity and protective efficacy against hepatitis B

Engerix-B (Hep-B[Eng]) is a noninfectious recombinant DNA vaccine containing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). It is produced from genetically engineered yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Intramuscular Hep-B(Eng) [0-, 1-, 6-month schedule] has excellent immunogenicity in healthy neonates and infants, children, adolescents and adults, with seroprotection rates of 85-100% seen approximate, equals 1 month after the final dose of vaccine; seroprotection was defined as an antibody against HBsAg (anti-HBs) titre of > or =10 IU/L. The use of alternative Hep-B(Eng) immunisation schedules (e.g. a 0-, 1-, 2-, 12-month schedule in neonates and infants, 0-, 12-, 24-month or two-dose schedules in children and adolescents, and accelerated schedules in adults) have also been associated with high rates of seroprotection. Seroprotection rates were generally similar with Hep-B(Eng) and the recombinant vaccine Recombivax HB (Hep-B[Rax]) or plasma-derived vaccines (PDVs) approximate, equals 1 month after the final dose (although anti-HBs geometric mean titres were significantly higher with Hep-B[Eng] than with Hep-B[Rax]). One month after the final dose, adults had significantly higher seroprotection rates with the recombinant triple-antigen vaccine Bio-Hep-B (Hep-B[Bio]) than with Hep-B(Eng), although seroprotection rates in healthy infants were similar with Hep-B(Eng) and Hep-B(Bio). Hep-B(Eng) had excellent immunogenicity in several groups considered at high risk of acquiring hepatitis B (e.g. neonates born to hepatitis B carrier mothers and healthcare workers). The immunogenicity of Hep-B(Eng) was reduced in patients with conditions associated with impaired immune function (e.g. patients undergoing haemodialysis or being treated for malignancy), although it had good immunogenicity in patients with diabetes mellitus.Hep-B(Eng) had excellent protective efficacy against HBsAg carriage in healthy infants and children, and in neonates born to hepatitis B carrier mothers (protective efficacy of 95-99%). Hep-B(Eng) also demonstrated good protective efficacy in a number of other high-risk groups. Hep-B(Eng) is generally well tolerated with a tolerability profile similar to that of Hep-B(Rax), Hep-B(Bio) and PDVs. In conclusion, Hep-B(Eng) is a well established, highly immunogenic hepatitis B vaccine with good tolerability and excellent protective efficacy; it offers flexibility through a variety of immunisation schedules. In addition, it appears that Hep-B(Eng) confers immunity for at least 10 years. Hep-B(Eng) has an important role in mass vaccination campaigns against hepatitis B, as well as in groups considered at high risk of acquiring hepatitis B.

A novel hepatitis B vaccination regimen for adolescents: two doses 12 months apart

BACKGROUND

Two- and three-dose hepatitis B vaccinations for adolescents are usually administered using dosing schedules of 6 months duration. This does not suit all circumstances. A 12-month schedule would be useful in schools and settings where only annual vaccination is the most practical option.

AIM

To examine the efficacy of a 12-month dosing interval for two-dose hepatitis B vaccination of adolescents.

SUBJECTS

Four hundred and fifty-eight healthy first-year high school (Year 7) students. VACCINATION REGIMEN: Engerix-B (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) 20 micro g: two doses, 12 months apart. SERUM COLLECTION: #1, same day as first vaccine dose given; #2, >1 month after second vaccine dose.

RESULTS

Of the 458 children: 15 did not provide serum #1, 17 had prior vaccination, 2 had prior infection, 18 moved, 7 failed to provide serum #2, 12 withdrew (only 1 cited vaccine adverse reactions as the reason). Three hundred and eighty-seven (210 males, 177 females) aged 11.8-14.2 years (mean: 12.9+/-0.42 years) at entry completed both injections 321-381 days (mean: 359+/-10.7 days) apart and supplied serum #2, 30-57 days (mean: 41+/-5.6 days) after the second vaccine dose.Anti-HBs responses: 379 of the 387 subjects (97.9%; 95% CI: 95.9-99.1%) achieved anti-HBs > or =10 mIU/ml (range 10-170,460 mIU/ml, geometric mean concentration (GMC) 4155 mIU/ml-95% CI of mean: 3381-5106 mIU/ml). Sex was the only determinant of anti-HBs concentration (206 males: GMC 3073 mIU/ml-95% CI: 2285-4134 mIU/ml; 173 females: GMC 5944 mIU/ml-95% CI: 4508-7851 mIU/ml; P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

A high seroprotection rate and GMC were achieved using two 20 micro g doses of Engerix-B administered 12 months apart. These results are similar to those achieved by others using 6-month three- and two-dose regimens in adolescents.

Hepatitis B vaccine -- do we need boosters?

This review analyses the cumulated data from a number of long-term follow-up studies among infants, children and adults vaccinated against hepatitis B in industrialised and developing countries. Despite low or undetectable antibody responses years after vaccination, the development of HBsAg was a rarity and, if present, only transient. Some vaccinees developed anti-HBc responses but none developed an HB carrier state or clinical manifestations of disease. Studies demonstrating anamnestic responses among those with low or undetectable anti-HBs levels following challenge with HB vaccine, together with the production of anti-HBs in circulating B-cells by spot ELISA, confirmed the presence of immune memory among vaccinees. Anamnestic anti-HBs responses all correlate close in kinetics and magnitude with proliferative T-cell responses. The accumulated data from studies assessed in this Review indicate that protection is dependent on immune memory, rather than declining anti-HBs responses and add additional weight to the European Consensus recommendations (12) that following a complete course of vaccination, booster doses are unnecessary in immunocompetent persons. If implemented, this recommendation will have considerable cost benefits world-wide.

Immunizations for international travel

Many infections encountered by international travelers can be prevented by adherence to personal protective measures and appropriate vaccinations. This review outlined the incidence and importance of the major vaccine-preventable infectious diseases encountered by U.S. travelers, as well as the indications, contraindications, and side effects of available vaccines. Official proof of yellow fever vaccine often is required for entry into some countries. Based on endemic or epidemic infections at destinations, planned activities, and age and medical history of international travelers, other vaccines may be recommended. Many clinicians will be familiar with some of the infections and vaccines that may be used in travelers; other vaccines may be encountered infrequently and associated with significant risk of adverse effects. Since vaccines do not provide complete protection and some travel-related infections do not have vaccines available yet (e.g., malaria and dengue fever), physicians need to be vigilant concerning febrile illness in returning travelers.

A new accelerated vaccination schedule for rapid protection against hepatitis A and B

BACKGROUND

Increasing travel stresses the requirement for rapid protection against infections such as hepatitis A and B.

METHODS

This randomised, multicentre study investigated an accelerated vaccination schedule using a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine (Twinrix, Smithkline Beecham Biologicals) compared with simultaneous administration of the two corresponding monovalent vaccines. The combined vaccine was administered on days 0, 7 and 21, whereas the comparison group received hepatitis A vaccine on day 0 and hepatitis B vaccine on days 0, 7 and 21. All subjects received booster vaccination at month 12.

RESULTS

At month 1, 100% of subjects in the combined group and 99% of the controls were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies. The corresponding seroprotection rates for anti-HBs antibodies were 82.0 and 83.9%, respectively. Examination of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the treatment differences showed the two vaccines to be equivalent in terms of immunogenicity 1 week after the initial vaccination course. Just prior to the booster, the seropositivity rate for anti-HAV was 96.2% in the combined group and 95% in the control group. For anti-HBs, this was 94 and 91.6%, respectively. All subjects were seropositive for anti-HAV and seroprotected against hepatitis B at month 13. The anti-HAV GMCs were 9571mIU/ml with the combined vaccine and 5206mIU/ml in control subjects. The anti-HBs titre was 26002 and 29,196mIU/ml, respectively. Both groups had a similar reactogenicity profile.

CONCLUSIONS

The accelerated schedule of the combined vaccine provides a good immune response against hepatitis A and B antigens and is suitable for last minute immunisation.

Does the concurrent administration of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine influence the immune response to other travelers vaccines?

BACKGROUND

Travelers seeking protection from hepatitis A also often need protection against other infections, prevalent at their destinations.

METHODS

A total of 396 volunteers received not only a hepatitis A vaccine but also either a vaccine against polio, hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, typhoid fever or rabies according to their individual needs. We investigated the potential influence of the hepatitis A vaccination on the immune response to the other travelers vaccines that were administered concurrently.

RESULTS

With seroprotection rates of 100% for yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis and rabies immunization and tetanus boosters our data demonstrate that the concurrent administration of hepatitis A vaccine does not compromise the immune response of these vaccines. Also for oral typhoid, hepatitis B and diphtheria vaccination we did not detect a negative influence of concurrent hepatitis A vaccine administration as compared with respective vaccinations when given alone. Prior to vaccination, more than one third of our subjects lacked protective antibody levels against diphtheria and only 44% of initially seronegative travelers seroconverted to an anti-diphtheria titer > or = 0.01 mIU/mL, supporting a need for an additional dose. Furthermore, only two thirds of the vaccinees tested prior to vaccination were protected against polio type 3, and the seroconversion rate following the administration of oral polio vaccine, was lower for viral type 3 (80%), as has been previously demonstrated in settings without concurrent other vaccinations.

CONCLUSION

No negative effect of concurrent travelers vaccinations on the immune response of a hepatitis A vaccine has been detected in a previous report, and, likewise our data suggest no impairment of the antibody response of these travelers vaccines by the concurrent administration of the hepatitis A vaccine.

The anti-HBs response after 2 different accelerated intradermal and intramuscular schemes for hepatitis B vaccination

To study early seroconversion rates after hepatitis B vaccination intramuscular (i.m.) and low-dose intradermal (i.d.) vaccination was compared when given either according to the registered 0, 4, 8 weeks scheme (scheme A), or to an accelerated 0, 2, 6 weeks scheme (scheme B). Medical staff received either 2 microg i.d. or 20 microg i.m. of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, in a non-randomized open trial. Two weeks after the third dose i.m. vaccinees overall had significantly higher rates of protective anti-HBs levels (anti-HBs > or = 10 IU/I), (23/30, 77%) compared with i.d. vaccinees (75/166, 45%) (p < 0.001). We conclude that when rapid protection against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is desirable, such as for post-exposure prophylaxis, an accelerated low-dose i.d. vaccination schedule cannot be used.

Immunizations for international travel

Immunization recommendations for international travelers is a complex subject that takes into consideration the geographic destination, planned activities during travel, health conditions at destination, length of trip, and underlying health status of the traveler. The final immunization program is also determined by how much time is available before departure and the worldwide availability of vaccines and their cost. In some cases, preventive behaviors and chemoprophylaxis may protect against the risk of infection when immunizations are unavailable or unobtainable.

Accelerated schedule of hepatitis B vaccination in liver transplant candidates

Liver transplantation has become the treatment of choice worldwide for many patients with end-stage liver disease. In terms of survival and quality of life, the results of the procedure in many centers are very good. However, the long-term function of the grafts may be affected by vascular, immunologic, or infection problems, the latter being a major cause of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Therefore, prophylactic vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is recommended in patients awaiting liver transplantation. Individuals with chronic advanced liver disease are known to be less responsive to HBV vaccination. On the other hand, the widely recommended standard schedule (months 0, 1, and 6) for immunization against hepatitis B takes 6 months, a regimen which may not be completed in time prior to OLT or which may not be completed due to noncompliance, possible reasons for the lower rates of seroprotection in OLT candidates. Studies show that, in principle, complete immunization with an accelerated hepatitis B vaccination protocol (0, 7, 21 days) induces early seroprotection with excellent seroprotection rates and anti-HBs titers in immunocompetent individuals. We therefore performed a prospective clinical trial to assess immunogenicity and reactogenicity of this accelerated vaccination regimen in OLT candidates compared to healthy controls.

A week in the life of a travel clinic

International travel has increased enormously in recent years. With the greater movement of people have come increased encounters with a wide variety of diseases: malaria, dengue, cholera, typhoid fever, Ebola virus, and many more. The need for greater scope, consistency, and knowledgeability in pretravel health care to meet these challenges has been met by the emergence of the discipline of travel medicine. Travelers are well advised to become informed of the risks they face and to take steps to minimize those risks. After reviewing a traveler's medical history and a detailed itinerary, a travel medicine practitioner can offer expert advice on behavioral modifications, immunizations, and chemoprophylaxis regimens which will increase the traveler's margin of safety. The issues most frequently addressed in a travel clinic include treatment of traveler's diarrhea, malaria chemoprophylaxis, and immunizations, for hepatitis A, typhoid fever, tetanus/diphtheria, influenza, pneumococcus, hepatitis B, polio, meningococcus, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, and rabies. Pretravel consultation must consider the age and underlying health problems of the traveler, the nature of the trip (wilderness, jungle, rural, urban, resort, or cruise), the duration of travel, and the latest available information on the site in terms of disease outbreaks, terrorism, and natural calamities.